Food for the Faithful

https://www.reddit.com/r/Jung/comments/bk6n50/what_does_the_term_anima_possession_mean_in_the/ https://lonerwolf.com/the-anima-and-animus/

An academic experiment in how totalitarian social theories are infiltrating our society through the Academy: Note that the howling left demands social conformity by constantly harping on the threat to social order posed by alt-right ideology without ever being able to provide a definition of precisely who they are referring to and what they mean by "alt-right". As a Classical Liberal in the English sense, I find the far left's reaction to be very telling. So, here's an experiment for my readers and listeners to try. Type Postmodernism and Critical Theory along with the name of any university in the Western World into a search engine of your choice then watch what that search engine will find. Virtually to an Academy Cultural Marxist Critical Theory and Postmodernism are being taught as viable and sensible socio-political theories. Then type Fascism or Nazism into the same search engine along with any Academy which comes to mind to discover how many are teaching actual far right totalitarian ideologies as viable socio-political theories rather than as disastrous experiments in totalitarian tyranny. I cannot find any Academy teaching them as viable socio-political theories, but I invite you to share with me links to your searches if you were able to find any which are doing so. Postmodernism and Critical Theory are the actual threats that we need to be speaking about. Any sane tax paying citizen ought to be demanding that their legislators immediately cease to fund such courses and ensure that tenure is refused to any professor who teaches such dangerous Neo-Marxist ideologies as viable socio-political options to our youth. By this I mean that it ought to be fully encouraged to discuss and debate these ideologies but never to present them as a solution to constitutionally limited government, the Rule of Law, and individual freedom and personal autonomy for to do so is to undermine the underpinning philosophical foundation of Western Culture. The sovereign and accountable individual created in the Divine image is the bedrock for a free society. Let good ideas succeed in the greatest market of all, the free market of open debate where truly hideous ideas can be exposed for being the toxic ideologies that they are. Every social collectivist society has invariably resulted in oppression and tyranny featuring uniformity of thought where dissenting opinions were crushed under the societal desire to create absolute social compliance and homogeneity. This is known by many names in various parts of the world, sometimes it is known as the nail which sticks up must get pounded down, crab-in-a-bucket syndrome, tall poppy syndrome, or Janteloven. No matter what we may call it, they all refer to the same mind worm, namely, to shut up and comply because you’re only a cog in a big machine! I for one abhor with a gut-wrenching flaming passion such cloying demands for marching in jack-booted lockstep like so many blind sheep herded by our leading psychopaths to ruin. “. . .the totalitarian systems of the 20th century represent a kind of collective psychosis. Whether gradually or suddenly, reason and common human decency are no longer possible in such a system: there is only a pervasive atmosphere of terror, and a projection of “the enemy,” imagined to be “in our midst.” Thus society turns on itself, urged on by the ruling authorities.” Joost Meerloo, The Rape of the Mind “The phenomenon we have witnessed in Germany was nothing less than [an] outbreak of epidemic insanity. . . No one knew what was happening to him, least of all of the Germans, who allowed themselves to be driven to the slaughterhouse by their leading psychopaths like hypnotized sheep.” Carl Jung, After the Catastrophe

First Principles: Elon Musk on the Power of Thinking for Yourself written by JAMES CLEAR James Clear writes about habits, decision making, and continuous improvement. He is the author of the #1 New York Times bestseller, Atomic Habits. The book has sold over 7 million copies worldwide and has been translated into more than 50 languages. https://jamesclear.com/first-principles

Yesterday I wrote a post about gaslighting as well as produced a podcast on that topic entitled, “Gaslight this: Projecting and problem solving do not mix”. I need to clarify that gaslighting occurs only under circumstances where someone is being falsely accused, or mischaracterized. However, if you are pointing out damaging behaviour to someone whose conduct is affecting you negatively, particularly when it is habitual, that is not gaslighting. This is simply giving the other party an opportunity to reflect on their behaviour. If upon reflection, they become angered by your assertiveness then you're likely looking at someone who refuses to alter their negatively behaviour which is likely to be their patterned manner of responding to criticism. When this occurs, if at all possible, you must distance yourself from that person since this behaviour is harmful to both themself as well as to others. Recognize that the only person whose behaviour you can change is that of yourself. If the other party refuses your warning, it's sayonara time.

False promises, commitments which aren't met, platitudes, and low-resolution ideologies have become substitutes for dealing with complex multivariate issues. Most often they're employed in lieu of sincere and earnest evaluations of the actual sources for human suffering and societal problems. Recognizing that problems and suffering are both inevitable and inherent to our existence is where the journey for truth must begin because halfway measures will avail us nothing. For us to deal with the suffering nature of existence the quest for meaning and solutions in the face of it must begin within ourselves. And the most significant suffering we endure is due to our own inability to be honest with ourselves. Which is why humans are the only living creature capable of constructing lies then believing their own lies. Gaslighting is how these lies will manifest themselves by projecting the blame for suffering and unresolved problems onto others. If you have made a comprehensive defense of reality and the pursuit of truth using reason, ethics, epistemology, and ontology, yet you're still being accused of stating things you've not stated, then you're being gaslighted. It's far easier to project our inadequacies onto others rather than examine our own flawed thinking. Therefore, I choose to avoid at all costs defending my moral rectitude but rather choose to defend what I can prove to be demonstrably true. Sadly, in the Academy today if students refuse to base their arguments on their professor’s ideological possession, they will receive lousy grades due to their "educators" inherent prejudices. And the same issue exists in Postmodern legislatures where ideology has come to mean more than practical solutions to the problems we face.

The single most appalling aspect of Postmodern society is how readily people swallow the official state narrative being propagated by the legacy media without questioning it's dictatorial and contradictory hypocrisy. On my birthday I have one observation regarding my fellows which has been demonstrated consistently since my awakening to ideological possession, namely that people cannot define themselves what it is that they believe, nor do they have any interest in understanding how damaging the official narrative has been to maintain healthy social order. The ignorance is a direct result of an utter inability for reflection and individuation. If we continue this path the West will become no different than the Third Reich, the Soviet Union and its satellite countries behind the Iron Curtain of disinformation. Behold the erecting of a new iron curtain of the mind under which blind social collectivism and conformity will be the prevalent lunacy. I warn you about merely attacking the symptoms of society's current ideological possession. There is but one source for the mental pathogen which is undermining social order. Playing whack-a-mole with the radical left is to be cooperating with the Hegelian Dialectic they're using to deceive us. They will invent myriad of new ways to distract us to prevent us from focusing on the source of the problem. We must attack the serpent's head, the Cultural Marxist Critical Theory the powers that be are using to undermine the Rule of Law, Constitutionalism, and proper Parliamentary oversight and accountability. One of our biggest challenges in orienting ourselves in a Postmodern world is the fact that we find it difficult to comprehend that the materialism of socialism being applied in the current political sphere has severed our connection to finding higher spiritual ontological meaning. Under a guise of equity, the radical left has convinced modern humanity that life is a zero-sum game and merely a struggle over finite material resources. This is the great insidious lie of all Neo-Marxist ideologies, that pursuing spiritual meaning is the opiate of the masses and that the state must redistribute material wealth. Invariably this has resulted in wealth being accumulated by the elite whose narcissism has deluded them into believing that they have the moral authority to know why is good for us while denying God His proper place in maintaining social order. All because our grasping political class asserts that life is purely a material struggle over physical resources. https://www.perfectingofthesaints.com/articles/articles-false-doctrine-in-the-end-times/#:~:text=False%20Doctrine%20in%20the%20End%20Times%20Pastor%20A.,just%20teaching%E2%80%A6it%20is%20specific%20teaching%20regarding%20absolute%20truth.

https://ci-ic.org/blog/2021/01/23/173-years-since-marx-and-engels-established-the-communist-manifesto/#:~:text=Marx%20and%20Engels%20are%20the%20fathers%20of%20scientific,catachetical%20form%20and%20call%20the%20thing%20Communist%20Manifesto%21 Can anyone explain to me why it's so shocking that nations which have been our biggest ideological enemies are the very nations causing the greatest human suffering at present? The very fact that we have chosen to do business with them is abundant proof of the depths of our own complicity and naivety. Stop with this faux virtue signalling outrage. Since the West chose to get into bed with Beelzebub we ought not to be surprised that our whoring has resulted in creating Satan's spawn. The locus for the nexus of the Divine encounter exists only at the level of the individual. Social collectivism is a rejection of the spiritual nature of our humanity. Not a single culture has ever evolved which didn't have an ontology to provide individuals with a framework which could give life a higher meaning and purpose. Social collectivism is an expression of the nihilism which is the inevitable consequence of rejecting such an ontological framework. It is an attempt to create, as Nietzsche warned, the Ubermensch, namely the man who would become his own god. And it invariably has led to murderous antihuman tyranny. On December 1st, 1939, at the Swiss Federal Institute for Technology (ETH) Carl Jung is quoted from his lecture as stating that “we fall captive to the herd animal if we cannot reach the individual Divinity within ourselves”. In this short statement he described the reason for the totalitarian tyranny that was the predominant ideological pathogen of the 20th Century which resulted in the murder and oppression of countless millions around the world. All because mankind rejected his own individuality, sovereign, and spiritual nature. In this he echoed what Nietzsche had asserted “God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?” Western authoritarian governments seek to fulfil these sacred games by creating a version of political ideology which rejects the Divine, loathes the individual, and seeks to create some version of future utopia which will be built on the corpses of its citizens and the ruins of the institutions their ideology is corrupting. And there won’t be enough water to wash away the filth of their perversion of constitutionally limited responsible government. This is the very reason that voting cannot solve our ideological crisis. We must become the counter-revolution. This toxic ideology must die under our knives which must be forged by reason and religious passion to place our Christian heritage and values once again in the fore. As Jung asserted the responsibility for this task rests solely on the individual and his or her encounter with the Divine within themselves. Salvation cannot be found in social collectivism because no one is responsible or accountable for our individual sins but each one of us. They must be brought to God and repented of for us to find forgiveness and salvation. It is only by this process that society writ large will be healed because every soul brought into proper relationship with the Divine nexus within will affect healing which will extend beyond ourselves into our family, friends, and fellow citizens. “You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden. Nor do people light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on a stand, and it gives light to all in the house. In the same way, let your light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven.”: Matthew 5:14-16

I'm an ignorant man, nevertheless I seek after wisdom, and I'm wise enough to despise Janteloven. It is a pathological ideological phenomenon which drives not merely the envy upon which socialism is socially constructed but also offers demonstrable proof of socialism's unworkability. Even people who reject Janteloven yet who grew up with it are affected by it. I have noted they often ask rhetorical questions without ever coming to reasonable conclusions. Since I teach problem solving I know that if the correct questions are asked in the proper sequence that ultimately root causes for problems will appear. Janteloven has made it impossible for those affected by it to ask the right questions in proper sequence, moreover it has made them unwilling to act upon the inevitable conclusions of a proper line of inquiry. Janteloven cause people to become impotent and unwilling to act assertively and it drives me insane whenever I encounter it. But wait, it is worse than what I've stated since the Janteloveners and their victims have entered some bizarre pact where the victim plays along with their victimization. It's no small coincidence that Stockholm Syndrome was first recognized due to a hostage incident in the capital of Sweden where the captors entered into a weird symbiotic relationship with their captors. They cooperate with their abuser purely out of fear for reprisals in spite of the fact that the passive aggressive nature of both abuser and victim are constantly on display. It puts flesh on the concept that the beatings will continue until moral improves because no good deed will go unpunished. If you were to point this out to either party they would either faltly deny it or grow furious, which pretty much sums up why both parties are playing a passive-aggressive pathological unending game where nothing ever gets resolved. Und ze beat goes on! The ten rules of Janteloven state: You're not to think you are anything special. You're not to think you are as good as we are. You're not to think you are smarter than we are. You're not to imagine yourself better than we are. You're not to think you know more than we do. You're not to think you are more important than we are. You're not to think you are good at anything. You're not to laugh at us. You're not to think anyone cares about you. You're not to think you can teach us anything. The Janters who transgress this unwritten 'law' are regarded with suspicion and some hostility, as it goes against the town's communal desire to preserve harmony, social stability, and uniformity. http://www.ruachministries.org/JanteSpirit.htm#:~:text=Written%20in%201933%2C%20it%20tells%20about%20the%20ugly,to%20have%20owned%20it%20as%20their%20particular%20DNA.

Stoltenberg's first steps into politics came in his early teens, when he was influenced by his sister Camilla, who at the time was a member of the then Marxist–Leninist group Red Youth. Opposition to the Vietnam War was his triggering motivation. Following heavy bombing raids against the North Vietnamese port city of Hai Phong at the end of the Vietnam War, he participated in protest rallies targeting the United States Embassy in Oslo. On at least one occasion embassy windows were broken by stone-throwing protesters. Several of Stoltenberg's friends were arrested by the police after these events. Up to 1990, he had regular contacts with a Soviet diplomat. He ended this relationship after being informed by the Norwegian Police Security Service his contact was a KGB agent, warning him of further contact. Stoltenberg's code name within the KGB was "Steklov". https://www.newsinenglish.no/2016/10/14/stoltenberg-still-making-headlines/?fbclid=IwAR2NNwVZ28EPxFwWTAscfDFP_Wt-juIko8PVeb2aUVlmSVHY_EOqUFD-04E https://www.nrk.no/norge/stoltenberg-fikk-kodenavn-av-russerne-1.13157661?fbclid=IwAR3-ycWcsl2HwDEF90D1UsHULvumpqIUO_H1lTGmPWBxtUGNsmpEN2mAWR0 https://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/i/kaJoOj/kodenavn-steklov?fbclid=IwAR3pCN8HjBVmmcsBrmtfWQv81APDpqK0kXCAa8tRbmzp7-3Y2bdMdUkWtlE https://ivarfjeld.com/2022/03/01/agent-steklov-on-top-of-nato/?fbclid=IwAR0YJXcFOdmckhVwtVwhrPEadaA4F_QL9VcnvsPR8-8EVqkDCCCr2X-KfBQ

For the first time I present my wife in a revealing interview revealing some of the falseness behind social engineering and the vital yet differing roles played by men and women in society as we all as in the armed forces. The radical left hides behind a veil of equity but is that really their goal?

How exciting. Isn't an easily predictable global conflict on the scale of Ragnarok, the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse led by a Beast numbering 666 featuring an energy crisis caused by green lunacy grand? Why we choose to do business with totalitarian regimes instead of mining and refining our own energy resources ethically is a stunning rejection of reason. It is also a crime against humanity if we happen to be looking for another such crime at present. Are we witnessing the old struggle between the two competing versions of socialism re-emerge? Are the two main versions of social collectivism with its rejection of individual liberty what lies behind the Ukrainian conflict? I recall visiting Vemork Museum in Telemark Norway so as to better understand the resistance fighters who prevented heavy water from being shipped to Germany. In the centre of that museum above the village of Rjukan is a shrine to the Bolshevik Revolution. Two versions of social collectivism were on full display. Nazism and its version of social collectivism identifying with the victimizer and Marxism with its version of social collectivism identifying with the victim. Both murder the very idea of the sovereign and autonomous individual. Both involve total state control over the economy, education, health care, and are replete with social engineering policies led by the state. Both resulted in tyranny and industrial murder on a massive scale. Neither fought to free people from the overreach of the collective. It appalled me as I began to realize that the concept of individual agency was non-existent among them. And I'm not at all certain much has changed today.

How exciting. Isn't an easily predictable global conflict on the scale of Ragnarok, the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse led by a Beast numbering 666 featuring an energy crisis caused by green lunacy grand? Why we choose to do business with totalitarian regimes instead of mining and refining our own energy resources ethically is a stunning rejection of reason. It is also a crime against humanity if we happen to be looking for another such crime at present. Are we witnessing the old struggle between the two competing versions of socialism re-emerge? Are the two main versions of social collectivism with its rejection of individual liberty what lies behind the Ukrainian conflict? I recall visiting Vemork Museum in Telemark Norway so as to better understand the resistance fighters who prevented heavy water from being shipped to Germany. In the centre of that museum above the village of Rjukan is a shrine to the Bolshevik Revolution. Two versions of social collectivism were on full display. Nazism and its version of social collectivism identifying with the victimizer and Marxism with its version of social collectivism identifying with the victim. Both murder the very idea of the sovereign and autonomous individual. Both involve total state control over the economy, education, health care, and are replete with social engineering policies led by the state. Both resulted in tyranny and industrial murder on a massive scale. Neither fought to free people from the overreach of the collective. It appalled me as I began to realize that the concept of individual agency was non-existent among them. And I'm not at all certain much has changed today.

In 1970, Yuri Bezmenov, a 31-year-old KGB officer specializing in propaganda, defected to Canada. Bezmenov (also known as Tomas Schuman) was sickened by the oppressive nature and toll of communist totalitarianism, and wanted to devote his life to educating Western nations, America in particular, on what he and the KGB had been doing to us, to undermine and ultimately destroy our societies. In 1984, Bezmenov published a small book, Love Letter to America, in which he explained, in great detail, how the Communists running the USSR were working to destroy America—not using physical weapons, but through what he described as “cultural subversion.” We don’t know his endgame and neither do we know how much of his KGB training he still employs, but in light of current events, there may be a way for us to get a deeper understanding by studying the words of Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmenov, a former KGB agent who defected to Canada in 1970. In 1984, Bezmenov gave an interview to G. Edward Griffin from which much can be learned today. His most chilling point was that there’s a long-term plan put in play by Russia to defeat America through psychological warfare and “demoralization”. It’s a long game that takes decades to achieve but it may already be bearing fruit. Bezmenov made the point that the work of the KGB mainly does not involve espionage, despite what our popular culture may tell us. Most of the work, 85% of it, was “a slow process which we call either ideological subversion, active measures, or psychological warfare.” In what is perhaps a most striking passage in the interview, here’s how Bezmenov described the state of a “demoralized” person: “As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore,” said Bezmenov. “A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures; even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him [a] concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it, until he [receives] a kick in his fat-bottom. When a military boot crashes his balls then he will understand. But not before that. That’s the [tragedy] of the situation of demoralization.” It’s hard not to see in that the state of many modern Americans. We have become a society of polarized tribes, with some people flat out rejecting facts in favour of narratives and opinions. Once demoralization is completed, the second stage of ideological brainwashing is “destabilization”. During this two-to-five-year period, asserted Bezmenov, what matters is the targeting of essential structural elements of a nation: economy, foreign relations, and defence systems. Basically, the subverter (Russia) would look to destabilize every one of those areas in the United States, considerably weakening it. The third stage would be “crisis”. It would take only up to six weeks to send a country into crisis, explained Bezmenov. The crisis would bring “a violent change of power, structure, and economy” and will be followed by the last stage, “normalization.” That’s when your country is basically taken over, living under a new ideology and reality. This will happen to America unless it gets rid of people who will bring it to a crisis, warned Bezmenov. What’s more “if people will fail to grasp the impending danger of that development, nothing ever can help [the] United States,” adding, “You may kiss goodbye to your freedom.” It bears saying that when he made this statement, he was warning about baby boomers and Democrats of the time. In another, somewhat terrifying excerpt, here’s what Bezmenov had to say about what is really happening in the United States. It may think it is living in peace, but it has been actively at war with Russia. And for some time: “Most of the American politicians, media, and educational system trains another generation of people who think they are living at the peacetime,” said the former KGB agent. “False. United States is in a state of war: undeclared, total war against the basic principles and foundations of this system.” Bezmenov’s interview may be seen here: https://youtu.be/bX3EZCVj2XA

Sophistry is the use of fallacious arguments, especially with the intention of deceiving: example: "trying to argue that I had benefited in any way from the disaster was pure sophistry" Synonyms for deception; hypocrisy, cunning, treachery, guile, duplicity, insincerity, legerdemain, dissimulation, craftiness, fraudulence, deceitfulness, deceptiveness What do the Scriptures say about those who employ such means? Colossians 2:8 ESV: See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ. Ephesians 4:14 ESV: So that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro by the waves and carried about by every wind of doctrine, by human cunning, by craftiness in deceitful schemes. In response to an article entitle Sex and Leadership https://www.bizcatalyst360.com/sex-and-leadership/ written buy an acquaintance of mine Andre van Heerden, I became engaged in a conversation with one of Andre’s readers. Andre van Heerden's article dealt with the distinct roles that men and women play in the workplace. In this postmodern world we're Cultural Marxism Critical Theory not only tries to make things all things equal but all things the same, I left a sarcastic remark attached to the feed below Andre's article. One of the ostrich mob, namely those who live with their heads permanently in the sand, grew enraged at my poor and perhaps vulgar attempt at humor. What's fascinating to me, at least, is the inability of the radical left to admit the failures of their own attempts at social engineering. My wife is one of the first of two women to graduate from Naval Academy (sjøkrigsskolen) in Bergen Norway. She attended Naval Academy at a time when the social engineers in Norway we're trying to prove that women are men, that men are women, and that women are manly. My wife quickly learned that she could not be the best man in the Navy but rather the best woman. Yet although she was an exemplary officer, the role that she fulfilled in the Navy and the Coast Guard was not identical to the roles that men played. Undoubtedly her contribution was equally valuable, but it was not the same. And inevitably, as young women do when they reach a certain age and her biological clock was ticking, she and her ex decided to have a child. During her maternity leave she attended further training at the Naval School of Staff at Akershus Fortress in Oslo which was roughly the equivalent of completing a master’s degree. Since her child had not yet been weaned it was necessary to have the baby brought to her so she could breast feed the little fellow. Herein lies an example of the militaries utter inability to accommodate the difference in sexes. She was placed in a broom closet and asked to sit in an office chair where she was to breast feed her infant son. Needless to say, an office chair was not an ideal place to sit while attempting to breastfeed a baby. Repeatedly the armed forces showed an utter ignorance, or perhaps willful blindness, of how to accommodate women in the armed forces. And at this time, she was already a senior officer. If such treatment was given to senior officers, you can only imagine how difficult it is for female non-commissioned personnel. And yet the social engineers in Norway still insist all things were equal. When her maternity leave was completed, she returned to duty and reported to her commanding officer. She was then ordered to go north to Bodø which is within the Arctic Circle. With some shock and surprise my wife asked her commanding officer, “You wish me to go north to the Arctic Circle with an infant”? At which juncture he told her that she had to prove herself despite the fact did she had served in the Navy and the Coast Guard for seven years and had done exemplary service. At this point she resigned her Commission knowing that all the reason in the world wasn't going to change an experiment in social engineering that was doomed to fail from the start. With Cultural Marxist Critical Theory science is subservient to furthering the Cultural Revolution. Facts therefore must be made to conform to the ideology. Any facts which dismiss or negate the ideology must be attacked with ad hominem illogical fallacies because speech itself, indeed the very words we use, must be made into tools to further the revolution. Andre van Heerden had meet a very valid point in his article, one with which I heartily agreed. Yet the fellow previous mentioned previously became enraged at the fact that I had used sarcasm to reinforce Andre’s point. And there's another amazing aspect of management consultants, managers manage businesses that produce things, either via production, servicing or selling. Almost invariably whenever I read an article on management consulting it appears to me that the consultant has utterly forgotten that managers manage workers, and the workers must have the proper tools and information to do their job correctly the first time. Workplace organization, shopfloor management, problem solving, proper maintenance of equipment, production methods, process flow mapping, pFMEAs and Control Plans seldom seem to enter into the equation. Which leaves me wondering what on earth do these consultants think managers manage? The outraged fellow in question claims to be a professor at a business college here in Canada. At this juncture both my wife and her brother, who is a retired Colonel from the Norwegian Air Force, were engaged in this conversation. My brother-in-law is an extremely successful businessperson with a global clientele. He lives at a villa in France while maintaining a global network of partners and customers that he's served very successfully for years. This alleged business professor expressed clearly that free market economic liberty, the rule of law, and constitutional constraints on democracy we're attacks on democracy. He told me that I hated democracy because I reminded him that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is the supreme law of the land and that therefore the government cannot pass any legislation, even at the local level, that contradicts the Charter. His rage was particularly directed at the Freedom Convoy 2022 who were protesting the government's unconstitutional restriction of movement throughout the dominion of Canada as well as in exiting and returning to Canada. Freedom of movement is guaranteed in the Charter. No law can be passed which limits it, nor can people be forced to have medical procedures which goes against their conscience. This is why Trudeau attempted to ram the emergency measures act through parliament even though the requirements of enacting the emergency measures act had not been met because our PM hoped to do an end run around our Charter. This alleged business professor became practically violent in his attack against not only me but against my brother-in-law and my wife. But better yet, he contradicted himself several times in his own argument while lying about his own military career. When I exposed these contradictions, he erased all of his remarks and left the discussion. Which is a darn pity because I collect postmodern diatribes like a philatelist collects rare stamps with this exception, the ostrich crowd parrot one another’s talking points like they can share the same brain. I have several thoughts about this. Firstly, it's astounding that a person who's a professor in business seems to know so little about doing business. Secondly, that Canadians appear to be utterly ignorant of limited constitutional government functions with its separation of powers; the role of the executive, that of the legislature and that of the judiciary. Without these brakes, without these limits, we won't have democracy, we will have mob rule. Yet that is exactly what the woke mob wants. Out of an attempt to make all things the same their own argument deconstructs itself as reality hits them right in the kisser. Men are not women. Men do not menstruate. Women cannot become men. The nuclear family is the most successful model for raising children in a healthy and moral manner. The desire of Postmodern Cultural Marxist Critical Theorists is to deconstruct civil society while labeling any who happened to notice that they're taking aim straight at normalcy. Their response is to label us as homophobic, racist, bigoted, misogynistic, and sexist. Once again, the raging Postmodern Mob have divided society into an us versus them mentality where we will either agree with their failed attempts at social engineering or be pilloried and vilified for objecting. Instead of embracing our greatest legal inheritance, namely that of English Common Law under which all are deemed to be equal before the law, they have redivided society based upon race, creed, sex, colour, ethnicity, and social status. If we do not stop them using all means at our disposal, their sophistry will dispose of us. Know them by their fallacious arguments and mark their deceit. To them the only narrative permitted is the narrative which furthers the Cultural Revolution, calling all of us a fringe minority holding unacceptable views. Yesterday we exposed one of them, and he took his toys and ran away because his hypocrisy, cunning, treachery, guile, and duplicity couldn’t stand once it has been brought to light. I hope you will all help to do the same when you encounter the ostrich mob with the heads buried deep in the sands of postmodern delusion. `

From yesterday’s podcast: The phrase “Know thyself” was not invented by Socrates, rather it was the motto inscribed on the frontispiece of the Temple of Delphi. This assertion, imperative in its form, indicates that man must stand and live according to his nature. Man must look at himself, into himself. But to find what? And by what means? These two questions are fundamental: First as to, “The what”. Indeed, this invitation to introspection must be connected to the Platonic theory of reminiscence. Everyone, says Socrates, has the knowledge itself, but must just remember. Knowledge is inherent in man, not outside of him. Wisdom however is learning to recollect. Then as to, “The How”. This knowledge of oneself can be achieved only through the Socratic method, that is to say, the dialogue between the soul and the self, or between a student and his teacher. Socrates often acted in the role of a questioner, as an attendant emotional. Socrates’ questions because he knows nothing, knows he knows nothing, has nothing to learn, however he can help his followers to discover the truths they have within themselves. Without this work on ourselves, life is worthless according to Socrates: Hence his axiom, “An unexamined life is not worth living “ His philosophy does not mean, as it does with the sophists, the acquisition of knowledge, rather it is a way of questioning, to challenge, a form of self-concern and self-inquiry. Partly due to the influence of Plato and Aristotle, the term sophistry has come to signify the deliberate use of fallacious reasoning, intellectual charlatanism, and moral unscrupulousness. So let us examine the sophistry of Justin Trudeau who in one short day completely contradicted himself in a news conference for the entire world to see where he revoked the invocation of the Emergency Measures Act when less than 24 hours prior, he had insisted these measures were necessary in spite of the fact the protestors and their vehicles had already been cleared out of the city core. In fact, it is more difficult to travel downtown now than it was when the convoy was present because the authorities have set up random roadblocks stopping legitimate traffic to inquire of the drivers where their vehicles are headed. No illegal inquiry, search and seizure are allowed under English Common Law; therefore, the police do not have legal grounds to stop vehicles and inquire as to their destination. Moreover, within that same time frame Trudeau held another news conference where he claimed to stand with the rights of the Ukraine to defend itself against Russian incursion and therefore, he is sending our troops to their aid. This in spite of the fact that the part of the Ukraine in question is rife with separatists who side with Russia. Media outlets all over the world as well as consuls and embassies have issued statements denouncing Trudeau’s hypocrisy because he had the unmitigated gall to state that he will defend the rights of Ukrainians while crushing civil liberties here in Canada even as bank accounts remain frozen and peaceful protesters remain in jail without bail. I have often asserted and will do so again, our crisis of conscience, for that is what it is, is not a political problem. Rather it is a moral, philosophical, and spiritual one. I am almost 69 years old; I was born late in my parents’ lives. I have a long window into the past. My grandparents were born in the 1880’s, and my great-grandfather in the 1820’s. I know with absolute certainty that moral and spiritual values were a fundamental aspect of how they made value judgements about their leaders. They would never have tolerated political leaders who behaved in such a reprehensible and immoral manner. And this observation certainly does not mean that their leaders from bygone times were perfect, they simply were not as blatantly authoritarian and hypocritical as Justin Trudeau whose hubris is so enormous that he is incapable of self-examination. He is the living example of an unexamined life not worth living. But wait, why do many Canadians not see this? The only conclusion that I can draw is that many have never examined the actual motives for their own behaviour. And I have two things to say about that, firstly when you examine yourself honestly you will quickly conclude that no one is qualified or wise enough to arbitrarily attempt to control the lives of others, which is why you will never hear nor read of me climbing up on my moral high horse. Therefore, I have less than no desire to control the lives of others or take from them what is not mine to take. And secondly, those who live unexamined lives are invariably those who would use the full force of the state to issue arbitrary dictates to others which in fact infringe on our personal autonomy and legally guaranteed civil liberties. Until this nation can carefully examine its own moral deceitfulness to examine the hypocrisy of Trudeau’s sophistry replete as it is with blatantly contradictory rhetoric, our civil liberties, the maintenance of the Rule of Law, and upholding Charter rights will be impossible. If we allow this sad situation to continue, the Dominion of Canada will have been lost to its own foolishness and hubris. Yes, the sophistry of Justin Trudeau’s government exemplifies the deliberate use of fallacious reasoning, intellectual charlatanism, and moral unscrupulousness so obvious only an un-examining fool could miss it.

The Counter-Revolution is building in momentum: Canadians are rejecting the sleight of hand being played on us by our elite class. Progressivism may fly in on the wings of a dove, but it will eventually reveal itself as an all-consuming bird of prey. People are fast growing disillusioned with the Cultural Marxist Revolution being propagated by our woke governments. Sadly, however, many do not understand the origins of this Neo-Marxist march through all of our institutions. Nor do many place sufficient value on the necessity of freedom of discourse and assembly required to maintain the sovereign rights of the individual. Let’s begin with driving in our own lane, ideologically speaking: At least have the convictions of your own belief system. If you're a Communist, you must support the right of the proletariat to rebel against the bourgeoisie. If you're a Classical Liberal, you must believe in private property rights and free market economies without central planning. If you're a Conservative, you must believe in constitutionally limited government and the Rule of English Common Law. Stop this hypocrisy! Stay in your own lane! Many are incapable of adhering to their own ideological possession because they don't actually understand themselves and their ideological motivations! Know thyself is a moral, epistemological injunction. The philosophy of Socrates still shines today. Even the most distant philosophers of his principles have discussed and debated his philosophy and teaching (Nietzsche for example). The phrase “Know thyself” was not invented by Socrates, rather it was the motto inscribed on the frontispiece of the Temple of Delphi. This assertion, imperative in its form, indicates that man must stand and live according to his nature. Man has to look at himself, into himself. But to find what? And by what means? These two questions are fundamental. First as to the what. Indeed, this invitation to introspection must be connected to the Platonic theory of reminiscence. Everyone, says Socrates, has the knowledge itself, but must just remember. Knowledge is inherent in man, not outside of him. Wisdom however is learning to recollect. As to the How, then. This knowledge of oneself can be achieved only through the Socratic method, that is to say, the dialogue between the soul and the self, or between a student and his teacher. Socrates often acted in the role of questioner, as an attendant emotional. Socrates’ questions because he knows nothing, knows he knows nothing, has nothing to learn, but can help his followers to discover the truths they have within them. Without this work on yourself, life is worthless according to Socrates: Hence his axiom, “An unexamined life is not worth living “ His philosophy does not mean, as with the sophists, the acquisition of knowledge but a way of questioning, to challenge, a form of self-concern. Partly due to the influence of Plato and Aristotle, the term sophistry has come to signify the deliberate use of fallacious reasoning, intellectual charlatanism, and moral unscrupulousness. So, let’s examine the sophistry of Trudeau’s ilk on full display for the entire world to see. The species of identity politics engaged in by Trudeau's government insists on identifying our capital of Ottawa as First Nation's territory. Here’s the thing, what land in North America wasn't the traditional territory of First Nation's people? He uses the fact that he acknowledges Ottawa is Anishnabeg territory so that he can claim to be virtuous merely by repeating the same mantra while doing little to actually address First Nation’s concerns. To add insult to injury, literally physical injury, the elderly woman knocked down by Trudeau's mounted Stasi was a Haudenosaunee clan mother. I spoke with her after I dropped my wife off at her embassy last week. For Trudeau tolerance and inclusiveness apparently includes knocking a clan mother using a walker to the ground so as to dislocate her shoulder. This is exactly how Trudeau demonstrates his respect for not merely a native woman, but a clan mother. Yes, brutalizing a First Nations woman on First Nation's territory is Trudeau's version of respecting First Nation's rights to protest his government's disregard for our First Nations peoples. This is shameless hypocrisy on full view for the entire world to see. Mr. Trudeau, Canada was once a leader in peacekeeping, while your illiberal authoritarian regime has turned it into the very model of how to crush peaceful demonstrators. And now under your tyranny we have martial law. The sophistry you once employed to convince Canadians you were all about peace, light and sunny ways flew in on the wings of a dove but today is flying out on the wings of an all-consuming bird of prey!

PART 1: James Lindsay—The Roots of the New Race-Based Marxism Gripping the West AMERICAN THOUGHT LEADERS with JAN JEKIELEK “The working class has become the enemy of Marxists.” Critical race theory is a new form of Marxism based not on class, but on identity and race, says James Lindsay, founder of New Discourses and author of the new book, “Race Marxism: The Truth About Critical Race Theory and Praxis.” In this two-part deep-dive interview, James Lindsay breaks down the roots of critical race theory, the logic of Herbert Marcuse’s “repressive tolerance,” why powerful elites appear to have bought into woke ideology, the rise of a social credit scoring system in America, and the strange fusion he now sees between fascism and communism. https://www.theepochtimes.com/james-lindsay-the-roots-of-the-new-race-based-marxism-gripping-the-west-part-1_4285075.html?utm_source=share-btn-copylink

The narrative is controlled and those who dare to challenge it will be persecuted because there's a system which guarantees said persecution. We require a new level of muck raking journalism to assist in breaking up the global criminal cartel which exists to ensure our compliance to its arbitrary dictates. The war, for it is a war, isn't between the haves and the have nots nor has it ever been. The actual battle is between the "I'm going to take what you have by force because your place is to serve" and "I demand to exercise my inherent freedom to pursue my own betterment and economic advantage as I voluntarily cooperate and trade freely with others". The ruling class never changes no matter what label they apply to themselves. And whatever label they do apply is invariably a lie. A ruse to disguise their actual intent. The Emergency Measures Act enacted by Trudeau does not meet the requirements for it to have been passed. This means nothing other than our elected reps do not understand the law they were elected to legislate and since they are our legislators this demonstrates they are unqualified to legislate due to their ignorance of the law. Let that sink in! It is akin to taking your car to a mechanic who does not know the difference between a harmonic balancer and a water pump or a piston from a crankshaft. We are governed by incompetent ideological idiots who actually think that men can menstruate and that a woman can become a man. Moreover, they believe the conditions needed to generate those impossibilities are fluid. Their attachment to deconstructionism has divorced them from reality. These are the very people who are telling us to follow the science! They add no value to society. If their toilet needed a new seal or their house required a renovation, they would be utterly helpless to do the work themselves. At the same time, they believe themselves to be so enlightened that they view blue collar workers like myself as the great unwashed. People who should just shut up and do as we are told by our enlightened masters who couldn’t organize a piss-up in a brewery. Everyday Hansard and https://www.cpac.ca/ clearly demonstrates to our horror the childish, churlishness of our parliamentarians who are bought and paid for by their handlers while blowing in the direction of every shifting breeze. Just the other day Trudeau told the Jewish descendant of Holocaust survivors that she stood with Nazi flags and when asked to apologize he simply walked off the floor of Parliament to do what he does best, hide when required to act like a responsible adult. The fact he has not yet spoken with the truckers is clearly indicative of the man-child who poses as a Prime Minister. Worse, the Speaker of the House did nothing to restore order and require the PM to fess up to his insults. But, since God cannot be mocked, I have the following warning from the Scriptures to the Prime Minister of the Dominion of Canada: (To the chief Musician, Maschil, A Psalm of David, when Doeg the Edomite came and told Saul, and said unto him, David is come to the house of Ahimelech.) Why Do You Boast of Mischief? (1 Samuel 21:10-15; Psalm 34:1-22; Psalm 56:1-13) Psalm 52: 1: Why boastest thou thyself in mischief, O mighty man? The lovingkindness of God endureth continually. 2: Thy tongue deviseth very wickedness, Like a sharp razor, working deceitfully. 3: Thou lovest evil more than good, And lying rather than to speak righteousness. Selah 4: Thou lovest all devouring words, thou deceitful tongue. 5: God will likewise destroy thee for ever; He will take thee up, and pluck thee out of thy tent, And root thee out of the land of the living. Selah 6: The righteous also shall see it , and fear, And shall laugh at him,'saying , 7: Lo, this is the man that made not God his strength, But trusted in the abundance of his riches, And strengthened himself in his wickedness. 8: But as for me, I am like a green olive-tree in the house of God: I trust in the lovingkindness of God for ever and ever. 9: I will give thee thanks for ever, because thou hast done it; And I will hope in thy name, for it is good, in the presence of thy saints.

Radical leftists are nothing but political prostitutes and liars since they know full well that they require the permission of those whom they govern to use the maximum force of the state to steal from the governed. The ruling elite do so under the false pretence of having compassion for the downtrodden while also claiming to represent the citizen they're stealing from. In this the elite have created an unreconcilable and false dichotomy. What this might properly be called is an illegal protection racket. It is organized crime aimed at robbing the citizen in plain view while claiming that this thievery is for our own good even as they label us as racists, bigots, and homophobes! In a podcast entitled, “He fooled us all and he will do it again” clinical psychologist Dr. Jordan B Peterson refers to the Prime Minister as a master of lies. Although I am rue to disagree with a man as learned and careful as Peterson, I do disagree. I was never fooled and found his lies revolting long before he became PM. Nevertheless, I have pasted the link to Dr Peterson’s assessment of the narcissistic psychopath who currently substitutes for our PM in the notes attached to this podcast. https://youtu.be/qfDGAvQhd6o 'Haavamaal' is an Old Norse poem, which can be traced back to the 13th century. 'Haavamaal' consists of several smaller poems and its verses are attributed to Odin, which are referred to as the sayings of the High One. It is regarded as one of the most important sources of Old Norse philosophy, from the old age to now and was written in the ancient Norse language in Iceland which has changed but little even today. Modern Norwegian is much easier for an English speaker to learn (which is the ONLY reason I could learn to speak and write Norwegian. From Haavamaal: 26. An ignorant man | thinks that all he knows, When he sits by himself in a corner; But never what answer | to make he knows, When others with questions come. 27. A witless man, | when he meets with men, Had best in silence abide; For no one shall find | that nothing he knows, If his mouth is not open too much. (But a man knows not, | if nothing he knows, When his mouth has been open too much.) 28. Wise shall he seem | who well can question, And also answer well; Nought is concealed | that men may say Among the sons of men. 29. Often he speaks | who never is still With words that win no faith; The babbling tongue, | if a bridle it find not, Oft for itself sings ill. 30. In mockery no one | a man shall hold, Although he fares to the feast; Wise seems one oft, | if nought he is asked, And safely he sits dry-skinned there.

Scripture Luke 12:2-3 2: For there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; neither hid, that shall not be known. 3: Therefore, whatsoever ye have spoken in darkness shall be heard in the light; and that which ye have spoken in the ear in closets shall be proclaimed upon the housetops. Not since the FLQ Crisis in 1970 has any Prime Minister so divided a nation that the PM thought it necessary to declare martial law to hold it together. Innocent people will now be arrested without due process of law. It is essential to realize that we have a Prime Minister who will use totalitarian authority to crush all dissent with the help of the Premier of Ontario, Doug Ford, who is allegedly a Conservative, threatening all manner of draconian punishments against the truckers including enormous fines, imprisonment, and loss of license. Mark my words, things are about to get very ugly. This will not end well for the government or the protestors. We are in a no-win situation where we are damned if we do and damned if we don't. The only choice left to us is in choosing what form of damnation we prefer. I pray incessantly that God deliver my nation from this Cultural Marxist dictatorship. For the sake of my righteous ancestors who helped to found Canada as a Christian nation under God and for the sake of their descendants, I pray God deliver us from this dictatorial pathological narcissist and his evil cabal. I pray everything that that man and the mafia which pulls his strings does in secret be shouted from the roof tops and that such outrage result that he would be torn from office in disgrace. In Christ Jesus Holy Name I pray. AMEN and AMEN!

One thing I've noted about the protests over governmental overreach is the ignorance of the history of rebellions from pre-Confederation times which still remain a foundational part of Canada's national Zeitgeist. Both protestors and the government appear to be suffering from historical amnesia. William Lyon Mackenzie attempted to overthrow the government during the 1837-38 Rebellion but was also a leading politician of his time. While his grandson, William Lyon Mackenzie King, was our Liberal Prime Minister during WWII. It's time to re-examine the history of rebellions in order to study their outcomes because the rebellions and the rebels themselves had lasting affects on how we govern ourselves with the rebels themselves becoming leading citizens and politicians. For their legacy still shapes our ideas of peace, order, and good government today!

Man is Not a Piano Key – Dostoevsky on Human Nature and Why We Act Irrationally “Dostoevsky, the only psychologist from whom I’ve anything to learn.” – Friedrich Nietzsche In 1864, one of the most brilliant writers of all time, Fyodor Dostoevsky, published his novel Notes from Underground. It is considered to be the first existentialist novel. And it is no wonder why Nietzsche, the first and greatest psychologist among philosophers considered Dostoevsky to be such a great psychologist. Dostoevsky’s understanding of human nature and how well he managed to describe it in his works is arguably unmatched in the history of world literature. In Notes from Underground, Dostoevsky gives us a look into thoughts of a bitter, resentful, and isolated narrator who remains unnamed, so he is often referred by readers and critics as the Underground Man. “Gentlemen, let us suppose that man is not stupid. (Indeed, one cannot refuse to suppose that, if only from the one consideration, that, if man is stupid, then who is wise?) But if he is not stupid, he is monstrously ungrateful!” “In short, one may say anything about the history of the world–anything that might enter the most disordered imagination. The only thing one can’t say is that it’s rational. The very word sticks in one’s throat. And, indeed, this is the odd thing that is continually happening: there are continually turning up in life moral and rational persons, sages and lovers of humanity who make it their object to live all their lives as morally and rationally as possible, to be, so to speak, a light to their neighbours simply in order to show them that it is possible to live morally and rationally in this world. And yet we all know that those very people sooner or later have been false to themselves, playing some queer trick, often a most unseemly one. Now I ask you: what can be expected of man since he is a being endowed with strange qualities? Shower upon him every earthly blessing, drown him in a sea of happiness, so that nothing but bubbles of bliss can be seen on the surface; give him economic prosperity, such that he should have nothing else to do but sleep, eat cakes and busy himself with the continuation of his species, and even then out of sheer ingratitude, sheer spite, man would play you some nasty trick. He would even risk his cakes and would deliberately desire the most fatal rubbish, the most uneconomical absurdity, simply to introduce into all this positive good sense his fatal fantastic element. It is just his fantastic dreams, his vulgar folly that he will desire to retain, simply in order to prove to himself–as though that were so necessary– that men still are men and not the keys of a piano, which the laws of nature threaten to control so completely that soon one will be able to desire nothing but by the calendar. And that is not all: even if man really were nothing but a piano-key, even if this were proved to him by natural science and mathematics, even then he would not become reasonable, but would purposely do something perverse out of simple ingratitude, simply to gain his point. And if he does not find means he will contrive destruction and chaos, will contrive sufferings of all sorts, only to gain his point! He will launch a curse upon the world, and as only man can curse (it is his privilege, the primary distinction between him and other animals), may be by his curse alone he will attain his object–that is, convince himself that he is a man and not a piano-key! If you say that all this, too, can be calculated and tabulated–chaos and darkness and curses, so that the mere possibility of calculating it all beforehand would stop it all, and reason would reassert itself, then man would purposely go mad in order to be rid of reason and gain his point! I believe in it, I answer for it, for the whole work of man really seems to consist in nothing but proving to himself every minute that he is a man and not a piano-key! It may be at the cost of his skin, it may be by cannibalism! And this being so, can one help being tempted to rejoice that it has not yet come off, and that desire still depends on something we don’t know?” https://overthinkersjourney.com/man-is-not-a-piano-key-dostoevsky-on-human-nature-and-why-we-act-irrationally/?fbclid=IwAR3Qzu3xxStYKmAKsktKR17te8fvmVW-UR6Scai41_lCkjE2h4i6QrUFvzA Even as Canadians risk all at their own expense to protest our government's attack on our Charter rights our friends and family abroad haven't even asked what the protest is about, whether it is peaceful, how the people involved protest actually behave, especially since the trucks are parked in front of the Norwegian Embassy. I'm gobsmacked that the biggest peaceful protest of its kind in the world, one we are so intimately familiar with, hasn't evoked one single question from the folks in Scandinavia. It's not merely distance which separates us, it's the enormous gulf between how we perceive the world and how they do. With this exception though, I'm intensely curious what makes them tick while they utterly disregard anything outside of their own frame of reference.

More on the Mafia on the Hill, its ties to Power Corporation controlled by the Desmarais family, and their involvement with the CCP. The Canadian government has become a de facto criminal cartel. In the past the Dons in charge of this kept a low profile which is always wise in such organizations however the pathological narcissism and stupidity of Justin Trudeau has made keeping this network of malfeasance and influence peddling a secret. The following links are to the article I quoted from in this podcast: https://adarapress.com/2022/02/07/how-beijing-bought-off-the-trudeaus/ https://planetaryliberation.community/2021/08/15/the-canadian-cabal-pedophilia-murder-and-treason/?fbclid=IwAR3Dg00swEK3OBjTrrfu6ktiqId6Zd57v8HpP_1DKn5IWZkJgxmCSkFccRM https://www.theglobeandmail.com/world/article-montreals-power-corp-deepens-ties-with-chinas-notorious-bo-family/ https://tnc.news/2020/04/22/just-the-facts-liberal-partys-connections-to-chinas-communist-regime/ https://thekeymonk.blogspot.com/2005/03/paul-desmarais-and-corruption-from.html "The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. WORKING MEN OF ALL COUNTRIES, UNITE!". This translation is the authorised translation by Marx and Engels and is the most commonly used version in English.

Our ancestors with all their faults we're wise enough to create constitutional laws that would limit the state from impinging on the inherent God given rights of each individual citizen. Constitutions exist to prevent the state from exceeding its legal limits to govern. And yet we see in Norway, in Canada, all throughout the western world, and certainly today in the USA governments exceeding their constitutional mandate to govern. Legislators have become a law unto themselves. Lobbyists are afforded access to controlling government which by right belongs only to the people. The elite are doing so because ideological possession has replaced the understanding required for them to engage in self reflection. This is why governments all throughout the West have become a law unto themselves since out leaders cannot conceive of themselves as being wrong. These exact sentiments were reflected in our Prime Minister's own words during the Freedom Convoy rally here in Ottawa. He finds the beliefs of the people in that rally to be abhorrent. So, my question is all the rallies in the world aren't going to change how people think. Until we can get to the bottom of why they are ideologically possessed and therefore believe in such nonsense and replace their ideological possession with the deep thought required to have an epistemologically and ontological belief system we're ****** ! end of article

What also remains to be seen is where to next? Both sides of this controversy are in a standoff. I am reminded at that key moment in Boston as the American colonies were growing fed up with their lack of representation in British Parliament while the King ignored their constitutional rights. Samuel Adams was provoking young men to violence to challenge the presence of British soldiers in Boston. Push came to shove, and the soldiers fired on the boys Samuel had incited to riot. The consequences were dire since the soldiers were charged with murder. It was Samuel’s first cousin John Adams who was later to become America’s second President who saved the day when he asserted that the new nation must be based upon the Rule of Law and consequently defended the soldiers in court. As a result of his intervention the Rule of Law was upheld with calmer heads prevailing for the soldiers who had been charged with murder were acquitted. I pray that in this ever-evolving situation downtown that calmer heads will also prevail. I hope that any provocateurs will be detained and prevented from ruining an otherwise peaceful protest. I also pray for the restoration of our Charter rights so that we may move freely across the provincial borders of this great nation as well as to travel both in and out of Canada at will. The last living signer of Canadian Charter Of Rights & Freedoms, Brian Peckford has filed a lawsuit in Federal Court seeking to strike down the federal government’s mandatory Covid-19 vaccine requirements! Since Mr. Peckford helped to draft that great document which recognizes our inherent liberties his lawsuit will be very difficult for the courts to ignore. We are living in a momentous time in Canadian history where the values which have defined this nation from colonial times are being challenged by our leading psychopaths possessed of a species of hubris that would tear down the foundations of our constitutional parliamentary democracy.