UncivilLaw

Texas AG Ken Paxton has faced allegations of wrongdoing and legal troubles for years. He was indicted on securities fraud counts in 2015, and his own staff reported him to the FBI for suspected corruption in 2020 over his dealings with Nate Paul, a donor and real estate investor. After whistleblowers sued and Paxton struck a $3.3 million settlement, House members began investigating the whistleblowers' claims in secret before impeaching Paxton on May 27 on 20 articles of impeachment. The Senate however is only considering 16 of the 20. The House voted 121-23 to approve the articles of impeachment, with 60 Republicans and 61 Democrats voting in favor. All votes against were by Republicans According to the articles, Paxton used his power and office to help Paul work through legal difficulties. They also accuse him of accepting bribes in the form of renovations to his home and a job for a woman with whom he was having an extramarital affair. The articles say that when confronted allegations of wrongdoing, Paxton retaliated against whistleblowers in his office and spent government money trying to cover up his wrongdoing with a sham investigation into their claims. For more info, see: https://senate.texas.gov/coi.php #texas #paxton #impeachment #ag #attorneygeneral

Texas AG Ken Paxton has faced allegations of wrongdoing and legal troubles for years. He was indicted on securities fraud counts in 2015, and his own staff reported him to the FBI for suspected corruption in 2020 over his dealings with Nate Paul, a donor and real estate investor. After whistleblowers sued and Paxton struck a $3.3 million settlement, House members began investigating the whistleblowers' claims in secret before impeaching Paxton on May 27 on 20 articles of impeachment. The Senate however is only considering 16 of the 20. The House voted 121-23 to approve the articles of impeachment, with 60 Republicans and 61 Democrats voting in favor. All votes against were by Republicans According to the articles, Paxton used his power and office to help Paul work through legal difficulties. They also accuse him of accepting bribes in the form of renovations to his home and a job for a woman with whom he was having an extramarital affair. The articles say that when confronted allegations of wrongdoing, Paxton retaliated against whistleblowers in his office and spent government money trying to cover up his wrongdoing with a sham investigation into their claims. For more info, see: https://senate.texas.gov/coi.php #texas #paxton #impeachment #ag #attorneygeneral Produced by Uncivil Law LLC. All Rights Reserved. Become an UNCIVILIAN for 99 cents!: https://www.youtube.com/@uncivillaw/join ★☆★ CONNECT WITH ME ★☆★ : https://linktr.ee/uncivillaw ★☆★ Equipment I use ★☆★: https://www.amazon.com/shop/uncivillaw/list/34X4SONFZW2G 🚨 Donate to uncivil law at ➜ https://tinyurl.com/4xufuebm 🚨 Email uncivil law at ➜ kurt@UncivilLawLLC.com The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. SwuM, Ben Belial - Reflect https://chll.to/672db1e8

Texas AG Ken Paxton has faced allegations of wrongdoing and legal troubles for years. He was indicted on securities fraud counts in 2015, and his own staff reported him to the FBI for suspected corruption in 2020 over his dealings with Nate Paul, a donor and real estate investor. After whistleblowers sued and Paxton struck a $3.3 million settlement, House members began investigating the whistleblowers' claims in secret before impeaching Paxton on May 27 on 20 articles of impeachment. The Senate however is only considering 16 of the 20. The House voted 121-23 to approve the articles of impeachment, with 60 Republicans and 61 Democrats voting in favor. All votes against were by Republicans According to the articles, Paxton used his power and office to help Paul work through legal difficulties. They also accuse him of accepting bribes in the form of renovations to his home and a job for a woman with whom he was having an extramarital affair. The articles say that when confronted allegations of wrongdoing, Paxton retaliated against whistleblowers in his office and spent government money trying to cover up his wrongdoing with a sham investigation into their claims. For more info, see: https://senate.texas.gov/coi.php #texas #paxton #impeachment #ag #attorneygeneral

Texas AG Ken Paxton has faced allegations of wrongdoing and legal troubles for years. He was indicted on securities fraud counts in 2015, and his own staff reported him to the FBI for suspected corruption in 2020 over his dealings with Nate Paul, a donor and real estate investor. After whistleblowers sued and Paxton struck a $3.3 million settlement, House members began investigating the whistleblowers' claims in secret before impeaching Paxton on May 27 on 20 articles of impeachment. The Senate however is only considering 16 of the 20. The House voted 121-23 to approve the articles of impeachment, with 60 Republicans and 61 Democrats voting in favor. All votes against were by Republicans According to the articles, Paxton used his power and office to help Paul work through legal difficulties. They also accuse him of accepting bribes in the form of renovations to his home and a job for a woman with whom he was having an extramarital affair. The articles say that when confronted allegations of wrongdoing, Paxton retaliated against whistleblowers in his office and spent government money trying to cover up his wrongdoing with a sham investigation into their claims. For more info, see: https://senate.texas.gov/coi.php #texas #paxton #impeachment #ag #attorneygeneral Produced by Uncivil Law LLC. All Rights Reserved. Become an UNCIVILIAN for 99 cents!: https://www.youtube.com/@uncivillaw/join ★☆★ CONNECT WITH ME ★☆★ : https://linktr.ee/uncivillaw ★☆★ Equipment I use ★☆★: https://www.amazon.com/shop/uncivillaw/list/34X4SONFZW2G 🚨 Donate to uncivil law at ➜ https://tinyurl.com/4xufuebm 🚨 Email uncivil law at ➜ kurt@UncivilLawLLC.com The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. SwuM, Ben Belial - Reflect https://chll.to/672db1e8

Texas AG Ken Paxton has faced allegations of wrongdoing and legal troubles for years. He was indicted on securities fraud counts in 2015, and his own staff reported him to the FBI for suspected corruption in 2020 over his dealings with Nate Paul, a donor and real estate investor. After whistleblowers sued and Paxton struck a $3.3 million settlement, House members began investigating the whistleblowers' claims in secret before impeaching Paxton on May 27 on 20 articles of impeachment. The Senate however is only considering 16 of the 20. The House voted 121-23 to approve the articles of impeachment, with 60 Republicans and 61 Democrats voting in favor. All votes against were by Republicans According to the articles, Paxton used his power and office to help Paul work through legal difficulties. They also accuse him of accepting bribes in the form of renovations to his home and a job for a woman with whom he was having an extramarital affair. The articles say that when confronted allegations of wrongdoing, Paxton retaliated against whistleblowers in his office and spent government money trying to cover up his wrongdoing with a sham investigation into their claims. For more info, see: https://senate.texas.gov/coi.php #texas #paxton #impeachment #ag #attorneygeneral 0:00 - Introduction 1:10:00 - Detailed Discussion of Charges 1:30:00 - Resume General Coverage

Former President Donald Trump is facing a criminal investigation in Georgia for his alleged attempts to interfere with the 2020 election results in the state. But can he use his federal power to escape state prosecution? Join us for a live deep dive into the legal issues surrounding this unprecedented case. We will discuss the following questions: How does the doctrine of removal work, and under what circumstances can a defendant transfer a state case to federal court? What are the legal challenges and risks that Trump would face if he tries to remove his case to federal court? How likely is it that Trump will succeed in his removal strategy, and what are the possible outcomes of the case? Don’t miss this chance to learn more about the complex and fascinating legal battle between Trump and Georgia. Subscribe to our channel and hit the bell icon to get notified when we go live. #Trump #Georgia #Election #Law #Livestream

Welcome back to Uncivil Law, where we offer Legal Education with an Edge. If you thought the legal sphere was dull, think again. Today, we're diving deep into one of the most controversial, jaw-dropping decisions that has everyone from law students to politicians up in arms. Yep, you guessed it. We're talking about the Supreme Court's recent decision in Biden v. Nebraska. Hold onto your robes, because this one's a doozy. So, the Biden administration had this shiny plan to forgive student loans—a plan that many saw as a one-way ticket to financial freedom. But then the Supreme Court stepped in, and the rest, as they say, is legal history. But why did the Court shoot it down? Was it a matter of constitutionality, states' rights, or something else altogether? We'll pull back the curtain and take you through the nuances of the decision, step-by-step, and you might just find out that the law has more twists than a John Grisham novel. Whether you agree with the verdict or not, understanding the legal framework is crucial. We'll explore the majority opinion, the dissents, and of course, add our own Uncivil Law flair to it all. There will be no holding back; we'll ask the questions that many are thinking but few are asking. Such as, could this case set a precedent for future executive actions? Is this the end of loan forgiveness schemes as we know it? And most importantly, what does it mean for the average Joe drowning in student debt? For our long-time viewers, you know the drill. Hit that Like button if you're as captivated by this case as we are, and don't forget to Subscribe for more cutting-edge legal insights delivered with a side of sass. For those new to the channel, well, buckle up. You're in for a thought-provoking ride through the world of law that you won't get in any lecture hall. #SupremeCourtShockers #BidenVNebraskaExplained #StudentLoansGameOver #LegalTwists #UncivilLawVibes #LawyeredUp #ControversialVerdicts #DebtDebacle #LegalEducationWithAnEdge Produced by Uncivil Law LLC. All Rights Reserved. Become an UNCIVILIAN for 99 cents!: https://www.youtube.com/@uncivillaw/join ★☆★ CONNECT WITH ME ★☆★ : https://linktr.ee/uncivillaw ★☆★ Equipment I use ★☆★: https://www.amazon.com/shop/uncivillaw/list/34X4SONFZW2G 🚨 Donate to uncivil law at ➜ https://tinyurl.com/4xufuebm 🚨 Email uncivil law at ➜ kurt@UncivilLawLLC.com The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. SwuM, Ben Belial - Reflect https://chll.to/672db1e8

This video will be very demonitized ...

Good morning, law enthusiasts! Rise and shine with today's episode of "Legal News Roundup," brought to you by "Uncivil Law," where we don't just tackle the law; we give it a piece of our mind. As you kick-start your day, let our host be your legal compass through the maze of current events and cases that are making headlines. We'll explore everything from ongoing trials that have the nation riveted, to groundbreaking court decisions that promise to send ripples through our judicial system. For the true crime aficionados among you, we've got a segment that will chill your spine and boggle your mind. And as always, we'll cap it off with the latest happenings from the highest court in the land: the US Supreme Court. Why settle for bland legalese when you can have 'Legal Education with an Edge'? Dive into the day's most pressing legal stories through a conservative lens, accentuated by commentary that's as thought-provoking as it is sardonic. If you're ready to rise to the legal occasion, hit that subscribe button and ring the notification bell so you don't miss out on any of our daily insights. Who says law has to be boring? #UncivilLaw #LegalNewsRoundup #LegalEducationWithAnEdge #MorningLegalBriefing #OngoingTrials #LandmarkDecisions #TrueCrimeWatch #SCOTUSAlert #ConservativeLegalPerspective #SardonicLegalTakes

Good morning and welcome to another episode of "Legal News Roundup" on "Uncivil Law." As you pour your morning coffee, we're here to pour over the intricate web of legal cases, trials, and decisions that are shaping the world as we know it. Today, our solitary yet robust voice will guide you through the legal labyrinth that has captured the public's attention. We'll be dissecting high-profile cases in the news, exploring ongoing trials that are setting precedents, analyzing recent court decisions that challenge conventional wisdom, and even venturing into the intriguing realm of true crime. And let's not forget our quick update on the hallowed halls of the US Supreme Court. "Legal Education with an Edge" isn't just a tagline; it's a mission statement. Expect to see the day's legal events through a conservative lens, laced with a commentary that's as incisive as it is entertaining. If you're yearning for law served with a side of wit and a sprinkle of sarcasm, you've come to the right place. So hit that subscribe button, ring the notification bell, and join us in dissecting the legal happenings that are gripping the nation and the world. Your daily dose of law is just a click away. #UncivilLaw #LegalNewsRoundup #MorningLegalFix #HighProfileCases #OngoingTrials #CourtDecisions #TrueCrimeDigest #SupremeCourtUpdate #ConservativeLegalCommentary #LawWithAnEdge

Welcome back to Uncivil Law, where we offer Legal Education with an Edge. Today, we've got a hot potato of a case that even Hollywood couldn't script any better. Picture this: A TikTok psychic takes to social media to accuse an Idaho professor of quadruple murder. That's right, not one, not two, but four counts of murder. Imagine the uproar, the media frenzy, and the damage to the professor's reputation. But the plot thickens. Our psychic friend decides to file a counterclaim after the professor sues for defamation. You might be thinking, surely those psychic powers would foresee the outcome, right? Wrong. The counterclaim crumbled faster than a house of cards in a windstorm. So, what does this spellbinding drama teach us about defamation, counterclaims, and, oh, the limitations of psychic powers in the court of law? In this episode, we'll delve into the nitty-gritty of defamation claims, what constitutes a counterclaim, and why "psychic powers" might be suitable for entertainment but are utterly powerless in a legal battleground. Get ready for a journey into the mystic—or perhaps not so mystic—realm where the law takes no prisoners. As always, we're going to lay down some serious legal wisdom, served up with a side of wit and a dash of sarcasm, because let's face it, this case begs for it. You won't want to miss this one, folks. Trust me, it's a legal thriller, a courtroom drama, and a morality play all rolled into one deliciously absurd tale. Make sure to hit that subscribe button, ring the bell for notifications, and smash the like button if you're excited to see clairvoyance clash with cold, hard legal fact. #ViralLaw #DefamationDrama #LegalEducation #RealityVsPsychic #JusticeServed #UncivilLaw #SmashTheLikeButton #SubscribeNow Produced by Uncivil Law LLC. All Rights Reserved. Become an UNCIVILIAN for 99 cents!: https://www.youtube.com/@uncivillaw/join ★☆★ CONNECT WITH ME ★☆★ : https://linktr.ee/uncivillaw ★☆★ Equipment I use ★☆★: https://www.amazon.com/shop/uncivillaw/list/34X4SONFZW2G 🚨 Donate to uncivil law at ➜ https://tinyurl.com/4xufuebm 🚨 Email uncivil law at ➜ kurt@UncivilLawLLC.com The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. SwuM, Ben Belial - Reflect https://chll.to/672db1e8

Legal News Roundup : Aug 29, 2023

Mark Meadows, Trump’s former White House chief of staff, is one of the 19 defendants who were indicted by a Fulton County grand jury for allegedly conspiring to subvert the 2020 election results in Georgia. He faces two felony charges: violation of Georgia’s racketeering act and solicitation of violation of oath by a public officer. Meadows has filed a motion to move his case from state court to federal court, arguing that he is immune from prosecution under the U.S. Constitution because he acted as a federal officer when he contacted Georgia officials on behalf of Trump. He testified for nearly three hours on Monday in a hearing to support his motion. He denied any wrongdoing and claimed that he was performing his official duties as Trump’s chief of staff. The outcome of Meadows’ motion could have significant implications for the other defendants, including Trump himself, who could also seek to move their cases to federal court if Meadows succeeds. Federal court would offer a more favorable venue for the defendants, as they would face a larger and more diverse jury pool than in Fulton County, which is a Democratic stronghold. However, moving the case to federal court could also pose some risks for the defendants, as they could face additional charges from the U.S. Department of Justice, which has jurisdiction over federal crimes. The DOJ could potentially charge the defendants with violating federal laws related to election interference, obstruction of justice, or civil rights violations. The Georgia election case is one of several legal challenges that Trump and his allies are facing across the country for their attempts to overturn the 2020 election results. The case is being closely watched by legal experts and political observers, as it could set a precedent for how state and federal authorities handle election-related crimes in the future. Thank you for watching this video. If you enjoyed it, please like, share, and subscribe to my channel. And don’t forget to hit the bell icon to get notified of my latest updates. Produced by Uncivil Law LLC. All Rights Reserved. Become an UNCIVILIAN for 99 cents!: https://www.youtube.com/@uncivillaw/join ★☆★ CONNECT WITH ME ★☆★ : https://linktr.ee/uncivillaw ★☆★ Equipment I use ★☆★: https://www.amazon.com/shop/uncivillaw/list/34X4SONFZW2G 🚨 Donate to uncivil law at ➜ https://tinyurl.com/4xufuebm 🚨 Email uncivil law at ➜ kurt@UncivilLawLLC.com The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. SwuM, Ben Belial - Reflect https://chll.to/672db1e8

Good morning and welcome back to "Uncivil Law" with your latest episode of "Legal News Roundup." As the world gears up for the day, we're here to break down the intricate tapestry of the legal landscape that's making headlines. Dive deep with our singular voice of reason, as we delve into pressing legal cases currently in the news spotlight, discuss the ongoing trials that have everyone talking, and dissect the most recent court decisions that promise to leave an indelible mark on our judicial system. For those with a penchant for true crime, today's roundup promises a closer look at the eerie and the enigmatic. And, of course, no episode is complete without updates from the heart of it all: the US Supreme Court. Here at "Uncivil Law," we're not just about relaying facts. Our motto, 'Legal Education with an Edge,' rings true in every episode. Expect razor-sharp insights, a conservative lens, and commentary that's both enlightening and, at times, dripping with wit and sarcasm. So, grab your morning brew, hit play, and immerse yourself in the legal world's twists and turns. And don't forget to subscribe for your daily dose of the law, delivered with just the right amount of edge. #UncivilLaw #LegalNewsRoundup #LegalEducation #CurrentCases #CourtDecisions #TrueCrimeTales #USSupremeCourt #ConservativeLegalTake #WittyLawAnalysis

Laura Loomer Makes a Mistake - Trump COULD HAVE pardoned the Jan 6 protesters

The Ontario Divisional Court upheld a concerning decision against Dr. Jordan Peterson, the internationally renowned psychologist, author, and staunch defender of free speech. The decision, mandated by the College of Psychologists of Ontario, requires Dr. Peterson to participate in a coaching program, ostensibly addressing "professionalism in public statements." The directive came after several complaints about Dr. Peterson's online remarks. Dr. Peterson, a distinguished clinical psychologist and professor emeritus at the University of Toronto, is globally recognized for his influential books, online lectures, and podcasts. Furthermore, he has gained a significant following on platforms like Twitter, where he unapologetically shares his views on various topics, from cultural issues to criticisms of political figures. Dr. Peterson expressed his concerns about the mandate, indicating that non-compliance could jeopardize his license to practice in Ontario. He challenged the directive, asserting that it threatened his fundamental right to free speech, and subsequently sought a judicial review with the Ontario Divisional Court. To keep his supporters and the public informed, Dr. Peterson shared relevant details of the case on Twitter, including documents provided by the college. Some of these documents revealed the nature of complaints raised against him, such as his skepticism of certain COVID-19 restrictions and a spirited disagreement with Gerald Butts, a close associate of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. In one notable exchange about overpopulation, Dr. Peterson countered a user, suggesting the individual was "free to leave" the planet if they felt strongly about the issue. Many supporters of Dr. Peterson, championing the principles of free expression, rallied behind him. They voiced their criticisms against the college's decision, with some even organizing a protest outside the college's offices earlier in the year. This situation has evolved beyond a simple conduct inquiry, raising pivotal questions about the role of social media and the extent to which professional organizations can influence or control the online expressions of their members. #JordanPeterson #12RulesForLife #BeyondOrder #CleanYourRoom #MapsOfMeaning #PetersonWisdom #JBPThoughts #PsychologyInsights #JordanOnTour #LobsterHierarchy #ChaosAndOrder #PetersonPodcast

Welcome to another day of riveting legal discourse with "Uncivil Law." As the morning sun shines, so does our passion for dissecting today's most talked-about legal news and cases from around the world. Delve deep with our unmatched host, who seamlessly merges profound legal insights with a wit that's sharper than a judge's gavel. At "Uncivil Law," we don't just talk about the law; we challenge it, question it, and at times, have a chuckle over its complexities. Standing firm on our tagline 'Legal Education with an Edge,' we're here to provide a perspective that's as insightful as it is irreverent. With a conservative lean and an unfiltered voice, we're breaking down today's legal narratives like no other channel does. Today, as we unravel the intricacies of current legal cases, be prepared to think, question, and perhaps even laugh a little. Because here, the law isn't just statutes and judgments—it's a story, one that deserves a brilliant narrator. Don't miss out on our daily episodes. Subscribe, ring that bell, and be part of a community that views the legal world through a unique lens. Join us, as we make our way through the labyrinth of the law, armed with knowledge, wit, and a dash of sarcasm. #UncivilLaw #LegalEducation #MorningLegalBrew #LegalNewsToday #LegalCasesUnveiled #ConservativeCommentary #WittyLaw #EdgeOfLaw

Good morning, legal enthusiasts! Welcome to today's episode of "Uncivil Law." On this 22nd day of August, we're diving deep into the most pressing legal news and cases that have the world buzzing. Get ready to dissect some of the most intriguing cases from across the globe, brought to you by our unparalleled host. As we navigate through today's legal maze, you'll gain insights, clarity, and perhaps a chuckle or two, courtesy of our host's unique blend of sharp legal acumen and razor-edged wit. "Uncivil Law" isn't your ordinary legal channel. Here, we're passionate about 'Legal Education with an Edge.' We take on the heavy-hitting topics, break them down, and offer you a perspective that's undeniably conservative, undiluted, and unapologetically uncivil. As we piece together the jigsaw of today's legal scene, you'll be equipped not only with information but with a perspective that challenges the mainstream narrative. Be prepared for a blend of solid legal analysis, sprinkled generously with our host's signature wit and sarcasm. Hit that subscribe button, tap the notification bell, and dive into the deep end of legal discourse. For those who value our content and wish to fuel more episodes like this, do consider supporting us. Join us in this episode of "Uncivil Law," where we turn the dense pages of law into an engaging, insightful, and at times, cheeky narrative. Let's venture into the world of law, one witty observation at a time. #UncivilLaw #LegalEducation

Welcome back to "Uncivil Law," where we dive deep into the complexities of the legal world, but with a twist. Today, we're unraveling a landmark Supreme Court case that's left the nation buzzing. We'll dissect the intricacies of the ruling, its implications, and as always, sprinkle in some of that classic "Uncivil Law" wit. For those new to the channel, we're all about serious legal commentary but, here's the catch, we don't take ourselves too seriously. If you're tired of the same old drab legal discussions and are craving some sharp, insightful, and occasionally sarcastic takes on the law, you're in the right place. Make sure to subscribe for your regular dose of "Legal Education with an Edge." Dive in, and let's get uncivilized together. #LegalDeepDive #UncivilLaw #LegalTwist #LawNerdsUnite #EdgeOfLaw #SassyLegal #CourtroomChronicles #SubscribeNow Produced by Uncivil Law LLC. All Rights Reserved. Become an UNCIVILIAN for 99 cents!: https://www.youtube.com/@uncivillaw/join ★☆★ CONNECT WITH ME ★☆★ : https://linktr.ee/uncivillaw ★☆★ Equipment I use ★☆★: https://www.amazon.com/shop/uncivillaw/list/34X4SONFZW2G 🚨 Donate to uncivil law at ➜ https://tinyurl.com/4xufuebm 🚨 Email uncivil law at ➜ kurt@UncivilLawLLC.com The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. SwuM, Ben Belial - Reflect https://chll.to/672db1e8

Police use of visual estimation of speed (US v. Sowards)

In today's deep dive on "Uncivil Law", we unpack the sorority scandal that's making waves across the University of Wyoming. While some see this as a simple case of gender inclusion, the legal implications are far more intricate and reveal underlying issues in the broader legal landscape. With "Legal Education with an Edge", we'll cut through the noise, delve into the heart of the matter, and provide keen insights that other channels might overlook. Our presenter, with his signature blend of wit and no-nonsense commentary, will guide you through the maze of legal jargon and potential consequences for the future of educational institutions. So, if you've ever wondered about the boundaries of gender rights, university bylaws, and how our legal system views such matters, this is the episode you've been waiting for. Stick around, and don't forget to share your thoughts in the comments. Because here, every perspective counts...as long as it's backed by sound legal reasoning. #LegalDeepDive #SororityScandal #LawUnfiltered #UncivilInsights #EdgeOfLaw #WyomingLegalDrama #ConservativeLegalTake Produced by Uncivil Law LLC. All Rights Reserved. Become an UNCIVILIAN for 99 cents!: https://www.youtube.com/@uncivillaw/join ★☆★ CONNECT WITH ME ★☆★ : https://linktr.ee/uncivillaw ★☆★ Equipment I use ★☆★: https://www.amazon.com/shop/uncivillaw/list/34X4SONFZW2G 🚨 Donate to uncivil law at ➜ https://tinyurl.com/4xufuebm 🚨 Email uncivil law at ➜ kurt@UncivilLawLLC.com The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. SwuM, Ben Belial - Reflect https://chll.to/672db1e8

Legal News Roundup - Aug 18, 2023

Facts of the case Gerald Francis Gault, fifteen years old, was taken into custody for allegedly making an obscene phone call. Gault had previously been placed on probation. The police did not leave notice with Gault's parents, who were at work, when the youth was arrested. After proceedings before a juvenile court judge, Gault was committed to the State Industrial School until he reached the age of 21. Question Were the procedures used to commit Gault constitutionally legitimate under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?

Welcome back to "Uncivil Law," where we bring you Legal Education with an Edge. 🔥 In today's live stream, we dive deep into the most intriguing legal news of the day. Hold onto your gavels, because we're taking you on a whirlwind tour of the latest courtroom decisions that have got everyone talking. 🏛️ Think you knew the ins and outs of today's headline-grabbing true crime cases? Think again. We've got the hard-hitting analysis that'll make you see things from a whole new perspective. 🚔💼 And as always, we'll be dipping our toes into the fascinating world of pop culture law. Because who doesn't love a good Hollywood legal drama? 🎥🍿 So, whether you're here for a dose of serious legal commentary or just looking for that signature "Uncivil Law" wit (or perhaps a mix of both?), this livestream is for you. Our conservative legal lean might not sit well with everyone, but hey, the truth often doesn't. Buckle up and let's get uncivil! 👓📜 #LegalDeepDive #CourtroomDrama #TrueCrimeRevealed #PopCultureLaw #LegalWithEdge #UncivilInsights