ArmedAttorneys

In a bizarre address, the White House touted gun control achievements and claimed it's "not finished," declaring more gun control measures as a priority in the future for the President. Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes recap gun control measures and bizarre White House statements made during the annual Safer Communities Summit held on June 16, 2023. Further your education and firearms passion. Learn more at Sonoran Desert Institute: https://www.sdi.edu/armed-attorneys/ LAS Concealment: https://lasconcealment.com/ Biden's Speech: https://youtu.be/0LNSnR8ZFyc Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

The ATF final rule on stabilizing braces has finally come under scrutiny by Congress. But what is the path going forward? Will the ATF get reined in by Congress for its blatant overreach? Armed Attorneys Richard Hayes and Edwin Walker discuss House Joint Resolution 44, ATF overreach regarding stabilizing braces, and why we can't celebrate victory just yet... Further your education and firearms passion. Learn more at Sonoran Desert Institute: https://www.sdi.edu/armed-attorneys/ Smith & Bradley: https://bit.ly/3PfSeSS House Joint Resolution 44: https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-joint-resolution/44/text Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

Longstanding gun control has been found unconstitutional and struck down in a recent 3rd circuit court decision. At the center of the case is Bryan Range, a non-violent felon who sued the United States to restore his gun rights. Armed Attorneys Richard Hayes and Edwin Walker discuss applications, implications, and everything in between for the future of recently stricken longstanding gun control. Range v. Attorney General could shake up the landscape for non-violent felons and gun ownership. Further your education and firearms passion. Learn more at Sonoran Desert Institute: https://www.sdi.edu/armed-attorneys/ Acre Gold: https://getacregold.com/ Court opinion: https://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/212835pen.pdf Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

A district court recently struck down a 50-year-old gun law as unconstitutional. As a result, we could see further expansion of gun rights to 18, 19, and 20-year-olds across the nation. Will the ruling stand in the Fourth Circuit? Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Edwin Walker discuss the opinion, Bruen implications, and the refreshing 2A win. Further your education and firearms passion. Learn more at Sonoran Desert Institute: https://www.sdi.edu/armed-attorneys/ Fraser v. ATF - Opinion: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63354855/47/fraser-v-bureau-of-alcohol-tobacco-firearms-and-explosives/ Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

The new GOA and GOF rulings have halted the ATF final rule on pistol braces for many. But how do the new GOA and GOF cases affect you? Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes discuss the most recent injunctions, who is affected, and what this means for gun owners going forward. Further your education and firearms passion. Learn more at Sonoran Desert Institute: https://www.sdi.edu/armed-attorneys/ Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

The ATF has been dealt its latest blow regarding the final rule on stabilizing braces, but the question remains: Who is covered by the FPC, GOA, and GOF lawsuits? Do the injunction rulings apply to all pistol brace owners? Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes discuss the latest on FPC, GOA, and GOF lawsuits, and who may be covered. ATF Final Rule on Stabilizing Braces: “Can I Just Remove The Brace?” https://youtu.be/oAYxaLnXgEY ATF Final Rule on Stabilizing Braces: Understanding Constructive Possession https://youtu.be/q5XasYQ8W7A Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

With the fight for constitutional (AKA "permitless") carry won across most of the nation, the 2A community is finally able to relax. Or is it? The battle is not won, and in fact it's far from over. Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes discuss the 2A fight that follows constitutional carry, and 3 main objectives we should all push for. Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

With the imminent stabilizing brace deadline from the ATF Final Rule looming and compliance methods being questioned, the newest 2A buzzwords, constructive possession and constructive intent, are sweeping the gun community. But what does "constructive possession" or “constructive intent” mean, and how do they relate to the ATF Final Rule on stabilizing braces? Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes discuss the complex legal concept, and whether it has relevance with pistol stabilizing braces and the new ATF Final Rule. ATF Stabilizing Brace Final Rule Amnesty Ending: Compliance Options and FAQs https://youtu.be/Aa6riqG10qg Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

Should you purchase "NFA Lite" items (items that are not yet regulated by the NFA), or is the risk too great that the ATF will bait and switch as we've seen with solvent traps, FRTs, bump stocks, and arm braces? Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes discuss risk calculation of "NFA Lite" items and possible pitfalls. Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

With the ATF Final Rule on stabilizing braces and the deadline looming, many are asking "Can I just remove the brace?" The guidance provided by the ATF varies from the Final Rule itself. Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes discuss whether removing the pistol brace is compliant under the ATF’s Final Rule on stabilizing braces. Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

The ATF Stabilizing Brace Final Rule amnesty is ending soon, and many are asking what are the compliance options? Today the Armed Attorneys break down everything you need to know about the ATF Stabilizing Brace Final Rule Amnesty, including FAQs and compliance options. Acre Gold: https://getacregold.com/ Should I Get an NFA Gun Trust in 2023? https://youtu.be/PAuA_LArY_s Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

A recent bill exploiting tragedy for enhanced gun control paraded as safety measures has gained momentum this legislative session in Texas. Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor, Richard Hayes, and Edwin Walker discuss HB 2744, political grandstanding to exploit tragedy and further gun control agendas, and the blatant disregard for constitutionality we're seeing across the political spectrum. --- Who Represents Me https://wrm.capitol.texas.gov/home Justin Holland https://house.texas.gov/members/member-page/?district=33 Sam Harless https://house.texas.gov/members/member-page/?district=126 --- Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

Can you carry a gun across state lines? Which states allow constitutional carry? Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes discuss the Federal Safe Passage Act, intrastate travel with a gun, and certain pitfalls you need to consider before you hit the road with your firearm. Fly With a Gun: TSA Rules for Traveling, Carrying, and Transporting a Firearm on an Airplane https://youtu.be/ncg2c_0E05I Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

The latest ATF overreach has resulted in Matthew Hoover and Kristopher Ervin being convicted by the federal government for their parts in production/distribution of the auto key card. Is the First Amendment being dragged down alongside the Second? Will our elected representatives step in to stop the out-of-control ATF in its overzealous gun control and gun confiscation efforts? Armed Attorneys Richard Hayes and Edwin Walker discuss the convictions of Matthew Hoover and Kristopher Ervin, the appeal process, the Second AND First Amendment implications, and what we in the 2A community can do to help. --- FIND YOUR REPRESENTATIVE https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative --- SAMPLE EMAIL OR LETTER SUBJECT: Hearing Request - Matthew Hoover and Kristopher Ervin - Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government NAME, I am writing to ask you to support Matthew Hoover and Kristopher Ervin publicly. Two men who find themselves the victims of government overreach, weaponization, and injustice. With troubling frequency, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, supported by the Department of Justice, has overstepped its bounds to redefine terms expressly defined by the Congress. This includes the redefinition of bump stocks to be considered machine guns, incomplete firearms to be considered completed firearms, and braced pistols to be considered short-barreled rifles. American gun owners are subject to the whims of unelected bureaucrats to change the meaning of terms; contrary to Congress, contrary to plain meaning, and contrary to longstanding tradition. Unfortunately, the weaponization of these agencies and decisions made outside of the halls of Congress have real-world implications; they can and have destroyed lives. The latest victims of this arbitrary and capricious method of “governing” are Matthew Hoover and Kristopher Ervin, who were just convicted in the United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, in connection to the alleged possession and transfer of what the ATF now considers an unregistered machine gun. In reality, the item alleged to be a machine gun was simply a metal card with a depiction on it, more closely related to a book, blueprint, or photograph, as opposed to a firearm or firearm part. I am writing to encourage you and your fellow lawmakers to rein in the ATF and the DOJ for this clear First Amendment violation and unconstitutional override of Congress. These agencies have overstepped their bounds and need immediate oversight. Please support Matthew Hoover and Kristopher Ervin publicly and demand a hearing in the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government to get answers. Thank you for your consideration, and I look forward to your response. Sincerely, NAME --- Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

The 2A battle continues with the latest bump stock Supreme Court review being filed, and a promising update on machine guns and the circuit split we're seeing. Armed Attorneys Richard Hayes and Emily Taylor discuss aspects of this case and the other bump stock cases that have been filed. The country is split. Will the Supreme Court take on the case? Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

A 6-3 Supreme Court decision has challenged aspects of the prohibited person list, citing NYSRPA v. Bruen. What aspect of the prohibited persons list was challenged, and more importantly, was it successful? Armed Attorneys Richard Hayes and Edwin Walker discuss the challenge, applications of the NYSRPA v. Bruen one-step test, and 2A implications going forward. Further your education and firearms passion. Learn more at Sonoran Desert Institute: https://www.sdi.edu/armed-attorneys/ Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

"Can you legally shoot through a door" is the question many are asking in the wake of a Kansas City, Missouri shooting. Andrew Lester finds himself charged with Assault in the First degree after he shot through a door when encountered by Ralph Yarl. Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes discuss whether you can legally shoot through a door. Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

Recently, the ATF has appeared to ramp up their efforts for FRT confiscation after a minimal confiscation effort in 2022. But why? Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes discuss FRTs, what to do if you receive an ATF letter, and how to properly confiscate the item(s). ATF at My Door For My FRT – What Do I Do? https://youtu.be/rdSTb3t-pEY Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

As the ATF continues to wage war against gun owners in America, one 2A sanctuary has had enough and declared the agency "unconstitutional." But are the measures they've taken productive? Could there be unintended consequences to the firearms industry as a result? Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes discuss the latest battleground in the war to preserve the 2A. Big Loss: 2A Sanctuary Backfires https://youtu.be/mZvr7fgAOs8 Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

Sgt. Daniel Perry was convicted of murder in Texas arising out of a BLM riot. Self defense attorneys Emily Taylor, Richard Hayes, and Edwin Walker explain why he lost. Will Daniel Perry be pardoned by the governor? Will his murder conviction stand? The Armed Attorneys discuss. Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis recently signed a bill into law to prevent frivolous lawsuits against insurance companies, including lawsuits against armed self-defenders' lawful use of force. But it appears that crime DOES pay and DeSantis' law may not be enough to stop them. Why is this law necessary and what happens to the good guy with a gun after the smoke clears? Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Dylan Price discuss the national trend of insurance companies paying the bad guy and why the Florida bill may not fix any problems. Further your education and firearms passion. Learn more at Sonoran Desert Institute: https://www.sdi.edu/armed-attorneys/ Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

Senator Chris Murphy went head to head with Senator Ted Cruz in the latest senate showdown, opposing a common sense bill proposed to increase school safety. Armed Attorneys Richard Hayes, Emily Taylor, and Edwin Walker discuss the proposed bills and why Senator Murphy and other Democrats are opposed to compromise even when faced with legislation that could keep our children safe. Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

man used an Apple AirTag to track a truck thief and is currently being investigated for murder. Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes discuss the critical self-defense element missing from this Apple AirTag tracking case and the potential for a murder charge. Acre Gold: https://getacregold.com/ Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

During a "routine" ATF inspection of one of the nation's largest gun stores, at which there were over a dozen out-of-state ATF agents present, Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene came to the FFL's aid. Watch the interaction unfold, and hear what Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes have to say about the unprecedented inspection that took place. Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

Thanks to Aura for sponsoring today's video. Use our link https://aura.com/armedattorneys or scan the QR code to try two weeks free and see just how many data brokers are sharing your information. In a first of its kind prosecution, the parents of a shooting suspect have been charged for the actions of their son. Can you be charged for another's actions? Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes discuss this first of its kind prosecution and the dangerous legal precedent it may set. Support Our 2A Community: YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/ Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys #2A #ArmedAttorneys #SelfDefense General Information Only The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney. All Rights Reserved This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.