We The People - Constitutional Conventions

Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html PROOF OF CLAIM Rights Doc. 4 WE are all born with free will and unalienable rights. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law’ Consent makes the contract Adhesion contracts are not contracts because there was no consent, they are considered as gifts. We do not require any corporate created rights, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedom provided by the Government of Canada Corporation and/or ICCPR provided by the United Nations Corporation. If anyone claims to have jurisdiction over, you and/or requests payment request a copy of the contract. Government Corporations Government Services Corporations doing business as Government of Canada and/or the government of any provinces can only create rules (statutes) that only apply to their employees, franchisees, officers and dependents. Their rules (statutes) do not apply to the people in general. That is why the rules they create (statutes) are referred to as “public policy”. We do not require any corporate created rights, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedom provided by the Government of Canada Corporation and/or ICCPR provided by the United Nations Corporation. Women and men living in Canada are not subject to any Public Policies, mandates, or acts of legislation promoted by any commercial or municipal corporation for its officers and employees. We should not vote in private corporate shareholder elections sponsored by Canada Inc., Province of _____ Inc., or any other foreign corporation. All Acts, Bills and statutes created by the Government of Canada and/or any of the provincial governments only apply to “person”. The definition of person in Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition on page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being ( i.e. natural person ) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. In other words, if I say the basket includes apples and oranges you will not find any other type of fruit in the basket. As plainly stated in Black’s Law dictionary, anything that applies to person only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Does not apply to men or women! The Government of Canada and Government of all provinces are Crown for profit Corporations. The Prime Minister and/or the Premiers receive their orders from the shareholders of the Crown Corporation. They are the C.E.O.s/officers of the Crown Corporations. They carry out the orders that are relayed to them by the Governor General and/or the Lieutenant Governor. They (politicians) are in place to take the blame for the harm that is done to the people. They are replaced every four years with someone who claims that he/she is going to right the wrongs that were created, but nothing changes they carry out the orders provided by the shareholders as the previous C.E.O.s. Four years later they are blamed and replaced. PERSONS All Acts, Bills and statutes created by the Government of Canada and/or any of the provincial governments only apply to “person”. The definition of person in Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition on page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person ) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. In other words, if I say the basket includes apples and oranges you will not find any other type of fruit in the basket. As plainly stated in Black’s Law dictionary, anything that applies to person only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Does not apply to men or women _________________________________________________________ Name written in all capital letters The governing book of the English language is “The Oxford Styles Manual” which sometimes refers to “The Chicago Manual of Style” also The Oxford Manual of Style. All Uppercase text, all caps, or gloss is listed in the style's manuals under “foreign - language” , named ”Ancient-Latin” or Dog Latin. All Caps are not defined or recognized in meaning. All Caps is not English although you may think you are able to read it as English it is in fact, a calculated deception to be read separated from the rest of the “Document”. All Uppercase text has no lawful grammatical jurisdiction with common English and is a foreign language, headed under “Ancient-Latin”. (The Chicago Manual of Style, 16th Edition, 11:144-47). Glossa is two or more languages on a legal document. Glossa is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of a text( Black’s Law Dictionary page 621 5th Edition) “Glossa” is also used to conceal or confuse the real facts in order to confuse, in order to gain tacit consent. A name written in all capital letters is written in dog Latin or is known as systemic text “a thing” created by the employees of the crown corporation, Therefore the Crown Corporation owns the creation. If you claim that the name written in all capital letters, is, you. You are admitting you are the property of the Crown Corporation (a slave). Cestui Que Vie Trust 's beneficiary is the name in all capital letters which is the property of the Crown Corporation, it is not you. All governments (corporations) and businesses such as banks and others that write your name in all capital letters are committing constructive fraud and conversion. (Engaged in criminal activity) ___________________________________________________ City, Municipality, Village et al Address Date TO: Mayor, CAO, CEO, Councillors et al FROM: The men and women living therein, The enclosed documentation: 1) Proof of Incorporation of the following entities; from Dunn & Bradstreet or EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Note: the following are government services corporations’ (dba( "doing business as,") Government of Canada, EDGAR (CIK 0000230098) ; Government of British Columbia, EDGAR (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306) ; Government of Alberta, EDGAR (CIK 0000810961) ; Government of Saskatchewan, EDGAR (CIK 0000203098) ; Government of Manitoba, EDGAR (CIK 0000826926) ; Ontario, EDGAR (CIK 0000074615) ; Quebec, EDGAR (0000722803) ; Province of New Brunswick, EDGAR (CIK 0000862406) ; Province of Nova Scotia, EDGAR (CIK 0000842639) 2) Copy of the Clearfield Doctrine; showing that corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to taxation or law enforcement et al, without a consent to contract which is corporate policy when doing commerce. * Seek legal clarification and written proof to the contrary. This letter comes with the enclosed documents to ascertain the jurisdiction within our council, in which official positions are being held . Depending on the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed upon entering office, the positions may be operating under the "Color of Law," in a De-Facto, Un-lawful and thus ultra vires standing. This holds personal liability for anything signed on behalf of the people. There are 3 possible jurisdictions: A) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution with full legal authority and jurisdiction to taxation, schools, infrastructure, peace keeping, hospital, courts, et al. as services, and needs of the local men and women therein. B) Having as the "Trustee" full fiduciary control of the "Trusts" set up to care for the local needs. De-jure/ lawful B) Non-Governmental Office, (NGO): a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, without the legal authority or jurisdiction to taxation. This entity provides "Service Contracts," which requires contracts and consent to contract by those involved in the services. It's known as "Body Corporate," and serves "Incorporated Inhabitants." Did the men and women give consent to be incorporated? That's called FRAUD. Who is the "Head of Council" or "Global Mayor?" (“A created fiction” The Executive Control and Authority comes from the Corporation of the Province wherein we reside, and to which your office would receive the Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al directly, through downloads from the corporation and are corporate policies not district policies. De-facto/ un-lawful/FRAUD C) Public/Private/Partnerships, (PPP): an International Entity one which downloads "FOREIGN," Corporate policies, UN/United Nations, WEF/ World Economic Forum, WHO/ World Health Organization et al. In this position there is also no legal authority or jurisdiction to taxation. Consent to contract is a legal requirement to contract with the men and women. Did the men and women consent to Foreign Corporate Policies and occupation in the community without knowledge or consent? Are the United Nations Sustainable Goals/SDG's, Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 policies being implemented? Who has fiduciary control over the local Trusts as their Trustee? Who is the "Head of Council," and "Council of the Whole." “A fiction” De-Facto, un-lawful/FRAUD These are jurisdictional questions that are important to ascertain because through the stroke of a pen, a man or woman is being put into extreme personal liability for the agreements and infrastructures signed on to. Furthermore, there are 3 levels of Lawful/de-jure/jurisdictions LOCAL, PROVINCIAL, and FEDERAL - Each has their sphere of lawful jurisdiction and geographical area - Each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers - NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview We the people have come to ascertain for ourselves the jurisdiction WE are in because the last few years have shown us that something has gone horribly awry at the local level. We the people voted for positions of service to the local jurisdiction. Was there comprehension of the meaning of the oath, declaration or covenant sworn, upon taking office? Was time given to properly peruse any documents to sign and vote on? Many of these documents were written over many years, by legal firms and lawyers, whose signatures are not within the documents...whose are! They contain legalise, a language unto itself, and is the basis for how most FRAUD has occurred. Words like person, individual, inhabitant, resident, citizen, et al have a completely different meaning in these documents. FRAUD vitiates everything. We the people intend on restoring Peace, Order, and Lawful Governance should our suspicions prove correct. We require a response by ________________________________ and expect such from our elected officials. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law, and thus consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls upon the claimant. No response is considered tacit agreement. ______________________________________________________ Regional District of Address Date TO: Board Chair, CAO, CEO, Directors et al FROM: The enclosed documentation: 1) Proof of the Incorporation of the following entities, NOTE: government services corporations (dba:"doing business as,") EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; Government of Canada, (CIK 0000230098) Government of British Columbia, (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306) Government of Alberta, (CIK 0000810961) Government of Saskatchewan, (CIK 0000203098) Government of Manitoba, (CIK 0000826926) Ontario, (CIK 0000074615) Quebec, (CIK 0000722803) Province of New Brunswick, (CIK 0000862406) Province of Nova Scotia, (CIK 0000842639) 2) Copy of The CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE; showing that Corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to Taxation or Law Enforcement et al without consent to contract by those involved in the transaction. Personal liability is then enforceable upon those acting illegally. The enclosed documents show that the Regional District through its Incorporation may be operating under the "Color of Law" and as such is de-facto, un-lawful, and ultra-vires. This information is not hear-say nor opinion, rather they state the facts of the matter, which are; ?- What Oath, Declaration, or Covenant was signed upon the commencement of the positions in council? These matter! ?- What jurisdiction is the office under? There are 3 possible Jurisdictions; 1) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution, with lawful de-jure status as a holder of the "PUBLIC TRUST", Trustee with Fiduciary control, and thus legal authority to the taxation of the men and women within a geographical area, and is one of "service" to the local needs; school, hospital, peace keeping, infrastructure, courts, et al. 2) Non-Governmental Office (NGO): a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, that provides "Service Contracts," and is known as a "Body Corporate" to "Incorporated Inhabitants." This jurisdiction requires Consent to Contract, is de-facto, un-lawful and as such has NO legal jurisdiction to taxation. The Executive Control and Authority comes from the corporation of the province wherein the office is located. The Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al are downloaded to the district and are corporate policies. 3) Public/Private/Partnerships (PPP) : an INTERNATIONAL ENTITY, receiving downloads from a "FOREIGN" Corporation; United Nations, WHO/World Health Organization, WEF/World Economic Forum et al. This is also a de-facto, un-lawful jurisdiction with NO legal grounds to the taxation of men and women, and also requires Consent to Contract. NOTE: In British Columbia, as an example, The BC Assessment Authority is a CROWN Corporation, created in 1974 by the Corporation of British Columbia Inc., "in order to earn profit for the Government of British Columbia Inc., without jurisdiction nor contracts with the men and women of BC. NOTE: There are 3 levels of lawful, de-jure governance Local, Provincial and Federal - Each has their sphere of jurisdiction and geographical area - Each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers - NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview These 2 questions are the most important because the answer to them will establish the personal liability through the signature/autograph put upon the documents requiring a vote. Was there full comprehension of the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed when entering office as a Director? Was there time to peruse any documents requiring a vote? Most often these documents are many pages long and were made over many years, by legal firms and lawyers whose signatures are NOT contained therein. Whose is? Making that signature "personally" liable for the decisions made Was there full comprehension of the difference between the legal wording contained therein, and the knowledge of their meanings? Such as person, individual, constituent, citizen,et al. "Legalese" is a language unto itself and is the basis for most FRAUD, which in law vitiates everything. The men and women in our Regional District Office were empowered by the men and women, to operate under, and in a jurisdiction that is de-jure, lawful, and with a fiduciary trust, to serve the men and women of our geographical area and no other. To ensure that the needs of the local men, women, and their property were the priority and responsibility of the Regional District. So...What Office is held? Lawfully/de-jure or unlawfully and de-facto? We require an answer, on or before __________________ No answer will be considered a tacit agreement. The office of the Regional District is held by the trust of the members of our community, the neighbours and friends who voted for positions in an office to serve the community. That's why we require proof of what oath, declaration, or covenant was given. The men and women of __________________ _________________________________________________________ Notice of Demand and Trespass Proof of Jurisdiction and Contract Proof of Claim It has come to our attention, the concerned men and women, that our Educational Institutions, whose service to us is the education of our sons and daughters (hereafter named as our "property") has implemented the SOGI 123 Program without a consent to contract. HISTORY; this program began in 2007 through the ARC Foundation. A private foundation based in Vancouver, British Columbia Inc. Other corporations involved in the funding are; British Columbia Ministry of Education Inc.; British Columbia Teachers Federation Inc.; University of British Columbia Inc., and through private donations( gifts from registered charities also corporations), and the corporation of Canada Inc. Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Documents included herein: - Proof of the incorporation of Government of Canada Inc., Government of British Columbia Inc. - Copy of the "CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE", a 1942 court case, accepted worldwide because it's corporate, commerce law. Clearly stating the requirement of contracts Governments lose their sovereignty when they become corporations, thus no different than Canadian Tire using Canadian Tire money. - Copy of the definition of "GLOSSA", pertinent in this matter because it's a matter of concealment, meant to confuse using "text" to corrupt the real facts in order to gain tacit consent. There's no statute of limitation on fraud. - Our Mayoral, Councillor, and Regional Districts are also incorporated through the removal of many of the municipal powers in 2004 with the Local Government Act incorporated into the Community Charter, prior to this; the local mayor had full de-jure and lawful jurisdiction, in relation to our schools. - Copy of the definition of the All Capital Identity, created with the "Birth Certificate," a fiction, constructive fraud and conversion. - Copy of the 10 Points of Contract Law, made simple for comprehension on this matter. - Copy of the 12 Presumptions of Court. Included for the comprehension of status. Fundamentally, the fraud upon our property when born, vitiates any Board jurisdiction to the ownership of our property. We, the men and women who created them, own them. "He who creates owns!" A maxim in law Therefore, it is incumbent upon those who have positions on the Board to cease and desist the SOGI 123 Program which is an infringement upon the property known as our sons and daughters. Failure to do so as corporate entities, through Contract Law, we intend on exercising our jurisdiction, as is our right, to the fullest extent upon the men and women personally sitting on the Board. We strongly suggest a consultation with a lawyer, who by the way wrote this mess. "Praetextu legis injusta agens duplo puniendus" We the People DO NOT require legal Re-presentation in this matter because we're well aware of the 12 Presumptions of Court. I doubt any lawyer will be willing to assist the men and women on the Board, regardless of the facts, because through their: legalize they do deceive. Be it therefore noted, with the documents contained herein, that our claim of proof of contract and the jurisdictional fraud, put against us and our property is considered a trespass. It is the duty of men and women to discuss these delicate matters with our property within our own jurisdiction. We are not against the health and wellbeing of another's property, within their jurisdiction, rather not in the educational setting. We the People, regarding our property in the care of the educational system, again, reiterate, and declare that the burden of proof falls on the claimant. Consider the response with wisdom and discernment since we voted men and women into what we thought was a Educational Office not a Corporate Office. We require no more than 7 days for implementing the redressing of the trespass against our property, with the immediate removal of any and all literature, electronic or written, devices, toys (we use the word with baited breath) et al in relation to the SOGI 123 PROGRAM post haste. For it was through corporate policies, without contractual consent, that the trespass has been made against our property thus creating this claim against those men and women on the Board personally. Furthermore, do not be deceived into thinking that the registration of our property into the corporation rather than an educational institution voids any responsibility on the part of the men and women on the Board, as it was done in fraud. Again we'll state that fraud vitiates everything. In all fairness to the men and women on the Board, our neighbours, not the corporations involved, perhaps unaware of the situation mentioned above and the personal liability for this trespass, We the People will support the men and women in this matter of remedy, because we trusted that their service, while sitting on the Board, was to serve our property with a lawful education. No response will be considered a tacit agreement. Sincerely and without prejudice or malice We the People Autograph_______________________:________ __________________________________________________________ Statement of Claim Taxation Between the Corporation of ______________________________________ And the noted particulars on the documents included herein. The above corporation has not proved jurisdiction, consent to contract, nor provide proof of a contract to claim the monies expected in taxation, hence tacit agreement to this claim. Who claims this debt be true, who claims this debt to due? Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Three requirements were made in writing to the Corporations Finance Minister to provide said proof, and are included in this document. Furthermore, copies of the Clearfield Doctrine, EDGAR # for the Corporation involved, Regina-v-John Anthony Hill 12 May, 2011 at Southwark Crown Court, Case # T20107746, (the Queen declared, "Lawfully NOT valid Monarch, hence Charles the III too),and "Glossa," (see Black's Law) corrupts the essence of the text presented on your documents. This refusal of consent to contract extends from this day forward, as noted with receipt of this document, until such a date in the future when there is a de-jure government upon the landmass commonly known worldwide as Canada, British Columbia, et al. Autograph _________________________:___________________________ Dated this day _______________________________________________________ Proof of Claim Re: Property Tax; Contract and Proof of Consent to Contract Between the Corporation of ___________________________________________________ and _____________________________________________________________________________ Regarding the property registered as; ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ It is required and incumbent upon the Corporations Minister of Finance, to provide proof of jurisdiction as a corporation, to taxation without full disclosure of the facts, and consent to contract, as per contract law. See: The Clearfield Doctrine; Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 363 Syllabus CLEARFIELD TRUST CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES CERTIORARI to the CIRCUIT COURT of APPEALS for the THIRD CIRCUIT No. 490 Argued February 5, 1943 Decided March 1, 1943(and accepted worldwide when conducting commerce) Further to the above noted court case, this requirement will be expected within 7 days receipt of this claim for proof of the jurisdictional obligation by the corporation to taxation to the property noted herein. Who claims this debt be true, who claims this debt be due? Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Property Taxes have been paid previously without consent to contract, due to the fraud perpetrated without full disclosure of the fact that the corporation mentioned herein, was not a lawful government with the de-jure jurisdiction to taxation, thus Ultra-Vires. Rather, a corporation whose name included the words "government," which is fraud based on Black's Law Dictionary, any edition. No response will be confirmation of a tacit agreement to the above. Thanking you in advance, Autograph: _________________________:_____________________________ Dated this day: ______________________________________ ______________________________________________________ STATEMENT of CLAIM Date:_____________________ STATE of TITLE CERTIFICATE: Certificate number________________________________________ Land Title Office__________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ Title Number______________________________________________ Registered Owner__________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ Taxation Authority__________________________________________ Description of Land__________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ Charges, Liens and Interests_____________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ Proof of contract is required to provide evidence of any claim made upon the aforementioned property; taxation; land use; water use; structures and buildings above, on, or below the land; any and all animals thereon; any and all chattles upon said land; et al, provide proof of any contractual obligation having been made with respect to said land. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law, and thus consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. (See: Regina-v-John Anthony Hill 12 May, 2011 at Southwark Crown Court, Case # T20107746, in which the Queen was declared to be a "Lawfully NOT Valid Monarch." Hence, neither is Charles the III) (See: Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 363, Syllabus. Clearfield trust Co.et al. v. United States, Certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.No. 490. Argued February 5, 1943 Decided March 1, 1943 ; and accepted worldwide when conducting commerce) The requirement to provide Proof of Contract within this Statement of Claim, is expected within ____________days from receipt of the documentation herein. No response will be considered a tacit agreement to the above. Autograph_________________________:_______________________ :GLOSSA: ~ The 'Born-Date' Vs. the 'Registration-Date' Does your Birth Certificate identify YOU as TWO people, not one? (You is plural, one and another) Have you ever wondered why your SURNAME is written using the ALL UPPERCASE TEXT? Put simply, 'you' are using a ‘Legal’ name and this is fraud. See the ‘name’ is actually split up into separate entities – The Christian-name and The ‘Surname’. You register these names to the Crown Corporation LTD. as their Property by your Birth Certificate which is given a bond number. Your physical value is used as collateral for these bonds allowing the United Kingdom LTD. to take out loans from private Banks, such as 'Bank of England' and profit is made by way of legal fines (Acts & Statutes), bills and taxation. – Hence money is no longer backed by Gold or Silver, but by our physical value or man power. The UNITED KINGDOM LTD is a privately owned Corporation-ship. And corporations are considered ‘ships’ and they are governed under the law of the sea, known as Maritime Law. There is no real 'ship' but a 'document-vessel' – which in our case was our Birth Certificate Created by the Doctor when s/he ‘docked’ you. TAKE NOTICE Whenever you encounter the Legal Document (document-vessel) you will notice that your surname (or sometimes all of your names) will be written using the ALL-UPPERCASE TEXT. This is no coincidence - the ALL UPPERCASE text is not defined or recognized in The Oxford Styles Manual, (the governing book of the English language) – meaning that although you may be able to read it as English, it is in fact, NOT English. The all CAPS or Gloss can be found within the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under 'foreign-languages', named 'Ancient-Latin' The main place this ALL-UPPERCASE text is found to be defined as a language, is when American Sign Language (ASL), a signing language used for the deaf, is written. ASL can be defined in the book ‘The Chicago Manual of Style’ under the foreign-languages header: American Sign Language (ASL) compound signs, 10.152 and ‘glosses, 10.147’. Thus, defining this text as a foreign language Further going on to say that when written, it has no 1-to-1 correspondence with any other languages on the document. The all CAPS or Gloss is also found in the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under foreign-languages, 'Ancient-Latin', however as the all caps UK LTD is registered in [Washington D.C[, they seem to be using the 'Chicago Manual of Style' , not the Oxford. Putting two or more languages onto a legal document is known in law as a ‘Glossa’. Black's Law Dictionary defines: 'GLOSSA' - “It is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of the text”. Meaning that by using a Glossa in a document they are trying to conceal or confuse the real facts. If you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL-UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL if you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALLf you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So, you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL-UPPER CASE. If you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL-UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So, you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL Soon you will realize that virtually all court orders, speeding tickets and most other legal documents actually make no sense whatsoever. They only make sense when we make the assumption that it is all plain English and we read it as one, once you take one away from the other – it renders the document useless. Seeing as the ‘government’ is simply a privately owned Corporation, it can only impose fines and acts upon other corporations. And by tricking us to registering our names as a corporate entity and then tricking us into thinking these names are physically us, it manages to get us to represent the corporately registered name and therefore bear the burden of fines and policies. This is a crime known as “personage”. Hand in hand with “personage” comes a crime known as “barratry” which is knowingly bringing false claims into court- This is what police, politicians, judges are doing daily. The Birth-Certificate, Two-Names, Two-Dates and Two-Languages? Capitis Diminutio Maxima (Name in ALL CAPITALS) For the purposes of understanding one's legal or commercial status under the Admiralty system (the law system used in England, Canada and much of the US), it is necessary to examine the curious use of all CAPS -Capitis Diminutio Maxima- in legal and domestic income tax forms, credit cards & statements, loans, mortgages, speeding & parking tickets, car documents, road tax, court summons etc. While seemingly a trite concern, this apparently small detail has extremely deep significance for all of us! Gage Canadian Dictionary 1983 Sec. 4 defines Capitalize adj. as "To take advantage of - To use to one's own advantage." Black's Law Dictionary – Revised 4th Edition 1968, provides a more comprehensive definition as follows … Capitis Diminutio (meaning the diminishing of status through the use of capitalization)- In Roman law. A diminishing or abridgment of personality; a loss or curtailment of a man's status or aggregate of leg al attributes and qualifications.

Corporations Masquerading as Government : Which “Government” Can We Trust? It is A FACT that Corporations are masquerading as government in countries around the world – for profit and not for the purpose of governance. We know the role of true government is to act as trustees for the people… to provide services to the community, to represent its interests. But do those claiming government status today truly act as our trustees? Does real government still exist? What the FUQ is going on in government today???? Let’s go right back to the beginning… before there was Government. Natural Trust When each of us is born, our parents take on the role of Executor of a trust. They appoint Trustees like nannies, school teachers, dentists etc. to return benefits to you as the Beneficiary. Your parents may make the determinations about your care, but they do so on your behalf until we reach maturity. When we become of age (whatever age that is) we take on the role of Executor, and continue to appoint Trustees to return benefits to us as Beneficiaries. This is a global human phenomenon; even the most isolated tribes in the deepest jungles appear to behave in the same way. Let’s call this a Natural Trust. How Does This Relate To Government? In the same way we appoint nannies and dentists, we also appoint Government as a Trustee. They perform an administrative service and return benefits to us as Beneficiaries. We enjoy the benefits of roads, schools, public health services etc… or at least that’s how it should work. Most people, I believe, would be comfortable appointing Government as a Trustee – provided Government functions according to this Natural Trust, and more importantly that Government actually serves the people. But what if somewhere, something went wrong..? What if the Government, appointed as Trustee, started serving another master? What if the actions of Government were benefiting others – like shareholders? Would you trust them enough to appoint them your Trustee? Inconsistencies in the Representation of “Government” Let’s first look to the United States. The original Constitution reads “The Constitution for the United States”. As of 1871, a Constitution was substituted and reads “The CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”. So which is it? Which one is legitimate? How many constitutions are there? A similar scenario appears to be taking place in Australia. The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) tells us that Government is named “Government of the Commonwealth”.… yet occupying the country’s capital is the “Australian Government”. Further inconsistency manifests in the name of the Parliament holding office in Australia. The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) defines Parliament as “The Parliament” or “The Parliament of the Commonwealth”. This is in direct contrast to the entity called “Parliament of Australia” which is currently occupying the country’s capital. Surely the Constitutions in both America and Australia aren’t so weak that legal entity names can so easily be substituted? It doesn’t take a constitutional lawyer to tell you there are strict rules for altering constitutions; that’s why we have referenda. But does anyone remember the referenda that enabled these changes to be made? And is it just the name that’s different..? Frequently Unanswered Questions. When such questions are put to “Government”, answers are scarce – if not completely absent. In a recent case study involving the importation of a 1959 Chevrolet Corvette into Australia, “Australian Customs & Border Protection Service” were challenged to provide evidence they were in fact a legitimate Department of the de jure Government of the Commonwealth of Australia. After twelve months of questioning at all levels of Government, no answers have been forthcoming. “Ministers”, “Judges”, “Commissioners”, “Departments”, “Governors”, and even the Prime Minister – all remain silent. So who are they? Are they really Government? So far, no “Government” official has been willing to attempt an explanation; to demonstrate their legitimacy as representatives of true government. But is a government’s refusal to provide evidence of its legitimacy really good enough? Is that what you expect of a Government that is supposed to act as your trustee? What happened to accountability in Government? Should 12 months without answers be taken AS the answer…?? Accountability in Government… in the Words of JFK So what happened to accountability in government? Surely questions related to the lawful validity of Government are not simply vexatious? Rather, isn’t a “Government” official who declines scrutiny into the lawful validity of their office claiming to be above the law? In 1961 US President John F Kennedy made a speech to the American Newspaper Publishers Association that everyone in Government – and those who believe Government do not have to answer to the people – should listen to. He stated: “Government at all levels must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information, outside the narrowest limits of national security…. We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors, and we expect you to point them out when we miss them” said Kennedy. Those are powerful words. So if this is the case, does real government simply shut up when its validity is challenged? Or does it attempt to address the concerns of those it is supposed to serve, especially as public pressure to do so continues to mount? And if they don’t serve us…. who ARE they serving?? What would happen if the “Government” started to act as the Executor of a trust – dictating rules, codes and statutes to you? What happens if “Government” started demanding that benefits be returned to them..? How could this happen..? Corporate “Government” Trust Let’s consider for a minute the scenario of a Corporate Government Trust, in which the “government” plays the role of Executor. Would a “government” acting as Executor take questions from it’s Trustee? Would the “Government” create a legal entity to which you act as Trustee? Perhaps upon the registration of your birth? Do governments address you … or a LEGAL ENTITY? More importantly, does the silence of government on these questions provide the “fullest possible information” ?? What can we do about this..? The first action appears to be to determine the capacity in which “Government” acts. Who are they actually serving..? This question is critical. But I don’t expect this information to be any more forthcoming of government than the answer of their legitimacy. So in the meantime, there are other things we can do in our interactions with Corporate Government. Some offer to accept the role of Trustee to their Corporate Government on the condition that they be paid an annual fee to be the Trustee… say $1,000,000 p.a. Others provide terms and conditions to their Corporate Government, which set out fees and charges applicable for acts of the pretence to real government. Either of these two approaches would collapse if those claiming government status were able to demonstrate their legitimacy. But these actions have been shown to stop Corporate Government agencies in their tracks. Does this sound like the actions of a Trustee of the people? Or an Executor and Beneficiary of a corrupted system? More importantly, how many challenges to the lawful validity of government have been met with the proof demanded by its people? So what the FUQ do we do next? In dealings with any government representative, ask them ONE SIMPLE QUESTION: Can you please demonstrate that today’s government (the one you represent) is the same one as established at the inception of this country? It is the onus of any person or entity claiming government status to prove they act on behalf of legitimate government. Until they can demonstrate this, don’t deal with them. ask the fruadster Her Majesty, The Queen for the truth about the “Australian Government” or Canada government US Government; something all levels of “ Government” have been unwilling or unable to provide. Share this video. The Corporate Government phenomenon is not limited just to the United States, the UK, the Canada or Australia. Increasingly, Governments around the world are behaving as Executors and Beneficiaries, not as Trustees of their people. We all have a right to know… which “Government” can we trust? Visit for more information.

ISubscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8n this powerful video, Peggy Peterson stands against unfair taxes and the UN agenda, delivering a compelling rebuttal to the Huntsville council's agenda. Her deputation on property tax sheds light on the anti-human agenda, sparking public pushback and a fight against injustice. PROOF OF CLAIM Rights Doc. 4 WE are all born with free will and unalienable rights. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law’ Consent makes the contract Adhesion contracts are not contracts because there was no consent, they are considered as gifts. We do not require any corporate created rights, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedom provided by the Government of Canada Corporation and/or ICCPR provided by the United Nations Corporation. If anyone claims to have jurisdiction over, you and/or requests payment request a copy of the contract. Government Corporations Government Services Corporations doing business as Government of Canada and/or the government of any provinces can only create rules (statutes) that only apply to their employees, franchisees, officers and dependents. Their rules (statutes) do not apply to the people in general. That is why the rules they create (statutes) are referred to as “public policy”. We do not require any corporate created rights, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedom provided by the Government of Canada Corporation and/or ICCPR provided by the United Nations Corporation. Women and men living in Canada are not subject to any Public Policies, mandates, or acts of legislation promoted by any commercial or municipal corporation for its officers and employees. We should not vote in private corporate shareholder elections sponsored by Canada Inc., Province of _____ Inc., or any other foreign corporation. All Acts, Bills and statutes created by the Government of Canada and/or any of the provincial governments only apply to “person”. The definition of person in Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition on page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being ( i.e. natural person ) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. In other words, if I say the basket includes apples and oranges you will not find any other type of fruit in the basket. As plainly stated in Black’s Law dictionary, anything that applies to person only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Does not apply to men or women! The Government of Canada and Government of all provinces are Crown for profit Corporations. The Prime Minister and/or the Premiers receive their orders from the shareholders of the Crown Corporation. They are the C.E.O.s/officers of the Crown Corporations. They carry out the orders that are relayed to them by the Governor General and/or the Lieutenant Governor. They (politicians) are in place to take the blame for the harm that is done to the people. They are replaced every four years with someone who claims that he/she is going to right the wrongs that were created, but nothing changes they carry out the orders provided by the shareholders as the previous C.E.O.s. Four years later they are blamed and replaced. PERSONS All Acts, Bills and statutes created by the Government of Canada and/or any of the provincial governments only apply to “person”. The definition of person in Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition on page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person ) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. In other words, if I say the basket includes apples and oranges you will not find any other type of fruit in the basket. As plainly stated in Black’s Law dictionary, anything that applies to person only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Does not apply to men or women _________________________________________________________ Name written in all capital letters The governing book of the English language is “The Oxford Styles Manual” which sometimes refers to “The Chicago Manual of Style” also The Oxford Manual of Style. All Uppercase text, all caps, or gloss is listed in the style's manuals under “foreign - language” , named ”Ancient-Latin” or Dog Latin. All Caps are not defined or recognized in meaning. All Caps is not English although you may think you are able to read it as English it is in fact, a calculated deception to be read separated from the rest of the “Document”. All Uppercase text has no lawful grammatical jurisdiction with common English and is a foreign language, headed under “Ancient-Latin”. (The Chicago Manual of Style, 16th Edition, 11:144-47). Glossa is two or more languages on a legal document. Glossa is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of a text( Black’s Law Dictionary page 621 5th Edition) “Glossa” is also used to conceal or confuse the real facts in order to confuse, in order to gain tacit consent. A name written in all capital letters is written in dog Latin or is known as systemic text “a thing” created by the employees of the crown corporation, Therefore the Crown Corporation owns the creation. If you claim that the name written in all capital letters, is, you. You are admitting you are the property of the Crown Corporation (a slave). Cestui Que Vie Trust 's beneficiary is the name in all capital letters which is the property of the Crown Corporation, it is not you. All governments (corporations) and businesses such as banks and others that write your name in all capital letters are committing constructive fraud and conversion. (Engaged in criminal activity) ___________________________________________________ City, Municipality, Village et al Address Date TO: Mayor, CAO, CEO, Councillors et al FROM: The men and women living therein, The enclosed documentation: 1) Proof of Incorporation of the following entities; from Dunn & Bradstreet or EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Note: the following are government services corporations’ (dba( "doing business as,") Government of Canada, EDGAR (CIK 0000230098) ; Government of British Columbia, EDGAR (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306) ; Government of Alberta, EDGAR (CIK 0000810961) ; Government of Saskatchewan, EDGAR (CIK 0000203098) ; Government of Manitoba, EDGAR (CIK 0000826926) ; Ontario, EDGAR (CIK 0000074615) ; Quebec, EDGAR (0000722803) ; Province of New Brunswick, EDGAR (CIK 0000862406) ; Province of Nova Scotia, EDGAR (CIK 0000842639) 2) Copy of the Clearfield Doctrine; showing that corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to taxation or law enforcement et al, without a consent to contract which is corporate policy when doing commerce. * Seek legal clarification and written proof to the contrary. This letter comes with the enclosed documents to ascertain the jurisdiction within our council, in which official positions are being held . Depending on the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed upon entering office, the positions may be operating under the "Color of Law," in a De-Facto, Un-lawful and thus ultra vires standing. This holds personal liability for anything signed on behalf of the people. There are 3 possible jurisdictions: A) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution with full legal authority and jurisdiction to taxation, schools, infrastructure, peace keeping, hospital, courts, et al. as services, and needs of the local men and women therein. B) Having as the "Trustee" full fiduciary control of the "Trusts" set up to care for the local needs. De-jure/ lawful B) Non-Governmental Office, (NGO): a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, without the legal authority or jurisdiction to taxation. This entity provides "Service Contracts," which requires contracts and consent to contract by those involved in the services. It's known as "Body Corporate," and serves "Incorporated Inhabitants." Did the men and women give consent to be incorporated? That's called FRAUD. Who is the "Head of Council" or "Global Mayor?" (“A created fiction” The Executive Control and Authority comes from the Corporation of the Province wherein we reside, and to which your office would receive the Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al directly, through downloads from the corporation and are corporate policies not district policies. De-facto/ un-lawful/FRAUD C) Public/Private/Partnerships, (PPP): an International Entity one which downloads "FOREIGN," Corporate policies, UN/United Nations, WEF/ World Economic Forum, WHO/ World Health Organization et al. In this position there is also no legal authority or jurisdiction to taxation. Consent to contract is a legal requirement to contract with the men and women. Did the men and women consent to Foreign Corporate Policies and occupation in the community without knowledge or consent? Are the United Nations Sustainable Goals/SDG's, Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 policies being implemented? Who has fiduciary control over the local Trusts as their Trustee? Who is the "Head of Council," and "Council of the Whole." “A fiction” De-Facto, un-lawful/FRAUD These are jurisdictional questions that are important to ascertain because through the stroke of a pen, a man or woman is being put into extreme personal liability for the agreements and infrastructures signed on to. Furthermore, there are 3 levels of Lawful/de-jure/jurisdictions LOCAL, PROVINCIAL, and FEDERAL - Each has their sphere of lawful jurisdiction and geographical area - Each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers - NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview We the people have come to ascertain for ourselves the jurisdiction WE are in because the last few years have shown us that something has gone horribly awry at the local level. We the people voted for positions of service to the local jurisdiction. Was there comprehension of the meaning of the oath, declaration or covenant sworn, upon taking office? Was time given to properly peruse any documents to sign and vote on? Many of these documents were written over many years, by legal firms and lawyers, whose signatures are not within the documents...whose are! They contain legalise, a language unto itself, and is the basis for how most FRAUD has occurred. Words like person, individual, inhabitant, resident, citizen, et al have a completely different meaning in these documents. FRAUD vitiates everything. We the people intend on restoring Peace, Order, and Lawful Governance should our suspicions prove correct. We require a response by ________________________________ and expect such from our elected officials. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law, and thus consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls upon the claimant. No response is considered tacit agreement. ______________________________________________________ Regional District of Address Date TO: Board Chair, CAO, CEO, Directors et al FROM: The enclosed documentation: 1) Proof of the Incorporation of the following entities, NOTE: government services corporations (dba:"doing business as,") EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; Government of Canada, (CIK 0000230098) Government of British Columbia, (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306) Government of Alberta, (CIK 0000810961) Government of Saskatchewan, (CIK 0000203098) Government of Manitoba, (CIK 0000826926) Ontario, (CIK 0000074615) Quebec, (CIK 0000722803) Province of New Brunswick, (CIK 0000862406) Province of Nova Scotia, (CIK 0000842639) 2) Copy of The CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE; showing that Corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to Taxation or Law Enforcement et al without consent to contract by those involved in the transaction. Personal liability is then enforceable upon those acting illegally. The enclosed documents show that the Regional District through its Incorporation may be operating under the "Color of Law" and as such is de-facto, un-lawful, and ultra-vires. This information is not hear-say nor opinion, rather they state the facts of the matter, which are; ?- What Oath, Declaration, or Covenant was signed upon the commencement of the positions in council? These matter! ?- What jurisdiction is the office under? There are 3 possible Jurisdictions; 1) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution, with lawful de-jure status as a holder of the "PUBLIC TRUST", Trustee with Fiduciary control, and thus legal authority to the taxation of the men and women within a geographical area, and is one of "service" to the local needs; school, hospital, peace keeping, infrastructure, courts, et al. 2) Non-Governmental Office (NGO): a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, that provides "Service Contracts," and is known as a "Body Corporate" to "Incorporated Inhabitants." This jurisdiction requires Consent to Contract, is de-facto, un-lawful and as such has NO legal jurisdiction to taxation. The Executive Control and Authority comes from the corporation of the province wherein the office is located. The Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al are downloaded to the district and are corporate policies. 3) Public/Private/Partnerships (PPP) : an INTERNATIONAL ENTITY, receiving downloads from a "FOREIGN" Corporation; United Nations, WHO/World Health Organization, WEF/World Economic Forum et al. This is also a de-facto, un-lawful jurisdiction with NO legal grounds to the taxation of men and women, and also requires Consent to Contract. NOTE: In British Columbia, as an example, The BC Assessment Authority is a CROWN Corporation, created in 1974 by the Corporation of British Columbia Inc., "in order to earn profit for the Government of British Columbia Inc., without jurisdiction nor contracts with the men and women of BC. NOTE: There are 3 levels of lawful, de-jure governance Local, Provincial and Federal - Each has their sphere of jurisdiction and geographical area - Each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers - NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview These 2 questions are the most important because the answer to them will establish the personal liability through the signature/autograph put upon the documents requiring a vote. Was there full comprehension of the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed when entering office as a Director? Was there time to peruse any documents requiring a vote? Most often these documents are many pages long and were made over many years, by legal firms and lawyers whose signatures are NOT contained therein. Whose is? Making that signature "personally" liable for the decisions made Was there full comprehension of the difference between the legal wording contained therein, and the knowledge of their meanings? Such as person, individual, constituent, citizen,et al. "Legalese" is a language unto itself and is the basis for most FRAUD, which in law vitiates everything. The men and women in our Regional District Office were empowered by the men and women, to operate under, and in a jurisdiction that is de-jure, lawful, and with a fiduciary trust, to serve the men and women of our geographical area and no other. To ensure that the needs of the local men, women, and their property were the priority and responsibility of the Regional District. So...What Office is held? Lawfully/de-jure or unlawfully and de-facto? We require an answer, on or before __________________ No answer will be considered a tacit agreement. The office of the Regional District is held by the trust of the members of our community, the neighbours and friends who voted for positions in an office to serve the community. That's why we require proof of what oath, declaration, or covenant was given. The men and women of __________________ _________________________________________________________ Notice of Demand and Trespass Proof of Jurisdiction and Contract Proof of Claim It has come to our attention, the concerned men and women, that our Educational Institutions, whose service to us is the education of our sons and daughters (hereafter named as our "property") has implemented the SOGI 123 Program without a consent to contract. HISTORY; this program began in 2007 through the ARC Foundation. A private foundation based in Vancouver, British Columbia Inc. Other corporations involved in the funding are; British Columbia Ministry of Education Inc.; British Columbia Teachers Federation Inc.; University of British Columbia Inc., and through private donations( gifts from registered charities also corporations), and the corporation of Canada Inc. Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Documents included herein: - Proof of the incorporation of Government of Canada Inc., Government of British Columbia Inc. - Copy of the "CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE", a 1942 court case, accepted worldwide because it's corporate, commerce law. Clearly stating the requirement of contracts Governments lose their sovereignty when they become corporations, thus no different than Canadian Tire using Canadian Tire money. - Copy of the definition of "GLOSSA", pertinent in this matter because it's a matter of concealment, meant to confuse using "text" to corrupt the real facts in order to gain tacit consent. There's no statute of limitation on fraud. - Our Mayoral, Councillor, and Regional Districts are also incorporated through the removal of many of the municipal powers in 2004 with the Local Government Act incorporated into the Community Charter, prior to this; the local mayor had full de-jure and lawful jurisdiction, in relation to our schools. - Copy of the definition of the All Capital Identity, created with the "Birth Certificate," a fiction, constructive fraud and conversion. - Copy of the 10 Points of Contract Law, made simple for comprehension on this matter. - Copy of the 12 Presumptions of Court. Included for the comprehension of status. Fundamentally, the fraud upon our property when born, vitiates any Board jurisdiction to the ownership of our property. We, the men and women who created them, own them. "He who creates owns!" A maxim in law Therefore, it is incumbent upon those who have positions on the Board to cease and desist the SOGI 123 Program which is an infringement upon the property known as our sons and daughters. Failure to do so as corporate entities, through Contract Law, we intend on exercising our jurisdiction, as is our right, to the fullest extent upon the men and women personally sitting on the Board. We strongly suggest a consultation with a lawyer, who by the way wrote this mess. "Praetextu legis injusta agens duplo puniendus" We the People DO NOT require legal Re-presentation in this matter because we're well aware of the 12 Presumptions of Court. I doubt any lawyer will be willing to assist the men and women on the Board, regardless of the facts, because through their: legalize they do deceive. Be it therefore noted, with the documents contained herein, that our claim of proof of contract and the jurisdictional fraud, put against us and our property is considered a trespass. It is the duty of men and women to discuss these delicate matters with our property within our own jurisdiction. We are not against the health and wellbeing of another's property, within their jurisdiction, rather not in the educational setting. We the People, regarding our property in the care of the educational system, again, reiterate, and declare that the burden of proof falls on the claimant. Consider the response with wisdom and discernment since we voted men and women into what we thought was a Educational Office not a Corporate Office. We require no more than 7 days for implementing the redressing of the trespass against our property, with the immediate removal of any and all literature, electronic or written, devices, toys (we use the word with baited breath) et al in relation to the SOGI 123 PROGRAM post haste. For it was through corporate policies, without contractual consent, that the trespass has been made against our property thus creating this claim against those men and women on the Board personally. Furthermore, do not be deceived into thinking that the registration of our property into the corporation rather than an educational institution voids any responsibility on the part of the men and women on the Board, as it was done in fraud. Again we'll state that fraud vitiates everything. In all fairness to the men and women on the Board, our neighbours, not the corporations involved, perhaps unaware of the situation mentioned above and the personal liability for this trespass, We the People will support the men and women in this matter of remedy, because we trusted that their service, while sitting on the Board, was to serve our property with a lawful education. No response will be considered a tacit agreement. Sincerely and without prejudice or malice We the People Autograph_______________________:________ __________________________________________________________ Statement of Claim Taxation Between the Corporation of ______________________________________ And the noted particulars on the documents included herein. The above corporation has not proved jurisdiction, consent to contract, nor provide proof of a contract to claim the monies expected in taxation, hence tacit agreement to this claim. Who claims this debt be true, who claims this debt to due? Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Three requirements were made in writing to the Corporations Finance Minister to provide said proof, and are included in this document. Furthermore, copies of the Clearfield Doctrine, EDGAR # for the Corporation involved, Regina-v-John Anthony Hill 12 May, 2011 at Southwark Crown Court, Case # T20107746, (the Queen declared, "Lawfully NOT valid Monarch, hence Charles the III too),and "Glossa," (see Black's Law) corrupts the essence of the text presented on your documents. This refusal of consent to contract extends from this day forward, as noted with receipt of this document, until such a date in the future when there is a de-jure government upon the landmass commonly known worldwide as Canada, British Columbia, et al. Autograph _________________________:___________________________ Dated this day _______________________________________________________ Proof of Claim Re: Property Tax; Contract and Proof of Consent to Contract Between the Corporation of ___________________________________________________ and _____________________________________________________________________________ Regarding the property registered as; ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ It is required and incumbent upon the Corporations Minister of Finance, to provide proof of jurisdiction as a corporation, to taxation without full disclosure of the facts, and consent to contract, as per contract law. See: The Clearfield Doctrine; Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 363 Syllabus CLEARFIELD TRUST CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES CERTIORARI to the CIRCUIT COURT of APPEALS for the THIRD CIRCUIT No. 490 Argued February 5, 1943 Decided March 1, 1943(and accepted worldwide when conducting commerce) Further to the above noted court case, this requirement will be expected within 7 days receipt of this claim for proof of the jurisdictional obligation by the corporation to taxation to the property noted herein. Who claims this debt be true, who claims this debt be due? Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Property Taxes have been paid previously without consent to contract, due to the fraud perpetrated without full disclosure of the fact that the corporation mentioned herein, was not a lawful government with the de-jure jurisdiction to taxation, thus Ultra-Vires. Rather, a corporation whose name included the words "government," which is fraud based on Black's Law Dictionary, any edition. No response will be confirmation of a tacit agreement to the above. Thanking you in advance, Autograph: _________________________:_____________________________ Dated this day: ______________________________________ ______________________________________________________ STATEMENT of CLAIM Date:_____________________ STATE of TITLE CERTIFICATE: Certificate number________________________________________ Land Title Office__________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ Title Number______________________________________________ Registered Owner__________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ Taxation Authority__________________________________________ Description of Land__________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ Charges, Liens and Interests_____________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ Proof of contract is required to provide evidence of any claim made upon the aforementioned property; taxation; land use; water use; structures and buildings above, on, or below the land; any and all animals thereon; any and all chattles upon said land; et al, provide proof of any contractual obligation having been made with respect to said land. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law, and thus consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. (See: Regina-v-John Anthony Hill 12 May, 2011 at Southwark Crown Court, Case # T20107746, in which the Queen was declared to be a "Lawfully NOT Valid Monarch." Hence, neither is Charles the III) (See: Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 363, Syllabus. Clearfield trust Co.et al. v. United States, Certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.No. 490. Argued February 5, 1943 Decided March 1, 1943 ; and accepted worldwide when conducting commerce) The requirement to provide Proof of Contract within this Statement of Claim, is expected within ____________days from receipt of the documentation herein. No response will be considered a tacit agreement to the above. Autograph_________________________:_______________________ :GLOSSA: ~ The 'Born-Date' Vs. the 'Registration-Date' Does your Birth Certificate identify YOU as TWO people, not one? (You is plural, one and another) Have you ever wondered why your SURNAME is written using the ALL UPPERCASE TEXT? Put simply, 'you' are using a ‘Legal’ name and this is fraud. See the ‘name’ is actually split up into separate entities – The Christian-name and The ‘Surname’. You register these names to the Crown Corporation LTD. as their Property by your Birth Certificate which is given a bond number. Your physical value is used as collateral for these bonds allowing the United Kingdom LTD. to take out loans from private Banks, such as 'Bank of England' and profit is made by way of legal fines (Acts & Statutes), bills and taxation. – Hence money is no longer backed by Gold or Silver, but by our physical value or man power. The UNITED KINGDOM LTD is a privately owned Corporation-ship. And corporations are considered ‘ships’ and they are governed under the law of the sea, known as Maritime Law. There is no real 'ship' but a 'document-vessel' – which in our case was our Birth Certificate Created by the Doctor when s/he ‘docked’ you. TAKE NOTICE Whenever you encounter the Legal Document (document-vessel) you will notice that your surname (or sometimes all of your names) will be written using the ALL-UPPERCASE TEXT. This is no coincidence - the ALL UPPERCASE text is not defined or recognized in The Oxford Styles Manual, (the governing book of the English language) – meaning that although you may be able to read it as English, it is in fact, NOT English. The all CAPS or Gloss can be found within the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under 'foreign-languages', named 'Ancient-Latin' The main place this ALL-UPPERCASE text is found to be defined as a language, is when American Sign Language (ASL), a signing language used for the deaf, is written. ASL can be defined in the book ‘The Chicago Manual of Style’ under the foreign-languages header: American Sign Language (ASL) compound signs, 10.152 and ‘glosses, 10.147’. Thus, defining this text as a foreign language Further going on to say that when written, it has no 1-to-1 correspondence with any other languages on the document. The all CAPS or Gloss is also found in the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under foreign-languages, 'Ancient-Latin', however as the all caps UK LTD is registered in [Washington D.C[, they seem to be using the 'Chicago Manual of Style' , not the Oxford. Putting two or more languages onto a legal document is known in law as a ‘Glossa’. Black's Law Dictionary defines: 'GLOSSA' - “It is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of the text”. Meaning that by using a Glossa in a document they are trying to conceal or confuse the real facts. If you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL-UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL if you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALLf you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So, you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL-UPPER CASE. If you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL-UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So, you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL Soon you will realize that virtually all court orders, speeding tickets and most other legal documents actually make no sense whatsoever. They only make sense when we make the assumption that it is all plain English and we read it as one, once you take one away from the other – it renders the document useless. Seeing as the ‘government’ is simply a privately owned Corporation, it can only impose fines and acts upon other corporations. And by tricking us to registering our names as a corporate entity and then tricking us into thinking these names are physically us, it manages to get us to represent the corporately registered name and therefore bear the burden of fines and policies. This is a crime known as “personage”. Hand in hand with “personage” comes a crime known as “barratry” which is knowingly bringing false claims into court- This is what police, politicians, judges are doing daily. The Birth-Certificate, Two-Names, Two-Dates and Two-Languages? Capitis Diminutio Maxima (Name in ALL CAPITALS) For the purposes of understanding one's legal or commercial status under the Admiralty system (the law system used in England, Canada and much of the US), it is necessary to examine the curious use of all CAPS -Capitis Diminutio Maxima- in legal and domestic income tax forms, credit cards & statements, loans, mortgages, speeding & parking tickets, car documents, road tax, court summons etc. While seemingly a trite concern, this apparently small detail has extremely deep significance for all of us! Gage Canadian Dictionary 1983 Sec. 4 defines Capitalize adj. as "To take advantage of - To use to one's own advantage." Black's Law Dictionary – Revised 4th Edition 1968, provides a more comprehensive definition as follows … Capitis Diminutio (meaning the diminishing of status through the use of capitalization)- In Roman law. A diminishing or abridgment of personality; a loss or curtailment of a man's status or aggregate of leg al attributes and qualifications.

Public Service Announcement for the Residents of the City of Nelson. March 5, 2024 https://nelson.civicweb.net/document/116999/AGENDA%20RFD%20Bill%2044%20-%20Density%20increase.pdf?handle=099C5FD255484DAEA21BACF12FF02269 5 min. CorinneMori7845

Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html B PROOF OF CLAIM Rights Doc. 4 WE are all born with free will and unalienable rights. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law’ Consent makes the contract Adhesion contracts are not contracts because there was no consent, they are considered as gifts. We do not require any corporate created rights, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedom provided by the Government of Canada Corporation and/or ICCPR provided by the United Nations Corporation. If anyone claims to have jurisdiction over, you and/or requests payment request a copy of the contract. Government Corporations Government Services Corporations doing business as Government of Canada and/or the government of any provinces can only create rules (statutes) that only apply to their employees, franchisees, officers and dependents. Their rules (statutes) do not apply to the people in general. That is why the rules they create (statutes) are referred to as “public policy”. We do not require any corporate created rights, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedom provided by the Government of Canada Corporation and/or ICCPR provided by the United Nations Corporation. Women and men living in Canada are not subject to any Public Policies, mandates, or acts of legislation promoted by any commercial or municipal corporation for its officers and employees. We should not vote in private corporate shareholder elections sponsored by Canada Inc., Province of _____ Inc., or any other foreign corporation. All Acts, Bills and statutes created by the Government of Canada and/or any of the provincial governments only apply to “person”. The definition of person in Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition on page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being ( i.e. natural person ) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. In other words, if I say the basket includes apples and oranges you will not find any other type of fruit in the basket. As plainly stated in Black’s Law dictionary, anything that applies to person only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Does not apply to men or women! The Government of Canada and Government of all provinces are Crown for profit Corporations. The Prime Minister and/or the Premiers receive their orders from the shareholders of the Crown Corporation. They are the C.E.O.s/officers of the Crown Corporations. They carry out the orders that are relayed to them by the Governor General and/or the Lieutenant Governor. They (politicians) are in place to take the blame for the harm that is done to the people. They are replaced every four years with someone who claims that he/she is going to right the wrongs that were created, but nothing changes they carry out the orders provided by the shareholders as the previous C.E.O.s. Four years later they are blamed and replaced. PERSONS All Acts, Bills and statutes created by the Government of Canada and/or any of the provincial governments only apply to “person”. The definition of person in Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition on page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person ) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. In other words, if I say the basket includes apples and oranges you will not find any other type of fruit in the basket. As plainly stated in Black’s Law dictionary, anything that applies to person only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Does not apply to men or women _________________________________________________________ Name written in all capital letters The governing book of the English language is “The Oxford Styles Manual” which sometimes refers to “The Chicago Manual of Style” also The Oxford Manual of Style. All Uppercase text, all caps, or gloss is listed in the style's manuals under “foreign - language” , named ”Ancient-Latin” or Dog Latin. All Caps are not defined or recognized in meaning. All Caps is not English although you may think you are able to read it as English it is in fact, a calculated deception to be read separated from the rest of the “Document”. All Uppercase text has no lawful grammatical jurisdiction with common English and is a foreign language, headed under “Ancient-Latin”. (The Chicago Manual of Style, 16th Edition, 11:144-47). Glossa is two or more languages on a legal document. Glossa is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of a text( Black’s Law Dictionary page 621 5th Edition) “Glossa” is also used to conceal or confuse the real facts in order to confuse, in order to gain tacit consent. A name written in all capital letters is written in dog Latin or is known as systemic text “a thing” created by the employees of the crown corporation, Therefore the Crown Corporation owns the creation. If you claim that the name written in all capital letters, is, you. You are admitting you are the property of the Crown Corporation (a slave). Cestui Que Vie Trust 's beneficiary is the name in all capital letters which is the property of the Crown Corporation, it is not you. All governments (corporations) and businesses such as banks and others that write your name in all capital letters are committing constructive fraud and conversion. (Engaged in criminal activity) ___________________________________________________ City, Municipality, Village et al Address Date TO: Mayor, CAO, CEO, Councillors et al FROM: The men and women living therein, The enclosed documentation: 1) Proof of Incorporation of the following entities; from Dunn & Bradstreet or EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Note: the following are government services corporations’ (dba( "doing business as,") Government of Canada, EDGAR (CIK 0000230098) ; Government of British Columbia, EDGAR (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306) ; Government of Alberta, EDGAR (CIK 0000810961) ; Government of Saskatchewan, EDGAR (CIK 0000203098) ; Government of Manitoba, EDGAR (CIK 0000826926) ; Ontario, EDGAR (CIK 0000074615) ; Quebec, EDGAR (0000722803) ; Province of New Brunswick, EDGAR (CIK 0000862406) ; Province of Nova Scotia, EDGAR (CIK 0000842639) 2) Copy of the Clearfield Doctrine; showing that corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to taxation or law enforcement et al, without a consent to contract which is corporate policy when doing commerce. * Seek legal clarification and written proof to the contrary. This letter comes with the enclosed documents to ascertain the jurisdiction within our council, in which official positions are being held . Depending on the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed upon entering office, the positions may be operating under the "Color of Law," in a De-Facto, Un-lawful and thus ultra vires standing. This holds personal liability for anything signed on behalf of the people. There are 3 possible jurisdictions: A) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution with full legal authority and jurisdiction to taxation, schools, infrastructure, peace keeping, hospital, courts, et al. as services, and needs of the local men and women therein. B) Having as the "Trustee" full fiduciary control of the "Trusts" set up to care for the local needs. De-jure/ lawful B) Non-Governmental Office, (NGO): a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, without the legal authority or jurisdiction to taxation. This entity provides "Service Contracts," which requires contracts and consent to contract by those involved in the services. It's known as "Body Corporate," and serves "Incorporated Inhabitants." Did the men and women give consent to be incorporated? That's called FRAUD. Who is the "Head of Council" or "Global Mayor?" (“A created fiction” The Executive Control and Authority comes from the Corporation of the Province wherein we reside, and to which your office would receive the Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al directly, through downloads from the corporation and are corporate policies not district policies. De-facto/ un-lawful/FRAUD C) Public/Private/Partnerships, (PPP): an International Entity one which downloads "FOREIGN," Corporate policies, UN/United Nations, WEF/ World Economic Forum, WHO/ World Health Organization et al. In this position there is also no legal authority or jurisdiction to taxation. Consent to contract is a legal requirement to contract with the men and women. Did the men and women consent to Foreign Corporate Policies and occupation in the community without knowledge or consent? Are the United Nations Sustainable Goals/SDG's, Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 policies being implemented? Who has fiduciary control over the local Trusts as their Trustee? Who is the "Head of Council," and "Council of the Whole." “A fiction” De-Facto, un-lawful/FRAUD These are jurisdictional questions that are important to ascertain because through the stroke of a pen, a man or woman is being put into extreme personal liability for the agreements and infrastructures signed on to. Furthermore, there are 3 levels of Lawful/de-jure/jurisdictions LOCAL, PROVINCIAL, and FEDERAL - Each has their sphere of lawful jurisdiction and geographical area - Each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers - NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview We the people have come to ascertain for ourselves the jurisdiction WE are in because the last few years have shown us that something has gone horribly awry at the local level. We the people voted for positions of service to the local jurisdiction. Was there comprehension of the meaning of the oath, declaration or covenant sworn, upon taking office? Was time given to properly peruse any documents to sign and vote on? Many of these documents were written over many years, by legal firms and lawyers, whose signatures are not within the documents...whose are! They contain legalise, a language unto itself, and is the basis for how most FRAUD has occurred. Words like person, individual, inhabitant, resident, citizen, et al have a completely different meaning in these documents. FRAUD vitiates everything. We the people intend on restoring Peace, Order, and Lawful Governance should our suspicions prove correct. We require a response by ________________________________ and expect such from our elected officials. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law, and thus consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls upon the claimant. No response is considered tacit agreement. ______________________________________________________ Regional District of Address Date TO: Board Chair, CAO, CEO, Directors et al FROM: The enclosed documentation: 1) Proof of the Incorporation of the following entities, NOTE: government services corporations (dba:"doing business as,") EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; Government of Canada, (CIK 0000230098) Government of British Columbia, (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306) Government of Alberta, (CIK 0000810961) Government of Saskatchewan, (CIK 0000203098) Government of Manitoba, (CIK 0000826926) Ontario, (CIK 0000074615) Quebec, (CIK 0000722803) Province of New Brunswick, (CIK 0000862406) Province of Nova Scotia, (CIK 0000842639) 2) Copy of The CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE; showing that Corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to Taxation or Law Enforcement et al without consent to contract by those involved in the transaction. Personal liability is then enforceable upon those acting illegally. The enclosed documents show that the Regional District through its Incorporation may be operating under the "Color of Law" and as such is de-facto, un-lawful, and ultra-vires. This information is not hear-say nor opinion, rather they state the facts of the matter, which are; ?- What Oath, Declaration, or Covenant was signed upon the commencement of the positions in council? These matter! ?- What jurisdiction is the office under? There are 3 possible Jurisdictions; 1) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution, with lawful de-jure status as a holder of the "PUBLIC TRUST", Trustee with Fiduciary control, and thus legal authority to the taxation of the men and women within a geographical area, and is one of "service" to the local needs; school, hospital, peace keeping, infrastructure, courts, et al. 2) Non-Governmental Office (NGO): a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, that provides "Service Contracts," and is known as a "Body Corporate" to "Incorporated Inhabitants." This jurisdiction requires Consent to Contract, is de-facto, un-lawful and as such has NO legal jurisdiction to taxation. The Executive Control and Authority comes from the corporation of the province wherein the office is located. The Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al are downloaded to the district and are corporate policies. 3) Public/Private/Partnerships (PPP) : an INTERNATIONAL ENTITY, receiving downloads from a "FOREIGN" Corporation; United Nations, WHO/World Health Organization, WEF/World Economic Forum et al. This is also a de-facto, un-lawful jurisdiction with NO legal grounds to the taxation of men and women, and also requires Consent to Contract. NOTE: In British Columbia, as an example, The BC Assessment Authority is a CROWN Corporation, created in 1974 by the Corporation of British Columbia Inc., "in order to earn profit for the Government of British Columbia Inc., without jurisdiction nor contracts with the men and women of BC. NOTE: There are 3 levels of lawful, de-jure governance Local, Provincial and Federal - Each has their sphere of jurisdiction and geographical area - Each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers - NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview These 2 questions are the most important because the answer to them will establish the personal liability through the signature/autograph put upon the documents requiring a vote. Was there full comprehension of the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed when entering office as a Director? Was there time to peruse any documents requiring a vote? Most often these documents are many pages long and were made over many years, by legal firms and lawyers whose signatures are NOT contained therein. Whose is? Making that signature "personally" liable for the decisions made Was there full comprehension of the difference between the legal wording contained therein, and the knowledge of their meanings? Such as person, individual, constituent, citizen,et al. "Legalese" is a language unto itself and is the basis for most FRAUD, which in law vitiates everything. The men and women in our Regional District Office were empowered by the men and women, to operate under, and in a jurisdiction that is de-jure, lawful, and with a fiduciary trust, to serve the men and women of our geographical area and no other. To ensure that the needs of the local men, women, and their property were the priority and responsibility of the Regional District. So...What Office is held? Lawfully/de-jure or unlawfully and de-facto? We require an answer, on or before __________________ No answer will be considered a tacit agreement. The office of the Regional District is held by the trust of the members of our community, the neighbours and friends who voted for positions in an office to serve the community. That's why we require proof of what oath, declaration, or covenant was given. The men and women of __________________ _________________________________________________________ Notice of Demand and Trespass Proof of Jurisdiction and Contract Proof of Claim It has come to our attention, the concerned men and women, that our Educational Institutions, whose service to us is the education of our sons and daughters (hereafter named as our "property") has implemented the SOGI 123 Program without a consent to contract. HISTORY; this program began in 2007 through the ARC Foundation. A private foundation based in Vancouver, British Columbia Inc. Other corporations involved in the funding are; British Columbia Ministry of Education Inc.; British Columbia Teachers Federation Inc.; University of British Columbia Inc., and through private donations( gifts from registered charities also corporations), and the corporation of Canada Inc. Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Documents included herein: - Proof of the incorporation of Government of Canada Inc., Government of British Columbia Inc. - Copy of the "CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE", a 1942 court case, accepted worldwide because it's corporate, commerce law. Clearly stating the requirement of contracts Governments lose their sovereignty when they become corporations, thus no different than Canadian Tire using Canadian Tire money. - Copy of the definition of "GLOSSA", pertinent in this matter because it's a matter of concealment, meant to confuse using "text" to corrupt the real facts in order to gain tacit consent. There's no statute of limitation on fraud. - Our Mayoral, Councillor, and Regional Districts are also incorporated through the removal of many of the municipal powers in 2004 with the Local Government Act incorporated into the Community Charter, prior to this; the local mayor had full de-jure and lawful jurisdiction, in relation to our schools. - Copy of the definition of the All Capital Identity, created with the "Birth Certificate," a fiction, constructive fraud and conversion. - Copy of the 10 Points of Contract Law, made simple for comprehension on this matter. - Copy of the 12 Presumptions of Court. Included for the comprehension of status. Fundamentally, the fraud upon our property when born, vitiates any Board jurisdiction to the ownership of our property. We, the men and women who created them, own them. "He who creates owns!" A maxim in law Therefore, it is incumbent upon those who have positions on the Board to cease and desist the SOGI 123 Program which is an infringement upon the property known as our sons and daughters. Failure to do so as corporate entities, through Contract Law, we intend on exercising our jurisdiction, as is our right, to the fullest extent upon the men and women personally sitting on the Board. We strongly suggest a consultation with a lawyer, who by the way wrote this mess. "Praetextu legis injusta agens duplo puniendus" We the People DO NOT require legal Re-presentation in this matter because we're well aware of the 12 Presumptions of Court. I doubt any lawyer will be willing to assist the men and women on the Board, regardless of the facts, because through their: legalize they do deceive. Be it therefore noted, with the documents contained herein, that our claim of proof of contract and the jurisdictional fraud, put against us and our property is considered a trespass. It is the duty of men and women to discuss these delicate matters with our property within our own jurisdiction. We are not against the health and wellbeing of another's property, within their jurisdiction, rather not in the educational setting. We the People, regarding our property in the care of the educational system, again, reiterate, and declare that the burden of proof falls on the claimant. Consider the response with wisdom and discernment since we voted men and women into what we thought was a Educational Office not a Corporate Office. We require no more than 7 days for implementing the redressing of the trespass against our property, with the immediate removal of any and all literature, electronic or written, devices, toys (we use the word with baited breath) et al in relation to the SOGI 123 PROGRAM post haste. For it was through corporate policies, without contractual consent, that the trespass has been made against our property thus creating this claim against those men and women on the Board personally. Furthermore, do not be deceived into thinking that the registration of our property into the corporation rather than an educational institution voids any responsibility on the part of the men and women on the Board, as it was done in fraud. Again we'll state that fraud vitiates everything. In all fairness to the men and women on the Board, our neighbours, not the corporations involved, perhaps unaware of the situation mentioned above and the personal liability for this trespass, We the People will support the men and women in this matter of remedy, because we trusted that their service, while sitting on the Board, was to serve our property with a lawful education. No response will be considered a tacit agreement. Sincerely and without prejudice or malice We the People Autograph_______________________:________ __________________________________________________________ Statement of Claim Taxation Between the Corporation of ______________________________________ And the noted particulars on the documents included herein. The above corporation has not proved jurisdiction, consent to contract, nor provide proof of a contract to claim the monies expected in taxation, hence tacit agreement to this claim. Who claims this debt be true, who claims this debt to due? Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Three requirements were made in writing to the Corporations Finance Minister to provide said proof, and are included in this document. Furthermore, copies of the Clearfield Doctrine, EDGAR # for the Corporation involved, Regina-v-John Anthony Hill 12 May, 2011 at Southwark Crown Court, Case # T20107746, (the Queen declared, "Lawfully NOT valid Monarch, hence Charles the III too),and "Glossa," (see Black's Law) corrupts the essence of the text presented on your documents. This refusal of consent to contract extends from this day forward, as noted with receipt of this document, until such a date in the future when there is a de-jure government upon the landmass commonly known worldwide as Canada, British Columbia, et al. Autograph _________________________:___________________________ Dated this day _______________________________________________________ Proof of Claim Re: Property Tax; Contract and Proof of Consent to Contract Between the Corporation of ___________________________________________________ and _____________________________________________________________________________ Regarding the property registered as; ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ It is required and incumbent upon the Corporations Minister of Finance, to provide proof of jurisdiction as a corporation, to taxation without full disclosure of the facts, and consent to contract, as per contract law. See: The Clearfield Doctrine; Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 363 Syllabus CLEARFIELD TRUST CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES CERTIORARI to the CIRCUIT COURT of APPEALS for the THIRD CIRCUIT No. 490 Argued February 5, 1943 Decided March 1, 1943(and accepted worldwide when conducting commerce) Further to the above noted court case, this requirement will be expected within 7 days receipt of this claim for proof of the jurisdictional obligation by the corporation to taxation to the property noted herein. Who claims this debt be true, who claims this debt be due? Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Property Taxes have been paid previously without consent to contract, due to the fraud perpetrated without full disclosure of the fact that the corporation mentioned herein, was not a lawful government with the de-jure jurisdiction to taxation, thus Ultra-Vires. Rather, a corporation whose name included the words "government," which is fraud based on Black's Law Dictionary, any edition. No response will be confirmation of a tacit agreement to the above. Thanking you in advance, Autograph: _________________________:_____________________________ Dated this day: ______________________________________ ______________________________________________________ STATEMENT of CLAIM Date:_____________________ STATE of TITLE CERTIFICATE: Certificate number________________________________________ Land Title Office__________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ Title Number______________________________________________ Registered Owner__________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ Taxation Authority__________________________________________ Description of Land__________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ Charges, Liens and Interests_____________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ Proof of contract is required to provide evidence of any claim made upon the aforementioned property; taxation; land use; water use; structures and buildings above, on, or below the land; any and all animals thereon; any and all chattles upon said land; et al, provide proof of any contractual obligation having been made with respect to said land. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law, and thus consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. (See: Regina-v-John Anthony Hill 12 May, 2011 at Southwark Crown Court, Case # T20107746, in which the Queen was declared to be a "Lawfully NOT Valid Monarch." Hence, neither is Charles the III) (See: Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 363, Syllabus. Clearfield trust Co.et al. v. United States, Certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.No. 490. Argued February 5, 1943 Decided March 1, 1943 ; and accepted worldwide when conducting commerce) The requirement to provide Proof of Contract within this Statement of Claim, is expected within ____________days from receipt of the documentation herein. No response will be considered a tacit agreement to the above. Autograph_________________________:_______________________ :GLOSSA: ~ The 'Born-Date' Vs. the 'Registration-Date' Does your Birth Certificate identify YOU as TWO people, not one? (You is plural, one and another) Have you ever wondered why your SURNAME is written using the ALL UPPERCASE TEXT? Put simply, 'you' are using a ‘Legal’ name and this is fraud. See the ‘name’ is actually split up into separate entities – The Christian-name and The ‘Surname’. You register these names to the Crown Corporation LTD. as their Property by your Birth Certificate which is given a bond number. Your physical value is used as collateral for these bonds allowing the United Kingdom LTD. to take out loans from private Banks, such as 'Bank of England' and profit is made by way of legal fines (Acts & Statutes), bills and taxation. – Hence money is no longer backed by Gold or Silver, but by our physical value or man power. The UNITED KINGDOM LTD is a privately owned Corporation-ship. And corporations are considered ‘ships’ and they are governed under the law of the sea, known as Maritime Law. There is no real 'ship' but a 'document-vessel' – which in our case was our Birth Certificate Created by the Doctor when s/he ‘docked’ you. TAKE NOTICE Whenever you encounter the Legal Document (document-vessel) you will notice that your surname (or sometimes all of your names) will be written using the ALL-UPPERCASE TEXT. This is no coincidence - the ALL UPPERCASE text is not defined or recognized in The Oxford Styles Manual, (the governing book of the English language) – meaning that although you may be able to read it as English, it is in fact, NOT English. The all CAPS or Gloss can be found within the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under 'foreign-languages', named 'Ancient-Latin' The main place this ALL-UPPERCASE text is found to be defined as a language, is when American Sign Language (ASL), a signing language used for the deaf, is written. ASL can be defined in the book ‘The Chicago Manual of Style’ under the foreign-languages header: American Sign Language (ASL) compound signs, 10.152 and ‘glosses, 10.147’. Thus, defining this text as a foreign language Further going on to say that when written, it has no 1-to-1 correspondence with any other languages on the document. The all CAPS or Gloss is also found in the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under foreign-languages, 'Ancient-Latin', however as the all caps UK LTD is registered in [Washington D.C[, they seem to be using the 'Chicago Manual of Style' , not the Oxford. Putting two or more languages onto a legal document is known in law as a ‘Glossa’. Black's Law Dictionary defines: 'GLOSSA' - “It is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of the text”. Meaning that by using a Glossa in a document they are trying to conceal or confuse the real facts. If you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL-UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL if you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALLf you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So, you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL-UPPER CASE. If you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL-UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So, you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL Soon you will realize that virtually all court orders, speeding tickets and most other legal documents actually make no sense whatsoever. They only make sense when we make the assumption that it is all plain English and we read it as one, once you take one away from the other – it renders the document useless. Seeing as the ‘government’ is simply a privately owned Corporation, it can only impose fines and acts upon other corporations. And by tricking us to registering our names as a corporate entity and then tricking us into thinking these names are physically us, it manages to get us to represent the corporately registered name and therefore bear the burden of fines and policies. This is a crime known as “personage”. Hand in hand with “personage” comes a crime known as “barratry” which is knowingly bringing false claims into court- This is what police, politicians, judges are doing daily. The Birth-Certificate, Two-Names, Two-Dates and Two-Languages? Capitis Diminutio Maxima (Name in ALL CAPITALS) For the purposes of understanding one's legal or commercial status under the Admiralty system (the law system used in England, Canada and much of the US), it is necessary to examine the curious use of all CAPS -Capitis Diminutio Maxima- in legal and domestic income tax forms, credit cards & statements, loans, mortgages, speeding & parking tickets, car documents, road tax, court summons etc. While seemingly a trite concern, this apparently small detail has extremely deep significance for all of us! Gage Canadian Dictionary 1983 Sec. 4 defines Capitalize adj. as "To take advantage of - To use to one's own advantage." Black's Law Dictionary – Revised 4th Edition 1968, provides a more comprehensive definition as follows … Capitis Diminutio (meaning the diminishing of status through the use of capitalization)- In Roman law. A diminishing or abridgment of personality; a loss or curtailment of a man's status or aggregate of leg al attributes and qualifications.

A city in Ontario, Canada is set to build a new recreation center featuring a glass-walled "universal gender neutral common area" instead of male-female changing rooms. One woman who expressed concerns about the plan was thrown out of a city council meeting last week.

Indigenous meaning - what they don't teach you in school Danielle Smith usin UN Buzzwords

The Peoples Operation Restoration https://rumble.com/v4bmf5l-the-peoples-operation-restoration-lets-take-back-our-country.html

I do not have a mask. I have never worn a mask, and the only time that a mask has been on my face, was when it was “put” on my face while I was restrained and drugged, while in the hospital. I have always had a fear of suffocation, I don’t cover my face. There is a reason for the fear, but that’s my business, the fear is manageable by not covering my face. I don’t need an exemption, exception, permission, or “anyone’s” diagnosis of “mental disorder” to manage that fear. I am a 56 year old happily married Grandma. We live in a small Hamlet in central Alberta called Alder Flats. We own a small acreage, I garden, sew, make mukluks, and moccasins, I have farm chickens and a good dog to herd them. I am grateful for all these things as well as the fact that I have always been healthy and was fortunate enough to share my health with my sister who was diagnosed with Lupus in the late nineties and needed a kidney in 2006. We now share one set of healthy kidneys. I am intolerant to dishonesty, and have always been somewhat of a loner because of this fact. Dishonesty has become accepted and expected in today’s society, and I can’t stand listening to it. This is the reason I have never listened to news, or politicians and never managed to embrace the social media platforms to the extent that others have. I have many years of experience in the oilfields, I am an auto mechanic, and Class 1 truck driver, as well. I also have 10 years of administrative experience as an assistant manager in an Oil Sands Core Hole Project Field Office in Northern Alberta. When the ax came down on Gas and Oil, I applied for a job with Canada Post, as a Term Employee. If you are not familiar with what a term employee is, we are Canada Post Employed “Scab” workers who pay union dues but are not entitled to Union Support. I worked hard, travelled 210,000 kms in the first 2 years with Canada Post, picking up hours in numerous Post Offices within 150 kms from my home. In doing this I managed to obtain “Continuous” Term status, which just means that once a Term is Continuous they are entitled to parts of the Collective Agreement, but our positions are reviewed yearly, so we are guaranteed no hours and employment can be terminated yearly. In the spring of 2018 the Postmaster in my small community post office went on leave, and I was assigned the position on a temporary basis. This is not an acting position, I did not get acting pay, but I was expected to “act” as a Postmaster. This post office is what is called a “Group” Post Office, which means the Postmaster provides the premises and is obligated to provide liability insurance for the space. Covid came to my community in the late fall of 2019. Many people were very sick and we lost some elders to pneumonia. So when the Covid was announced in March of 2020, after everyone was over the bug, I like everyone else believed the emergency somewhat. While we were in “two weeks to flatten the curve” I heard the term “Social Distancing” and instantly knew this was not about a virus, the term is not only an oxymoron, but it is also a contradiction to human nature. The Health Orders do not use this term, Physical Distancing is used in these documents, which actually makes sense if one is trying to prevent a physical illness. It was also around this time that Trudeau announced it would be 12 to 18 months before there would be a vaccine and once everyone was vaccinated we could all get back to normal. In August of 2020, I could see that the members of my community were all very upset about the coming school year and masks on children. I wrote a letter to our councillor, who is also a member and business owner in the community, asking him to call a community town hall so we could discuss the matter, and discuss as a community, and maybe vote as to whether the children should be masked, I received no answer. The first day of school September 2020, I went to work, the post office opens at 10:00 am, so the children were outside for their first recess, I was shocked to see the grade 5’s and 6’s, this is an elementary school, were playing Soccer with Masks on, and if this wasn’t bad enough it was an extremely hot fall the temperature was in the high 20’s already at this time in the morning. Tears came to my eyes, for the damage we were inflicting upon our children. I followed the AHS, “back to school” orders, which stated no masks during physical recreation. I then read the Wetaskiwin School Board back to school orders which stated that the AHS orders would be adhered to, but schools can implement orders over and above AHS to accommodate that school in particular. Keep in mind that there has never been, in the AHS Health Orders for anyone to wear masks outside. I wrote another letter to the school staff, informing them that I knew the order for children to wear masks outside came from the Principal/Staff themselves, and to let them know they were going too far. I also included a copy of the letter to the councillor, so as to let them know I was not “picking” on them. The only response I received from that letter was a phone call to me at the post office, from the punk Principal, trying to reprimand me for my actions as a Canada Post employee. I told her I’m a tax paying member of the community before I’m a Canada Post Employee, and I’m paying her wages, and the building she works in is paid for by the communities tax dollar also. She informed me she would be reporting me to Canada Post. Which I know happened because when Scott, my CPC Supervisor, called me on Dec 24, to tell me I had been snitched on, he informed me that he knew about the letter to the school, I told him the same thing I told the Principal, none of CPC business, I was acting as a member of my community. Something else that happened in September of 2020, was that I received from Canada Post in the mail a case of “Readiquat” 6 - 1 litre bottles. This Pesticide came to my Post Office as well as every Post Office Canada, for use on hard surfaces, counters, mailboxes, debit machines ect. There were no TDG markings on this box, as well Canada Post did not issue a WHIMS/MSDS document with the product nor did they issue the required PPE or training for the use of the pesticide. I immediately sent an email to my Local Area Supervisor, Local Area Manager, Local Union President that I had received the Toxin, and was refusing to use it, and where is the MSDS and PPE? My Supervisor called and claimed, he knew nothing about the chemical as it had been sent by Head Office, Ottawa, he would look into it and get back to me. I informed the building owners that the toxic pesticide was on their property, as was my moral duty as a concerned community member, and the next day they provided me with the SDS on the product this is the USA version of the Canadian MSDS, and expressed that they wanted it off their property, however the RSMC who brings the mail load to Alder Flats, had showed up earlier and informed me that Scott our LAS had told her to let me know that if I don’t want to use the toxin, I could send it back with her. She took the case back to her office, the Winfield Post Office which is the Alder Flats Home Office and is where I believe it still is, as Canada Post informed its employee’s in a blanket Info message that these products could “not” be returned to Head Office. So, this Pesticide that is lethal to every living thing on earth, is in every post office in Canada. It may not be being used, but do the owners of the buildings that house Canada Post know that these chemicals are on their property, because it is their legal obligation to inform the fire departments that it is on their property. If it is being used in Post Offices, is the paper towel waste going into our landfills, is this waste going into our ground waters, it might be just a little at a time, but it is an illegal dumping of hazardous waste as far as I’m concerned. This chemical can be found on the Gov’t of Canada Hard Surface Disinfectant website with hundreds of other chemicals that have been allowed into the country under “Emergency Authorization” not approval. Much like the PCR and Gene Therapy Injections. The difference between this chemical in particular and the others, is this is the one that I know for a fact, came through the postal system, and it was sent “by” Canada Post for use in every Post Office in Canada. This fact is significant. When Canada Post came out with a their own Mask Policy/Practice/Requirement/Protocol/Rule, and were instructing employees to refuse service to anyone that was not wearing a mask, I bucked, knowing the AHS Mask Requirements, and as well as having made myself aware of Alberta Human Rights Act, I refused to wear the mask or tell anyone to wear one. I worked alone, behind my “super shield”, 2 meters physically distanced from my customers, and I wasn’t sick. I had a physical and a mental concern with wearing a mask, therefore I was entitled to an exemption, AHS orders at the time, stated a “concern” was all that was needed. I did nothing to break the AHS Health Orders. On Dec 24, 2020 “Karen” that’s really her name, a teacher from the school, snitched to Canada Post that I was not wearing a mask. My Supervisor, Scott contacted me by phone, to ask if this was so, I was honest and told him that I had informed myself and I didn’t legally have too. He told me that the Alberta Human Rights Act did not apply to me when I am on Canada Post Property owned/leased as Canada Post property is the “queen’s” sovereign ground, and I would have to comply with Canada Post. At that time, it had only been referred to on Canada Post letterhead as the face covering policy or the face covering practice or the face covering requirement, I asked him which of these am I supposed to comply with, as the definitions of the three are vastly different. He wasn’t sure. He warned me that I would have to wear my mask, or seek medical help for my fear of suffocation, (I am fed up with this personal, medical/mental diagnosis, everyone seems to think they are entitled to make on me) and go on Disability. In email communications, my LAM has since added the face covering protocol and I enquired once again as to what am I expected to comply with? I have since received, from the union’s lawyer, that it is in fact Canada Post Safety “Rules” that I am failing to Comply with. This answer took 9 months for CPC and CPAA to come up with. The fact that they are going to start preaching “safety” rules to myself and my customers after I have called them on distribution of Toxic Pesticides, is simply Ludicrous. I closed that day for the Christmas Break and reopened on Dec 29th, my supervisor called that afternoon and asked again if I was wearing my mask, I told him no I wasn’t and I wasn’t going to, I work alone. He said he would have no choice but to suspend me if I wasn’t “willing” to comply. There’s another oxymoron for you, these people are morons. I told him to send it to me in writing. I arrived for work on Dec 30, and received a call from my union rep asking if I was wearing my mask I replied no and I wasn’t going to, she told me that Scott had issued me a Suspension notice and it was in the Alder Flats CPC email inbox. She advised me to remove my personal belongings, and leave the post office. She asked if I had anyone to work for me, I told her, I was suspended, that’s not my problem, that’s Scott’s problem. I had however contacted the Alder Flats Term employee by text message that I had been suspended and that she would be called on. I did as CPAA, Xan advised, removed my personal belongings, locked up, and dropped my employee key in the Outgoing Mail Drop so as to not be responsible for the premises. This meant that the Alder Flats term employee, and the Postmaster on leave, providing the premises, would be the only people with employee keys to the premises. Whoever opened the post office next would find my key in the outgoing mail drop. While I was packing up the RSMC showed up with the mail load, I told her I was suspended and couldn’t take mail, she told me she knew that and she was only there to post these signs that had been printed at the Buck Lake Post Office 10 km up the line on her route, on Canada Post letterhead, that the post office would be closed until Jan 4, 2021 due to unforeseen difficulties. She posted one sign on the employee door and one on the lobby door. There are 3 things wrong with this scenario, one is a violation of the collective agreement. The suspension notice came to me through email not the required registered mail. A Canada Post Supervisor made the decision to close a Post Office with providing prior public notice that it would be closed nor did Canada Post know he was doing so. There were Canada Post employees in other post offices that knew I was suspended before I did. On Jan 7, 2021 because I didn’t have a job to go to, and the school had delayed the students return until Jan 11, I decided to protest at the school for the masks to be removed from the children when outside. Scott, on behalf of Canada Post called the RCMP on me and falsely reported that I had entered the post office and been asked to leave but then I stood outside away from the door, without a mask on, harassing Canada Post customers. The RCMP arrived, it only took 28 minutes for the officer to respond, an hour and 45 mins after beginning my protest, which is simply amazing, since actual break and enters at the councillors own business don’t get responded to until the next day. The officer asked for my DOB, I told him I didn’t have to give that to him as I was doing nothing illegal. He questioned me about the allegations from the post office, I told him they were untrue, he asked about by employee key, I told him it is in the post office. He asked if I had crossed the street to the post office I told him no, but I had crossed the street to get a drink of water from my vehicle, that was parked in front of the liquor store. He asked about my protest and why I was protesting, I told him to read the sign. The post office is in the same building as the liquor store. The post office is on the east side of the building with an east facing window. The liquor store has a north facing window. The school is across the street to the north, and cannot be seen from the post office window. He then went to the school, and received some more false allegations from the staff, and as he was leaving town I observed him stopping behind the vehicle I had parked in front of the liquor store. He was obviously running the plate, which by the way is registered to my husband. At no point did this officer make a legal confirmation of my identity. I walked with my sign by myself until the end of day school bell rang and then I went home. At approximately 4:00 pm that same afternoon, two vehicles pulled up to my gate, I was dumbfounded to see Scott and the Postmaster/Mentor from Winfield, both in masks, there to issue me a Cease, Desist, and Stand Down, I was engaging in an “illegal” work stoppage. This was another sign to me that there is something fundamentally wrong with what is going on with the Covid. Employers regardless of who that employer is, do not have the right to go to their employee’s homes to threaten, harass and scapegoat their employees for the illegal outcomes of their unsubstantiated Covid measures, and expected compliance to accept a non-medical prescription of a non-proven prophylactic for the prevention of Covid. You see, I was unaware at that time, that the building owner had a confrontation with the CPC Local Area Manager, Todd on Jan 4, about the fact, that the Postmaster on leave, who is responsible for providing the post office premises, had never signed a lease for the space so the building owners held the liability on the premises, and were refusing access until Canada Post informed them who would be replacing me in the Post Office. There is big shit to closing any Post Office, an indictable offence actually, and that shit is not on me, but that is where, attempts are being made to dump it. The distribution of the Readiquat through the mail is also an indictable offence, both of these laws can be found in the Canada Post Corporation Act, one is called Abandonment of Mail the other is Dangerous Substances. I believe every person in this community has a lawsuit against Canada Post for the Abandonment of their mail on Dec 30 and 31 of 2020 and Jan 4, of 2021. As well any person in Canada that was refused service by a Canada Post employee for not wearing a mask, has a lawsuit against Canada Post. Every person in Canada has a lawsuit against Canada Post for distributing through the mail service, toxic unapproved pesticides into their communities and the environment. I protested on Friday Jan 8 also, with no incidents. As well, I received an email, from my Union Head Office, Ottawa President advising me that my strike action was illegal and I could lose my job, she advised me that I should return to work on Jan 11, and wear my mask. I called her to explain what was going on, she completely ignored everything I said, and continued repeating the “you HAVE to wear the mask” narrative. I told her, there are only two things I HAVE to do in life, one is live my life with integrity so as to like myself, and then I HAVE to die. This person now refuses to have anything to do with me or my case. On Jan 11, I decided against protesting any longer as the kids were back in school, and there is no need for the children to be witness to what is an adults issue, although, I believe it is time for the kids to start fighting back, because the “adults” have all become cowardly, face booking, germ phobic, hypochondriacs, willing to allow this assault on our kids. As for the vulnerable to Covid, milk and honey baby boomers, who lived their long full lives, exactly the way the wanted, in a time of world prosperity, sitting back with their masks on, claiming that they are just glad they don’t have to live in this mess for much longer. Well, I’m just ashamed for these people when I hear this, not that it is for me to be ashamed for them, but they are obviously so selfish, that they are incapable of even realizing their shame. I might be wrong and everyone else right, but it doesn’t feel that way. Anyway on Monday Jan 11, I made a pot of kinnikinnick tea also known as red bearberry tea, known by natives, but unfortunately for me, the knowledge of why it is known to the natives is not shared. This tea was given to me by a member of my community. I was ignorant at the time to the effects of the tea, which is my failing, the effects can be found on the internet. It is a Diuretic and can cause hallucinations. What I am still ignorant to, and am unsure as to where to find, is what did the natives use this tea for? Not of you in particular, just in general because, while what I experienced was “medically” diagnosed as Delirium, it was far from that in my experience. I started drinking the tea, because I was getting no honesty, lies were being spoken of me, I had had enough of all of it, and felt, for whatever reason, I could find the answer if I did some Indian time. I realize that is politically incorrect, but we call ourselves Indians, when we are not speaking to the political. I don’t have very much native blood in me, I’m a registered metis, and my lineage is well documented. This I have a problem with, to identify as metis is to honor my white grandfathers, not that I don’t honor these men, my lineage comes to me through my maternal grandfather. But to give honor to Louis and the boys, for taking native “wives”, and calling themselves the Metis, doesn’t negate the fact that the native blood came from my Native Grandmother’s. Anyway, I threw some things out of my house, one of which was the new TV, with the camera, I as well as everyone else, are on camera everywhere we go, I don’t need a camera in my TV too. I watch TV, the TV doesn’t watch me. Billy came home from work, and looked at the pile, and knew exactly why those items had been removed from our home. He wanted to pick it up, but I insisted that the wind needed to blow through it. I continued my own personal little powwow the remainder of that week, the weather was mild so Billy was home on Standby, I had a couple people over for tea, and my husband was present. I have clear memory up until Thursday, Billy started to get concerned, I wasn’t eating or sleeping, naked and hallucinating and not making sense to him when he spoke to me. On Jan 15, Friday afternoon he contacted my daughter in BC, she called the Drayton Valley Hospital who advised her to call the AHS Mental Health Link Hotline, and was advised that the RCMP would have to do a “wellness check” and to call 911. 2 cruisers showed up, one of which was the same officer who had been called to the false Disturbing the Peace and Harassment Report by Canada Post on Jan 7. It was my nephew who made the 911 call, he and his family live across the street from us, he and his wife were present when the RCMP showed up and it was the RCMP that called EMS. While waiting for the Ambulance, 45 mins for sure, my family members were questioned as to my history, was there domestic abuse, history of mental problems, suicide attempts, violence ect. To which they answered “no”, never to all. My husband was caring for me in the shop and not without his own suffering from what was happening, I remember him crying while he held me in his arms telling the officers that he hoped that something like this never happened to one of their wives. When the Ambulance showed up I got into the Ambulance unassisted and willingly. I had nothing on but a Zip up hoody, earrings and rings, two of which went missing, one being my family ring. Once the Ambulance was on the road, the paramedic advised me that he would be inserting an IV which I accepted. Once the IV was in the paramedic told me I would have to put a mask on. I remember sticking my thumb in my mouth, and saying something like I’m a thumb sucker, and the mask gets in the way, he laughed and said, your funny but he insisted, and I resisted, EMS records state I was threatening the paramedic with my thumb, so 5mg of Midazolam was administered, and I was physically restrained and I’m assuming masked, according to records, I woke up and was resisting the restraints, so was given 5 mg more Midazolam. I remember nothing after the first dose. I have since researched the uses and effects to the drug, which is the Euthanasia drug. It should not be given to the Renal Deficient, or anyone suspected of alcohol or substance abuse, which according to EMS records was suspected, as well as “suicide attempt”. This man put my life at risk, one could argue that he did not know I was Renal Deficit, but no one will ever convince me that my medical history as well as everyone else’s in Alberta for sure, is not in AHS’s Data Base, and can be viewed in an Ambulance. I’m sure it is considered an Invasion of Privacy to the patient and considered unethical but if the information in this Data Base is not going to be used to help people in emergencies, and to prevent undue cost on the Medical System and needless medical harm, then what is the purpose of everyone’s information being in one big Medical Data Base? It certainly not for the benefit of those that, the information is being collected on, because trying to obtain this “private” information of “mine” is a redundant process at best. It is my private information but anything that someone else said about me and the identity of those people, is their private information, and needs to be omitted, this is a serious flaw in our medical system, my experience and the way I was treated once I got to the Misericordia Hospital in Edmonton will explain the seriousness of this flaw. Emergency room records upon arrival 18:00 state: brought in by EMS from home in Alder Flats, husband called EMS (not true) throwing electronics outside of house ( this happened on the 11th but the pile was still in the yard and visible to the RCMP but was not witnessed by anyone at all) As well as, on day 1 of 6 day mental decline, I went to school no Covid not wearing a mask, if you follow the dates, day 1 of 6 would put me at the school on a Sunday. Day 6 of 6 suicidal, flight of ideas, lash out, communicate and spell things then liable, aggressive, and homicidal. Possible Domestic abuse. Burns to arm. I don’t remember burning my arm, but it is in the shape of the corner on the door of our wood stove. At 19:15 the first of 2 Admission Certificates under the AHS Mental Health Act was written up on me, by a family physician on ER duty, according to notes, there were no family contact numbers and the number that they had was my cell phone number and notes state that a message was left at the number above, this is also not true, there was no message left on my phone, my husband had my cell phone, and the call was never made, I have received confirmation from my cell service, there were no calls to or from my phone between the dates of Jan 14th, and Jan 18th. As well as the 4 Criteria that must be met, that there is no documented evidence that I can find were ever met, The Doctor completing the document must form “their” opinion, based on facts observed by them as well as: on the following facts communicated to me others which states patient was apprehended and brought to ER after displaying violent behavior. Now I don’t know who the “others” were but I am assuming that it was the Paramedic who got the information from the RCMP officer who responded to both of these reports. I don’t have confirmation of this because “my” private RCMP documents contain so many omissions to protect the privacy of others, that until I receive the complete documents that I have requested, I can prove nothing, but the school rumor could have come from only one person, The RCMP officer who can’t count. I was not apprehended, RCMP report states that I went with EMS willingly. The second Admission Certificate was written up at 1:15 on the 16th. This document was completed by a Nephrologist, after 5 mg more of Midazolam, this man also put my life at risk. The incompetence of this person astounds me. So within 7.5 hours from my arrival in the ER I was legally being held under the Mental Health Act, and was not able to leave. Between the hours of 19:15, Jan 15 and 1:15, Jan 16 there was a CT scan performed on me, blood was taken, PCR test was taken, urine was taken by means of catheter, due to the fact that I was not able to produce urine, I was treated for Herpes, I don’t know what that’s about. An exception to consent was written up at 21:15, so as to perform a Lumbar Puncture on me, I was sedated for the procedure but records state that the Lumbar Puncture was only attempted. All of this was without my knowledge because I was drugged and restrained for most of it also, nor did my family have any knowledge of these things being done to me. As well, there was no effort made to inform me or my family of my rights, after the first admission certificate had been issued, which was supposed to happen within 24 hours and there was only a time span 7.5 hours before issuing the second. All this information that notes say they didn’t have is in that AHS Data Base they aren’t using to help people. I was admitted to the General Medicine ward, not the Mental Health Ward. My next clear memory after being drugged in the Ambulance, is on the 17th, so from what I can decipher from these documents I was drugged and restrained much of the time, until I eventually pulled the IV out and refused the drugs. When I woke up on the 17th I remember leaving my room without a mask and being escorted by security back to my room and advised not to leave again without a mask. A couple hours later I was alone in my private room, leaning on the window sill, when 3 nurses and 2 peace officers came in and ordered me to my bed, I refused, the nurses moved my bed so that it was positioned in front of me, at which point the this gang proceeded to physically put me on my bed, I resisted which is my natural instinct when physically attacked. One of the peace officers then used what his supervisor referred to as “pain assisted compliance” a mandible pressure point maneuver, which collapsed me and caused me to scream in pain, I was bruised and my jaw was sore for weeks. I was put on the bed, restrained, and injected with more drugs, and left with a mask on my face, and a diaper on my ass. I awoke later having to pee, and was told I could use the diaper, I refused to lay there and piss myself, and was offered a bed pan and again refused, I was then released after much negotiation and allowed to use the bathroom. I returned to bed. I should mention that because I am a living donor, who has only one kidney, should my kidney fail, I automatically go to the top of the donor recipient list, this was guaranteed to me by AHS prior to the transplant. Not that I would accept a cadaver kidney, but it is proof that AHS knows damn well, what my medical history is. The fact that this Nephrologist did not to recognize the renal stress my body was in or protect me as Renal Deficient, shows incompetence in the field of Nephrology and is indication of Negligence. Yet as a Nephrologist, he was absolutely certain that I was suffering from “Mental Disorder” and needed to be locked up because I will benefit from treatment for the “mental disorder”. On the 19th I woke up scared for my safety, and demanded from a nurse access to a phone so I could call my husband and go home, her reply was, oh you can’t leave, you’re being held under the Mental Health Act, I asked what that meant, she replied I would have to speak to my doctor about that. I demanded to speak to my doctor and she replied which one? You have a whole team of doctors. It was Jan 20th when a doctor entered my room and introduced himself as a psychiatrist, I asked him where the rest of the team was and he immediately got defensive and replied that he could get them all here but it would take a lot longer for me to get out of here if I was going to insist on seeing them all at once. He told me my family had me committed (which according to the mental health act can’t even legally happen) and wanted me to stay in the hospital and receive more tests to ensure that my mental state was not due to a physical illness, my daughter was acting as my next of kin, I told him, that is absurd, as she suffers from mental health issues and is by no means able to speak for me. I pegged this man for a liar, as soon as he spoke to me and called him out for the fact, and this infuriated him. It also infuriated the next doctor who came to my room, accusing my husband of locking me up. Upon entering my room he had stated that he was there to confirm my medical history, he had my medical records with him, his first wanted to confirm that I had been a living donor, since 2016. I corrected him, and was shocked that they had the information wrong, I immediately started telling him I was going home, call my husband, that is when he said he had spoke to my husband and it was my husband who wanted me in here. I called him a liar, he slammed my hospital records closed, and stomped out of my room, saying he wasn’t going to argue with me. The failure on his part to fail to confirm my medical history, lead to a grossly inaccurate account of my medical history on the discharge summary that was not completed until 6 weeks after I left the hospital, which I immediately made a formal request to have corrected, but have been denied these corrections on this legal document, because I’m told that the doctor who wrote that information “believed it to be true at the time”. The doctor who wrote the discharge summary was taking her information off of the records, so she can’t change her summary unless the doctor who produced the records makes his changes first. I have since learned that my medical history confirmation was obtained from my nephew of all people, who had called on the morning of Jan 16, to enquire as to my condition, he was questioned as to “his” knowledge of my medical history during this phone call. Who in their right mind would think that my nephew would even have an accurate account of my medical history? But this is the information that I must legally accept unless this doctor admits to being wrong. A Health Advocate who is supposed to be investigating the Mental Health Act Breech told me, “Doctors are not going to admit to being wrong”. This person refuses to acknowledge the negligence and abuse while being held. It’s no coincidence that the “believed it to be true at the time” narrative is the same excuse I received from the RCMP Commanding Officer about his Constable’s lies and erroneous statements on the Occurrence Reports as well as this officer’s personal involvement with having me committed. I told him the officer is guilty of forgery, and the people at Canada Post who started the lies are guilty of Public Mischief. He refuses to address any of the illegal activities of those that perpetrated this crime against me and insists that I have to go through the union channel to address this crime. This is pointless, the union as well as Canada Post refuse to acknowledge that this even happened, even when I cc him on these matters with CPC and CPAA, the emails go unanswered, by all. So essentially, this RCMP Commanding Officer is telling me that because I am a union member I am no longer entitled to the legal system in my personal life and he refuses to lay charges on my behalf, against those that falsely accused and reported me and has refused to provide me with a written response to my report of Public Mischief, I can however send a “complaint” about his and his constables unethical behavior if I would like. On the morning of the 21st a lab tech came to my room for blood as I was coerced by the psychiatrist into accepting more blood tests, and an EEG before he would transfer me to the mental health ward and provide me with copies of the admission certificates. The lab tech entered my room and asked if I was Laureen LeClerc, I replied yes, but how do you know, he asked what do you mean, I replied, I don’t have an Admission ID bracelet on, this young man looked scared and left. I refused any further tests until I received ID. I received the ID later that afternoon, but was never told the reason why I didn’t have one before that. I received the EEG on Friday the 22nd, I was crying on my bed after returning to my room, the psychiatrist came to my room and asked what was wrong, and I told him I was feeling violated by the test, Once again he got angry and proceeded to tell me that I didn’t know the meaning of violated. I told him to leave me alone, it was hours before my brain stopped hurting. Lab Results show that the blood that was taken later that day on the 21st, was to test me for Syphilis. This I consider to be a personal insult. I asked him what the blood was for when the quack was coercing me into more tests, he brushed the question off, as just the normal blood work up. He did not tell me that I was being tested for an STD. Testing me for an STD is to imply that either myself or my husband have been unfaithful to each other and this assumption was based on the Domestic Abuse rumor. Apparently, according to AHS, we have had an ongoing Syphilis epidemic in Alberta for the last 2 years and there were 5 stillborn deaths due to Congenital Syphilis before July 2021 alone. How many children have died of Covid during the “worldwide pandemic” in Alberta? There were no restrictions put on dating. Does anyone in Alberta know we are in a state of “province wide” Syphilis Epidemic? I was transferred to the Mental Health Ward on Jan 23, and received copies of the certificates and was advised of my rights to a Mental Health Advocate, but it was Saturday and due to Covid, there no answers there. On Sunday the Quack came to my room and spent about 45 min talking to me, one of the most bizarre conversations I’ve ever had with what is supposed to be a medical professional. When he was finished he said he was going to cancel the Admission Certificates and I was free to leave the hospital, It was 5:00 pm, my home is 2 hours away, it was dark and the weather was bad, I told him I would stay one more night voluntarily and speak to another psychiatrist in the morning if it made him feel better. That psychiatrist is the one who produced the erroneous discharge summary six weeks later, one statement on the summary that I find profound, is the statement that there was some question as to whether I was Dehydrated upon arrival to the ER, which seems to me, would have been the simplest treatments to administer if it was suspected, Dehydration being a leading cause of delirium in the elderly, not that I’m that old, but they did have me on the geriatric ward for 7 days. A week or so after returning home and sorting myself out, It took a long time for my body and mind to clear the drugs that had been administered to me, I started my fight with Canada Post, I was willing to be suspended for not wearing the mask and just let it go, but I am not willing to let the fact that, if it had not been for the lies spoken of me by my colleagues, the RCMP would never have had the rumor to spread in the first place, invoking a “Covid Criminal” opinion of me in everyone who was supposed to be caring for me. Not that I believe that anyone who is being held as a Mental Health “Prisoner”, is there to be cared for. If this was in fact the case, they wouldn’t be locking people up based on “hear say” or I guess the legal medical term is “facts communicated by other’s”. The Canada Post/CPAA fight continues, absolutely no member of either of these “parties” will communicate with me about any of these matters. I get nothing but “you weren’t wearing a mask” as if, had I just worn the mask, people wouldn’t have had to lie about, and falsely accuse me. This is there way of waiting out my Term, which should be renewed on October 31, 2021. Two more weeks and they drop me, at which time they will start legal action against me to retrieve the $11,766.00 (update - I received a payroll deposit of .01, yes 1 cent on Feb 17, 2022) that they claim I owe them. Which is all the monies I have received since my suspension notice. Some of it is for a pending Short Term Disability claim that I told them I could not back up with medical records as I am not disabled nor do I suffer from mental disorder, and I am tired of being told that the only way I can receive an income through Canada Post is to claim a disability, which to me is committing insurance fraud. The bulk of it is some of the Retroactive Basic Pay that I received in June which is what they owe me for every day of work that I missed since Jan 21, 2021. This is the deadline date for Canada Post to take further action upon my suspension, or put me back to work. Neither of which happened. CPAA insists, that because I went on STDP for the time I was “medically detained”, that my suspension ended then. I am assuming that with the right lies, Canada Post can also try to pin the closure of our Post Office on me as well, since I was the last person to lock the door. Speaking of Insurance Fraud, Who is Canada Life? It has come to my attention that there is something fishy going on with people’s pension funds. A company named Canada Life has taken over the pension/benefits programs of numerous smaller insurance companies like Great West Life, Manulife, Sun Life ect. This came to my attention when I tried to withdraw my employee contributions from the now Canada Life. This was refused as I am still an employee, my employment has to be terminated for me to draw on these funds, and even then, the amount that I can withdraw is controlled by the Alberta Government. I received a summary from Sun life as well as Canada Life, stating that the funds have been transferred between the companies, and I now have money invested in Blackrock 2030 and Blackrock 2035. Now I don’t know if you recognize the name Blackrock or not, but you can find that name as well as Vanguard at the end of most of the money trails in the world including the mRNA injections. I don’t believe that there is any money left in anyone’s pension fund. So all these people who are complying with the inhumane Covid measures, because they have invested in their pension for years, are going to find that they just should have stood their ground, and fought back against the medical tyranny, because they had nothing to lose but their grandchildren’s freedom in the first place. I should mention that my privacy has been breached or my private information is being withheld, by every one of the institutions mentioned in this letter. The responses I have received from the Office of the Privacy Commissioner in regards to my privacy request and complaint with Morneau-Shepell/Canada apparently, those documents were being held in the Canada Post information Bank and it was Canada Post that removed the documents from my file. I have numerous documents from both of these entities, ensuring that my personal medical documents could not be viewed by Canada Post. The complaint was also against Morneau-Shepell/Canada Life for the untimely manner in which it took for me to obtain the address to send my request to, which turned out to be a Canada Post email address, I questioned this at the time and was verbally assured once again, that Canada Post could not view my Medical Documents. The response to this complaint refers to it as having been against Canada Post, and there was nothing to complain about, the fill in the blank, generic response document was completed with the appropriate dates that verified there was no bases for the complaint. I was also informed that if I was not happy with this response, I could send a privacy complaint about the privacy complaints department to the privacy complaints department. We wonder why there isn’t enough tax dollar to fund our medical systems, it is because there are government funded institutions like this and the Health Advocacy Program that employ hundreds, maybe thousands of people, and of course these people all need jobs, but these institutions/programs fail to produce the protections or the checks and balances that we believe we are paying for. I have other complaints and privacy requests that I have filed, against some of the other institutions mentioned in this letter, no one is listening to me, or maybe I should say no one reads what I am saying. Regards, Laureen LeClerc ________________________________________________________________________ Lyle “The house that is divided will fall” Our house is clearly divided, and we need to make an attempt to bring it together. You are not receiving this letter because you are councillor, although, close to half a million dollars in the last 7 years of tax payed councillor wages, should be enough to enact your response to what is happening in your community. You are receiving this letter, because you are obviously seen as a leading member of the community, as well as being related to a majority of the members in it. You, yourself, obviously don’t believe we are all going to die from the corona virus or you would have operated your own business according to Alberta guidelines, this may be an assumption, but there is no plexiglass shield at your business. As of Aug 13, 2020 according to the Alberta.ca Covid update 221 people have died from or WITH?? Covid in total. 153 of those loved and lost souls, were over the age of 80, average life expectancy in Alberta is 82 years. I say WITH Covid because there was only 12 of those people that ever received intensive care lifesaving COVID measures to keep them alive. What is even worse than that number is the 27 people from that age group who never even got to one our so called “overrun hospitals”. The thought that those 27 people may have been some of the people who were at the end of their lives, died, locked up in their rooms in an old folks home, with no family around brings tears to my eyes. The next hard hit age group is 70-79, 48 loved and lost souls, all of which made it to the hospital, but only 33 of which received intensive care lifesaving covid measures to keep them alive. There are no people under the age of 20 in this province who have died from the virus. There is also no evidence that children are spreaders of the virus. This is obviously not a fight against a virus to our bodies, it is a virus against our humanity. This mandate to mask SOME of our children is morally wrong on every level. The reason for not masking the younger kids is because the survival instinct in the younger children is too strong, a child’s first and foremost instinct is to BREATH. The older children on the most part, have already been programmed through social media, and are easily manipulated, and will follow, if not willingly, then out of peer pressure. We have given the breath of life to these children and there are some in this community, who for fear of the virus killing an elderly loved one who has lived a long full life, or worse yet, scared of getting the virus themselves, who would willing obstruct that breath of life and claim it is better for everyone. And those little kids with the strongest instinct to breath, will ask for masks so they can be like the big kids. It breaks my heart and bring tears to my eyes as I type. I have three arguments to the mask mandate. To begin with the number and age of people who die from covid, “wear a mask when you visit the elderly and vulnerable!!!” if it makes you and them feel better. Secondly, if the virus is air born, then shouldn’t the eyes and ears be covered also?? Thirdly, to SOME of the kids wearing masks, if it is some of the children, then as a community if the masks or no masks is causing a rift in our community, (child’s AGE laws be damned) then can we not agree, that the some kids, be the ones whose parents want their children masked. In the 28 months that I have been in the temporary position I hold at the post office, I have heard the argument, “yeah but this is a small town” many, many times, while doing my job according to standards that are expected of me for the pay that I receive, as well as attempting to establish the need for a post office in our community. So now I ask, where is the small town community argument? It is time for the elders in this community to protect and lead our children. As a community/family we have to be able to come together and say this far and no further. Status or position will not mean much in a community that has no humanity. I speak for many members of the community, who are scared to speak for themselves because they indulge in social media, and fear the repercussions of that evil if they speak out. I on the other hand live only for the next visit I will have with my grandchildren, unmasked and beautiful, the way they were born and I will give up everything for that right, because in the end to see the smile and laughter in a grandchild’s face is the ultimate reward for the struggle that is life. I believe that I live in a community where the elders, on the most part feel the same as I. We should be coming together to figure out a way as a community undivided, to combat this assault on our children and protect the truly vulnerable from infection, rather than allowing propaganda to divide us. This community wants and needs a Town Hall Meeting. We look to you for leadership, because that is the position you have established for yourself. Political Status aside. If you should decide to take action and call this meeting, it should be done by word of mouth, posters, or hand delivered flyers. NO SOCIAL MEDIA ANNOUNCEMENTS. Preferably no cell phones allowed. We could start with a small private meeting with a few of the most prominent elders and members to discuss where general mind set is atand go from there. Sincerely, Laureen _________________________________________________________________________________________ Lyle “The house that is divided will fall” Our house is clearly divided, and we need to make an attempt to bring it together. You are not receiving this letter because you are councillor, although, close to half a million dollars in the last 7 years of tax payed councillor wages, should be enough to enact your response to what is happening in your community. You are receiving this letter, because you are obviously seen as a leading member of the community, as well as being related to a majority of the members in it. You, yourself, obviously don’t believe we are all going to die from the corona virus or you would have operated your own business according to Alberta guidelines, this may be an assumption, but there is no plexiglass shield at your business. As of Aug 13, 2020 according to the Alberta.ca Covid update 221 people have died from or WITH?? Covid in total. 153 of those loved and lost souls, were over the age of 80, average life expectancy in Alberta is 82 years. I say WITH Covid because there was only 12 of those people that ever received intensive care lifesaving COVID measures to keep them alive. What is even worse than that number is the 27 people from that age group who never even got to one our so called “overrun hospitals”. The thought that those 27 people may have been some of the people who were at the end of their lives, died, locked up in their rooms in an old folks home, with no family around brings tears to my eyes. The next hard hit age group is 70-79, 48 loved and lost souls, all of which made it to the hospital, but only 33 of which received intensive care lifesaving covid measures to keep them alive. There are no people under the age of 20 in this province who have died from the virus. There is also no evidence that children are spreaders of the virus. This is obviously not a fight against a virus to our bodies, it is a virus against our humanity. This mandate to mask SOME of our children is morally wrong on every level. The reason for not masking the younger kids is because the survival instinct in the younger children is too strong, a child’s first and foremost instinct is to BREATH. The older children on the most part, have already been programmed through social media, and are easily manipulated, and will follow, if not willingly, then out of peer pressure. We have given the breath of life to these children and there are some in this community, who for fear of the virus killing an elderly loved one who has lived a long full life, or worse yet, scared of getting the virus themselves, who would willing obstruct that breath of life and claim it is better for everyone. And those little kids with the strongest instinct to breath, will ask for masks so they can be like the big kids. It breaks my heart and bring tears to my eyes as I type. I have three arguments to the mask mandate. To begin with the number and age of people who die from covid, “wear a mask when you visit the elderly and vulnerable!!!” if it makes you and them feel better. Secondly, if the virus is air born, then shouldn’t the eyes and ears be covered also?? Thirdly, to SOME of the kids wearing masks, if it is some of the children, then as a community if the masks or no masks is causing a rift in our community, (child’s AGE laws be damned) then can we not agree, that the some kids, be the ones whose parents want their children masked. In the 28 months that I have been in the temporary position I hold at the post office, I have heard the argument, “yeah but this is a small town” many, many times, while doing my job according to standards that are expected of me for the pay that I receive, as well as attempting to establish the need for a post office in our community. So now I ask, where is the small town community argument? It is time for the elders in this community to protect and lead our children. As a community/family we have to be able to come together and say this far and no further. Status or position will not mean much in a community that has no humanity. I speak for many members of the community, who are scared to speak for themselves because they indulge in social media, and fear the repercussions of that evil if they speak out. I on the other hand live only for the next visit I will have with my grandchildren, unmasked and beautiful, the way they were born and I will give up everything for that right, because in the end to see the smile and laughter in a grandchild’s face is the ultimate reward for the struggle that is life. I believe that I live in a community where the elders, on the most part feel the same as I. We should be coming together to figure out a way as a community undivided, to combat this assault on our children and protect the truly vulnerable from infection, rather than allowing propaganda to divide us. This community wants and needs a Town Hall Meeting. We look to you for leadership, because that is the position you have established for yourself. Political Status aside. If you should decide to take action and call this meeting, it should be done by word of mouth, posters, or hand delivered flyers. NO SOCIAL MEDIA ANNOUNCEMENTS. Preferably no cell phones allowed. We could start with a small private meeting with a few of the most prominent elders and members to discuss where general mind set is at and go from there. Sincerely, Laureen _________________________________________________________________________________________ Alder Flats Elementary School Staff I’m not sure if anyone else in the community has noticed the hypocrisy of what is going on at the elementary school in regards to the masks but I’m definitely seeing it, and I am unable to let it go unmentioned. Children might not know the words Hypocrite, or Hypocrisy, or their meaning, but they know it, when they see it and instinctively know it is wrong. I work in the Hamlet, and therefore unlike the parents who are not present to observe what’s going on, I see the children outside at lunch time and during their physical activity time outside, in the FRESH air RUNNING around putting their hands over their masks to pull them down for AIR supply, with a teacher standing off by herself with a mask on, who also puts her hand over her mask to pull it down to communicate with the children, I can’t hear what she is saying, but I certainly hope it is not instruction to put their masks on. I see school staff members leave the school during school hours to go to the post office without the mask on. I see school staff, in the school, in a photo on the front page of the County Market newspaper who are clearly not physical distancing. The photo may have been taken before the school opened, but the practice of physical distancing has been in practice for months. I keep hearing that the measures that are being practiced on our children, is to prevent the spread and kids potentially taking the virus home to someone who might be the most vulnerable (elderly) It is not the children who leave the community to go to the major centers for their blood tests, cataract surgeries, heart exams and what have you. It is the most vulnerable elderly, who also gather and have gathered every day since the virus was announced, at our local restaurants, without masks to SOCIALIZE. Children are not able to leave the community to pick up the virus unless taken by an adult, so if the cough comes to our community, then it wasn’t the kids that brought it and the kids should not be held responsible for spreading it. SOCIAL distancing is a contradiction in human nature and I urge the staff to use the word PHYSICAL rather than SOCIAL when speaking to the kids to avoid future emotional damage. WORDS should not be manipulated as to confuse their DEFINITION. I have read the Alberta legislature in regards to the masks as well as the Wetaskiwin County School Division guidelines and can find nothing that states that the kids have to wear masks outside during physical recreation or school breaks. WCSD states that schools can modify these guidelines, which leads me to believe that the decision to wear masks outside is made by the school staff themselves. If this in fact the case, then you’ve gone TOO FAR. The school and the property it sits on is funded with tax payer dollars, and therefore belongs to the community. The staff who work in the school get paid from tax payer dollars and therefore work for the community. IF the decision to make the children wear masks outside is coming from the AFES school staff themselves, then the community should have been informed that the staff is making this decision themselves. What is clearly stated, is that masks are suggested when physical distancing cannot be maintained and Deena Henshaw reversed her decision to practice physical distancing in the classroom (because an airborne virus can’t jump over the BACK of a child’s head???) So, masking the kids during breaks and physical recreation outside, is redundant. I have been told that the younger children are also being “ENCOURAGED” to mask up, as well, some parents have been advised to refrain from allowing children to play in the park outside of school hours. None of you have the right nor the legal ability to suggest or try to enforce either, this a false sense of, and abuse of power. Control yourselves rather than trying to control others. For anyone who argues that the children want to wear the masks, then we seriously have to look at ourselves as a society, and ask ourselves why are our children are scared enough to cut off their air supply to prevent catching something that no child in Alberta and only 1 terminally ill child in all of Canada has died WITH. If these children believe that it is to protect the elderly who are obviously not taking any measures to protect themselves, then we are letting the children carry a burden that is not theirs to carry, nor are they mature enough to cope with the concept of such a responsibility, also very troubling, that as a society, this is where we are at. I fail to understand how responsible adults can allow the MENTAL health of our children to be compromised, which could last a lifetime, to prevent the spread of a virus that only people who have already lived a life time are dying from. Which is 227 over the age of 70 years out of 254 total Covid RELATED deaths in Alberta as of Sept 13, 2020, 2:30 pm according to the Alberta.ca Covid update website. Especially since there was only 48 of those who passed, that ever received Covid lifesaving intensive care treatment to save their lives. Of the 170 octogenarians and older, who passed there were 24 who were never even admitted to hospital. So to continue with this attack on the kids as the SPEADERS is unjustified, and I question the moral standards of any adult whether it be government officials, teachers, parents, or grandparents that would take part in the enforcement of it or participate in the fear mongering of the kids. If there is any one of you, while you are restricting another human beings basic bodily functions, regardless of who that human being is, can hear even the smallest voice inside of you saying, I don’t feel this right, it is your moral conscience speaking to you, and to disregard this warning is a very scary place for society to be in. I have always been proud to live in a community where kids had the freedom to be kids, now so much now. _________________________________________________________________________________________ Mike Lake You will notice, I did not give you the respect of the “honourable”. I Supported you and Lyle in the past, but not this time. I voted for my fundamental human rights and freedoms. You are receiving this letter and supporting documents, because this happened to me on your watch! Any one of these things that happened to me, could happen to you or someone you love also. All of it, because of a lie that was told and repeated and passed on, I’m sure you are aware of how rumors can snowball. Is anyone speaking lies about you or yours? After all as an MP you still have to pay taxes, right? You and your family still require health care, right? You should hope that in this time of pending Bill C-36 that, is not rumored that you are Violent, Homicidal, and Suicidal. Because the people who said these things about me, well, there identity is being protected. Have we payed enough Carbon Tax for our Green House Gasses? How much is it costing us to Poison our ground water, with the all the toxic waste that is being illegally dumped due to “covid”? To keep us healthy and safe! I think the “climate change, the earth is burning up” narrative can be dropped any time, because Government backed Corporations will have poisoned our water, long before the earth burns up. As for the Readiquat, what pesticides are being used on the school buses and in the schools? Do you know much Isopropyl alcohol (hand sanitizer) it takes to kill an adult if swallowed? Do you know what Osmosis is? What are the symptoms of Isopropyl Poisoning? I have added an extra photo into your envelope. I was told that the yard that this empty hand sanitizer Tote came from, had hundreds of empty hand sanitizer totes. Why have people been convinced to bath our children in this toxic chemical? Ignorantly, contributing to the dumping of toxic chemicals into our ground water supply? Not to mention what it is doing to the kids, when simple hand hygiene, preferably with natural soap and water will kill the “covid”, this applies to hard surfaces as well. Laureen LeClerc ________________________________________________________________________________

Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8

Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html B PROOF OF CLAIM Rights Doc. 4 WE are all born with free will and unalienable rights. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law’ Consent makes the contract Adhesion contracts are not contracts because there was no consent, they are considered as gifts. We do not require any corporate created rights, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedom provided by the Government of Canada Corporation and/or ICCPR provided by the United Nations Corporation. If anyone claims to have jurisdiction over, you and/or requests payment request a copy of the contract. Government Corporations Government Services Corporations doing business as Government of Canada and/or the government of any provinces can only create rules (statutes) that only apply to their employees, franchisees, officers and dependents. Their rules (statutes) do not apply to the people in general. That is why the rules they create (statutes) are referred to as “public policy”. We do not require any corporate created rights, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedom provided by the Government of Canada Corporation and/or ICCPR provided by the United Nations Corporation. Women and men living in Canada are not subject to any Public Policies, mandates, or acts of legislation promoted by any commercial or municipal corporation for its officers and employees. We should not vote in private corporate shareholder elections sponsored by Canada Inc., Province of _____ Inc., or any other foreign corporation. All Acts, Bills and statutes created by the Government of Canada and/or any of the provincial governments only apply to “person”. The definition of person in Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition on page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being ( i.e. natural person ) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. In other words, if I say the basket includes apples and oranges you will not find any other type of fruit in the basket. As plainly stated in Black’s Law dictionary, anything that applies to person only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Does not apply to men or women! The Government of Canada and Government of all provinces are Crown for profit Corporations. The Prime Minister and/or the Premiers receive their orders from the shareholders of the Crown Corporation. They are the C.E.O.s/officers of the Crown Corporations. They carry out the orders that are relayed to them by the Governor General and/or the Lieutenant Governor. They (politicians) are in place to take the blame for the harm that is done to the people. They are replaced every four years with someone who claims that he/she is going to right the wrongs that were created, but nothing changes they carry out the orders provided by the shareholders as the previous C.E.O.s. Four years later they are blamed and replaced. PERSONS All Acts, Bills and statutes created by the Government of Canada and/or any of the provincial governments only apply to “person”. The definition of person in Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition on page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person ) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. In other words, if I say the basket includes apples and oranges you will not find any other type of fruit in the basket. As plainly stated in Black’s Law dictionary, anything that applies to person only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Does not apply to men or women _________________________________________________________ Name written in all capital letters The governing book of the English language is “The Oxford Styles Manual” which sometimes refers to “The Chicago Manual of Style” also The Oxford Manual of Style. All Uppercase text, all caps, or gloss is listed in the style's manuals under “foreign - language” , named ”Ancient-Latin” or Dog Latin. All Caps are not defined or recognized in meaning. All Caps is not English although you may think you are able to read it as English it is in fact, a calculated deception to be read separated from the rest of the “Document”. All Uppercase text has no lawful grammatical jurisdiction with common English and is a foreign language, headed under “Ancient-Latin”. (The Chicago Manual of Style, 16th Edition, 11:144-47). Glossa is two or more languages on a legal document. Glossa is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of a text( Black’s Law Dictionary page 621 5th Edition) “Glossa” is also used to conceal or confuse the real facts in order to confuse, in order to gain tacit consent. A name written in all capital letters is written in dog Latin or is known as systemic text “a thing” created by the employees of the crown corporation, Therefore the Crown Corporation owns the creation. If you claim that the name written in all capital letters, is, you. You are admitting you are the property of the Crown Corporation (a slave). Cestui Que Vie Trust 's beneficiary is the name in all capital letters which is the property of the Crown Corporation, it is not you. All governments (corporations) and businesses such as banks and others that write your name in all capital letters are committing constructive fraud and conversion. (Engaged in criminal activity) ___________________________________________________ City, Municipality, Village et al Address Date TO: Mayor, CAO, CEO, Councillors et al FROM: The men and women living therein, The enclosed documentation: 1) Proof of Incorporation of the following entities; from Dunn & Bradstreet or EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Note: the following are government services corporations’ (dba( "doing business as,") Government of Canada, EDGAR (CIK 0000230098) ; Government of British Columbia, EDGAR (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306) ; Government of Alberta, EDGAR (CIK 0000810961) ; Government of Saskatchewan, EDGAR (CIK 0000203098) ; Government of Manitoba, EDGAR (CIK 0000826926) ; Ontario, EDGAR (CIK 0000074615) ; Quebec, EDGAR (0000722803) ; Province of New Brunswick, EDGAR (CIK 0000862406) ; Province of Nova Scotia, EDGAR (CIK 0000842639) 2) Copy of the Clearfield Doctrine; showing that corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to taxation or law enforcement et al, without a consent to contract which is corporate policy when doing commerce. * Seek legal clarification and written proof to the contrary. This letter comes with the enclosed documents to ascertain the jurisdiction within our council, in which official positions are being held . Depending on the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed upon entering office, the positions may be operating under the "Color of Law," in a De-Facto, Un-lawful and thus ultra vires standing. This holds personal liability for anything signed on behalf of the people. There are 3 possible jurisdictions: A) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution with full legal authority and jurisdiction to taxation, schools, infrastructure, peace keeping, hospital, courts, et al. as services, and needs of the local men and women therein. B) Having as the "Trustee" full fiduciary control of the "Trusts" set up to care for the local needs. De-jure/ lawful B) Non-Governmental Office, (NGO): a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, without the legal authority or jurisdiction to taxation. This entity provides "Service Contracts," which requires contracts and consent to contract by those involved in the services. It's known as "Body Corporate," and serves "Incorporated Inhabitants." Did the men and women give consent to be incorporated? That's called FRAUD. Who is the "Head of Council" or "Global Mayor?" (“A created fiction” The Executive Control and Authority comes from the Corporation of the Province wherein we reside, and to which your office would receive the Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al directly, through downloads from the corporation and are corporate policies not district policies. De-facto/ un-lawful/FRAUD C) Public/Private/Partnerships, (PPP): an International Entity one which downloads "FOREIGN," Corporate policies, UN/United Nations, WEF/ World Economic Forum, WHO/ World Health Organization et al. In this position there is also no legal authority or jurisdiction to taxation. Consent to contract is a legal requirement to contract with the men and women. Did the men and women consent to Foreign Corporate Policies and occupation in the community without knowledge or consent? Are the United Nations Sustainable Goals/SDG's, Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 policies being implemented? Who has fiduciary control over the local Trusts as their Trustee? Who is the "Head of Council," and "Council of the Whole." “A fiction” De-Facto, un-lawful/FRAUD These are jurisdictional questions that are important to ascertain because through the stroke of a pen, a man or woman is being put into extreme personal liability for the agreements and infrastructures signed on to. Furthermore, there are 3 levels of Lawful/de-jure/jurisdictions LOCAL, PROVINCIAL, and FEDERAL - Each has their sphere of lawful jurisdiction and geographical area - Each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers - NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview We the people have come to ascertain for ourselves the jurisdiction WE are in because the last few years have shown us that something has gone horribly awry at the local level. We the people voted for positions of service to the local jurisdiction. Was there comprehension of the meaning of the oath, declaration or covenant sworn, upon taking office? Was time given to properly peruse any documents to sign and vote on? Many of these documents were written over many years, by legal firms and lawyers, whose signatures are not within the documents...whose are! They contain legalise, a language unto itself, and is the basis for how most FRAUD has occurred. Words like person, individual, inhabitant, resident, citizen, et al have a completely different meaning in these documents. FRAUD vitiates everything. We the people intend on restoring Peace, Order, and Lawful Governance should our suspicions prove correct. We require a response by ________________________________ and expect such from our elected officials. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law, and thus consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls upon the claimant. No response is considered tacit agreement. ______________________________________________________ Regional District of Address Date TO: Board Chair, CAO, CEO, Directors et al FROM: The enclosed documentation: 1) Proof of the Incorporation of the following entities, NOTE: government services corporations (dba:"doing business as,") EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; Government of Canada, (CIK 0000230098) Government of British Columbia, (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306) Government of Alberta, (CIK 0000810961) Government of Saskatchewan, (CIK 0000203098) Government of Manitoba, (CIK 0000826926) Ontario, (CIK 0000074615) Quebec, (CIK 0000722803) Province of New Brunswick, (CIK 0000862406) Province of Nova Scotia, (CIK 0000842639) 2) Copy of The CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE; showing that Corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to Taxation or Law Enforcement et al without consent to contract by those involved in the transaction. Personal liability is then enforceable upon those acting illegally. The enclosed documents show that the Regional District through its Incorporation may be operating under the "Color of Law" and as such is de-facto, un-lawful, and ultra-vires. This information is not hear-say nor opinion, rather they state the facts of the matter, which are; ?- What Oath, Declaration, or Covenant was signed upon the commencement of the positions in council? These matter! ?- What jurisdiction is the office under? There are 3 possible Jurisdictions; 1) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution, with lawful de-jure status as a holder of the "PUBLIC TRUST", Trustee with Fiduciary control, and thus legal authority to the taxation of the men and women within a geographical area, and is one of "service" to the local needs; school, hospital, peace keeping, infrastructure, courts, et al. 2) Non-Governmental Office (NGO): a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, that provides "Service Contracts," and is known as a "Body Corporate" to "Incorporated Inhabitants." This jurisdiction requires Consent to Contract, is de-facto, un-lawful and as such has NO legal jurisdiction to taxation. The Executive Control and Authority comes from the corporation of the province wherein the office is located. The Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al are downloaded to the district and are corporate policies. 3) Public/Private/Partnerships (PPP) : an INTERNATIONAL ENTITY, receiving downloads from a "FOREIGN" Corporation; United Nations, WHO/World Health Organization, WEF/World Economic Forum et al. This is also a de-facto, un-lawful jurisdiction with NO legal grounds to the taxation of men and women, and also requires Consent to Contract. NOTE: In British Columbia, as an example, The BC Assessment Authority is a CROWN Corporation, created in 1974 by the Corporation of British Columbia Inc., "in order to earn profit for the Government of British Columbia Inc., without jurisdiction nor contracts with the men and women of BC. NOTE: There are 3 levels of lawful, de-jure governance Local, Provincial and Federal - Each has their sphere of jurisdiction and geographical area - Each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers - NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview These 2 questions are the most important because the answer to them will establish the personal liability through the signature/autograph put upon the documents requiring a vote. Was there full comprehension of the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed when entering office as a Director? Was there time to peruse any documents requiring a vote? Most often these documents are many pages long and were made over many years, by legal firms and lawyers whose signatures are NOT contained therein. Whose is? Making that signature "personally" liable for the decisions made Was there full comprehension of the difference between the legal wording contained therein, and the knowledge of their meanings? Such as person, individual, constituent, citizen,et al. "Legalese" is a language unto itself and is the basis for most FRAUD, which in law vitiates everything. The men and women in our Regional District Office were empowered by the men and women, to operate under, and in a jurisdiction that is de-jure, lawful, and with a fiduciary trust, to serve the men and women of our geographical area and no other. To ensure that the needs of the local men, women, and their property were the priority and responsibility of the Regional District. So...What Office is held? Lawfully/de-jure or unlawfully and de-facto? We require an answer, on or before __________________ No answer will be considered a tacit agreement. The office of the Regional District is held by the trust of the members of our community, the neighbours and friends who voted for positions in an office to serve the community. That's why we require proof of what oath, declaration, or covenant was given. The men and women of __________________ _________________________________________________________ Notice of Demand and Trespass Proof of Jurisdiction and Contract Proof of Claim It has come to our attention, the concerned men and women, that our Educational Institutions, whose service to us is the education of our sons and daughters (hereafter named as our "property") has implemented the SOGI 123 Program without a consent to contract. HISTORY; this program began in 2007 through the ARC Foundation. A private foundation based in Vancouver, British Columbia Inc. Other corporations involved in the funding are; British Columbia Ministry of Education Inc.; British Columbia Teachers Federation Inc.; University of British Columbia Inc., and through private donations( gifts from registered charities also corporations), and the corporation of Canada Inc. Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Documents included herein: - Proof of the incorporation of Government of Canada Inc., Government of British Columbia Inc. - Copy of the "CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE", a 1942 court case, accepted worldwide because it's corporate, commerce law. Clearly stating the requirement of contracts Governments lose their sovereignty when they become corporations, thus no different than Canadian Tire using Canadian Tire money. - Copy of the definition of "GLOSSA", pertinent in this matter because it's a matter of concealment, meant to confuse using "text" to corrupt the real facts in order to gain tacit consent. There's no statute of limitation on fraud. - Our Mayoral, Councillor, and Regional Districts are also incorporated through the removal of many of the municipal powers in 2004 with the Local Government Act incorporated into the Community Charter, prior to this; the local mayor had full de-jure and lawful jurisdiction, in relation to our schools. - Copy of the definition of the All Capital Identity, created with the "Birth Certificate," a fiction, constructive fraud and conversion. - Copy of the 10 Points of Contract Law, made simple for comprehension on this matter. - Copy of the 12 Presumptions of Court. Included for the comprehension of status. Fundamentally, the fraud upon our property when born, vitiates any Board jurisdiction to the ownership of our property. We, the men and women who created them, own them. "He who creates owns!" A maxim in law Therefore, it is incumbent upon those who have positions on the Board to cease and desist the SOGI 123 Program which is an infringement upon the property known as our sons and daughters. Failure to do so as corporate entities, through Contract Law, we intend on exercising our jurisdiction, as is our right, to the fullest extent upon the men and women personally sitting on the Board. We strongly suggest a consultation with a lawyer, who by the way wrote this mess. "Praetextu legis injusta agens duplo puniendus" We the People DO NOT require legal Re-presentation in this matter because we're well aware of the 12 Presumptions of Court. I doubt any lawyer will be willing to assist the men and women on the Board, regardless of the facts, because through their: legalize they do deceive. Be it therefore noted, with the documents contained herein, that our claim of proof of contract and the jurisdictional fraud, put against us and our property is considered a trespass. It is the duty of men and women to discuss these delicate matters with our property within our own jurisdiction. We are not against the health and wellbeing of another's property, within their jurisdiction, rather not in the educational setting. We the People, regarding our property in the care of the educational system, again, reiterate, and declare that the burden of proof falls on the claimant. Consider the response with wisdom and discernment since we voted men and women into what we thought was a Educational Office not a Corporate Office. We require no more than 7 days for implementing the redressing of the trespass against our property, with the immediate removal of any and all literature, electronic or written, devices, toys (we use the word with baited breath) et al in relation to the SOGI 123 PROGRAM post haste. For it was through corporate policies, without contractual consent, that the trespass has been made against our property thus creating this claim against those men and women on the Board personally. Furthermore, do not be deceived into thinking that the registration of our property into the corporation rather than an educational institution voids any responsibility on the part of the men and women on the Board, as it was done in fraud. Again we'll state that fraud vitiates everything. In all fairness to the men and women on the Board, our neighbours, not the corporations involved, perhaps unaware of the situation mentioned above and the personal liability for this trespass, We the People will support the men and women in this matter of remedy, because we trusted that their service, while sitting on the Board, was to serve our property with a lawful education. No response will be considered a tacit agreement. Sincerely and without prejudice or malice We the People Autograph_______________________:________ __________________________________________________________ Statement of Claim Taxation Between the Corporation of ______________________________________ And the noted particulars on the documents included herein. The above corporation has not proved jurisdiction, consent to contract, nor provide proof of a contract to claim the monies expected in taxation, hence tacit agreement to this claim. Who claims this debt be true, who claims this debt to due? Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Three requirements were made in writing to the Corporations Finance Minister to provide said proof, and are included in this document. Furthermore, copies of the Clearfield Doctrine, EDGAR # for the Corporation involved, Regina-v-John Anthony Hill 12 May, 2011 at Southwark Crown Court, Case # T20107746, (the Queen declared, "Lawfully NOT valid Monarch, hence Charles the III too),and "Glossa," (see Black's Law) corrupts the essence of the text presented on your documents. This refusal of consent to contract extends from this day forward, as noted with receipt of this document, until such a date in the future when there is a de-jure government upon the landmass commonly known worldwide as Canada, British Columbia, et al. Autograph _________________________:___________________________ Dated this day _______________________________________________________ Proof of Claim Re: Property Tax; Contract and Proof of Consent to Contract Between the Corporation of ___________________________________________________ and _____________________________________________________________________________ Regarding the property registered as; ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ It is required and incumbent upon the Corporations Minister of Finance, to provide proof of jurisdiction as a corporation, to taxation without full disclosure of the facts, and consent to contract, as per contract law. See: The Clearfield Doctrine; Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 363 Syllabus CLEARFIELD TRUST CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES CERTIORARI to the CIRCUIT COURT of APPEALS for the THIRD CIRCUIT No. 490 Argued February 5, 1943 Decided March 1, 1943(and accepted worldwide when conducting commerce) Further to the above noted court case, this requirement will be expected within 7 days receipt of this claim for proof of the jurisdictional obligation by the corporation to taxation to the property noted herein. Who claims this debt be true, who claims this debt be due? Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Property Taxes have been paid previously without consent to contract, due to the fraud perpetrated without full disclosure of the fact that the corporation mentioned herein, was not a lawful government with the de-jure jurisdiction to taxation, thus Ultra-Vires. Rather, a corporation whose name included the words "government," which is fraud based on Black's Law Dictionary, any edition. No response will be confirmation of a tacit agreement to the above. Thanking you in advance, Autograph: _________________________:_____________________________ Dated this day: ______________________________________ ______________________________________________________ STATEMENT of CLAIM Date:_____________________ STATE of TITLE CERTIFICATE: Certificate number________________________________________ Land Title Office__________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ Title Number______________________________________________ Registered Owner__________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ Taxation Authority__________________________________________ Description of Land__________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ Charges, Liens and Interests_____________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ Proof of contract is required to provide evidence of any claim made upon the aforementioned property; taxation; land use; water use; structures and buildings above, on, or below the land; any and all animals thereon; any and all chattles upon said land; et al, provide proof of any contractual obligation having been made with respect to said land. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law, and thus consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. (See: Regina-v-John Anthony Hill 12 May, 2011 at Southwark Crown Court, Case # T20107746, in which the Queen was declared to be a "Lawfully NOT Valid Monarch." Hence, neither is Charles the III) (See: Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 363, Syllabus. Clearfield trust Co.et al. v. United States, Certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.No. 490. Argued February 5, 1943 Decided March 1, 1943 ; and accepted worldwide when conducting commerce) The requirement to provide Proof of Contract within this Statement of Claim, is expected within ____________days from receipt of the documentation herein. No response will be considered a tacit agreement to the above. Autograph_________________________:_______________________ :GLOSSA: ~ The 'Born-Date' Vs. the 'Registration-Date' Does your Birth Certificate identify YOU as TWO people, not one? (You is plural, one and another) Have you ever wondered why your SURNAME is written using the ALL UPPERCASE TEXT? Put simply, 'you' are using a ‘Legal’ name and this is fraud. See the ‘name’ is actually split up into separate entities – The Christian-name and The ‘Surname’. You register these names to the Crown Corporation LTD. as their Property by your Birth Certificate which is given a bond number. Your physical value is used as collateral for these bonds allowing the United Kingdom LTD. to take out loans from private Banks, such as 'Bank of England' and profit is made by way of legal fines (Acts & Statutes), bills and taxation. – Hence money is no longer backed by Gold or Silver, but by our physical value or man power. The UNITED KINGDOM LTD is a privately owned Corporation-ship. And corporations are considered ‘ships’ and they are governed under the law of the sea, known as Maritime Law. There is no real 'ship' but a 'document-vessel' – which in our case was our Birth Certificate Created by the Doctor when s/he ‘docked’ you. TAKE NOTICE Whenever you encounter the Legal Document (document-vessel) you will notice that your surname (or sometimes all of your names) will be written using the ALL-UPPERCASE TEXT. This is no coincidence - the ALL UPPERCASE text is not defined or recognized in The Oxford Styles Manual, (the governing book of the English language) – meaning that although you may be able to read it as English, it is in fact, NOT English. The all CAPS or Gloss can be found within the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under 'foreign-languages', named 'Ancient-Latin' The main place this ALL-UPPERCASE text is found to be defined as a language, is when American Sign Language (ASL), a signing language used for the deaf, is written. ASL can be defined in the book ‘The Chicago Manual of Style’ under the foreign-languages header: American Sign Language (ASL) compound signs, 10.152 and ‘glosses, 10.147’. Thus, defining this text as a foreign language Further going on to say that when written, it has no 1-to-1 correspondence with any other languages on the document. The all CAPS or Gloss is also found in the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under foreign-languages, 'Ancient-Latin', however as the all caps UK LTD is registered in [Washington D.C[, they seem to be using the 'Chicago Manual of Style' , not the Oxford. Putting two or more languages onto a legal document is known in law as a ‘Glossa’. Black's Law Dictionary defines: 'GLOSSA' - “It is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of the text”. Meaning that by using a Glossa in a document they are trying to conceal or confuse the real facts. If you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL-UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL if you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALLf you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So, you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL-UPPER CASE. If you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL-UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL-UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So, you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL Soon you will realize that virtually all court orders, speeding tickets and most other legal documents actually make no sense whatsoever. They only make sense when we make the assumption that it is all plain English and we read it as one, once you take one away from the other – it renders the document useless. Seeing as the ‘government’ is simply a privately owned Corporation, it can only impose fines and acts upon other corporations. And by tricking us to registering our names as a corporate entity and then tricking us into thinking these names are physically us, it manages to get us to represent the corporately registered name and therefore bear the burden of fines and policies. This is a crime known as “personage”. Hand in hand with “personage” comes a crime known as “barratry” which is knowingly bringing false claims into court- This is what police, politicians, judges are doing daily. The Birth-Certificate, Two-Names, Two-Dates and Two-Languages? Capitis Diminutio Maxima (Name in ALL CAPITALS) For the purposes of understanding one's legal or commercial status under the Admiralty system (the law system used in England, Canada and much of the US), it is necessary to examine the curious use of all CAPS -Capitis Diminutio Maxima- in legal and domestic income tax forms, credit cards & statements, loans, mortgages, speeding & parking tickets, car documents, road tax, court summons etc. While seemingly a trite concern, this apparently small detail has extremely deep significance for all of us! Gage Canadian Dictionary 1983 Sec. 4 defines Capitalize adj. as "To take advantage of - To use to one's own advantage." Black's Law Dictionary – Revised 4th Edition 1968, provides a more comprehensive definition as follows … Capitis Diminutio (meaning the diminishing of status through the use of capitalization)- In Roman law. A diminishing or abridgment of personality; a loss or curtailment of a man's status or aggregate of leg al attributes and qualifications.

Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 B PROOF OF CLAIM Rights Doc. 4 WE are all born with free will and unalienable rights. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law’ Consent makes the contract Adhesion contracts are not contracts because there was no consent, they are considered as gifts. We do not require any corporate created rights, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedom provided by the Government of Canada Corporation and/or ICCPR provided by the United Nations Corporation. If anyone claims to have jurisdiction over you and/or requests payment requests a copy of the contract. Government Corporations Government Services Corporations doing business as Government of Canada and/or the government of any provinces can only create rules (statutes) that only apply to their employees, franchisees, officers and dependents. Their rules (statutes) do not apply to the people in general. That is why the rules they create (statutes) are referred to as “public policy”. We do not require any corporate created rights, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedom provided by the Government of Canada Corporation and/or ICCPR provided by the United Nations Corporation. Women and men living in Canada are not subject to any Public Policies, mandates, or acts of legislation promoted by any commercial or municipal corporation for its officers and employees. We should not vote in private corporate shareholder elections sponsored by Canada Inc., Province of _____ Inc., or any other foreign corporation. All Acts, Bills and statutes created by the Government of Canada and/or any of the provincial governments only apply to “person”. The definition of person in Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition on page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being ( i.e. natural person ) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. In other words if I say the basket includes apples and oranges you will not find any other type of fruit in the basket. As plainly stated in Black’s Law dictionary, anything that applies to person only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Does not apply to men or women! The Government of Canada and Government of all provinces are Crown for profit Corporations. The Prime Minister and/or the Premiers receive their orders from the shareholders of the Crown Corporation. They are the C.E.O.s/officers of the Crown Corporations. They carry out the orders that are relayed to them by the Governor General and/or the Lieutenant Governor. They (politicians) are in place to take the blame for the harm that is done to the people. They are replaced every four years with someone who claims that he/she are going to right the wrongs that were created, but nothing changes they carry out the orders provided by the shareholders as the previous C.E.O.s. Four years later they are blamed and replaced. PERSONS All Acts, Bills and statutes created by the Government of Canada and/or any of the provincial governments only apply to “person”. The definition of person in Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition on page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person ) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. In other words if I say the basket includes apples and oranges you will not find any other type of fruit in the basket. As plainly stated in Black’s Law dictionary, anything that applies to person only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Does not apply to men or women _________________________________________________________ Name written in all capital letters The governing book of the English language is “The Oxford Styles Manual” which sometimes refers to “The Chicago Manual of Style” also The Oxford Manual of Style. All Uppercase text, all caps, or gloss is listed in the styles manuals under “foreign - language” , named ”Ancient-Latin” or Dog Latin. All Caps are not defined or recognised in meaning. All Caps is not English although you may think you are able to read it as English it is in fact, a calculated deception to be read separated from the rest of the “Document”. All Uppercase text has no lawful grammatical jurisdiction with common English and is a foreign language, headed under “Ancient-Latin”. (The Chicago Manual of Style, 16th Edition, 11:144-47). Glossa is two or more languages on a legal document. Glossa is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of a text( Black’s Law Dictionary page 621 5th Edition) “Glossa” is also used to conceal or confuse the real facts in order to confuse, in order to gain tacit consent. A name written in all capital letters is written in dog latin or is known as systemic text “a thing” created by the employees of the crown corporation, Therefore the Crown Corporation owns the creation. If you claim that the name written in all capital letters is you. You are admitting you are the property of the Crown Corporation (a slave). Cestui Que Vie Trust 's beneficiary is the name in all capital letters which is the property of the Crown Corporation, it is not you. All governments (corporations) and businesses such as banks and others that write your name in all capital letters are committing constructive fraud and conversion. (Engaged in criminal activity) ___________________________________________________ City, Municipality, Village et al Address Date TO: Mayor, CAO, CEO, Councillors et al FROM: The men and women living therein, The enclosed documentation: 1) Proof of Incorporation of the following entities; from Dunn & Bradstreet or EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Note: the following are government services corporations’ (dba( "doing business as,") Government of Canada, EDGAR (CIK 0000230098) ; Government of British Columbia, EDGAR (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306) ; Government of Alberta, EDGAR (CIK 0000810961) ; Government of Saskatchewan, EDGAR (CIK 0000203098) ; Government of Manitoba, EDGAR (CIK 0000826926) ; Ontario, EDGAR (CIK 0000074615) ; Quebec, EDGAR (0000722803) ; Province of New Brunswick, EDGAR (CIK 0000862406) ; Province of Nova Scotia, EDGAR (CIK 0000842639) 2) Copy of the Clearfield Doctrine; showing that corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to taxation or law enforcement et al, without a consent to contract which is corporate policy when doing commerce. * Seek legal clarification and written proof to the contrary. This letter comes with the enclosed documents to ascertain the jurisdiction within our council, in which official positions are being held . Depending on the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed upon entering office, the positions may be operating under the "Color of Law," in a De-Facto, Un-lawful and thus ultra vires standing. This holds personal liability for anything signed on behalf of the people. There are 3 possible jurisdictions: A) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution with full legal authority and jurisdiction to taxation, schools, infrastructure, peace keeping, hospital, courts, et al. as services, and needs of the local men and women therein. B) Having as the "Trustee" full fiduciary control of the "Trusts" set up to care for the local needs. De-jure/ lawful B) Non-Governmental Office, (NGO): a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, without the legal authority or jurisdiction to taxation. This entity provides "Service Contracts," which requires contracts and consent to contract by those involved in the services. It's known as "Body Corporate," and serves "Incorporated Inhabitants." Did the men and women give consent to be incorporated? That's called FRAUD. Who is the "Head of Council" or "Global Mayor?" (“A created fiction” The Executive Control and Authority comes from the Corporation of the Province wherein we reside, and to which your office would receive the Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al directly, through downloads from the corporation and are corporate policies not district policies. De-facto/ un-lawful/FRAUD C) Public/Private/Partnerships, (PPP): an International Entity one which downloads "FOREIGN," Corporate policies, UN/United Nations, WEF/ World Economic Forum, WHO/ World Health Organization et al. In this position there is also no legal authority or jurisdiction to taxation. Consent to contract is a legal requirement to contract with the men and women. Did the men and women consent to Foreign Corporate Policies and occupation in the community without knowledge or consent? Are the United Nations Sustainable Goals/SDG's, Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 policies being implemented? Who has fiduciary control over the local Trusts as their Trustee? Who is the "Head of Council," and "Council of the Whole." “A fiction” De-Facto, un-lawful/FRAUD These are jurisdictional questions that are important to ascertain because through the stroke of a pen, a man or woman is being put into extreme personal liability for the agreements and infrastructures signed on to. Furthermore, there are 3 levels of Lawful/de-jure/jurisdictions LOCAL, PROVINCIAL, and FEDERAL - Each has their sphere of lawful jurisdiction and geographical area - Each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers - NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview We the people have come to ascertain for ourselves the jurisdiction WE are in because the last few years have shown us that something has gone horribly awry at the local level. We the people voted for positions of service to the local jurisdiction. Was there comprehension of the meaning of the oath, declaration or covenant sworn, upon taking office? Was time given to properly peruse any documents to sign and vote on? Many of these documents were written over many years, by legal firms and lawyers, whose signatures are not within the documents...whose are! They contain legalise, a language unto itself, and is the basis for how most FRAUD has occurred. Words like person, individual, inhabitant, resident, citizen, et al have a completely different meaning in these documents. FRAUD vitiates everything. We the people intend on restoring Peace, Order, and Lawful Governance should our suspicions prove correct. We require a response by ________________________________ and expect such from our elected officials. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law, and thus consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls upon the claimant. No response is considered tacit agreement. ______________________________________________________ Regional District of Address Date TO: Board Chair, CAO, CEO, Directors et al FROM: The enclosed documentation: 1) Proof of the Incorporation of the following entities, NOTE: government services corporations (dba:"doing business as,") EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; Government of Canada, (CIK 0000230098) Government of British Columbia, (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306) Government of Alberta, (CIK 0000810961) Government of Saskatchewan, (CIK 0000203098) Government of Manitoba, (CIK 0000826926) Ontario, (CIK 0000074615) Quebec, (CIK 0000722803) Province of New Brunswick, (CIK 0000862406) Province of Nova Scotia, (CIK 0000842639) 2) Copy of The CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE; showing that Corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to Taxation or Law Enforcement et al without consent to contract by those involved in the transaction. Personal liability is then enforceable upon those acting illegally. The enclosed documents show that the Regional District through its Incorporation may be operating under the "Color of Law" and as such is de-facto, un-lawful, and ultra-vires. This information is not hear-say nor opinion, rather they state the facts of the matter, which are; ?- What Oath, Declaration, or Covenant was signed upon the commencement of the positions in council? These matter! ?- What jurisdiction is the office under? There are 3 possible Jurisdictions; 1) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution, with lawful de-jure status as a holder of the "PUBLIC TRUST", Trustee with Fiduciary control, and thus legal authority to the taxation of the men and women within a geographical area, and is one of "service" to the local needs; school, hospital, peace keeping, infrastructure, courts, et al. 2) Non-Governmental Office (NGO): a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, that provides "Service Contracts," and is known as a "Body Corporate" to "Incorporated Inhabitants." This jurisdiction requires Consent to Contract, is de-facto, un-lawful and as such has NO legal jurisdiction to taxation. The Executive Control and Authority comes from the corporation of the province wherein the office is located. The Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al are downloaded to the district and are corporate policies. 3) Public/Private/Partnerships (PPP) : an INTERNATIONAL ENTITY, receiving downloads from a "FOREIGN" Corporation; United Nations, WHO/World Health Organization, WEF/World Economic Forum et al. This is also a de-facto, un-lawful jurisdiction with NO legal grounds to the taxation of men and women, and also requires Consent to Contract. NOTE: In British Columbia, as an example, The BC Assessment Authority is a CROWN Corporation, created in 1974 by the Corporation of British Columbia Inc., "in order to earn profit for the Government of British Columbia Inc., without jurisdiction nor contracts with the men and women of BC. NOTE: There are 3 levels of lawful, de-jure governance; Local, Provincial and Federal - Each has their sphere of jurisdiction and geographical area - Each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers - NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview These 2 questions are the most important because the answer to them will establish the personal liability through the signature/autograph put upon the documents requiring a vote. Was there full comprehension of the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed when entering office as a Director? Was there time to peruse any documents requiring a vote? Most often these documents are many pages long and were made over many years, by legal firms and lawyers whose signatures are NOT contained therein. Whose is? Making that signature "personally" liable for the decisions made Was there full comprehension of the difference between the legal wording contained therein, and the knowledge of their meanings? Such as person, individual, constituent, citizen,et al. "Legalese" is a language unto itself and is the basis for most FRAUD, which in law vitiates everything. The men and women in our Regional District Office were empowered by the men and women, to operate under, and in a jurisdiction that is de-jure, lawful, and with a fiduciary trust, to serve the men and women of our geographical area and no other. To ensure that the needs of the local men, women, and their property were the priority and responsibility of the Regional District. So...What Office is held? Lawfully/de-jure or unlawfully and de-facto? We require an answer, on or before __________________ No answer will be considered a tacit agreement. The office of the Regional District is held by the trust of the members of our community, the neighbours and friends who voted for positions in an office to serve the community. That's why we require proof of what oath, declaration, or covenant was given. The men and women of __________________ _________________________________________________________ Notice of Demand and Trespass Proof of Jurisdiction and Contract Proof of Claim It has come to our attention, the concerned men and women, that our Educational Institutions, whose service to us is the education of our sons and daughters (hereafter named as our "property") has implemented the SOGI 123 Program without a consent to contract. HISTORY; this program began in 2007 through the ARC Foundation. A private foundation based in Vancouver, British Columbia Inc. Other corporations involved in the funding are; British Columbia Ministry of Education Inc.; British Columbia Teachers Federation Inc.; University of British Columbia Inc., and through private donations( gifts from registered charities also corporations), and the corporation of Canada Inc. Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Documents included herein: - Proof of the incorporation of Government of Canada Inc., Government of British Columbia Inc. - Copy of the "CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE", a 1942 court case, accepted worldwide because it's corporate, commerce law. Clearly stating the requirement of contracts Governments lose their sovereignty when they become corporations, thus no different than Canadian Tire using Canadian Tire money. - Copy of the definition of "GLOSSA", pertinent in this matter because it's a matter of concealment, meant to confuse using "text" to corrupt the real facts in order to gain tacit consent. There's no statute of limitation on fraud. - Our Mayoral, Councillor, and Regional Districts are also incorporated through the removal of many of the municipal powers in 2004 with the Local Government Act incorporated into the Community Charter, prior to this; the local mayor had full de-jure and lawful jurisdiction, in relation to our schools. - Copy of the definition of the All Capital Identity, created with the "Birth Certificate," a fiction, constructive fraud and conversion. - Copy of the 10 Points of Contract Law, made simple for comprehension on this matter. - Copy of the 12 Presumptions of Court. Included for the comprehension of status. Fundamentally, the fraud upon our property when born, vitiates any Board jurisdiction to the ownership of our property. We, the men and women who created them, own them. "He who creates owns!" A maxim in law Therefore, it is incumbent upon those who have positions on the Board to cease and desist the SOGI 123 Program which is an infringement upon the property known as our sons and daughters. Failure to do so as corporate entities, through Contract Law, we intend on exercising our jurisdiction, as is our right, to the fullest extent upon the men and women personally sitting on the Board. We strongly suggest a consultation with a lawyer, who by the way wrote this mess. "Praetextu legis injusta agens duplo puniendus" We the People DO NOT require legal Re-presentation in this matter because we're well aware of the 12 Presumptions of Court. I doubt any lawyer will be willing to assist the men and women on the Board, regardless of the facts, because through their: legalize they do deceive. Be it therefore noted, with the documents contained herein, that our claim of proof of contract and the jurisdictional fraud, put against us and our property is considered a trespass. It is the duty of men and women to discuss these delicate matters with our property within our own jurisdiction. We are not against the health and wellbeing of another's property, within their jurisdiction, rather not in the educational setting. We the People, regarding our property in the care of the educational system, again, reiterate, and declare that the burden of proof falls on the claimant. Consider the response with wisdom and discernment since we voted men and women into what we thought was a Educational Office not a Corporate Office. We require no more than 7 days for implementing the redressing of the trespass against our property, with the immediate removal of any and all literature, electronic or written, devices, toys (we use the word with baited breath) et al in relation to the SOGI 123 PROGRAM post haste. For it was through corporate policies, without contractual consent, that the trespass has been made against our property thus creating this claim against those men and women on the Board personally. Furthermore, do not be deceived into thinking that the registration of our property into the corporation rather than an educational institution voids any responsibility on the part of the men and women on the Board, as it was done in fraud. Again we'll state that fraud vitiates everything. In all fairness to the men and women on the Board, our neighbours, not the corporations involved, perhaps unaware of the situation mentioned above and the personal liability for this trespass, We the People will support the men and women in this matter of remedy, because we trusted that their service, while sitting on the Board, was to serve our property with a lawful education. No response will be considered a tacit agreement. Sincerely and without prejudice or malice We the People Autograph_______________________:________ __________________________________________________________ Statement of Claim Taxation Between the Corporation of ______________________________________ And the noted particulars on the documents included herein. The above corporation has not proved jurisdiction, consent to contract, nor provide proof of a contract to claim the monies expected in taxation, hence tacit agreement to this claim. Who claims this debt be true, who claims this debt to due? Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Three requirements were made in writing to the Corporations Finance Minister to provide said proof, and are included in this document. Furthermore, copies of the Clearfield Doctrine, EDGAR # for the Corporation involved, Regina-v-John Anthony Hill 12 May, 2011 at Southwark Crown Court, Case # T20107746, (the Queen declared, "Lawfully NOT valid Monarch, hence Charles the III too),and "Glossa," (see Black's Law) corrupts the essence of the text presented on your documents. This refusal of consent to contract extends from this day forward, as noted with receipt of this document, until such a date in the future when there is a de-jure government upon the landmass commonly known worldwide as Canada, British Columbia, et al. Autograph _________________________:___________________________ Dated this day _______________________________________________________ Proof of Claim Re: Property Tax; Contract and Proof of Consent to Contract Between the Corporation of ___________________________________________________ and _____________________________________________________________________________ Regarding the property registered as; ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ It is required and incumbent upon the Corporations Minister of Finance, to provide proof of jurisdiction as a corporation, to taxation without full disclosure of the facts, and consent to contract, as per contract law. See: The Clearfield Doctrine; Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 363 Syllabus CLEARFIELD TRUST CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES CERTIORARI to the CIRCUIT COURT of APPEALS for the THIRD CIRCUIT No. 490 Argued February 5, 1943 Decided March 1, 1943(and accepted worldwide when conducting commerce) Further to the above noted court case, this requirement will be expected within 7 days receipt of this claim for proof of the jurisdictional obligation by the corporation to taxation to the property noted herein. Who claims this debt be true, who claims this debt be due? Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Property Taxes have been paid previously without consent to contract, due to the fraud perpetrated without full disclosure of the fact that the corporation mentioned herein, was not a lawful government with the de-jure jurisdiction to taxation, thus Ultra-Vires. Rather, a corporation whose name included the words "government," which is fraud based on Black's Law Dictionary, any edition. No response will be confirmation of a tacit agreement to the above. Thanking you in advance, Autograph: _________________________:_____________________________ Dated this day: ______________________________________ ______________________________________________________ STATEMENT of CLAIM Date:_____________________ STATE of TITLE CERTIFICATE: Certificate number________________________________________ Land Title Office__________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ Title Number______________________________________________ Registered Owner__________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ Taxation Authority__________________________________________ Description of Land__________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ Charges, Liens and Interests_____________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ Proof of contract is required to provide evidence of any claim made upon the aforementioned property; taxation; land use; water use; structures and buildings above, on, or below the land; any and all animals thereon; any and all chattles upon said land; et al, provide proof of any contractual obligation having been made with respect to said land. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law, and thus consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. (See: Regina-v-John Anthony Hill 12 May, 2011 at Southwark Crown Court, Case # T20107746, in which the Queen was declared to be a "Lawfully NOT Valid Monarch." Hence, neither is Charles the III) (See: Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 363, Syllabus. Clearfield trust Co.et al. v. United States, Certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.No. 490. Argued February 5, 1943 Decided March 1, 1943 ; and accepted worldwide when conducting commerce) The requirement to provide Proof of Contract within this Statement of Claim, is expected within ____________days from receipt of the documentation herein. No response will be considered a tacit agreement to the above. Autograph_________________________:_______________________ :GLOSSA: ~ The 'Born-Date' Vs. the 'Registration-Date' Does your Birth Certificate identify YOU as TWO people, not one? (You is plural, one and another) Have you ever wondered why your SURNAME is written using the ALL UPPERCASE TEXT? Put simply, 'you' are using a ‘Legal’ name and this is fraud. See the ‘name’ is actually split up into separate entities – The Christian-name and The ‘Surname’. You register these names to the Crown Corporation LTD. as their Property by your Birth Certificate which is given a bond number. Your physical value is used as collateral for these bonds allowing the United Kingdom LTD. to take out loans from private Banks, such as 'Bank of England' and profit is made by way of legal fines (Acts & Statutes), bills and taxation. – Hence money is no longer backed by Gold or Silver, but by our physical value or man power. The UNITED KINGDOM LTD is a privately owned Corporation-ship. And corporations are considered ‘ships’ and they are governed under the law of the sea, known as Maritime Law. There is no real 'ship' but a 'document-vessel' – which in our case was our Birth Certificate Created by the Doctor when s/he ‘docked’ you. TAKE NOTICE Whenever you encounter the Legal Document (document-vessel) you will notice that your surname (or sometimes all of your names) will be written using the ALL UPPERCASE TEXT. This is no coincidence - the ALL UPPERCASE text is not defined or recognised in The Oxford Styles Manual, (the governing book of the English language) – meaning that although you may be able to read it as English, it is in fact, NOT English. The all CAPS or Gloss can be found within the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under 'foreign-languages', named 'Ancient-Latin' The main place this ALL UPPERCASE text is found to be defined as a language, is when American Sign Language (ASL), a signing language used for the deaf, is written. ASL can be defined in the book ‘The Chicago Manual of Style’ under the foreign-languages header: American Sign Language (ASL) compound signs, 10.152 and ‘glosses, 10.147’. Thus, defining this text as a foreign language Further going on to say that when written, it has no 1-to-1 correspondence with any other languages on the document. The all CAPS or Gloss is also found in the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under foreign-languages, 'Ancient-Latin', however as the all caps UK LTD is registered in [Washington D.C[, they seem to be using the 'Chicago Manual of Style' , not the Oxford. Putting two or more languages onto a legal document is known in law as a ‘Glossa’. Black's Law Dictionary defines: 'GLOSSA' - “It is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of the text”. Meaning that by using a Glossa in a document they are trying to conceal or confuse the real facts. f you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL if you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALLf you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL UPPER CASE. f you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL Soon you will realize that virtually all court orders, speeding tickets and most other legal documents actually make no sense whatsoever. They only make sense when we make the assumption that it is all plain English and we read it as one, once you take one away from the other – it renders the document useless. Seeing as the ‘government’ is simply a privately owned Corporation it can only impose fines and acts upon other corporations. And by tricking us to registering our names as a corporate entity and then tricking us into thinking these names are physically us, it manages to get us to represent the corporately registered name and therefore bear the burden of fines and policies. This is a crime known as “personage”. Hand in hand with “personage” comes a crime known as “barratry” which is knowingly bringing false claims into court- This is what police, politicians, judges are doing daily. The Birth-Certificate, Two-Names, Two-Dates and Two-Languages? Capitis Diminutio Maxima (Name in ALL CAPITALS) For the purposes of understanding one's legal or commercial status under the Admiralty system (the law system used in England, Canada and much of the US), it is necessary to examine the curious use of all CAPS -Capitis Diminutio Maxima- in legal and domestic income tax forms, credit cards & statements, loans, mortgages, speeding & parking tickets, car documents, road tax, court summons etc. While seemingly a trite concern, this apparently small detail has extremely deep significance for all of us! Gage Canadian Dictionary 1983 Sec. 4 defines Capitalize adj. as "To take advantage of - To use to ones own advantage." Blacks Law Dictionary – Revised 4th Edition 1968, provides a more comprehensive definition as follows … Capitis Diminutio (meaning the diminishing of status through the use of capitalization)- In Roman law. A diminishing or abridgment of personality; a loss or curtailment of a man's status or aggregate of leg al attributes and qualifications.

Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Brian Thiesen - MONEY TALKS: Part 1 - Smart Meter Fires https://rumble.com/v4csfol-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-1-smart-meter-fires.html Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 2 - Big Data, Big Power, Big Government https://rumble.com/v4csmd3-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-2-big-data-big-power-big-government.html Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 3 - Pensions, Power, Politics and Climate - https://rumble.com/v4cse96-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-3-pensions-power-politics-and-climate.html Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes If interested please copy and send in your letter for a response BC Minister of Finance PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't Victoria, BC V8W 9E2 From: January 8, 2024 To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy, Good day Minister, It has come to my attention that THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, CANADA REVENUE AGENCY, and the GOVERNMENT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA CANADA et al, are corporate entities. (see inclosed papers from Dun & Bradstreet) When I inquired in 2023 of the truth of this, to both BC MP Lorne Derksen and FED MP Todd Doherty, I received no response federally, MP Derksen told me he didn't know and to look into it myself, which I did. The government of BC is a registered corporation in Hong Kong! My requirement to you, Honourable Minister Conroy, comes because you should be able to provide the financial documents I seek based on your position in government. I have spent the past months, an arduous process indeed, looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes, which my family and I have always paid faithfully. However, understanding some corporate procedures,there's a requirement to documents of full disclosure, informed consent, and signed contracts with the entities involved in any contractual obligation. My aged mother said she's never signed a contract, nor have I. With your knowledge in the Finance Department, would you kindly forward by e-mail and in writing, the legislative documentation, document/s, contracts, requiring the payment of Property Taxes. I require this information to lawfully give my consent. Please respond by January 31,2024 to the above address/e-mail. Sincerely, ___________________________________________________________ PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't Victoria BC V8W 9E2 To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy Good day Minister, I am sending you a second letter. There is further documentation included; 1) Copy of the 1st letter dated, January 8, 2024, received January 10, 2024 and confirmed 2) Copy of who Dun & Bradstreet is 3) Copies showing proof that the Province of British Columbia, and the Government of Canada, are corporations 4) Copy of The Clearfield Doctrine, showing the illegality of taxation by corporations, and accepted worldwide 5) Copy of 10 simple truths of contract law Therefore, it is incumbent of you, with the title of Minister of Finance, to provide me with the proof of obligation to pay Property Tax. I am, and have been willing to pay property taxes, provided I am doing so lawfully and with full disclosure and consent. Please respond within 7 days both written and by e-mail to; Thank you. _________________________________________________________ Proof of Claim CRA or Canada! Letter of Claim to "CRA" and "ARO" https://www.aro.ca/en/ We do not recall, and our files do not indicate that we have any contractual obligation to "CRA" or "ARO". Therefore, you are demanded to validate your claim, pursuant to Laws of (province) and Canada and provide me with the following documents: 1. Certified copy of the contract giving rise to alleged debt claimed on your aforementioned letter. 2. Letter of commitment,signed by an officer of your company, attesting to the Lawfulness, legitimacy and accuracy of the Claims as well as your company's full compliance with all the laws,provincial and federal, govering your company's actions in relation to this matter. 3.Copy of contract between yor company and the entity you be acting on behalf of. 4. Collection Agency license number of your company ("CRA" and "ARO") 5.Collection Agent License number for person(s) contacting me on behalf of your company. 6. Since I presume that "CRA" authority devolves from the Income Tax Act and "ARO" receives its authority from some other law which would also in turn, receive its authority from, at least ultimately of you "CRA" and "ARO", proof that the Constitutional Act, 1982 has been properly proclaimed into law, which would involve proof that Section 59 of the Charter has been fulfilled. Proof of Claim CRA or Canada! video ok, from what you can find lawfully please provide a letter to give to a CA to ensure they are acting in good faith... Below is a template for a letter you can use to request verification of a debt from a Collection Agency (CA). This letter is designed to ensure that the CA is acting in good faith and to protect your rights. Please note that this is a general template and may need to be adjusted based on your specific circumstances and local laws. It's advisable to consult with a legal professional for personalized advice. [Your Full Name] [Your Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] [Date] [Collection Agency's Name] [Collection Agency's Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] Re: Request for Verification of Debt Dear [Collection Agency's Name], I am writing in response to your [call/letter/email] dated [Date of the CA's communication], regarding an alleged debt for [Name of the Original Creditor], account number [Account Number, if provided]. Under my rights as per the applicable provincial and federal laws, I am requesting a validation of this debt. Please provide the following documentation to verify the legitimacy of the alleged debt: Certified Copy of Original Contract: A certified copy of the original contract or agreement with [Original Creditor's Name] that gives rise to the alleged debt. Letter of Commitment: A letter signed by an officer of your agency, attesting to the lawfulness, legitimacy, and accuracy of the claim. This letter should also confirm your agency's compliance with all relevant laws governing debt collection activities. Proof of Authority to Collect: A copy of the contract or agreement between your agency and [Original Creditor's Name] that authorizes you to collect on this alleged debt. Detailed Statement of the Debt: A detailed statement of the amount being claimed, including an itemization of any additional charges or fees. Proof of Last Payment: If applicable, the date and amount of the last payment made on this account. Please note that until the requested documentation is provided, I consider this matter to be in dispute. Furthermore, I request that all communications regarding this alleged debt be made in writing and sent to the address noted above. In accordance with the law, I expect a response to this request within 30 days of the receipt of this letter. Failure to provide the requested documentation within this timeframe will be interpreted as an acknowledgment that the debt is unverified and must be removed from my credit report, and that any further collection attempts are ceased. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response. Sincerely, [Your Name] Remember, this letter is a request for information and does not acknowledge the debt as yours. It's important to send this letter via registered mail or a method that provides proof of delivery. Keep a copy of the letter and any correspondence you receive in response for your records. In the letter template I provided, I adhered closely to the key elements you mentioned in your original text. However, I did include a few additional standard requests commonly used in debt verification letters for completeness and clarity: Detailed Statement of the Debt: This includes an itemization of any additional charges or fees. This detail is often important to fully understand the breakdown of the claimed debt. Proof of Last Payment: If there were any payments made on the account, this information helps establish the history of the debt. Method of Communication: I included a request that all communications be made in writing. This is a common practice to ensure there's a clear record of all interactions. Timeframe for Response: I specified a 30-day period for the CA to respond, which is a standard timeframe in many jurisdictions for debt verification requests. These additions are meant to provide a more comprehensive framework for the verification of the debt and to protect your rights in the process. However, if you prefer to stick strictly to the points mentioned in your original text, you can modify the template accordingly. Remember, it's always advisable to tailor any legal document to your specific situation and to consult with a legal professional if you have any doubts or questions. ______________________________________________________ 10 POINTS of CONTRACT LAW POWER of CHOICE / "FREE WILL to CONTRACT" 1) More than 1 party is needed to contract 2) AGREEMENT = OFFER & ACCEPTANCE - OFFER is the "presentment", therefore, without acceptance, there can be NO contract. - ACCEPTANCE is taken as "TACIT" ( applied though not expressed) if NO has not been verbally said. * A presentment can be accepted as noted : "with conditional acceptance" 3) There MUST be an INTENTION to CREATE a "Legal Relationship", ie: AGREE to the consiquences of breaking the contract 4) LAWFUL "CONSIDERATION" Both or all parties have to give something of value to be considered a contract * Consideration has to be agreed to by ALL parties to be LEGAL #1 POINT / Mortgages... Bank Accounts...Credit Cards When you got your Mortgage...WHAT did the bank put up as "Lawful Consideration" FULL DISCLOSURE MUST be given to be LAWFUL 5) CAPACITY to contract requires that Full Disclosure be given and "understood/comprehended" in full to be Lawful... NO minor,drunkard,lunatic, or other mental incapicity can be present to be a Lawful Contract 6) FREE CONSENT : ..............FRAUD........... NO force, trickery, undue influence, misrepresentation, coercion can take place. * ANY mistake therein, VOIDS the contract between TRUSTEE/BENEFICIARY 7) LAWFUL OBJECT : "anything" illegal or harmful to either party, made, or in part of the contract, VOIDS the contract 8) CERTAINTY of MEANING or FULL DISCLOSURE: *** Almost ALL contracts are VOID because the parties that signed have NOT, with certainty, "understood or comprehended" the LEGAL meaning of the "CONTRACTED WORDS", ie: person, individual, citizen, etc. and therefore, as undefined = FRAUD!............ man, woman, is WHO you are, ALL other words or terms used to contract are LEGAL terms for FICTION! 9) SIGNATURE and AUTOGRAPH : Signature = FICTION / Corporate Identity, LGBTQS2+ et al Autograph = "LIVING", man or woman...period! *** if you as a man or woman sign a contract there is NO CONTRACT because... there CANNOT be a contract wherein one side is "living" and the other is a "fictional" identity 10) YOU must have CERTAINTY : of the TERMS and PRIVACY to CONTRACT BOTH have to APPROVE! VOID if broken and must be re-done. (Example the BNA Act of 1867, the contract died when Queen Victoria died in 1901...similar to a Power of Attorney document, VOID when there's the death. Queen Victoria took OUT her Heirs) Darcy Martans made a Flyer to motivate more of her town and local area for meetings. Darcy added her email and phone contact info attached is word document of flyer - please change the contact info to you or your local group email - also emailed out was phase 1 and phase 2 pdf files - please forward these out to your family and friends Thank you “CANADIAN’S do NOT have An ABSOLUTE RIGHT to PRIVATE PROPERTY” Federal Justice Minister, David Lametti Spring 2022 "YOU WILL OWN NOTHING AND BE HAPPY" AGENDA 2030 WEF/ World Economic Forum Founder Klaus Schwab LEARN HOW TO END THE FRAUD CONTACT: ConstitutionalConventions.ca info@constitutionalconventions.ca Darcy Martans - with important inforamation (Share) Deputation Hamilton ON, Erin Gomaz, November 6 2023 Deputation to Huntsvillle, January 29 2024 Peggy Pederson Shelagh McFarlane Lawful Affirmation and Declaration of Dominion (use this document to collect autographs of support).

I met with my Calgary doctor friend again to discuss this issue that he has been working on for 25 years. Fluoride. Dr. Bob used to be a proponent for the fluoride in the water until a colleague of his, had him look at a study back in 1998. I joke that after he realized his mistake, he was like an ex-smoker. Tenacious! He has been trying to expose the lies for 25 years! They were successful in turning off the taps on fluoride, in Calgary in 1999. The "fluoridians" fought back and in 2021, they won a plebiscite to put fluoride back into Calgary water. The costs to bring back neurotoxins is starting at about $28 million dollars. To this Calgarian, I believe that the cost is too high for adding this known toxin to all the water of 1.3 million people. Dr. Bob and discuss the dumbing down and damaging effects this will have on generations of children for tiny benefits. Get involved. Do your research. Please share this podcast. FOUNDER Safe Water Calgary www.safewatercalgary.com CHAIR, Fluoride Free Canada www.fluoridefreecanada.ca Board, ABC (Associacion Buen Commune, parent organization for Project Ixcanaan) www.ixcanaan.com https://rumble.com/v4g326k-fluoride-out-dr.-bob-dickson.html?fbclid=IwAR0KSxJe2KzpTqLBe2f0_lFlpNU7EFLk9V6R_s3dd7BFJCys-swDadgjEMM

Emergency Meeting Our Property, farms and livelihoods are at risk. By the People for the People Regarding proposed land bylaws WEDNESDAY FEBRUARY 28th @ 7pm at Barrhead Legion 5026 - 51st Street Barrhead AB Suggested donation of 2 dollars is requested for the hall rental Our Freedoms, farms and livelihoods are at risk. Proposed Bylaws include: Farm animal restrictions per acre Pet restrictions per acre Soil usage Guest Restrictions per property Heavy equipment restrictions Building / Sea-can restrictions per proerty AND MANY, MANY More PROOF OF CLAIM Rights Doc. 4 WE are all born with free will and unalienable rights. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law’ Consent makes the contract Adhesion contracts are not contracts because there was no consent, they are considered as gifts. We do not require any corporate created rights, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedom provided by the Government of Canada Corporation and/or ICCPR provided by the United Nations Corporation. If anyone claims to have jurisdiction over you and/or requests payment requests a copy of the contract. Government Corporations Government Services Corporations doing business as Government of Canada and/or the government of any provinces can only create rules (statutes) that only apply to their employees, franchisees, officers and dependents. Their rules (statutes) do not apply to the people in general. That is why the rules they create (statutes) are referred to as “public policy”. We do not require any corporate created rights, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedom provided by the Government of Canada Corporation and/or ICCPR provided by the United Nations Corporation. Women and men living in Canada are not subject to any Public Policies, mandates, or acts of legislation promoted by any commercial or municipal corporation for its officers and employees. We should not vote in private corporate shareholder elections sponsored by Canada Inc., Province of _____ Inc., or any other foreign corporation. All Acts, Bills and statutes created by the Government of Canada and/or any of the provincial governments only apply to “person”. The definition of person in Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition on page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being ( i.e. natural person ) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. In other words if I say the basket includes apples and oranges you will not find any other type of fruit in the basket. As plainly stated in Black’s Law dictionary, anything that applies to person only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Does not apply to men or women! The Government of Canada and Government of all provinces are Crown for profit Corporations. The Prime Minister and/or the Premiers receive their orders from the shareholders of the Crown Corporation. They are the C.E.O.s/officers of the Crown Corporations. They carry out the orders that are relayed to them by the Governor General and/or the Lieutenant Governor. They (politicians) are in place to take the blame for the harm that is done to the people. They are replaced every four years with someone who claims that he/she are going to right the wrongs that were created, but nothing changes they carry out the orders provided by the shareholders as the previous C.E.O.s. Four years later they are blamed and replaced. PERSONS All Acts, Bills and statutes created by the Government of Canada and/or any of the provincial governments only apply to “person”. The definition of person in Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition on page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person ) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. In other words if I say the basket includes apples and oranges you will not find any other type of fruit in the basket. As plainly stated in Black’s Law dictionary, anything that applies to person only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Does not apply to men or women _________________________________________________________ Name written in all capital letters The governing book of the English language is “The Oxford Styles Manual” which sometimes refers to “The Chicago Manual of Style” also The Oxford Manual of Style. All Uppercase text, all caps, or gloss is listed in the styles manuals under “foreign - language” , named ”Ancient-Latin” or Dog Latin. All Caps are not defined or recognised in meaning. All Caps is not English although you may think you are able to read it as English it is in fact, a calculated deception to be read separated from the rest of the “Document”. All Uppercase text has no lawful grammatical jurisdiction with common English and is a foreign language, headed under “Ancient-Latin”. (The Chicago Manual of Style, 16th Edition, 11:144-47). Glossa is two or more languages on a legal document. Glossa is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of a text( Black’s Law Dictionary page 621 5th Edition) “Glossa” is also used to conceal or confuse the real facts in order to confuse, in order to gain tacit consent. A name written in all capital letters is written in dog latin or is known as systemic text “a thing” created by the employees of the crown corporation, Therefore the Crown Corporation owns the creation. If you claim that the name written in all capital letters is you. You are admitting you are the property of the Crown Corporation (a slave). Cestui Que Vie Trust 's beneficiary is the name in all capital letters which is the property of the Crown Corporation, it is not you. All governments (corporations) and businesses such as banks and others that write your name in all capital letters are committing constructive fraud and conversion. (Engaged in criminal activity) ___________________________________________________ City, Municipality, Village et al Address Date TO: Mayor, CAO, CEO, Councillors et al FROM: The men and women living therein, The enclosed documentation: 1) Proof of Incorporation of the following entities; from Dunn & Bradstreet or EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Note: the following are government services corporations’ (dba( "doing business as,") Government of Canada, EDGAR (CIK 0000230098) ; Government of British Columbia, EDGAR (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306) ; Government of Alberta, EDGAR (CIK 0000810961) ; Government of Saskatchewan, EDGAR (CIK 0000203098) ; Government of Manitoba, EDGAR (CIK 0000826926) ; Ontario, EDGAR (CIK 0000074615) ; Quebec, EDGAR (0000722803) ; Province of New Brunswick, EDGAR (CIK 0000862406) ; Province of Nova Scotia, EDGAR (CIK 0000842639) 2) Copy of the Clearfield Doctrine; showing that corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to taxation or law enforcement et al, without a consent to contract which is corporate policy when doing commerce. * Seek legal clarification and written proof to the contrary. This letter comes with the enclosed documents to ascertain the jurisdiction within our council, in which official positions are being held . Depending on the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed upon entering office, the positions may be operating under the "Color of Law," in a De-Facto, Un-lawful and thus ultra vires standing. This holds personal liability for anything signed on behalf of the people. There are 3 possible jurisdictions: A) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution with full legal authority and jurisdiction to taxation, schools, infrastructure, peace keeping, hospital, courts, et al. as services, and needs of the local men and women therein. B) Having as the "Trustee" full fiduciary control of the "Trusts" set up to care for the local needs. De-jure/ lawful B) Non-Governmental Office, (NGO): a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, without the legal authority or jurisdiction to taxation. This entity provides "Service Contracts," which requires contracts and consent to contract by those involved in the services. It's known as "Body Corporate," and serves "Incorporated Inhabitants." Did the men and women give consent to be incorporated? That's called FRAUD. Who is the "Head of Council" or "Global Mayor?" (“A created fiction” The Executive Control and Authority comes from the Corporation of the Province wherein we reside, and to which your office would receive the Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al directly, through downloads from the corporation and are corporate policies not district policies. De-facto/ un-lawful/FRAUD C) Public/Private/Partnerships, (PPP): an International Entity one which downloads "FOREIGN," Corporate policies, UN/United Nations, WEF/ World Economic Forum, WHO/ World Health Organization et al. In this position there is also no legal authority or jurisdiction to taxation. Consent to contract is a legal requirement to contract with the men and women. Did the men and women consent to Foreign Corporate Policies and occupation in the community without knowledge or consent? Are the United Nations Sustainable Goals/SDG's, Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 policies being implemented? Who has fiduciary control over the local Trusts as their Trustee? Who is the "Head of Council," and "Council of the Whole." “A fiction” De-Facto, un-lawful/FRAUD These are jurisdictional questions that are important to ascertain because through the stroke of a pen, a man or woman is being put into extreme personal liability for the agreements and infrastructures signed on to. Furthermore, there are 3 levels of Lawful/de-jure/jurisdictions LOCAL, PROVINCIAL, and FEDERAL - Each has their sphere of lawful jurisdiction and geographical area - Each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers - NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview We the people have come to ascertain for ourselves the jurisdiction WE are in because the last few years have shown us that something has gone horribly awry at the local level. We the people voted for positions of service to the local jurisdiction. Was there comprehension of the meaning of the oath, declaration or covenant sworn, upon taking office? Was time given to properly peruse any documents to sign and vote on? Many of these documents were written over many years, by legal firms and lawyers, whose signatures are not within the documents...whose are! They contain legalise, a language unto itself, and is the basis for how most FRAUD has occurred. Words like person, individual, inhabitant, resident, citizen, et al have a completely different meaning in these documents. FRAUD vitiates everything. We the people intend on restoring Peace, Order, and Lawful Governance should our suspicions prove correct. We require a response by ________________________________ and expect such from our elected officials. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law, and thus consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls upon the claimant. No response is considered tacit agreement. ______________________________________________________ Regional District of Address Date TO: Board Chair, CAO, CEO, Directors et al FROM: The enclosed documentation: 1) Proof of the Incorporation of the following entities, NOTE: government services corporations (dba:"doing business as,") EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; Government of Canada, (CIK 0000230098) Government of British Columbia, (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306) Government of Alberta, (CIK 0000810961) Government of Saskatchewan, (CIK 0000203098) Government of Manitoba, (CIK 0000826926) Ontario, (CIK 0000074615) Quebec, (CIK 0000722803) Province of New Brunswick, (CIK 0000862406) Province of Nova Scotia, (CIK 0000842639) 2) Copy of The CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE; showing that Corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to Taxation or Law Enforcement et al without consent to contract by those involved in the transaction. Personal liability is then enforceable upon those acting illegally. The enclosed documents show that the Regional District through its Incorporation may be operating under the "Color of Law" and as such is de-facto, un-lawful, and ultra-vires. This information is not hear-say nor opinion, rather they state the facts of the matter, which are; ?- What Oath, Declaration, or Covenant was signed upon the commencement of the positions in council? These matter! ?- What jurisdiction is the office under? There are 3 possible Jurisdictions; 1) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution, with lawful de-jure status as a holder of the "PUBLIC TRUST", Trustee with Fiduciary control, and thus legal authority to the taxation of the men and women within a geographical area, and is one of "service" to the local needs; school, hospital, peace keeping, infrastructure, courts, et al. 2) Non-Governmental Office (NGO): a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, that provides "Service Contracts," and is known as a "Body Corporate" to "Incorporated Inhabitants." This jurisdiction requires Consent to Contract, is de-facto, un-lawful and as such has NO legal jurisdiction to taxation. The Executive Control and Authority comes from the corporation of the province wherein the office is located. The Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al are downloaded to the district and are corporate policies. 3) Public/Private/Partnerships (PPP) : an INTERNATIONAL ENTITY, receiving downloads from a "FOREIGN" Corporation; United Nations, WHO/World Health Organization, WEF/World Economic Forum et al. This is also a de-facto, un-lawful jurisdiction with NO legal grounds to the taxation of men and women, and also requires Consent to Contract. NOTE: In British Columbia, as an example, The BC Assessment Authority is a CROWN Corporation, created in 1974 by the Corporation of British Columbia Inc., "in order to earn profit for the Government of British Columbia Inc., without jurisdiction nor contracts with the men and women of BC. NOTE: There are 3 levels of lawful, de-jure governance; Local, Provincial and Federal - Each has their sphere of jurisdiction and geographical area - Each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers - NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview These 2 questions are the most important because the answer to them will establish the personal liability through the signature/autograph put upon the documents requiring a vote. Was there full comprehension of the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed when entering office as a Director? Was there time to peruse any documents requiring a vote? Most often these documents are many pages long and were made over many years, by legal firms and lawyers whose signatures are NOT contained therein. Whose is? Making that signature "personally" liable for the decisions made Was there full comprehension of the difference between the legal wording contained therein, and the knowledge of their meanings? Such as person, individual, constituent, citizen,et al. "Legalese" is a language unto itself and is the basis for most FRAUD, which in law vitiates everything. The men and women in our Regional District Office were empowered by the men and women, to operate under, and in a jurisdiction that is de-jure, lawful, and with a fiduciary trust, to serve the men and women of our geographical area and no other. To ensure that the needs of the local men, women, and their property were the priority and responsibility of the Regional District. So...What Office is held? Lawfully/de-jure or unlawfully and de-facto? We require an answer, on or before __________________ No answer will be considered a tacit agreement. The office of the Regional District is held by the trust of the members of our community, the neighbours and friends who voted for positions in an office to serve the community. That's why we require proof of what oath, declaration, or covenant was given. The men and women of __________________ _________________________________________________________ Notice of Demand and Trespass Proof of Jurisdiction and Contract Proof of Claim It has come to our attention, the concerned men and women, that our Educational Institutions, whose service to us is the education of our sons and daughters (hereafter named as our "property") has implemented the SOGI 123 Program without a consent to contract. HISTORY; this program began in 2007 through the ARC Foundation. A private foundation based in Vancouver, British Columbia Inc. Other corporations involved in the funding are; British Columbia Ministry of Education Inc.; British Columbia Teachers Federation Inc.; University of British Columbia Inc., and through private donations( gifts from registered charities also corporations), and the corporation of Canada Inc. Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Documents included herein: - Proof of the incorporation of Government of Canada Inc., Government of British Columbia Inc. - Copy of the "CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE", a 1942 court case, accepted worldwide because it's corporate, commerce law. Clearly stating the requirement of contracts Governments lose their sovereignty when they become corporations, thus no different than Canadian Tire using Canadian Tire money. - Copy of the definition of "GLOSSA", pertinent in this matter because it's a matter of concealment, meant to confuse using "text" to corrupt the real facts in order to gain tacit consent. There's no statute of limitation on fraud. - Our Mayoral, Councillor, and Regional Districts are also incorporated through the removal of many of the municipal powers in 2004 with the Local Government Act incorporated into the Community Charter, prior to this; the local mayor had full de-jure and lawful jurisdiction, in relation to our schools. - Copy of the definition of the All Capital Identity, created with the "Birth Certificate," a fiction, constructive fraud and conversion. - Copy of the 10 Points of Contract Law, made simple for comprehension on this matter. - Copy of the 12 Presumptions of Court. Included for the comprehension of status. Fundamentally, the fraud upon our property when born, vitiates any Board jurisdiction to the ownership of our property. We, the men and women who created them, own them. "He who creates owns!" A maxim in law Therefore, it is incumbent upon those who have positions on the Board to cease and desist the SOGI 123 Program which is an infringement upon the property known as our sons and daughters. Failure to do so as corporate entities, through Contract Law, we intend on exercising our jurisdiction, as is our right, to the fullest extent upon the men and women personally sitting on the Board. We strongly suggest a consultation with a lawyer, who by the way wrote this mess. "Praetextu legis injusta agens duplo puniendus" We the People DO NOT require legal Re-presentation in this matter because we're well aware of the 12 Presumptions of Court. I doubt any lawyer will be willing to assist the men and women on the Board, regardless of the facts, because through their: legalize they do deceive. Be it therefore noted, with the documents contained herein, that our claim of proof of contract and the jurisdictional fraud, put against us and our property is considered a trespass. It is the duty of men and women to discuss these delicate matters with our property within our own jurisdiction. We are not against the health and wellbeing of another's property, within their jurisdiction, rather not in the educational setting. We the People, regarding our property in the care of the educational system, again, reiterate, and declare that the burden of proof falls on the claimant. Consider the response with wisdom and discernment since we voted men and women into what we thought was a Educational Office not a Corporate Office. We require no more than 7 days for implementing the redressing of the trespass against our property, with the immediate removal of any and all literature, electronic or written, devices, toys (we use the word with baited breath) et al in relation to the SOGI 123 PROGRAM post haste. For it was through corporate policies, without contractual consent, that the trespass has been made against our property thus creating this claim against those men and women on the Board personally. Furthermore, do not be deceived into thinking that the registration of our property into the corporation rather than an educational institution voids any responsibility on the part of the men and women on the Board, as it was done in fraud. Again we'll state that fraud vitiates everything. In all fairness to the men and women on the Board, our neighbours, not the corporations involved, perhaps unaware of the situation mentioned above and the personal liability for this trespass, We the People will support the men and women in this matter of remedy, because we trusted that their service, while sitting on the Board, was to serve our property with a lawful education. No response will be considered a tacit agreement. Sincerely and without prejudice or malice We the People Autograph_______________________:________ __________________________________________________________ Statement of Claim Taxation Between the Corporation of ______________________________________ And the noted particulars on the documents included herein. The above corporation has not proved jurisdiction, consent to contract, nor provide proof of a contract to claim the monies expected in taxation, hence tacit agreement to this claim. Who claims this debt be true, who claims this debt to due? Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Three requirements were made in writing to the Corporations Finance Minister to provide said proof, and are included in this document. Furthermore, copies of the Clearfield Doctrine, EDGAR # for the Corporation involved, Regina-v-John Anthony Hill 12 May, 2011 at Southwark Crown Court, Case # T20107746, (the Queen declared, "Lawfully NOT valid Monarch, hence Charles the III too),and "Glossa," (see Black's Law) corrupts the essence of the text presented on your documents. This refusal of consent to contract extends from this day forward, as noted with receipt of this document, until such a date in the future when there is a de-jure government upon the landmass commonly known worldwide as Canada, British Columbia, et al. Autograph _________________________:___________________________ Dated this day _______________________________________________________ Proof of Claim Re: Property Tax; Contract and Proof of Consent to Contract Between the Corporation of ___________________________________________________ and _____________________________________________________________________________ Regarding the property registered as; ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ It is required and incumbent upon the Corporations Minister of Finance, to provide proof of jurisdiction as a corporation, to taxation without full disclosure of the facts, and consent to contract, as per contract law. See: The Clearfield Doctrine; Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 363 Syllabus CLEARFIELD TRUST CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES CERTIORARI to the CIRCUIT COURT of APPEALS for the THIRD CIRCUIT No. 490 Argued February 5, 1943 Decided March 1, 1943(and accepted worldwide when conducting commerce) Further to the above noted court case, this requirement will be expected within 7 days receipt of this claim for proof of the jurisdictional obligation by the corporation to taxation to the property noted herein. Who claims this debt be true, who claims this debt be due? Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Property Taxes have been paid previously without consent to contract, due to the fraud perpetrated without full disclosure of the fact that the corporation mentioned herein, was not a lawful government with the de-jure jurisdiction to taxation, thus Ultra-Vires. Rather, a corporation whose name included the words "government," which is fraud based on Black's Law Dictionary, any edition. No response will be confirmation of a tacit agreement to the above. Thanking you in advance, Autograph: _________________________:_____________________________ Dated this day: ______________________________________ ______________________________________________________ STATEMENT of CLAIM Date:_____________________ STATE of TITLE CERTIFICATE: Certificate number________________________________________ Land Title Office__________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ Title Number______________________________________________ Registered Owner__________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ Taxation Authority__________________________________________ Description of Land__________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ Charges, Liens and Interests_____________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ Proof of contract is required to provide evidence of any claim made upon the aforementioned property; taxation; land use; water use; structures and buildings above, on, or below the land; any and all animals thereon; any and all chattles upon said land; et al, provide proof of any contractual obligation having been made with respect to said land. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law, and thus consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. (See: Regina-v-John Anthony Hill 12 May, 2011 at Southwark Crown Court, Case # T20107746, in which the Queen was declared to be a "Lawfully NOT Valid Monarch." Hence, neither is Charles the III) (See: Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 363, Syllabus. Clearfield trust Co.et al. v. United States, Certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.No. 490. Argued February 5, 1943 Decided March 1, 1943 ; and accepted worldwide when conducting commerce) The requirement to provide Proof of Contract within this Statement of Claim, is expected within ____________days from receipt of the documentation herein. No response will be considered a tacit agreement to the above. Autograph_________________________:_______________________ :GLOSSA: ~ The 'Born-Date' Vs. the 'Registration-Date' Does your Birth Certificate identify YOU as TWO people, not one? (You is plural, one and another) Have you ever wondered why your SURNAME is written using the ALL UPPERCASE TEXT? Put simply, 'you' are using a ‘Legal’ name and this is fraud. See the ‘name’ is actually split up into separate entities – The Christian-name and The ‘Surname’. You register these names to the Crown Corporation LTD. as their Property by your Birth Certificate which is given a bond number. Your physical value is used as collateral for these bonds allowing the United Kingdom LTD. to take out loans from private Banks, such as 'Bank of England' and profit is made by way of legal fines (Acts & Statutes), bills and taxation. – Hence money is no longer backed by Gold or Silver, but by our physical value or man power. The UNITED KINGDOM LTD is a privately owned Corporation-ship. And corporations are considered ‘ships’ and they are governed under the law of the sea, known as Maritime Law. There is no real 'ship' but a 'document-vessel' – which in our case was our Birth Certificate Created by the Doctor when s/he ‘docked’ you. TAKE NOTICE Whenever you encounter the Legal Document (document-vessel) you will notice that your surname (or sometimes all of your names) will be written using the ALL UPPERCASE TEXT. This is no coincidence - the ALL UPPERCASE text is not defined or recognised in The Oxford Styles Manual, (the governing book of the English language) – meaning that although you may be able to read it as English, it is in fact, NOT English. The all CAPS or Gloss can be found within the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under 'foreign-languages', named 'Ancient-Latin' The main place this ALL UPPERCASE text is found to be defined as a language, is when American Sign Language (ASL), a signing language used for the deaf, is written. ASL can be defined in the book ‘The Chicago Manual of Style’ under the foreign-languages header: American Sign Language (ASL) compound signs, 10.152 and ‘glosses, 10.147’. Thus, defining this text as a foreign language Further going on to say that when written, it has no 1-to-1 correspondence with any other languages on the document. The all CAPS or Gloss is also found in the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under foreign-languages, 'Ancient-Latin', however as the all caps UK LTD is registered in [Washington D.C[, they seem to be using the 'Chicago Manual of Style' , not the Oxford. Putting two or more languages onto a legal document is known in law as a ‘Glossa’. Black's Law Dictionary defines: 'GLOSSA' - “It is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of the text”. Meaning that by using a Glossa in a document they are trying to conceal or confuse the real facts. f you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL if you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALLf you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL UPPER CASE. f you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL Soon you will realize that virtually all court orders, speeding tickets and most other legal documents actually make no sense whatsoever. They only make sense when we make the assumption that it is all plain English and we read it as one, once you take one away from the other – it renders the document useless. Seeing as the ‘government’ is simply a privately owned Corporation it can only impose fines and acts upon other corporations. And by tricking us to registering our names as a corporate entity and then tricking us into thinking these names are physically us, it manages to get us to represent the corporately registered name and therefore bear the burden of fines and policies. This is a crime known as “personage”. Hand in hand with “personage” comes a crime known as “barratry” which is knowingly bringing false claims into court- This is what police, politicians, judges are doing daily. The Birth-Certificate, Two-Names, Two-Dates and Two-Languages? Capitis Diminutio Maxima (Name in ALL CAPITALS) For the purposes of understanding one's legal or commercial status under the Admiralty system (the law system used in England, Canada and much of the US), it is necessary to examine the curious use of all CAPS -Capitis Diminutio Maxima- in legal and domestic income tax forms, credit cards & statements, loans, mortgages, speeding & parking tickets, car documents, road tax, court summons etc. While seemingly a trite concern, this apparently small detail has extremely deep significance for all of us! Gage Canadian Dictionary 1983 Sec. 4 defines Capitalize adj. as "To take advantage of - To use to ones own advantage." Blacks Law Dictionary – Revised 4th Edition 1968, provides a more comprehensive definition as follows … Capitis Diminutio (meaning the diminishing of status through the use of capitalization)- In Roman law. A diminishing or abridgment of personality; a loss or curtailment of a man's status or aggregate of leg al attributes and qualifications.

In 1914, two brothers enlist in the war and find themselves in the bloodiest battlefields. Their spirit is tested, both in the trenches and at home.

Steve Lesperance Kawartha Freedom Group /KLTPA Weekly Meeting @everyone What a lively evening we had last night! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdNJSOIhOew WE HAD A SURPRISE GUEST, DALLAS & PISSED OF GRAMA THEY CAME WITH GREAT INSIGHTFUL ROLL OUTS FROM THESE TROUBLING TIMES. Don't miss a beat!Please share and subscribe, and come out to our text meeting... every Mondays at 7pm! ~~~~~~~~~~~ Get support by setting up a Chapter in your area email us SueThem@OTPA.ca ~~~~~~~~~~~ Email us your Stories to SueThem@KLTPA.ca Let us know if you would like: EMAIL your story and we will read them out LIVE in our studio broadcast ZOOM from your location ~~~~~~~~~~~ WHY: We share knowledge and wisdom about how to navigate current times and make life better for our families. We watch out for each other and our neighbours. HOW: We arrange for speakers to bring us up to speed on latest news, in areas such as health, politics, the economy and also you who have experience with Kawartha Lakes, good or bad. CONTACT US: if you would like to be a guest speaker or share your your experience with Kawartha Lakes, good or bad. ~~~~~~~~~~~ www.facebook.com/groups/kawarthafreedomgroup www.facebook.com/groups/kltpa info@KawarthaFreedomGroup.ca SueThem@KLTPA.ca ~~~~~~~~~~~ LOCATION: WILLY'S MAN CAVE (look for Teepees) 3900 Hwy 35 North, Cameron ON Every Monday: Doors open at 6:30, meeting starts at 7pm ZOOM MEETING INFO: us02web.zoom.us/j/9259008609?pwd=WUFXQnVSZUtrMkxrRWVQWUlRS05JZz09 Meeting ID: 925 900 8609 Passcode: 547803 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdNJSOIhOew

trategic Plan or Vision Statement? jumpinkawarthalakes.ca/strategicplan2024 Special Council Meeting (Strategic Plan) - February 15, 2024 • Special Council Meeting (Strategic Pl... ~~~~~~~~ Weldon Hachey - aka Barrie Thong Man / weldon.hachey ~~~~~~~~ CALLING ALL TROOPS WHO: Mayor Doug Elmslie, Council & all individuals of City of Kawartha Lakes. WHAT: Strategic Plan Public Meeting WHERE: Council Chambers, City Hall, 26 Francis Street Lindsay WHEN: Thursday, Feb 15 2024 7:00 pm WHY: To let City Council know that we’re on guard and demand our needs be put first. HOW: The session will begin with staff providing a brief overview of the draft Strategic Plan, followed by time for deputations and correspondence from Committees and the public. ~~~~~~~~ KAWARTHA FREEDOM GROUP WHAT: A group of informed concerned caring accountable individuals who are aware of the times WHERE: Willy's Man Cave (look for Teepees) 3900 Hwy 35 North, Cameron ON WHEN: Mondays 7-9pm, Doors open at 6:30pm WHY: We share knowledge and wisdom about how to navigate current times and make life better for our families. We watch out for each other and our neighbours. HOW: We arrange for speakers to bring us up to speed on latest news, in areas such as health, politics, and the economy, hosting live and on Zoom. ~~~~~~~~~~~ ZOOM MEETING INFO: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/9259008609... Meeting ID: 925 900 8609 Passcode: 547803 ~~~~~~~~~~~ www.facebook.com/groups/kawarthafreedomgroup info@KawarthaFreedomGroup.ca freecanadarightnow@gmail.com

While you were earning an honest days wage, at 1:30 pm today, it looks to be an estimated added bill of $5,000,000 & 10,000,000 will be put on the people of the Kawartha lakes! ... looks like your taxes will be going way up! Is this a Pearson Subdivision Scandal? Are the people of Kawartha Lakes on the hook for paying for the storm drains in the Pierson subdividing, instead of the developer? Perhaps this saying makes sense now... "absolutely power, corrupts absolutely" ... will they make it good? You the people, need to be on watch! ~~~ Deputation ~~~ Report ENG2023-032, Assuption of Pearson Farms Subdicision, Phase 4B, Lindsay, being item 10.3.4 on the Agenda ~~~~~~~~ DEPUTATION: Chief William Denby / kltpa / william.denby.182 ~~~~~~~~ CALLING ALL TROOPS WHO: Mayor Doug Elmslie, Council & all individuals of City of Kawartha Lakes. WHAT: Strategic Plan Public Meeting WHERE: Council Chambers, City Hall, 26 Francis Street Lindsay WHEN: Thursday, Feb 15 2024 7:00 pm WHY: To let City Council know that we’re on guard and demand our needs be put first. HOW: The session will begin with staff providing a brief overview of the draft Strategic Plan, followed by time for deputations and correspondence from Committees and the public. ~~~~~~~~ KAWARTHA FREEDOM GROUP WHAT: A group of informed concerned caring accountable individuals who are aware of the times WHERE: Willy's Man Cave (look for Teepees) 3900 Hwy 35 North, Cameron ON WHEN: Mondays 7-9pm, Doors open at 6:30pm WHY: We share knowledge and wisdom about how to navigate current times and make life better for our families. We watch out for each other and our neighbours. HOW: We arrange for speakers to bring us up to speed on latest news, in areas such as health, politics, and the economy, hosting live and on Zoom. ~~~~~~~~~~~ ZOOM MEETING INFO: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/9259008609... Meeting ID: 925 900 8609 Passcode: 547803 ~~~~~~~~~~~ www.facebook.com/groups/kawarthafreedomgroup info@KawarthaFreedomGroup.ca freecanadarightnow@gmail.com

The Sale of the Corporation of Canada - Shelley Ann Clark is a riveting account of what took place behind the scenes at the Canadian Free Trade Negotiations Office. Shrouded in a veil of secrecy, clandestine meetings, and midnight shredding of briefing books and key working papers, there was still time for the creation of a “SEX PIT”. The man who was parachuted in by former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney to do the deed was a sexual predator. His need for sex led to carelessness and bad judgment that almost destroyed the Prime Minister’s plan to leave a legacy that he was the one who had achieved a Free Trade Agreement with one of the world’s most powerful countries, the United States of America, where everyone else had failed. https://shelleyannclark.wordpress.com/2011/01/22/biography-of-shelley-ann-clark/Susan Brierley will be sharing how to free oneself from being owned by Corporate Canada.Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Brian Thiesen - MONEY TALKS: Part 1 - Smart Meter Fires https://rumble.com/v4csfol-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-1-smart-meter-fires.html Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 2 - Big Data, Big Power, Big Government https://rumble.com/v4csmd3-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-2-big-data-big-power-big-government.html Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 3 - Pensions, Power, Politics and Climate - https://rumble.com/v4cse96-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-3-pensions-power-politics-and-climate.html Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes If interested please copy and send in your letter for a response BC Minister of Finance PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't Victoria, BC V8W 9E2 From: January 8, 2024 To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy, Good day Minister, It has come to my attention that THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, CANADA REVENUE AGENCY, and the GOVERNMENT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA CANADA et al, are corporate entities. (see inclosed papers from Dun & Bradstreet) When I inquired in 2023 of the truth of this, to both BC MP Lorne Derksen and FED MP Todd Doherty, I received no response federally, MP Derksen told me he didn't know and to look into it myself, which I did. The government of BC is a registered corporation in Hong Kong! My requirement to you, Honourable Minister Conroy, comes because you should be able to provide the financial documents I seek based on your position in government. I have spent the past months, an arduous process indeed, looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes, which my family and I have always paid faithfully. However, understanding some corporate procedures,there's a requirement to documents of full disclosure, informed consent, and signed contracts with the entities involved in any contractual obligation. My aged mother said she's never signed a contract, nor have I. With your knowledge in the Finance Department, would you kindly forward by e-mail and in writing, the legislative documentation, document/s, contracts, requiring the payment of Property Taxes. I require this information to lawfully give my consent. Please respond by January 31,2024 to the above address/e-mail. Sincerely, ___________________________________________________________ PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't Victoria BC V8W 9E2 To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy Good day Minister, I am sending you a second letter. There is further documentation included; 1) Copy of the 1st letter dated, January 8, 2024, received January 10, 2024 and confirmed 2) Copy of who Dun & Bradstreet is 3) Copies showing proof that the Province of British Columbia, and the Government of Canada, are corporations 4) Copy of The Clearfield Doctrine, showing the illegality of taxation by corporations, and accepted worldwide 5) Copy of 10 simple truths of contract law Therefore, it is incumbent of you, with the title of Minister of Finance, to provide me with the proof of obligation to pay Property Tax. I am, and have been willing to pay property taxes, provided I am doing so lawfully and with full disclosure and consent. Please respond within 7 days both written and by e-mail to; Thank you. _________________________________________________________ Proof of Claim CRA or Canada! Letter of Claim to "CRA" and "ARO" https://www.aro.ca/en/ We do not recall, and our files do not indicate that we have any contractual obligation to "CRA" or "ARO". Therefore, you are demanded to validate your claim, pursuant to Laws of (province) and Canada and provide me with the following documents: 1. Certified copy of the contract giving rise to alleged debt claimed on your aforementioned letter. 2. Letter of commitment,signed by an officer of your company, attesting to the Lawfulness, legitimacy and accuracy of the Claims as well as your company's full compliance with all the laws,provincial and federal, govering your company's actions in relation to this matter. 3.Copy of contract between yor company and the entity you be acting on behalf of. 4. Collection Agency license number of your company ("CRA" and "ARO") 5.Collection Agent License number for person(s) contacting me on behalf of your company. 6. Since I presume that "CRA" authority devolves from the Income Tax Act and "ARO" receives its authority from some other law which would also in turn, receive its authority from, at least ultimately of you "CRA" and "ARO", proof that the Constitutional Act, 1982 has been properly proclaimed into law, which would involve proof that Section 59 of the Charter has been fulfilled. Proof of Claim CRA or Canada! video ok, from what you can find lawfully please provide a letter to give to a CA to ensure they are acting in good faith... Below is a template for a letter you can use to request verification of a debt from a Collection Agency (CA). This letter is designed to ensure that the CA is acting in good faith and to protect your rights. Please note that this is a general template and may need to be adjusted based on your specific circumstances and local laws. It's advisable to consult with a legal professional for personalized advice. [Your Full Name] [Your Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] [Date] [Collection Agency's Name] [Collection Agency's Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] Re: Request for Verification of Debt Dear [Collection Agency's Name], I am writing in response to your [call/letter/email] dated [Date of the CA's communication], regarding an alleged debt for [Name of the Original Creditor], account number [Account Number, if provided]. Under my rights as per the applicable provincial and federal laws, I am requesting a validation of this debt. Please provide the following documentation to verify the legitimacy of the alleged debt: Certified Copy of Original Contract: A certified copy of the original contract or agreement with [Original Creditor's Name] that gives rise to the alleged debt. Letter of Commitment: A letter signed by an officer of your agency, attesting to the lawfulness, legitimacy, and accuracy of the claim. This letter should also confirm your agency's compliance with all relevant laws governing debt collection activities. Proof of Authority to Collect: A copy of the contract or agreement between your agency and [Original Creditor's Name] that authorizes you to collect on this alleged debt. Detailed Statement of the Debt: A detailed statement of the amount being claimed, including an itemization of any additional charges or fees. Proof of Last Payment: If applicable, the date and amount of the last payment made on this account. Please note that until the requested documentation is provided, I consider this matter to be in dispute. Furthermore, I request that all communications regarding this alleged debt be made in writing and sent to the address noted above. In accordance with the law, I expect a response to this request within 30 days of the receipt of this letter. Failure to provide the requested documentation within this timeframe will be interpreted as an acknowledgment that the debt is unverified and must be removed from my credit report, and that any further collection attempts are ceased. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response. Sincerely, [Your Name] Remember, this letter is a request for information and does not acknowledge the debt as yours. It's important to send this letter via registered mail or a method that provides proof of delivery. Keep a copy of the letter and any correspondence you receive in response for your records. In the letter template I provided, I adhered closely to the key elements you mentioned in your original text. However, I did include a few additional standard requests commonly used in debt verification letters for completeness and clarity: Detailed Statement of the Debt: This includes an itemization of any additional charges or fees. This detail is often important to fully understand the breakdown of the claimed debt. Proof of Last Payment: If there were any payments made on the account, this information helps establish the history of the debt. Method of Communication: I included a request that all communications be made in writing. This is a common practice to ensure there's a clear record of all interactions. Timeframe for Response: I specified a 30-day period for the CA to respond, which is a standard timeframe in many jurisdictions for debt verification requests. These additions are meant to provide a more comprehensive framework for the verification of the debt and to protect your rights in the process. However, if you prefer to stick strictly to the points mentioned in your original text, you can modify the template accordingly. Remember, it's always advisable to tailor any legal document to your specific situation and to consult with a legal professional if you have any doubts or questions. ______________________________________________________ 10 POINTS of CONTRACT LAW POWER of CHOICE / "FREE WILL to CONTRACT" 1) More than 1 party is needed to contract 2) AGREEMENT = OFFER & ACCEPTANCE - OFFER is the "presentment", therefore, without acceptance, there can be NO contract. - ACCEPTANCE is taken as "TACIT" ( applied though not expressed) if NO has not been verbally said. * A presentment can be accepted as noted : "with conditional acceptance" 3) There MUST be an INTENTION to CREATE a "Legal Relationship", ie: AGREE to the consiquences of breaking the contract 4) LAWFUL "CONSIDERATION" Both or all parties have to give something of value to be considered a contract * Consideration has to be agreed to by ALL parties to be LEGAL #1 POINT / Mortgages... Bank Accounts...Credit Cards When you got your Mortgage...WHAT did the bank put up as "Lawful Consideration" FULL DISCLOSURE MUST be given to be LAWFUL 5) CAPACITY to contract requires that Full Disclosure be given and "understood/comprehended" in full to be Lawful... NO minor,drunkard,lunatic, or other mental incapicity can be present to be a Lawful Contract 6) FREE CONSENT : ..............FRAUD........... NO force, trickery, undue influence, misrepresentation, coercion can take place. * ANY mistake therein, VOIDS the contract between TRUSTEE/BENEFICIARY 7) LAWFUL OBJECT : "anything" illegal or harmful to either party, made, or in part of the contract, VOIDS the contract 8) CERTAINTY of MEANING or FULL DISCLOSURE: *** Almost ALL contracts are VOID because the parties that signed have NOT, with certainty, "understood or comprehended" the LEGAL meaning of the "CONTRACTED WORDS", ie: person, individual, citizen, etc. and therefore, as undefined = FRAUD!............ man, woman, is WHO you are, ALL other words or terms used to contract are LEGAL terms for FICTION! 9) SIGNATURE and AUTOGRAPH : Signature = FICTION / Corporate Identity, LGBTQS2+ et al Autograph = "LIVING", man or woman...period! *** if you as a man or woman sign a contract there is NO CONTRACT because... there CANNOT be a contract wherein one side is "living" and the other is a "fictional" identity 10) YOU must have CERTAINTY : of the TERMS and PRIVACY to CONTRACT BOTH have to APPROVE! VOID if broken and must be re-done. (Example the BNA Act of 1867, the contract died when Queen Victoria died in 1901...similar to a Power of Attorney document, VOID when there's the death. Queen Victoria took OUT her Heirs) Darcy Martans made a Flyer to motivate more of her town and local area for meetings. Darcy added her email and phone contact info attached is word document of flyer - please change the contact info to you or your local group email - also emailed out was phase 1 and phase 2 pdf files - please forward these out to your family and friends Thank you “CANADIAN’S do NOT have An ABSOLUTE RIGHT to PRIVATE PROPERTY” Federal Justice Minister, David Lametti Spring 2022 "YOU WILL OWN NOTHING AND BE HAPPY" AGENDA 2030 WEF/ World Economic Forum Founder Klaus Schwab LEARN HOW TO END THE FRAUD CONTACT: ConstitutionalConventions.ca info@constitutionalconventions.ca Darcy Martans - with important inforamation (Share) Deputation Hamilton ON, Erin Gomaz, November 6 2023 Deputation to Huntsvillle, January 29 2024 Peggy Pederson Shelagh McFarlane Lawful Affirmation and Declaration of Dominion (use this document to collect autographs of support).

Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 B PROOF OF CLAIM Rights Doc. 4 WE are all born with free will and unalienable rights. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law’ Consent makes the contract Adhesion contracts are not contracts because there was no consent, they are considered as gifts. We do not require any corporate created rights, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedom provided by the Government of Canada Corporation and/or ICCPR provided by the United Nations Corporation. If anyone claims to have jurisdiction over you and/or requests payment requests a copy of the contract. Government Corporations Government Services Corporations doing business as Government of Canada and/or the government of any provinces can only create rules (statutes) that only apply to their employees, franchisees, officers and dependents. Their rules (statutes) do not apply to the people in general. That is why the rules they create (statutes) are referred to as “public policy”. We do not require any corporate created rights, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedom provided by the Government of Canada Corporation and/or ICCPR provided by the United Nations Corporation. Women and men living in Canada are not subject to any Public Policies, mandates, or acts of legislation promoted by any commercial or municipal corporation for its officers and employees. We should not vote in private corporate shareholder elections sponsored by Canada Inc., Province of _____ Inc., or any other foreign corporation. All Acts, Bills and statutes created by the Government of Canada and/or any of the provincial governments only apply to “person”. The definition of person in Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition on page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being ( i.e. natural person ) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. In other words if I say the basket includes apples and oranges you will not find any other type of fruit in the basket. As plainly stated in Black’s Law dictionary, anything that applies to person only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Does not apply to men or women! The Government of Canada and Government of all provinces are Crown for profit Corporations. The Prime Minister and/or the Premiers receive their orders from the shareholders of the Crown Corporation. They are the C.E.O.s/officers of the Crown Corporations. They carry out the orders that are relayed to them by the Governor General and/or the Lieutenant Governor. They (politicians) are in place to take the blame for the harm that is done to the people. They are replaced every four years with someone who claims that he/she are going to right the wrongs that were created, but nothing changes they carry out the orders provided by the shareholders as the previous C.E.O.s. Four years later they are blamed and replaced. PERSONS All Acts, Bills and statutes created by the Government of Canada and/or any of the provincial governments only apply to “person”. The definition of person in Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition on page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person ) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. In other words if I say the basket includes apples and oranges you will not find any other type of fruit in the basket. As plainly stated in Black’s Law dictionary, anything that applies to person only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Does not apply to men or women _________________________________________________________ Name written in all capital letters The governing book of the English language is “The Oxford Styles Manual” which sometimes refers to “The Chicago Manual of Style” also The Oxford Manual of Style. All Uppercase text, all caps, or gloss is listed in the styles manuals under “foreign - language” , named ”Ancient-Latin” or Dog Latin. All Caps are not defined or recognised in meaning. All Caps is not English although you may think you are able to read it as English it is in fact, a calculated deception to be read separated from the rest of the “Document”. All Uppercase text has no lawful grammatical jurisdiction with common English and is a foreign language, headed under “Ancient-Latin”. (The Chicago Manual of Style, 16th Edition, 11:144-47). Glossa is two or more languages on a legal document. Glossa is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of a text( Black’s Law Dictionary page 621 5th Edition) “Glossa” is also used to conceal or confuse the real facts in order to confuse, in order to gain tacit consent. A name written in all capital letters is written in dog latin or is known as systemic text “a thing” created by the employees of the crown corporation, Therefore the Crown Corporation owns the creation. If you claim that the name written in all capital letters is you. You are admitting you are the property of the Crown Corporation (a slave). Cestui Que Vie Trust 's beneficiary is the name in all capital letters which is the property of the Crown Corporation, it is not you. All governments (corporations) and businesses such as banks and others that write your name in all capital letters are committing constructive fraud and conversion. (Engaged in criminal activity) ___________________________________________________ City, Municipality, Village et al Address Date TO: Mayor, CAO, CEO, Councillors et al FROM: The men and women living therein, The enclosed documentation: 1) Proof of Incorporation of the following entities; from Dunn & Bradstreet or EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Note: the following are government services corporations’ (dba( "doing business as,") Government of Canada, EDGAR (CIK 0000230098) ; Government of British Columbia, EDGAR (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306) ; Government of Alberta, EDGAR (CIK 0000810961) ; Government of Saskatchewan, EDGAR (CIK 0000203098) ; Government of Manitoba, EDGAR (CIK 0000826926) ; Ontario, EDGAR (CIK 0000074615) ; Quebec, EDGAR (0000722803) ; Province of New Brunswick, EDGAR (CIK 0000862406) ; Province of Nova Scotia, EDGAR (CIK 0000842639) 2) Copy of the Clearfield Doctrine; showing that corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to taxation or law enforcement et al, without a consent to contract which is corporate policy when doing commerce. * Seek legal clarification and written proof to the contrary. This letter comes with the enclosed documents to ascertain the jurisdiction within our council, in which official positions are being held . Depending on the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed upon entering office, the positions may be operating under the "Color of Law," in a De-Facto, Un-lawful and thus ultra vires standing. This holds personal liability for anything signed on behalf of the people. There are 3 possible jurisdictions: A) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution with full legal authority and jurisdiction to taxation, schools, infrastructure, peace keeping, hospital, courts, et al. as services, and needs of the local men and women therein. B) Having as the "Trustee" full fiduciary control of the "Trusts" set up to care for the local needs. De-jure/ lawful B) Non-Governmental Office, (NGO): a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, without the legal authority or jurisdiction to taxation. This entity provides "Service Contracts," which requires contracts and consent to contract by those involved in the services. It's known as "Body Corporate," and serves "Incorporated Inhabitants." Did the men and women give consent to be incorporated? That's called FRAUD. Who is the "Head of Council" or "Global Mayor?" (“A created fiction” The Executive Control and Authority comes from the Corporation of the Province wherein we reside, and to which your office would receive the Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al directly, through downloads from the corporation and are corporate policies not district policies. De-facto/ un-lawful/FRAUD C) Public/Private/Partnerships, (PPP): an International Entity one which downloads "FOREIGN," Corporate policies, UN/United Nations, WEF/ World Economic Forum, WHO/ World Health Organization et al. In this position there is also no legal authority or jurisdiction to taxation. Consent to contract is a legal requirement to contract with the men and women. Did the men and women consent to Foreign Corporate Policies and occupation in the community without knowledge or consent? Are the United Nations Sustainable Goals/SDG's, Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 policies being implemented? Who has fiduciary control over the local Trusts as their Trustee? Who is the "Head of Council," and "Council of the Whole." “A fiction” De-Facto, un-lawful/FRAUD These are jurisdictional questions that are important to ascertain because through the stroke of a pen, a man or woman is being put into extreme personal liability for the agreements and infrastructures signed on to. Furthermore, there are 3 levels of Lawful/de-jure/jurisdictions LOCAL, PROVINCIAL, and FEDERAL - Each has their sphere of lawful jurisdiction and geographical area - Each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers - NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview We the people have come to ascertain for ourselves the jurisdiction WE are in because the last few years have shown us that something has gone horribly awry at the local level. We the people voted for positions of service to the local jurisdiction. Was there comprehension of the meaning of the oath, declaration or covenant sworn, upon taking office? Was time given to properly peruse any documents to sign and vote on? Many of these documents were written over many years, by legal firms and lawyers, whose signatures are not within the documents...whose are! They contain legalise, a language unto itself, and is the basis for how most FRAUD has occurred. Words like person, individual, inhabitant, resident, citizen, et al have a completely different meaning in these documents. FRAUD vitiates everything. We the people intend on restoring Peace, Order, and Lawful Governance should our suspicions prove correct. We require a response by ________________________________ and expect such from our elected officials. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law, and thus consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls upon the claimant. No response is considered tacit agreement. ______________________________________________________ Regional District of Address Date TO: Board Chair, CAO, CEO, Directors et al FROM: The enclosed documentation: 1) Proof of the Incorporation of the following entities, NOTE: government services corporations (dba:"doing business as,") EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; Government of Canada, (CIK 0000230098) Government of British Columbia, (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306) Government of Alberta, (CIK 0000810961) Government of Saskatchewan, (CIK 0000203098) Government of Manitoba, (CIK 0000826926) Ontario, (CIK 0000074615) Quebec, (CIK 0000722803) Province of New Brunswick, (CIK 0000862406) Province of Nova Scotia, (CIK 0000842639) 2) Copy of The CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE; showing that Corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to Taxation or Law Enforcement et al without consent to contract by those involved in the transaction. Personal liability is then enforceable upon those acting illegally. The enclosed documents show that the Regional District through its Incorporation may be operating under the "Color of Law" and as such is de-facto, un-lawful, and ultra-vires. This information is not hear-say nor opinion, rather they state the facts of the matter, which are; ?- What Oath, Declaration, or Covenant was signed upon the commencement of the positions in council? These matter! ?- What jurisdiction is the office under? There are 3 possible Jurisdictions; 1) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution, with lawful de-jure status as a holder of the "PUBLIC TRUST", Trustee with Fiduciary control, and thus legal authority to the taxation of the men and women within a geographical area, and is one of "service" to the local needs; school, hospital, peace keeping, infrastructure, courts, et al. 2) Non-Governmental Office (NGO): a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, that provides "Service Contracts," and is known as a "Body Corporate" to "Incorporated Inhabitants." This jurisdiction requires Consent to Contract, is de-facto, un-lawful and as such has NO legal jurisdiction to taxation. The Executive Control and Authority comes from the corporation of the province wherein the office is located. The Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al are downloaded to the district and are corporate policies. 3) Public/Private/Partnerships (PPP) : an INTERNATIONAL ENTITY, receiving downloads from a "FOREIGN" Corporation; United Nations, WHO/World Health Organization, WEF/World Economic Forum et al. This is also a de-facto, un-lawful jurisdiction with NO legal grounds to the taxation of men and women, and also requires Consent to Contract. NOTE: In British Columbia, as an example, The BC Assessment Authority is a CROWN Corporation, created in 1974 by the Corporation of British Columbia Inc., "in order to earn profit for the Government of British Columbia Inc., without jurisdiction nor contracts with the men and women of BC. NOTE: There are 3 levels of lawful, de-jure governance; Local, Provincial and Federal - Each has their sphere of jurisdiction and geographical area - Each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers - NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview These 2 questions are the most important because the answer to them will establish the personal liability through the signature/autograph put upon the documents requiring a vote. Was there full comprehension of the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed when entering office as a Director? Was there time to peruse any documents requiring a vote? Most often these documents are many pages long and were made over many years, by legal firms and lawyers whose signatures are NOT contained therein. Whose is? Making that signature "personally" liable for the decisions made Was there full comprehension of the difference between the legal wording contained therein, and the knowledge of their meanings? Such as person, individual, constituent, citizen,et al. "Legalese" is a language unto itself and is the basis for most FRAUD, which in law vitiates everything. The men and women in our Regional District Office were empowered by the men and women, to operate under, and in a jurisdiction that is de-jure, lawful, and with a fiduciary trust, to serve the men and women of our geographical area and no other. To ensure that the needs of the local men, women, and their property were the priority and responsibility of the Regional District. So...What Office is held? Lawfully/de-jure or unlawfully and de-facto? We require an answer, on or before __________________ No answer will be considered a tacit agreement. The office of the Regional District is held by the trust of the members of our community, the neighbours and friends who voted for positions in an office to serve the community. That's why we require proof of what oath, declaration, or covenant was given. The men and women of __________________ _________________________________________________________ Notice of Demand and Trespass Proof of Jurisdiction and Contract Proof of Claim It has come to our attention, the concerned men and women, that our Educational Institutions, whose service to us is the education of our sons and daughters (hereafter named as our "property") has implemented the SOGI 123 Program without a consent to contract. HISTORY; this program began in 2007 through the ARC Foundation. A private foundation based in Vancouver, British Columbia Inc. Other corporations involved in the funding are; British Columbia Ministry of Education Inc.; British Columbia Teachers Federation Inc.; University of British Columbia Inc., and through private donations( gifts from registered charities also corporations), and the corporation of Canada Inc. Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Documents included herein: - Proof of the incorporation of Government of Canada Inc., Government of British Columbia Inc. - Copy of the "CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE", a 1942 court case, accepted worldwide because it's corporate, commerce law. Clearly stating the requirement of contracts Governments lose their sovereignty when they become corporations, thus no different than Canadian Tire using Canadian Tire money. - Copy of the definition of "GLOSSA", pertinent in this matter because it's a matter of concealment, meant to confuse using "text" to corrupt the real facts in order to gain tacit consent. There's no statute of limitation on fraud. - Our Mayoral, Councillor, and Regional Districts are also incorporated through the removal of many of the municipal powers in 2004 with the Local Government Act incorporated into the Community Charter, prior to this; the local mayor had full de-jure and lawful jurisdiction, in relation to our schools. - Copy of the definition of the All Capital Identity, created with the "Birth Certificate," a fiction, constructive fraud and conversion. - Copy of the 10 Points of Contract Law, made simple for comprehension on this matter. - Copy of the 12 Presumptions of Court. Included for the comprehension of status. Fundamentally, the fraud upon our property when born, vitiates any Board jurisdiction to the ownership of our property. We, the men and women who created them, own them. "He who creates owns!" A maxim in law Therefore, it is incumbent upon those who have positions on the Board to cease and desist the SOGI 123 Program which is an infringement upon the property known as our sons and daughters. Failure to do so as corporate entities, through Contract Law, we intend on exercising our jurisdiction, as is our right, to the fullest extent upon the men and women personally sitting on the Board. We strongly suggest a consultation with a lawyer, who by the way wrote this mess. "Praetextu legis injusta agens duplo puniendus" We the People DO NOT require legal Re-presentation in this matter because we're well aware of the 12 Presumptions of Court. I doubt any lawyer will be willing to assist the men and women on the Board, regardless of the facts, because through their: legalize they do deceive. Be it therefore noted, with the documents contained herein, that our claim of proof of contract and the jurisdictional fraud, put against us and our property is considered a trespass. It is the duty of men and women to discuss these delicate matters with our property within our own jurisdiction. We are not against the health and wellbeing of another's property, within their jurisdiction, rather not in the educational setting. We the People, regarding our property in the care of the educational system, again, reiterate, and declare that the burden of proof falls on the claimant. Consider the response with wisdom and discernment since we voted men and women into what we thought was a Educational Office not a Corporate Office. We require no more than 7 days for implementing the redressing of the trespass against our property, with the immediate removal of any and all literature, electronic or written, devices, toys (we use the word with baited breath) et al in relation to the SOGI 123 PROGRAM post haste. For it was through corporate policies, without contractual consent, that the trespass has been made against our property thus creating this claim against those men and women on the Board personally. Furthermore, do not be deceived into thinking that the registration of our property into the corporation rather than an educational institution voids any responsibility on the part of the men and women on the Board, as it was done in fraud. Again we'll state that fraud vitiates everything. In all fairness to the men and women on the Board, our neighbours, not the corporations involved, perhaps unaware of the situation mentioned above and the personal liability for this trespass, We the People will support the men and women in this matter of remedy, because we trusted that their service, while sitting on the Board, was to serve our property with a lawful education. No response will be considered a tacit agreement. Sincerely and without prejudice or malice We the People Autograph_______________________:________ __________________________________________________________ Statement of Claim Taxation Between the Corporation of ______________________________________ And the noted particulars on the documents included herein. The above corporation has not proved jurisdiction, consent to contract, nor provide proof of a contract to claim the monies expected in taxation, hence tacit agreement to this claim. Who claims this debt be true, who claims this debt to due? Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Three requirements were made in writing to the Corporations Finance Minister to provide said proof, and are included in this document. Furthermore, copies of the Clearfield Doctrine, EDGAR # for the Corporation involved, Regina-v-John Anthony Hill 12 May, 2011 at Southwark Crown Court, Case # T20107746, (the Queen declared, "Lawfully NOT valid Monarch, hence Charles the III too),and "Glossa," (see Black's Law) corrupts the essence of the text presented on your documents. This refusal of consent to contract extends from this day forward, as noted with receipt of this document, until such a date in the future when there is a de-jure government upon the landmass commonly known worldwide as Canada, British Columbia, et al. Autograph _________________________:___________________________ Dated this day _______________________________________________________ Proof of Claim Re: Property Tax; Contract and Proof of Consent to Contract Between the Corporation of ___________________________________________________ and _____________________________________________________________________________ Regarding the property registered as; ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ It is required and incumbent upon the Corporations Minister of Finance, to provide proof of jurisdiction as a corporation, to taxation without full disclosure of the facts, and consent to contract, as per contract law. See: The Clearfield Doctrine; Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 363 Syllabus CLEARFIELD TRUST CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES CERTIORARI to the CIRCUIT COURT of APPEALS for the THIRD CIRCUIT No. 490 Argued February 5, 1943 Decided March 1, 1943(and accepted worldwide when conducting commerce) Further to the above noted court case, this requirement will be expected within 7 days receipt of this claim for proof of the jurisdictional obligation by the corporation to taxation to the property noted herein. Who claims this debt be true, who claims this debt be due? Contract makes the law, consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. Property Taxes have been paid previously without consent to contract, due to the fraud perpetrated without full disclosure of the fact that the corporation mentioned herein, was not a lawful government with the de-jure jurisdiction to taxation, thus Ultra-Vires. Rather, a corporation whose name included the words "government," which is fraud based on Black's Law Dictionary, any edition. No response will be confirmation of a tacit agreement to the above. Thanking you in advance, Autograph: _________________________:_____________________________ Dated this day: ______________________________________ ______________________________________________________ STATEMENT of CLAIM Date:_____________________ STATE of TITLE CERTIFICATE: Certificate number________________________________________ Land Title Office__________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ Title Number______________________________________________ Registered Owner__________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ Taxation Authority__________________________________________ Description of Land__________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ Charges, Liens and Interests_____________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ Proof of contract is required to provide evidence of any claim made upon the aforementioned property; taxation; land use; water use; structures and buildings above, on, or below the land; any and all animals thereon; any and all chattles upon said land; et al, provide proof of any contractual obligation having been made with respect to said land. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law, and thus consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls on the claimant. (See: Regina-v-John Anthony Hill 12 May, 2011 at Southwark Crown Court, Case # T20107746, in which the Queen was declared to be a "Lawfully NOT Valid Monarch." Hence, neither is Charles the III) (See: Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 363, Syllabus. Clearfield trust Co.et al. v. United States, Certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.No. 490. Argued February 5, 1943 Decided March 1, 1943 ; and accepted worldwide when conducting commerce) The requirement to provide Proof of Contract within this Statement of Claim, is expected within ____________days from receipt of the documentation herein. No response will be considered a tacit agreement to the above. Autograph_________________________:_______________________ :GLOSSA: ~ The 'Born-Date' Vs. the 'Registration-Date' Does your Birth Certificate identify YOU as TWO people, not one? (You is plural, one and another) Have you ever wondered why your SURNAME is written using the ALL UPPERCASE TEXT? Put simply, 'you' are using a ‘Legal’ name and this is fraud. See the ‘name’ is actually split up into separate entities – The Christian-name and The ‘Surname’. You register these names to the Crown Corporation LTD. as their Property by your Birth Certificate which is given a bond number. Your physical value is used as collateral for these bonds allowing the United Kingdom LTD. to take out loans from private Banks, such as 'Bank of England' and profit is made by way of legal fines (Acts & Statutes), bills and taxation. – Hence money is no longer backed by Gold or Silver, but by our physical value or man power. The UNITED KINGDOM LTD is a privately owned Corporation-ship. And corporations are considered ‘ships’ and they are governed under the law of the sea, known as Maritime Law. There is no real 'ship' but a 'document-vessel' – which in our case was our Birth Certificate Created by the Doctor when s/he ‘docked’ you. TAKE NOTICE Whenever you encounter the Legal Document (document-vessel) you will notice that your surname (or sometimes all of your names) will be written using the ALL UPPERCASE TEXT. This is no coincidence - the ALL UPPERCASE text is not defined or recognised in The Oxford Styles Manual, (the governing book of the English language) – meaning that although you may be able to read it as English, it is in fact, NOT English. The all CAPS or Gloss can be found within the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under 'foreign-languages', named 'Ancient-Latin' The main place this ALL UPPERCASE text is found to be defined as a language, is when American Sign Language (ASL), a signing language used for the deaf, is written. ASL can be defined in the book ‘The Chicago Manual of Style’ under the foreign-languages header: American Sign Language (ASL) compound signs, 10.152 and ‘glosses, 10.147’. Thus, defining this text as a foreign language Further going on to say that when written, it has no 1-to-1 correspondence with any other languages on the document. The all CAPS or Gloss is also found in the 'Oxford Styles Manual', under foreign-languages, 'Ancient-Latin', however as the all caps UK LTD is registered in [Washington D.C[, they seem to be using the 'Chicago Manual of Style' , not the Oxford. Putting two or more languages onto a legal document is known in law as a ‘Glossa’. Black's Law Dictionary defines: 'GLOSSA' - “It is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of the text”. Meaning that by using a Glossa in a document they are trying to conceal or confuse the real facts. f you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL if you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALLf you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL UPPER CASE. f you take a second to analyze any documents that are written within the legal realm (driving license, passport, fines, speeding tickets, court orders or summons) you will rapidly realize that while most of the document will be written in normal English, most of the important details are actually in this ALL UPPERCASE language. Like we established earlier, the ALL UPPERCASE text and the plain English text cannot be read as one text in a document, they have no jurisdiction over one another. You can only read one at a time. So you must read all of the English in one go, and then go back to read the ALL Soon you will realize that virtually all court orders, speeding tickets and most other legal documents actually make no sense whatsoever. They only make sense when we make the assumption that it is all plain English and we read it as one, once you take one away from the other – it renders the document useless. Seeing as the ‘government’ is simply a privately owned Corporation it can only impose fines and acts upon other corporations. And by tricking us to registering our names as a corporate entity and then tricking us into thinking these names are physically us, it manages to get us to represent the corporately registered name and therefore bear the burden of fines and policies. This is a crime known as “personage”. Hand in hand with “personage” comes a crime known as “barratry” which is knowingly bringing false claims into court- This is what police, politicians, judges are doing daily. The Birth-Certificate, Two-Names, Two-Dates and Two-Languages? Capitis Diminutio Maxima (Name in ALL CAPITALS) For the purposes of understanding one's legal or commercial status under the Admiralty system (the law system used in England, Canada and much of the US), it is necessary to examine the curious use of all CAPS -Capitis Diminutio Maxima- in legal and domestic income tax forms, credit cards & statements, loans, mortgages, speeding & parking tickets, car documents, road tax, court summons etc. While seemingly a trite concern, this apparently small detail has extremely deep significance for all of us! Gage Canadian Dictionary 1983 Sec. 4 defines Capitalize adj. as "To take advantage of - To use to ones own advantage." Blacks Law Dictionary – Revised 4th Edition 1968, provides a more comprehensive definition as follows … Capitis Diminutio (meaning the diminishing of status through the use of capitalization)- In Roman law. A diminishing or abridgment of personality; a loss or curtailment of a man's status or aggregate of leg al attributes and qualifications.

Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Brian Thiesen - MONEY TALKS: Part 1 - Smart Meter Fires https://rumble.com/v4csfol-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-1-smart-meter-fires.html Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 2 - Big Data, Big Power, Big Government https://rumble.com/v4csmd3-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-2-big-data-big-power-big-government.html Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 3 - Pensions, Power, Politics and Climate - https://rumble.com/v4cse96-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-3-pensions-power-politics-and-climate.html Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes If interested please copy and send in your letter for a response BC Minister of Finance PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't Victoria, BC V8W 9E2 From: January 8, 2024 To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy, Good day Minister, It has come to my attention that THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, CANADA REVENUE AGENCY, and the GOVERNMENT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA CANADA et al, are corporate entities. (see inclosed papers from Dun & Bradstreet) When I inquired in 2023 of the truth of this, to both BC MP Lorne Derksen and FED MP Todd Doherty, I received no response federally, MP Derksen told me he didn't know and to look into it myself, which I did. The government of BC is a registered corporation in Hong Kong! My requirement to you, Honourable Minister Conroy, comes because you should be able to provide the financial documents I seek based on your position in government. I have spent the past months, an arduous process indeed, looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes, which my family and I have always paid faithfully. However, understanding some corporate procedures,there's a requirement to documents of full disclosure, informed consent, and signed contracts with the entities involved in any contractual obligation. My aged mother said she's never signed a contract, nor have I. With your knowledge in the Finance Department, would you kindly forward by e-mail and in writing, the legislative documentation, document/s, contracts, requiring the payment of Property Taxes. I require this information to lawfully give my consent. Please respond by January 31,2024 to the above address/e-mail. Sincerely, ___________________________________________________________ PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't Victoria BC V8W 9E2 To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy Good day Minister, I am sending you a second letter. There is further documentation included; 1) Copy of the 1st letter dated, January 8, 2024, received January 10, 2024 and confirmed 2) Copy of who Dun & Bradstreet is 3) Copies showing proof that the Province of British Columbia, and the Government of Canada, are corporations 4) Copy of The Clearfield Doctrine, showing the illegality of taxation by corporations, and accepted worldwide 5) Copy of 10 simple truths of contract law Therefore, it is incumbent of you, with the title of Minister of Finance, to provide me with the proof of obligation to pay Property Tax. I am, and have been willing to pay property taxes, provided I am doing so lawfully and with full disclosure and consent. Please respond within 7 days both written and by e-mail to; Thank you. _________________________________________________________ Proof of Claim CRA or Canada! Letter of Claim to "CRA" and "ARO" https://www.aro.ca/en/ We do not recall, and our files do not indicate that we have any contractual obligation to "CRA" or "ARO". Therefore, you are demanded to validate your claim, pursuant to Laws of (province) and Canada and provide me with the following documents: 1. Certified copy of the contract giving rise to alleged debt claimed on your aforementioned letter. 2. Letter of commitment,signed by an officer of your company, attesting to the Lawfulness, legitimacy and accuracy of the Claims as well as your company's full compliance with all the laws,provincial and federal, govering your company's actions in relation to this matter. 3.Copy of contract between yor company and the entity you be acting on behalf of. 4. Collection Agency license number of your company ("CRA" and "ARO") 5.Collection Agent License number for person(s) contacting me on behalf of your company. 6. Since I presume that "CRA" authority devolves from the Income Tax Act and "ARO" receives its authority from some other law which would also in turn, receive its authority from, at least ultimately of you "CRA" and "ARO", proof that the Constitutional Act, 1982 has been properly proclaimed into law, which would involve proof that Section 59 of the Charter has been fulfilled. Proof of Claim CRA or Canada! video ok, from what you can find lawfully please provide a letter to give to a CA to ensure they are acting in good faith... Below is a template for a letter you can use to request verification of a debt from a Collection Agency (CA). This letter is designed to ensure that the CA is acting in good faith and to protect your rights. Please note that this is a general template and may need to be adjusted based on your specific circumstances and local laws. It's advisable to consult with a legal professional for personalized advice. [Your Full Name] [Your Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] [Date] [Collection Agency's Name] [Collection Agency's Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] Re: Request for Verification of Debt Dear [Collection Agency's Name], I am writing in response to your [call/letter/email] dated [Date of the CA's communication], regarding an alleged debt for [Name of the Original Creditor], account number [Account Number, if provided]. Under my rights as per the applicable provincial and federal laws, I am requesting a validation of this debt. Please provide the following documentation to verify the legitimacy of the alleged debt: Certified Copy of Original Contract: A certified copy of the original contract or agreement with [Original Creditor's Name] that gives rise to the alleged debt. Letter of Commitment: A letter signed by an officer of your agency, attesting to the lawfulness, legitimacy, and accuracy of the claim. This letter should also confirm your agency's compliance with all relevant laws governing debt collection activities. Proof of Authority to Collect: A copy of the contract or agreement between your agency and [Original Creditor's Name] that authorizes you to collect on this alleged debt. Detailed Statement of the Debt: A detailed statement of the amount being claimed, including an itemization of any additional charges or fees. Proof of Last Payment: If applicable, the date and amount of the last payment made on this account. Please note that until the requested documentation is provided, I consider this matter to be in dispute. Furthermore, I request that all communications regarding this alleged debt be made in writing and sent to the address noted above. In accordance with the law, I expect a response to this request within 30 days of the receipt of this letter. Failure to provide the requested documentation within this timeframe will be interpreted as an acknowledgment that the debt is unverified and must be removed from my credit report, and that any further collection attempts are ceased. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response. Sincerely, [Your Name] Remember, this letter is a request for information and does not acknowledge the debt as yours. It's important to send this letter via registered mail or a method that provides proof of delivery. Keep a copy of the letter and any correspondence you receive in response for your records. In the letter template I provided, I adhered closely to the key elements you mentioned in your original text. However, I did include a few additional standard requests commonly used in debt verification letters for completeness and clarity: Detailed Statement of the Debt: This includes an itemization of any additional charges or fees. This detail is often important to fully understand the breakdown of the claimed debt. Proof of Last Payment: If there were any payments made on the account, this information helps establish the history of the debt. Method of Communication: I included a request that all communications be made in writing. This is a common practice to ensure there's a clear record of all interactions. Timeframe for Response: I specified a 30-day period for the CA to respond, which is a standard timeframe in many jurisdictions for debt verification requests. These additions are meant to provide a more comprehensive framework for the verification of the debt and to protect your rights in the process. However, if you prefer to stick strictly to the points mentioned in your original text, you can modify the template accordingly. Remember, it's always advisable to tailor any legal document to your specific situation and to consult with a legal professional if you have any doubts or questions. ______________________________________________________ 10 POINTS of CONTRACT LAW POWER of CHOICE / "FREE WILL to CONTRACT" 1) More than 1 party is needed to contract 2) AGREEMENT = OFFER & ACCEPTANCE - OFFER is the "presentment", therefore, without acceptance, there can be NO contract. - ACCEPTANCE is taken as "TACIT" ( applied though not expressed) if NO has not been verbally said. * A presentment can be accepted as noted : "with conditional acceptance" 3) There MUST be an INTENTION to CREATE a "Legal Relationship", ie: AGREE to the consiquences of breaking the contract 4) LAWFUL "CONSIDERATION" Both or all parties have to give something of value to be considered a contract * Consideration has to be agreed to by ALL parties to be LEGAL #1 POINT / Mortgages... Bank Accounts...Credit Cards When you got your Mortgage...WHAT did the bank put up as "Lawful Consideration" FULL DISCLOSURE MUST be given to be LAWFUL 5) CAPACITY to contract requires that Full Disclosure be given and "understood/comprehended" in full to be Lawful... NO minor,drunkard,lunatic, or other mental incapicity can be present to be a Lawful Contract 6) FREE CONSENT : ..............FRAUD........... NO force, trickery, undue influence, misrepresentation, coercion can take place. * ANY mistake therein, VOIDS the contract between TRUSTEE/BENEFICIARY 7) LAWFUL OBJECT : "anything" illegal or harmful to either party, made, or in part of the contract, VOIDS the contract 8) CERTAINTY of MEANING or FULL DISCLOSURE: *** Almost ALL contracts are VOID because the parties that signed have NOT, with certainty, "understood or comprehended" the LEGAL meaning of the "CONTRACTED WORDS", ie: person, individual, citizen, etc. and therefore, as undefined = FRAUD!............ man, woman, is WHO you are, ALL other words or terms used to contract are LEGAL terms for FICTION! 9) SIGNATURE and AUTOGRAPH : Signature = FICTION / Corporate Identity, LGBTQS2+ et al Autograph = "LIVING", man or woman...period! *** if you as a man or woman sign a contract there is NO CONTRACT because... there CANNOT be a contract wherein one side is "living" and the other is a "fictional" identity 10) YOU must have CERTAINTY : of the TERMS and PRIVACY to CONTRACT BOTH have to APPROVE! VOID if broken and must be re-done. (Example the BNA Act of 1867, the contract died when Queen Victoria died in 1901...similar to a Power of Attorney document, VOID when there's the death. Queen Victoria took OUT her Heirs) Darcy Martans made a Flyer to motivate more of her town and local area for meetings. Darcy added her email and phone contact info attached is word document of flyer - please change the contact info to you or your local group email - also emailed out was phase 1 and phase 2 pdf files - please forward these out to your family and friends Thank you “CANADIAN’S do NOT have An ABSOLUTE RIGHT to PRIVATE PROPERTY” Federal Justice Minister, David Lametti Spring 2022 "YOU WILL OWN NOTHING AND BE HAPPY" AGENDA 2030 WEF/ World Economic Forum Founder Klaus Schwab LEARN HOW TO END THE FRAUD CONTACT: ConstitutionalConventions.ca info@constitutionalconventions.ca Darcy Martans - with important inforamation (Share) Deputation Hamilton ON, Erin Gomaz, November 6 2023 Deputation to Huntsvillle, January 29 2024 Peggy Pederson Shelagh McFarlane Lawful Affirmation and Declaration of Dominion (use this document to collect autographs of support).

Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Brian Thiesen - MONEY TALKS: Part 1 - Smart Meter Fires https://rumble.com/v4csfol-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-1-smart-meter-fires.html Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 2 - Big Data, Big Power, Big Government https://rumble.com/v4csmd3-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-2-big-data-big-power-big-government.html Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 3 - Pensions, Power, Politics and Climate - https://rumble.com/v4cse96-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-3-pensions-power-politics-and-climate.html Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes If interested please copy and send in your letter for a response BC Minister of Finance PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't Victoria, BC V8W 9E2 From: January 8, 2024 To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy, Good day Minister, It has come to my attention that THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, CANADA REVENUE AGENCY, and the GOVERNMENT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA CANADA et al, are corporate entities. (see inclosed papers from Dun & Bradstreet) When I inquired in 2023 of the truth of this, to both BC MP Lorne Derksen and FED MP Todd Doherty, I received no response federally, MP Derksen told me he didn't know and to look into it myself, which I did. The government of BC is a registered corporation in Hong Kong! My requirement to you, Honourable Minister Conroy, comes because you should be able to provide the financial documents I seek based on your position in government. I have spent the past months, an arduous process indeed, looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes, which my family and I have always paid faithfully. However, understanding some corporate procedures,there's a requirement to documents of full disclosure, informed consent, and signed contracts with the entities involved in any contractual obligation. My aged mother said she's never signed a contract, nor have I. With your knowledge in the Finance Department, would you kindly forward by e-mail and in writing, the legislative documentation, document/s, contracts, requiring the payment of Property Taxes. I require this information to lawfully give my consent. Please respond by January 31,2024 to the above address/e-mail. Sincerely, ___________________________________________________________ PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't Victoria BC V8W 9E2 To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy Good day Minister, I am sending you a second letter. There is further documentation included; 1) Copy of the 1st letter dated, January 8, 2024, received January 10, 2024 and confirmed 2) Copy of who Dun & Bradstreet is 3) Copies showing proof that the Province of British Columbia, and the Government of Canada, are corporations 4) Copy of The Clearfield Doctrine, showing the illegality of taxation by corporations, and accepted worldwide 5) Copy of 10 simple truths of contract law Therefore, it is incumbent of you, with the title of Minister of Finance, to provide me with the proof of obligation to pay Property Tax. I am, and have been willing to pay property taxes, provided I am doing so lawfully and with full disclosure and consent. Please respond within 7 days both written and by e-mail to; Thank you. _________________________________________________________ Proof of Claim CRA or Canada! Letter of Claim to "CRA" and "ARO" https://www.aro.ca/en/ We do not recall, and our files do not indicate that we have any contractual obligation to "CRA" or "ARO". Therefore, you are demanded to validate your claim, pursuant to Laws of (province) and Canada and provide me with the following documents: 1. Certified copy of the contract giving rise to alleged debt claimed on your aforementioned letter. 2. Letter of commitment,signed by an officer of your company, attesting to the Lawfulness, legitimacy and accuracy of the Claims as well as your company's full compliance with all the laws,provincial and federal, govering your company's actions in relation to this matter. 3.Copy of contract between yor company and the entity you be acting on behalf of. 4. Collection Agency license number of your company ("CRA" and "ARO") 5.Collection Agent License number for person(s) contacting me on behalf of your company. 6. Since I presume that "CRA" authority devolves from the Income Tax Act and "ARO" receives its authority from some other law which would also in turn, receive its authority from, at least ultimately of you "CRA" and "ARO", proof that the Constitutional Act, 1982 has been properly proclaimed into law, which would involve proof that Section 59 of the Charter has been fulfilled. Proof of Claim CRA or Canada! video ok, from what you can find lawfully please provide a letter to give to a CA to ensure they are acting in good faith... Below is a template for a letter you can use to request verification of a debt from a Collection Agency (CA). This letter is designed to ensure that the CA is acting in good faith and to protect your rights. Please note that this is a general template and may need to be adjusted based on your specific circumstances and local laws. It's advisable to consult with a legal professional for personalized advice. [Your Full Name] [Your Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] [Date] [Collection Agency's Name] [Collection Agency's Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] Re: Request for Verification of Debt Dear [Collection Agency's Name], I am writing in response to your [call/letter/email] dated [Date of the CA's communication], regarding an alleged debt for [Name of the Original Creditor], account number [Account Number, if provided]. Under my rights as per the applicable provincial and federal laws, I am requesting a validation of this debt. Please provide the following documentation to verify the legitimacy of the alleged debt: Certified Copy of Original Contract: A certified copy of the original contract or agreement with [Original Creditor's Name] that gives rise to the alleged debt. Letter of Commitment: A letter signed by an officer of your agency, attesting to the lawfulness, legitimacy, and accuracy of the claim. This letter should also confirm your agency's compliance with all relevant laws governing debt collection activities. Proof of Authority to Collect: A copy of the contract or agreement between your agency and [Original Creditor's Name] that authorizes you to collect on this alleged debt. Detailed Statement of the Debt: A detailed statement of the amount being claimed, including an itemization of any additional charges or fees. Proof of Last Payment: If applicable, the date and amount of the last payment made on this account. Please note that until the requested documentation is provided, I consider this matter to be in dispute. Furthermore, I request that all communications regarding this alleged debt be made in writing and sent to the address noted above. In accordance with the law, I expect a response to this request within 30 days of the receipt of this letter. Failure to provide the requested documentation within this timeframe will be interpreted as an acknowledgment that the debt is unverified and must be removed from my credit report, and that any further collection attempts are ceased. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response. Sincerely, [Your Name] Remember, this letter is a request for information and does not acknowledge the debt as yours. It's important to send this letter via registered mail or a method that provides proof of delivery. Keep a copy of the letter and any correspondence you receive in response for your records. In the letter template I provided, I adhered closely to the key elements you mentioned in your original text. However, I did include a few additional standard requests commonly used in debt verification letters for completeness and clarity: Detailed Statement of the Debt: This includes an itemization of any additional charges or fees. This detail is often important to fully understand the breakdown of the claimed debt. Proof of Last Payment: If there were any payments made on the account, this information helps establish the history of the debt. Method of Communication: I included a request that all communications be made in writing. This is a common practice to ensure there's a clear record of all interactions. Timeframe for Response: I specified a 30-day period for the CA to respond, which is a standard timeframe in many jurisdictions for debt verification requests. These additions are meant to provide a more comprehensive framework for the verification of the debt and to protect your rights in the process. However, if you prefer to stick strictly to the points mentioned in your original text, you can modify the template accordingly. Remember, it's always advisable to tailor any legal document to your specific situation and to consult with a legal professional if you have any doubts or questions. ______________________________________________________ 10 POINTS of CONTRACT LAW POWER of CHOICE / "FREE WILL to CONTRACT" 1) More than 1 party is needed to contract 2) AGREEMENT = OFFER & ACCEPTANCE - OFFER is the "presentment", therefore, without acceptance, there can be NO contract. - ACCEPTANCE is taken as "TACIT" ( applied though not expressed) if NO has not been verbally said. * A presentment can be accepted as noted : "with conditional acceptance" 3) There MUST be an INTENTION to CREATE a "Legal Relationship", ie: AGREE to the consiquences of breaking the contract 4) LAWFUL "CONSIDERATION" Both or all parties have to give something of value to be considered a contract * Consideration has to be agreed to by ALL parties to be LEGAL #1 POINT / Mortgages... Bank Accounts...Credit Cards When you got your Mortgage...WHAT did the bank put up as "Lawful Consideration" FULL DISCLOSURE MUST be given to be LAWFUL 5) CAPACITY to contract requires that Full Disclosure be given and "understood/comprehended" in full to be Lawful... NO minor,drunkard,lunatic, or other mental incapicity can be present to be a Lawful Contract 6) FREE CONSENT : ..............FRAUD........... NO force, trickery, undue influence, misrepresentation, coercion can take place. * ANY mistake therein, VOIDS the contract between TRUSTEE/BENEFICIARY 7) LAWFUL OBJECT : "anything" illegal or harmful to either party, made, or in part of the contract, VOIDS the contract 8) CERTAINTY of MEANING or FULL DISCLOSURE: *** Almost ALL contracts are VOID because the parties that signed have NOT, with certainty, "understood or comprehended" the LEGAL meaning of the "CONTRACTED WORDS", ie: person, individual, citizen, etc. and therefore, as undefined = FRAUD!............ man, woman, is WHO you are, ALL other words or terms used to contract are LEGAL terms for FICTION! 9) SIGNATURE and AUTOGRAPH : Signature = FICTION / Corporate Identity, LGBTQS2+ et al Autograph = "LIVING", man or woman...period! *** if you as a man or woman sign a contract there is NO CONTRACT because... there CANNOT be a contract wherein one side is "living" and the other is a "fictional" identity 10) YOU must have CERTAINTY : of the TERMS and PRIVACY to CONTRACT BOTH have to APPROVE! VOID if broken and must be re-done. (Example the BNA Act of 1867, the contract died when Queen Victoria died in 1901...similar to a Power of Attorney document, VOID when there's the death. Queen Victoria took OUT her Heirs) Darcy Martans made a Flyer to motivate more of her town and local area for meetings. Darcy added her email and phone contact info attached is word document of flyer - please change the contact info to you or your local group email - also emailed out was phase 1 and phase 2 pdf files - please forward these out to your family and friends Thank you “CANADIAN’S do NOT have An ABSOLUTE RIGHT to PRIVATE PROPERTY” Federal Justice Minister, David Lametti Spring 2022 "YOU WILL OWN NOTHING AND BE HAPPY" AGENDA 2030 WEF/ World Economic Forum Founder Klaus Schwab LEARN HOW TO END THE FRAUD CONTACT: ConstitutionalConventions.ca info@constitutionalconventions.ca Darcy Martans - with important inforamation (Share) Deputation Hamilton ON, Erin Gomaz, November 6 2023 Deputation to Huntsvillle, January 29 2024 Peggy Pederson Shelagh McFarlane Lawful Affirmation and Declaration of Dominion (use this document to collect autographs of support).

Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Brian Thiesen - MONEY TALKS: Part 1 - Smart Meter Fires https://rumble.com/v4csfol-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-1-smart-meter-fires.html Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 2 - Big Data, Big Power, Big Government https://rumble.com/v4csmd3-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-2-big-data-big-power-big-government.html Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 3 - Pensions, Power, Politics and Climate - https://rumble.com/v4cse96-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-3-pensions-power-politics-and-climate.html Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes If interested please copy and send in your letter for a response BC Minister of Finance PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't Victoria, BC V8W 9E2 From: January 8, 2024 To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy, Good day Minister, It has come to my attention that THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, CANADA REVENUE AGENCY, and the GOVERNMENT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA CANADA et al, are corporate entities. (see inclosed papers from Dun & Bradstreet) When I inquired in 2023 of the truth of this, to both BC MP Lorne Derksen and FED MP Todd Doherty, I received no response federally, MP Derksen told me he didn't know and to look into it myself, which I did. The government of BC is a registered corporation in Hong Kong! My requirement to you, Honourable Minister Conroy, comes because you should be able to provide the financial documents I seek based on your position in government. I have spent the past months, an arduous process indeed, looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes, which my family and I have always paid faithfully. However, understanding some corporate procedures,there's a requirement to documents of full disclosure, informed consent, and signed contracts with the entities involved in any contractual obligation. My aged mother said she's never signed a contract, nor have I. With your knowledge in the Finance Department, would you kindly forward by e-mail and in writing, the legislative documentation, document/s, contracts, requiring the payment of Property Taxes. I require this information to lawfully give my consent. Please respond by January 31,2024 to the above address/e-mail. Sincerely, ___________________________________________________________ PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't Victoria BC V8W 9E2 To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy Good day Minister, I am sending you a second letter. There is further documentation included; 1) Copy of the 1st letter dated, January 8, 2024, received January 10, 2024 and confirmed 2) Copy of who Dun & Bradstreet is 3) Copies showing proof that the Province of British Columbia, and the Government of Canada, are corporations 4) Copy of The Clearfield Doctrine, showing the illegality of taxation by corporations, and accepted worldwide 5) Copy of 10 simple truths of contract law Therefore, it is incumbent of you, with the title of Minister of Finance, to provide me with the proof of obligation to pay Property Tax. I am, and have been willing to pay property taxes, provided I am doing so lawfully and with full disclosure and consent. Please respond within 7 days both written and by e-mail to; Thank you. _________________________________________________________ Proof of Claim CRA or Canada! Letter of Claim to "CRA" and "ARO" https://www.aro.ca/en/ We do not recall, and our files do not indicate that we have any contractual obligation to "CRA" or "ARO". Therefore, you are demanded to validate your claim, pursuant to Laws of (province) and Canada and provide me with the following documents: 1. Certified copy of the contract giving rise to alleged debt claimed on your aforementioned letter. 2. Letter of commitment,signed by an officer of your company, attesting to the Lawfulness, legitimacy and accuracy of the Claims as well as your company's full compliance with all the laws,provincial and federal, govering your company's actions in relation to this matter. 3.Copy of contract between yor company and the entity you be acting on behalf of. 4. Collection Agency license number of your company ("CRA" and "ARO") 5.Collection Agent License number for person(s) contacting me on behalf of your company. 6. Since I presume that "CRA" authority devolves from the Income Tax Act and "ARO" receives its authority from some other law which would also in turn, receive its authority from, at least ultimately of you "CRA" and "ARO", proof that the Constitutional Act, 1982 has been properly proclaimed into law, which would involve proof that Section 59 of the Charter has been fulfilled. Proof of Claim CRA or Canada! video ok, from what you can find lawfully please provide a letter to give to a CA to ensure they are acting in good faith... Below is a template for a letter you can use to request verification of a debt from a Collection Agency (CA). This letter is designed to ensure that the CA is acting in good faith and to protect your rights. Please note that this is a general template and may need to be adjusted based on your specific circumstances and local laws. It's advisable to consult with a legal professional for personalized advice. [Your Full Name] [Your Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] [Date] [Collection Agency's Name] [Collection Agency's Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] Re: Request for Verification of Debt Dear [Collection Agency's Name], I am writing in response to your [call/letter/email] dated [Date of the CA's communication], regarding an alleged debt for [Name of the Original Creditor], account number [Account Number, if provided]. Under my rights as per the applicable provincial and federal laws, I am requesting a validation of this debt. Please provide the following documentation to verify the legitimacy of the alleged debt: Certified Copy of Original Contract: A certified copy of the original contract or agreement with [Original Creditor's Name] that gives rise to the alleged debt. Letter of Commitment: A letter signed by an officer of your agency, attesting to the lawfulness, legitimacy, and accuracy of the claim. This letter should also confirm your agency's compliance with all relevant laws governing debt collection activities. Proof of Authority to Collect: A copy of the contract or agreement between your agency and [Original Creditor's Name] that authorizes you to collect on this alleged debt. Detailed Statement of the Debt: A detailed statement of the amount being claimed, including an itemization of any additional charges or fees. Proof of Last Payment: If applicable, the date and amount of the last payment made on this account. Please note that until the requested documentation is provided, I consider this matter to be in dispute. Furthermore, I request that all communications regarding this alleged debt be made in writing and sent to the address noted above. In accordance with the law, I expect a response to this request within 30 days of the receipt of this letter. Failure to provide the requested documentation within this timeframe will be interpreted as an acknowledgment that the debt is unverified and must be removed from my credit report, and that any further collection attempts are ceased. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response. Sincerely, [Your Name] Remember, this letter is a request for information and does not acknowledge the debt as yours. It's important to send this letter via registered mail or a method that provides proof of delivery. Keep a copy of the letter and any correspondence you receive in response for your records. In the letter template I provided, I adhered closely to the key elements you mentioned in your original text. However, I did include a few additional standard requests commonly used in debt verification letters for completeness and clarity: Detailed Statement of the Debt: This includes an itemization of any additional charges or fees. This detail is often important to fully understand the breakdown of the claimed debt. Proof of Last Payment: If there were any payments made on the account, this information helps establish the history of the debt. Method of Communication: I included a request that all communications be made in writing. This is a common practice to ensure there's a clear record of all interactions. Timeframe for Response: I specified a 30-day period for the CA to respond, which is a standard timeframe in many jurisdictions for debt verification requests. These additions are meant to provide a more comprehensive framework for the verification of the debt and to protect your rights in the process. However, if you prefer to stick strictly to the points mentioned in your original text, you can modify the template accordingly. Remember, it's always advisable to tailor any legal document to your specific situation and to consult with a legal professional if you have any doubts or questions. ______________________________________________________ 10 POINTS of CONTRACT LAW POWER of CHOICE / "FREE WILL to CONTRACT" 1) More than 1 party is needed to contract 2) AGREEMENT = OFFER & ACCEPTANCE - OFFER is the "presentment", therefore, without acceptance, there can be NO contract. - ACCEPTANCE is taken as "TACIT" ( applied though not expressed) if NO has not been verbally said. * A presentment can be accepted as noted : "with conditional acceptance" 3) There MUST be an INTENTION to CREATE a "Legal Relationship", ie: AGREE to the consiquences of breaking the contract 4) LAWFUL "CONSIDERATION" Both or all parties have to give something of value to be considered a contract * Consideration has to be agreed to by ALL parties to be LEGAL #1 POINT / Mortgages... Bank Accounts...Credit Cards When you got your Mortgage...WHAT did the bank put up as "Lawful Consideration" FULL DISCLOSURE MUST be given to be LAWFUL 5) CAPACITY to contract requires that Full Disclosure be given and "understood/comprehended" in full to be Lawful... NO minor,drunkard,lunatic, or other mental incapicity can be present to be a Lawful Contract 6) FREE CONSENT : ..............FRAUD........... NO force, trickery, undue influence, misrepresentation, coercion can take place. * ANY mistake therein, VOIDS the contract between TRUSTEE/BENEFICIARY 7) LAWFUL OBJECT : "anything" illegal or harmful to either party, made, or in part of the contract, VOIDS the contract 8) CERTAINTY of MEANING or FULL DISCLOSURE: *** Almost ALL contracts are VOID because the parties that signed have NOT, with certainty, "understood or comprehended" the LEGAL meaning of the "CONTRACTED WORDS", ie: person, individual, citizen, etc. and therefore, as undefined = FRAUD!............ man, woman, is WHO you are, ALL other words or terms used to contract are LEGAL terms for FICTION! 9) SIGNATURE and AUTOGRAPH : Signature = FICTION / Corporate Identity, LGBTQS2+ et al Autograph = "LIVING", man or woman...period! *** if you as a man or woman sign a contract there is NO CONTRACT because... there CANNOT be a contract wherein one side is "living" and the other is a "fictional" identity 10) YOU must have CERTAINTY : of the TERMS and PRIVACY to CONTRACT BOTH have to APPROVE! VOID if broken and must be re-done. (Example the BNA Act of 1867, the contract died when Queen Victoria died in 1901...similar to a Power of Attorney document, VOID when there's the death. Queen Victoria took OUT her Heirs) Darcy Martans made a Flyer to motivate more of her town and local area for meetings. Darcy added her email and phone contact info attached is word document of flyer - please change the contact info to you or your local group email - also emailed out was phase 1 and phase 2 pdf files - please forward these out to your family and friends Thank you “CANADIAN’S do NOT have An ABSOLUTE RIGHT to PRIVATE PROPERTY” Federal Justice Minister, David Lametti Spring 2022 "YOU WILL OWN NOTHING AND BE HAPPY" AGENDA 2030 WEF/ World Economic Forum Founder Klaus Schwab LEARN HOW TO END THE FRAUD CONTACT: ConstitutionalConventions.ca info@constitutionalconventions.ca Darcy Martans - with important inforamation (Share) Deputation Hamilton ON, Erin Gomaz, November 6 2023 Deputation to Huntsvillle, January 29 2024 Peggy Pederson Shelagh McFarlane Lawful Affirmation and Declaration of Dominion (use this document to collect autographs of support).

Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Brian Thiesen - MONEY TALKS: Part 1 - Smart Meter Fires https://rumble.com/v4csfol-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-1-smart-meter-fires.html Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 2 - Big Data, Big Power, Big Government https://rumble.com/v4csmd3-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-2-big-data-big-power-big-government.html Brian Thiesen -MONEY TALKS: Part 3 - Pensions, Power, Politics and Climate - https://rumble.com/v4cse96-brian-thiesen-money-talks-part-3-pensions-power-politics-and-climate.html Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes If interested please copy and send in your letter for a response BC Minister of Finance PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't Victoria, BC V8W 9E2 From: January 8, 2024 To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy, Good day Minister, It has come to my attention that THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, CANADA REVENUE AGENCY, and the GOVERNMENT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA CANADA et al, are corporate entities. (see inclosed papers from Dun & Bradstreet) When I inquired in 2023 of the truth of this, to both BC MP Lorne Derksen and FED MP Todd Doherty, I received no response federally, MP Derksen told me he didn't know and to look into it myself, which I did. The government of BC is a registered corporation in Hong Kong! My requirement to you, Honourable Minister Conroy, comes because you should be able to provide the financial documents I seek based on your position in government. I have spent the past months, an arduous process indeed, looking for any Act, Statute, Legislation et al showing the contractual obligation to Property Taxes, which my family and I have always paid faithfully. However, understanding some corporate procedures,there's a requirement to documents of full disclosure, informed consent, and signed contracts with the entities involved in any contractual obligation. My aged mother said she's never signed a contract, nor have I. With your knowledge in the Finance Department, would you kindly forward by e-mail and in writing, the legislative documentation, document/s, contracts, requiring the payment of Property Taxes. I require this information to lawfully give my consent. Please respond by January 31,2024 to the above address/e-mail. Sincerely, ___________________________________________________________ PO Box 9048 Stn. Prov. Gov't Victoria BC V8W 9E2 To: Hon. Minister of Finance, Katrine Conroy Good day Minister, I am sending you a second letter. There is further documentation included; 1) Copy of the 1st letter dated, January 8, 2024, received January 10, 2024 and confirmed 2) Copy of who Dun & Bradstreet is 3) Copies showing proof that the Province of British Columbia, and the Government of Canada, are corporations 4) Copy of The Clearfield Doctrine, showing the illegality of taxation by corporations, and accepted worldwide 5) Copy of 10 simple truths of contract law Therefore, it is incumbent of you, with the title of Minister of Finance, to provide me with the proof of obligation to pay Property Tax. I am, and have been willing to pay property taxes, provided I am doing so lawfully and with full disclosure and consent. Please respond within 7 days both written and by e-mail to; Thank you. _________________________________________________________ Proof of Claim CRA or Canada! Letter of Claim to "CRA" and "ARO" https://www.aro.ca/en/ We do not recall, and our files do not indicate that we have any contractual obligation to "CRA" or "ARO". Therefore, you are demanded to validate your claim, pursuant to Laws of (province) and Canada and provide me with the following documents: 1. Certified copy of the contract giving rise to alleged debt claimed on your aforementioned letter. 2. Letter of commitment,signed by an officer of your company, attesting to the Lawfulness, legitimacy and accuracy of the Claims as well as your company's full compliance with all the laws,provincial and federal, govering your company's actions in relation to this matter. 3.Copy of contract between yor company and the entity you be acting on behalf of. 4. Collection Agency license number of your company ("CRA" and "ARO") 5.Collection Agent License number for person(s) contacting me on behalf of your company. 6. Since I presume that "CRA" authority devolves from the Income Tax Act and "ARO" receives its authority from some other law which would also in turn, receive its authority from, at least ultimately of you "CRA" and "ARO", proof that the Constitutional Act, 1982 has been properly proclaimed into law, which would involve proof that Section 59 of the Charter has been fulfilled. Proof of Claim CRA or Canada! video ok, from what you can find lawfully please provide a letter to give to a CA to ensure they are acting in good faith... Below is a template for a letter you can use to request verification of a debt from a Collection Agency (CA). This letter is designed to ensure that the CA is acting in good faith and to protect your rights. Please note that this is a general template and may need to be adjusted based on your specific circumstances and local laws. It's advisable to consult with a legal professional for personalized advice. [Your Full Name] [Your Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] [Date] [Collection Agency's Name] [Collection Agency's Address] [City, Province, Postal Code] Re: Request for Verification of Debt Dear [Collection Agency's Name], I am writing in response to your [call/letter/email] dated [Date of the CA's communication], regarding an alleged debt for [Name of the Original Creditor], account number [Account Number, if provided]. Under my rights as per the applicable provincial and federal laws, I am requesting a validation of this debt. Please provide the following documentation to verify the legitimacy of the alleged debt: Certified Copy of Original Contract: A certified copy of the original contract or agreement with [Original Creditor's Name] that gives rise to the alleged debt. Letter of Commitment: A letter signed by an officer of your agency, attesting to the lawfulness, legitimacy, and accuracy of the claim. This letter should also confirm your agency's compliance with all relevant laws governing debt collection activities. Proof of Authority to Collect: A copy of the contract or agreement between your agency and [Original Creditor's Name] that authorizes you to collect on this alleged debt. Detailed Statement of the Debt: A detailed statement of the amount being claimed, including an itemization of any additional charges or fees. Proof of Last Payment: If applicable, the date and amount of the last payment made on this account. Please note that until the requested documentation is provided, I consider this matter to be in dispute. Furthermore, I request that all communications regarding this alleged debt be made in writing and sent to the address noted above. In accordance with the law, I expect a response to this request within 30 days of the receipt of this letter. Failure to provide the requested documentation within this timeframe will be interpreted as an acknowledgment that the debt is unverified and must be removed from my credit report, and that any further collection attempts are ceased. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response. Sincerely, [Your Name] Remember, this letter is a request for information and does not acknowledge the debt as yours. It's important to send this letter via registered mail or a method that provides proof of delivery. Keep a copy of the letter and any correspondence you receive in response for your records. In the letter template I provided, I adhered closely to the key elements you mentioned in your original text. However, I did include a few additional standard requests commonly used in debt verification letters for completeness and clarity: Detailed Statement of the Debt: This includes an itemization of any additional charges or fees. This detail is often important to fully understand the breakdown of the claimed debt. Proof of Last Payment: If there were any payments made on the account, this information helps establish the history of the debt. Method of Communication: I included a request that all communications be made in writing. This is a common practice to ensure there's a clear record of all interactions. Timeframe for Response: I specified a 30-day period for the CA to respond, which is a standard timeframe in many jurisdictions for debt verification requests. These additions are meant to provide a more comprehensive framework for the verification of the debt and to protect your rights in the process. However, if you prefer to stick strictly to the points mentioned in your original text, you can modify the template accordingly. Remember, it's always advisable to tailor any legal document to your specific situation and to consult with a legal professional if you have any doubts or questions. ______________________________________________________ 10 POINTS of CONTRACT LAW POWER of CHOICE / "FREE WILL to CONTRACT" 1) More than 1 party is needed to contract 2) AGREEMENT = OFFER & ACCEPTANCE - OFFER is the "presentment", therefore, without acceptance, there can be NO contract. - ACCEPTANCE is taken as "TACIT" ( applied though not expressed) if NO has not been verbally said. * A presentment can be accepted as noted : "with conditional acceptance" 3) There MUST be an INTENTION to CREATE a "Legal Relationship", ie: AGREE to the consiquences of breaking the contract 4) LAWFUL "CONSIDERATION" Both or all parties have to give something of value to be considered a contract * Consideration has to be agreed to by ALL parties to be LEGAL #1 POINT / Mortgages... Bank Accounts...Credit Cards When you got your Mortgage...WHAT did the bank put up as "Lawful Consideration" FULL DISCLOSURE MUST be given to be LAWFUL 5) CAPACITY to contract requires that Full Disclosure be given and "understood/comprehended" in full to be Lawful... NO minor,drunkard,lunatic, or other mental incapicity can be present to be a Lawful Contract 6) FREE CONSENT : ..............FRAUD........... NO force, trickery, undue influence, misrepresentation, coercion can take place. * ANY mistake therein, VOIDS the contract between TRUSTEE/BENEFICIARY 7) LAWFUL OBJECT : "anything" illegal or harmful to either party, made, or in part of the contract, VOIDS the contract 8) CERTAINTY of MEANING or FULL DISCLOSURE: *** Almost ALL contracts are VOID because the parties that signed have NOT, with certainty, "understood or comprehended" the LEGAL meaning of the "CONTRACTED WORDS", ie: person, individual, citizen, etc. and therefore, as undefined = FRAUD!............ man, woman, is WHO you are, ALL other words or terms used to contract are LEGAL terms for FICTION! 9) SIGNATURE and AUTOGRAPH : Signature = FICTION / Corporate Identity, LGBTQS2+ et al Autograph = "LIVING", man or woman...period! *** if you as a man or woman sign a contract there is NO CONTRACT because... there CANNOT be a contract wherein one side is "living" and the other is a "fictional" identity 10) YOU must have CERTAINTY : of the TERMS and PRIVACY to CONTRACT BOTH have to APPROVE! VOID if broken and must be re-done. (Example the BNA Act of 1867, the contract died when Queen Victoria died in 1901...similar to a Power of Attorney document, VOID when there's the death. Queen Victoria took OUT her Heirs) Darcy Martans made a Flyer to motivate more of her town and local area for meetings. Darcy added her email and phone contact info attached is word document of flyer - please change the contact info to you or your local group email - also emailed out was phase 1 and phase 2 pdf files - please forward these out to your family and friends Thank you “CANADIAN’S do NOT have An ABSOLUTE RIGHT to PRIVATE PROPERTY” Federal Justice Minister, David Lametti Spring 2022 "YOU WILL OWN NOTHING AND BE HAPPY" AGENDA 2030 WEF/ World Economic Forum Founder Klaus Schwab LEARN HOW TO END THE FRAUD CONTACT: ConstitutionalConventions.ca info@constitutionalconventions.ca Darcy Martans - with important inforamation (Share) Deputation Hamilton ON, Erin Gomaz, November 6 2023 Deputation to Huntsvillle, January 29 2024 Peggy Pederson Shelagh McFarlane Lawful Affirmation and Declaration of Dominion (use this document to collect autographs of support).