1Candyman1

Lyin’ Biden, resident Joe Biden saying the quiet part out loud. Joe Biden “Because a lot if you fly over these areas that are burned to the ground, you'll see in the midst of 20 homes that are just totally destroyed, one home sitting there because they had the right roof on it. And, anyway, since I took office, FEMA's provided Texas alone.” DEWs Directed Energy Weapons

One of many reasons what is wrong with the left! MSM, enemy of our constitutional republic, pushing more division.

For those who can't spend 4 hours watching the full roundtable event – Federal Health Agencies and the COVID Cartel: What Are They Hiding – here is a 14-minute edited version that captures many important points. Posted by Republican Senator Ron Johnson on X(formerly Twitter). Full video: https://rumble.com/v4fpw4c-federal-health-agencies-and-the-covid-cartel-what-are-they-hiding.html

Left thinks government is everything. Christian Nationalists!

“Dear Mr. Schäfer, I'll send them the photocopies + printouts because I'm scared! I ordered usb sticks through Amazon and got them last week. One stick was opened packaging and there were also data on it (PDF texts). I wanted to send the stick back but thought no, look first, "exactly what that is. I can't read English very well, but what I understand is a list of abducted children! They are probably caught and exploited, it's terribly sad. A company CYM operates camps and evaluates children. They offer it, the adrenochrome, and sell it!! Disposal means to dispose of! There are many hundreds of pages and I can only print a few for them. There are also lists of names and photos of adults! I think these are the people who hold the children captive. I can't find anyone here who believes me, everyone says you're crazy. But that's true, that's what "Q" says. So I come to you, Mr. Schäfer, on your side you represent the truth of Q: I would also like to write to Mr. Trump, but the mail is controlled. I guess that's not the case within Germany yet. Can't send an email because I'm honestly scared now, these are bad murderers who torture small children, as Q also writes. I've been reading Q for a long time. Please find ways to write this publicly on your blog or website. I have looked for the names etc etc a few times (not all of them!!) and the companies are so serious. Can you give the list to Mr. Trump, who will hopefully free you from your suffering!!! I'm really scared, and in case the letter is intercepted, my name must not be found, because my son is also the same age as these poor children. Wish them strength and thank you very much Steffi ( If I have to send more, then I have to be careful! Write on her hominibus website something like Steffi get in touch, then I will see it and can answer! !!)“ Links within video: https://gab.com/GermanQPatriot https://t.me/WTF1_3 Telegram https://ufile.io/f/p4bxk (paid subscription) benjaminfulford.net https://web.archive.org/web/20200924225717/https://site-891171.mozfiles.com/files/891171/Adrenochrome04082020.pdf https://truthnews.de/geleakte-dokumente-kinder-wegen-adrenochrom-in-haft/

How do diplomats distinguish friend from foe, and navigate the ambiguous shades in between? This question is vital to understanding key foreign policy shifts, especially those predicated on identifying and categorizing an enemy. For example, the importance of whether US policymakers recognized an actor as a communist during the Cold War, or terrorist during the war on terror is difficult to dispute. This issue is explored in a chapter of a new collection of essays on diplomacy, which investigates the reasons behind the shift that led to a dramatic turnaround in US policy towards Libya in 2011. Following an improvement in relations between Muammar Gaddafi’s Libya and Europe and the US during the 2000s, Libya re-entered the international community as an ally against Islamic terrorism and as warden of illegal migration into Europe. But in 2011, as the so-called Arab Spring spread throughout North Africa, the United States changed tack. Having previously viewed the Libyan regime as an ally in the war on terror, Gaddafi suddenly became a ‘madman’ bent on the ‘genocide’. This bewildering two-month turnaround raises questions. Specifically, what kind of information was reported to policymakers and by whom, and what was the role of diplomacy in producing this knowledge? Is the term ‘terrorism’ still useful for understanding conflicts in Libya? How does diplomacy work? Diplomacy is an ecosystem of knowledge production. Reports are sent from missions abroad, which are then compiled, analysed, summarized if considered relevant, and possibly briefed to policymakers. Feedback is also sent back down the structure of diplomacy, shaping future reporting. But how does prioritization from above govern these systems as information makes its way up the chain of command? How do practitioners respond to these pressures? And why are some perspectives are entirely ignored, while others thrive? Concern about effective knowledge production is as old as diplomacy itself. Renaissance pioneers of early modern diplomacy like Machiavelli, Botero, Callières and Guicciardini were concerned about misidentifying actors, intentions and events in ‘speculative’ analysis. Furthermore, they were aware that persuading foreign powers of a certain interpretation of events could facilitate the pursuit of policy goals. My research draws on post-structuralist concepts to offer a method for understanding how diplomacy produces representations of actors in international politics. Empirically, it examines how diplomatic reporting, analysis, and prioritization practices come to classify the political identity of the actor they are looking at. This approach has been applied to a variety of cases, from Vietnam, where it reveals how France persuaded the US to support its colonial war in Indochina in 1947, to more recent US policy shifts against Mali and Morocco, based on identifying them as enemies in the war on terror. The Libya—US relationship in 2011 Application of this method to the case of Libya — US relations in 2011 also reveals critical insights. In terms of reporting, while the State Department had little analytical capacity on North Africa, it did inform policymakers that the rebels were a complex coalition that included deeply anti-American elements. Likewise, they warned against taking Gaddafi’s ever-bombastic statements of revenge against the rebels at face value, citing his long tradition of overblown rhetoric and evidence that there were no plans or resources for such attacks. However, within a month the image of a Gaddafian genocide of peaceful democracy-seeking protesters became dominant at the State Department and the White House. How did this vital shift occur? Diplomats on the ground transmitted vital nuances and warnings about the complex composition of the ‘peaceful pro-democracy protesters’, and how best to ‘mitigate the potential for Islamic extremists and Al-Qaeda to exploit the transition’. These reports were rarely pursued by the Secretary of State and were deprioritized across US diplomatic knowledge production. Instead, Secretary Clinton relied on a small circle of informal advisors, ranging from Sidney Blumenthal to Tony Blair, who insisted on a simpler view featuring freedom-loving democrats rebelling against a tyrant. This method traces the dominant representations of the conflict in US policy and the origin of the exact wording and conceptualization used. Denoting the power of descriptions, in a ‘quick note on vocabulary re Libya’, former Clinton advisor Anne-Marie Slaughter advised her to ‘support [the rebels] by pushing back against the idea that this is anything other than a popular revolt’. This was influential: from then on Clinton referred to the conflict only by these terms. These featured in President Obama’s subsequent 28 March speech, which compared Libyan rebels to American independence heroes and laid the ground for US support of the revolt. Why we need to understand diplomatic behaviour Examining how diplomats understand the identity of international actors allows for two new perspectives of relevance to diplomatic practice and analysis. First, a detailed understanding of diplomatic reporting reveals how a specific description works, how it functions and what ideas, narratives and links it depends on. Second, analysis of how representations of actors and their contexts are constituted, reveals the dynamics of knowledge production of diplomatic institutions and systems. This allows for a constructive critique of information management, analysis, prioritization and the role of dominant policy priorities. For the practice of diplomacy and policy, this method helps understand past mistakes, avoid new ones, and, crucially, make better use of available resources. Crucially, it stresses the need to make better use of the vast, nuanced and multi-perspective pool of diplomatic knowledge, and understand the reasons why it is often brushed aside. Dr Pablo de Orellana is a Lecturer in International Relations at the Department of War Studies, King’s College London. His research interests include diplomacy, nationalism and the relationship between art and conflict. Source: https://medium.com/international-affairs-blog/how-gaddafi-went-from-friend-to-foe-in-us-eyes-e09cd4373b51

Rothschild Family Tree & History

ELITE HUMAN TRAFFICKING [VOL. 1] - GHISLAINE MAXWELL'S TERRAMAR PROJECT ELITE HUMAN TRAFFICKING [VOL.2] - ART IN EMBASSIES ELITE HUMAN TRAFFICKING [VOL.3] - PATTERNS OF THE CABAL ELITE HUMAN TRAFFICKING [VOL.4] - DR. PHIL'S TURN-ABOUT RANCH ELITE HUMAN TRAFFICKING [VOL.5] - THE CULT OF MOLOCH & THE LUZZATTO FAMILY ELITE HUMAN TRAFFICKING [VOL.6] - PEDOPHILE POLITICIANS

Pedogate 2020 By Mouthy Buddha Pedogate 1, 00.00, In Depth Exploration Pedogate 2, 27.10, Tom Hanx Pedogate 3, 48.50, Symbols & Pizzagate 2.0

BOY RAPE VICTIM OF BILL CLINTON FBI INTERVIEW FBI interviews boy rape victim of Bill Clinton, and details of sex assaults & Satanic rituals. Journalist Jen Moore who uncovered the story was murdered shortly after Cathy OBrien, MK Ultra: https://rumble.com/v4c5xic-cathy-obrien-with-mark-phillips-at-the-granada-forum-october-31-1996..html

My first debunking video. There’s at least one video floating around the web that says it’s a place for elitist to sacrifice. Share the real story. Share this video. Get the facts out. THE STORY The Donnafugata Theater dates back to the first half of the 19th century and is inserted in one of the most beautiful and particular contexts of Ragusa Ibla: that of Palazzo Donnafugata, one of the most significant palaces in Ragusa, also for its pictorial works contained in it.
 In 1997 at the behest of the lawyer Scucces, owner of the property, the first works of restoration and recovery of the small family theater began, which began its ascent towards the role that should have always belonged to him: that of “throbbing heart” of the entire building.
The main feature of the theater is the perfect acoustics. Lawyer Scucces likes to say with a smile full of satisfaction and emotion that “in her theater microphones are absolutely forbidden!”.
The adjacent rooms have all been restored and set up so that they can be used to host conferences and conferences.
Completely finished to restore in 2004, the Donnafugata theater represents the only theater in Ragusa and with its 100 seats it was counted among the smallest European theaters and awarded in 2006 with the prestigious Eurispes prize “The hundred Italian excellences”.
From the date of completion of the restoration, the Donnafugata regularly functions as a theater open to the public while maintaining its private management always entrusted to the property of the theater itself. THE MANAGEMENT The artistic direction of the theater was taken care of in the first five years by Avv. Pietro Di Quattro who subsequently entrusted the same to his daughters Vicky and Costanza giving the start to an all-female management.
 For three decades the theater has been carrying out a varied and intense theatrical activity at full capacity: on the one hand there is a season of prose that sees on the stage of the Donnafugata alternate increasingly illustrious names of the Italian theater scene, on the other hand a remarkable season of classical music is confirmed year after year: “Ibla Classica International”. In the last year, an opening to the youngest has been joined with the review 'the Donnafugata of the little ones'.
A series of collateral activities complete the picture of the varied and careful offer that the Donnafugata Theater offers, establishing itself as one of the focal cultural centers in Ragusa and Ragusa Ibla. NOTES OF NATURE Two hundred plants become special spectators of the Christmas concert “Notes of Nature. More oxygen for art", promoted by the Donnafugata Theater of Ragusa Ibla, Accademia alla Scala in Milan and Confagricoltura Ragusa A Christmas concert dedicated to the plant kingdom. To take care of the environment, including through music, and to return to relying on the biorhythms of nature. The Donnafugata Theater in Ragusa Ibla celebrates Christmas with a special appointment, designed for a special audience: two hundred plants, of different species, arranged in the stalls. Special spectators of the concert “Notes of nature. More oxygen for art”, staged in the beautiful Ibleo theater and streamed on Christmas Day. Beautiful plant specimens, even the beards, made available by the floro-growing and wine-growing companies associated with Confagricoltura Ragusa, co-partner of the initiative together with the prestigious Accademia Teatro alla Scala in Milan. On the stage of the Ragusa theatre Ibla played his string quartet consisting of Kinga Dobryniewska on the violin, Sofia Goetz on the violin, Daniel Ciobanu on the viola and Marco Mauro Moruzzi on the cello.
Neither gloves nor masks therefore, but only leaves and roots to enjoy a concert all to themselves. Taking care of the environment and together inviting the spectators, deprived in this time of the possibility of being physically a “public” who attends the theater, to return to listen to the biological rhythms of nature that, together with the rhythms of music, can be a stimulus for new ideas and experiences.
An initiative conceived by the artistic directors of the Teatro Donnafugata, the sisters Vicky and Costanza DiQuattro, with the collaboration of the Accademia alla Scala in Milan and Confagricoltura.
At the end of the concert, all the plants were donated to the hospital wards of the Asp of Ragusa to try to alleviate, through beauty, suffering and loneliness. https://www.culturalheritageonline.com/location-4507_Teatro-Donnafugata.php https://teatrodonnafugata.it Pronunciation: https://youtu.be/q7K451yXlps?si=X87N32p_BOHJUGxH

Creepy, “Pedo Pete” Joe Biden! Joe does this in public, what does he do in private? Some is exposed on Laptop from Hell?

Fall Of The Cabal, The Sequel! Part 21 to 28! By Janet Ossebaard & Cyntha Koeter Narrated by Janet Ossebaard R.I.P. Janet Ossebaard SEQUEL TO THE FALL OF THE CABAL, PART 21: COVID-19: KILLER NOSE SWABS & ABUSED PCR-TESTS PART 22: COVID-19: MONEY & MURDER IN HOSPITALS PART 23: WHISTLEBLOWERS ABOUT HOSPITAL MURDERS PART 24: COVID-19: MANDATORY VACCINATIONS? TIME FOR ACTION! PART 25: COVID-19 - TORTURE PROGRAM PART 26: COVID-19: GENOCIDE WRAPPED UP PART 27: THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM – THE END OF HOMO SAPIENS PART 28: CLIMATE CRISIS? Run time: 4.14.11 TIME STAMP: PART 21, PART 22, 31.00 PART 23, 58.57 PART 24, 1.24.20 PART 25, 1.56.27 PART 26, 2.32.01 PART 27, 3.04.18 PART 28, 3.35.52 Other links: https://rumble.com/v4d69wu-fall-of-the-cabal-the-sequel-parts-1-to-10.html https://rumble.com/v4ddqgf-fall-of-the-cabal-the-sequel-part-11-20.html