chronicclarity

Nov 2, 2018

Jul 6, 2012 moronbrothersKY

September 26, 2012 Patrick Clawson, member of the globalist-controlled think-tank and neo-con influenced Washington Institute for Near East Studies (WINES); recently spoke about the use of false flags as a necessary way for instigating a war with Iran. Clawson remarked that Obama has had a difficult time “getting the US into a war with Iran” and advocating the use of conventional means (i.e. using a false flag to provoke a military strike). Clawson said: “If in fact Iran is not going to compromise, then it would be best if someone else started the war. . . One can combine other means of pressure with sanctions. We could step up the pressure. I mean, look people – Iranian submarines go down all the time. What if one of them did not come back up? Who would know why?” In 1992, Netanyahu predicts that Iran was “3 to 5 years” from having a nuclear weapon. In 1992, Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres predicts an Iranian nuclear warhead by 1999 to French TV. In 1995, New York Times reports US and Israel claim Iran would have the bomb by 2000. In 1998, speaking before Congress Donald Rumsfeld proclaims Iran could have an intercontinental ballistic missile that could hit the US by 2003. The reality is that between 1985 and 2002 the Israeli Ministry of Defense used shell corporations to smuggle nuclear triggers from the US. One of the operatives, Richard Kelly Smith, met with Netanyahu who worked for one of the shell corporations called Heli Trading Company and was an integral part of the smuggling ring. In the 1950’s the US assisted Iranian nuclear endeavors with the aid of Atoms for Peace program that united the US and other European governments to contribute to Iran’s nuclear program until the state-sponsored removal of the Shah of Iran. When the US-friendly Ayatollah Khomeini was installed, he disbanded the nuclear program citing conflictions of nuclear weapons with the Qur’an. Still, mainstream media continues to sound the alarm that Iran not only has nuclear weapons, but will strike US bases if attacked by Israel. While Iran maintains that their nuclear program is to develop power for their nation, Israeli officials, including Netanyahu say: “Those in the international community who refuse to put red lines before Iran don’t have a moral right to place a red light before Israel.” Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad explains that Iran does not take the Zionist regime’s threats of military strike seriously. Ahmadinejad asserts that Iran is quite capable of defending itself against an attack with Israeli armed forces. He also said that Iran views the Zionists at a “dead end” and scrambling to gain ground and maintain power.

March 26, 2013 Black conservative leaders discuss the little-known history of how the NRA was created to protect freed slaves – and how gun control is an effort to control people. CURE is the largest black conservative think tank in the nation and is headquartered in Washington, D.C. CURE organized the news conference in response to concerns shared by black conservatives that the Senate proposed laws will restrict their ability to defend themselves, their property and their families. They are also concerned that the proposed gun control legislation puts too much power in the hands of politicians. “I believe that it is our duty to stand together and challenge the proposals currently on the table in the Senate, which invoke painful memories of Jim Crow laws and black codes,” said CURE president and founder, Star Parker. “Black history is rife with government demands for background checks in order to qualify for constitutional rights. All Americans should be concerned.” DAFR fights for the inalienable firearms rights of responsible disabled Americans. Disabled Americans have unique needs when exercising their 2nd Amendment rights. The mission of DAFR is intertwined within five basic areas of focus. These areas consist of: 1. The introduction of firearms for self-defense to disabled Americans. 2. Shooting sports program and organized competition for disabled Americans and wounded veterans. 3. Oversee firearms legislation and research their impact on Americans with disabilities. 4. Offer assistance to responsible disabled Americans in order to exercise their 2nd Amendment right. 5. Educating the public and elected officials about how disabled American firearms owners have unique needs that must be met when exercising their 2nd Amendment right. We have also become concerned with recent legislation that is proposed throughout the United States in reaction to the tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut. With that, our organization has taken a clear stand on various bills, public acts and proposed laws that we deem would be disadvantageous to responsible disabled firearms owners. DAFR intends to shed light on the fact that many Disabled Americans can only use certain types of firearms such as the highly adaptable AR15 rifle platform. A ban or other serious restrictions on the AR15 rifle as well as certain other firearms will have an adverse effect on the rights of thousands of disabled Americans.

Sep 16, 2011 The Obama administration is facing scrutiny following the failure of a solar energy company that received half-a-billion dollars in government aid and then when bankrupt, laying off about a thousand workers. Newly disclosed internal White House emails show just 60 days after Obama took office, his administration rushed to approve a $535 million loan guarantee to the solar panel manufacturing company Solyndra, despite warnings from the Office of Management and Budget that the loan had not been properly vetted. The White House had advocated Solyndra receive the loan as part of Obama's stimulus package in order to create green jobs and assist American solar panel manufacturers competing with heavily-subsidized Chinese counterparts. Another case of take the money and run...............of course from the tax payers expense.

October 24, 2013

September 29, 2013 In this clip at the inauguration of the new office for the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in Washington, D.C., Hillary Clinton frankly reveals who’s running the show in the US. Some have called her comments an “accident” but I see no accident here. She is among her peers and the CFR has a “non-attribution law”, whereby members are allowed to speak freely without having their statements subject to being attributable in the media. What is the CFR? Today, it is considered to be the most influential foreign policy Think Tank in the US. Since its inception in 1921, the CFR has served as an intermediary between high finance, big oil, corporate elitists and the US Government. CFR members occupy key positions in government, the mass media, financial institutions, multinational corporations, the military, and intelligence communities. Over the past 70 years, within every US Presidential Administration, be it Republican or Democratic, almost all the cabinet positions have been held by CFR members. Since 1940, every US Secretary of State (with one exception) has been a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and/or its younger brother, the Trilateral Commission. Also since 1940, every Secretary of War and every Secretary of Defense has been a CFR member. During most of its existence, the CIA has been headed by CFR members and virtually every key US national security and foreign policy adviser has been a CFR member since World War II. On its web page, the CFR boasts that its magazine, Foreign Affairs, “is acclaimed for its analysis of recent international developments and for its forecasts of emerging trends.” How hard can that be, when your organization plays a major role in causing said “emerging trends”? CFR meeting participants are forbidden “to publish a speaker’s statement in attributed form in any newspaper; to repeat it on television or radio, or on a speaker’s platform, or in a classroom; or to go beyond a memo of limited circulation.” Therefore, the only information the public has on the CFR is the information they release for public consumption – which should be a matter of deep concern to anyone who understands the immense effect that CFR directives have on America’s foreign policy. Here is a Membership Roster Council of Foreign Relations (CFR), Trilateral Commission (TC), Bilderberg Group (B), Democrat (D), Republican (R): OBAMA’S EXECUTIVE CABINET MEMBERS, IN ORDER OF SUCCESSION TO THE PRESIDENCY: Joseph R. Biden CFR Secretary Hillary Rodham B, CFR, TC Secretary John Kerry CFR Department of the Treasury: Secretary Timothy F. Geithner B, CFR, TC Nominated: Larry Summers CFR, BB Janet Yellen CFR Department of Justice: Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr. CFR Department of Agriculture: Secretary Thomas J. Vilsack CFR Department of Commerce: Secretary John E. Bryson CFR, TC Department of Veterans Affairs: Secretary Eric K. Shinseki CFR Department of Homeland Security: Secretary Janet A. Napolitano CFR Florida Representative and DNC Chair: Debbie Wasserman Schultz. CFR United States Ambassador to the United Nations: Ambassador Susan Rice CFR White House Chief of Staff Bill Daley CFR POLITICAL HEAVYWEIGHTS: Both Bushes CFR,B, (R) Both Clintons CFR,TC,B, (D) Jimmy Carter CFR,TC, (D) Obama & Biden CFR, (D) Dick Cheney CFR,TC, (R) Newt Gingrich CFR, (R) Mitch McConnell CFR, (R) Rick Perry B, (D&R) John Kerry CFR, (D) John McCain CFR, (R) Zbig Brzezinski TC, B (D) Henry Kissinger B, (R) Paul Volker CFR, TC,B, (D) Alan Greenspan CFR, TC, B Ben Bernanke B Tim Geithner CFR, TC, B David Rockefeller CFR, TC,B George Soros CFR, B Albert Gore, Jr. CFR, (D) Donald Rumsfeld CFR, B, (R) Warren Christopher CFR, (D) THE MEDIA: George Will CFR, TC, (R) George Stephanopoulos CFR, B, (D) William Kristol B, (R) William Frank Buckley, Jr. B, CFR, (R) Tom Brokaw CFR Rupert MurdocH CFR, B Dick Morris CFR (D&R) Charles Krauthammer CFR Katherine Graham CFR,TC,BB David Richmond Gergen B, CFR, TC Robert B. Reich CFR Brian Williams CFR IN THE NEWS: Haley Barbour CFR, (D) Eric Holder CFR, (D) Larry Summers CFR, B, (D) – Up for new head of THE FED Janet Yellen CFR, (D) – Up for new head of THE FED MORE POLITICIANS: Fred Thompson CFR, (R) Charles B. Rangel CFR, (D) Barney Frank CFR, (D) Christopher J. Dodd CFR, (D) Richard Newton Gardner CFR, TC Ruth Bader Ginsburg CFR, (D) Sandra Day O’Connor CFR, (R) Sandy Berger CFR, B Robert S. Mcnamara CFR, (D) Warren Christopher CFR, (D) Madeleine Albright CFR, (D) MILITARY: General David Petraeus CFR Wesley Kanne Clark CFR INTERNATIONAL BANKERS: James Wolfensohn B, CFR, TC Paul Wolfowitz B, CFR, TC

February 9, 2015 This was an important address made to the Ukrainian Parliament by Deputy Oleg Tsarov on November 20, 2013, just one day prior to the deadliest day of the protests held in Kiev’s Maidan (“Independence”) Square, which culminated in a massacre of 50 people, causing Ukraine’s President, Viktor Yanukovych to flee the country. It never made the “News” in the Criminal Mainstream Media. This is yet more evidence that the US Government was the controlling power behind the extremely violent and illegal February 2014 Ukrainian coup, which overthrew the democratically-elected and never legally removed-from-power Ukrainian President. Volya members told Tsarov that “American instructors presented examples of the past successful use of social networks, used to organize protests in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya,” and he was told that the TechCamp Project was, at that time being overseen by the US ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey R. Pyatt. A detailed timeline of the US-planned coup, starting at least as early as March 2013 can be found under the blog post, “How the US Recruited 300 People to Manipulate Social Media to Overthrow the Legitimate Government in Ukraine” by a British blogger using the Twitter handle https://twitter.com/Ian56789 “This new evidence from Tsarev, piled on top of all the other evidence that already proved the assertion by the founder of the ‘private CIA’ firm Stratfor, that the overthrow of Yanukovych was ‘the most blatant coup in history,’ simply cements the reality, that all of the sanctions against Russia, and all of the ‘me too’ statements supporting Obama’s coup and ethnic cleansing in Ukraine, by David Cameron, Stephen Harper, and Obama’s other co-Nazis, are abominations, which should be loudly condemned by all decent persons in all countries. “The aggressor here is Obama, not Putin; and NATO must end, now: all decent nations should quit it ASAP. (War crimes trials against Obama and his agents should follow. After all: these people are bringing the world closer to a nuclear war than has been the case since 1962, and there is no decent reason for it.) “Here was Professor Francis Boyle, the most internationally-prestigious authority on such matters, summing it all up: “Boyle told RIA Novosti on May 8: ‘The Ukrainian crisis had been planned, as well as the war. There was a war plan, there was a war game. Then it was revised and implemented. We are seeing steps now being taken that were planned in advance,’ Boyle said, adding, ‘This is all being used as a pretext to bring NATO military forces, as Rasmussen said, by air, sea, and land right up to the borders of the Russian Federation. They are clearly going ahead with this.’ Boyle extolled Russia for trying to exhaust all diplomatic means possible to resolve the Ukrainian crisis, and accused the United States and NATO of deliberate escalation. “‘So that the US won’t be provided with any more pretexts for hostile provocative maneuvers that they are going to take in any event,’ Boyle asserted, ‘Russian President Vladimir Putin is in a very difficult and dangerous situation and needs to be very careful. The US has already resumed the Cold War with the neo-Nazi coup d’etat in Ukraine that the United States-sponsored, controlled, and directed,’ he said. “It’s still not too late for the condemnation by the entire decent world to come down upon the leading nazis and force them to stop, before they blow the entire habitable world up with their evil… “The time for the collecting of evidence is already past. The evidence is already here. There are already international war crimes enough, and so no need exists for us to await the ultimate one – a totally unnecessary nuclear war – before finally acting. To start with: the sanctions against Russia must end – immediately. They are crimes that can end fast. And they must, in order for the prosecutions against the perpetrators to start, and in order for this Nazi cancer upon humanity to be removed before it’s too late…”

March 31, 2015 In February, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro arrested at least 11 people, including an air force general, whom Maduro says were involved in a plot to overthrow the government. “It is the government of the United States that is behind the plans of destabilization and coups against Venezuela,” said Maduro in a television address. Following Obama’s interview, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov exited a Beijing meeting with Indian and Chinese counterparts. Lavrov told reporters, “[I]f anyone still needed a confirmation of the fact that the United States was directly involved from the very beginning in the coup that President Obama referred to using a neutral term ‘transfer of power,’ they now have it.” In late 2013, the United States trained and armed rebels aiming to overthrow Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. In neighboring Jordan, the CIA trained one 50-person cell of such rebels, which soon after were to enter the besieged Mediterranean nation. In May 2007, sources within the U.S. intelligence community told ABC News that the Bush administration ordered the CIA to manipulate Iran’s “currency and international financial transactions” to destabilize the Islamic republic.

Russell Bonner Bentley aka "Texas" is an American, who came to Donetsk in the middle of 2014 to join the military forces of Donetsk People's Republic (DPR) in order to fight against fascism. Since January 2015 he has made several Youtube-reports from Donbass describing damages and murders of citizens of DPR conducted by Ukrainian neo-nazis and Ukrainian army. “…You Vote for Obama, you vote Bush, you vote for Hillary Clinton (spits, in disgust). What kind of person are you, to do that? Bentley’s tone grows gradually angrier, as he appeals to any Americans watching this: “All the peoples who have died, all the homes that have been destroyed, are only because this war was started by the United States Government. “What kind of people spend billions of dollars to destroy innocent peoples’ homes? “This is your responsibility…this is a war for the future of mankind – and you decide which side you’re on. Are you going to be on the side of the people that do this? (Indicating the devastation around him) If not, now is the time to make your move, now is the time to do more than just hit “Like” on a Facebook page. “Now is the time to go to the street. Now is the time to stand up and say, ‘No more! No more murder, no more terrorism,’ that the United States backs for the Nazis here. “This is what happens everyday in Ukraine: the Nazis, that the United States backs are murdering civilians, here. (Pointing at the camera) What are YOU going to do about it?”

June 12, 2015 The TPP, or the Trans-Pacific Partnership, is a trade deal that has been negotiated in secret for years now. The deal encompasses the United States, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam. A lot of people are going to be affected by this, but for some reason the public is not allowed to see what’s in it. In fact many of the lawmakers which are about to vote on this deal haven’t even read it themselves. Those who have, are forbidden to expose what it contains. If that strikes you as fishy, you’re not alone. The real danger lies in the way that this agreement subverts the sovereignty of nations. The TPP would create a system of shadowy trade tribunals which would allow companies to to override and nullify laws in any member country. These tribunals are extrajudicial. Their authority is outside above national justice systems. The arbitrators are unelected, and completely unaccountable to the people. The laws which will be subject to this new agreement include (but are not limited to) intellectual property rights, food and product safety, environmental standards, and just about any regulation that may affect the way companies do business. If they get away with phase one of this power grab you can rest assured that there will be more to come. This isn’t about trade. This isn’t about jobs. This is about power, power that is being covertly shifted farther and farther away from the people.

July 30, 2016

Mar 26, 2017 “21st Century Cures Act”, which was one of the last laws passed during Obama’s presidency.

Oct 29, 2008 Especially in politics it is of the utmost importance to try to look behind the facade: who makes up the team of the presidential candidate? The future president of the United States of America is for a large part dependent on and being fed by his team of advisors and future cabinet members. Webster Tarpley wrote a book on the men and women behind presidential hopeful Barack Obama. He argues that there is more to Obama than his charismatic appearance and that some of his advisors pose a danger to the US and the world in case Obama might be elected to become the next US president. Whether Tarpleys view is correct for now is a matter of opinion and remains to be seen, but for the public debate it is relevant to take note of his facts and arguments. Therefor DeepJournal interviewed Webster Tarpley on the topic of his recently published book Obama, The Postmodern Coup,The Making of a Manchurian Candidate.

Lionel Nation 2018 It seems like all of the righteous rage and frustration over the evils and inequities perpetrated over the past half century by the US Government; anger that would have rightly been directed toward George W Bush for 9/11 and the Endless Wars or toward Barack Obama for doubling down on drone strikes and pumping up the surveillance state is being displaced onto Donald Trump. It seems like all of the the hatred that is so richly deserved by the Neocons is being diverted onto Trump, even though he defunded ISIS and has been much less warlike than his predecessors. Seriously, where was all the outrage that we see being hurled at the President in the Mainstream Media when Bush took us to war with Iraq on a lie? “We’re in a war right now, not against Liberalism but against unipolar Globalism, New World Order, Deep State, police state, intel state, government-within-the-government, permanent government, shadow government. We’re in a in a war with a Soros-backed, Bilderberg-backed, a multi-layered conspiracy; world involving dark forces and people and methodologies that transcend anything from the past.

May 25, 2011

Jun 12, 2014 Does Obama plan to bankrupt America? On May 2, 1966, two Columbia University sociologists, Professor of Social Work Richard A. Cloward and his then-research associate Frances Fox Piven, wrote a pivotal article in The Nation, articulating "a strategy to end poverty." The solution to ending poverty, Cloward and Piven argued, required expanding the government welfare state beyond providing Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, unemployment insurance and food stamps. They sought to establish a "guaranteed annual income" of at least $100,000 a year as a constitutional right. Having concluded that a capitalist system would never apply capital fairly to fulfill the needs of workers, the two Columbia University-based sociologists concluded that a progressive strategy of voting ever-expanding social welfare programs could push the capitalist system to the breaking point.

STAGES OF THE BOLSHEVIK TAKEOVER OF AMERICA Over 30 years ago Yuri Bezmenov (Tomas Schuman) gave warning to America of how we were being subverted by patient Russian tactics. This is just a clip, I recommend watching the full length lectures. Given the state of politics against our current president, Donald Trump, and the "work" (read: Destabilization) Barack Obama did under the guise of "progressivism," America needs to pay attention. Overt espionage using Donald Trump is NOT the issue - it's the subtle overturning of America's patriotism and morals that will ruin us if we don't turn the tide.

Oct 29, 2008 Especially in politics it is of the utmost importance to try to look behind the facade: who makes up the team of the presidential candidate? The future president of the United States of America is for a large part dependent on and being fed by his team of advisors and future cabinet members. Webster Tarpley wrote a book on the men and women behind presidential hopeful Barack Obama. He argues that there is more to Obama than his charismatic appearance and that some of his advisors pose a danger to the US and the world in case Obama might be elected to become the next US president. Whether Tarpleys view is correct for now is a matter of opinion and remains to be seen, but for the public debate it is relevant to take note of his facts and arguments. Therefor DeepJournal interviewed Webster Tarpley on the topic of his recently published book Obama, The Postmodern Coup,The Making of a Manchurian Candidate.