1. 1611 KJV Marginal Notes = Modern Version Textual Footnotes? James White Thomas Ross Debate Review #9

    1611 KJV Marginal Notes = Modern Version Textual Footnotes? James White Thomas Ross Debate Review #9

    3
    0
    4.3K
  2. James White & Thomas Ross Debate Review #3: The Epistle Dedicatory: KJV Translators Say KJV is Best

    James White & Thomas Ross Debate Review #3: The Epistle Dedicatory: KJV Translators Say KJV is Best

    4
    0
    7.24K
  3. Is the King James Version (KJV) Too Hard to Understand? James White / Thomas Ross Debate Review 11

    Is the King James Version (KJV) Too Hard to Understand? James White / Thomas Ross Debate Review 11

    3
    0
    4.99K
  4. Which King James Bible Version would I recommend?

    Which King James Bible Version would I recommend?

    6
    0
    795
  5. 3) Response To The Video: The Apocrypha & The Bible (1611 Bible & Post-1611 Bibles)

    3) Response To The Video: The Apocrypha & The Bible (1611 Bible & Post-1611 Bibles)

    3
    0
    357
  6. God's name in 19 old bibles from 1477 - 1877 --------- Yahweh? Jehovah?

    God's name in 19 old bibles from 1477 - 1877 --------- Yahweh? Jehovah?

    2
    0
    160
  7. GREAT SHAKING COMING

    GREAT SHAKING COMING

    77
  8. The Nestle-Aland Greek Text is Corrupt: 0% Greek Manuscript Evidence: KJV & Textus Receptus Are Pure

    The Nestle-Aland Greek Text is Corrupt: 0% Greek Manuscript Evidence: KJV & Textus Receptus Are Pure

    5
    0
    3.64K
  9. Did The King James Translators View Their Work As Perfect? | False Friends & The Prefaces To The AV

    Did The King James Translators View Their Work As Perfect? | False Friends & The Prefaces To The AV

    122