Citizen Media News

In the midst of a highly anticipated speaker race within the Republican Party, Congressman Thomas Massie from Kentucky shares his insights and concerns about the selection process, funding plans, and the critical issues the party is grappling with. Citizen Media News feels it is essential to delve into the heart of these matters to understand the GOP's current dynamics. The speaker race, a competitive contest between Congressman Jim Jordan and Congressman Steve Scalise, underscores the division and complexities within the party. Congressman Massie highlights the need for clarity and a well-articulated plan for the next 75 days, stating that going into the race with a vague plan can be detrimental. He emphasizes the importance of knowing the plan before committing, underscoring that an unclear approach can ultimately lead to dissatisfaction among party members. The congressman revealed that he has requested Steve Scalise to present his plan for the next 75 days, which is crucial for resolving this internal struggle. He mentions the historical significance of the race, pointing out that this competitive scenario is different from traditional, uncontested appointments. The primary concern remains the lack of an articulated plan for the immediate future. While the speaker race is one of the central topics, Congressman Massie also addresses the release of the January 6th video footage and the situation of J6 prisoners. He indicates his involvement in releasing some of the video footage, demonstrating a commitment to transparency regarding the events of that fateful day. Additionally, he underscores his reluctance to support funding for Ukraine, aligning his stance with those skeptical about U.S. aid to the country. In the backdrop of the speaker race and these critical issues, the congressman raises essential questions about the party's direction and future. This candid and informative interview provides insight into the GOP's current dynamics and challenges, shedding light on the complex web of internal politics and external concerns.

Former Speaker McCarthy Lies to CMN at Capitol Press Conference

Crenshaw

In the heart of the Speaker of the House hearings at the Longworth Building, we conversed with New York Congressman George Santos. The dialogue offered insight into the next House Speaker's selection, key political landscape issues, and personal matters. The conversation began with Congressman Santos discussing the recent vote in the closed-door session. He noted that the vote count was 113 to 99, with eight members voting for an unspecified alternative and three abstaining. This outcome, that day, led to Congressman Steve Scalise being designated as the Speaker-elect. Santos highlighted the importance of party cohesion and unity when asked about his thoughts on this process. He emphasized that the party needed to work together as they moved towards the House floor vote. Shifting the conversation to a more local issue, the interviewer brought up the proposed Casino and Coliseum project on Long Island, to which Santos expressed his lack of support. He cited his opposition to the project, which he felt was inconsistent with supporting the casino development. The discussion took a historical turn as the interviewees reflected on the significance of the proposed casino location. The discussion described this area's historical importance, particularly in terms of aviation history and entertainment. It was where Charles Lindbergh took off and served as a backdrop for cultural and entertainment performances. The conversation then delved into the ongoing situation in Israel as Santos wore an Israeli flag pin. He expressed deep concern and described his efforts to assist constituents trapped in the conflict. He focused on facilitating their safe return to the United States, describing these efforts as tireless and relentless. Santos was asked about his legal situation and charges. Santos affirmed his intention to fight the charges, maintaining his innocence and expressing his determination to prove it in court. Regarding the Speaker selection, Santos confirmed his support for Jim Jordan, expressing respect for Scalise but raising concerns about his health and well-being. He voiced his wish for Scalise to prioritize his health and recuperation. They touched on the release of the January 6th video footage and the situation of J6 prisoners, Santos expressed the importance of transparency and accountability. He called for a full release of the footage and raised concerns about the conditions of detainees. The conversation concluded with some light-hearted banter about sports and team allegiances. Congressman Santos, a Patriots fan, discussed the current state of New York sports teams, expressing a sour outlook as a Mets fan. As the Speaker of the House selection process unfolds, and key issues continue to shape the political landscape, Congressman George Santos offered a candid and insightful perspective on these matters.

Amid the Speaker of the House hearings at the Longworth Building, we sat down with Michigan District 1 Congressman Jack Bergman, a retired US Marine Lieutenant General. Our conversation revolved around the expectations for the next Speaker of the House, particularly in relation to the release of information regarding the events of January 6th. Congressman Bergman took a cautious stance when asked whether he would call on the next Speaker to release information about January 6th. He emphasized his role as a representative of the people, acknowledging that he doesn't always agree with his constituents but is committed to representing their diverse opinions. In his view, the focus should be on more pressing matters that require immediate attention in his official capacity. He expressed concern about the confusion sown by the media and the state of Americans' First Amendment rights, which he believes are under threat. The conversation also touched on the recent controversies regarding election integrity, highlighting the significant divide in public opinion on the issue. The interview concluded with a reference to taxpayer dollars and the need for public officials to be accountable. While not providing a direct answer to the question posed, Congressman Bergman emphasized the complexity and importance of the issues currently facing the nation. As the Speaker of the House hearings progress, it remains to be seen how these concerns will influence the direction of the proceedings and the role of the next Speaker in addressing them.

During the recent Speaker of the House hearings held in the Longworth Building, Arkansas Congressman Bruce Westerman shared insights into the priorities and expectations of conservatives. The discussion began by addressing pressing matters that have piqued the interest of conservative readers. These include the release of videos related to the events of January 6th and concerns regarding prisoners' treatment. Congressman Westerman expressed a desire for greater transparency in releasing the videos, citing the undisclosed backlog of 41,000 hours. He emphasized the importance of holding the new Speaker accountable for these issues. Furthermore, the conversation shifted towards the topic of defunding Ukraine, another concern of interest to conservative readers. While acknowledging that electing a new Speaker is the immediate focus, Congressman Westerman stressed the need to engage in earnest discussions about Ukraine funding and accountability in due course. The interview also touched upon the recent events in Israel, underscoring the uncertainty of the situation and its potential consequences. Congressman Westerman acknowledged that the priorities of the American people encompass a wide range of issues, including rising fuel costs, inflation, economic challenges, national security, the situation in Afghanistan, and the release of Iranian funds. The Congressman highlighted the importance of a clear governance plan moving forward. While the election of a new Speaker is pivotal, he suggested that the focus should be on the strategies and plans to address pressing issues rather than individual personalities. Lastly, the idea of former President Donald Trump taking on the role of Speaker was briefly discussed, revealing the complexities and constitutional questions surrounding this prospect.

In the midst of the Speaker of the House hearings at the Longworth Building, we had a brief but insightful conversation with Florida Congressman Byron Donalds. The dialogue touched upon critical issues surrounding the selection of the next House Speaker and the proposed rule change requiring 217 votes for the selection. When questioned about his thoughts on the rule change requiring 217 votes, Congressman Donalds expressed support for the idea. He emphasized the importance of cohesive decision-making and the need to ensure unity within the party. Regarding his optimism about securing a Speaker by the week's end, Donalds expressed optimism, highlighting the path to this goal as gathering the necessary 217 votes. In a conversation that pivoted between potential Speaker candidates, Donalds pointed out the qualities he values in a Speaker. He believes that the next Speaker should be committed to conservative principles, bring a fresh perspective to leadership, and possess the ability to unify the entire conference. The discussion also delved into viewers' concerns, including the release of the January 6th tapes, the status of J-6 prisoners, the release of 41,000 hours of video, and the matter of Ukraine funding. Congressman Donalds expressed his support for releasing the January 6th tapes and the importance of accountability and transparency in Ukraine funding. When asked about the potential of Jim Jordan as Speaker, Congressman Donalds emphasized that it's not a matter of comparing individuals but rather looking toward the future. The transition from Kevin McCarthy to the next Speaker is about what's next and ensuring that the nomination serves the party's best interests. Congressman Donalds mentioned his vote would be for Jim Jordan but would support another choice if so chosen by the party. As the Speaker of the House hearings continue, the focus remains on the path to Speaker selection and the critical issues that require attention in the coming days.

In a recent exclusive interview, Ivan Raiklin, known for his conservative stances, stood outside the congressional hearing room in the Longworth Building with Dana Milbank, who seriously referred to his own newspaper as the "Washington Compost." This candid conversation covered a range of topics, from the tragic events at the Capitol to the race for the next Speaker of the House, culminating in a call for former President Donald Trump to assume the role of Speaker. The interview commenced with a brief exchange on the event itself. Raiklin informed Milbank that it took place earlier that morning, October 10th, which coincided with what would have been Ashli Babbitt's 38th birthday. It was emphasized that her untimely demise marked the first and only murder in the history of the U.S. Capitol, setting the tone for an intense conversation. While initially intended to focus on the Speaker of the House race, the interview organically delved into the sensitive topic of Ashli Babbitt's death. Raiklin spoke passionately about Congress members who deemed her death a murder, highlighting that former Speaker Kevin McCarthy's refusal to use the term 'murder' contributed to his loss of the Speaker position. Despite moments of tension, the conversation provided an opportunity for Raiklin to articulate his views on the day's events and emphasize the significance of addressing this event, particularly within the context of the upcoming GOP presidential debate. Raiklin went on to propose a remarkable twist to the Speaker of the House race. He suggested that the next Speaker should embody specific qualities, including addressing concerns related to government agencies, particularly the FBI and DOJ. He questioned the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines and their connection to political influence. Most notably, Raiklin called for Trump to be elected Speaker of the House, suggesting a process in which members of Congress nominate Trump during the race and accumulate 150 votes to secure his victory. This unconventional proposition was presented as a mechanism for rectifying what Raiklin referred to as "Trump Derangement Syndrome" and addressing past government misconduct. The interview was punctuated with passionate dialogue, reinforcing the deep divisions and debates within conservative circles. Raiklin's unconventional proposal for Trump's role in the Speaker of the House race adds an intriguing layer to the ongoing political discourse. The conversation between Raiklin and Milbank was a window into the thoughts and opinions of one conservative voice, highlighting controversial issues, passionate beliefs, and a unique approach to the upcoming Speaker of the House race while being interviewed by a prominent D.C. journalist.

Ivan Raiklin takes time to explain the role of the House Administration office. Amidst growing questions about the J6 committee and its status with Republicans now in control of the House, an existing committee, the House Administration Committee, has taken center stage. The importance of this committee, along with its potential to address the aftermath of January 6th, was emphasized in a recent discussion led by an influential conservative figure. The relationship between the J6 committee and the House Administration Committee is rooted in the jurisdiction of committees in both the House and the Senate. The House Administration Committee comprises three subcommittees, one of which is the oversight subcommittee. This specific subcommittee holds the responsibility to oversee the Capitol Police Board, an essential entity involved in determining the restricted zone during the events of January 6th. The Capitol Police Board is significant for its role in establishing the restricted zone and supervising the Capitol Police. These law enforcement officials were responsible for the decision to criminalize 1,200 individuals in connection with the January 6th events. Crucially, the US Capitol Police own the CCTV footage related to that day, making them a central figure in understanding the events that transpired. Moreover, documents used to criminalize individuals, such as impact statements, were obtained from the Capitol Police. This House Administration Committee is one of two committees in Congress tasked with overseeing these crucial elements. Raiklin underscored the committee's significance by proposing that funding for the US Capitol Police should be contingent on meeting specific benchmarks. This included the release of 41,000 hours of CCTV footage and investigations into critical figures, including Nancy Pelosi, her daughter & her son-in-law, Yogananda Pittman, the former acting police chief, the current Capitol Police chief, the inspector general, the general counsel, and every individual within the Capitol Police. The committee's role, particularly the oversight subcommittee led by Congressman Barry Loudermilk, was deemed vital in pursuing the truth regarding the events of January 6th. The discussion also delved into the importance of investigating the "fedsurrection," which led to subpoenas and information requests to entities like the Metropolitan Police, Department of Justice (DOJ), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and others. This investigative approach was viewed as a critical step in unveiling the truth. The discussion underlined the House Administration Committee's pivotal role in addressing the post-January 6th landscape. Its jurisdiction over the Capitol Police and related documentation places it at the forefront of efforts to uncover what transpired on that fateful day. The conservative leader's remarks highlighted the importance of this committee and its potential to provide much-needed transparency and accountability in the aftermath of the January 6th events.

On Ashli Babbitt's birthday, a group of passionate conservative activists, led by former Trump advisor Ivan, gathered to address critical issues and underscored the urgent need for a strong Speaker of the House. The discussion, which took place on October 10th, touched on a range of pressing matters, including the economic influence of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), medical tyranny, Big Tech censorship, and the events of January 6th. Ivan Raiklin, a prominent figure in conservative circles, called for a Speaker of the House who would lead robust investigations into these issues. He highlighted the CCP's impact on the US economy, stressing the need to reject this influence and allocate significant funds to counter the Chinese threat. Medical tyranny and the consequences of unlawful mandates also featured prominently in the discussion. Ivan pointed out the lack of accountability for those responsible for imposing such mandates, including Acting Secretary Austin. Censorship, particularly by Big Tech companies, was another crucial concern. The activists insisted on severe consequences for individuals and organizations involved in censoring free speech, citing continued violations of the First Amendment. However, the primary focus of the gathering was on the events of January 6th. Ivan called for a comprehensive investigation into what transpired that day, including any potential cover-up. He emphasized the necessity of a Speaker of the House who would fearlessly challenge the deep state and hold those responsible accountable. Micki Witthoeft, the mother of Ashli Babbitt, who tragically lost her life during the events of January 6th, added her perspective to the discussion. She stressed the need for America-first candidates who prioritize the interests of American citizens over political maneuvering. Micki expressed her disappointment with the current state of Congress, where politicians often prioritize political games over addressing critical issues. The gathering also considered potential Speaker of the House candidates, including Kevin McCarthy, Steve Scalise, and Jim Jordan. Concerns were raised about their track records and whether they were the right individuals to lead the House during these challenging times. Ivan proposed a unique solution to address these issues, suggesting a Speaker who could appoint a House Sergeant at Arms with the authority to overhaul the Capitol Police and conduct a thorough investigation into the events of January 6th. He argued that this approach would provide the leverage needed to challenge the deep state and address pressing concerns. The discussion concluded with a call for active engagement from American citizens, encouraging them to educate themselves about these critical issues and demand accountability from their elected officials. The message was clear: the next Speaker of the House must prioritize the needs of the American people over political agendas and be willing to challenge the status quo to resolve pressing national concerns.

In a candid and revealing interview on ‘Indivisible with John Stubbins” Show, Lieutenant Colonel Allen West, a prominent conservative voice from Texas, shared his firsthand observations of the ongoing border crisis and his concerns about the broader implications for national security. LTC West delved into the pressing issues surrounding the U.S.-Mexico border, with West emphasizing the gravity of the situation. He began by addressing the rampant illegal activities on the border, including child trafficking and drug smuggling, explicitly highlighting the emergence of the so-called "zombie drug" phenomenon. West's experience on the ground in Kinney County, a strategically located region between Eagle Pass and Del Rio, provided valuable insights into the challenges faced by law enforcement and border security officials. He expressed his frustration at the federal government's response to the border crisis, emphasizing that the problem was not improving despite official reassurances to the contrary. High-speed chases, cartel operations on social media platforms, and young individuals from across the country participating in smuggling activities were among the concerning trends West mentioned during the interview. He underscored the severity of the crisis, emphasizing that the implications extended far beyond the border region, impacting communities nationwide. West called for a decisive response to the border crisis, proposing a military intervention to combat the well-organized and well-resourced cartel organizations. He argued that designating these cartels as foreign terrorists would enable the U.S. to target their assets and resources, sending a clear message that such activities would not be tolerated. Stubbins and West also discussed the need for strong leadership at the state level, particularly in Texas, where West emphasized the importance of governors and state governments taking action across the country to protect the nation’s borders when the federal government has failed to do so effectively. The conversation shifted to the upcoming GOP presidential debate, where West urged former President Donald Trump not to skip the debate, emphasizing the need for candidates to earn their rankings and maintain focus on critical national issues. West highlighted the importance of restoring economic, energy, national and domestic border security, along with safeguarding parental rights and educational freedom. He emphasized that these issues should be at the forefront of the political agenda in the lead-up to the next election. LTC West's insights provided a comprehensive overview of the border crisis and its impact on national security, leaving no doubt about the urgency of addressing the situation promptly.

Mindy Robinson Addresses Clark County Commissioners, Expressing Concerns Over Nevada's Election Integrity In a passionate address at a recent Clark County, Nevada County Commissioner meeting, political commentator and activist Mindy Robinson voiced her deep concerns about the state of Nevada's election integrity, stirring a heated debate within the community. Robinson began by asserting that Nevada's election had become a "catastrophe" that had left the state as the "laughing stock of the nation." She didn't mince words as she delved into what she saw as the systemic issues plaguing Nevada's elections. First, Robinson highlighted problems she believed should have triggered alarm bells long before the general election. She pointed out that Nevada's primary election had faced issues, with 40,000 people unable to vote due to problems with their ballots, which she attributed to DMV errors. She argued that this should have led to a redo of the primary election. Robinson also raised concerns about transparency in the election process. She accused Joe Gloria, an election official, of preventing people who weren't "progressive" from observing the polls, potentially allowing for foul play without proper oversight. She emphasized the lack of access to the adjudication room, where poll watchers could ensure that votes were accurately counted, as a significant problem. Furthermore, Robinson criticized the conditions at polling locations, describing people waiting outside in freezing, rainy weather during the election. She questioned why there were no better facilities provided for voters. Robinson didn't stop there. She questioned the election results, notably the victory of certain officials, including the Nevada Attorney General, whom she claimed was responsible for a crime wave. She also expressed skepticism about some members of the County Commission, alleging financial fraud and promoting controversial agendas. Robinson pointedly criticized the County Commission's decision to certify election results despite hours of testimony from voters who couldn't cast their ballots in the primary. She argued that the system's lack of accountability and transparency left the community powerless. In her closing remarks, Robinson lamented the challenges faced by the community in holding its officials accountable when they are responsible for investigating potential election fraud. She expressed her frustration at the lack of options for recourse and urged those in power to consider the consequences of their actions. Robinson's speech concluded with a stark warning, suggesting that if influential individuals took certain actions against her and others, the community's anger and frustration could reach new heights. The address by Mindy Robinson has ignited a fierce debate over election integrity and transparency in Nevada, highlighting the deep divisions and concerns within the community. It remains to be seen how these concerns will be addressed and whether they will lead to changes in the election process. In a passionate address at a recent Clark County, Nevada County Commissioner meeting, political commentator and activist Mindy Robinson voiced her deep concerns about the state of Nevada's election integrity, stirring a heated debate within the community. Robinson began by asserting that Nevada's election had become a "catastrophe" that had left the state as the "laughing stock of the nation." She didn't mince words as she delved into what she saw as the systemic issues plaguing Nevada's elections. First, Robinson highlighted problems she believed should have triggered alarm bells long before the general election. She pointed out that Nevada's primary election had faced issues, with 40,000 people unable to vote due to problems with their ballots, which she attributed to DMV errors. She argued that this should have led to a redo of the primary election. Robinson also raised concerns about transparency in the election process. She accused Joe Gloria, an election official, of preventing people who weren't "progressive" from observing the polls, potentially allowing for foul play without proper oversight. She emphasized the lack of access to the adjudication room, where poll watchers could ensure that votes were accurately counted, as a significant problem. Furthermore, Robinson criticized the conditions at polling locations, describing people waiting outside in freezing, rainy weather during the election. She questioned why there were no better facilities provided for voters. Robinson didn't stop there. She questioned the election results, notably the victory of certain officials, including the Nevada Attorney General, whom she claimed was responsible for a crime wave. She also expressed skepticism about some members of the County Commission, alleging financial fraud and promoting controversial agendas. Robinson pointedly criticized the County Commission's decision to certify election results despite hours of testimony from voters who couldn't cast their ballots in the primary. She argued that the system's lack of accountability and transparency left the community powerless. In her closing remarks, Robinson lamented the challenges faced by the community in holding its officials accountable when they are responsible for investigating potential election fraud. She expressed her frustration at the lack of options for recourse and urged those in power to consider the consequences of their actions. Robinson's speech concluded with a stark warning, suggesting that if influential individuals took certain actions against her and others, the community's anger and frustration could reach new heights. The address by Mindy Robinson has ignited a fierce debate over election integrity and transparency in Nevada, highlighting the deep divisions and concerns within the community. It remains to be seen how these concerns will be addressed and whether they will lead to changes in the election process.

In an exclusive interview with our conservative college newspaper, Lieutenant Colonel Ivan Raiklin, we provided valuable insights into the complexities surrounding the events of January 6th at the U.S. Capitol. Raiklin, a retired military officer and passionate advocate for truth and accountability, drew comparisons between historical leadership transparency and the modern era's intricate challenges. Raiklin commenced the interview by illustrating parallels between the candid discussions among World War II military leaders and the evolving landscape of contemporary issues. He underscored the changing significance of ranks and the emergence of lieutenant colonels as voices of reason amid political turmoil. Raiklin contrasted their integrity with what he perceives as growing corruption within the military establishment. The interview introduced Lieutenant Colonel Ivan Raiklin as a central figure in the discourse. Known for his relentless pursuit of transparency and truth, Raiklin has garnered attention for his efforts to unveil what he believes lies beneath the surface of the January 6th incident. The discussion set the stage for a comprehensive exploration of the inner workings of Washington, D.C., and allegations of power manipulation. Raiklin delved into the role of the Capitol Police Board in determining the level of criminalization for defendants involved in the January 6th events. He emphasized that this board ultimately reports to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, suggesting their influence in shaping the narrative of that day. Raiklin contended that the board manipulated evidence to ensure a 100% conviction rate for the accused, revealing a concerning level of control over the justice system. The interview also explored Raiklin's perspective on the Electoral Count Act and its significant role in the events surrounding January 6th. Raiklin meticulously researched the intricate details of potential scenarios and contingencies, shedding light on his belief that there was room for legal maneuvers within the act. Raiklin suggested that his public discussions on social media about these nuances may have triggered a response from those in power, potentially leading to the events of January 6th. Raiklin's insights prompted questions about cause and effect, raising the possibility that his public discourse on the Electoral Count Act may have contributed to the events that unfolded on that fateful day. As we navigate the complexities of this pivotal moment in history, Lieutenant Colonel Ivan Raiklin's perspective offers a unique lens to examine the intricacies of the January 6th incident and the broader challenges facing our nation.

In a recent episode of "Indivisible with John Stubbins," John hosted Bill Robinson, a prominent figure in conservative media and a respected writer for Newsmax. This enlightening conversation covered a wide range of topics, offering viewers a glimpse into the life and perspective of this influential voice. A Journey to Conservatism Bill Robinson's journey into conservative media began with a background in marketing, working for major corporations like GE. This experience gave him unique insights into the corporate world. However, his career took an unexpected turn when he founded his own marketing firm, Relentless Marketing. Here, he ventured into public relations, eventually finding himself on platforms like CNN, Fortune, Forbes, The Wall Street Journal, and the Financial Times. Robinson's diverse portfolio transitioned seamlessly from business and technology to politics. He contributed columns to the Huffington Post for seven years, starting with critical pieces on Obama and later shifting to support Trump. Today, he continues to deliver Christian conservative columns for Newsmax and Real America's Voice. Trump and Robinson: A Unique Bond Robinson's association with President Trump underscores the human side of the former President. This connection didn't happen overnight. Robinson humorously recounts his seven-year pursuit to secure an interview with Trump. He shared anecdotes about their encounters in New York in the 1980s. He highlighted Trump's remarkable ability to make everyone he speaks to feel like the most crucial person in the room, a trait Robinson believes contributed to Trump's election. The Authenticity of President Trump The conversation delved into Trump's authenticity, dispelling the myth that he is solely interested in himself. Robinson emphasized Trump's genuine care for others. He revealed that every conversation with the former President begins with inquiries about Robinson's health and personal well-being. According to Robinson, Trump's authenticity shines through, making these exchanges effortless and meaningful. President Trump's Humor and Wit A lighthearted moment in the discussion centered around Trump's humor. Robinson recalled a recent incident involving Trump and Chris Christie, highlighting Trump's ability to handle criticisms with wit and charm. Instead of engaging in a verbal feud, Trump responded humorously, downplaying the situation, a testament to his unique communication style. American Anarchy: A Call for Accountability As the conversation shifted to serious matters, Robinson addressed the importance of his upcoming documentary, "American Anarchy." He stressed the need to revisit the origins of the deep state's actions, citing cases like those of General Flynn, Carter Page, and George Stephanopoulos. Robinson argued that the failure to hold those responsible accountable only encourages them to continue their actions. A Plea for Legal Action Robinson expressed his concern about a two-tiered justice system, exemplified by the lack of consequences for those involved in the FISA warrant scandal. He urged immediate and severe legal action against those who committed treason, asserting that this is the only way to preserve law and order in the country. A Call to Action As the interview concluded, Robinson and Stubbins highlighted the importance of getting involved in the fight for accountability and transparency. They urged Americans to take action, support conservative causes, and work towards restoring integrity in the justice system. The conversation with Bill Robinson provided valuable insights into the world of conservative media and its essential role in holding those in power accountable. It serves as a reminder that the pursuit of truth and justice should always be at the forefront of any democracy.

"Indivisible with John Stubbins" hosted Sheriff Richard Mack and Mark Finchem, discussing various issues ranging from election integrity to the border crisis. Sheriff Mack and Finchem, influential figures in conservative circles, provided insights into their experiences and concerns during the broadcast. They shed light on the urgency of addressing these issues from their conservative perspective. Election Integrity Takes Center Stage Fresh off the Mike Lindell summit, Mark Finchem shared his observations on the event. He emphasized the need for action, not just rhetoric, among conservative patriots. One critical development he mentioned was deploying a device at major vote-counting centers to detect internet connections in ballot tabulation machines. This technological advancement is a significant defensive measure against potential tampering with election results. Finchem also discussed an app for reporting irregularities, a critical tool for identifying potential election law violations. This app empowers citizens to take an active role in preserving the integrity of elections. This initiative resonates with conservatives who have raised concerns about election transparency since 2020. Challenges at the Southern Border Sheriff Richard Mack discussed the escalating crisis at the southern border. He lamented the catastrophic situation marked by rampant drug trafficking, exacerbated by the current administration's lax immigration policies. The sheriff argued that the federal government's failure to protect the border violates Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution, which obligates the government to safeguard states from invasion. Sheriff Mack also raised concerns about terrorists infiltrating the country, expressing alarm over the growing presence of Middle Eastern terrorists collaborating with drug cartels. He underscored the urgent need to address border security. A Flawed Judicial System The conversation pivoted to issues within the judicial system. Sheriff Mack and Mark Finchem highlighted concerns about the grand jury process and prosecutors' overreach. They criticized the lack of fairness and due process in grand jury proceedings, emphasizing that this undermines the accused's rights and needs reform. Additionally, they discussed how the courts have failed to address evidence related to election irregularities. Despite an abundance of verbal and written evidence, the courts have been reluctant to hear cases, causing frustration among conservatives. Homelessness and Drug Epidemic in Phoenix Mark Finchem drew attention to the growing homeless population in downtown Phoenix and the associated drug epidemic. He argued that a record number of deaths, particularly among children, are linked to drug abuse and called for urgent action to address these issues. In Conclusion These influential conservatives highlighted their dedication to addressing critical concerns around the nation at large. From election integrity to border security and judicial reform, their perspectives offered a glimpse into conservatives' priorities in battleground states. "Indivisible" serves as a platform for open dialogue and a call to action for conservatives concerned about the future of America.

Flemingsburg, Ky - In a passionate and lengthy address, Ivan Raiklin, a retired Green Beret and constitutional lawyer, delivered a powerful message to conservatives. Raiklin began by thanking the crowd and expressing his gratitude for the opportunity to speak, acknowledging Scott Kesterson for his work and the audience for their presence. Rallying his audience to become better informed about perceived threats to the nation and to take action against them, Raiklin's speech focused on the importance of education and grassroots involvement, with a call to "castrate the deep state" and "crush the commies." Raiklin emphasized the importance of knowing and exposing the truth, referring to political "hostages" who sought the truth and were unjustly imprisoned. He urged the audience to repel the lies perpetuated by the government through big tech and big media. Drawing on his extensive background in national security, Raiklin highlighted his experience countering various threats both domestically and abroad. He stressed that his mission now is to expose domestic enemies, emphasizing the need to identify specific individuals within government agencies who have played a role in undermining the nation. Raiklin mentioned the Nuremberg Code in the context of the pandemic response, suggesting that coercion and manipulation led many to accept emergency-use-authorized products. He criticized the pharmaceutical industry's influence and the role of figures like Dr. Anthony Fauci. The speaker called for accountability, referencing the scripture verse Leviticus 24:19-20, which suggests punishment in proportion to the harm inflicted. He questioned when people would stand against the injustices committed against children and individuals who suffered adverse effects from the vaccines. Raiklin spotlighted two individuals in the audience, Brad Miller and Dr. Pete Chambers, commending their courage in speaking out against the vaccine mandates despite personal sacrifices. He stressed the need for public support for individuals like them, who are on the "legal, moral, and ethical high ground." The speaker also urged the audience to stop consuming mainstream media outlets and support alternative platforms like Getter, Telegram, Truth Social, and Rumble. He called on the crowd to take a stand against the government's encroachment on civil liberties and to expose the individuals complicit in these actions. Ivan Raiklin's address resonated strongly, advocating for a proactive approach to defend conservative principles and American values. Raiklin continued stressing the need for citizens to educate themselves about critical figures and entities that he believes are undermining American values. He pointed to the Capitol Police Board and what he termed the "Fed insurrection coup" on January 6th, as well as the alleged weaponization of the Department of Defense (DOD), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and the Department of Justice (DOJ). Raiklin argued that it's essential for the current House of Representatives to take action and exhibit a strong backbone. The activist used provocative language, calling for the "castration" of the "deep state" and explaining that he has a list. He suggested that this could be achieved by altering funding mechanisms or other means and urged his audience to use their imagination regarding the specifics. Raiklin also expressed concerns about the threat posed by what he called "commies," with a particular focus on the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Russia, Iran, and North Korea. He emphasized the need to confront these perceived adversaries and safeguard American interests. During the Q&A session, Raiklin fielded questions from the audience. One attendee asked about the citizenship status of members of Congress, to which Raiklin admitted uncertainty but expressed a willingness to research the matter further. Another audience member inquired about how to support Raiklin's cause. He encouraged individuals to get involved through platforms like Telegram and advocated for challenging mainstream media outlets. Raiklin underscored the importance of creating uncensored content and emphasized the need to establish alternative platforms to disseminate their message if they were removed from the internet. Raiklin concluded by stressing the significance of in-person meetings and activism at the local level. He argued that face-to-face interactions are immune to censorship, offering an effective way to advance their goals. Addressing the community level, Raiklin recommended that parents take inspiration from past instances where parents successfully challenged policies they disagreed with, particularly in relation to schools. He cited instances in Iowa where parents pushed back against certain mandates, leading to legislative changes. In summary, Ivan Raiklin's speech at this conservative fest called for increased vigilance, education, and local activism to address perceived threats to the nation. While his rhetoric was provocative, it echoed the sentiments of a segment of conservative activists who advocate for change at the grassroots level. Raiklin emphasized the importance of investigative efforts to uncover dirt on those in power and expose it to delegitimize them. He called for a collective effort to push back against a lawless executive branch and reaffirmed his commitment to the fight for truth, accountability, and action.

In the midst of a nation grappling with vaccine mandates and COVID-19 restrictions, Dr. Shannon Kroner, an advocate for vaccine choice, has released a children's book titled "I'm Unvaccinated, and That's Okay." The book, aimed at educating young minds about the importance of personal health decisions, has garnered significant attention, selling out its initial run in just two weeks. The conversation unfolded during a recent "Discussions of Truth" episode with host Ian Trottier. Dr. Kroner, who has been involved in vaccine injury awareness since 2001, discussed her motivation behind the book, the dire implications of vaccine mandates, and the heart-wrenching experiences of vaccine-injured children. The book, which centers around a young boy navigating a world filled with vaccine pressures and controversies, offers a unique perspective on the issue. The young protagonist is unvaccinated, with his older sibling having suffered vaccine-related injuries. Dr. Kroner takes readers through why the boy's parents decided not to vaccinate him, including concerns about vaccine ingredients and the absence of liability for vaccine manufacturers. "I'm Unvaccinated, and That's Okay" is an illustrative work. Though Dr. Kroner outsourced the artwork to an illustrator, she designed the book's pages personally. The response to the book has been overwhelming, with its first run of 5,000 copies selling out quickly. Due to the high demand, additional copies were reprinted, and it remains available for those interested in exploring its message. In her conversation with Trottier, Dr. Kroner also shed light on her experience with vaccine injury. She recounted a harrowing incident during her pregnancy in 2009 when she received a flu shot and subsequently lost 95% of her amniotic fluid. This traumatic event was a turning point that solidified her commitment to vaccine choice. The book, published by Skyhorse Publishing, an imprint of the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), has received endorsements from prominent vaccine choice movements, including Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Dell Bigtree, and pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas. Dr. Kroner expressed concern about the rise of autoimmune disorders, cancer, and infertility, particularly among young adults who have received the COVID-19 vaccine. She believes that vaccine-related issues will continue to affect future generations and that informed choices about vaccination are critical. As the debate over vaccine mandates and personal freedoms intensifies, Dr. Shannon Kroner's book offers a timely and thought-provoking perspective. "I'm Unvaccinated, and That's Okay" seeks to educate children about the importance of making informed healthcare decisions while acknowledging that there are different viewpoints on vaccination. The book is now available and aims to contribute to the ongoing dialogue surrounding vaccine choice, ensuring that the voices of those who advocate for individual rights in healthcare are heard, especially in the face of increasing pressure for mandatory vaccination.

Las Vegas, NV - ReAwaken America - Actress and Activist Mindy Robinson Discusses Political Corruption and the Central Banking System In an exclusive interview with "Discussions of Truth," Mindy Robinson, known for her roles in films such as "Bleach" and "Sense of Fear," delved into the world of politics, government corruption, and the central banking system. Robinson, who has been involved in various political activities, opened up about her experiences and her passionate quest for truth. Robinson, introduced as a "freedom fighter" and "actress extraordinaire," began the interview with her perspective on the political landscape, stating, "I'm here because it's the right thing to do." She expressed her frustration with the two-party system and criticized the influence of money, blackmail, and power on the Republican and Democratic parties. The conversation turned to the central banking system, with Robinson emphasizing that the United States doesn't control its currency. She mentioned the Bank of International Settlements and its regulation of the central banking system. Robinson argued that Americans are born into debt and discussed the consequences of this financial burden on the country's citizens. As the discussion continued, Robinson touched on various historical events, such as wars and political cover-ups. She expressed her belief that many wars have been fought on false premises, including the Vietnam War and World War I. Robinson criticized the lack of transparency in government actions and the impact on American lives. Robinson's passion for researching and presenting information was evident throughout the interview. She emphasized the importance of fact-checking and encouraged viewers to conduct their research. Robinson also shared insights into her documentary-making process, stating that she meticulously compiles information from various sources, fact-checks claims, and presents her findings with evidence. Regarding her work and where people can find it, Robinson mentioned her presence on various social media platforms, including Twitter, Instagram, Telegram, Facebook, and Gab. She encouraged people to explore her content and even share it on their platforms, emphasizing her commitment to informing the public. The interview concluded with a discussion about Robinson's recent film, "Bleach," where she played an evil queen. Despite not knowing the film's release date, Robinson praised her co-star Lorenzo Lamas. She shared a fun connection between one of Discussions of Truth’s producers and a karaoke event they attended. Mindy Robinson's interview shed light on her political activism, dedication to exposing corruption, and her role as an actress in the film industry. It highlighted her commitment to providing well-researched information to her audience and encouraging critical thinking.

Special guests Jason Jones, Chief Correspondent for Newsmax & West Virginia Congressional Candidate Nate Cain. Since July 10th, the southern border has witnessed a significant surge in Honduran migrants & the reasons behind this influx are not shrouded in mystery. Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas signed an exemption allowing Hondurans to enter the United States, and as a result, they have been arriving in substantial numbers. To put the scale of the issue into perspective, in June, border patrol apprehended around 10,000 Hondurans between ports of entry. Following the exemption order, that number had surged to 23,000 by the end of July. With data from August still pending, it’s evident that the situation is rapidly worsening. Jones highlighted the impact of this surge on border communities. He shared video footage from the Texas DPS Elite Aircraft Division, which is actively patrolling the El Paso sector, where migrants are crossing from Juarez, Mexico, and being transported by smugglers to stash houses in El Paso due to the lack of infrastructure. This has resulted in dangerous pursuits and chaotic situations in the area. The dire consequences extend beyond the border region. Recently, it was revealed that 17,688 migrants were held in border patrol stations, overwhelming the system. This forced border patrol agents to shift their focus solely to processing incoming migrants, leaving border cities more vulnerable to crime and security threats. National security concerns loom large as well. Jones pointed out that Joint Terrorism Task Forces are currently searching for 15 individuals from Uzbekistan who crossed the border w/an ISIS-affiliated terrorist. The whereabouts of these individuals remain unknown, highlighting the compounding national security failures at the southwest border. Jaeson reiterated that irregular migration is not the root cause; it’s the result of government policies. Policies such as exemptions for unaccompanied children and family units have fueled the surge. He stressed that many in Washington are aware of the situation but are not forthcoming with the truth. Nate Cain, who is running for Congress in West Virginia, began by discussing a new bill he is championing, which addresses parental rights in education. He emphasized the need for parents to have a say in their children’s education, especially in areas where personal values and beliefs intersect with school policies. While his children are grown, Cain acknowledged that he recognizes many parents’ concerns today. Issues such as children being pulled out of classrooms for counseling sessions without parental consent, discussions related to gender-affirming care, and worries about indoctrination have fueled a growing demand for parental involvement in the education system. “Parents have a right to know what is being taught to their children,” Cain asserted. He emphasized the importance of transparency in counseling sessions and the need for parents to choose schools that align with their values, advocating for school choice to foster healthy competition. Another pressing issue discussed was that of transgender bathroom policies in schools. Cain pointed to a troubling incident in Loudoun County, Virginia, where a male student, identifying as female, was allowed to use the girls’ bathroom and subsequently committed sexual assault. This event highlighted the need for robust policies that prioritize safety. One of the most alarming issues raised during the conversation was promoting sexually explicit content in school libraries. Cain described a disturbing trend involving books funded by the American Library Association and the NEA, which contain explicit material, including depictions of sexual acts, that would typically be unacceptable under FCC guidelines. These books have found their way into public school libraries, prompting outrage from parents. To address these concerns, Cain and his campaign team crafted a bill to protect parental rights and ensure children are not exposed to explicit material in educational settings. The bill has garnered significant support from both legislators and concerned citizens. In conclusion, the episode shed light on the dire situation at the southern border, with a particular focus on the surge in Honduran migration and its far-reaching consequences. As concerns about border security and national security continue to mount, the need for a comprehensive and transparent response from government officials becomes ever more pressing. The episode also shed light on the critical issues surrounding parental rights and school accountability in West Virginia. Cain’s advocacy for transparency, parental involvement, and child safety in the education system underscores the significance of these concerns and his dedication to addressing them effectively. As he continues his campaign for Congress, Cain’s commitment to his constituents’ concerns serves as a testament to his dedication to public service.

Las Vegas, NV - In a passionate gathering of advocates and family members of January 6th defendants, the “J6 Political Prisoner Update Conference” unfolded as a fervent plea for justice, transparency, and civil liberties. The event, which took place at an undisclosed location, featured a series of speakers who shared their perspectives on the ongoing situation surrounding the individuals arrested in connection with the events of January 6th. The conference began with Dr. Simone Gold, who emphasized the importance of disseminating information that had not yet been disclosed regarding the J6 situation. Dr. Gold, known for her participation in Clay Park events, called for a deeper examination of the civil liberties at stake in these cases. “We have people in prison unjustly. We have people in pretrial. Most importantly, we have people charged with crimes for which there is no evidence,” Dr. Gold declared, underscoring her concerns about the impact on individual freedoms. One of the striking stories shared at the conference was that of an attendee who had spent 60 days in a maximum-security federal jail for a misdemeanor charge of entering and remaining on January 6th. This experience raised questions about the severity of punishments handed down for relatively minor offenses. The speakers argued that the federal Department of Justice and the federal judiciary were acting in ways that were detrimental to justice. They highlighted issues such as the poisoned jury pool in Washington, D.C., and the practice of indicting individuals without all the elements of a crime being met. The case of John Strand, a non-violent individual facing a 32-month sentence, was brought to the forefront, emphasizing the need for fair and proportionate sentencing. Ashli Babbitt’s mother, Micki Witthoeft, emotionally discussed the tragedy of her daughter’s death and the lack of accountability for it. Throughout the conference, speakers conveyed the idea that the treatment of January 6th defendants set a dangerous precedent for civil liberties. They argued that the situation had become a platform for political maneuvering, drawing parallels to former President Donald Trump’s involvement. The event also shed light on the need for transparency in the form of video footage from January 6th, which could provide crucial evidence regarding the actions of both protesters and law enforcement officers. Attendees asserted that this footage belonged to the American people and called for its release. The conference wasn’t just about sharing stories and grievances; it was a call to action. Attendees were encouraged to reach out to Congressman Barry Loudermilk, who chairs the Oversight Subcommittee of the House Administration Committee, and demand transparency and accountability regarding the events of January 6th. Additionally, a nonprofit foundation called “Stand in the Gap” was introduced, aiming to provide support to January 6th defendants and fight for justice in the long term. The foundation’s representatives emphasized the importance of financial support in their efforts. The conference concluded with an urgent appeal to righteous pastors and churches to support January 6th defendants and adopt their causes. Attendees were encouraged to get involved on a local level and take action within their communities. As the J6 Political Prisoner Update Conference came to a close, it left a resounding message: the fight for justice, civil liberties, and accountability in the aftermath of January 6th is far from over. The passionate speakers and attendees expressed their commitment to advocating for a fair and transparent resolution to these cases, setting the stage for continued activism and engagement on the issue.

Washington DC - Amid ongoing budget discussions in Congress, members of the House Freedom Caucus gathered in Washington, D.C., to address critical concerns regarding the American economy and immigration policies. The event, attended by lawmakers from the conservative caucus, saw impassioned speeches and calls for fiscal responsibility and border security. The caucus members emphasized their dedication to changing the direction of government spending and policies. The event commenced with Representative Scott Perry taking the stage, emphasizing that their gathering was not about political games but about the American people. Perry expressed his frustrations with what he viewed as government overreach and negligence, pointing to actions by the Department of Labor and accusing the Department of Justice of prioritizing political adversaries over law enforcement. He criticized President Biden's response to a disaster in Hawaii and accused Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas of ignoring the law. Perry argued that American citizens were facing job competition with illegal immigrants, and he lamented the opioid crisis impacting his constituents. He called for a change in government policies that he viewed as restricting individual freedoms and criticized political theater in Washington. Perry underlined the Freedom Caucus's opposition to continuing resolutions perpetuating the Biden administration's spending policies, emphasizing the importance of Congress exercising its power of the purse. Senator Rick Scott of Florida took the stage and addressed the nation's economic challenges. He decried excessive government spending, which he argued had led to soaring inflation rates and high-interest rates on mortgages and credit cards. Scott urged fellow Republicans to stand firm against reckless spending and called on the Freedom Caucus to lead the way in altering the country's fiscal trajectory. He also voiced concerns about hurricane relief funding and the federal government's failure to support disaster-stricken areas, promising to fight for his state's farmers and ranchers who had not received assistance for hurricane damage. Representative J.K. McCarthy echoed the importance of fiscal responsibility, highlighting the separation of powers embedded in the nation's founding principles. He called on fellow Republicans to utilize the power of the purse to hold the executive branch accountable for its actions and emphasized issues related to inflation and its impact on American families. The event featured several other lawmakers from different states who shared their concerns about government overreach, the border crisis, and the erosion of individual liberties. They called for a change in the status quo and vowed not to support a continuing resolution that did not address their key concerns. The Freedom Caucus members concluded the event by reaffirming their commitment to representing the interests of the American people and advocating for fiscal responsibility and secure borders. They pledged to fight against reckless spending and government policies they deemed detrimental to the nation's well-being. Dave McIntosh, President of the Club for Growth, also addressed the audience, stressing the urgency of addressing the growing national debt and expressing the organization's support for lawmakers working to curtail deficit spending. The press conference highlighted the concerns and priorities of conservative lawmakers during this crucial period of budget negotiations, underscoring their determination to ensure their principles are reflected in government spending decisions.

In an exclusive interview with Enrique Tarrio, the leader of the Proud Boys, we delved into their perspective on the nation's state and plans. While the Proud Boys have faced their fair share of controversy and media scrutiny, Tarrio provided insights into their beliefs, actions, and political aspirations. Despite their reputation, the Proud Boys describe themselves as a "study group for art students," emphasizing their commitment to peaceful and law-abiding engagement. In the interview, Tarrio touched on several key topics: Momentum and Inspiration: Tarrio expressed his optimism about the current momentum within the conservative movement, particularly the America First movement. He highlighted the dissatisfaction with the establishment, both in the Republican and Democratic parties, and the belief that this discontent will continue to grow. The Impact of COVID-19: Tarrio noted that the pandemic had a significant impact on awakening people to the effects of government policies on their daily lives. Many previously politically neutral individuals were drawn into the political sphere due to the pandemic's economic, social, and personal implications. Focusing on Local Elections: The Proud Boys' leader emphasized the importance of focusing on local races, especially within the Republican Party. He encouraged their supporters to engage in grassroots efforts to secure GOP seats, believing that many local races are "easy to win" with sufficient enthusiasm and participation. The Future of the Proud Boys: Tarrio explained that the Proud Boys have always had contingency plans for different political scenarios and are currently adjusting their strategies. While maintaining their core values of fellowship and brotherhood, they are expanding their political activism, particularly in contested seats. Tarrio also addressed the criticism and legal challenges the Proud Boys faced following the events of January 6th. He highlighted the charges brought against some members as disproportionate to their actions during the Capitol breach. As the interview continued, Tarrio discussed the inspiration behind the Proud Boys' actions and their commitment to their beliefs. He defended their response to what they perceived as government overreach and criticized the media for not understanding their perspective. Tarrio also hinted at the possibility of running for political office, stating he might consider a run for a seat in 2022. He emphasized his intent to run in a highly contested district and signaled his readiness to engage in the political process to promote America First principles. In response to online comments, Tarrio and his associates remained unfazed, emphasizing their dedication to their cause and their belief in the principles they represent. The interview with Enrique Tarrio provided a unique insight into the Proud Boys' worldview and their determination to remain engaged in American politics, even in the face of challenges and controversies. Their focus on local races and their willingness to participate in the democratic process demonstrate their commitment to effecting change from within the system they critique.

Las Vegas, Nevada - August 26, 2023 Retired Lieutenant General Michael Flynn held a press conference in Las Vegas, Nevada, addressing a diverse audience on the significance of informed citizenship, community involvement, and preserving American values. Flynn spoke at length on various topics and emphasized the importance of critical thinking, informed decision-making, and active participation in shaping the nation's future. Flynn began by stressing the significance of seeking information from reliable sources and becoming critical thinkers. He highlighted the necessity of being well-informed before engaging in any action or decision-making process. He encouraged the audience to research and consider facts that hold meaning to them individually, regardless of political affiliations. Throughout his speech, Flynn emphasized the role of local action in shaping the national landscape. He stated that engagement at the community level, whether through religious institutions, civic organizations, or political groups, has a broader impact on the country. He urged attendees to take responsibility for their actions and avoid apathy, asserting that excuses no longer have a place in the discourse. Flynn discussed the decline of societal values and the necessity of preserving the nation's Judeo-Christian principles. He defended his stance against being labeled a "Christian nationalist," asserting his commitment to patriotism and Americanism, which celebrate the nation's foundations and the freedom to express individual beliefs. The conversation shifted to fifth-generation warfare, where Flynn and co-author Boone Cutler delved into psychological operations, information dissemination, and intelligence analysis. Flynn stressed that the digital environment presents a new battleground for influencing minds and shaping public perception. He highlighted their newly released book, "How to Fight AI," as a tool to empower citizens to understand and navigate this landscape. Regarding women's societal roles, Flynn acknowledged their growing leadership in addressing critical issues. He said that women are poised to lead the nation forward, emphasizing the importance of their perspectives in the evolving landscape. The press conference also touched on the January 6th Capitol events. Flynn addressed the concerns of those imprisoned or facing legal action concerning the events, urging them to remain steadfast and maintain faith. Flynn concluded by referencing Psalm 23 and urging citizens to turn to faith and strong values in facing the challenges ahead. He highlighted the importance of unity, regardless of political leanings, to safeguard the country's future. In a spirited Q&A session, Flynn answered questions about constitutional rights, the 19th Amendment, transgender issues, and more. His speech resonated with attendees from diverse backgrounds and political affiliations, reflecting his intent to inspire active citizenship and critical engagement. The press conference, marked by Flynn's unwavering commitment to American ideals and informed action, offered insight into his perspective on the nation's trajectory and the steps necessary to secure its future. https://www.generalflynn.com/ (~16:25) Citizen Media News asks a question of Gen Flynn on the anniversary of the 19th Amendment. (~6:46) TakeYourPowerBackShow.com's Kim Yeater asks a question.

Las Vegas - Reawaken America - 'Discussions of Truth' Meets Micki Witthoeft - Ashli's Mom and January 6th detainee's spouse, Nicole Reffitt. Mother of Ashli Babbitt Speaks Out on Capitol Incident and January 6 Defendants In an exclusive interview with Ian Trottier for Discussions of Truth, Mickey Witthoeft, the mother of Ashli Babbitt, opened up about her feelings and thoughts regarding the tragic incident that took her daughter's life during the events at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. A Capitol Police officer fatally shot Babbitt as she attempted to breach a window during the unrest. Witthoeft's poignant words underscore the pain of losing a loved one in such a public and controversial manner. Witthoeft expressed her disbelief and sorrow over losing her daughter, highlighting that Ashli Babbitt had served her country and completed four tours of duty in the Middle East. The shock of seeing her daughter return from service only to be met with such a tragic end during a political rally was described as "unacceptable" by Witthoeft. The grieving mother recounted the peaceful days that had led up to the events of January 6 and voiced her concerns about the excessive use of force by law enforcement that day. Justice and Accountability for January 6 Defendants Mickey Witthoeft was joined by Nicole Reffitt, whose husband, Guy Reffitt, became one of the first January 6 defendants to go to trial. The interview shed light on the challenges these individuals and their families face as they navigate the legal system and seek justice. Reffitt revealed that her husband was sentenced to 7.5 years in prison for his involvement on January 6. The interview emphasized the importance of supporting these defendants and their families through commissary donations and raising awareness about their cases. Witthoeft and Reffitt echoed concerns about the alleged lack of due process for the January 6 defendants. They argued that many defendants face harsh charges for participating in the Capitol incident, even when their actions may not have been directly violent or confrontational. The conversation explored the perceived bias within the judicial system and questioned the motives behind the continued prosecution of these cases. A Call to Action for Unity and Change The interview concluded with Witthoeft and Reffitt calling on American citizens to take action and make their voices heard. Witthoeft urged citizens to contact their local representatives and demand accountability for the treatment of January 6 defendants and their families. She emphasized the power of unity and encouraged people to come together to support those affected by the aftermath of January 6. In the emotional and candid conversation, Mickey Witthoeft and Nicole Reffitt conveyed their commitment to seeking justice for their loved ones and all individuals caught in the legal aftermath of the Capitol incident. Their voices served as a reminder that the repercussions of January 6 continue to reverberate through the lives of those there, spurring them to advocate for change and accountability. The interview provided a personal and poignant perspective on the complexities surrounding the events of January 6, shedding light on the experiences and emotions of those directly impacted by the tragedy.

Las Vegas, August 26, 2023 – (Reawaken America) - In a recent episode of "Discussion of Truth" hosted by Ian Trottier and Candice Savino, prominent host Stew Peters discussed his background and evolving views on the current state of the United States government. Peters, known for his conservative solid stance, candidly addressed his concerns about what he perceives as a national crisis. Peters, who gained notoriety as a bounty hunter, shared his journey from law enforcement to becoming a vocal commentator on political and societal issues. After George Floyd's death, Peters believed outside forces manipulated the subsequent protests and violence. He criticized the media narrative surrounding the incident and accused the government of facilitating a wave of destruction in response. In the interview, Peters asserted that both major political parties are deeply flawed and argued that the real enemy lies within the current government. He cited examples such as the alleged misuse of power during the COVID-19 pandemic and the influence of foreign interests on elected representatives. Peters challenged the status quo and urged Americans to defend their rights and freedoms more actively. Peters rejected the idea of trusting political plans and emphasized the need for grassroots action. He urged citizens to hold their elected officials accountable and take a stand against what he sees as government overreach. Peters highlighted his concerns about the erosion of individual liberties and invoked historical figures like William Wallace to underscore the importance of resistance against perceived tyranny. Throughout the interview, Peters maintained a strong focus on faith and the need to recenter values in the fight for change. He cautioned against complacency and stressed the urgency of acting to protect the future of upcoming generations. His passionate call to action resonated with many listeners who view the increasingly tumultuous political climate. The "Discussion of Truth" episode, available on Citizen Media News' website, stirred controversy and sparked conversations about the role of government and citizen involvement in shaping the nation's trajectory. As Peters continues to advocate for more proactive measures, his message resonates with those who share his concerns about the direction of the country. Discussion of Truth's Ian Trottier and Candice Savino sit down with top rated news host, Stew Peters. discussionsoftruth.com StewPeters.com