HughJanus

Occurence at 11.35 pm local Arizona time with nobody there to count or supervise anything and with nobody having been supposed to have been there in point of fact. This is an example of the mechanics of a vote flipping action which creates the mirror flip line graphs that you dispay with an apparant vote flip cheat ratio setting of 53% .The same setting found in Colorado as evidenced with an error logic test. If the same error logic test is applied to Arizona then I am certain that you will get the same result. This vid shows you that votes were counted at the Navajo County level in the sec of state democrat primary race but then not added to the grand total tally. In the Colorado sos primary vid link below I also noted that there was an obvious disconnect between the county level results and the grand tally results and the same was happening there. I recorded the rest of of Colorado on a different site and so not like this and the Peters SOS race but with further analysis I may be able to cobble together some documented evidence showing the 'big picture' like I have here. https://rumble.com/v1e6al3-colorado-june-28th-2022-sec-of-state-primary-election-tampering-moffat-yuma.html It looks to me like the Adrian Fontes 417 votes were added to the Hobbs tally so that when calculated between her and other candidate it was hobbs 517 - Marco Lopez 245, with 245 being 48.8% leaving 52.2% of 517-245 difference to Hobbs and consistant with a vote flip cheat algorithm ratio target setting of 53%. And with the election taken as a whole, looking at the 'big picture' it is suggestive of being the same if following the very simple logic train of thought that if someone is voting for someone on a multi race ballot then they will llkely vote for the other candidates of the same party, if you vote dem gov you will want a dem sos and attorney that will work together and toward the same goals and so forth and same for dems. it bares out on the maga side with them all being in the 300k range . ( except for the fact that finchem and masters are both 60k less than lake 380k which makes me think that I may find instances like this with them as the analisysis progresses or perhaps it has something to do with 63k vote suppression as described in the article below, were there any reports of people recieving ballots without finchem or masters on the ticket or was it just down to general ajudication fraud ? Hopefully as my analysis progresses I will find out. BREAKING: 63,000 Mail-In Ballots Sent to Wrong Voters in Strongly ... welovetrump.com/2022/08/03/breaking-63000-mail-in-ballots-sent-to-wrong-voters... “During Arizona’s primary elections, the RNC and Republican Party of Arizona’s poll observer program documented and reported multiple failures by Pinal County’s Elections https://welovetrump.com/2022/08/03/breaking-63000-mail-in-ballots-sent-to-wrong-voters-in-strongly-republican-pinal-county-arizona/ On the Dem side the SOS race got 294k so following the simple logic train it should all be in the 200k range and Hobbs should be 219k not 419k as described in my vid posting link below. 219,209 of 419,209 is 52.3% and again consistant with a vote flip cheat algorithm target setting of 53%. Which leaves a deficit of 200k which is also consistant with the findings of 200k 'ajudication errors' in the 2020 stolen election forensic audit in Arizona as described in the article below. https://citizenwells.com/2021/01/31/arizona-audit-focus-on-ballots-200k-adjudicated-errors-ballots-in-maricopa-county-red-flag-why-so-many-and-how-were-they-processed-and-who-supervised/ Arizona is generally thought of a a red till dead ( at which point they will start flipping your vote to binden) state isn't it, so that suggests that Colorado is red with an identical 53% vote flip cheat algorithm setting and not purple as a local informed me. Perhaps misinformed and mislead or perhaps simply just not any more. I guess that the rual liberal hippies have fallen out of favour with the slow motion car wreck that is slow joe blows as well as they can no longer afford to buy weed perhaps or something? And what does that say about georgia that had to use a vote flip cheat algorithm setting of 60% as evidencewd by voter GA ? The 441 votes of Reginold Bolding in the sos dem race are identical to the never Trumper Rino Doug Douchebag endorsed Beau Lane addition of 441 so looks like they went there. No percentage calculations needed there, just threw the lot straight across, because, lets face it, maga voters were shoving it up their butt with a coconut without even so much as an excuse me and no mistake wern't they. Also the percentage of precincts reporting went to 100% and then were all brought back down across the board to 92.9%. There are two reasons for doing that isnt there. Firstly if you are doing a procedure such as this one in the vid and you dont make adjustments afterwards all the percentages will start going all screwy everywhere and it hides what you have just done and stops the grand tally percentage that eveyone looks at from altering too much. And secondly if you are shoving in faud ballots and dont adjust the percentage then the percentage amount will end up going above 100% like 105% or 179% as with the Virginia council or have votes being added with 100% aready reported and links to my vid postings that I think are examples of that are below. https://rumble.com/vonr8j-nov-2-election-preview.html https://rumble.com/v19f1bl-corporates-to-seize-everything-and-tax-you-into-serfdom-hell-yes-honest.-10.html https://rumble.com/v1eeuf3-colorado-june-28th-2022-sec-of-state-primary-election-steal-pitkin-county.html All those were on the day fraud shift though I think and probably pedo radical blm antifa recriuts with limited training and by the looks of them mostly brain defective crackhead f ups. But this is past 10.30pm-11.30pm at night when the Dominion night cheat shift have taken over to make recalculations and manual ajustments and down load from usb sticks and such ,and it all goes like clockwork becuase they are fully trained experienced full time proffessional criminals arent they. Dem Gov Race KATIE HOBBS 332,413 - 332,930 ADDITION 517 ( LOOKS LIKE MOST FLIPPED FROM DEM SOS RACE OTHER 100 COULD ALL BE FAKE ONES FOR ALL I IKNOW ) ( Navajo County level 3663 - 4180 Addition 517) Marco Lopez 99,074 - 99313 Addition 247 ( Navajo County level 1449 - 1696 Addition 247 ) Aron Lieberman 22113 - 22,228 Addition 115 ( 4 more than the 111 counted at Navajo county level? just fraud ballots or taken from an AG race not on screen perhaps?) ( Navajo County level 520 - 635 Addition 111 ( 4 less than was added at grand tally level ? ) Dem SOS Race ADRIAN FONTES 231,534 - 231,534 ADDITION 0 ( 417 NOT ADDED FROM NAVAJO COUNTY COUNT MOST LIKELY WENT TO KATIE HOBBS ) REGINALD BOLDING 208076 - 208,076 addition 0 ( 441 FROM NAVAJO COUNTY LEVEL NOT ADDED IDENTICAL TO NEVER TRUMPER DOUG DOUCHEBAG ENDORSED BEAU LANE ADDITION ) GOP Gov race Karrin Taylor Robson 245,171 - 246,083 Addition 912 ( Navajo County level 2790 - 3702 Addition 912 ) Kari Lake 213,165 - 214,849 Addition 1684 ( Navajo County level 2594 - 4278 Addition 1684 ) Matt Salmon 22,204 - 22,305 Addition 101 ( Navajo County level 325 - 426 Addition 101) Scott Neely 17,847 - 17,928 Addition 81 ( Navajo County level 217 - 295 Addition 81 ) GOP SOS Race Mark Finchem 177,171 - 178,535 Addition 1364 ( Navajo County level 2175 - 3539 Addition 1364 ) BEAU LANE 127,127 - 127,568 ADDITION 441 ( IDENTICAL 441 NOT ADDED TO REGINALD BOLDING IN DEM SOS RACE AND LIKELY FROM THERE ) ( Navajo County level 1431 - 1872 Addition 441 ) Shawnna Bolick 95,061 - 95,546 Addition 485 ( Navajo County level 1238 - 1723 Addition 485 ) Michelle Rita 77,727 - 78,000 Addition 273 ( Navajo County level 771 - 1044 Addition 273 )

The recent primary has just given proof positive evidence that Arizona is a deep red ultra maga high turn out state, that the criminals that stole it are desperately trying to palm off as being a blue state now after the stolen 2020 election somehow? In an election in which maga candidates wiped the board with ,despite the massive fraud, the top scorer by a full 40k is the full time professional criminal pretending to be a democrat Katie Hobbs? Really? Seriously? If those numbers stay the same then Hobbs will win and win big in a proof positive deep red ultra maga state that by all accounts detest the full time criminal treason and federal crime committing tds riddled wench? Really? Seriously? The three maga candidates got similar numbers, lake 380k, finchem 314k, masters 312k... and logic dictates that it wil be the same for democrat with fontes getting 284k. hobbs should logically be 219k not 419k. making a deficiet of 200k, you know like what was found in the 2020 stolen election Arizona audit ;). A full forensic audit is required and the cheat machines absolutely must be removed before nov if there is to be any hope of anything even remotely resemberling democracy . Katie Hobbs ( Criminal ) 419,209 ??????????????????????? Kari Lake ( Maga ) 380,687 Mark Finchem ( Maga ) 314,591 Blake Masters ( Maga ) 312,430 Arian Fontes ( Democrat ) 294,105 ( watching through pre-analysis it looked like bolding actually won against fontes )

full analysis not completed, to be updated, parts 3,4,5 and 6 not started yet recalculations being made with no one there to count or supervise anything. 11.35 pm local Arizona time

Kari Lake 236,131 - 236,017 Reduction 114 12.05 am Arizona local time

Two plus two equals twenty two....... Do you know how you can tell when the computer cheat algorithm is having a bad hair day and on mass on the day voter turnout is really kicking its ass? When the flip ratio setting has been excedded and it is having to throw in so many fraudulant ballots to try and keep up that it has to start to throw all the numbers backwards so that the total number of votes 'cast' doesn't exceed the total number of registared voters and census data for the area..... Robson 236,346 - 235,084 Reduction 1,262 Lake 198,936 - 197,923 Reduction 1,013 Salmon 21,398 - 21,296 Reduction 102 Neely 17,067 - 16,994 Reduction 73 Votes counted drops from 60.7% to 60.3% 10.37 pm local Arizona time https://rumble.com/v1eo85z-arizona-aug-2nd-2022-gop-gov-primary-vote-reduction-election-fraud-crime.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=12 Mark Finchem 164,915 - 163,497 Reduction 1,418 Beau Lane 122,686 - 121,992 Reduction 694 Shawnna Bolick 91,060 - 90,661 Reduction 399 Michelle Ugent-Rita 74,944 - 74,616 Reduction 378 Votes counted 56.7% reduced to 56.4% 10.37 pm local Arizona time https://rumble.com/v1esl43-mark-finchem-part-1-zoomed-arizona-aug-2nd-2022-gop-gov-primary-vote-reduct.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=12 Blake Masters 165,440 - 164,565 Reduction 875 Jim Lamon 144,308 - 143,519 Reduction 789 Mark Brnovich 84,710 - 84,217 Reduction 493 Michael McQuire 43,864 - 43,651 Reduction votes counted at 59.2% reduced to 58.9% 10.37 pm Arizona local time https://rumble.com/v1esuhf-blake-masters-part-1-zoomed-arizona-aug-2nd-2022-gop-gov-primary-vote-reduc.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=12 Katie Hobbs 324,189 - 322,750 Reduced 1,439 Marco Lopez 95,775 - 95,313 Reduced 462 Aron Lieberman 21,197 - 21,088 Reduced 109 votes counted at 66.8% reduced to 66.5% 10.37 pm local Arizona time https://rumble.com/v1esz8j-katie-hobbs-part-1-zoomed-arizona-aug-2nd-2022-gop-gov-primary-vote-reducti.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=12 Adrian Fontes 225,354 - 224,362 Reduced 992 Reginald Balding 202,181 - 201,212 Reduced 969 Votes counted at 65.8% reduced to 65.5% 10.27 pm Arizona local time https://rumble.com/v1et0n3-adrian-fontes-part-1-zoomed-arizona-aug-2nd-2022-gop-gov-primary-vote-reduc.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=12

Adrian Fontes 225,354 - 224,362 Reduced 992 Reginald Balding 202,181 - 201,212 Reduced 969 Votes counted at 65.8% reduced to 65.5% 10.27 pm Arizona local time

Katie Hobbs 324,189 - 322,750 Reduced 1,439 Marco Lopez 95,775 - 95,313 Reduced 462 Aron Lieberman 21,197 - 21,088 Reduced 109 votes counted at 66.8% reduced to 66.5% 10.37 pm local Arizona time

Blake Masters 165,440 - 164,565 Reduction 875 Jim Lamon 144,308 - 143,519 Reduction 789 Mark Brnovich 84,710 - 84,217 Reduction 493 Michael McQuire 43,864 - 43,651 Reduction votes counted at 59.2% reduced to 58.9% 10.37 pm Arizona local time

Mark Finchem 164,915 - 163,497 Reduction 1,418 Beau Lane 122,686 - 121,992 Reduction 694 Shawnna Bolick 91,060 - 90,661 Reduction 399 Michelle Ugent-Rita 74,944 - 74,616 Reduction 378 Votes counted 56.7% reduced to 56.4% 10.37 pm local Arizona time

Two plus two equals twenty two....... Do you know how you can tell when the computer cheat algorithm is having a bad hair day and on mass on the day voter turnout is really kicking its ass? When the flip ratio setting has been excedded and it is having to throw in so many fraudulant ballots to try and keep up that it has to start to throw all the numbers backwards so that the total number of votes 'cast' doesn't exceed the total number of registared voters and census data for the area..... Robson 236,346 - 235,084 Reduction 1,262 Lake 198,936 - 197,923 Reduction 1,013 Salmon 21,398 - 21,296 Reduction 102 Neely 17,067 - 16,994 Reduction 73 Votes counted drops from 60.7% to 60.3% 10.37 pm local Arizona time

started as solid colour won on 100% and you will see a couple of seconds later it is reduced to striped in the lead, time 9.11 pm local Colorado time. When the curser was over it again 2 min later it had been reduced to 94.1%

Went from 100% solid colour won to 90% striped in the lead, time frame 9.09 - 9.12 pm local Colorado time

Started at 95.1% and increased with votes added to 99% at 9.06 pm local Colorado time and was noticed at 9.12 pm to have reduced back down to 95.1%

went from 95% reported to 98.8% with votes added and then later was brought back down to 95%

Went from 94.4% lead to 100% with votes added and reduced back down to 94.4% justin the lead again . first noticed at 9.11 pm and happened about 9.06 pm local Colorado time

More votes added after 100% of precincts had already reported

votes added to Rio Blanco County after 100% of precincts had aleady reported in first noticed at 9.07 pm local Colorado time.

percentage of votes counted went down not up as votes were added from 96.7% down to 93.3%

let it play for few seconds so that you can see Garfield County change from in the lead to won and then cursor on county showing increrased from 96.3 percent to 100% with vote increase and then let it play on for 30 sec or so to let you see how long it takes for the program to tamper with it and put it back to just in the lead then skip forward to show it has been reduced back down to 96.3%. 9.06 pm local Colorado time

Not on the straight and narrow county indeed! more votes added after 100% of precincts had already reported. This and the other vids such as counties going from striped in the lead to solid colour won and back again are examples of the computer algorithm 'shuffling the cards ', adding more votes in where needed and spreading the reduced otes counted across various counties to try and make it less noticable and such and spread out the fraud actions , the electoral equivalent of 'plate juggling' with '27 counties in the air at once' with all the coloured sqaures being shuffled around like a Rubics cube to get the predetermined outcome and quantity. A good automotive analogy would be the electronic control unit (ecu) for the 'fuel injection system' of the 'engine management system' of a car. _ the candidates are like the fuel to air ratio mixtures that have to be kept at the right mixture and quantity levels to work and have to be injected at the right time and in the right place, and the initial dump of fake votes that they always start off with is like the automatic choke coming on to help get the engine started. they even call it the 'global elections management system' ( gems) dont they ;). the logic failure was set at 53% for that machine in colorado wasnt it and the mail in fraud nitrious kit allows for up to 70% for particually bad slow motion car wrecks like slow joe blows, in the georgia run off vids warnock is I think at the full severnty and ossoff was set at about 57% and the average was about 62.5 and voter ga reported average 60% eorror rates..... an example of predetermined result can be found in the illinois prebroadcast vid. if you look at the governer races you will see that the wnners are announced and that the target rough result is very close to the real displasyed result. other races are different but you only need to seize control of the important ones like gov and sos in a primary dont you. its primary prebroadcast purpose though is voter suppression obviously if you look at it and think the tossers have already won again i must have got the dates wrong, then you may not vote at all and they then can for you, or not look too closely at the cheating on screen if you think it is done and over already. other people mentioned places like michigan and georgia but I think you will find that sort of felony is common place all over and people have only just started to become vaugely aware that it is happening

votes added to Sagauche County after 100% of precincts had already reported in

8.52 pm local Colorado time Votes added to Alamosa county hours after 100% of precincts had reported in at near start of the evening

8.39 pm local colorado time at 90.9% votes counted 8.47 pm local colorado time at 100% votes counted Peters 1632 - 1764 Anderson 1581 - 1681 O'Donnell 1151 - 1212 8.52 pm local colorado time votes counted reduced back down to 90.9% Went from striped 'in the lead' to solid red 'won' back to just striped 'in the lead' again

El paso County votes counted reduced for a second time from 98.3% to 94.8% at about 8.46 pm local Colorado time.

went from 93.8% to 100% with votes added and then was taken back down to 93.8% later went from in the lead to won back to just in the lead again