Attorney Steve® Legal News

http://www.blockchaincounsel.io LBRY, a blockchain-based content-sharing platform, sold a digital token called LBRY credits, which could be used to purchase or access content on the platform. The SEC alleged that LBRY sold these tokens without first registering them as securities, and that LBRY made misleading statements about the use of the tokens. LBRY has agreed to settle the charges and will pay the penalty, but has not admitted to any wrongdoing. This is the latest in a string of actions taken by the SEC against crypto companies that are selling unregistered securities. The SEC has already obtained summary judgment against two other companies, and is currently litigating against several others. It is clear that the SEC is taking a tough stance on this issue, and companies that are selling digital tokens should be very careful to ensure that they are in compliance with securities laws.

http://www.vondran.com PS. I passed the California bar exam, first attempt, WITHOUT taking a bar review course. Saved about 3k right there. ATTORNEY STEVE® #1 TIP TO SUCCEED IN LAW SCHOOL Committing to law school is a big decision. It's three years of your life dedicated to a single goal: becoming a lawyer. The bar exam is the final hurdle between you and your career, and it's no secret that it's a tough one to pass. But with the right learning techniques, you can set yourself up for success. Bar review tapes are a great way to familiarize yourself with the material and get used to hearing the concepts being discussed. Outlining is also crucial; breaking down the information into manageable chunks will make it easier to digest come exam time. And of course, taking good notes in class will give you a solid foundation on which to build your understanding of the material. With hard work and dedication, anyone can succeed in law school. But using these learning techniques will help you make the most of your time and set yourself up for success on the bar exam.

http://www.AttorneySteve.com In the case of Cobbler Nevada vs. Gonzales, Strike 3 Holdings, LLC was seeking a default judgment against Gonzales for copyright infringement. However, the court found that there was insufficient evidence to show that Gonzales was liable for infringement and denied the motion. Strike 3 then submitted additional evidence, but the court again found that there was insufficient evidence of infringement and denied the motion. As a result, Strike 3's attempt to secure a default judgment against Gonzales has so far been unsuccessful. The case is ongoing and it remains to be seen whether Strike 3 will be able to secure a judgment in its favor. ATTORNEY STEVE® VIDEO RESOURCES 1. Overview of Torrent law: https://youtu.be/rc4OROnuWAM 2. Copyright infringement possible penalties: https://youtu.be/LJxTTcDuhzs 3. Cobbler Nevada vs Gonzales case: https://youtu.be/CRRDRx2bF5Y 4. Federal court default vs. default judgment: https://youtu.be/LNsyo8Lpods

http://www.trademarkcollege.com A trademark is a sign that distinguishes the goods or services of one enterprise from those of other enterprises. A generic trademark, also known as a genericized trademark or generic brand, is a trademark that has become so common that it is no longer associated with a specific brand or product. Generic trademarks are typically descriptive terms that are used to refer to a whole category of products or services, rather than to a particular brand. As a result, generic trademarks are often subject to cancellation. In order to avoid genericization, businesses need to ensure that their trademarks are not used in a generic way. This can be accomplished by using the trademark only as an adjective, and by using it along with the generic name of the product or service. For example, instead of saying "T-shirts," one should say "T-shirt brand T-shirts." By taking measures to prevent generic use, businesses can help to protect their trademarks and avoid cancellation.

http://www.BitTorrentLawyer.com One way to challenge a subpoena is to motion to quash on the grounds that it is overbroad and irrelevant, or an invasion of a recognized privacy interest. This must be done in a timely manner, as the motion will likely be denied if it is filed after the time period specified in the subpoena. When challenging a subpoena, it is important to remember that the burden of proof is on the party challenging the subpoena to show that it is overbroad and irrelevant. Therefore, it is important to have strong evidence to support the motion to quash. If the motion is successful, the court will quash the subpoena and the party will not be required to provide the requested information.

https://www.vondranlegal.com/copyright-recapture As an artist, it's important to be aware of your copyright status. For many creators, once their work is published, they lose all control over it. However, there is a way for artists to regain copyright ownership of their work: by sending a notice of termination to the rights holder. Under copyright law, an artist has the right to terminate any transfer or license of their copyright after a certain number of years. This termination period varies depending on when the copyright was originally transferred or licensed. For works published after 1978, the termination period is 35 years. To recapture your copyright, you must first file a notice of termination with the Copyright Office. This notice must be filed within certain time limits, so it's important to act quickly. Once the notice is filed, you will have regain full copyright ownership of your work and will be able to license it as you see fit. For many artists, this second chance at copyright ownership is a valuable opportunity to recapture control over their work. If you think you might be eligible to terminate a copyright transfer or license, be sure to consult with an attorney to learn more about your rights and how to protect them. Call Vondran Legal®, the Copyright Law Firm at (877) 276-5084.

http://www.dmcacounsel.com. [over 695 videos and growing]. Subscribe for new videos: https://bit.ly/38vXDzk​ Thank you for supporting LEGAL EDUCATION and EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE! Yes, you can SHARE OUR VIDEOS on your social media networks. ETSY DMCA TAKEDOWN PROCESS OVERVIEW This video provides a basic overview of the following legal concepts: 1. Copyright infringement on Etsy 2. Take down notice and considering "fair use" factors first 3. The counter-notification process (and the attestation of mistake or misclassification and the consent to federal court jurisdiction) 4. Filing a 512(f) claim for bad faith abuse of the DMCA law 5. Copyright Claims Board ("CCB") and bringing 512(f) cases for up to $5,000 in this venue. Also, the right to opt-out of the small claims copyright court. ATTORNEY STEVE Video Resources: -Overview of the small claims copyright board: https://youtu.be/_PHFzqeBvZA - Top 10 tips to help you succeed in small claims court: https://youtu.be/qTUhBMdddsk -

http://www.attorneysteve.com. [over 695 videos and growing]. Subscribe for new videos: https://bit.ly/38vXDzk​ Thank you for supporting LEGAL EDUCATION and EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE! Yes, you can SHARE OUR VIDEOS on your social media networks. FAKE WEBSITES AND THE LIMITS OF FREE SPEECH In 2012, Anthony Novak created a parody Facebook page called "Parma Police Department." The page featured fake news stories and humorous posts about the police department in the city of Parma, Ohio. Novak's page was widely shared and liked by members of the community. However, the city of Parma was not amused. In 2013, the city filed a criminal complaint against Novak, arguing that the page interfered with government services and was therefore against the law. The case made its way to the Ohio Supreme Court, which ruled in favor of Novak, citing the First Amendment right to parody. The court found that Novak's page did not cause any actual harm and that it was clearly intended as a parody. As a result, the city of Parma was forced to accept that Anthony Novak's Facebook page was protected speech. Novak, then sued the law enforcement officers in civil court for a violation of his civil rights, but the case was kicked out due to an alleged "qualified immunity" of the officers. Novak is now seeking review by the United States Supreme Court. OTHER RELATED VIDEO RESOURCES: 1. Attorney Steve® overview of free speech and exceptions: https://youtu.be/5PhqAePU5Uk 2. When does free speech protest turn into civil or criminal liability: https://youtu.be/5kds8KRpxPQ 3. How to prove a free-speech violation by Attorney Steve®: https://youtu.be/0UgRDTbQsKA

http://www.vondranlegal.com [over 695 videos and growing]. Subscribe for new videos: https://bit.ly/38vXDzk​ Thank you for supporting LEGAL EDUCATION and EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE! Yes, you can SHARE OUR VIDEOS on your social media networks. IS IT LEGAL TO FILM LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES IN ARIZONA? Attorney Steve® discusses free speech and recording law enforcement activities in Arizona and what I call the "8-foot rule." In the state of Arizona, it is legal to record law enforcement officers as long as you keep your distance. According to Arizona law, you must be at least eight feet away from the officer in order to avoid breaking the law. Video recording can be a valuable tool for documenting police misconduct and helping to keep officers accountable. However, it is important to keep your distance in order to avoid getting arrested or becoming involved in an altercation with the police. When recording law enforcement, always be respectful and observe all laws in order to keep yourself and others safe.

http://www.DMCAcounsel.com [over 695 videos and growing]. Subscribe for new videos: https://bit.ly/38vXDzk​ Thank you for supporting LEGAL EDUCATION and EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE! Yes, you can SHARE OUR VIDEOS on your social media networks. ETSY DMCA TAKEDOWN PROCESS If you believe that your copyright has been infringed on Etsy, you may file a DMCA takedown notice with them. This notice will require you to provide certain information, including the copyright registration number for the work that you believe has been infringed. Once they receive this notice, they will remove the infringing material from their site and may also contact the seller to let them know that their listing has been removed. The seller may then file a counternotification, claiming that they did not infringe on your copyright. If ETSY receives this counternotification, they may restore the listing to their site. However, you may still be able to sue the seller for copyright infringement and damages. In this video, Attorney Steve® talks about a unique approach being used in "small claims" copyright claims board ("CCB") process to seek damages under 17 U.S.C. 512(f) for filing an alleged bad faith DMCA counter notice. Will it work? Time will tell.

http://www.copyrightclaims.net [over 695 videos and growing]. Subscribe for new videos: https://bit.ly/38vXDzk​ Thank you for supporting LEGAL EDUCATION and EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE! Yes, you can SHARE OUR VIDEOS on your social media networks. THE NEW COPYRIGHT CLAIMS BOARD IN WASHINGTON D.C. When photos or videos are used on a commercial website without the copyright holder's permission, it can lead to claims of copyright infringement. The new Copyright Claims Board provides a streamlined process for resolving these disputes. If a copyright holder believes their work has been used without permission, they can file a claim with the Board. The Board will then review the claim and make a determination. If the Board finds that the use was unauthorized, it can order the infringing party to pay damages. In some cases, the Board may also order the infringing party to remove the copyrighted material from their website. By providing a quick and efficient way to resolve disputes, the Copyright Claims Board can help to protect the rights of copyright holders and prevent unauthorized use of copyrighted material.

http://www.BittorrentLawyer.com [over 695 videos and growing]. Subscribe for new videos: https://bit.ly/38vXDzk​ Thank you for supporting LEGAL EDUCATION and EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE! Yes, you can SHARE OUR VIDEOS on your social media networks. In this episode of "COURT SHORTS", Attorney Steve® Copyright Defense lawyer, discusses a case where a "John Doe" Defendant tried to file a counterclaim for a "due process" violation. Judge Terry Hatter, JR. was not going for it. DUE PROCESS RIGHTS MUST BE PROTECTED In a recent case, Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe, Judge Hatter of the Central District of California ruled that the plaintiff's due process rights had been violated. Strike 3 Holdings is a copyright holder that sends "takedown" notices to internet service providers (ISPs), demanding that they remove infringing content. In this case, the plaintiff's ISP forwarded one of these notices to him, but Strike 3 failed to give the plaintiff an opportunity to respond before sending a second notice. As a result, the plaintiff's ISP cut off his internet service. Judge Hatter found that this was a violation of the plaintiff's due process rights, and he ordered Strike 3 to pay damages. This case highlights the importance of giving individuals an opportunity to respond to accusations before taking any adverse action against them. CONTACT A STRIKE 3 COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT DEFENSE LAW FIRM Call us at (877) 276-5084 if you receive a subpoena from your ISP in regard to a BitTorrent file-sharing adult movie case. We have settled millions of dollars in claims and helped hundreds of clients.

http://www.cryptolitigation.io. (damages cases and enforcement actions in excess of $100,000). NOTE: We do not handle these cases on a contingency fee basis. Defendants must be located in California or Arizona. [over 695 videos and growing]. Subscribe for new videos: https://bit.ly/38vXDzk​ Thank you for supporting LEGAL EDUCATION and EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE! Yes, you can SHARE OUR VIDEOS on your social media networks. KEEPING UP WITH THE KARDASHIANS - CRYPTO INFLUENCING! Celebrities and others are using social media networks to encourage the public to purchase stocks and other investments. These endorsements may be unlawful if they do not disclose the nature, source, and amount of any compensation paid, directly or indirectly, by the company in exchange for the endorsement. The SEC’s Enforcement Division and Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations encourage investors to be wary of investment opportunities that sound too good to be true. We encourage investors to research potential investments rather than rely on paid endorsements from artists, sports figures, or other icons.

http://www.cryptolitigation.io [over 695 videos and growing]. Subscribe for new videos: https://bit.ly/38vXDzk​ Thank you for supporting LEGAL EDUCATION and EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE! Yes, you can SHARE OUR VIDEOS on your social media networks. RIPPLE FIGHTS BACK WITH ITS OWN MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST SEC In this episode, Attorney Steve® reads "the other side" of the SEC lawsuit (Ripple's position). Was the XRP token an "investment contract" under the age-old Howey test? Hear Defendant's chime in. Here is part 1 (SEC's MSJ against RIPPLE): https://youtu.be/0vmxDsgju7M

https://www.cryptolitigation.io. [over 695 videos and growing]. Subscribe for new videos: https://bit.ly/38vXDzk​ Thank you for supporting LEGAL EDUCATION and EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE! Yes, you can SHARE OUR VIDEOS on your social media networks. Here is part 2 (RIPPLE and DEFENDANTS MSJ against RIPPLE): https://youtu.be/0vmxDsgju7M SEC SEEKS SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST RIPPLE AND EXECUTIVES Ripple, the company behind the XRP digital asset, is facing a lawsuit from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC alleges that Ripple has violated securities laws by selling XRP as an unregistered security. Ripple has filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that XRP is not a security and that the SEC's complaint should be dismissed. The motion is currently pending before the court. The SEC's lawsuit against Ripple is based on the theory that XRP is an investment contract. In order for an investment contract to exist, there must be an investment of money in a common enterprise with a reasonable expectation of profits derived from the efforts of others. The SEC contends that XRP satisfies all of these elements and that Ripple knew or should have known that XRP was a security when it sold it to investors. Ripple, however, denies these allegations and argues that XRP is not a security. The outcome of the SEC's lawsuit against Ripple will have significant implications for the cryptocurrency industry. If the court finds that XRP is a security, it would likely mean that other digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum are also securities. This would subject cryptocurrencies to greater scrutiny from regulators and could make it more difficult for them to be traded on exchanges. Conversely, if the court finds that XRP is not a security, it could pave the way for other digital assets to be treated similarly. The SEC's lawsuit against Ripple is ongoing, and it remains to be seen how it will ultimately be resolved.

http://www.attorneysteve.com Copyright Watchdog® - In this episode Attorney Steve® discusses a new copyright bittorrent lawsuit filed in the Pennslyvania federal court against Comcast. DMCA "safe harbors" and 1202 claim at issue. VOLTAGE HOLDINGS SUES COMCAST The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) was enacted in 1998 to protect copyrighted works in the digital age. One of the key provisions of the DMCA is the Safe Harbor provision, which shields online service providers from liability for copyright infringement by their users. In order to qualify for the Safe Harbor, service providers must adopt and implement a notice-and-takedown procedure for infringing content, and they must maintain a repeat infringer policy. Comcast is one of the largest online service providers in the United States, and it has recently been embroiled in a lawsuit over allegations that it failed to comply with the DMCA Safe Harbor provisions. Voltage Pictures, a movie production company, sent thousands of notices of infringement to Comcast, alleging that its users had illegally downloaded copyrighted movies. Comcast allegedly failed to properly process the notices and failed to take action against repeat infringers. As a result, Voltage filed suit against Comcast, seeking damages for copyright infringement. The case is still pending, but it highlights the importance of service providers complying with the DMCA Safe Harbor provisions. If Comcast is found liable for copyright infringement, it could be on the hook for millions of dollars in damages. This case underscores the need for service providers to take steps to ensure that they are in compliance with the law.

http://www.attorneysteve.com Nearly 700 videos and GROWING FAST! Subscribe for new videos: https://bit.ly/38vXDzk​ ATTORNEY STEVE® DISCUSSES SOME OF THE MAIN TORTS! There are or 7 so intentional torts 7, the four main types of intentional torts: assault, battery, negligence, and false imprisonment. Assault is when someone attempts or threatens to physically harm another person. Battery is when someone actually physically harms another person. Conversion is when someone unlawfully interferes with another person's personal property. Trespass is when someone unlawfully enters onto another person's land. These are just some of the most common intentional torts; there are many others that exist under tort law. In order to prove that an intentional tort has been committed, it must be shown that the defendant had the intent to commit the act in question. This can be difficult to prove, which is why negligence and strict product liability are more commonly used in civil lawsuits. However, intentional torts can still be viable claims in certain situations. For example, if someone intentionally vandalizes another person's property, the victim could sue for damages under the tort of trespass. If you have been the victim of an intentional tort, it is important to understand your legal options so that you can make the best decision for your case.

http://www.cryptokiddies.net Nearly 700 videos and GROWING FAST! Subscribe for new videos: https://bit.ly/38vXDzk​ Thank you for supporting LEGAL EDUCATION and EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE! Yes, you can share our videos on your social media networks. OVERVIEW OF NEW COINBASE CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT In this episode, Attorney Steve® discusses the new lawsuit against Coinbase over the loss of funds. KEEP YOUR CRYPTO SAFE Cryptocurrency is a digital or virtual currency that uses cryptography for security. Cryptocurrencies are decentralized, meaning they are not subject to government or financial institution control. Bitcoin, the first and most well-known cryptocurrency, was created in 2009. Cryptocurrencies are often traded on decentralized exchanges and can also be used to purchase goods and services. While cryptocurrency is a relatively new phenomenon, it has grown rapidly in recent years. As of 2021, the total market value of all cryptocurrencies was over $2 trillion. One of the most important aspects of owning cryptocurrency is keeping it safe. Crypto wallets come in two main types: hot wallets and cold wallets. Hot wallets are software wallets that are connected to the internet. These wallets are convenient for day-to-day use but are at a greater risk of being hacked due to their connectivity. Cold wallets are hardware wallets that are not connected to the internet. Cold wallets are much more secure but can be inconvenient to use for everyday transactions. Many people choose to keep their cryptocurrency in both hot and cold wallets for maximum security. Another important thing to keep in mind is that you should never store your cryptocurrency on an exchange. Exchanges are central points of failure and are much more likely to be hacked than individual wallets. Coinbase, one of the largest US-based exchanges, has been hacked multiple times, resulting in the loss of millions of dollars worth of crypto. If you own crypto, it's important to store it in a safe place such as a cold wallet or an offline storage device such as a USB drive. If you have a legal issues involving Coinbase or Crypto.com that is over $100,000 in losses, call us to discuss your case. OTHER RESOURCES 1. Overview of the California Legal Remedies Act ("CLRA"): https://youtu.be/W9TiJ0_AsoQ 2. Link to the Coinbase lawsuit: https://www.vondranlegal.com/coinbase-sued-in-class-action-brought-before-california-northern-district-court

http://www.copyrightattorney.io Vondran Legal® Photo Infringement Video. We can help with the following types of copyright law matters dealing with the unlicensed use of photos, images, videos, drone footage, and other content: 1. Real estate disputes involving photos of the property (residential or commercial) 2. 1201 CMI removal claims 3. 17 USC 107 Fair Use Defense 4. Federal copyright infringement lawsuits (Plaintiffs and Defendants) 5. Arbitration or mediation involving photo, content, or copyright infringement. We have handled several hundred copyright infringement matters, and we are one of the premier firms in the united states handling these IP cases. Call us for more information at (877) 276-5084.

https://www.blogtalkradio.com/attorneysteve Steve and Lisa bring you the August Piracy Log Updates. In this episode we talk about: 1. TV signal piracy cases (Dish-Nagrastar) on the move 2. Business Software Alliance back in the software audit game? 3. California Cyberflashing law targets unsolicited sexual content: https://youtu.be/9RJ-0CDhuBM 4. Starting to see more counterfeit commercials from the USPTO 5. Mariah Carey lawsuit 6. Taylor Swift copyright lawsuit 7. Triller lawsuit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRzTfJSidfo Thanks for watching, don't forget to subscribe and share!! Steve Vondran, IP & Technology Lawyer

http://www.copyrightwatchdog.com. Nearly 700 videos and GROWING FAST! Subscribe for new videos: https://bit.ly/38vXDzk​ Thank you for supporting LEGAL EDUCATION and EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE! Yes, you can share our videos on your social media networks. TAYLOR SWIFT LAWSUIT NEWS - VONDRAN ENTERTAINMENT LAW In this episode of Copyright Watchdog® Attorney Steve® discusses a recent lawsuit filed in Tennessee District Court seeking ONE MILLION DOLLARS alleging copyright infringement against the famous singer. WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO PROVE COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT? In order to prove copyright infringement, you must be able to show that the person who allegedly infringed on your copyright had access to your work and that there is substantial similarity between the two works. However, proving access and similarity can be difficult. For example, if your work was published online, it may be difficult to prove that the alleged infringer had access to it. Similarly, assessing whether two works are substantially similar requires a careful analysis of their protected elements. As a result, copyright infringement cases often turn on whether the plaintiff can prove these elements. If you are considering bringing a copyright infringement lawsuit, you should consult with an experienced attorney to discuss the evidence you will need to prove your case.

http://www.vondranlegal.com. Nearly 700 videos and GROWING FAST! Subscribe for new videos: https://bit.ly/38vXDzk​ Thank you for supporting LEGAL EDUCATION and EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE! Yes, you can share our videos on your social media networks. CALIFORNIA PASSES NEW CYBERFLASHING LAW TO OUTLAW UNSOLICITED ELECTRONIC SEXUALLY HARASSING CONTENT California Law will outlaw Cyberflashing. Sending unwanted sexually graphic material can cost you up to $30,000 plus potential punitive damages and attorney fees. Tell that (not so) "special friend" of yours and do them a favor. Cyberflashing is the act of sending unsolicited sexual photos or videos to someone electronically, typically through a phone or email. While it may seem like a harmless prank, cyberflashing can be a form of sexual harassment, and it is currently illegal in California. The law defines cyberflashing as the distribution of “sexual images without the recipient’s consent, with the intent to annoy, harass, or alarm the recipient.” If convicted of cyberflashing, a person can face up to six months in jail and a $1,000 fine or face civil penalties up to $30,000. While Californians are currently the only ones protected by this law, other states are considering similar legislation. In the meantime, victims of cyberflashing can file a civil suit against their harasser. If you are a victim of revenge porn, deep fakes, or unwanted and unsolicited sexual material through digital transmission (email, text, app, etc), call us to see if you have a case at (877) 276-5084. ___________________________________ OTHER HELPFUL RESOURCES 1. What are punitive damages: https://youtu.be/CADst1RTrUs 2. What is revenge porn?: https://www.vondranlegal.com/california-revenge-porn-lawyer 3. What are Deep Fakes: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/oct/07/california-makes-deepfake-videos-illegal-but-law-may-be-hard-to-enforce _______________________ Stay in the know with Attorney Steve® Social Media! _______________________ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/stevevond... Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/attorneystev... Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/attorneysteve TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@attorneysteve Twitter: https://twitter.com/SteveVondran ----------------------------------------- 🏢 Main Office 🏢 San Francisco Office: https://www.vondranlegal.com/san-fran... ______________________ Other Locations: San Diego Office: https://www.vondranlegal.com/san-dieg... Orange County Office: https://www.vondranlegal.com/orange-c... Santa Monica Office: https://www.vondranlegal.com/beverly-... Phoenix - Camelback Office: https://www.vondranlegal.com/phoenix-... ______________________ This is general legal information and not legal advice or a substitute for legal advice. This is attorney advertisement.

http://www.softwareaudits.net Nearly 700 videos and GROWING FAST! Subscribe for new videos: https://bit.ly/38vXDzk​ Thank you for supporting LEGAL EDUCATION and EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE! Yes, you can share our videos on your social media networks. BREAKING IP LEGAL NEWS - IS BSA GEARING UP FOR SOFTWARE AUDITS IN 2022? The software alliance appears to be on the move sending out audit demand letters and seeking large settlements for software non-compliance. Vondran Legal® has been a leading software audit defense law firm in the United States for many years now. In this area of law, there is no substitute for experience. If you received a letter from a software company, for example, Microsoft, Adobe, SIIA, Software Compliance Group, Vero, Solidworks, Autodesk, Ansys, Synopsis or another company, call us for a free initial discussion. We have helped many companies large and small (and from all types of industries) in resolving these disputes. _________________________ Stay in the know with Attorney Steve® Social Media! _________________________ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/stevevond... Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/attorneystev... Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/attorneysteve TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@attorneysteve Twitter: https://twitter.com/SteveVondran ----------------------------------------- 🏢 Main Office 🏢 San Francisco Office: https://www.vondranlegal.com/san-fran... ________________________ Other Locations: San Diego Office: https://www.vondranlegal.com/san-dieg... Orange County Office: https://www.vondranlegal.com/orange-c... Santa Monica Office: https://www.vondranlegal.com/beverly-... Phoenix - Camelback Office: https://www.vondranlegal.com/phoenix-... ________________________ This is general legal information and not legal advice or a substitute for legal advice. This is attorney advertisement.

http://www.islandlawyer.net In this exciting video, Attorney Steve® discusses a great tool for every litigator's toolbox (in the 9th circuit, anyway). This includes Washington, Oregon, Montana, Hawaii, Utah, Arizona, California, Idaho, and yes, EVEN THE MARIANA ISLANDS!!! Wow, now, if I was a 25-year-old lawyer, I would be setting up my appellate practice there!! This video discusses how a lawyer with the proper experience can allow up to 4 law students to assist in a federal court ninth circuit appeals process. That is pretty cool to know and may be helpful if you are going up some "deep pocket" litigants. Can U.S. citizens move to the Northern Mariana Islands? Yes, US citizens can live and work in the country visa-free.

http://www.CopyrightLawyer.us [over 695 videos and growing]. Subscribe for new videos: https://bit.ly/38vXDzk​ Thank you for supporting LEGAL EDUCATION and EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE! Yes, you can SHARE OUR VIDEOS on your social media networks. CALIFORNIA TATTOO LITIGATION CASE LAW UPDATES Tattoos have been a part of human culture for centuries, and their popularity shows no signs of waning. In the United States, the tattoo industry is worth an estimated $2.3 billion, with over 45 million Americans sporting at least one tattoo. Given the widespread popularity of tattoos, it's not surprising that some people try to cash in on other people's designs. Unfortunately, this can lead to instances of tattoo copyright infringement. One recent case (NOT THE CASE DISCUSSED IN THIS VIDEO) involved jazz legend Miles Davis. After Davis's death in 1991, his estate began licensing his name and likeness for use on a variety of products, including clothing and theater merchandise. In 2016, the estate learned that a company called Tattoos for Lovers was selling t-shirts featuring a design that included a portrait of Davis along with the words "Miles Davis - Jazz Trumpet Legend." The estate sent a cease and desist letter to the company, but the company continued to sell the shirts. As a result, the estate filed a lawsuit against the company for copyright infringement. While this case is currently still working its way through the courts, it highlights the potential legal difficulties that can arise when someone tries to profit from another person's tattoo design. So if you're going to create, make sure to be original!! We can help with copyright infringement disputes in California or Arizona involving tattoo art. _____________________ _________________________ Stay in the know with Attorney Steve® Social Media! _________________________ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/stevevond... Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/attorneystev... Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/attorneysteve TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@attorneysteve Twitter: https://twitter.com/SteveVondran ----------------------------------------- 🏢 Main Office 🏢 San Francisco Office: https://www.vondranlegal.com/san-fran... ________________________ Other Locations: San Diego Office: https://www.vondranlegal.com/san-dieg... Orange County Office: https://www.vondranlegal.com/orange-c... Santa Monica Office: https://www.vondranlegal.com/beverly-... Phoenix - Camelback Office: https://www.vondranlegal.com/phoenix-... ________________________ 🎥 Attorney Steve's Setup 🎥 https://www.vondranlegal.com/my-setup 🕺🏻 Attorney Steve® Free Legal Guides, Letters, and Docs 🕺🏻 https://www.scribd.com/user/184669271... 🌟 Avvo Client Reviews 🌟 https://www.avvo.com/attorneys/94104-... 🔥 Check out my video on WINNING SMALL CLAIMS LAWSUITS here 🔥 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTUhB... 👨‍🎓 Learn how to register a trademark WITHOUT A LAWYER here 👨‍🎓 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gSE5... ✔️ Get valuable tips on MEDIATION SUCCESS here ✔️ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E32Ks... _________________________ ✈️ Copyright Policy Institute ("CPi") ✈️ Steve Vondran, Esq. is the founder of the Washington D.C.-based Copyright Policy institute. (support FAIR USE RIGHTS for all creators) Visit: https://www.copyrightpolicy.org/ _________________________ NOTICE: This website is general legal information only and not legal advice. Some information may not be accurate or current. We are licensed to practice law in CA and AZ. Parts of our videos may constitute “fair use” under the copyright laws, if you have any issues, please call us at (877) 276-5084. By watching our videos, you confirm that we are not liable for any use or reliance on the content of any of our videos. Please seek legal counsel if you have any questions. The best money you will ever spend is for a one-hour consultation with an IP law firm designed to keep you OUT OF COURT. Thank you all for your continued comments, likes, and support. ________________________ © 2020 Attorney Steve Vondran. All rights reserved.