Kawartha First Nation - Joanne Pepper Band Council Member Deputation 2024.03.19
2024.03.19 Kawartha First Nation - Joanne Pepper Band Council Member Deputation
... meanwhile today at the
Kawartha Lakes City Council
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIMNB...
Historical Event at City Hall Today!
March 19, 2024. It got so hot, the City Staff called the Kawartha Lakes Police Service for protection.
No longer does the public take it from the Council, Mayor, or should I say “Head of Council” and the unelected CAO. (not that I’m convinced that ANY of the others were legitimately elected, but that’s another topic).
The Municipality, in writing, claimed they respect the First Nations people of this land and promised to involve them in decisions on things such as land issues, yet they are barging ahead on some gigantic residential development (think of all the tax and also permit $$$ coming to them – btw, we still have not seen where that line is in the budget) that the poor city cannot possibly digest, as they are already over capacity in sewage, roadways, schools, health, police services… the list goes on.
Go to the Kawartha Lakes city website and type in First Nation Policy June15 2021
https://www.kawarthalakes.ca/en/municipal-services/resources/Council-Policies-/CP2022-009-Repatriation-of-Indigenous-Artefacts-and-Remains-to-and-Sharing-Archival-Information-with-First-Nations-Policy.docx
Read where the Municipality made it POLICY to involve First Nations in decisions.
Sounds really nice but in reality they DENIED the requests of six band council members to speak.
So they all spoke anyway despite the mayor ordering them to sit down (and this was at recess!). Videos coming...
If you watched the city’s broadcast of the meeting today, you will not see the part where the cops walked in or hear any of the kerfuffle, but we got it all here!
Even the part where Councilor Perry goaded on an upset woman as if he was going to take her in a fight.
Betters in the audience were giving her 10 to 1 odds.
~~~~~
Who was denied?
Here are the deputations by the SIX individuals who were DENIED to speak, as recorded in the lobby of City Hall that same afternoon:
Joanne Pepper - Band Council
https://youtu.be/KAtvt-nLwe8
Ancient artifacts used by our ancestors found by farmers in Kawartha Lakes:
a) grinding stone tool used to grind grains
b) hide scraper blade
c) sling stone for slingshots
d) perforated stone used with a hide strap possibly used as a weapon
441
views
1
comment
Meet Lex Dove how to stand in your authority
Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240
Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344
Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions
Subscribe to get important Information
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html
info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca nPower welcomes a new ‘wingman’, Lex Dove.
Lex is named after InPower’s comprehensive Lex Mercatoria (Law Merchant) study course, which is available to all members, and offers valuable knowledge on how to stand in your authority.
In just two minutes, Lex outlines how and why InPower’s Notice of Liability, which is rooted in the foundations of Lex Mercatoria works, and why it’s a powerful antidote to the for-profit harms we see in our world.
It’s a great way to share the message of InPower’s work with friends, family and your community.
If you struggle to express to others why you’re walking the path with InPower, and why taking action in the world is so important to you, why not let Lex do the talking?
https://www.inpowermovement.org
958
views
1
comment
Monday March 18 @ 7-9 PM EST Time, Doors open at 6:30pm Zoom Meeting also
Monday March 18 @ 7-9 PM EST Time, Doors open at 6:30pm Zoom Meeting also
Assembly of Kawartha First Nation
~~~ DETAILS ~~~
WHO: Kawartha Freedom Group
WHAT: A group of informed concerned caring accountable individuals who
are aware of the times
WHERE: Willy's Man Cave (look for Teepees)
3900 Hwy 35 North, Cameron ON
WHEN: Mondays 7-9 PM, Doors open at 6:30pm
WHY: We share knowledge and wisdom about how to navigate current times and make life better for our families. We watch out for each other and our neighbours.
HOW: We arrange for speakers to bring us up to speed on latest news, in areas such as health, politics, and the economy, hosting live and on
Zoom.
~~~~~~~~~~~
ZOOM MEETING INFO:
Meeting ID: 925 900 8609Passcode: 547803
KawathaFreedomGroup/KLTPA 6:06 PM
ZOOM MEETING INFO:https://us02web.zoom.us/j/9259008609?pwd=WUFXQnVSZUtrMkxrRWVQWUlRS05JZz09
Meeting ID: 925 900 8609
Passcode: 547803
~~~~~~~~~~~
www.facebook.com/groups/kawarthafreedomgroup
https://www.facebook.com/groups/kltpa
info@KawarthaFreedomGroup.ca
SueThem@KLTPA.ca
572
views
5
comments
Chief Poundmaker "We all know the story about the man who sat by the trail too long
Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240
Subscribe to get important Information
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html
Elders, leaders and members of the Poundmaker Cree Nation –
It is a privilege to be here with you today to honour the life and legacy of Chief Poundmaker or Pihtokahanapiwiyin.
I would like to acknowledge that we are on the sacred lands of the Poundmaker Cree Nation in Treaty 6 territory.
It was here that Chief Poundmaker made his indelible mark on history –
Here that he earned his well-deserved reputation as a diplomat and peacemaker.
Here that he stood up for his people and demonstrated compassion in the face of persecution.
134 years later, we gather at the battle site to honour and remember the story of Chief Poundmaker.
We recognize that during his lifetime, Chief Poundmaker was not treated justly nor showed the respect he deserved as a leader of his people.
We know that the colonial perspectives which dominated relations between Indigenous peoples and the Crown did not allow for open and collaborative dialogue.
And we acknowledge that if we are to move forward together on the path of reconciliation, the Government of Canada must acknowledge the wrongs of the past.
We have the duty to take an honest look at this chapter of our shared history and make right by the Poundmaker Cree Nation.
It is my sincere hope that by coming together today and taking this important step together as equal partners, we can continue the important work of reconciling the past and renewing our relationship.
Oral tradition tells us that Chief Poundmaker’s role as an influential leader begins in 1873, with the conclusion of peace negotiations between the Cree and the Blackfoot nations.
Known as the “Peacemaker” by the Indigenous peoples of the Northern Plains, Chief Poundmaker had tried to maintain peaceful relations and open dialogue between the Cree and settlers both before and after the signing of Treaty 6 in 1876.
In 1876, Poundmaker, now a headman or minor chief, was part of the Cree delegation at Fort Carlton where Treaty 6 was concluded with Alexander Morris, Lieutenant-Governor of the Northwest Territories and Treaty Commissioner.
A powerful orator, Chief Poundmaker argued that the Government of Canada had to provide the appropriate assistance to the Cree as life in the Prairies was changing.
He requested assistance not only for the signatories of the Treaty, but also for future generations.
This included advocating for the Medicine Chest provision in Treaty 6.
Indeed, Chief Poundmaker was a visionary and an early advocate for universal health care. And his spirit and the strength of his convictions throughout the treaty negotiations continues to inspire his people to this day.
In 1881, Chief Poundmaker, as an acknowledged leader of his people, was selected to lead the Marquess of Lorne, son-in-law of Queen Victoria, on a journey from Battleford to Blackfoot Crossing.
Chief Poundmaker impressed the Marquess with his traditional teachings and his statesmanship.
In the years following the signing of Treaty 6, Chief Poundmaker, along with others such as Big Bear or Mistahimaskwa, pushed government officials to live up to the promises and obligations laid out in the Treaty, often with frustrating results.
By the winter of 1885, the combination of a depleted bison population, cuts to government aid and fundamental disagreements regarding the implementation of treaty promises resulted in wide-spread dissatisfaction in the Prairies.
In the push to settle Western Canada, and guided by colonial thinking and policies, the federal government sought to exert increased control over Indigenous peoples. Tension between the Canadian government, Métis, First Nations and settlers eventually amounted to a conflict known as the Northwest Resistance.
Government officials in Western Canada began to target Chief Poundmaker and his people, especially after members of his community were accused of looting in Battleford, as Poundmaker sought rations from Indian Affairs officials for his people.
Chief Poundmaker and his people came to be viewed as a threat.
On May 2, 1885, seeking reprisal for the purported looting, the Canadian Expeditionary Force followed the Cree back to their reserve and launched an attack where we now stand.
Right here, at battle site hill.
Led by Lieutenant-Colonel William Otter, more than 300 men attacked Poundmaker’s people, but after seven hours on the battlefield, Otter’s men were forced to retreat.
Though he did not participate in the battle, Chief Poundmaker saved many lives. At a critical time, he carried the pipe of a wounded war chief onto the battlefield, and used his considerable authority to stop the counterattack on Colonel Otter’s retreating troops, thereby avoiding more bloodshed.
Fearing further reprisal against his people, Chief Poundmaker attempted to negotiate a peace agreement with the commander of the Canadian Expeditionary Force, Major-General Frederick Middleton.
Unable to come to an agreement, Poundmaker and his followers were arrested at Battleford on May 26, 1885.
Fuelled by mistrust and a lack of understanding, government officials held Chief Poundmaker, as the recognized leader of his people, responsible for the actions of his community and convicted him of treason-felony in August 1885.
While Chief Poundmaker unequivocally maintained his innocence, he was sentenced to three years in prison at the Stony Mountain Penitentiary.
Chief Poundmaker’s imprisonment meant denying members of his nation his strong leadership.
They were deeply affected by the harsh restrictions and deprivations imposed upon them by government officials.
The Nation was also forced to surrender their weapons, which left them unable to hunt and protect themselves.
Labelled as a rebellion band by the Government of Canada, the Poundmaker Cree Nation saw the reputation of their honoured Chief tarnished by his wrongful conviction and were forced to live without a Chief for over three decades.
Although Chief Poundmaker was released early from prison due to his deteriorating health, he died only four months after his release in 1886 while visiting his adopted father Chief Crowfoot at Blackfoot Crossing.
He was buried there and in 1967, his remains were brought back to the Poundmaker Cree Nation and buried here, at battle site hill.
Today, our government acknowledges that Chief Poundmaker was a peacemaker who never stopped fighting for peace.
A leader who, time and again, sought to prevent further loss of life in the growing conflict in the Prairies.
The Government of Canada recognizes that Chief Poundmaker was not a criminal, but someone who worked tirelessly to ensure the survival of his people, and hold the Crown accountable to its obligations as laid out in Treaty 6.
We recognize that the unjust conviction and imprisonment of Chief Poundmaker had, and continues to have, a profound impact on the Poundmaker Cree Nation.
Chief Poundmaker often spoke of the need to continue moving forward.
He said: “We all know the story about the man who sat by the trail too long, and then it grew over, and he could never find his way again. We can never forget what has happened, but we cannot go back. Nor can we just sit beside the trail.”
Well, the Government of Canada has been sitting beside the trail for far too long.
And if we are to join the Poundmaker Cree Nation on the path of reconciliation, we need to acknowledge the past and build a foundation for healing and renewed understanding.
And so, as an important symbol of our desire to revitalize our relationship with the Poundmaker Cree Nation, I’m here today on behalf of the Government of Canada to confirm without reservation that Chief Poundmaker is fully exonerated of any crime or wrongdoing.
I would also like to offer all members of the Poundmaker Cree Nation, past and present, an apology for the historic injustices, hardships and oppression suffered by Chief Poundmaker and your community, on behalf of the Government of Canada and all Canadians.
The Poundmaker Cree Nation has long advocated to hear these words from the Government of Canada.
And it is your dedicated efforts that have brought us here today to honour Chief Poundmaker, the way he should have been many, many years ago.
To ensure that his legacy is celebrated for years to come. To help right past wrongs.
As Poundmaker’s people, the hardships you have overcome reflect his courage, his belief and his vision that you would go on as a strong and vibrant people.
You have always known that your Chief deserved to be respected and celebrated.
Now, all Canadians will have the opportunity to learn and understand the true history and legacy of Chief Poundmaker.
Before being sentenced to imprisonment, Chief Poundmaker stated: “Everything that is bad that has been laid against me this summer, there is nothing of it true. … I did everything to stop bloodshed. If I had not done so, there would have been plenty of blood spilled this summer …”
In 1885, Chief Poundmaker was treated as a criminal and a traitor.
In 2019, we recognize the truth in his words that he – as a leader, statesman and peacemaker – did everything he could to ensure that lives were not needlessly lost.
It has taken us 134 years to reach today’s milestone – the exoneration of Chief Poundmaker.
I know that the exoneration and apology I have offered today cannot make up for what has been lost.
But it is my hope that these words can mark a new beginning. That this day leads us to a brighter future, as we continue to walk together on the path toward reconciliation. A path Chief Poundmaker charted for us all so many years ago.
It is my hope that we can make the next century a shared legacy with a proud history, dedicated to the spirit of Chief Poundmaker, honoured leader of his people.
Thank you.
Kinanaskomitinawaw.
1.16K
views
6
comments
Peggy Peterson Update on the Next Town Meetings in Ontario - contact whitewaterwoman@proton.me
ISubscribe to get important Information
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8n this powerful video, Peggy Peterson stands against unfair taxes and the UN agenda, delivering a compelling rebuttal to the Huntsville council's agenda. Her deputation on property tax sheds light on the anti-human agenda, sparking public pushback and a fight against injustice.
PROOF OF CLAIM
Rights Doc. 4
WE are all born with free will and unalienable rights.
No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent.
Contract makes the law’
Consent makes the contract
Adhesion contracts are not contracts because there was no consent, they are considered as gifts.
We do not require any corporate created rights, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedom provided by the Government of Canada Corporation and/or ICCPR provided by the United Nations Corporation.
If anyone claims to have jurisdiction over, you and/or requests payment request a copy of the contract.
Government Corporations
Government Services Corporations doing business as Government of Canada and/or the government of any provinces can only create rules (statutes) that only apply to their employees, franchisees, officers and dependents. Their rules (statutes) do not apply to the people in general.
That is why the rules they create (statutes) are referred to as “public policy”.
We do not require any corporate created rights, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedom provided by the Government of Canada Corporation and/or ICCPR provided by the United Nations Corporation.
Women and men living in Canada are not subject to any Public Policies, mandates, or acts of legislation promoted by any commercial or municipal corporation for its officers and employees.
We should not vote in private corporate shareholder elections sponsored by Canada Inc., Province of _____ Inc., or any other foreign corporation.
All Acts, Bills and statutes created by the Government of Canada and/or any of the provincial governments only apply to “person”.
The definition of person in Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition on page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being ( i.e. natural person ) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers.
Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. In other words, if I say the basket includes apples and oranges you will not find any other type of fruit in the basket. As plainly stated in Black’s Law dictionary, anything that applies to person only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers.
Does not apply to men or women!
The Government of Canada and Government of all provinces are Crown for profit Corporations. The Prime Minister and/or the Premiers receive their orders from the shareholders of the Crown Corporation. They are the C.E.O.s/officers of the Crown Corporations. They carry out the orders that are relayed to them by the Governor General and/or the Lieutenant Governor.
They (politicians) are in place to take the blame for the harm that is done to the people. They are replaced every four years with someone who claims that he/she is going to right the wrongs that were created, but nothing changes they carry out the orders provided by the shareholders as the previous C.E.O.s. Four years later they are blamed and replaced.
PERSONS
All Acts, Bills and statutes created by the Government of Canada and/or any of the provincial governments only apply to “person”.
The definition of person in Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition on page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person ) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers.
Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. In other words, if I say the basket includes apples and oranges you will not find any other type of fruit in the basket. As plainly stated in Black’s Law dictionary, anything that applies to person only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers.
Does not apply to men or women
_________________________________________________________
Name written in all capital letters
The governing book of the English language is “The Oxford Styles Manual” which sometimes refers to “The Chicago Manual of Style” also The Oxford Manual of Style. All Uppercase text, all caps, or gloss is listed in the style's manuals under “foreign - language” , named ”Ancient-Latin” or Dog Latin. All Caps are not defined or recognized in meaning. All Caps is not English although you may think you are able to read it as English it is in fact, a calculated deception to be read separated from the rest of the “Document”.
All Uppercase text has no lawful grammatical jurisdiction with common English and is a foreign language, headed under “Ancient-Latin”. (The Chicago Manual of Style, 16th Edition, 11:144-47).
Glossa is two or more languages on a legal document. Glossa is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of a text( Black’s Law Dictionary page 621 5th Edition)
“Glossa” is also used to conceal or confuse the real facts in order to confuse, in order to gain tacit consent.
A name written in all capital letters is written in dog Latin or is known as systemic text “a thing” created by the employees of the crown corporation, Therefore the Crown Corporation owns the creation. If you claim that the name written in all capital letters, is, you. You are admitting you are the property of the Crown Corporation (a slave).
Cestui Que Vie Trust 's beneficiary is the name in all capital letters which is the property of the Crown Corporation, it is not you.
All governments (corporations) and businesses such as banks and others that write your name in all capital letters are committing constructive fraud and conversion. (Engaged in criminal activity)
___________________________________________________
City, Municipality, Village et al Address Date
TO: Mayor, CAO, CEO, Councillors et al
FROM: The men and women living therein,
The enclosed documentation:
1) Proof of Incorporation of the following entities; from Dunn & Bradstreet or EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Note: the following are government services corporations’ (dba( "doing business as,")
Government of Canada, EDGAR (CIK 0000230098) ; Government of British Columbia, EDGAR (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306) ; Government of Alberta, EDGAR (CIK 0000810961) ; Government of Saskatchewan, EDGAR (CIK 0000203098) ; Government of Manitoba, EDGAR (CIK 0000826926) ; Ontario, EDGAR (CIK 0000074615) ; Quebec, EDGAR (0000722803) ; Province of New Brunswick, EDGAR (CIK 0000862406) ; Province of Nova Scotia, EDGAR (CIK 0000842639)
2) Copy of the Clearfield Doctrine; showing that corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to taxation or law enforcement et al, without a consent to contract which is corporate policy when doing commerce.
* Seek legal clarification and written proof to the contrary.
This letter comes with the enclosed documents to ascertain the jurisdiction within our council, in which official positions are being held . Depending on the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed upon entering office, the positions may be operating under the "Color of Law," in a De-Facto, Un-lawful and thus ultra vires standing. This holds personal liability for anything signed on behalf of the people.
There are 3 possible jurisdictions:
A) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution with full legal authority and jurisdiction to taxation, schools, infrastructure, peace keeping, hospital, courts, et al. as services, and needs of the local men and women therein.
B) Having as the "Trustee" full fiduciary control of the "Trusts" set up to care for the local needs.
De-jure/ lawful
B) Non-Governmental Office, (NGO): a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, without the legal authority or jurisdiction to taxation. This entity provides "Service Contracts," which requires contracts and consent to contract by those involved in the services. It's known as "Body Corporate," and serves "Incorporated Inhabitants." Did the men and women give consent to be incorporated? That's called FRAUD. Who is the "Head of Council" or "Global Mayor?" (“A created fiction” The Executive Control and Authority comes from the Corporation of the Province wherein we reside, and to which your office would receive the Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al directly, through downloads from the corporation and are corporate policies not district policies.
De-facto/ un-lawful/FRAUD
C) Public/Private/Partnerships, (PPP): an International Entity one which downloads "FOREIGN," Corporate policies, UN/United Nations, WEF/ World Economic Forum, WHO/ World Health Organization et al. In this position there is also no legal authority or jurisdiction to taxation. Consent to contract is a legal requirement to contract with the men and women. Did the men and women consent to Foreign Corporate Policies and occupation in the community without knowledge or consent? Are the United Nations Sustainable Goals/SDG's, Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 policies being implemented? Who has fiduciary control over the local Trusts as their Trustee? Who is the "Head of Council," and "Council of the Whole." “A fiction”
De-Facto, un-lawful/FRAUD
These are jurisdictional questions that are important to ascertain because through the stroke of a pen, a man or woman is being put into extreme personal liability for the agreements and infrastructures signed on to.
Furthermore, there are 3 levels of Lawful/de-jure/jurisdictions
LOCAL, PROVINCIAL, and FEDERAL
- Each has their sphere of lawful jurisdiction and geographical area
- Each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers
- NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview
We the people have come to ascertain for ourselves the jurisdiction WE are in because the last few years have shown us that something has gone horribly awry at the local level. We the people voted for positions of service to the local jurisdiction. Was there comprehension of the meaning of the oath, declaration or covenant sworn, upon taking office? Was time given to properly peruse any documents to sign and vote on? Many of these documents were written over many years, by legal firms and lawyers, whose signatures are not within the documents...whose are! They contain legalise, a language unto itself, and is the basis for how most FRAUD has occurred. Words like person, individual, inhabitant, resident, citizen, et al have a completely different meaning in these documents.
FRAUD vitiates everything.
We the people intend on restoring Peace, Order, and Lawful Governance should our suspicions prove correct. We require a response by ________________________________ and expect such from our elected officials.
No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law, and thus consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls upon the claimant. No response is considered tacit agreement.
______________________________________________________
Regional District of Address Date
TO: Board Chair, CAO, CEO, Directors et al
FROM:
The enclosed documentation:
1) Proof of the Incorporation of the following entities, NOTE: government services corporations (dba:"doing business as,")
EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission;
Government of Canada, (CIK 0000230098)
Government of British Columbia, (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306)
Government of Alberta, (CIK 0000810961)
Government of Saskatchewan, (CIK 0000203098)
Government of Manitoba, (CIK 0000826926)
Ontario, (CIK 0000074615)
Quebec, (CIK 0000722803)
Province of New Brunswick, (CIK 0000862406)
Province of Nova Scotia, (CIK 0000842639)
2) Copy of The CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE; showing that Corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to Taxation or Law Enforcement et al without consent to contract by those involved in the transaction. Personal liability is then enforceable upon those acting illegally.
The enclosed documents show that the Regional District through its Incorporation may be operating under the "Color of Law" and as such is de-facto, un-lawful, and ultra-vires.
This information is not hear-say nor opinion, rather they state the facts of the matter, which are;
?- What Oath, Declaration, or Covenant was signed upon the commencement of the positions in council? These matter!
?- What jurisdiction is the office under? There are 3 possible Jurisdictions;
1) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution, with lawful de-jure status as a holder of the "PUBLIC TRUST", Trustee with Fiduciary control, and thus legal authority to the taxation of the men and women within a geographical area, and is one of "service" to the local needs; school, hospital, peace keeping, infrastructure, courts, et al.
2) Non-Governmental Office (NGO): a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, that provides "Service Contracts," and is known as a "Body Corporate" to "Incorporated Inhabitants." This jurisdiction requires Consent to Contract, is de-facto, un-lawful and as such has NO legal jurisdiction to taxation. The Executive Control and Authority comes from the corporation of the province wherein the office is located. The Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al are downloaded to the district and are corporate policies.
3) Public/Private/Partnerships (PPP) : an INTERNATIONAL ENTITY, receiving downloads from a "FOREIGN" Corporation; United Nations, WHO/World Health Organization, WEF/World Economic Forum et al. This is also a de-facto, un-lawful jurisdiction with NO legal grounds to the taxation of men and women, and also requires Consent to Contract.
NOTE:
In British Columbia, as an example, The BC Assessment Authority is a CROWN
Corporation, created in 1974 by the Corporation of British Columbia Inc., "in order to earn profit for the Government of British Columbia Inc., without jurisdiction nor contracts with the men and women of BC.
NOTE: There are 3 levels of lawful, de-jure governance
Local, Provincial and Federal
- Each has their sphere of jurisdiction and geographical area
- Each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers
- NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview
These 2 questions are the most important because the answer to them will establish the personal liability through the signature/autograph put upon the documents requiring a vote.
Was there full comprehension of the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed when entering office as a Director? Was there time to peruse any documents requiring a vote? Most often these documents are many pages long and were made over many years, by legal firms and lawyers whose signatures are NOT contained therein.
Whose is?
Making that signature "personally" liable for the decisions made
Was there full comprehension of the difference between the legal wording contained therein, and the knowledge of their meanings? Such as person, individual, constituent, citizen,et al. "Legalese" is a language unto itself and is the basis for most FRAUD, which in law vitiates everything.
The men and women in our Regional District Office were empowered by the men and women, to operate under, and in a jurisdiction that is de-jure, lawful, and with a fiduciary trust, to serve the men and women of our geographical area and no other.
To ensure that the needs of the local men, women, and their property were the priority and responsibility of the Regional District. So...What Office is held?
Lawfully/de-jure or unlawfully and de-facto?
We require an answer, on or before __________________ No answer will be considered a tacit agreement.
The office of the Regional District is held by the trust of the members of our community, the neighbours and friends who voted for positions in an office to serve the community. That's why we require proof of what oath, declaration, or covenant was given.
The men and women of __________________
_________________________________________________________
Notice of Demand and Trespass
Proof of Jurisdiction and Contract
Proof of Claim
It has come to our attention, the concerned men and women, that our Educational Institutions, whose service to us is the education of our sons and daughters (hereafter named as our "property") has implemented the SOGI 123 Program without a consent to contract.
HISTORY; this program began in 2007 through the ARC Foundation. A private foundation based in Vancouver, British Columbia Inc. Other corporations involved in the funding are; British Columbia Ministry of Education Inc.; British Columbia Teachers Federation Inc.; University of British Columbia Inc., and through private donations( gifts from registered charities also corporations), and the corporation of Canada Inc.
Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant.
Documents included herein:
- Proof of the incorporation of Government of Canada Inc., Government of British Columbia Inc.
- Copy of the "CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE", a 1942 court case, accepted worldwide because it's corporate, commerce law.
Clearly stating the requirement of contracts
Governments lose their sovereignty when they become corporations, thus no different than Canadian Tire using Canadian Tire money.
- Copy of the definition of "GLOSSA", pertinent in this matter because it's a matter of concealment, meant to confuse using "text" to corrupt the real facts in order to gain tacit consent. There's no statute of limitation on fraud.
- Our Mayoral, Councillor, and Regional Districts are also incorporated through the removal of many of the municipal powers in 2004 with the Local Government Act incorporated into the Community Charter, prior to this; the local mayor had full de-jure and lawful jurisdiction, in relation to our schools.
- Copy of the definition of the All Capital Identity, created with the "Birth Certificate," a fiction, constructive fraud and conversion.
- Copy of the 10 Points of Contract Law, made simple for comprehension on this matter.
- Copy of the 12 Presumptions of Court. Included for the comprehension of status.
Fundamentally, the fraud upon our property when born, vitiates any Board jurisdiction to the ownership of our property. We, the men and women who created them, own them. "He who creates owns!" A maxim in law Therefore, it is incumbent upon those who have positions on the Board to cease and desist the SOGI 123 Program which is an infringement upon the property known as our sons and daughters. Failure to do so as corporate entities, through Contract Law, we intend on exercising our jurisdiction, as is our right, to the fullest extent upon the men and women personally sitting on the Board.
We strongly suggest a consultation with a lawyer, who by the way wrote this mess. "Praetextu legis injusta agens duplo puniendus"
We the People DO NOT require legal Re-presentation in this matter because we're well aware of the 12 Presumptions of Court. I doubt any lawyer will be willing to assist the men and women on the Board, regardless of the facts, because through their: legalize they do deceive.
Be it therefore noted, with the documents contained herein, that our claim of proof of contract and the jurisdictional fraud, put against us and our property is considered a trespass. It is the duty of men and women to discuss these delicate matters with our property within our own jurisdiction. We are not against the health and wellbeing of another's property, within their jurisdiction, rather not in the educational setting.
We the People, regarding our property in the care of the educational system, again, reiterate, and declare that the burden of proof falls on the claimant. Consider the response with wisdom and discernment since we voted men and women into what we thought was a Educational Office not a Corporate Office.
We require no more than 7 days for implementing the redressing of the trespass against our property, with the immediate removal of any and all literature, electronic or written, devices, toys (we use the word with baited breath) et al in relation to the SOGI 123 PROGRAM post haste. For it was through corporate policies, without contractual consent, that the trespass has been made against our property thus creating this claim against those men and women on the Board personally. Furthermore, do not be deceived into thinking that the registration of our property into the corporation rather than an educational institution voids any responsibility on the part of the men and women on the Board, as it was done in fraud. Again we'll state that fraud vitiates everything.
In all fairness to the men and women on the Board, our neighbours, not the corporations involved, perhaps unaware of the situation mentioned above and the personal liability for this trespass, We the People will support the men and women in this matter of remedy, because we trusted that their service, while sitting on the Board, was to serve our property with a lawful education.
No response will be considered a tacit agreement.
Sincerely and without prejudice or malice
We the People
Autograph_______________________:________
__________________________________________________________
Statement of Claim
Taxation
Between the Corporation of ______________________________________
And the noted particulars on the documents included herein.
The above corporation has not proved jurisdiction, consent to contract, nor provide proof of a contract to claim the monies expected in taxation, hence tacit agreement to this claim.
Who claims this debt be true, who claims this debt to due? Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant.
Three requirements were made in writing to the Corporations Finance Minister to provide said proof, and are included in this document. Furthermore, copies of the Clearfield Doctrine, EDGAR # for the Corporation involved, Regina-v-John Anthony Hill 12 May, 2011 at Southwark Crown Court, Case # T20107746, (the Queen declared, "Lawfully NOT valid Monarch, hence Charles the III too),and "Glossa," (see Black's Law) corrupts the essence of the text presented on your documents.
This refusal of consent to contract extends from this day forward, as noted with receipt of this document, until such a date in the future when there is a de-jure government upon the landmass commonly known worldwide as Canada, British Columbia, et al. Autograph _________________________:___________________________
Dated this day
_______________________________________________________
Proof of Claim
Re: Property Tax; Contract and Proof of Consent to Contract
Between the Corporation of ___________________________________________________ and
_____________________________________________________________________________
Regarding the property registered as;
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
It is required and incumbent upon the Corporations Minister of Finance, to provide proof of jurisdiction as a corporation, to taxation without full disclosure of the facts, and consent to contract, as per contract law.
See: The Clearfield Doctrine;
Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 363
Syllabus
CLEARFIELD TRUST CO. et al.
v.
UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI to the CIRCUIT COURT of APPEALS for the THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 490 Argued February 5, 1943 Decided March 1, 1943(and accepted worldwide when conducting commerce)
Further to the above noted court case, this requirement will be expected within 7 days receipt of this claim for proof of the jurisdictional obligation by the corporation to taxation to the property noted herein.
Who claims this debt be true, who claims this debt be due? Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant.
Property Taxes have been paid previously without consent to contract, due to the fraud perpetrated without full disclosure of the fact that the corporation mentioned herein, was not a lawful government with the de-jure jurisdiction to taxation, thus Ultra-Vires. Rather, a corporation whose name included the words "government," which is fraud based on Black's Law Dictionary, any edition.
No response will be confirmation of a tacit agreement to the above.
Thanking you in advance,
Autograph:
_________________________:_____________________________
Dated this day: ______________________________________
______________________________________________________
STATEMENT of CLAIM
Date:_____________________
STATE of TITLE CERTIFICATE:
Certificate number________________________________________
Land Title Office__________________________________________
________________________________________________________
Title Number______________________________________________
Registered Owner__________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Taxation Authority__________________________________________
Description of Land__________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
Charges, Liens and Interests_____________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
Proof of contract is required to provide evidence of any claim made upon the aforementioned property; taxation; land use; water use; structures and buildings above, on, or below the land; any and all animals thereon; any and all chattles upon said land; et al, provide proof of any contractual obligation having been made with respect to said land.
No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law, and thus consent makes the contract.
The burden of proof falls on the claimant.
(See: Regina-v-John Anthony Hill 12 May, 2011 at Southwark Crown Court, Case # T20107746, in which the Queen was declared to be a "Lawfully NOT Valid Monarch." Hence, neither is Charles the III)
(See: Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 363, Syllabus. Clearfield trust Co.et al. v. United States, Certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.No. 490. Argued February 5, 1943 Decided March 1, 1943 ; and accepted worldwide when conducting commerce)
The requirement to provide Proof of Contract within this Statement of Claim, is expected within ____________days from receipt of the documentation herein.
No response will be considered a tacit agreement to the above.
Autograph_________________________:_______________________
:GLOSSA: ~ The 'Born-Date' Vs. the 'Registration-Date'
Does your Birth Certificate identify YOU as TWO people, not one?
(You is plural, one and another)
Have you ever wondered why your SURNAME is written using the ALL UPPERCASE TEXT?
Put simply, 'you' are using a ‘Legal’ name and this is fraud.
See the ‘name’ is actually split up into separate entities – The Christian-name and The ‘Surname’. You register these names to the Crown Corporation LTD. as their Property by your Birth Certificate which is given a bond number. Your physical value is used
as collateral for these bonds allowing the United Kingdom LTD. to take out loans from private Banks, such as 'Bank of England' and profit is made by way of legal fines (Acts & Statutes), bills and taxation. – Hence money is no longer backed by Gold or Silver, but by our physical value or man power.
The UNITED KINGDOM LTD is a privately owned Corporation-ship. And corporations are considered ‘ships’ and they are governed under the law of the sea, known as Maritime Law. There is no real 'ship' but a 'document-vessel' – which in our case was our Birth Certificate
Created by the Doctor when s/he ‘docked’ you.
TAKE NOTICE
Whenever you encounter the Legal Document (document-vessel) you will notice that your surname (or sometimes all of your names) will be written using the ALL-UPPERCASE TEXT.
This is no coincidence - the ALL UPPERCASE text is not defined or recognized in The Oxford Styles Manual, (the governing book of the English language) – meaning that although you may be able to read it as English, it is in fact,
NOT English. The all CAPS or Gloss can be found within the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under 'foreign-languages', named 'Ancient-Latin'
The main place this ALL-UPPERCASE text is found to be defined as a language, is when American Sign Language (ASL), a signing language used for the deaf, is written.
ASL can be defined in the book ‘The Chicago Manual of Style’ under the foreign-languages header: American Sign Language (ASL) compound signs, 10.152 and ‘glosses, 10.147’.
Thus, defining this text as a foreign language
Further going on to say that when written, it has no 1-to-1 correspondence with any other languages on the document.
The all CAPS or Gloss is also found in the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under foreign-languages, 'Ancient-Latin', however as the all caps UK LTD is registered in [Washington D.C[, they seem to be using the 'Chicago Manual of Style' , not the Oxford.
Putting two or more languages onto a legal document is known in law as a ‘Glossa’. Black's Law Dictionary defines: 'GLOSSA' - “It is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of the text”. Meaning that by using a Glossa in a document they are trying to conceal or confuse the real facts.
If you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL-UPPERCASE language.
Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL if you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language.
Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALLf you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language.
Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So, you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL-UPPER CASE.
If you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL-UPPERCASE language.
Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So, you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL
Soon you will realize that virtually all court orders, speeding tickets and most other legal documents actually make no sense whatsoever. They only make sense when we make the assumption that it is all plain English and we read it as one, once you take one away from the other – it renders the document useless.
Seeing as the ‘government’ is simply a privately owned Corporation, it can only impose fines and acts upon other corporations. And by tricking us to registering our names as a corporate entity and then tricking us into thinking these names are physically us, it manages to get us to represent the corporately registered name and therefore bear the burden of fines and policies.
This is a crime known as “personage”.
Hand in hand with “personage” comes a crime known as “barratry” which is knowingly bringing false claims into court- This is what police, politicians, judges are doing daily.
The Birth-Certificate, Two-Names, Two-Dates and Two-Languages?
Capitis Diminutio Maxima (Name in ALL CAPITALS)
For the purposes of understanding one's legal or commercial status under the Admiralty system (the law system used in England, Canada and much of the US), it is necessary to examine the curious use of all CAPS -Capitis Diminutio Maxima- in legal and domestic income tax forms, credit cards & statements, loans, mortgages, speeding & parking tickets, car documents, road tax, court summons etc.
While seemingly a trite concern, this apparently small detail has extremely deep significance for all of us!
Gage Canadian Dictionary 1983 Sec. 4 defines Capitalize adj. as "To take advantage of - To use to one's own advantage."
Black's Law Dictionary – Revised 4th Edition 1968, provides a more comprehensive definition as follows …
Capitis Diminutio (meaning the diminishing of status through the use of capitalization)- In Roman law. A diminishing or abridgment of personality; a loss or curtailment of a man's status or aggregate of leg al attributes and qualifications.
472
views
1
comment
Indigenous meaning - what they don't teach you in school Danielle Smith usin UN Buzzwords
Indigenous meaning - what they don't teach you in school Danielle Smith usin UN Buzzwords
466
views
2
comments
Indigenous meaning - what they don't teach you in school Danielle Smith usin UN Buzzwords
Indigenous meaning - what they don't teach you in school Danielle Smith usin UN Buzzwords
88
views
March 4th Meeting 1000 Huckvale Place Williams Lake, BC
Subscribe to get important Information
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
B PROOF OF CLAIM
Rights Doc. 4
WE are all born with free will and unalienable rights.
No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent.
Contract makes the law’
Consent makes the contract
Adhesion contracts are not contracts because there was no consent, they are considered as gifts.
We do not require any corporate created rights, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedom provided by the Government of Canada Corporation and/or ICCPR provided by the United Nations Corporation.
If anyone claims to have jurisdiction over you and/or requests payment requests a copy of the contract.
Government Corporations
Government Services Corporations doing business as Government of Canada and/or the government of any provinces can only create rules (statutes) that only apply to their employees, franchisees, officers and dependents. Their rules (statutes) do not apply to the people in general.
That is why the rules they create (statutes) are referred to as “public policy”.
We do not require any corporate created rights, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedom provided by the Government of Canada Corporation and/or ICCPR provided by the United Nations Corporation.
Women and men living in Canada are not subject to any Public Policies, mandates, or acts of legislation promoted by any commercial or municipal corporation for its officers and employees.
We should not vote in private corporate shareholder elections sponsored by Canada Inc., Province of _____ Inc., or any other foreign corporation.
All Acts, Bills and statutes created by the Government of Canada and/or any of the provincial governments only apply to “person”.
The definition of person in Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition on page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being ( i.e. natural person ) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers.
Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. In other words if I say the basket includes apples and oranges you will not find any other type of fruit in the basket. As plainly stated in Black’s Law dictionary, anything that applies to person only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers.
Does not apply to men or women!
The Government of Canada and Government of all provinces are Crown for profit Corporations. The Prime Minister and/or the Premiers receive their orders from the shareholders of the Crown Corporation. They are the C.E.O.s/officers of the Crown Corporations. They carry out the orders that are relayed to them by the Governor General and/or the Lieutenant Governor.
They (politicians) are in place to take the blame for the harm that is done to the people. They are replaced every four years with someone who claims that he/she are going to right the wrongs that were created, but nothing changes they carry out the orders provided by the shareholders as the previous C.E.O.s. Four years later they are blamed and replaced.
PERSONS
All Acts, Bills and statutes created by the Government of Canada and/or any of the provincial governments only apply to “person”.
The definition of person in Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition on page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person ) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers.
Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. In other words if I say the basket includes apples and oranges you will not find any other type of fruit in the basket. As plainly stated in Black’s Law dictionary, anything that applies to person only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers.
Does not apply to men or women
_________________________________________________________
Name written in all capital letters
The governing book of the English language is “The Oxford Styles Manual” which sometimes refers to “The Chicago Manual of Style” also The Oxford Manual of Style. All Uppercase text, all caps, or gloss is listed in the styles manuals under “foreign - language” , named ”Ancient-Latin” or Dog Latin. All Caps are not defined or recognised in meaning. All Caps is not English although you may think you are able to read it as English it is in fact, a calculated deception to be read separated from the rest of the “Document”.
All Uppercase text has no lawful grammatical jurisdiction with common English and is a foreign language, headed under “Ancient-Latin”. (The Chicago Manual of Style, 16th Edition, 11:144-47).
Glossa is two or more languages on a legal document. Glossa is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of a text( Black’s Law Dictionary page 621 5th Edition)
“Glossa” is also used to conceal or confuse the real facts in order to confuse, in order to gain tacit consent.
A name written in all capital letters is written in dog latin or is known as systemic text “a thing” created by the employees of the crown corporation, Therefore the Crown Corporation owns the creation. If you claim that the name written in all capital letters is you. You are admitting you are the property of the Crown Corporation (a slave).
Cestui Que Vie Trust 's beneficiary is the name in all capital letters which is the property of the Crown Corporation, it is not you.
All governments (corporations) and businesses such as banks and others that write your name in all capital letters are committing constructive fraud and conversion. (Engaged in criminal activity)
___________________________________________________
City, Municipality, Village et al Address Date
TO: Mayor, CAO, CEO, Councillors et al
FROM: The men and women living therein,
The enclosed documentation:
1) Proof of Incorporation of the following entities; from Dunn & Bradstreet or EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Note: the following are government services corporations’ (dba( "doing business as,")
Government of Canada, EDGAR (CIK 0000230098) ; Government of British Columbia, EDGAR (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306) ; Government of Alberta, EDGAR (CIK 0000810961) ; Government of Saskatchewan, EDGAR (CIK 0000203098) ; Government of Manitoba, EDGAR (CIK 0000826926) ; Ontario, EDGAR (CIK 0000074615) ; Quebec, EDGAR (0000722803) ; Province of New Brunswick, EDGAR (CIK 0000862406) ; Province of Nova Scotia, EDGAR (CIK 0000842639)
2) Copy of the Clearfield Doctrine; showing that corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to taxation or law enforcement et al, without a consent to contract which is corporate policy when doing commerce.
* Seek legal clarification and written proof to the contrary.
This letter comes with the enclosed documents to ascertain the jurisdiction within our council, in which official positions are being held . Depending on the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed upon entering office, the positions may be operating under the "Color of Law," in a De-Facto, Un-lawful and thus ultra vires standing. This holds personal liability for anything signed on behalf of the people.
There are 3 possible jurisdictions:
A) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution with full legal authority and jurisdiction to taxation, schools, infrastructure, peace keeping, hospital, courts, et al. as services, and needs of the local men and women therein.
B) Having as the "Trustee" full fiduciary control of the "Trusts" set up to care for the local needs.
De-jure/ lawful
B) Non-Governmental Office, (NGO): a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, without the legal authority or jurisdiction to taxation. This entity provides "Service Contracts," which requires contracts and consent to contract by those involved in the services. It's known as "Body Corporate," and serves "Incorporated Inhabitants." Did the men and women give consent to be incorporated? That's called FRAUD. Who is the "Head of Council" or "Global Mayor?" (“A created fiction” The Executive Control and Authority comes from the Corporation of the Province wherein we reside, and to which your office would receive the Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al directly, through downloads from the corporation and are corporate policies not district policies.
De-facto/ un-lawful/FRAUD
C) Public/Private/Partnerships, (PPP): an International Entity one which downloads "FOREIGN," Corporate policies, UN/United Nations, WEF/ World Economic Forum, WHO/ World Health Organization et al. In this position there is also no legal authority or jurisdiction to taxation. Consent to contract is a legal requirement to contract with the men and women. Did the men and women consent to Foreign Corporate Policies and occupation in the community without knowledge or consent? Are the United Nations Sustainable Goals/SDG's, Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 policies being implemented? Who has fiduciary control over the local Trusts as their Trustee? Who is the "Head of Council," and "Council of the Whole." “A fiction”
De-Facto, un-lawful/FRAUD
These are jurisdictional questions that are important to ascertain because through the stroke of a pen, a man or woman is being put into extreme personal liability for the agreements and infrastructures signed on to.
Furthermore, there are 3 levels of Lawful/de-jure/jurisdictions
LOCAL, PROVINCIAL, and FEDERAL
- Each has their sphere of lawful jurisdiction and geographical area
- Each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers
- NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview
We the people have come to ascertain for ourselves the jurisdiction WE are in because the last few years have shown us that something has gone horribly awry at the local level. We the people voted for positions of service to the local jurisdiction. Was there comprehension of the meaning of the oath, declaration or covenant sworn, upon taking office? Was time given to properly peruse any documents to sign and vote on? Many of these documents were written over many years, by legal firms and lawyers, whose signatures are not within the documents...whose are! They contain legalise, a language unto itself, and is the basis for how most FRAUD has occurred. Words like person, individual, inhabitant, resident, citizen, et al have a completely different meaning in these documents.
FRAUD vitiates everything.
We the people intend on restoring Peace, Order, and Lawful Governance should our suspicions prove correct. We require a response by ________________________________ and expect such from our elected officials.
No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law, and thus consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls upon the claimant. No response is considered tacit agreement.
______________________________________________________
Regional District of Address Date
TO: Board Chair, CAO, CEO, Directors et al
FROM:
The enclosed documentation:
1) Proof of the Incorporation of the following entities, NOTE: government services corporations (dba:"doing business as,")
EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission;
Government of Canada, (CIK 0000230098)
Government of British Columbia, (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306)
Government of Alberta, (CIK 0000810961)
Government of Saskatchewan, (CIK 0000203098)
Government of Manitoba, (CIK 0000826926)
Ontario, (CIK 0000074615)
Quebec, (CIK 0000722803)
Province of New Brunswick, (CIK 0000862406)
Province of Nova Scotia, (CIK 0000842639)
2) Copy of The CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE; showing that Corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to Taxation or Law Enforcement et al without consent to contract by those involved in the transaction. Personal liability is then enforceable upon those acting illegally.
The enclosed documents show that the Regional District through its Incorporation may be operating under the "Color of Law" and as such is de-facto, un-lawful, and ultra-vires.
This information is not hear-say nor opinion, rather they state the facts of the matter, which are;
?- What Oath, Declaration, or Covenant was signed upon the commencement of the positions in council? These matter!
?- What jurisdiction is the office under? There are 3 possible Jurisdictions;
1) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution, with lawful de-jure status as a holder of the "PUBLIC TRUST", Trustee with Fiduciary control, and thus legal authority to the taxation of the men and women within a geographical area, and is one of "service" to the local needs; school, hospital, peace keeping, infrastructure, courts, et al.
2) Non-Governmental Office (NGO): a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, that provides "Service Contracts," and is known as a "Body Corporate" to "Incorporated Inhabitants." This jurisdiction requires Consent to Contract, is de-facto, un-lawful and as such has NO legal jurisdiction to taxation. The Executive Control and Authority comes from the corporation of the province wherein the office is located. The Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al are downloaded to the district and are corporate policies.
3) Public/Private/Partnerships (PPP) : an INTERNATIONAL ENTITY, receiving downloads from a "FOREIGN" Corporation; United Nations, WHO/World Health Organization, WEF/World Economic Forum et al. This is also a de-facto, un-lawful jurisdiction with NO legal grounds to the taxation of men and women, and also requires Consent to Contract.
NOTE:
In British Columbia, as an example, The BC Assessment Authority is a CROWN
Corporation, created in 1974 by the Corporation of British Columbia Inc., "in order to earn profit for the Government of British Columbia Inc., without jurisdiction nor contracts with the men and women of BC.
NOTE: There are 3 levels of lawful, de-jure governance;
Local, Provincial and Federal
- Each has their sphere of jurisdiction and geographical area
- Each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers
- NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview
These 2 questions are the most important because the answer to them will establish the personal liability through the signature/autograph put upon the documents requiring a vote.
Was there full comprehension of the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed when entering office as a Director? Was there time to peruse any documents requiring a vote? Most often these documents are many pages long and were made over many years, by legal firms and lawyers whose signatures are NOT contained therein.
Whose is?
Making that signature "personally" liable for the decisions made
Was there full comprehension of the difference between the legal wording contained therein, and the knowledge of their meanings? Such as person, individual, constituent, citizen,et al. "Legalese" is a language unto itself and is the basis for most FRAUD, which in law vitiates everything.
The men and women in our Regional District Office were empowered by the men and women, to operate under, and in a jurisdiction that is de-jure, lawful, and with a fiduciary trust, to serve the men and women of our geographical area and no other.
To ensure that the needs of the local men, women, and their property were the priority and responsibility of the Regional District. So...What Office is held?
Lawfully/de-jure or unlawfully and de-facto?
We require an answer, on or before __________________ No answer will be considered a tacit agreement.
The office of the Regional District is held by the trust of the members of our community, the neighbours and friends who voted for positions in an office to serve the community. That's why we require proof of what oath, declaration, or covenant was given.
The men and women of __________________
_________________________________________________________
Notice of Demand and Trespass
Proof of Jurisdiction and Contract
Proof of Claim
It has come to our attention, the concerned men and women, that our Educational Institutions, whose service to us is the education of our sons and daughters (hereafter named as our "property") has implemented the SOGI 123 Program without a consent to contract.
HISTORY; this program began in 2007 through the ARC Foundation. A private foundation based in Vancouver, British Columbia Inc. Other corporations involved in the funding are; British Columbia Ministry of Education Inc.; British Columbia Teachers Federation Inc.; University of British Columbia Inc., and through private donations( gifts from registered charities also corporations), and the corporation of Canada Inc.
Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant.
Documents included herein:
- Proof of the incorporation of Government of Canada Inc., Government of British Columbia Inc.
- Copy of the "CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE", a 1942 court case, accepted worldwide because it's corporate, commerce law.
Clearly stating the requirement of contracts
Governments lose their sovereignty when they become corporations, thus no different than Canadian Tire using Canadian Tire money.
- Copy of the definition of "GLOSSA", pertinent in this matter because it's a matter of concealment, meant to confuse using "text" to corrupt the real facts in order to gain tacit consent. There's no statute of limitation on fraud.
- Our Mayoral, Councillor, and Regional Districts are also incorporated through the removal of many of the municipal powers in 2004 with the Local Government Act incorporated into the Community Charter, prior to this; the local mayor had full de-jure and lawful jurisdiction, in relation to our schools.
- Copy of the definition of the All Capital Identity, created with the "Birth Certificate," a fiction, constructive fraud and conversion.
- Copy of the 10 Points of Contract Law, made simple for comprehension on this matter.
- Copy of the 12 Presumptions of Court. Included for the comprehension of status.
Fundamentally, the fraud upon our property when born, vitiates any Board jurisdiction to the ownership of our property. We, the men and women who created them, own them. "He who creates owns!" A maxim in law Therefore, it is incumbent upon those who have positions on the Board to cease and desist the SOGI 123 Program which is an infringement upon the property known as our sons and daughters. Failure to do so as corporate entities, through Contract Law, we intend on exercising our jurisdiction, as is our right, to the fullest extent upon the men and women personally sitting on the Board.
We strongly suggest a consultation with a lawyer, who by the way wrote this mess. "Praetextu legis injusta agens duplo puniendus"
We the People DO NOT require legal Re-presentation in this matter because we're well aware of the 12 Presumptions of Court. I doubt any lawyer will be willing to assist the men and women on the Board, regardless of the facts, because through their: legalize they do deceive.
Be it therefore noted, with the documents contained herein, that our claim of proof of contract and the jurisdictional fraud, put against us and our property is considered a trespass. It is the duty of men and women to discuss these delicate matters with our property within our own jurisdiction. We are not against the health and wellbeing of another's property, within their jurisdiction, rather not in the educational setting.
We the People, regarding our property in the care of the educational system, again, reiterate, and declare that the burden of proof falls on the claimant. Consider the response with wisdom and discernment since we voted men and women into what we thought was a Educational Office not a Corporate Office.
We require no more than 7 days for implementing the redressing of the trespass against our property, with the immediate removal of any and all literature, electronic or written, devices, toys (we use the word with baited breath) et al in relation to the SOGI 123 PROGRAM post haste. For it was through corporate policies, without contractual consent, that the trespass has been made against our property thus creating this claim against those men and women on the Board personally. Furthermore, do not be deceived into thinking that the registration of our property into the corporation rather than an educational institution voids any responsibility on the part of the men and women on the Board, as it was done in fraud. Again we'll state that fraud vitiates everything.
In all fairness to the men and women on the Board, our neighbours, not the corporations involved, perhaps unaware of the situation mentioned above and the personal liability for this trespass, We the People will support the men and women in this matter of remedy, because we trusted that their service, while sitting on the Board, was to serve our property with a lawful education.
No response will be considered a tacit agreement.
Sincerely and without prejudice or malice
We the People
Autograph_______________________:________
__________________________________________________________
Statement of Claim
Taxation
Between the Corporation of ______________________________________
And the noted particulars on the documents included herein.
The above corporation has not proved jurisdiction, consent to contract, nor provide proof of a contract to claim the monies expected in taxation, hence tacit agreement to this claim.
Who claims this debt be true, who claims this debt to due? Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant.
Three requirements were made in writing to the Corporations Finance Minister to provide said proof, and are included in this document. Furthermore, copies of the Clearfield Doctrine, EDGAR # for the Corporation involved, Regina-v-John Anthony Hill 12 May, 2011 at Southwark Crown Court, Case # T20107746, (the Queen declared, "Lawfully NOT valid Monarch, hence Charles the III too),and "Glossa," (see Black's Law) corrupts the essence of the text presented on your documents.
This refusal of consent to contract extends from this day forward, as noted with receipt of this document, until such a date in the future when there is a de-jure government upon the landmass commonly known worldwide as Canada, British Columbia, et al. Autograph _________________________:___________________________
Dated this day
_______________________________________________________
Proof of Claim
Re: Property Tax; Contract and Proof of Consent to Contract
Between the Corporation of ___________________________________________________ and
_____________________________________________________________________________
Regarding the property registered as;
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
It is required and incumbent upon the Corporations Minister of Finance, to provide proof of jurisdiction as a corporation, to taxation without full disclosure of the facts, and consent to contract, as per contract law.
See: The Clearfield Doctrine;
Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 363
Syllabus
CLEARFIELD TRUST CO. et al.
v.
UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI to the CIRCUIT COURT of APPEALS for the THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 490 Argued February 5, 1943 Decided March 1, 1943(and accepted worldwide when conducting commerce)
Further to the above noted court case, this requirement will be expected within 7 days receipt of this claim for proof of the jurisdictional obligation by the corporation to taxation to the property noted herein.
Who claims this debt be true, who claims this debt be due? Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant.
Property Taxes have been paid previously without consent to contract, due to the fraud perpetrated without full disclosure of the fact that the corporation mentioned herein, was not a lawful government with the de-jure jurisdiction to taxation, thus Ultra-Vires. Rather, a corporation whose name included the words "government," which is fraud based on Black's Law Dictionary, any edition.
No response will be confirmation of a tacit agreement to the above.
Thanking you in advance,
Autograph:
_________________________:_____________________________
Dated this day: ______________________________________
______________________________________________________
STATEMENT of CLAIM
Date:_____________________
STATE of TITLE CERTIFICATE:
Certificate number________________________________________
Land Title Office__________________________________________
________________________________________________________
Title Number______________________________________________
Registered Owner__________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Taxation Authority__________________________________________
Description of Land__________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
Charges, Liens and Interests_____________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
Proof of contract is required to provide evidence of any claim made upon the aforementioned property; taxation; land use; water use; structures and buildings above, on, or below the land; any and all animals thereon; any and all chattles upon said land; et al, provide proof of any contractual obligation having been made with respect to said land.
No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law, and thus consent makes the contract.
The burden of proof falls on the claimant.
(See: Regina-v-John Anthony Hill 12 May, 2011 at Southwark Crown Court, Case # T20107746, in which the Queen was declared to be a "Lawfully NOT Valid Monarch." Hence, neither is Charles the III)
(See: Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 363, Syllabus. Clearfield trust Co.et al. v. United States, Certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.No. 490. Argued February 5, 1943 Decided March 1, 1943 ; and accepted worldwide when conducting commerce)
The requirement to provide Proof of Contract within this Statement of Claim, is expected within ____________days from receipt of the documentation herein.
No response will be considered a tacit agreement to the above.
Autograph_________________________:_______________________
:GLOSSA: ~ The 'Born-Date' Vs. the 'Registration-Date'
Does your Birth Certificate identify YOU as TWO people, not one?
(You is plural, one and another)
Have you ever wondered why your SURNAME is written using the ALL UPPERCASE TEXT?
Put simply, 'you' are using a ‘Legal’ name and this is fraud.
See the ‘name’ is actually split up into separate entities – The Christian-name and The ‘Surname’. You register these names to the Crown Corporation LTD. as their Property by your Birth Certificate which is given a bond number. Your physical value is used
as collateral for these bonds allowing the United Kingdom LTD. to take out loans from private Banks, such as 'Bank of England' and profit is made by way of legal fines (Acts & Statutes), bills and taxation. – Hence money is no longer backed by Gold or Silver, but by our physical value or man power.
The UNITED KINGDOM LTD is a privately owned Corporation-ship. And corporations are considered ‘ships’ and they are governed under the law of the sea, known as Maritime Law. There is no real 'ship' but a 'document-vessel' – which in our case was our Birth Certificate
Created by the Doctor when s/he ‘docked’ you.
TAKE NOTICE
Whenever you encounter the Legal Document (document-vessel) you will notice that your surname (or sometimes all of your names) will be written using the ALL UPPERCASE TEXT.
This is no coincidence - the ALL UPPERCASE text is not defined or recognised in The Oxford Styles Manual, (the governing book of the English language) – meaning that although you may be able to read it as English, it is in fact,
NOT English. The all CAPS or Gloss can be found within the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under 'foreign-languages', named 'Ancient-Latin'
The main place this ALL UPPERCASE text is found to be defined as a language, is when American Sign Language (ASL), a signing language used for the deaf, is written.
ASL can be defined in the book ‘The Chicago Manual of Style’ under the foreign-languages header: American Sign Language (ASL) compound signs, 10.152 and ‘glosses, 10.147’.
Thus, defining this text as a foreign language
Further going on to say that when written, it has no 1-to-1 correspondence with any other languages on the document.
The all CAPS or Gloss is also found in the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under foreign-languages, 'Ancient-Latin', however as the all caps UK LTD is registered in [Washington D.C[, they seem to be using the 'Chicago Manual of Style' , not the Oxford.
Putting two or more languages onto a legal document is known in law as a ‘Glossa’. Black's Law Dictionary defines: 'GLOSSA' - “It is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of the text”. Meaning that by using a Glossa in a document they are trying to conceal or confuse the real facts.
f you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language.
Like we established earlier, the ALL UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL if you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language.
Like we established earlier, the ALL UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALLf you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language.
Like we established earlier, the ALL UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL UPPER CASE.
f you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language.
Like we established earlier, the ALL UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL
Soon you will realize that virtually all court orders, speeding tickets and most other legal documents actually make no sense whatsoever. They only make sense when we make the assumption that it is all plain English and we read it as one, once you take one away from the other – it renders the document useless.
Seeing as the ‘government’ is simply a privately owned Corporation it can only impose fines and acts upon other corporations. And by tricking us to registering our names as a corporate entity and then tricking us into thinking these names are physically us, it manages to get us to represent the corporately registered name and therefore bear the burden of fines and policies.
This is a crime known as “personage”.
Hand in hand with “personage” comes a crime known as “barratry” which is knowingly bringing false claims into court- This is what police, politicians, judges are doing daily.
The Birth-Certificate, Two-Names, Two-Dates and Two-Languages?
Capitis Diminutio Maxima (Name in ALL CAPITALS)
For the purposes of understanding one's legal or commercial status under the Admiralty system (the law system used in England, Canada and much of the US), it is necessary to examine the curious use of all CAPS -Capitis Diminutio Maxima- in legal and domestic income tax forms, credit cards & statements, loans, mortgages, speeding & parking tickets, car documents, road tax, court summons etc.
While seemingly a trite concern, this apparently small detail has extremely deep significance for all of us!
Gage Canadian Dictionary 1983 Sec. 4 defines Capitalize adj. as "To take advantage of - To use to ones own advantage."
Blacks Law Dictionary – Revised 4th Edition 1968, provides a more comprehensive definition as follows …
Capitis Diminutio (meaning the diminishing of status through the use of capitalization)- In Roman law. A diminishing or abridgment of personality; a loss or curtailment of a man's status or aggregate of leg al attributes and qualifications.
807
views
3
comments
StrategicPlan - Weldon Hachey2024.02.15
trategic Plan or Vision Statement?
jumpinkawarthalakes.ca/strategicplan2024
Special Council Meeting (Strategic Plan) - February 15, 2024
• Special Council Meeting (Strategic Pl...
~~~~~~~~
Weldon Hachey - aka Barrie Thong Man
/ weldon.hachey
~~~~~~~~
CALLING ALL TROOPS
WHO:
Mayor Doug Elmslie, Council & all individuals of City of Kawartha Lakes.
WHAT:
Strategic Plan Public Meeting
WHERE:
Council Chambers, City Hall, 26 Francis Street Lindsay
WHEN:
Thursday, Feb 15 2024 7:00 pm
WHY:
To let City Council know that we’re on guard and demand our needs be put first.
HOW:
The session will begin with staff providing a brief overview of the draft Strategic Plan, followed by time for deputations and correspondence from Committees and the public.
~~~~~~~~
KAWARTHA FREEDOM GROUP
WHAT: A group of informed concerned caring accountable individuals who are aware of the times
WHERE: Willy's Man Cave (look for Teepees)
3900 Hwy 35 North, Cameron ON
WHEN: Mondays 7-9pm, Doors open at 6:30pm
WHY: We share knowledge and wisdom about how to navigate current times and make life better for our families. We watch out for each other and our neighbours.
HOW: We arrange for speakers to bring us up to speed on latest news, in areas such as health, politics, and the economy, hosting live and on Zoom.
~~~~~~~~~~~
ZOOM MEETING INFO:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/9259008609...
Meeting ID: 925 900 8609
Passcode: 547803
~~~~~~~~~~~
www.facebook.com/groups/kawarthafreedomgroup
info@KawarthaFreedomGroup.ca
freecanadarightnow@gmail.com
494
views
1
comment
REGISTER BETRAY
Subscribe to get important Information
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
Brian Thiesen - MONEY TALKS: Part 1 - Smart Meter Fires
https://rumble.com/v4csfol-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-1-smart-meter-fires.html
Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 2 - Big Data, Big Power, Big Government
https://rumble.com/v4csmd3-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-2-big-data-big-power-big-government.html
Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 3 - Pensions, Power, Politics and Climate - https://rumble.com/v4cse96-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-3-pensions-power-politics-and-climate.html
Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
Looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes
If interested please copy and send in your letter for a response
BC Minister of Finance
PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't
Victoria, BC V8W 9E2
From:
January 8, 2024
To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy,
Good day Minister,
It has come to my attention that THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, CANADA REVENUE AGENCY, and the GOVERNMENT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA CANADA et al, are corporate entities. (see inclosed papers from Dun & Bradstreet)
When I inquired in 2023 of the truth of this, to both BC MP Lorne Derksen and FED MP Todd Doherty, I received no response federally, MP Derksen told me he didn't know and to look into it myself, which I did. The government of BC is a registered corporation in Hong Kong!
My requirement to you, Honourable Minister Conroy, comes because you should be able to provide the financial documents I seek based on your position in government. I have spent the past months, an arduous process indeed, looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes, which my family and I have always paid faithfully. However, understanding some corporate procedures,there's a requirement to documents of full disclosure, informed consent, and signed contracts with the entities involved in any contractual obligation. My aged mother said she's never signed a contract, nor have I.
With your knowledge in the Finance Department, would you kindly forward by e-mail and in writing, the legislative documentation, document/s, contracts, requiring the payment of Property Taxes. I require this information to lawfully give my consent. Please respond by January 31,2024 to the above address/e-mail.
Sincerely,
___________________________________________________________
PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't
Victoria BC V8W 9E2
To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy
Good day Minister,
I am sending you a second letter. There is further documentation included;
1) Copy of the 1st letter dated, January 8, 2024, received January 10, 2024 and confirmed
2) Copy of who Dun & Bradstreet is
3) Copies showing proof that the Province of British Columbia, and the Government of Canada, are corporations
4) Copy of The Clearfield Doctrine, showing the illegality of taxation by corporations, and accepted worldwide
5) Copy of 10 simple truths of contract law
Therefore, it is incumbent of you, with the title of Minister of Finance, to provide me with the proof of obligation to pay Property Tax. I am, and have been willing to pay property taxes, provided I am doing so lawfully and with full disclosure and consent. Please respond within 7 days both written and by e-mail to;
Thank you.
_________________________________________________________
Proof of Claim CRA or Canada!
Letter of Claim to "CRA" and "ARO"
https://www.aro.ca/en/
We do not recall, and our files do not indicate that we have any contractual obligation to "CRA" or "ARO". Therefore, you are demanded to validate your claim, pursuant to Laws of (province) and Canada and provide me with the following documents:
1. Certified copy of the contract giving rise to alleged debt claimed on your aforementioned letter.
2. Letter of commitment,signed by an officer of your company, attesting to the Lawfulness, legitimacy and accuracy of the Claims as well as your company's full compliance with all the laws,provincial and federal, govering your company's actions in relation to this matter.
3.Copy of contract between yor company and the entity you be acting on behalf of.
4. Collection Agency license number of your company ("CRA" and "ARO")
5.Collection Agent License number for person(s) contacting me on behalf of your company.
6. Since I presume that "CRA" authority devolves from the Income Tax Act and "ARO" receives its authority from some other law which would also in turn, receive its authority from, at least ultimately of you "CRA" and "ARO", proof that the Constitutional Act, 1982 has been properly proclaimed into law, which would involve proof that Section 59 of the Charter has been fulfilled.
Proof of Claim CRA or Canada! video
ok, from what you can find lawfully please provide a letter to give to a CA to ensure they are acting in good faith...
Below is a template for a letter you can use to request verification of a debt from a Collection Agency (CA). This letter is designed to ensure that the CA is acting in good faith and to protect your rights. Please note that this is a general template and may need to be adjusted based on your specific circumstances and local laws. It's advisable to consult with a legal professional for personalized advice.
[Your Full Name] [Your Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] [Date] [Collection Agency's Name] [Collection Agency's Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] Re: Request for Verification of Debt Dear [Collection Agency's Name],
I am writing in response to your [call/letter/email] dated [Date of the CA's communication], regarding an alleged debt for [Name of the Original Creditor], account number [Account Number, if provided].
Under my rights as per the applicable provincial and federal laws, I am requesting a validation of this debt. Please provide the following documentation to verify the legitimacy of the alleged debt:
Certified Copy of Original Contract: A certified copy of the original contract or agreement with [Original Creditor's Name] that gives rise to the alleged debt.
Letter of Commitment: A letter signed by an officer of your agency, attesting to the lawfulness, legitimacy, and accuracy of the claim. This letter should also confirm your agency's compliance with all relevant laws governing debt collection activities.
Proof of Authority to Collect: A copy of the contract or agreement between your agency and [Original Creditor's Name] that authorizes you to collect on this alleged debt.
Detailed Statement of the Debt: A detailed statement of the amount being claimed, including an itemization of any additional charges or fees.
Proof of Last Payment: If applicable, the date and amount of the last payment made on this account. Please note that until the requested documentation is provided, I consider this matter to be in dispute.
Furthermore, I request that all communications regarding this alleged debt be made in writing and sent to the address noted above. In accordance with the law, I expect a response to this request within 30 days of the receipt of this letter.
Failure to provide the requested documentation within this timeframe will be interpreted as an acknowledgment that the debt is unverified and must be removed from my credit report, and that any further collection attempts are ceased.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response. Sincerely,
[Your Name] Remember, this letter is a request for information and does not acknowledge the debt as yours.
It's important to send this letter via registered mail or a method that provides proof of delivery. Keep a copy of the letter and any correspondence you receive in response for your records.
In the letter template I provided, I adhered closely to the key elements you mentioned in your original text. However, I did include a few additional standard requests commonly used in debt verification letters for completeness and clarity:
Detailed Statement of the Debt: This includes an itemization of any additional charges or fees. This detail is often important to fully understand the breakdown of the claimed debt.
Proof of Last Payment: If there were any payments made on the account, this information helps establish the history of the debt.
Method of Communication: I included a request that all communications be made in writing. This is a common practice to ensure there's a clear record of all interactions.
Timeframe for Response: I specified a 30-day period for the CA to respond, which is a standard timeframe in many jurisdictions for debt verification requests. These additions are meant to provide a more comprehensive framework for the verification of the debt and to protect your rights in the process.
However, if you prefer to stick strictly to the points mentioned in your original text, you can modify the template accordingly. Remember, it's always advisable to tailor any legal document to your specific situation and to consult with a legal professional if you have any doubts or questions.
______________________________________________________
10 POINTS of CONTRACT LAW
POWER of CHOICE / "FREE WILL to CONTRACT"
1) More than 1 party is needed to contract
2) AGREEMENT = OFFER & ACCEPTANCE
- OFFER is the "presentment", therefore, without acceptance, there can be NO contract.
- ACCEPTANCE is taken as "TACIT" ( applied though not expressed) if NO has not been verbally said.
* A presentment can be accepted as noted : "with conditional acceptance"
3) There MUST be an INTENTION to CREATE a "Legal Relationship",
ie: AGREE to the consiquences of breaking the contract
4) LAWFUL "CONSIDERATION"
Both or all parties have to give something of value to be considered a contract
* Consideration has to be agreed to by ALL parties to be LEGAL
#1 POINT / Mortgages... Bank Accounts...Credit Cards
When you got your Mortgage...WHAT did the bank put up as "Lawful Consideration" FULL DISCLOSURE MUST be given to be LAWFUL
5) CAPACITY to contract requires that Full Disclosure be given and "understood/comprehended" in full to be Lawful...
NO minor,drunkard,lunatic, or other mental incapicity can be present to be a Lawful Contract
6) FREE CONSENT : ..............FRAUD...........
NO force, trickery, undue influence, misrepresentation, coercion can take place. * ANY mistake therein, VOIDS the contract between TRUSTEE/BENEFICIARY
7) LAWFUL OBJECT :
"anything" illegal or harmful to either party, made, or in part of the contract, VOIDS the contract
8) CERTAINTY of MEANING or FULL DISCLOSURE:
*** Almost ALL contracts are VOID because the parties that signed have NOT, with certainty, "understood or comprehended" the LEGAL meaning of the "CONTRACTED WORDS", ie: person, individual, citizen, etc. and therefore, as undefined = FRAUD!............ man, woman, is WHO you are, ALL other words or terms used to contract are LEGAL terms for FICTION!
9) SIGNATURE and AUTOGRAPH :
Signature = FICTION / Corporate Identity, LGBTQS2+ et al
Autograph = "LIVING", man or woman...period!
*** if you as a man or woman sign a contract there is NO CONTRACT because... there CANNOT be a contract wherein one side is "living" and the other is a "fictional" identity
10) YOU must have CERTAINTY :
of the TERMS and PRIVACY to CONTRACT
BOTH have to APPROVE! VOID if broken and must be re-done.
(Example the BNA Act of 1867, the contract died when Queen Victoria died in 1901...similar to a Power of Attorney document, VOID when there's the death. Queen Victoria took OUT her Heirs)
Darcy Martans made a Flyer to motivate more of her town and local area for meetings. Darcy added her email and phone contact info
attached is word document of flyer - please change the contact info to you or your local group email - also emailed out was phase 1 and phase 2 pdf files - please forward these out to your family and friends
Thank you
“CANADIAN’S do NOT have An ABSOLUTE RIGHT
to PRIVATE PROPERTY”
Federal Justice Minister, David Lametti Spring 2022
"YOU WILL OWN NOTHING
AND BE HAPPY"
AGENDA 2030 WEF/ World Economic Forum
Founder Klaus Schwab
LEARN HOW TO END THE FRAUD
CONTACT: ConstitutionalConventions.ca info@constitutionalconventions.ca
Darcy Martans - with important inforamation (Share)
Deputation Hamilton ON, Erin Gomaz, November 6 2023
Deputation to Huntsvillle, January 29 2024 Peggy Pederson Shelagh McFarlane
Lawful Affirmation and Declaration of Dominion (use this document to collect autographs of support).
620
views
2
comments
LAWYERS ARE LEGAL MAMMON PARASITES ** LEGAL A.I.D.S.
Subscribe to get important Information
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
Brian Thiesen - MONEY TALKS: Part 1 - Smart Meter Fires
https://rumble.com/v4csfol-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-1-smart-meter-fires.html
Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 2 - Big Data, Big Power, Big Government
https://rumble.com/v4csmd3-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-2-big-data-big-power-big-government.html
Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 3 - Pensions, Power, Politics and Climate - https://rumble.com/v4cse96-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-3-pensions-power-politics-and-climate.html
Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
Looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes
If interested please copy and send in your letter for a response
BC Minister of Finance
PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't
Victoria, BC V8W 9E2
From:
January 8, 2024
To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy,
Good day Minister,
It has come to my attention that THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, CANADA REVENUE AGENCY, and the GOVERNMENT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA CANADA et al, are corporate entities. (see inclosed papers from Dun & Bradstreet)
When I inquired in 2023 of the truth of this, to both BC MP Lorne Derksen and FED MP Todd Doherty, I received no response federally, MP Derksen told me he didn't know and to look into it myself, which I did. The government of BC is a registered corporation in Hong Kong!
My requirement to you, Honourable Minister Conroy, comes because you should be able to provide the financial documents I seek based on your position in government. I have spent the past months, an arduous process indeed, looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes, which my family and I have always paid faithfully. However, understanding some corporate procedures,there's a requirement to documents of full disclosure, informed consent, and signed contracts with the entities involved in any contractual obligation. My aged mother said she's never signed a contract, nor have I.
With your knowledge in the Finance Department, would you kindly forward by e-mail and in writing, the legislative documentation, document/s, contracts, requiring the payment of Property Taxes. I require this information to lawfully give my consent. Please respond by January 31,2024 to the above address/e-mail.
Sincerely,
___________________________________________________________
PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't
Victoria BC V8W 9E2
To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy
Good day Minister,
I am sending you a second letter. There is further documentation included;
1) Copy of the 1st letter dated, January 8, 2024, received January 10, 2024 and confirmed
2) Copy of who Dun & Bradstreet is
3) Copies showing proof that the Province of British Columbia, and the Government of Canada, are corporations
4) Copy of The Clearfield Doctrine, showing the illegality of taxation by corporations, and accepted worldwide
5) Copy of 10 simple truths of contract law
Therefore, it is incumbent of you, with the title of Minister of Finance, to provide me with the proof of obligation to pay Property Tax. I am, and have been willing to pay property taxes, provided I am doing so lawfully and with full disclosure and consent. Please respond within 7 days both written and by e-mail to;
Thank you.
_________________________________________________________
Proof of Claim CRA or Canada!
Letter of Claim to "CRA" and "ARO"
https://www.aro.ca/en/
We do not recall, and our files do not indicate that we have any contractual obligation to "CRA" or "ARO". Therefore, you are demanded to validate your claim, pursuant to Laws of (province) and Canada and provide me with the following documents:
1. Certified copy of the contract giving rise to alleged debt claimed on your aforementioned letter.
2. Letter of commitment,signed by an officer of your company, attesting to the Lawfulness, legitimacy and accuracy of the Claims as well as your company's full compliance with all the laws,provincial and federal, govering your company's actions in relation to this matter.
3.Copy of contract between yor company and the entity you be acting on behalf of.
4. Collection Agency license number of your company ("CRA" and "ARO")
5.Collection Agent License number for person(s) contacting me on behalf of your company.
6. Since I presume that "CRA" authority devolves from the Income Tax Act and "ARO" receives its authority from some other law which would also in turn, receive its authority from, at least ultimately of you "CRA" and "ARO", proof that the Constitutional Act, 1982 has been properly proclaimed into law, which would involve proof that Section 59 of the Charter has been fulfilled.
Proof of Claim CRA or Canada! video
ok, from what you can find lawfully please provide a letter to give to a CA to ensure they are acting in good faith...
Below is a template for a letter you can use to request verification of a debt from a Collection Agency (CA). This letter is designed to ensure that the CA is acting in good faith and to protect your rights. Please note that this is a general template and may need to be adjusted based on your specific circumstances and local laws. It's advisable to consult with a legal professional for personalized advice.
[Your Full Name] [Your Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] [Date] [Collection Agency's Name] [Collection Agency's Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] Re: Request for Verification of Debt Dear [Collection Agency's Name],
I am writing in response to your [call/letter/email] dated [Date of the CA's communication], regarding an alleged debt for [Name of the Original Creditor], account number [Account Number, if provided].
Under my rights as per the applicable provincial and federal laws, I am requesting a validation of this debt. Please provide the following documentation to verify the legitimacy of the alleged debt:
Certified Copy of Original Contract: A certified copy of the original contract or agreement with [Original Creditor's Name] that gives rise to the alleged debt.
Letter of Commitment: A letter signed by an officer of your agency, attesting to the lawfulness, legitimacy, and accuracy of the claim. This letter should also confirm your agency's compliance with all relevant laws governing debt collection activities.
Proof of Authority to Collect: A copy of the contract or agreement between your agency and [Original Creditor's Name] that authorizes you to collect on this alleged debt.
Detailed Statement of the Debt: A detailed statement of the amount being claimed, including an itemization of any additional charges or fees.
Proof of Last Payment: If applicable, the date and amount of the last payment made on this account. Please note that until the requested documentation is provided, I consider this matter to be in dispute.
Furthermore, I request that all communications regarding this alleged debt be made in writing and sent to the address noted above. In accordance with the law, I expect a response to this request within 30 days of the receipt of this letter.
Failure to provide the requested documentation within this timeframe will be interpreted as an acknowledgment that the debt is unverified and must be removed from my credit report, and that any further collection attempts are ceased.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response. Sincerely,
[Your Name] Remember, this letter is a request for information and does not acknowledge the debt as yours.
It's important to send this letter via registered mail or a method that provides proof of delivery. Keep a copy of the letter and any correspondence you receive in response for your records.
In the letter template I provided, I adhered closely to the key elements you mentioned in your original text. However, I did include a few additional standard requests commonly used in debt verification letters for completeness and clarity:
Detailed Statement of the Debt: This includes an itemization of any additional charges or fees. This detail is often important to fully understand the breakdown of the claimed debt.
Proof of Last Payment: If there were any payments made on the account, this information helps establish the history of the debt.
Method of Communication: I included a request that all communications be made in writing. This is a common practice to ensure there's a clear record of all interactions.
Timeframe for Response: I specified a 30-day period for the CA to respond, which is a standard timeframe in many jurisdictions for debt verification requests. These additions are meant to provide a more comprehensive framework for the verification of the debt and to protect your rights in the process.
However, if you prefer to stick strictly to the points mentioned in your original text, you can modify the template accordingly. Remember, it's always advisable to tailor any legal document to your specific situation and to consult with a legal professional if you have any doubts or questions.
______________________________________________________
10 POINTS of CONTRACT LAW
POWER of CHOICE / "FREE WILL to CONTRACT"
1) More than 1 party is needed to contract
2) AGREEMENT = OFFER & ACCEPTANCE
- OFFER is the "presentment", therefore, without acceptance, there can be NO contract.
- ACCEPTANCE is taken as "TACIT" ( applied though not expressed) if NO has not been verbally said.
* A presentment can be accepted as noted : "with conditional acceptance"
3) There MUST be an INTENTION to CREATE a "Legal Relationship",
ie: AGREE to the consiquences of breaking the contract
4) LAWFUL "CONSIDERATION"
Both or all parties have to give something of value to be considered a contract
* Consideration has to be agreed to by ALL parties to be LEGAL
#1 POINT / Mortgages... Bank Accounts...Credit Cards
When you got your Mortgage...WHAT did the bank put up as "Lawful Consideration" FULL DISCLOSURE MUST be given to be LAWFUL
5) CAPACITY to contract requires that Full Disclosure be given and "understood/comprehended" in full to be Lawful...
NO minor,drunkard,lunatic, or other mental incapicity can be present to be a Lawful Contract
6) FREE CONSENT : ..............FRAUD...........
NO force, trickery, undue influence, misrepresentation, coercion can take place. * ANY mistake therein, VOIDS the contract between TRUSTEE/BENEFICIARY
7) LAWFUL OBJECT :
"anything" illegal or harmful to either party, made, or in part of the contract, VOIDS the contract
8) CERTAINTY of MEANING or FULL DISCLOSURE:
*** Almost ALL contracts are VOID because the parties that signed have NOT, with certainty, "understood or comprehended" the LEGAL meaning of the "CONTRACTED WORDS", ie: person, individual, citizen, etc. and therefore, as undefined = FRAUD!............ man, woman, is WHO you are, ALL other words or terms used to contract are LEGAL terms for FICTION!
9) SIGNATURE and AUTOGRAPH :
Signature = FICTION / Corporate Identity, LGBTQS2+ et al
Autograph = "LIVING", man or woman...period!
*** if you as a man or woman sign a contract there is NO CONTRACT because... there CANNOT be a contract wherein one side is "living" and the other is a "fictional" identity
10) YOU must have CERTAINTY :
of the TERMS and PRIVACY to CONTRACT
BOTH have to APPROVE! VOID if broken and must be re-done.
(Example the BNA Act of 1867, the contract died when Queen Victoria died in 1901...similar to a Power of Attorney document, VOID when there's the death. Queen Victoria took OUT her Heirs)
Darcy Martans made a Flyer to motivate more of her town and local area for meetings. Darcy added her email and phone contact info
attached is word document of flyer - please change the contact info to you or your local group email - also emailed out was phase 1 and phase 2 pdf files - please forward these out to your family and friends
Thank you
“CANADIAN’S do NOT have An ABSOLUTE RIGHT
to PRIVATE PROPERTY”
Federal Justice Minister, David Lametti Spring 2022
"YOU WILL OWN NOTHING
AND BE HAPPY"
AGENDA 2030 WEF/ World Economic Forum
Founder Klaus Schwab
LEARN HOW TO END THE FRAUD
CONTACT: ConstitutionalConventions.ca info@constitutionalconventions.ca
Darcy Martans - with important inforamation (Share)
Deputation Hamilton ON, Erin Gomaz, November 6 2023
Deputation to Huntsvillle, January 29 2024 Peggy Pederson Shelagh McFarlane
Lawful Affirmation and Declaration of Dominion (use this document to collect autographs of support).
640
views
4
comments
AFTER... ACQUIRED PROPERTY
Subscribe to get important Information
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
Brian Thiesen - MONEY TALKS: Part 1 - Smart Meter Fires
https://rumble.com/v4csfol-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-1-smart-meter-fires.html
Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 2 - Big Data, Big Power, Big Government
https://rumble.com/v4csmd3-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-2-big-data-big-power-big-government.html
Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 3 - Pensions, Power, Politics and Climate - https://rumble.com/v4cse96-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-3-pensions-power-politics-and-climate.html
Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
Looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes
If interested please copy and send in your letter for a response
BC Minister of Finance
PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't
Victoria, BC V8W 9E2
From:
January 8, 2024
To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy,
Good day Minister,
It has come to my attention that THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, CANADA REVENUE AGENCY, and the GOVERNMENT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA CANADA et al, are corporate entities. (see inclosed papers from Dun & Bradstreet)
When I inquired in 2023 of the truth of this, to both BC MP Lorne Derksen and FED MP Todd Doherty, I received no response federally, MP Derksen told me he didn't know and to look into it myself, which I did. The government of BC is a registered corporation in Hong Kong!
My requirement to you, Honourable Minister Conroy, comes because you should be able to provide the financial documents I seek based on your position in government. I have spent the past months, an arduous process indeed, looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes, which my family and I have always paid faithfully. However, understanding some corporate procedures,there's a requirement to documents of full disclosure, informed consent, and signed contracts with the entities involved in any contractual obligation. My aged mother said she's never signed a contract, nor have I.
With your knowledge in the Finance Department, would you kindly forward by e-mail and in writing, the legislative documentation, document/s, contracts, requiring the payment of Property Taxes. I require this information to lawfully give my consent. Please respond by January 31,2024 to the above address/e-mail.
Sincerely,
___________________________________________________________
PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't
Victoria BC V8W 9E2
To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy
Good day Minister,
I am sending you a second letter. There is further documentation included;
1) Copy of the 1st letter dated, January 8, 2024, received January 10, 2024 and confirmed
2) Copy of who Dun & Bradstreet is
3) Copies showing proof that the Province of British Columbia, and the Government of Canada, are corporations
4) Copy of The Clearfield Doctrine, showing the illegality of taxation by corporations, and accepted worldwide
5) Copy of 10 simple truths of contract law
Therefore, it is incumbent of you, with the title of Minister of Finance, to provide me with the proof of obligation to pay Property Tax. I am, and have been willing to pay property taxes, provided I am doing so lawfully and with full disclosure and consent. Please respond within 7 days both written and by e-mail to;
Thank you.
_________________________________________________________
Proof of Claim CRA or Canada!
Letter of Claim to "CRA" and "ARO"
https://www.aro.ca/en/
We do not recall, and our files do not indicate that we have any contractual obligation to "CRA" or "ARO". Therefore, you are demanded to validate your claim, pursuant to Laws of (province) and Canada and provide me with the following documents:
1. Certified copy of the contract giving rise to alleged debt claimed on your aforementioned letter.
2. Letter of commitment,signed by an officer of your company, attesting to the Lawfulness, legitimacy and accuracy of the Claims as well as your company's full compliance with all the laws,provincial and federal, govering your company's actions in relation to this matter.
3.Copy of contract between yor company and the entity you be acting on behalf of.
4. Collection Agency license number of your company ("CRA" and "ARO")
5.Collection Agent License number for person(s) contacting me on behalf of your company.
6. Since I presume that "CRA" authority devolves from the Income Tax Act and "ARO" receives its authority from some other law which would also in turn, receive its authority from, at least ultimately of you "CRA" and "ARO", proof that the Constitutional Act, 1982 has been properly proclaimed into law, which would involve proof that Section 59 of the Charter has been fulfilled.
Proof of Claim CRA or Canada! video
ok, from what you can find lawfully please provide a letter to give to a CA to ensure they are acting in good faith...
Below is a template for a letter you can use to request verification of a debt from a Collection Agency (CA). This letter is designed to ensure that the CA is acting in good faith and to protect your rights. Please note that this is a general template and may need to be adjusted based on your specific circumstances and local laws. It's advisable to consult with a legal professional for personalized advice.
[Your Full Name] [Your Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] [Date] [Collection Agency's Name] [Collection Agency's Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] Re: Request for Verification of Debt Dear [Collection Agency's Name],
I am writing in response to your [call/letter/email] dated [Date of the CA's communication], regarding an alleged debt for [Name of the Original Creditor], account number [Account Number, if provided].
Under my rights as per the applicable provincial and federal laws, I am requesting a validation of this debt. Please provide the following documentation to verify the legitimacy of the alleged debt:
Certified Copy of Original Contract: A certified copy of the original contract or agreement with [Original Creditor's Name] that gives rise to the alleged debt.
Letter of Commitment: A letter signed by an officer of your agency, attesting to the lawfulness, legitimacy, and accuracy of the claim. This letter should also confirm your agency's compliance with all relevant laws governing debt collection activities.
Proof of Authority to Collect: A copy of the contract or agreement between your agency and [Original Creditor's Name] that authorizes you to collect on this alleged debt.
Detailed Statement of the Debt: A detailed statement of the amount being claimed, including an itemization of any additional charges or fees.
Proof of Last Payment: If applicable, the date and amount of the last payment made on this account. Please note that until the requested documentation is provided, I consider this matter to be in dispute.
Furthermore, I request that all communications regarding this alleged debt be made in writing and sent to the address noted above. In accordance with the law, I expect a response to this request within 30 days of the receipt of this letter.
Failure to provide the requested documentation within this timeframe will be interpreted as an acknowledgment that the debt is unverified and must be removed from my credit report, and that any further collection attempts are ceased.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response. Sincerely,
[Your Name] Remember, this letter is a request for information and does not acknowledge the debt as yours.
It's important to send this letter via registered mail or a method that provides proof of delivery. Keep a copy of the letter and any correspondence you receive in response for your records.
In the letter template I provided, I adhered closely to the key elements you mentioned in your original text. However, I did include a few additional standard requests commonly used in debt verification letters for completeness and clarity:
Detailed Statement of the Debt: This includes an itemization of any additional charges or fees. This detail is often important to fully understand the breakdown of the claimed debt.
Proof of Last Payment: If there were any payments made on the account, this information helps establish the history of the debt.
Method of Communication: I included a request that all communications be made in writing. This is a common practice to ensure there's a clear record of all interactions.
Timeframe for Response: I specified a 30-day period for the CA to respond, which is a standard timeframe in many jurisdictions for debt verification requests. These additions are meant to provide a more comprehensive framework for the verification of the debt and to protect your rights in the process.
However, if you prefer to stick strictly to the points mentioned in your original text, you can modify the template accordingly. Remember, it's always advisable to tailor any legal document to your specific situation and to consult with a legal professional if you have any doubts or questions.
______________________________________________________
10 POINTS of CONTRACT LAW
POWER of CHOICE / "FREE WILL to CONTRACT"
1) More than 1 party is needed to contract
2) AGREEMENT = OFFER & ACCEPTANCE
- OFFER is the "presentment", therefore, without acceptance, there can be NO contract.
- ACCEPTANCE is taken as "TACIT" ( applied though not expressed) if NO has not been verbally said.
* A presentment can be accepted as noted : "with conditional acceptance"
3) There MUST be an INTENTION to CREATE a "Legal Relationship",
ie: AGREE to the consiquences of breaking the contract
4) LAWFUL "CONSIDERATION"
Both or all parties have to give something of value to be considered a contract
* Consideration has to be agreed to by ALL parties to be LEGAL
#1 POINT / Mortgages... Bank Accounts...Credit Cards
When you got your Mortgage...WHAT did the bank put up as "Lawful Consideration" FULL DISCLOSURE MUST be given to be LAWFUL
5) CAPACITY to contract requires that Full Disclosure be given and "understood/comprehended" in full to be Lawful...
NO minor,drunkard,lunatic, or other mental incapicity can be present to be a Lawful Contract
6) FREE CONSENT : ..............FRAUD...........
NO force, trickery, undue influence, misrepresentation, coercion can take place. * ANY mistake therein, VOIDS the contract between TRUSTEE/BENEFICIARY
7) LAWFUL OBJECT :
"anything" illegal or harmful to either party, made, or in part of the contract, VOIDS the contract
8) CERTAINTY of MEANING or FULL DISCLOSURE:
*** Almost ALL contracts are VOID because the parties that signed have NOT, with certainty, "understood or comprehended" the LEGAL meaning of the "CONTRACTED WORDS", ie: person, individual, citizen, etc. and therefore, as undefined = FRAUD!............ man, woman, is WHO you are, ALL other words or terms used to contract are LEGAL terms for FICTION!
9) SIGNATURE and AUTOGRAPH :
Signature = FICTION / Corporate Identity, LGBTQS2+ et al
Autograph = "LIVING", man or woman...period!
*** if you as a man or woman sign a contract there is NO CONTRACT because... there CANNOT be a contract wherein one side is "living" and the other is a "fictional" identity
10) YOU must have CERTAINTY :
of the TERMS and PRIVACY to CONTRACT
BOTH have to APPROVE! VOID if broken and must be re-done.
(Example the BNA Act of 1867, the contract died when Queen Victoria died in 1901...similar to a Power of Attorney document, VOID when there's the death. Queen Victoria took OUT her Heirs)
Darcy Martans made a Flyer to motivate more of her town and local area for meetings. Darcy added her email and phone contact info
attached is word document of flyer - please change the contact info to you or your local group email - also emailed out was phase 1 and phase 2 pdf files - please forward these out to your family and friends
Thank you
“CANADIAN’S do NOT have An ABSOLUTE RIGHT
to PRIVATE PROPERTY”
Federal Justice Minister, David Lametti Spring 2022
"YOU WILL OWN NOTHING
AND BE HAPPY"
AGENDA 2030 WEF/ World Economic Forum
Founder Klaus Schwab
LEARN HOW TO END THE FRAUD
CONTACT: ConstitutionalConventions.ca info@constitutionalconventions.ca
Darcy Martans - with important inforamation (Share)
Deputation Hamilton ON, Erin Gomaz, November 6 2023
Deputation to Huntsvillle, January 29 2024 Peggy Pederson Shelagh McFarlane
Lawful Affirmation and Declaration of Dominion (use this document to collect autographs of support).
513
views
3
comments
Private vs Public
Subscribe to get important Information
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
Brian Thiesen - MONEY TALKS: Part 1 - Smart Meter Fires
https://rumble.com/v4csfol-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-1-smart-meter-fires.html
Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 2 - Big Data, Big Power, Big Government
https://rumble.com/v4csmd3-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-2-big-data-big-power-big-government.html
Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 3 - Pensions, Power, Politics and Climate - https://rumble.com/v4cse96-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-3-pensions-power-politics-and-climate.html
Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
Looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes
If interested please copy and send in your letter for a response
BC Minister of Finance
PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't
Victoria, BC V8W 9E2
From:
January 8, 2024
To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy,
Good day Minister,
It has come to my attention that THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, CANADA REVENUE AGENCY, and the GOVERNMENT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA CANADA et al, are corporate entities. (see inclosed papers from Dun & Bradstreet)
When I inquired in 2023 of the truth of this, to both BC MP Lorne Derksen and FED MP Todd Doherty, I received no response federally, MP Derksen told me he didn't know and to look into it myself, which I did. The government of BC is a registered corporation in Hong Kong!
My requirement to you, Honourable Minister Conroy, comes because you should be able to provide the financial documents I seek based on your position in government. I have spent the past months, an arduous process indeed, looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes, which my family and I have always paid faithfully. However, understanding some corporate procedures,there's a requirement to documents of full disclosure, informed consent, and signed contracts with the entities involved in any contractual obligation. My aged mother said she's never signed a contract, nor have I.
With your knowledge in the Finance Department, would you kindly forward by e-mail and in writing, the legislative documentation, document/s, contracts, requiring the payment of Property Taxes. I require this information to lawfully give my consent. Please respond by January 31,2024 to the above address/e-mail.
Sincerely,
___________________________________________________________
PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't
Victoria BC V8W 9E2
To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy
Good day Minister,
I am sending you a second letter. There is further documentation included;
1) Copy of the 1st letter dated, January 8, 2024, received January 10, 2024 and confirmed
2) Copy of who Dun & Bradstreet is
3) Copies showing proof that the Province of British Columbia, and the Government of Canada, are corporations
4) Copy of The Clearfield Doctrine, showing the illegality of taxation by corporations, and accepted worldwide
5) Copy of 10 simple truths of contract law
Therefore, it is incumbent of you, with the title of Minister of Finance, to provide me with the proof of obligation to pay Property Tax. I am, and have been willing to pay property taxes, provided I am doing so lawfully and with full disclosure and consent. Please respond within 7 days both written and by e-mail to;
Thank you.
_________________________________________________________
Proof of Claim CRA or Canada!
Letter of Claim to "CRA" and "ARO"
https://www.aro.ca/en/
We do not recall, and our files do not indicate that we have any contractual obligation to "CRA" or "ARO". Therefore, you are demanded to validate your claim, pursuant to Laws of (province) and Canada and provide me with the following documents:
1. Certified copy of the contract giving rise to alleged debt claimed on your aforementioned letter.
2. Letter of commitment,signed by an officer of your company, attesting to the Lawfulness, legitimacy and accuracy of the Claims as well as your company's full compliance with all the laws,provincial and federal, govering your company's actions in relation to this matter.
3.Copy of contract between yor company and the entity you be acting on behalf of.
4. Collection Agency license number of your company ("CRA" and "ARO")
5.Collection Agent License number for person(s) contacting me on behalf of your company.
6. Since I presume that "CRA" authority devolves from the Income Tax Act and "ARO" receives its authority from some other law which would also in turn, receive its authority from, at least ultimately of you "CRA" and "ARO", proof that the Constitutional Act, 1982 has been properly proclaimed into law, which would involve proof that Section 59 of the Charter has been fulfilled.
Proof of Claim CRA or Canada! video
ok, from what you can find lawfully please provide a letter to give to a CA to ensure they are acting in good faith...
Below is a template for a letter you can use to request verification of a debt from a Collection Agency (CA). This letter is designed to ensure that the CA is acting in good faith and to protect your rights. Please note that this is a general template and may need to be adjusted based on your specific circumstances and local laws. It's advisable to consult with a legal professional for personalized advice.
[Your Full Name] [Your Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] [Date] [Collection Agency's Name] [Collection Agency's Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] Re: Request for Verification of Debt Dear [Collection Agency's Name],
I am writing in response to your [call/letter/email] dated [Date of the CA's communication], regarding an alleged debt for [Name of the Original Creditor], account number [Account Number, if provided].
Under my rights as per the applicable provincial and federal laws, I am requesting a validation of this debt. Please provide the following documentation to verify the legitimacy of the alleged debt:
Certified Copy of Original Contract: A certified copy of the original contract or agreement with [Original Creditor's Name] that gives rise to the alleged debt.
Letter of Commitment: A letter signed by an officer of your agency, attesting to the lawfulness, legitimacy, and accuracy of the claim. This letter should also confirm your agency's compliance with all relevant laws governing debt collection activities.
Proof of Authority to Collect: A copy of the contract or agreement between your agency and [Original Creditor's Name] that authorizes you to collect on this alleged debt.
Detailed Statement of the Debt: A detailed statement of the amount being claimed, including an itemization of any additional charges or fees.
Proof of Last Payment: If applicable, the date and amount of the last payment made on this account. Please note that until the requested documentation is provided, I consider this matter to be in dispute.
Furthermore, I request that all communications regarding this alleged debt be made in writing and sent to the address noted above. In accordance with the law, I expect a response to this request within 30 days of the receipt of this letter.
Failure to provide the requested documentation within this timeframe will be interpreted as an acknowledgment that the debt is unverified and must be removed from my credit report, and that any further collection attempts are ceased.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response. Sincerely,
[Your Name] Remember, this letter is a request for information and does not acknowledge the debt as yours.
It's important to send this letter via registered mail or a method that provides proof of delivery. Keep a copy of the letter and any correspondence you receive in response for your records.
In the letter template I provided, I adhered closely to the key elements you mentioned in your original text. However, I did include a few additional standard requests commonly used in debt verification letters for completeness and clarity:
Detailed Statement of the Debt: This includes an itemization of any additional charges or fees. This detail is often important to fully understand the breakdown of the claimed debt.
Proof of Last Payment: If there were any payments made on the account, this information helps establish the history of the debt.
Method of Communication: I included a request that all communications be made in writing. This is a common practice to ensure there's a clear record of all interactions.
Timeframe for Response: I specified a 30-day period for the CA to respond, which is a standard timeframe in many jurisdictions for debt verification requests. These additions are meant to provide a more comprehensive framework for the verification of the debt and to protect your rights in the process.
However, if you prefer to stick strictly to the points mentioned in your original text, you can modify the template accordingly. Remember, it's always advisable to tailor any legal document to your specific situation and to consult with a legal professional if you have any doubts or questions.
______________________________________________________
10 POINTS of CONTRACT LAW
POWER of CHOICE / "FREE WILL to CONTRACT"
1) More than 1 party is needed to contract
2) AGREEMENT = OFFER & ACCEPTANCE
- OFFER is the "presentment", therefore, without acceptance, there can be NO contract.
- ACCEPTANCE is taken as "TACIT" ( applied though not expressed) if NO has not been verbally said.
* A presentment can be accepted as noted : "with conditional acceptance"
3) There MUST be an INTENTION to CREATE a "Legal Relationship",
ie: AGREE to the consiquences of breaking the contract
4) LAWFUL "CONSIDERATION"
Both or all parties have to give something of value to be considered a contract
* Consideration has to be agreed to by ALL parties to be LEGAL
#1 POINT / Mortgages... Bank Accounts...Credit Cards
When you got your Mortgage...WHAT did the bank put up as "Lawful Consideration" FULL DISCLOSURE MUST be given to be LAWFUL
5) CAPACITY to contract requires that Full Disclosure be given and "understood/comprehended" in full to be Lawful...
NO minor,drunkard,lunatic, or other mental incapicity can be present to be a Lawful Contract
6) FREE CONSENT : ..............FRAUD...........
NO force, trickery, undue influence, misrepresentation, coercion can take place. * ANY mistake therein, VOIDS the contract between TRUSTEE/BENEFICIARY
7) LAWFUL OBJECT :
"anything" illegal or harmful to either party, made, or in part of the contract, VOIDS the contract
8) CERTAINTY of MEANING or FULL DISCLOSURE:
*** Almost ALL contracts are VOID because the parties that signed have NOT, with certainty, "understood or comprehended" the LEGAL meaning of the "CONTRACTED WORDS", ie: person, individual, citizen, etc. and therefore, as undefined = FRAUD!............ man, woman, is WHO you are, ALL other words or terms used to contract are LEGAL terms for FICTION!
9) SIGNATURE and AUTOGRAPH :
Signature = FICTION / Corporate Identity, LGBTQS2+ et al
Autograph = "LIVING", man or woman...period!
*** if you as a man or woman sign a contract there is NO CONTRACT because... there CANNOT be a contract wherein one side is "living" and the other is a "fictional" identity
10) YOU must have CERTAINTY :
of the TERMS and PRIVACY to CONTRACT
BOTH have to APPROVE! VOID if broken and must be re-done.
(Example the BNA Act of 1867, the contract died when Queen Victoria died in 1901...similar to a Power of Attorney document, VOID when there's the death. Queen Victoria took OUT her Heirs)
Darcy Martans made a Flyer to motivate more of her town and local area for meetings. Darcy added her email and phone contact info
attached is word document of flyer - please change the contact info to you or your local group email - also emailed out was phase 1 and phase 2 pdf files - please forward these out to your family and friends
Thank you
“CANADIAN’S do NOT have An ABSOLUTE RIGHT
to PRIVATE PROPERTY”
Federal Justice Minister, David Lametti Spring 2022
"YOU WILL OWN NOTHING
AND BE HAPPY"
AGENDA 2030 WEF/ World Economic Forum
Founder Klaus Schwab
LEARN HOW TO END THE FRAUD
CONTACT: ConstitutionalConventions.ca info@constitutionalconventions.ca
Darcy Martans - with important inforamation (Share)
Deputation Hamilton ON, Erin Gomaz, November 6 2023
Deputation to Huntsvillle, January 29 2024 Peggy Pederson Shelagh McFarlane
Lawful Affirmation and Declaration of Dominion (use this document to collect autographs of support).
451
views
THE UNDENIABLE TRUTH
Subscribe to get important Information
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
Brian Thiesen - MONEY TALKS: Part 1 - Smart Meter Fires
https://rumble.com/v4csfol-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-1-smart-meter-fires.html
Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 2 - Big Data, Big Power, Big Government
https://rumble.com/v4csmd3-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-2-big-data-big-power-big-government.html
Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 3 - Pensions, Power, Politics and Climate - https://rumble.com/v4cse96-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-3-pensions-power-politics-and-climate.html
Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
Looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes
If interested please copy and send in your letter for a response
BC Minister of Finance
PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't
Victoria, BC V8W 9E2
From:
January 8, 2024
To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy,
Good day Minister,
It has come to my attention that THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, CANADA REVENUE AGENCY, and the GOVERNMENT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA CANADA et al, are corporate entities. (see inclosed papers from Dun & Bradstreet)
When I inquired in 2023 of the truth of this, to both BC MP Lorne Derksen and FED MP Todd Doherty, I received no response federally, MP Derksen told me he didn't know and to look into it myself, which I did. The government of BC is a registered corporation in Hong Kong!
My requirement to you, Honourable Minister Conroy, comes because you should be able to provide the financial documents I seek based on your position in government. I have spent the past months, an arduous process indeed, looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes, which my family and I have always paid faithfully. However, understanding some corporate procedures,there's a requirement to documents of full disclosure, informed consent, and signed contracts with the entities involved in any contractual obligation. My aged mother said she's never signed a contract, nor have I.
With your knowledge in the Finance Department, would you kindly forward by e-mail and in writing, the legislative documentation, document/s, contracts, requiring the payment of Property Taxes. I require this information to lawfully give my consent. Please respond by January 31,2024 to the above address/e-mail.
Sincerely,
___________________________________________________________
PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't
Victoria BC V8W 9E2
To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy
Good day Minister,
I am sending you a second letter. There is further documentation included;
1) Copy of the 1st letter dated, January 8, 2024, received January 10, 2024 and confirmed
2) Copy of who Dun & Bradstreet is
3) Copies showing proof that the Province of British Columbia, and the Government of Canada, are corporations
4) Copy of The Clearfield Doctrine, showing the illegality of taxation by corporations, and accepted worldwide
5) Copy of 10 simple truths of contract law
Therefore, it is incumbent of you, with the title of Minister of Finance, to provide me with the proof of obligation to pay Property Tax. I am, and have been willing to pay property taxes, provided I am doing so lawfully and with full disclosure and consent. Please respond within 7 days both written and by e-mail to;
Thank you.
_________________________________________________________
Proof of Claim CRA or Canada!
Letter of Claim to "CRA" and "ARO"
https://www.aro.ca/en/
We do not recall, and our files do not indicate that we have any contractual obligation to "CRA" or "ARO". Therefore, you are demanded to validate your claim, pursuant to Laws of (province) and Canada and provide me with the following documents:
1. Certified copy of the contract giving rise to alleged debt claimed on your aforementioned letter.
2. Letter of commitment,signed by an officer of your company, attesting to the Lawfulness, legitimacy and accuracy of the Claims as well as your company's full compliance with all the laws,provincial and federal, govering your company's actions in relation to this matter.
3.Copy of contract between yor company and the entity you be acting on behalf of.
4. Collection Agency license number of your company ("CRA" and "ARO")
5.Collection Agent License number for person(s) contacting me on behalf of your company.
6. Since I presume that "CRA" authority devolves from the Income Tax Act and "ARO" receives its authority from some other law which would also in turn, receive its authority from, at least ultimately of you "CRA" and "ARO", proof that the Constitutional Act, 1982 has been properly proclaimed into law, which would involve proof that Section 59 of the Charter has been fulfilled.
Proof of Claim CRA or Canada! video
ok, from what you can find lawfully please provide a letter to give to a CA to ensure they are acting in good faith...
Below is a template for a letter you can use to request verification of a debt from a Collection Agency (CA). This letter is designed to ensure that the CA is acting in good faith and to protect your rights. Please note that this is a general template and may need to be adjusted based on your specific circumstances and local laws. It's advisable to consult with a legal professional for personalized advice.
[Your Full Name] [Your Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] [Date] [Collection Agency's Name] [Collection Agency's Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] Re: Request for Verification of Debt Dear [Collection Agency's Name],
I am writing in response to your [call/letter/email] dated [Date of the CA's communication], regarding an alleged debt for [Name of the Original Creditor], account number [Account Number, if provided].
Under my rights as per the applicable provincial and federal laws, I am requesting a validation of this debt. Please provide the following documentation to verify the legitimacy of the alleged debt:
Certified Copy of Original Contract: A certified copy of the original contract or agreement with [Original Creditor's Name] that gives rise to the alleged debt.
Letter of Commitment: A letter signed by an officer of your agency, attesting to the lawfulness, legitimacy, and accuracy of the claim. This letter should also confirm your agency's compliance with all relevant laws governing debt collection activities.
Proof of Authority to Collect: A copy of the contract or agreement between your agency and [Original Creditor's Name] that authorizes you to collect on this alleged debt.
Detailed Statement of the Debt: A detailed statement of the amount being claimed, including an itemization of any additional charges or fees.
Proof of Last Payment: If applicable, the date and amount of the last payment made on this account. Please note that until the requested documentation is provided, I consider this matter to be in dispute.
Furthermore, I request that all communications regarding this alleged debt be made in writing and sent to the address noted above. In accordance with the law, I expect a response to this request within 30 days of the receipt of this letter.
Failure to provide the requested documentation within this timeframe will be interpreted as an acknowledgment that the debt is unverified and must be removed from my credit report, and that any further collection attempts are ceased.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response. Sincerely,
[Your Name] Remember, this letter is a request for information and does not acknowledge the debt as yours.
It's important to send this letter via registered mail or a method that provides proof of delivery. Keep a copy of the letter and any correspondence you receive in response for your records.
In the letter template I provided, I adhered closely to the key elements you mentioned in your original text. However, I did include a few additional standard requests commonly used in debt verification letters for completeness and clarity:
Detailed Statement of the Debt: This includes an itemization of any additional charges or fees. This detail is often important to fully understand the breakdown of the claimed debt.
Proof of Last Payment: If there were any payments made on the account, this information helps establish the history of the debt.
Method of Communication: I included a request that all communications be made in writing. This is a common practice to ensure there's a clear record of all interactions.
Timeframe for Response: I specified a 30-day period for the CA to respond, which is a standard timeframe in many jurisdictions for debt verification requests. These additions are meant to provide a more comprehensive framework for the verification of the debt and to protect your rights in the process.
However, if you prefer to stick strictly to the points mentioned in your original text, you can modify the template accordingly. Remember, it's always advisable to tailor any legal document to your specific situation and to consult with a legal professional if you have any doubts or questions.
______________________________________________________
10 POINTS of CONTRACT LAW
POWER of CHOICE / "FREE WILL to CONTRACT"
1) More than 1 party is needed to contract
2) AGREEMENT = OFFER & ACCEPTANCE
- OFFER is the "presentment", therefore, without acceptance, there can be NO contract.
- ACCEPTANCE is taken as "TACIT" ( applied though not expressed) if NO has not been verbally said.
* A presentment can be accepted as noted : "with conditional acceptance"
3) There MUST be an INTENTION to CREATE a "Legal Relationship",
ie: AGREE to the consiquences of breaking the contract
4) LAWFUL "CONSIDERATION"
Both or all parties have to give something of value to be considered a contract
* Consideration has to be agreed to by ALL parties to be LEGAL
#1 POINT / Mortgages... Bank Accounts...Credit Cards
When you got your Mortgage...WHAT did the bank put up as "Lawful Consideration" FULL DISCLOSURE MUST be given to be LAWFUL
5) CAPACITY to contract requires that Full Disclosure be given and "understood/comprehended" in full to be Lawful...
NO minor,drunkard,lunatic, or other mental incapicity can be present to be a Lawful Contract
6) FREE CONSENT : ..............FRAUD...........
NO force, trickery, undue influence, misrepresentation, coercion can take place. * ANY mistake therein, VOIDS the contract between TRUSTEE/BENEFICIARY
7) LAWFUL OBJECT :
"anything" illegal or harmful to either party, made, or in part of the contract, VOIDS the contract
8) CERTAINTY of MEANING or FULL DISCLOSURE:
*** Almost ALL contracts are VOID because the parties that signed have NOT, with certainty, "understood or comprehended" the LEGAL meaning of the "CONTRACTED WORDS", ie: person, individual, citizen, etc. and therefore, as undefined = FRAUD!............ man, woman, is WHO you are, ALL other words or terms used to contract are LEGAL terms for FICTION!
9) SIGNATURE and AUTOGRAPH :
Signature = FICTION / Corporate Identity, LGBTQS2+ et al
Autograph = "LIVING", man or woman...period!
*** if you as a man or woman sign a contract there is NO CONTRACT because... there CANNOT be a contract wherein one side is "living" and the other is a "fictional" identity
10) YOU must have CERTAINTY :
of the TERMS and PRIVACY to CONTRACT
BOTH have to APPROVE! VOID if broken and must be re-done.
(Example the BNA Act of 1867, the contract died when Queen Victoria died in 1901...similar to a Power of Attorney document, VOID when there's the death. Queen Victoria took OUT her Heirs)
Darcy Martans made a Flyer to motivate more of her town and local area for meetings. Darcy added her email and phone contact info
attached is word document of flyer - please change the contact info to you or your local group email - also emailed out was phase 1 and phase 2 pdf files - please forward these out to your family and friends
Thank you
“CANADIAN’S do NOT have An ABSOLUTE RIGHT
to PRIVATE PROPERTY”
Federal Justice Minister, David Lametti Spring 2022
"YOU WILL OWN NOTHING
AND BE HAPPY"
AGENDA 2030 WEF/ World Economic Forum
Founder Klaus Schwab
LEARN HOW TO END THE FRAUD
CONTACT: ConstitutionalConventions.ca info@constitutionalconventions.ca
Darcy Martans - with important inforamation (Share)
Deputation Hamilton ON, Erin Gomaz, November 6 2023
Deputation to Huntsvillle, January 29 2024 Peggy Pederson Shelagh McFarlane
Lawful Affirmation and Declaration of Dominion (use this document to collect autographs of support).
541
views
2
comments
It’s solution time!
https://twitter.com/EndTheFraudCC - Subscribe to get important Information
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8Are we dealing with corporations, and not governments?
If so, how do we fix this problem? How do we remove our consent?
1.04K
views
8
comments
Dunn & Bradstreet (D&B) DUNS Think They OWN YOU!!!
https://twitter.com/EndTheFraudCC - Subscribe to get important Information
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
HardEvidenceofCorporateTakeoveratAllLevelsof
GovernmentinCanada,asWellasoftheUnitedNations
Dunn & Bradstreet (D&B) DUNS code number areassigned to corporations in Canada to track theircredit ratings.Below you will find the DUNSnumbers for the aggregate Canada government andeach of its major agencies,
those of the aggregategovernmentsofeachProvincealongwiththatofits largest city,
and those of the aggregate UnitedNationsandsomeofitsmajoragencies.
Thesecorporatecodenumberscanbeverifiedbyusing
thefollowinglinktotheD&Bwebsiteandtypingintherequiredinformation:
https://www.dnb.com/business-directory/company-profiles.government_of_canada.fd19bb9f2383aa16a9dd3791feed2ce7.html
Site has been removed by censorship http://mycredit.dnb.com/search-for-duns-number/
In checking DUNS code numbers for governments, you will find that they have many subsidiaries, pension funds and shell corporations to lessen financial accountability. You will find that some of them are listed as being in a geographical location other than in their territorial authority, making their operations even more suspicious. The City of Chicago corporation, for example, is located in Washington, DC, the State of Montana Corporation is located in Chicago, Illinois and the State of Maine corporation – listed with seemingly sardonic humor as “State-O-Maine Inc.” – is located in New York City, New York. You will often also see executive, legislative and judicial offices and judges themselves listed as corporations.
Manta.com is a website for obtaining data on corporations. If the names of any of these government entities are entered, you will find that virtually all of them are listed as private, for–profit corporations.You will also see in the aggregate valuations of their assets that Manta.com provides is vastly greater than what is listed in these private government corporations’ public/private/partnerships fraudulent but well-publicized budget documents that seek to justify draconian but fraudulent budget cuts and their related tax-based extortion rackets.
This confirms that many hundred trillions of dollars of men and women money listed in the semi-secret government comprehensive annual financial reports (CAFRs) as government institutional investments are being siphoned off by the global banking cartel and those sinister forces behind it.
They are doing this via that obscure subsidiary of the private, for-profit Federal Reserve System known as the Depository Trust Clearing Center (DTCC), dba Cede Inc. (Again, note the sardonic humor.)
Cede & Co. The secret trillion-dollar company that owns America
With the awakening given to us by u/atobitt regarding the rampant corruption that runs up and down the chain I began my due diligence.
Surprise it is the Rockefeller’s, Rothschilds or Bilderbergs.
Enjoy 🍌
I am a researcher and investigator some call a Conspiracy theorists and 100 percent convinced that a tiny organisation owns all of the wealth in the WORLD.
Who owns the WORLD? That depends who you ask. A growing body of opinion points to an obscure, but immensely powerful organisation called CEDE and Company.
This small New York based financial institution has a dozen directors and no more than a half dozen employees but holds, according to some reports, some 34 trillion dollars in assets. A complex system of interlocking bodies, such as The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation, the National Securities Clearing Corporation and the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation oversee all stock trading in the WORLD. They all come under the umbrella of Cede.
And, on paper at least, own all the stocks traded. The multi-trillion dollar secret works like this: The Depository Trust Company is a private bank for securities.(PPP) Every other financial organisation in the US, bankers and brokerage houses, is obliged to secure membership with DTC. Like the Federal Reserve, DTC is a private company entrusted with national responsibility. It processes all stock and paper securities for every US bank and brokerage house.
Cede technically owns nearly all of the publicly issued stock in the United States. Private investors don’t own the stock they think they own, but rather have contractual rights that are part of a complex chain of rights ending up at Cede and Company.
It sounds dry and academic, but it impacts every man and woman. And as long as the Public/Private/partnerships remains the preeminent economic power on Earth, it affects the rest of us too.
The Depository Trust Company absolutely controls every paper asset transaction and they physically hold the majority of stock and bond certificates in their name. Very few people hold genuine stock ownership certificates.
And many men and women, depend on private finance for all of their retirement and health needs, are concerned that these precious stocks could at any moment ‘vanish’ overnight to service all these de-facto (PPP's) corporations they call country’s staggering national debt. The Depository Trust &
Clearing Corporation is notoriously publicity-shy, but the DTC’s infallible DTC’s governance of the stock market was, another ”DTC's controlled test Do you remember Black Monday? There were 535 million transactions on Monday, and 400 million transactions on Tuesday". "DTC cleared every transaction without a single glitch!".
Conclusion Black Monday – a colossal financial downturn that ruined millions of men and women's futures – was a controlled test. That it was a deliberately manipulated disaster for the benefit of the DTC.
The 2008 financial crash which led from a crisis in the subprime mortgage market to a series of massive bailouts that taxpayers are still paying for is just one symptom of a system that’s not only too big to fail.
“They repeatedly have gone bankrupt deliberately. The de-facto government's have mortgaged the entire country. No one really owns anything...we don't even have our original birth certificates. Titles and deeds have small print telling you the original is with the DTCC.
“All the people, and their property, are really owned by Cede, which is owned by the private bankers…(PPP"S) “It is not a lawful system, but it is legal.” Legal to their corupt lawyers, judges and courts.
EDIT 2: And we thought England owned us. Larger share holder in this shadowy clan is Australia. DTC is 13th in the club. LETS MAKE THEM LAST PLACE!
Just who owns Australia's Westpac?
http://www.gwb.com.au/gwb/news/banking/wpac97.html
This is Worls War and They need us exterminated!!!. What are they going to do play against themselves? I want reparations for all of our ancestors from these creatures!
Who owns CEDE & Co.?
After becoming aware of the DTCC; and learning that CEDE & Co. is a subsidiary of DTCC, my interest was piqued, i'm aware this info may be dated to a few of you ; but informative, to many still learning
"One thing is for sure Westpac is not majority owned by Australians. As you will see in the links below at least 50% of the company is owned by foreigners largely hidden in nominee companies.
The company's financials are stored in an image format ensuring that search engines cannot search on the major shareholders in this banking giant (search engines search on text only)
Amongst its 20 largest shareholders are Rotchschild and Rockefeller interests and the infamous Cede and Co a US$6.1 trillion anonymous fund - blamed for the "controlled" sharemarket crash on Black Monday in October 1987." http://www.gwb.com.au/gwb/news/banking/wpac97.html
IF it was worth $6.1 trillion then . . .
by 2003 it may have been worth $23 TRILLION "..is that it appears that Cede isn’t just some dummy name, but an actual corporation that DTCC controls. And, well, if you ask anybody about this, who actually knows about it, they will naturally tell you that it is all a formality. To serve you better, of course. And, well, maybe it is. DTCC seems like a nice and friendly company. It is a private company, owned by the same people (PPP) (major U.S. banks) who own the Federal Reserve Bank."
The unknown 23 trillion dollar illuminati size company
"The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation is the biggest Bank in the World that you have probably never heard it. They happen to be the registered owners of 99% of all paper (stocks, bonds, securities, etc.). Scary, but true. And they have a perfectly good reason for it - with electronic trading, it is impossible to make timely changes to registered ownership of the paper."
They had a this site but it is gone http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/banking_and_taxation_irs_and_insurance/social_security/news.php?q=1237576173
I was able to find it on the waybackmachine - WHO REALLY OWNS YOUR MONEY? https://web.archive.org/web/20210421232459/http://fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/banking_and_taxation_irs_and_insurance/social_security/news.php?q=1237576173
The DTCC is bigger than GM, GE, Google, Microsoft and many other mega-companies - all added together. Are you sure you never heard of them? Maybe you should take a look for yourself, and then come back to YourMortgageOrYourLife.com for some more surprises.
www.nowpublic.com/tech-biz/who-really-owns-your-money-part-one-dtcc-and-cede-do-0
This semi-secret (PPP's) entity fraudulently confiscates these investment funds as an executor after they have been registered by brokers, relegating investors to mere beneficiaries whose funds can then be lawfully – at least according to presently and commonly used Universal Commercial Code (UCC)-based statutory law, not Law -- ( I left out constitutions and common law or british common law, bill of rights and the magna carta as these are all fictional rules and NOT laws , but also all de-fact as the UCC ) confiscated at the will of said executor of the criminal family.
Who owns Washington DC? London, The District of Columbia and the Vatican.
DC has its own flag and own independent constitution. The Act of 1871 passed by Congress created a separate “corporation” known as THE UNITED STATES & corporate government for the District of Columbia. Thus DC acts as a Corporation through the Act. The flag of Washington’s District of Columbia has 3 red stars (the 3 stars denoting DC, Vatican City and City of London).
The implications of this are staggering: not only has this corporate subversion of all these de-facto governments happened world wide with the United Nations headquartered right in (The headquarters of the United Nations (UN) is in the Turtle Bay neighborhood of Midtown Manhattan, New York City, U.S., on 17 to 18 acres) , but it has happened in almost all of the nations of the world by means of similar corporate subversion enacted under different names. This definitely explains why all de-facto governments at all levels in almost all nations were NEVER to protect the public interest, but only special interests (PPP's) – specifically, the interests of their fellow predatory for-profit corporations whose actions are now destroying this planet and all life upon it.
With more comprehending the Deputations in the towns will end this FRAUD!
This explains why the men and women of the world are soon going to see sweeping constitutionally-based lawful and law enforcement becoming law officers and new actions in all of the nations of the world against those who, unrepentantly abusing these ill-gotten gains, have perpetrated crimes against nature and humanity.
This also explains the honest transitional governments and financial systems that are going to be installed as the callous, corrupt human systems of the past collapse. The new transparent governmental and financial models now being discussed tested, as well as the likewise poorly publicized/ contextualized mass resignations of government, banking and corporate officials now occurring worldwide are heralds of these imminent planetary events.
Why Is This Important? Clearfield Doctrine
It is well settled that an officer must be elected, appointed or commissioned. Employees cannot be made officers “by virtue of their employment” unless they are employed by a governmental entity, but that proposition is merely color of law. In any case,
“’Public office’ means any position in which the normal and usual duties are conducted on behalf of a governmental entity.” --Idaho Code 59-703(9).
The Clearfield Doctrine is explicit.
“ . . . the government descended to the level of a mere private corporation and takes on the character of a mere private citizen . . . For the purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as an entity entirely separate from government.” --Bank of U.S. v. Planters Bank of Georgia, 9 Wheat. 22 U.S. 904, U.S. v. Erie Ry Co., 106 U.S. 327; Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 318 U.S. 363 (1943).
“When governments enter the world of commerce, they are subject to the same burdens as any private firm or corporation.” --U.S. v. Burr. 309 U.S. 22; See 22 U.S.C.A. 286e. Bank of
U.S. v. Planters Bank of Georgia, 22 U.S. 904 (9 Wheat. 904, 6 L.Ed. 244); C.R.S. 11-60-103.
“The government, by becoming a corporator, lays down its sovereignty . . . exercises no power or privilege which is not derived from the charter.”
--Bank of U.S. v. Planters Bank, 22 U.S. 904 (9 Wheat. 904, 6 L.Ed. 244) (1824).
“Governments lose their immunity and descend to level of private corporations when involved in commercial activity enforcing negotiable instruments, as in fines, penalties, assessments, bails, taxes, the remedy lies in the hand of the state and its municipalities seeking remedy.”
--Rio Grande v. Darke, 167 P. 241.
“The rule of governmental immunity as to all political subdivisions of government is hereby abrogated as it has heretofore been abrogated as to municipal corporations, i.e., cities. No longer is the defense of governmental immunity for tort liability available, irrespective of whether the involved political subdivision is functioning ‘governmentally’ or ‘proprietarily’.”
--Myers v. Genessee County, 375 Mich 1, 1965.
“The principal of sovereign immunity is not one which allows the sovereign to continue to inflict injury.... [sovereign immunity] does not give the sovereign the right to totally disregard the effect of its actions upon the public.”
--Shaw v. Salt Lake County, 224 P2d 1037.
“Sovereign immunity does not apply where (as here) government is a lawbreaker or jurisdiction is the issue.”
--Arthur v. Fry, 300 F.Supp. 622 (1960).
DUNS Numbers of the US Corporate Government and Most of Its Major Agencies working in CORPORATE CAPACITY.
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT-052714196 US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD)-030421397 US DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY-026661067 US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (DOJ)-011669674
US DEPARTMENT OF STATE-026276622
US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES (HHS)-OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY-112463521
US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION-944419592 US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY-932010320
US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY-932394187 US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR-020949010
US DEPARTMENT OF LABOR-029536183
US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD)-OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY-030945779
US DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS (VA)-931691211
US TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (TSA)-050297655 US FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA)-056622429
BURAEU OF CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION (CBP)-796730922
FEDERAL BURAEU OF IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE)-130221646
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA)-057944910 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS & SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA)-003259074
NATIONAL OCEANIC & ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA)-079933920 US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (NRC)-364281923
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA)-037751583 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC)-020309969 US SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC)-003475175
US PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE (USPHS)-039294216 NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH (NIH)-061232000
US CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION (CDC)-927645465
US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA)-138182175 US INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (IRS)-040539587
FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD OF GOVERNORS (Fed)-001959410 FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (FBI)-878865674 NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY (NSA)-617395215
US DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION (DEA)-167247027
FEDERAL BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, FIREARMS AND TOBACCO (BAFT)-132282310
FEDERAL BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT (BLM)-926038563 FEDERAL BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS (BIA)-926038407
DUNS Numbers of Each US Corporate State and Its Largest City working in CORPORATE CAPACITY.
STATE OF ALABAMA-004027553 CITY OF BIRMINGHAM-074239450 STATE OF ALASKA-078198983 CITY OF FAIRBANKS-079261830 STATE OF ARIZONA-068300170 CITY OF PHOENIX -030002236 STATE OF ARKANSAS-619312569 CITY OF LITTLE ROCK-065303794 STATE OF CALIFORNIA-071549000 CITY OF LOS ANGELES -159166271 STATE OF COLORADO-076438621 CITY OF DENVER-066985480 STATE OF CONNECTICUT-016167285 CITY OF BRIDGEPORT-156280596 STATE OF DELAWARE-037802962 CITY OF WILMINGTON-067393900 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA-949056860 CITY OF WASHINGTON-073010550 STATE OF FLORIDA-004078374 CITY OF MIAMI-965299576
STATE OF GEORGIA-069230183 CITY OF ATLANTA-065372500 STATE OF HAWAII-077676997 CITY OF HONOLULU-828979612 STATE OF IDAHO-071875734 CITY OF BOISE-070017017 STATE OF ILLINOIS-065232498 CITY OF CHICAGO-556057206 STATE OF INDIANA-071789435 CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS-964647155 STATE OF IOWA-828089701 CITY OF DAVENPORT-963855494 STATE OF KANSAS-827975009 CITY OF WICHITA-069862755 STATE OF KENTUCKY-828008883 CITY OF LOUISVILLE-943445093 STATE OF LOUISIANA-0612389911 CITY OF NEW ORLEANS-033692404 STATE OF MAINE-061207536 CITY OF PORTLAND,MAINE-071747802 STATE OF MARYLAND -847612442 CITY OF BALTIMORE-052340973 STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS-138090548 CITY OF BOSTON-007277284 STATE OF MICHIGAN-054698428 CITY OF DETROIT-021733631 STATE OF MINNESOTA-050375465 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS-009901959 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI-008210692 CITY OF JACKSON-020864955 STATE OF MISSOURI-616963596 CITY OF KANSAS (CITY)-832496868 STATE OF MONTANA-945782027 CITY OF BILLINGS-068925759 STATE OF NEBRASKA-041472307 CITY OF OMAHA-926604690 STATE OF NEVADA-123259447 CITY OF LAS VEGAS-019342317 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE-066760232 CITY OF MANCHESTER-045009073 STATE OF NEW JERSEY-067373258 CITY OF NEWARK-019092531 STATE OF NEW MEXICO-007111818 CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE-129962346 STATE OF NEW YORK-041002973 CITY OF NEW YORK-021741036 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA-830979667 CITY OF CHARLOTTE-809275006
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA-098564300 CITY OF BISMARCK-080245640 STATE OF OHIO-034309166 CITY OF COLUMBUS-010611869 STATE OF OKLAHOMA-050411726 CITY OF OKLAHOMA (CITY)-073131542 STATE OF OREGON-932534998 CITY OF PORTLAND (OREGON)-054971197 STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA-933882784 CITY OF PHILADELPHIA-929068737 STATE OF RHODE ISLAND-008421763 CITY OF PROVIDENCE-069853752 STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA-067006072 CITY OF COLUMBIA-878281562 STATE OF TENNESSEE-04143882 CITY OF MEMPHIS-051386258 STATE OF TEXAS-002537595 CITY OF HOUSTON-967421590 STATE OF UTAH-009094301 CITY OF SALT LAKE CITY-017096780 STATE OF VERMONT-066760240 CITY OF BURLINGTON-037442977 STATE OF VIRGINIA-047850373 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH-074736299 STATE OF WASHINGTON-079248936 CITY OF SEATTLE-009483561 STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA-828092515 CITY OF CHARLESTON -197931681 STATE OF WISCONSIN-001778349 CITY OF MILWAUKEE-004779133 STATE OF WYOMING-832826015 CITY OF CHEYENNE-021917273
DUNS Numbers of the United Nations Corporation and Some of Its Major
Corporate Agencies working in CORPORATE CAPACITY
UNITED NATIONS (UN)-824777304
UN DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM(UNDP)-793511262
UN EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC, & CULTURAL ORGANIZATION (UNESCO)-053317819
UN WORLD FOOD PROGRAM (UNWFP)-054023952
UN INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S EDUCATION FUND (UNICEF)-017698452 UN WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO)-618736326
The importance to know the difference between; Constitutional government, Municipality Government, CORPORATE GOVERNMENT.
The above depiction shows you, the average person what to look for in bills, ordinances and legislation for law within your State.
It is important to pay attention and take away any presumption you or your private property is not in commerce for taxation or other purposes by which your CORPORATE NAME is attached.
TAKE BOLD ACTION NOW FOR YOUR FUTURE AND FOR THE FUTURE OF YOUR CHILDREN.
There is no other path.
It is our destiny,and if we don’t take action we will be diluted outfrom ever again being able to take this course of actionthat will make us the free
Organzie a Local Meeting - We have so many men and women looking to connect!
878
views
3
comments
Canadian income tax ( ILLEGAL)(SCAM)(FRAUD)
Subscribe to get important Information
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
Taxpayers have now become the main source of funds for the de-facto government
The original tax act of 1917, a temporary tax to finance the war effort, all eleven pages of it.
The original tax act of 1917 to finance the war effort, all eleven pages of it. Finance Minister White hoped it would be a temporary tax and so insisted it be called a *war tax* so that once the war ended, it might be *revisited*. Instead, in 1921 the government added a *sales tax*, and more over the years since..
Photo Credit: via vimyridgehistory.com
de-facto Canada history, July 25: 100 years of “temporary” tax
July 25, 1917. The First World War was at its height, having dragged on for three years grinding up lives, resources, and money.
On July 25, the federal government introduced a “War Income Tax” in Parliament to help replenish the drained federal coffers. The “Income War Tax Act” would be passed on August 17th, and with Royal Assent, come into effect in September 20th.
It was somewhat of a political gesture as well in that only days before the government announced conscription, which would send more young men to war.
Conscription (obligatory military service) was a highly controversial move, and the fact that wealthier Canadians would have to do more to contribute to the war was not totally unwelcome, although there certainly was opposition.
Editorial cartoon of the day, showing cynicism over the new tax possibly leading the phrase *tax grab*.
Editorial cartoon of the day, showing cynicism over the new tax possibly leading the phrase *tax grab*. ©canadianhistoryproject.ca
While it is generally believed that personal income tax was to be a temporary measure and often was touted as such, in truth the finance minister, Sir Thomas White has suggested that it be “revisited” after the war. However, even at the time, other politicians said that once embarked upon, such a tax would likely remain for years to come.
Sir Thomas White, Finance Minister who introduced a *war tax*.
Sir Thomas White, Finance Minister who introduced a *war tax* in 1917 a *temporary* tax that has risen to become the main source of revenue for the government. ©Archives Canada PA 005106
SIR THOMAS WHITE – Minister of Finance (Leeds): Mr. Chairman, I desire today to lay before this committee proposals for a national measure of income taxation. Hitherto we have relied upon duties of customs and of excise, postal rates and other miscellaneous sources of revenue. Canada has been, and will continue during the lifetime of those present today, to be a country inviting immigration. I have, therefore, thought it desirable that we should not be known to the outside world as a country of heavy individual taxation.
We are, however, confronted with grave conditions arising out of the war. The time has arrived when we must resort to direct taxation. I am confident, Mr. Chairman, that the people of Canada, whose patriotism during this war has been so often and so nobly proven, will, in light of present conditions, which call for it, cheerfully accept the burden and the sacrifice of this additional taxation”.
We cannot see very far ahead in these days. We do not know how long this war will last. We do not know what the attitude of the people of this country will be upon the many questions, social, industrial, financial and fiscal.
Therefore, I have placed no time limit upon this measure but merely have placed upon Hansard the suggestion that, a year or two after the war is over, the measure should be reviewed by the minister of finance of the day, with a view of judging whether it is suitable to the conditions which then prevail.
But since that time, taxes and methods of taxation have dramatically increased, with the government creating new methods and areas to tax.
The Globe newspaper in July 1917 announcing the tax as a headline even superceding war news.The Globe newspaper in July 26,1917 announcing the tax as a headline even superceding war news. ©via vimyridgehistory.com
The original 11-page tax act, has ballooned into a document of over 3,000 pages.
In 1918, a person required to pay taxes would have contributed the equivalent of about 14 dollars in today’s terms, whereas in 2016 that same person would be paying over $4,000.
Income tax, once a minimal source of revenue for the government, has now risen to the point where taxpayers have now become the main source of funds for the government, growing from a mere 2.6 per cent of revenue in 2017, to and expected 51 per cent this year.
TAKE BOLD ACTION NOW FOR YOUR FUTURE AND FOR THE FUTURE OF YOUR CHILDREN.
There is no other path.
It is our destiny,and if we don’t take action we will be diluted outfrom ever again being able to take this course of actionthat will make us the free
Organzie a Local Meeting - We have so many men and women looking to connect!
1.23K
views
7
comments
Neil Farstad -Follow Up to Creston RDCK Deputation
https://www.theawarenessproject.ca/creston-rdck-deputation-project/deputation-documents
https://www.youtube.com/@trueearthwarrior
Second phase support presentation for autographs in Wynndel, BC, Canada on the 14th January 2024 with Neil Farstad presenting
Subscribe to get important Information
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
Deputation to the Town - To restore lawful jurisdiction and Unalienable Rights
Joel Sussman, Speaks to 15 Minute Cities in Aurora
Today we are questioning if fraud has taken place within our local governments as it appears they may be governed by a global entity through public/private partnerships. Our local representatives may or may not know this and I’d like to present what we have found.
To our elected officials I have to ask:
If you, as our elected officials, are not the body in power & control, who is?
Who’s your boss?
Who’s pushing the sustainable development and climate action plans within our organizations?
Do you feel at all manipulated that such plans of overreach were being slid past you before you even found your feet within your newly elected positions?
Why do you think that was done to you?
If these ideologies that are being forced upon the residents turn out to be unlawful and out of your area of jurisdiction, who do you think will take the fall or go to jail?
Exposure of widespread corruption within our Federal, Provincial and local levels of government are more extreme and more frequent, with Trudeau’s billion dollar green slush fund being the latest. The Stephen Joseph Harper government was no better: Canadian banks received 'secret' bailout in 2008
We were never told the true cost of a $114-billion “secret bailout” for the country’s biggest Private (PPP) banks during the financial crisis
“At its peak in March 2009, support for Canadian banks reached $114-billion. To put that into perspective, that would have made up seven per cent of the Canadian economy in 2009 and was worth $3,400 for every man, woman and child in Canada.”
three of the country’s biggest banks — CIBC, Bank of Montreal and Scotiabank — were receiving government support that was equal to or more than the value of the company’s shares.
Airbus Deal
The Airbus Affair was a political scandal that began in the late 1980s and concluded around 2010. The scandal concerned the purchase of Airbus passenger aircraft for Air Canada in the 1980s (when it was a crown corporation) by the government of Prime Minister Brian Mulroney.
It was alleged that German Canadian businessman Karlheinz Schreiber had bribed Mulroney to purchase Airbus aircraft. Mulroney countered that he had not acted inappropriately and that the allegations were part of a smear campaign. Mulroney sued the federal government (NO HE SUED US WITH RAISING TAXES ) for $50 million.
Ultimately, the RCMP ended its investigation without laying charges. The government settled out of court with Mulroney in 1997. However, it was later determined that Mulroney had indeed acted inappropriately and had received at least $225,000 in cash.
Foreign Countries Infiltrating
Foreign countries infiltrating Canada, spy chief warns -The Canadian Press Published Friday, January 7,2011
https://www.ctvnews.ca/foreign-countries-infiltrating-canada-spy-chief-warns-1.593597
In 2011, Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) Director Richard Fadden warned of foreign countries infiltrating Canada at municipal levels.
So, my question for you is why are you taking your orders from known criminals, without questioning?
“Because we were told to do it” has never been a valid defence. Perhaps, this presentationmay provide clarity.
Did you know OUR Town and Regional Districts/or County are United Nations (UN) satellite field offices which are public/private partnerships acting in de facto law?
In this UN partnership, everything can be done by the signatures of only 2 people, the Mayor and the CAO or, in the case of the Regional District or County, the Chair of the Board and the CAO.
These two people can call a local emergency which is why you had better know who they work for.
Municipalities mandated COVID-19 vaccine
Murder Charges for Pushing the Vaccine (death shot) (SHARE)
Therefore, instead of gathering in their unlawful offices, we have instead, gathered in this neutral place with men and women.
The agenda today is:
1) To inform elected representatives of suspected fraud that has taken place.
2) To give the restructuring history of all municipalities under the UN Agenda 21 and UN Agenda 2030 where Canada Inc. became a UN member nation state in 1992 and appears to have ceased existing as a sovereign country.
- The Municipal Primer
- FCM and CCME are just a few involved in the Agenda
This Booklet explains how these non-government City Municipalities took over your City Hall, convert official status, assume regulatory control, and leave th elocallyelected officials holding nothing but incredible personal liability for everything they agree to sign.
SLIDE 5 - Promoting Sustainable Developement Book - If you would like one please email info@constitutionalconventions.ca
SLIDE 6 – The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide
An Introduction To Sustainable Development Planning
By most accounts, the UN Agenda 21 sounds fantastic....at first glance, just as the Climate Action Plans of both the Regional Districts or County of OUR TOWN do. Only until further investigation are other secret agendas revealed, that are not of benefit to all, especially the earth.
SLIDE 7 – Agenda 21 quotes:
Now we will explain some of the history that is crucial that must be Educated.
The following is quoted from the “The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide”.
“The UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) produced Agenda 21 in 1992, and since that time Agenda 21 has become the guiding international blueprint for development into the twenty-first century. During the preparation of Agenda 21, the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) worked to ensure that thisglobal plan alsoaddressed the roles and perspectives of local governments.”
As a result, the UN framework was provided to local governments... supposedly? working with their communities, to create their own local action plans for sustainable development. The reality of this implementation isnot as advertised. (SECRET BEHIND CLOSED DOORS)
SLIDE 8 – Sustainable Development - Agenda 21 quotes Continued:
To quote: “Sustainable development, therefore, is a program of action for local and globaleconomic reform—a program thathas yet to befully definedand ICLEI became the main source of consultation to push and fund the global agenda.”
To quote: “Sustainable development, therefore, is a program of action for local and globaleconomic reform—a program thathas yet to befully defined. The challenge of this new program is to develop, test, and disseminate ways to change the process of economic development so that it does not destroy the ecosystems and community systems (e.g., cities, villages, neighborhoods, and families) that make life possible and worthwhile.
No one Fully understands how, or even if, sustainable development can be achieved; however, there is a growing consensus that it must be accomplished at the local level if it is ever to be achieved on a global basis."
SLIDE 9 – Dowdeswell -Elizabeth Dowdeswell, former Executive Director, United Nations Environment Programme
An example is: a quote from Elizabeth Dowdeswell, former Executive Director, UN Environment Programme stated that “terms like sustainable development and environmental conservation can often conjure up images of processes too grand for local communities and their organizations to handle and influence. For all these reasons, the Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide is more than just another book. It is a lever for changing the art of managing sustainable development at the level of local government. Indeed this guide can serve as a symbol of today’s historic transformation in the concept of partnerships...” Is this management or manipulation?
"Terms like sustainable development and environmental conservation can often conjure up images of processes too grand for local communities and their organizations to handle and influence. For all these reasons, the Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide is more than just a Book. It is a lever for changing the art of managing sustainable development at the level of local government. Indeed this guide can serve as a symbol of today's historic transformation in the concept of partnerships...)
SLIDE 10 - Corporation of Canada Signs on.....
(Sustainable Action Plans) asfollows:
Brian Mulroney signed this international treaty whereby, he agreed Canada Inc. would join the United Nations Global Governance System.
Upon his signature, Canada Inc. has ceased to operate as a sovereign nation – illegally and unlawfully. All signatories agreed to several UN
Declarations (Sustainable Action Plans).
1. The convention on climate change that:
a) Climate change is bad and humans are causing it
b) it’s a global problem so no one nation can stop it
c) we need global government
2. The UN Agenda 21 charter that:
a) only UN “sustainable development” will stop climate change
b) all present consumption and production modes are
“unsustainable”
c) we need global government
The UN Charter ordered all signatory members to restructure their existing governments. In the UN system:
1. Canada Corporation becomes a UN Member state
2. The provinces became sub-national member states
3. The local/municipal became a UN City State
All UN members agreed to partner their existing governments with a “sustainable development” non-governmental organization that would help their country embrace this new “green technology” to save the planet...for a LOT of money.
Brian Mulroney signed this international treaty whereby, he agreed Canada Inc. would join the United Nations Global Governance System.
Upon his signature, Canada Inc. has ceased to operate as a sovereign nation – illegally and unlawfully. All signatories agreed to several UN Declarations (Sustainable Action Plans
Slide 11- Clip from Brian Mulroney signed United Nations Global Governance Treaty......
Brian Mulroney signed this international treaty United Nations Global Governance
UN members use the trademarked sustainable development goals logos.
This helps you know who’s getting money from the UN/WEF/World Bank.
Video on Rumble "We the People Constitutional Conventions"
Title: Brian Mulroney signed United Nations Global Governance Treaty......
Brian Mulroney signs on to United Nations Climate Change Agenda 1992
SLIDE 12 – United Nations Development Goals Logo
By the year 2000, countries, including Canada, were being governed by directions of the UN, G7, G20, Council of Foreign Relations, World Economic Forum and World Health Organization, to name a few of the major players. Every one of these organizations is a foreign based non-governmental organization (NGO). Every member of all these organizations areUN-ELECTED!
Our Town was captured by the United Nations/World Economic Forum by the declaration of Office they took when “sworn” in. Once they are “sworn” to serve the municipality, instead of us the men and women, they have agreed to “Municipal government” and “regions” instead of “de jure” (lawful) adminstraion locally. They are under a false oath.
SLIDE 13 – Canada Inc. under the PPP Global Governance System
The “public officials, the Mayor, Councillors and Regional Directors of becamepartnered with a Private Corporation, The Corporation of our Town and The Corporation of the Regional District/County.
An appointed Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) helped implement the global agenda instead of a local one. The local officials became employees to the United Nations by agreeing to take the Community Charter previously known as The Municipal Act, “Declaration of Office” (or DOO).
The new de facto United Nations Global Governance System is a corporate (veil) structure set like a "burger chain" franchise. So, instead of being "governed", we get "serviced". Policies are set at the top of the Public/Private Partnership (PPP) top level and downloaded to the ones below like this:
SLIDE 14 – Guide for Municipal Council Members and Regional Directors/County in your Province,Territory
Oct 12,2018 Prepared by Colin Stewart and Marie Watmough
The United Nations Agenda was implemented in every Province and Territory in Secret!
The DOO is a commercial (UN) declaration and public officials are NOT to take this corporate “oath”. When they do, they become “employees” – in agreement with the Municipal Act or Community Charter and therefore they MUST follow it so taking the DOO gets them into a lot of Doo Doo – us too.
NOTE: "CSIS has knows about foreign interference in Canada for at least the last 30 years. Every federal government from Mr. Mulroney to Mr. Trudeau today have been compromised.
Our Local Towns all have been compromised as well. ____________________________________________________________
2.0 THE LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR LOCAL GOVERMENTS IN OUR PROVINCE/TERRITORY
BEFORE 1998 the Local Government Act of our Province was knows as the Municipal Act, and it was almost a sole source for legislature enacted the Community Charter, and removed from the Local Government Act a great many of the powers of the municipalities, incorporating them into the community Charter
SLIDE 15 - Community Charter Asserted in May 29, 2003 in British Columbia/Provinces/ Territories
Municipal government = the ORGANIZATION OF THE CORPORATION.
The “government” they form internally, the MUNICIPALITY’S “governing officers”, the City’s “Board of Directors”, the City’s LAWS which are legal and commercial. Municipal government is the BUSINESS, the corporation, that provides our services.
Part 2- Municipal Purposes and Powers
Division- Purposes and Fundamental Powers
Municipalities and their Councils
6 (1) A municipality is a corporation of the residents of its area.
(2) The Governing body a municipality is its council
(go slow here – 3 slides to fit in as you speak with long quotes)
SLIDE 16 – Back to "Local Agenda 21"
SLIDE 17- Agenda 21 quote – increasing pace...
SLIDE 18 – Sustainable development.... More quotes from The Local Agenda 21...
The UN public/private partnerships look like government and spend like government but they are NOT government. They are in de facto possession of sovereign powers. The UN Global Government system overturns the rightful government and installs its own defacto government; has possession of governing powers without right and maintains itself by force and captured regulatory control.
SLIDE 19– Defacto Definition
_________________________________________________________
De facto
"de facto" is defined as accepted (as fact) but unauthorized and illegitimate; instealled and founded in decit and fraud, without lawful title."
____________________________________________________________
SLIDE 20–"De facto Government"
A defacto government is defined as “private, corporate secret Mayor/Council/Board; non-governmental organizations.”
SLIDE 21 "De Jure Government
For those that may not know, The word “De jure” means “rightful, legitimate, constitutional and legal;elected andin compliance witheveryaspect of law.”
A De jure government is always public;sovereign and autonomous
SLIDE 22 – United Nations Global Government...
-overturns the rightful government and installs it's own instead
-has possession of governing powers without right
-maintains itself by force and capture regulatory control
If we wonder why all our questions have gone unanswered with regards to the climate action plans and why our overwhelming public input in opposition does not get acknowledged anywhere it is because we have NO Public office. It’s vacant and controlled by the UN Public/Private Partnership. So, what we have is a “Municipal” government and not a “local” government.
A forensic audit of our the Town and the Regional District will reveal exactly how manyBillions of dollars have been funnelled both from AND TO the UN through ICLEI and the provincial municipalities since 1994
SLIDE 22 – Criminal Code Section 46(1)(b)
– Criminal Code Section 46(1)(b) is an Act created to protect the de facto Unlawful system!
CANADA Inc. being a UN member state has NO Authority to implement foreign mandates, policies, treaties or any agreements that violate our Unalienable Rights
see - Clearfield Doctrine - https://rumble.com/v42e26t-clearfield-doctrine-clearfield-trust-co.-v.-united-states-318-us.-363-371..html
SLIDE - 23 The CANADIAN Constitution Act
The CANADIAN Constitution Act; the Charter of Rights Act; the Bill of Rights Act and the Coronation Oath Act are all de-facto! This is IMPORTANT INFORMATION that MUST Be Educated. These Acts will Not Protect you , your Property or Your Family.
The Last four years have be an eye opener to many that there is and Never have been Laws protecting us from the blatant Corruption!
They ARE and always have been De Facto!
SLIDE - 24 Criminal Code of Canada Inc. Section 46(1)(b)
Canada is like Coca- Cola, Walmart, McDonalds - For example Canada makes Rules for it's employees or guide lines - Canada Inc calls them criminal codes as they cannot call them Law's as they are NOT Laws.
Government Services Corporation doing business as Government of Canada only has Jurisdiction over it's employees, franchisees, officers and/or dependants.
Here are crucial FACTS you MUST fully comprehend!
Companies (Canada Inc.) establish rules to govern the conduct and actions of their employees. These rules should leave no room for discretion and argument. The rules must be enforced and action be taken every time a rule is violated.
So you as a man/woman are identified as a person/corporation not as a man/woman
The purpose of section 32 is to make it clear that the Charter only applies to governments, and not to man/woman
The Charter protects those basic rights and freedoms that are considered essential to preserving Canada as a democratic country. It applies to all governments – federal, provincial and territorial – and includes protection of the following: The rights and freedoms in the Charter are not absolute.
absolute - no exceptions
The rights and freedoms in the Charter are not absolute. They can be limited to protect the Corporation of Canada Inc. rights - NOTman/woman.
Criminal Code of Canada Inc. is a protective measure for the corporations/business/company Canada Inc.
Criminal Code definition of “person” includes bodies in addition to corporations, and it is important to ensure that the same rules for attributing criminal
High treason
46(1)Every one commits high treason who, in Canada,
(a)kills or attempts to kill Her Majesty, or does her any bodily harm tending to death or destruction, maims or wounds her, or imprisons or restrains her;
(b)levies war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto; or
(c)assists an enemy at war with Canada, or any armed forces against whom Canadian Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the country whose forces they are.
Marginal note:Treason
(2)Every one commits treason who, in Canada,
(a)uses force or violence for the purpose of overthrowing the government of Canada or a province;
(b)without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other than Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada;
(c)conspires with any person to commit high treason or to do anything mentioned in paragraph (a);
(d)forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph (a) and manifests that intention by an overt act; or
(e)conspires with any person to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) or forms an intention to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) and manifests that intention by an overt act.
Marginal note:Canadian citizen
(3)Notwithstanding subsection (1) or (2), a Canadian citizen or a person who owes allegiance to Her Majesty in right of Canada,
(a)commits high treason if, while in or out of Canada, he does anything mentioned in subsection (1); or
(b)commits treason if, while in or out of Canada, he does anything mentioned in subsection (2).
Marginal note:Overt act
(4)Where it is treason to conspire with any person, the act of conspiring is an overt act of treason.
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-46.html
Canada is like Coca- Cola or Walmart - For example Walmart makes Rules for it's employees or guide lines to
You now have your answer why all our questions have gone unanswered with regards to the climate action plans and why our overwhelming public input in opposition does not get acknowledged anywhere it is because we have NO Public office. It’s vacant and controlled by the UN Public/Private Partnership. So, what we have is a “Municipal” government and not a “local” government.
.Government Services Corporation doing business as Government of Canada only has Jurisdiction over it's employees, franchisees, officers ond/or dependants.
To those that are elected – YOU WERE ELECTED TO FORM THE GOVERNMENT ONOUR BEHALF – WITHOURTRUST.YOU ARE OUR LOCAL LEVEL OF GOVERNENT.The town staff and regional district/County staff are NOT the government.
YOU CAN THINK you have the power and authority but you DON'T. You are NO MORE than one vote at a table!! Unfortunately, you have been fraudulently partnered through yourcontract and thosecontractsmust be renegotiated.A rightful mayor and council appoint the CAO and staff, and the mayor and council MUST dismiss them. Elected directors form the local Board of Regional District/County that can appoint the CAO and staff and you can directly dismiss them.
With that, you can work with a lawyer to verify the claims we’re making here today. It is now at the point that we really need our elected representatives to step up, step down or step aside.
Now, questions for elected officials that demand answers:
1. As elected officials what did you sign?
2. Did you understand what oath you were asked to take when you took public “office”?
3. What jurisdiction are you in and who’s your employer?
4. Did you sign more than one oath?
5. What you signed designates what jurisdiction you’re operating under.
6. The possible proof of the Town and Regional District/County fraud may be in your oath –
- who did you swear to serve? A“Covenant” is not an oath with regards to our Town.
And, a “Declaration of Rural Appointment Official” is not an oath.
7. Where is the published law that has been presented to the the Men/Women; debated; brought to vote and been passed and regarding the Climate Action Plans; Sustainable development; Municipal partnerships and all United Nations public/private partnerships?
If these published laws cannot be produced, these Public/Private partnerships and United Nations Programs are NOT compliant to laws and government is acting in a state of “ultra vires”.
Ultra vires is a Latin phrase meaning literally "beyound the powers".
"If an act requires legal authourity and is done with such authority. It is characterized in law as intra vires (literally 'within powers".
acts that are intra vires may equivalently be termed "valid" amd those that are untra vires "INVALID"
Ultra vires is a Latin phrase meaning literally "beyond the powers".
"If an act requires legal authourity and is done with such authority. It is characterized in law as intra vires (literally 'within powers".
acts that are intra vires may equivalently be termed "valid" and those that are ultra vires "INVALID"
We need to turn back the page to a simpler time when open, transparent, municipal government and regional districts/counties were serving the men and women of their areas in their best interests.
In the coming days, the mayor and councillors and the Regional District Directors/County will receive an electronic information package which will contain the text of this deputation as well as thought provoking supporting documentation of which we have spoken about here today.
As for the rest of us sitting here, there is no “caped crusader” that will whisk in to change this for us, we have to be proactive and cannot sit back and relax. It is up to us to each of us here to become involved. Here’s your chance.
Thank you for your patience, your respect in listening and your active participation for changing our future for the benefit of all.
Month Day, 2024
Deputation Presentation
To:
The Town of ________ and
The Regional District/County of ___________________
By
Names of Men and Women
We require a written response to the questions by
Month Day, 2024.
Month Day, 2024
Names of each man or woman
Area location - District /Couty
To The Mayor : Name and Councillors: Names of each councillor
And to: Area “A”; Area “B” and Area “C” Directors of the Regional District or County
name sof each member (respectively); and Chair name
RE: Deputation of men and women dated Month Day, 2024
Dear Sirs and Madams,
The enclosed deputation and supporting documents shows that it appears you are acting in three (3) different legal capacities – public; private and international.
Did you know our Town and Regional District /County offices are United
Nations (UN) satellite field offices which are public/private partnerships acting in defacto law?
You can work with a lawyer to verify the claims we have made.
The men and women who undertook the deputation and those who support it understood they elected you to act in and for the local public office ONLY, and therefore are requiring a written response to the following questions by 5:00 p.m.,Day, Month, 2023.
Questions for elected officials that demand answers:
1. As newly elected officials what did you sign?
2. Did you understand what oath you were asked to take when you took public “office”?
3. What jurisdiction are you in and who’s your employer?
4. Did you sign more than one oath?
5. Who did you swear to serve? The possible proof of the Town and Regional District fraud may be in your oath. A “Covenant” is not an oath with regards to the Town of ______. And, a “Declaration of Rural Appointment Official” is not an oath with regards to the Regional District or County.
Please produce any and all, Oaths, Covenants, Declarations of office or any other contract you have signed with regards to your service to the Town of _______ or The Regional District/County.
6. Where is the published law that has been presented; debated; brought to vote and been passed regarding the Climate Action Plans; Sustainable development; Municipal partnerships and all United Nations public/private partnerships?
If these published laws cannot be produced, these Public/Private partnerships and United Nations Programs are not compliant laws and government is acting in a state of “ultra vires”.
We look forward to your response. Sincerely, Names of Men and Woman
Enclosed:
• Deputation Title Page
• Questions for each elected official to respond to
• Deputation Presentation – Paper Copy
• Deputation Supporting Power Point – Paper Copy
• Who’s Who in Government? - Paper Copy
• Links Page – Paper Copy
• USB – Video of Deputation
• Restoring Your Local Peace, Order & Good
Governance
TAKE BOLD ACTION NOW FOR YOUR FUTURE AND FOR THE FUTURE OF YOUR CHILDREN.
There is no other path.
It is our destiny,and if we don’t take action we will be diluted outfrom ever again being able to take this course of actionthat will make us the free
Organize a Local Meeting - We have so many men and women looking to connect!
667
views
2
comments
Ron the Rancher
Subscribe to get important Information
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
Deputation to the Town - To restore lawful jurisdiction and Unalienable Rights
Today we are questioning if fraud has taken place within our local governments as it appears they may be governed by a global entity through public/private partnerships. Our local representatives may or may not know this and I’d like to present what we have found.
To our elected officials I have to ask:
If you, as our elected officials, are not the body in power & control, who is?
Who’s your boss?
Who’s pushing the sustainable development and climate action plans within our organizations?
Do you feel at all manipulated that such plans of overreach were being slid past you before you even found your feet within your newly elected positions?
Why do you think that was done to you?
If these ideologies that are being forced upon the residents turn out to be unlawful and out of your area of jurisdiction, who do you think will take the fall or go to jail?
Exposure of widespread corruption within our Federal, Provincial and local levels of government are more extreme and more frequent, with Trudeau’s billion dollar green slush fund being the latest. The Stephen Joseph Harper government was no better: Canadian banks received 'secret' bailout in 2008
We were never told the true cost of a $114-billion “secret bailout” for the country’s biggest Private (PPP) banks during the financial crisis
“At its peak in March 2009, support for Canadian banks reached $114-billion. To put that into perspective, that would have made up seven per cent of the Canadian economy in 2009 and was worth $3,400 for every man, woman and child in Canada.”
three of the country’s biggest banks — CIBC, Bank of Montreal and Scotiabank — were receiving government support that was equal to or more than the value of the company’s shares.
Airbus Deal
The Airbus Affair was a political scandal that began in the late 1980s and concluded around 2010. The scandal concerned the purchase of Airbus passenger aircraft for Air Canada in the 1980s (when it was a crown corporation) by the government of Prime Minister Brian Mulroney.
It was alleged that German Canadian businessman Karlheinz Schreiber had bribed Mulroney to purchase Airbus aircraft. Mulroney countered that he had not acted inappropriately and that the allegations were part of a smear campaign. Mulroney sued the federal government (NO HE SUED US WITH RAISING TAXES ) for $50 million.
Ultimately, the RCMP ended its investigation without laying charges. The government settled out of court with Mulroney in 1997. However, it was later determined that Mulroney had indeed acted inappropriately and had received at least $225,000 in cash.
Foreign Countries Infiltrating
Foreign countries infiltrating Canada, spy chief warns -The Canadian Press Published Friday, January 7,2011
https://www.ctvnews.ca/foreign-countries-infiltrating-canada-spy-chief-warns-1.593597
In 2011, Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) Director Richard Fadden warned of foreign countries infiltrating Canada at municipal levels.
So, my question for you is why are you taking your orders from known criminals, without questioning?
“Because we were told to do it” has never been a valid defence. Perhaps, this presentationmay provide clarity.
Did you know OUR Town and Regional Districts/or County are United Nations (UN) satellite field offices which are public/private partnerships acting in de facto law?
In this UN partnership, everything can be done by the signatures of only 2 people, the Mayor and the CAO or, in the case of the Regional District or County, the Chair of the Board and the CAO.
These two people can call a local emergency which is why you had better know who they work for.
Municipalities mandated COVID-19 vaccine
Murder Charges for Pushing the Vaccine (death shot) (SHARE)
Therefore, instead of gathering in their unlawful offices, we have instead, gathered in this neutral place with men and women.
The agenda today is:
1) To inform elected representatives of suspected fraud that has taken place.
2) To give the restructuring history of all municipalities under the UN Agenda 21 and UN Agenda 2030 where Canada Inc. became a UN member nation state in 1992 and appears to have ceased existing as a sovereign country.
- The Municipal Primer
- FCM and CCME are just a few involved in the Agenda
This Booklet explains how these non-government City Municipalities took over your City Hall, convert official status, assume regulatory control, and leave th elocallyelected officials holding nothing but incredible personal liability for everything they agree to sign.
SLIDE 5 - Promoting Sustainable Developement Book - If you would like one please email info@constitutionalconventions.ca
SLIDE 6 – The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide
An Introduction To Sustainable Development Planning
By most accounts, the UN Agenda 21 sounds fantastic....at first glance, just as the Climate Action Plans of both the Regional Districts or County of OUR TOWN do. Only until further investigation are other secret agendas revealed, that are not of benefit to all, especially the earth.
SLIDE 7 – Agenda 21 quotes:
Now we will explain some of the history that is crucial that must be Educated.
The following is quoted from the “The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide”.
“The UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) produced Agenda 21 in 1992, and since that time Agenda 21 has become the guiding international blueprint for development into the twenty-first century. During the preparation of Agenda 21, the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) worked to ensure that thisglobal plan alsoaddressed the roles and perspectives of local governments.”
As a result, the UN framework was provided to local governments... supposedly? working with their communities, to create their own local action plans for sustainable development. The reality of this implementation isnot as advertised. (SECRET BEHIND CLOSED DOORS)
SLIDE 8 – Sustainable Development - Agenda 21 quotes Continued:
To quote: “Sustainable development, therefore, is a program of action for local and globaleconomic reform—a program thathas yet to befully definedand ICLEI became the main source of consultation to push and fund the global agenda.”
To quote: “Sustainable development, therefore, is a program of action for local and globaleconomic reform—a program thathas yet to befully defined. The challenge of this new program is to develop, test, and disseminate ways to change the process of economic development so that it does not destroy the ecosystems and community systems (e.g., cities, villages, neighborhoods, and families) that make life possible and worthwhile.
No one Fully understands how, or even if, sustainable development can be achieved; however, there is a growing consensus that it must be accomplished at the local level if it is ever to be achieved on a global basis."
SLIDE 9 – Dowdeswell -Elizabeth Dowdeswell, former Executive Director, United Nations Environment Programme
An example is: a quote from Elizabeth Dowdeswell, former Executive Director, UN Environment Programme stated that “terms like sustainable development and environmental conservation can often conjure up images of processes too grand for local communities and their organizations to handle and influence. For all these reasons, the Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide is more than just another book. It is a lever for changing the art of managing sustainable development at the level of local government. Indeed this guide can serve as a symbol of today’s historic transformation in the concept of partnerships...” Is this management or manipulation?
"Terms like sustainable development and environmental conservation can often conjure up images of processes too grand for local communities and their organizations to handle and influence. For all these reasons, the Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide is more than just a Book. It is a lever for changing the art of managing sustainable development at the level of local government. Indeed this guide can serve as a symbol of today's historic transformation in the concept of partnerships...)
SLIDE 10 - Corporation of Canada Signs on.....
(Sustainable Action Plans) asfollows:
Brian Mulroney signed this international treaty whereby, he agreed Canada Inc. would join the United Nations Global Governance System.
Upon his signature, Canada Inc. has ceased to operate as a sovereign nation – illegally and unlawfully. All signatories agreed to several UN
Declarations (Sustainable Action Plans).
1. The convention on climate change that:
a) Climate change is bad and humans are causing it
b) it’s a global problem so no one nation can stop it
c) we need global government
2. The UN Agenda 21 charter that:
a) only UN “sustainable development” will stop climate change
b) all present consumption and production modes are
“unsustainable”
c) we need global government
The UN Charter ordered all signatory members to restructure their existing governments. In the UN system:
1. Canada Corporation becomes a UN Member state
2. The provinces became sub-national member states
3. The local/municipal became a UN City State
All UN members agreed to partner their existing governments with a “sustainable development” non-governmental organization that would help their country embrace this new “green technology” to save the planet...for a LOT of money.
Brian Mulroney signed this international treaty whereby, he agreed Canada Inc. would join the United Nations Global Governance System.
Upon his signature, Canada Inc. has ceased to operate as a sovereign nation – illegally and unlawfully. All signatories agreed to several UN Declarations (Sustainable Action Plans
Slide 11- Clip from Brian Mulroney signed United Nations Global Governance Treaty......
Brian Mulroney signed this international treaty United Nations Global Governance
UN members use the trademarked sustainable development goals logos.
This helps you know who’s getting money from the UN/WEF/World Bank.
Video on Rumble "We the People Constitutional Conventions"
Title: Brian Mulroney signed United Nations Global Governance Treaty......
Brian Mulroney signs on to United Nations Climate Change Agenda 1992
SLIDE 12 – United Nations Development Goals Logo
By the year 2000, countries, including Canada, were being governed by directions of the UN, G7, G20, Council of Foreign Relations, World Economic Forum and World Health Organization, to name a few of the major players. Every one of these organizations is a foreign based non-governmental organization (NGO). Every member of all these organizations areUN-ELECTED!
Our Town was captured by the United Nations/World Economic Forum by the declaration of Office they took when “sworn” in. Once they are “sworn” to serve the municipality, instead of us the men and women, they have agreed to “Municipal government” and “regions” instead of “de jure” (lawful) adminstraion locally. They are under a false oath.
SLIDE 13 – Canada Inc. under the PPP Global Governance System
The “public officials, the Mayor, Councillors and Regional Directors of becamepartnered with a Private Corporation, The Corporation of our Town and The Corporation of the Regional District/County.
An appointed Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) helped implement the global agenda instead of a local one. The local officials became employees to the United Nations by agreeing to take the Community Charter previously known as The Municipal Act, “Declaration of Office” (or DOO).
The new de facto United Nations Global Governance System is a corporate (veil) structure set like a "burger chain" franchise. So, instead of being "governed", we get "serviced". Policies are set at the top of the Public/Private Partnership (PPP) top level and downloaded to the ones below like this:
SLIDE 14 – Guide for Municipal Council Members and Regional Directors/County in your Province,Territory
Oct 12,2018 Prepared by Colin Stewart and Marie Watmough
The United Nations Agenda was implemented in every Province and Territory in Secret!
The DOO is a commercial (UN) declaration and public officials are NOT to take this corporate “oath”. When they do, they become “employees” – in agreement with the Municipal Act or Community Charter and therefore they MUST follow it so taking the DOO gets them into a lot of Doo Doo – us too.
NOTE: "CSIS has knows about foreign interference in Canada for at least the last 30 years. Every federal government from Mr. Mulroney to Mr. Trudeau today have been compromised.
Our Local Towns all have been compromised as well. ____________________________________________________________
2.0 THE LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR LOCAL GOVERMENTS IN OUR PROVINCE/TERRITORY
BEFORE 1998 the Local Government Act of our Province was knows as the Municipal Act, and it was almost a sole source for legislature enacted the Community Charter, and removed from the Local Government Act a great many of the powers of the municipalities, incorporating them into the community Charter
SLIDE 15 - Community Charter Asserted in May 29, 2003 in British Columbia/Provinces/ Territories
Municipal government = the ORGANIZATION OF THE CORPORATION.
The “government” they form internally, the MUNICIPALITY’S “governing officers”, the City’s “Board of Directors”, the City’s LAWS which are legal and commercial. Municipal government is the BUSINESS, the corporation, that provides our services.
Part 2- Municipal Purposes and Powers
Division- Purposes and Fundamental Powers
Municipalities and their Councils
6 (1) A municipality is a corporation of the residents of its area.
(2) The Governing body a municipality is its council
(go slow here – 3 slides to fit in as you speak with long quotes)
SLIDE 16 – Back to "Local Agenda 21"
SLIDE 17- Agenda 21 quote – increasing pace...
SLIDE 18 – Sustainable development.... More quotes from The Local Agenda 21...
The UN public/private partnerships look like government and spend like government but they are NOT government. They are in de facto possession of sovereign powers. The UN Global Government system overturns the rightful government and installs its own defacto government; has possession of governing powers without right and maintains itself by force and captured regulatory control.
SLIDE 19– Defacto Definition
_________________________________________________________
De facto
"de facto" is defined as accepted (as fact) but unauthorized and illegitimate; instealled and founded in decit and fraud, without lawful title."
____________________________________________________________
SLIDE 20–"De facto Government"
A defacto government is defined as “private, corporate secret Mayor/Council/Board; non-governmental organizations.”
SLIDE 21 "De Jure Government
For those that may not know, The word “De jure” means “rightful, legitimate, constitutional and legal;elected andin compliance witheveryaspect of law.”
A De jure government is always public;sovereign and autonomous
SLIDE 22 – United Nations Global Government...
-overturns the rightful government and installs it's own instead
-has possession of governing powers without right
-maintains itself by force and capture regulatory control
If we wonder why all our questions have gone unanswered with regards to the climate action plans and why our overwhelming public input in opposition does not get acknowledged anywhere it is because we have NO Public office. It’s vacant and controlled by the UN Public/Private Partnership. So, what we have is a “Municipal” government and not a “local” government.
A forensic audit of our the Town and the Regional District will reveal exactly how manyBillions of dollars have been funnelled both from AND TO the UN through ICLEI and the provincial municipalities since 1994
SLIDE 22 – Criminal Code Section 46(1)(b)
– Criminal Code Section 46(1)(b) is an Act created to protect the de facto Unlawful system!
CANADA Inc. being a UN member state has NO Authority to implement foreign mandates, policies, treaties or any agreements that violate our Unalienable Rights
see - Clearfield Doctrine - https://rumble.com/v42e26t-clearfield-doctrine-clearfield-trust-co.-v.-united-states-318-us.-363-371..html
SLIDE - 23 The CANADIAN Constitution Act
The CANADIAN Constitution Act; the Charter of Rights Act; the Bill of Rights Act and the Coronation Oath Act are all de-facto! This is IMPORTANT INFORMATION that MUST Be Educated. These Acts will Not Protect you , your Property or Your Family.
The Last four years have be an eye opener to many that there is and Never have been Laws protecting us from the blatant Corruption!
They ARE and always have been De Facto!
SLIDE - 24 Criminal Code of Canada Inc. Section 46(1)(b)
Canada is like Coca- Cola, Walmart, McDonalds - For example Canada makes Rules for it's employees or guide lines - Canada Inc calls them criminal codes as they cannot call them Law's as they are NOT Laws.
Government Services Corporation doing business as Government of Canada only has Jurisdiction over it's employees, franchisees, officers and/or dependants.
Here are crucial FACTS you MUST fully comprehend!
Companies (Canada Inc.) establish rules to govern the conduct and actions of their employees. These rules should leave no room for discretion and argument. The rules must be enforced and action be taken every time a rule is violated.
So you as a man/woman are identified as a person/corporation not as a man/woman
The purpose of section 32 is to make it clear that the Charter only applies to governments, and not to man/woman
The Charter protects those basic rights and freedoms that are considered essential to preserving Canada as a democratic country. It applies to all governments – federal, provincial and territorial – and includes protection of the following: The rights and freedoms in the Charter are not absolute.
absolute - no exceptions
The rights and freedoms in the Charter are not absolute. They can be limited to protect the Corporation of Canada Inc. rights - NOTman/woman.
Criminal Code of Canada Inc. is a protective measure for the corporations/business/company Canada Inc.
Criminal Code definition of “person” includes bodies in addition to corporations, and it is important to ensure that the same rules for attributing criminal
High treason
46(1)Every one commits high treason who, in Canada,
(a)kills or attempts to kill Her Majesty, or does her any bodily harm tending to death or destruction, maims or wounds her, or imprisons or restrains her;
(b)levies war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto; or
(c)assists an enemy at war with Canada, or any armed forces against whom Canadian Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the country whose forces they are.
Marginal note:Treason
(2)Every one commits treason who, in Canada,
(a)uses force or violence for the purpose of overthrowing the government of Canada or a province;
(b)without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other than Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada;
(c)conspires with any person to commit high treason or to do anything mentioned in paragraph (a);
(d)forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph (a) and manifests that intention by an overt act; or
(e)conspires with any person to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) or forms an intention to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) and manifests that intention by an overt act.
Marginal note:Canadian citizen
(3)Notwithstanding subsection (1) or (2), a Canadian citizen or a person who owes allegiance to Her Majesty in right of Canada,
(a)commits high treason if, while in or out of Canada, he does anything mentioned in subsection (1); or
(b)commits treason if, while in or out of Canada, he does anything mentioned in subsection (2).
Marginal note:Overt act
(4)Where it is treason to conspire with any person, the act of conspiring is an overt act of treason.
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-46.html
Canada is like Coca- Cola or Walmart - For example Walmart makes Rules for it's employees or guide lines to
You now have your answer why all our questions have gone unanswered with regards to the climate action plans and why our overwhelming public input in opposition does not get acknowledged anywhere it is because we have NO Public office. It’s vacant and controlled by the UN Public/Private Partnership. So, what we have is a “Municipal” government and not a “local” government.
.Government Services Corporation doing business as Government of Canada only has Jurisdiction over it's employees, franchisees, officers ond/or dependants.
To those that are elected – YOU WERE ELECTED TO FORM THE GOVERNMENT ONOUR BEHALF – WITHOURTRUST.YOU ARE OUR LOCAL LEVEL OF GOVERNENT.The town staff and regional district/County staff are NOT the government.
YOU CAN THINK you have the power and authority but you DON'T. You are NO MORE than one vote at a table!! Unfortunately, you have been fraudulently partnered through yourcontract and thosecontractsmust be renegotiated.A rightful mayor and council appoint the CAO and staff, and the mayor and council MUST dismiss them. Elected directors form the local Board of Regional District/County that can appoint the CAO and staff and you can directly dismiss them.
With that, you can work with a lawyer to verify the claims we’re making here today. It is now at the point that we really need our elected representatives to step up, step down or step aside.
Now, questions for elected officials that demand answers:
1. As elected officials what did you sign?
2. Did you understand what oath you were asked to take when you took public “office”?
3. What jurisdiction are you in and who’s your employer?
4. Did you sign more than one oath?
5. What you signed designates what jurisdiction you’re operating under.
6. The possible proof of the Town and Regional District/County fraud may be in your oath –
- who did you swear to serve? A“Covenant” is not an oath with regards to our Town.
And, a “Declaration of Rural Appointment Official” is not an oath.
7. Where is the published law that has been presented to the the Men/Women; debated; brought to vote and been passed and regarding the Climate Action Plans; Sustainable development; Municipal partnerships and all United Nations public/private partnerships?
If these published laws cannot be produced, these Public/Private partnerships and United Nations Programs are NOT compliant to laws and government is acting in a state of “ultra vires”.
Ultra vires is a Latin phrase meaning literally "beyound the powers".
"If an act requires legal authourity and is done with such authority. It is characterized in law as intra vires (literally 'within powers".
acts that are intra vires may equivalently be termed "valid" amd those that are untra vires "INVALID"
Ultra vires is a Latin phrase meaning literally "beyond the powers".
"If an act requires legal authourity and is done with such authority. It is characterized in law as intra vires (literally 'within powers".
acts that are intra vires may equivalently be termed "valid" and those that are ultra vires "INVALID"
We need to turn back the page to a simpler time when open, transparent, municipal government and regional districts/counties were serving the men and women of their areas in their best interests.
In the coming days, the mayor and councillors and the Regional District Directors/County will receive an electronic information package which will contain the text of this deputation as well as thought provoking supporting documentation of which we have spoken about here today.
As for the rest of us sitting here, there is no “caped crusader” that will whisk in to change this for us, we have to be proactive and cannot sit back and relax. It is up to us to each of us here to become involved. Here’s your chance.
Thank you for your patience, your respect in listening and your active participation for changing our future for the benefit of all.
Month Day, 2024
Deputation Presentation
To:
The Town of ________ and
The Regional District/County of ___________________
By
Names of Men and Women
We require a written response to the questions by
Month Day, 2024.
Month Day, 2024
Names of each man or woman
Area location - District /Couty
To The Mayor : Name and Councillors: Names of each councillor
And to: Area “A”; Area “B” and Area “C” Directors of the Regional District or County
name sof each member (respectively); and Chair name
RE: Deputation of men and women dated Month Day, 2024
Dear Sirs and Madams,
The enclosed deputation and supporting documents shows that it appears you are acting in three (3) different legal capacities – public; private and international.
Did you know our Town and Regional District /County offices are United
Nations (UN) satellite field offices which are public/private partnerships acting in defacto law?
You can work with a lawyer to verify the claims we have made.
The men and women who undertook the deputation and those who support it understood they elected you to act in and for the local public office ONLY, and therefore are requiring a written response to the following questions by 5:00 p.m.,Day, Month, 2023.
Questions for elected officials that demand answers:
1. As newly elected officials what did you sign?
2. Did you understand what oath you were asked to take when you took public “office”?
3. What jurisdiction are you in and who’s your employer?
4. Did you sign more than one oath?
5. Who did you swear to serve? The possible proof of the Town and Regional District fraud may be in your oath. A “Covenant” is not an oath with regards to the Town of ______. And, a “Declaration of Rural Appointment Official” is not an oath with regards to the Regional District or County.
Please produce any and all, Oaths, Covenants, Declarations of office or any other contract you have signed with regards to your service to the Town of _______ or The Regional District/County.
6. Where is the published law that has been presented; debated; brought to vote and been passed regarding the Climate Action Plans; Sustainable development; Municipal partnerships and all United Nations public/private partnerships?
If these published laws cannot be produced, these Public/Private partnerships and United Nations Programs are not compliant laws and government is acting in a state of “ultra vires”.
We look forward to your response. Sincerely, Names of Men and Woman
Enclosed:
• Deputation Title Page
• Questions for each elected official to respond to
• Deputation Presentation – Paper Copy
• Deputation Supporting Power Point – Paper Copy
• Who’s Who in Government? - Paper Copy
• Links Page – Paper Copy
• USB – Video of Deputation
• Restoring Your Local Peace, Order & Good
Governance
TAKE BOLD ACTION NOW FOR YOUR FUTURE AND FOR THE FUTURE OF YOUR CHILDREN.
There is no other path.
It is our destiny,and if we don’t take action we will be diluted outfrom ever again being able to take this course of actionthat will make us the free
Organize a Local Meeting - We have so many men and women looking to connect!
167
views
STOP calling them OUR Government - They are NOT our Government - they are de-facto
Subscribe to get important Information
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
Deputation to the Town - To restore lawful jurisdiction and Unalienable Rights
Today we are questioning if fraud has taken place within our local governments as it appears they may be governed by a global entity through public/private partnerships. Our local representatives may or may not know this and I’d like to present what we have found.
To our elected officials I have to ask:
If you, as our elected officials, are not the body in power & control, who is?
Who’s your boss?
Who’s pushing the sustainable development and climate action plans within our organizations?
Do you feel at all manipulated that such plans of overreach were being slid past you before you even found your feet within your newly elected positions?
Why do you think that was done to you?
If these ideologies that are being forced upon the residents turn out to be unlawful and out of your area of jurisdiction, who do you think will take the fall or go to jail?
Exposure of widespread corruption within our Federal, Provincial and local levels of government are more extreme and more frequent, with Trudeau’s billion dollar green slush fund being the latest. The Stephen Joseph Harper government was no better: Canadian banks received 'secret' bailout in 2008
We were never told the true cost of a $114-billion “secret bailout” for the country’s biggest Private (PPP) banks during the financial crisis
“At its peak in March 2009, support for Canadian banks reached $114-billion. To put that into perspective, that would have made up seven per cent of the Canadian economy in 2009 and was worth $3,400 for every man, woman and child in Canada.”
three of the country’s biggest banks — CIBC, Bank of Montreal and Scotiabank — were receiving government support that was equal to or more than the value of the company’s shares.
Airbus Deal
The Airbus Affair was a political scandal that began in the late 1980s and concluded around 2010. The scandal concerned the purchase of Airbus passenger aircraft for Air Canada in the 1980s (when it was a crown corporation) by the government of Prime Minister Brian Mulroney.
It was alleged that German Canadian businessman Karlheinz Schreiber had bribed Mulroney to purchase Airbus aircraft. Mulroney countered that he had not acted inappropriately and that the allegations were part of a smear campaign. Mulroney sued the federal government (NO HE SUED US WITH RAISING TAXES ) for $50 million.
Ultimately, the RCMP ended its investigation without laying charges. The government settled out of court with Mulroney in 1997. However, it was later determined that Mulroney had indeed acted inappropriately and had received at least $225,000 in cash.
Foreign Countries Infiltrating
Foreign countries infiltrating Canada, spy chief warns -The Canadian Press Published Friday, January 7,2011
https://www.ctvnews.ca/foreign-countries-infiltrating-canada-spy-chief-warns-1.593597
In 2011, Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) Director Richard Fadden warned of foreign countries infiltrating Canada at municipal levels.
So, my question for you is why are you taking your orders from known criminals, without questioning?
“Because we were told to do it” has never been a valid defence. Perhaps, this presentationmay provide clarity.
Did you know OUR Town and Regional Districts/or County are United Nations (UN) satellite field offices which are public/private partnerships acting in de facto law?
In this UN partnership, everything can be done by the signatures of only 2 people, the Mayor and the CAO or, in the case of the Regional District or County, the Chair of the Board and the CAO.
These two people can call a local emergency which is why you had better know who they work for.
Municipalities mandated COVID-19 vaccine
Murder Charges for Pushing the Vaccine (death shot) (SHARE)
Therefore, instead of gathering in their unlawful offices, we have instead, gathered in this neutral place with men and women.
The agenda today is:
1) To inform elected representatives of suspected fraud that has taken place.
2) To give the restructuring history of all municipalities under the UN Agenda 21 and UN Agenda 2030 where Canada Inc. became a UN member nation state in 1992 and appears to have ceased existing as a sovereign country.
- The Municipal Primer
- FCM and CCME are just a few involved in the Agenda
This Booklet explains how these non-government City Municipalities took over your City Hall, convert official status, assume regulatory control, and leave th elocallyelected officials holding nothing but incredible personal liability for everything they agree to sign.
SLIDE 5 - Promoting Sustainable Developement Book - If you would like one please email info@constitutionalconventions.ca
SLIDE 6 – The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide
An Introduction To Sustainable Development Planning
By most accounts, the UN Agenda 21 sounds fantastic....at first glance, just as the Climate Action Plans of both the Regional Districts or County of OUR TOWN do. Only until further investigation are other secret agendas revealed, that are not of benefit to all, especially the earth.
SLIDE 7 – Agenda 21 quotes:
Now we will explain some of the history that is crucial that must be Educated.
The following is quoted from the “The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide”.
“The UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) produced Agenda 21 in 1992, and since that time Agenda 21 has become the guiding international blueprint for development into the twenty-first century. During the preparation of Agenda 21, the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) worked to ensure that thisglobal plan alsoaddressed the roles and perspectives of local governments.”
As a result, the UN framework was provided to local governments... supposedly? working with their communities, to create their own local action plans for sustainable development. The reality of this implementation isnot as advertised. (SECRET BEHIND CLOSED DOORS)
SLIDE 8 – Sustainable Development - Agenda 21 quotes Continued:
To quote: “Sustainable development, therefore, is a program of action for local and globaleconomic reform—a program thathas yet to befully definedand ICLEI became the main source of consultation to push and fund the global agenda.”
To quote: “Sustainable development, therefore, is a program of action for local and globaleconomic reform—a program thathas yet to befully defined. The challenge of this new program is to develop, test, and disseminate ways to change the process of economic development so that it does not destroy the ecosystems and community systems (e.g., cities, villages, neighborhoods, and families) that make life possible and worthwhile.
No one Fully understands how, or even if, sustainable development can be achieved; however, there is a growing consensus that it must be accomplished at the local level if it is ever to be achieved on a global basis."
SLIDE 9 – Dowdeswell -Elizabeth Dowdeswell, former Executive Director, United Nations Environment Programme
An example is: a quote from Elizabeth Dowdeswell, former Executive Director, UN Environment Programme stated that “terms like sustainable development and environmental conservation can often conjure up images of processes too grand for local communities and their organizations to handle and influence. For all these reasons, the Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide is more than just another book. It is a lever for changing the art of managing sustainable development at the level of local government. Indeed this guide can serve as a symbol of today’s historic transformation in the concept of partnerships...” Is this management or manipulation?
"Terms like sustainable development and environmental conservation can often conjure up images of processes too grand for local communities and their organizations to handle and influence. For all these reasons, the Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide is more than just a Book. It is a lever for changing the art of managing sustainable development at the level of local government. Indeed this guide can serve as a symbol of today's historic transformation in the concept of partnerships...)
SLIDE 10 - Corporation of Canada Signs on.....
(Sustainable Action Plans) asfollows:
Brian Mulroney signed this international treaty whereby, he agreed Canada Inc. would join the United Nations Global Governance System.
Upon his signature, Canada Inc. has ceased to operate as a sovereign nation – illegally and unlawfully. All signatories agreed to several UN
Declarations (Sustainable Action Plans).
1. The convention on climate change that:
a) Climate change is bad and humans are causing it
b) it’s a global problem so no one nation can stop it
c) we need global government
2. The UN Agenda 21 charter that:
a) only UN “sustainable development” will stop climate change
b) all present consumption and production modes are
“unsustainable”
c) we need global government
The UN Charter ordered all signatory members to restructure their existing governments. In the UN system:
1. Canada Corporation becomes a UN Member state
2. The provinces became sub-national member states
3. The local/municipal became a UN City State
All UN members agreed to partner their existing governments with a “sustainable development” non-governmental organization that would help their country embrace this new “green technology” to save the planet...for a LOT of money.
Brian Mulroney signed this international treaty whereby, he agreed Canada Inc. would join the United Nations Global Governance System.
Upon his signature, Canada Inc. has ceased to operate as a sovereign nation – illegally and unlawfully. All signatories agreed to several UN Declarations (Sustainable Action Plans
Slide 11- Clip from Brian Mulroney signed United Nations Global Governance Treaty......
Brian Mulroney signed this international treaty United Nations Global Governance
UN members use the trademarked sustainable development goals logos.
This helps you know who’s getting money from the UN/WEF/World Bank.
Video on Rumble "We the People Constitutional Conventions"
Title: Brian Mulroney signed United Nations Global Governance Treaty......
Brian Mulroney signs on to United Nations Climate Change Agenda 1992
SLIDE 12 – United Nations Development Goals Logo
By the year 2000, countries, including Canada, were being governed by directions of the UN, G7, G20, Council of Foreign Relations, World Economic Forum and World Health Organization, to name a few of the major players. Every one of these organizations is a foreign based non-governmental organization (NGO). Every member of all these organizations areUN-ELECTED!
Our Town was captured by the United Nations/World Economic Forum by the declaration of Office they took when “sworn” in. Once they are “sworn” to serve the municipality, instead of us the men and women, they have agreed to “Municipal government” and “regions” instead of “de jure” (lawful) adminstraion locally. They are under a false oath.
SLIDE 13 – Canada Inc. under the PPP Global Governance System
The “public officials, the Mayor, Councillors and Regional Directors of becamepartnered with a Private Corporation, The Corporation of our Town and The Corporation of the Regional District/County.
An appointed Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) helped implement the global agenda instead of a local one. The local officials became employees to the United Nations by agreeing to take the Community Charter previously known as The Municipal Act, “Declaration of Office” (or DOO).
The new de facto United Nations Global Governance System is a corporate (veil) structure set like a "burger chain" franchise. So, instead of being "governed", we get "serviced". Policies are set at the top of the Public/Private Partnership (PPP) top level and downloaded to the ones below like this:
SLIDE 14 – Guide for Municipal Council Members and Regional Directors/County in your Province,Territory
Oct 12,2018 Prepared by Colin Stewart and Marie Watmough
The United Nations Agenda was implemented in every Province and Territory in Secret!
The DOO is a commercial (UN) declaration and public officials are NOT to take this corporate “oath”. When they do, they become “employees” – in agreement with the Municipal Act or Community Charter and therefore they MUST follow it so taking the DOO gets them into a lot of Doo Doo – us too.
NOTE: "CSIS has knows about foreign interference in Canada for at least the last 30 years. Every federal government from Mr. Mulroney to Mr. Trudeau today have been compromised.
Our Local Towns all have been compromised as well. ____________________________________________________________
2.0 THE LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR LOCAL GOVERMENTS IN OUR PROVINCE/TERRITORY
BEFORE 1998 the Local Government Act of our Province was knows as the Municipal Act, and it was almost a sole source for legislature enacted the Community Charter, and removed from the Local Government Act a great many of the powers of the municipalities, incorporating them into the community Charter
SLIDE 15 - Community Charter Asserted in May 29, 2003 in British Columbia/Provinces/ Territories
Municipal government = the ORGANIZATION OF THE CORPORATION.
The “government” they form internally, the MUNICIPALITY’S “governing officers”, the City’s “Board of Directors”, the City’s LAWS which are legal and commercial. Municipal government is the BUSINESS, the corporation, that provides our services.
Part 2- Municipal Purposes and Powers
Division- Purposes and Fundamental Powers
Municipalities and their Councils
6 (1) A municipality is a corporation of the residents of its area.
(2) The Governing body a municipality is its council
(go slow here – 3 slides to fit in as you speak with long quotes)
SLIDE 16 – Back to "Local Agenda 21"
SLIDE 17- Agenda 21 quote – increasing pace...
SLIDE 18 – Sustainable development.... More quotes from The Local Agenda 21...
The UN public/private partnerships look like government and spend like government but they are NOT government. They are in de facto possession of sovereign powers. The UN Global Government system overturns the rightful government and installs its own defacto government; has possession of governing powers without right and maintains itself by force and captured regulatory control.
SLIDE 19– Defacto Definition
_________________________________________________________
De facto
"de facto" is defined as accepted (as fact) but unauthorized and illegitimate; instealled and founded in decit and fraud, without lawful title."
____________________________________________________________
SLIDE 20–"De facto Government"
A defacto government is defined as “private, corporate secret Mayor/Council/Board; non-governmental organizations.”
SLIDE 21 "De Jure Government
For those that may not know, The word “De jure” means “rightful, legitimate, constitutional and legal;elected andin compliance witheveryaspect of law.”
A De jure government is always public;sovereign and autonomous
SLIDE 22 – United Nations Global Government...
-overturns the rightful government and installs it's own instead
-has possession of governing powers without right
-maintains itself by force and capture regulatory control
If we wonder why all our questions have gone unanswered with regards to the climate action plans and why our overwhelming public input in opposition does not get acknowledged anywhere it is because we have NO Public office. It’s vacant and controlled by the UN Public/Private Partnership. So, what we have is a “Municipal” government and not a “local” government.
A forensic audit of our the Town and the Regional District will reveal exactly how manyBillions of dollars have been funnelled both from AND TO the UN through ICLEI and the provincial municipalities since 1994
SLIDE 22 – Criminal Code Section 46(1)(b)
– Criminal Code Section 46(1)(b) is an Act created to protect the de facto Unlawful system!
CANADA Inc. being a UN member state has NO Authority to implement foreign mandates, policies, treaties or any agreements that violate our Unalienable Rights
see - Clearfield Doctrine - https://rumble.com/v42e26t-clearfield-doctrine-clearfield-trust-co.-v.-united-states-318-us.-363-371..html
SLIDE - 23 The CANADIAN Constitution Act
The CANADIAN Constitution Act; the Charter of Rights Act; the Bill of Rights Act and the Coronation Oath Act are all de-facto! This is IMPORTANT INFORMATION that MUST Be Educated. These Acts will Not Protect you , your Property or Your Family.
The Last four years have be an eye opener to many that there is and Never have been Laws protecting us from the blatant Corruption!
They ARE and always have been De Facto!
SLIDE - 24 Criminal Code of Canada Inc. Section 46(1)(b)
Canada is like Coca- Cola, Walmart, McDonalds - For example Canada makes Rules for it's employees or guide lines - Canada Inc calls them criminal codes as they cannot call them Law's as they are NOT Laws.
Government Services Corporation doing business as Government of Canada only has Jurisdiction over it's employees, franchisees, officers and/or dependants.
Here are crucial FACTS you MUST fully comprehend!
Companies (Canada Inc.) establish rules to govern the conduct and actions of their employees. These rules should leave no room for discretion and argument. The rules must be enforced and action be taken every time a rule is violated.
So you as a man/woman are identified as a person/corporation not as a man/woman
The purpose of section 32 is to make it clear that the Charter only applies to governments, and not to man/woman
The Charter protects those basic rights and freedoms that are considered essential to preserving Canada as a democratic country. It applies to all governments – federal, provincial and territorial – and includes protection of the following: The rights and freedoms in the Charter are not absolute.
absolute - no exceptions
The rights and freedoms in the Charter are not absolute. They can be limited to protect the Corporation of Canada Inc. rights - NOTman/woman.
Criminal Code of Canada Inc. is a protective measure for the corporations/business/company Canada Inc.
Criminal Code definition of “person” includes bodies in addition to corporations, and it is important to ensure that the same rules for attributing criminal
High treason
46(1)Every one commits high treason who, in Canada,
(a)kills or attempts to kill Her Majesty, or does her any bodily harm tending to death or destruction, maims or wounds her, or imprisons or restrains her;
(b)levies war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto; or
(c)assists an enemy at war with Canada, or any armed forces against whom Canadian Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the country whose forces they are.
Marginal note:Treason
(2)Every one commits treason who, in Canada,
(a)uses force or violence for the purpose of overthrowing the government of Canada or a province;
(b)without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other than Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada;
(c)conspires with any person to commit high treason or to do anything mentioned in paragraph (a);
(d)forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph (a) and manifests that intention by an overt act; or
(e)conspires with any person to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) or forms an intention to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) and manifests that intention by an overt act.
Marginal note:Canadian citizen
(3)Notwithstanding subsection (1) or (2), a Canadian citizen or a person who owes allegiance to Her Majesty in right of Canada,
(a)commits high treason if, while in or out of Canada, he does anything mentioned in subsection (1); or
(b)commits treason if, while in or out of Canada, he does anything mentioned in subsection (2).
Marginal note:Overt act
(4)Where it is treason to conspire with any person, the act of conspiring is an overt act of treason.
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-46.html
Canada is like Coca- Cola or Walmart - For example Walmart makes Rules for it's employees or guide lines to
You now have your answer why all our questions have gone unanswered with regards to the climate action plans and why our overwhelming public input in opposition does not get acknowledged anywhere it is because we have NO Public office. It’s vacant and controlled by the UN Public/Private Partnership. So, what we have is a “Municipal” government and not a “local” government.
.Government Services Corporation doing business as Government of Canada only has Jurisdiction over it's employees, franchisees, officers ond/or dependants.
To those that are elected – YOU WERE ELECTED TO FORM THE GOVERNMENT ONOUR BEHALF – WITHOURTRUST.YOU ARE OUR LOCAL LEVEL OF GOVERNENT.The town staff and regional district/County staff are NOT the government.
YOU CAN THINK you have the power and authority but you DON'T. You are NO MORE than one vote at a table!! Unfortunately, you have been fraudulently partnered through yourcontract and thosecontractsmust be renegotiated.A rightful mayor and council appoint the CAO and staff, and the mayor and council MUST dismiss them. Elected directors form the local Board of Regional District/County that can appoint the CAO and staff and you can directly dismiss them.
With that, you can work with a lawyer to verify the claims we’re making here today. It is now at the point that we really need our elected representatives to step up, step down or step aside.
Now, questions for elected officials that demand answers:
1. As elected officials what did you sign?
2. Did you understand what oath you were asked to take when you took public “office”?
3. What jurisdiction are you in and who’s your employer?
4. Did you sign more than one oath?
5. What you signed designates what jurisdiction you’re operating under.
6. The possible proof of the Town and Regional District/County fraud may be in your oath –
- who did you swear to serve? A“Covenant” is not an oath with regards to our Town.
And, a “Declaration of Rural Appointment Official” is not an oath.
7. Where is the published law that has been presented to the the Men/Women; debated; brought to vote and been passed and regarding the Climate Action Plans; Sustainable development; Municipal partnerships and all United Nations public/private partnerships?
If these published laws cannot be produced, these Public/Private partnerships and United Nations Programs are NOT compliant to laws and government is acting in a state of “ultra vires”.
Ultra vires is a Latin phrase meaning literally "beyound the powers".
"If an act requires legal authourity and is done with such authority. It is characterized in law as intra vires (literally 'within powers".
acts that are intra vires may equivalently be termed "valid" amd those that are untra vires "INVALID"
Ultra vires is a Latin phrase meaning literally "beyond the powers".
"If an act requires legal authourity and is done with such authority. It is characterized in law as intra vires (literally 'within powers".
acts that are intra vires may equivalently be termed "valid" and those that are ultra vires "INVALID"
We need to turn back the page to a simpler time when open, transparent, municipal government and regional districts/counties were serving the men and women of their areas in their best interests.
In the coming days, the mayor and councillors and the Regional District Directors/County will receive an electronic information package which will contain the text of this deputation as well as thought provoking supporting documentation of which we have spoken about here today.
As for the rest of us sitting here, there is no “caped crusader” that will whisk in to change this for us, we have to be proactive and cannot sit back and relax. It is up to us to each of us here to become involved. Here’s your chance.
Thank you for your patience, your respect in listening and your active participation for changing our future for the benefit of all.
Month Day, 2024
Deputation Presentation
To:
The Town of ________ and
The Regional District/County of ___________________
By
Names of Men and Women
We require a written response to the questions by
Month Day, 2024.
Month Day, 2024
Names of each man or woman
Area location - District /Couty
To The Mayor : Name and Councillors: Names of each councillor
And to: Area “A”; Area “B” and Area “C” Directors of the Regional District or County
name sof each member (respectively); and Chair name
RE: Deputation of men and women dated Month Day, 2024
Dear Sirs and Madams,
The enclosed deputation and supporting documents shows that it appears you are acting in three (3) different legal capacities – public; private and international.
Did you know our Town and Regional District /County offices are United
Nations (UN) satellite field offices which are public/private partnerships acting in defacto law?
You can work with a lawyer to verify the claims we have made.
The men and women who undertook the deputation and those who support it understood they elected you to act in and for the local public office ONLY, and therefore are requiring a written response to the following questions by 5:00 p.m.,Day, Month, 2023.
Questions for elected officials that demand answers:
1. As newly elected officials what did you sign?
2. Did you understand what oath you were asked to take when you took public “office”?
3. What jurisdiction are you in and who’s your employer?
4. Did you sign more than one oath?
5. Who did you swear to serve? The possible proof of the Town and Regional District fraud may be in your oath. A “Covenant” is not an oath with regards to the Town of ______. And, a “Declaration of Rural Appointment Official” is not an oath with regards to the Regional District or County.
Please produce any and all, Oaths, Covenants, Declarations of office or any other contract you have signed with regards to your service to the Town of _______ or The Regional District/County.
6. Where is the published law that has been presented; debated; brought to vote and been passed regarding the Climate Action Plans; Sustainable development; Municipal partnerships and all United Nations public/private partnerships?
If these published laws cannot be produced, these Public/Private partnerships and United Nations Programs are not compliant laws and government is acting in a state of “ultra vires”.
We look forward to your response. Sincerely, Names of Men and Woman
Enclosed:
• Deputation Title Page
• Questions for each elected official to respond to
• Deputation Presentation – Paper Copy
• Deputation Supporting Power Point – Paper Copy
• Who’s Who in Government? - Paper Copy
• Links Page – Paper Copy
• USB – Video of Deputation
• Restoring Your Local Peace, Order & Good
Governance
TAKE BOLD ACTION NOW FOR YOUR FUTURE AND FOR THE FUTURE OF YOUR CHILDREN.
There is no other path.
It is our destiny,and if we don’t take action we will be diluted outfrom ever again being able to take this course of actionthat will make us the free
Organize a Local Meeting - We have so many men and women looking to connect!
1.06K
views
3
comments
Ron Dow the Racher has Important information (SHARE)
Subscribe to get important Information
https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail.
Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8
Deputation to the Town - To restore lawful jurisdiction and Unalienable Rights
Today we are questioning if fraud has taken place within our local governments as it appears they may be governed by a global entity through public/private partnerships. Our local representatives may or may not know this and I’d like to present what we have found.
To our elected officials I have to ask:
If you, as our elected officials, are not the body in power & control, who is?
Who’s your boss?
Who’s pushing the sustainable development and climate action plans within our organizations?
Do you feel at all manipulated that such plans of overreach were being slid past you before you even found your feet within your newly elected positions?
Why do you think that was done to you?
If these ideologies that are being forced upon the residents turn out to be unlawful and out of your area of jurisdiction, who do you think will take the fall or go to jail?
Exposure of widespread corruption within our Federal, Provincial and local levels of government are more extreme and more frequent, with Trudeau’s billion dollar green slush fund being the latest. The Stephen Joseph Harper government was no better: Canadian banks received 'secret' bailout in 2008
We were never told the true cost of a $114-billion “secret bailout” for the country’s biggest Private (PPP) banks during the financial crisis
“At its peak in March 2009, support for Canadian banks reached $114-billion. To put that into perspective, that would have made up seven per cent of the Canadian economy in 2009 and was worth $3,400 for every man, woman and child in Canada.”
three of the country’s biggest banks — CIBC, Bank of Montreal and Scotiabank — were receiving government support that was equal to or more than the value of the company’s shares.
Airbus Deal
The Airbus Affair was a political scandal that began in the late 1980s and concluded around 2010. The scandal concerned the purchase of Airbus passenger aircraft for Air Canada in the 1980s (when it was a crown corporation) by the government of Prime Minister Brian Mulroney.
It was alleged that German Canadian businessman Karlheinz Schreiber had bribed Mulroney to purchase Airbus aircraft. Mulroney countered that he had not acted inappropriately and that the allegations were part of a smear campaign. Mulroney sued the federal government (NO HE SUED US WITH RAISING TAXES ) for $50 million.
Ultimately, the RCMP ended its investigation without laying charges. The government settled out of court with Mulroney in 1997. However, it was later determined that Mulroney had indeed acted inappropriately and had received at least $225,000 in cash.
Foreign Countries Infiltrating
Foreign countries infiltrating Canada, spy chief warns -The Canadian Press Published Friday, January 7,2011
https://www.ctvnews.ca/foreign-countries-infiltrating-canada-spy-chief-warns-1.593597
In 2011, Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) Director Richard Fadden warned of foreign countries infiltrating Canada at municipal levels.
So, my question for you is why are you taking your orders from known criminals, without questioning?
“Because we were told to do it” has never been a valid defence. Perhaps, this presentationmay provide clarity.
Did you know OUR Town and Regional Districts/or County are United Nations (UN) satellite field offices which are public/private partnerships acting in de facto law?
In this UN partnership, everything can be done by the signatures of only 2 people, the Mayor and the CAO or, in the case of the Regional District or County, the Chair of the Board and the CAO.
These two people can call a local emergency which is why you had better know who they work for.
Municipalities mandated COVID-19 vaccine
Murder Charges for Pushing the Vaccine (death shot) (SHARE)
Therefore, instead of gathering in their unlawful offices, we have instead, gathered in this neutral place with men and women.
The agenda today is:
1) To inform elected representatives of suspected fraud that has taken place.
2) To give the restructuring history of all municipalities under the UN Agenda 21 and UN Agenda 2030 where Canada Inc. became a UN member nation state in 1992 and appears to have ceased existing as a sovereign country.
- The Municipal Primer
- FCM and CCME are just a few involved in the Agenda
This Booklet explains how these non-government City Municipalities took over your City Hall, convert official status, assume regulatory control, and leave th elocallyelected officials holding nothing but incredible personal liability for everything they agree to sign.
SLIDE 5 - Promoting Sustainable Developement Book - If you would like one please email info@constitutionalconventions.ca
SLIDE 6 – The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide
An Introduction To Sustainable Development Planning
By most accounts, the UN Agenda 21 sounds fantastic....at first glance, just as the Climate Action Plans of both the Regional Districts or County of OUR TOWN do. Only until further investigation are other secret agendas revealed, that are not of benefit to all, especially the earth.
SLIDE 7 – Agenda 21 quotes:
Now we will explain some of the history that is crucial that must be Educated.
The following is quoted from the “The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide”.
“The UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) produced Agenda 21 in 1992, and since that time Agenda 21 has become the guiding international blueprint for development into the twenty-first century. During the preparation of Agenda 21, the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) worked to ensure that thisglobal plan alsoaddressed the roles and perspectives of local governments.”
As a result, the UN framework was provided to local governments... supposedly? working with their communities, to create their own local action plans for sustainable development. The reality of this implementation isnot as advertised. (SECRET BEHIND CLOSED DOORS)
SLIDE 8 – Sustainable Development - Agenda 21 quotes Continued:
To quote: “Sustainable development, therefore, is a program of action for local and globaleconomic reform—a program thathas yet to befully definedand ICLEI became the main source of consultation to push and fund the global agenda.”
To quote: “Sustainable development, therefore, is a program of action for local and globaleconomic reform—a program thathas yet to befully defined. The challenge of this new program is to develop, test, and disseminate ways to change the process of economic development so that it does not destroy the ecosystems and community systems (e.g., cities, villages, neighborhoods, and families) that make life possible and worthwhile.
No one Fully understands how, or even if, sustainable development can be achieved; however, there is a growing consensus that it must be accomplished at the local level if it is ever to be achieved on a global basis."
SLIDE 9 – Dowdeswell -Elizabeth Dowdeswell, former Executive Director, United Nations Environment Programme
An example is: a quote from Elizabeth Dowdeswell, former Executive Director, UN Environment Programme stated that “terms like sustainable development and environmental conservation can often conjure up images of processes too grand for local communities and their organizations to handle and influence. For all these reasons, the Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide is more than just another book. It is a lever for changing the art of managing sustainable development at the level of local government. Indeed this guide can serve as a symbol of today’s historic transformation in the concept of partnerships...” Is this management or manipulation?
"Terms like sustainable development and environmental conservation can often conjure up images of processes too grand for local communities and their organizations to handle and influence. For all these reasons, the Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide is more than just a Book. It is a lever for changing the art of managing sustainable development at the level of local government. Indeed this guide can serve as a symbol of today's historic transformation in the concept of partnerships...)
SLIDE 10 - Corporation of Canada Signs on.....
(Sustainable Action Plans) asfollows:
Brian Mulroney signed this international treaty whereby, he agreed Canada Inc. would join the United Nations Global Governance System.
Upon his signature, Canada Inc. has ceased to operate as a sovereign nation – illegally and unlawfully. All signatories agreed to several UN
Declarations (Sustainable Action Plans).
1. The convention on climate change that:
a) Climate change is bad and humans are causing it
b) it’s a global problem so no one nation can stop it
c) we need global government
2. The UN Agenda 21 charter that:
a) only UN “sustainable development” will stop climate change
b) all present consumption and production modes are
“unsustainable”
c) we need global government
The UN Charter ordered all signatory members to restructure their existing governments. In the UN system:
1. Canada Corporation becomes a UN Member state
2. The provinces became sub-national member states
3. The local/municipal became a UN City State
All UN members agreed to partner their existing governments with a “sustainable development” non-governmental organization that would help their country embrace this new “green technology” to save the planet...for a LOT of money.
Brian Mulroney signed this international treaty whereby, he agreed Canada Inc. would join the United Nations Global Governance System.
Upon his signature, Canada Inc. has ceased to operate as a sovereign nation – illegally and unlawfully. All signatories agreed to several UN Declarations (Sustainable Action Plans
Slide 11- Clip from Brian Mulroney signed United Nations Global Governance Treaty......
Brian Mulroney signed this international treaty United Nations Global Governance
UN members use the trademarked sustainable development goals logos.
This helps you know who’s getting money from the UN/WEF/World Bank.
Video on Rumble "We the People Constitutional Conventions"
Title: Brian Mulroney signed United Nations Global Governance Treaty......
Brian Mulroney signs on to United Nations Climate Change Agenda 1992
SLIDE 12 – United Nations Development Goals Logo
By the year 2000, countries, including Canada, were being governed by directions of the UN, G7, G20, Council of Foreign Relations, World Economic Forum and World Health Organization, to name a few of the major players. Every one of these organizations is a foreign based non-governmental organization (NGO). Every member of all these organizations areUN-ELECTED!
Our Town was captured by the United Nations/World Economic Forum by the declaration of Office they took when “sworn” in. Once they are “sworn” to serve the municipality, instead of us the men and women, they have agreed to “Municipal government” and “regions” instead of “de jure” (lawful) adminstraion locally. They are under a false oath.
SLIDE 13 – Canada Inc. under the PPP Global Governance System
The “public officials, the Mayor, Councillors and Regional Directors of becamepartnered with a Private Corporation, The Corporation of our Town and The Corporation of the Regional District/County.
An appointed Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) helped implement the global agenda instead of a local one. The local officials became employees to the United Nations by agreeing to take the Community Charter previously known as The Municipal Act, “Declaration of Office” (or DOO).
The new de facto United Nations Global Governance System is a corporate (veil) structure set like a "burger chain" franchise. So, instead of being "governed", we get "serviced". Policies are set at the top of the Public/Private Partnership (PPP) top level and downloaded to the ones below like this:
SLIDE 14 – Guide for Municipal Council Members and Regional Directors/County in your Province,Territory
Oct 12,2018 Prepared by Colin Stewart and Marie Watmough
The United Nations Agenda was implemented in every Province and Territory in Secret!
The DOO is a commercial (UN) declaration and public officials are NOT to take this corporate “oath”. When they do, they become “employees” – in agreement with the Municipal Act or Community Charter and therefore they MUST follow it so taking the DOO gets them into a lot of Doo Doo – us too.
NOTE: "CSIS has knows about foreign interference in Canada for at least the last 30 years. Every federal government from Mr. Mulroney to Mr. Trudeau today have been compromised.
Our Local Towns all have been compromised as well. ____________________________________________________________
2.0 THE LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR LOCAL GOVERMENTS IN OUR PROVINCE/TERRITORY
BEFORE 1998 the Local Government Act of our Province was knows as the Municipal Act, and it was almost a sole source for legislature enacted the Community Charter, and removed from the Local Government Act a great many of the powers of the municipalities, incorporating them into the community Charter
SLIDE 15 - Community Charter Asserted in May 29, 2003 in British Columbia/Provinces/ Territories
Municipal government = the ORGANIZATION OF THE CORPORATION.
The “government” they form internally, the MUNICIPALITY’S “governing officers”, the City’s “Board of Directors”, the City’s LAWS which are legal and commercial. Municipal government is the BUSINESS, the corporation, that provides our services.
Part 2- Municipal Purposes and Powers
Division- Purposes and Fundamental Powers
Municipalities and their Councils
6 (1) A municipality is a corporation of the residents of its area.
(2) The Governing body a municipality is its council
(go slow here – 3 slides to fit in as you speak with long quotes)
SLIDE 16 – Back to "Local Agenda 21"
SLIDE 17- Agenda 21 quote – increasing pace...
SLIDE 18 – Sustainable development.... More quotes from The Local Agenda 21...
The UN public/private partnerships look like government and spend like government but they are NOT government. They are in de facto possession of sovereign powers. The UN Global Government system overturns the rightful government and installs its own defacto government; has possession of governing powers without right and maintains itself by force and captured regulatory control.
SLIDE 19– Defacto Definition
_________________________________________________________
De facto
"de facto" is defined as accepted (as fact) but unauthorized and illegitimate; instealled and founded in decit and fraud, without lawful title."
____________________________________________________________
SLIDE 20–"De facto Government"
A defacto government is defined as “private, corporate secret Mayor/Council/Board; non-governmental organizations.”
SLIDE 21 "De Jure Government
For those that may not know, The word “De jure” means “rightful, legitimate, constitutional and legal;elected andin compliance witheveryaspect of law.”
A De jure government is always public;sovereign and autonomous
SLIDE 22 – United Nations Global Government...
-overturns the rightful government and installs it's own instead
-has possession of governing powers without right
-maintains itself by force and capture regulatory control
If we wonder why all our questions have gone unanswered with regards to the climate action plans and why our overwhelming public input in opposition does not get acknowledged anywhere it is because we have NO Public office. It’s vacant and controlled by the UN Public/Private Partnership. So, what we have is a “Municipal” government and not a “local” government.
A forensic audit of our the Town and the Regional District will reveal exactly how manyBillions of dollars have been funnelled both from AND TO the UN through ICLEI and the provincial municipalities since 1994
SLIDE 22 – Criminal Code Section 46(1)(b)
– Criminal Code Section 46(1)(b) is an Act created to protect the de facto Unlawful system!
CANADA Inc. being a UN member state has NO Authority to implement foreign mandates, policies, treaties or any agreements that violate our Unalienable Rights
see - Clearfield Doctrine - https://rumble.com/v42e26t-clearfield-doctrine-clearfield-trust-co.-v.-united-states-318-us.-363-371..html
SLIDE - 23 The CANADIAN Constitution Act
The CANADIAN Constitution Act; the Charter of Rights Act; the Bill of Rights Act and the Coronation Oath Act are all de-facto! This is IMPORTANT INFORMATION that MUST Be Educated. These Acts will Not Protect you , your Property or Your Family.
The Last four years have be an eye opener to many that there is and Never have been Laws protecting us from the blatant Corruption!
They ARE and always have been De Facto!
SLIDE - 24 Criminal Code of Canada Inc. Section 46(1)(b)
Canada is like Coca- Cola, Walmart, McDonalds - For example Canada makes Rules for it's employees or guide lines - Canada Inc calls them criminal codes as they cannot call them Law's as they are NOT Laws.
Government Services Corporation doing business as Government of Canada only has Jurisdiction over it's employees, franchisees, officers and/or dependants.
Here are crucial FACTS you MUST fully comprehend!
Companies (Canada Inc.) establish rules to govern the conduct and actions of their employees. These rules should leave no room for discretion and argument. The rules must be enforced and action be taken every time a rule is violated.
So you as a man/woman are identified as a person/corporation not as a man/woman
The purpose of section 32 is to make it clear that the Charter only applies to governments, and not to man/woman
The Charter protects those basic rights and freedoms that are considered essential to preserving Canada as a democratic country. It applies to all governments – federal, provincial and territorial – and includes protection of the following: The rights and freedoms in the Charter are not absolute.
absolute - no exceptions
The rights and freedoms in the Charter are not absolute. They can be limited to protect the Corporation of Canada Inc. rights - NOTman/woman.
Criminal Code of Canada Inc. is a protective measure for the corporations/business/company Canada Inc.
Criminal Code definition of “person” includes bodies in addition to corporations, and it is important to ensure that the same rules for attributing criminal
High treason
46(1)Every one commits high treason who, in Canada,
(a)kills or attempts to kill Her Majesty, or does her any bodily harm tending to death or destruction, maims or wounds her, or imprisons or restrains her;
(b)levies war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto; or
(c)assists an enemy at war with Canada, or any armed forces against whom Canadian Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the country whose forces they are.
Marginal note:Treason
(2)Every one commits treason who, in Canada,
(a)uses force or violence for the purpose of overthrowing the government of Canada or a province;
(b)without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other than Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada;
(c)conspires with any person to commit high treason or to do anything mentioned in paragraph (a);
(d)forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph (a) and manifests that intention by an overt act; or
(e)conspires with any person to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) or forms an intention to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) and manifests that intention by an overt act.
Marginal note:Canadian citizen
(3)Notwithstanding subsection (1) or (2), a Canadian citizen or a person who owes allegiance to Her Majesty in right of Canada,
(a)commits high treason if, while in or out of Canada, he does anything mentioned in subsection (1); or
(b)commits treason if, while in or out of Canada, he does anything mentioned in subsection (2).
Marginal note:Overt act
(4)Where it is treason to conspire with any person, the act of conspiring is an overt act of treason.
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-46.html
Canada is like Coca- Cola or Walmart - For example Walmart makes Rules for it's employees or guide lines to
You now have your answer why all our questions have gone unanswered with regards to the climate action plans and why our overwhelming public input in opposition does not get acknowledged anywhere it is because we have NO Public office. It’s vacant and controlled by the UN Public/Private Partnership. So, what we have is a “Municipal” government and not a “local” government.
.Government Services Corporation doing business as Government of Canada only has Jurisdiction over it's employees, franchisees, officers ond/or dependants.
To those that are elected – YOU WERE ELECTED TO FORM THE GOVERNMENT ONOUR BEHALF – WITHOURTRUST.YOU ARE OUR LOCAL LEVEL OF GOVERNENT.The town staff and regional district/County staff are NOT the government.
YOU CAN THINK you have the power and authority but you DON'T. You are NO MORE than one vote at a table!! Unfortunately, you have been fraudulently partnered through yourcontract and thosecontractsmust be renegotiated.A rightful mayor and council appoint the CAO and staff, and the mayor and council MUST dismiss them. Elected directors form the local Board of Regional District/County that can appoint the CAO and staff and you can directly dismiss them.
With that, you can work with a lawyer to verify the claims we’re making here today. It is now at the point that we really need our elected representatives to step up, step down or step aside.
Now, questions for elected officials that demand answers:
1. As elected officials what did you sign?
2. Did you understand what oath you were asked to take when you took public “office”?
3. What jurisdiction are you in and who’s your employer?
4. Did you sign more than one oath?
5. What you signed designates what jurisdiction you’re operating under.
6. The possible proof of the Town and Regional District/County fraud may be in your oath –
- who did you swear to serve? A“Covenant” is not an oath with regards to our Town.
And, a “Declaration of Rural Appointment Official” is not an oath.
7. Where is the published law that has been presented to the the Men/Women; debated; brought to vote and been passed and regarding the Climate Action Plans; Sustainable development; Municipal partnerships and all United Nations public/private partnerships?
If these published laws cannot be produced, these Public/Private partnerships and United Nations Programs are NOT compliant to laws and government is acting in a state of “ultra vires”.
Ultra vires is a Latin phrase meaning literally "beyound the powers".
"If an act requires legal authourity and is done with such authority. It is characterized in law as intra vires (literally 'within powers".
acts that are intra vires may equivalently be termed "valid" amd those that are untra vires "INVALID"
Ultra vires is a Latin phrase meaning literally "beyond the powers".
"If an act requires legal authourity and is done with such authority. It is characterized in law as intra vires (literally 'within powers".
acts that are intra vires may equivalently be termed "valid" and those that are ultra vires "INVALID"
We need to turn back the page to a simpler time when open, transparent, municipal government and regional districts/counties were serving the men and women of their areas in their best interests.
In the coming days, the mayor and councillors and the Regional District Directors/County will receive an electronic information package which will contain the text of this deputation as well as thought provoking supporting documentation of which we have spoken about here today.
As for the rest of us sitting here, there is no “caped crusader” that will whisk in to change this for us, we have to be proactive and cannot sit back and relax. It is up to us to each of us here to become involved. Here’s your chance.
Thank you for your patience, your respect in listening and your active participation for changing our future for the benefit of all.
Month Day, 2024
Deputation Presentation
To:
The Town of ________ and
The Regional District/County of ___________________
By
Names of Men and Women
We require a written response to the questions by
Month Day, 2024.
Month Day, 2024
Names of each man or woman
Area location - District /Couty
To The Mayor : Name and Councillors: Names of each councillor
And to: Area “A”; Area “B” and Area “C” Directors of the Regional District or County
name sof each member (respectively); and Chair name
RE: Deputation of men and women dated Month Day, 2024
Dear Sirs and Madams,
The enclosed deputation and supporting documents shows that it appears you are acting in three (3) different legal capacities – public; private and international.
Did you know our Town and Regional District /County offices are United
Nations (UN) satellite field offices which are public/private partnerships acting in defacto law?
You can work with a lawyer to verify the claims we have made.
The men and women who undertook the deputation and those who support it understood they elected you to act in and for the local public office ONLY, and therefore are requiring a written response to the following questions by 5:00 p.m.,Day, Month, 2023.
Questions for elected officials that demand answers:
1. As newly elected officials what did you sign?
2. Did you understand what oath you were asked to take when you took public “office”?
3. What jurisdiction are you in and who’s your employer?
4. Did you sign more than one oath?
5. Who did you swear to serve? The possible proof of the Town and Regional District fraud may be in your oath. A “Covenant” is not an oath with regards to the Town of ______. And, a “Declaration of Rural Appointment Official” is not an oath with regards to the Regional District or County.
Please produce any and all, Oaths, Covenants, Declarations of office or any other contract you have signed with regards to your service to the Town of _______ or The Regional District/County.
6. Where is the published law that has been presented; debated; brought to vote and been passed regarding the Climate Action Plans; Sustainable development; Municipal partnerships and all United Nations public/private partnerships?
If these published laws cannot be produced, these Public/Private partnerships and United Nations Programs are not compliant laws and government is acting in a state of “ultra vires”.
We look forward to your response. Sincerely, Names of Men and Woman
Enclosed:
• Deputation Title Page
• Questions for each elected official to respond to
• Deputation Presentation – Paper Copy
• Deputation Supporting Power Point – Paper Copy
• Who’s Who in Government? - Paper Copy
• Links Page – Paper Copy
• USB – Video of Deputation
• Restoring Your Local Peace, Order & Good
Governance
TAKE BOLD ACTION NOW FOR YOUR FUTURE AND FOR THE FUTURE OF YOUR CHILDREN.
There is no other path.
It is our destiny,and if we don’t take action we will be diluted outfrom ever again being able to take this course of actionthat will make us the free
Organize a Local Meeting - We have so many men and women looking to connect!
232
views
4
comments
The real man answers to deviant. . . coincidentally news hack from Canuckistan
The real man answers to deviant. . . coincidentally news hack from Canuckistan
Video with proper use of vulgar language. The real man answers to deviant. . . coincidentally news hack from Canuckistan.
Those who still retain any resemblance to manhood, learn, practice and apply every day when talking to a woke deviant imbecile. Yes, the future of this country depends on it.
785
views
5
comments
Dr. Pierre Kory Discovers "Really Uncomfortable Facts" After Investigating Childhood Vaccines
“When you look at the history and the science that supports those vaccines, you learn some really, really uncomfortable facts . . . one of the most glaring is the wealth of data showing the absolute explosion in chronic illness that's coincident with the explosion in the childhood vaccines..."
Excerpt:
https://rumble.com/v2xsqy0-really-uncomfortable-facts-dr.-pierre-kory-after-taking-a-closer-look-at-ch.html
Full Interview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umLgGcmm7ac
https://twitter.com/PierreKory
https://twitter.com/BretWeinstein
.......................
Dr. Pierre Kory Website:
https://drpierrekory.com/
FLCCC Website:
https://covid19criticalcare.com/
Dr. Pierre Kory On Substack:
https://pierrekory.substack.com/
War On Ivermectin: The Medicine That Saved Millions And Could Have Ended The COVID Pandemic
https://amzn.to/3Jn9QZX
Dr. Pierre Kory Videos Featured On Sunfellow On COVID-19
https://rumble.com/search/all?q=sunfellow%20-%20Pierre%20Kory
.......................
"What I learned from the Covid Vaccine debacle is that regulators approving COVID vaccines, and childhood vaccines, are crooks, and the same people approve all those vaccines. They are approving COVID vaccine applications that any serious regulator, who cares about infants, would have laughed out of the room. This is all I need to know about them. If these crooks are approving 'Covid Vaxx' for infants, I cannot believe their assurances about other childhood vaccines. I will not believe that 'they are safe', or that 'they are effective' unless it is proven without the involvement of these people or the greedy companies financing fake research."
-- Igor Chudov
Crooks Who Approved "Covid Vaxx" Approved Other "Childhood Vaccines" Also
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/crooks-who-approved-covid-vaxx-approved
.......................
Learn about the dark side of childhood vaccines:
Turtles All The Way Down: Vaccine Science And Myth (Book)
https://amzn.to/3FvVymr
Sunfellow Vaccination Resource Page
https://sunfellow.com/vaccination-resource-page/
Children's Health Defense
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/too-many-sick-children/
ICAN
https://icandecide.org/
National Vaccine Information Center
https://www.nvic.org/
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Summarizes his Views On Childhood Vaccines In 3 Minutes
https://rumble.com/v2samua-robert-f.-kennedy-jr.-summarizes-his-views-on-childhood-vaccines-in-3-minut.html
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Answers Tough Questions On Childhood Vaccines
https://rumble.com/v2wz2ph-robert-f.-kennedy-jr.-answers-tough-questions-on-childhood-vaccines.html
Steve Kirsch Testifies In Pennsylvania Senate: The Truth About All Vaccines
https://rumble.com/v2to8sg-steve-kirsch-testifies-in-pennsylvania-senate-the-truth-about-all-vaccines.html
Attorney Aaron Siri: How Vaccine Companies Received Immunity From Liability
https://rumble.com/v2a181k-attorney-aaron-siri-how-vaccine-companies-received-immunity-from-liability.html
McCullough, Malone, Cole, Thomas, Wakefield, Tapper, Lawrie, Kirsch, Owens, Nawaz Childhood Vaccines
https://rumble.com/v1see0u-mccullough-malone-cole-thomas-wakefield-tapper-lawrie-kirsch-owens-nawaz-ch.html
Peer-Reviewed Study: Vaccination WITH ALL VACCINES Drives Chronic Illness In The United States
https://rumble.com/v270spu-peer-reviewed-study-vaccination-with-all-vaccines-drives-chronic-illness-in.html
Three Independent Studies Answer This Question: Do Vaccines Make Us Healthier?
https://rumble.com/v10m6o7-three-independent-studies-answer-this-question-do-vaccines-make-us-healthie.html
VAXXED VS UNVAXXED: Dr. Paul Thomas & Dr. James Lyons-Weiler Put CDC Vaccine Schedule To The Test
https://rumble.com/v23e5lw-vaxxed-vs-unvaxxed-dr.-paul-thomas-and-dr.-james-lyons-weiler-put-cdc-vacci.html
Peer-Reviewed, Ten-Year Study: Are Vaccinated Kids Healthier Than The Unvaccinated?
https://rumble.com/v10m6zb-peer-reviewed-ten-year-study-are-vaccinated-kids-healthier-than-the-unvacci.html
‘Vaccine Secrets’: What Parents Should Know Before They Vaccinate Their Kids
https://rumble.com/v10m7rn-vaccine-secrets-what-parents-should-know-before-they-vaccinate-their-kids.html
Studies Outside the U.S. Show Unvaccinated Children Healthier than Vaccinated Children
http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/studies-outside-the-u-s-show-unvaccinated-children-healthier-than-vaccinated-children/
Studies Prove Without Doubt That Unvaccinated Children Are Far Healthier Than Their Vaccinated Peers
http://vactruth.com/2014/02/26/unvaccinated-children-healthier/
Joe Rogan Interviews Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (The Complete, Unedited Interview - Episode #1999)
https://rumble.com/v2ujfts-joe-rogan-interviews-robert-f.-kennedy-jr.-the-complete-unedited-interview-.html
Steve Kirsch Interviews Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
https://rumble.com/v248udk-steve-kirsch-interviews-robert-f.-kennedy-jr..html
Childhood Vaccines Cause Sudden Death Infant Syndrome, Autism & Chronic Illnesses In Children
https://rumble.com/v29qk2i-childhood-vaccines-cause-sudden-death-infant-syndrome-autism-and-chronic-il.html
Dr. Paul Thomas: Childhood Vaccines Cause Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
https://rumble.com/v29qgja-dr.-paul-thomas-childhood-vaccines-cause-sudden-infant-death-syndrome.html
Dr. Peter McCullough Calls For Manhattan-Style Project To Investigate Childhood Autism
https://rumble.com/v2nv6na-dr.-peter-mccullough-calls-for-manhattan-style-project-to-investigate-child.html
Dr. Peter McCullough: Most Childhood Vaccines Are UNNECESSARY & Potentially Harmful!
https://rumble.com/v2pgaoo-dr.-peter-mccullough-most-childhood-vaccines-are-unnecessary-and-potentiall.html
Dr. Peter McCullough: Childhood Vaccines Cause Autism Which, In Turn, May Cause Transgenderism!
https://rumble.com/v2pjogg-dr.-peter-mccullough-childhood-vaccines-cause-autism-which-in-turn-may-caus.html
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. - The CDC Knows Childhood Vaccines Cause Autism!
https://rumble.com/v29pbaa-robert-f.-kennedy-jr.-the-cdc-knows-childhood-vaccines-cause-autism.html
Candace Owens & Dr. Robert Malone Discuss Childhood Vaccines
https://rumble.com/v10mccn-candace-owens-and-dr.-robert-malone-discuss-childhood-vaccines.html
Dr. Robert Malone: If There's Anybody That Deserves The Nobel Peace Prize, It's Bobby Kennedy Jr.
https://rumble.com/v24h3mo-dr.-robert-malone-if-theres-anybody-that-deserves-the-nobel-peace-prize-its.html
Steve Kirsch & Dr. Ryan Cole Discuss Childhood Vaccines
https://rumble.com/v1fx1kt-steve-kirsch-and-dr.-ryan-cole-discuss-childhood-vaccines.html
Dr. Tess Lawrie: "I Would Caution Against Taking Childhood Vaccines!"
https://rumble.com/v1jqs7p-dr.-tess-lawrie-i-would-caution-against-taking-childhood-vaccines.html
Dr. Mike Yeadon: "I'm Ashamed That I Was Pro-Vaccine. I Didn't Do My Homework."
https://rumble.com/v1wqfgc-dr.-mike-yeadon-im-ashamed-that-i-was-pro-vaccine.-i-didnt-do-my-homework..html
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: The Extraordinarily Dangerous Ingredients In Childhood Vaccines
https://rumble.com/v2s5yvm-dr.-sherri-tenpenny-the-extraordinarily-dangerous-ingredients-in-childhood-.html
Roman Bystrianyk: Dissolving Vaccine Illusions
https://rumble.com/v1phi7j-roman-bystrianyk-dissolving-vaccine-illusions.html
Sunfellow Health & Healing Resource Page
https://sunfellow.com/sunfellow-health-healing-resource-page/
Sunfellow Health & Healing On Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/c-1547414
1.81K
views
4
comments
Megyn Kelly Regrets Getting The Covid Vaccine After Developing An 'Autoimmune Issue'
Megyn Kelly @megynkelly Regrets Getting The Covid Vaccine After Developing An 'Autoimmune Issue'
“For the first time, I tested positive for an autoimmune issue at my annual physical. And I went to the best Rheumatologist in New York, and I asked her, do you think this could have to do with the fact that got the damn booster and then got COVID within three weeks? And she said yes. Yes. I wasn't the only one she'd seen that with.”
Source Video:
https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1699537816558919834
See also:
Megyn Kelly Publicly Says She REGRETS Taking the COVID Vaccine, Suspects It Caused New Medical Issue
https://vigilantnews.com/post/megyn-kelly-publicly-says-she-regrets-taking-the-covid-vaccine-suspects-it-caused-new-medical-issue
COVID HALL OF FAME: Taking The COVID-19 Vaccine "Was The Biggest Mistake Of My Life!"
https://rumble.com/v2s56ik-covid-hall-of-fame-taking-the-covid-19-vaccine-was-the-biggest-mistake-of-m.html
Collection Of Peer Reviewed Case Reports & Studies Citing Adverse Effects Post Covid Vaccination
https://react19.org/science
Covid-19 Vaccine Pharmacovigilance Report
https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/resources/covid-19-vaccine-pharmacovigilance-report/
More Than 1,000 Peer Reviewed Articles On COVID Vaccine Injuries
https://community.covidvaccineinjuries.com/compilation-peer-reviewed-medical-papers-of-covid-vaccine-injuries/
COVID-19 Vaccination Stories, Side Effects & Healing
https://sunfellow.com/covid-19-vaccination-stories-side-effects-healing/
COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Event Tracking System (VAERS)
https://sunfellow.com/covid-19-vaers/
COVID-19 Vaccine Bad Batches Reference Page
https://sunfellow.com/100-of-covid-19-vaccine-deaths-were-caused-by-just-5-of-the-batches/
Increasing Death Rates, Plummeting Birth Rates, Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS)
https://sunfellow.com/increasing-death-rates-plummeting-birth-rates-sudden-adult-death-syndrome-sads/
COVID-19 & Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE)
https://sunfellow.com/covid-19-antibody-dependent-enhancement-ade/
Covid-19 – Vaccine-Induced T Cell Suppression, Virus Activation, Cancer, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s
https://sunfellow.com/bhakdi-burkhardt-cole-hoffe/
COVID-19 Menstrual & Breast Milk Disruptions, Miscarriages, Infertility, Transmission (Shedding)
https://sunfellow.com/covid-19-menstrual-breast-milk-disruptions-miscarriages-infertility-transmission-shedding/
COVID-19 Psychosis
https://www.sunfellow.com/covid-19-psychosis/
COVID-19 - Mystery Clots In Vaccinated Deceased People
https://sunfellow.com/covid19-blood-clots-in-vaccinated-dead-people/
Has Our Blood Supply Been Contaminated By Vaccinated, Genetically-Modified Blood?
https://www.sunfellow.com/has-our-blood-supply-been-contaminated-by-vaccinated-genetically-modified-blood/
COVID-19 Healing Resources
https://sunfellow.com/covid-19-healing-resources/
255
views
2
comments