CitizenMediaNews

An interview on the "Indivisible with John Stubbins" show featuring Sandy Smith, a congressional candidate from North Carolina's District 1. The conversation covers redistricting, Smith's political movement, her opponent, and critical issues like the military, the southern border, school choice, the economy, and her pro-life stance. Sandy Smith discusses the uncertainty around redistricting, emphasizing the grassroots movement she has built in the heavily Democrat district. She highlights her achievements and challenges during previous elections, including strong opposition from Nancy Pelosi. Smith criticizes her opponent, Don Davis, as a "rubber stamp" for Nancy Pelosi and advocates for a focus on military readiness, border security, and school choice. The interview touches on various issues, emphasizing the need to address woke training in the military, secure the southern border, implement school choice, and revive the economy. Sandy Smith expresses strong pro-life views and calls for a return to focusing on core military training rather than woke ideologies.

In a recent episode of "Indivisible with John Stubbins," Boone Cutler, co-author of the "Citizen's Guide to Fifth Generation Warfare," joined the show to discuss the book and its relevance in today's socio-political landscape. Cutler, a self-proclaimed American patriot and veteran, shared insights into the challenges faced by veterans and the need for increased awareness and preparedness. Reflecting on the state of the veteran community post-Iraq and Afghanistan, he emphasized the importance of mutual support and camaraderie. The book, co-authored with General Michael Flynn, addresses the confusion prevalent among citizens regarding the forces influencing societal narratives. Cutler highlighted the necessity of understanding fifth-generation warfare involving AI-driven psychological programming. He stressed that this form of warfare isn't confined to physical combat but extends to the psychological realm, affecting individuals daily. The conversation delved into the global impact of fifth-generation warfare, drawing parallels between various nations, including the U.S., Canada, Australia, and the UK. Cutler and Stubbins expressed concerns about the potential consequences of unchecked influences, mainly through AI-driven psychological operations. Cutler emphasized the need for citizens to be disciplined in understanding the operational environment. He argued that awareness and education are crucial in countering the effects of psychological manipulation and maintaining a united front against divisive tactics. The discussion expanded to include topics like the border situation, the importance of a robust military, and the need to address criminal behavior without excuses. Cutler advocated for accountability at both individual and societal levels. The interview also touched upon Cutler's previous work, "Call Sign Voodoo," providing a soldier's perspective on psychological operations during the Iraq War. Cutler shared insights into the effectiveness of psychological operations in empowering individuals and discussed the parallels between those experiences and current societal challenges. As the conversation concluded, Cutler urged citizens to be vigilant, reject learned helplessness, and actively understand and counter the impact of fifth-generation warfare.

In an exclusive interview on "Indivisible with John Stubbins," conservative speaker and author Chris Weidner revealed the launch of a groundbreaking initiative aimed at fostering collaboration among like-minded professionals. Weidner, a member of the Motivational Speakers Hall of Fame and co-founder of The Red Referral Network, joined the show to discuss the platform's mission and its potential impact on conservative communities. The Red Referral Network, co-founded with Dinesh D’Souza, introduces a novel approach to business networking, drawing inspiration from established models like Business Networking International (BNI). Weidner emphasized the need for conservatives to support each other economically, expressing concern about funding individuals or businesses that may hold opposing political views. The platform aims to facilitate weekly in-person meetings across various cities, fostering connections and business referrals exclusively within the conservative community. One key feature of the network is its focus on addressing the challenges faced by conservatives in an increasingly polarized society. Weidner highlighted the sense of persecution conservatives often experience and emphasized the importance of weekly gatherings to provide mutual encouragement. Additionally, the Red Referral Network plans to offer exclusive content created by Dinesh D’Souza for its members, further enhancing the platform's value. The idea originated from Weidner's desire to improve upon existing networking models, particularly BNI, by creating small groups nationwide. With the Republican Party not actively pursuing such initiatives, Weidner and D’Souza took it upon themselves to build a platform that goes beyond business referrals, incorporating a sense of community and shared values.

In a recent episode of "Indivisible with John Stubbins," Brother Jaeson Jones, Chief Correspondent at Newsmax stationed at the southern border, has provided a startling update on the escalating crisis. The conversation delved into the severe consequences of a surge surpassing previous border crisis definitions. Jones disclosed critical information from a law enforcement-sensitive report indicating that 82,000 people crossed through the Darien gap in August alone. The influx of 175,000 Venezuelans in the last ten months is of particular concern. He stressed that the situation has evolved into a global problem, with individuals from over 163 countries flowing through the Darien gap, debunking the notion of adequate vetting. The interview shed light on the brazenness of cartels, which now engage in open activities, including gun battles involving heavy weaponry. Jones emphasized the distressing lack of background information on migrants, highlighting the risk of unvetted individuals and potential security threats, such as the smuggling of dangerous items like fentanyl. The dire situation extends beyond migrants, impacting American citizens. The interview referenced a rancher who discovered 244 bodies on his property since the start of the Biden administration, situated 69 miles north of the border. Jones criticized the administration's handling of the crisis, accusing them of intentional negligence. He highlighted citizens' abandonment and the challenges law enforcement faced, echoing concerns about national security. As the crisis intensified, Jones concluded with a grim outlook, predicting no slowdown in the foreseeable future. The interview paints a bleak picture of the border situation, calling for urgent attention to the complex issues. In the second half of the show, conservative commentator Tiffany Savage, known by the pseudonym Politically Savvy, weighed in on the GOP leadership changes and emphasized the importance of grassroots involvement in local politics. The discussion began with the departure of Speaker McCarthy, a move that surprised many, especially considering his alignment with the America First movement. Tiffany Savage highlighted the disloyalty within the Democratic Party, pointing out that even those who collaborated with McCarthy in supporting funding to Ukraine turned against him when Matt Gates introduced the motion to vacate. Savage expressed concern about the chaotic image the Democrats want to project onto the Republican Party. She dismissed the idea of President Trump returning to the House leadership, citing his current legal challenges and the need to focus on his presidential campaign. Instead, she endorsed Steve Scalise, emphasizing his ability to unite the party and his commitment to constitutional principles. The conversation also touched on potential contenders like Byron Donald and Jim Jordan, with Savage ultimately advocating for grassroots involvement. She urged conservatives to become part of their local GOP, emphasizing the significance of state-level seats in safeguarding constitutional values. The call for local engagement extended beyond federal positions, encouraging participation in everything from judgeships to city councils. As the episode wrapped up, the discussion shifted towards the upcoming 2024 election, with Savage encouraging viewers to participate actively at the grassroots level. The conversation provided insights into the evolving dynamics within the GOP and underscored the importance of conservative involvement at all levels of government.

In a recent episode of "Indivisible with John Stubbins," the spotlight was on Set Apart Farms, featuring its owners, James and Angela Hollon. The couple, also partners in the show, discussed their mission to heal veterans and their families. The conversation emphasized the often-overlooked aspect of family support in the veteran healing process. Set Apart Farms, a faith-based organization, addresses the challenges faced by military and veteran families, drawing from the personal experiences of James and Angela. Angela, a veteran spouse, shared how their struggles led them to establish the organization, highlighting the lack of support systems for families navigating the complexities of the VA system. The couple recounted their journey, including a critical surgery that took years to secure but was ultimately botched, leading to a two-year battle with broken systems and insufficient communication. Their experience exposed the gaps in existing programs that primarily focused on the veteran, leaving families without proper resources for healing. James expressed frustration at the allocation of resources, drawing attention to the living conditions of some veteran families compared to detainees in Guantanamo Bay. The couple emphasized the need for comprehensive healing, criticizing clinical approaches often involving pharmaceuticals and excluding the family unit. Angela and James advocate for holistic, faith-based healing, incorporating mind, body, and soul approaches. They underscored the importance of including families in therapy and support programs, as opposed to isolating veterans, and highlighted the detrimental impact of the family unit's dissolution on veterans' well-being. The Hollons outlined Set Apart Farms' plans, including establishing a physical location for immersive, long-term healing experiences. The envisioned facility aims to provide an array of therapies, partnering with private sectors for music and art therapy and faith-based counseling, all customized to meet the diverse needs of individual families. The couple urged support for their cause through contributions and donations to Set Apart Farms, emphasizing the opportunity for individuals to make a tangible difference in the lives of veterans and their families.

Washington, D.C. - In an exclusive interview with Congressman Max Miller, held in the hallowed halls of the Capitol Longworth Building, Miller voiced his unequivocal support for Representative Jim Jordan as the next Speaker of the House. As the House Speaker hearings continue to gather momentum, Miller's endorsement highlights the debate surrounding conservative leadership within the Republican Party. The interview commenced with Miller addressing a recent statement by another member of Congress, expressing doubts about Jordan's ability to lead. Miller countered these reservations, citing Jordan's track record of serving Ohio and the country. He emphasized Jordan's instrumental role as Chairman of the Judiciary Committee and the Oversight Committee, praising his unwavering dedication to holding the Democrats accountable. One critical point of contention arose regarding the possibility of Scalise securing the nomination within the closed room. Miller confirmed that irrespective of the private selection process outcome, he would vote for Jim Jordan on the House floor. This unwavering support stems from Miller's deep-rooted trust and loyalty to Jordan, which he asserted cannot be bought. In response to a question about potential distrust in Scalise, Miller clarified that his endorsement of Jordan is not a reflection of distrust in Scalise but rather a testament to his longstanding relationship with Jordan. "I've known Jim for several years," Miller stated, underscoring the depth of their connection. Despite being pressed on his decision, Miller adamantly upheld his stance, asserting that he believed Jim Jordan was the right choice for the Speaker of the House role. He also pushed back against the notion that his endorsement was a dig at any other candidate, emphasizing that he seeks to promote better questions and thoughtful discourse in political discussions. The interview concluded with Miller's declaration that his support for Jordan is unwavering and not just a passing phase. He firmly believes that Jordan is the most qualified candidate for the role of Speaker of the House, and his trust and loyalty to Jordan will be reflected in his vote on the House floor. As the nation eagerly awaits the outcome of the Speaker of the House hearings, Congressman Max Miller's endorsement of Jim Jordan signifies the ongoing conservative leadership debates within the Republican Party. With Jordan's proven track record and Miller's strong support, the race for the Speaker's chair takes an intriguing turn.

In the midst of a highly anticipated speaker race within the Republican Party, Congressman Thomas Massie from Kentucky shares his insights and concerns about the selection process, funding plans, and the critical issues the party is grappling with. Citizen Media News feels it is essential to delve into the heart of these matters to understand the GOP's current dynamics. The speaker race, a competitive contest between Congressman Jim Jordan and Congressman Steve Scalise, underscores the division and complexities within the party. Congressman Massie highlights the need for clarity and a well-articulated plan for the next 75 days, stating that going into the race with a vague plan can be detrimental. He emphasizes the importance of knowing the plan before committing, underscoring that an unclear approach can ultimately lead to dissatisfaction among party members. The congressman revealed that he has requested Steve Scalise to present his plan for the next 75 days, which is crucial for resolving this internal struggle. He mentions the historical significance of the race, pointing out that this competitive scenario is different from traditional, uncontested appointments. The primary concern remains the lack of an articulated plan for the immediate future. While the speaker race is one of the central topics, Congressman Massie also addresses the release of the January 6th video footage and the situation of J6 prisoners. He indicates his involvement in releasing some of the video footage, demonstrating a commitment to transparency regarding the events of that fateful day. Additionally, he underscores his reluctance to support funding for Ukraine, aligning his stance with those skeptical about U.S. aid to the country. In the backdrop of the speaker race and these critical issues, the congressman raises essential questions about the party's direction and future. This candid and informative interview provides insight into the GOP's current dynamics and challenges, shedding light on the complex web of internal politics and external concerns.

Former Speaker McCarthy Lies to CMN at Capitol Press Conference

Crenshaw

In the heart of the Speaker of the House hearings at the Longworth Building, we conversed with New York Congressman George Santos. The dialogue offered insight into the next House Speaker's selection, key political landscape issues, and personal matters. The conversation began with Congressman Santos discussing the recent vote in the closed-door session. He noted that the vote count was 113 to 99, with eight members voting for an unspecified alternative and three abstaining. This outcome, that day, led to Congressman Steve Scalise being designated as the Speaker-elect. Santos highlighted the importance of party cohesion and unity when asked about his thoughts on this process. He emphasized that the party needed to work together as they moved towards the House floor vote. Shifting the conversation to a more local issue, the interviewer brought up the proposed Casino and Coliseum project on Long Island, to which Santos expressed his lack of support. He cited his opposition to the project, which he felt was inconsistent with supporting the casino development. The discussion took a historical turn as the interviewees reflected on the significance of the proposed casino location. The discussion described this area's historical importance, particularly in terms of aviation history and entertainment. It was where Charles Lindbergh took off and served as a backdrop for cultural and entertainment performances. The conversation then delved into the ongoing situation in Israel as Santos wore an Israeli flag pin. He expressed deep concern and described his efforts to assist constituents trapped in the conflict. He focused on facilitating their safe return to the United States, describing these efforts as tireless and relentless. Santos was asked about his legal situation and charges. Santos affirmed his intention to fight the charges, maintaining his innocence and expressing his determination to prove it in court. Regarding the Speaker selection, Santos confirmed his support for Jim Jordan, expressing respect for Scalise but raising concerns about his health and well-being. He voiced his wish for Scalise to prioritize his health and recuperation. They touched on the release of the January 6th video footage and the situation of J6 prisoners, Santos expressed the importance of transparency and accountability. He called for a full release of the footage and raised concerns about the conditions of detainees. The conversation concluded with some light-hearted banter about sports and team allegiances. Congressman Santos, a Patriots fan, discussed the current state of New York sports teams, expressing a sour outlook as a Mets fan. As the Speaker of the House selection process unfolds, and key issues continue to shape the political landscape, Congressman George Santos offered a candid and insightful perspective on these matters.

Amid the Speaker of the House hearings at the Longworth Building, we sat down with Michigan District 1 Congressman Jack Bergman, a retired US Marine Lieutenant General. Our conversation revolved around the expectations for the next Speaker of the House, particularly in relation to the release of information regarding the events of January 6th. Congressman Bergman took a cautious stance when asked whether he would call on the next Speaker to release information about January 6th. He emphasized his role as a representative of the people, acknowledging that he doesn't always agree with his constituents but is committed to representing their diverse opinions. In his view, the focus should be on more pressing matters that require immediate attention in his official capacity. He expressed concern about the confusion sown by the media and the state of Americans' First Amendment rights, which he believes are under threat. The conversation also touched on the recent controversies regarding election integrity, highlighting the significant divide in public opinion on the issue. The interview concluded with a reference to taxpayer dollars and the need for public officials to be accountable. While not providing a direct answer to the question posed, Congressman Bergman emphasized the complexity and importance of the issues currently facing the nation. As the Speaker of the House hearings progress, it remains to be seen how these concerns will influence the direction of the proceedings and the role of the next Speaker in addressing them.

During the recent Speaker of the House hearings held in the Longworth Building, Arkansas Congressman Bruce Westerman shared insights into the priorities and expectations of conservatives. The discussion began by addressing pressing matters that have piqued the interest of conservative readers. These include the release of videos related to the events of January 6th and concerns regarding prisoners' treatment. Congressman Westerman expressed a desire for greater transparency in releasing the videos, citing the undisclosed backlog of 41,000 hours. He emphasized the importance of holding the new Speaker accountable for these issues. Furthermore, the conversation shifted towards the topic of defunding Ukraine, another concern of interest to conservative readers. While acknowledging that electing a new Speaker is the immediate focus, Congressman Westerman stressed the need to engage in earnest discussions about Ukraine funding and accountability in due course. The interview also touched upon the recent events in Israel, underscoring the uncertainty of the situation and its potential consequences. Congressman Westerman acknowledged that the priorities of the American people encompass a wide range of issues, including rising fuel costs, inflation, economic challenges, national security, the situation in Afghanistan, and the release of Iranian funds. The Congressman highlighted the importance of a clear governance plan moving forward. While the election of a new Speaker is pivotal, he suggested that the focus should be on the strategies and plans to address pressing issues rather than individual personalities. Lastly, the idea of former President Donald Trump taking on the role of Speaker was briefly discussed, revealing the complexities and constitutional questions surrounding this prospect.

In the midst of the Speaker of the House hearings at the Longworth Building, we had a brief but insightful conversation with Florida Congressman Byron Donalds. The dialogue touched upon critical issues surrounding the selection of the next House Speaker and the proposed rule change requiring 217 votes for the selection. When questioned about his thoughts on the rule change requiring 217 votes, Congressman Donalds expressed support for the idea. He emphasized the importance of cohesive decision-making and the need to ensure unity within the party. Regarding his optimism about securing a Speaker by the week's end, Donalds expressed optimism, highlighting the path to this goal as gathering the necessary 217 votes. In a conversation that pivoted between potential Speaker candidates, Donalds pointed out the qualities he values in a Speaker. He believes that the next Speaker should be committed to conservative principles, bring a fresh perspective to leadership, and possess the ability to unify the entire conference. The discussion also delved into viewers' concerns, including the release of the January 6th tapes, the status of J-6 prisoners, the release of 41,000 hours of video, and the matter of Ukraine funding. Congressman Donalds expressed his support for releasing the January 6th tapes and the importance of accountability and transparency in Ukraine funding. When asked about the potential of Jim Jordan as Speaker, Congressman Donalds emphasized that it's not a matter of comparing individuals but rather looking toward the future. The transition from Kevin McCarthy to the next Speaker is about what's next and ensuring that the nomination serves the party's best interests. Congressman Donalds mentioned his vote would be for Jim Jordan but would support another choice if so chosen by the party. As the Speaker of the House hearings continue, the focus remains on the path to Speaker selection and the critical issues that require attention in the coming days.

Amidst the ongoing Speaker of the House hearings at the Longworth Building, we briefly talked with Guam Congressman James Moylan, delving into several significant topics, including releasing January 6th political prisoners, Ukraine funding, and First Amendment rights. When asked if he would call upon the next House Speaker to release the January 6th political prisoners, Congressman Moylan indicated that, at this point, his primary focus is on the selection of the House Speaker, emphasizing that this should be the immediate priority. The conversation then shifted to the issue of funding for Ukraine and whether the next Speaker would be called upon to address it. Moylan acknowledged this is a matter under consideration but stressed the necessity of electing a Speaker first to handle these issues effectively. The interview took a more solemn tone as Congressman Moylan was asked about the state of First Amendment rights and the situation at the federal courthouse, where protests seemingly resulted in severe prison sentences. He emphasized the importance of exercising free speech while adhering to the law. Despite the pressing concerns raised, some questions remained unanswered, leaving room for further exploration as the Speaker of the House hearings unfold. The selection of the next Speaker, the fate of political prisoners, and the issue of Ukraine funding will be integral to the discussions within the Longworth Building.

In a recent exclusive interview, Ivan Raiklin, known for his conservative stances, stood outside the congressional hearing room in the Longworth Building with Dana Milbank, who seriously referred to his own newspaper as the "Washington Compost." This candid conversation covered a range of topics, from the tragic events at the Capitol to the race for the next Speaker of the House, culminating in a call for former President Donald Trump to assume the role of Speaker. The interview commenced with a brief exchange on the event itself. Raiklin informed Milbank that it took place earlier that morning, October 10th, which coincided with what would have been Ashli Babbitt's 38th birthday. It was emphasized that her untimely demise marked the first and only murder in the history of the U.S. Capitol, setting the tone for an intense conversation. While initially intended to focus on the Speaker of the House race, the interview organically delved into the sensitive topic of Ashli Babbitt's death. Raiklin spoke passionately about Congress members who deemed her death a murder, highlighting that former Speaker Kevin McCarthy's refusal to use the term 'murder' contributed to his loss of the Speaker position. Despite moments of tension, the conversation provided an opportunity for Raiklin to articulate his views on the day's events and emphasize the significance of addressing this event, particularly within the context of the upcoming GOP presidential debate. Raiklin went on to propose a remarkable twist to the Speaker of the House race. He suggested that the next Speaker should embody specific qualities, including addressing concerns related to government agencies, particularly the FBI and DOJ. He questioned the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines and their connection to political influence. Most notably, Raiklin called for Trump to be elected Speaker of the House, suggesting a process in which members of Congress nominate Trump during the race and accumulate 150 votes to secure his victory. This unconventional proposition was presented as a mechanism for rectifying what Raiklin referred to as "Trump Derangement Syndrome" and addressing past government misconduct. The interview was punctuated with passionate dialogue, reinforcing the deep divisions and debates within conservative circles. Raiklin's unconventional proposal for Trump's role in the Speaker of the House race adds an intriguing layer to the ongoing political discourse. The conversation between Raiklin and Milbank was a window into the thoughts and opinions of one conservative voice, highlighting controversial issues, passionate beliefs, and a unique approach to the upcoming Speaker of the House race while being interviewed by a prominent D.C. journalist.

Ivan Raiklin takes time to explain the role of the House Administration office. Amidst growing questions about the J6 committee and its status with Republicans now in control of the House, an existing committee, the House Administration Committee, has taken center stage. The importance of this committee, along with its potential to address the aftermath of January 6th, was emphasized in a recent discussion led by an influential conservative figure. The relationship between the J6 committee and the House Administration Committee is rooted in the jurisdiction of committees in both the House and the Senate. The House Administration Committee comprises three subcommittees, one of which is the oversight subcommittee. This specific subcommittee holds the responsibility to oversee the Capitol Police Board, an essential entity involved in determining the restricted zone during the events of January 6th. The Capitol Police Board is significant for its role in establishing the restricted zone and supervising the Capitol Police. These law enforcement officials were responsible for the decision to criminalize 1,200 individuals in connection with the January 6th events. Crucially, the US Capitol Police own the CCTV footage related to that day, making them a central figure in understanding the events that transpired. Moreover, documents used to criminalize individuals, such as impact statements, were obtained from the Capitol Police. This House Administration Committee is one of two committees in Congress tasked with overseeing these crucial elements. Raiklin underscored the committee's significance by proposing that funding for the US Capitol Police should be contingent on meeting specific benchmarks. This included the release of 41,000 hours of CCTV footage and investigations into critical figures, including Nancy Pelosi, her daughter & her son-in-law, Yogananda Pittman, the former acting police chief, the current Capitol Police chief, the inspector general, the general counsel, and every individual within the Capitol Police. The committee's role, particularly the oversight subcommittee led by Congressman Barry Loudermilk, was deemed vital in pursuing the truth regarding the events of January 6th. The discussion also delved into the importance of investigating the "fedsurrection," which led to subpoenas and information requests to entities like the Metropolitan Police, Department of Justice (DOJ), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and others. This investigative approach was viewed as a critical step in unveiling the truth. The discussion underlined the House Administration Committee's pivotal role in addressing the post-January 6th landscape. Its jurisdiction over the Capitol Police and related documentation places it at the forefront of efforts to uncover what transpired on that fateful day. The conservative leader's remarks highlighted the importance of this committee and its potential to provide much-needed transparency and accountability in the aftermath of the January 6th events.

On Ashli Babbitt's birthday, a group of passionate conservative activists, led by former Trump advisor Ivan, gathered to address critical issues and underscored the urgent need for a strong Speaker of the House. The discussion, which took place on October 10th, touched on a range of pressing matters, including the economic influence of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), medical tyranny, Big Tech censorship, and the events of January 6th. Ivan Raiklin, a prominent figure in conservative circles, called for a Speaker of the House who would lead robust investigations into these issues. He highlighted the CCP's impact on the US economy, stressing the need to reject this influence and allocate significant funds to counter the Chinese threat. Medical tyranny and the consequences of unlawful mandates also featured prominently in the discussion. Ivan pointed out the lack of accountability for those responsible for imposing such mandates, including Acting Secretary Austin. Censorship, particularly by Big Tech companies, was another crucial concern. The activists insisted on severe consequences for individuals and organizations involved in censoring free speech, citing continued violations of the First Amendment. However, the primary focus of the gathering was on the events of January 6th. Ivan called for a comprehensive investigation into what transpired that day, including any potential cover-up. He emphasized the necessity of a Speaker of the House who would fearlessly challenge the deep state and hold those responsible accountable. Micki Witthoeft, the mother of Ashli Babbitt, who tragically lost her life during the events of January 6th, added her perspective to the discussion. She stressed the need for America-first candidates who prioritize the interests of American citizens over political maneuvering. Micki expressed her disappointment with the current state of Congress, where politicians often prioritize political games over addressing critical issues. The gathering also considered potential Speaker of the House candidates, including Kevin McCarthy, Steve Scalise, and Jim Jordan. Concerns were raised about their track records and whether they were the right individuals to lead the House during these challenging times. Ivan proposed a unique solution to address these issues, suggesting a Speaker who could appoint a House Sergeant at Arms with the authority to overhaul the Capitol Police and conduct a thorough investigation into the events of January 6th. He argued that this approach would provide the leverage needed to challenge the deep state and address pressing concerns. The discussion concluded with a call for active engagement from American citizens, encouraging them to educate themselves about these critical issues and demand accountability from their elected officials. The message was clear: the next Speaker of the House must prioritize the needs of the American people over political agendas and be willing to challenge the status quo to resolve pressing national concerns.

In a candid and revealing interview on ‘Indivisible with John Stubbins” Show, Lieutenant Colonel Allen West, a prominent conservative voice from Texas, shared his firsthand observations of the ongoing border crisis and his concerns about the broader implications for national security. LTC West delved into the pressing issues surrounding the U.S.-Mexico border, with West emphasizing the gravity of the situation. He began by addressing the rampant illegal activities on the border, including child trafficking and drug smuggling, explicitly highlighting the emergence of the so-called "zombie drug" phenomenon. West's experience on the ground in Kinney County, a strategically located region between Eagle Pass and Del Rio, provided valuable insights into the challenges faced by law enforcement and border security officials. He expressed his frustration at the federal government's response to the border crisis, emphasizing that the problem was not improving despite official reassurances to the contrary. High-speed chases, cartel operations on social media platforms, and young individuals from across the country participating in smuggling activities were among the concerning trends West mentioned during the interview. He underscored the severity of the crisis, emphasizing that the implications extended far beyond the border region, impacting communities nationwide. West called for a decisive response to the border crisis, proposing a military intervention to combat the well-organized and well-resourced cartel organizations. He argued that designating these cartels as foreign terrorists would enable the U.S. to target their assets and resources, sending a clear message that such activities would not be tolerated. Stubbins and West also discussed the need for strong leadership at the state level, particularly in Texas, where West emphasized the importance of governors and state governments taking action across the country to protect the nation’s borders when the federal government has failed to do so effectively. The conversation shifted to the upcoming GOP presidential debate, where West urged former President Donald Trump not to skip the debate, emphasizing the need for candidates to earn their rankings and maintain focus on critical national issues. West highlighted the importance of restoring economic, energy, national and domestic border security, along with safeguarding parental rights and educational freedom. He emphasized that these issues should be at the forefront of the political agenda in the lead-up to the next election. LTC West's insights provided a comprehensive overview of the border crisis and its impact on national security, leaving no doubt about the urgency of addressing the situation promptly.

Mindy Robinson Addresses Clark County Commissioners, Expressing Concerns Over Nevada's Election Integrity In a passionate address at a recent Clark County, Nevada County Commissioner meeting, political commentator and activist Mindy Robinson voiced her deep concerns about the state of Nevada's election integrity, stirring a heated debate within the community. Robinson began by asserting that Nevada's election had become a "catastrophe" that had left the state as the "laughing stock of the nation." She didn't mince words as she delved into what she saw as the systemic issues plaguing Nevada's elections. First, Robinson highlighted problems she believed should have triggered alarm bells long before the general election. She pointed out that Nevada's primary election had faced issues, with 40,000 people unable to vote due to problems with their ballots, which she attributed to DMV errors. She argued that this should have led to a redo of the primary election. Robinson also raised concerns about transparency in the election process. She accused Joe Gloria, an election official, of preventing people who weren't "progressive" from observing the polls, potentially allowing for foul play without proper oversight. She emphasized the lack of access to the adjudication room, where poll watchers could ensure that votes were accurately counted, as a significant problem. Furthermore, Robinson criticized the conditions at polling locations, describing people waiting outside in freezing, rainy weather during the election. She questioned why there were no better facilities provided for voters. Robinson didn't stop there. She questioned the election results, notably the victory of certain officials, including the Nevada Attorney General, whom she claimed was responsible for a crime wave. She also expressed skepticism about some members of the County Commission, alleging financial fraud and promoting controversial agendas. Robinson pointedly criticized the County Commission's decision to certify election results despite hours of testimony from voters who couldn't cast their ballots in the primary. She argued that the system's lack of accountability and transparency left the community powerless. In her closing remarks, Robinson lamented the challenges faced by the community in holding its officials accountable when they are responsible for investigating potential election fraud. She expressed her frustration at the lack of options for recourse and urged those in power to consider the consequences of their actions. Robinson's speech concluded with a stark warning, suggesting that if influential individuals took certain actions against her and others, the community's anger and frustration could reach new heights. The address by Mindy Robinson has ignited a fierce debate over election integrity and transparency in Nevada, highlighting the deep divisions and concerns within the community. It remains to be seen how these concerns will be addressed and whether they will lead to changes in the election process. In a passionate address at a recent Clark County, Nevada County Commissioner meeting, political commentator and activist Mindy Robinson voiced her deep concerns about the state of Nevada's election integrity, stirring a heated debate within the community. Robinson began by asserting that Nevada's election had become a "catastrophe" that had left the state as the "laughing stock of the nation." She didn't mince words as she delved into what she saw as the systemic issues plaguing Nevada's elections. First, Robinson highlighted problems she believed should have triggered alarm bells long before the general election. She pointed out that Nevada's primary election had faced issues, with 40,000 people unable to vote due to problems with their ballots, which she attributed to DMV errors. She argued that this should have led to a redo of the primary election. Robinson also raised concerns about transparency in the election process. She accused Joe Gloria, an election official, of preventing people who weren't "progressive" from observing the polls, potentially allowing for foul play without proper oversight. She emphasized the lack of access to the adjudication room, where poll watchers could ensure that votes were accurately counted, as a significant problem. Furthermore, Robinson criticized the conditions at polling locations, describing people waiting outside in freezing, rainy weather during the election. She questioned why there were no better facilities provided for voters. Robinson didn't stop there. She questioned the election results, notably the victory of certain officials, including the Nevada Attorney General, whom she claimed was responsible for a crime wave. She also expressed skepticism about some members of the County Commission, alleging financial fraud and promoting controversial agendas. Robinson pointedly criticized the County Commission's decision to certify election results despite hours of testimony from voters who couldn't cast their ballots in the primary. She argued that the system's lack of accountability and transparency left the community powerless. In her closing remarks, Robinson lamented the challenges faced by the community in holding its officials accountable when they are responsible for investigating potential election fraud. She expressed her frustration at the lack of options for recourse and urged those in power to consider the consequences of their actions. Robinson's speech concluded with a stark warning, suggesting that if influential individuals took certain actions against her and others, the community's anger and frustration could reach new heights. The address by Mindy Robinson has ignited a fierce debate over election integrity and transparency in Nevada, highlighting the deep divisions and concerns within the community. It remains to be seen how these concerns will be addressed and whether they will lead to changes in the election process.

In the midst of a politically charged atmosphere filled with conflicting narratives and conspiracy theories, Ivan Raiklin has emerged as a central figure within conservative circles, making sweeping allegations regarding the 2020 U.S. Presidential election. Raiklin, a vocal critic of the election process, has embarked on a mission to present his perspective on events, leveling accusations against several parties for alleged improprieties. In this article, we dissect Raiklin's assertions and provide context to his followers' claims that have ignited fervent debates. A Surprising Platform Raiklin's commentary kicks off with a theatrical declaration: "Likes. To try to shut me down. But I'm still alive." This enigmatic opening sets the stage for his narrative, which he contends has been stifled by social media platforms and mainstream news outlets. Raiklin portrays himself as a marauder, asserting that his outspoken views have been met with efforts to silence him. The Allegations The heart of Raiklin's contentions are the events surrounding the 2020 election and its aftermath. He alleges that unlawful activities tainted the election, an unsubstantiated "Fed Insurrection" purportedly led by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and subsequent cover-ups. Raiklin points fingers at various entities, including Big Tech corporations, mainstream media, and state officials, whom he accuses of quashing dissenting voices and propagating false narratives. COVID-19 and Its Election Impact Raiklin links the origins of COVID-19 to what he terms "CCP 19," contending that the pandemic was manipulated for political gain. He argues that these circumstances led to changes in the election process, such as the expansion of mail-in voting, which, according to Raiklin, was strategically implemented to influence the election's outcome. Allegations at the State Level Raiklin delves into the specifics of the 2020 election, asserting that numerous states deviated from their election laws, jeopardizing its integrity. He highlights instances where alterations to election procedures were executed by non-legislative actors, including governors, secretaries of state, and courts. According to Raiklin, these actions contravened Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, which vests the authority to appoint electors in state legislatures. Federal Involvement and Suppression Raiklin criticizes the Supreme Court's handling of Texas v. Pennsylvania, a lawsuit aimed at challenging the election results in several states. He suggests that political considerations might have influenced the court's decision not to hear the case. Raiklin underscores the significance of the Director of National Intelligence in investigating foreign interference in elections, yet he accuses the intelligence community of withholding information to shield certain political interests. Schumer's Warning and Brennan's Outrage To substantiate his claims, Raiklin features clips of Senator Chuck Schumer cautioning that "the intelligence community has six ways from Sunday of getting back at you." He argues that this serves as proof of a potent intelligence apparatus that could be leveraged for political purposes. Additionally, he highlights former CIA Director John Brennan expressing his indignation at intelligence agencies being subjected to oversight. A Call for Transparency Ivan Raiklin presents a multifaceted narrative of election irregularities and alleged foreign influence in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election. While his assertions have sparked intense controversy and await substantiation, they underscore the imperative need for transparency and accountability within the electoral process. In the weeks to come, whether these allegations gain traction or remain on the fringes of political discourse remains uncertain.

In an exclusive interview with our conservative college newspaper, Lieutenant Colonel Ivan Raiklin, we provided valuable insights into the complexities surrounding the events of January 6th at the U.S. Capitol. Raiklin, a retired military officer and passionate advocate for truth and accountability, drew comparisons between historical leadership transparency and the modern era's intricate challenges. Raiklin commenced the interview by illustrating parallels between the candid discussions among World War II military leaders and the evolving landscape of contemporary issues. He underscored the changing significance of ranks and the emergence of lieutenant colonels as voices of reason amid political turmoil. Raiklin contrasted their integrity with what he perceives as growing corruption within the military establishment. The interview introduced Lieutenant Colonel Ivan Raiklin as a central figure in the discourse. Known for his relentless pursuit of transparency and truth, Raiklin has garnered attention for his efforts to unveil what he believes lies beneath the surface of the January 6th incident. The discussion set the stage for a comprehensive exploration of the inner workings of Washington, D.C., and allegations of power manipulation. Raiklin delved into the role of the Capitol Police Board in determining the level of criminalization for defendants involved in the January 6th events. He emphasized that this board ultimately reports to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, suggesting their influence in shaping the narrative of that day. Raiklin contended that the board manipulated evidence to ensure a 100% conviction rate for the accused, revealing a concerning level of control over the justice system. The interview also explored Raiklin's perspective on the Electoral Count Act and its significant role in the events surrounding January 6th. Raiklin meticulously researched the intricate details of potential scenarios and contingencies, shedding light on his belief that there was room for legal maneuvers within the act. Raiklin suggested that his public discussions on social media about these nuances may have triggered a response from those in power, potentially leading to the events of January 6th. Raiklin's insights prompted questions about cause and effect, raising the possibility that his public discourse on the Electoral Count Act may have contributed to the events that unfolded on that fateful day. As we navigate the complexities of this pivotal moment in history, Lieutenant Colonel Ivan Raiklin's perspective offers a unique lens to examine the intricacies of the January 6th incident and the broader challenges facing our nation.

In a recent episode of "Indivisible with John Stubbins," John hosted Bill Robinson, a prominent figure in conservative media and a respected writer for Newsmax. This enlightening conversation covered a wide range of topics, offering viewers a glimpse into the life and perspective of this influential voice. A Journey to Conservatism Bill Robinson's journey into conservative media began with a background in marketing, working for major corporations like GE. This experience gave him unique insights into the corporate world. However, his career took an unexpected turn when he founded his own marketing firm, Relentless Marketing. Here, he ventured into public relations, eventually finding himself on platforms like CNN, Fortune, Forbes, The Wall Street Journal, and the Financial Times. Robinson's diverse portfolio transitioned seamlessly from business and technology to politics. He contributed columns to the Huffington Post for seven years, starting with critical pieces on Obama and later shifting to support Trump. Today, he continues to deliver Christian conservative columns for Newsmax and Real America's Voice. Trump and Robinson: A Unique Bond Robinson's association with President Trump underscores the human side of the former President. This connection didn't happen overnight. Robinson humorously recounts his seven-year pursuit to secure an interview with Trump. He shared anecdotes about their encounters in New York in the 1980s. He highlighted Trump's remarkable ability to make everyone he speaks to feel like the most crucial person in the room, a trait Robinson believes contributed to Trump's election. The Authenticity of President Trump The conversation delved into Trump's authenticity, dispelling the myth that he is solely interested in himself. Robinson emphasized Trump's genuine care for others. He revealed that every conversation with the former President begins with inquiries about Robinson's health and personal well-being. According to Robinson, Trump's authenticity shines through, making these exchanges effortless and meaningful. President Trump's Humor and Wit A lighthearted moment in the discussion centered around Trump's humor. Robinson recalled a recent incident involving Trump and Chris Christie, highlighting Trump's ability to handle criticisms with wit and charm. Instead of engaging in a verbal feud, Trump responded humorously, downplaying the situation, a testament to his unique communication style. American Anarchy: A Call for Accountability As the conversation shifted to serious matters, Robinson addressed the importance of his upcoming documentary, "American Anarchy." He stressed the need to revisit the origins of the deep state's actions, citing cases like those of General Flynn, Carter Page, and George Stephanopoulos. Robinson argued that the failure to hold those responsible accountable only encourages them to continue their actions. A Plea for Legal Action Robinson expressed his concern about a two-tiered justice system, exemplified by the lack of consequences for those involved in the FISA warrant scandal. He urged immediate and severe legal action against those who committed treason, asserting that this is the only way to preserve law and order in the country. A Call to Action As the interview concluded, Robinson and Stubbins highlighted the importance of getting involved in the fight for accountability and transparency. They urged Americans to take action, support conservative causes, and work towards restoring integrity in the justice system. The conversation with Bill Robinson provided valuable insights into the world of conservative media and its essential role in holding those in power accountable. It serves as a reminder that the pursuit of truth and justice should always be at the forefront of any democracy.

"Indivisible with John Stubbins" hosted Sheriff Richard Mack and Mark Finchem, discussing various issues ranging from election integrity to the border crisis. Sheriff Mack and Finchem, influential figures in conservative circles, provided insights into their experiences and concerns during the broadcast. They shed light on the urgency of addressing these issues from their conservative perspective. Election Integrity Takes Center Stage Fresh off the Mike Lindell summit, Mark Finchem shared his observations on the event. He emphasized the need for action, not just rhetoric, among conservative patriots. One critical development he mentioned was deploying a device at major vote-counting centers to detect internet connections in ballot tabulation machines. This technological advancement is a significant defensive measure against potential tampering with election results. Finchem also discussed an app for reporting irregularities, a critical tool for identifying potential election law violations. This app empowers citizens to take an active role in preserving the integrity of elections. This initiative resonates with conservatives who have raised concerns about election transparency since 2020. Challenges at the Southern Border Sheriff Richard Mack discussed the escalating crisis at the southern border. He lamented the catastrophic situation marked by rampant drug trafficking, exacerbated by the current administration's lax immigration policies. The sheriff argued that the federal government's failure to protect the border violates Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution, which obligates the government to safeguard states from invasion. Sheriff Mack also raised concerns about terrorists infiltrating the country, expressing alarm over the growing presence of Middle Eastern terrorists collaborating with drug cartels. He underscored the urgent need to address border security. A Flawed Judicial System The conversation pivoted to issues within the judicial system. Sheriff Mack and Mark Finchem highlighted concerns about the grand jury process and prosecutors' overreach. They criticized the lack of fairness and due process in grand jury proceedings, emphasizing that this undermines the accused's rights and needs reform. Additionally, they discussed how the courts have failed to address evidence related to election irregularities. Despite an abundance of verbal and written evidence, the courts have been reluctant to hear cases, causing frustration among conservatives. Homelessness and Drug Epidemic in Phoenix Mark Finchem drew attention to the growing homeless population in downtown Phoenix and the associated drug epidemic. He argued that a record number of deaths, particularly among children, are linked to drug abuse and called for urgent action to address these issues. In Conclusion These influential conservatives highlighted their dedication to addressing critical concerns around the nation at large. From election integrity to border security and judicial reform, their perspectives offered a glimpse into conservatives' priorities in battleground states. "Indivisible" serves as a platform for open dialogue and a call to action for conservatives concerned about the future of America.

Flemingsburg, Ky - In a passionate and lengthy address, Ivan Raiklin, a retired Green Beret and constitutional lawyer, delivered a powerful message to conservatives. Raiklin began by thanking the crowd and expressing his gratitude for the opportunity to speak, acknowledging Scott Kesterson for his work and the audience for their presence. Rallying his audience to become better informed about perceived threats to the nation and to take action against them, Raiklin's speech focused on the importance of education and grassroots involvement, with a call to "castrate the deep state" and "crush the commies." Raiklin emphasized the importance of knowing and exposing the truth, referring to political "hostages" who sought the truth and were unjustly imprisoned. He urged the audience to repel the lies perpetuated by the government through big tech and big media. Drawing on his extensive background in national security, Raiklin highlighted his experience countering various threats both domestically and abroad. He stressed that his mission now is to expose domestic enemies, emphasizing the need to identify specific individuals within government agencies who have played a role in undermining the nation. Raiklin mentioned the Nuremberg Code in the context of the pandemic response, suggesting that coercion and manipulation led many to accept emergency-use-authorized products. He criticized the pharmaceutical industry's influence and the role of figures like Dr. Anthony Fauci. The speaker called for accountability, referencing the scripture verse Leviticus 24:19-20, which suggests punishment in proportion to the harm inflicted. He questioned when people would stand against the injustices committed against children and individuals who suffered adverse effects from the vaccines. Raiklin spotlighted two individuals in the audience, Brad Miller and Dr. Pete Chambers, commending their courage in speaking out against the vaccine mandates despite personal sacrifices. He stressed the need for public support for individuals like them, who are on the "legal, moral, and ethical high ground." The speaker also urged the audience to stop consuming mainstream media outlets and support alternative platforms like Getter, Telegram, Truth Social, and Rumble. He called on the crowd to take a stand against the government's encroachment on civil liberties and to expose the individuals complicit in these actions. Ivan Raiklin's address resonated strongly, advocating for a proactive approach to defend conservative principles and American values. Raiklin continued stressing the need for citizens to educate themselves about critical figures and entities that he believes are undermining American values. He pointed to the Capitol Police Board and what he termed the "Fed insurrection coup" on January 6th, as well as the alleged weaponization of the Department of Defense (DOD), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and the Department of Justice (DOJ). Raiklin argued that it's essential for the current House of Representatives to take action and exhibit a strong backbone. The activist used provocative language, calling for the "castration" of the "deep state" and explaining that he has a list. He suggested that this could be achieved by altering funding mechanisms or other means and urged his audience to use their imagination regarding the specifics. Raiklin also expressed concerns about the threat posed by what he called "commies," with a particular focus on the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Russia, Iran, and North Korea. He emphasized the need to confront these perceived adversaries and safeguard American interests. During the Q&A session, Raiklin fielded questions from the audience. One attendee asked about the citizenship status of members of Congress, to which Raiklin admitted uncertainty but expressed a willingness to research the matter further. Another audience member inquired about how to support Raiklin's cause. He encouraged individuals to get involved through platforms like Telegram and advocated for challenging mainstream media outlets. Raiklin underscored the importance of creating uncensored content and emphasized the need to establish alternative platforms to disseminate their message if they were removed from the internet. Raiklin concluded by stressing the significance of in-person meetings and activism at the local level. He argued that face-to-face interactions are immune to censorship, offering an effective way to advance their goals. Addressing the community level, Raiklin recommended that parents take inspiration from past instances where parents successfully challenged policies they disagreed with, particularly in relation to schools. He cited instances in Iowa where parents pushed back against certain mandates, leading to legislative changes. In summary, Ivan Raiklin's speech at this conservative fest called for increased vigilance, education, and local activism to address perceived threats to the nation. While his rhetoric was provocative, it echoed the sentiments of a segment of conservative activists who advocate for change at the grassroots level. Raiklin emphasized the importance of investigative efforts to uncover dirt on those in power and expose it to delegitimize them. He called for a collective effort to push back against a lawless executive branch and reaffirmed his commitment to the fight for truth, accountability, and action.