Chris Schwartz (Black Hawk County, Iowa Supervisor) Debunked again (we aren't safe anywhere?)
Everything on my site is archived https://archive.ph/https://professor_enigma.webs.com/covid-increase-homicides https://web.archive.org/web/20230000000000*/https://professor_enigma.webs.com/covid-increase-homicides
Chris Schwartz (Black Hawk County, Iowa Supervisor) says we aren't safe anywhere & I debunk that... again.
Let us give another intellectual beating to a fat little bridge troll named Chris Schwartz, the #AOC of Black Hawk County, Iowa Supervisors.
He said some years ago (projecting the hood rat culture of Iowa’s most dangerous city Waterloo, upon everyone) that “we’re not safe anywhere” after crying crocodile tears over another cadaver in Black Hawk County, Iowa.
Continuing & building upon what I wrote here http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/covid-increase-homicides http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/votechrisschwartz-black-hawk demolishing his idiotic talking point – featuring as many states as I can – focusing on counties (as well as the % of the state’s population that those counties comprise) that have ZERO murder & <2 murders. https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/time-series/demo/popest/2010s-counties-total.html https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/time-series/demo/popest/2020s-counties-total.html
I will also look at the demographics of those counties. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045222 I wanted to find an excel file w/ just those demographics, but I could not, so I have to do it old school on the Census website. Grrrr!
[NOTE: For all these counties I will include the % of residents that are “White alone, not Hispanic or Latino” in [brackets] – it will be the FIRST number. The SECOND number will be the % of that county that is “Black or African American Alone.” I flirted with the idea of calculating the en masse total of those counties that are “White Alone” & “Black or African American alone”, but that was more work than I wanted. I will just provide the percentages, sue me. This will be an eye-opening experience indeed]
***
Our first contestant is New York State, as their 2022 report is out. https://www.criminaljustice.ny.gov/tableau_index_crime.htm (Select “Index Crime Data Table”) https://web.archive.org/web/20230704225925/https://mypublicdashboard.ny.gov/t/OJRP_PUBLIC/views/NYSIndexCrimebyCountyandRegion/IndexDataTable?%3Aembed=y&%3AisGuestRedirectFromVizportal=y
Counties in NY that had ZERO murders in 2022: Allegany [93.8%, 1.6%], Cattaraugus [89.6%, 1.6%], Chenango [94.3, 1.1], Cortland [91.4, 2.4], Essex [92.8, 2.1], Greene [84.7, 5.6], Hamilton [94.1, 1.4], Herkimer [93.4, 1.7], Lewis [95.8, 0.8], Montgomery [78.7, 4.0], Orleans [86.8, 5.1], Putnam [73.5, 4.9], Saratoga [89.2, 2.3], Schuyler [94.4, 1.1], Warren [92.8, 1.6], Wyoming [90.5, 4.7] & Yates [94.8, 1.0].
2022 cumulative population for those counties = 965,476 & 4.9% of NY’s population lives in counties with zero murders. 17 of NY’s 62 counties (27.41%) had zero murders in 2022. Those counties have a really high % of white people #whitesupremacy
[NOTE: I am also focusing on counties w/ <2 homicides as there are a lot of rural counties that have no homicides in most years, but the population is so small that one murder will cause the rate to skyrocket to levels that might make Chicago blush (but not East St. Louis, they are usually top of the heap or close). When one throws out counties w/ <2 murders in a year, we can get a better picture of where it’s really dangerous. However, there are some rural counties that are dangerous in America, but for the most part if your county fluctuates between zero & one murder per year, it’s probably much safer overall than inner-cities run by the Demoncrat Party]
Counties in NY that had ONE murder in 2022: Chemung [85.6, 6.2], Columbia [85.2, 5.0], Delaware [90.6, 2.4], Jefferson [80.7, 6.7], Livingston [90.9, 2.3], Ontario [88.7, 3.0], Otsego [89.7, 3.1], Schoharie [92.0, 1.9], Seneca [89.5, 4.0], Tioga [94.3, 1.2], Washington [92.3, 3.0] & Wayne [89.0, 3.1].
Cumulative population of those counties = 801,631 & 4.07% of NY’s population lives in counties w/ one murder.
29 of NY’s 62 counties (46.77%) have <2 murders. 8.98% of NY’s population lives in counties with <2 murders.
Counties in BOLD were won by Joe Pinion in the 2022 NY U.S. Senate race w/ 60% or more of the vote in 2022. The rest of them were either won by Chuck Schumer or the GOP <60% of the vote. If you want to look for yourself https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/ Schumer failed to hit 60% in any of those counties
***
Wisconsin https://www.doj.state.wi.us/dles/bjia/ucr-offense-data
Counties sans murders 2022: Adams [89.3, 3.2], Ashland [81.6, 0.6], Barron [92.0, 1.8], Buffalo [94.8, 0.7], Burnett [90.2, 0.8], Columbia [91.4, 1.8], Door [92.9, 0.8], Dunn [91.8, 0.9], Florence [94.8, 0.6], Forest [79.9, 0.7], Green [93.6, 0.8], Iowa [94.3, 0.9], Iron [94.4, 0.4], Jackson [85.9, 2.3], Kewaunee [93.6, 0.6], Langlade [92.8, 1.1], Manitowoc [88.8. 1.4], Marquette [92.5, 0.8], Menominee [13.5, 1.0], Oneida [94.6, 0.6], Ozaukee [90.1, 2.1], Pepin [95.3, 0.6], Pierce [92.9, 0.9], Price [93.5, 0.6], Richland [93.7, 0.9], Rusk [94.3, 1.0], Sauk [89.7, 1.4], Sawyer [77.9, 0.4], Taylor [95.3, 0.4], Trempealeau [88.2, 0.6], Vilas, Washburn, Washington, Waupaca & Waushara.
Cumulative population of those counties = 1,108,722 & 18.81% of WI’s population lives in counties w/ ZERO murders. 35 of WI’s 72 counties (48.61%) had no murders in 2022. All of those counties but one are uber-White. #whitesupremacy
Counties w/ one murder 2022: Calumet [89.7, 1.1], Crawford [94.0, 2.0], Douglas [90.9, 1.4], Grant [94.4, 1.6], Jefferson [88.6, 1.3], Lafayette [93.2, 0.6], Marinette [94.3, 0.8], Polk [94.8, 0.5], Portage [90.2, 1.1], Shawano [85.5, 0.6], Sheboygan [82.1, 2.5], Vernon [95.9. 0.4], Walworth [85.0, 1.2], Winnebago [86.7, 2.8] & Wood [91.6, 1.0].
Cumulative population of those counties = 965,099 & 16.38% of WI’s population lives in counties with one murder.
35.19% of WI’s entire population lives in counties with <2 murders. 50 of WI’s 72 counties (69.44%) had <2 murders.
Counties in BOLD were won by Tim Michels w/ 60% of the vote or more in the 2022 WI Gubernatorial Sweepstakes. Evers won one county w/ 60% of the vote.
***
Arkansas, come on down, you’re the next contestant on… Let’s see how many counties in your state had no murder. https://www.dps.arkansas.gov/crime-info-support/arkansas-crime-information-center/crime-statistics/ https://www.dps.arkansas.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022-Offense-By-Contributor.pdf
Counties in AR that had ZERO murders 2022: Ashley [68.1, 23.9], Bradley [53.8, 27.5], Calhoun [71.7, 20.4], Carroll [76.3, 1.0], Chicot [38.9, 53.8], Clark [68.0, 23.7], Cleburne [93.5, 0.7], Cross [72.2, 23.1], Dallas [52.0, 40.2], Grant [91.1, 3.3], Hot Spring [82.1, 11.1], Howard [62.8, 20.5], Lafayette [58.8, 34.7], Lawrence [94.3, 1.2], Monroe [53.7, 40.1], Nevada [63.1, 29.7], Newton [92.2, 0.5], Ouachita [54.6, 39.9], Perry [90.8, 2.1], Pike [85.8, 3.8], Pope [82.2, 3.4], Randolph [89.8, 1.2], Scott [82.8, 0.9], Searcy [92.0, 0.6], Sharp [92.6, 1.1], Woodruff [69.6, 25.4] & Yell [73.3, 2.4].
Cumulative population of those counties = 436,078 & 27 of AR’s 75 counties (36%) had zero murders in 2022. 14.31% of AR’s population lives in counties w/ no murders.
Counties in AR that had ONE murder 2022: Clay [94.2, 1.1], Cleveland [83.8, 11.0], Conway [80.3, 11.4], Crawford [82.2, 1.9], Drew [65.8, 27.6], Fulton [92.9, 0.9], Greene [91.4, 2.4], Independence [86.7, 2.6], Izard [92.0, 2.6], Johnson [76.7, 2.5], Lee [41.0, 53.2], Little River [72.0, 19.5], Madison [87.2, 0.9], Polk [87.2, 0.7] & Van Buren [92.3, 0.9].
Cumulative population for those counties = 330,698 & 10.85% of AR’s population lives in counties w/ one murder.
42 of AR’s 75 counties (56%) have <2 murders & 25.17% of AR’s population lives in counties w/ <2 murders.
Counties in BOLD gave 60% of their vote to Sarah Huckabee Sanders (2022 AR Gubernatorial). Chris Jones failed to receive 60% in any of those counties.
***
https://showmecrime.mo.gov/public/ Missouri, Show Me your counties that have ZERO murders & ONE murder. I opened up “SRS Crime Rates By County”, “Summary Offense” & “Murder & Nonnegligent Homicide”. I also opened “NIBRS Crimes and Rates by County”, “Offense Type” & “Crimes Against Person” & finally “Murder & Nonnegligent Manslaughter.”
Counties in MO that had ZERO murders 2022: Andrew [93.0, 1.4], Atchison [95.6, 0.6], Audrain [87.3, 5.7], Barry [83.9. 0.8], Barton [91.5, 0.7], Bates [92.5, 1.6], Benton [93.5, 0.8], Caldwell [92.4, 1.0], Carroll [93.5, 2.2], Carter [92.4, 0.7], Cass [85.9, 5.2], Chariton [94.2, 2.5], Clark [96.1, 0.5], Cooper [88.8, 5.5], Crawford [94.4, 0.7], Daviess [95.2, 0.7], DeKalb [86.6, 8.5], Dent [93.4, 0.6], Douglas [93.2, 0.8], Dunklin [78.7, 10.9], Franklin [94.5, 1.0], Gasconade [94.8, 0.8], Gentry [94.1, 1.0], Harrison [94.1, 0.5], Hickory [93.5, 0.8], Holt [94.9, 0.7], Iron [93.3, 1.8], Knox [94.3, 1.1], Lafayette [91.0, 2.2], Lewis [92.0, 3.3], Livingston [91.8, 3.1], McDonald [75.3, 2.1], Macon [92.5, 2.6], Madison [93.5, 0.8], Maries [93.9, 0.9], Mercer [93.2, 0.7], Miller [93.9, 0.9], Monroe [92.1, 2.8], Montgomery [93.4, 1.7], New Madrid [78.9, 16.2], Nodaway [93.4, 2.0], Oregon [93.3, 0.5], Osage [96.9, 0.5], Pulaski [69.4, 11.8], Putnam [94.5, 0.3], Ralls [94.9. 1.4], Reynolds [93.1, 1.3], St. Clair [94.0, 0.8], Ste Genevieve [94.5, 1.8], Saline [76.8, 6.3], Schuyler [96.3, 0.3], Scotland [96.6, 0.1], Shelby [94.2, 1.2], Stoddard [94.4, 1.4], Stone [93.6, 0.5], Sullivan [76.1, 2.8], Vernon [92.9, 0.9], Warren [91.0, 2.4], Washington [93.1, 2.7], Wayne [93.8, 1.0] & Worth [95.4, 1.0]. Holy Smokes Batman – sure are a lot of uber-white counties in MO that have no murders. I wonder why that is?
Cumulative population of those counties = 1,076,870 & 61 of MO’s 115 counties (53.04%) had zero murders in 2022. 17.43% of MO’s population live in counties with no murders. Remember, St. Louis City is an “Independent City” & tabulated as a “County” for Census purposes.
Counties in MO that had ONE Murder 2022: Adair [88.0, 4.0], Bollinger [95.0, 0.8], Butler [87.3, 6.1], Callaway [89.3, 5.0], Camden [93.0, 0.9], Cedar [92.9, 0.8], Christian [91.7, 1.0], Clay [78.4, 8.0], Clinton [93.0, 1.4], Dallas [93.2, 0.5], Grundy [92.8, 0.9], Howard [89.4, 5.1], Laclede [92.3, 1.1], Lawrence [87.1, 0.8], Morgan [93.2, 0.9], Newton [84.1, 1.2], Ozark [93.9, 0.5], Pettis [83.1, 3.6], Phelps [87.8, 2.6], Pike [89.3, 5.9], Platte [78.5, 8.6], Randolph [88.4, 5.7], Ray [93.2, 1.4], Ripley [93.3, 0.7], St. Francois [91.4, 4.1] & Taney [87.8, 1.9].
Cumulative population for those counties = 1,154,918 & 18.69% of MO’s population lives in counties w/ one murder.
87 of MO’s 115 counties (75.65%) had less than two murders & 36.12% of MO’s population lives in counties w/ less than two murders. MO’s counties with <2 murders, the whitest counties you know (lol). #whitesupremacy #samseder #majorityreport
Counties in BOLD gave 60% of their vote to Eric Schmitt. The overweight Trudy Busch Valentine failed to get 60% in any of those counties. I guess the safest places in MO vote Republican by overwhelming margins & the places in MO that are akin to a demilitarized zone prefer Democrats. They better defund the police, that’ll fix the problem, right?
***
Pennsylvania https://www.ucr.pa.gov/PAUCRSPUBLIC/Home/Index
PA counties sans murder 2022: Bradford [95.3, 1.0], Cameron [95.1, 0.7], Clinton [94.4, 1.6], Crawford [94.4, 1.9], Forest [68.7, 22.9], Fulton [95.2, 1.4], Huntingdon [90.7, 5.3], Jefferson [96.9. 0.5], Mercer [89.8, 5.7], Perry [94.4, 1.3], Potter [95.9. 0.6], Somerset [94.5, 2.6], Sullivan [93.2, 2.1], Susquehanna [95.5, 0.8], Union [85.5, 6.3], Wayne [89.9, 3.2] & Wyoming [94.5, 1.2].
Those counties had a cumulative population of 701,243 & 17 of PA’s 67 counties (25.37%) had no murders. 5.4% of PA’s population lives in counties w/ no murders.
PA counties w/ no murders are not very diverse, are they?
PA counties w/ one murder 2022: Adams [88.3, 2.2], Butler [93.7, 1.4], Centre [84.9, 3.9], Clarion [95.3, 1.5], Clearfield [93.9, 2.2], Juniata [93.4, 1.1], McKean [93.1, 2.4], Pike [78.2, 7.0] & Snyder [94.6, 1.4].
Those counties had a cumulative population of 740,417 & 5.7% of PA’s population lives in counties w/ one murder. 11.11% of PA’s population lives in counties w/ <2 murders.
26 of PA’s 67 counties (38.8%) have <2 murders.
Counties in BOLD gave Douglas V. Mastriano 60% of the vote or more. Joshua Shapiro failed to attain 60% in any of those counties.
***
Wyoming (if an agency or county did not report & they were all small, rural, jerkwater counties – I assumed they had ZERO murders, which is likely true) https://wyomingdci.wyo.gov/criminal-justice-information-services-cjis/uniform-crime-reportingnibrs https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1NM5Y-dodT7sJ_QwcsVAo0eNrtW8P8cOF
Counties in WY sans murders 2022: Campbell, Converse, Crook, Goshen, Hot Springs, Johnson, Lincoln, Niobrara, Park, Sheridan, Sublette, Teton, Uinta & Weston.
Cumulative population of those counties = 239,448 & 41.18% of WY lives in counties w/ no murders. 14 of WY’s 23 counties (60.86%) had no murders in 2022.
Counties in WY w/ one murder 2022: Albany, Fremont, Laramie & Washakie.
Cumulative population of those counties = 185,945 & 31.98% of WY lives in counties w/ one murder. 73.16% of WY lives in counties with <2 murders. 18 of WY’s 23 counties (78.26%) live in counties that had <2 murders in 2022.
Counties in BOLD cast 60% of their ballots for Mark Gordon. Theresa A. Livingston did not even win a county in WY (2022 WY Gubernatorial). If you noticed that I am picking the race the GOP did worse in (if there are two races to choose from), then you get some extra credit points.
I apologize, but it got very cumbersome bracketing all the percentages of each county that was “White Only, Not Hispanic” & “Black or African-American Only.” I have ALL these counties archived in batches of six for each group (e.g. https://web.archive.org/web/20230714001516/https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/johnsoncountywyoming%2Chotspringscountywyoming%2Cgoshencountywyoming%2Ccrookcountywyoming%2Cconversecountywyoming%2Ccampbellcountywyoming/PST045222 & https://web.archive.org/web/20230714003054/https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/washakiecountywyoming%2Claramiecountywyoming%2Cfremontcountywyoming%2Calbanycountywyoming/PST045222 ) so you can go back & check the percentages for each of those counties years from now if you want – it will be quick & easy! It was just going to take too dang long, sorry! The batching & archiving takes long enough!
Wyoming is one of the whitest & rural states in America, ergo – it does not have a homicide problem.
***
California https://oag.ca.gov/crime https://data-openjustice.doj.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2023-06/Homicide%20In%20CA%202022f.pdf
Counties in CA without murders 2022: Alpine, Amador, Colusa, Glenn, Modoc, Mono, Plumas, Shasta, Sierra, Trinity & Tuolumne. Check out the % of those counties’ populations that are Black vs. the California average vs. the national average. #whitesupremacy
Cumulative population of those counties = 378,154 & 0.96% of CA’s population lives in counties w/ no murders. 11 of CA’s 58 counties (18.96%) had no murders in 2022.
Counties in CA w/ one murder 2022: Calaveras, Inyo, Lake, Mariposa & Siskiyou. Cumulative population of those counties = 194,152 & 0.49% of CA’s population lives in counties w/ one murder in 2022. 16 of CA’s 58 counties (27.58%) had <2 murders. 1.46% of CA’s population lives in counties w/ <2 murders.
Counties in BOLD gave 60% of their vote to Brian Dahle. Gavin Newsom failed to hit 60% in any of those counties.
***
South Dakota https://sdcrime.nibrs.com/ReportsIndex/List https://sdcrime.nibrs.com/Report/CrimeDensityReports “Murder and Nonnegligent Manslaughter” https://archive.is/NeHN9
Counties in SD sans murders 2022: Aurora, Beadle, Bennett, Bon Homme, Brookings, Brown, Brule, Buffalo, Butte, Campbell, Clark, Codington, Corson, Custer, Davison, Day, Deuel, Dewey, Douglas, Edmunds, Fall River, Faulk, Grant, Gregory, Haakon, Hamlin, Hand, Hanson, Harding, Hutchinson, Hyde, Jackson, Jerauld, Jones, Kingsbury, Lake, Lyman, Marshall, McCook, McPherson, Mellette, Miner, Moody, Oglala Lakota, Perkins, Potter, Roberts, Sanborn, Spink, Stanley, Sully, Todd, Tripp, Turner, Union, Walworth & Ziebach.
57 of SD’s 66 counties (86.36%) had no murders in 2022. Cumulative population of those counties = 396,935 & 43.62% of SD lives in counties w/ zero murders.
Counties in SD w/ one murder 2022: Yankton, Meade, Lawrence, Hughes, Clay & Charles Mix.
63 of SD’s 66 counties (95.45%) had <2 murders in 2022. Cumulative population of those counties = 123,470 & 57.19% of SD lives in counties with <2 murders (2022).
You will see from a few of those counties, their population is so small that one murder makes their rate absolutely skyrocket. Uber-white South Dakota has a lot of counties where people aren’t knifing & shooting each other on a weekly basis.
Counties in BOLD gave Kristi Noem 60% of their vote (2022 SD Gubernatorial). Jamie Smith won 2 of those counties w/ 60% of the vote.
***
Minnesota (select 2022) https://cde.state.mn.us/DownloadData/OffenseCountyMunicipalByCountyDownload
Counties in MN sans murders 2022: Becker, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Carlton, Carver, Chippewa, Chisago, Clearwater, Cook, Cottonwood, Dodge, Douglas, Faribault, Fillmore, Goodhue, Grant, Houston, Hubbard, Isanti, Jackson, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Koochiching, Lac qui Parle, Lake, Le Sueur, Lincoln, Lyon, Mahnomen, Martin, McLeod, Meeker, Mille Lacs, Mower, Murray, Nicollet, Nobles, Norman, Pennington, Pine, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Redwood, Rock, Roseau, Sherburne, Sibley, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Traverse, Wabasha, Wadena, Waseca, Watonwan, Wilkin, Winona, Wright & Yellow Medicine.
Minnesota counties sans homicides, the whitest counties you know! Cumulative population for those counties = 1,606,481 & 28.09% of MN lives in counties w/ no homicide (2022). Of MN’s 87 counties, 63 of them (72.41%) had no murders in 2022.
Counties in MN w/ one murder 2022: Beltrami, Cass, Clay, Freeborn, Itasca, Marshall, Morrison, Renville, Rice, Steele & Washington.
Cumulative population of those counties = 658,560 & 11.51% of MN’s population lives in counties w/ one murder.
39.61% of MN’s population resides in counties w/ <2 murders (2022). 74 of MN’s 87 counties (85.05%) had <2 murders.
Counties in BOLD voted 60% for Scott Jensen (2022 MN Gubernatorial). Tim Walz captured 1 of those counties w/ 60% of the vote.
***
Montana https://dataportal.mt.gov/t/MBCC/views/CIM-ViolentCrime/Dash_ViolentCrime_StatsbyCounty?iframeSizedToWindow=true&%3Aembed=y&%3AshowAppBanner=false&%3Adisplay_count=n&%3AshowVizHome=n&%3Aorigin=viz_share_link (Select 2022 & Murder/Manslaughter) https://archive.is/pATpX
MT Counties w/ no murders 2022: Beaverhead, Big Horn, Blaine, Broadwater, Carbon, Carter, Chouteau, Custer, Daniels, Dawson, Deer Lodge, Fallon, Fergus, Garfield, Glacier, Golden Valley, Granite, Hill, Jefferson, Judith Basin, Lewis & Clark, Liberty, Lincoln, Madison, McCone, Meagher, Mineral, Musselshell, Park, Petroleum, Phillips, Pondera, Powder River, Powell, Prairie, Ravalli, Roosevelt, Rosebud, Sanders, Sheridan, Silver Bow, Stillwater, Sweet Grass, Teton, Toole, Treasure, Valley, Wheatland & Wibaux.
Cumulative population of those counties = 465,430 & 41.45% of MT lives in counties sans murders. 49 of MT’s 56 counties (87.5%) had no murders.
Montana counties with no murders, the whitest, least diverse counties you know (there are a few small exceptions, feel free to peruse them)! I wonder why that is?
MT Counties w/ one murder 2022: Lake, Missoula & Richland
Cumulative population of those counties = 165,131 & 14.7% of MT’s population lives in counties w/ one murder.
56.15% of MT’s population lives in counties w/ <2 murders. 52 of MT’s 56 counties (92.85%) had <2 murders. We’re not safe anywhere? Only retarded folks or groomers who want male pedophiles in the same locker room as little girls believe this pap. Next…
Montana had no Governor or Senate race in 2022, so I am using their 2020 Senate tilt as a baseline. Counties in BOLD voted 60% for Steve Daines. Steve Bullock won 4 of those counties in MT w/ 60% of the vote.
***
Utah https://bci.utah.gov/crime-in-utah-dashboards/ https://public.domo.com/embed/pages/2kQyM
Counties in UT that had zero murders 2022: Beaver, Cache, Carbon, Daggett, Duchesne, Garfield, Grand, Iron, Juab, Kane, Millard, Morgan, Rich, San Juan, Sanpete, Sevier, Uintah & Wayne
Cumulative population of those counties = 416,218 & 12.31% of UT’s population lives in counties sans murder. 18 of UT’s 29 counties (62.06%) had no murder in 2022.
Counties in UT that had one murder 2022: Box Elder, Davis, Summit & Wasatch
Cumulative population of those counties = 511,101 & 15.11% of UT’s population lives in counties w/ one murder. 27.42% of UT’s population lives in counties w/ <2 murders (2022).
22 of UT’s 29 counties (75.86%) had <2 murders in 2022.
Counties in BOLD voted 60% or more for Mike Lee (2022 UT Senate). Stealth Democrat Evan McMullin failed to hit 60% in any UT counties w/ <2 murders in 2022.
***
Idaho https://nibrs.isp.idaho.gov/CrimeInIdaho/Report/CrimeDensityReports (Select 2022 & also Murder & Nonnegligent Manslaughter) https://nibrs.isp.idaho.gov/CrimeInIdaho/Publication/Active/Crime%20In%20Idaho%202022.pdf
Counties in ID that had ZERO murders 2022: Bear Lake, Blaine, Boundary, Butte, Camas, Caribou, Cassia, Clark, Elmore, Franklin, Fremont, Gem, Gooding, Idaho, Jefferson, Jerome, Lemhi, Lewis, Oneida, Owyhee, Payette, Power, Teton, Valley & Washington.
Cumulative population of those counties = 353,903 & 18.25% of ID’s population lives in counties sans murders. 25 of ID’s 44 counties (56.81%) had no murder in 2022. Take a good, hard look at the demographics of those counties. Not really diverse, although there are a few that have a high American Indian population, but aside from that it’s overwhelmingly White Only, not Hispanic or Latino.
Counties in ID that had ONE murder 2022: Bannock, Bingham, Boise, Clearwater, Custer, Lincoln, Nez Perce & Shoshone.
Cumulative population = 223,639 & 11.53% of ID’s population lives in counties w/ one murder.
33 of ID’s 44 counties (75%) have <2 murders. 29.78% of ID’s population lives in counties w/ <2 murders (2022).
Counties in BOLD voted 60% for Mike Crapo (2022 ID Senate). David Roth captured one of those counties w/ 60% of the vote. The 60% threshold is arbitrary, but it’s a nice round number & at least a 20% margin of victory, very significant.
***
Thankfully, Rhode Island does not have a lot of counties, as they do not have a density reports that other states do, so you can easily see which counties have zero murders https://riucr.nibrs.com/Report/AnnualTrendReport “State Police” had jurisdiction over 2 murders in 2022, but no word on the where of those, I am not sure if they would remove one or more of the counties below.
Counties in RI that had zero murders 2022: Bristol & Kent
2 of RI’s 5 counties (40%) had no murders in 2022. Cumulative population = 221,635 & 20.26% of RI’s population lives in counties with no murders.
Counties in RI that had one murder 2022: Newport & Washington
Cumulative population = 214,811. 4 of RI’s 5 counties (80%) have <2 murders. 19.64% of RI lives in counties w/ one murder & 39.9% of the state lives in counties w/ <2 murders.
Counties in BOLD gave 60% of their vote to Ashley Marie Kalus (2022 RI Gubernatorial). Daniel J. McKee captured two of RI’s counties that had <2 murders in 2022.
***
Ohio https://dpsoibrspext.azurewebsites.net/ Select “Crimes Reported by County”, “2022” & “Full Year.” I wish they would do it like NY state does, or California, Florida or Oklahoma. I am kind of old school; I appreciate an elongated PDF where I can explore (and archive) all sorts of data. It is what it is. I would like a full report containing ALL counties in one document. Noble County did NOT report data for 2021-22, but I checked from 2015-2020 & no murders there, so I am including them. Sue me.
Counties in OH that had zero murders 2022: Adams, Auglaize, Belmont, Carroll, Champaign, Coshocton, Fulton, Geauga, Guernsey, Hardin, Harrison, Henry, Knox, Lawrence, Licking, Logan, Meigs, Mercer, Morgan, Muskingum, Noble, Ottawa, Perry, Putnam, Sandusky, Scioto, Shelby, Union, Van Wert, Warren, Washington, Williams, Wood & Wyandot
Cumulative population = 1,897,009 & 16.13% of OH lives in counties w/ no murders. Of OH’s 88 counties, 34 (38.63%) of them had no murder in 2022. Ohio Counties with no murders, the whitest counties you know! #whitesupremacy #samseder #majorityreport
Counties in OH that had one murder 2022: Allen, Ashtabula, Clinton, Crawford, Defiance, Delaware, Fayette, Greene, Hancock, Highland, Hocking, Huron, Lake, Madison, Medina, Miami, Pickaway, Preble, Ross & Tuscarawas
Cumulative population = 1,786,024 & 15.19% of OH lives in counties w/ one murder. 54 of OH’s 88 counties (61.36%) had <2 murders in 2022. 31.32% of OH lives in counties w/ <2 murders.
Ohio is a “red state” that has a lot of murder problems, but those are in the “diverse” (or not so “diverse” – meaning cities & counties that have a Black plurality or majority) counties that are typically won by Democrats in large margins. Akron, Dayton, Cleveland, Cincinnati, Toledo, etc.
The demographics of the counties above say a lot, without saying anything at all.
Counties in BOLD delivered 60% or more of their vote to J.D. Vance. Tim Ryan captured NONE of those counties w/ 60% of the vote. None, zero, nada. Surprised?
***
Illinois https://ilucr.nibrs.com/Report/CrimeDensityReports (Select “2022” & “Murder and Nonnegligent Manslaughter”) There are a lot of states that maintain old school reports, while using interactive data platforms as well. Illinois maintains their Annual “Crime in Illinois” reports & they also have an interactive section for NIBRS data.
Counties in IL that had zero murders 2022: Alexander, Bond, Boone, Brown, Bureau, Calhoun, Carroll, Cass, Christian, Clark, Clay, Coles, Crawford, Cumberland, DeWitt, Douglas, Edgar, Fayette, Ford, Franklin, Fulton, Gallatin, Greene, Hamilton, Hardin, Henderson, Iroquois, Jasper, Jefferson, Jersey, Johnson, Kankakee, Knox, Lawrence, Lee, Livingston, Logan, Macoupin, Marion, Marshall, Mason, Massac, McDonough, McHenry, McLean, Menard, Mercer, Monroe, Morgan, Moultrie, Ogle, Perry, Piatt, Pike, Pope, Pulaski, Putnam, Randolph, Saline, Schuyler, Scott, Shelby, Stark, Union, Wabash, Washington, Wayne, White, Williamson & Woodford.
Cumulative population = 1,969,543 & 15.65% of IL lives in counties sans murders. 70 of IL’s 102 counties (68.62%) had no murders in 2022.
Counties in IL that had one murder 2022: Whiteside, Warren, LaSalle, Jo Daviess, Henry, Edwards, DeKalb, Clinton & Adams
Cumulative population of those counties = 457,204 & 3.63% of IL lives in counties w/ one murder.
79 of IL’s 102 counties (77.45%) had <2 murders. 19.28% of IL lives in counties w/ <2 murders. Those counties, I will remind you again, were overwhelmingly White & underwhelmingly Black for the most part. #factsarenotracist
[NOTE: Whomever did the per 100,000 calculations was off on their math a bit at time. For example, the murder rate per 100,000 for Edwards County indicates two murders, based on their population. However, https://ilucr.nibrs.com/Report/CrimesIndex when I look at Edwards County on that report, it indicates ONE murder. Doing “back of the envelope” calculations in my head tipped me off that either IL’s population figures differ markedly from the Census or someone’s calculator was broken. I think I was able to rectify this myself, but it added a lot of time. Clinton County was also off, but at least the murder rate for counties with no murders was easy to figure out. Champaign County had 7 murders according to the two-year comparison, but the Density report had their rate over 10 per 100,000. Go figure.]
Counties in BOLD gave 60% of their vote (or more) to Kathy Salvi (2022 IL Senate). Tammy Duckworth failed to win any of those counties w/ 60% of the vote. The safest places in IL overwhelmingly prefer Republicans. Wonder why that is? Maybe it’s a cultural thing, eh?
***
Texas https://txucr.nibrs.com/SRSReport/CrimeTrends Everything is bigger in Texas, including the astronomical number of counties it possesses.
Counties in TX that had zero murders 2022: Archer, Armstrong, Bailey, Baylor, Bee, Borden, Bosque, Briscoe, Brooks, Burleson, Callahan, Childress, Clay, Cochran, Coke, Coleman, Collingsworth, Concho, Crane, Crockett, Crosby, Culberson, Delta, Dickens, Duval, Floyd, Foard, Franklin, Garza, Glasscock, Hale, Hall, Hamilton, Hansford, Hardeman, Hartley, Haskell, Hemphill, Houston, Hudspeth, Jack, Jim Hogg, Karnes, Kenedy, Kent, Kimble, King, Kinney, Knox, Lipscomb, Live Oak, Loving, Lynn, McMullen, Madison, Martin, Mason, Menard, Mills, Mitchell, Montague, Motley, Nolan, Oldham, Parmer, Presidio, Rains, Real, Roberts, Runnels, San Jacinto, Schleicher, Shackelford, Sherman, Somervell, Sterling, Stonewall, Sutton, Terrell, Terry, Throckmorton, Trinity, Upton, Wheeler, Yoakam, Zapata & Zavala.
Cumulative population = 555,749 & 1.85% of TX lives in counties w/ no murders. 87 of TX’s 254 counties (34.25%) had no murders in 2022
Counties in TX that had one murder 2022: Anderson, Andrews, Austin, Blanco, Brewster, Calhoun, Camp, Carson, Colorado, Comal, Cooke, Dallam, Dawson, Deaf Smith, DeWitt, Edwards, Fayette, Fisher, Freestone, Goliad, Grimes, Hill, Irion, Jasper, Jeff Davis, Kaufman, Kendall, Kerr, Lampasas, Lavaca, Lee, Limestone, Llano, McCulloch, Moore, Newton, Ochiltree, Palo Pinto, Pecos, Randall, Red River, Reeves, Robertson, Rockwall, Rusk, Shelby, Starr, Titus, Walker, Washington, Willacy, Wilson & Wood.
Cumulative population of those counties = 1,790,634 & 5.96% of TX lives in counties w/ one murder (2022).
Of TX’s 254 counties, 140 (55.11%) have <2 murders. Take a good hard look at the demographics of those counties above & compare them to the Texas state average (wink wink). 7.81% of TX lives in counties w/ <2 murders.
Counties in BOLD were won by Greg Abbott (60% or >). Beta Male O’Rourke won only three counties (60% or >). TX Gubernatorial Sweepstakes 2022
[NOTE: If a an agency, particularly a smaller one was not reporting data to TX NIBRS, https://www.dps.texas.gov/section/crime-records/crime-texas I checked some previous reports & if there were several years of no murders, I added them above. E.G. from 2017-2021, tiny Brewster Co. had 2 years sans murders & three years w/ one. I dumped them in the “one homicide” group. There were a few other small counties that reported no NIBRS data yet had no criminal homicides from 2017-2021. Coleman for example had one criminal homicide in that period, I dumped them in the “no homicide” group for 2022. Sue me. Hutchinson had 2 homicides in one year of the 2017-2021 time frame, so they are NOT included above]
***
Nebraska https://crimestats.ne.gov/public/Browse/browsetables.aspx (I opened “SRS Crime Rates by County (Ranked by Population)”, as well as “NIBRS Crimes and Incident Counts by County - Last 3 Years”. Select “2022” & “Murder and Nonnegligent Manslaughter”) https://archive.is/ev4C1
Counties in NE w/ zero criminal homicides 2022: Adams, Antelope, Arthur, Banner, Blaine, Boone, Boyd, Brown, Burt, Butler, Chase, Cherry, Cheyenne, Clay, Colfax, Cuming, Dakota, Dawson, Deuel, Dixon, Dodge, Dundy, Fillmore, Franklin, Frontier, Furnas, Gage, Garden, Garfield, Gosper, Grant, Greeley, Hamilton, Harlan, Hayes, Hitchcock, Holt, Hooker, Howard, Jefferson, Johnson, Kearney, Keith, Keya Paha, Kimball, Knox, Lincoln, Logan, Loup, McPherson, Madison, Merrick, Morrill, Nance, Nemaha, Nuckolls, Otoe, Pawnee, Perkins, Phelps, Pierce, Polk, Red Willow, Richardson, Rock, Saline, Saunders, Seward, Sherman, Sioux, Stanton, Thayer, Thomas, Thurston, Valley, Washington, Wayne, Webster & Wheeler
Cumulative population of those counties = 593,473 & 30.15% of NE lives in counties without murders. 79 of NE’s 93 counties (84.94%) had no homicides in 2022.
Counties in NE w/ ONE criminal homicide 2022: Box Butte, Buffalo, Cass, Custer, Dawes,
Platte, Sarpy, Scotts Bluff & Sheridan
Cumulative population = 378,545 & 19.23% of NE lives in counties w/ one murder.
Of NE’s 93 counties, 88 (94.62%) had <2 murders. 49.39% of NE lives in counties w/ <2 murders (2022).
Counties in BOLD were won (60% or >) by Jim Pillen (NE Gubernatorial 2022). Carol Blood won ZERO counties (60% or >).
***
Massachusetts https://ma.beyond2020.com/ma_public/ “SRS Crime Rates By County”, “2022” & “Murder and Nonnegligent Homicide” https://archive.is/477wM
Counties in MA w/ zero homicides 2022: Franklin & Nantucket
Cumulative population = 85,315 & 1.22% of MA’s population lives in counties w/ no homicides. 2 of MA’s 14 counties (14.28%) had no murders.
Counties in MA w/ ONE homicide 2022: Dukes
Cumulative Population = 20,868 & 0.29% of MA lives in counties with one homicide.
3 of MA’s 14 counties (21.42%) have <2 murders. 1.52% of MA lives in counties w/ <2 homicides.
Geoff Diehl failed to win any of those counties, period (MA 2022 Gubernatorial) Maura Healey captured all 3 of those counties w/ 60% of the vote.
***
Iowa https://icrime.dps.state.ia.us/CrimeInIowa/Report/CrimeDensityReports https://archive.is/790z9 (Select “2022” & “Murder And Nonnegligent Manslaughter”)
I was poised to polish this off, but Iowa finally came out w/ their 2022 report. Here we go again.
Counties in Iowa sans murders 2022: Adair, Adams, Appanoose, Audubon, Boone,
Bremer, Buchanan, Buena Vista, Butler, Calhoun, Carroll, Cass, Cedar, Cerro Gordo, Cherokee, Chickasaw, Clarke, Clay, Clayton, Crawford, Davis, Decatur, Delaware, Des Moines, Dickinson, Emmet, Fayette, Floyd, Franklin, Fremont, Greene, Grundy, Guthrie, Hamilton, Hancock, Hardin, Harrison, Henry, Humboldt, Ida, Iowa, Jasper, Jefferson, Jones, Keokuk, Kossuth, Lee, Louisa, Lucas, Lyon, Madison, Mahaska, Marion, Mills, Mitchell, Monona, Monroe, Montgomery, O'Brien, Osceola, Page, Palo Alto, Plymouth, Pocahontas, Poweshiek, Ringgold, Sac, Shelby, Sioux, Tama, Taylor, Union, Van Buren, Warren, Washington, Wayne, Winnebago, Worth & Wright.
79 of IA’s 99 counties (79.79%) had no murders (2022). Cumulative population = 1,215,796 & 37.98% of IA lives in counties sans murders.
Counties in IA w/ one murder: Allamakee, Benton, Dallas, Dubuque, Howard, Johnson, Marshall, Muscatine, Pottawattamie, Wapello & Winneshiek.
Cumulative population of those counties = 642,763 & 20.08% of IA lives in counties w/ one murder.
90 of IA’s 99 counties (90.9%) have <2 murders. 58.07% of IA lives in counties w/ <2 murders. Sounds like “we’re not safe anywhere” is utter B.S. But then again, Black Hawk County, Iowa Supervisor Chris Schwartz is fat, little Hobbit w/ a room temperature IQ.
Counties in BOLD voted 60% or more for Chuck Grassley (2022 IA Senate). Michael “California is Great” Franken captured one, single solitary county (60%) in that list. That was the only one he won outright too.
Amazingly, the safest counties in Iowa vote overwhelmingly Republican the vast majority of the time. I wonder why that is?
***
Now for the grand finale. Take a gander at the national % of “White alone, not Hispanic or Latino, percent” versus “Black or African American alone, percent” & compare those race percentages, *especially* in the boatloads of counties that had zero murders. If you’re shocked then I am pleased to be the first to open your eyes. The U.S. is (2022) 58.9% “White alone, not Hispanic or Latino.” The U.S. is 13.6% (2022) “Black or African American alone.”
The most dangerous adversary to a black person in America is not the police, not a Confederate flag-waving redneck, not a white militiaman from rural Idaho & not an Asian person (I identify as Asian & have for some time) like myself who carries a gun & goes to work every single day.
None of those are the problem, the danger for black folks (especially young black males) is other black folks (especially young black males) & typically in counties & cities where the Democrat Party has been running the place into the ground for decades.
That creepy old man/groomer Sam Seder can screech about #whitesupremacy all he wants while he fantasizes about pedophiles hanging out with his daughter, https://rumble.com/vcj22f-face-bloat-stan-seder-i-mean-sam-seder-vs.-face-bloat-stan-seder.html but the truth is not going to change. You can call me racist, but you cannot call me wrong!
PS I archived all these counties (in batches of six, e.g. if there were 22 counties in a batch, I did 3 batches of 6 & then a batch of 4) at the Wayback Machine for your perusal, so you can check my work if you want.
The following states that I covered (NE, TX, RI, MA, NY, WI, AR, MO, PA, WY, CA, SD, MN, MT, UT, ID, OH, IL, IA) have a collective population of 168,057,533 & that is 50.42% of the entire U.S. population. This is a great sample.
Some of these states have high murder rates, some do not (relative to the national average). Some of these states are largely rural, some are very urban, some vote Republican the vast majority of the time & some vote Pedocrat. Some are “purple”, so this will give us a great view on just whether the “we’re not safe anywhere” line has any merit, which I have already demolished anyways. This is like dropping a bunker buster on the enemy & following it up w/ a hydrogen bomb. I’m just making sure.
Those states above collectively have 1,409 counties. Of those 1,409 counties, (53.01%) 747 of them had ZERO Murders in 2022. These United States has 3,142 counties (soon, CT will transition from 8 counties to 9 “Councils of Government”) & extrapolation that out I can say that 1,666 counties in these United States have NO Murders in a given year. It certainly does not sound like “we’re not safe anywhere” – well, unless you’re a retard.
The states examined have 1,409 counties & 970 (68.84%) of them had LESS THAN TWO MURDERS. Does not sound like “we are not safe anywhere” – unless again, you are a functionally-retarded mouth-breather. Extrapolating that out, of the 3,142 counties in the U.S., 2,163 of them would have <2 murders in a given year. That narrows down the problem areas a bit, eh?
I understand not all counties are the same, so let us go a bit further. The states listed above had a collective population of 168,057,533. The collective population of their counties with ZERO murders was 14,683,478 – meaning that 8.73% of the population lives in counties with zero murders in a given year.
That means of the entire U.S. population, 29,119,912 people live in counties sans murder.
Let us go even further. Of the states listed above, 26,029,088 (15.48%) of their 168,057,533 people live in counties with <2 murders. That means of the entire U.S. population, 51,620,246 people live in counties w/ <2 murders.
You can tally the murder rate yourself for those single-murder counties & collectively, their average is usually rather low. That means we have eliminated most counties from being dangerous & a good chunk of the entire population.
Recall what John Lott said (his essay was the impetus for all the above information) http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/sam-seder-ilhan-omar-racism https://crimeresearch.org/2017/04/number-murders-county-54-us-counties-2014-zero-murders-69-1-murder/ about the concentration of murders in these United States
“The United States can really be divided up into three types of places. Places where there are no murders, places where there are a few murders, and places where murders are very common. In 2014, the most recent year that a county-level breakdown is available, 54% of counties (with 11% of the population) have no murders. 69% of counties have no more than one murder, and about 20% of the population. These counties account for only 4% of all murders in the country.”
“The worst 1% of counties have 19% of the population and 37% of the murders. The worst 2% of counties contain 28% of the population and 51% of the murders. The worst 5% of counties contain 47% of the population and account for 68% of murders. But even within those counties the murders are very heavily concentrated in small areas. Murders actually used to be even more concentrated. From 1977 to 2000, on average 73 percent of counties in any given year had zero murders. Possibly, this change is a result of the opioid epidemic’s spread to more rural areas. But that question is beyond the scope of this study. Lott’s book “More Guns, Less Crime” showed how dramatically counties within states vary dramatically with respect to murder and other violent crime rates.”
I’ve effectively eliminated 15.48% of the population & over two-thirds (68.84%) of ALL counties from the conversation.
I am not going to cover the most dangerous counties (but have covered a slew of dangerous, Democrat-dominated cities http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/sam-seder-ilhan-omar-racism3 ), but if I segregated the top 10% of counties w/ the highest murder rates, they would be doing more than their fair share. As I wrote a few years ago in the above essay:
“Those cities had 28.54% of all homicides 2018-2020… Those cities were only 6.354% of the entire U.S. population 2018-2020 & had a staggering homicide rate of 24.856 per 100,000. Again, the U.S. homicide rate from 2018-2020 was 5.533 per 100,000. Their homicide rate was collectively >449% HIGHER than the U.S. average.”
I could have (and should have – eventually will) gone further & stuffed in numerous other cities (large & small) or counties & virtually replicated what John Lott did. There is not a homicide problem sweeping across the U.S.
Yes, it has gotten worse since the fatherless terrorists in the #blacklivesmatter movement used a drug addict & career criminal as an excuse to burn down cities & murder 8 thousand more black folks (https://rumble.com/v2s3mpk-charlie-kirk-subdues-blacklivesmatter-and-whitesupremacy.html) 2020-21, relative to 2016-19, but most of the U.S. is still safe.,
I would wager ~25% of the U.S. population is where the lion’s share of the violence is occurring, not in rural Iowa, Montana, Idaho, most of Missouri, most of Illinois, Vermont, NH, most of Ohio, most of NY state, most of Georgia, most of Michigan, etc.
So, do not listen to the carnival-barkers like groomer/bi-polaroid Sam Seder, the fat little troll Chris Schwartz, Roland Martin, the dumb ladies on The View or the wingnuts on MSLSD.
America’s massive homicide problems are typically in Democrat-run areas that have been stricken by poverty (or are working their way to that point, they have wrecked a number of cities over just the past decade), not uber-white, uber-Republican counties. This data hammers that home.
America’s Counties Lacking Murders: The Whitest (and most Republican) Counties You Know!
When my great-great grandfather got off the boat as the Civil War was ending & eventually made his way to Idaho, he did not have any black folks in tow. Nobody picked cotton for him & he didn’t pick any cotton, voluntarily or not.
He & the generations that followed him had absolutely nothing to do w/ slavery, an institution that existed in these United States for https://www.onthisday.com/date/1784/may/12 https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/treaty-of-paris for less than 80 years before being eradicated. A lot of people were maimed, had their families uprooted, a lot of people bled & died to that end.
The current #blacklivesmatter #whitesupremacy hysteria is blaming people (much like law-abiding gunowners are blamed when a mentally-ill person who has been arrested numerous times goes on a rampage or finally picks on someone his own size & age and gets a “receipt”) who had nothing to do w/ past transgressions.
It’s akin to blaming David Berkowitz’s great-great grandfather for his crimes. It’s silly at best & evil at worst.
White folks & primarily white men are not a young black man’s biggest enemy in America – that would be our crumbling & largely ineffective government school system, which is churning out in many jurisdictions – SJWs who can’t tell their heads from their butts, but they know their pronouns & they know #whitesupremacy is the reason Terrell can’t read & can’t get a job.
I am not the reason ~70% of black children are born out-of-wedlock & why most of them do not have any sort of relationship w/ their biological father. That’s a cultural issue & that’s why Asians (primarily Asian men) are doing so well in America. White Supremacy forgot to fasten a millstone around their neck & hold them down their whole lives.
The biggest enemy of black people (primarily young, black men) are other black people (primarily young black men), period. I could add the government school system, irresponsible young men that abandon their children, the antique media (as Rush Limbaugh used to call them) & the garbage on the idiot box.
The next time you see Black Hawk County, Iowa Supervisor Chris Schwartz (or that groomer Sam Seder, Roland Martin, Joe Biden, Chris Hayes, Ilhan Omar or #AOC or any of their enablers) flap his flabby jowls, “We’re not safe anywhere” – give him a quiz using my data. Mr. Chairman, I Yield Back.
212
views
3
comments
Why isn’t Pride Month in the same month as HIV/AIDS Awareness Month?
Good Question! Why isn’t Pride Month in the same month as HIV/AIDS Awareness Month?
They should be in the same month as the vast majority of HIV cases are homosexual men & when you lump drug addicts in there, the infection rates are astounding. So, Pride Month & HIV/AIDS Awareness Month should be a joint venture, to raise awareness about that behavior.
Throw in some awareness for people wrecking their lives w/ drugs & we can raise awareness. Or you can autistically screech #whitesupremacy from the rooftops. You have no facts & data, but at least you’re loud.
HIV/AIDS is a homosexual & drug addict disease (99.999999% preventable BTW) https://rumble.com/v2e2f68-divorcee-sam-seder-just-isnt-very-bright-covid-19-vs.-aidshiv.html
COVID-19 death rates by race & ethnicity (along w/ numerous other facts) https://rumble.com/v2rgw38-covid-19-lockdowns-get-nuked.html
My massive COVID-19 data hub http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/covid-19-hub
My massive Democrat Crime Wave hub http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/black-lives-do-not-matter
Enjoy!
226
views
3
comments
Derrick Johnson (NAACP) vs sound logic & Ron DeSantis
Recently, Derrick Johnson of the NAACP demonstrated how dumb he is, by explaining the exodus of people from Democrat-leaning states as propaganda language, which is absolutely not true, unless your name is Derrick Johnson & you’re a functionally retarded mouth breather.
Derrick also says Florida is seeing people move in because it is an attractive place geographically. The exodus of wealthy people who actually finished school & aren’t on meth from New York to Florida has been happening for decades, but it has gone into overdrive since the COVID-19 plandemic.
Derrick Johnson has a low IQ. I could also tell Derrick that California is a geographically-attractive destination, yet people are fleeing in droves. From the time California became a state until 2000, they always added to their number of Congressional Districts. In 2010, they stayed the same.
I understand that it’s harder to gain more as you get a lot of Congressional Districts, especially depending on how fast the other states are growing. However, in 2020 California lost a Congressional Seat & by 2030, they are set to lose multiple seats.
How does Derrick Johnson explain this? Well, he cannot. All his responses are talking points & the race card, which is the refuge of people who have an IQ around room temperature.
People are migrating to https://rumble.com/v2gaoks-divorcee-sam-seder-wants-to-sell-rural-america-some-snake-oil.html GOP-dominated states, from Democrat-leaning ones & that has accelerated over the past several years.
Now for some homicide data from Florida, since it is not safe for black folks, according to the NAACP. Now for a ditty I have been adding to for years, some data from Florida.
http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/covid-increase-homicides Since Florida has good county-level data I am going to add them.
Let’s look at Florida counties that voted 60% or > for Donald Trump both times, as well as Shillary Clinton & the dementia-riddled fake POTUS “Plugs” Biden.
The most pro-Trump counties in FL are: Baker, Bay, Bradford, Calhoun, Charlotte, Citrus, Clay, Collier, Columbia, DeSoto, Dixie, Franklin, Gilchrist, Glades, Gulf, Hamilton, Hardee, Hernando, Highlands, Holmes, Indian River, Jackson, Lafayette, Levy, Liberty, Marion, Martin, Nassau, Okaloosa, Okeechobee, Putnam, St. Johns, Santa Rosa, Sumter, Suwannee, Taylor, Union, Wakulla, Walton & Washington.
Collective population for those counties (2018-2020) = 11,159,166
Collective homicides for those counties (2018-2020) = 413, which yields a homicide rate of 3.7 per 100,000.
The most pro-Dumocrat counties in FL are: Broward & Gadsden. You will notice that Trump dominated the dementia patient in FL, partially because he took big chunks out of very pro-Hillary counties & made them much more competitive.
Collective population (2018-2020) for those counties (using U.S. Census Bureau Data) = 5,978,673
Collective homicides for those counties (2018-2020) = 367, which yields a homicide rate of 6.138 per 100,000.
According to the FBI, FL’s homicide rate (2018, 2019 & 2020 – 5.2, 5.2, 5.9) = 5.433 per 100,000 (slightly lower than the national avg.).
Now for some uncomfortable data on arrests in Florida. In 2020 of the 844 arrests for “Murder”, 494 (58.53%) of them were “Black.” In 2019, there were 787 arrests for Murder & 447 (56.8%) of the arrestees were “Black.” In 2018, there were 710 arrests for Murder & 386 (54.36%) of the arrestees were “Black.” In 2017, there were 634 arrests for “Murder” & 58.51% (371) of the arrestees were “Black.”
Seeing a trend here? See how the # of arrests for “Blacks” increased each of those years as #blacklivesmatter stoked the fires of racial tensions? They (meaning folks like Maxine Waters, Barack Obama & Ilhan Omar) used these idiots like pawns, got them all ginned-up & hoped they would create enough chaos that all their opponents would submit. We won’t submit & I have firearms to back that statement up.
If you would like your eyes to explode, see this supplemental homicide data [NOTE: See the note on the page about the light blue bars as it related to “negligent homicide”]. I calculated from 1996-2020 there were (excluding “negligent manslaughter” aka “negligent homicide”) 5,743 white on white criminal homicides/non-negligent manslaughter events. During the same time frame, there were 4,207 Black on Black offenses.
Considering that “White” is a much larger percentage of FL’s population, the Black-on-Black criminal homicide rate in FL is stratospheric. Don’t forget, #blacklivesmatter but only when they’re killed in altercations w/ the police. The young black men killed by other young black men in Jacksonville, Miami, Orlando, Tampa, etc. do not matter & they don’t sell newspapers. George Floyd sells newspapers even though thousands of George Floyds are snuffed-out by other young black men in gangland/drug land killings every year.
By the way, why aren’t Asians slaughtering each other in droves down in the Sunshine State?
Florida is only https://web.archive.org/web/20220205053010/https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/FL/PST045221 16.9% Black. In 2010, Florida was only 16% Black. https://archive.ph/20130814015143/http://www.census.gov/2010census/popmap/ipmtext.php?fl=12 YIKES! The people who are murdering black people in Florida are… other black people most of the time.
A Challenge to all Democrats that I have yet to see answered http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/covid-increase-homicides The most violent counties in America have beaucoup black on black murder & they tend to overwhelmingly vote Democrat. Change my mind or debate me on it & get steamrolled. I probably won’t bother w/ “this channel has no content” sock puppet accounts though, as I’ve had a few unemployed Democrats on YouTube (and other sites) who have lots of free time just close their accounts after the defeat & start again.
So, if you’re not a friend & you have one of those patented accounts w/ nothing on them, I probably won’t waste the time. My free time is valuable, those people have nothing but free time. Have a nice day!
13.3K
views
2
comments
Ranked Choice Voting Still Sucks Part II
Ranked Choice Voting Still Sucks Part II *this is a follow-up to https://rumble.com/v2vm1mo-joe-bidens-sham-victory-or-why-ranked-choice-voting-sucks.html *
Now let us run the deficit between first & second place pertaining to POTUS races from 1912 to the present for all races *AND* all races where nobody got 50% of the vote plus one. Pertaining to the second part, I will be excluding races where the popular vote winner did not win the Electoral College (2016, 2000).
Senate races are a different animal, not subject to the Electoral College & one race in one state, whereas a POTUS race is in 51 (or 50 or 48) different jurisdictions.
Average margin of victory in POTUS races 1912 to present, popular vote winner from 2nd place (14.44, 3.14, 26.23, 25.21, 17.43, 17.76, 24.26, 9.95, 7.5, 4.48, 10.76, 15.4, 0.17, 22.58, 0.7, 23.15, 2.07, 9.74, 18.21, 7.72, 5.56, 8.51, 2.47, 7.26, 3.86, 4.46). The average of those = 11.27% & the Population Standard Deviation = 8.108%
Here are the deficits between first & second place (14.44, 3.14, 4.48, 0.17, 0.7, 5.56, 8.51) where the winner of the popular vote also failed to breach the 50% plus one vote mark (excluding 2000 & 2016). The average of those = 5.285% & the Population Standard Deviation = 4.578%
Comparing those two sets of data, the contests (again, excluding 2016 & 2000) where the winner of the Electoral College did not breach 50% plus one, those races had deficits between 1st & 2nd that were within 1SD of *all POTUS contests* since 1912. Not an outlier.
If we take all POTUS races since 1912 & exclude the ones where (along w/ 2000 & 2016) the popular vote winner did *NOT* cross the 50% plus one threshold (26.23, 25.21, 17.43, 17.76, 24.26, 9.95, 7.5, 10.76, 15.4, 22.58, 23.15, 2.07, 9.74, 18.21, 7.72, 2.47, 7.26, 3.86, 4.46) we have an average of 13.474% & the Population Standard Deviation = 8.011%.
Separating those two sets of data, we do (13.474 minus 8.011 = 5.463%) have an outlier though & going into it I did not think it would be, but I was wrong.
Now let us look at the winner of the popular vote (and I will include *ALL* elections from 1912 to present) & see how that stacks up against those other elections where the winner of the Electoral College won enough EVs in states where he *DID NOT* have a popular voter majority in that state & compare that to all POTUS elections from 1912 to present.
All POTUS elections since 1912, national popular vote average % for the person who won the electoral college (41.83, 49.25, 49.55, 49.72, 43.42, 50.08, 50.75, 43.01, 49.23, 47.87, 45.93, 51.26, 60.35, 54.03, 58.22, 57.41, 60.8, 54.72, 53.39, 55.14, 57.37, 61.05, 60.67, 58.77, 53.37, 50.73, 52.86, 51.01) = 52.563% Population Standard Deviation = 5.38%
POTUS elections since 1912 where the winner of the Electoral College would not have won it if states where that person did not attain 50% plus one were excluded: 1912, 1916, 1948, 1960, 1968, 1976, 1980, 1992, 1996, 2000, 2016 & 2020. The average popular vote % of those candidates was (41.83, 49.25, 49.55, 49.72, 43.42, 50.08, 50.75, 43.01, 49.23, 47.87, 45.93, 51.26) was 47.658%. That is barely within 1SD (52.563 minus 5.38 = 47.183%) of the average of all POTUS elections 1912-2020.
Again, just because that magical 50% mark is not obtained by someone, “So what?” & I can add the data above indicates those elections are not an outlier.
Again, I understand POTUS elections are a different animal than Senate races, but if we are to haggle about 50% plus one, who is going to argue that Ronald Reagan did not have a seismic victory in 1980? He got a lot of EVs in states where nobody hit 50%. So did Jimmy Carter. SO WHAT!
Was Bill Clinton’s win in 1992 tainted because of that? Bill Clinton was POTUS twice because he received beaucoup EVs in states where nobody sniffed a popular vote majority. SO WHAT!
That means Democrats & Republicans need to do better & so do third parties because the only thing they are spoiling are the chances of the Republicans & Democrats to hit 50% plus one.
I am really closing this now. If your state has not officially kiboshed any push for Ranked Choice Voting, write your elected officials & get them to do it in the next session. If Libertarian, Green or any “other” party voters want to be spoilers, let them “throw their vote away” in the general election, which may simply result in the winner being south of 50% of the vote.
Or Republicans & Democrats need to get better at convincing those folks to join their bloc. They made their decision, they do not like Republicans or Democrats, they should not be allowed to decide the election (essentially, after it has already been decided) by voting for someone else who is not their preference.
Pretending to read the minds of voters is one of the calling cards of RCV, “they must be holding their noses.” Maybe everyone is holding their noses? If they are holding their noses, so what? Maybe more folks need to get involved in primaries (and less in general elections), so we can have more Rand Paul in the GOP & less Mitch McConnell.
I hope you find the above data interesting & helpful, should you run into one of these schmucks that's pushing RCV & open primaries. Mr. Chairman, I FINALLY Yield Back!
190
views
3
comments
Creep Sam Seder says Republicans have nothing on Hunter Biden
The divorcee Stan Seder #samseder #majorityreport says Republicans have nothing on Hunter Biden. Uh, no.
The divorcees logic is infantile at worst, adolescent at best https://rumble.com/v2e7snu-sam-seder-vs.-sound-logic-sam-seder-is-divorced-from-reality.html https://rumble.com/v2knv0i-sam-seders-favorite-argument-debunked.html
Even if you find someone on “the other side” that agrees w/ you, does not mean you are correct. FDR believed education was a state task, not a federal task, will the bi-polar divorcee suddenly pine for the end of the Federal Dept. of Education. No, he will not.
The Federal Dept. of Education is unconstitutional, whether or not dictator wannabee FDR concurs or not.
James Patrick Holding made a salient point while debunking Bill Maher’s “Religulous”
https://rumble.com/vuvflu-bill-maher-and-his-religulous-crockumentary-gets-dissected-by-james-patrick.html https://www.tektonics.org/ crockumentary. Just because you quiz a person on a certain topic & they cannot answer doesn’t mean “you win”, especially if it’s an ambush interview, which is popular among folks who do not know much.
So, even if a Republican believes there is no evidence against Hunter Biden, does not mean it is true. Bad logic Stan Seder, bad logic.
When the divorcee uploaded a video supposedly proving (from Republicans themselves) that there is no smoking gun on Hunter Biden, I pointed out to the old man that Hunter lied on a gun application to a federal agency. This has been admitted to by the crackhead Hunter Biden & it has been known for some time, it is not a new allegation by any means.
This lie, that he committed knowingly on this gun application to a federal agency is a serious offense. If the divorcee does not know it is a serious offence I would not be surprised as he is ignorant on guns in general & the function of them. He doesn’t know a “magazine clip thingy”, from a barrel shroud, from his head, from his butt.
The only knowledge he would have would be talking points spoonfed to him by the autistics in his studio.
Sam Seder jumped the sharked on this one & I am not sure if he’s really this stupid or trying to be sly & convince others it is true by becoming an online social media vegetable that has a lot of free time to yell over all detractors.
My Democrat Insurrection #insurrection playlist https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoA9J0G6s-6pat3gSUBf3nm1FOVF3z3Rg documenting the Democrat Party’s goal to let as many lunatics as possible loose on society so they can *attempt* to intimidating America into bowing to their Marxist ideology or they’ll riot. If they riot in Iowa, well, let’s just say I would advise against that. (wink wink)
The most violent counties in America have beaucoup black on black murder & they tend to vote Democrat, change my mind on this or debate me & get ripped up from the floor up. https://rumble.com/v2ahqta-divorcee-sam-seder-vs.-utubekookdetector-black-on-black-crime.html http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/sam-seder-ilhan-omar-racism3 http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/covid-increase-homicides
The Simon Conway Show https://tunein.com/podcasts/p1476962/?topicid=296199716
Iowa Firearms Coalition https://iowafc.org/
Sam Seder is afraid to debate James Patrick Holding on The Impossible Faith https://tektonics.org/lp/nowayjose.php Methinks the divorcee has little faith in that religion degree from a diploma mill
280
views
1
comment
UTubekookdetector vs Mark Lang (black on black murder)
Had a clown on YouTube come over to one of my videos chronicling the stupidity of Sam Seder supporters & he was so ashamed of his comment, he deleted it.
I still took him to task & gave him 3 chances to debate, all of which he failed. Not worth anymore time, but it was fun while it lasted.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbH5Q96n-TI&lc=UgwNEuZS14GR3JQDAH54AaABAg
https://www.youtube.com/post/Ugkx7fXuC5cENUKhTfdYYPxWu-7vmz9bgUUp
https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxGYM-p5KnygDaa3pGqqRSoiPciqYko7Uf
https://archive.is/Nautb
https://archive.is/HsrBx
https://www.youtube.com/post/Ugkx7Yr0TTkhjntx8A6yGtWIy9OuClA8gcMl
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCttDMvhfTBYcbGcIy49Yusw/community?lc=Ugzauj5dHrw-IT_w7aF4AaABAg&lb=Ugkx7fXuC5cENUKhTfdYYPxWu-7vmz9bgUUp
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCttDMvhfTBYcbGcIy49Yusw/community?lc=Ugzauj5dHrw-IT_w7aF4AaABAg.9qvJEr2Q7_l9qz7RKlDJH0&lb=Ugkx7fXuC5cENUKhTfdYYPxWu-7vmz9bgUUp
https://archive.is/pIHcF
https://archive.is/4UOqd
https://archive.ph/9kEA9
https://archive.is/3y4Nj
https://archive.is/Oilps
Marks Lang’s YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjEYN31XQZ_cmcRHm9T1K5Q https://www.youtube.com/@marklang61 If you would like to ask him why the most violent counties in America vote Democrat & have lots of black on black murder. Why is that?
I gave Mark Lang 3 chances to respond to some of my data on why the most violent counties in America have beaucoup black on black murder &typically vote Democrat. He wasn’t interested in debating. The board has received Mark Lang’s concession & I graciously accept it.
http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/what-s-new 5/29/23 & 6/22/23 entries
This clown has at least 3 accounts on Rumble that is he logging in & out of constantly (he checks my page several times a day), trying to thumb down all my comments, so they are not visible to anyone not logged in.
Hi Mark, you would look okay if it wasn't for your face (lol)
194
views
1
comment
Joe Biden's Sham Victory or Why Ranked Choice Voting Sucks
Joe Biden's Sham Victory or Why Ranked Choice Voting Sucks
Let us compare the % of all EV (Electoral Votes) that were captured by the winner of the Electoral College in states where the winner did not get more than 50% of the vote in that particular state. I will also calculate the % of EV in states won by <50% for the individual getting 2nd place in the Electoral College.
For this exercise, I will ignore any faithless electors, folks who decided to throw their EV away by voting for an individual that did not win their state. https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/ I will start w/ all post-WWII POTUS elections.
Harry Truman 1948 received 84 EV in states where he did NOT hit >50% of the vote. Those were 27.63% of his 304 EV. Without those EV, he does not have an Electoral College majority. Truman also failed to win a national popular vote majority.
Thomas Dewey 1948 received 91 EV in states where he did NOT hit >50% of the vote. Those were 48.14% of his 189 EV. Dewey also failed to win a popular vote majority.
In 1948, Strom Thurmond received 38 EVs & 10 of them (26.31%) were in states where he did not win a popular vote majority.
1948 POTUS election, 185 of 531 (34.83%) EVs in states where no candidate won a popular vote majority.
Ike 1952 received 11 EV in states where he did not win >50% of the vote, which was 2.48% of his 442 EV.
Adlai Stevenson 1952 received 10 EV in states where he failed to win a majority, which was 11.23% of his 89 EV. Stevenson did not have a national popular vote majority.
1952 POTUS election, 21 of the 531 EVs (3.95%) in states where no candidate won a popular vote majority.
Ike 1956 received 11 of his 457 EV (2.4%) from states where he did not win a majority of the popular vote.
Adlai Stevenson 1956 received 74 EV & 8 of those (10.81%) were in states where he did not have a popular vote majority. He also failed to gain a national popular vote majority.
1956 POTUS election, 19 of the 531 EVs (3.57%) were from states where the winner did not obtain a popular vote majority.
JFK 1960 received 43 of his 309 EV (13.91%) in states where he did not gain a popular vote majority. Sans those 43 EV, Kennedy would not have won an Electoral College Majority. He also failed to receive a national popular vote majority.
Nixon 1960 received 0 of his 220 EV in states where he did not gain a popular majority. He also failed to receive a national popular vote majority.
1960 POTUS election, 51 EVs (MS’ 8 EVs were “unpledged”) of the 537 (9.49%) were in states where the winner did not hit the >50% popular vote threshold.
LBJ 1964 received 0 of his 486 EV in states where he did not win a popular vote majority. LBJ won a national popular vote majority.
Barry Goldwater 1964 received 0 of his 52 EV from states where he failed to win a popular vote majority. He did not win a national popular vote majority.
1964 POTUS election, 0 of the 538 EV (0%) were in states where the popular vote winner failed to achieve a popular vote majority.
Nixon 1968 received 222 of his 302 EV (73.5%) in states where he failed to gain a popular vote majority. Without those EVs, he does not win an Electoral College Majority. Nixon also failed to receive a national popular vote majority.
Hubert Humphrey 1968 received 152 of his 191 EV (79.58%) from states where he failed to receive a popular vote majority. Hubert Humphrey also failed to secure a popular vote majority.
George Wallace 1968 obtained 45 EV & 28 of those (62.22%) were in states where he fell short of a popular vote majority.
In the 1968 POTUS election, 402 of the 538 EVs (74.72%) were allocated to candidates that did NOT obtain a popular vote majority in that jurisdiction.
Richard Nixon 1972 of his 521 EV, 0% (0) of them came from states where he failed to crest the 50% popular vote margin. Nixon won a national popular vote majority.
George McGovern 1972 received 0 EV of his 17 EV in states where he failed to get a popular vote majority. Obviously, McGovern did not achieve a national popular vote majority.
1972 POTUS election, 0% of the 538 EV were allocated to candidates that did NOT obtain a popular vote majority in that jurisdiction.
1976 Jimmy Carter received 43 of his 297 EV (14.47%) in states where he failed to achieve a popular vote majority. Without these EVs, he does not win an electoral college majority. Carter notched a national popular vote majority.
1976 Gerald Ford got 91 of his 240 EV (37.91%) from states where he did not get a popular vote majority. Ford did not have a national popular vote majority.
In the 1976 POTUS election, 134 of the 538 EVs (24.9%) were in states where nobody received a popular vote majority.
1980 Ronald Reagan captured 489 EVs, 235 of them (48.05%) came from states where he did not win a majority of the popular vote. Sans those EVs, Reagan does not win a majority of the Electoral College. Reagan won the national popular vote by a large margin.
This particular example may demonstrate how absolutely stupid Ranked Choice Voting is, which we will get to momentarily.
1980 Jimmy Carter captured 49 EVs & 34 of those (69.38%) came from states where he did not win a popular vote majority. Carter did not win a national popular vote majority.
In the 1980 POTUS election, 269 of the 538 EVs (50%) were in states where no candidate received a popular vote majority.
1984 Ronald Reagan won 525 EV & zero of those (0%) came from states where he failed to attain a popular vote majority. He won the national popular vote by a wide margin.
1984 Walter Mondull won 13 EVs & 10 (76.92%) of those came from jurisdictions where he failed to obtain a popular vote majority. Mondale did not have a national popular vote majority.
1984 POTUS election, of the 538 EV, (1.85%) 10 of those were in states where no candidate received a popular vote majority.
1988 George H.W. Bush won 426 EV & none (0%) of them were in states where he failed to attain a popular vote majority. He achieved a national popular vote majority.
1988 Michael “Beetle Bailey” Dukakis received 112 EVs, zero (0%) of them were in states where he failed to attain a popular vote majority.
1988 POTUS election of the 538 EV, (0%) none of them were in states where no candidate received a popular vote majority.
1992 “Slick Willie” Bill Clinton captured 370 EV & 361 (97.56%) of them were in jurisdictions where he did not have a popular vote majority. Obviously, without those EV he is not even close to an Electoral College Majority. Bill was far short of a national popular vote majority. Are Democrats going to argue Bill’s victory was tainted because of that?
1992 George H.W. Bush received 168 EV & 168 (100%) of them were in states where he did not get a popular vote majority. He also was well short of a national popular vote majority.
In the 1992 POTUS election of the 538 EV, (529) 98.32% of them were in jurisdictions where nobody received a popular vote majority.
1996 “Slick Willie” Bill Clinton got 379 EV, 149 (39.31%) of those were in jurisdictions where he did not get a popular vote majority. Without those, he does not win a majority in the electoral college. He also was short of a national popular vote majority.
1996 Bob Dole got 159 EVs & 127 (79.87%) of those were in states where he did not capture a popular vote majority. He was well short of a national popular vote majority.
In the 1996 POTUS election, 276 of the 538 EV (51.3%) were in areas where nobody captured a popular vote majority.
2000 George W. Bush won 271 EV & 54 EV (19.92%) were in states where he did not capture a popular vote majority. He was short of a national popular vote majority. Without those EV, he does not have an Electoral College majority.
2000 “Uncle” Albert Gore Jr. won 267 EV & 44 EV (16.47%) were in states where he did not capture a popular vote majority. He was short of a national popular vote majority.
2000 POTUS election, 98 of the 538 EV (18.21%) were in states where nobody achieved a popular vote majority.
2004 George W. Bush received 286 EV, 12 (4.19%) of those were in states where he did not capture a popular vote majority. He received a national popular vote majority.
2004 The French-Looking Candidate John F. Kerry captured 252 EV & 10 (3.96%) of those were in states where he did not capture a popular vote majority.
2004 POTUS election, of the 538 EV, (4.08%) 22 of them were in states where nobody achieved a popular vote majority.
2008 Barry Hussein Obongo received 365 EV & 26 (7.12%) of those were in states where he did not capture a popular vote majority. He did capture the national popular vote majority. I am NOT adding an additional EV to his total (that is, total of EVs won in states where nobody hit the 50% threshold), due to winning an EV in Nebraska, which doles out its EVs by Congressional District. Obongo did not win a popular vote majority in NE but did win a majority in one of its CDs.
2008 John McCain obtained 173 EV, 14 (8.09%) of those were in states where he did not capture a popular vote majority.
In the 2008 POTUS election, 40 of the 538 EV (7.43%) were in states where nobody achieved a popular vote majority.
2012 Barack Obozo obtained 332 EV & 29 EV (8.73%) were in states where he did not capture a popular vote majority. He won a national popular vote majority.
2012 Mitt Romney obtained 206 EV & 0 EV (0%) were in jurisdictions where he failed to capture a popular vote majority.
In the 2012 POTUS election, 29 of the 538 EV (5.39%) were in jurisdictions where nobody captured a popular vote majority.
2016 Donald J. Trump captured 306 EV & 107 of those (34.96%) were in jurisdictions where he did not capture a popular vote majority. Without those EVs, he does not win an Electoral College Majority. I am NOT adding an additional EV to his total (EVs in jurisdictions where nobody hit 50% of the vote plus one), due to winning an EV in Maine, which doles out its EVs by Congressional District. Trump did not win a popular vote majority in ME but did win a majority in one of its CDs. Trump & Clinton were both short of a national popular vote majority.
2016 Shillary Clintonoid captured 232 EV, 50 EVs (21.55%) were in jurisdictions where prune face did not capture a popular vote majority.
In the 2016 POTUS election, of the 538 EV (29.18%), 157 of them were in states where no candidate captured a popular vote majority.
The % of Electoral Votes in POTUS elections from 1948-2016 that were given to candidates that did NOT achieve a popular vote *majority* in that particular state was (2,242 of 9,662) 23.2%.
The % of Electoral Votes (from states where they did NOT achieve a popular vote majority) in POTUS elections (1948-2016) that went to the person who achieved a majority in the electoral college is (1,387 of 6,867) 20.19%.
Now, we shift it a bit. The % of Electoral Votes (from states where they did NOT achieve a popular vote majority) in POTUS elections (1948-2016) that went to the person who achieved a majority in the electoral college *AND* received a national popular vote majority was (367 of 4,105) 8.94%.
***
2020 “Kid Sniffer” Joe Biden “captured” 306 EV & (57) 18.62% were in jurisdictions where the dementia patient did not capture a popular vote majority. Biden won a national popular vote majority, but sans those 57 EVs he does not win an electoral college majority.
2020 Donald J. Trump captured 232 EVs & (6.46%) 15 of them were in states where he did not capture a popular vote majority.
In the 2020 POTUS election, of the 538 EV, 72 (13.38%) of them were allocated to candidates that did not achieve a popular vote majority in that state.
Joe Biden supposedly received >51% of the national popular vote, a substantial win. Yet, the % of his Electoral Votes that came from states where he failed to breach the 50% mark was substantial.
If I calculate a Population Standard Deviation pertaining to the % of EVs *from states where nobody received a popular vote majority* from 1948-2016 for those who won the electoral college & achieved a national popular vote majority that = 13.4147 (2.48,2.4,0,0,14.47,48.05,0,0,4.19,7.12,8.73)
Joe Biden is on the upper end of that, but within 1SD (8.94+13.4147). The reason Ronald Reagan (in 1980) had such a high % of EVs in states where he failed to obtain a popular vote majority is because a disgruntled Republican named John Anderson was siphoning off some votes, enough to diminish Reagan’s support enough that in many of the states he won, he could not crest 50% there, despite doing so easily on a national level.
Joe Biden had no “major” opponent aside from Donald J. Trump. The % of EVs he received w/ not popular vote majority in the states (and thus, giving him the election) is alarming. And that’s about all I have to say about that.
***
Now to the stench known as Ranked Choice Voting, or a way to allow Lisa Murkowski to piggyback off of Democrat support to win a general election when she likely would’ve been dispatched in the GOP Primary. https://elections.alaska.gov/results/22GENR/US%20SEN.pdf https://www.elections.alaska.gov/election-results/e/?id=22genr https://www.elections.alaska.gov/results/22PRIM/ElectionSummaryReportRPT.pdf
One of the reasons Alaska & other states have either implemented Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) or are thinking about it is because many times the winner of the election fails to get a popular vote majority. That just means the Dems & GOP are not doing a good enough job & folks are looking elsewhere.
I told that to my father & he replied, “So what?!” I concur, so what? Look at all the POTUS elections where the person who took the oath of office got a slew of EVs from states where he was <50% & became POTUS because of that.
Look at all the POTUS elections where nobody received a popular vote majority. So what?
Bill Clinton never sniffed a popular vote majority, should we have had RCV & essentially make Perot voters determine the election by choosing between George H.W. Bush & Bill Clinton? Or does it only matter if it’s a statewide Senate seat?
What if Perot voters “teamed-up” to dispatch Bill Clinton? Were people “holding their nose voting for Perot” as well or were they the really smart voters who were proving how intelligent they are by refusing to vote for the “two-party duopoly”?
That’s the beauty of this system & I “threw away” my vote many times on the Libertarian. I knew Gary Johnson (I am still a Libertarian, but registered Republican once again) was not going to win in 2016 & I never answered the question, “If you had to choose between Hillary & Trump, who do you pick?” I never answered that because unlike the RCV clowns who supposedly know better, I did not vote strategically.
I was hoping Gary’s performance in 2016 was a springboard & then an idiot who pandered to #blacklivesmatter named Jo Jorgensen came along & I decided I was w/ Orange Man Bad.
The RCV clowns assume that because I voted Libertarian I was “throwing my vote away.” I never threw my vote away, period.
If you believe in your heart (or are so disenfranchised at the Republicans & Democrats that anyone else is better) that the Libertarians can fix this mess we are in, then work to convince others to join you.
People vote one way or another for many different reasons. When I caucused for Ron Paul in 2012 & Rand Paul in 2016, I was voting *FOR* both of them, not against anyone else.
When I decided to cast my lot w/ Orange Man Bad in 2020, it was because Biden & the child predators who want men in your daughter’s fitness center locker room or school bathroom must be stopped.
Who cares why people vote the way they vote; whether it’s because they despise one candidate more than another or because they love a candidate.
Joe Biden could’ve been replaced on the ballot by Pol Pot & Pol Pot would’ve gotten the same number of fake & real votes as Joe Biden, period.
Some people might vote for Candidate A because “while he is not perfect, he has a good chance to win the general election.”
Someone might vote for Candidate C “because he is not perfect and really who is perfect? Do you think that if we had 3 major parties & the Libertarians had a majority in Congress, we would be better off suddenly? Then the Greens or other indy candidates would be screeching about ‘Washington’s broken triopoly’ good old boys club. So, to argue that people are always holding their nose & want another alternative is a façade much of the time.” How do you like them apples?
Nobody w/ a pulse is going to argue that Ronald Reagan’s win in 1980 was not a tsunami but look at all the states where he failed to gain a popular vote majority. The only reason was because there was another Republican siphoning off votes from him.
The same goes for a lot of other races, the Libertarians steal some Republican-leaning support & perhaps the Green Party siphons off some disgruntled Communists who don’t believe that groomers like Joe Biden are redistributing enough $ for their liking.
Many proponents of RCV assume much of the above, that their *REAL* preferences are someone else & thus we need RCV. Uh, ok. If those were their preferences, how come the failure to attain 50.1% of the vote? [X NOTE]
It just means the election is contentious, there are a lot of viewpoints, presumably a lot of candidates & We The People are having a difficult time picking a winner. Just because nobody hits 50.1% doesn’t mean voters are holding their nose & choosing the lesser-of-two-evils?
Richard Nixon won >60% of the popular vote in 1972 & LBJ won 61% of it in 1964, people could have just as easily been “holding their nose” voting for those clowns as when George W. Bush won in 2000 w/ 47.87% of the popular vote. The only difference is in the former two elections, there were a much higher proportion of the electorate “holding their nose” whilst voting for Tricky Dick & “Landslide” Ballot Stuffer Johnson.
See what I did there?
***
https://www.theepochtimes.com/south-dakota-bans-left-favoring-ranked-choice-voting_5148317.html
[X NOTE] https://web.archive.org/web/20181205041531/https://ivn.us/2018/12/04/ranked-choice-voting-survives-one-person-one-vote-challenge/
Here’s a debunking of some of the common talking points for RCV:
“One of the most prominent arguments against ranked choice voting, outside its complexity, is that voters end up getting multiple votes, so it must violate the constitutional precedent of “one person, one vote.”
“The problem with this argument is a fundamental misunderstanding of ranked choice voting and how it works. Voters don’t get multiple votes. They only get a single vote that counts toward the results… The technical term is single transferable vote. The idea is to show how these voters would ultimately vote should runoff elections be needed to produce a winner with majority support without using additional taxpayer dollars and resources for new elections.”
Rebuttal: Calling it a “single, transferable vote” is semantics, or better yet moving goalposts. If you are going to “throw your vote away” on a “third party” candidate then do so, but as I mentioned above, maybe they’re not “throwing it away,” maybe they are all-in for the Green Party or Libertarian Party. I was all-in for the Libertarians for about a decade & then I realized my best chance is to try to get the best Republican nominated in the primary. The open-borders zealots in the Libertarian Party were also quite annoying (some Libertarians, such as Larry Sharpe are NOT open borders zealots).
It's not a single vote if you are ranking all the candidates, you should just admit that. Another common rejoinder https://ballotpedia.org/Ranked-choice_voting_(RCV) is: “In a ranked-choice election, the only way to waste your vote is to actually vote against a candidate. As long as the candidate you like least doesn’t reach the 50 percent threshold, they won’t win. So only positive votes matter. ... Ranked-choice voting effectively allows voters to vote their actual preferences instead of having to vote strategically. This would have a meaningful impact on elections and governing. It would empower independent and third party candidates by eliminating the “wasted vote” argument.”
That bile courtesy of Greg Orman, who ran a sham Senate campaign (backed by the Democrat Party) in Kansas back in 2014. The Dems did not run a candidate & instead backed a stealth Democrat masquerading as an Independent. The voters did not buy it.
I am amazed at Orman’s ability to read the minds of millions of people. I am shocked that w/ this ability, the moron was not able to win a Senate seat. Who does Orman “like least”? Adolph Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot or Vladimir Lenin?
Orman’s tacit admission is that RCV is not for preferences, but is strategic, despite what he says above. If Libertarians were the actual preference of We The People, if third-party candidates were the actual preference, then they would have won more than just four https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_third_party_and_independent_performances_in_United_States_elections Senate elections (Angus King & “Parkay Teeth” Bernie Sanders, both in 2012 & 2018. The latter never ran against a Democrat and a Republican in the same election, King did, so his case is an actual win by an Independent, not one where the Democrats realized they had a dyed-in-the-wool Communist, so they did not nominate a candidate. King also won the gubernatorial sweepstakes twice as an Indy, defeating a Republican & a Democrat each time) since 1990 & more than 6 Gubernatorial elections in the same time frame.
Independent candidates do much better in Gubernatorial races than in the Senate. In the Senate, they don’t even get 5% of the vote about 91% of the time. Yeah, voters are really gravitating towards those folks & Orman (as well as his RCV enablers) want to pretend that those are the real smart voters who are pissed-off about that dang duopoly in Washington & we must give them a voice.
They’re an outlier, period & the data shows that. So, either join the Republicans or the Democrats & get involved in primaries (so we can get more Rand Paul & Thomas Massie, less Mitch McConnell & Susan Collins) or keep voting for candidates that get 2% of the vote.
They’re trying to get third-party voters involved, as if they’re not already involved. It’s not empowering those third-party voters as Orman stated, it’s allowing them to choose between the Republican & Democrat when their candidate does not win.
But, but, the Republicans & Democrats suck, so RCV is allowing the lesser-of-two-evils to breach the 50% threshold in an election where they otherwise would not.
Choose the Republican or the Democrat then or keep trying to grow your third-party base. I tried it for about a decade, it was frustrating. I digress.
Now back to the IVN Network bile: “In a system that at every institutional level tells voters there are only two viable options — Republican or Democrat — this causes many voters to cast their ballots strategically, leading to “lesser-of-two-evils” voting (i.e. voting against the least preferred candidate rather than the preferred candidate) and vote splitting.”
More mind reading. These are the same folks who think America is a democracy. https://ivn.us/posts/forward-podcast-do-voters-really-care-about-democracy This system also tells folks that Social Security is not a Ponzi Scheme, the federal government has an obligation to “educate” our children & how many of these folks have ever read or comprehend Article I Section I or Article I Section VII of our Constitution? I digress.
[NOTE: This is a kook group that is pushing back against closed primaries. https://ivn.us/posts/opinion-if-we-want-young-people-vote-ny-open-primaries https://ivn.us/posts/video-who-will-give-1-million-independent-penn-voters-equal-vote https://ivn.us/posts/new-mexico-ready-end-closed-primaries Closed primaries are not voter suppression. https://ballotpedia.org/Closed_primary Because the GOP or the Dummycrats require you to actually be a member (a golf course banning non-members from their venue is not suppression either) of their clique to vote in their primary is not suppression, it’s common sense. I would require all voter registration to end 60 days before an election & if you are registered & want to vote in the GOP primary, you must also register w/ them 60 days prior or you don’t vote. You could also get involved w/ the Libertarian Party or Green Party, two lesser political parties that usually have a candidate on the ballot in most states, especially the former. I don’t want independent voters or registered Democrats voting in my GOP primary. Remember the angst towards Rush Limbaugh’s “Operation Chaos” in the 2008 Democrat primary? Closed primaries would stop that, so quit whining or get involved w/ a specific political party. I should also point out that trying to get Independent voters involved in primaries is a bit odd because the vast majority of Republicans & Democrats don’t bother to get involved in primaries. Maybe urge more of them to turnout? It’s also a fact that during midterm elections, turnout is much, much lower than POTUS election years. Maybe urge more registered Republicans & Dums to get to their own primary?]
[NOTE: It is true (I remember Gary Johnson mentioning this in 2016; more Americans are NOT registered w/ the GOP or Democrats alone) that indy voters make up the biggest voting bloc in America. So, if it’s true that in general elections people are holding their nose, voting for the lesser-of-two-evils Democrat or Republican, why do those indy voters keep voting for them? If all those indy voters got together & were as organized as the Demoncrat kiddie groomers or the Republicans, they could elect the President. They could all vote for the Libertarian candidate & guess what? We would have a third-party President. So, perhaps people are more likely to “hold their nose” for the Republican or Democrat than the Libertarian or Green Party whack job. Needless to say, I don’t really buy the “holding your nose” argument. Maybe all the candidates are so bad, you have to hold your nose for someone & to date, anyone not a Republican or Democrat is not even worth holding one’s nose for. So yes, in most states there are more people not affiliated w/ the Democrats & Republicans, but by golly they still vote for them 95+% of the time. Odd? https://independentvoterproject.org/petition/end-rigged-elections https://elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov/ror/123day-gen-2020/historical-reg-stats.pdf https://www.cnn.com/election/2022/results/california/primaries/governor If ALL of California’s indy voters got together behind a third-party candidate, they would be able to, by their sheer numbers get a candidate into the runoff. Yet, they continue to hold their nose for Fascists like Gavin Newsom. Go figure]
Wouldn’t the least-preferred candidate be the person who got the fewest votes? Or at the very least major parties that can get on most state ballots?
Speaking for Iowa, in all Gubernatorial elections since 2006, we have had a Republican, Democrat & Libertarian candidate. I guess the Greens are the least-preferred because after 2006 they were not able to even make the ballot & have never received more than 1.43% of the vote.
In Senate elections, the Greens rarely even get on the ballot. Most of the time the Libertarians do, but they get a skosh over 2%, if they are lucky. Why is that? They cannot raise the money (and ending campaign finance laws that limit $ donated directly to candidates would help 3rd party candidates more than anything else) & they cannot get the signatures to get on the ballot.
What does that mean? They are the least-preferred candidates you morons!
Sounds like the Greens & Libertarians are the ones the voters are scared of, but for some reason these nutcases think the voters are scared of the folks who get 95-100% of the vote in virtually every election. And yes, you should be scared of the Democrats because they want to allow male pedophiles in your daughter’s locker room.
Maybe the voters are idiots? Congress routinely has approval ratings right up there w/ STDs & cockroaches, no matter who controls Congress. The national debt continues to skyrocket & the economy has been tepid since the Tech Bubble popped. The economy has been in the crapper for the better part of 3 years.
Congress has approval ratings in the toilet, voters throw the bums out. The debt continues to skyrocket, Congress has approval ratings in the toilet, the voters throw the bums out, Congress has low approval ratings, the debt continues to skyrocket, the voters throw the bums out, Congress has approval ratings in the toilet.
Maybe the voters should fire themselves? Maybe if the shelves are empty for 3 or 4 months that will be the wake-up call we need. I hope it happens, the pain will be immense, but what doesn’t kill me (and empty shelves for 4 months will not kill me) will quite possibly wake America up & make it stronger in the long run. I digress.
More from the IVN article: “Instant runoff voting (the most popular form of ranked choice voting among US reformers) is an alternative voting method that is designed to remedy these problems that affect voter choice and empowerment.”
Rebuttal: Calling this an “instant” runoff is another use of semantics. For example, in Georgia https://ballotpedia.org/Runoff_election there is a runoff election the following month after the general election if no candidate hits 50% (plus one vote) of all votes cast. I understand the urge to avoid making voters go to the polls again, especially if they voted in the primary. I also understand the urge to include more than the top two as rarely there is a 3rd party or write-in candidate that gets a substantial % of the vote.
This would be three trips to the polls in about 5 months, depending on when you had your primary.
In Georgia & Louisiana (although the latter has a “jungle-primary”, Ballotpedia calls it https://ballotpedia.org/Jungle_primary the “Louisiana majority-vote system”) the top two advance to the runoff & the RCV in Alaska manipulated it so they could get marginal candidates & their voters involved. Instead of the top two advancing from a crowded primary, they made it four. How is someone supposed to get 50% (although Gavin Newsom did it in the 2022 primary) when you have 19 candidates on the ballot?
Even Chuck Grassley, as popular as he is in Iowa, would have a difficult time hitting the 50% threshold in a jungle primary, as there would likely be several Republicans challenging him. He may get 50%, but it would become much more difficult as more Republicans got in the race.
If I was to implement RCV in an electoral system, I would let the Libertarians, Greens, Republicans & Dumocrats have their primaries & then have that system in the general election – I would avoid a jungle primary where you can have numerous Republicans, numerous Democrats, a few Libertarians & a few other “independent candidates” on the ballot.
But I am not in favor of RCV, don’t allow marginal candidates to decide the election, if they were so popular, they would not be marginal.
You could also amend your State Constitution, in the event of the Governor’s race not having a candidate hit 50.001%, allow the legislature to vote in their preferred candidate among the top two (or perhaps all candidates that breach the 10% mark, I’m amenable). They are directly elected by We The People, they could decide.
[NOTE: Repealing the 17th Amendment & sending Senate elections back to the legislatures as it was intended would end a lot of this dark money spending in Senate races if that irritates you & it would keep people from making the Senate their career, I guarantee it]
If they fail to give a preference by the time the new Administration steps in, whomever is Speaker of the House take the reins until the Legislature makes a decision.
The top two vote-getters in Alaska’s crowded primary in the summer of 2022 received 83.6% (Lisa Murkowski & Kelly Tshibaka) of the vote, yet the top four advanced & the next two were marginal candidates (Patricia Chesbro got 6.82% & Buzz Kelley received 2.13%). This is definitive proof that there should be a GOP Primary prior to this & one of those heavyweights would be gone.
This was an open primary disaster that ensured nobody would get 50% or virtually ensured that. I will reiterate, I am for closed primaries. It keeps Republicans from meddling w/ the Democrat primary & vice-versa.
All “Democrat” candidates received a combined 8.86% of the vote in the 2022 primary. That is far less than what the Democrat nominee received in any Senate general election from 1998 (they received a paltry 10.51% in 2002 & 11.62% in 2016, probably due to Murkowski being opposed by the man who defeated her in the GOP primary back in 2010. Joe Miller ran as a Libertarian) to 2022 & is indicative of a lot of third-party votes probably for Murkowski.
Lisa Murkowski has been subjected to primary challenges every single time since her father appointed her in an act of nepotism. In 2004, she received over 50% of the vote in a tough GOP primary & did the same in 2016, although the former was much closer.
In 2010, she was defeated, her opponent even getting a popular vote majority & that’s when she mounted a write-in campaign & was obviously saved by non-Republican voters in the general. That is their right, if they want to do so but they had to choose – save Murkowski or “throw your vote away.”
If each party had its primary, Murkowski would’ve likely been toast & not even part of the equation unless she mounts a write-in campaign as she did in 2010. Then, let those who vote for marginal candidates save her again, if they want to.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/south-dakota-bans-left-favoring-ranked-choice-voting_5148317.html I would advise you to write your elected officials & do what South Dakota did, kibosh RCV.
[NOTE: Alaskan Democrat Mary Peltola won the state’s at-large congressional seat during the same mid-terms, even though “nearly 60 percent of voters cast their ballots for a Republican,” the Federalist reported. https://thefederalist.com/2023/01/11/ranked-choice-voting-keeps-rigging-elections/ ]
Lunatic Regressives are doing all they can to get marginal voters to the polls, everything but educating people on the Constitution. They want to mail out ballots to everyone, they want everyone registered automatically, they turned welfare offices into voter registration centers & now they want cluttered, convoluted RCV-style open primaries.
It’s not really that hard to vote & if you have to cajole people that much, they probably should not vote. I have changed my voter registration before, it’s not difficult.
If those independent voters want a voice, get behind the Libertarian or Green Party, they would probably love to have you. Most of these indy voters end up casting a ballot for a Republican or Democrat anyways (read: They hold their noses for the main parties & NOT the Libertarians, Green Teeth Party or any other “Independent” candidate), so they should hitch their wagon to one of them & get involved in primaries. I too, have voted in a lot of primary elections because that may be the difference between nominating a Rand Paul or a squish like Mitt Romney.
Make those “disaffected voters” who cast their ballots for marginal candidates (again, I have voted for a lot of folks over the years that got ~3-4% of the vote) either continue doing so or hitch their wagon to one of the big boys.
In an election where there are more “heavyweights” (like MN’s gubernatorial election that went to Jesse Ventura, the 1992 POTUS election & several gubernatorial sweepstakes in ME, just to name a few), it becomes less likely anyone will get a popular vote majority & a RCV-style open primary ensures that.
Why not have all party primaries (The Libertarians usually have a candidate, especially in AK) & then implement RCV? I presume then you’d have an amalgamation of Indy candidates (some of them outliers, some of them heavyweights) doing the flight-of-the-bumblebee to get on the ballot. You might have 5 or 6 in the general where RCV comes in, instead of 19.
Why the top four? Why not implement a threshold where only candidates that hit 25% (plus one vote, ensuring no more than three move on) move on & if there are no 25% vote getters (or only one) you take the top two (Yes, 25% is arbitrary, someone else might prefer 10% to get more clowns in). If there were only two, we’d essentially have a re-run of Murkowski getting dumped in the general election, although it is possible that indy voters may have saved her again.
25% plus one is a good threshold, it would keep marginal candidates out of the general & would probably be a better barometer. You would have a lot of “disaffected” third-party voters (who usually vote Libertarian or Alaskan Independence) forced to vote for Murkowski or Kelly Tshibaka or you can just sit on your duff at home & sit it out.
This system is not new, but it is certainly a diversion from the norm.
I don’t think they are trying to get more third-party candidates elected, because a monstrosity of a primary w/ 19 people on the ballot is certainly less-likely to see an “Independent” make it to the general, they just want the small % of voters (AK has elected two “Independent” Governors & several people to their legislature) who do not vote Republican or Democrat to “have a say.”
If you want to “have a say,” do what some voters have done in ME or AK over the past few decades. Get behind an Indy candidate & vote them into office; your numbers in most states are large enough, but they keep “holding their nose” (or that is what we are told) for the Democrat or Republican.
I don’t buy it that people are begging for another option when the Dums & Republicans continue to dominate elections. For the record, I do not favor public funding of elections, I don’t favor public funding in most things as it is either unconstitutional and/or ineffective.
I would avoid what Georgia or Louisiana does, where you could have the voters going to the polls on the same race 3 times. Murkowski & her Democrat allies did not want something like GA’s system where the top two move on because that would not allow Democrats to vote for Chesbro & then rank Lisa second.
The Dummycrat might respond, “If it was just Murkowski in the general against Kelly, we would do that.” Ok, then go do it!
Or we can just continue the same system that was in place for many decades & quit whining because you get 40% or less of the vote, but the person that defeated you only got ~48%. Get better at convincing people to vote your way.
Why are we so obsessed w/ increasing turnout & not educating voters? Regressive Democrats do not want voters educated. I can use Story County, Iowa Supervisor Latifah Faisal as an example. She never mentions the national debt when whining about this country & she never mentions the Constitution, because she has no working knowledge of this. She knows how to say, “The government (read: taxpayers) should pay for your internet, because freedom & stuff.” Not much else up in that tiny brainpan.
This goes for a LOT of elected Democrats & most of their voters. It’s not as if you’re going to have some nuanced conversation w/ these idiots over Article I Section I (who is THE lawmaker?) or Article I Section VII (All Bills raising revenues shall originate in the Peoples’ House), just get out & vote.
It reminds me of the Super Bowl, which I have not watched for eons. #superbowl #whocares There are a lot of people who know squat about football & most do not care, but when the Super Bowl comes around, they have 850 tons of food, a pony keg & a good time.
The same goes for voting, they don’t know much, they don’t pay attention (but by golly, they have a 3-sentence rejoinder on topics educated folks have written books about), but they’ll vote. As an aside, people who know jack squat about football also know what play should have been called w/ one minute left in the game.
I would rather increase turnout of educated voters, not zombies who just know how to recite the things they want other people to pay for.
I will reiterate again, https://ivn.us/2018/12/03/gop-asking-tennessees-lawmakers-close-states-open-primaries closed primaries are not voter suppression, this is a retarded argument. I was a registered Libertarian; you can get involved.
It’s not that hard to register as a Republican to vote in their primaries & it forces people to do so if they want to vote for the dumbest Republican, to make it easier for someone else to win. If you want to vote in the GOP or Democrat primary that bad, then register w/ that party, period.
Get campaign finance laws changed that allow massive donations directly to a candidate, that would allow some well-heeled, well-financed person to donate to an Independent candidate &get his message out on the airwaves. Keeping that system in place only helps the GOP & Democrats.
Or get that large number of independent voters together & get someone outside the box elected. It can be done!
The IVN article engages in more mind reading: “The idea behind ranked choice voting is that voters can show which candidate they prefer most without feeling like they are wasting their vote, while also showing their preference for the top vote getters should no one get a majority. In many ways, this upholds the precedent of “one person, one vote” better than the choose-one voting system, because it gives voters the confidence to express their true preference in an election while also ensuring they get an equal vote in the final results.”
And again, if the true preference of the voters was a lesser candidate, more would win or be competitive, but they are not. The idea of “wasting your vote” is contrived, just a way to allow people who do not vote for a Republican or Democrat to be swing voters.
[NOTE: I would argue Joe Biden’s voters are not holding their noses. The COVID-19 lockdowns gave them the option of being underemployed & poor or sitting at home on their fat duffs, getting paid to watch Netflix. They don’t have much to lose. In addition, they voted for Biden because the 6 years it took them to get a useless degree translates to a lot of possible retirement savings (maybe that is giving them too much credit) squandered dealing w/ that debt. They want me & my boss to pay for that, despite the fact that our families already footed the bill for that]
And AGAIN (!) most states have enough unaffiliated voters they could elect a Libertarian or some other “Independent” candidate, but they do not. They’re not involved enough to register w/ one of the two major parties, but they still vote for them. Sounds like they need to get more involved.
It’s one person, several votes when you can “throw your vote away” on Patricia Chesbro & then save Lisa Murkowski from defeat in the 2nd round. That’s two votes to me, calling it “a single, transferable vote” is semantics.
AK’s RCV allowed two marginal candidates into the general election, period.
In conclusion, make sure your elected representatives know (and in most cases, a candidate obtaining 50% is not a problem & if not, “so what” as my father would say) that you oppose this RCV garbage & ask them to close your primaries, we don’t need Republicans & Democrats crossing over to vote for candidates they prefer to face & if you are an unaffiliated voter, register w/ one of the two major parties, get more Rand Pauls elected or do your best to get Libertarians elected.
I am working to get more Libertarian-leaning (sans the open borders garbage) Republicans elected & defeat as many Democrats as possible, they are toxic to society & will be judged accordingly for their sins against children (I’m talking those borderline-pedophiles that have a penis, wanting to hang out in the same pool locker room as little girls). If voting Republican to stop male pedophiles from hanging out in the same fitness center locker room as my daughter is “holding my nose” then count me in as a nose-holder.
Mr. Chairman, I Yield Back!
***
Like Perry Mason “Just one more question” or Columbo “just one more thing” I am back. I was going to tally the margin of victories for Senate races & compare them w/ Alaska, but that would be a lot of work.
Sometimes (although not often) one party does not bother to field a candidate (that is more common in the House) & sometimes you have two folks from the same party running against each other in the general.
Therefore, tallying the margin of victory would be quite tedious & not give us a good evaluation of AK Senate races in relation to all Senate races en masse.
So, beginning in 2004, which was AK’s first Senate race where the winner failed to attain a popular vote majority – I will compare all those races w/ all Senate races where the winner failed to obtain a popular vote majority, using Dave Leip’s data. https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/
Since 2004, there have been (and I am NOT counting 2022, as their jungle primary/RCV virtually ensured that nobody would get 50%) six AK Senate contests & 5 of them (83.33%) of them had a winner that did not capture a popular vote majority.
Prior to 2004, only one time did an AK Senate race feature a winner who did not capture a popular vote majority. In addition, there were only two candidates on the general election ballot much of the time, so it was guaranteed that someone gets 50% plus one.
Those dang third-party voters, siphoning off support (I am being facetious)! It was bound to happen.
Of those 5 AK Senate contests where no popular vote majority was obtained, the average margin of victory was 5.122% (3.03, 1.25, 4, 2.13, 15.2). It should be noted in one of those contests, the winner did not achieve 40% & that is uber-rare. That was the year Murkowski mounted a write-in campaign after the GOP ditched her in favor of Joe Miller.
There are a lot of AK voters who are disenfranchised w/ the two main parties & it is also obvious that a lot of AK unaffiliated voters like Lisa Murkowski. Registered Republicans? Not so much.
In 2020, 2016, 2014, 2010, 2008 & 2004 there were 203 Senate contests & 23 of them met my criteria, nobody captured a popular vote majority. That’s 11.33% of all Senate contests. Much lower than the % in AK since 2004, but more than one in ten. It’s uncommon, but not unheard of.
[NOTE: No special elections counted unless they were in the November election cycle. If there was a runoff, it counts as an election w/ no popular vote majority & that requires a runoff in some states. I am only counting LA Senate contests in 2008 & 2010, as their silly jungle primary system was NOT in place for those races. I am also not counting the GA 2020 runoff for Johnny Isakson’s empty seat as the general election was a “jungle primary”]
The average margin of victory in those 23 races was (1.11, 3.03, 0.01, 1.24, 2.92, 3.35, 1.6, 1.68, 4.01, 0.81, 1.56, 1.94, 2.13, 0.14, 1.43, 2.43, 2.79, 5.66, 15.2, 1.78, 1.69, 1.75, 5.24) 2.76%, much lower than the margins in those AK Senate races where nobody received a popular vote majority. Population Standard Deviation for the 23 data points above = 2.982%.
The average margin of victory in AK Senate races that did NOT have a popular vote majority winner was *almost* one standard deviation above the average for all 23 of those Senate races, so the victors in AK have margins much higher than the typical Senate race sans a popular vote majority winner.
If you separate AK’s 5 senate races sans a popular vote majority winner from those 23 (leaving us w/ 18 races), then you have an outlier. AK’s Senate races where nobody gets a popular vote majority have much higher margins than races in other states where nobody received 50% plus one. Get it?
Some clowns will say, “Derp, we need more RCV in every state, derp.” Would you rather win a race w/ 50.07% of the vote & the 2nd place finisher received 49.76% of the vote OR win w/ 49% of the vote & 2nd place was back at 40.2%?
You see, just because nobody gets 50% plus one does not mean some travesty has occurred, but it does mean you may be within striking distance if you can convince more new voters to be in your bloc & convince others to turn away from the dark side.
In the case of the Democrats, see how many people you can cajole into being paid to do basically nothing & more stimulus payments on top of “free” college & “free” electric cars.
I do commend AK for avoiding another election round, as runoffs in GA typically have much lower turnout than the general. I would not sit at home, but I would also avoid a 3rd election (primary, general, runoff) in one year for a specific office. That can create voting burnout.
To finally conclude this rambling spiel, I would write your State Senator, State Representative, Governor & anyone else who will listen (and feel free to use my info) & urge them to kibosh any push for RCV voting, especially in the manner Alaska conducts it.
I think I have made all my points several times, be vigilant my friends. Mr. Chairman, I Finally Yield Back!
PS In a way, third party voters already decide a lot of elections. Their decisions ensure the Democrat & Republican candidates get <50% of the vote.
387
views
1
comment
Election Denier Jen Psaki vs Chris Sununu
Election Denier Jan Psaki vs Chris Sununu
“I’ll circle back to you on that” vegetable Jen Psaki was being a purveyor of The Big Lie recently & New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu was having none of it.
Democrats like Jen Psaki, Hillary Clinton & the divorcee Sam Seder #samseder #majorityreport have the audacity to whine about Donald Trump and election denialism, when they invented “election denialism.” https://rumble.com/v1ou9vw-kari-lake-decimates-the-democrat-media-on-the-big-lie.html
Quit regurgitating The Big Lie ladies.
Lastly, I’ve debunked Democrat “Republican Voter Suppression” talking points w/ actual data https://rumble.com/v24tyd2-divorcee-sam-seder-debunked-on-republican-voter-suppression.htmlA list of entities you can sue, because they require a Photo ID for many things http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/democrat-vote-fraud Are we gutting Medicaid rights because they require an ID to enroll (or at least officially tell you they need one)
PS the most violent counties in America have beaucoup black on black murder & they tend to vote Democrat. Why is that? https://rumble.com/v2ahqta-divorcee-sam-seder-vs.-utubekookdetector-black-on-black-crime.html http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/black-lives-do-not-matter http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/sam-seder-ilhan-omar-racism3
***
I recently had it out w/ a Sam Seder supporter who has absolutely lost his mind since I defeated him not once, but twice. The guy I debunked in these videos is so incensed by his defeat that he's logging into his (at least 3) sock puppet accounts to thumb down all my comments to -2 so people cannot see them unless they're logged in. He cannot debate, but he spends hours scouring my comments on Rumble to thumb them down. What's the matter old man, can't debate? His only advantage is lots of free time. He also may challenge you to a "debate" on Zoom, but do not go for it, he is trolling for personal info.
See https://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/what-s-new 5.29.23 entry, he tried responding to me from his YouTube channel & deleted the comment, but I found out the URL. This will give you the skinny on him. The worst he can do is spend all day on his fat duff in front of the computer, logging into his various accounts, giving you a thumbs down on all his comments, because he obviously cannot debate.
178
views
1
comment
Election Denier Sam Seder vs Scott Walker
The creepy https://rumble.com/vcj22f-face-bloat-stan-seder-i-mean-sam-seder-vs.-face-bloat-stan-seder.html divorcee Sam Seder was recently regurgitating The Big Lie (again), stating that Scott Walker & Republicans in Wisconsin “gutted voting rights” & thus somehow stole an election or two up in Badgerland.
I’ve debunked Sam Seder’s fact-free, generalized, hearsay-laden rants on “Republican Voter Suppression.” https://rumble.com/v24tyd2-divorcee-sam-seder-debunked-on-republican-voter-suppression.html
And Democrats have the audacity to whine about Donald Trump and election denialism, when they invented “election denialism.” https://rumble.com/v1ou9vw-kari-lake-decimates-the-democrat-media-on-the-big-lie.html
A list of entities you can sue, because they require a Photo ID for many things http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/democrat-vote-fraud Are we gutting Medicaid rights because they require an ID to enroll (or at least officially tell you they need one)
*****
I recently had it out w/ a Sam Seder supporter who has absolutely lost his mind since I defeated him not once, but twice. The guy I debunked in these videos is so incensed by his defeat that he's logging into his (at least 3) his sock puppet accounts to thumb down all my comments to -2 so ppl cannot see the unless they're logged in. He cannot debate, but he spends hours scouring my comments on Rumble to thumb them down. What's the matter old man, can't debate? His only advantage is lots of free time. He also may challenge you to a "debate" on Zoom, but do not go for it, he is trolling for info.
See https://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/what-s-new 5.29.23 entry, he tried responding to me from his YouTube channel & deleted the comment, but I found out the URL. This will give you the skinny on him. The worst he can do is spend all day on his fat duff in front of the computer, logging into his various accounts, giving you a thumbs down on all his comments, because he obviously cannot debate.
208
views
1
comment
Charlie Kirk subdues #blacklivesmatter & #whitesupremacy
Recently, Charlie Kirk chronicled the devastation caused by the fatherless children in the #blacklivesmatter movement & asked who many more black folks were murdered because the BLM movement got their fatherless supporters ginned-up, causing them to have fits & wreck their communities.
I believe I can come close to answering that question: In a typical year, more blacks are murdered than all other races combined & they are usually murdered by other black folks.
Why is that? Why aren’t Asians murdering Asians in droves indiscriminately? Maybe because they grew up w/ a daddy in the home & did not brainwash their kids from birth inside the home & at a failing government school that the world is against them & they’ll fail?
http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/sam-seder-ilhan-omar-racism3 https://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/black-lives-do-not-matter https://rumble.com/v2ahqta-divorcee-sam-seder-vs.-utubekookdetector-black-on-black-crime.html
According to the FBI, the U.S. murder/non-negligent manslaughter rate 2016-2019 = 5.2 per 100,000.
The murder/non-negligent manslaughter rate 2020-21 = 6.8 per 100,000 – a staggering increase.
Keep in mind, the FBI usually adjusts the previous year total when the current report comes out.
Now, let us look at the NIBRS data & find out what % of murder victims & offenders (where we KNOW the race of the victim or perp) were Black 2016-19. That was 23,688 offenders & (13,385) 56.5% of them were Black. That is very disproportionate!
If a Progressive lunch meat slicer takes issue w/ that, I will point out that 23,688 is a pretty good sample size of all murder offenders. Deal w/ it and/or get an education at a parochial school, so you can learn something aside from autistically-reciting your pronouns.
From 2016-19 of the 21,695 victims where we KNOW the race of the victim, (11,193) 51.59% of the victims were Black. That is also very disproportionate!
From 2020-21, the NIBRS data gives us 23,034 murder offenders where we KNOW the race of the offender. Of those 23,034 offenders, (13,707) 59.5% of them were Black. That is also very disproportionate!!
From 2020-2021, the NIBRS data gives us 24,584 victims of murder & of those 24,584 victims, (14,382) 58.5% were Black.
The murder rate (per 100,000) was much, much higher in the latter (2020-2021) time frame than the former (2016-2019) & the % of murder victims that were Black & offenders that were Black increased substantially as well.
It appears that despite the whining of carnival barkers like the divorcee Stan Seder, #blacklivesmatter accomplished what they wanted to accomplish. They created more chaos, they pined for fragmented families because they hate nuclear families & they used millions of idiots as pawns in their game.
I realize more jurisdictions are going to NIBRS data, so this may not correlate exactly, but from 2016-2019, there were 2,798.25 black people murdered each year. From 2020-2021 it was 7,191 black people murdered each year.
It is NOT a stretch to say that #AOC the mentally ill divorcee Sam Seder, Maxine Waters & the rest of the BLM crew caused 8 thousand more black people to be murdered because they wanted race riots over the George Floyd events. Think about that, 8 thousand black people are dead because of the BLM riots, most likely.
They cared not that this caused a lot of innocent black folks to get murdered in the wake of these events, they were trying to intimidate all of America, give us what we want, or we riot.
Well, if you riot in Iowa & block the street you will get arrested. If you riot in Iowa & attempt to burn businesses down, you will end up in prison or if you’re really unlucky, you might run into a concealed carrier defending his business.
You see, folks like #AOC the divorcee Sam Seder, Maxine Waters, Don Lemon, Anderson Cooper, Patrisse Cullors, the obese Joy Reid, the bi-polar Ana Kasparian, Mr. Milequetoast Chris Hayes & the rest of them do not care, they were hoping their Marxist vision for America would be realized in the wake of the riots, but all they did was cause millions of people to leave NY, NJ, MA, IL &, CA for states that don’t allow violent felons to run loose & flaunt the rule of law.
That will not happen in Iowa, you try that here & you will get a reckoning. That might fly in California, that might work in New York City, Portland or Chicago. But try it here & it will be the final time. Guaranteed!
Those folks will be sitting on their asses doing nothing, but they do realize in chess, the pawns go first. They’ll remain on the outside looking in, until the shelves are empty & then I will have a good laugh. Maybe then America will get the reset it needs.
The Democrats realize rural America is a threat to their vision, we own our homes, we are stockpiling non-perishable items among other things (cough, cough) & we do not allow fatherless children to burn half the town down, like what has happened in Portland & the Twin Cities.
Think about that folks, 8 thousand more black people murdered over the death of a career drug addict & criminal, all because they want me & you to finance the health care of drug addicts & let career felons escape the prison terms they deserve. Jordan Neely is perfect example of that. He was a bully who bullied children & the elderly, until he picked on the wrong Marine.
The biggest threat to black folks in America is not #whitesupremacy & it’s not someone waving the Confederate Flag or the police. It is other blacks & particularly, young black men. #blacklivesmatter hates the nuclear family, they want more dysfunctional fatherless children because they’re more malleable & will vote Democrat. https://rumble.com/v2s3ci2-blacklivesmatter-sam-seder-and-the-rock-have-something-in-common.html
546
views
2
comments
#blacklivesmatter Sam Seder & The Rock have something in common
Apparently #blacklivesmatter has scrubbed their website of some anti-nuclear family information, just in time for the election (lol). I would say that perhaps they’ve realized since the Black/African-American community has been ravaged by fatherless households, but they only did it because it might turn some folks off to their sociopathology.
Don’t worry DUHwayne “The Rock” Johnson, don’t worry Sam Seder -- #blacklivesmatter #39144 isn’t good at nuclear families either.
The only links you’ll need
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=2967591673477229&id=1400591836843895
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoA9J0G6s-6owc0S5klji-hEBtbAzbloB
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=2909861932583537&id=1400591836843895
PS, if you want to read a short note about the “nuclear family” vs. the Biblical extended-family concept see the note on Luke 2:48-50 https://www.tektonics.org/TK-LK.php
This was originally uploaded on YouTube back in October 2020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktSxzDraEDw
108
views
1
comment
The COVID-19 Vaccines Are Going To Save Us, Maybe, Not Really Part V
My previous videos on this topic: https://rumble.com/vra04h-the-covid-19-vaccines-will-save-us-maybe-not-really.html https://rumble.com/vwvczy-the-covid-19-vaccines-are-going-to-save-us-maybe-not-really-part-iii.html https://rumble.com/vuf6u0-the-covid-19-vaccines-are-going-to-save-us-maybe-not-really-part-ii.html https://rumble.com/v1g5lw5-the-covid-19-vaccines-are-going-to-save-us-maybe-not-really-part-iv.html
They (the CDC, Washington) lied to us & were willing to fire everyone (but they did not get their way thankfully) for not taking an experimental "shot." I told my employer, I am not taking it period. I did not take this experimental clot-shot & I will NOT ever take it.
The COVID-19 lockdowns https://rumble.com/v2rgw38-covid-19-lockdowns-get-nuked.html & this faux "vaccine" are the biggest health care debacle in modern American history.
172
views
1
comment
COVID-19 Lockdowns get NUKED!
It's a bad day to be a #BranchCovidian like the creep Sam Seder, pencil-necked Anthony Fauci, rat-faced Ilhan Omar & the vacuous #AOC
Thanks to Thomas E. Woods for inspiring this rant
Divorcees like Sam Seder et al. have been very vocal that the lockdowns were worth it & w/ the recent end to the COVID-19 hysteria https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2023/05/09/fact-sheet-end-of-the-covid-19-public-health-emergency.html https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/courage-strength-optimism/biden-to-end-covid-19-emergency-declaration-may-11 has prompted retards like him to wonder if we’re doing this too early or if we should do it all. Won’t it risk more lives if we don’t have another economic retraction & pay people to sit at home?
I’ve already proven through my essays on COVID-19 that the states that locked-down did worse in most cases http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/covid-19-hub than the states that did not, but it doesn’t matter to carnival-barkers like the divorcee. He is going to continue sitting on his duff, vegetating on social media in an attempt to just yell-over everyone who opposes him.
[NOTE: http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/covid-19-hysteria I have a boatload of updates (ending in November 2021) featuring numerous states (and a few groupings of those who did NOT have a stay-at-home or shelter-in-place order vs. states that went bonkers over a respiratory virus) & their death rates (although NOT age-adjusted, but I did mention those demographics several times, as well as the % of deaths in the 65+ age groups) that you may find interesting. ALL of those have been archived. http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/iowa-covid-19-spike This focuses specifically on Iowa, New Mexico, Illinois & California w/ lots of good info, go read it!]
Let’s bury these #BranchCovidians some more, shall we? Tom Woods recently https://mailchi.mp/tomwoods/scorecard?e=be42d9646c https://archive.ph/Xt04A https://mcusercontent.com/77713d21ff56f1c126607d2c5/images/695ed1ff-2c93-6bc9-1150-373ed8c8047a.png featured a post reciting CDC data on *age-adjusted* death rates (Florida is expected to be higher in deaths per capita as they have a high % of residents in the 65+ age group, California should be much lower as their population features a high % of folks under 65) for COVID-19 & if I gave you the data & covered up the states, you could not tell me (especially if you are a Dumbasscrat) which states had California, New York & New Mexico style lockdowns & hysteria & which ones “did not care who died or lived.”
I dubbed those states the NON-LOCKDOWNS (Iowa, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Utah, Arkansas & Nebraska) & the LOCKDOWNS (these states were clustered in the Northeast & went bonkers over a respiratory virus) were New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, District of Columbia & Rhode Island. The LOCKDOWNS PLUS TWO were those aforementioned states plus Maryland & Delaware.
[NOTE: I could NOT find the exact chart Tom Woods was illustrating (I wish he had linked to it directly), but the following are close & they give us some good data on death rates by race & ethnicity.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/covid19_mortality_final/COVID19.htm https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/72/wr/mm7218a4.htm ]
Some of the states in the Top 20 are more rural (like New Mexico & understand that Iowa for example is a “rural” state but has a handful of counties that have are much more dense than the U.S. average) such as New Mexico, Nevada & Kansas – some are densely populated like NY, NJ & Georgia.
There are some rural states that did decidedly better than the national average (Iowa, Idaho, Utah) & some densely populated areas like Illinois & MA. The former has a lot of rural counties however inside a state w/ a few large population centers. In the latter, they are packed-in like sardines.
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/NE,UT,WY,SD,ND,IA/PST045222 https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/RI,DC,MA,CT,NJ,NY/PST045222 https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/DE,MD,IL,NM,AR,US/PST045222
Of the states that never had a shelter-in-place or stay-at-home order – IA, ND & especially NE & UT were below the national average. Democrats often autistically repeat, “they be spread out, that why those states did so well!”
So, what happened in NV, KS, Louisiana & NM? All of those are below the national average for population density & LA is not much above it. There are a number of states that are more densely populated than LA that did much better than the national average.
Here are the biggest stories according to the incomparable Thomas E. Woods:
[Woods quote] The CDC has released its numbers for age-adjusted Covid mortality… New Mexico is the fourth highest. You may not remember, because you're not the fanatic I am, but the media once trumpeted New Mexico as a success story. [NOTE: See https://rumble.com/v111dfj-latifah-faisal-story-county-iowa-supervisor-vs.-kim-reynolds-covid-19-new-m.html & https://rumble.com/vsf0b9-story-county-iowa-supervisor-latifah-faisal-got-duped-by-covid-19-scientocr.html ] It was one of their drearily predictable "Here's how [insert name of state] beat the coronavirus" stories. And of course it was the usual thing: they followed the useless "public health" protocols, etc. And yet there it is at number four.
(I would also adjust this chart for obesity levels, because I think we'd get a clearer picture still.)
Iowa, the "state that doesn't care if you live or die," in the words of The Atlantic, is all the way down at 27. And of course the major story is Florida, at 36!
California, the land of bizarre, irrational, and endless restrictions, is at 39 -- a trivial difference from Florida, and in any case Florida's all-cause mortality figures turned out better than California's.
Remember when people were screaming at Florida for defying all the recommendations? If you had asked them where they expected Florida to wind up when all was said and done, precisely zero of them would have said #36. It would have been at least top five, if not number one.
In other words, the crazies were wrong, period, and we win. All the destruction and disruption was for nothing. [Woods quote end]
I could also add, look where NY, MI & NJ are (all Democrat Governors), would the #BranchCovidians have believed they would be above the national average when it is said & done? How come MA (GOP Governor at the time, for what it is worth) did much better yet they are packed-in like sardines?
Just some food for thought, let us keep plowing forward.
That said, let us tabulate ALL the age-adjusted death rates & a population standard deviation:
422.9, 422.3, 366.9, 356.5, 355.9, 353.1, 345.2, 342.1, 335, 331.6, 329.5, 327.5, 325.1, 324.1, 321.7, 313.3, 311.5, 301.8, 300, 298, 296.5, 293.9, 293, 287.8, 281.2, 279.5, 267.7, 267.3, 266.7, 266.1, 260.9, 259.1, 255.8, 250.4, 245.5, 245, 244.6, 244.4, 242.7, 232.9, 232.5, 229.8, 222.7, 222, 195.5, 176.5, 173.4, 170.3, 161.3, 112.4, 93.8
The average I get from those numbers (tossing out the U.S. average of course) is 275.592 & I presume the discrepancy is because of states that have much higher % of older folks (regardless of density & en masse population) & thus a lot more older folks than other states. E.G. California could have a murder rate of 10 per 100,000 & Iowa could have a murder rate of 30 per 100,000, but the calculated average of those two states together would NOT equal 20 per 100,000 because California has so many more residents. I will use the figure provided in Tom Woods’ post, which was 282.7 per 100,000. The Population Standard Deviation = 67.652
Hawaii, like New Zealand did great because… it is an island. Some Democrats were retarded enough to think the Kiwi nation solved the COVID-19 crisis, but I’m not sure if they’ve ever looked at a map of Oceania. They probably can’t even find Ohio on a U.S. map.
The states that are *more than* one standard deviation *above* the average (282.7+67.652 = 350.352) are: MS, OK, KY, NM, AL & TX.
The states that are *more than* one standard deviation *below* the average (282.7-67.652 = 215.048) are: UT, NH, OR, WA, ME, VT & HI.
Notice all the states that did “really well” (save HI, due to being an island) were in more northern climes & all the states that did “really bad” could be considered states w/ more tolerable winters. If you think they are not tolerable, spend a winter in northern MN or the Dakotas & get back to me.
A slew of states, in fact most states fall within 1SD of the average, some of them rural (and like most rural states, they have some population centers) & some of them densely populated. Some of them are Democrat trifectas & some of them are GOP trifectas.
And again, the big story according to Mr. Woods (and he’s right) is NM’s total failure, as well as FL & CA being almost neck-and-neck. Who would’ve thunk it?
Not Story County, Iowa Supervisor Latifah Faisal #latifahfaisal #faisal4story (she is the #AOC of Iowa, never had a real job & not very bright) or the Divorcee Sam Seder or “Little” Anthony Fauci. The Scientific American should hang its head in shame over its declaration that NM had “solved” COVID-19 – no, it did not.
Ironically, Iowa’s worst counties were some of the more rural in the first several months of COVID-19 & the counties in Iowa that are more densely populated than the national average were doing much better. In NM, there were a handful of counties having most of the problems, everyone needs to remember that.
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/VT,ME,WA,OR,NH,UT/PST045222 According to the latest Census Bureau data the U.S. has a population of (333,287,557) 93.8 people per square mile & the combined population of the states that did “really well” (UT, NH, OR, WA, ME, VT – I am tossing out Hawaii… because island) was 18,834,358 (only 5.65% of the entire U.S. population) & the average population per square mile was 77.933 – a far cry below the U.S. average.
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/AL,NM,KY,OK,TX,MS/PST045222 The combined population of the states that did “really bad” (MS, OK, KY, NM, AL & TX) was 48,689,379 (only 14.6% of the U.S. population) & the average population per square mile was 77.2.
Barely one-fifth of the U.S. population was in states that were on the extreme, one end or the other.
Not much difference in density between those two groups, eh? Virtually identical! Funny, isn’t it? I was told by more than a few dozen uneducated Democrats (after I gave them some COVID-1 death rate numbers) that the reasons “some red states are doing better” (after shrieking like banshees about Kristi Noem, Ron DeSantis & Kim Reynolds wanting to kill everyone w/ a respiratory virus) is because nobody lives there & it’s all spread out.
One could point out, as I have mentioned, you could conceivably have the entire population clustered in one small area and the rest of the state be hypothetically empty. Ergo, you could have an area well below the U.S. average for density, yet one area has a massive cluster. Fair enough!
But remember that the counties in Iowa & New Mexico (because I did run these numbers troglodyte) that had the biggest issues were not densely populated. Remember that!
In the group that did “really bad” only 3 states had a population density above the U.S. average & the others were well below. In the group that did “really good” only two were denser than the U.S. average & the others were not even close to the average.
Do I want to run the numbers for the densest counties in TX, AL, WA, NH, etc. & compare those w/ the most rural counties? Did enough of that for IA & NM, no thanks!
Are there other factors we could consider? Of course, we could look at race/ethnicity demographics, as well as the % of the population that is in the 65+ age group, which we will do first. 16.8% of the U.S. population en masse is 65 or older. https://public.tableau.com/views/ThePopulation65YearsandOlder2021/Dashboard?:showVizHome=no https://data.census.gov/table?q=population+by+age+by+state&tid=ACSST1Y2021.S0101 (I downloaded the data from the 2nd link into Excel, isolated the necessary cells (excl. Puerto Rico) & that was the info I used)
(17.6,13.4,18.3,17.4,15.2,15.1,18.0,20.1,12.8,21.1,14.7,19.6,16.5,16.6,16.4,17.8,16.7,17.0,16.6,21.7,16.3,17.4,18.1,16.8,16.8,17.6,19.7,16.4,16.5,19.3,16.9,18.5,17.5,17.0,16.0,17.8,16.2,18.6,19.0,18.3,18.6,17.6,17.0,13.2,11.6,20.6,16.3,16.2,20.7,17.9,17.9)
Those 51 data points average 17.272 & the Population Standard Deviation = 1.997, but we only need the latter data point.
Pertaining to the states that did “really bad” on COVID-19 (MS, OK, KY, NM, AL & TX), all of them (16.8+1.997 = 18.797) are within 1SD of the average % of the population that is 65 or older, so *NONE OF THEM* are outliers & that doesn’t necessarily explain their problems. In fact, TX has such a small % of their population 65 & over, they were one standard deviation below the national average.
Pertaining to the states that did “really good” on COVID-19 (UT, NH, OR, WA, ME, VT), Vermont, Maine & New Hampshire all had a % of 65 & older residents that were one standard deviation *ABOVE* the national average, yet they still did exceptionally well. Oregon was very close to being 1SD above.
UT was 1SD below the national average, they have a very small % of people 65 & over. The other two states (OR & WA) were inside 1 SD. So, it could be something else, such as demographics?
It should be noted that death rates per 100,000 don’t rise significantly until you hit the 25-34 age group & go into orbit when you hit 65+ age groups. Surprised? If so, you’re an idiot.
All groups got *worse* in 2021 (except for the oldest group & likely because there’s not a lot of those people around anyways, sorry!), despite the vaccine-palooza.
Now, if I take all the CDC data for each year 2020-2022 by Race & Ethnicity for each group (190.8,201.8,86.8,67.2,66.6,34.1,154.8,151.4,72.9,123.5,200.9,67.8,74.1,105.0,61.2,164.8,161.7,60.9,31.9,50.7,26.7) & that is an average of 102.647. Population Standard Deviation = 56.692
For the groups that were *more than one standard deviation above* (in any one year) the average were (102.647+56.692 = 159.339) American Indian or Alaska Native, Hispanic or Latino & Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander. I am going to add Black or African American to the list since they were so close as well. If you do not like that, sue me.
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045222 According to the Census Bureau, America was 13.6% “Black”, 1.3% “AI/AN”, 18.9% “Hispanic or Latino” & 0.3% “Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone.” Those were the groups that struggled w/ COVID-19. Then we have 59.3% of the population is “White alone, NOT Hispanic” & 6.1% “Asian alone.”
Again, the states that struggled w/ COVID-19 were MS, OK, KY, NM, AL & TX and the s states that did well (e.g. had age-adjusted death rates more than 1SD below the national average) were UT, NH, OR, WA, ME & VT.
Peeking at the demographics of those states let us find out if that had anything to do with it or not. https://data.census.gov/table?g=010XX00US$0400000&d=DEC+Demographic+Profile&tid=DECENNIALDP2020.DP1 (Again, I used the Excel file & I tabulated “White” & “Asian” under the “One Race” category)
To make this easier, since White only & Asian only (Non-Hispanic) did the best, I will simply calculate the % of each state population that has those two groups combined. I know this data won’t exactly jive (due to Census revisions that have become rather common) w/ my previous data on age groups, but it should be close enough to compare. Don’t like it? Sue me.
Adding those two groups together for each state (because lumping it all together would be cheating, I had to do both groups for each state, one at a time) yields these data points: (65.6, 65.4, 64, 71.9, 56.6, 74.2, 71.2, 64.7, 44.5, 60.7, 56.4, 60.1, 83.6, 67.3, 79.7, 86.9, 78.5, 84.1, 59, 92, 55.5, 76.8, 77.2, 82.7, 57.1, 79.2, 85.3, 81.1, 60, 90.9, 65.2, 52.8, 64.8, 65.5, 84.6, 79.5, 65.8, 79.4, 78.9, 74.9, 65.2, 82.2, 74.2, 55.5, 81.2, 91.6, 67.4, 76.1, 90.6, 83.4, 85.6) & the average is 72.482. Population Standard Deviation = 11.578.
States that were *one standard deviation above* (72.482+11.578 = 84.06%) were Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Montana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Vermont, West Virginia & Wyoming. Their cumulative age-adjusted COVID-19 death rate = 253.366 per 100,000.
Below the national average, but not one standard deviation (1SD) & thus not an outlier.
These results are a bit puzzling – among those states (although if we did factor in those who are drug-abusers & obesity, labor force participation rates, etc. we might write a whole book & get a clearer picture) Kentucky was one of the worst, despite being heavy among demographics that did much better pertaining to COVID-19 death rates.
Not surprisingly, the states that were in the upper echelon (age-adjusted death rates >1SD *below* the national average) were Vermont, New Hampshire & Maine. In other words, states with a very high % of white folks. I wonder if they’d get upset over Ron DeSantis dumping a few hundred thousand illegal alien migrants inside their borders? I digress.
Montana & ND were below the national average, WY & WV were above it, the latter being very close to >1SD above the average.
States that were *one standard deviation below* (72.482-11.578 = 60.904%) pertaining to those demographics are (small % of population that is Non-Hispanic White & Non-Hispanic Asian): California, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Nevada, New Mexico & Texas. Their cumulative age-adjusted COVID-19 death rate minus Hawaii = 311.55 per 100,000.
Much higher than the national average, but still within 1SD & thus not an outlier.
No surprise HI did well, an island nation w/ a very high percentage of “Asian alone” residents & they fared very well against COVID-19. They were the only one in the very successful group that had those demographics <1SD below the national average.
MS, NM & TX all fared poorly (>1SD above the age-adjusted national death rate) & their demographics (as well as a slew of personal health factors such as diabetes, obesity, poor eating habits, drug use, lack of activity, etc.) may be part of the reason.
CA, DC, FL & MD were all below the national age-adjusted death rate average, but within 1SD. GA, LA & NV were all above the national age-adjusted death rate average, but within the coveted one standard deviation.
I have to conclude, the most definitive thing I can get from this is *IF* you lived in a climate where the winters are brutally cold & your state was not a racially-diverse melting pot, your chances of having an age-adjusted COVID-19 death rate that is an outlier on the low end was much, much better overall than a state in a hotter climate (mild winters for the most part, winter in NM & TX is much different than winter in the Dakotas) down South.
That is what I get from this *when I consider the outliers* – the states that did very well or very bad because just autistically-repeating, “Kim Reynolds did not lock down, she never had a shelter in place or stay at home order. Kristi Noem did not lock down, that’s why people died. Ron DeSantis did not lock down long enough & that’s why people died!”
That line of B.S. has been buried.
I will finally close w/ this. Those states that never had shelter-in-place or stay-at-home orders (IA, ND, SD, UT, WY, NE, AR) had a collective age-adjusted death rate of 274.614 per 100,000, which is within one standard deviation of the national average. In my essays, I dubbed them the NON-LOCKDOWNS. http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/covid-19-hysteria
The states that went crazy, a cluster up in the Northeast (NY, NJ, CT, MA, DC & RI) had a collective age-adjusted death rate of 273.4 per 100,000. *VIRTUALLY IDENTICAL* to the states that “did not care if people lived or died” according to mentally ill carnival barkers in the Regressive Democrat camp. Who would’ve thunk it?
If I tossed in New Mexico amongst that group (because those are the states that went above-and-beyond in COVID-19 insanity) that would push it up a bit more, but the point is if I covered the names of all those states up & let Democrats guess, they would be wrong.
Here is some more information pertaining to the LOCKDOWNS (NY, NJ, CT, MA, DC & RI) vs. The NON-LOCKDOWNS (IA, ND, SD, UT, WY, NE, AR): The latter, in the year or so following the onset of COVID-19 – were more mobile & were not sheltering-in-place (see the previous link, as well as https://rumble.com/vju1d9-old-fart-rants-and-his-brown-teeth-cannot-defend-covid-19-lockdowns.html & the comment I added on it https://archive.ph/hmG4f because I forgot to put it in the description), which according to Democrats should lead to piles of dead bodies a mile high, that is not the case of course.
I mentioned the Univ. of Maryland “Social Distancing Index” https://data.covid.umd.edu/ in my essay debunking YouTube drug addict Old Fart Rants but let us supplement that data for everyone.
https://archive.ph/Tv6i2 https://archive.ph/Tv6i2/47f66e96a8db68cf4525bfe136dfacf3ed2ae605.jpg https://archive.ph/Ars2c Here are the state-by-state numbers on their “Social Distancing Index” from 2/1/20 to 4/20/21, when they ceased updating it. I took a screenshot just so you can see the data for yourself, I am telling you the truth.
I covered the “Social Distancing Index” data briefly in my essays, but never went from 2/1/20 to 4/20/21 – let us do that shall we?
The “Social Distancing Index” data for all 50 states (plus DC) are: 26, 29, 31, 25, 38, 31, 34, 33, 57, 33, 29, 41, 26, 32, 27, 26, 28, 27, 30, 26, 38, 36, 32, 30, 25, 27, 26, 27, 34, 28, 39, 31, 44, 28, 26, 29, 25, 33, 33, 32, 27, 24, 26, 30, 29, 30, 34, 34, 28, 27, 24 ***The HIGHER your score, the more locking-down you did, the LOWER your score, you wanted people to die according to the antique media #BranchCovidians *** https://data.covid.umd.edu/about/index.html
The cumulative avg. of those numbers = 30.686 & the Population Standard Deviation = 5.798
States that were *more than one standard deviation BELOW the average* & were thus naughty are (30.686-5.798 = 24.888): Arkansas, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Dakota & Wyoming.
[NOTE: Since the Social Distancing Index score is rounded, any state scoring a 25 or lower is included in the list above]
Age-adjusted COVID-19 death rate per 100,000 for AR, MS, OK, SD & WY = 355.7
That is *MORE THAN one standard deviation above* the national age-adjusted death rate average. #BranchCovidians are smiling
[NOTE: Iowa, Alabama, Maine, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota & Tennessee all scored a “26” & were thus, close – but those are the rules]
States that were *more than one standard deviation ABOVE the average* & were thus did what their East German masters told them (30.686+5.798 = 36.484) are: California, District of Columbia, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey & New York.
[NOTE: Again, due to lack of rounding & the average landing in the middle, any state scoring a 36 or above is included in the above list. Not including Hawaii… because island]
Age-adjusted COVID-19 death rate per 100,000 for CA, DC, MD, MA, NJ & NY = 268.683
That is within 1SD of the national average, nothing to cheer about, nothing to boo about. If the lockdown sociopaths were right, they should have age-adjusted death rates below everyone else or close to that, but it’s not the case.
Iowa, Florida, Idaho, Montana & Utah all had lower death rates, just in case they think the above is a big deal, it is not.
The NON-LOCKDOWNS (IA, ND, SD, UT, WY, NE, AR) had a collective “Social Distancing Index” score of 25.857 & an age-adjusted COVID-19 death rate of 274.614 per 100,000. AGAIN, VIRTUALLY IDENTICAL to the LOCKDOWNS!
THE LOCKDOWNS (NY, NJ, CT, MA, DC, RI) had a collective “Social Distancing Index” score of 40.333 an age-adjusted COVID-19 death rate of 273.4 per 100,000. Below the national average, but within 1SD of it, so nothing that would be considered an outlier, but that is what the sociopaths on lockdown land expected because they were good little Soviets, sheltering place on their fat duffs, wasting their lives watching Netflix.
The previous two paragraphs should not be true, it should not happen. I repeat myself because this will hammer it into peoples’ heads, perhaps some of you who are aware of what these #BranchCovidians want to do will help wake someone up to the Fascism creeping into American society, courtesy of people who think we can control a respiratory virus.
In conclusion, there’s no truth to the “lockdowns save lives” rubbish & there never was. I do wish the Univ. of MD “Social Distancing Index” went through 2022, but it is what it is.
I presume the Democrats would try to get out of this by saying we need a national lockdown & if we had that by golly, we’d have more freeloaders voting Democrat & somehow, some way COVID-19 would be in the dust bin of history.
A national lock down would likely get kiboshed by the SCOTUS, which is one of the reasons Democrats want to pack the court, so they can get their national lockdowns, take away everyone’s firearms (but the hood rats will still have them) & regulate farming into oblivion.
That is a good reason to get Joe Biden out of the WH next November & give Republicans control of the Senate. Thomas Sowell said, “The Republicans are dumb, the Democrats are dangerous.”
We may need a national divorce or the Progressives will be signing a new Treaty of Paris acknowledging defeat.
We can’t stop idiots from giving HIV to their new friend they met at the Blue Oyster Bar an hour ago, yet they think we can stop a respiratory virus. https://rumble.com/v2e2f68-divorcee-sam-seder-just-isnt-very-bright-covid-19-vs.-aidshiv.html
Mr. Chairman, I Yield Back!
PS Tell your unemployed Democrat friends to take Tom Woods’ COVID-19 quiz https://rumble.com/vii8iz-latifah-faisal-story-county-iowa-supervisor-takes-the-covid-19-chart-challe.html https://www.covidchartsquiz.com/
303
views
1
comment
Creep Sam Seder won't talk about Chicago's Bloody Memorial Day Weekend
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXzUJQ6-yUw https://abc7chicago.com/chicago-memorial-day-weekend-shootings-shooting-crime-crimes/13318549/ https://news.yahoo.com/memorial-day-weekend-violence-11-120718635.html
I was wondering why the divorcee Sam Seder wasn’t autistically repeating the number of people (most of them black) that were shot or shot & killed in Chicago this weekend.
Chicago shootings this Memorial Day weekend have left at least 44 people shot, nine fatally, according to police says one news report & another says it's been a violent and deadly Memorial Day weekend in Chicago with at least 50 shot, 10 fatally, police said. Yet another report states, “Eleven people were killed and 45 others were wounded in Chicago over the long Memorial Day weekend, one of the bloodiest in recent history.”
If you’ve read my essays on murder in America, you’re smarter than any lunch meat slicing Sam Seder supporter & you know that Chicago has one of the highest murder rates in America, they usually do & lots of black-on-black murder. Why is that? http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/sam-seder-ilhan-omar-racism3 http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/covid-increase-homicides http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/black-lives-do-not-matter https://rumble.com/v2ahqta-divorcee-sam-seder-vs.-utubekookdetector-black-on-black-crime.html
Why are there so many fatherless children in Chicago? Why are Chicago’s government schools failing black kids of badly? It’s almost as if the Democrats don’t want this problem solved. Will the toady divorcee Sam Seder waddle over to the Chicago Police Chief’s main office & find out how many of the hood rats who committed shootings this weekend ignored background checks?
Do hood rats ever follow background check laws? Even the divorcee Sam Seder knows they don’t, but he wants to use that to allow the ATF to compile gun lists.
Sam Seder, why are the most violent counties in America full of black-on-black murder & why do they vote Democrat? Why is that?
Any Sam Seder supporter posting on this video will have to debate this w/ me & I will tag them in a comment on my “Community” tab & record the debate. I’m sure there will be plenty of “this channel has no content” opponents. Your channel has to be at least 2 years old, or I will not even bother.
Good luck lunch meat slicers.
#samseder #majorityreport #samsederwontdebateJPH The divorcee Sam Seder is afraid to debate James Patrick Holding on The Impossible Faith. https://tektonics.org/lp/nowayjose.php Methinks the divorcee has little confidence in that religion degree from a diploma mill.
323
views
2
comments
Dave Rubin (indirectly) explains why creep Sam Seder is not worth his time
Sam Seder, #samseder #majorityreport failed talk radio host, failed actress, failed comedienne, failed husband – has this narcissistic belief that if he challenges someone & they don’t come running immediately, he wins.
Some of us have real jobs that don’t consist of sitting on one’s ass all day vegetating on social media & then doing the same alone in a small apartment.
Dave Rubin is busy w/ his kids Stan Seder, so you get me instead old man. Stan is a grifter & like Meghan Markle was a few clicks below trailer trash, Sam Seder is a few clicks below a hack.
Here’s what we’re going to debate: “Why do the most violent jurisdictions in America have beaucoup black on black murder & why do they typically vote Democrat?”
SPOILER: The divorcee has already conceded this point. He did not come running immediately, ergo, I won.
I’ve had a few of Stan’s autistics tell me to call into his little internet show on this topic, but how on earth would we cover in a phone call to this creep – how would we cover thousands of pages of data?
http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma//sam-seder-ilhan-omar-racism3 http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/covid-increase-homicides https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoA9J0G6s-6pat3gSUBf3nm1FOVF3z3Rg https://rumble.com/v2ahqta-divorcee-sam-seder-vs.-utubekookdetector-black-on-black-crime.html http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/black-lives-do-not-matter
The real #INSURRECTION is a Democrat Insurrection
Pay no attention to the fat man behind the curtain, Stan will do a 10-minute video summarizing what folks in the know have written books on.
The divorcee is welcome to try & refute me on his little internet show over the next few days & when I get home from my real job, I will return fire.
Stan, why do so many young black men get murdered by other young black men in inner-cities run by Democrats & why is this not happening in the Asian community? I would say a dearth of fathers in one & an abundance of fathers in the other is one of the main reasons.
Sam Seder is afraid #samsederwontdebateJPH to debate James Patrick Holding on The Impossible Faith. https://tektonics.org/lp/nowayjose.php Stan lacks confidence in his coloring book talking points & religion degree from a diploma mill.
PS If any of Stan’s lunch meat slicers come to this video to challenge me your channel has to be at least 2 years old & we will debate the following: “Why do the most violent jurisdictions in America have beaucoup black on black murder & why do they typically vote Democrat?”
I will tag you in a post on my “Community” tab & then proceed to start up the steamroller. Bring your “A” game though, it will be recorded for posterity. Good luck!
166
views
2
comments
Sam Seder, #AOC & Joy Reid are worried about young black men getting murdered
Sam Seder, #AOC & Joy Reid are worried about young black men getting murdered
It appears groomer/divorcee Sam Seder, the overweight Joy Reid & the bartender #AOC are suddenly worried about young black men having their lives ended prematurely. They all had autistic fits over a thug named Jordan Neely finally picking on someone his own size. He was used to beating up children & the elderly, this time there were some fit, adult men & the intimidation tactics & mentally ill hysterics that worked when he was beating up little children & old people no longer worked.
Working off what I did in a previous video https://rumble.com/v2o1yoo-aoc-and-creepy-sam-seder-suddenly-worried-about-dead-black-folks-in-nyc.html I calculated a murder victimization rate for children in Democrat enclave St. Louis. Let us go further w/ that & focus on some other diverse, Democrat-run dungholes.
Jordan Neely was not a child, but we’ll focus on children because it really hits home.
According to The St. Louis Post Dispatch, https://graphics.stltoday.com/apps/homicide-tracker/2021/ https://graphics.stltoday.com/apps/homicide-tracker/2022/ there were 66 children murdered in St. Louis, a city notorious for stratospheric amounts of murders & most of it is black on black. 11 children have been murdered in St. Louis so far in 2023.
https://web.archive.org/web/20230516011600/https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/stlouiscitymissouri/PST045222 St. Louis only has 293,310 people according to the Census Bureau & 55,728 of them are under 18 years of age. That means last year in St. Louis, the murder victimization rate for children was 66.393 per 100,000. 37 children murdered in St. Louis last year. I would guarantee 80-90% of them were Black.
How about Baltimore? https://homicides.news.baltimoresun.com/ This site allows me to filter it by race, but I DO NOT know from Census data https://web.archive.org/web/20230126001718/https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/baltimorecitymaryland/PST045222 https://web.archive.org/web/20220521183049/https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/baltimorecitymaryland/PST045221 how many people under 18 were Black. So, I will simply focus on the murder victimization rate for children (20.5% of Baltimore’s population is <18 years of age).
For what it is worth, since 2007 to the current date, https://homicides.news.baltimoresun.com/?range=all&age=under18&race=black there have been 220 Black children murdered in Baltimore, an average of almost 13 per year & 2023 is not even half over yet. For you Democrats listening, since 2007, as sure as the sun is going to rise tomorrow morning, a black child is murdered every single month & then some. I don’t see the bartender, the Divorcee Sam Seder or the overweight Joy Reid screeching about that.
Since 2007 to the current date, https://homicides.news.baltimoresun.com/?range=all&age=under18&race=all 283 (!) children have been murdered, an average of almost 17 per year. You can see & if you have followed my essays on this topic – there is a LOT of black-on-black murder in Baltimore & the children murdered in Baltimore are overwhelmingly… Black. Where are the crocodile tears Sam Seder? #samseder #majorityreport
Baltimore’s population 2018-2020 = 1,732,605 & 20.5% of the city was less than 18 years old, that gives us a total of 355,184 children in Baltimore.
From 2020-2022, (16, 19 & 22) according to the Baltimore Sun there were 57 children murdered in that wonderful city, resulting in a murder rate of 16.048 per 100,000 for children.
Just for some clarity, https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/LATEST/webapp/#/pages/downloads according to the FBI (go to “ Download NIBRS Tables” & then click on “Victims” – unfortunately the FBI has a 10 & under age category & an 11-15, then it jumps to 16-20, so this comparison does not exactly jive!) there were 900 children 15 years of age & younger murdered in 2021.
If you go to another FBI page https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/LATEST/webapp/#/pages/explorer/crime/crime-trend you will see that 2,178 people 19 years of age & younger were murdered in 2021. Just some food for thought.
How about Chicago, one of the biggest & most dysfunctional Democrat cities in America? https://graphics.suntimes.com/homicides/ https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/chicagocityillinois/PST045222 (Chicago is losing population again, but I am going to use the 2021 population for 2022 as well, even though it’s likely a lot less. 20.4% of Chicago’s population is <18 years old)
According to the Chicago Sun Times (68, 61 & 55) there were 184 children murdered in the Windy City, 2020-2022.
Chicago population 2020-2022 = 8,139,498 & that means the juvenile population was ~ 1,660,458. That gives us a juvenile murder victimization rate of 11.081 per 100,000. Not bad, but I doubt Sam Seder, the bartender or Joy Reid will flap their teeth about it. Those kids can’t be used as political pawns, so they’re useless.
For what it is worth, from 2018-2022, there were 214 Black children murdered in Chicago, almost 43 per year. Jordan Neely was not a child, he was 30 years old & the number of black people 30 years of age & younger that were murdered in Chicago from 2018-2022 was 1,561.
I doubt Sam Seder will have an autistic fit about those Black people that were murdered in the Windy City because they’re not politically-expedient, they are worthless to him. I should mention that a lot of them were probably gang-banger hood rats just getting a receipt from another dysfunctional, fatherless child – but some of them were just in the wrong place at the wrong time & took a bullet in a drive-by shooting, where someone else was the intended target.
Now we turn to one of America’s most dangerous cities, Flint, Michigan. I’ve profiled this city & many other dangerous, diverse, Democrat-run dungholes www.freewebs.com/professor_enigma/sam-seder-ilhan-omar-racism3 a few times before. It’s more difficult to get the faces of those (particularly in smaller cities) murdered, but for what it is worth I have two articles that give us a snapshot of Flint. https://www.mlive.com/news/flint/2014/01/recap_of_flints_52_homicides_i.html https://www.mlive.com/news/g66l-2019/01/66cace3e514524/where-and-when-flints-35-homicides-occurred-last-year.html
In those two years, there were (8 in 2014 & 3 in 2018) 11 children murdered in Flint. Using data from the Census Bureau & Wikipedia to try & figure this out, https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/flintcitymichigan/PST045222 https://web.archive.org/web/20230000000000*/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flint,_Michigan https://web.archive.org/web/20230000000000*/https://www.biggestuscities.com/city/flint-michigan I estimate that in 2014 Flint had a population of 99,002 & 95,943 in 2018.
According to the 2010 Census, 27.3% of the city was <18 years old & in 2020 it was 24.5%. I will use the latter figure – as Flint’s population is falling, many young families are moving out, nobody is moving in & in a decade or two the city will be a ghost town.
I estimate that 47,762 juveniles lived in Flint in those 2 years & 11 of them were murdered – giving us a juvenile murder victimization rate of 23.030 per 100,000. That is staggering & if I could get a few more years’ worth of data, I think it would hover around that mark.
In other words, there are a LOT of young black folks being murdered in Flint, Michigan, a city that has a history of violence, most of it being black on black in a state (Michigan) that is notorious for black on black violent. The main culprits are Detroit, Flint, Saginaw, Grand Rapids & Pontiac.
Joy Reid, the divorcee Sam Seder & #AOC will not cry for them, will they? But they will cry for a thug who assaulted & terrorized the elderly & children, getting arrested 42 times. They did not cry for his victims, but they did have an autistic fit when he picked on the wrong Marine.
“Face Bloat” Sam Seder, the overweight Joy Reid & Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez don’t give a twit about young kids being murdered if they cannot use them as political pawns.
Let’s turn to Milwaukee, a Democrat-dominated enclave, within a Democrat-dominated county in a state that is a battleground. If you’ve read my previous essays on this topic, the counties that overwhelmingly (≥ 60%) voted for Trump have much lower murder rates than those that overwhelmingly voted for Mrs. Bill Clinton & The Fake POTUS Biden. https://web.archive.org/web/20220716122020/https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/milwaukeecitywisconsin/PST045221
Milwaukee population 2020-2022 = 1,709,857 & ~26.1% of the city is less than 18 years of age, giving us a total of 446,273.
According to the folks at the Milwaukee Urinal-Sentinel, https://projects.jsonline.com/apps/Milwaukee-Homicide-Database/ from 2020-2022 (select “UCR Homicides”) there were (12% of 224 murders in 2022, equaling 27 * 12% of 197 murders in 2021, equaling 24 * 14% of 190 in 2020, equaling 27) there were 78 children murdered in Milwaukee. That gives us a child murder victimization rate of 17.478 per 100,000. You can also see as you peruse the data, the vast majority of murder victims in Milwaukee are Black. If you have looked at my essays on this topic, you also know that most of the murder offenders in Milwaukee City are also Black.
According to the FBI, https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/LATEST/webapp/#/pages/explorer/crime/crime-trend just in 2020-21 alone, of the 305 murder offenders where the race of the offender is known, 260 of them (85.24%) were Black. Milwaukee City is less than 40% Black.
Of the 385 (FBI data) murder victims from 2020-2021, (324) 84.15% of them were Black. Same story, different diverse city run by Democrats & these carnival barkers like Joy Reid, #AOC & the Divorcee Sam Seder do not care about those little black kids getting gunned-down.
Birmingham, Alabama is another Chocolate City dominated by Democrats within a so-called “Red State.” [NOTE: Why do I not like the “Red” or “Blue” designations? See “Reagan’s Sea of Blue” in 1984] https://www.al.com/news/2023/01/birminghams-deadliest-year-in-decades-these-are-the-144-homicide-victims-of-2022.html https://www.bhamwiki.com/w/List_of_Birmingham_homicides_in_2022 https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/birminghamcityalabama/PST045222 https://www.bhamwiki.com/w/List_of_Birmingham_homicides_in_2021 https://www.al.com/news/2022/01/birmingham-metro-area-homicides-soared-in-2021-these-are-the-lives-that-were-lost.html
Using the data from AL dot com (and I checked to make sure justifiable homicides & negligent manslaughter cases were removed) I count 8 juvenile murders in 2021 & 12 in 2022, which is 20 en masse.
Birmingham’s population 2021-2022 = 394,485 & ~19.4% are <18 years old which equals 76,530 juveniles. This gives us a juvenile murder victimization rate of 26.133 per 100,000.
There was a little 2-year-old black boy named Major Turner that was killed in Birmingham when some hood rats opened fire on the apartment he was staying in. Just sitting there on the couch & his life is over. Cry some crocodile tears for him Sam Seder, next time you waddle to the fridge in your small apartment for a donut.
Many of the murders in Birmingham alert the police because of their ShotSpotter system, which detects gunfire. You know why they need that, because there are a LOT of unsavory characters stalking the streets of Birmingham, Alabama.
You would not believe the number of folks victimized at gas stations just filling up their car or buying whatever it is they drink. Most of the murders where people are arrested, the arrestees are young black males.
There’s plenty of young black males getting exterminated by other black folks in Birmingham every year, Joy Reid’s flabby jowls would be bouncing up and down for hours as she chronicles the barbarism of Birmingham.
She won’t do that though, because she would be profiling young black males for doing the dirty deed & that does not score the same number of political points a white Marine scores when he finally stops a mentally ill, young black man from terrorizing more citizens.
How about the Big Easy, New Orleans?: https://www.wdsu.com/article/new-orleans-ends-2021-with-218-murders-well-never-get-over-this/38646625 https://www.nola.com/news/crime_police/new-orleans-murders-see-map-of-locations-neighborhood-totals-and-2022-statistics/article_0be65fb6-ed80-11ec-8caa-4fb1de4ad468.html https://www.wdsu.com/article/new-orleans-murders-in-2019-what-the-data-tells-us/30899265 https://www.wdsu.com/article/new-orleans-murders-in-2019-explore-a-map-of-the-killings-and-names-of-each-victim/30900679
In 2021, 17 children were killed in the Big Easy, that number was 11 in 2019. New Orleans population 2021 & 2019 = 767,115, which yield a child homicide victimization rate of 18.159 per 100,000. 20.1% of the population is <18 (154,190). Stay Classy New Orleans!
To conclude, here is a song we’ve heard before: “The brothers represent a demographic that makes up nearly 80% of the city's murder victims — Black men, according to reports from NOPD and Orleans Parish Coroner’s Office tracked by WDSU. Black men make up about 30% of the city’s population… Data also shows almost half the city's murders happened in 2 of NOPD’s eight police districts — the fifth and seventh. Those are made up of two predominantly Black areas — the 9th ward, and New Orleans East.” #whitesupremacy
Here is a quote from another article a few years before: “An analysis of New Orleans Police Department data WDSU conducted sheds light on where and how people were murdered in 2019 and who they were. The data reveal murder victims were overwhelmingly black men, and more than half were killed in two of the city’s eight police districts: the 7th District, comprising New Orleans East; and the 5th District, which is made up of the 9th Ward, St. Roch and most of the 7th Ward. While striking, the data is not surprising, Scharf and Signh said. They point to racial and economic inequalities that have been in place for hundreds of years and stem from deficiencies in education, transportation, wage growth and other structural factors.”
And by golly, no matter how big the welfare state gets, the disparities continue. How come Asians have figured this out? Most of the murder victims in New Orleans are also under forty, so there’s a whole bunch of young black folks Democrats can cry about, but they won’t because… “look at that white guy subduing a mentally ill, unemployed black man on the subway who assaulted children & old folks. Why is he doing that!?”
Indianapolis, Indiana, a Democrat enclave inside a GOP-dominated State: https://www.wrtv.com/news/local-news/crime/people-weve-lost-these-are-the-indianapolis-homicide-victims-of-2022 https://www.indystar.com/story/news/crime/2021/06/07/indianapolis-homicides-victims-2021-and-what-we-know-so-far/5133030001/ https://databases.indystar.com/indianapolis-crime-list-of-all-criminal-homicides-in-2021/ https://databases.indystar.com/indianapolis-crime-list-of-all-criminal-homicides-in-2020/
16 juveniles murdered in 2022, 15 in 2021 & 12 in 2020. Indy population 2020-2022 = 2,650,042 & ~24.7% of the city is <18 years of age (654,560). This is a juvenile murder victimization rate of 6.569 per 100,000
Philly: I could not good data (but the Denver Post does have a LOT of good data on murder in Denver) for Denver on the number of children murdered, but I did see an article that mentioned the number of children murdered in Philadelphia: https://web.archive.org/web/20230323080646/https://www.denverpost.com/2023/01/29/denver-homicides-shootings-2022/
“More juveniles were shot in New York City in 2021 than in 2018 and 2019 combined, according to the Wall Street Journal. In Philadelphia, 81 children were murdered in 2022 — up from 52 in all of 2019 and 2020.”
Philadelphia population 2019, 2020 & 2022 = 4,755,119 & the % of the population that is <18 years old was ~21.9%. That gives us a juvenile population in Philly of 1,041,371. That gives us a juvenile homicide victimization rate of 12.771 per 100,000.
How about those dead young black folks Joy Reid, divorcee Sam Seder # vacuous #AOC ? BTW, they were likely murdered by other blacks.
How about Nashville? https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/2022/02/24/2022-homicides-nashville-remember-citys-slain/9173878002/ https://www.tennessean.com/in-depth/news/local/2021/03/30/2021-homicides-nashville-remember-citys-slain/4375245001/
In 2022 there were 11 children murdered & in 2021 there were 7 children murdered in Nashville.
Nashville population 2021 & 2022 = 1,362,473 & 20.75% of the population is <18 years of age (282,713), which gives us a child homicide victim rate of 6.366 per 100,000.
Durham City, NC https://bullcityhomicide.wordpress.com/2023-homicides/2021-homicides/ https://bullcityhomicide.wordpress.com/2023-homicides/2020-homicides/ https://bullcityhomicide.wordpress.com/2023-homicides/2022-homicides/ https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/durhamcitynorthcarolina/PST045222 https://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/crime/article255230541.html
Compare the BullCity 2020 list w/ this https://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/crime/article255230541.html
Durham juvenile murder victims 2020-2022 = (5 in 2020, 5 in 2021 & 3 in 2022) 13 & Durham population 2020-2022 = 860,961. 20.8% of its population is <18 years old (179,080), which yields a juvenile murder victimization rate of 7.259 per 100,000.
Charlotte, NC https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article260454197.html https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/crime/article273382780.html
At least 9 juveniles were murdered in Charlotte in 2022 & a newspaper article updated on 3/30/23 says the following: “Since 2021, at least 73 children and teens in Charlotte have been shot, 33 lives cut short. But numbers are only the start of the story.”
Since I do not know the exact number of juveniles (because 18 is a teenager, but not considered a juvenile) murdered in Charlotte, a diverse city w/a murder rate in the troposphere – I cannot calculate a murder victimization rate. If I *assumed* those 33 were juveniles, the rate would be about (back of the envelope calculation) 5.3 or 5.4 per 100,000.
According to the FBI, https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/LATEST/webapp/#/pages/explorer/crime/crime-trend (Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department) in 2020 & 2021, 213 of the 249 homicide offenders (85.54%) in Charlotte were…. Black. Charlotte is only 35.2% Black.
Kansas City, MO https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/crime/article248234580.html https://fox4kc.com/news/kansas-city-missouri-homicide-map/
16 juveniles murdered in KC, MO back in 2021 & 9 in 2022. KC population 2021 & 2022 = 1,017,691 & 22.8% of KC’s population is <18 YO (232,034). That equals a juvenile homicide victimization rate of 10.774 per 100,000. Sam Seder, cry some tears old man for all the black folks being snuffed out by other black folks in one of America’s largest cities, which happens to be another diverse, Democrat enclave inside a Republican-dominated state.
>80% of the murder offenders in KC are Black & 74% of the victims are Black. KC is only 26.5% Black.
Atlanta: https://www.ajc.com/news/atlantas-2021-homicide-victims/EVKLI56XNFFXNDOQLDOG6K332U/ https://www.ajc.com/news/atlantas-2022-homicide-victims/NR3QXZ55TNDV3DVXTUGLTHVD7M/ https://homicides.ajc.com/2020/
From 2020-2022 (11 in 2020, 10 in 2021 & 16 in 2022) 37 juveniles were murdered in Atlanta, most of them Black. Many of them minding their own business at a gas station or just sitting in a car waiting for their mother. For you Democrats listening to this, over the past 3 years there has been a child murder a month in Atlanta.
Atlanta population 2020-2022 = 1,494,303 & ~17.5% of their population is less than 18 years of age (261,503). That gives us a juvenile homicide victimization rate of 14.148 per 100,000.
According to the FBI from 2020-2021 of the 128 murder offenders where we know the race of the offender – 124 of them were Black. In a typical year, >90% of Atlanta’s murder victims are Black in a city that is 48.2% Black. https://rumble.com/v2ahqta-divorcee-sam-seder-vs.-utubekookdetector-black-on-black-crime.html
Young black men are being murdered by young black men in Atlanta, does ferret face Sam seder care? Does the vacuous #AOC care that black lives do not matter to #blacklivesmatter in Atlanta?
Again, according to the FBI, https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/LATEST/webapp/# in 2020 & 2021 there were 15,393 “Black” people victimized by Homicide. In 2020 & 2021, there were 11,608 “White” people victimized by Homicide. This includes “Hispanics” as well, you can see a massive disparity there.
In 2020 & 2021 there were 14,789 “Black or African American” Homicide Offenders. In 2020 & 2021 there were 11,065 “White” Homicide Offenders.
According to the FBI, in 2020 there were 1,185 juveniles murdered & in 2021 it was 1,527. In closing, if the overweight Joy Reid, the divorcee Sam Seder & the bartender are concerned about young black folks meeting their maker they may want to quit whining about white guys on the subway that subdue mentally ill folks who could never hold a real job & never wanted a real job & maybe, just maybe concentrate on the rats who abandon their children to the baby momma.
Most of those children are doomed & our vaunted government school system is a meat grinder. People go in one end, mentally deficient social justice warriors come out the other. This is the way the Democrats want it & you are seeing the results of decades of their policies in places like Philly, Chicago, Atlanta, Washington DC, Los Angeles, Cleveland, Detroit, etc.
PS Hands up, Don’t shoot in Ferguson was a lie. https://rumble.com/vfxji5-old-fart-rants-the-ferguson-effect-and-michael-brown.html George Floyd was a drug addict who was acting out because, he was on drugs, even though Derek Chauvin did IMO, commit negligent manslaughter.
This latest “whatever the current things is” obsession these carnival barkers are focusing on, even if it was legitimate – Jordan Neely’s thug tactics eventually reaped karma – this current obsession is a ruse to distract you from the fact that Blacks & in particular, young black men tend to murder young black men at a rate no other demographic in America even gets close to.
#BlackLivesMatter used the George Floyd fiasco to gin-up their base of lunatics & it cost thousands of black folks their lives – cooler heads usually prevail, but since the summer of 2020 it has been anything but cool. It has been chaos & it is particularly bad in “Diverse” cities run by the Democrat Party & bodies of black folks are piling up, usually at the hands of other black folks.
For every Derek Chauvin there are thousands of shootings in the hood, many times a gang-banger is just getting what is called a “receipt” for his behavior. Other times a young black child is minding their own business walking home from school, sitting in a car or on the front porch eating pizza when suddenly they are caught in the crossfire of drive-by clash.
The bi-polar divorcee Sam Seder, the bartender Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez & Joy Reid care not about black folks that are murdered in the hood & get 3 paragraphs in the Philly Inquirer or the Atlanta Urinal-Constipation. Mr. Chairman, I Yield Back.
Like Columbo or Perry Mason, “Just one more question sir” I am back again. I have to give you this information again, just in case someone is watching & they have not heard it before:
According to the FBI, the U.S. murder/non-negligent manslaughter rate 2016-2019 = 5.2 per 100,000.
The murder/non-negligent manslaughter rate 2020-21 = 6.8 per 100,000 – a staggering increase.
Let us look at the NIBRS data & find out what % of murder victims & offenders (where we KNOW the race of the victim or perp) were Black 2016-19. That was 23,688 offenders & (13,385) 56.5% of them were Black. That is very disproportionate!
From 2016-19 of the 21,695 victims where we KNOW the race of the victim, (11,193) 51.59% of the victims were Black. That is also very disproportionate!
From 2020-21, the NIBRS data gives us 23,034 murder offenders where we KNOW the race of the offender. Of those 23,034 offenders, (13,707) 59.5% of them were Black. That is also very disproportionate!!
From 2020-2021, the NIBRS data gives us 24,584 victims of murder & of those 24,584 victims, (14,382) 58.5% were Black.
But Joe Biden & the vacuous divorcee Sam Seder think #whitesupremacy is the biggest threat to America. That’s like a guard at Auschwitz saying the biggest threat to Jews is Winston Churchill. Finally, I’m done. ><> + <><
#samseder #majorityreport Sam Seder is afraid to debate my friend James Patrick Holding on The Impossible Faith. https://tektonics.org/lp/nowayjose.php Methinks Stan has no confidence in that religion degree from a diploma mill
130
views
1
comment
#AOC and Creepy Sam Seder suddenly worried about dead black folks in NYC
#AOC and creepy Sam Seder #samseder #majorityreport suddenly worried about dead black folks in NYC
A previous video I did focusing on arrest demographics in NYC & New York State. The latter is on Buffalo, New York itself. https://rumble.com/v15vk83-divorcees-sam-seder-and-old-fart-rants-are-suddenly-concerned-about-dead-pe.html https://rumble.com/v15dy6b-sam-seder-and-old-fart-rants-are-suddenly-concerned-about-dead-people-in-bu.html https://www.criminaljustice.ny.gov/crimnet/ojsa/adult-arrest-demographics.html
New York City Homicide Victims 2022 https://homicidenyc.com/nyc-2022-homicide-victims/
New York City Supplemental Homicide Reports https://www.nyc.gov/site/nypd/stats/reports-analysis/homicide.page
The spike in murder in New York City, particularly the rise in violent crime on the subway can be laid at the feet of the New York City Council & uneducated, mentally ill folks like #AOC https://rumble.com/v1m31o6-aoc-and-the-democrat-insurrection.html
https://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/covid-increase-homicides From 2018-2020 there were 1,928 homicides (FBI) & state data says 1,973. Homicide rate of 3.256 per 100,000 (FBI) or 3.332 (New York Division of Criminal Services). https://www.criminaljustice.ny.gov/crimnet/ojsa/indexcrimes/County-totals.xls https://www.criminaljustice.ny.gov/crimnet/ojsa/indexcrimes/county_totals.htm https://www.criminaljustice.ny.gov/crimnet/ojsa/indexcrimes/Regions.xls
Cumulative NY State population 2018-2020 = 59,197,019
The uber-Republican counties in NY (60% or > for Trump) were: Allegany, Cattaraugus, Fulton, Genesee, Hamilton, Herkimer, Lewis, Orleans, Schoharie, Steuben & Wyoming.
Cumulative 2018-2020 population for those counties = 1,597,194
Cumulative Homicides 2018-2020 for those counties = 22, equaling a homicide rate of 1.377 per 100,000. Looks like the uber-Republican, uber-Donald Trump counties in NY are not very violent, they are very safe.
Since Joe Biden won NY by such a large %, I will only include counties where the Dumocrat received 66% of the vote or >. Those counties were: Bronx, Kings, New York, Queens & Tompkins.
Cumulative 2018-2020 population for those counties = 24,393,277
Cumulative Homicides 2018-2020 for those counties = 1,040 (homicide rate = 4.263 per 100,000). That homicide rate is *lower* than the U.S. average, but is much higher than the NY average for that time frame.
Again, I must say that the most violent areas of NY State are not the uber-White, uber-Republican areas, but the areas where Democrats dominate.
I cover data like that in state after state after state after state & it is the same story whether the state is uber-Republican or uber-Democrat.
In New York City, blacks commit over three quarters of all shootings, though they are only 25% of the city's population. Whites, by contrast, commit only 2% of all shootings, though they are 34% of the population. New York's crime disparities are repeated in virtually every racially diverse city in America. I have documented this over & over. https://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/sam-seder-ilhan-omar-racism3 The real problem facing inner city black neighborhoods today is not the police, but criminals.
In 2014, over 6,000 blacks were murdered, more than all White and Hispanic homicide victims combined. Who is killing them? Not the police and not white civilians, but other blacks.
In fact, a police officer is more than 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black male, than an unarmed black male is to be killed by a police officer. If the police ended all use of lethal force tomorrow, it would have a negligible effect on the black homicide rate.
In Chicago, in just the first six months of 2016, over 2,300 people were shot. That is a shooting per hour some weekends. The vast majority of the victims were black. During this same period, the Chicago police shot 12 people. All armed and dangerous. That is 1/2 of 1% of all shootings.
***
Of the 75,560 Adult Arrests in New York City 2016-18 categorized as “violent”, 54.84% (41,442) of the arrestees were…. Black.
Of the 68,760 Adults Arrests in New York City 2019-2021 categorized as “violent”, 54.98% (37,809) if the arrestees were…. Black.
New York City is ~24% Black.
Now let’s look at data across the entire state of New York: Of the 115,916 Adult Arrests in New York State 2016-18 categorized as “violent”, 50.7% (58,778) of the arrestees were… Black.
Of the 103,622 Adult Arrests in New York State 2019-2021 categorized as “violent”, 51.56% (53,437) of the arrestees were… Black. New York State is roughly 17.6% Black.
***
Democrats like the overweight Joy Reid & the uneducated bartender #AOC also cried some crocodile tears over black men getting removed from the gene pool at such a young age. Speaking of that, I looked at the homicide NYC website & in 2022 and so far in 2023 there have been (32 in 2022 & 8 as of this day in 2023) 40 children murdered in New York City. Get off your fat ass, go buy some flowers & cry some crocodile tears for those kids. Keep in mind, NYC is much safer today then it was when Rudy Giuliani became Mayor & the decades preceding his ascension to City Hall.
40 kids murdered in a city that large is not an eye-popping amount, if you want your eyes to explode, look at St. Louis City, another diverse dunghole run by Democrats in an uber-Republican state. People are fleeing New York City now; people have been fleeing St. Louis City for 50 years.
According to The St. Louis Post Dispatch, https://graphics.stltoday.com/apps/homicide-tracker/2021/ https://graphics.stltoday.com/apps/homicide-tracker/2022/ there were 66 children murdered in St. Louis, a city notorious for stratospheric amounts of murders & most of it is black on black. 11 children have been murdered in St. Louis so far in 2023.
https://web.archive.org/web/20230516011600/https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/stlouiscitymissouri/PST045222 St. Louis only has 293,310 people according to the Census Bureau & 55,728 of them are under 18 years of age. That means last year in St. Louis, the murder victimization rate for children was 66.393 per 100,000. 37 children murdered in St. Louis last year. I would guarantee 80-90% of them were Black.
What was that about Jordan Neely again?
Go to https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/LATEST/webapp/# then find “Download NIBRS Tables” & then download the file for “Offenders” in 2021. Of the 16,977 “homicide” offenders, 8,504 of them were “Black or African American”, 50.09% of the total. Blacks are only ~13.6% of the population. If I EXCLUDE situations where law enforcement did NOT know the race of the offender, Blacks were 56.81% of all offenders.
Blacks were 38.83% of all assault offenders in 2021 & if I include only those where the race of the offender was known, Blacks were 41.09% of all “Assault” offenders.
If one downloads the file for “Victims”, of the 16,138 murder victims where we know the race of the victim, 9,114 of them or 56.47% of them were Black. I have covered this before, how many times Joy Reid, you fat, water-retaining sea cow, how many times do we have to go there?
The most common theme among those murdered in these United States is the victim tends to be 35 years old or younger & Black. Blacks are more than half of all offenders, you do the math Sam Seder, if you can fat boy. Keep in mind, pertaining to those FBI files on race, “WHITE” includes “Hispanic.”
Think about that for a second, more Blacks were murdered in 2021 than all other races combined & most of the time as I have documented, it’s a Black person killing them. In other words, the most common form of murder in America is a Black person killing another Black person.
Again, if Joy Reid & Sam Seder are crying crocodile tears over young black men dying, I have a list 14 miles high that they can have faux autistic fits over for the next few decades.
This does not mean that Jordan Neely was guilty, this is just the big picture, but as you will see – Neely was a thug who picked on old people & children. If he was hypothetically in rural Western Iowa & tried to pick on a farmer who throws around his weight in hay bales many a hot summer afternoon – well, he wouldn’t pick that fight because he only assaults old people & children.
I am so glad I do not live in New York City or some other Democrat-run hellhole that is descending into the 10th level of hell – I thank Jesus Christ for that every single day. I am glad I do not have to ride the subway. YIKES!
A mentally ill, deranged person on a crowded subway car is a dangerous environment. If someone like Neely tried that in Western Rural Iowa, his intended victim would likely be armed & would retreat as much as they could as they called the police, but if the mentally ill person continues to pursue their *INTENDED VICTIM* they would likely be met w/ lethal force & this is what Neely found out that day, although his demise did not come at the end of a person practicing constitutional carry, it came at the end of a forearm.
I should also throw this in, another diverse American city that is dominated by Democrats, that is Memphis, Tennessee has a sky-high https://rumble.com/v27qdkq-divorcee-sam-seder-flaps-his-gums-about-tyre-nichols-democrat-insurrection.html murder rate & much of it is Black people killing Black people. If Joy Reid & the divorcee Sam Seder did a video every time a black person was murdered in Memphis by another black person, they would be really busy. >93% of the homicide offenders where the race of the offender was known in Memphis were… Black. >86% of the victims were… Black.
What was that about Jordan Neely again?
Before I play some clips, I would tell the divorcee Sam Seder if he wants to do something to make America great again, tell those mostly young black males to raise the children the sire & tell young women to keep their legs closed until they’re married.
One, he will not do that because he is incapable of cultivating a decent relationship w/ a woman, I would presume that psychosis can be linked somehow to his relationship or lack thereof w/ his own father. So, he would be a hypocrite, to use a line he has abused into oblivion.
Two, he will not do that because intact, nuclear families w/ parents that actually work are less likely to vote Democrat & Sam Seder’s best chance at creating more Democrat voters is to make
***
Since Clay & Buck mentioned a mass shooting in Atlanta, I figured I would add their data to this essay quickly. Keep in mind, Atlanta is a city that is uber-Democrat in a battleground state. From 2018-2020, Atlanta had a murder rate of 23.360 per 100,000 – well beyond the national average. Their murder rate was 19.97 per 100,000 in the 2015-2017 time frame. http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/sam-seder-ilhan-omar-racism
According to the FBI, in 2021 (NIBRS data): Of the 102 murder offenders where the race of the offender was known, 101 (99.01%) of them were Black. 144 of the 155 murder victims (92.9%) were also Black. #blacklivesmatter
There’s a lot of Black people being slain in Atlanta on a regular basis, but the overweight Joy Reid, the bartender #AOC & the divorcee Sam Seder somehow missed it.
***
Want more data? Of course you do! How about Georgia? Criminal Homicide Rate 2018-2020 (2,239 criminal homicides according to the FBI, Georgia Bureau of Investigation does not have data published for 2020 yet, but their figures differ) = 7.030 per 100,000
Criminal Homicide Rate for Atlanta, Augusta/Richmond County, Savannah, Bibb County & Dougherty County 2018-2020 (683 criminal homicides) = 21.081 per 100,000.
Criminal Homicide Rate in Georgia OUTSIDE Atlanta, Augusta/Richmond County, Savannah, Bibb County & Dougherty County 2018-2020 (1,556 criminal homicides) = 5.438 per 100,000.
I will find counties in GA that Donald Trump won 60% of the vote or more in 2016 & 2020. That will reveal the most pro-Trump counties in GA. Will I perform the arduous task of finding out who they send to Atlanta each legislative session? Uh, no. Sorry!
https://gbi.georgia.gov/services/crime-statistics [Because GA state data on county populations was so close in most cases to Census estimates, I am using GA data on population to save time & not looking up each county for multiple years on the Census website]
The counties we will look at are: Appling, Atkinson, Banks, Barrow, Bartow, Ben Hill, Berrien, Bleckley, Brantley, Bryan, Butts, Camden, Candler, Carroll, Catoosa, Charlton, Chattooga, Cherokee, Clinch, Coffee, Colquitt, Columbia, Cook, Coweta, Crawford, Crisp, Dade, Dawson, Dodge, Echols, Effingham, Elbert, Emanuel, Evans, Fannin, Floyd, Forsyth, Franklin, Gilmer, Glascock, Glynn, Gordon, Grady, Greene, Habersham, Hall, Haralson, Harris, Hart, Heard, Irwin, Jackson, Jasper, Jeff Davis, Jenkins, Johnson, Jones, Lamar, Lanier, Laurens, Lee, Lincoln, Long, Lumpkin, Madison, Marion, Miller, Monroe, Montgomery, Morgan, Murray, Oconee, Oglethorpe, Paulding, Pickens, Pierce, Pike, Polk, Pulaski, Putnam, Rabun, Schley, Seminole, Stephens, Tattnall, Taylor, Telfair, Tift, Toombs, Towns, Treutlen, Troup, Turner, Union, Upson, Walker, Walton, Ware, Wayne, Wheeler, White, Whitfield, Wilcox & Worth.
Cumulative Homicides 2018-19 for those counties = 195 (86 in 2019 & 109 in 2018)
Cumulative population for those counties 2018-19 = (2019 = 4,076,742 & 2018 = 4,000,056) 8,076,798
Homicide Rate (per 100,000) for those counties 2018 & 2019 = 2.414. That is way below the average in Georgia & below the national average. The most violent counties in GA tend to skew towards the Dumocrat Party, not those who vote for Donald Trump by 20 points or more. Those uber-Donald Trump counties in GA are also well below the average homicide rate OUTSIDE Atlanta, Augusta/Richmond County, Savannah, Bibb County & Dougherty County.
http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/covid-increase-homicides https://rumble.com/v1oh7ps-divorcee-sam-seder-just-in-case-he-talks-about-the-abrams-kemp-debate.html Here are the counties in GA that voted 60%≥ for Donald Trump (2016 & 2020) & Brian Kemp (2018): Appling, Atkinson, Banks, Barrow, Bartow, Ben Hill, Berrien, Bleckley, Brantley, Bryan, Butts, Camden, Candler, Carroll, Catoosa, Charlton, Chattooga, Cherokee, Clinch, Coffee, Colquitt, Columbia, Cook, Coweta, Crawford, Crisp, Dade, Dawson, Dodge, Echols, Effingham, Elbert, Emanuel, Evans, Fannin, Floyd, Forsyth, Franklin, Gilmer, Glascock, Glynn, Gordon, Grady, Greene, Habersham, Hall, Haralson, Harris, Hart, Heard, Irwin, Jackson, Jasper, Jeff Davis, Jenkins, Johnson, Jones, Lamar, Lanier, Laurens, Lee, Lincoln, Long, Lumpkin, Madison, Marion, Miller, Monroe, Montgomery, Morgan, Murray, Oconee, Oglethorpe, Paulding, Pickens, Pierce, Pike, Polk, Pulaski, Putnam, Rabun, Schley, Seminole, Stephens, Tattnall, Taylor, Telfair, Tift, Toombs, Towns, Treutlen, Troup, Turner, Union, Upson, Walker, Walton, Ware, Wayne, Wheeler, White, Whitfield, Wilcox & Worth.
Cumulative Population for those Counties 2016-20 = 20,097,119
Cumulative Murders for those Counties 2016-2020 = 509 & that is a homicide rate of 2.532 per 100,000. This is well below the national average, the GA state average & the average in the counties that are uber-Pervert Biden/Hillary & overweight Stacey Abrams.
[NOTE: Since some non-metro counties were omitted for 2016-17, I did my best to fill in the missing amounts to make the homicide totals more accurate. This is likely why the FBI & GA State Data differ so much. You’ll see the Republican counties do much better than the “diverse” Biden/Clinton/Stacey Abrams counties]
Here are all the GA counties that voted 60%≥ for overweight Stacey Abrams (2018), Shillary Clinton (2016) & senile Joe Biden (2020): Clarke, Clayton, DeKalb, Dougherty, Fulton, Hancock, Macon, Richmond, Rockdale & Taliaferro.
[NOTE: If a County was NOT listed in a state report, I am doing my best to fill in the blanks. E.G. if a Podunk County had a murder each year 2018-20 & no data in the state report for 2016-17 I am *assuming/estimating* they had a murder each year in 2016-17. Richmond Co. was odd, from 2016-19 they had double digit murders every year & in 2020 it was zero. Be advised, the city of Macon, GA is Bibb County & Macon County is a totally different entity]
Cumulative population for those Counties 2016-20 = 13,124,292 (this tally I am using the U.S. Census Bureau data)
Cumulative Murders for those Counties 2016-20 = 1,520 which yields a homicide/murder rate of 11.581 per 100,000. That is well above the GA average & the national average. Counties that overwhelmingly voted for Stacey Abrams, Joe Biden & Mrs. Bill Clinton are indistinguishable from a war zone.
From 2016-2020 the FBI tally has 3,623 cases of Murder/Non-Negligent Manslaughter in GA & a homicide rate of 6.88 per 100,000. The Georgia Crime Information Center gives us 3,085 (Homicide Rate = 5.92 per 100,000). That is quite a large difference, not sure of the discrepancy as the GA state data is careful to mention it is tallying cases of Murder & Non-Negligent Manslaughter. It is likely the non-metro counties that did not report in 2016-17. The FBI national Murder/Non-Negligent Manslaughter rate 2016-2020 = 5.46 per 100,000.
Georgia’s only categorizations for arrests by race are “White” (which I presume includes “Hispanic” as well, but there is no indication – that’s just an educated guess) & “Non-White” (which I presume includes Black, Asian, Indian, etc.).
From 2016-20 there were 2,202 arrests for Murder/Non-Negligent Manslaughter. Of those 2,202 arrests 75.61% (1,665) of the arrestees were “Non-White.” Look at GA’s demographics just in case you are wondering if these arrests skew towards one race or another (cough). Essentially, ~40% of GA’s population are committing >3/4 of Georgia’s homicides & I doubt Asians are much of the total if you get what I mean but that’s all the further they go w/ the data.
Enjoy & pass it on if you like it!
822
views
5
comments
Election Deniers CNN & Divorcee Sam Seder get wrecked by Donald Trump voter
CNN wants Donald Trump to stop talking about the 2020 election. Do they want Hillary Clinton, Jesse Jackson, Jamie Raskin, the obese Stacey Abrams, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, et al. to stop engaging in 2 decades of election denial? https://rumble.com/v1ou9vw-kari-lake-decimates-the-democrat-media-on-the-big-lie.html
CNN & other election deniers like the divorcee Sam Seder #samseder #majorityreport on the Dumocrat side get wrecked by a Donald Trump supporter
Just in case you were wondering, the 2020 election was a snowjob http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/democrat-election-fraud If you live in a GOP trifecta, make sure you shore up your election laws prior to 2024 so the Democrats cannot stuff those blue ballot boxes w/ fake votes in 2024
Divorcee Sam Seder is afraid to debate me on why the most violent jurisdictions in America have loads of black on black murder & why they vote Democrat most of the time. Why is that? https://rumble.com/v2ahqta-divorcee-sam-seder-vs.-utubekookdetector-black-on-black-crime.html http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/sam-seder-ilhan-omar-racism3
129
views
They (The Democrats) Want You To Be Poor!
They (The Democrat Party) Want You To Be Poor
***So I can post this on Rumble, any quotes from articles that are linked to will be preceded with *** & ended with ***
All Democrats & many Republicans claim to be for “the workin’ man” (remember when Matt Hooper told Quint that he was tired of his “working class hero B.S.”) but impose policies that destroy the middle class.
Social Security is a perfect example, it was not created to help the poor, it was created to control the middle class & upper middle class.
Fossil fuels have provided reliable, cheap energy & that was a boon to the middle class, but the Democrats need to take that away because they need that control. Don’t like high gas prices, go buy an electric car (and for the price of that car you could get 2 econoboxes that get ~40MPH). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqLV72YiYcw Don’t like your high rent? Go buy a house. Don’t like being poor? Perhaps finish school, get established in your job, have a successful marriage & THEN have the kids.
Isn’t that right Story County, Iowa Supervisor Latifah Faisal? Don’t like being poor? Don’t consume alcohol, stay off drugs. Anyways… https://mailchi.mp/tomwoods/fossilfuels?e=be42d9646c https://tomwoods.com/ep-2131-we-need-more-fossil-fuels/
***As you know, the worst people in the world (Davos) have gathered to decide how they can further make our lives miserable.
One of my most provocative guests just returned to my show, with a brand new book that takes direct aim at one of the elites' most cherished projects.
It's Alex Epstein, and his book is Fossil Future: Why Global Human Flourishing Requires More Oil, Coal, and Natural Gas -- Not Less.
His argument is extremely convincing, and introduces considerations most people never think about.
He recently wrote:
Fossil fuels, which provide 80 percent of the world’s energy, have and will continue to have the unique benefit of providing low-cost, reliable energy to billions of people in thousands of places — a benefit that is desperately needed in a world where some 3 billion people still use less electricity than a typical American refrigerator. Contrary to claims that solar and wind are rapidly replacing fossil fuels, fossil fuel use is still growing, while intermittent solar and wind energy, after generations on the market, provide just 3 percent of the world’s energy — and that 3 percent is totally dependent on fossil fuels, especially natural gas, for 24/7 backup. Solar and wind are nowhere near being able to replace the energy that fossil fuels provide today, let alone the far greater amounts of energy humanity needs going forward.
One of the key benefits of more fossil fuel use, I will argue, will be powering our enormous and growing ability to master climate danger, whether natural or man-made — an ability that has made the average person on Earth 50 times less likely to die from a climate-related disaster than they were in the 1°C colder world of one hundred years ago.
Because fossil fuel use is so vital to the world’s future, I will argue, today’s proposed policies to rapidly eliminate fossil fuel use would, if fully implemented, have truly apocalyptic consequences — making the world an impoverished, dangerous, and miserable place for most people. And even if fossil fuel elimination policies aren’t fully implemented — which they won’t be, given the expressed intent of China, Russia, and India to increase their fossil fuel use — even widespread restrictions on fossil fuel use that fall far short of elimination will shorten and inflict misery on billions of lives, especially in the poorest parts of the world.***
And that’s not all folks! https://mailchi.mp/tomwoods/flatten?e=be42d9646c
***Here's what they're up to now.
Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, is speaking of "flattening the curve" -- but she's not speaking about COVID.
She's using that propaganda phrase for a whole new purpose now. The "curve" is energy use.
"So what we have to do," she says, "is flatten the curve and avoid the peak demands. We will propose a mandatory target for reducing electricity use at peak hours and we will work very closely with the member states to achieve this." https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/speech_22_5389 https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/09/07/new-normal-eu-president-calls-for-mandatory-energy-rationing-to-flatten-the-curve-of-demand/
They have created this energy problem in the first place, and of course they are positioning themselves as the people who will manage it for us.
States have always thrived on crises, but this is getting ridiculous.
One crisis after the other, always with the elites imposing more mandates and restrictions, and always hurting the most vulnerable people.
Radio host Jesse Kelly put it this way: "Whenever you hear climate change death cultists talk about 'transition' and 'some pain,' just know that’s poor people dying. That's the 'some pain' they’re talking about."
And our friend Saifedean Ammous just added: "If you are a productive human but cannot get 24/7 electricity today, the only possible explanation is that you’ve been enslaved by your local politicians and central bankers."
In the old days, progressives claimed to want to improve the standard of living of the poorest. Now it's pretty blunt: you will be poorer, and if you object you're an enemy of the state.***
They want you to be poor, get it now? But that’s not all! https://www.climatedepot.com/2021/12/31/climate-lockdowns-paper-published-in-prestigious-journal-laments-democracy-calls-for-authoritarian-environmentalism-modeled-after-covid-lockdowns-to-address-the-alleged-climate-emergency/
***Abstract Excerpt: Is authoritarian power ever legitimate? ... While, under normal conditions, maintaining democracy and rights is typically compatible with guaranteeing safety, in emergency situations, conflicts between these two aspects of legitimacy can and often do arise. A salient example of this is the COVID-19 pandemic, during which severe limitations on free movement and association have become legitimate techniques of government. Climate change poses an even graver threat to public safety. Consequently, I argue, legitimacy may require a similarly authoritarian approach."
The paper's author Ross Mittaga, calls for "authoritarian environmentalism" to address the alleged climate "emergency." : "It is ultimately an empirical question whether authoritarian governance is better able to realize desired environmental outcomes and, if so why and to what extent? Yet, it is undeniable that nearly all wealthy democratic states have failed to respond adequately to the climate crisis. By contrast, various less affluent authoritarian regimes have been successful in implementing stringent climate policies..."***
Democracy dies in darkness, right? And that darkness will be during that state-mandated blackout to save the planet. I thought Democrats cared about democracy? Not anymore (and America was never intended to be a democracy) they don’t and again, they want you to be living in a crappy apartment, they want you to have no property & they want you to be poor.
Read further into the story for scathing critiques of this Nazi-esque lockdown proposal.
But that’s still not all kids! https://www.climatedepot.com/2022/04/13/another-lockdown-in-europe-to-punish-putin-report-urges-europe-should-ban-all-business-flights-private-jets-internal-flights-ban-car-use-within-cities-reducing-heating-in-buildings-fast-tr/
***A new report is urging Europe to hurt Putin by imposing COVID lockdown-inspired energy bans on Europeans. The RePlanet report, being touted by the UK Guardian, is calling for a “ban all business flights, private jets & internal flights,” imposing a ban on “car use within cities” and “reducing heating in buildings,” all while “fast-tracking solar & wind” power. The RePlanet report is titled, “SWITCH OFF PUTIN: UKRAINE ENERGY SOLIDARITY PLAN – How we can stop funding Putin’s war machine.”
“We propose bans on all business flights, private jets and internal flights within Europe to save oil, and bans also on car use within cities,” the report’s authors said. “This should be combined with free public transport. While the impacts of this are not easily quantified, we believe this could double the reduction in oil use beyond that proposed by the IEA.”
The report is explicit in its enchantment with COVID lockdowns. “In some ways, the speed of the change will resemble the Covid lockdowns,” the report noted, adding, “as, with Covid lockdowns, social pressure to abide by national restrictions will also play a big part.”
The report, which calls for “energy rationing” and claims it will be “rationing via fair shares,” apes the COVID template by stating, “We may need a state of emergency declared.” The report is open about how COVID lockdowns can be the model for so much of what progressives and government leaders want to impose on society.***
You will be poor & you will like it. Unfortunately, the Democrats here have done a fine job of cajoling their already underemployed base to do more of nothing & when you have nothing to lose, climate lockdowns, energy rationing won’t hurt you… as much.
However, what will they do when their small apartment is freezing & there’s nothing to eat? This is why George Washington urged that a free people ought to be armed. It would get exceedingly ugly. Oh, did I mention that you’ll be poor & like it?
Now, Joe Biden & his cronies are renewing their push to shove everyone in electric cars, this is part of a larger war on Rural America, as I chronicled here http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/archive http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/sam-seder-debunked
Electric cars would be feasible (assuming you can afford them, but do not worry, I’m sure people who actually pay taxes will fund the “credits” for underemployed Democrat voters in Chicago, Detroit, Baltimore & Los Angeles to obtain them) if you live in an area sans adverse weather & have a short trip to work.
The Democrats also intend (this is part of so-called “smart growth” policies) to make electric cars more feasible by blueprinting 15-minute cities. https://www.theepochtimes.com/15-minute-cities-are-complete-impoverishment-and-enslavement-of-all-the-people_5231593.html
***Christine Anderson, a member of the European Parliament, believes that COVID-19 passports and QR codes that became widespread during the pandemic were test runs toward implementing “15-minute cities” aimed at tightening government control over people.
A 15-minute city is a neighborhood where a resident can reach everything they need, such as a grocery store, doctor, and so forth, within a 15-minute walk. Anderson says such cities are the beginning of tighter government control of people.
The government can exert control by deciding “you are no longer allowed to leave your 15-minute immediate area. They don’t have to fence it in or anything. It will be done via digital ID,” she said in an interview on the “American Thought Leaders” program published on April 25.
“If you now fancy another store and it does not happen to be in your neighborhood, guess what? You won’t be going to that store anymore,” she told host Jan Jekielek.
“Like I said, total control is what we’re talking about.”
In Europe, legislation is being advanced to set up 15-minute cities. According to Anderson, the Digital Green Certificate, the COVID pass introduced during the pandemic, was only a test run designed to get people used to producing a QR code and related requirements.
“Now, they’re slamming us with these 15-minute cities,” she said. “Make no mistake, it’s not about your convenience. It’s not that they want you to be able to have all of these places that you need to get to close by. It’s not about saving the planet either.
“With the 15-minute cities, they will have to have those before they can lock you down, and that’s what we were talking about here.
“In Great Britain, some counties have already passed legislation. They will be able to impose a climate lockdown. That’s the next step. That’s what we are talking about. In order to do that, they will have to have these 15-minute cities.”
The next step, Anderson says, will involve restricting people within their localities, only allowing them to leave the place two or three times a year. However, the rich will be able to get away with these rules as they can purchase exit passes from the poorer segments, she stated.
“The poor people will be left in these 15-minute neighborhoods, while the ones that are better off get to go wherever they want to go. This is what we are talking about.”
An article featured on the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) website https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/03/15-minute-city-stickiness/ in March 2022 called the concept of 15-minute cities “a lot more than a fad” and a consequence of the current times, specifically the pandemic.
“With COVID-19 and its variants keeping everyone home (or closer to home than usual), the 15-minute city went from a ‘nice-to-have’ to a rallying cry,” it claimed. “As climate change and global conflict cause shocks and stresses at faster intervals and increasing severity, the 15-minute city will become even more critical.”
Digital Tyranny
Anderson pointed out that Chinese communist-style “social credit” systems are already being tested out in Europe.
“There are pilot projects already going on in Bologna [Italy]. There, it’s called the ‘Bologna Wallet.’ In Vienna, it’s called the ‘Vienna Token.'”
“It’s voluntary for now, and it’s only pretty much enticing people. If you do this, you get some tickets for a little less, to go to the theater. Voluntary. Once again, [it’s the] first step,” she said.
“But soon, there will be a time when you don’t have a choice anymore. You have to have this Digital Green Certificate with this QR code. Then, they will tell you where you can go, what you can do, and what you cannot do.”
Anderson criticized “The Line” project that’s under construction in Saudi Arabia. A 200-kilometer-long, 200-meter-wide, 500-meter-high structure, The Line is projected to house up to 9 million people.
“If I wanted to get total control of the people, that’s exactly where and how I would house them, and then, have them on a three-meal-a-day prescription. Guess what will happen if you do not do as you are told—they will probably cancel those meals. It’s so easy,” she said.
“That’s what we’re talking about. When you really take all of this together, there is no other way for me to actually say this—it will be a complete impoverishment and enslavement of all the people. I’m stating it so clearly because that’s what it seems like, and that’s what it looks like to me.”
The concept of 15-minute cities is drawing heated debate on social media. When documentary maker Carla Francome posted a thread in February about the benefits of such cities, it soon attracted criticism.
One person suggested that while 15-minute cities sound great in theory, they would become a problem once the government tries to enforce them.
Another pointed out that if 15-minute cities were to become a reality, Francome would have to gain a special permit to visit her father if he was living 30 minutes away.
“One day, you’ll be trapped in your 15-minute city, waiting for a drone to deliver your sweet and sour bugs and trying to remember what it was like to be on holiday,” author Lisa Keeble wrote in an April 22 tweet. “You’ll ask yourself – when did it all go wrong.
“When you applauded lockdowns and masks.”***
Heck, you may not even need a car, yay! Many of the mentally ill divorcee Sam Seder’s listeners have no property & probably have no car because they utilize taxpayer-funded urban mass transit. Yes, taxpayers in Iowa who never use this garbage are funding it. https://archive.ph/fmWvi (Just in case you refuse to look at anything on Facebook) https://rumble.com/v1lsjoo-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-endorses-violence-against-the-nyc-mta.html
https://www.climatedepot.com/2023/04/12/watch-morano-oan-tv-on-biden-epas-ev-mandates-this-is-mandating-car-shortages-for-americans-to-force-people-into-public-transit/ https://www.climatedepot.com/2023/04/10/great-car-reset-bidens-epa-to-release-strict-new-fed-emissions-standard-to-move-u-s-car-market-decisively-toward-electric-vehicles-up-to-2-3-of-cars-sold-mandated-to-be-ev-by-2032/
***Biden's EPA Chief Micheal Regan: "Together, today's actions will accelerate our ongoing transition to a clean vehicles future, tackle the climate crisis head on... […]
CNN: The US Environmental Protection Agency is preparing to release strict new proposed federal emissions standards for light-duty vehicles that, if implemented, would move the US car market decisively toward electric vehicles over the next decade. The EPA is considering emissions standards that could make up to two-thirds of new passenger vehicles sold in the US electric by 2032, according to a source familiar with the proposal. If implemented, the new greenhouse gas performance standards would start for light-duty vehicles that are model year 2027 and gradually increase through model year 2032. By 2032, the rules would ensure that 64% to 67% of all new-car sales in the US would be electric vehicles, according to the source
The Great Car Reset has arrived: Our transportation system is being intentionally collapsed; (and our freedom of movement is being stripped away) EVs to be forced upon YOU without a vote!
Marc Morano: "This is the planned rationing of vehicles. The planned rationing of American cars. That's the only way this plan makes sense ... the only result is going to be shortages of cars and a completely altered used car market. You can look to Cuba to find out what it's like to have a raging used car market because that's what we're looking at here. And you can look to old East Germany. East Germany had their famed Trabant car, where people would have to get on waiting lists for years to get one and that's what we're faced with here when the government is going to mandate you can only buy a new electric car. ... An Australian bank is announcing it's not going to give financing for loans to anyone buying a gas-powered car. The World Bank has now announced it wants to set a timetable to stop the funding for -- even at the automaker level for gas-powered cars. The powers that be, the corporate world, the bankers, the governments, academia -- they've decided that gas-powered cars are over and they're putting all the forces into play to end it without our say in it.
And if you somehow avoid the gas car bans, they will make obtaining gas for it a nightmare! See:
Gas Station Bans Next on Climate Agenda: Colorado city BANS new gas stations due to ‘obligation’ to tackle ‘climate change’ – Follows California cities)
American Energy Alliance "Today, less than 6% of cars are electric, despite years of generous tax credits...The EPA rule is an attempt to accelerate the number of electric vehicle sales to 67% by 2032."***
This reminds me of a lot of cities in California (surprise!) trying to make you poor & restrict cheap energy to the poor & middle class by declaring a war on natural gas (which is much cleaner than coal, but it be damned too!). https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/natural-gas-bans/
A really bad idea called property taxes started in Wisconsin, but since then most really bad ideas start in California & spread across these United States.
***Municipalities across the country have taken it upon themselves, often at the behest of radical environmentalists, to restrict the use of natural gas in their jurisdictions. These restrictions often take the form of bans on future construction projects including natural gas hookups. Several states have taken the initiative to protect their residents from these short-sighted and counterproductive rules. Here you will find a continuously updated list of municipalities and states that have enacted or are considering legislation on this issue and an overview of problems associated with natural gas bans.***
Iowa, https://www.legis.iowa.gov/legislation/BillBook?ga=89&ba=HF555 among other states (most of them Republican-controlled legislatures) have prohibited local natural gas bans. Look for the Democrats to attempt to make this a national ban at some point, Federalism only matters when it’s a Democrat-leaning County wanting to implement mask mandates & shelter-in-place orders inside a Republican trifecta.
Those natural gas bans are another facet of the Democrat war on property-owners & businesses in Rural America.
224
views
1
comment
Creepy Sam Seder & the Democrat (California) Crime Wave
Creepy Sam Seder & the Democrat (California) Crime Wave
California’s policies have also made Santa Monica, a once lovely place – a violent dunghole https://www.theepochtimes.com/how-californias-famous-beach-town-is-getting-unsafe-matt-wilson_5136175.html
According to the FBI https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/LATEST/webapp/#/pages/explorer/crime/crime-trend here are San Francisco Homicides: 2015 (53), 2016 (57), 2017 (56), 2018 (46), 2019 (40), 2020 (48) & no data for 2021.
According to the FBI here’s San Francisco Robbery data: 2015 (3,610), 2016 (3,175) 2017 (3,220), 2018 (3,165), 2019 (3,055), 2020 (2,388) & no data for 2021.
FBI data for S.F. pertaining to Rape (revised, NOT legacy definition): 2015 (344), 2016 (342) 2017 (367), 2018 (354), 2019 (324), 2020 (198) & no data for 2021.
FBI data for S.F. pertaining to Aggravated Assault: 2015 (2,703), 2016 (2,616) 2017 (2,658), 2018 (2,579), 2019 (2,514), 2020 (2,162) & no data for 2021.
FBI data for S.F. pertaining to Motor Vehicle Theft: 2015 (6,915), 2016 (5,433) 2017 (4,834), 2018 (4,217), 2019 (4,249), 2020 (5,966) & no data for 2021
FBI data for S.F. pertaining to Larceny-Theft: 2015 (40,918), 2016 (36,991) 2017 (44,587), 2018 (39,675), 2019 (39,887), 2020 (25,319) & no data for 2021
Now, all the same FBI data for Los Angeles City (no data for 2021 yet, sadly): Murder 2015 (282), 2016 (293), 2017 (281), 2018 (258), 2019 (258), 2020 (351)
FBI data for Los Angeles City: Robbery 2015 (8,952), 2016 (10,307), 2017 (10,814), 2018 (10,327), 2019 (9,652), 2020 (8,013) You can see there, Murder is skyrocketing, but many Robberies are LIKELY not being reported
FBI data for Los Angeles City: Rape 2015 (2,209), 2016 (2,343), 2017 (2,455) , 2018 (2,528), 2019 (2,274), 2020 (1,983)
FBI data for Los Angeles City: Aggravated Assault 2015 (13,713), 2016 (15,874), 2017 (16,957), 2018 (17,013), 2019 (17,216), 2020 (18,535)
FBI data for Los Angeles City: Motor Vehicle Theft 2015 (16,152), 2016 (18,591), 2017 (19,193), 2018 (17,316), 2019 (15,642), 2020 (21,169)
FBI data for Los Angeles City: Larceny-Theft 2015 (61,191), 2016 (64,739), 2017 (65,757), 2018 (67,963), 2019 (66,253), 2020 (50,990) That signal is definitely contradictory to what we are seeing in murder, assault & motor vehicle theft. My educated guess is that in San Fransicko & Lost Angeles, there are a lot of thefts (petty or not) going unreported due to the fact that “petty theft” is tolerated by bureaucrats, so why report it? Nothing will be done & this is done by Soros-allied scumbags on purpose.
Let us look at state data now & they collate it BY COUNTY, so I will give you the list for San Francisco County, but not Los Angeles City. I will instead use Los Angeles County & you can compare. Ok? https://data-openjustice.doj.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2022-08/Homicide%20In%20CA%202021.pdf https://oag.ca.gov/crime
Murders for San Francisco County (which is the same as San Francisco City, it is a consolidated city/county entity) 2015 (53) 2016 (58) 2017 (56) 2018 (47) 2019 (40) 2020 (49) 2021 (56)
Murders for Los Angeles County 2015 (592) 2016 (622), 2017 (580) 2018 (570) 2019 (508) 2020 (677) 2021 (841)
I cannot find useful data by County or City in the state reports or databases (it’s mostly statewide data) for items like Aggravated Assault, Rape, etc.
According to the San Francisco PD https://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/stay-safe/crime-data/crime-reports here’s the Murder data (click on the DECEMBER report, as it will give YTD totals, no need to add up the numbers from 12 reports): 2015 (53) 2016 (58) 2017 (56) 2018 (46) 2019 (41) 2020 (48) 2021 (56) 2022 (56)
NOTE: SF publishes previous years’ data, so when I was looking for the official figure for 2015, I would look at the 2016 report, as these numbers are often revised. One report would not open (2019), there was an error, so I went with the current report, no idea how much it changed in real time. The numbers for 2022 will likely change slightly when the year end 2023 report is published, sue me.
Aggravated Assault 2015 (2,725) 2016 (2,616) 2017 (2,690) 2018 (2,622) 2019 (2,547) 2020 (2,183) 2021 (2,395) 2022 (2,590)
Robbery 2015 (3,635) 2016 (3,175) 2017 (3,256) 2018 (3,208) 2019 (3,099) 2020 (2,404) 2021 (2,257) 2022 (2,370)
Rape 2015 (398) 2016 (342) 2017 (437) 2018 (417) 2019 (396) 2020 (224) 2021 (225) 2022 (237)
Auto Theft 2015 (7,004) 2016 (5,433) 2017 (4,943) 2018 (4,308) 2019 (4,442) 2020 (6,082) 2021 (6,077) 2022 (6,281)
Larceny/Theft (Larceny/Theft category includes Theft from Vehicle) 2015 (41,811) 2016 (36,991) 2017 (46,716) 2018 (42,200) 2019 (42,022) 2020 (25,692) 2021 (32,005) 2022 (35,401)
All those crimes in SF dropped in 2020 (Except for Auto Theft & Murder), but all of them (except for Rape, Larceny & Robbery) have picked up since then & returned close to the level seen in the 2 years prior to the COVID-19 plandemic.
My educated guess is in SF, there are a lot of pretty thefts not being reported. It’s hard to hide a murder & if a woman is raped, that is usually reported (unless you are some Regressive Democrat dumbass on a college campus where 90% of the women are raped & nobody says anything, wink wink).
Petty theft is not taken seriously by the clowns in smoke-filled backrooms in California, ergo – there is a lot of petty (or not so petty, if you are a business-owner) being ignored because it does no good to report it.
Auto Thefts are usually reported, because you might need that car to get home from your job & that has been exploding since the Plandemic started. Petty theft is a big business in California & the legislature has essentially green-lighted it, no wonder it is out-of-control & likely boatloads of it are not even reported to the police.
You made your bed California, sleep in it. Keep voting w/ your feet good people in California, get out while you can & move to Texas, Iowa, the Carolinas, Florida, Idaho, etc. Places where this B.S. it not tolerated. If you’re a mentally ill nut like Sam Seder, stay there, we don’t want you groomers/nutcases anywhere near us.
Some Los Angeles Police Department data. If you want to look at all the “people of color” murdered in Los Angeles back in 2022 https://www.lapdonline.org/lapd-homicide-victims/ Los Angeles City is 57% Hispanic/Latino & Black combined, yet I would wager from a cursory evaluation of the victims, >75% are of those races. #BlackLivesMatter
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/losangelescitycalifornia/PST045222
Some salient facts from LAPD’s 2022 Homicide Report https://lapdonlinestrgeacc.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/lapdonlinemedia/2022-LAPD-Annual-Homicide-Report-03-23-23.pdf Despite universal background checks required by California law https://www.gov.ca.gov/2022/06/02/fact-sheet-californias-gun-safety-policies-save-lives-provide-model-for-a-nation-seeking-solutions/ the LAPD “seized 8,427 firearms in 2022, 234 fewer than the 8,661 from the previous year, a decrease of three percent Citywide.”
Guess a lot of gangbangers are ignoring that universal background check law, funny, isn’t it? This will be used to compile lists of gun owners by the ATF, using defunct FFL’s primarily. The hood rats will never comply w/ that law or the law the requires you to have insurance to operate a motor vehicle or when your license is suspended, you can’t drive anymore. Some things never change.
Indeed, as I stated above, in 2022, 90% of the arrestees for murder were Black or Hispanic & 88% of the victims were of those races as well. #BlackLivesMatter #peopleofcolor I know this will shock you, but the vast majority of the victims are Male & they were 35 years old or younger. Most of those arrested were between 18 & 35 years of age. Where have I seen this movie before?
California state data that I elucidated on my website some years ago said this: “Not surprisingly, from 2010-2019, 26.34% of the Murder arrestees were Black in California. 46.7% were Hispanic, 20.06% were White & 6.89% “Other.” Gee, I wonder why Asians are assimilating fine, having usually intact families, not snorting drugs up their noses or shooting up & not butchering each other in the hood. From 2010-2019, 28.55% of the Murder victims were Black, 43.4% were Hispanic, 20.32% were White & 7.3% were Other. Plenty of Black-on-Black Murder happening in the Golden State too.”
The Los Angeles Police Department lists 382 murders in 2022, 402 in 2021 & 355 in 2020. The LAPD says (and this will buttress my point contrary to universal background checks) that from 2020-2022, well over 50% of the murders in the city were… “gang related.” If you think these hood rats are going to comply w/ universal background checks then whatever you are smoking needs to be extinguished & you should head to the Betty Ford Clinic to dry yourself out & then have your head examined.
I need to make this point as well: Los Angeles is like any other city that struggles or doesn’t struggle with murder & violent crime. I saw this perusing Oakland’s data years ago. LAPD is divided into 4 Bureaus. The Central & South Bureaus (especially the latter) have the vast majority of the murder & the vast majority of the gang-related murder.
The West Bureau is very safe, trailing way behind all other bureaus. Missouri is a great example of this. MO has a sky-high murder rate, yet the vast majority of it is happening in Democrat-dominated, diverse counties such as Jackson County, St. Louis County & St. Louis City. The uber-Republican counties that overwhelmingly voted for Donald Trump & Other Republicans, not so much.
But Sam Seder & his dysfunctional group of troglodytes do not want you to know that. For every mass shooting they fawn over & cry crocodile tears over, hundreds of Black men are being slain by Black Men. Now, back to the game.
Unfortunately, I could not find good data within the LAPD chronicling petty thefts, assaults, motor vehicle thefts, etc. over long periods of time.
In conclusion, the crime wave in parts of California can be laid at the feet of Black Lives Matters, Gavin Newsom, Maxine Waters & bottom-feeders like the divorcee Sam Seder. California has basically said it is okay to steal $900 from Walgreens or Nordstrom’s, which is precisely why those entities are leaving many Democrat-run cities like L.A. or Portland, because they have become uninhabitable hell holes.
This is what Black Lives Matters wants & they are getting their way in California as an organized crime larceny ring has sprung up, smash-and-grabs are prevalent there. Don’t let them California your Idaho, your Iowa or your Florida. Shun these useless parasites & keep your powder dry.
As Dalton said in Road House & I will attach this to where California is headed – it is going to get worse, before it gets better. Mr. Chairman, I Yield Back.
Sam Seder has refused to dedicate one of his shows in a futile attempt to refute the following statement: “The most violent jurisdictions in America have beaucoup black on black murder & they tend to vote Democrat.” http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/sam-seder-ilhan-omar-racism3 http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/covid-increase-homicides http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/black-lives-do-not-matter https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoA9J0G6s-6pat3gSUBf3nm1FOVF3z3Rg https://rumble.com/v2ahqta-divorcee-sam-seder-vs.-utubekookdetector-black-on-black-crime.html I accept the groomer’s concession.
Sam Seder #majorityreport #samseder is afraid to debate my friend James Patrick Holding on The Impossible Faith. https://tektonics.org/lp/nowayjose.php #samsederwontdebateJPH Sam has no confidence in that religion degree he obtained from a diploma mill.
187
views
Election Denier Sam Seder vs Rudy Giuliani
Election Denier Sam Seder vs Rudy Giuliani
Recently, Divorcee & Election Denier Sam Seder was whining about Rudy Giuliani employing “trickery” in the form of telling illegal aliens & legal resident aliens that were not official, legal U.S. citizens that they would be required to show proof of citizenship before voting.
Is the divorcee Sam Seder engaging in election denialism? His party is full of election deniers – such luminaries as Maxine “make a crowd around Trump Cabinet members when you see them” Waters, Reverend “Love Child” Jesse Jackson & his mentally ill son, Barack “It’s clear not every vote was counted in 2004” Obama, Robert “Sheets” Byrd, Barbara Boxer, Hillary “Russia Hacked the Vote” Clinton, the overweight, Looking Like the Crypt Keeper Stephanie Tubbs Jones, “Ferret Face” Jamie Raskin, Sheila Jackson Lee, Cynthia McKinney, John Conyers (who wanted an FBI investigation), Eddie Bernice Johnson, “The Swimmer” Ted Kennedy who drove off a bridge in 1969 resulting in the death of Mary Jo, Elijah Cummings & many others. Uh-oh, the divorcee Sam Seder is perpetuating The Big Lie!
All that has been catalogued here https://rumble.com/v1ou9vw-kari-lake-decimates-the-democrat-media-on-the-big-lie.html
What if Rudy Giuliani said, “I don’t regret that at all, they can call it what they want, Dinkins didn’t win did he?” You may remember “Dingy” Harry Reid saying that after admitting he lied about Mitt Romney’s tax returns on the Senate floor during the 2012 Presidential campaign.
When the divorcee Sam Seder whines about people showing proof of citizenship or an ID, he tips his hand as a vote fraudster. Why do you think Ohio had to go all the way to the SCOTUS for the right to clean their voter rolls? If you fail to vote in 3 federal elections, you are removed from the voter rolls.
The Democrats do not want voter roll maintenance done, this way if they can mail out ballots to every registered voter willy-nilly, they have a pool of inactive voters to utilize for fraud in the event of a close election.
http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/democrat-vote-fraud Why do you think Democrats like Keith Ellison sponsored legislation that would have allowed anyone to walk into any precinct & cast a ballot sans identification that would not be provisional. Because he wants fraud to be easy.
Why do you think Republicans in Iowa had to go to court to fight for a Photo ID requirement? Because the Democrats want fraud in the event of a close election. Voter fraud in many cases does not have to be widespread, many races would require only one in one-thousand votes to be fictitious to sway an election.
The divorcee Sam Seder has tipped his hand. Iowa has a Photo ID requirement, but if you DO NOT have your ID (and I am working to change that) you have to sign a sworn affidavit that you are who you say you are & if you’re found guilty of false information you can be charged w/ a felony.
I want a Photo ID required or your ballot is provisional & you have the Tuesday after the election to provide the relevant information to your County Auditor.
Is Sam Seder engaging in the Big Lie, is the old man an election denier? Sounds like it, the pot & the kettle have now tendered their resignations.
Here’s some sobering information courtesy of New York City Department of Investigation 2013 Report on the New York City Board of Elections’ Employment Practices, Operations, and Election Administration
[Begin Report Quote] ***[Progressives] who oppose efforts to prevent voter fraud claim that there is no fraud - or at least not any that involves voting in person at the polls. But New York City's watchdog Department of Investigations [see p. 12-24 here] has just provided the latest evidence of how easy it is to commit voter fraud that is almost undetectable. DOI undercover agents showed up at 63 polling places last fall and pretended to be voters who should have been turned away by election officials; the agents assumed the names of individuals who had died or moved out of town, or who were sitting in jail. In 61 instances, or 97 percent of the time, the testers were allowed to vote. Those who did vote cast only a write-in vote for a "John Test" so as to not affect the outcome of any contest. DOI published its findings two weeks ago in a searing 70-page report accusing the city's Board of Elections of incompetence, waste, nepotism, and lax procedures...
You'd think more media outlets would have been interested, because the sloppiness revealed in the DOI report is mind-boggling. Young undercover agents were able to vote using the names of people three times their age, people who in fact were dead. In one example, a 24-year female agent gave the name of someone who had died in 2012 at age 87; the workers at the Manhattan polling site gave her a ballot, no questions asked. Even the two cases where poll workers turned away an investigator raise eyebrows. In the first case, a poll worker on Staten Island walked outside with the undercover investigator who had just been refused a ballot; the "voter" was advised to go to the polling place near where he used to live and "play dumb" in order to vote. In the second case, the investigator was stopped from voting only because the felon whose name he was using was the son of the election official at the polling place.
Here are some highlights, er, lowlights from the DOI report:
DOI also found that the BOE’s Personnel Guidelines do not advise employees about their whistleblower protection rights. The New York City Whistleblower Law protects employees of City agencies, including the BOE, from retaliation for reporting to DOI or to a member of the City Council, the Public Advocate or the Comptroller, each of whom must refer the complaints to DOI, conduct that employees reasonably believe involve corruption, criminal activity, conflicts of interest, gross mismanagement or abuse of authority…
DOI interviewed a former BOE employee who reported that the BOE maintains active voter registrations for people who are not eligible to vote, including deceased individuals, felons, and nonresidents of New York City, and duplicate registrations for some voters. The former employee also stated that people easily could vote as ineligible voters remaining on the rolls because those individuals would appear in the registration books on Election Day and poll workers do not scrutinize the signatures of voters to determine that they that are similar to the pre-printed digitized signatures in the poll book. In light of these statements, DOI sought to test whether ineligible individuals are present on the voter rolls. Thus, using various database searches, DOI identified 176 individuals who at one time were registered voters in New York City: 86 deceased persons, 42 incarcerated felons, and 48 former City residents. During DOI’s Citywide 2013 Election Day investigative operations, DOI sought to determine whether any of them remained in BOE’s registration books and to test whether investigators using the names of those ineligible individuals would be permitted to vote. In sum, DOI investigators found that 63 out of 176 (36%) of the ineligible individuals were still listed as eligible voters in the registration books at poll sites. The majority of those 63 ineligible individuals remained on the rolls nearly two years, and some as long as four years, since a death, felony conviction, or move outside of New York City.
In total, DOI investigators were able to “cast a vote” as 61 of the 63 (97%) ineligible voters who were listed in the registration books – 39 deceased persons, 14 felons, and 8 nonresidents – although no vote was cast for any actual candidate. In lieu of voting for any actual candidate, investigators cast a vote for a fictitious candidate named “John Test.” During the September 2013 primary and October 2013 runoff elections using lever voting machines, investigators signed the registration book as the ineligible individuals, entered the lever voting machine, and cast a vote either by doing a write-in vote for “John Test” or gaining access to the lever machine without doing a write-in vote. During the November 2013 general election using electronic scanner machines, investigators signed the registration books as the ineligible individuals and then cast a vote by doing a write-in vote for “John Test” in the Mayor’s race and scanning the paper ballot through the scanner.
In the 61 out of 63 instances when the ineligible individuals were in the registration books, DOI investigators reported that poll workers did not meaningfully review the signatures provided by investigators for similarity with the pre-printed signatures in the registration books. DOI investigators also found that poll workers did not check the dates of birth listed in the registration books as they were required to do…
In five instances, DOI investigators in their twenties and thirties posed as individuals whose ages as recorded in the registration books, ranged from 82 to 92, and despite the obvious disparity, the investigators were given ballots or access to lever booths without question by the BOE poll workers…
DOI identified 86 deceased individuals who at one time were registered voters. During DOI’s Citywide Election Day investigative operations, DOI investigators went to poll sites where the deceased individuals would have voted based on their previous home addresses. DOI investigators found that 39 of the 86 deceased individuals were listed in the registration books. The majority of the 39 deceased individuals who were listed in the registration books died before January 2012. In all 39 instances, DOI investigators were able to cast a vote as the deceased persons who were listed in the registration books. DOI investigators cast those 39 votes as deceased individuals in all five Boroughs including 11 votes in Manhattan, 7 votes in Brooklyn, 7 votes in Queens, 9 votes in the Bronx, and 5 votes in Staten Island…*** [End Report Quote]
Now that we have that out of the way, I’ve challenged the divorcee Sam Seder numerous times to a debate on why the most violent jurisdictions in America have loads of black on black murder & they tend to vote Democrat. For every cop that shoots a black person, whether it is justified or not, I have a truckload of young black males slain by other young black males. http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/sam-seder-ilhan-omar-racism3
The divorcee has continued to run away from this & if I challenge him, he is required to answer immediately or he forfeits. I’ve had a number of his autistics (probably offended someone there) tell me to call into his little internet show & joust w/ him on this.
Do they really think I can cover that several hundred plus pages of data I have in a 20-minute phone call w/ the bi-polaroid, when I have a real job & no time to listen to internet shows?
I’ve informed them to tell the divorcee to dedicate tomorrow’s show attempting to refute my data & I will respond in kind. I’ve yet to see this challenge met, apparently Sam has conceded. Why are his voters so violent & so mentally ill.
The most dangerous adversary to a young black male is not the police, not a Confederate Flag-Waving Redneck, not a white militia member – but other young black males & I have the data to prove it.
It’s not trickery, it’s not sorcery, it’s not ambiguous – it’s the real deal & I didn’t set on my laptop during the break of an obscure internet show named after an obscure show on a failed network like Err America.
I collated it myself & nobody “googled some facts” during the break & fed me talking points.
Sam Seder has privately acknowledged this, but he’s going to say it publicly, period.
https://spectator.org/harry-reid-i-lied-about-romney-but-he-didnt-win-did-he/ Harry Reid admits he lied about Mitt Romney’s tax returns & says, “I don’t regret that at all… They can call it whatever they want, Romney didn’t win did he.”
One last thing old man, did Joe Biden ever engage in election trickery where fat women from out of state were stuffing ballots in drop boxes in Georgia at 3AM w/ rubber gloves on? Just wondering. http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/democrat-election-fraud
I debunked the creep Sam Seder #samseder #majorityreport on so-called “Republican Voter Suppression” https://rumble.com/v24tyd2-divorcee-sam-seder-debunked-on-republican-voter-suppression.html
Sam Seder is afraid to debate James Patrick Holding #samsederwontdebateJPH on The Impossible Faith. https://tektonics.org/lp/nowayjose.php Methinks the divorcee lacks confidence in that religion degree from a diploma mill
420
views
Creepy Sam Seder & Dylan Mulvaney EMBARRASSED by James O'Keefe
Dylan Mulvaney was recently confronted by the incomparable James O'Keefe & seemed as uncomfortable as women feel when "females" that have a penis enter their locker room.
If Dylan Mulvaney *attempts* to enter the women's rest room in Iowa, he will be arrested.
Sam Seder #samseder #majorityreport is likely angry at this, but he would get arrested to (this is contingent upon him *attempting* this) if he tried it. Would Sam Seder like it if Roman Polanski was wandering around his daughter's locker room?
No wonder his wife left him. YIKES!
https://okeefemediagroup.com/ <<< If you want to support James O'Keefe
35
views
Sam Seder supporter MDL61 gets PWNED again!
Sam Seder supporter MDL61 gets PWNED again!
His comment https://rumble.com/v28rvib-mrlive-the-2023-state-of-the-union-and-analysis-2723.html#comment-208388660
My rebuttal https://rumble.com/v28rvib-mrlive-the-2023-state-of-the-union-and-analysis-2723.html#comment-211550952
Informing him he needs to put up or shut up on my challenge https://rumble.com/v28rvib-mrlive-the-2023-state-of-the-union-and-analysis-2723.html#comment-223678332
Apparently, this guy has thrown in the towel, his silence speaks volumes https://rumble.com/v28rvib-mrlive-the-2023-state-of-the-union-and-analysis-2723.html#comment-224147268
All these comments are archived, just in case he deletes them later. Just plug any of the above links into either of the two following & you will see the relevant comments. These are the comments for this video, but feel free to peruse all the comments on that video as they are archived as well 😉 https://web.archive.org/ https://archive.ph/
This concludes my second & final tussle w/ a social media vegetable named MDL61, a very vacuous supporter of the divorcee Sam Seder. Since he called me a “racist” for suggesting that Asians were defeating Blacks in government schools, I challenged the old man to find for me as many government school districts (and you cannot use a school that has 10 Black students & 6 Asian students from a majority white District, your sample has to be much bigger, I informed him of that) that he could where Asians were being outperformed by Blacks in graduation rates (use a 3-year block of data too, so we can avoid outliers) and/or reading & math comprehension.
I found a scant few where Whites were defeating Asians, http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/sam-seder-ilhan-omar-racism3 but not many. Asian men are out-earning every other demographic in America, despite being a helpless minority. It must be their culture.
If you have a father in the home, a good male role model in the home the child is far, far, far more likely (prisons are full of fatherless children that never finished High School) to finish school & thus far less likely to partake in recreational drug use, which makes it far less likely they will become a criminal.
https://rumble.com/v1mt84s-more-information-on-out-of-wedlock-births-2010-2017.html
https://rumble.com/v1mtkci-divorcee-sam-seder-suddenly-concerned-about-fatherless-black-children.html https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoA9J0G6s-6owc0S5klji-hEBtbAzbloB
http://freewebs.com/professor_enigma/black-lives-do-not-matter https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5pWdKMB4mE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aq3n4CsMx8k Most young black children do NOT live w/ both parents, many of them have no positive male role model in the homes & as Denzel Washington says, “If they don’t find a father in the home, they’ll find one in the streets & prison will become their home.”
Denzel’s parents were divorced, but his father was always a part of his life, which is likely why he is successful & not dysfunctional. My father has always been there for me, which is why I am successful & not dysfunctional.
Back in the 1940s & 1950s, most Black children had both biological parents living in the home & by the mid-1960s, we had seen a seismic downturn, which has been dwarfed by the seismic downturn in Black kids living w/ both parents over the past 50 years. It is sad, it is disheartening.
Democrats refuse to acknowledge this & play to the lowest common denominator, fuming over conspiracies like the police are hunting them (in jurisdictions where the City Council is overwhelmingly Democrat too, hmmm) & Confederate militias, White Supremacy – every imaginary boogeyman but the truth.
The soft bigotry of low expectations is an effort to keep Black people poor & trapped in government schools that are a wreck. And you get to pay for it.
On the flip side, Asians are doing the opposite. The vast majority of them are born to parents (see this data from California, it explains A LOT! https://rumble.com/v2lnikg-ever-wonder-why-california-is-a-mess-part-ii.html) who have degrees or at least finished high school & daddy is in the home, he doesn’t spare the rod.
Junior does his homework every single night, like it or not. Eventually, he learns to like it & ends up another one of the many Asian men who have done nothing but succeed in this country. Some were born here & some came here under the auspices of a meritorious immigration system, a system that was damaged by LBJ & his Democrat Congress in the 1960s, a system that Barack Hussein Obama tried to damage even further (but failed for the most part due to a GOP House) & a system that Joe Biden & his treasonous cronies have effectively neutered in a plot to bring in more riff-raff, merit need not apply.
Meritorious Hispanics (such as those who went to Florida from Cuba) & Asians are less likely to vote Democrat, which is why Joe Biden wants a tsunami of people, many of which are illiterate in their own language, to fill the vacuum & destroy this country.
These meritorious Asians are doing well in government, charter & private schools, but Black children (especially in places like California & New York and especially in government schools) are not doing well.
https://rumble.com/v1dmq69-brian-tyler-cohen-is-not-very-bright-part-v.html BONUS: Look at the demographics & voting preferences of some of the states w/ the highest % of residents that did not finish 9th grade, as well as the % of the population that did not finish High School. This is what the Democrats want & states ravaged by illegal immigration tend to fare worse.
Enough of that, MDL61 balked when challenged at debating something specific, something detailed, something a meme or a 2-sentence snarky reply where he tries to be funny would not cut it because he cannot do that.
Even *IF* he could refute my data (and he cannot), he is too lazy to put the necessary work into it, he does videos where he cuts-and-pastes the content of others or does some silly meme.
But he cannot refute my data & he goes to the same well every other underemployed troglodyte in the Dumocrat Party does – he goes to the race card. “You’re RACIST!” You can call me racist, but you can’t call me wrong Mark.
MDL61 also whined that I prohibited him from posting on my channel because he has a lot of free time & while I am at work (unless I am taking some well-deserved vacation, such as today) he would be posting 2-sentence responses on all my videos, none of which even remotely answered anything I brought up, so he would be a waste of time in that regard. He just wants to get his name up there & he is not going to debate anything specific, period. He can see the last 3 paragraphs as to why I will give the old man no attention on my channel.
I would ask him to put up a point-by-point, detailed response to one of my videos, but he won’t do that, he’ll just post 35-word “replies” instead. I do these detailed videos as a hedge against folks like him who have no facts & no intelligence, but they do have gobs of free time to try & yell over everyone on the interwebs.
I already challenged him to upload a detailed response & you all saw the results of that, he is a waste of time.
In closing, the board has received MDL61’s concession and I have graciously accepted it. Unless he uploads an actual response that does not consist of a meme (and I doubt he will) this will likely be the final time I give him any attention.
As soon as I give him some attention, he runs away, but he wants to yammer about Donald Trump, who has not a clue who he is. It’s as if he only “debates” people who don’t know who he is or cares what he posts. He loves debating opponents that do not even know there’s a debate going on. Funny, isn’t it?
PS This guy loved repeating “John Andrew from Iowa” as if he had found it hidden in some cryptic Gnostic Gospel. He simply went to my website & looked at my social media links. I go by “John Andrew” & a few other monikers (I chose “John Andrew” because an unemployed Janitor from Chicago named McCainisthroughX thought I was some other person named who went by “John Andrew” & started falsely accusing him of being me. This was not true, but I ran w/ it), he can repeat them all he wants & look for “John Andrew” in the phonebook, I doubt he’ll find me, in fact I am quite certain of it as that is not my name, but by all means, repeat it as if you are some super-sleuth.
My previous response to this clown https://rumble.com/v2bv0gy-sam-seder-supporter-mdl61-gets-pwned.html
399
views
1
comment
Ever Wonder Why California Is A Mess? Part II
Ever Wonder Why California Is A Mess? Part II
An influx of illegal immigrants, along w/ a Progressive ideology has doomed California. If the U.S. doesn’t switch gears, I think the entire nation will be like California. An influx of low-skilled labor isn’t going to increase our labor force participation rate.
Progressives are having hissy fits over merit-based immigration (which is actually a good Donald Trump idea) because it’s harder to bribe successful folks w/ welfare benefits. What are they going to do? Tell them that if they’re successful we’ll take more of your money to finance an extravagant welfare state?
Broken link? Find it archived https://archive.ph/ https://archive.org/
The background material
https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2016/2016014.pdf
https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2017/2017094.pdf
https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018070.pdf
https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2015/2015011.pdf
https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2016/2016006.pdf
https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/getpubcats.asp?sid=091#061
https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/least-educated-state-california-no-1-percentage-residents-25-and [NOTE: see NCES Table 219.50 in conjunction w/ this]
https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_DP_DPDP1&prodType=table
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/nj,co,fl,US/PST045218 (Race and Hispanic Origin)
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/az,nv,tx,nm,ca,US/PST045218 (Race and Hispanic Origin)
For data on out-of-wedlock births & other source data, see one of my previous videos on California. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVBxOUm54Qg
Table 401.60. U.S. Department of Education appropriations for major programs, by state or jurisdiction: Fiscal years 2012-2016 (language assistance or English language acquisition)
From FY2012-16, California received $759 million for language assistance or English language acquisition classes from federal taxpayers.
Table 107. Percent of high school dropouts (status dropouts) among persons 16 to 24 years old, by sex and race/ethnicity [NOTE: For years 1998-2001]
1998 US avg all races 11.8
1999 US avg all races 11.2
2000 US avg all races 10.9
2001 US avg all races 10.7
1998-2001 Cumulative avg 11.2
1998 Hispanic origin 29.5
1999 Hispanic origin 28.6
2000 Hispanic origin 27.8
2001 Hispanic origin 27
1998-2001 Cumulative avg 28.2
Table 219.80. Percentage of high school dropouts among persons 16 through 24 years old (status dropout rate) and number of status dropouts, by noninstitutionalized or institutionalized status,
birth in or outside of the United States, and selected characteristics. [NOTE: For years 2010-16]
You are far, far more likely to not be in the labor force if you dropped out of high school [e.g. table 504.20].
2010 US avg all races 8.3
2011 US avg all races 7.7
2012 US avg all races 7.0
2013 US avg all races 6.8
2014 US avg all races 6.3
2015 US avg all races 6.0
2016 US avg all races 5.8
2010-16 cumulative avg 6.8
2010 Hispanic 16.7
2011 Hispanic 14.5
2012 Hispanic 12.8
2013 Hispanic 11.8
2014 Hispanic 10.7
2015 Hispanic 9.9
2016 Hispanic 9.1
2010-16 cumulative avg 12.2
2011 “For those born outside of the United States”, “Hispanic” 27.9
2012 “For those born outside of the United States”, “Hispanic” 24.2
2014 “For those born outside of the United States”, “Hispanic” 20.8
2015 “For those born outside of the United States”, “Hispanic” 18.7
2016 “For those born outside of the United States”, “Hispanic” 16.1
Cumulative avg for selected years (not all were available) = 21.5
California ranks No. 1 among the 50 states for the percentage of its residents 25 and older who have never completed ninth grade and 50th for the percentage who have graduated from high school, according to new data from the Census Bureau… 9.7 percent of California residents 25 and older, the Census Bureau says, never completed ninth grade. Only 82.5 percent graduated from high school… California and Texas—while having the highest percentages of residents 25 and older who never finished ninth grade and the lowest percentages who graduated from high school—are the nation’s two most populous states.
In fact, the 2,510,370 California residents 25 and older who, according to the Census Bureau, never finished ninth grade outnumber the entire populations of 15 other states. In California, children are required to attend school from six years of age until they are 18… The Census Bureau’s American Community Survey queries a random sample of more than 3.5 million U.S. households each year and publishes a one-year estimate for each year. The five-year estimate, the bureau says, “is a weighted average of the five one-year estimates.” The newly released five-year estimates are for the period from 2013 through 2017.
Nationwide, 5.4 percent of residents 25 and older have never finished ninth grade, according to the latest five-year estimates.
Turning to Table 104.70: Number and percentage distribution of 6- to 18-year-olds, by parent’s highest level of educational attainment, household type, and child’s race/ethnicity & in the *older literature* it is Table 12: Percentage distribution of 6- to 18-year-olds, by parent’s highest level of educational attainment, household type, and child’s race/ethnicity.
2006, Both household types, (single-parent & two-parent household) all ethnic groups (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.) “Less than high school completion” = 11.2%
2006, Two-parent household, all ethnic groups (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.) “Less than high school completion” = 7.4%
2006, Single-parent household, all ethnic groups (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.) “Less than high school completion” = 19.2%
2006, Two-parent household, Hispanic, “Less than high school completion” = 29.5%
2006, Single-parent household, Hispanic, “Less than high school completion” = 39.1%
------------------------------------------
2008, Both household types, (single-parent & two-parent household) all ethnic groups (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.) “Less than high school completion” = 10.9%
2008, Two-parent household, all ethnic groups (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.) “Less than high school completion” = 7.4%
2008, Single-parent household, all ethnic groups (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.) “Less than high school completion” = 18.3%
2008, Two-parent household, Hispanic, “Less than high school completion” = 28.7%
2008, Single-parent household, Hispanic, “Less than high school completion” = 38%
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2010, Both household types, (single-parent & two-parent household) all ethnic groups (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.) “Less than high school completion” = 11.6%
2010, Two-parent household, all ethnic groups, (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.) “Less than high school completion” = 7.1%
2010, Single-parent household, all ethnic groups, (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.) “Less than high school completion” = 20.3%
2010, Two-parent household, Hispanic, “Less than high school completion” = 25%
2010, Single-parent household, Hispanic, “Less than high school completion” = 37.4%
---------------------------------------------------
2011, Both household types, (single-parent & two-parent household) all ethnic groups, (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.) “Less than high school completion” = 11.2%
2011, Two-parent household, all ethnic groups (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.) “Less than high school completion” = 7.5%
2011, Single-parent, all ethnic groups (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.) “Less than high school completion” = 18.3%
2011, Two-parent household, Hispanic, “Less than high school completion” = 26.8%
2011, Single-parent household, Hispanic, “Less than high school completion” = 36.9%
---------------------------------------------------------------
2013, Both household types, (single-parent & two-parent household) all ethnic groups, (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.) “Less than high school completion” = 10.8%
2013, Two-parent household, all ethnic groups (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.) “Less than high school completion” = 7.2%
2013, Single-parent, all ethnic groups (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.) “Less than high school completion” = 17.6%
2013, Two-parent household, Hispanic, “Less than high school completion” = 24.9%
2013, Single-parent household, Hispanic, “Less than high school completion” = 35.2%
---------------------------------------------
2016, Both household types, (single-parent & two-parent household) all ethnic groups, (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.) “Less than high school completion” = 10.4%
2016, Two-parent household, all ethnic groups (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.) “Less than high school completion” = 6.4%
2016, Single-parent, all ethnic groups (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.) “Less than high school completion” = 17.8%
2016, Two-parent household, Hispanic, “Less than high school completion” = 20.8%
2016, Single-parent household, Hispanic, “Less than high school completion” = 32.3%
-------------------------------------------
Both household types, all ethnicities cumulative avg. (2006, 2008, 2010-11, 2013, 2016) = 11%
Two-parent households, all ethnicities cumulative avg. (2006, 2008, 2010-11, 2013, 2016) = 7.2%
Single-parent households, all ethnicities cumulative avg. (2006, 2008, 2010-11, 2013, 2016) = 18.6%
Two-parent household Hispanic cumulative avg. (2006, 2008, 2010-11, 2013, 2016) = 26%
Single-parent household Hispanic cumulative avg. (2006, 2008, 2010-11, 2013, 2016) = 36.5%
------------------------------------------------
More uncomfortable data, out-of-wedlock birth rates in states w/ higher-than-average “Hispanic” populations. I covered this previously for California & New Mexico, it’s worth revisiting.
Births to unmarried women, by race and Hispanic origin of mother: United States, each state and territory
California average, all races 2010-17 = 39.25%
California Hispanic 2010-17 = 52.8%
California Black 2010-17 = 66.85%
California White 2010-17 = 23.58%
New Mexico average, all races 2010-17 = 51.73%
New Mexico Hispanic 2010-17 = 57.95%
New Mexico Black 2010-17 = 55.41%
New Mexico White 2010-17 = 30.56%
Texas average, all races 2010-17 = 41.8%
Texas Hispanic 2010-17 = 50.6%
Texas Black 2010-17 = 63.6%
Texas White 2010-17 = 26.8%
Arizona average, all races 2010-17 = 45.1%
Arizona Hispanic 2010-17 = 56.6%
Arizona White 2010-17 = 30.5%
Arizona Black 2010-17 = 62.4%
Nevada average, all races 2010-17 = 46%
Nevada Hispanic 2010-17 = 54.2%
Nevada White 2010-17 = 34%
Nevada Black 2010-17 = 72.8%
Florida average, all races 2010-17 = 47.6%
Florida Hispanic 2010-17 = 50.9%
Florida White 2010-17 = 36.9%
Florida Black 2010-17 = 69.2%
Colorado average, all races 2010-17 = 23%
Colorado Hispanic 2010-17 = 34%
Colorado Black = 40.4%
Colorado White = 17.1%
New Jersey, all races 2010-17 = 35.3%
New Jersey Hispanic 2010-17 = 59.2%
New Jersey Black 2010-17 = 67.7%
New Jersey White 2010-17 = 18.5%
Dishonorable Mention: District of Columbia, all races 2010-17 = 50.8%
District of Columbia Hispanic 2010-17 = 61.2%
District of Columbia Black 2010-17 = 78.1%
District of Columbia White 2010-17 = 5.7%
Dishonorable Mention II: Mississippi average, all races 2010-17 = 54.07%
Mississippi Hispanic 2010-17 = 54.52%
Mississippi Black 2010-17 = 80.6%
Mississippi White 2010-17 = 32.35%
USA average all races 2010-17 = 40.36%
USA average Hispanic 2010-17 = 53%
USA average White 2010-17 = 29%
USA average Black 2010-17 = 71.1%
In the states that I covered that have a much larger than average “Hispanic” population [NOTE: Make sure you take a gander at all the Census “race/ethnicity” designations] – California, New Mexico, Texas, Arizona, Nevada, Florida, Colorado & New Jersey – the Hispanic out-of-wedlock birth rate was 52%. The only state that was any sort of outlier was Colorado.
The overall average for all races in those states was 41.2%.
Sans Colorado the average was 54.6% for “Hispanic.” For all races in those states sans Colorado it was 43.8%. America has a problem—we have a lot of unskilled (or at least very irresponsible) immigrants failing to finish high school, dropping out of the labor force & having children who don’t finish high school, drop out of the labor force & Bernie Sanders is there w/ your wallet to save the day.
A merit-based immigration system is something I’ve been in favor of for a long time. Jobs are merit-based, always have been. A meritocracy in the workplace dictates that the best employees get “better” schedules, better pay & promotions.
If you can’t run the forklift, if you can’t drive the truck, if you can’t get enough units/hour then guess what? They will find something else for you to do or let you go. If you can’t manage the production floor effectively & it’s organized chaos, someone else will do it for you.
Immigration should be no different, there’s nothing wrong w/ a meritocracy because the business of America is business, not global or domestic handouts.
I’ve said it many times before, I will say it again—America’s people were voting for crazy people (like FDR & Truman) back in the 1940s & 1950s, w/ one important caveat—those people themselves weren’t crazy & they practiced that lost craft called “personal responsibility.”
Many of those folks were those who emigrated to these United States from Europe in the 1910s & 1920s. Those folks didn’t have a welfare state to take advantage of, even if they were privy to doing so. They learned English, they integrated, they built families & most important—the family unit was largely intact.
Many of those folks were part of “The Greatest Generation” that helped us win World War II & turned America into an economic powerhouse (these folks also unfortunately voted in pols like FDR, Truman & LBJ—socialists who started this grand welfare state).
That ALL started to change in the 1960s & here we are seeing the nuclear family crumbling & a lot of emasculated soyboys like Bernie Sanders, Stan Seder, Bill Maher, Bruce Jenner & Beta-male O’ Rourke.
I blame “We The People” as much as I blame the cockroaches in Washington, there are a lot of folks in this country that need some tough love, some personal responsibility & probably a lifetime supply of condoms & IUDs.
If you’re in a single-parent household you are not doomed, nobody is saying that. However, those in single-parent households are more likely to have an absentee father or mother (as opposed to regular visits or shared living arrangements) & those in single-parent households (especially those who were NOT born here) are more likely to be drop out of high school, far more likely to live w/ a parent who has no education & far, far more likely to NOT be in the labor force.
This is a huge problem. It’s also become an expensive problem as taxpayers are held hostage by those who seek to buy Peter’s vote w/ Paul’s money.
Ergo, we do need to shift from a family & refugee immigration program to an economic & merit-based immigration system. Nancy Pelosi says, “nobody is without merit.” Uh, no. Folks who have HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, STDs, gang-affiliations, lack of a family structure—have no business being here.
If we didn’t have an extravagant welfare state/cradle-to-grave entitlement structure this would be less of a problem. But we do have those obstacles to deal with & bringing in more unskilled labor that isn’t participating in the labor force isn’t going so solve our oncoming economic problems—it will exacerbate them.
It’s not racist to point out that California has a lot of unskilled Hispanics in single-parent households that aren’t participating in the labor force (merit-based immigration would solve much of that). It’s not racist to point out many of them are on welfare. It’s not racist to point out that California’s public education system is failing all ethnic groups there, especially Hispanics & Blacks.
Just as it’s not racist to point out that Mississippi has a lot of white trash that have kids out of wedlock, no family structure, dropping out of high school, high-illiteracy rates & lots of STDs.
Just as it’s not racist to point out that Mississippi’s black residents are usually poor because daddy isn’t around. It’s not racist to point out the truth, but some in this age of massive political correctness want to make it that way & shout-down anyone who dares oppose them.
I guess if “white privilege” (and maybe “Asian privilege” too) means I had two parents that were always around, always worked, always gave me more love than I deserved & always provided for me—then I am guilty as charged.
Bill Maher is right about one thing (although I disagree to how he arrives at this conclusion & I will amend his quote slightly), many Americans (including Bill Maher) are ignorant & very irresponsible.
It’s not my fault whites in Mississippi are failing & it’s certainly not my fault that California bringing-in droves of unskilled Hispanics is failing. Our current immigration system is failing Asian & Hispanic immigrants who are educated, who do have two-parent households, who are practicing that lost art called “personal responsibility.”
As far as most Progressives go who disagree with me, void of facts—it’s easy to conspicuously compassionate when you do not pay the cost. Have a nice day & you have been warned!
This video originally uploaded on YouTube back in 2019
175
views
Donald Trump's bad logic (contra Ron DeSantis)
Donald Trump's recent ad contra Ron DeSantis was not a home run, he was struck out looking (to use a sportsball analogy) IMO
The most violent jurisdictions in America have lots of black on black murder & they typically vote Democrat. Why is that? https://rumble.com/v2ahqta-divorcee-sam-seder-vs.-utubekookdetector-black-on-black-crime.html
25
views
1
comment