robertexter

Shasta County supervisors meeting, March 15, 2022

This video is a production of Wethepeopleradio.us and wethepeopleradiorecords.com You can find information discussed on this show at either https://www.wethepeopleradio.us/archives/2020-10-11/ or http://www.wethepeopleradiorecords.com/20201011/

This video is a production of Wethepeopleradio.us and wethepeopleradiorecords.com You can find information discussed on this show at either https://www.wethepeopleradio.us/archives/2020-10-18/ or http://www.wethepeopleradiorecords.com/20201018/

This video is a production of Wethepeopleradio.us and wethepeopleradiorecords.com You can find information discussed on this show at either https://www.wethepeopleradio.us/archives/2020-10-25/ or http://www.wethepeopleradiorecords.com/20201025

This video is a production of Wethepeopleradio.us and wethepeopleradiorecords.com You can find information discussed on this show at either https://www.wethepeopleradio.us/archives/2020-11-01/ or http://www.wethepeopleradiorecords.com/20201101/

This video is a production of Wethepeopleradio.us and wethepeopleradiorecords.com You can find information discussed on this show at either https://www.wethepeopleradio.us/archives/2020-11-08/ or http://www.wethepeopleradiorecords.com/20201108/

Ninety years old wise men must be heard.

A citizen journalist outlines why Shasta County Supervisor Mary Rickert is still a target of recall.

Part 13 - Hour 2, Dr. Harry Booyens This video is a production of Wethepeopleradio.us and wethepeopleradiorecords.com You can find information discussed on this show at either https://www.wethepeopleradio.us/archives/2020-11-15/ or http://www.wethepeopleradiorecords.com/20201115

Part 13 - Hour 1, Dr. Harry Booyens This video is a production of Wethepeopleradio.us and wethepeopleradiorecords.com You can find information discussed on this show at either https://www.wethepeopleradio.us/archives/2020-11-15/ or http://www.wethepeopleradiorecords.com/20201115

This video is a production of Wethepeopleradio.us and wethepeopleradiorecords.com You can find information discussed on this show at either https://www.wethepeopleradio.us/archives/2021-04-25/ or http://www.wethepeopleradiorecords.com/20210425

This video is a production of Wethepeopleradio.us and wethepeopleradiorecords.com You can find information discussed on this show at either https://www.wethepeopleradio.us/archives/2021-04-25/ or http://www.wethepeopleradiorecords.com/20210425

This video is a production of Wethepeopleradio.us and wethepeopleradiorecords.com You can find information discussed on this show at either https://www.wethepeopleradio.us/archives/2021-04-11/ or http://www.wethepeopleradiorecords.com/20210411/

Shasta County's deliberation on mandates

Salute to our brave soldiers

Shasta County CA had a successful supervisor recall of Supervisor Leonard Moti. Before the recall election, Moti was appointed chair and Mary Rickert vice chair by a 3 - 2 vote. This was a deliberate move that denied Supervisor Les Baugh from being appointed Chair, which was supposed to happen. The meeting was held just prior to the recall election, and the chair appointments were political and on the assumption that Moti would not be recalled, but he was. Since one of Mary’s votes to vice chair was eliminated, the new supervisor should have a vote. So it was only understandable that Mary would have to face another vote from the new board members.

Shannon Eckleberger, a nurse, explains why Mary Rickert should not be vice chair.

Shasta County CA had a successful supervisor recall of Supervisor Leonard Moti. Before the recall election, Moti was appointed chair and Mary Rickert vice chair by a 3 - 2 vote. This was a deliberate move that denied Supervisor Les Baugh from being appointed Chair, which is understandable. This was all political and on the assumption that Moti would not be recalled, but he was. Supervisor Les Baugh was appointed chair in the prior meeting, and a few days were properly given to decide on Mary's position. Hence, since one of Mary’s votes to vice chair was eliminated, the new supervisor should have a vote. So it was only understandable that Mary would have to face another vote from the new board members.