TRUTH SCIENCE151

This video features a Sovereign Citizen playing stupid game with the police and loses. Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #COURT #GEORGIA #BODYCAM #COURTCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

In this video we head over to Louisiana where a Sovereign Citizen couple is attempting the "right to travel" script and fails miserably at it. Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #COURT #LOUISIANA #BODYCAM #COURTCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

This video features a Sovereign Citizen having yet another run-in with some police officers in the state of Georgia. Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #COURT #GEORGIA #BODYCAM #COURTCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

This video features a Sovereign Citizen who gets pulled over for driving with no plates on his vehicle. Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/@TRUTH_SCIENCE151?si=2b0Ha6F1GZIbGEPF #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #COURT #WISCONSIN #BODYCAM #COURTCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

This video features a Sovereign Citizen couple who gets pulled over in Indiana. Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/@TRUTH_SCIENCE151?si=2b0Ha6F1GZIbGEPF #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #COURT #INDIANA #BODYCAM #COURTCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

This video features the famous sovereign citizen couple attempting the right to travel and failing miserably at it once again. Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #COURT #INDIANA #BODYCAM #COURTCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

This video features a sovereign citizen couple who seem to share a brain getting their car towed because it was not registered. Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/@TRUTH_SCIENCE151?si=2b0Ha6F1GZIbGEPF #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #COURT #INDIANA #BODYCAM #COURTCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

This video features a Black sovereign citizen queen who gets caught shoplifting in Macy's. Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/@TRUTH_SCIENCE151?si=2b0Ha6F1GZIbGEPF #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #COURT #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #BODYCAM #COURTCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

This video features a Moorish sovereign citizen knuckle head at a traffic stop, making things very difficult. "The inhabitants of Africa," averred the Moorish Holy Koran, "are the descendants of the ancient Canaanites from the land of Canaan" (ancient Palestine, presumably located in West Asia). The eventual founders of the Moroccan empire, the Moabites from the land of Moab in turn "received permission from the Pharaohs of Egypt to settle and inhabit North-West Africa, and were joined by "their Canaanite, Hittite and Amorite brethren seeking new homes." Hence, claimed the Koran Questions for Moorish Americans, "Moroccans" was the modern name for the ancient Moabites. But how had biblical Moabites, who inhabited what is seems, was now the nationstate of Jordan, become modern-day Moroccans occupying the northwest corner of the African continent? Noble Drew Ali's intention, to lay claim to the grandeur of the former Moorish empire while at the same time grounding Moorish American identity in biblical antiquity. From the scriptures Prophet Ali extracted a Moabite identity for African Americans, but his real goal, or so it appears, was to appropriate the more recently arrived and decidedly non-biblical Morabites, or Almoravids —an error no doubt attributable to post-vocalic -r deletion in African-American speech patterns (Ebonics be praised!). The term Morabite was derived from the Arabic word murabti, meaning "bound," as in a religious order. Murabti was the name assumed by North African Muslims who submitted to a purified Islamic doctrine during the period spanning the mid-eleventh to the mid-twelfth centuries. After conquering North Africa, the Murabtin (Almoravids) traversed the Straits of Magellan (Gibraltar?) and gave renewed impetus to the Moorish empire in Spain. Hence Morabites were indeed Moors who inhabited the northwestern shores of Africa and beyond. And were it actually possible for Moorish Americans to trace their ancestry directly to the Moors of Morocco, Morabite —but not Moabite—ancestors likely would be found among them. The word "Moor" has its origin in 46 B.C. when the Romans invaded North Africa. They called the inhabitants they met there Maures from the Greek word mauros, meaning dark or black. The word indicated more than one ethnic group. To Shakespeare "Moor" simply meant "black African." It is important to point out that the medieval Moors who conquered Europe should not be confused with the modern Moors aka "Moorish Americans". In Ross Brann's article "The Moors?" he considers the meaning and significance of Moorish identity in literary works, film, and scholarship. Brann notes that even today the figure is "employed regularly in academic circles and in popular culture without much question or reflection" and "without clarification of who precisely the Moors are". Recounting a history of the uses of the term Moor, he explains that "Andalusi Arabic sources—as opposed to later mudéjar and morisco sources in Aljamiado—neither refer to individuals as Moors nor recognize any such group, community or culture". Moor is a term applied from the outside, by Europeans, yet "unlike relatively stable terms of Roman provenance inherited by Christians such as Arab, Ishmaelite and Saracen," the significance of the term varies in particular historical moments and shifts over time. Early in the history of al-Andalus, Moor signified "Berber" as a geographic and ethnic identity. Later writing, however, from twelfth- and thirteenth-century Christian kingdoms, demonstrates the "transformation of Moor from a term signifying Berber into a general term referring primarily to Muslims (regardless of ethnicity) living in recently conquered Christian lands and secondarily to those residing in what was still left of al-Andalus". Moors are not a distinct orself-definedpeople. The 1911Encyclopædia Britannicaobserved that "The term 'Moors' has no real ethnological value." Europeans of theMiddle Agesand theearly modern periodvariously applied the name to Arabs, North African Berbers, as well as Muslim Europeans. The term has also been used in Europe in a broader, somewhat derogatory sense to refer to Muslims in general, especially those of Arab or Berber descent, whether living in Spain or North Africa. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/@TRUTH_SCIENCE151?si=2b0Ha6F1GZIbGEPF #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #MOORISHAMERICAN #SOVEREIGNCITIZEN #SOVCIT #NewMoorOrder #RISEOFTHEMOORS #SOVEREIGN #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITSARRESTED #CanaanlandMoors #FACTS #OWNED #FRAUDS #FAIL #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

This video features a Moorish sovereign citizen who refuses to cooperate with officers at a traffic stop. "The inhabitants of Africa," averred the Moorish Holy Koran, "are the descendants of the ancient Canaanites from the land of Canaan" (ancient Palestine, presumably located in West Asia). The eventual founders of the Moroccan empire, the Moabites from the land of Moab in turn "received permission from the Pharaohs of Egypt to settle and inhabit North-West Africa, and were joined by "their Canaanite, Hittite and Amorite brethren seeking new homes." Hence, claimed the Koran Questions for Moorish Americans, "Moroccans" was the modern name for the ancient Moabites. But how had biblical Moabites, who inhabited what is seems, was now the nationstate of Jordan, become modern-day Moroccans occupying the northwest corner of the African continent? Noble Drew Ali's intention, to lay claim to the grandeur of the former Moorish empire while at the same time grounding Moorish American identity in biblical antiquity. From the scriptures Prophet Ali extracted a Moabite identity for African Americans, but his real goal, or so it appears, was to appropriate the more recently arrived and decidedly non-biblical Morabites, or Almoravids —an error no doubt attributable to post-vocalic -r deletion in African-American speech patterns (Ebonics be praised!). The term Morabite was derived from the Arabic word murabti, meaning "bound," as in a religious order. Murabti was the name assumed by North African Muslims who submitted to a purified Islamic doctrine during the period spanning the mid-eleventh to the mid-twelfth centuries. After conquering North Africa, the Murabtin (Almoravids) traversed the Straits of Magellan (Gibraltar?) and gave renewed impetus to the Moorish empire in Spain. Hence Morabites were indeed Moors who inhabited the northwestern shores of Africa and beyond. And were it actually possible for Moorish Americans to trace their ancestry directly to the Moors of Morocco, Morabite —but not Moabite—ancestors likely would be found among them. The word "Moor" has its origin in 46 B.C. when the Romans invaded North Africa. They called the inhabitants they met there Maures from the Greek word mauros, meaning dark or black. The word indicated more than one ethnic group. To Shakespeare "Moor" simply meant "black African." It is important to point out that the medieval Moors who conquered Europe should not be confused with the modern Moors aka "Moorish Americans". In Ross Brann's article "The Moors?" he considers the meaning and significance of Moorish identity in literary works, film, and scholarship. Brann notes that even today the figure is "employed regularly in academic circles and in popular culture without much question or reflection" and "without clarification of who precisely the Moors are". Recounting a history of the uses of the term Moor, he explains that "Andalusi Arabic sources—as opposed to later mudéjar and morisco sources in Aljamiado—neither refer to individuals as Moors nor recognize any such group, community or culture". Moor is a term applied from the outside, by Europeans, yet "unlike relatively stable terms of Roman provenance inherited by Christians such as Arab, Ishmaelite and Saracen," the significance of the term varies in particular historical moments and shifts over time. Early in the history of al-Andalus, Moor signified "Berber" as a geographic and ethnic identity. Later writing, however, from twelfth- and thirteenth-century Christian kingdoms, demonstrates the "transformation of Moor from a term signifying Berber into a general term referring primarily to Muslims (regardless of ethnicity) living in recently conquered Christian lands and secondarily to those residing in what was still left of al-Andalus". Moors are not a distinct orself-definedpeople. The 1911Encyclopædia Britannicaobserved that "The term 'Moors' has no real ethnological value." Europeans of theMiddle Agesand theearly modern periodvariously applied the name to Arabs, North African Berbers, as well as Muslim Europeans. The term has also been used in Europe in a broader, somewhat derogatory sense to refer to Muslims in general, especially those of Arab or Berber descent, whether living in Spain or North Africa. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/@TRUTH_SCIENCE151?si=2b0Ha6F1GZIbGEPF #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #MOORISHAMERICAN #SOVEREIGNCITIZEN #SOVCIT #NewMoorOrder #RISEOFTHEMOORS #SOVEREIGN #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITSARRESTED #CanaanlandMoors #FACTS #OWNED #FRAUDS #FAIL #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

In this video we witness a surprising victory for a Moorish sovereign citizen in court. The inhabitants of Africa," averred the Moorish Holy Koran, "are the descendants of the ancient Canaanites from the land of Canaan" (ancient Palestine, presumably located in West Asia). The eventual founders of the Moroccan empire, the Moabites from the land of Moab in turn "received permission from the Pharaohs of Egypt to settle and inhabit North-West Africa, and were joined by "their Canaanite, Hittite and Amorite brethren seeking new homes." Hence, claimed the Koran Questions for Moorish Americans, "Moroccans" was the modern name for the ancient Moabites. But how had biblical Moabites, who inhabited what is seems, was now the nationstate of Jordan, become modern-day Moroccans occupying the northwest corner of the African continent? Noble Drew Ali's intention, to lay claim to the grandeur of the former Moorish empire while at the same time grounding Moorish American identity in biblical antiquity. From the scriptures Prophet Ali extracted a Moabite identity for African Americans, but his real goal, or so it appears, was to appropriate the more recently arrived and decidedly non-biblical Morabites, or Almoravids —an error no doubt attributable to post-vocalic -r deletion in African-American speech patterns (Ebonics be praised!). The term Morabite was derived from the Arabic word murabti, meaning "bound," as in a religious order. Murabti was the name assumed by North African Muslims who submitted to a purified Islamic doctrine during the period spanning the mid-eleventh to the mid-twelfth centuries. After conquering North Africa, the Murabtin (Almoravids) traversed the Straits of Magellan (Gibraltar?) and gave renewed impetus to the Moorish empire in Spain. Hence Morabites were indeed Moors who inhabited the northwestern shores of Africa and beyond. And were it actually possible for Moorish Americans to trace their ancestry directly to the Moors of Morocco, Morabite —but not Moabite—ancestors likely would be found among them. The word "Moor" has its origin in 46 B.C. when the Romans invaded North Africa. They called the inhabitants they met there Maures from the Greek word mauros, meaning dark or black. The word indicated more than one ethnic group. To Shakespeare "Moor" simply meant "black African." It is important to point out that the medieval Moors who conquered Europe should not be confused with the modern Moors aka "Moorish Americans". In Ross Brann's article "The Moors?" he considers the meaning and significance of Moorish identity in literary works, film, and scholarship. Brann notes that even today the figure is "employed regularly in academic circles and in popular culture without much question or reflection" and "without clarification of who precisely the Moors are". Recounting a history of the uses of the term Moor, he explains that "Andalusi Arabic sources—as opposed to later mudéjar and morisco sources in Aljamiado—neither refer to individuals as Moors nor recognize any such group, community or culture". Moor is a term applied from the outside, by Europeans, yet "unlike relatively stable terms of Roman provenance inherited by Christians such as Arab, Ishmaelite and Saracen," the significance of the term varies in particular historical moments and shifts over time. Early in the history of al-Andalus, Moor signified "Berber" as a geographic and ethnic identity. Later writing, however, from twelfth- and thirteenth-century Christian kingdoms, demonstrates the "transformation of Moor from a term signifying Berber into a general term referring primarily to Muslims (regardless of ethnicity) living in recently conquered Christian lands and secondarily to those residing in what was still left of al-Andalus". Moors are not a distinct orself-definedpeople. The 1911Encyclopædia Britannicaobserved that "The term 'Moors' has no real ethnological value." Europeans of theMiddle Agesand theearly modern periodvariously applied the name to Arabs, North African Berbers, as well as Muslim Europeans. The term has also been used in Europe in a broader, somewhat derogatory sense to refer to Muslims in general, especially those of Arab or Berber descent, whether living in Spain or North Africa. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/@TRUTH_SCIENCE151?si=2b0Ha6F1GZIbGEPF #COURT #MOORISHAMERICAN #SOVEREIGNCITIZEN #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVCIT #NewMoorOrder #RISEOFTHEMOORS #SOVEREIGN #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITSARRESTED #CanaanlandMoors #FACTS #OWNED #FRAUDS #FAIL #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

In this video we have an inmate who intends to represent himself in court. Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/@TRUTH_SCIENCE151?si=2b0Ha6F1GZIbGEPF #COURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZEN #COURTCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

We head over to Florida where a Moorish sovereign citizen has been pulled over for driving with fake Moorish tags. "The inhabitants of Africa," averred the Moorish Holy Koran, "are the descendants of the ancient Canaanites from the land of Canaan" (ancient Palestine, presumably located in West Asia). The eventual founders of the Moroccan empire, the Moabites from the land of Moab in turn "received permission from the Pharaohs of Egypt to settle and inhabit North-West Africa, and were joined by "their Canaanite, Hittite and Amorite brethren seeking new homes." Hence, claimed the Koran Questions for Moorish Americans, "Moroccans" was the modern name for the ancient Moabites. But how had biblical Moabites, who inhabited what is seems, was now the nationstate of Jordan, become modern-day Moroccans occupying the northwest corner of the African continent? Noble Drew Ali's intention, to lay claim to the grandeur of the former Moorish empire while at the same time grounding Moorish American identity in biblical antiquity. From the scriptures Prophet Ali extracted a Moabite identity for African Americans, but his real goal, or so it appears, was to appropriate the more recently arrived and decidedly non-biblical Morabites, or Almoravids —an error no doubt attributable to post-vocalic -r deletion in African-American speech patterns (Ebonics be praised!). The term Morabite was derived from the Arabic word murabti, meaning "bound," as in a religious order. Murabti was the name assumed by North African Muslims who submitted to a purified Islamic doctrine during the period spanning the mid-eleventh to the mid-twelfth centuries. After conquering North Africa, the Murabtin (Almoravids) traversed the Straits of Magellan (Gibraltar?) and gave renewed impetus to the Moorish empire in Spain. Hence Morabites were indeed Moors who inhabited the northwestern shores of Africa and beyond. And were it actually possible for Moorish Americans to trace their ancestry directly to the Moors of Morocco, Morabite —but not Moabite—ancestors likely would be found among them. The word "Moor" has its origin in 46 B.C. when the Romans invaded North Africa. They called the inhabitants they met there Maures from the Greek word mauros, meaning dark or black. The word indicated more than one ethnic group. To Shakespeare "Moor" simply meant "black African." It is important to point out that the medieval Moors who conquered Europe should not be confused with the modern Moors aka "Moorish Americans". In Ross Brann's article "The Moors?" he considers the meaning and significance of Moorish identity in literary works, film, and scholarship. Brann notes that even today the figure is "employed regularly in academic circles and in popular culture without much question or reflection" and "without clarification of who precisely the Moors are". Recounting a history of the uses of the term Moor, he explains that "Andalusi Arabic sources—as opposed to later mudéjar and morisco sources in Aljamiado—neither refer to individuals as Moors nor recognize any such group, community or culture". Moor is a term applied from the outside, by Europeans, yet "unlike relatively stable terms of Roman provenance inherited by Christians such as Arab, Ishmaelite and Saracen," the significance of the term varies in particular historical moments and shifts over time. Early in the history of al-Andalus, Moor signified "Berber" as a geographic and ethnic identity. Later writing, however, from twelfth- and thirteenth-century Christian kingdoms, demonstrates the "transformation of Moor from a term signifying Berber into a general term referring primarily to Muslims (regardless of ethnicity) living in recently conquered Christian lands and secondarily to those residing in what was still left of al-Andalus". Moors are not a distinct orself-definedpeople. The 1911Encyclopædia Britannicaobserved that "The term 'Moors' has no real ethnological value." Europeans of theMiddle Agesand theearly modern periodvariously applied the name to Arabs, North African Berbers, as well as Muslim Europeans. The term has also been used in Europe in a broader, somewhat derogatory sense to refer to Muslims in general, especially those of Arab or Berber descent, whether living in Spain or North Africa. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/@TRUTH_SCIENCE151?si=2b0Ha6F1GZIbGEPF #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #MOORISHAMERICAN #SOVEREIGNCITIZEN #SOVCIT #NewMoorOrder #RISEOFTHEMOORS #SOVEREIGN #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITSARRESTED #CanaanlandMoors #FACTS #OWNED #FRAUDS #FAIL #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

This video features an aggressive stalker sovereign citizen who just doesn't know when to leave someone alone. Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/@TRUTH_SCIENCE151?si=2b0Ha6F1GZIbGEPF #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #MOORISHAMERICAN #SOVEREIGNCITIZEN #SOVCIT #FLORIDA #NewMoorOrder #RISEOFTHEMOORS #SOVEREIGN #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITSARRESTED #CanaanlandMoors #FACTS #OWNED #FRAUDS #FAIL #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

This video features a Sovereign Citizen who finds out the hard way that the sovereign script doesn't work. Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/@TRUTH_SCIENCE151?si=2b0Ha6F1GZIbGEPF #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGNCITIZEN #BODYCAM #GEORGIA #COURTCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #COURT #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

This video features a Moorish sovereign citizen trying the right to travel in Florida and things don't work out very well for him.. The inhabitants of Africa," averred the Moorish Holy Koran, "are the descendants of the ancient Canaanites from the land of Canaan" (ancient Palestine, presumably located in West Asia). The eventual founders of the Moroccan empire, the Moabites from the land of Moab in turn "received permission from the Pharaohs of Egypt to settle and inhabit North-West Africa, and were joined by "their Canaanite, Hittite and Amorite brethren seeking new homes." Hence, claimed the Koran Questions for Moorish Americans, "Moroccans" was the modern name for the ancient Moabites. But how had biblical Moabites, who inhabited what is seems, was now the nationstate of Jordan, become modern-day Moroccans occupying the northwest corner of the African continent? Noble Drew Ali's intention, to lay claim to the grandeur of the former Moorish empire while at the same time grounding Moorish American identity in biblical antiquity. From the scriptures Prophet Ali extracted a Moabite identity for African Americans, but his real goal, or so it appears, was to appropriate the more recently arrived and decidedly non-biblical Morabites, or Almoravids —an error no doubt attributable to post-vocalic -r deletion in African-American speech patterns (Ebonics be praised!). The term Morabite was derived from the Arabic word murabti, meaning "bound," as in a religious order. Murabti was the name assumed by North African Muslims who submitted to a purified Islamic doctrine during the period spanning the mid-eleventh to the mid-twelfth centuries. After conquering North Africa, the Murabtin (Almoravids) traversed the Straits of Magellan (Gibraltar?) and gave renewed impetus to the Moorish empire in Spain. Hence Morabites were indeed Moors who inhabited the northwestern shores of Africa and beyond. And were it actually possible for Moorish Americans to trace their ancestry directly to the Moors of Morocco, Morabite —but not Moabite—ancestors likely would be found among them. The word "Moor" has its origin in 46 B.C. when the Romans invaded North Africa. They called the inhabitants they met there Maures from the Greek word mauros, meaning dark or black. The word indicated more than one ethnic group. To Shakespeare "Moor" simply meant "black African." It is important to point out that the medieval Moors who conquered Europe should not be confused with the modern Moors aka "Moorish Americans". In Ross Brann's article "The Moors?" he considers the meaning and significance of Moorish identity in literary works, film, and scholarship. Brann notes that even today the figure is "employed regularly in academic circles and in popular culture without much question or reflection" and "without clarification of who precisely the Moors are". Recounting a history of the uses of the term Moor, he explains that "Andalusi Arabic sources—as opposed to later mudéjar and morisco sources in Aljamiado—neither refer to individuals as Moors nor recognize any such group, community or culture". Moor is a term applied from the outside, by Europeans, yet "unlike relatively stable terms of Roman provenance inherited by Christians such as Arab, Ishmaelite and Saracen," the significance of the term varies in particular historical moments and shifts over time. Early in the history of al-Andalus, Moor signified "Berber" as a geographic and ethnic identity. Later writing, however, from twelfth- and thirteenth-century Christian kingdoms, demonstrates the "transformation of Moor from a term signifying Berber into a general term referring primarily to Muslims (regardless of ethnicity) living in recently conquered Christian lands and secondarily to those residing in what was still left of al-Andalus". Moors are not a distinct orself-definedpeople. The 1911Encyclopædia Britannicaobserved that "The term 'Moors' has no real ethnological value." Europeans of theMiddle Agesand theearly modern periodvariously applied the name to Arabs, North African Berbers, as well as Muslim Europeans. The term has also been used in Europe in a broader, somewhat derogatory sense to refer to Muslims in general, especially those of Arab or Berber descent, whether living in Spain or North Africa. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/@TRUTH_SCIENCE151?si=2b0Ha6F1GZIbGEPF #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #MOORISHAMERICAN #SOVEREIGNCITIZEN #SOVCIT #NewMoorOrder #RISEOFTHEMOORS #SOVEREIGN #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITSARRESTED #CanaanlandMoors #FACTS #OWNED #FRAUDS #FAIL #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

This traffic encounter is with a Moorish sovereign couple who believes that they are not driving but instead traveling. Of course the officers knows better and requests the driver to produce a license and registration for the vehicle. This sovereign couple refuses to comply with the officers request and instead starts praying to "the most high" and asks for God to remove the officers from their presence. The word "Moor" has its origin in 46 B.C. when the Romans invaded North Africa. They called the inhabitants they met there Maures from the Greek word mauros, meaning dark or black. The word indicated more than one ethnic group. To Shakespeare "Moor" simply meant "black African." It is important to point out that the medieval Moors who conquered Europe should not be confused with the modern Moors Aka "Moorish Americans". Moors are not a distinct orself-definedpeople. The 1911Encyclopædia Britannicaobserved that "The term 'Moors' has no real ethnological value." Europeans of theMiddle Agesand theearly modern periodvariously applied the name to Arabs, North African Berbers, as well as Muslim Europeans. The term has also been used in Europe in a broader, somewhat derogatory sense to refer to Muslims in general, especially those of Arab or Berber descent, whether living in Spain or North Africa. The termMooris anexonym used by Christian Europeans to designate theMusliminhabitants of theMaghreb, theIberian Peninsula,SicilyandMaltaduring theMiddle Ages. In medievalRomance languages, variations of theLatinword for the Moors (for instance,ItalianandSpanish:moro,French:maure,Portuguese:mouro,Romanian:maur) developed different applications and connotations. The term initially denoted a specific Berber people in westernLibya, but the name acquired more general meaning during the medieval period, associated with "Muslim", similar to associations with "Saracens". During the context of theCrusadesand theReconquista, the term Moors included the derogatory suggestion of "infidels".. In Ross Brann's article "The Moors?" he considers the meaning and significance of Moorish identity in literary works, film, and scholarship. Brann notes that even today the figure is "employed regularly in academic circles and in popular culture without much question or reflection" and "without clarification of who precisely the Moors are". Recounting a history of the uses of the term Moor, he explains that "Andalusi Arabic sources—as opposed to later mudéjar and morisco sources in Aljamiado—neither refer to individuals as Moors nor recognize any such group, community or culture". Moor is a term applied from the outside, by Europeans, yet "unlike relatively stable terms of Roman provenance inherited by Christians such as Arab, Ishmaelite and Saracen," the significance of the term varies in particular historical moments and shifts over time. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/@TRUTH_SCIENCE151?si=2b0Ha6F1GZIbGEPF #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #MOORISHAMERICAN #SOVEREIGNCITIZEN #SOVCIT #NewMoorOrder #RISEOFTHEMOORS #SOVEREIGN #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITSARRESTED #CanaanlandMoors #FACTS #OWNED #FRAUDS #FAIL #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

We have a Moorish sovereign getting owned by the police and his wife for not having his car registered. This Moorish scientists learns a valuable lesson about not following DMV rules.. The inhabitants of Africa," averred the Moorish Holy Koran, "are the descendants of the ancient Canaanites from the land of Canaan" (ancient Palestine, presumably located in West Asia). The eventual founders of the Moroccan empire, the Moabites from the land of Moab in turn "received permission from the Pharaohs of Egypt to settle and inhabit North-West Africa, and were joined by "their Canaanite, Hittite and Amorite brethren seeking new homes." Hence, claimed the Koran Questions for Moorish Americans, "Moroccans" was the modern name for the ancient Moabites. But how had biblical Moabites, who inhabited what is seems, was now the nationstate of Jordan, become modern-day Moroccans occupying the northwest corner of the African continent? Noble Drew Ali's intention, to lay claim to the grandeur of the former Moorish empire while at the same time grounding Moorish American identity in biblical antiquity. From the scriptures Prophet Ali extracted a Moabite identity for African Americans, but his real goal, or so it appears, was to appropriate the more recently arrived and decidedly non-biblical Morabites, or Almoravids —an error no doubt attributable to post-vocalic -r deletion in African-American speech patterns (Ebonics be praised!). The term Morabite was derived from the Arabic word murabti, meaning "bound," as in a religious order. Murabti was the name assumed by North African Muslims who submitted to a purified Islamic doctrine during the period spanning the mid-eleventh to the mid-twelfth centuries. After conquering North Africa, the Murabtin (Almoravids) traversed the Straits of Magellan (Gibraltar?) and gave renewed impetus to the Moorish empire in Spain. Hence Morabites were indeed Moors who inhabited the northwestern shores of Africa and beyond. And were it actually possible for Moorish Americans to trace their ancestry directly to the Moors of Morocco, Morabite —but not Moabite—ancestors likely would be found among them. The word "Moor" has its origin in 46 B.C. when the Romans invaded North Africa. They called the inhabitants they met there Maures from the Greek word mauros, meaning dark or black. The word indicated more than one ethnic group. To Shakespeare "Moor" simply meant "black African." It is important to point out that the medieval Moors who conquered Europe should not be confused with the modern Moors aka "Moorish Americans". In Ross Brann's article "The Moors?" he considers the meaning and significance of Moorish identity in literary works, film, and scholarship. Brann notes that even today the figure is "employed regularly in academic circles and in popular culture without much question or reflection" and "without clarification of who precisely the Moors are". Recounting a history of the uses of the term Moor, he explains that "Andalusi Arabic sources—as opposed to later mudéjar and morisco sources in Aljamiado—neither refer to individuals as Moors nor recognize any such group, community or culture". Moor is a term applied from the outside, by Europeans, yet "unlike relatively stable terms of Roman provenance inherited by Christians such as Arab, Ishmaelite and Saracen," the significance of the term varies in particular historical moments and shifts over time. Early in the history of al-Andalus, Moor signified "Berber" as a geographic and ethnic identity. Later writing, however, from twelfth- and thirteenth-century Christian kingdoms, demonstrates the "transformation of Moor from a term signifying Berber into a general term referring primarily to Muslims (regardless of ethnicity) living in recently conquered Christian lands and secondarily to those residing in what was still left of al-Andalus". Moors are not a distinct orself-definedpeople. The 1911Encyclopædia Britannicaobserved that "The term 'Moors' has no real ethnological value." Europeans of theMiddle Agesand theearly modern periodvariously applied the name to Arabs, North African Berbers, as well as Muslim Europeans. The term has also been used in Europe in a broader, somewhat derogatory sense to refer to Muslims in general, especially those of Arab or Berber descent, whether living in Spain or North Africa. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/@TRUTH_SCIENCE151?si=2b0Ha6F1GZIbGEPF #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #MOORISHAMERICAN #SOVEREIGNCITIZEN #SOVCIT #NewMoorOrder #RISEOFTHEMOORS #SOVEREIGN #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITSARRESTED #CanaanlandMoors #FACTS #OWNED #FRAUDS #FAIL #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

We have a Moorish sovereign refusing to corporate while at a traffic stop. Unfortunately for this Moorish scientists he runs into a no nonsense officer who isn't going for his bull. "The inhabitants of Africa," averred the Moorish Holy Koran, "are the descendants of the ancient Canaanites from the land of Canaan" (ancient Palestine, presumably located in West Asia). The eventual founders of the Moroccan empire, the Moabites from the land of Moab in turn "received permission from the Pharaohs of Egypt to settle and inhabit North-West Africa, and were joined by "their Canaanite, Hittite and Amorite brethren seeking new homes." Hence, claimed the Koran Questions for Moorish Americans, "Moroccans" was the modern name for the ancient Moabites. But how had biblical Moabites, who inhabited what is seems, was now the nationstate of Jordan, become modern-day Moroccans occupying the northwest corner of the African continent? Noble Drew Ali's intention, to lay claim to the grandeur of the former Moorish empire while at the same time grounding Moorish American identity in biblical antiquity. From the scriptures Prophet Ali extracted a Moabite identity for African Americans, but his real goal, or so it appears, was to appropriate the more recently arrived and decidedly non-biblical Morabites, or Almoravids —an error no doubt attributable to post-vocalic -r deletion in African-American speech patterns (Ebonics be praised!). The term Morabite was derived from the Arabic word murabti, meaning "bound," as in a religious order. Murabti was the name assumed by North African Muslims who submitted to a purified Islamic doctrine during the period spanning the mid-eleventh to the mid-twelfth centuries. After conquering North Africa, the Murabtin (Almoravids) traversed the Straits of Magellan (Gibraltar?) and gave renewed impetus to the Moorish empire in Spain. Hence Morabites were indeed Moors who inhabited the northwestern shores of Africa and beyond. And were it actually possible for Moorish Americans to trace their ancestry directly to the Moors of Morocco, Morabite —but not Moabite—ancestors likely would be found among them. The word "Moor" has its origin in 46 B.C. when the Romans invaded North Africa. They called the inhabitants they met there Maures from the Greek word mauros, meaning dark or black. The word indicated more than one ethnic group. To Shakespeare "Moor" simply meant "black African." It is important to point out that the medieval Moors who conquered Europe should not be confused with the modern Moors aka "Moorish Americans". In Ross Brann's article "The Moors?" he considers the meaning and significance of Moorish identity in literary works, film, and scholarship. Brann notes that even today the figure is "employed regularly in academic circles and in popular culture without much question or reflection" and "without clarification of who precisely the Moors are". Recounting a history of the uses of the term Moor, he explains that "Andalusi Arabic sources—as opposed to later mudéjar and morisco sources in Aljamiado—neither refer to individuals as Moors nor recognize any such group, community or culture". Moor is a term applied from the outside, by Europeans, yet "unlike relatively stable terms of Roman provenance inherited by Christians such as Arab, Ishmaelite and Saracen," the significance of the term varies in particular historical moments and shifts over time. Early in the history of al-Andalus, Moor signified "Berber" as a geographic and ethnic identity. Later writing, however, from twelfth- and thirteenth-century Christian kingdoms, demonstrates the "transformation of Moor from a term signifying Berber into a general term referring primarily to Muslims (regardless of ethnicity) living in recently conquered Christian lands and secondarily to those residing in what was still left of al-Andalus". Moors are not a distinct orself-definedpeople. The 1911Encyclopædia Britannicaobserved that "The term 'Moors' has no real ethnological value." Europeans of theMiddle Agesand theearly modern periodvariously applied the name to Arabs, North African Berbers, as well as Muslim Europeans. In medievalRomance languages, variations of theLatinword for the Moors (for instance,ItalianandSpanish:moro,French:maure,Portuguese:mouro,Romanian:maur) developed different applications and connotations. The term initially denoted a specific Berber people in westernLibya, but the name acquired more general meaning during the medieval period, associated with "Muslim", similar to associations with "Saracens". DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/@TRUTH_SCIENCE151?si=2b0Ha6F1GZIbGEPF #SOVEREIGN #SOVEREIGNCITIZEN #SOVCIT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #MOORS #MOORISHAMERICAN #MOORISHSOVEREIGN #MOORISHWORLDTV #WARRANT #OWNED #FRAUDS #RISEOFTHEMOORS #CanaanlandMoors #NANONALITYCARD #MOROCCO #ARRESTED #MOORISHAMERICANSOVEREIGN #TRUTHSCIENCE151

In this video we take you into the dark side of Moorish science. We have a Moorish woman alleging that CFS has kidnapped her child. This Moorish scientists has gotten into some legal troubles and as a consequence of that her child was removed from her custody. This Moorish sovereign has her day in court and tries to use Moorish science as her legal defense and the judge is not going for it whatsoever. Throughout the court hearings this Moorish sovereigns only defense is challenging the courts jurisdiction. This Moorish scientists refuses to hire an attorney and insist on using Moorish science as her legal defense. This Moorish woman is to stubborn to drop the Moorish defense and truly do what it takes to regain custody of her child. In short Moorish science ruins this woman's life. "The inhabitants of Africa," averred the Moorish Holy Koran, "are the descendants of the ancient Canaanites from the land of Canaan" (ancient Palestine, presumably located in West Asia). The eventual founders of the Moroccan empire, the Moabites from the land of Moab in turn "received permission from the Pharaohs of Egypt to settle and inhabit North-West Africa, and were joined by "their Canaanite, Hittite and Amorite brethren seeking new homes." Hence, claimed the Koran Questions for Moorish Americans, "Moroccans" was the modern name for the ancient Moabites. But how had biblical Moabites, who inhabited what is seems, was now the nationstate of Jordan, become modern-day Moroccans occupying the northwest corner of the African continent? Noble Drew Ali's intention, to lay claim to the grandeur of the former Moorish empire while at the same time grounding Moorish American identity in biblical antiquity. From the scriptures Prophet Ali extracted a Moabite identity for African Americans, but his real goal, or so it appears, was to appropriate the more recently arrived and decidedly non-biblical Morabites, or Almoravids —an error no doubt attributable to post-vocalic -r deletion in African-American speech patterns (Ebonics be praised!). The term Morabite was derived from the Arabic word murabti, meaning "bound," as in a religious order. Murabti was the name assumed by North African Muslims who submitted to a purified Islamic doctrine during the period spanning the mid-eleventh to the mid-twelfth centuries. After conquering North Africa, the Murabtin (Almoravids) traversed the Straits of Magellan (Gibraltar?) and gave renewed impetus to the Moorish empire in Spain. Hence Morabites were indeed Moors who inhabited the northwestern shores of Africa and beyond. And were it actually possible for Moorish Americans to trace their ancestry directly to the Moors of Morocco, Morabite —but not Moabite—ancestors likely would be found among them. The word "Moor" has its origin in 46 B.C. when the Romans invaded North Africa. They called the inhabitants they met there Maures from the Greek word mauros, meaning dark or black. The word indicated more than one ethnic group. To Shakespeare "Moor" simply meant "black African." It is important to point out that the medieval Moors who conquered Europe should not be confused with the modern Moors aka "Moorish Americans". In Ross Brann's article "The Moors?" he considers the meaning and significance of Moorish identity in literary works, film, and scholarship. Brann notes that even today the figure is "employed regularly in academic circles and in popular culture without much question or reflection" and "without clarification of who precisely the Moors are". Recounting a history of the uses of the term Moor, he explains that "Andalusi Arabic sources—as opposed to later mudéjar and morisco sources in Aljamiado—neither refer to individuals as Moors nor recognize any such group, community or culture". Moor is a term applied from the outside, by Europeans, yet "unlike relatively stable terms of Roman provenance inherited by Christians such as Arab, Ishmaelite and Saracen," the significance of the term varies in particular historical moments and shifts over time. Early in the history of al-Andalus, Moor signified "Berber" as a geographic and ethnic identity. Later writing, however, from twelfth- and thirteenth-century Christian kingdoms, demonstrates the "transformation of Moor from a term signifying Berber into a general term referring primarily to Muslims (regardless of ethnicity) living in recently conquered Christian lands and secondarily to those residing in what was still left of al-Andalus". DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/@TRUTH_SCIENCE151?si=uuP3hEoqeS5HRFxo #MOORISHAMERICAN #SOVEREIGN #SOVEREIGNCITIZEN #SOVCIT #NewMoorOrder #RISEOFTHEMOORS #MOORISHREPUBLIC #ShalamoorBey #LightTajiriBey #USAR #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #PERSONAMJURISDICTION #CanaanlandMoors #ARRESTED #MOORISHSOVEREIGN #WARRANT #FACTS #OWNED #FRAUDS #POLICE #FAIL #BREAKINGNEWS #WATCHDOG #YTCOMMUNITY #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE

Embark on a chilling journey into the shadows of Moorish Sovereignty. Uncover the alarming claims of ancestral rights used as a facade for breaking laws, seizing homes, and filing fraudulent lawsuits against law enforcement. Noble Drew Ali- A History Before And After The Turkish Fez LINK DOWN BELOW⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://u.pcloud.link/publink/show?code=XZw4VMXZt3l0cYHjEpV9zor4LDDSD0rqLpFk ⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️ "The inhabitants of Africa," averred the Moorish Holy Koran, "are the descendants of the ancient Canaanites from the land of Canaan" (ancient Palestine, presumably located in West Asia). The eventual founders of the Moroccan empire, the Moabites from the land of Moab in turn "received permission from the Pharaohs of Egypt to settle and inhabit North-West Africa, and were joined by "their Canaanite, Hittite and Amorite brethren seeking new homes." Hence, claimed the Koran Questions for Moorish Americans, "Moroccans" was the modern name for the ancient Moabites. But how had biblical Moabites, who inhabited what is seems, was now the nationstate of Jordan, become modern-day Moroccans occupying the northwest corner of the African continent? Noble Drew Ali's intention, to lay claim to the grandeur of the former Moorish empire while at the same time grounding Moorish American identity in biblical antiquity. From the scriptures Prophet Ali extracted a Moabite identity for African Americans, but his real goal, or so it appears, was to appropriate the more recently arrived and decidedly non-biblical Morabites, or Almoravids —an error no doubt attributable to post-vocalic -r deletion in African-American speech patterns (Ebonics be praised!). The term Morabite was derived from the Arabic word murabti, meaning "bound," as in a religious order. Murabti was the name assumed by North African Muslims who submitted to a purified Islamic doctrine during the period spanning the mid-eleventh to the mid-twelfth centuries. After conquering North Africa, the Murabtin (Almoravids) traversed the Straits of Magellan (Gibraltar?) and gave renewed impetus to the Moorish empire in Spain. Hence Morabites were indeed Moors who inhabited the northwestern shores of Africa and beyond. And were it actually possible for Moorish Americans to trace their ancestry directly to the Moors of Morocco, Morabite —but not Moabite—ancestors likely would be found among them. The word "Moor" has its origin in 46 B.C. when the Romans invaded North Africa. They called the inhabitants they met there Maures from the Greek word mauros, meaning dark or black. The word indicated more than one ethnic group. To Shakespeare "Moor" simply meant "black African." It is important to point out that the medieval Moors who conquered Europe should not be confused with the modern Moors aka "Moorish Americans". In Ross Brann's article "The Moors?" he considers the meaning and significance of Moorish identity in literary works, film, and scholarship. Brann notes that even today the figure is "employed regularly in academic circles and in popular culture without much question or reflection" and "without clarification of who precisely the Moors are". Recounting a history of the uses of the term Moor, he explains that "Andalusi Arabic sources—as opposed to later mudéjar and morisco sources in Aljamiado—neither refer to individuals as Moors nor recognize any such group, community or culture". Moor is a term applied from the outside, by Europeans, yet "unlike relatively stable terms of Roman provenance inherited by Christians such as Arab, Ishmaelite and Saracen," the significance of the term varies in particular historical moments and shifts over time. Early in the history of al-Andalus, Moor signified "Berber" as a geographic and ethnic identity. Later writing, however, from twelfth- and thirteenth-century Christian kingdoms, demonstrates the "transformation of Moor from a term signifying Berber into a general term referring primarily to Muslims (regardless of ethnicity) living in recently conquered Christian lands and secondarily to those residing in what was still left of al-Andalus". Moors are not a distinct orself-definedpeople. The 1911Encyclopædia Britannicaobserved that "The term 'Moors' has no real ethnological value." Europeans of theMiddle Agesand theearly modern periodvariously applied the name to Arabs, North African Berbers, as well as Muslim Europeans. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/@TRUTH_SCIENCE151?si=2b0Ha6F1GZIbGEPF #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #MOORISHAMERICAN #SOVCIT #NEWARK #SOVCITS #SOVEREIGN #CANAANLANDMOORS #RISEOFTHEMOORS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

Noble Drew Ali- A History Before And After The Turkish Fez LINK DOWN BELOW⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://u.pcloud.link/publink/show?code=XZw4VMXZt3l0cYHjEpV9zor4LDDSD0rqLpFk ⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️ "The inhabitants of Africa," averred the Moorish Holy Koran, "are the descendants of the ancient Canaanites from the land of Canaan" (ancient Palestine, presumably located in West Asia). The eventual founders of the Moroccan empire, the Moabites from the land of Moab in turn "received permission from the Pharaohs of Egypt to settle and inhabit North-West Africa, and were joined by "their Canaanite, Hittite and Amorite brethren seeking new homes." Hence, claimed the Koran Questions for Moorish Americans, "Moroccans" was the modern name for the ancient Moabites. But how had biblical Moabites, who inhabited what is seems, was now the nationstate of Jordan, become modern-day Moroccans occupying the northwest corner of the African continent? Noble Drew Ali's intention, to lay claim to the grandeur of the former Moorish empire while at the same time grounding Moorish American identity in biblical antiquity. From the scriptures Prophet Ali extracted a Moabite identity for African Americans, but his real goal, or so it appears, was to appropriate the more recently arrived and decidedly non-biblical Morabites, or Almoravids —an error no doubt attributable to post-vocalic -r deletion in African-American speech patterns (Ebonics be praised!). The term Morabite was derived from the Arabic word murabti, meaning "bound," as in a religious order. Murabti was the name assumed by North African Muslims who submitted to a purified Islamic doctrine during the period spanning the mid-eleventh to the mid-twelfth centuries. After conquering North Africa, the Murabtin (Almoravids) traversed the Straits of Magellan (Gibraltar?) and gave renewed impetus to the Moorish empire in Spain. Hence Morabites were indeed Moors who inhabited the northwestern shores of Africa and beyond. And were it actually possible for Moorish Americans to trace their ancestry directly to the Moors of Morocco, Morabite —but not Moabite—ancestors likely would be found among them. The word "Moor" has its origin in 46 B.C. when the Romans invaded North Africa. They called the inhabitants they met there Maures from the Greek word mauros, meaning dark or black. The word indicated more than one ethnic group. To Shakespeare "Moor" simply meant "black African." It is important to point out that the medieval Moors who conquered Europe should not be confused with the modern Moors aka "Moorish Americans". In Ross Brann's article "The Moors?" he considers the meaning and significance of Moorish identity in literary works, film, and scholarship. Brann notes that even today the figure is "employed regularly in academic circles and in popular culture without much question or reflection" and "without clarification of who precisely the Moors are". Recounting a history of the uses of the term Moor, he explains that "Andalusi Arabic sources—as opposed to later mudéjar and morisco sources in Aljamiado—neither refer to individuals as Moors nor recognize any such group, community or culture". Moor is a term applied from the outside, by Europeans, yet "unlike relatively stable terms of Roman provenance inherited by Christians such as Arab, Ishmaelite and Saracen," the significance of the term varies in particular historical moments and shifts over time. Early in the history of al-Andalus, Moor signified "Berber" as a geographic and ethnic identity. Later writing, however, from twelfth- and thirteenth-century Christian kingdoms, demonstrates the "transformation of Moor from a term signifying Berber into a general term referring primarily to Muslims (regardless of ethnicity) living in recently conquered Christian lands and secondarily to those residing in what was still left of al-Andalus". Moors are not a distinct orself-definedpeople. The 1911Encyclopædia Britannicaobserved that "The term 'Moors' has no real ethnological value." Europeans of theMiddle Agesand theearly modern periodvariously applied the name to Arabs, North African Berbers, as well as Muslim Europeans. The term has also been used in Europe in a broader, somewhat derogatory sense to refer to Muslims in general, especially those of Arab or Berber descent, whether living in Spain or North Africa. In medievalRomance languages, variations of theLatinword for the Moors (for instance,ItalianandSpanish:moro,French:maure,Portuguese:mouro,Romanian:maur) developed different applications and connotations. The term initially denoted a specific Berber people in westernLibya, but the name acquired more general meaning during the medieval period, associated with "Muslim", similar to associations with "Saracens". DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/@TRUTH_SCIENCE151?si=qgXt3LgqH74VejVi #NOBLEDREWALI #MOORISHSCIENCETEMPLE #SOVEREIGNCITIZEN #MOORS

On July 3, 2021, a standoff occurred between armed members of a militia group calledRise of the Moorsand local police officers onInterstate 95inWakefield, Massachusetts after a state trooper responding to disabled vehicles allegedly found the group carryinglong guns, side-arms and wearing tactical body armor. Police said the group claimed to be traveling from Rhode Island to Maine for "training" on their privately owned land. The standoff lasted several hours and resulted in 11 arrests Rise of the Moors is a New England group whose members identify asMoorish Americans. AnInstagramaccount belonging to the group says its goal is to continue the work ofNoble Drew Ali, founder of theMoorish Science Temple of America. According toThe Washington Post, the group is part of theMoorish sovereign-citizen movement, who claimimmunityfrom local, state and federal laws. TheSouthern Poverty Law Centerclassifies the Rise of the Moors as an anti-government group and identifies the Moorish sovereign-citizen movement with the broader Americansovereign-citizen movement. About two weeks after the standoff, some members of the group filed a $70,000,000 civil rights and defamation lawsuit against some media outlets, the Massachusetts State Police, some individual troopers involved in the standoff, the presiding judge from the arraignment, and the State of Massachusetts for "violating the claimants civil, national and human rights". The suit was dismissed as it would involve federal intervention in state court proceedings and that the allegations did not demonstrate any defamation. Police say the arrested are: Jamhal Tavon Sanders Latimer, 29, of Providence, Rhode Island; Robert Rodriguez, 21, of the Bronx, New York; Wilfredo Hernandez, 21, of the Bronx; Alban El Curraugh, 27, of the Bronx; Aaron Lamont Johnson, 29, of Detroit; Quinn Cumberlander, 40, of Pawtucket, Rhode Island; Lamar Dow, 34, of the Bronx; and Conrad Pierre, 29, of Baldwin, New York. Moorish sovereigns believe that a 1787 treaty between the U.S. and Morocco -- a claim that SPLC says is "fictitious" -- grants them immunity from U.S. law, the center reported. Some groups create their own birth certificates, passports, driver's licenses and vehicle registrations, according to SPLC. This perceived immunity from local authority is used to justify refusing to pay taxes, buy car insurance, register vehicles, and "defraud banks", the center reported. The movement has no unified leadership and consists of small groups, most of which operate in the Southeast, Northeast and Midwest U.S., according to the SPLC. SPLC officially listed Rise of the Moors as an anti-government organization in 2020. Cruz said the center has counted so far six organizations that are classified as Moorish sovereign anti-government groups across the country. The SPLC has reported seeing the Rise of the Moors group participate in paramilitary training before, but the location of the training is unknown. He said it's uncommon to see sovereign citizen groups participate in such training. He warned the public to be wary of such groups, saying sovereign communities, "tend to prey on people who have fallen on hard times, and are not necessarily aware of what it means to be part of a sovereign nation." "With the Moorish groups especially, they try and tailor their message to bring in Black and brown folks with the idea that their sovereign nation will provide opportunities and a more equitable society for folks," Cruz said. "A lot of times people get caught up in that and don't realize that essentially what they're espousing is illegal. You can't just grab a car and drive it wherever you want. You can't just squat in homes and make them your own. You can't just carry around firearms and not have them registered." Rise of the Moors Mission statement: "The main focus ofRise of the Moorsis to perform all things relating to andappropriate to portraying the overall history of our ancestors - the Olmecs, Moabites, Canaanites, Hittites etc.; Informing all Moors of their political status here in the Maghreb Al Aqsa (America – Morocco the most extreme west); Enlighten the minds of the fallen Moors, restoring them the their ‘In Full Life,’ ‘In Propria Persona Sui Juris’ status, as opposed to the mentality of a minor who is ‘Civil liter Mortuus’; to promote a collective of Moorish Americans and connecting them to the Rise of the Moors social and economic platform; to promote the use of moral principles and the branches of knowledge dealing with ethical awareness; to encourage all Moorish Americans to believe in the capacity of each other to succeed in business, to encourage, support and provide patronage in our affairs". DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/@TRUTH_SCIENCE151?si=uuP3hEoqeS5HRFxo #SOVEREIGN #SOVEREIGNCITIZEN #SOVCIT #MOORISHAMERICAN #RISEOFTHEMOORS #CanaanlandMoors #MOROCCO #ARRESTED #MOORISSOVEREIGN #TRUTHSCIENCE151

You are about to watch a Moorish sovereign get totally owned by the "policy enforcers". This is the second time this Moorish scientists has an embarrassing encounter with the "policy enforcers". After refusing to give the "policy enforcers" his drivers license they have to smash his window and drag him out of the vehicle. The word "Moor" has its origin in 46 B.C. when the Romans invaded North Africa. They called the inhabitants they met there Maures from the Greek word mauros, meaning dark or black. The word indicated more than one ethnic group. To Shakespeare "Moor" simply meant "black African." It is important to point out that the medieval Moors who conquered Europe should not be confused with the modern Moors Aka "Moorish Americans". Moors are not a distinct or self-defined people. The 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica observed that "The term 'Moors' has no real ethnological value." Europeans of the Middle Ages and the early modern period variously applied the name to Arabs, North African Berbers, as well as Muslim Europeans. The term has also been used in Europe in a broader, somewhat derogatory sense to refer to Muslims in general, especially those of Arab or Berber descent, whether living in Spain or North Africa. The term Moor is an exonym used by Christian Europeans to designate the Muslim inhabitants of the Maghreb, the Iberian Peninsula, Sicily and Malta during the Middle Ages. In medieval Romance languages, variations of the Latin word for the Moors (for instance, Italian and Spanish: moro, French: maure, Portuguese: mouro, Romanian: maur) developed different applications and connotations. The term initially denoted a specific Berber people in western Libya, but the name acquired more general meaning during the medieval period, associated with "Muslim", similar to associations with "Saracens". During the context of the Crusades and the Reconquista, the term Moors included the derogatory suggestion of "infidels".. In Ross Brann's article "The Moors?" he considers the meaning and significance of Moorish identity in literary works, film, and scholarship. Brann notes that even today the figure is "employed regularly in academic circles and in popular culture without much question or reflection" and "without clarification of who precisely the Moors are". Recounting a history of the uses of the term Moor, he explains that "Andalusi Arabic sources—as opposed to later mudéjar and morisco sources in Aljamiado—neither refer to individuals as Moors nor recognize any such group, community or culture". Moor is a term applied from the outside, by Europeans, yet "unlike relatively stable terms of Roman provenance inherited by Christians such as Arab, Ishmaelite and Saracen," the significance of the term varies in particular historical moments and shifts over time. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/@TRUTH_SCIENCE151?si=WkvY5HmCYYgU_ZkG #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGNCITIZEN #MOORISHAMERICAN #MICHIGAN #COURT #COURTCAM #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #SOVCITS #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

We have a Moorish sovereign at a traffic stop and he has lots of Moorish sovereign paper work to present to the officers. This Moorish scientists thinks that stating his nationality will suffice in getting him out of this traffic stop but boy was he wrong.. "The inhabitants of Africa," averred the Moorish Holy Koran, "are the descendants of the ancient Canaanites from the land of Canaan" (ancient Palestine, presumably located in West Asia). The eventual founders of the Moroccan empire, the Moabites from the land of Moab in turn "received permission from the Pharaohs of Egypt to settle and inhabit North-West Africa, and were joined by "their Canaanite, Hittite and Amorite brethren seeking new homes." Hence, claimed the Koran Questions for Moorish Americans, "Moroccans" was the modern name for the ancient Moabites. But how had biblical Moabites, who inhabited what is seems, was now the nationstate of Jordan, become modern-day Moroccans occupying the northwest corner of the African continent? Noble Drew Ali's intention, to lay claim to the grandeur of the former Moorish empire while at the same time grounding Moorish American identity in biblical antiquity. From the scriptures Prophet Ali extracted a Moabite identity for African Americans, but his real goal, or so it appears, was to appropriate the more recently arrived and decidedly non-biblical Morabites, or Almoravids —an error no doubt attributable to post-vocalic -r deletion in African-American speech patterns (Ebonics be praised!). The term Morabite was derived from the Arabic word murabti, meaning "bound," as in a religious order. Murabti was the name assumed by North African Muslims who submitted to a purified Islamic doctrine during the period spanning the mid-eleventh to the mid-twelfth centuries. After conquering North Africa, the Murabtin (Almoravids) traversed the Straits of Magellan (Gibraltar?) and gave renewed impetus to the Moorish empire in Spain. Hence Morabites were indeed Moors who inhabited the northwestern shores of Africa and beyond. And were it actually possible for Moorish Americans to trace their ancestry directly to the Moors of Morocco, Morabite —but not Moabite—ancestors likely would be found among them. The word "Moor" has its origin in 46 B.C. when the Romans invaded North Africa. They called the inhabitants they met there Maures from the Greek word mauros, meaning dark or black. The word indicated more than one ethnic group. To Shakespeare "Moor" simply meant "black African." It is important to point out that the medieval Moors who conquered Europe should not be confused with the modern Moors Aka "Moorish Americans". In Ross Brann's article "The Moors?" he considers the meaning and significance of Moorish identity in literary works, film, and scholarship. Brann notes that even today the figure is "employed regularly in academic circles and in popular culture without much question or reflection" and "without clarification of who precisely the Moors are". Recounting a history of the uses of the term Moor, he explains that "Andalusi Arabic sources—as opposed to later mudéjar and morisco sources in Aljamiado—neither refer to individuals as Moors nor recognize any such group, community or culture". Moor is a term applied from the outside, by Europeans, yet "unlike relatively stable terms of Roman provenance inherited by Christians such as Arab, Ishmaelite and Saracen," the significance of the term varies in particular historical moments and shifts over time. Early in the history of al-Andalus, Moor signified "Berber" as a geographic and ethnic identity. Later writing, however, from twelfth- and thirteenth-century Christian kingdoms, demonstrates the "transformation of Moor from a term signifying Berber into a general term referring primarily to Muslims (regardless of ethnicity) living in recently conquered Christian lands and secondarily to those residing in what was still left of al-Andalus". Moors are not a distinct or self-defined people. The 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica observed that "The term 'Moors' has no real ethnological value." Europeans of the Middle Ages and the early modern period variously applied the name to Arabs, North African Berbers, as well as Muslim Europeans. The term has also been used in Europe in a broader, somewhat derogatory sense to refer to Muslims in general, especially those of Arab or Berber descent, whether living in Spain or North Africa. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/@TRUTH_SCIENCE151?si=QgPinha3Sp40lYXi #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGNCITIZEN #MOORISHAMERICAN #MICHIGAN #COURT #COURTCAM #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #SOVCITS #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY