AlexDrones

In this video I expose the fake conspiracy theory that's unfortunately gone viral. My experience as a roadie that ran lasers for Excision, having to go through advanced laser safety classes so we could acquire variances from the FDA to be in compliance taught me a lot about lasers. Very quickly I learned that lasers are inherently inefficient. Coming out of those classes my dreams of making a laser gun capable of doing the same damage as a firearm vanished once I understood how much energy would be required however I knew the military would be capable of creating a weapon far more powerful than what I was dreaming up yet still this same fact is the reason why the military doesn't issue laser rifles, because the technology to make it a viable weapon on the battlefield just can't possibly exist unless battery technology changes significantly. A laser rifle about the size of an M16 could exist but it would be for very specific use because the battery would die very quickly. This changes when lasers are mounted to tanks, aircraft and battleships because there is far more room to store energy on those platforms as compared to a laser weapon the size of a rifle. In fact it would be cheaper to run than using ammunitions and with more space to store power the lasers could potentially have unlimited shots so long as the laser itself doesn't overheat or blow itself up. The more space to store energy the more power the laser throughput. Still, these lasers would not be able to travel very far in atmosphere and beam divergence would weaken the absorption the farther the target. This is why so many early DEWs programs were scrapped. Manned aircraft would have to get too close to enemy bases and drones run the risk of being shot down. There is however better use cases for lasers in the military, for instance, shooting down drone swarms from the ground, dazzling satellite sensors, and even aircraft taking down incoming missles instead of using chaff. I know this is wikipedia but this is actually a good starting point for the layman to begin learning about the failures and success of DEWs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_YAL-1 There's better sources of information and I encourage all to really seek out the truth of what DEWs are actually capable of, because you will learn there can be no such thing as a deathstar, city vaporizer, and all the laughable fantasies my fellow conspiracy theorists dream about without a shred of real evidence. Unburned blue umbrellas that are also on an unburned patio deck and unburned blue cars right next to unburned white cars are a hilarious stretch. While its true that laser frequency can be programmed in such a way that it doesn't burn something, this only applies to low powered lasers such as medical because once the power is increased to high power lasers levels everything burns colors be damned. Furthermore the DEWs that are in the field today use a technique called spectral beam combining, which causes multiple laser modules at different frequencies to form a single, powerful, high quality beam making the laser efficient but also highly lethal. This also means the frequency doesn't matter because anything said laser shoots is going to be absorbing photons and getting damaged. In fact the only way to really stop a high power laser weapon is with technology known as mirror shielding which is basically mirrors infused with cryogenics which would be very expensive to implement and not ideal because it could still fail. It would almost make more sense to shoot at the laser at that cost and hope you nail it before it nails you. I could go on about my knowledge of lasers but in this video I left all that out because it was unnecessary due to the fact that it only took me 5 seconds to debunk this conspiracy clown with the exact data he told us to use to research for ourselves. Seems this person was either too lazy to actually look at the satellite data or perhaps he knows he's lying looking for attention and hopes none of us would actually look into it. He was also on x talking about they're shooting and moving so we cant track them for long but the reality is satellite telemetry data is only good for about 20 days then it becomes unreliable to go back in time to figure out satellite location history. If he would have read the user manual for MatLab he would have known this. He's probably paranoid about China and I don't blame him but this conspiracy is just debunked and that's the truth of the matter.