Rock7414

Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about for the chance to win $20,000 in prizes. In partnership with FISKARS® $20,000 in prizes Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about. Now accepting submissions VOCAL.MEDIA/CHALLENGES $20,000 in Prizes - Enter the Create Your Happiness Challen... 22 Like 2 Comments - 3 Shares Comment Share https://vocal.media/vocal-plus?via=leavie LEARN MORE This my link to my poetry on Vocal. Please share it because I don't have any reads on my poetry. https://linktr.ee/Soulonfire

Plummer v. State was an 1893 court case decided by the Indiana Supreme Court. The case overturned a manslaughter conviction, ruling that the convicted defendant had been protecting himself from the illegal use of force by a police officer.[¹] It is widely quoted on the internet, under the false belief that it gives citizens the right to resist an unlawful arrest by force, including deadly force. The full citation is Plummer v. State, 135 Ind. 308, 34 N.E. 968 (1893).On June 20, 1892, Jackson Plummer, a 60 year-old man in ill health, left his home with his handgun and went looking for members of the town board of Kentland, Indiana. The board had ordered Plummer to trim his trees and he objected.[2] Plummer came into contact with John Keefe and a man named Elliott, and Keefe told Plummer to go home, the board was not going to cut down his trees.[³] Plummer started walking home, but not before he had pointed the pistol at Elliott and a board member named Conklin, and had threatened the town marshal, if he were to show up. James Dorn, who was the marshal of the town, then arrived.[3] Dorn struck Plummer with a billy club and then shot at him with a revolver without first informing Plummer of any intention to arrest him. Before Dorn struck and shot at Plummer, Plummer had not resisted or behaved violently; he had walked toward his home with a revolver in his hand and told the officer to keep away. Dorn and Plummer exchanged gunshots, each hitting the other and Dorn died from the gunshot wound. [3³]https://vocal.media/criminal/the-art-of-war-mmbnrv03cr

School bullying is wrong tiktok.com/@leeahd74

https://youtube.com/shorts/-YlRScwj8Uk?feature=share. Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about for the chance to win $20,000 in prizes. In partnership with FISKARS® $20,000 in prizes Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about. Now accepting submissions VOCAL.MEDIA/CHALLENGES $20,000 in Prizes - Enter the Create Your Happiness Challen... 22 Like 2 Comments - 3 Shares Comment Share https://vocal.media/vocal-plus?via=leavie LEARN MORE https://linktr.ee/Soulonfire

Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about for the chance to win $20,000 in prizes. In partnership with FISKARS® $20,000 in prizes Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about. Now accepting submissions VOCAL.MEDIA/CHALLENGES $20,000 https://vocal.media/vocal-plus?via=leavie LEARN MORE Please share with available participants who enjoys writing contests. Poem contests with 60 words or more.

Skip to main content Vox homepage Contribute Contribute Newsletters Newsletters Vox main menu BIDEN ADMINISTRATION MORE Search This week in TikTok: The racism scandal among the app’s top creators Plus, how high schoolers are turning to TikTok in lieu of prom. By Rebecca Jennings@rebexxxxa Apr 28, 2020, 9:10am EDT Share this story Share this on Facebook (opens in new window) Share this on Twitter (opens in new window) SHARE All sharing options This story is part of a group of stories called The Goods Hello from The Goods’ twice-weekly newsletter! On Tuesdays, internet culture reporter Rebecca Jennings uses this space to update you all on what’s been going on in the world of TikTok. Is there something you want to see more of? Less of? Different of? Email me at rebecca.jennings@vox.com, and subscribe to The Goods’ newsletter here. Emmuhlu was everything people loved about TikTok: She was funny, weird, relatable, and open about her struggles with mental health and body image. She dyed her hair fun colors, delivered goofy screeds laden with feminist and progressive messages, and rapped flawless lyrics to Nicki Minaj; her love of the artist earned her a top spot among the Barbz, Nicki Minaj’s fan army. Then someone posted a video of her yelling the n-word out of a car window. Emmuhlu, whose real name is not public, is just one of a slew of TikTokers who’ve recently been canceled by former fans after videos of them saying racist, homophobic, or otherwise offensive words. On influencer gossip channels, scandals like these are surfacing on a near-daily basis, with huge stars like Mattia Polibio and Chase Hudson both having been found to have said or written the n-word, while another, Nessa Barrett, made a TikTok dancing to a verse from the Quran (she’s said she didn’t know what the sound was). Fans have flooded Twitter with hashtags like #mattiaisoverparty, and expressed their disappointment that “everyone was rooting for you girl.” FEATURED VIDEOS FROM VOX How radical gardeners took back New York City How radical gardeners took back New York City It’s a common theme for those in the public eye — as soon as someone gains enough followers, people will start digging into their past and, on occasion, stumble upon something indefensible. Digital influencers like Jeffree Star and Jake Paul have had to apologize for past racist remarks, but what’s different with TikTokers is that many of them have only been famous for a few months at most. The dynamics of teenage “cancel culture” aren’t limited to the famous — this New York Times piece from October explores how the already fragile dynamics of high school social life are complicated by the discovery of past online posts — it’s just that the whisper networks are much larger when they are. Adam Martinez, better known for his username @adamrayokay, where he posts videos of himself in character as “Hot Cheeto Girl” Rosa, went viral in December, and it only took until April before tweets from 2012 resurfaced in which he used the n-word. None of these scandals, however, have shaken TikTok quite like Emmuhlu’s, who was a burgeoning progressive voice on the platform. In the days since her racist video was exposed, she’s posted several apology videos and has reportedly been doxxed, sent death threats, and subjected to insults about past abusive relationships. Some TikTokers have pointed out the double standards of canceling Emmuhlu, while male stars like Mattia and Chase don’t seem to face the same consequences. Because she’s deleted all her social media accounts except for TikTok, I haven’t been able to get in contact with Emmuhlu, but she likely won’t be the last TikToker to have to publicly reckon with their past self. TikTok in the news In happier news, BuzzFeed profiled the most soothing presence on TikTok, actor and vegan influencer Tabitha Brown. I could tell you about Brown’s videos, which are typically vegetable-forward recipe tutorials mixed in with funny or inspirational stories, but the best way to describe them is the viral tweet that just says, “She really make you feel like everything is gonna be ok.” You know those people protesting social distancing guidelines and begging politicians to “open up the economy” so they can get their hair done? A viral TikTok last week attempted to fact-check one of them by measuring the exact length of a woman’s undyed roots, proving that the last time she actually dyed her hair was in October, well before salons closed due to lockdown. Someone get this girl a journalism job! I love this bizarre listicle in which Interview magazine asked a bunch of people, including university professors and professional dancers, about their thoughts on TikTok. I also love the way one professor describes it by comparing it to the way Instagram democratized photography: “The Instagram filter of TikTok is the soundtrack. Phone cameras can take HQ videos now but can’t produce the same production-quality sound. TikTok outsources this lack by using audio files of songs. You feel like you’re on the level of the celebrity with the music, and that becomes the mechanism to create new celebrities.” Meme watch Much like the high school version of adult New Year’s Eve, prom is always kind of a disappointment, but never more than when you can’t have prom at all. In the Atlantic, Kaitlyn Tiffany covered the kids who will be spending their would-be proms at home with their parents, dressed up and with literally nowhere to go — except TikTok. All across the country, teenagers are putting on prom dresses and doing their hair and makeup for video shoots in their kitchens. Some of them are setting up elaborate promposals to each other, even when neither of them will get to go. It sucks, and it’s not a replacement for a night that according to every teen comedy is a formative experience, but there’s something comforting about knowing that even if you’re spending prom night alone, you’re not really alone at all. “Losing prom is losing a communal experience,” Tiffany writes, “but the loss itself is something that teenagers all over the country can share.” One Last Thing This is the most artfully shot TikTok about the most cursed fashion item I’ve ever seen in my life. Sign up for the newsletterThe Goods Get our newsletter in your inbox twice a week. Email (required) By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Notice and European users agree to the data transfer policy. For more newsletters, check out our newsletters page. SUBSCRIBE Help keep The Goods free for all Consumer culture helps us understand who we are and what we value as a society. That's why, here at The Goods, we aim to explain what we buy, why we buy it, and why it matters. Financial contributions from our readers help support our journalism and enable our staff to continue to offer our work for free. Please consider making a contribution to Vox today from as little as $3. Senate Hearing Considers NIH Budget And State Of Medical Research IN THIS STREAM TikTok: the most exciting, and controversial, social media app on the planet Do we really need influencers’ Israel-Palestine hot takes? This week in TikTok: The racism scandal among the app’s top creators This week in TikTok: When doctors and nurses go viral VIEW ALL 88 STORIES NEXT UP IN THE GOODS The death of the girlboss A weed dealer in NYC on how legalization could affect his business The ugly truth behind your fancy rewards credit card Why Etsy dropped $1.6 billion on Depop The perpetual discourse over LGBTQ Pride, explained One year after #BlackoutTuesday, what have companies really done for racial justice? Sponsored Content Warning Signs of Metastatic Breast Cancer Shouldn't Be Ignored The Actual Cost Of 1 Day Full Mouth Implants In 2021 Might Surprise you 30 Movies That Are Banned And Will Never Be Remade Today [Pics] Nostradamus' Nightmare Predictions For 2021 – Read This Right Away [Pics] Celebrities Who Passed Away In 2020 Warning Signs of Metastatic Breast Cancer Shouldn't Be Ignored The Actual Cost Of 1 Day Full Mouth Implants In 2021 Might Surprise you The Actual Cost Of 1 Day Full Mouth Implants In 2021 Might... Dental | Sponsored Listing [Photos] Traci Lords Is 53 Now & Here's What She Looks Like Today [Photos] Traci Lords Is 53 Now & Here's What She Looks Like Today Loves Newsfeed Need Dental Implants But Have No Money? Need Dental Implants But Have No Money? Dental | Sponsored Listing Forgotten Old Celebs Who Are Still Alive Today Forgotten Old Celebs Who Are Still Alive Today ItsTheVibe Recommended by Terms of Use Privacy Notice Cookie Policy Do Not Sell My Personal Info Licensing FAQ Accessibility Platform Status Contact Send Us a Tip Masthead About Us Editorial Ethics and Guidelines Advertise with us Jobs @ Vox Media © 2021 Vox Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about for the chance to win $20,000 in prizes. In partnership with FISKARS® $20,000 in prizes Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about. Now accepting submissions VOCAL.MEDIA/CHALLENGES $20,000 in Prizes - Enter the Create Your Happiness Challen... 22 Like 2 Comments - 3 Shares Comment Share https://vocal.media/vocal-plus?via=leavie LEARN MORE

Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about for the chance to win $20,000 in prizes. In partnership with FISKARS® $20,000 in prizes Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about. Now accepting submissions VOCAL.MEDIA/CHALLENGES $20,000 in Prizes - Enter the Create Your Happiness Challen... 22 Like 2 Comments - 3 Shares Comment Share https://vocal.media/vocal-plus?via=leavie LEARN MORE https://vocal.media/criminal/justice-for-stephon-clark I'm looking for people who's willing to fund big bro and organization that's willing to handle white supremacists attacks on black women. https://gofund.me/96471a16

Plummer v. State was an 1893 court case decided by the Indiana Supreme Court. The case overturned a manslaughter conviction, ruling that the convicted defendant had been protecting himself from the illegal use of force by a police officer.[¹] It is widely quoted on the internet, under the false belief that it gives citizens the right to resist an unlawful arrest by force, including deadly force. The full citation is Plummer v. State, 135 Ind. 308, 34 N.E. 968 (1893).On June 20, 1892, Jackson Plummer, a 60 year-old man in ill health, left his home with his handgun and went looking for members of the town board of Kentland, Indiana. The board had ordered Plummer to trim his trees and he objected.[2] Plummer came into contact with John Keefe and a man named Elliott, and Keefe told Plummer to go home, the board was not going to cut down his trees.[³] Plummer started walking home, but not before he had pointed the pistol at Elliott and a board member named Conklin, and had threatened the town marshal, if he were to show up. James Dorn, who was the marshal of the town, then arrived.[3] Dorn struck Plummer with a billy club and then shot at him with a revolver without first informing Plummer of any intention to arrest him. Before Dorn struck and shot at Plummer, Plummer had not resisted or behaved violently; he had walked toward his home with a revolver in his hand and told the officer to keep away. Dorn and Plummer exchanged gunshots, each hitting the other and Dorn died from the gunshot wound. [3³] For all information https://linktr.ee/Soulonfire

Plummer v. State was an 1893 court case decided by the Indiana Supreme Court. The case overturned a manslaughter conviction, ruling that the convicted defendant had been protecting himself from the illegal use of force by a police officer.[¹] It is widely quoted on the internet, under the false belief that it gives citizens the right to resist an unlawful arrest by force, including deadly force. The full citation is Plummer v. State, 135 Ind. 308, 34 N.E. 968 (1893).On June 20, 1892, Jackson Plummer, a 60 year-old man in ill health, left his home with his handgun and went looking for members of the town board of Kentland, Indiana. The board had ordered Plummer to trim his trees and he objected.[2] Plummer came into contact with John Keefe and a man named Elliott, and Keefe told Plummer to go home, the board was not going to cut down his trees.[³] Plummer started walking home, but not before he had pointed the pistol at Elliott and a board member named Conklin, and had threatened the town marshal, if he were to show up. James Dorn, who was the marshal of the town, then arrived.[3] Dorn struck Plummer with a billy club and then shot at him with a revolver without first informing Plummer of any intention to arrest him. Before Dorn struck and shot at Plummer, Plummer had not resisted or behaved violently; he had walked toward his home with a revolver in his hand and told the officer to keep away. Dorn and Plummer exchanged gunshots, each hitting the other and Dorn died from the gunshot wound. [3³] https://linktr.ee/Soulonfire https://vocal.media/vocal-plus?via=leavie tiktok.com/@leeahd74

Plummer v. State was an 1893 court case decided by the Indiana Supreme Court. The case overturned a manslaughter conviction, ruling that the convicted defendant had been protecting himself from the illegal use of force by a police officer.[¹] It is widely quoted on the internet, under the false belief that it gives citizens the right to resist an unlawful arrest by force, including deadly force. The full citation is Plummer v. State, 135 Ind. 308, 34 N.E. 968 (1893).On June 20, 1892, Jackson Plummer, a 60 year-old man in ill health, left his home with his handgun and went looking for members of the town board of Kentland, Indiana. The board had ordered Plummer to trim his trees and he objected.[2] Plummer came into contact with John Keefe and a man named Elliott, and Keefe told Plummer to go home, the board was not going to cut down his trees.[³] Plummer started walking home, but not before he had pointed the pistol at Elliott and a board member named Conklin, and had threatened the town marshal, if he were to show up. James Dorn, who was the marshal of the town, then arrived.[3] Dorn struck Plummer with a billy club and then shot at him with a revolver without first informing Plummer of any intention to arrest him. Before Dorn struck and shot at Plummer, Plummer had not resisted or behaved violently; he had walked toward his home with a revolver in his hand and told the officer to keep away. Dorn and Plummer exchanged gunshots, each hitting the other and Dorn died from the gunshot wound. [3³] https://linktr.ee/Soulonfire

Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about for the chance to win $20,000 in prizes. In partnership with FISKARS® $20,000 in prizes Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about. Now accepting submissions VOCAL.MEDIA/CHALLENGES $20,000 in Prizes - Enter the Create Your Happiness Challen... 22 Like 2 Comments - 3 Shares Comment Share https://vocal.media/vocal-plus?via=leavie LEARN MORE https://linktr.ee/Soulonfire https://vocal.media/criminal/trayvon-benjamin-martin

Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about for the chance to win $20,000 in prizes. In partnership with FISKARS® $20,000 in prizes Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about. Now accepting submissions VOCAL.MEDIA/CHALLENGES $20,000 in Prizes - Enter the Create Your Happiness Challen... 22 Like 2 Comments - 3 Shares Comment Share https://vocal.media/vocal-plus?via=leavie LEARN MOREWrite a story about a craft or project you're passionate about for the chance to win $20,000 in prizes. In partnership with FISKARS® $20,000 in prizes Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about. Now accepting submissions VOCAL.MEDIA/CHALLENGES $20,000 in Prizes - Enter the Create Your Happiness Challen... 22 Like 2 Comments - 3 Shares Comment Share LEARN MORE https://linktr.ee/Soulonfire

Plummer v. State was an 1893 court case decided by the Indiana Supreme Court. The case overturned a manslaughter conviction, ruling that the convicted defendant had been protecting himself from the illegal use of force by a police officer.[¹] It is widely quoted on the internet, under the false belief that it gives citizens the right to resist an unlawful arrest by force, including deadly force. The full citation is Plummer v. State, 135 Ind. 308, 34 N.E. 968 (1893). On June 20, 1892, Jackson Plummer, a 60 year-old man in ill health, left his home with his handgun and went looking for members of the town board of Kentland, Indiana. The board had ordered Plummer to trim his trees and he objected.[2] Plummer came into contact with John Keefe and a man named Elliott, and Keefe told Plummer to go home, the board was not going to cut down his trees.[³] Plummer started walking home, but not before he had pointed the pistol at Elliott and a board member named Conklin, and had threatened the town marshal, if he were to show up. James Dorn, who was the marshal of the town, then arrived.[3] Dorn struck Plummer with a billy club and then shot at him with a revolver without first informing Plummer of any intention to arrest him. Before Dorn struck and shot at Plummer, Plummer had not resisted or behaved violently; he had walked toward his home with a revolver in his hand and told the officer to keep away. Dorn and Plummer exchanged gunshots, each hitting the other and Dorn died from the gunshot wound. [3³] https://linktr.ee/Soulonfire Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about for the chance to win $20,000 in prizes. In partnership with FISKARS® $20,000 in prizes Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about. Now accepting submissions VOCAL.MEDIA/CHALLENGES $20,000 in Prizes - Enter the Create Your Happiness Challen... 22 Like 2 Comments - 3 Shares Comment Share https://vocal.media/vocal-plus?via=leavie LEARN MORE

https://vocal.media/criminal/trayvon-benjamin-martin tiktok.com/@leeahd74 Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about for the chance to win $20,000 in prizes. In partnership with FISKARS® $20,000 in prizes Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about. Now accepting submissions VOCAL.MEDIA/CHALLENGES $20,000 in Prizes - Enter the Create Your Happiness Challen... 22 Like 2 Comments - 3 Shares Comment Share https://vocal.media/vocal-plus?via=leavie LEARN MORE

Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about for the chance to win $20,000 in prizes. In partnership with FISKARS® $20,000 in prizes Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about. Now accepting submissions VOCAL.MEDIA/CHALLENGES $20,000 in Prizes - Enter the Create Your Happiness Challen... 22 Like 2 Comments - 3 Shares Comment Share https://vocal.media/vocal-plus?via=leavie LEARN MORE Plummer v. State was an 1893 court case decided by the Indiana Supreme Court. The case overturned a manslaughter conviction, ruling that the convicted defendant had been protecting himself from the illegal use of force by a police officer.[¹] It is widely quoted on the internet, under the false belief that it gives citizens the right to resist an unlawful arrest by force, including deadly force. The full citation is Plummer v. State, 135 Ind. 308, 34 N.E. 968 (1893).On June 20, 1892, Jackson Plummer, a 60 year-old man in ill health, left his home with his handgun and went looking for members of the town board of Kentland, Indiana. The board had ordered Plummer to trim his trees and he objected.[2] Plummer came into contact with John Keefe and a man named Elliott, and Keefe told Plummer to go home, the board was not going to cut down his trees.[³] Plummer started walking home, but not before he had pointed the pistol at Elliott and a board member named Conklin, and had threatened the town marshal, if he were to show up. James Dorn, who was the marshal of the town, then arrived.[3] Dorn struck Plummer with a billy club and then shot at him with a revolver without first informing Plummer of any intention to arrest him. Before Dorn struck and shot at Plummer, Plummer had not resisted or behaved violently; he had walked toward his home with a revolver in his hand and told the officer to keep away. Dorn and Plummer exchanged gunshots, each hitting the other and Dorn died from the gunshot wound. [3³]

Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about for the chance to win $20,000 in prizes. In partnership with FISKARS® $20,000 in prizes Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about. Now accepting submissions VOCAL.MEDIA/CHALLENGES $20,000 in Prizes - Enter the Create Your Happiness Challen... 22 Like 2 Comments - 3 Shares Comment Share LEARN MORE https://linktr.ee/Soulonfire I'm raising money for Disabled Mom And Child, NEED HELP. Click to Donate: https://gofundme.com/f/20bt1eu6w0?sharetype=teams&member=5439946&rcid=r01-162207885805-e4529022e4e64df1&pc=tw_co_campmgmt_m&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=p_lico+share-sheet+chico96c #GoFundMe

Writing contests for all of the writers. I am an ambassador for vocal and write about politics. https://linktr.ee/Soulonfire

All aboard the money train station to vocal https://linktr.ee/Soulonfire Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about for the chance to win $20,000 in prizes. In partnership with FISKARS® $20,000 in prizes Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about. Now accepting submissions VOCAL.MEDIA/CHALLENGES $20,000 in Prizes - Enter the Create Your Happiness Challen... 22 Like 2 Comments - 3 Shares Comment Share https://vocal.media/vocal-plus?via=leavie LEARN MORE

Join us in our writing contests and poetry. Please share. https://vocal.media/vocal-plus?via=leavie https://linktr.ee/Soulonfire

We need writers and we pay really good. https://linktr.ee/Soulonfire

Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about for the chance to win $20,000 in prizes. In partnership with FISKARS® $20,000 in prizes Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about. Now accepting submissions https://vocal.media/vocal-plus?via=leavie

On June 20, 1892, Jackson Plummer, a 60 year-old man in ill health, left his home with his handgun and went looking for members of the town board of Kentland, Indiana. The board had ordered Plummer to trim his trees and he objected.[2] Plummer came into contact with John Keefe and a man named Elliott, and Keefe told Plummer to go home, the board was not going to cut down his trees.[³] Plummer started walking home, but not before he had pointed the pistol at Elliott and a board member named Conklin, and had threatened the town marshal, if he were to show up. James Dorn, who was the marshal of the town, then arrived.[3] Dorn struck Plummer with a billy club and then shot at him with a revolver without first informing Plummer of any intention to arrest him. Before Dorn struck and shot at Plummer, Plummer had not resisted or behaved violently; he had walked toward his home with a revolver in his hand and told the officer to keep away. Dorn and Plummer exchanged gunshots, each hitting the other and Dorn died from the gunshot wound. [3³] Plummer v. State was an 1893 court case decided by the Indiana Supreme Court. The case overturned a manslaughter conviction, ruling that the convicted defendant had been protecting himself from the illegal use of force by a police officer.[¹] It is widely quoted on the internet, under the false belief that it gives citizens the right to resist an unlawful arrest by force, including deadly force. The full citation is Plummer v. State, 135 Ind. 308, 34 N.E. 968 (1893). https://vocal.media/criminal/the-art-of-war-mmbnrv03cr

Hello I thought you might be interested in supporting this GoFundMe, https://gofund.me/2435b81c. Even a small donation could help Leavie Scott reach their fundraising goal. And if you can't make a donation, it would be great if you could share the fundraiser to help spread the word. Thanks for taking a look!

Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about for the chance to win $20,000 in prizes. In partnership with FISKARS® $20,000 in prizes Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about. Now accepting submissions VOCAL.MEDIA/CHALLENGES $20,000 in Prizes - Enter the Create Your Happiness Challen... 22 Like 2 Comments - 3 Shares Comment Share https://vocal.media/vocal-plus?via=leavie LEARN MORE

Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about for the chance to win $20,000 in prizes. In partnership with FISKARS® $20,000 in prizes Write a story about a craft or project you're passionate about. Now accepting submissions VOCAL.MEDIA/CHALLENGES $20,000 in Prizes - Enter the Create Your Happiness LEARN MORE. https://vocal.media/vocal-plus?via=leavie