RichardGage911

[[[Please subscribe to our NEW YouTube channel, RichardGage911Again: https://www.youtube.com/user/richardgage YouTube's censorship has given me two strikes already on this channel. Soon it will be gone.]]] 9/11: An Architect’s Guide | Part 3: The Twin Towers and Extreme Heat Course Number: RG911-AAG-L3 Live three-part webinar series. Each part is about 1 1/2 hours long. We at RichardGage911 (http://RichardGage911.org) are dedicated to conducting research and providing education about the complete destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, our courses give architects the technical knowledge and analytical framework with which to evaluate the most likely cause of those building failures. Course Description: Never before has a steel-framed high-rise collapsed from fire. Why, then, did three such buildings collapse on September 11, 2001? In Part 3 of “9/11: An Architect’s Guide,” Richard Gage, AIA, provides an overview of the most important evidence related to the extreme heat observed both before and after the Twin Towers’ destruction. As documented extensively in the report issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), molten metal was seen pouring out of the South Tower during the seven minutes leading up to its collapse. Molten metal was also observed in the debris of both buildings, while various other evidence of extreme heat and incendiary chemical reactions have been documented since. In 2005, NIST concluded that the Twin Towers’ destruction resulted from the combined effects of the airplane impact damage and ensuing fires, both of which are phenomena that fail to account for the extreme heat observed before and after the Twin Towers’ destruction. Does NIST’s explanation for these unprecedented structural failures explain all of the evidence? Together, we will study the collapses and evaluate which of the two leading hypotheses — fire-induced failure or controlled demolition — is more consistent with the evidence. Participants will be encouraged to decide for themselves if a new investigation is warranted. Learning Objectives: Participants will be able to: 1. Describe the characteristics of building fires and the aspects of high-rise design that contribute to make fire-induced failure in steel-framed high-rise buildings a rare occurrence. 2. Recognize the distinct features associated with fire-induced failure and the distinct features associated with the procedure of controlled demolition. 3. Describe step-by-step the series of structural failures that the National Institute of Standards and Technology found to be the most likely cause of the collapse of World Trade Center Twin Towers. 4. Analyze the physical evidence and the dynamics of the collapse of the Twin Towers according to how consistent it is with the competing hypotheses of fire-induced failure and controlled demolition. Visit http://RichardGage911.org for more information. #richardgage #richardgage911 #richardgage911:unleashed! #wtc7 #911con #worldtradecenter #TwinTowers #WTC #Part 3TTandExtremeHeat Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

[[[Please subscribe to our NEW YouTube channel, "RichardGage911Again": https://www.youtube.com/user/richardgage YouTube's censorship has given me two strikes already on this channel.]]] 9/11: An Architect’s Guide | Part 2: The Twin Towers’ Explosive Destruction Course Number: RG911-AAG-OD2 Three-part webinar series. Each part is about 1 1/2 hours. We are an organization dedicated to conducting research and providing education about the complete destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, our courses give architects the technical knowledge and analytical framework with which to evaluate the most likely cause of those building failures. Course Description: Never before has a steel-framed high-rise collapsed from fire. Why, then, did three such buildings collapse on September 11, 2001? In Part 2 of “9/11: An Architect’s Guide,” Richard Gage, AIA, provides an overview of the most important evidence related to the explosiveness of the Twin Towers’ destruction. Much like that of WTC 7, the destruction of the Twin Towers exhibited most of the features of controlled demolition. In 2005, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) concluded that the Twin Towers’ destruction resulted from the combined effects of the airplane impact damage and ensuing fires. Is NIST’s explanation for these unprecedented structural failures valid? Decide for yourself after watching this informative one-hour presentation. Using the information presented, you will be able to evaluate which of the two hypotheses — fire-induced failure or controlled demolition �� is more consistent with the evidence. Learning Objectives: Participants will be able to: 1. Describe the characteristics of building fires and the aspects of high-rise design that contribute to make fire-induced failure in steel-framed high-rise buildings a rare occurrence. 2. Recognize the distinct features associated with fire-induced failure and the distinct features associated with the procedure of controlled demolition. 3. Describe step-by-step the series of structural failures that the National Institute of Standards and Technology found to be the most likely cause of the collapse of World Trade Center Twin Towers. 4. Analyze the physical evidence and the dynamics of the collapse of the Twin Towers according to how consistent it is with the competing hypotheses of fire-induced failure and controlled demolition. Learn more: https://RichardGage911.org #RichardGage911 #NIST911 #AnArchetectsguidepart2 #TTExplosivedestruction #richardgage911 #richardgage911:unleashed! #wtc7 #911con #worldtradecenter #richardgage Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

What does Freedom of Speech mean in today’s social media censorship environment? How should it apply to privately held monopolies like YouTube? How do we “manage” Free Speech for the good of all? Or do we? What are the implications of YouTube’s Jan 25, 2019 statement: “We’ll begin reducing recommendations of borderline content and content that could misinform users in harmful ways—such as….videos promoting a phony miracle cure for a serious illness, claiming the earth is flat, or making blatantly false claims about historic events like 9/11.” Who is Cass Sunstein and what is “Cognitive Infiltration”? How do “propaganda campaigns” that shape narrative, and “censorship” inter-relate? What’s the best way to overcome the mainstream media propaganda? What are the subjects and types of content that YouTube and others are censoring? How does YouTube censorship actually work? What is the methodology of shadow banning and de-platforming and how can we protect ourselves from it? What is the “Trusted Flagger” YouTube program and how is it deployed? How have “community volunteer teams” vs. “professional teams” been working for YouTube behind the scenes? How are censorship “bots” used? How is “fear, uncertainty, and doubt” (FUD) deployed against us? How do we censor ourselves in this new environment – even while being advocates of free speech?! Where and when did the “copywrite��� concept begin and who was it designed to protect? ************************************************************** How do distributed decentralized technologies work for alternative media content creators? What is the IPFS (Interplanetary File System) and how can it benefit sharing 9/11 truth? Can cryptocurrency aid in freedom of speech? Our guest on RichardGage911:UNLEASHED is Matthew Raymer He has formal degrees in Physics, Mathematics, and Computer Science. He has published papers on Computational Biophysics and was a software engineer & architect, and is a life-long serial entrepreneur. He has spent 30 years consulting, constructing, instructing, and planning projects for small and medium size enterprise corporations and government agencies. Mathew hosts the underground podcast De-platformed from his home in southeast Asia. He has recently specialized in understanding social media censorship and providing practical solutions for content providers. In fact, we use his excellent services, Content Safe here at RichardGage911:UNLEASHED! Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

20 years after 9/11, experts still disagree on the nature of the Pentagon terror attack. Thierry Meyssan introduces theory B: "a missile struck the Pentagon." See more at https://richardgage911.org/9-11con-the-pentagon/

The Amazing Pre-9/11 Journeys of Architectural Photographer Tom Scott Gordon What was the “Bridgeways Project” and why was it so very secretive? Was there a developing problem of galvanic corrosion with the aluminum cladding on the towers? Why did this project get terminated so abruptly in one day – stunning the dozens gathered for the most cryptic meeting of their lives – attended by none other than our guest today on RichardGage911:UNLEASHED! Why was this architectural photographer hired to study and photograph the city landscape immediately surrounding the Twin Towers more than ten years before 9/11? Why was the Twin Towers architect of record, Emery Roth & Sons, re-hired 20 years after their completion, to engage in the massive project to protect the public on the plaza below the towers – and to protect from what? Was there an even larger project underway to actually decommission the Twin Towers? My guest is multi-decade architectural photographer Tom Scott Gordon of TS Gordon/Building Images who earned numerous AIA awards, (American Institute of Architects) on assignments for over 650 architecture and design firms. He earned a bachelor’s degree from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago in 1976. His formative years were spent under the tutelage of acclaimed artists including audio genius Dr. Paul Klipsch, famed watercolorist, Robert Andrew Parker, “AIA Gold Medalist” Fay Jones, and his associates; ‘Uncle’ Norman Jaffe, AIA, David George, AIA, and Bob Shaheen, ASLA. ************************ Learn more at https://RichardGage911.org Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

What’s the evidence at the crime scene that suggests a crime - other than the “Act of War” that the official narrative has presented? What arms industry contractors were deeply involved in the writing of the NIST report? Who was really in control of security at the World Trade Center? What was the role of Kroll Associates and Jerome Hauer in the 9/11 event? What really happened to John O’Neil - and why? What are the deeper connections of Mayor Giuliani that might shed light on 9/11? Who was really in control of security at the airports of the origin of the hijacked flights? Where did the investigation of the “9/11 insider trading” lead? What is the connection between the 9/11 event and the laundered drug money by the big banks? Why were the only fireproofing upgrades at the Twin Towers at and near the floors by the airplanes. What was the secret role of J. Paul Bremer at Marsh & McLennan, and in Iraq following 9/11? And what very interesting product development was he involved with? What are the implications of the elevator modernization by Ace Elevator at the Twin Towers the nine months prior to 9/11? Check out the Jeremy Rys slideshow "9/11: Inside Out" https://www.facebook.com/911InsideOut _____________________________________________________ Jeremy Rys is my guest on RichardGage911:UNLEASHED! He has a Bachelor's of Science Degree in Physics from Bridgewater State University. He has been investigating 9/11 and related events since 2004. He has also been a major contributor to the scientific debunking literature and videos including his work with Engineer Jonathan Cole on the “9/11 Experiments” series. He is also appreciated in the foreword of Kevin Ryan's book Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects. For more info visit https://RichardGage911.org Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

20 years after 9/11, experts still disagree on the nature of the Pentagon terror attack. Barbara Honegger introduces theory A: "multiple explosions from pre-placed explosives, not due to a plane impact, and a plane, not Flight 77, destroyed at/near the helipad." See more at https://richardgage911.org/9-11con-the-pentagon/

20 years after 9/11, experts still disagree on the nature of the Pentagon terror attack. Craig McKee & Adam Ruff introduce theory C: "no 757 Hit the Pentagon." See more at https://richardgage911.org/9-11con-the-pentagon/

20 years after 9/11, experts still disagree on the nature of the Pentagon terror attack. David Chandler and Wayne Coste introduce theory D: "a plane with the dimensions of a Boeing 757 impacted the Pentagon." See more at https://richardgage911.org/9-11con-the-pentagon/

9/11CON – The Pentagon What Really Happened?! Find Out on Saturday March 19 – 10AM to 10PM Pacific A Live-Streamed Online Event for the 9/11 Truth Movement 4 Major Researchers | 4 Unique Theories Learn more: https://RichardGage911.org #richardgage911 #richardgage911:unleashed! #wtc7 #911con #worldtradecenter #richardgage #911CON #RichardGage911 #Pentagon Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

Mick Harrison describes his role in the upcoming film series "9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom" Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

9/11: An Architect’s Guide | Part 1 - World Trade Center 7 Course Number: RG911-AAG-OD1 Live three-part webinar series. Each part is about 1 1/2 hours long Richard Gage, AIA, Architect is dedicated to conducting research and providing education about the complete destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, my courses provide the technical knowledge and analytical framework with which to evaluate the most likely cause of those building failures. Course Description: In Part 1 of “9/11: An Architect’s Guide,” Richard Gage, AIA, provides an overview of the most important and readily understandable evidence regarding the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7), a 47-story high-rise that was not struck by an airplane. The damage WTC 7 suffered from the collapse of the North Tower was found to be inconsequential. It had fires that were similar to those that have occurred previously in high-rise buildings. Yet it fell symmetrically into its own footprint in the manner of a typical controlled demolition. In 2008, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) concluded that WTC 7’s destruction was caused by normal office fires that burned “at temperatures hundreds of degrees below those typically considered in design practice for establishing structural fire resistance ratings.” Is NIST’s explanation for this unprecedented structural failure valid? Decide for yourself after watching this informative one-hour presentation. Using the information presented, you will be able to evaluate which of the two hypotheses — fire-induced failure or controlled demolition — is more consistent with the evidence. Learning Objectives: Participants will be able to: 1. Describe the characteristics of building fires and the aspects of high-rise design that contribute to make fire-induced failure in steel-framed high-rise buildings a rare occurrence. 2. Recognize the distinct features associated with fire-induced failure and the distinct features associated with the procedure of controlled demolition. 3. Describe step-by-step the series of structural failures that the National Institute of Standards and Technology found to be the most likely cause of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7. 4. Analyze the physical evidence and dynamics of Building 7’s collapse according to how consistent they are with the competing hypotheses of fire-induced failure and controlled demolition. For more information: visit https://RichardGage911.org​ #Part1WorldTradeCenter #anarchitectguide911 #NIST911 #richardgage #richardgage911 #richardgage911:unleashed! #wtc7 #911con #worldtradecenter Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

[[[This version corrects/removes the technical difficulties. ]]] 9/11 Researcher of 15 years, Aidan Monaghan brings the rubber to the road. This electrical engineer tracks down the answers to questions that most of us wouldn’t even think to ask: What were the capabilities of the GPS-guided autopilot flight control systems on Boeing 757/767’s navigation prior to 9/11? How about its performance on 9/11? What was the capability to remotely deliver flight plan waypoints to aircraft flight management systems before 9/11? And what was the history of remote "backdoor" accessibility to Boeing flight control computers? What was the significance of 9/11 flight transponder activity of the highjacked aircraft on 9/11? What is the significance of United Airline flight 175’s observed and measured performance prior to impacting WTC 2? What is the significance of the extreme and low-visibility weather the day before 9/11 on the alleged hijacker’s hoped-for outcome? Is the publicly released American Airlines #77 Flight Data Recorder an accurate record of the flight that hit the Pentagon? What was the flying capability of the alleged hijackers? Could they have flown the profiles on 9/11? Aidan Monaghan is a tireless 9/11 researcher of almost 2 decades. He has a degree in Electrical Engineering and had a career in “Electrostatics”! He’s been conducting data collection from the government via the Freedom of Information Act requests that have yielded the 9/11 Truth Community a treasure trove of valuable data proving the official narrative of 9/11 can’t possibly be true. Visit https://RichardGage911.org for more info. Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

9/11: An Architect’s Guide | Part 3: The Twin Towers and Extreme Heat Course Number: RG911-AAG-L3 Live three-part webinar series. Each part is about 1 1/2 hours long. We at RichardGage911 ( http://RichardGage911.org ) are dedicated to conducting research and providing education about the complete destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, our courses give architects the technical knowledge and analytical framework with which to evaluate the most likely cause of those building failures. Course Description: Never before has a steel-framed high-rise collapsed from fire. Why, then, did three such buildings collapse on September 11, 2001? In Part 3 of “9/11: An Architect’s Guide,” Richard Gage, AIA, provides an overview of the most important evidence related to the extreme heat observed both before and after the Twin Towers’ destruction. As documented extensively in the report issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), molten metal was seen pouring out of the South Tower during the seven minutes leading up to its collapse. Molten metal was also observed in the debris of both buildings, while various other evidence of extreme heat and incendiary chemical reactions have been documented since. In 2005, NIST concluded that the Twin Towers’ destruction resulted from the combined effects of the airplane impact damage and ensuing fires, both of which are phenomena that fail to account for the extreme heat observed before and after the Twin Towers’ destruction. Does NIST’s explanation for these unprecedented structural failures explain all of the evidence? Together, we will study the collapses and evaluate which of the two leading hypotheses — fire-induced failure or controlled demolition — is more consistent with the evidence. Participants will be encouraged to decide for themselves if a new investigation is warranted. Learning Objectives: Participants will be able to: 1. Describe the characteristics of building fires and the aspects of high-rise design that contribute to make fire-induced failure in steel-framed high-rise buildings a rare occurrence. 2. Recognize the distinct features associated with fire-induced failure and the distinct features associated with the procedure of controlled demolition. 3. Describe step-by-step the series of structural failures that the National Institute of Standards and Technology found to be the most likely cause of the collapse of World Trade Center Twin Towers. 4. Analyze the physical evidence and the dynamics of the collapse of the Twin Towers according to how consistent it is with the competing hypotheses of fire-induced failure and controlled demolition. Visit http://RichardGage911.org for more information. #richardgage #richardgage911 #richardgage911:unleashed! #wtc7 #911con #worldtradecenter #TwinTowers #WTC #Part 3TTandExtremeHeat Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

9/11: An Architect’s Guide | Part 2: The Twin Towers’ Explosive Destruction Course Number: RG911-AAG-OD2 Three-part webinar series. Each part is about 1 1/2 hours. We are an organization dedicated to conducting research and providing education about the complete destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, our courses give architects the technical knowledge and analytical framework with which to evaluate the most likely cause of those building failures. Course Description: Never before has a steel-framed high-rise collapsed from fire. Why, then, did three such buildings collapse on September 11, 2001? In Part 2 of “9/11: An Architect’s Guide,” Richard Gage, AIA, provides an overview of the most important evidence related to the explosiveness of the Twin Towers’ destruction. Much like that of WTC 7, the destruction of the Twin Towers exhibited most of the features of controlled demolition. In 2005, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) concluded that the Twin Towers’ destruction resulted from the combined effects of the airplane impact damage and ensuing fires. Is NIST’s explanation for these unprecedented structural failures valid? Decide for yourself after watching this informative one-hour presentation. Using the information presented, you will be able to evaluate which of the two hypotheses — fire-induced failure or controlled demolition �� is more consistent with the evidence. Learning Objectives: Participants will be able to: 1. Describe the characteristics of building fires and the aspects of high-rise design that contribute to make fire-induced failure in steel-framed high-rise buildings a rare occurrence. 2. Recognize the distinct features associated with fire-induced failure and the distinct features associated with the procedure of controlled demolition. 3. Describe step-by-step the series of structural failures that the National Institute of Standards and Technology found to be the most likely cause of the collapse of World Trade Center Twin Towers. 4. Analyze the physical evidence and the dynamics of the collapse of the Twin Towers according to how consistent it is with the competing hypotheses of fire-induced failure and controlled demolition. Learn more: https://RichardGage911.org #RichardGage911 #NIST911 #AnArchetectsguidepart2 #TTExplosivedestruction #richardgage911 #richardgage911:unleashed! #wtc7 #911con #worldtradecenter #richardgage Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

9/11: An Architect’s Guide | Part 1 - World Trade Center 7 Course Number: RG911-AAG-OD1 Live three-part webinar series. Each part is about 1 1/2 hours long Richard Gage, AIA, Architect is dedicated to conducting research and providing education about the complete destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, my courses provide the technical knowledge and analytical framework with which to evaluate the most likely cause of those building failures. Course Description: In Part 1 of “9/11: An Architect’s Guide,” Richard Gage, AIA, provides an overview of the most important and readily understandable evidence regarding the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7), a 47-story high-rise that was not struck by an airplane. The damage WTC 7 suffered from the collapse of the North Tower was found to be inconsequential. It had fires that were similar to those that have occurred previously in high-rise buildings. Yet it fell symmetrically into its own footprint in the manner of a typical controlled demolition. In 2008, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) concluded that WTC 7’s destruction was caused by normal office fires that burned “at temperatures hundreds of degrees below those typically considered in design practice for establishing structural fire resistance ratings.” Is NIST’s explanation for this unprecedented structural failure valid? Decide for yourself after watching this informative one-hour presentation. Using the information presented, you will be able to evaluate which of the two hypotheses — fire-induced failure or controlled demolition — is more consistent with the evidence. Learning Objectives: Participants will be able to: 1. Describe the characteristics of building fires and the aspects of high-rise design that contribute to make fire-induced failure in steel-framed high-rise buildings a rare occurrence. 2. Recognize the distinct features associated with fire-induced failure and the distinct features associated with the procedure of controlled demolition. 3. Describe step-by-step the series of structural failures that the National Institute of Standards and Technology found to be the most likely cause of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7. 4. Analyze the physical evidence and dynamics of Building 7’s collapse according to how consistent they are with the competing hypotheses of fire-induced failure and controlled demolition. For more information: visit https://RichardGage911.org​ #Part1WorldTradeCenter #anarchitectguide911 #NIST911 #richardgage #richardgage911 #richardgage911:unleashed! #wtc7 #911con #worldtradecenter Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

9/11: An Architects Guide | Part 2: The Twin Towers Explosive Destruction Course Number: RG911-AAG-OD2 Three-part webinar series. Each part is about 1 1/2 hours. We are an organization dedicated to conducting research and providing education about the complete destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, our courses give architects the technical knowledge and analytical framework with which to evaluate the most likely cause of those building failures. Course Description: Never before has a steel-framed high-rise collapsed from fire. Why, then, did three such buildings collapse on September 11, 2001? In Part 2 of 9/11: An Architects Guide, Richard Gage, AIA, provides an overview of the most important evidence related to the explosiveness of the Twin Towers destruction. Much like that of WTC 7, the destruction of the Twin Towers exhibited most of the features of controlled demolition. In 2005, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) concluded that the Twin Towers destruction resulted from the combined effects of the airplane impact damage and ensuing fires. Is NISTs explanation for these unprecedented structural failures valid? Decide for yourself after watching this informative one-hour presentation. Using the information presented, you will be able to evaluate which of the two hypotheses fire-induced failure or controlled demolition is more consistent with the evidence. Learning Objectives: Participants will be able to: 1. Describe the characteristics of building fires and the aspects of high-rise design that contribute to make fire-induced failure in steel-framed high-rise buildings a rare occurrence. 2. Recognize the distinct features associated with fire-induced failure and the distinct features associated with the procedure of controlled demolition. 3. Describe step-by-step the series of structural failures that the National Institute of Standards and Technology found to be the most likely cause of the collapse of World Trade Center Twin Towers. 4. Analyze the physical evidence and the dynamics of the collapse of the Twin Towers according to how consistent it is with the competing hypotheses of fire-induced failure and controlled demolition. Learn more: https://RichardGage911.org Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

9/11: An Architect’s Guide | Part 2: The Twin Towers’ Explosive Destruction Course Number: RG911-AAG-OD2 Please like, share, subscribe! Three-part webinar series. Each part is about 1 1/2 hours. We are an organization dedicated to conducting research and providing education about the complete destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, our courses give architects the technical knowledge and analytical framework with which to evaluate the most likely cause of those building failures. Course Description: Never before has a steel-framed high-rise collapsed from fire. Why, then, did three such buildings collapse on September 11, 2001? In Part 2 of “9/11: An Architect’s Guide,” Richard Gage, AIA, provides an overview of the most important evidence related to the explosiveness of the Twin Towers’ destruction. Much like that of WTC 7, the destruction of the Twin Towers exhibited most of the features of controlled demolition. In 2005, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) concluded that the Twin Towers’ destruction resulted from the combined effects of the airplane impact damage and ensuing fires. Is NIST’s explanation for these unprecedented structural failures valid? Decide for yourself after watching this informative one-hour presentation. Using the information presented, you will be able to evaluate which of the two hypotheses — fire-induced failure or controlled demolition �� is more consistent with the evidence. Learning Objectives: Participants will be able to: 1. Describe the characteristics of building fires and the aspects of high-rise design that contribute to make fire-induced failure in steel-framed high-rise buildings a rare occurrence. 2. Recognize the distinct features associated with fire-induced failure and the distinct features associated with the procedure of controlled demolition. 3. Describe step-by-step the series of structural failures that the National Institute of Standards and Technology found to be the most likely cause of the collapse of World Trade Center Twin Towers. 4. Analyze the physical evidence and the dynamics of the collapse of the Twin Towers according to how consistent it is with the competing hypotheses of fire-induced failure and controlled demolition. For more info: https://RichardGage911.org Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

My Guest is John A. Richardson, President of Richardson Nutritional Center - provider of Vitamin B17. There is probably no greater scam perpetrated upon the American people than the disease and the industry of cancer—with the possible exception of 9/11, and now the current disease that is going around along with it’s dangerous cure. My Guest is the son of respected pioneer of nutritional health and alternative treatment, Dr. John A. Richardson, who wrote the book Laetrile Case Histories - the Richardson Cancer Clinic Experience. John Jr. is a senior accounting and financial management executive with over 30 years’ experience. He carries on the legacy of his father, who used Laetrile very successfully in his medical practice. His work is showcased in several books including - “A World Without Cancer—The Story of Vitamin B17,” authored by his good friend, the world renowned researcher G. Edward Griffin. What is Vitamin B17 and how does it fight Cancer? Stories of healing goes back decades Laetrile outlawed, but the healing continued Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center researcher proves Laetrile works! Why was it covered up? John and his team at RNC are fully devoted to providing the best quality California Grown Apricot Seeds and B17 Products. RNC and its brand Nutriseed are currently the #1 source in the world for California Apricot Seeds. The company embodies the legacy of both John A. Richardson, MD and G Edward Griffin. He has been eating Apricot Seeds since he was 5 years old. He will never get cancer. He has devoted the past two decades of his life marketing those Apricot Seeds and associated products. John's mission in life is “to get B17 back into every body”. Learn more about Apricot seeds and Vitamin B17: https://rncstore.com/r?id=ftriut Visit also https://RichardGage911.org Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

9/11: An Architect’s Guide | Part 1 - World Trade Center 7 Course Number: RG911-AAG-OD1 Live three-part webinar series. Each part is about 1 1/2 hours long Richard Gage, AIA, Architect is dedicated to conducting research and providing education about the complete destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, my courses provide the technical knowledge and analytical framework with which to evaluate the most likely cause of those building failures. Course Description: In Part 1 of “9/11: An Architect’s Guide,” Richard Gage, AIA, provides an overview of the most important evidence regarding the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7), a 47-story high-rise that was not struck by an airplane. The damage WTC 7 suffered from the collapse of the North Tower was found to be inconsequential. It had fires that were similar to those that have occurred previously in high-rise buildings. Yet it fell symmetrically into its own footprint in the manner of a typical controlled demolition. In 2008, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) concluded that WTC 7’s destruction was caused by normal office fires that burned “at temperatures hundreds of degrees below those typically considered in design practice for establishing structural fire resistance ratings.” Is NIST’s explanation for this unprecedented structural failure valid? Decide for yourself after watching this informative one-hour presentation. Using the information presented, you will be able to evaluate which of the two hypotheses — fire-induced failure or controlled demolition — is more consistent with the evidence. Learning Objectives: Participants will be able to: 1. Describe the characteristics of building fires and the aspects of high-rise design that contribute to make fire-induced failure in steel-framed high-rise buildings a rare occurrence. 2. Recognize the distinct features associated with fire-induced failure and the distinct features associated with the procedure of controlled demolition. 3. Describe step-by-step the series of structural failures that the National Institute of Standards and Technology found to be the most likely cause of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7. 4. Analyze the physical evidence and dynamics of Building 7’s collapse according to how consistent they are with the competing hypotheses of fire-induced failure and controlled demolition. For more information: visit https://RichardGage911.org​ ​ Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

Our guest on RichardGage911:UNLEASHED! is John Perkins, the author of the updated New York Times Bestseller, “New Confessions of An Economic Hit Man”—updated after 9/11, and chillingly close to home. But he offers solutions and hope regarding the haunting problems that he helped to create—as well as tools to help fight back. As a former economic hit man, John Perkins shares new details about the ways he and others cheated countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars. Then he reveals how the deadly Economic Hit Man cancer he helped create has spread far more widely and deeply than ever in the US and everywhere else—to become the dominant system of business, government, and society today. Economic hit men are the shock troops of what John calls the corporatocracy, a vast network of corporations, banks, colluding governments, and the rich and powerful people tied to them. If the EHMs can’t maintain the corrupt status quo through nonviolent coercion, the jackal assassins swoop in. In his updated book he exposes the fact that all the EHM and jackal tools—false economics, false promises, threats, bribes, extortion, debt, deception, coups, assassinations, unbridled military power—are used around the world still today exponentially more than during the era Perkins originally exposed over two decades ago. Perkins reveals the secret history of events that have created the current American Empire, including: How the defeats in Vietnam and Iraq have benefited big business The role of Israel as Fortress America in the Middle East Tragic repercussions of the IMF's Asian Economic Collapse The current Latin American revolution and its lessons for democracy U.S. blunders in Tibet, Congo, Lebanon, and Venezuela From the U.S. military in Iraq to infrastructure development in Indonesia, from Peace Corps volunteers in Africa to jackals in Venezuela, Perkins exposes a conspiracy of corruption that has fueled instability and anti-Americanism around the globe, with consequences reflected in our daily headlines. As dark as the story gets, our reformed EHM also provides hope. Perkins offers specific actions each of us can take to transform what he calls a failing Death Economy into a Life Economy that provides sustainable abundance for all, with an inspired plan to turn the tide for future generations. Visit Us at https://RichardGage911.org

This year’s Anarchapulco international event had Richard Gage, AIA, Architect speaking right in the middle of a tropical paradise – Jardin Secreto (Secret Garden) the perfect get-away environment for this freedom-loving crowd. Richard opened his talk with a very personal story of his own awakening to the truth about 9/11 in 2006 with the early reaction of his shock, then deep pain, and then visceral anger upon the realization of the immensity of the scam, and crime of the century. He told this gentle crowd how he couldn’t believe that he was the only architect willing to speak out regularly and grow an organization to take on this global scam. And grow it he did. He was asked by MC Earnest Hancock to share what happened at AE911Truth in September, so he opened up about the difficult separation from AE911Truth that began with his candid comments about the Covid and vaccine manipulations, about Spike Lee pulling his 9/11 Truth segment from HBO, and about the AE board’s over-reaction to their PR consultant’s panic attack regarding the Slate magazine article. It’s a lot to pack in, and he did. It changed our lives quite significantly and Richard has shined threw it all, maintaining the high road, exonerating his former fellow board members, and taking the blame for speaking off-topic. The attendees seemed appreciative of his persistence over 15 years at AE911Truth, with 600 hundred presentations and an equal number of TV & radio interviews over the years. They were also supportive of our ongoing leadership in the 9/11 Truth Movement at RichardGage911.org, independent of AE911Truth and expanding our message. Richard introduced me on stage for the first time ever and shared with the crowd how hard we work together side by side in order to get the truth further out there on social media with our new video podcast RichardGage911:UNLEASED! which we produce together at least every week. I was so proud to be by his side up there, having admired his work for the last 6 years since we first met in Sandpoint, ID, and married almost 3 years ago. He then started in with the evidence for the Third Tower to collapse, WTC Building 7, which most people know nothing about. It was the 47 story high-rise that, after witnesses hear explosions, collapses suddenly, smoothly, symmetrically into its own footprint in less than 7 seconds – and in the exact manner of a classic controlled demolition. Here is a very short clip that I snuck while taking pics during the presentation: He told the audience that he starts with this building for 3 reasons, 1) because people are unfamiliar with it so they are more intrigued as well as openminded, 2) nobody died in that building according to the official narrative, so people don’t have a trauma induced fear-based experience associated with it like so many do with the Twin Towers, and 3) the evidence of controlled demolition is crystal clear, so the audience is then more open-minded about our bigger Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

9/11-Based Screenplay Makes for Gripping Political Thriller! Our guest on Richard Gage911:UNLEASHED! is the consummate 9/11 researcher Art Olivier, the former mayor of Bellflower, CA who couldn’t just wake up to the truth of 9/11 in 2006 - he had to write his own screenplay about it! The resulting 2012 fictional film connects the dots for us from our own set of well known contradictions and inadvertent exposures from the official narrative of the September 11th attacks. The story starts several months earlier though with the planning of the 9/11 False Flag operation in the den of a New York billionaire from “The Council”. A CIA agent named Delgado, known for his success in clandestine operations in Pakistan, is summoned to get direction from his real boss who informs him of the operation to restore Iraqi oil profits to American and British firms. What follows is a fascinating portrayal of the line-up of familiar components of lexicon in the 9/11 Truth Movement - neatly tied together in this ambitious film made on a thrifty budget. As a result of producing the 9/11 story you are not supposed to know, the US Department ofHomeland Security placed him on the Terrorist Watchlist. Art Olivier was the year-2000 Libertarian opponent to Dick Cheney for Vice President and was Arnold Schwarzenegger's 2006 opponent for governor! We’ll find out how his 9/11 research impacted his political life as well! #richardgage911 #richardgage911:unleashed! #wtc7 #911con #worldtradecenter #richardgage #artoliver #operationterror Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

My guest is Native Oklahoman, Holland Van den Nieuwenhof - the writer and producer of "A Noble Lie" - the first full-length documentary proving the official story of the bombing of the Murrah Building as myth. He is the relentless truth warrior that reveals the pre-cursor psychological operation to 9/11. Why was there overwhelming evidence of foreknowledge of the 1995 Murrah Building bombing among federal officials - yet no one stopped the deadly attack which killed 168? Why were there 2 separate blasts, 10 seconds apart - heard by witnesses and recorded at the nearby seismic station - yet officials maintain that only one blast occurred? Why were there repeated public announcements of additional undetonated bombs found in the building, yet officials later denied them. Why was the 10 foot round crater under the Ryder truck far off-center from the damage pattern of the building? If the Ryder truck was parked in FRONT of the Murrah building, why was so much of the building debris blown past the truck, into the street, and into the façade of the building across the street? Why was the Clinton and other key prosecutorial legal evidence moved into the Murrah building before the attack? Why was there legislation, similar to the Patriot Act, ready to go right after the bombing? My guest is Holland Van den Nieuwenhof, a native of Oklahoma who formerly served in the US Marine Corps as a rifle squad leader. His broadcasting career started in 2007 as a co-host on Radio Free Oklahoma, and later as co-host on the Free Mind Report. Holland is also the writer and producer for A Noble Lie: Oklahoma City 1995, the first full-length documentary examining the Oklahoma City bombing in the light of new and suppressed evidence that proves the official story as a Deep State lie. He join us to shed light on questions long ignored and censored about the Oklahoma City Bombing. Visit https://RichardGage911.org #richardgage911 #richardgage911:unleashed! #wtc7 #911con #worldtradecenter #richardgage #Hollandvandennieuwenhof #oklahomacitybombing Content Managed by ContentSafe.co

9/11: An Architect’s Guide | Part 2: The Twin Towers’ Explosive Destruction Course Number: RG911-AAG-OD2 Three-part webinar series. Each part is about 1 1/2 hours. We are an organization dedicated to conducting research and providing education about the complete destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, our courses give architects the technical knowledge and analytical framework with which to evaluate the most likely cause of those building failures. Course Description: Never before has a steel-framed high-rise collapsed from fire. Why, then, did three such buildings collapse on September 11, 2001? In Part 2 of “9/11: An Architect’s Guide,” Richard Gage, AIA, provides an overview of the most important evidence related to the explosiveness of the Twin Towers’ destruction. Much like that of WTC 7, the destruction of the Twin Towers exhibited most of the features of controlled demolition. In 2005, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) concluded that the Twin Towers’ destruction resulted from the combined effects of the airplane impact damage and ensuing fires. Is NIST’s explanation for these unprecedented structural failures valid? Decide for yourself after watching this informative one-hour presentation. Using the information presented, you will be able to evaluate which of the two hypotheses — fire-induced failure or controlled demolition �� is more consistent with the evidence. Learning Objectives: Participants will be able to: 1. Describe the characteristics of building fires and the aspects of high-rise design that contribute to make fire-induced failure in steel-framed high-rise buildings a rare occurrence. 2. Recognize the distinct features associated with fire-induced failure and the distinct features associated with the procedure of controlled demolition. 3. Describe step-by-step the series of structural failures that the National Institute of Standards and Technology found to be the most likely cause of the collapse of World Trade Center Twin Towers. 4. Analyze the physical evidence and the dynamics of the collapse of the Twin Towers according to how consistent it is with the competing hypotheses of fire-induced failure and controlled demolition. Learn more: https://RichardGage911.org #richardgage911 #richardgage911:unleashed! #wtc7 #911con #worldtradecenter #richardgage #anarchitectsguide #twintowerspart2 Content Managed by ContentSafe.co