Randoctor

coronavirus news from around the world. Ironically, Planned Parenthood physician wants essentially to force everybody to vaccinate. What happened to "my body, my choice"? we discuss previous world health emergencies including "The Population Bomb" 1960s push for mandatory sterilizations and abortions. When experts decide, the choices gone. Furthermore, Dr. Fauci offers political rather than medical reasons for vaccinating, which still, remains a good idea for those elderly and vulnerable. We discuss the ongoing politicization of all things Covid.

How does stress effect illness? Which treatments work with your medical plan? Will my doctor reject me if I try an alternative? Will insurance help me with alternative medicine? When should I be calling my insurance company? How much should I be willing to spend on treatment? Are alternatives ever worth it? Cancer treatment always seems to require different opinions and multiple visits. Is it ok to push for getting into a doctor quickly?

establishing Zika’s first-time-ever presence in Brazil, in early 2015– prior to any knowledge of any microcephaly-increase. In the words of one of the central figures, Recife’s Dr. Carlos Brito (2015): I believe [that 80% of Pernambuco’s dengue cases are in reality] Zika. We investigated 1,100 (dengue) patients . Of this total, 81% met clinical criteria for Zika. His confidant, Dr. Kleber Luz, an infectious disease expert in Natal earlier had also recharacterized dengue patients, retroactively, as Zika. "We collected more than 500 samples, and we insisted that it was not dengue, that it was something urgent and new," says Luz. After ruling out other options, (Luz and Brito) concluded it had to be Zika. There were some behind-the-scenes doubts, in government and the academy. Drs. Brito and Luz contacted Brazil's Ministry of Health, but the Brazilian government wasn't convinced. Whatever was going around had no dangerous symptoms or long-lasting effects, and people weren't dying. So the government chose not to implement mandatory reporting for the infection, and when the summer of 2015 ended, so did any worries about Zika. "There was enormous resistance to the idea that it could be Zika.” Frustrated, the doctors decided to form their own group to study the virus.

Kevin McKernan conducted a study that raises questions about the impurity content of mRNA vaccine, suggesting it may contain fragments of DNA.

With common sense and common language, we uncover common misconceptions of the (un)common-cold (commonly called Covid), we have in common. Discussed: Cases down 77%. The lowest since October, 15% of the population vaccinated and other background herd immunity. Best use case for Covid, active octogenarians who are free once again to socialize. The worst thing since World War II?: Doubtful must consider the future age-possibilities, without seeming to utilitarian The upcoming decline in economic possibility, diminished growth as a result of overspending, stimulus, cutting back the economy – stopping dating, sttopping marriage, declining birthrate. Any reason to wear a mask after being vaccinated? Hint: no. Was there a Tampa Bay super spreading event? After the Super Bowl? No. (Ditto, Sturgis) If you had one year to live, would you spend it isolated from your family, even at risk of Covid? Have we given people who might be making those type of choices the information correctly? One mask, two masks, three masks! Unless you have a snorkel, you're going to be getting air from the surrounding "soup" of aerosol and microbes. If you can smell say "rotten fish" from across the room, what makes you think that a mask could stop a few micron sized virus? We take a look around the world, Sweden versus Israel, lockdowns versus not. Is herd immunity (despite Sweden success) getting a bad name? Some recent deaths, young men in the neighborhood. Diseases of despair on the rise, suicides have doubled Covid is a different issue for the very young versus very old. 1000 or 10,000 times difference in case totality rate There should be an algorithm for figuring out your rationale for taking vaccine. Very different set of circumstances at age 25 versus 75 for instance. If the vaccine (like any vaccine) has some small chance of long-term illness or even death, the that should be weighed against the nearly 0 likelihood of Covid fatality at these younger age groups, the reverse obtains at older ages. Taking one's mask off should be the appropriate reward and incentive for vaccination. Do politicians revel in the power in controlling our lives, micromanaging? Have we let them? Ultimately it's your responsibility to "do you". Learn up, make the best decisions.

Einstein required a solar eclipse to prove General Relativity: the sun's incredibly bright light otherwise blots out the visual information behind it. So too with current SARS/Covid's obscuring the valid useful information from the prior (2003) SARS epidemic. A full locust-cycle of 17 years passed in the interim. Did the Chinese make vaccines during that time? (yes) Did they have success? (Well, no coronavirus until this last leak, so yes) Were there side effects or problems? (Very likely) Did they immunize the population? Did that play into China's low numbers outside of Wuhan? Was that hidden? (Unknown) Everyone speaks about the "new normal" after THIS Coronavirus, but is that a valid worry if 17 years went by since the previous? (Probably not) This is very much unlike influenza which has a natural zoonnotic (domestic animal proximity) reservoir with humans: Chinese farmers' pigs' being sheltered indoors in the winter. The same doesn't hold true with coronavirus' animal hosts: pangolins and bats. So why worry? (Well, there are interests built around worrying) Using the same "solar eclipse" effect of blotting out current coronavirus barrage of information helps us look back at what went right and wrong (potentially) with the prior SARS-1 vaccines. Should this give us any concern and/or guidance in choosing from the potentially multiple different vaccines which will be presented to us. The decision matrix for a 15-year-old, 35-year-old, 55-year-old, 85-year-old: between potential problems from a vaccine and potential problems from the illness itself differs vastly. It's not a "one-size-fits-all" approach, nor should it be treated that way. And on the other end the vaccines, especially when we consider the Indian and Chinese simpler but less effective (but potentially long-term safer) vaccine variants: which one is the right one for you?

Never before has there been an mRNA-mediated vaccine, moreover with expedited, abbreviated phase III human safety trials. mRNA vaccines have YOU producing spike protein for (potentially) months. Can this overstimulation of the immune system bring longer-term problems? Nobody really can say. Understanding that there are inherent risks from ANY vaccine – and essentially nearly ZERO risk from Covid 19 for those healthy and young– there may be an age intersection-point at which below which the vaccine is MORE dangerous than the coronavirus itself. Let's try to figure that out. Options: Are two vaccines necessary for everybody? No INFLUENZA this year! The same mitigation protocol that couldn't stop coronavirus stopped influenza? Or has been there been blurring of the lines? Covid 19 numbers continue to drop. Let's compare, once again, lockdown states versus non-lockdown states. Should schools have closed? Should they stay closed?

A medical moment: Covid-19, coronavirus update, discussion, review. Topics covered: CASES, cases, cases! We have more cases because we do more testing. Hospitalizations and fatalities are better measures of a disease's severity. The locked liquor cabinet. When we're not supposed to look at or think about certain aspects of coronavirus, the natural impulse is to query, "why?" Why were off-label uses of known, reasonably safe medications discouraged for coronavirus? Vaccine talk: How do they work? Who should get them first? Are there different types of vaccines? When did China have and deploy one? Which vaccine is the best? What percentage of the population vaccinated or immune constitutes adequate barrier in preventing pandemic spread? The "better helmet"/ riskier behavior paradox. Does this apply to masks? North versus South! Battleground Dakotas: North Dakota did lockdowns and mask-mandates yet perfomed no better than South Dakota which did not. Is there a "super mutant" coronavirus? (United Kingdom)? Is vitamin D an actual preventive for coronavirus severity? Do our leaders obey their own mask, lockdown, distancing statutes? The latest, Dr. Birx. Separately, what can the NBA players' attitude toward the virus tell us? Have any of them gotten actually ill? What do life insurance sales tell us about actuarial risk to coronavirus? With no immunity either, which would you rather not see: Spanish flu or coronavirus? The case is made.

Other topics covered: The perpetual emergency stratified risk, which vaccine is the best for you. The N95 Catch-22 One mask, two masks, red mask, blue masks? China's economy grew, G7's shrank. What's up with that? Sweden versus the world! Catching up on Nigeria, Israel, France, UK. Israel's second spike after vaccinations. "Viruses gonna virus". Masks after immunity? Keeping our powder dry. Even stipulating Covid-19 was not human-engineered, there are lessons for future biowarriors, biowarfare, and our potential defense. The hidden antimicrobials amongst us. Generic drugs' off label usage has been assiduously avoided and in fact pilloried: HCQ, Ivermectin. Safe but effective? Safe but ineffective? The "right to try" should not apply only to cancer patients. What's the life expectancy of a nursing home resident? In general that is. Median is five months, averages 14 months. 53% die within six months. That's without coronavirus. Joe Biden's mask? After immunity

Keeping up with Covid. Tune in, good stuff. How do things look in the world and in the world of Covid? We will talk about vaccines, strategies, relative risk. Who looks at Covid-risks more accurately, the left or the right? And how close is either group to reality? Apparently people have gained weight (in developed countries) during Covid. Has that helped their health-risk? How will other countries, less developed and hoping to become developed do? Test case: Ghana. Coming around a little bit on the mRNA vaccines. A few key questions, for most the actual duration, half-life of mRNA in our bodies. And (with humor) should you get a nose mask?

Medical overview of what constitutes a #coronavirus "case" epidemiologically. Should we be concerned about the increase in number of cases? How does the severity of coronavirus rank against the more severe influenza's, e.g. 1917's Spanish flu? Why has the case fatality rate gone down by an order of magnitude in only six months? A little basic common sense applied to what has become, surprisingly, less well understood over time: coronavirus. Please listen in

Vaccines have been deployed. What are the results so far? Would be the best and most efficacious pattern of dispersal? In the laboratory of ideas, Indonesia is taking a different approach, vaccinating, preferentially the busiest and most active individuals rather than the elderly (first). Does everyone need two doses? Does everyone need a full dose? If shortage situations existed or persisted, what would be the best (game theory) strategy?

George Webb doesn’t mince words when he discusses the significance of recent events: "You can't compare this to the Kennedy assassination or even Reagan," he asserts. What’s unfolding now rivals the gravitas of Caesar’s assassination, with the very fabric of democratic governance hanging in the balance. Despite the presence of thirty thousand attendees, armed with 30-megapixel cameras, we are left piecing together grainy images and fragmented timelines, as if the truth itself is deliberately obscured. "If you want to see the dark hand, you have to wait for these events," Webb continues. He sees these assassination attempts as a "live study, a live autopsy" of how the deep state operates. The FBI had long known about Crooks, a sniper who frequented shooting ranges, preparing for something far more sinister than a hunting trip. "We had 700 messages over that four or five-year period," Webb recounts, messages that detailed bomb-making, detonators, and potential targets, including former President Trump. Yet, despite the evidence, a veil of negligence—willful, according to Webb—clouds the investigation. "What part of, 'Hey, I should collect a group of people around the Pittsburgh area that are a threat to Trump' do you not understand?" Webb asks, incredulous at the lack of action. "The last thing I would do is leave anything uncovered," he continues, highlighting the glaring absence of precaution in a situation where the stakes couldn't be higher. The most damning evidence of this negligence comes from the Special Agent in Charge, Rojek, who revealed that Crooks had been on the roof from 6:05 to 6:11 PM, precisely when Trump took the stage. Yet, "they all say they went to a vending machine," Webb notes, incredulous. "That’s the one time you don’t want to go to the vending machine." As the story unfolds, Webb paints a picture of a security apparatus not just asleep at the wheel, but perhaps complicit in its dereliction. "This isn't one person leaving their post; this is six people simultaneously leaving," he points out, drawing a chilling parallel to John Wilkes Booth and the lone guard who left Lincoln vulnerable. The involvement of Maxwell Yearick and his possible accomplice Kennan Hooper raises even more questions. "Yearick has been on the FBI's watch list, but he’s nowhere to be found since the Trump assassination," Webb notes, suggesting that the dark hand behind these events may extend further than anyone has yet acknowledged. In the end, the real question isn't just about who pulled the trigger, but who allowed it to happen. "Any one person could have stopped the whole assassination," Webb concludes, laying bare the unsettling truth that sometimes, the most dangerous conspiracies are the ones hiding in plain sight. Webb’s work as a citizen journalist underscores the critical role independent voices play in uncovering the truth. In an age where mainstream narratives often obscure rather than illuminate, it’s the tireless efforts of individuals like Webb who bring hidden details to light. This mirrors my own experience with the Zika virus, where I spent nearly a year researching the phenomenon. Like Webb, I found that what the public was told didn’t quite match the reality. In my book Overturning Zika, I expose how fear was engineered to serve larger agendas. Who uncovers the truth these days? Often, it’s those who refuse to accept the official story, who dig deeper, and who, like Webb, are willing to challenge the status quo.

Do the benefits of genetic testing outweigh the costs and when should it be done? How important is genetic history in determining cancer risk? Discussing the relative rates of hereditary, versus replicative or environmental risk-factors for cancer. Tomasetti, Vogelstein stochastic model of cancer incidence (cover photo). We discuss the shock of getting a cancer diagnosis, the Kubler Ross phases between denial and ultimate acceptance. How does one navigate the diagnosis on the way to proper, efficient, efficacious, and timely therapy?

Show, by show, what you need to know! (about cancer) First episode, we will cover the basics: although there's been no "cure for cancer", in a sense already there may be. Were going to give you perspective on what's been going on with cancer, what is the "best practice" to help minimize, avoid and (God forbid) treat.

All that knowledge, all that "Internet", all that information, and it sat unwatched, ignored, and more… ridiculed. But after the big lie comes the tiny truths. Yes Covid 19 leaked from a CCP/China lab. The bigger question though is given that everybody with commonsense knew about this at the time, why did it take so long to have somebody (fortunately Dr./Sen. Rand Paul) confront the "powers that be" in the form of Dr. Fauci. Similarly, people have been misled about the background numbers, to the point that they're willing to give children a vaccine with no long-term data safety data for an illness that does precisely no damage to those same children. PLUS: We hope to make sense of the diagram shown here.

"We won't get fooled again!" The Who, 1971 or "We will get fooled again!", The WHO, 2021 one is a great song, and another is a mediocre plea we keep hearing again and again. Right now it's the "Delta variant" about which were supposed to be scared. very possibly the Delta variant just like its predecessors the alpha, beta, gamma, and the undoubtedly soon to arrive epsilon, this is just one more in the natural course of any virus' evolution. There is no specific reason this should be any more dangerous; nonetheless, societies are closing down again per their unscientific governors.

Dr. James A. Thorp, who practices maternal-fetal medicine and is a prominent medical researcher, has recently made significant and alarming discoveries related to COVID-19 vaccines and their impact on pregnancy outcomes and menstrual function. In his groundbreaking study titled "COVID-19 Vaccines: The Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes and Menstrual Function," Dr. Thorp reveals that COVID-19 vaccinations are associated with a substantial increase in adverse effects. These effects include menstrual abnormalities, miscarriages, fetal chromosomal abnormalities, fetal malformations, cystic hygroma, cardiac disorders, arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, vascular malperfusion, and growth abnormalities. The speed at which the COVID-19 vaccines were developed and rolled out to the general population was unprecedented, thanks to Operation Warp Speed. However, historically, vaccines undergo an average of 10-12 years of rigorous clinical trials before being authorized for widespread administration. Dr. Thorp's research highlights the potential risks of deploying these novel SARS-CoV-2 vaccines under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) within just 10 months of their development. At the onset of the pandemic, these vaccines were hailed as the primary solution to the crisis, as early treatment strategies for COVID-19 were (WRONGLY!?) deemed ineffective. In the wake of his groundbreaking findings and the public's growing concern about the potential negative effects of COVID-19 vaccines, Dr. James A. Thorp faced unexpected repercussions. Despite the scientific importance and relevance of his research, he was surprisingly fired from his position. This decision seems odd in light of a Project Veritas video featuring Pfizer director Dr. Jordon Trishton Walker in which he openly admitted that there was something unusual about the impact of the COVID-19 shots, especially in relation to women's reproductive health. He revealed that Pfizer was well aware of the alterations in menstruation associated with the administration of their mRNA-based vaccine. However, they appeared to downplay the significance of these findings and did not express much concern about this particular aspect. Despite being a pharmaceutical giant that had administered its product to billions of people worldwide, Pfizer seemingly had limited understanding of the exact mechanisms causing these changes in women's reproductive health. Dr. Walker mentioned that the company was uncertain about the reasons behind these effects and expressed doubt if they would ever fully comprehend them. The firing of Dr. Thorp and the revelations in the Project Veritas video stirred controversy and raised questions about the transparency of pharmaceutical companies, the dissemination of vital research, and the ethical considerations surrounding the COVID-19 vaccination campaign. The situation underscored the importance of open dialogue, scientific integrity, and the need for further investigation into the potential long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccines on various populations, particularly pregnant individuals and women's health. Dr. Thorp's research serves as a crucial reminder of the importance of evidence-based decision-making and the continuous pursuit of knowledge in the field of medicine.

Maybe you've heard, Tom Brady and the Buccaneers won the Super Bowl. Tom also is a smart guy, and in context did not wear a mask, going into the stadium and during the ceremonies. Apparently Tampa's mayor's more concerned about illegal hugs than illegal drugs. Although she goes around ignoring her own statutes, par for the course. Sweden is the "winner" across the zero-threshold of coronavirus deaths, first in class, first in Europe. Vaccine news, Israel's finding it harder to scare up "customers". You knew this was coming: The heavy hand of government's forcing people to do what theoretically should be voluntary: "Don’t want to vaccinate? Israel set to limit access to cafes, culture and more" The kerfuffle at the New York Times. Chief Science Editor Donald McNeil was the right man to fire, but got fired for completely the wrong reasons. We go over his March 2020 importations importuning for United States ago all "medieval" of the virus, and duplicate communist Cuba, and the PRC's draconian lockdown stylings. This is how we got in this mess in part. False, exaggerated wailings and gnashing of teeth, either done out of fear or misdirection. After all it was very effective in the ultimate goal: mail-in ballots. Hundreds of Thousands of Israelis Have Said No to the COVID-19 Vaccine: Why Are They Waiting? A return to almost-normalcy relies on the vast majority of Israelis over age 50 getting vaccinated for COVID-19, but it isn't happening. New studies explain who isn't getting the shot, and why

Coronavirus case numbers and fatalities are down in the United States enormously. Are we ready to declare "victory" and get on with our business? Well if Sweden is an example, no. They done the best in Europe, yet "the beatings will continue until morale improves". There are few other jokes that come to mind unfortunately. But people who pursue power, once they get it well, they may enjoy it. Italy has temperature sensitive drones pursuing people. Denmark wants a Corona passport. The United States wants to cut off Florida, yet open the border to Mexico. Florida's been doing a good job, Mexico, well will give them a pass, but if you worried about coronavirus contagion, you would probably do the opposite. What is "herd immunity", how do we reach it? At what level? When did become a bad word? Why is it that every simple inexpensive choice has been thrown aside, for a time consuming more risky one? Why do we air on the side of finding Covid deaths, and close things down for a disease which is only 1/3000 (0.03%) fatal– yet, downplay any vaccine or second vaccine reactions or deaths? No animal studies? No problem. Why are people dissing the United States' vaccine creation and distribution? We led the world as we do with other illnesses in finding the answer: in this case in terms of treatment possibilities, medications, refinements and hospital care,, vaccine creation, innovation etc. Mr. Biden claims that there was no vaccine distribution before him, yet he got the vaccine before presidency.

Jack Cashill, an investigative journalist renowned for his bold and often controversial investigations, has delved into some of the most contentious and underreported stories in recent American history. His latest book, "Ashli: The Untold Story of the Women of January 6th," continues his trend of uncovering narratives that mainstream media either ignores or distorts. Throughout his career, Cashill has positioned himself as a crucial literary custodian of these complex and often suppressed stories, earning both admiration and criticism for his relentless pursuit of the truth. The Major Media's Blind Spots Cashill argues that major media outlets frequently leave significant stories untold, a gap he has sought to fill with his work. "The major media leave all the big stories on the table. They don't report the things that they should be reporting," he asserts. This conviction drives Cashill to investigate and document events that he believes are crucial to understanding contemporary American history. His body of work includes extensive coverage of the shootdown of TWA Flight 800, the death of Commerce Secretary Ron Brown, the George Zimmerman trial, and the true story behind the Trayvon Martin case. He also claims to have discovered that Bill Ayers ghostwrote Barack Obama's memoir "Dreams from My Father." The TWA Flight 800 Controversy One of Cashill's most provocative investigations centers on the crash of TWA Flight 800. He contends that the official explanation—a fuel tank explosion—was a cover-up for what was actually a missile strike by the U.S. Navy. According to Cashill, the CIA and FBI took over the investigation from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) to suppress the truth. "The CIA took over the investigation from the FBI and created the animation that the FBI showed once," he explains, suggesting a coordinated effort to mislead the public. Cashill's book, co-written with James Sanders, explores this theory in depth, presenting evidence and eyewitness accounts that support the missile strike hypothesis. Despite significant pushback from government agencies and mainstream media, Cashill remains steadfast in his belief that TWA Flight 800 was brought down by friendly fire during a naval exercise gone wrong. He recounts how the media initially reported finding explosive residue on the plane, only to later attribute it to a dog training exercise—a shift he finds highly suspicious. The Death of Ron Brown Another major investigation led Cashill to scrutinize the death of Commerce Secretary Ron Brown, whose plane crashed in Croatia in 1996. Cashill argues that Brown was murdered to protect the Clinton administration from scandals involving illegal fundraising activities. "The dispassionate observer looking at the evidence walks away with a firm conviction that Ron Brown was murdered," Cashill states. He bases his claim on evidence such as a circular hole found in Brown's head, which he and some experts believe was caused by a bullet. Cashill's deep dive into this case involved collaboration with Brown's confidant and co-conspirator, Nolanda Butler-Hill, who provided inside information on Brown's activities and the circumstances surrounding his death. Despite the gravity of his allegations, Cashill acknowledges that proving them conclusively remains challenging. Nonetheless, he presents a compelling case that suggests Brown's death was not an accident but a politically motivated assassination. The Zimmerman and Martin Case Cashill also played a prominent role in challenging the mainstream narrative surrounding the George Zimmerman trial and the shooting of Trayvon Martin. He argues that the case was manipulated to serve a political agenda, portraying Zimmerman as a villain and Martin as an innocent victim. "I am the principal literary custodian of the George Zimmerman trial, the true story behind the Trayvon Martin hoax," Cashill claims. In his writings, Cashill explores the inconsistencies and media biases that, in his view, distorted public perception of the case. He believes that the trial was used to stoke racial tensions and advance certain political goals, rather than to seek justice based on the facts. Cashill's friendship with Zimmerman has further fueled his commitment to defending him against what he sees as a gross miscarriage of justice. Bill Ayers and Barack Obama One of Cashill's most controversial claims is that Bill Ayers, a former member of the Weather Underground, ghostwrote Barack Obama's memoir "Dreams from My Father." Cashill asserts that if this fact had been widely known before the 2008 election, it would have derailed Obama's candidacy. "I knew this six weeks before the election, right? I'm sitting with the ultimate October surprise," he recalls. Cashill bases his claim on stylistic similarities between Ayers' writings and Obama's memoir, as well as insider information from sources close to the Obamas. Despite skepticism from many quarters, Cashill remains convinced of his theory, citing numerous nautical metaphors in "Dreams from My Father" that he believes could only have come from Ayers, a former merchant seaman. "Bill Ayers had a major helping hand in the writing of 'Dreams from My Father,'" he states unequivocally. January 6th and the Death of Ashli Babbitt In his latest book, "Ashli: The Untold Story of the Women of January 6th," Cashill turns his attention to the events of January 6, 2021, at the U.S. Capitol. He focuses particularly on the death of Ashli Babbitt, a 14-year Air Force veteran shot by Capitol Police. Cashill describes Babbitt as a patriotic and free-spirited individual who became a martyr for the cause she believed in. He contends that the media and government have distorted the facts surrounding her death to fit a particular narrative. Cashill provides a detailed account of Babbitt's final moments, arguing that her death was unjust and preventable. "On January 6th, there were four protesters who died. Three of them arguably were killed, including most famously Ashli Babbitt," he notes. He criticizes the police response and the subsequent investigation, suggesting that Babbitt's death was part of a larger effort to suppress the truth about January 6th. The Broader Implications Cashill's work often touches on broader themes of media bias, government corruption, and the struggle to uncover the truth in a complex and often deceitful world. He positions himself as a truth-seeker, committed to following the facts wherever they lead, regardless of the personal or professional consequences. "I don't, I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm just a reporter. I just go where the facts lead me," he asserts. Despite facing significant criticism and opposition, Cashill continues to pursue his investigative work with tenacity and dedication. He believes that the truth is essential for a functioning democracy and that uncovering hidden narratives is crucial for informed public discourse. His investigations into events like the TWA Flight 800 crash, the death of Ron Brown, the Zimmerman trial, and the January 6th incident highlight his commitment to this mission. Conclusion Jack Cashill's body of work reflects his unwavering commitment to uncovering the truth behind some of the most controversial and underreported stories in recent American history. His investigations have often challenged mainstream narratives, revealing complex and sometimes uncomfortable truths. From the downing of TWA Flight 800 to the death of Ashli Babbitt, Cashill's work underscores the importance of rigorous, fact-based journalism in an era of widespread misinformation and media bias. As Cashill himself states, "It's not even hard to do. I don't know why more people don't do it. I just report the facts that are there." This straightforward approach to journalism has defined his career and cemented his reputation as a determined and fearless investigator, willing to take on powerful interests and uncover the stories that others might prefer to leave untold.

A real worry? or pseudoscientific scare-equivalent of the Turboencabulator?

John Beaudoin of "The Real CDC,"delves into the alarming shifts in death patterns that starkly contrast the years 2020 and 2021, spotlighting a transformative period marked by the onset of COVID-19 and the subsequent rollout of what he terms "COVID immunization gene drug therapy injections." The essence of his book’s thesis emerges through a meticulous examination of three distinct profiles. "The symptom spectrum profile, the age spectrum profile, and the seasonality profile of excess deaths, deaths more than normal, changed starkly". This shift—from respiratory issues in 2020 to circulatory and blood-related causes in 2021—paints a grim picture. Moreover, the age spectrum profile saw a dramatic shift, with the average age of excess deaths dropping from 81 years in 2020 to about 65 in 2021. This change underscores not only a broadening of the demographic impact but also the profound effect of 2021s new therapy(!). Seasonality, typically observed in patterns of winter peaks corresponding with flu and pneumonia, underwent a radical change. As he notes, "The seasonality went from winter and then it turned off in the summer." The persistent, all-year-round pattern of deaths in 2021, deviating from the historical norm, suggests an unusual persistence of lethal threats beyond the cold months, challenging the conventional understanding of seasonal health trends. Rooted in detailed analysis and personal inquiry, John Beaudoin not only charts the statistical changes but also challenges the audience to confront the possible underlying causes—related to the medical treatments employed during the pandemic.. "The definition of the word vaccine was changed in all dictionaries in 2020 for this to be fit into that category. And the reason is the word vaccine was already an accepted word and an accepted medical treatment within the public. They use the word "booster" to fool people into thinking that they're getting their immune system boosted."

In this revealing conversation, Andrew Bridgen, former Member of Parliament, shares his first-hand account of the alarming discrepancies surrounding his electoral defeat, where his vote share mysteriously plummeted from 63% to 3%. Bridgen dissects the deeper implications of this loss—unacknowledged by the mainstream media—and links it to a broader pattern of selective scrutiny, government overreach, and corporate interests undermining democracy. From vaccine controversies to two-tier law enforcement and the erosion of civil liberties, Bridgen paints a stark picture of modern governance. His observations speak to a growing global phenomenon, where those in power operate with impunity, and critical events are met with an unsettling silence. 1. The Mysterious Election Results Bridgen reflected on his shocking election loss, where his vote count plummeted from 63% to 3%. He highlighted several irregularities, including the en-masse resignation of election officials and unexplained delays in ballot counts. Despite widespread local support, Bridgen found the results inexplicable and suspicious. "It doesn't make sense. I know what winning feels like; I've done it four times. Wherever I go, people tell me they voted for me." He noted how the mainstream media’s silence on his defeat only deepened his suspicions. "If I had really been humiliated at the polls, the media would have celebrated it. But there was nothing." 2. The Vaccine Debate and Government Overreach Bridgen critiqued the government's handling of COVID-19, especially the push for mRNA vaccines. He described the vaccine rollout as a disaster, driven more by corporatist interests than public health. "The biggest crime in humanity ever has been committed, and it’s ongoing with the so-called vaccines. They are neither safe nor effective." Bridgen also expressed concerns over the erosion of democratic principles, as governments worldwide seemed to be in lockstep with pharmaceutical companies and supranational organizations like the WHO. "Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer are both owned by the World Economic Forum. They don’t serve the people." 3. Selective Scrutiny and Media Silence Bridgen lamented the lack of accountability in government scandals, drawing comparisons to other high-profile cases, including Jeffrey Epstein. "Everywhere you go, there are cameras—except when Epstein ‘decides’ to kill himself." This selective scrutiny extended to the government’s handling of vaccine injuries and excess deaths. Bridgen argued that the lack of transparency was intentional and that political elites were using crises to further their own agendas. "The only pandemic we’ve had is a pandemic of fear, and it’s got to stop." 4. Immigration and Two-Tier Law Enforcement Bridgen also touched on immigration issues in the UK, noting how the government’s policies were fueling social tensions while failing to address the concerns of the working class. "One in twenty-seven people in the UK have been here for less than two years. And we’ve got a housing shortage. No one dares to do anything about it." He described the unequal application of law enforcement, where certain communities seemed to be policed more leniently. "I saw Muslim men armed with machetes in Birmingham, and the police asked them to leave their weapons in the mosque and go home. It’s two-tier law enforcement."

David Bell, MD, PhD, offered a striking critique of the modern public health landscape. As a seasoned physician and infectious disease expert with over 25 years of experience working in low-income countries, Bell provided a unique perspective on the shift toward vaccine-centered public health initiatives. His central argument is that diseases like TB, malaria, and HIV, which are responsible for a staggering death toll in the Third World, are being sidelined because they don’t have the glamour of a vaccine. "We’ve allowed the (vaccine-) business model to become the driving force of international public health," Bell remarked. He notes that instead of focusing on systemic improvements like sanitation, nutrition, and living conditions, global health agencies and pharmaceutical companies have become obsessed with developing and selling vaccines for diseases, regardless of the actual public health need. "The large pharmaceutical companies and their investors have seen opportunities, particularly in vaccines," he continues, pointing out that selling vaccines to millions of people—most of whom aren’t at risk—has become an incredibly profitable model. One of Bell’s key criticisms is the way public health resources are being diverted to diseases like Mpox (formerly monkeypox), while far deadlier diseases continue to ravage poorer countries. TB kills hundreds of thousands annually, while malaria claims thousands of lives each month. Yet, the world is more focused on producing millions of doses of Mpox vaccines for a disease with a relatively low fatality rate. "Monkeypox has been around for 25-30 years, but it’s almost certainly thousands of years old," Bell notes, adding that its reservoir is in rodents, not monkeys, and it spreads primarily through close physical contact. Despite this, Mpox was declared a public health emergency of international concern, leading to a rush for vaccines that Bell sees as unnecessary. "Follow the money," he advises, emphasizing that this has less to do with public health and more to do with financial incentives. "Vaccines are a medication. They have benefits and risks, just like anything else." Bell’s perspective stems from his years on the frontlines, where malaria, HIV, and TB have decimated populations. Unlike these chronic diseases, which require long-term strategies, vaccines offer a quick fix—and an even quicker profit. He questions why global health organizations and media outlets blow relatively small issues like Mpox into global crises while ignoring the ongoing disasters of diseases that claim far more lives. In his view, the WHO has become complicit in this shift, largely due to its funding model. Bell explains that the organization's reliance on earmarked donations from countries with large pharmaceutical interests has shifted its focus. "The WHO is 80% funded by private donations, many from pharmaceutical companies," Bell says. This, he believes, explains why there’s a disproportionate emphasis on diseases that can be "solved" with vaccines, while more fundamental health issues like nutrition go unaddressed. "If they could make the same noise about basic nutrition support as they do about vaccines, we’d be in a much better place," Bell argues. He sums up the current state of public health with a sharp observation: "Things aren’t getting worse in terms of disease. It’s just getting easier to make money out of it." This encapsulates Bell’s frustration with the industry’s direction. He isn’t against vaccines; rather, he is against the way they have come to dominate public health discourse at the expense of more pressing, long-term solutions. As long as the focus remains on vaccine development, genuine public health emergencies—like those found in impoverished nations—will continue to be ignored. Follow the money has become the guiding principle, and until that changes, malaria, TB, and HIV will remain in the shadows, killing millions while the spotlight shines on diseases that fit the vaccine narrative. #Vaccines #Mpox #PublicHealth #WHO #TB #Malaria #PharmaceuticalProfits #InfectiousDiseases #GlobalHealth #Monkeypox