Rumor has it

4:02

The Israeli army announced that 65 rockets were fired from Lebanon towards the Upper Galilee region

The Israeli army announced that 65 rockets were fired from Lebanon towards the Upper Galilee region in the past hours. According to the army, several rockets hit the northern city of Kiryat Shmona, damaging at least one house. Interview with Babak Ishaghi, Iran International @iranintltv

16 days ago 11 views

The possibility of some Lebanese citizens migrating to Syria in the event of war

2:44

3:36

The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution

The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution is a crucial part of the Bill of Rights, protecting citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. Here are the key points: Protection Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures: The Fourth Amendment ensures that individuals have the right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects. This means that law enforcement cannot conduct searches or seize property without a valid reason1. Warrant Requirement: For a search or seizure to be considered reasonable, it generally must be conducted with a warrant. This warrant must be issued by a judge or magistrate and based on probable cause. The warrant must also specify the place to be searched and the items or persons to be seized. Probable Cause: Law enforcement must have a reasonable basis to believe that a crime has been committed and that evidence of the crime is present in the place to be searched. Exclusionary Rule: Evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is typically inadmissible in court. This is known as the exclusionary rule, which aims to deter unlawful searches and seizures by law enforcement. The Fourth Amendment has been interpreted and applied in various ways over the years, especially with the advent of new technologies and changing societal norms. The Fourth Amendment’s application to digital surveillance and privacy issues has evolved significantly, especially with the rise of new technologies. Here are some key points on how it applies: Digital Surveillance and Privacy Expectation of Privacy: The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, which includes digital data. The Supreme Court has ruled that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their digital communications and data, even when held by third parties. Warrant Requirement: Law enforcement generally needs a warrant to access digital data. This was reinforced by the Supreme Court’s decision in Carpenter v. United States (2018), which held that accessing historical cell phone location data requires a warrant1. This decision marked a significant shift in how the Fourth Amendment is applied to digital information. Third-Party Doctrine: Traditionally, the third-party doctrine allowed law enforcement to access information shared with third parties (like phone companies) without a warrant. However, recent rulings have started to limit this doctrine, recognizing that digital data can be highly personal and sensitive. Technological Advances: As technology advances, courts are continually reassessing how the Fourth Amendment applies. For example, the use of GPS tracking, automated license plate readers, and other surveillance technologies are scrutinized to ensure they do not violate privacy rights. Balancing Act: Courts often balance the government’s interest in security and law enforcement with individuals’ privacy rights. This balance is crucial in determining the legality of digital surveillance practices. Key Cases and Developments Carpenter v. United States: This landmark case established that accessing cell phone location data without a warrant violates the Fourth Amendment. Riley v. California: The Supreme Court ruled that police must obtain a warrant before searching a cell phone seized during an arrest. These rulings highlight the ongoing efforts to adapt the Fourth Amendment to the digital age, ensuring that privacy rights are protected even as technology evolves.

18 days ago 24 views

Former top Hochul aide Linda Sun, husband accused of acting as Chinese Communist Party's agents

3:34

3:09

Boston University has been actively involved in research collaborations with Ukraine

Boston University has been actively involved in research collaborations with Ukraine, particularly in the field of public health. Researchers from Boston University have worked with scientists in Ukraine and Russia to address issues such as HIV transmission and substance use disorders. These collaborations have been ongoing for years, highlighting the importance of international cooperation in tackling global health challenges.

18 days ago 33 views

Here’s an uplifting message inspired by divine wisdom

1:54

2:19

Circle is primarily known for issuing USDC (USD Coin)

Circle is primarily known for issuing USDC (USD Coin), a stablecoin pegged to the U.S. dollar, which is designed to facilitate faster and more cost-effective transactions in the digital economy. Additionally, Circle has expanded into providing financial services and blockchain-related solutions, aiming to bridge traditional finance with cryptocurrencies.

19 days ago 33 views

3:56

Samara 08/25/2024 memorial to the Wagner PMC

15:13

4:57

The concept of the “reptilian matrix”

The concept of the “reptilian matrix” is a popular topic in conspiracy theories, particularly those propagated by figures like David Icke. According to these theories, a race of reptilian beings controls the world by manipulating human societies and governments1. However, there is no scientific evidence to support these claims.

21 days ago 39 views

Starting your journey to access the Akashic Records