Building 7, the Ted Walter cut (International Center for 9/11 justice, suppression)
The anomaly the 9/11 "truther movement" cannot answer
96
views
The 9/11 cult has their eyes set on Russell Brand.
We need to save Russell Brand from the cult!
The 9/11 cult has their eyes set on Russell Brand.
Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/we-need-to-save-russel-brand-from
116
views
DELETED OFF YouTube: "Hoodwinked at Shanksville on 9/11"
Download it here: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/Shanksville--The-TRUTH-video:f 😎
171
views
September 12, 2001 - The Ultimate RED PILL
Read my substack: https://911revision.substack.com/
92
views
2
comments
Irrefutable Episode 0 - The intro video YouTube does not want you to see.
You need to watch the 6 part series.
Find it here: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911truth-Irrefutable:2
Keep in mind, the Odysee channel is being censored, so if you have a black screen with with audio, try refreshing or clear your cache - It should work then
85
views
A 9/11 Rubble Pile Question
Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-disingenuous-search-for-911-justice
85
views
The disingenuous search for 9/11 Justice
Read the accompanying article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-disingenuous-search-for-911-justice
96
views
9/11 A Plane Story Uncensored
This is footage put together to help people understand that you cannot always believe your eyes, you cannot always believe what you are told.
You live in a time where your perception is being managed. Just like with Covid from 2020 to 2023, people outsourced their thinking way too easily.
9/11 was an attack on human consciousness.
Go to my substack and read the various articles for more detailed information.
9/11 The Plane / No Plane debate settled.
Most probably the best distraction of WHAT happened on September 11, 2001
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-the-plane-no-plane-argument
Odysee: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-A-Plane-Story-uncensored:8
YouTube link: https://youtu.be/Mwu1hbaZ2_s
4.98K
views
9
comments
Building 7 - The TRUTH cut 3.0 (The Epic Version)
Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition.
Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-operation-reason-building-7-didnt
Building 7: The REAL Truth Cut
After 22 years, let's break it down in less than 10 minutes - This is how they DEW'd it...
https://911revision.substack.com/p/building-7-the-real-truth-cut
An EPIC rework of my first B7 video by @MathEasySolns (X / Twitter)
- Telegram: https://t.me/meslinks
122
views
Top 5 Facts of Sept 11, 2001 MIND BLOWN
Top 5 Facts of Sept 11, 2001
- 9/11 Alchemy series, watch all 3 documentaries: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/9-11-Alchemy-Series:d
116
views
9/11 The Greatest Hits on the 9/11 truth movement
What if you looked at the observable evidence of what happened on September 11, 2001 and listened to the numerous survivor testimonies and you have questions that the established 9/11 truther talking heads can’t answer?
Listen to the questions being asked and the answers given in relation to observable evidence shared in this demolition of the counter narrative to the official story of 2 planes and jet fuel causing all the destruction witnessed on September 11, 2001.
Questions were asked from March 2023 to August 2023 – 6 months.
These talking heads have been at it for 16 years, holding seminars, creating documentaries, getting airtime on mainstream and alternative media, but cannot answer these basic questions on observable evidence?
All you need to do is LOOK and shut off the blah, blah, blah that you’ve been taught to regurgitate by these so called 9/11 “truthers”.
What agenda do they really have?
You need to realise the following regarding the cover up of September 11, 2001…
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the Observable EVIDENCE points you to.
People are lazy and if they think they’ve been handed an answer to their questions, they easily outsource their thinking and become parrots, regurgitating what their “trusted experts” taught them to think and say… Can you remember a recent event that used the same tactics? Maybe from 2020 to 2023?
So, in no particular order, and some archival footage thrown in for good measure, the following talking heads are included in this controlled demolition of the official approved counter narrative to the official LIE of WHAT happened on September 11, 2001.
- International Center for 9/11 Justice (formed June 2023)
- Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry
- AE911Truth
- 9/11 Colorado for truth
- Steven E. Jones
- Richard Gage
- David Chandler
- John Cole
- Wayne Coste
- Gene Laratonda
- Alex Jones
- James Corbett
I hope you have your critical thinking caps on students.
Do not outsource your thinking and just blindly believe what you’ve been told to see or the statements or questions asked.
Investigate and question everything.
A major shout out to Math Easy Solutions (https://www.youtube.com/@mes) and realityAXIS (https://www.youtube.com/@realityAXIS) for the awesome they are doing.
Find more here:
Telegram: https://t.me/Sept11_Deprogramming
Odysee: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7
Substak: https://911revision.substack.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/911Revisionist
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/879905060007964
Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2588430
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDqzsgSdVAoqRkPqlTg0vsQ
269
views
The 9/11 surfer / miracle man testimony
Sept 11, 2001 - You are one of only 2 civilian survivors of the disintegration of the North Tower 1.
How would you handle it if all the people you were going down the stairs with, disappeared never to be seen again?
Full interview: https://youtu.be/sYWj2xV1JWY
Extra snippet from the 9/11 Observable Evidence series: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/9-11-Deprogramming-series:6
108
views
9/11 TRUTH: What does it take for you to distrust someone?
9/11 LIAR : Richard Gage - September 5, 2023 vs 2011
What does it take for you to distrust someone?
Thought experiment:
This is Richard Gage, formerly with AE911Truth and also involved with the "International Center for 9/11 Justice" - Having a discussion on Sept 5, 2023;
Richard as well as his lawyer DENIES in this zoom meeting that they know about a Federal Qui-Tam (whistleblower) case, filed (2007) in which the 23 NIST subcontractors were accused of science fraud.
BUT, as you will see in these 3 clips, in June 2023 & in 2011 he was asked about the Federal Qui-Tam (whistleblower) case, filed (2007) and he CONFIRMS knowing about it.
The question asked:
Thank you for being able to ask a COVID & 9/11 related question:
This is for Richard especially, but Mike’s feedback, as a lawyer, would be appreciated…
With regards to court cases against NIST, I have done some reading and I have found that there were several cases filed against NIST and especially the 23 subcontractors who NIST tasked with drawing up reports that made up the 10 000-page NIST report over the last couple of years.
Here we have a 10,000-page NIST investigation that investigated everything that happened after the towers suffered damaging explosions and then ended before the towers underwent their final demise.
Their language was “up to the initiation of collapse.” That is science fraud. Any lawyer worth his salt should know that.
To get to my question:
2 Cases were filed by TWO professors in 2007 against these 23 subcontractors for SCIENCE FRAUD and ONE of these cases was filed as high up as the US Supreme court in 2009.
So, my question is, why have you been keeping MUM about these cases and the EVIDENCE presented, for the last 14 years and why is Richard Gage, AE911Truth AND the International Center for 911 Justice not talking about these cases, seeing it demolishes your THEORIES on explosives and Thermite?
Lastly. Richard, why are you trying so hard to keep yourself and the rest of your soldiers relevant in the so called “truther” movement, seeing you’ve been showed to be a disinformation agent like Fauci and the NIH?
You seem to be the COVID virus of the 9/11 truth.
285
views
3
comments
Do you trust the US Military Industrial Complex?
Do you think they'd tell you if they have star wars weapons?
Ever heard of the Directed Energy Professional Society? (Google them)
In this clip, Rumsfeld in 2003, then Lt Col Tom E. Bearden in 1985 and last clip is the Panama invasion in 1989, excerpt from the 1992 Academy Award winning documentary "The Panama Deception)
92
views
Building 7 - The REAL TRUTH cut
Building 7 - The TRUTH cut (9/11 Revisionist)
https://911revision.substack.com/
This is how they DEW'd it...
93
views
The 9/11 "truth" movement is a distraction movement!
Epic stream with @MathEasySolns discussing the 9/11 "truther" talking heads distractions as well as the questions they fail dismally at answering.
September 5, 2023
They actually BAN you if you're asking the right questions.
WAKE UP PEOPLE!!
98
views
1
comment
Disproving John Cole, PE’s alternative North Tower ‘spire’ theory and the official NIST theory.
During an instalment of Takeaways of the International Center for 9/11 Justice in August 2023, civil engineer Jonathan Cole presented his paper that was published during July 2023, in the Journal of 9/11 Studies.
Cole tried to show with remarkable simplicity how the very existence of the North Tower “spire” — a remnant of the core structure of the North Tower 1, that remained standing after the rest of the tower came down — completely undermines the official theory of the Twin Towers’ destruction.
You can watch Cole’s presentation (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YLaPD7AVJE
) to learn why the North Tower “spire” is, according to the “International Center for 911 Justice”, a conversation-ending piece of evidence you’ll want to have in your arsenal if you want to take on someone who believes the official narrative of Twin Towers demise.
Unfortunately for him, he falls short if he thinks he’d be able to take on a seasoned 9/11 investigator, as he will be shown in this edit of his attempt to explain away the observable evidence, as well as survivor testimonies of the North Tower in stairway B, how peer review is academia and not science…
For REAL science, study this: https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
257
views
DIRECTED ENERGY PROFESSIONAL SOCIETY (DEPS)
Website: https://deps.org
Senator Heinrich comments for the Feb 2023 DE T&E Joint Conference...
85
views
Wikipedia, ADL & censorship
The built in AI on X (Twitter) does not allow you to upload the raw file and have it play, so you'll have to share the link to this video for people to be able watch this video.
54
views
911 Truth can Alex Jones be trusted
There is a lot of censorship / disinformation in the trusted talking heads of the 9/11 "truth" movement.
Read my substack: https://911revision.substack.com/
1. The controlled demolition of the thermite theory: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite
2. Expanded: The controlled demolition of the 9/11 thermite theory - https://911revision.substack.com/p/expanded-the-controlled-demolition
3. Nukes - The distraction behind door no 3: https://911revision.substack.com/p/nuking-the-steel-of-the-twin-towers
4. Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-operation-reason-building-7-didnt
5. Burying the Truth of 9/11. A critical view of AE911Truth: https://911revision.substack.com/p/burying-the-truth-of-911
412
views
9/11 Truth: James Fetzer, why did you do a 180? Who got to you?
James Fetzer, why did you do a 180? Who got to you?
Why did things change when you got involved with Steven E. Jones that worked for the Dept of Energy, CIA and Los Alamos Labs?
Why did you start your smear campaign after Dr Wood left your "Scholars for 911 Truth" organisation?
When will you be filing your RFC (Request For Correction) to NIST, or sue NIST for science fraud like Dr Wood did in 2007 and make sure your case also goes as high as the US Supreme Court like Dr Wood did in 2009?
After all, you've been bashing her for years after all you were also a cult member promoting her work - So, who made you change your mind?
You seem to be so sure about your mini nuke theory, so why not put your money where your mouth is?
Or are you waiting for Richard Gage, AE911T or any other poo-ba organisation to do it first, seeing none of you 9/11 "truther" talking heads have yet to do so?
Whatever people should not do is read this substack: https://911revision.substack.com
Or read this book: https://wheredidthetowersgo.com
Nukes - The distraction behind door no 3
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points you. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/nuking-the-steel-of-the-twin-towers
217
views
1
comment
Is the 9/11 "truther" movement part of the bigger cover-up?
Why is the ONLY independent forensic investigation done on WHAT happened to 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on September 11, 2001 CENSORED for the last 16 years?!
They are SCARED of the evidence this scientist filed in 2007 AGAINST NIST's subcontractors for SCIENCE FRAUD.
The 9/11 "truth" movement talking heads have been ACTIVELY steering you away from the EVIDENCE this scientists presents.
Full series here:
https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/9-11-Deprogramming-series:6
97
views
Demolished - Richard Gage and indirectly AE911T by directed TRUTH July 2023
This is just the highlights. – A 2h panel discussion covering FEMA on 9/11, issues with journalists, geo-engineering, the energy question and more
Article by the host: https://truthsummit.substack.com/p/taking-stock-re-911-andrew-johnson-richard-gage
Original source video: https://youtu.be/8WJDYpI9wmY
112
views
Understanding 9/11 for dummies
Ever since September 11, 2001 people have been outsourcing their thinking.
Listen to what Professor Morgan Reynolds' 2009 Qui-Tam case was about.
Discussing air pressure, drag, aerodynamics and then let’s also look at the fraudulent NIST aeroplane impact report as well as the planted aeroplane fuselage and debris at the WTC complex…
And by the end of the video, SAIC and their “specialisation in impacts and explosions” and you’ll see they gave NIST fraudulent impact reports pertaining to the “planes” that supposedly hit the towers.
People also seem to struggle wrapping their brains around what the buildings were built with and that there is no way in hell, aluminium can cut through steel, like a hot knife through butter... Just exactly what did those "planes" have to go through?
Anyone that believes jet fuel, explosives, thermite, buried nukes, mini nukes were used, most probably also still believe in fairies, unicorns and santa claus. Open up your mind, LOOK at what is being presented to you in this video and be sure to put on your thinking cap, because a large proportion of people have fallen for the trap of the cover up, believing that the 9/11 "truther" movement are actually looking to expose the truth of WHAT happened to 8 buildings with a WTC prefix on September 11, 2001 - Americans, WAKE THE FUCK UP!
Ask yourself the question, WHAT are all the 9/11 "truther" talking heads really doing, whilst asking for donations and talking absolute bullshit?
Why, after nearly 22 years, do we still have such a strong cover-up with regards to the events of September 11, 2001?
Why does the 9/11 "truther" movement and Wikipedia not want you to know about the 2009 US Supreme Court Qui-Tam cases?
Top 5 Facts About September 11th, 2001 - Look into the work of Dr Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson and STOP outsourcing your thinking to the psy-op, that is the 9/11 "truther" movement.
594
views