CoronavirusPlushie

Watch the full interview here: https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/dr-pierre-kory-explains-covid-19-vaccine-shedding-5584790?&utm_medium=AmericanThoughtLeaders&utm_source=SocialM&utm_campaign=DrPierreKory&utm_content=2-10-2024

For years now, we’ve heard rumblings about COVID-19 vaccine shedding. Unvaccinated women talk of menstrual abnormalities after coming into close contact with vaccinated individuals. Some recently vaccinated mothers report babies experiencing bad reactions after breastfeeding. So what is this phenomenon? Is it real? And if so, what kinds of people are most affected? In this episode, I sit down with Dr. Pierre Kory, co-founder of the FLCCC Alliance and former chief of the Critical Care Service at the University of Wisconsin. He has been researching COVID-19 vaccine shedding, and he’s written a nine-part series on his Substack of what he’s uncovered thus far. American Thought Leaders Feb-10-2024 https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/dr-pierre-kory-explains-covid-19-vaccine-shedding-5584790

Paul Brennan at RCR reads the following from an email sent to him by Alia Bland of Voices for Freedom after her chat with him about her experience meeting Tony Blakely and John Whitehead, two of the commissioners from the Royal Commission of Inquiry Into Covid-19 (Lessons learned): "The recent terms of reference overview released by act party and nz first last week include the following wording: "The extent of disruption to New Zealander's health, education and business as a result of the government's policies". While safety is not specifically named in the release, our legal team is satisfied that the safety of the Covid injectables would be covered within the wording: "disruption to New Zealander's health". There's nothing more disruptive to one's health than being seriously injured by a mandated medical product . . . . . . The Covid Inquiry is one mechanism we can use to drive public understanding of the issues relating to the previous government's Covid response, we don't expect it to be the answer to all our prayers. However, we can and should engage with the process to further our own goals, including reaching everyday Kiwis with messaging and stories that will resonate and touch hearts at the human level. The more the public knows the issues, the more significant the pushback against future efforts to remove our rights".

On my Twitter too https://twitter.com/c_plushie/status/1756955546878619836

"They took the vaccine, and because it doesn't work, then they get Covid on top of it, so they've had multiple exposures of the Sars-CoV-2 spike protein . . . we know that the vaccine exposes the body to way more spike protein than Covid illness, so we wouldn't ascribe it to the lower exposure, Long Covid, it would be ascribed to the vaccine, where that's a systemic installation via injection. So no, we wouldn't ascribe it the respiratory illness." Also watch this related video: The Optimised Pfizer Shot (See Description Box) https://rumble.com/v4chssi-the-optimised-pfizer-shot-see-description-box.html

Source: John Campbell You Tube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwdRfbPrGIY&t=18s

In his interview with Mike Hosking Tony Blakely, Jacinda Ardern's choice for Chair of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Covid-19 (Lessons Learned), said this . . . "It wouldn't be a good use of our time to go and review the international literature and work out exactly what the vaccine effectiveness of it was, of the Moderna vaccine on the 12th of July 2022, that's not worth our effort." Some people commented on how they found it odd that he would speak of the Moderna shot, when it was the Pfizer shot that was given here in New Zealand. But Lynda Wharton on The Health Forum NZ did some research and found something which might give us a clue as to why the words "Moderna vaccine" came out of his mouth. Study: https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/52/3/677/7100842?login=false" "The Population Interventions Unit is expected to receive funding from Moderna Inc. to conduct research on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in Victoria, Australia" Thread in Twitter: https://twitter.com/c_plushie/status/1756082299555422464

Source @2ETEKA X account: https://twitter.com/2ETEKA/status/1755747233918853624 Commissioners should be impartial and Blakeley definitely isn’t. • Tony had worked closely with Adern/Verrall Labour to design the smoke free 2025 legislation (more on this later). • He then relocated to Melbourne in 2019 and became “the head of population interventions and Global health” and provided modelling to support Dan Andrews’ draconian lockdowns. He became Andrews “expert” behind the ridiculous Zero Elimination strategy. The clip below is Blakeley’s interview with RNZ November 13/11/23. It is quite frankly condescending nonsense, full of platitudes and ‘Adern-isms’. It’s alarming, he says : • He has already pre-judged the outcome, several times stating that the ‘team of 5 million’ did a great job and it was a great response. • He says the non adversarial approach is right and he’s ‘glad we aren’t doing it this way’ • Defends the secrecy and confidentiality of the Enquiry that was stipulated by Adern •Says that most people he speaks with from the community very very proud of our covid response • Says “hey the ending of it was a bit bumpy but people will reflect differently on this after they’ve had a holiday” • He says the effectiveness and efficacy of the vaccine is quote “ a fact”. When asked “are people still traumatised by the covid reponse?” He replies with a chuckle ; “Yeah we all had some bad experiences”and without irony he says “I had to get up early in the mornings and give interview after interview” You know Tony - people had to die alone, families could not see loved ones before they passed, people lost their jobs and let’s not get started on adverse reactions and deaths. But that was your reply …. That’s bordering on psychopathic. That’s a disgusting remark to make. Look you have to really listen to this yourself to understand how unsuitable this guy is. At one stage be even mentions how we are going to have to think about vaccine mandates in the future to factor in ‘Climate Change” I’ve added an RNZ clip at the end - Tony is spruiking smoke free 2025, he says that other countries that have banned smoking have had issues with a black market but - “NZ is an isolated island and lockdowns have strengthened our borders so NZ is an ideal country to ban smoking in” the inference is he wanted the lockdowns to extend INDEFINITELY. The other two Adern appointed commissioners have already quit. Tony Blakely, you need to do the right thing and step down. You are wholly unsuitable. I would recommend everyone contacting your local MP, contact National, Act and NZFirst and tell them if Tony is still there , this whole exercise is a total WASTE OF TIME. Just another elite academic drop kick.

Source: Dr. David Cartland X account https://twitter.com/CartlandDavid/status/1754470254867001550

Playing clips of the audio of some of my videos through a loud speaker outside parliament after a protest on 23 Aug, 2022. People were slowly leaving the grounds at this point, but the masked-up police who were stood in a line in front of parliament, and the NZ Herald who was live streaming the protest, heard me.

Lynda Wharton of The Health Forum NZ posted the following in Twitter. Please read, links where you submit your feedback right at the end: Dear New Zealand It's 8th February 2024. Today the new Government opened public submissions to contribute to the Royal Commission of Inquiry (Covid). You are invited to 1) Share your story of how the Covid response impacted YOU 2) Make suggestions for changes to any future Pandemic responses 3) Tell the Government what questions you would like including in the revised Terms of Reference - what do you want the Inquiry to research and report on? You can do 1, 2 or 3 of these options. Your submission is confidential. You can request it to remain confidential forever. When you submit (online) there are a series of questions about demographics like age, sex, area of NZ etc. THESE ARE OPTIONAL QUESTIONS You have until March 24 2024 to make your submission. Please summon the strength to do this. If you need help go here: https://www.voicesforfreedom.co.nz/covid-inquiry/ USE YOUR VOICE TO TELL YOUR GOVERNMENT WHAT YOU HAVE SUFFERED Please share this everywhere including other platforms, messenger etc. (watch the video to see an especially important issue that has been completely left out of the inquiry. SHOUT for it to be included!!) Submit your feedback here: https://haveyoursay.covid19lessons.royalcommission.nz

Sean Plunket Asked Helen Petousis Harris how many Kiwis were seriously injured by the Pfizer shot, and this is what she said.

Tony Blakely, Jacinda Ardern's pick for Chair of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Covid-19: A strong advocate of healthy people wearing masks. Here's Blakely in July 2020, citing a WHO commissioned meta-study on the effectiveness of face masks that was published in The Lancet in June 2020. It was this study that was instrumental in shifting global face mask policy in the middle of 2020. However, critics of this study, which claimed a risk reduction of 80% with face masks, say the study is seriously flawed on several levels and it should have been retracted. The more I see of this guy, the more he reminds me of Prof. Michael Baker, who would also cite this same flawed study when he was pushing masks. Criticism on the Lancet Study here: https://swprs.org/who-mask-study-seriously-flawed/

"Floor by floor, it started popping out." "It was as if they had detonated, you know, as if they were planned to take down a building, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom". "All the way down". ~ Firefighters, Pat Zoda and Dennis Tardio "I saw, from the corner, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. And as the bombs were going, people just started running." ~ Paul Lemos. Note the line of high velocity explosive bursts racing down the side of WTC 1, way ahead of the 'collapse' zone

Link to the TGA Nonclinical Evaluation Report for the Pfizer shot: https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2389-06.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3wGZCzuy9XGre_pwwdf2jTfO85glYy5baucEqOJeNV80WOJbNRfv2YFPo From page 19: Re producing more spike protein ('improve antigen expression') : "The V9 variant was selected as the clinical candidate. V8 and V9 have identical amino acid sequences of the encoded antigens and differ only in their codon optimisation sequences, which were designed to improve antigen expression (V9)" From pages 17 and 18: Re enabling it to better enter cells: "ALC-0315 has been optimised for RNA encapsulation and intracellular delivery." (ALC-0315 is one of the lipids that make up the nanoparticles). Source video (to which I added the screenshots) is Dr. John Campbell'discussion with Senator Rennick on 25 March 2023. If you click below it should start playing at the right place https://youtu.be/y8kaXrEQB5M?t=1114

Full debate here: https://rumble.com/v47gqb3-andrew-bridgen-mp-westminster-hall-full-debate-on-excess-deaths-16-jan-2024.html

Full debate here: https://rumble.com/v47gqb3-andrew-bridgen-mp-westminster-hall-full-debate-on-excess-deaths-16-jan-2024.html

0:11 - Sound of first explosion (a flash coincides with this explosion which I show later in the video). 0:15 - Sound of second explosion (not quite as loud as the first one. If you cant hear it, try listening with headphones). 0:16 - Man says: "that's the third". If you watch the full video (posted below) you can hear the man who filmed it saying that he thought he saw and heard another plane hit the tower. So when he says "that's the third", I think what happened is he mistook the sound of one of the explosions, for what he thought was the sound of the impact of a third plane. Original video (just click and it plays at the right place) https://youtu.be/DPw9XiJe09E?t=900

NIST FOIA 09-42: R14-UC, filmed by Cynthia Weil. Source video: https://youtu.be/ctjckFHtRJ4?t=3416

Fox 35 report on billions of DNA fragments found in the Moderna and Pfizer Covid shots. Jospeh A. Ladapo says that if the risks of DNA integration with #covid shots cannot be addressed then the shots aren't appropriate for use in humans. Ladapo has sent letters to the heads of both the FD and CDC questioning how this would impact humans in three mains areas: * Healthy human genes being transformed into cancerous cells. * Chromosomal instability. * And how integration could effect unintended parts of the body, such as the heart, brain, lungs and the injection site itself.

A few notable quotes from Blakely: "Vaccine efficacy is a very wide area. This is just my view as one citizen, is that it wouldn't be a good use of our time to go and review the international literature and work out exactly what the vaccine effectiveness was." 'There are other issues about vaccines, for example vaccine harms and things like that, which I think, personally, as just one expert here, are probably beyond what a Royal Commission should do, that can be done by others. But let's see what comes in on the engagement with the New Zealand public." "It's actually up to the New Zealand Public to come in with what their views are. We live in a democracy, so what's going to happen is we'll be collecting all those views on our terms of reference, on behalf of the New Zealand government. We then forward that data on to the Department of Internal Affairs, they analyse it, give it to Minister Brooke van Velden in April or May. She then sits down with the rest of the government cabinet and they decide how they want to tweak our terms of reference. It's their call." "We have been charged with doing the Inquiry in a non-adversarial way, so we speak to a lot of people and ask them to be free and frank, and we protect their confidentiality. The British and the Scottish are doing it in an adversarial way, where you have the lawyers in the room and it's cross examination, all the rest of it. Both have their strengths and weaknesses, at the moment though, our Inquiry is doing it in a non-adversarial way."

Incentivising Kiwis to get jabbed by offering them cash prizes, food, free tickets for the rugby, and other kinds of 'treats', was a big part of the 16 Oct, 2021 'Super Saturday Vaxathon'. But many of us watched this in dismay and horror, as we'd known for months how much injury and death the #covid shots were causing. Now, two years later, Dr. Matt Shelton of New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out With Science and Lynda Wharton speak out about the many Kiwis who died suddenly or were injured after experiencing "the sweet taste of #Pfizer BioNTech", as Patrick Gower put it on that 'Vaxathon' day.

When The 'Cure' Is Worse Than The Disease Medsafe CARM Safety Report #32 For the #Covid shot Data Up to 9 Oct, 2021 Report Published 27 Oct, 2021 Total Adverse Events Reported: 27, 651 Adverse Events Deemed Serious: 982 Deaths Reported After the Shot: 91 15 of these deaths were people aged 30-59 yrs. 1 of the deaths was a person aged 10-29 yrs. (exact ages of the deaths isn't given in the report). In regard to the 982 serious adverse events, Medsafe defines 'serious' as: * Is a medically important event or reaction. * Requires hospitalisation or prolongs an existing hospitalisation. * Causes persistent or significant disability or incapacity. * Is life threatening. * Causes a congenital anomaly/birth defect. * Results in death. Keep in mind that Medsafe itself acknowledges that typical reporting captures no more than 5% of the actual number of adverse events. So if 27,651 adverse events might have only been 5% of the actual number, there could have been around 553,020 adverse events at that time. And do you know how many covid related deaths there were on 9 Oct 2021? There were 28. The majority of whom were people in their 70s, 80s and 90s who had underlying health conditions. 5 of them never even tested positive for covid (4 of them tested negative and 1 wasn't tested) but they were classed as 'probable cases' based on symptoms and they were all included in the official 'covid death' numbers. As of 9 Oct, 2021 NONE of the covid related deaths were under 50 yrs of age. Yet 15 people who were reported as having died after the covid shot were aged 30-59 yrs, and 1 person who died was aged 10-29 yrs.

Marcel de Graaff, member of the European Parliament, tells of the shocking facts about the Covid19 shots found in a response from the European Medicines Agency. Marcel is talking here about the Dutch government, but I edited the original video to make it even more relevant to New Zealand. Watch, and you'll see. There are English subtitles, but here is most of what is said. I realise it's a long read, but please do read it. The EMA explicitly states that it has exclusively allowed the corona vaccines on the market for individual immunisations. And absolutely not for the control of infection and absolutely not for preventing or reducing infections. And this is devastating for governments that have gone full circle with the message that you are doing it for someone else Not only did the EMA not allow the vaccines at all to go against infections, the EMA goes even further. It explains in its answer, and I quote "The EMA's assessment reports on the admission of vaccines emphasise the lack of data on contagiousness" In other words, the vaccines were not intended to prevent infections and there are no data at all that substantiates that the vaccines help against infections. In fact, the EMA states that the exposure to the virus increases the chance of infections even in those vaccinated. The mass government campaigns to vaccinate yourself, to protect your parents, your neighbors, the weaker in society, were not only unauthorized, but also completely nonsense and not based on facts. The EMA says that the vaccines are only for the protection of the vaccinated individual. And before the individual, the patient, is vaccinated, all safety information must, and I quote the EMA again, "Be taken into account when administering or recommending a vaccination". So you were only allowed to make a recommendation for a vaccination after a doctor had determined that this was sensible in your case. And because almost no one under the age of 60 had a chance of serious complications due to the coronavirus, no one, but also no one under the age of 60 should be vaccinated after a single exception. So the sports halls full of vaccine prickers were completely in conflict with the use of which the vaccines had been administered by the EMA. To assess the safety of the vaccines, it was essential for the EMA that side effects would be properly registered. And the EMA says about this, we expect many reports of side effects that occur during or shortly after vaccination. And that means that the complaints must be reported especially in the first period immediately following vaccination. The government supported a policy in which these complaints were not reported the first 14 days after vaccination, because the vaccine would need 10 to 14 days to become effective. All complaints in that period were written to the coronavirus, and that is not only fraudulent, but that is deliberately endangering people's lives. And I remind you once again that we are still fighting with a gigantic so-called unexplained excessive mortality The government knew that the vaccines would not protect against the spread of the virus, but did not share this information with the citizens. On the contrary, it forced the vaccines to our citizens with lies, obscured the side effects and thus brought the health of everyone who had taken such a vaccine into danger. The vaccination campaigns should be stopped as soon as possible, and it is simply not safe. And it does not meet the requirements set by the EMA. And the government and all political parties that supported this should be held accountable for their lies and fraud.