Agent Of Change

Late 2022, I was blackmailed by the NZ Justice Department after publishing “the Dossier” on social media, which I felt deserved our attention because the chatter around the internet about the fisherman, at the time … had a LOT more to it than what we, as a nation were being told. After publishing “the Dossier”, I was involved in a sting operation by the NZ Justice Department, where I was video tapped consuming drugs. I won’t go into any more details but it’s safe to say I learned my lesson, and will not ever be stupid enough to put myself in that position, again. If a video surfaces on social media or anywhere for that matter, of me consuming drugs in a compromising position, you’ll know this is the video tape the NZ Justice Department used against me as “encouragement” not to speak out against the fisherman, or his wife who went on to win a second term as PM of NZ. Yes, I have consumed drugs for a number of years of my life. Not anymore, however. They too damned expensive, and the powers that be, seem to be looking for any reason to take down anyone who challenges and questions the narrative, the status quo and authority. What you’re about to listen to is a conversation I had with a person who found me and called me after watching interest in “the Dossier” blow up online. I will not ever disclose this persons name, occupation or location, because I consider myself an investigative journalist, and journalists NEVER reveal their sources. If YOU think you know who I’m talking to, please do NOT reveal or disclose their name to anyone, online or offline. They do NOT know I have published a 24 minute segment of this 90 minute conversation and they don’t know that I recorded the conversation, which might seem a lack of integrity on my part, to you. I disagree, and here’s why … You and I know that New Zealand and indeed the world are in crisis mode. Our freedom and democracy is literally being stolen from right under noses, and if you’re oblivious to the events of the past four years, check your pulse. We’re all being slowly but surely squeezed and manipulated into submission by our own Governments, whatever their stripes and stealthily herded into position by MPs, Police, Mainstream Media, Local Government and the legal system to usher in the New World Order, which includes, a One World Digital Currency and Social Credit System, facilitated by but NOT limited to the WEF, The WHO, The UN, Big Pharma, Blackrock, Vanguard and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, all of whom I asked my local National MP, Dan Bidois to look into and check out over a year ago, and heard nothing from since. It's time for us ALL to RISE, STAND and DECLARE in UNITY, that we’re about the business of truth and honesty, instead of corruption, lies and deceit because it appears the hallowed halls of Governments throughout the world are infected, and you and me, are the cure. NOTE: I Do NOT Condone Violence Or Aggression Against ANYONE, EVER. We have left the Age Of Ego behind. We have entered the Age Of Integrity. Are you with me? Because if we don’t stand together NOW, we may never get another chance. It’s time to feel your fear, and STAND anyway. If not for yourself, do it for your younglings and your unborn younglings, and they’ll honour you and your legacy, forever. I want to leave this world a MUCH better place than I found it, and I’m picking you do as well, but it’s no secret that freedom and democracy costs blood. The servicemen and women who spilled theirs so that we may all live in relative peace, are watching us. You’re damn right they’re watching us. Are you gonna sit idly by and watch everything you’ve ever worked for confiscated because you’re a few points short on the new Social Credit System, because I can say what lies in store for us all, ain’t pretty, nor is it fun. Will you choose to stand with me, with your countrymen and women, with your family, friends and colleagues, and resist? Or roll over? Choose. NOW. Not tomorrow. NOW. DISCLAIMER: The information contained within this video in not new and freely available to discover, almost anywhere. This video and text within the post includes information provided and readily available throughout Facebook and other social media channels by third, fourth and fifth party individuals and users, and since it has not been restricted and labelled as misinformation or disinformation, it may be considered the truth, or an untruth. I advise discretion and to do your own due diligence. You should not believe what I have to say or take my word as truth. I am not the One Source Of Truth. This information is intended to provide general information and education to the general public about the potential issues that affect everyone in New Zealand, and throughout the world. The information contained within this video and post text should not be your only source of business or life information. We recommend you seek professional advice as appropriate from suitably qualified professionals. The information disclosed may or may not be reliable and accurate at the time of publishing, however: • Neither Tim Webb, Facebook and Rumble users, nor any of its employees, contractors, and providers of information, make any express or implied representations or warranties regarding the material and facilities contained or referred to in this video, or text post; • Tim Webb, Facebook, Rumble, and their employees, contractors and providers of information, do not accept any liability, for any reason whatever, for any loss or damage which may arise in any way; (a) out of the use of any of that material or facilities; or (b) from errors in or omissions from that material or facilities; or (c) from inaccuracy of any information obtained through use of Facebook or Rumble or the profile of Tim Webb – Agent Of Tim Webb - Agent Of Change • Tim Webb is not responsible for the content of this video, nor other websites linked to, or referenced on Facebook, Rumble or ANYWHERE else on the internet. The inclusion of, or reference to any link to another website, or reference to any specific commercial product, process, or service, whether by trade name, trade mark, manufacture, or otherwise, does not constitute an endorsement, verification or recommendation by this site, The NZ Police or the New Zealand Government. • Tim Webb may change, delete, add to, or otherwise amend information contained within this video and text post without notice. • The contents of this video and text post should not be construed as legal or professional advice. • Any distinctions you inspire from thinking for yourself must be included and read in conjunction with this disclaimer and any other disclaimer that forms part of it. • Thank you for your attention. • I seek ONLY the truth It's important to note that I am in no way associated with Facebook, Rumble it's employees, or their Fact Checkers, who'll know absolutely NOTHING about this information.

A detailed doco on the disturbing rise of Jacinda Ardern, former NZ Labour Party Leader and NZ Prime Minister. This doco illustrates an eerily similar path to "Political Celebrity" that Stalin, Hitler and Mao travelled on their way to essentially slaughtering millions of people while ushering in totalitarianism, right under the nose of their victims.

On February 6h, 2022 (Waitangi Day, NZ), convoys from the top of the North Island and bottom of the South Island commenced their 3 day journey to meet at Parliament in Wellington NZ, to protest the Labour Government's Lockdown and Vaccine Mandates. The protest on Parliament Grounds lasted 23 days before NZ Police violently shut down the protest, which had grown in stature, popularity and people was affectionately known as Camp Freedom. I couldn't make it to Wellington to experience the event and support my countrymen and women, however soon after Camp Freedom was disbanded, I rewrote the lyrics to Bob Seger's Like A Rock and went into the studio to record the track, and in addition to that, I created the video for the track and this is the end result, with your truly featuring in a cameo at the very end. To my Kiwi brothas and sisters, thank you for holding the line. You made the rest of New Zealand proud. Kia Kaha

The Cabal Are ALREADY DEAD. The most INSPIRATIONAL 40 minutes with Dr David E. Martin, you'll ever hear ... the man is a realist, with a love for mankind that's rarely matched.

The WHO (World Health Organisation) are dispensing with Human Rights, after it was signed into agreement between various CORPORATIONS and the NZ GOVERNMENT CORPORATION, as NEW protocol for Pandemic Preparedness. The NZ Government has ENDORSED this new action. THIS VIDEO is probably the MOST IMPORTANT video you'll watch this week. Please give it the attention it deserves.

WE are the people we've been waiting for ...

Nick Hudson, who is the Chairman of PANDA - PANDEMICS DATA & ANALYSIS - shares his analysis and truth at the EUROPEAN UNION PARLIAMENT COVID SUMMIT 2023. Nick's presentation follows on from Dr David E. Martins presentation, and is an EYE-OPENER, to say the least. You'd have to be a complete fool to accept that the Pandemic was a naturally occuring phenomenon, and the vaccines, anything other than what they refer to as a bioweapon.

TRANSCRIPT Of Dr David E.Martin's Speech At The European Union Parliament MAY 2023 It is a, it is a particularly interesting location for B to be sitting today, given that over a decade ago I sat in this very chair right here in the European Union Parliament. And at that time I warned the world of what was coming, during that conversation that was hosted at the time by the Green and EFA and a number of the other parties of the European Unions, of various representations. We were having a conversation on whether Europe should adopt the United States policy of allowing for the patents on biologically derived materials. And at the time I urged this body and I urged people around the world that the weaponization of nature against humanity had dire consequences. Tragically, I sit here today, with that unfortunate line that I don't like to say, which is “I told you so.” But the fact of the matter is, we're here not for a reprisal on past decisions. We're here to actually, once again, come to the face of the human condition and ask the question, who do we want to be? What do we want humanity to look like? And rather than seeing this as an exercise in futility, which is very easy from time to time when you're in the position I'm in, I actually see this not as an exercise in futility. I see this as one of the greatest opportunities that faces us because we now have a public conversation, which is now front and center in people's minds. When this was an esoteric conversation about biological patents, nobody cared. But when that conversation came home, then it became something people can care about. So I'm actually quite grateful for this opportunity. I thank the members of Parliament for hosting this. I thank all of the translators who I apologize in advance. I will use terminology that is probably very difficult to translate, so my apologies, and I'd also like to acknowledge the fact that many of you are aware of my involvement with this in large part due to the amazing work of my wonderful wife, Kim Martin, who encouraged me at the very early days of this pandemic to get on front of the camera and talk about all the information that I had been sharing among very small groups around the world. And it was in fact her encouragement that put me in a place where many of you have heard what I have to say. Ironically, the world that I came from that used to be very popular, my CNBC and Bloomberg presentations, which were televised on mainstream media around the world, was an audience that I lost. I can confidently say Covid diminished my fame, but I can also confidently say that I'd rather stand among the people with whom I'm standing today than any of the folks that were part of that previous world. So, this is a much better place to be. My role today is to set the stage for this conversation in a historical context, because this did not come in the last three years. This did not come in the last five or six years. This actually is an ongoing question that probably began here in Europe in the early stages of the mid 19 hundreds, but certainly by 1913, 1914, this conversation started right here in Central Europe. The pandemic that we alleged to have happen in the last few years also did not happen overnight. In fact, the very specific pandemic using coronavirus began in a very different time. Most of you don't know that Coronavirus as a model of a pathogen was isolated in 1965. Coronavirus was identified in 1965 as one of the first infectious, replicatable viral models that could be used to modify a series of other experiences of human condition. It was isolated once upon a time associated with the common cold. But what's particularly interesting about its isolation in 1965 was that it was immediately identified as a pathogen that could be used and modified for a whole host of reasons. And you heard me correctly, that was 1965. And by the way, these slides are public domain. You're welcome to look at every single reference. Every comment that I made is based on published material. So do make sure that you look at those references. But in 1966, the very first COV Coronavirus model was used as a transatlantic biological experiment in human manipulation, and you heard the date 1966. I hope you're getting the point of what I'm saying. This is not an overnight thing. This is actually something that's been long in the making. A year before I was born, we had the first Trans-Atlantic coronavirus data sharing experiment between the United States and the United Kingdom. And in 1967, the year I was born, we did the first human trials on inoculating people with modified coronavirus. Isn't that amazing? 56 years ago, the overnight success of a pathogen that's been 56 years in engineering, and I want that to chill with all of you. Where were we when we actually allowed in violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties? Where were we as a human civilization when we thought it was an acceptable thing to do to take a pathogen for the United States and infect the world with it? Where was that conversation and what should have been that conversation in 1967? That conversation wasn't had. Ironically, the common cold was turned into a chimera in the 1970s, and in 1975, 1976 and 1977, we started figuring out how to modify coronavirus by putting it into different animals. Pigs and dogs. And not surprisingly, by the time we got to 1990, we found out that coronavirus as a infectious agent was an industrial problem for two primary industries, the industries of dogs and pigs. Dog breeders and pigs found that Coronavirus created gastrointestinal problems, and that became the basis for Pfizer's first spike protein vaccine. Patent filed. Are you ready for this In 1990? Did you hear what I just said? 1990. Operation Warpspeed. I'm sorry. Where's the warp and the speed? Pfizer 1990. The very first spike protein vaccine for Coronavirus. Isn't that fascinating? Isn't it fascinating that we were, we were told that, well, the spike protein is a new thing. We just found out that that's the problem. No. As a matter of fact, we didn't just find out it was not just now. Now the problem, we found that out in 1990 and filed the first patents on vaccines in 1990 for the spike protein of Coronavirus. And who would've thought Pfizer? Clearly the innocent organization that does nothing but promote human health. Clearly, Pfizer, the organization that has not bought the votes in this chamber, in every chamber of every government around the world, not that Pfizer, certainly they wouldn't have had anything to do with this, but oh yes, they did. And in 1990 they found out that there was a problem with vaccines. They didn't work. You know why they didn't work? It turns out that Coronavirus is a very malleable model. It transforms and it changes, and it mutates over time. As a matter of fact, every publication on vaccines for Coronavirus from 1990 until 2018, every single publication concluded that Coronavirus escapes the vaccine impulse because it modifies and mutates too quickly for vaccines to be effective. And since 1990 to 2018, that is the published science ladies and gentlemen, that's following the science, following the science is their own indictment of their own programs that said, it doesn't work. And there are thousands of publications to that effect, not a few hundred. And not paid for by pharmaceutical companies. These are publications that are independent scientific research that shows unequivocally including efforts of the chimera modifications made by Ralph Bair in the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. All of them show vaccines do not work on coronavirus. That's the science, and that science has never been disputed. But then we had an interesting development in 2002, and this date is most important because in 2002, the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill patented, and I quote, an infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus. Listen to those words … Infectious replication, defective. What does that phrase actually mean? For those of you not familiar with language, let me unpack it for you. Infectious replication. Defective means a weapon. It means something meant to target an individual but not have collateral damage to other individuals. That's what infectious replication defective means. And that patent was filed in 2002 on work funded by NIAD's Anthony Fauci from 1999 to 2002, and that work patented at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill mysteriously preceded SARS 1.0 by a year. “Dave, are you suggesting that SARS 1.0 wasn't from a wet market in Wuhan?” “Are you suggesting it might have come from a laboratory in the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill?” No, I'm not suggesting it. I'm telling you that's the facts we engineered SARS. SARS is not a naturally occurring phenomenon. The naturally occurring phenomenon is called the common cold. It's called influenza-like illness. It's called gastroenteritis. That's the naturally occurring coronavirus. SARS is the research developed by humans weaponizing a life system model to actually attack human beings, and they patented it in 2002. And in 2003, giant surprise, the CDC filed the patent on Coronavirus isolated from humans in violation once again of biological and chemical weapons, treaties and laws that we have in the United States, and I'm very, very precise on this. United States likes to talk about its rights and everything else, and the rule of law and all the nonsense that we like to talk about, but we don't ratify treaties about, I don't know, defending humans. We conspicuously avoid that we actually have a great track record of advocating for human rights and then denying them when it comes to actually being part of the international community, which is a slightly problematic thing. But let's get something very clear. When the CDC, in April of 2003 filed the patent on SARS Coronavirus isolated from humans, what did they do? They downloaded a sequence from China, and filed a patent on it in the United States. Any of you familiar with biological and chemical weapons treaties knows that's a violation. That's a crime. That's not an innocent, oops; that's a crime. And the United States Patent Office went as far as to reject that patent application on two occasions until the CDC decided to bribe the patent office to override the patent examiner to ultimately issue the patent in 2007 on SARS Coronavirus. But let's not let that get away from us, because it turns out that the RT PCR, which was the test that we allegedly were going to use to identify the risks associated with coronavirus, was actually identified as a bioterrorism threat by me in the European Union sponsored events in 2002 and 2003, 20 years ago that happened here in Brussels and across Europe. In 2005, this particular pathogen was specifically labelled as a bioterrorism and bioweapon platform technology, described as such. That's not my terminology that I'm applying to it. It was actually described as a bioweapons platform technology in 2005. And from 2005 onwards, it was actually a bio warfare enabling agent. It's official classification from 2005 forward. I don't know if that sounds like public health to you, does it? Biological warfare enabling technology that feels like not public health, that feels like not medicine, that feels like a weapon, designed to take out humanity. That's what it feels like, and it feels like that because that's exactly what it is. We have been lured into believing that EcoHealth Alliance and DARPA and all of these organizations are what we should be pointing to. But we've been specifically requested to ignore the facts that over $10 billion have been funnelled through black operations, through the check of Anthony Fauci and a side-by-side ledger where NIAD has a balance sheet, and next to it is a biodefense balance sheet. Equivalent dollar for dollar matching that no one in the media talks about, and it's been going on since 2005. Our gain of function moratorium. The moratorium that was supposed to freeze any efforts to do gain of function research. Conveniently, in the fall of 2014, the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill received a letter from NIAD saying that while the gain of function moratorium on coronavirus in vivo should be suspended, because their grants had already been funded, they received an exemption. Did you hear what I just said? A biological weapons lab facility at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill received an exemption from the gain of function moratorium so that by 2016 we could publish the journal article that said SARS Coronavirus is poised for human emergence in 2016 and what, you might ask Dave, was the coronavirus poised for human emergence? It was WIV ONE. Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus One. Poised for human emergence in 2016 at the proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, such that by the time we get to 2017 and 2018, the following phrase entered into common parlance among the community, there is going to be an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen. The operative word, obviously in that phrase, the word release, does that sound like leak? Does that sound like a bat and a Pangolin went into a bar in the Wuhan market and hung out and had sex? And, and lo and behold, we got SARS Cov-2. No accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen was the terminology used. And four times in April of 2019, seven months before the allegation of patient number one, four patent applications of Moderna were modified to include the term accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen as the justification for making a vaccine for a thing that did not exist. If you have not done so, please make sure that you make reference in every investigation to the premeditation nature of this, because it was in September of 2019 that the world was informed. That we were going to have an accident or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen so that by September, 2020 there would be a worldwide acceptance of a universal vaccine template. That's their words right in front of you on the screen. The intent was to get the world to accept a universal vaccine template, and the intent was to use coronavirus to get there. Let's, let's read this because we have to read this into the record everywhere I go. “Until an infectious disease crisis is very real present and at the emergency threshold that is often largely ignored to sustain the funding base beyond the crisis.” He said, “we need to increase the public understanding for the need for medical countermeasures, such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine.” “A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.” Sounds like public health. Sounds like the best of humanity. No. Ladies and gentlemen, this was premeditated domestic terrorism stated at the proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2015, published in front of them. This is an act of biological and chemical warfare perpetrated on the human race, and it was admitted to in writing that this was a financial heist and a financial fraud. “Investors will follow if they see profit at the end of the process.” Let me conclude by making five very brief recommendations. The last slide, nature was hijacked. This whole story started in 1965 when we decided to hijack a natural model and decide to start manipulating it. Science was hijacked when the only questions that could be asked were questions authorized under the patent protection of the CDC, the FDA, the NIH, and their equivalent organizations around the world. We didn't have independent science. We had hijacked science, and unfortunately there was no moral oversight in violation of all of the codes that we stand for. There was no independent, financially disinterested independent review board ever empanelled around coronavirus. Not once, not once, not since 1965. We do not have a single independent IRB ever empanelled, around Coronavirus. So, morality was suspended for medical countermeasures, and ultimately humanity was lost because we decided to allow it to happen. Our job today is to say, no more gain of function research period. No more weaponization of nature period. And most importantly, no more corporate patronage of science for their own self-interest unless they assume 100% product liability for every injury and every death that they maintain. Thank you very much. Dr David E. Martin Speaker - Covid Summit – European Union Parliament – May 2023