w

warneriniguezqh

    not likely to descend8 to a
    0:04
    second generation. The son of John
    0:15
    he might or might not retain the
    0:10
    personal name, or the trade-name;
    0:05
    he probably would inherit. This
    0:08
    why so large a majority of our
    0:07
    modern surnames are place-names,
    0:06
    whether in respect
    0:05
    of a town, as Nottingham, Debenham,
    0:09
    etcetera. Now and then a series of
    0:10
    Johns in regular descent would fix
    0:08
    the name of Johnson on the
    0:08
    family; or the son and grandson
    0:09
    pursuing the same
    0:08
    calling as the
    0:08
    surnames have arisen in such a
    0:04
    the line into Tanners. All
    0:25