CuntryPoints

Its not charity downstream from philla and a shared sense of identity and compassion if its "forced". Simple as I'm something of a socialist myself, and I'm definitely working class, so it has to mean more coming from me than some NEET trans communist. By "weak" I don't mean physically weak, I mean mentally weak ("it's tooooo haaaard!" type of shit.) Also, I mentioned *Jew as a reference to the group that earns the highest incomes by race/ethnicity in America, which (America) is where the most vocal crap about socialism comes from, so its not some weird muh jooz shit. *Ok, you got me, I was referencing someone specific, you know who I'm talking about

Holy shit my hair is thin. Better keep the hat on. Clean Your Room Wash Your Penis Eat Your Lamb And Steak

Prepare for cringe, but keep in mind that I'm a Chicken Rancher, so its your fault if you set the bar for me too high. Also, if I don't have free will, then technically none of this being cringe is my fault, as its all predetermined and baked into how the universe was always going to play out.

The evil wahmens are so unappreciative aren't they? We should like man up and stop simping or something... That'll teach em. P.S - Anyone wanna buy a Samsung Odyssey+ headset with the headphones removed? Got bored of murdering people in Blade & Sorcery

Ill try and find that Helen Clark video. I like the short format, and I think the hat is staying. [Points - Am I wrong?] Strong men can't be strong in a way that women arent also as strong, unless it's framed as a backhanded compliment or its just brute force Women can be strong in ways that men aren't or are less likely to be. A business staffed entirely by women can't be framed as suffering from a toxic lack of men. That implies you can have a toxic quantity of women (which you can, but we have to pretend isn't true). A business staffed entirely by men that does well is hurting women because it's men making lots of money not women who could take their place. The reverse is never true. Trans males don't have male privellage for some reason. Trans women (if they're real women) should be represented by normal women. A business staffed entirely by women could be framed as lacking trans women. [edit, can't find video, she's like a WEF shill now, so her old interview is buried in all the new stuff she's done]

I'll preemptively file this under hot shit takes perhaps, but it has struck a nerve I'd like to investigate. I posted the vocaroos of this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjOEjxE1Euc And through the brigading, cunny posting or responses telling me to fucking kill myself for being a bigot or pretending I was pro pedophile, there was still the unanswered question of achieving escape velocity up the slippery slope of LGBT nesting dolls not being celebrated. P.S - Someone told me to wear the hat so here you go https://voca.ro/1okFGqWQ2yz5

I'd make more, but my computer makes the mechanical equivalent of crying noises if I open wordpad too fast.

Just messing around post beer o'clock. I'd put in more effort with the Dr House voice and focus on that if I had a script.

Is there a one way valve when it comes to sexually progressive ideas of change? Are people who want to go back up the progressive stack in the spirit of infinite sexual/gender malleability a threat to the #bornthisway community? it's not like there's one answer, because everyone is different. I tried using a MAP who wants conversions therapy as a hyperbolic example of my point. This is a potentially a very hot shit take, but I'll ask it anyway The whole shtick on the left is that truth and wrongness is relative and subjective. We understand detransitioning, or girls or boys being abused as kids fucking with their sexual prefences later (even twin studies debunk a lot of the old gay gene myths), but people who detransition or who realised they weren't lesbians don't get a flag or a letter in the acronym, because they undermine the supposedly rock solid validity of their identities, which can also be so fluid and malleable that it's irreconcilable with the first assertion of auto assumed rock solidness To be crude, if you can cut a girls tits off, a boys dick off, sterilise them and end a billion year long line of death and rebirth, all with the "consent" of the child, often with parents not being able to stop them, how is touching a child out of bounds? Why is detransitioning therapy something that gets you're medical licence revoked, but trans affirmation therapy is fine? if someone wants either and that's "what they want for themselves, no matter the reason", why the "one way valve" as I characterised it? 379712955

Just my thoughts concerning foreign (usually American) interpretations of the Australian election as some huge deal, or OMG Labour are Communists and Libs are like Republicans, which is not how it works. Each way Albo and Scammo is douche vs Turd from Southpark regardless, but ranked choice voting, mandatory voting and boomers as the majority voting block causes issues (I believe) that maybe isn't as bad in other countries as I feel it is here. "yes, I um and ah a lot. I hate it and am working on it"😅

Is there utility in a memetic interpretation of a soul as a set of narratives and archetypes you align with, instead of either a thing you can't define but its immortal or immaterial (religious idea), or a thing that is stupid and a dumb fiction with no value (atheistic idea)? Just my ideas. Happy for any criticism or whatever. Notes to sort through /pol/378896092 /x/31911415

Simple as. I will lean into the Akubra and aussie vernacular as dingus khan recommended :)

*Edit - I think flexing and bragging are exactly the same. I can't be certain, because I'm too lazy to check. This isn't some bs video essay where I give an answer and hold it as correct, it's just a question I have that I haven't found a solid answer to, sparked by a weird conversation at a dinner party. Worst comes to worse I'm an asshole again "Every mental state we'd characterise as "unwell" can be characterised as a chemical imbalance. You as an individual can change those chemical imbalances, and everything good and bad about you mentally could technically be expressed in terms of chemicals. Not to make some atheistic "bundle of cells" point, but that if the idea that you had BPD was like a virus, teaching someone about responsibility, agency, stoicism etc would be like an inbuilt antivirus, or a way to rebalance neurochemical imbalances. Like.the whole serotonin and lobster thing. If you can see a different hierarchy in which you're a winner, then you don't need to downrank yourself" /pol/378719761 /sci/14502537