ConstitutionalConventions

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca scource https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zA7AIiJp-_4

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.caSo I got a, how to just to kind of reopen that. You can just simply claim that they're in breach because they are for. I said, You know, you could claim breach to open the file again, like breach of, their obligations because they're forcing you to associate as the tenant. And then you just disclaim that title, the tenant. Yeah, it's come to my attention. It's Yeah, yeah, it's come to my attention that there's a breach and we're gonna go ahead and reopen this case because somebody's forcing me to associate as a tenant. He's a tenant right now and he's being forced to be a tenant because the queen has the property and he's the trustee. It's in the enactments that he is a tenant and he's being forced to be a tenant. Monday morning, just call down to the courthouse, speak with the clerk. Just say hey it's come to my attention that there's a breach of obligation here Somebody's associating aiding? me as a tenant which is a violation. The breach of your guys's duty. The separation of power now. Yeah, and you want to reopen the file to answer into evidence.

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca Before the event: 1- Have several supporter with you. 2- Obtain knowledge of the laws that govern the eviction process. 3- Make sure everyone IS at the location before the law enforcers 4- Every one know their role, have recording material like paper and pen, video and sound recording equipment etc 5- Rehearse eviction simulation and roles everyone is expected to play. 6- Learn asking pertinent questions rather than making statement and claims. 7- Stay as polite and composed as possible (no disrespect, anger, load voice etc,) with everyone involved specially the Law enforcers, LE. 8- Be well prepared documenting/recording/ taking notes as soon as LEs arrive. 9- Prepare several copies of SCQ. https://takeactioncanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Public-Servants-Questionnaire_v1.pdf At the time of encounter: a. Only one individual interacts with LEs. Preferably the individual subject to eviction, or who can Handel the encounter. b. Meet and interact with them out side of your property, rather than allowing the to come in. c. Inform them they may be trespassing, if you have NT sign on the property. d. Avoid emotion and fear. e. Get LEs, and anyone with them, for complete the CSQ. f. Be assertive examining the legal documents, including court order, for authenticity and lawfulness. Accept NO PHOTOCOPY or documents without signature of the author. g. Avoid being involved in physical interactions. h. Do not abandon your property voluntarily. i. Fully document the event and compare notes. Read information and suggestions provided by experts such as: https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/fighting-your-foreclosure-in-court.html Learn the legal process and ALL steps that needs be satisfied for eviction to be lawful. Above link can be a useful source. Fighting Your Foreclosure in Court How difficult it is to challenge a foreclosure depends greatly on what type of foreclosure you're facing: judicial or nonjudicial. It's easier and less expensive to jump into an existing lawsuit with a judicial foreclosure than it is to challenge a nonjudicial foreclosure. If your foreclosure is nonjudicial, which means it proceeds outside the court system, you'll have to file a lawsuit to challenge the process. Summary of How to Fight a Foreclosure in Court While every foreclosure case is unique and different states have their own procedures, here's a summary of how you might go about challenging each type of foreclosure, with more details on the procedures below. Judicial Foreclosure To contest a judicial foreclosure, you have to file a written answer to the complaint (the lawsuit). You'll need to present your defenses and explain the reasons why the lender shouldn't be able to foreclose. You might need to defend yourself against a motion for summary judgment and at trial. If you have strong evidence that the lender or servicer made an error in the foreclosure procedures, like by failing to send you a breach letter, initiating the foreclosure too soon, or not following state foreclosure procedures, you might be able to force it to start the foreclosure over. Or you might get enough leverage to work out a way to save your home, like with a loan modification. Nonjudicial Foreclosures With a nonjudicial foreclosure, the process happens outside of a court's supervision, so you'll have to file a lawsuit to get a judge's attention. And you'll have the burden of proof because you want the judge to stop a proceeding (the foreclosure) that's already authorized by the mortgage or deed of trust you signed with you took out the loan. How to Fight a Judicial Foreclosure In a judicial foreclosure, the foreclosing party (the "lender") must file a lawsuit to get the foreclosure started. You'll be notified of the foreclosure case when papers called a summons and complaint (or petition) are delivered to (served on) you. The documents will advise you of the lawsuit and give you a limited amount of time to respond if you choose to contest it. And, significantly, the lender will have the burden of proving to the judge that the foreclosure is justified under the mortgage terms. What Proof Will the Lender Provide? The proof will typically consist of the documents you signed when taking out or refinancing your loan, like a mortgage (or deed of trust) and a promissory note. The paperwork might also include: copies of notices the servicer sent to you signed agreements assignments and endorsements internal accountings of payments both made and missed, and written statements under oath—called "declarations" or, if sworn before a notary public, "affidavits"—from lender employees or servicer who claim to have knowledge of how many payments you missed and the lender's compliance with your state's laws regarding foreclosure procedures. Generally, if you don't point out errors or omissions in the paperwork or procedures, the court will accept them as sufficient evidence, award the lender a default judgment, and order a foreclosure sale. Filing an Answer to the Lawsuit If you decide to respond to the suit, you can tell a judge why you think the foreclosure isn't warranted. You must present your objections to the foreclosure by filing an "answer" with the court by a specific deadline. What's an "Answer" in a Lawsuit? If you want to respond to the suit, an answer is the document that you file with the court and serve to the other parties in the case. Your answer tells the court your side of the story. The deadline is usually between 20 and 30 days after service, though it varies. Check the summons you received along with the complaint to find out how much time you have to file an answer in your case. You must prepare your answer in the proper format, including responses to each of the claims made by the lender and any defenses you might have. For each numbered paragraph in the complaint, you should admit, deny, or say you don't have sufficient information to admit or deny (and so you deny) the allegations contained in that particular paragraph. You may also ask that the lender prove its claims, like how many payments it says you've missed and the fees it claims you owe. Be aware that if you admit an allegation, the lender doesn't have to prove it. (Denying something that a complaint says doesn't necessarily mean you're saying it didn't happen. Instead, you're saying that the lender must prove it. Sometimes, it's a good idea to deny a "fact" that seems correct, usually because you might be able to make a legal argument about the way the fact is stated.) You'll also need to raise any defenses and affirmative defenses in your answer, such as the lender doesn't have the right to foreclose (called "standing"), as well as any counterclaims, like the servicer violated federal mortgage servicing laws, if applicable. Why You Might Want to File an Answer If you don't file an answer by the deadline, the lender's attorney will likely ask for a default judgment. To get the court to set aside (annul) a default judgment, you'd have to file a motion and show good cause for not filing an answer. Getting a court to set aside a default judgment is very difficult. In addition, if you don't file an answer, you aren't entitled to get notifications about what's happening in your foreclosure case. The court may proceed with the foreclosure without your involvement or notifying you about the proceedings. You also will likely lose the right to assert any defenses you could have against the foreclosure. If you don't include particular defenses or counterclaims in an answer, you might not be able to bring them up later on in the foreclosure. Of course, you shouldn't file a frivolous answer. Otherwise, you might get stuck paying the costs and expenses of the opposing parties, including their attorneys' fees. What Happens After You File an Answer: The Lender Might Ask for Summary Judgment The lender might then file a summary judgment motion, asking the judge to decide the case without a trial. You get the right to oppose the motion by submitting your arguments and evidence in a response to the motion. You need to serve your response to the other parties, and the court may then hold a hearing. If the court determines that you don't have evidence supporting a defense, the lender will win the motion, get a judgment of foreclosure, and be able to go forward with a foreclosure sale. If the judge denies the lender's motion, the court will allow the case to proceed to trial. Discovery Before the trial, "discovery" will take place. This process is when you and the lender ask each other for facts, documents, and other information before the trial. In a foreclosure, each side may ask the other to provide certain information (through a demand for the production of documents, interrogatories, and depositions) that might help prove or disprove the right to foreclose. Borrowers sometimes make discovery demands in their answer or when opposing a motion for summary judgment on the basis that discovery is necessary to expose specific facts about the case or facts that the lender claims are true. But you'll have to show that discovery might lead to relevant evidence or that the facts you need to justify your opposition to the foreclosure are exclusively within the lender's knowledge and control. Otherwise, the court might go ahead and grant summary judgment. Handling a Trial At the trial, the lender must try to prove it has the right to foreclose. Then, you must show that the lender shouldn't be permitted to foreclose. You'll both present your cases, sometimes through witnesses who can be questioned by the judge and cross-examined by the other side. For example, if you and the lender disagree about how many payments you've missed, both you and a representative who works for the loan servicer would testify, and the judge would decide which of you is most likely telling the truth. At the end of the trial, the judge will either: order the foreclosure to go ahead and, in many states, set the sale date, or dismiss the case, probably "without prejudice," which means the lender can still foreclose, but it has to start the process over. Strict Foreclosure: Only in Vermont and Connecticut In a strict foreclosure in Vermont or Connecticut, a judge who approves the foreclosure can order ownership (title) of the home to be transferred to the lender then and there, without holding a foreclosure sale. How to Fight a Nonjudicial Foreclosure in Court Because nonjudicial foreclosures proceed outside of court, you'll have to file a suit in court to get a judge to review the matter. And you'll have the burden of proof because you want the judge to stop a proceeding (the foreclosure) that's already authorized by the mortgage contract. You'll need to include a motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) and preliminary injunction to enjoin (stop) a foreclosure sale while your claims are being litigated. Usually, homeowners also ask the court for a permanent injunction. Asking for a Temporary Restraining Order In your application for a TRO, you'll have to show the judge that you'll suffer "irreparable injury" if the foreclosure happens. Courts often agree that losing your property to foreclosure causes irreparable harm. Courts sometimes grant TROs without a formal notice or hearing, so the lender might not have much time to respond. The judge will probably grant the TRO if the lender doesn't respond to your motion. However, you might have to post a bond to protect the lender from economic harm if you eventually lose the case. A bond could be expensive, but you might, in some circumstances, get the bond requirement waived, like if you don't have much income or if the court decides that the lender's interest is adequately protected. Some courts have said that bonds aren't required in foreclosures, especially in cases where the property value exceeds the amount the borrower owes, because the lender has a secured interest in the property and can eventually foreclose if the borrower loses the case. Or, you could suggest paying the bond by making payments, such as at your regular monthly mortgage payment amount or in an amount that would offset any expense the lender might incur during the process, or in a minimal (de minimus) amount. A temporary restraining order usually lasts until a court hearing in which you'll try to get a preliminary injunction stopping the foreclosure pending a full trial. Preliminary Injunction The court will review each party's documents at the preliminary injunction hearing. (The documents are usually the same type of paperwork that's used in judicial foreclosures.) You'll have to prove your case, like by showing that the lender didn't follow state or federal foreclosure laws or the terms of the deed of trust. You'll have to convince the judge at this preliminary injunction stage that the foreclosure should be put on hold until you can produce your full case at trial. You might use declarations or affidavits from you and other witnesses to establish the facts you believe should stop the foreclosure. At this hearing, the court must look at whether: you're likely to win at trial, and the injury that you would suffer from the foreclosure outweighs the injury that the lender is suffering by not getting paid. If the judge decides for the lender, the TRO will end, and the court will deny your motion for a preliminary injunction. While you can still proceed with your lawsuit, the foreclosure will likely go ahead because an injunction isn't in place to prevent it. While it's a long shot, you might be able to ask a higher court to overrule the denial. But if you're able to convince the judge to halt the foreclosure until you can present your full case at trial, the judge will issue a preliminary injunction. The lender might then try to settle with you, give up on the current foreclosure and start over, or meet any conditions the court sets and then ask the court to lift the injunction. Otherwise, you'll go to trial. The preliminary injunction enjoins the foreclosure pending the trial. When It Might Be Worth Fighting Your Foreclosure If it's clear that the lender failed to follow the law and, as a result, you were deprived of an important right, it might be worth it to fight the foreclosure in court. After all, if you could get the foreclosure dismissed or significantly delayed, you might be able to stay in your house much longer than you would otherwise. Or you might gain leverage that could help you in working out a way to keep it. You might have a decent shot at stopping or at least delaying a foreclosure if you have a strong defense, for example: the lender started the foreclosure based on false information, like if your payments were credited to the wrong party and you were never behind, or the servicer substantially overstated the amount you had to pay to reinstate your mortgage, depriving you of your reinstatement rights under state law, or you can prove that the lender didn't follow state requirements for a foreclosure, like by failing to properly send you a notice of intent to foreclose, if required in your state, or it violated federal mortgage servicing laws. Sometimes, though, filing an answer in a judicial foreclosure or starting a suit to fight a nonjudicial foreclosure isn't the best option. Say you're facing a judicial foreclosure and you have an argument that requires you to file another type of pleading to preserve your rights. Filing an incorrect response might cause you to lose an important right. For instance, if the lender made an error, like failing to properly serve you with the foreclosure lawsuit, you can dispute the court's jurisdiction by filing a motion to dismiss. If you win, the foreclosure has to start over. But if you file an answer, you likely stipulate (agree) that the court has the right to hear the case, and the foreclosure goes ahead. Litigation is complicated, and most people fare better after getting help from an attorney

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca You are not a person, or part of the body corporate. The Government tells you that it isn't you in their Acts and Statutes. Stan McDonald joins me to explains to why. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZXE7Iz0lxY

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca

Zoom.Meeting ID: 925 900 8609Passcode: 547803 ZOOM MEETING INFO: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/9259008609?pwd=WUFXQnVSZUtrMkxrRWVQWUlRS05JZz09 Meeting ID: 925 900 8609 Passcode: 547803

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca https://rumble.com/v4pb34l-the-destruction-of-the-world.html?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=sovereignsoul23

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca https://historylessonsdeleted.blogspot.com/2024/04/more-victories-for-rule-of-law-page.html

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca No Oaths of Office in the Federal Government Enemies destroying US government from within READ IN APP On January 10th of 1963, forty-five current communist goals were submitted to the Congressional record. Number thirteen was, “Do away with loyalty oaths.” Sixty years later on the very same day, Biden, Obrador, and Trudeau met in Mexico City for the Declaration of North America which states a plan to unify North America under the ideas of diversity, climate change, migration, health, and regional security. The beginnings of a North American Union, which is a step towards a one world government. According to law, elected officials must swear an oath that they will support, defend, and bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. And through the Freedom of Information Act, US attorney Todd Callender, along with his team at Project Proper Oath, found that not a single member of the existing cabinet has a valid oath of office. US Secretary of the Treasury, Janet Yellen, has no oath of office. US Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin, has no oath of office, and has also failed to register as a foreign agent, which is required due to serving on the boards and conducting international business with Raytheon, Nucor, and Tenet Healthcare. US Attorney General, Merrick Garland, has no oath of office. US Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, has no oath of office. US Secretary of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, has no oath of office. US Secretary of Transportation, Pete Buttigieg, has no oath of office. US Secretary of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, responsible for declaring a national emergency during COVID, has no oath of office. Former director of the Centers for Disease Control, Rochelle Walensky, had no oath of office. US special counsel, Jack Smith, responsible for investigating the January 6th U.S. Capitol attack, has no oath of office. US Attorney for the District of Columbia, Matthew Graves, chief prosecutor of Jan-sixers, has no oath of office. Vice President of the United States, Kamala Harris, has no oath of office. Within 30 days of appointment to public office, all public officials are legally required to have a signed and notarized copy of their oath of office. And it appears as if no elected officials in the Federal government have one. They are either non-existent, incomplete, or fraudulent. The fraudulent ones are missing signatures, are not notarized, and in most of them, the words “SO HELP ME GOD” are in all caps. In the US Constitution, “So help me God” is not in all caps. And this matters. As many have been telling us for decades, including the great Jordan Maxwell. "Today, the entire world of mankind operates under a world law which is referred to as the law of the high seas or, International Maritime Admiralty. When you were born, you came out of your mother's water. Since you came out of your mother's water, you are a maritime product. This is why, when you were born, the doc (dock) has to sign your birth (berth) certificate. It’s a maritime Admiralty manifest showing that your mother brought you into the world and you are going to make money. Anything in this country, if it's a lawful legal document of any kind, your name must be, according to maritime law, be in all capital letters. Why? Because you do not own your body. You do not own yourself. All capital letters name implies that you are a maritime admiralty product. You are not a human. You're not a living entity. You're a product. Your living entity person, the actual you, is represented under law by upper and lower case name. So you are a corporation, whether you know it or not. But you are merely a subsidiary of a larger corporation called UNITED STATES. This is the way the law works." ~ Jordan Maxwell

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca McIver has said the city was being governed in an improper, irregular and improvident manner. He has ordered a financial inspection of the city’s books and the city is currently being run by an interim administrator. The dismissed mayor and councillor allege the province began investigating their council after they found irregular spending patterns in Chestermere’s books. They also say city staff deleted emails and weren’t forthcoming with requested information. They are now seeking to have the case heard by the court.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAinN_lolDM

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.caSubscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca Notice of Claim for Settlement and Instruction for Payment Lawfully Established Duties and Rights of the Human Being 1. (1) Whereas I **name** born a free human being recognize that the Governor General of Canada and the Lieutenant Governor of Ontario have received my notarized “Notice of Understanding and Claim of Recognition” on April 3, 2018, proof of receipt is attached to this declaration, do declare the following in order for appropriations to be made from the Consolidated Revenue Fund. (2) Refer to the attached Notarized document “Notice of Understanding and Claim of Recognition” on April 3, 2018 Article 36 “Rights and Entitlements Back to My Control”. 2. Whereas I recognize that an appropriation means any authority, any law, which permits Parliament to pay money out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund. Financial Administration Act Interpretation Definitions 2 In this Act appropriation means any authority of Parliament to pay money out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund; 3. Whereas I recognize that in order to have access to this fund there has to be an operation of law that produces the right or obligation to access this fund. Any claim made against this fund must be backed by an operation of law that is recognized by the state party. 4. Whereas I recognize that the International Covenants working with the domestic law of the Constitution Act of Canada grants us, as human beings, the right of the security of our person and our right to enjoy a living and that the state party is under obligation to secure an adequate living on our behalf. Constitution Act, 1982 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Legal Rights Life, liberty and security of person 7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. Other rights and freedoms not affected by Charter 26. The guarantee in this Charter of certain rights and freedoms shall not be construed as denying the existence of any other rights or freedoms that exist in Canada. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Preamble Recognizing that, in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the ideal of free human beings enjoying freedom from fear and want can only be achieved if conditions are created whereby everyone may enjoy his economic, social and cultural rights, as well as his civil and political rights, 5. Whereas I recognize the State Party Canada, signatory to the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the Canadian Constitution 1982, has an obligation, a security, a guarantee by Surety for the human being to enjoy, unprescribed, his living and enjoy his fundamental rights and freedoms. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Civil Rights Article 11.1 The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to an adequate standard of living for himself and his family, including adequate food, clothing and housing, and to the continuous improvement of living conditions. The States Parties will take appropriate steps to ensure the realization of this right, recognizing to this effect the essential importance of international cooperation based on free consent. Blacks Law Dictionary 9th Ed. Surety A person who is primarily liable for paying another's debt or performing another’s obligation…..In other words, the term surety includes anyone who is bound on an obligation which, as between himself and another person who is bound to the obligee for the same performance, the latter obligor should discharge. In this sense, suretyship includes all accessorial obligations. 6. Whereas I recognize that State Party Canada has an obligation to preserve the right stated in article 5 of this Notice of Claim, and to educate and strengthen the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Civil Rights Article 13.1 The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to education. They agree that education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and the sense of its dignity, and shall strengthen the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. They further agree that education shall enable all persons to participate effectively in a free society, promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations and all racial, ethnic or religious groups, and further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace. 7. Whereas I recognize that payments are Subject to the Constitution Acts 1867 to 1982 and must be found in the authority of Parliament enactments, contracts, undertakings, regulations. Financial Administration Act PART III Public Disbursements Payments out of C.R.F. 26 Subject to the Constitution Acts, 1867 to 1982, no payments shall be made out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund without the authority of Parliament. Payment of guarantee 29 (1) Where a guarantee has been given under the authority of Parliament by or on behalf of Her Majesty for the payment of any debt or obligation, any amount required to be paid by the terms of the guarantee may, subject to the Act authorizing the guarantee, be paid out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund 8. Whereas I recognize that the minister, who is the head of the department, has the right to make discharge or requisition off of the consolidated revenue fund fulfilling the Financial Administration Act Article 26 which can only come from an enactment or regulation. Financial Administration Act PART III Public Disbursements Requisitions 33 (1) No charge shall be made against an appropriation except on the requisition of the appropriate Minister of the department for which the appropriation was made or of a person authorized in writing by that Minister. 9. Whereas I recognize that there is another authority, another operation of law, which has another way to access the consolidated revenue fund which is called an instruction for payment. Financial Administration Act PART III Public Disbursements Definition of instruction for payment 35 (1) In this section and section 36, instruction for payment means an instrument or other instruction for the payment of money, but does not include a requisition under section 33. Form of payments out of C.R.F. (2) Every payment out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund shall be made under the direction and control of the Receiver General by the issuance of an instruction for payment, in such form and authenticated in such manner as the Treasury Board may direct. 10. Whereas I recognize that an instruction for payment has no obligation or type of form or documentation to be sent and that I claim that this document is an “instruction for payment” out of the consolidated revenue fund on behalf of our fundamental human right and freedoms, more specifically on behalf of my adequate living, the security of the person, the person authorized, the human being, to make a claim for settlement.. Financial Administration Act PART III Public Disbursements Claim for Settlement 35 (3) An amount set out in an instruction for payment issued under subsection (2), less any amount charged back as a result of a reconciliation pursuant to section 36, may be paid out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund where (a) a claim for settlement of the amount is made by a member of the Canadian Payments Association or by a person authorized by the Receiver General to make a claim for settlement; and (b) the claim is made in the prescribed manner and is accompanied by the prescribed evidence 11. Whereas I recognize that the Receiver General is to examine and reconcile this claim of our fundamental rights as a human being to the security of the person as enumerated in international and domestic laws. Financial Administration Act PART III Public Disbursements Reconciliation of claim with evidence and instruction for payment 36 (1) Where a payment out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund is made in respect of a claim for settlement, the Receiver General shall examine the claim and make a reconciliation between the claim and (a) the supporting evidence; and (b) the instruction for payment to which the claim relates. 12. Whereas I recognize that the Financial Administration Act identifies that a human identified as a person or Corporation, has the capacity of a “natural person”. Financial Administration Act Incorporation by Letters Patent Capacity of a natural person (5) The corporation has, subject to its letters patent and this Act, the capacity of a natural person. Black’s Law 4th ed. INDIVIDUAL. As a noun, this term denotes a single person as distinguished from a group or class, and also, very commonly, a private or natural person as distinguished from a partnership, corporation, or association; The Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law: "natural person” A human being as distinguished from person (as a corporation) created by operation of law. 13. I understand and claim that the bank has breached it’s contractual agreements as per Consumer Notes Ontario http://canlii.org/en/on/laws/stat/so-2002-c-30-sch-a/latest/so-2002-c-30- Financial Institutions Canada Guideline Capital Adequacy Requirements Borrowing Multiple total borrowings should be no greater than 20 times capital, although this multiple can be exceeded with the Superintendent’s prior approval to an amount no greater than 23 times. Requirements for future performance agreements 22. Every future performance agreement shall be in writing, shall be delivered to the consumer and shall be made in accordance with the prescribed requirements . 2002, c. 30, Sched. A, s. 22. Representations 77. No lender shall make representations or cause representations to be made with respect to a credit agreement, whether orally, in writing or in any other form, unless the representations comply with the prescribed requirements. 2002, c. 30, Sched. A, s. 77. 14. Whereas I understand and claim that the bank has made false representations, did not meet prescriptive law and thereby breached its contractual agreements as per Bill of Exchange Act. Every contract signed or engaged upon for the lending or advancing of money or other valuable security is considered a consumer note. This consumer note must be clearly indicated upon it that its creation was for a consumer purchase. Every consumer bill or consumer note shall be prominently and legibly marked on its face with the words “ Purchase ” 15. Whereas I understand and claim that the Bills of Exchange Act governs consumer notes and that a “Note” or Consumer Note means promissory note. Bills of exchange act Consumer Bill Consumer Note 189(2) A consumer note is a promissory note ( a ) issued in respect of a consumer purchase; and ( b ) on which the purchaser or any one signing to accommodate him is liable as a party. 189 (3) Without limiting or restricting the circumstances in which , for the purposes of this Part, a bill of exchange or a promissory note shall be considered to be issued in respect of a consumer purchase , a bill of exchange or a promissory note shall be conclusively presumed to be so issued if ( a ) the consideration for its issue was the lending or advancing of money or other valuable security by a person other than the seller, in order to enable the purchaser to make the consumer purchase ; and 190. (1) Every consumer bill or consumer note shall be prominently and legibly marked on its face with the words “ Purchase ” before or at the time when the instrument is signed by the purchaser or by any person signing to accommodate the purchaser . 190. (2) Effect where not marked Bills of exchange article 190 (2) A consumer bill or consumer note that is not marked as required by this section is void , except in the hands of a holder in due course without notice that the bill or note is a consumer bill or consumer note or except as against a drawee without that notice. 16. Whereas I understand and claim that The obligation to pay this consumer note is void by the writer notifying the Holder of the note since the consumer note is not marked properly with the indication “consumer purchase”. 17. Whereas I **Name** Rescind this Agreement as and am entitled to remedy and including damages. Rescinding agreement 18. (1) Any agreement, whether written, oral or implied, entered into by while a person has engaged in an unfair practice may be rescinded by the consumer and the consumer is entitled to any remedy that is available in law, including damages. 2002, c.30, Sched. A, s. 18 (1). Form of notice (4) The consumer may express notice in any way as long as it indicates the intention of the consumer to rescind the agreement or to seek recovery where rescission is not possible and the reasons for so doing and the notice meets any requirements that may be prescribed. 2002, c. 30, Sched. A, s. 18 (4). Effect of rescission (14) When a consumer rescinds an agreement under subsection (1), such rescission operates to cancel, as if they never existed, (a) the agreement ; (b) all related agreements; (c) all guarantees given in respect of money payable under the agreement; (d) all security given by the consumer or a guarantor in respect of money payable under the agreement; and (e) all credit agreements, as defined in Part VII, and other payment instruments, including promissory notes, (i) extended, arranged or facilitated by the person with whom the consumer reached the agreement, or (ii) otherwise related to the agreement. 2002, c. 30, Sched. A, s. 18 (14). Waiver of notice (15) If a consumer is required to give notice under this Part in order to obtain a remedy , a court may disregard the requirement to give the notice or any requirement relating to the notice if it is in the interest of justice to do so. 2002, c. 30, Sched. A, s. 18 (15); 2008, c. 9, s. 79 18. Whereas I understand and claim that The obligation to pay this consumer note is void by the writer notifying the Holder of the note since the consumer note is not marked properly with the indication “consumer purchase” and for not disclosing in writing to the consumer all future performances. 19. Whereas I claim the following to be settled; a) Mastercard xxxxxxxxxxx in the amount of $xx,xxx.xx Cdn b) Payment to be deposited into Transit# xxxxx Institution# xxx Account# xxxxxxx **bank address** ** ** ** ** This is my declaration. Autograph - **name** non assumpsit - without prejudice human being with intrinsic, unalienable right