9/11 Thought Experiments

A Collapse / Demolition Thought Experiment Put on your thinking caps students Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/a-911-thought-experiment Controlled Demolition Expert Speaks Out! What we saw on 9/11 was not due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/controlled-demolition-expert-speaks Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers Showing you just how easily people are duped, who don't know any better Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/myanmar-provides-a-911-lesson-for Was every BOOM on 9/11 a bomb? Not everything that goes boom is a bomb. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/was-every-boom-a-bomb-on-911

The points we covered; 1. Structural collapse vs. controlled demolition - 2 min 50 sec 2. Structural integrity of the twin towers - 6 min 3. What we think we saw - 13 min 4. Who is Dr Judy Wood? - 16 min 30 sec 5. Lack of rubble - 21 min 6. Survivors in stairwell B of the North Tower between floors 2 and 22 - 27 min 7. Artifacts in the rubble. Where are the items to be expected? - 33 min 8. Basement is mostly intact and undamaged so if a controlled demolition, why were basements intact if explosives were not there? - 40 min 9. Seismic readings on all buildings. King Dome comparison. What is expected? What was measured? - 48 min 10. Building 6 pulled - 58 min 11. Building 7 BBC reported 20min prior to collapse BUT CNN reported it one hour prior - 1h 02min Building 7 and no explosive sounds - 1h 05min 13. Building 7 and the ongoing fuming at the world trade center - 1h 08min 14. Spontaneous combustion of things like oxygen tanks in ambulances - 1h 11min 15. Cars combusting randomly - 1h 14min 16. What about other buildings 3,4, 5, 6, and bankers buildings? Eight buildings were affected. The outcome of these building had no event like planes… What happened? 1h 18min 17. No heat - The rubble pile was COLD! - 1h 21 min 18. No pictures of molten metal. No evidence of it. - 1h 25min 19. Class 4 Hurricane Erin off coast. What can this mean? - 1h 33min 20. Magnetic field anomalies for each and every event - 1h 35min 21. Not everything that glows are hot and scientist John Hutchison replicating Nicola Tesla’s work and is famous for his “Hutchison Effect” - 1h 44min 22. Radio frequency technology now referred to as Directed Energy Weapons or Scalar waves and Lieutenant Colonel Tom E. Bearden - 1h 56min 23. The thermite lie - 2h 02min 24. Cold fusion is dangerous - 2h 16min 30sec 25. 60 Minutes on “Cold Fusion is Hot Again”. Dr. Rob Duncan, University of Missouri independent audit of research on cold fusion - 2h 24min 26. If cold fusion exists, how would it change the world? - 2h 29min Please find original upload here: https://rumble.com/v6tbgg9-countering-the-911-theory-of-controlled-demolition.html Dismantling the theory of controlled demolition on 9/11 Good intentioned truth seekers are being sold a provably false narrative Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/dismantling-the-theory-of-controlled My interview with Maryann Gebauer, is now available on Dr Morgan Reynolds' website https://nomoregames.net/2025/05/13/interview-countering-the-theory-of-controlled-demolition/

Well, you've bought into the bullshit! Most people never really think about what they are being presented with AND they never go and double check the information given to them. According to the calculations of the architects for an engineered truth, it would take 29 000 metric tonnes of thermite FOR EACH tower to be taken down. Yes, you read correctly - 29 000 metric tonnes!! Let's do an experiment with 100lbs thermite and see what it looks like. The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories People are so easily led by perceived "experts". Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite Expanded: The controlled demolition of the 9/11 thermite theory People are so easily led by perceived "experts". Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/expanded-the-controlled-demolition I highly recommend studying the blog: The Thermite Free Zone Link: http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com/ You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf Your guide to debunking thermite on 9/11 Molten Steel and Thermite has never been taken to court Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/your-guide-to-debunking-thermite Thermite Revisited & Demolished in 2024 Aerospace Engineer discusses the truth about thermite and September 11, 2001 Presentation: https://911revision.substack.com/p/thermite-revisited-and-demolished Anatomy of a 9/11 Thermite Brainwashing Operation I recently discovered the existence of an e-book from 2010 Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/anatomy-of-a-911-thermite-brainwashing

Controlled Demolition Expert Speaks Out! What we saw on 9/11 was not due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/controlled-demolition-expert-speaks Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers Showing you just how easily people are duped, who don't know any better Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/myanmar-provides-a-911-lesson-for 9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline

(I once did too, but then I stopped outsourcing my thinking) Just how much thermite would be needed for EACH tower? What are the ingredients of thermite? What was the construction materials of the towers? Why do the people selling the bomb and thermite narrative NOT want you to count past 3? They only talk about the towers and building 7. What about the 9/11 orphans that cannot be explained by bombs, thermite or nukes? If you bought into the nuke narrative, you’re even more bamboozled than those that bought the bomb and thermite narrative. Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," and the nuke theorists, the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion". – Prof David A. Hughes Article: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood-0ce The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories People are so easily led by perceived "experts". Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite Expanded: The controlled demolition of the 9/11 thermite theory People are so easily led by perceived "experts". Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/expanded-the-controlled-demolition I highly recommend studying the blog: The Thermite Free Zone Link: http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com/ You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf

Watch the full documentary: https://rumble.com/v4a8ixu-911-the-best-explainer-documentary-youll-ever-see.html Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers Showing you just how easily people are duped, who don't know any better Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/myanmar-provides-a-911-lesson-for

3 hours – A cut down version of “Observable Evidence.” Focuses on the Truth Movement. Download full series here: https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21AIp6HUM6YH5rqM0&id=88862EF47BCAF6CD%21150377&cid=88862EF47BCAF6CD

Why are people afraid to seek REAL truth? Why keep your head buried in the sand? 9/11 was an attack on human consciousness. People need to realise, they live in a time where their perceptions are being managed. Just like with Covid from 2020 to 2023, people outsourced their thinking way too easily to the government and MSM and in turn the so called "truther" movement - As there are bad actors in the alternative media, aka "truther" movements, especially when it comes to the events of September 11, 2001. There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11: 1. POOR Problem solving skills 2. Group Think (Peer Pressure, running with the herd) 3. They just can't handle the implications (they wish it weren't true)

Most people struggle with wrapping their heads around a conclusive body of evidence vs a belief or a theory / hypothesis. There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11: 1. POOR Problem solving skills 2. Group Think (Peer Pressure, running with the herd) 3. They just can't handle the implications (they wish it weren't true) You live in a time where your perception is being managed. Just like with Covid from 2020 to 2023, people outsourced their thinking way too easily. 9/11 was an attack on human consciousness.

A special presentation refuting 10 points of contention against DEW on 9/11 Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/refutation-of-the-911-truther-narratives Please read this article before watching the presentation I did on 10.02.2024. - https://911revision.substack.com/p/cowards-for-911-truth Get the popcorn - It was 4 hours long, refuting the following 10 points put forth against DEW being the mechanism of destruction on September 11, 2001. I dissect all 10 points he raises to try and refute DEW, which you can read about in this book. https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/ Let’s go! This is the initial background on 9/11 and then perception management. Timestamp 5 min 30 Below is the points raised against DEW, with my reply and reference to Dr Wood’s book and the discussion in the presentation with a timestamp for the full 4 hours broken down… 1.) Debris Pile Height: The claim of a too-low debris pile is debunked by recognizing that 90% of the Twin Towers' mass fell outside their footprints. Chapter 9 - Pages 171 to 196 (Timestamp 35 min23 to 57:30) 2.) Damage to Core Box Columns: DEW would need precise targeting features, making it implausible for the observed straight and horizontal breaks in core columns. Chapter 12 - Pages 247 to 256 (Timestamp 57:30 to 1h12:33) 3.) Fall of the "Spire": The assertion that steel "turned to dust" is challenged by the spire falling after being "shaken," likely by explosive charges. Chapter 8 - Pages 131 to 169 (Timestamp 1h12:33 to 1h31:30) 4.) "Toasted" Tops of Vehicles: Damage to vehicles is explained by partially unignited thermite falling through the air, not by DEW. Chapter 11 - Pages 213 to 246 (Timestamp 1h31:30 to 1h48:30) 5.) Once-Molten Iron Microspheres: The presence of molten iron spheres is explained by thermitic materials, not addressed by the DEW hypothesis. Chapter 15 - Page 321 to 339 (Timestamp 1h48:30 to 1h54:32) 6.) Molten Metal: DEW cannot explain observations of molten metal pouring from WTC 2 with temperatures exceeding those from jet fuel or office fires. Chapter 17 - Pages 349 to 394 (Timestamp 1h54:32 to 2h13:23) 7.) Active, Unignited Nano-Thermite: Discovery of nano-thermite in the dust supports the explosive/incendiary hypothesis, not explained by DEW. Chapter 7 - Pages 122 to 130 (Timestamp 2h13:23 to 2h21:08) 8.) Persistent Extreme Heat: High temperatures at Ground Zero contradict DEW proponents' denial of such temperatures. Chapter 13 - Pages 257 to 296 (Timestamp 2h21:08 to 2h47:56) 9.) Craters Observed in WTC 5 and 6: Holes in WTC 5 and 6 are attributed to falling steel, not exotic weaponry as suggested by DEW proponents. Chapter 10 - Pages 197 to 212 (Timestamp 2h47:56 to 3h08:15) 10.) Eyewitness Accounts of Multiple Explosions and Building 7: Numerous eyewitness accounts align with controlled demolition, not explained by the DEW hypothesis. Chapter 7 - Pages 95 to 130 - Timestamp 3h08:15 to 3h23:07 (Building 7 mentioned as well) Then for some closing thoughts, that are thought provoking… Timestamp 3h23:07 to 3h56:15