
D4CE Symposium
18 videos
Updated 4 months ago
Doctors for Covid Ethics and UK Column jointly hold these symposiums in which experts in science, medicine, finance, media, the law, and more come together to share knowledge, experience, and evidence freely and honestly.
-
D4CE 5th Symposium: Autoimmune-like Diseases Due to mRNA Vaccination – Accumulating Evidence
Doctors For Covid EthicsDr Michael Palmer summarized the evidence from autopsies and bio-distribution studies, which reinforced the mechanisms described by Dr Bhakdi. In short, the injected mRNA vaccines can cause damages all around the body over an extended period of time, and such vaccine damage is not rare.5.38K views 2 comments -
D4CE 5th Symposium: Health Outcomes of COVID-19 Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated
Doctors For Covid EthicsDr. Brian Hooker, PhD, PE, presents the statistical data on the adverse events associated with COVID vaccines. The VARS data has shown that the COVID vaccines can increase the risk of shingles, myocarditis, and other disorders.4.66K views 1 comment -
D4CE 5th Symposium: Vaccine ingredient problems you never heard about
Doctors For Covid EthicsWith Meryl Nass, MD, and panel discussion of Session I The Fundamental Flaws of mRNA Vaccine Technology For more information: https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/4.24K views 3 comments -
D4CE 5th Symposium: Vaccine Ingredient Problems by Meryl Nass MD
Doctors For Covid EthicsFor more information: https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/1.38K views 5 comments -
D4CE 5th Symposium: Criminal Complaint against SWISSMEDIC
Doctors For Covid EthicsPhilipp Kruse has been practicing law in Switzerland since 1997. He and his team have filed 22 ordinary court proceedings against all COVID-related mandates since December 2020. In July 2022, they filed a criminal complaint against SWISSMEDIC, the Swiss regulatory authority on drugs and vaccines. In this video, Philipp Kruse explains the substance and the legal strategy of this criminal complaint against SWISSMEDIC. He describes, by way of example, the adverse effects suffered by a former professional soccer player after she was injected with an mRNA vaccine (5:30). Kruse argues that the disinformation dispensed by the SWISSMEDIC, together with political and social pressures, push healthy people into a dangerous medical experiment, which leads to long-term health damage. At the same time, doctors and the public deny entirely the adverse effects caused by the vaccines and fail to help people suffering from them, which causes further physical and emotional harm to these victims. Mr. Kruse gives his reasons for filing this lawsuit against SWISSMEDIC instead of Pfizer (8:10). SWISSMEDIC has severely and repeatedly violated its essential legal duties and due diligence. He lists the three core allegations in detail (14:10): Unlawful "temporary approval." Deception of the population Inadequate market surveillance He also presents the timeline of the misdemeanors and violations committed by SWISSMEDIC, showing that the agency continued to extend the authorizations despite the growing warning signals and accumulating evidence of adverse effects (15:40). At the end of his presentation, Mr. Kruse summarizes what he and his team will do next and provides general guidance on applying his work to various jurisdictions. For further information on this important lawsuit, please visit https://corona-complaint.ch. This video is part of Doctors for COVID Ethics 5th Symposium: IN THE MIDST OF DARKNESS LIGHT PREVAILS. For more information about the symposium, please visit https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/.1.88K views -
D4CE 5th Symposium - Legal Update: How to Stop the Shot
Doctors For Covid EthicsRay L. Flores II is a health freedom attorney at Children's Health Defense (CHD). He starts his presentation by discussing the current legal situation in the USA. In his opinion, the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act is the most dangerous threat to the public because the Act protects vaccine manufacturers and any providers who distribute and inject vaccines from liability. The legal system presents numerous hurdles to those seeking redress for vaccine damage; for example, most courts in the USA are uncomfortable dealing with scientific questions (2:00). Nevertheless, there are ways to overcome these obstructions; one of them is through Worker's Compensation (1:20). Another urgent matter is the new California legislation which makes it punishable for physicians and other healthcare workers to disagree with any official medical guidance given by the state government, either publicly or in their advice to patients. Attorneys at CHD are now filing the lawsuits against this legislation on two grounds (3:50): 1. There is no difference between freedom of speech for doctors and the general public; 2. The scientific narrative has flip-flopped over time, as laid out in the document written by Dr. Sanjay Verma (see links below). Resources mentioned in this video: Workers' Compensation https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/workers-compensation-covid-vaccine-injury-victims/ Freedom of Speech for Doctors https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/chd-california-doctors-covid-misinformation-lawsuit/ Ever Shifting Narrative Declaration of Sanjay Verma, M.D. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/4-2-Verma.pdf This video is part of Doctors for COVID Ethics 5th Symposium: IN THE MIDST OF DARKNESS LIGHT PREVAILS. For more information about the symposium, please visit https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/.1.83K views 1 comment -
D4CE 5th Symposium: CBDC - Suicide Pill for Sovereignty
Doctors For Covid EthicsJohn Titus, a US attorney, starts his talk by introducing the concept of sovereignty (1:18), followed by a short clip showing Agustin Carlsen’s comment on Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) (2:35). Agustin Carlsen is the general manager of Bank for International Settlements (BIS). “The central banks will have absolute control on the rules and regulations that will determine the use of that expression of central bank liability and also we will have the technology to enforce that,” according to Carlsen. Titus believes that “CBDC is the sort of Trojan horse for the global control of nations by groups like BIS, International Monetary Fund (IMF), and World Bank Group,” and “The CBDC will end national sovereignty.” Watch the video on why and how CBDC can destroy personal and national sovereignty, explained by John Titus. This video is part of Doctors for COVID Ethics 5th Symposium: IN THE MIDST OF DARKNESS LIGHT PREVAILS. For more information about the symposium, please visit https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/.8.52K views 1 comment -
D4CE 5th Symposium: Laundering with Immunity – The Control Framework
Doctors For Covid EthicsCatherine Austin Fitts first introduce investigative journalist Corey Lynn and Attorney Carolynn A. Betts Esq. Corey starts her talk (1:40) with the history of the International Organizations Immunities Act. According to her, this US federal law is the key mechanism to allow international organizations to run both above and outside the law in the US. Corey Lynn discloses more treaties and headquarters agreements that grant specific organizations similar immunities, for example, Gates-founded Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (Gavi) and the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), the Bank of International Settlements (BIS). She also discusses the immunity of Big Pharm from lawsuits for vaccine damage. For further reading, please visit https://www.coreysdigs.com/u-s/laundering-with-immunity-the-control-framework-part-1/. This video is part of Doctors for COVID Ethics 5th Symposium: IN THE MIDST OF DARKNESS LIGHT PREVAILS. For more information about the symposium, please visit https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/.7.9K views 1 comment -
D4CE 5th Symposium: Overriding Sovereignty with International Treaties and Organizations
Doctors For Covid EthicsCatherine Austin Fitts with Carolyn Betts MBA JD. Carolyn first discusses (1:00) the book by Adam Lebor:Tower of Basel: The Shadowy History of the Secret Bank that Runs the World(PublicAffairs, 2013). She finds the section on World War II especially shocking: “Two guys who were from England and Germany and remained fast friends during World War II came up with the idea of the Bank of International Settlements (BIS).” According to Catherine, the real goal of these bankers who created BIS was to create a global bank that has “sovereign immunity” and can not “be prosecuted and questioned.” The two then discuss the following issues: 1. The BIS has extended its sovereign immunity to protect its member banks during the financial crisis and from prosecution. The New York Fed and HSBC are cited as examples (3:15). 2. The $21 trillion that have gone “missing” from the US government (6:20). Catherine speculates that the only way that the US government could balance the books in the face of this enormous theft is by lowering the life expectancy of the population. 3. Additional agencies and companies have been granted exemption from liability or even sovereign immunity status, particularly in healthcare. Carolyn Betts believes that the lawsuits against COVID-19 measures may be “the way to educate people nationally and internationally about what's been going on and what's been leading up to where we are today.” Catherine Austin Fitts adds, “I dare any international organization to march into court and say that their sovereign immunity gives them the power to implement mass atrocity and murder worldwide.” Carolyn agrees: “I just don't see how you can say there's sovereign immunity for murder.” Carolyn's book review on Tower of Basel: The Shadowy History of the Secret Bank that Runs the World (PublicAffairs, 2013): https://home.solari.com/book-review-tower-of-basel-the-shadowy-history-of-the-secret-bank-that-runs-the-world-by-adam-lebor/ This video is part of Doctors for COVID Ethics 5th Symposium: IN THE MIDST OF DARKNESS LIGHT PREVAILS. For more information about the symposium, please visit https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/.7.33K views 2 comments -
D4CE 5th Symposium: Intent to Harm
Doctors For Covid EthicsEvidence of Conspiracy to Commit Mass Murder by the pharma manufacturers, US Department of Defense (DOD), US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) by Alexandra (Sasha) Latypova. COVID “vaccines” are weapons – according to secretive yet official policies of the US government. This video is a must-watch. Sasha Latypova dives deep into the legal and administrative side of US COVID policies, based on publicly available materials. The video starts with Catherine Austin Fitts introducing Sasha Latypova and Meryl Nass, who joined a subsequent discussion. Sasha then summarizes the state of the evidence on COVID vaccines: they are toxic by design, they lack safety and efficacy. Manufacturing standards are lousy, and policy malignant (3:00). These observations raise the question: 1. Why has there been no remedial action by the regulators or the courts? (4:30) Sasha’s answer is startling: regulators and courts have not taken action, because the COVID vaccines are not merely covered by Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), but are also classified as “military countermeasures.” She then explains the critical legal rules involving EUA countermeasures in detail (7:30): • 21 USC 360bbb-3(k): Use of EUA countermeasures “shall not be considered to constitute a clinical investigation,” and therefore, “are not subject to FDA regulation.” This law is even cited in the FDA’s own draft guidance, which means that the FDA is fully aware that it has no legal competence in this case. • 21 USC 360bbb-3(c): EUA countermeasures issued at HHS Secretary's discretion are NOT required to meet any of the standards which conventionally regulate pharmaceutical products. Sasha says that all the interactions between the vaccine manufacturers and the FDA have no legal relevance at all – “vaccine development and approval is a performance art and voluntary.” 2. Who really sets the rules for the vaccine roll-out? (11:30) According to Sasha, the National Security Council (NSC) is in charge of the COVID Policy, not the public health-related agencies. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) leads the federal pandemic response, not HHS. The HHS mainly plays an information and propaganda role, “pretending that they are doing something over which they don't have the authority.” 3. Who is REALLY developing and manufacturing these injections? (13:30) Sasha asserts that NSC, DOD, and Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) are in charge, not the Pharma companies. She concludes with some hard-hitting statements: "BARDA also was very proud of being able to accelerate the clinical development by breaking the law." “BARDA alone took over the entire pharmaceutical industry in the United States.” "COVID-19 Injections are weapons intended to harm." Alexandra LATYPOVA is a serial entrepreneur and a founder of iCardiac Technologies. For her work regarding COVID vaccines, please visit https://sashalatypova.substack.com/ This video is part of Doctors for COVID Ethics 5th Symposium: IN THE MIDST OF DARKNESS LIGHT PREVAILS. For more information about the symposium, please visit https://doctors4covidethics.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-v-in-the-midst-of-darkness-light-prevails/.17.4K views 16 comments