NDE

462 Near Death Experience cases used to pull common traits out. When 462 people report almost identical stories, it becomes proof. I consider this proof. Concept of my data book: Those that have had a Near Death Experience (NDE) and those that have an interest in NDE’s crave details (personal accounts) on events that help them validate their experience or their views. This, to them, becomes elements of proof, building one upon the other. Conversely, skeptics await the “scientific proof” or, more appropriately, use the lack of “scientific evidence” to dismiss those experiences and experiencers accounts, painting them as influenced by medical pharmaceuticals or some long list of technical theories (Neurons, etc.). As an individual very interested in the subject since the mid 1970’s, I have read many books and frequent top tier websites as a consumer. I recently realized the “proof”, to me, was the abundance of firsthand accounts right in front of me. As a technical professional from the Nuclear Power industry, I realized that portraying the large number of “key elements” (consistent aspects of the accounts), in a way that cuts out all distracting text, would not only be of interest to NDE customers but also formed a type of proof (A type I will just call “common sense”). There could be no explanation why tens of thousands (as documented) individuals report such visceral and consistent accounts. I have broken down the anonymous posts/accounts (I have website permission in writing) of 462 individuals (Fair limited use for research) into 4,147 lines of Excel data that captured the essence of the accounts. While customers will internalize the nuggets of information for themselves, I help the process by pointing out 31 common aspects I found and they can look for them in those 462 cases. This data is not, purposefully, in a narrative form.