TheDarkMan

First, legal and technical stuff: this video contains footage which I found on the YouTube website. Such material is probably partially or totally covered by copyright but is used here as “Fair use” for the purposes of “criticism, comment...reporting, teaching, scholarship, [AND] research” in compliance with Chapter 1, S107 of the Copyright Law of the United States of America. The same fair use proviso applies to photographs. On the technical side, I could have annotated this video verbally, but the absence of my voice is no loss, and the absence of my ugly mug, a distinct improvement! I use WINDOWS MOVIE MAKER to create my video files, in WMV format. Files converted to this from other formats - including files downloaded from YouTube - lose quality; there can also be other problems, for me at any rate. I thought though that once a file was so converted, there would be no further such loss through editing. I may have been a little optimistic on that score, so please forgive the at times blurry images. On the content side, this is by no means my first contribution to Holocaust Revisionism as my fans - both of them - will realise. This video is though not simply about Holocaust Revisionism, it is about one of the greatest taboos of our age, of all ages, about the people who perpetuate it, and those warriors who have the temerity to challenge it. Although David Cole may both look and sound like a latter day Jerry Lewis, he is an individual of great personal courage. Having said that, he is not the first Jew to have broken ranks with the tribe, indeed, the founding fathers of Holocaust Revisionism were the French Socialist Paul Rassiner (1906-67) and the German Jew Josef Ginsburg (1908-90), two men with the most impeccable anti-Nazi credentials, an instant refutation - as if any were needed - of the de rigueur and at times mindless claim that Holocaust Revisionism is nothing but and never was anything but, a sinister Nazi conspiracy. I may have been a little hard on Michael Shermer, he is, after all, prepared to debate with Revisionists, unlike all the other arrogant authoritarians and dogmatists of the Exterminationist lobby, the men and women who insist there is no debate and refuse to come within spitting distance of us in case they too become tainted. Nevertheless, though Shermer has dared to debate Revisionists - on their own ground, if not on their own terms - his approach is fundamentally dishonest. By this, I do not mean that he is wilfully deceiving the world, rather that he is unwittingly deceiving himself; his rhetoric is a dead giveaway. I said in a previous video that when I started reading Revisionist literature c1980, Organised Jewry were terrified that we would be believed, but now they are terrified we may be right. With that in mind, I would invite any other prospective David Coles to break ranks and join us in this enterprise. We have already seen the beginnings of a paradigm shift on Zionism, with the 1982 atrocities of Sabra & Shatilla and then the First Intifada. The recent massacres in both Gaza and on the high seas, have ensured this transformation will be completed, hopefully within the next four or five years, even if the loonies of the so-called 9/11 Truth Movement continue to contaminate the waters with their ludicrous mantra of “9/11 was an inside job”. This video is not about conspiracy mongering or anything of that nature, it is, as David Cole said, about physical evidence, and the inability of both the mass media and academia to face the facts. Indeed, the forensic examinations of the remains of the so-called gas chambers - especially the one where the doors open inwards! - is I think proof positive that rather than the gas chamber fantasy being planned from the outset it was in fact something that developed in much the same way as did the myth of those other weapons of mass destruction half a century later. Having dug the hole, the propagandists kept on digging until eventually even they actual creators of the myth began to swallow their own propaganda.

This is oh so typical. Trump was accused of xenophobia and - bore, bore - racism - for restricting tourists and others from selected countries. Then months later, the very same people who attacked him for this attacked him for not taking the threat seriously. And the media dutifully went along with it.

The loveliest woman in Hawaii.

A short video made to dispel the lying propaganda directed against Donald Trump over the phony border crisis, and the bigger issues behind it. Below is a transcript (my narration only): Every Picture Tells A Story It’s often been said that every picture tells a story. Here is a recent one. Although this is clearly a montage, what is it telling you? The evil, wicked, racist Donald Trump takes pleasure in inflicting pain on asylum seekers, especially on the young and vulnerable. Here is another photograph, one that has not been staged: the message is a two year old boy has been drowned because of the wicked, racist policies of those evil, white Europeans. At one time they used to show us photographs like this to brainwash both the young and not-so-young into accepting uncontrolled immigration into Europe, but eventually the sheeple began to wise up, especially when they realised the same people who were so horrified about what happened at Belsen during the Second World War had no qualms about inflicting these horrors on innocent people. Here is a picture that tells an horrific story. This is a young Cambodian girl named Long Pros. According to Nicholas Kristof writing for The New York Times, January 3, 2009, she was 13 and hadn’t even had her first period when a young woman kidnapped her and sold her to a brothel in Phnom Penh. The female brothel owner beat her and tortured her with electric current until she agreed to have sex with men. Then the woman gouged out her right eye with a piece of metal. This is as shocking a story of inhumanity to an innocent young girl as anyone could wish to hear. It is also a pack of lies. Here is the truth, one that shows the best rather than the worst of humanity. One should of course feel sorry for Long Pros, the poor girl has after all lost an eye, but we should exercise a little critical faculty any time we hear a sob story with or without accompanying pictures. This woman is Amina Muse, she had a real sob story to tell. She was gang-raped in Somalia, and saw her brother murdered, at least, that is what she told the UK authorities. The only problem is, she was actually living in Sweden at the time. In January 2011, she was given a four and a half year sentence at Harrow Crown Court for a massive fraud. It remains to be seen if her real name is Amina Muse or if she has ever been to Somalia. In the United States, this bloke, Bright Erhmwemma, would be called an undocumented worker. In the UK he was called an illegal immigrant. “No one is illegal!”, they cry. Even when they prey on vulnerable women? Here is another asylum seeker. This woman took the legal route to American citizenship, but that citizenship was revoked in 2013 when it was revealed....that’s right, she took an active part in the Rwandan genocide. Every nation should have the right to defend its borders, and to protect its citizens from murderers, rapists, or plain undesirables. Like the mother who dragged this young girl all the way up from Honduras against the wishes of her husband, the child’s father. And the father who caused the death of his son by taking him out in an inflatable boat hoping eventually to reach Canada, even though he had been granted asylum in Turkey. Here is another photograph about the manufactured Southern border crisis, showing kids held in cages like animals. One senior Democrat actually cried for the camera when he saw this, but this is a photograph taken under the Obama Administration. And here is the truth rather than the hysteria; this is Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch in their weekly report, for July 13, 2018 explaining what has really been happening with these poor chil’len. All we hear, all we ever hear, from the left, and increasingly from the Democratic Party is: racism, racism, racism. Curiously, Mexico doesn’t tolerate illegal immigrants. This is what happens to so-called asylum seekers in Thailand. And don’t even think of applying for asylum in Japan. What do Mexico, Thailand and Japan have that Western nations don’t? The real question is, what do we have they don’t? The answer is of course white guilt. We’re supposed to feel guilty about our white privilege, and for the crimes committed against minorities in the past: real and imagined. The White Man owes asylum seekers, so-called. He owes them his wealth. He owes them his land. He owes them his women. We are constantly reminded of this. How many times have you seen pictures of starving African babies? Well guess what, they were showing us pictures like this in the 1960s. And this is the White Man’s fault because... The lunatics of the far left, and that is what they are, lunatics, would gladly see Europe over-run by tens of millions of Africans, and America by tens or even hundreds of millions of so-called asylum seekers from Central America, Africa, and God knows where else. White Americans are not happy with this, nor are an increasing number of blacks, who let’s face it have often had a raw deal, not because of so-called racism, but because of the way they’ve been used and exploited by the Democrats. What will happen to Europe and America if these insane leftists get their way? Look around you, look at the technology we take for granted every day. Was this developed by Africans? Did a Kenyan invent the computer; did a Ugandan invent the internal combustion engine or the electric generator? Did Nigeria put a man on the Moon? We must stop this madness now, for all our sakes. This woman may call us deplorables, but this is where she lives. This is just one of her homes. It’s time to end white guilt. And this left wing incited bloodless genocide. Every picture tells a story, but that story may be just that, a story, or even a fairy tale.

Secret Agent Man https://www.songfacts.com/facts/johnny-rivers/secret-agent-man Trump v The Media Liars https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/wikinut/wikinut-trump-v-the-media-liars.html

This video is a response to the intellectually dishonest and self-indulgent whinings of the Mumidiots, in particular Johanna Fernández, who actually made a film about this loser. Interviewed about Abu-Jamal and the significance of his "case" she responded with a broadside against the American criminal justice system, as can be seen here. According to her, 30% of black men in America aged 16-29 are in prison, on parole or probation, and guess what, it's all Whitey's fault. As the man said, there are lies, damned lies and statistics, not to mention statistical racism, so let's have some fun with official statistics. The following are extracted from a table compiled by the U.S. Census Bureau, “Statistical Abstracts of the United States: 2011”: In 2008 there were 678,677 male inmates in American prisons, but only 99,175 female. Now what was that about racism - surely if anything the criminal justice system is sexist ?? What is the reality? The reality is a lot more complex; crime is not a homogeneous entity; crime is anything that is proscribed by law; at times this has included drinking alcohol, having consensual sex with other adults or even reading from the Bible. The biggest genuine debate concerning crime in the United States and most other countries is not race or sex but the use, possession and distribution of recreational drugs from marijuana to heroin and crack cocaine, but this is not what most people are thinking of when they talk about crime. For most of us, crime means someone burgling our house or apartment, being mugged in the street, someone stealing money from our bank account; it means being assaulted or murdered simply because we happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time; it means having our car stolen, or being run down by a drunken driver... It is a sad biological reality that men are more predisposed to criminal acts than are women; violent crime, in particular street crime, is a young man's game for reasons that have nothing to do with any ludicrous race or gender bias. While some "right wing extremists" also make much of the fact that black men are "disproportionately involved in crime" - whatever that means - it is often conveniently forgotten that blacks are just as often the victims of crime. The most serious genuine problem blacks have in this field is murder, in particular young black men killing each other, often over trivialities. But there are other crimes which transcend even this, as you will see in this short video. When Johanna Fernández claims it is all Whitey's fault, does she really mean Terry Blair murdered six women because of white bigotry, or that the "Grim Sleeper" was driven to perpetrate his heinous crimes by racist oppression? Get a life. Incidentally, all the claims Fernández makes here about her hero are totally without foundation, as anyone who has taken the time to read the trial and appeal transcripts will realise. Abu-Jamal murdered a police officer, shot him through the head. He was arrested within two minutes of the crime - two minutes! There were witnesses, there was his gun which just happened to have five spent cases in it; one of his bullets was found in Daniel Faulkner's back, the other in his head. All this and more, yet incredibly braindeads like Johanna Fernández claim he is innocent. What is so frightening about this woman is not that she has such a wide (and dumb) audience but that she is a PhD. In spite of the enormous publicity generated over his case, Abu-Jamal is a run-of-the-mill murderer. If the death penalty were to be reserved only for the worst of the worst cases - like the serial killers alluded to here - there would be little if any manufactured controversy over it. And, in spite of its being racist - whatever that means - it is clear that most blacks support the death penalty in principle, so even if it had any basis in fact, the "racially stacked" jury argument doesn't wash. Credits Extracts from video clips used in this presentation are "Fair use" for the purposes of "criticism, comment...reporting, teaching, scholarship, [AND] research" in compliance with Chapter 1, S107 of the Copyright Law of the United States of America.

This pre-recorded hangout begins with some prefatory comments about Sage journals. I discuss the sentencing of false rape accusers explaining why harsh sentencing isn’t always a good idea. I discuss a number of actual rape cases including one I removed from the Timeline, which may or may not have been a false accusation. I cover the case of PC James Formby, yet another police officer who threw away his career over a pathetic woman. An article I found recently, from 1996, allegations by the daughter of Arthur Mullard, who sounds like another head case. After that I discuss two requests for information from two different police forces, one of which was totally ignored. Before turning to the Sage journals I cover the case of Conor McGregor and explain why I will not be adding him to the Timeline. After this I discussed said articles: the first related to #MeToo and “disclosure”. I have not and will not be adding any of these articles to the Timeline because frankly they are ridiculous, not mendacious. Police officers are said to be suspicious of rape allegations. Why do you think that is? The next is an article specifically about false rape allegations, including the mythical 2%; the name Lisak crops up here – see linked page below. The part about his work with “undetected sex offenders” is amusing to say the least. Mary Koss gets a look in – totally dishonest advocacy research, see the Timeline. The third article covers regret sex and alcohol. The authors seem to believe drunk women are just as credible as sober women. There is some discussion of rape law reform and so-called low conviction rates – specifically to England and Wales (and of course the rest of the world). I wasn’t sure but Bree is on the Timeline at February 4/5, 2006. The next one was on the theme stop blaming the victim; predictably it covers so-called rape myths, as well as homosexual rape. There is more garbage about rape culture. The next article concerns male rape, ie rape of males. Yes, there are homosexual rape myths too, there is also some garbage about women raping men. The next article is about understanding why rape victims go to the police. What is there to understand? The next article is from a Pergamon journal rather than a Sage journal; this focuses on child sexual abuse – real and imagined! Some of this sounds like coaching to me. The final article is from a Sage journal and concerns allegation made by teens. Police officers are said to treat these with suspicion. Yeah, right. I had quite a lot of criticisms to make about this, because frankly it is total nonsense, like rape culture again, and of course rape myths. The detectives quoted in this article were more skeptical than me! David Lisak on false rape allegations: https://www.falserapetimeline.org/false-rape-4987.html Mary Koss and The Scope Of Rape https://www.falserapetimeline.org/false-rape-1091.html False rape allegations and alcohol (follow the links) https://www.falserapetimeline.org/false-rape-5894.html Types of false rape accuser https://www.falserapetimeline.org/a-false-rape-timeline-types.html The Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale https://www.falserapetimeline.org/false-rape-1261.html “I Just Froze” – rape myths promoted by Rape Crisis Scotland https://www.archive.org/details/these-bitches-are-playing-you-archive My BitChute channel: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/InSYke600yaW/ Link to the entire body of my published work: https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/links.html Buy me a coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/ITMA Paypal: itsthatmanagain@yahoo.com

How To Stop Fatal Police Shootings — Dead You are about to watch a man being murdered. Be warned, some of you may find this distressing. That’s right, the victim was wearing headphones, obviously couldn’t hear, and was shot in the back fatally. Then what does this fucking imbecile do? Right, he handcuffs him. And what did the authorities do? They put a blind eye to the telescope. Just like Nelson at the Battle of Copenhagen. Watching that short clip reminded me of this scene from the classic 1973 Clint Eastwood film Magnum Force. In that film the police were murdering bad guys, albeit without due process. In the United States though, it’s innocent people who are murdered, battered, and everything in between. And what do you morons do? Yes, I’m talking to you, Black Lives Matter. You make it a racial issue. You even blame it on White Supremacy. As if. Here is another innocent, unarmed white man being murdered by the police. This time the pig who offed him was tried, and guess what, the jury acquitted him. You’ll probably recognise this poor guy; this is Walter Scott being murdered by Officer Michael Slager. Slager was charged with first degree murder. As with the murders of Daniel Shaver and Dillon Taylor, this was an open and shut case, but Slager’s trial resulted in a hung jury, and it was only a plea bargain that saw him sentenced subsequently to twenty years. None of these men needed to die. In the UK where police shootings are not an everyday occurance, firearm’s officers are far better trained, the first two would almost certainly not have happened. I realise that the situation in the US is very different, but even when you have an armed citizenry it should not be an option to shoot first and ask questions as an afterthought. There is though a simple way to halt most of these shootings and unnecessary deaths. All it would require is a simple change in the law. I’m now going to explain what that change is, and how we got to where we are. To do this, I’m going to go all around the houses, but if you bear with me, in a few minutes you will understand. Earlier this year I read a report that the Crown Prosecution Service - the equivalent of your Department Of Justice - had been fined £200,000 in 2015 for losing what was called highly sensitive information. This year it received a £325,000 fine for a similar data breach. I was curious as to who would pay the fine, so e-mailed the body concerned - the Information Commissioner. My e-mail was ignored, so were my two follow up e-mails. It was only when I contacted the man at the top directly that I received a response. This sort of behaviour is symptomatic of the way many civil servants treat us little people. In the United States, they even treat Congressmen and Senators the same way, as you will have realised if you have been following the attempts by Devin Nunes and others to extract information from the Department Of Justice about the great Trump-Russia hoax. The second takeaway from my e-mail exchange is that the fine levied on the CPS is paid to another branch of Government, in particular to the Consolidated Fund. In other words, the people at the top do something careless, something stupid, something bad, or even something terrible, and all that happens is the Government transfers money from its left pocket to its right. In July 2005, Jean Charles de Menezes was shot dead in London by a police officer. A discussion of the full circumstances of this shooting would take us too far afield, suffice it to say it was a tragic case of mistaken identity. He was shot in the head at point blank range because it was suspected he was wearing a suicide belt. Rather than charge the officers concerned or anyone else with murder, manslaughter, or any crime for which they could be held personally culpable, it was decided the Metropolitan Police should be prosecuted under health and safety regulations, I kid you not. The organisation was convicted and fined. Again, money was simply moved by the Government from its left pocket to its right, a lot of money was generated for lawyers, and police officers who could have been doing something useful sat around for days waiting to perjure themselves in court. On top of all that, the carpet muncher in charge of this bungled operation is now the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police. So how did this madness come about? To understand, we need to go back to the Nineteenth Century. Here is a quote from an article on the UK Parliament website about factory legislation. “In 1844, Parliament passed a further Factories Act which in effect was the first health and safety act in Britain. All dangerous machinery was to be securely fenced off, and failure to do so regarded as a criminal offence. No child or young person was to clean mill machinery while it was in motion. The Act limited the hours worked by children to six and a half, with three hours’ schooling, and set a maximum 12-hour day for young people between 13 and 18. The 12-hour rule also applied to women.” That’s what you morons call white privilege. This was the beginning of strict liability laws as they are understood today. Factory work in those days was often dangerous. If you’ve ever worked in a modern factory with lathes, or even a bakery, you’ll have noticed there are guards on machines and safety procedures that are regulated by law. The employer is responsible for any breaches of safety law, including injuries to staff. Even if he is not on the premises. Vicarious liability can be considered an offshoot of strict liability. In Limpus v London General Omnibus Company, (1862), it was ruled that a master is vicariously liable for the torts of his servants. There is more to it than that, but that should be enough. In English law, a limited company is a person, that was established in Saloman v Salomon, (1897). If a man breaks the law, he can be punished with loss of liberty. But a company is only a legal person, not an actual one. This means that in practice the only way to punish a company is to fine it. Police officers are agents of a company: the county, the state, the nation...However you phrase it, when a police officer damages property or a person, the penalty is paid by the employer. In practice, this means you, the public, any damages paid come out of your taxes. Normally, the police fight all the way then settle at the court door with no admission of liability. So here is the solution, a law must be passed, a simple law, shifting the liability from the county to the police union. That probably won’t stop the murder of a man in a Walter Scott type situation where the pig doesn’t realise he’s being filmed, and it won’t prevent either juries acquitting obviously guilty men or district attorneys declining to prosecute in the first place. But, if the Fraternal Order of Police had to shell out three or four multimillion dollar settlements over the course of a year or two, the thugs on the street would definitely be reigned in. Now you know what the real problem is, and the solution, what are you going to do about it?

This is the illustrated version of A SATIRE ON THE ADL. The un-illustrated version was published here simultaneously. A few points. Firstly, if i can be shown to have misattributed any of the photographs used in this film I will publicise the correct attribution as soon as practicable. My inexpert editing may give the impression that the Nazis dynamited people's homes, or that I think they did. I apologise for this; I've been having problems with Windows Movie Maker, in particular the film doesn't always break where the program indicates it does. For me at any rate! The Nazis did not dynamite people's homes, nor did they break the bones of Jews with rocks as shown here. Before the outbreak of World War Two, the persecution of the Jews was done within a framework of the rule of law; admittedly this law became increasingly repressive, but nothing like this happened in Nazi German or anywhere under Nazi dominion until well into the War. It is notable that "individual acts" against Jews were forbidden, and at times were punished severely. I have documented some of these in my book "Holocaust Denial: New Nazi Lie Or New Inquisition?" This documentation comes from Jewish - and only Jewish - sources. [Free download of this book in PDF format from Archive.Org]. It is not only white "racists" who are smeared by ADL hatemongers. One of the people they have traduced most is Louis Farrakhan. Herein he refutes the claim that he slandered the Jewish religion. The second clip shows Farrakhan's condemnation of the bigotry of blacks too, in particular the nihilistic gun culture of certain rap musicians and their "dissing" of the police and of law and order generally. I like in particular his comment that if rap musicians incite the murders of police officers there will be an equal and opposite reaction. This is the reality of most so-called anti-Semitism; Jewish hatemongers like Abraham Foxman - whom I have no hesitation in branding the most evil Jew in America - pour hate and vituperation on the goyim by the bucketload, and then whine about anti-Semitism when they are repaid in the same coin. His and Organised Jewry's attacks on Farrakhan and on Black Separatists generally has nothing to do with their anti-Semitism (real or imagined) and everything to do with their rejection of miscegenation, but that issue is beyond the scope of the current work. I should add that the occasional repetition is deliberate.

On June 13, 2023, the False Rape Timeline was seven years old. This pre-recorded hangout is a retrospective, an overview, and a look at some recent cases. GUESS WHO WASN’T RAPED LAST YEAR? was published January 2, 2016 (not at the bcginning of 2015); it covers selected false rape allegations for 2015. A TIMELINE OF RECENT FALSE RAPE CASES was published by DIGITAL JOURNAL on March 15, 2013. I mentioned my two site sponsors, including the late Paul Todd. I covered visitors to the Timeline, shadow banning, and redaction requests. I mentioned the major update of OPERATION YEWTREE, which now has its own page on the Timeline. Then I covered individual cases, in particular and in this order: Tina Turner Tara Reade The odious Menéndez brothers Bill Cosby accuser Victoria Valentino The conviction of Danny Masterson Cuba Gooding Junior Elizabeth Holmes Kesha Sebert A covered a ludicrous article in GLAMOUR magazine A new Netflix documentary – which I have not seen The musician Nick Carter A public consultation by the Crown Prosecution Service A new so-called study on rape – full of feminist lies. All the images at the end of the video are people who appear on the Timeline; victims and perpetrators. The links below are in the order in which they are alluded to in the hangout: Timeline Video Page – hangouts and related videos https://www.falserapetimeline.org/false-rape-4158.html GUESS WHO WASN’T RAPED LAST YEAR? https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/djetc/dj-false-rape-timeline.html A TIMELINE OF RECENT FALSE RAPE CASES https://infotextmanuscripts.org/djetc/dj-false-rape-timeline.html PAUL TODD (1961-2022) https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/djetc/paul-todd.pdf “OPERATION YEWTREE — Related Targets And Related Victims” https://www.falserapetimeline.org/false-rape-6773.html VICTIMS ARE BEING FAILED BY POLICE OFFICERS WHO *STILL* BELIEVE IN RAPE MYTHS https://web.archive.org/web/20230607000213/https://www.glamourmagazine.co.uk/victims-failed-police-officers-rape-myths the drugs and hallucinations page https://www.falserapetimeline.org/false-rape-6744.html

It Wasn’t About Cosby; It Isn’t About Corbyn Back in the late 1960s, early 1970s, a Batman comic, or maybe it was the TV series, featured an unusual plot. Batman’s arch-enemy the Joker would break into a warehouse and steal a wheelbarrow, then into a factory and steal a pot plant. Weird stuff. Batman and his sidekick in tights thought the Joker had gone off his rocker until they ran the relevant information through their computer. (In those days computers were massive things that ordinary people couldn’t house much less afford). What did the computer reveal? Only that the thefts were a distraction: the Joker was taking photographs. The recent trial and conviction of Bill Cosby was a similar distraction. Some people, mostly blacks, thought it was about race. It wasn’t about race. Others thought it was a genuine attempt to take down a serial sexual predator by hook or by crook. It wasn’t that either. Cosby was a distraction. The real purpose of the Bill Cosby witch-hunt was and is to remove statutes of limitations throughout the United States in all allegations of rape and lesser sexual offences. Here it is straight from the lips of one of his myriad false accusers: the whore Janice Dickinson: “I blame the laws about the statute of limitations which held me back because I believe it was ten years. Ah, I, I, I would very much like to see the laws change in America where there will be no statute of limitations ever...” If you want to see where this can and will lead, look at the UK where innocent men, famous and ordinary, have their worlds turned upside down or even their lives destroyed by whores like Dickinson or head cases like this certifiable lunatic. In the UK, we have seen and are seeing at the present time a different kind of witch-hunt, of Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. Many prominent Jews have pilloried him as an anti-Semite. The Jew with the biggest mouth here is the woman Norman Finkelstein calls the Barking Yenta, Margaret Hodge. Corbyn can make all this slander and libel go away; all he has to do is sign up the Labour Party to what Organised Jewry call the official definition of anti-Semitism, a definition that is no such thing. If he does this, they will never let up; they will simply demand more and more, continuing to whine about how oppressed and hated they are as they continue to pogo on other people’s heads. Signing up to this specious so-called definition would put Jews and in particular the State of Israel - the country that did this - above all criticism, and make it a criminal offence for ordinary people to speak out against it. I’m speaking here from personal experience because in 1996, Organised Jewry tried to drag me into court for exposing their blatant and easily provable lies, albeit on an entirely different subject. You’ll find my full videos on the Cosby witch-hunt and the campaign against Corbyn linked below; the latter is very short. Whenever you hear someone campaigning to take away your rights, campaigning for repressive legislation, or special privileges for some supposedly oppressed minority or other, always look behind the rhetoric. More often than not you’ll realise their ostensibly good intentions are anything but. Jeremy Corbyn — Anti-Semite? https://archive.org/details/jeremy-corbyn-anti-semite-archive The Prior Bad Acts Of Gloria Allred https://archive.org/details/the-prior-bad-acts-of-gloria-allred-archive

Two Thought Experiments Concerning Rape Hi, This is a short video by the International False Rape Timeline brought to you by a one-off donation from Mr E from A Voice For Men Forum. In July 2014, Richard Dawkins opined: “Date rape is bad. Stranger rape at knifepoint is worse. If you think that’s an endorsement of date rape, go away and learn how to think.” We won’t concern ourselves here with the question of date rape, like does it ever actually happen? Instead we will concentrate on real, unambiguous rape. According to the usual suspects, rape is just about the worst thing that could ever happen to a woman, physically, and even more so psychologically. Well, I beg to differ, and in this connection I’m going to show you two short clips, then ask you two rhetorical questions. The first is an excerpt from the conviction of Daniel Holtzclaw. If that name means nothing to you, he was the Oklahoma City police officer who was convicted of 18 sexual offences against women, including rape and oral rape. He received a total of 263 years in prison. The second is a very brief clip of Bethany Hamilton, who at the age of 13 had her left arm torn off by a shark, and though I hesitate to use the word lucky in that connection, she was lucky. To survive. Here is the first clip. And here is the second. Now here is the first question, imagine you were convicted of 18 sex offences, falsely unlike Holtzclaw, in Saudia Arabia where rape is capital. The judge says to you, normally you would be beheaded for committing such outrage, but we also have restorative justice, I have consulted with the victims, and they say an eye for an eye. You will be detained in Al-Hair prison for the next 54 weeks, during which time you will be sodomised once a week, a total of three times for every indignity you perpetrated on your victims. Then you will be deported. Okay, the choice is yours: execution, 263 years in prison, or a fate worse than death 54 weeks in a row. You know the answer. You also know the second question, and the answer to that: which fate would you rather suffer: rape, including anal rape, or having your arm ripped off by a shark?

A short video that tells it how it is. If you are a police officer and are "bent for the job", you can get away with anything, including murder. The viewer is invited to check out some of the cases alluded to here: James Ashley, murdered by PC Christopher Sherwood; Harry Stanley, gunned down by trigger happy morons; the tragic Stefan Kiszko - framed by a conspiracy between corrupt police, prosecutors AND forensic scientists. After he was cleared by the Court Of Appeal, a half-hearted attempt was made to prosecute those responsible. In 1995, proceedings against those responsible were stayed by a Stipendiary Magistrate at Rochdale; the grounds for this included the length of time since the trial and the loss of a number of documents. In other words, they framed a man for a crime, covered up their perfidy for two decades, then claimed the resultant delay would make it impossible for them to get a fair trial. Unfucking real. For a breathtaking example of police and state perfidy from the United States, check out the case of the Norfolk Four. Below is a transcript of sorts: Plod Evenin’ all. Like the hat, do yer? Think it’s funny? You won’t be laughing if you cross my path, because, you see, I am a very special type of person. You can call me Plod. I’m known by many names: cop, copper, fuzz, rozzer, pig. Filth. Plod to you. Like I said, I’m a very special person: If you thought minorities got special treatment; If you thought Britain was ruled by the rich; If you thought the world was run by the ruling class; If you thought the International Zionist Conspiracy was powerful... Try getting a bent copper in the dock. And even if that should happen, try getting a conviction against one. Want me to spell it out for yer? Remember this one, Rodney King? Take that, you black cunt. Fifty-six blows in eighty-one seconds. Not guilty - all of us. Think that’s racist? Here’s what we did to a white cunt. Gotcha! King was a convicted felon speeding under the influence. Ian Tomlinson, he was just a bloke on ’is way ’ome; unfortunately for ’im there was a riot goin’ on at the time. I should’ve been done for assault, or even manslaughter, but we fixed it with the CPS. Independent Crown Prosecution Service, yeah right. Just to show you how totally unbigotted I am, and brave, this is what we do to women. Ha ha. Take that, you bitch! This one’s a woman too. They had to go through the motions this time, so I was convicted, but... Six days in gaol, conviction quashed, then suspended on full pay. That’s what’s called bent for the job, but sometimes I even get away with it off my own back. Could you get away with rape? Or how about stabbing your own son through the heart? Bail on a murder charge, then suspended on full pay. Then no case to answer. Then there was James Ashley - a naked man shot dead in his own bedroom. Not guilty, but what else would you expect with a judge like Anne Rafferty? Then there was Harry Stanley - shot dead for the crime of carrying a table leg in a bag. Sure it looked like a gun. And don’t even mention the frame ups -- Kiszko The Birmingham Six The Guildford Four Tottenham Three The Norfolk Four induced confessions, fabricated confessions, suppressed evidence And I got away with all of them. Yeah, there was a half hearted attempt at a prosecution or two. But I walked away from them all, Scot free. Still think the rich run the show, or ZOG, or the Illuminati? There are some privileges money can’t buy. I can get away with murder, literally. Put me in the frame, and they won’t even investigate. They probably won’t even ask you what you did with the gun.

Greetings you filthy, anti-Semitic goyim, my name is Gideon Falter, and here is the Jews from the Campaign Against Anything. I mean the news from the Campaign Against Everything. I mean, I mean, I mean, I mean, I mean...oh fuck! This month saw a terrific victory here in the UK when our hidden hand forced the prosecution and conviction of the notorious Jew-hater Jeremy Bedford-Turner. He has yet to be sentenced, but we hope he gets years. Bedford-Turner made horrible claims about the Jews such as “When they sink, they become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of the revolutionary party; when they rise, there rises also their terrible power of the purse.” Gideon, it was Theodor Herzl who said that. Oh right, thanks, Luciana. Bedford-Turner claimed Jews control America. Here is what he said: “Believing with absolute certitude that now, with the White House, the Senate, and much of the American media in our hands, the lives of others do not count as much as our own...” Gideon, it was the Israeli journalist Ari Shavit who said that. Oh right, thanks, Luciana. We also dragged into court singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz who wrote vile songs like this one. Not that clip, Gideon. Gideon! Oh right, thanks, Luciana. These people are totally despicable. One thing I personally have never been able to understand is why you hate us? What have we ever done to you? Why do you hate us? Why?

This humble, one-man, ultra-low budget effort is THE definitive documentary on the witch-hunt and false conviction of Bill Cosby. All the facts herein have been compiled from easily checkable public domain sources. Please consider supporting my work exposing the sexual grievance industry, details below: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thedarkman Paypal: itsthatmanagain@yahoo.com Direct cash or credit transfer: Santander Mr A Baron sort code: 09-01-26 account number:13128493 The related links below are in alphabetical order after a fashion: Academic Feminism — Sisterhood Of Lies: documentation on the lies of Lisa Avalos https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/wikinut/wikinut-academic-feminism-sisterhood-of-lies.html BILL COSBY: A Voice Of Reason https://archive.org/details/BillCosbyAVoiceOfReason Frances Andrade case - sentencing remarks on the conviction of Michael Brewer https://web.archive.org/web/20180503185728/https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Judgments/r-brewer-sentencing-remarks.pdf Janice Dickinson – A Life Of Scandal https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/tln/the-latest-news-318.pdf Leigh Day exposed - see entry for December 14, 2006 https://www.falserapetimeline.org/a-false-rape-timeline.html Mary Koss and the scope of rape - debunked https://www.falserapetimeline.org/false-rape-1091.html Rape And Corroboration https://archive.org/details/rape-and-corroboration-archive Rape Trauma Syndrome Debunked https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/wikinut/wikinut-the-fallacy-of-rape-trauma-syndrome.html Roy Moore campaign press briefing https://archive.org/details/roy-moore-campaign-press-briefing Stefan Molyneux Debunks Every Single Sexual Assault Allegation Made Against Donald Trump https://archive.org/details/molyneux-on-trump The Truth About The Rape Crisis Network https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/wikinut/wikinut-the-truth-about-the-rape-crisis-network.html THESE BITCHES ARE PLAYING YOU: The Truth About Women Who ‘Delay’ Reporting Rape https://archive.org/details/these-bitches-are-playing-you-archive (All footage used here is reproduced here as “Fair use” for the purposes of “criticism, comment...reporting, teaching, scholarship, [AND] research” in compliance with Chapter 1, S107 of the Copyright Law of the United States of America - in which the repository for this video is based).

The fakest woman in American politics condemned out of her own mouth.

Gena Turgel is dead at 95. If you haven’t heard of Gena Turgel, do by all means read her ghost-written book I LIGHT A CANDLE, but first check out my 1996 letter to her publisher which went unanswered. Gena Turgel was an inmate of Belsen concentration camp, that much is certain. Almost everything else she claimed or wrote about her war-time misadventures is a tissue of lies, like Belsen being an extermination camp. In her book, she claims to have shared a barracks with Anne Frank. That may be true, but the claim everybody was talking about Anne’s diary is a total fantasy. As is often the case, especially when they go unchallenged, the lies grew with every retelling. Later she would claim she gave Anne cold water and washed her down. The Hell she did. Both HAARETZ and the BBC alluded to Mrs Turgel as the Bride of Belsen. No she wasn’t; she was only one of many such brides. Shameless liar that she was, her husband who predeceased her was even worse. He claimed to have arrested half the German officers in the camp. One of the myriad saps who paid tribute to this wicked old woman was the so-called Moslem Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, who took time out from opening a new bathhouse in Soho for his most committed supporters. Last month, singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz was convicted of, get this, performing songs about shameless liars likes Mrs Turgel. She was dragged into court by this little shit, Gideon Falter of the Campaign Against Anything. According to Gideon, Miss Chabloz is a hatemonger. No Gideon, the real cause of anti-Semitism in the modern world is not people like Alison Chabloz or the idiotic Jeremy Bedford-Turner, but one that lies much closer to home. Lies being the operative word. The above transcript was uploaded with the video on June 10, 2018. It was pulled within hours. For more information, see the bibliography on my main website: https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/baron_biblio_23.html in particular the entry for June 10.

This is the extended version of my appearance on THA Radio as dated. It was recorded on the evening of October 18, 2015 and uploaded the following morning. Its full title is THA Talks Edition 93 Alexander Baron – Holocaust, Revision VS Denial, Questioning The Paradigms Please check out my main website, especially this article about victim narratives: https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/djetc/new-trend-intro.html

My apologies for the at times poor sound quality of this video; this is due both to the limitations of my equipment and this being something of a rush job. Re the above, this video was uploaded on September 5, 2014. On September 19, I deleted the original and replaced it with a better quality version. It was compiled from 108 separate clips; 15 of these clips were re-recorded. Originally the video lasted for 83 minutes 9 seconds. The improved version runs to 83 minutes 7 seconds (downloaded). Having played it through I am as happy as I could hope to be with the sound quality, although the volume may require adjusting here and there. To IMDb entry for ROLF HARRIS AND YOU: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4053730/ The illustrated, annotated transcript (my text only) can be found on my main website at this link: https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/djetc/rolf-harris-video.html The links below are in the order in which they are mentioned: To Queen Victoria Hospital report: https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/djetc/rolf-harris-queen-victoria-hospital.pdf To Queen Mary's Hospital Carshalton report: https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/djetc/rolf-v-report-1.pdf To Wythenshawe Hospital report: https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/djetc/rolf-v-report-2.pdf To Booth Hall Hospital report: https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/djetc/rolf-harris-booth-hall-hospital.pdf To Lynda Lee-Potter article: https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/djetc/rolf-harris-potter.pdf To McMartin case - university law page: https://famous-trials.com/mcmartin To Robert Sheaffer review of THE COURAGE TO HEAL: https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/djetc/rolf-harris-lesbian-lies-shafted.html To Debunking feminist rape statistics: https://vennerroad.blogspot.com/2014/07/who-invented-rape-culture_7.html To Kelly Michaels case - university law page: https://famous-trials.com/mcmartin/907-michaelscase This video contains clips downloaded from the YouTube website and photographs gleaned from various sources. Copyright remains with the original author(s) [or whoever holds it at the time of this publication]; they are reproduced here as “Fair use” for the purposes of “criticism, comment...reporting, teaching, scholarship, [AND] research” in compliance with Chapter 1, S107 of the Copyright Law of the United States of America.

Ever heard of the glass ceiling? Of course you have, like those other chimeras sexism, the gender pay gap and mansplaining, it’s something you feminist airheads never stop whining about. It’s the reason there are so few women at the top, at least that’s what you would have us believe. And of course to rectify this injustice we need special campaigns like the 50: 50 Parliament; special monitoring of the mythical gender pay gap for big companies. Only big ones at the moment. And of course, special laws to promote women beyond their abilities, the Peter Principle. But what is the truth about this all-pervasive male conspiracy, is the patriarchy really holding you down, or could there be some other reason? In case you don’t recognise this woman, she is the photogenic, charismatic, and totally moronic Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. That’s right, at the top, you work all the time. Here is Jordan Peterson explaining this graphically. Note that he is talking about the A List of professional women, top flight commercial lawyers. He goes on to point out that once women of that calibre are married, almost always to men earning as much as or more than themselves, they tend to lose interest in their careers and opt for a better quality of life. It’s well to remember that like most men, most women don’t have careers. A woman may have a vocation, even a calling, but we can’t all belong to the 1%, otherwise it wouldn’t be the 1%, would it? There are some women who can do it, and can have it all, career, family life, fame and even fortune. People of a certain political persuasion may laugh at her, but Sarah Palin was not only a city councillor, mayor, and Governor of Alaska, she is also a mother of five. That takes some doing. For most women though, this sort of personal success comes with a price, and sometimes that price can be very heavy indeed. Prime Minister Theresa May is childless. Oprah Winfrey may be one of the wealthiest and most influential women in America, but check out her biography and ask yourself if you’d change places with her. We even hear about this glass ceiling rubbish in the military. Women don’t belong on the battlefield, and most men don’t want to be there. Here is a senior woman soldier telling a talking head about the price she herself has paid. Something of which you may not have heard is the 4% rule. This states that at the top, the very top, around 4% of the most physically superior women can compete with the men. Here is an illustration of this. In 2015, 19 women and 381 men began the US Army’s Ranger Class at Fort Benning, the first time women had been allowed. At the end of the 62 day course, 92 of the men and 2 of the women earned the Ranger tab. The solution to this imaginary problem is always to lower the standards, which is what quotas entails. But ask yourself this, do you really want to lower the standards for soldiers? Would you say the same thing about doctors? Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was queen for a day, and she loved it, but the novelty soon wore off. What she was forgetting, perhaps something she never realised, is that politicians are not meant to wield power over us, but for us. Here is a woman who does understand that, a woman who has been at the very top of the pyramid for longer than most of us have been alive, for a staggering sixty-seven years in fact. During that time she has never put a foot wrong. To be queen for a day is one thing, to be invited to a banquet as the guest of honour, to have people queue up to shake your hand, to be invited on an all-expenses paid foreign trip, that is something. But how would you like to make over two hundred and fifty official visits to over a hundred countries, always smiling for the camera, shaking hands with countless numbers of people you don’t know or perhaps don’t even like? And to do this year in, year out, decade in, decade out. Elizabeth II is inarguably one of the most remarkable women who has ever lived. She has wealth and prestige as well as power, yet in many ways she has less freedom than you. Would you change places with her, even if you could live as long? I doubt it. The glass ceiling isn’t simply a fallacy, it’s an illusion. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t aspire to bigger and greater things, including wealth, but don’t kid yourself you’re somehow being held down. Only the very few can make it to the top, and when they get there and look down, often they ask themselves, is that all there is?

This hour long hangout was recorded February 14, 2022 and uploaded to YouTube the following day. It is about what its title suggests, clearing the backlog, in no particular order. It begins with some comment about the Grace Tame case in Tasmania. Her abuser Nicholaas Bester was interviewed by Bettina Arndt, which obviously didn’t go down too well with the mainstream media. The following cases were also discussed or mentioned briefly: Ferguson Parker of Belmont, Texas – possibly falsely accused in addition to his proven statutory rape of a teenager at the school where he worked. The 1984 case of a bus driver acquitted of rape, a dude who had a previous conviction for rape. A legal case from Ohio, a really sick one involving a female abuser. The case of American sportsman Trevor Bauer, who will not be entered on the Timeline. The case of Peng Shuai warranted a mention. The case of serial rapist Abdallah Baballah. An alleged rape on an international flight. A new film about Jimmy Savile by Mark Williams-Thomas. A number of actresses/celebrities who claim to have been raped (but didn’t report it). A legal development in an aside to the Jeffrey Epstein case. Various other cases including the alleged Cyprus gang rape of 2019 plus police misconduct, etc. And certifiable lunatic Wilfred Wong, Sir Peter Hayman is alluded to incorrectly as Sir Peter Herman.

This hangout begins with some discussion of the recently acquitted Kevin Spacey including of his previous trials. Then I cover the Benjamin Mendy case. I cover a false rape allegation at Castle Goring; the alleged rape was reported but the retraction was not. I point out this is a regular occurrence and that false rape allegations are a lot more common than the mainstream media would have you believe. As if you didn’t know that already! When I alluded to a mugshot of the imaginary perpetrator I meant of course an artist’s impression. After that I go through a number of cases of alleged rape in no particular order, not all of which are on the Timeline or will be added to the Timeline; I explain why. I also comment on the posthumous libels on Rolf Harris. Next I mention the case of Saif Khan, a lowlife who got away with it. I also discuss the Josie Jolley case, a young woman who committed suicide. An alleged paedophile ring in Scotland. An article about consent and campus rape issues. A wide variety of other cases from both sides of the Atlantic including one from Africa. “KEVIN SPACEY — An Innocent Man” https://theduran.com/kevin-spacey-an-innocent-man/ Paul Todd obituary: https://infotextmanuscripts.org/djetc/paul-todd.pdf “When The News Comes To You And Is Ignored” https://theduran.com/when-the-news-comes-to-you-and-is-ignored/ Livestream comment on the car crash: https://infotextmanuscripts.org/djetc/ak-18-9-11-2022.mp4 “Daily Mirror” article on Rolf Harris: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/rolf-harriss-youngest-victim-proud-30068534 Archived link to the above https://archive.is/B2cRM The blind liar on Rolf Harris: https://web.archive.org/web/20230611210724/https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/may/17/why-blind-disabled-lin-berwick-denounced-rolf-harris Rolf Harris Tribute Site: https://www.rolfharris.site/ “How The Police Convict People Of Imaginary Crimes” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwE1GxuBBG0 Brian Banks case: https://www.falserapetimeline.org/false-rape-1268.html “These Bitches Are Playing You” https://archive.org/details/these-bitches-are-playing-you-archive The International False Rape Timeline: https://www.falserapetimeline.org/ My BitChute channel: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/InSYke600yaW/ Link to the entire body of my published work: https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/links.html Buy me a coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/ITMA Paypal: itsthatmanagain@yahoo.com

This hangout begins with some preliminary talk including a shout out to my site sponsor. Then I cover a wide variety of cases of obsessions including those of a non-sexual nature such as the murder of John Lennon. I play a short clip of Julia Hartley-Brewer. I cover the Hampstead Satanic abuse hoax and the tragic Sabine McNeill, and the tragi-comic case of Wilfrid Wong. This is followed with a discussion of the case of student airhead Katherine Clifton and of the falsely accused Professor Michael Patterson. After that I cover the cases of Anisah Ahmed and Eleanor Williams, both of whom have been discussed in hangouts before. After that I covered the Jimmy Savile hoax, “Operation Yewtree”, and the VIP paedophile ring hoax. I finished with the extraordinary Maria Marchese and Tawny Blazejowski cases. Print Friendly: https://www.printfriendly.com/ Candace Owens: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko7qK4QevjA&t=518s The Hampstead Satanic abuse hoax: https://www.falserapetimeline.org/false-rape-1852.html False rape accuser Katherine Clifton: https://www.falserapetimeline.org/false-rape-1440.html Jordan Peterson on female aggression: https://www.falserapetimeline.org/false-rape-6046.html Anisah Ahmed case: https://www.falserapetimeline.org/false-rape-6378.html Eleanor Williams case: https://www.falserapetimeline.org/false-rape-6692.html The Jimmy Savile hoax exposed: https://www.bitchute.com/video/hfBYZ68rTTEs/ The Rolf Harris Tribute Site: https://www.rolfharris.site/ Maria Marchese case: https://www.falserapetimeline.org/false-rape-5237.html Tawny Blazejowski case: https://www.falserapetimeline.org/false-rape-5236.html Follow me on Twitter (X): https://twitter.com/TheDarkMan1956 Follow me on GETTR: https://gettr.com/ Link to the entire body of my published work: https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/links.html Buy me a coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/ITMA Paypal donations: itsthatmanagain[AT]yahoo.com

I began with some stories in the news, first and foremost the ludicrous Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who now claims to be a “survivor” of sexual assault. I played a short clip of her whining. Marilyn Manson is back in the news for the wrong reason. For non-music fans, Manson is a dude. I covered the case being brought against the CPS here by Harriet Wistrich and associated uglies. I discussed some of the press coverage of related cases. I mentioned certifiable lunatic Wilfred Wong, currently residing at Her Majesty’s Pleasure for rescuing (kidnapping) a young boy to save him from Satanic abuse. Unreal. Regarding media mendacity, I started with a quote from Professor Butz. I explained gaslighting, for the few people who haven’t heard of it. I covered the Geoffrey Knights case; this wasn’t a sex case but outrageous reporting on it led to the judge staying the proceedings. I discussed the Ghomeshi case, which can be found on the Timeline. I covered the Cosby case and in this connection played a short clip of talking head Don Lemon interviewing Joan Tarshis. I went on to Operation Yewtree - Jimmy Savile, Dave Lee Travis, Max Clifford and Rolf Harris in particular. I couldn’t not cover the John Leslie case in a hangout like this. And the flim-flam of the CPS. Edward Heath, Harvey Proctor and the VIP paedophile ring nonsense get a mention. It was the idiot Chief Constable of Wiltshire, Mike Veale, not the Chief Constable of Warwickshire who endorsed this rubbish. I got that wrong. I ended with the cases of Robert Hughes and Cardinal Pell.

The media frenzy over Donald Trump in a nutshell: This is an impromptu video about the ongoing hate campaign against and lies about Donald Trump. I’ll keep it brief. What is Trump being accused of? Well, according to this woman, Maxine Waters, it is colluding with the Russians. Waters is as mad as a box of frogs; she has even accused Vladimir Putin of coining the phrase “Crooked Hillary”. We hear that word collusion a lot from numerous sources, but what does it mean? Colluding to do what? Crooked Hillary herself claimed the Russians interfered with the election. And presumably Vladimir Putin brainwashed a substantial tranche of the electorate into either voting for Trump or not voting for her? Hillary has also pointed the finger of blame at misogyny, and at a few other things. No Hillary, it isn’t women they don’t like, it’s you. Remember what Ed Klein called you? The latest nonsense is to claim or infer that Trump is somehow in the pay of the Russians. This map shows the countries in which the Trump Organisation operates. This is a company that turns over $9 billion + a year and employs over 22,000 people. That makes it statistically impossible for it not to have done business with some Russians. So what? Up until shortly before the election, Trump had no political ambitions. He spent over half a billion dollars of his own money running his campaign, and now he’s taking bribes? What did Trump actually say about Russia during the election? He said he wanted to get along with it, and with its leader. You think that’s a bad idea? You wanna return to the Cold War? The West won the Cold War, now we have other enemies, including enemies within. It makes sense to cooperate with Russia rather than fight it. There was and is no Russian collusion; these claims are a total fantasy. On the other hand, there is proven criminality by Hillary Clinton who used her post as Secretary of State to enrich the foundation she and her husband run. In order to do that, she jeopardised national security, and destroyed evidence of her criminality when she realised the game was up. Clinton, or at the very least her lieutenants, also conspired against Bernie Sanders. This was so blatant that it led to the resignation of Debbie Wasserman Schultz. There is also currently a legal action being fought by Sanders supporters against the DNC. The media hasn’t told you about that, has it? Clinton has also been protected by lowlife in high places. When she is eventually indicted, don’t be surprised if Loretta Lynch is named as a co-conspirator. Don’t believe anything the mainstream media is saying about Trump: it’s all lies, distortions, so-called leaks from anonymous sources. Many of these claims are debunked almost as soon as they are made, but the media simply ignores this and invents new ones. https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/wikinut/wikinut-trump-v-the-media-liars.html