NewsWagg

When I was at school in the 1980’s my friend was left handed The teacher forced him to use his right hand. The teacher was kind and thought he was doing good as this was apparently when was the belief at the time. Today people would say that was cruel and they never would do it. So why do I say this? I say is trendy to claim others are bad and how you would not have done the same when you have modern information and hindsight. To condemn others in the past for past actions means you are god. As only hod could know how people of the time thought. In truth most countries have done bad. Most indeed had slaves. Indeed if we are to teach African history it would show the Africans sold us slaves. It would show Africans themselves owned Europe slaves. Yet do we see these self righteous people condemn African countries from what they did in the past? Of course not. And why should anyone condemn anyone today for what went on in the past. Do we condemn the Romans for invading the UK of course not. One suspects those who declare how they see the British empire as being bad, do so as it is trendy and they believe it will make them look like wonderful kind people. And at the same time lots of left wing middle class people will desperately pist how wonderful this person is for saying how bad the British empire was in order to join in the look@how wonderful and nice I am. In reality they seem to be saying they are god and know the minds of the people of the time. #AlanCumming

Old Tom and Jerry cartoons are hysterical. They are also very violent. Over the years made more politically correct and as a result more dull. In the early days of the cartoon around the 1949’s, children had a lot of shows that were not politically correct. But children themselves were often well behaved. Today all the shows are politically correct and rather than fights people talk about feelings. Yet for all of this children today are extremely violent. The result of all this bland politically correct tv seems to have produced children full of rage and hate. It is only a few weeks ago where in a Scottish school a girl is kicking another girl in the head. The teach and other pupils act as if this was normal. In other clips huge gangs of children in London and Manchester raid shops, and the public act as if this happens each day. Perhaps politically correctness rather than improve society has made things dreadful.

If I was to park in a disabled bay then as I got out of my car and claimed I had no legs as I walked away and I demand you believe I have no legs even though you can see I am walking you would probably think I was not a good person. Around the world a few people are born lacking sex organs in some form. But for some reason some people find it trendy to claim they have no sex organs even when they have and insist we do not view them as male or female but non binary or whatever they feel. This is mocking people who have real medical problems. Clearly in most cases people are doing this because they see it as a latest trend. When I was a bit younger I had long hair and was into heavy metal. Some are goths some punks some teddy boys and so on. It is trendy to do this as a youth. And one suspects in a few years those who claim to be non binary or whatever will have moved onto whatever the latest trend is once non binary becomes mainstream. In the same way it used to be cool to have a tattoo but now newsreaders and people over 40 get them, they are no longer cool but a bit sad. By the way I am more than happy to go to court over this should anyone want to press charges. My support goes to those who do have a medical condition not the thousands who pretend to have no sex organs as it seems trendy. But then again if pretending you have no sex organs is acceptable then I will claim I am only a head and have no body arms or legs. Or indeed I will claim I have Leprosy if we no longer need a doctor to conclude if your I’ll and what illness you have. One chap today said I was a cis male. I have no idea what a cis male is. I presume it is an insult. Possibly a hate crime. It certainly sounds offensive.

Katharine Birbalsingh posts a tweet showing Marina Purkiss on the Jeremy Vine talking down to a lady. This sums up UK politics today. As I point out I am not a Conservative or Labour voter. I just like to observe. And one thing that is clear is Labour is now a left wing middle class party for left wing middle class people who feel guilty about being middle class and like to cosplay at being working class. So the lady phoned in and points out she is not pro strikes and points out that Labour are funded by unions. Indeed one must question if Labour are on the side of the people or unions when they advertise the strikes so much. To this she is talked down to. She may as well have been called stupid. We see in the tweets the same replies from all the left wing middle class people who post how stupid the lady is for not being Labour and of course apparently she is brain washed by newspapers. It is interesting to see some of the left wing middle class people posing in there flat caps that probably cost £500 as that is what these left wing middle class people often presume working class people wear. Notice too the hatred these left wing middle class people have for the working class and the insults they use. Yet these left wing middle class people think they are nice and kind and claim to be anti bullying.

Can you explain how it helps working class people to have children go without education because they of the strikes who may end up not getting a decent job because there education suffers? Can you explain how the strikes help working class people who become unemployed because businesses fail because customers cannot get to them. Can you explain how it helps working class people when they miss out on operations because they are cancelled because of very fat nurses are striking who are on an average £35/£40k wage. Can you explain how Royal Mail staff will be better off when in a few months they are let go because Royal Mail has lost so much money from the strikes and customers now have moved to other delivery businesses. It feels as if these strikes are supported by left wing middle class people who the strikes do not affect. The strikes seem to be using people to bring down the Conservative party. People seem to be against the strikes as they were against them in the 1970’s. Those strikes meant Labour were out of power for years. One suspects these strikes will keep conservatives in power for many more years. One also suspects that Labour promote and support the strikes because unions find them. Putting unions before the people. It is interesting today to see Labour day they are against coal mines while they were once saying coal mines good and stood by the coal mine strikes. Is this because they no longer get much money from coal mine unions these days? When my friends business goes bust because of the strikes and she has to tell all the staff they have no job and they end up using food banks and they cannot afford the mortgage. Will you be telling them that there loss is worth it for the greater good? Is it worth working class people in low wages to have no jobs in order to give well paid middle class people a pay rise?

On the latest Black Boy Lane saga it turns out most residents voted against the change of the name Black Boy Lane. In fact the black residents voted 190% not to change the name. So all these left wing middle class people who are supporting the name change (and who I suspect are mainly white) are showing us they do not believe in democracy. It is very interesting that they openly show they do not care about votes and will ignore people. Nothing changes does it folks.

Often I suspect many of the left wing middle class people who try to debate with me do so without understanding what they are debating. Today I have had a few post comments to me with the results that they seem to be defending something they have zero understanding of. In this thread this person shows us they have no facts and even try to get me to Google the facts (I knew the facts I just wanted to see if they did). In the end they did a Google but still failed to understand that Black Boy was the name of King Charles II. Bizarrely in the end this person informs me that I am a racist. Please provide proof I am racist. They even rant on about pics being on the street sign. I had to explain they only have words on street signs. In the end I just felt embarrassed for this person.

Not sure why the left want to teach children about crossdressers? I had someone tell me that they seem to want trans history being given as a lesson. As you know trans is an umbrella term and includes crossdressers. So presumably they see it important to teach people (presumably children) about crossdressers. Or perhaps they want to teach children about Ed Gein who murdered people and kept the skin and body parts because he had mental health problems from being transgender (the film Psycho (1960) and The Silence of the Lambs are influenced by him. Also the Nazi party were socialists (it is in the name). In fact Oswald Mosley who set up the UK version of the Nazi party was at one time a Labour MP.

To those who rescued the deer with a bucket on its head, you are good people with honour.

Strikes mean trying to get yourself a pay rise on the basis others become unemployed and children go without an education. It is bizarre that anyone who supports or is involved with the strikes can dare pretend they care about others. Even if your very thick and stupid you know children will be going without education if teachers strike. That could mean the difference between them getting a good job or not. They know business may go bust as customers and workers cannot get to the business as such people will become unemployed. So those seeking more money are doing so on the destruction of others. Big fat nurses who want more pay as they want to buy five cakes for breakfast do so on the fact some people will probably go without vital operations. How can these left wing middle class people pretend to be kind. Indeed people who do disgusting things often will justify what they do. Someone who rapes or murders will justify such actions. But it still does not make what they do as right. And as we point out when Labour mps support the strikes rather than the public, is it because unions give them money.

In the spirit of BLM the La Rose Lane sign that was Black Boy has been vandalised. A few years ago I stated that pulling statues down was wrong and people needed to vote on it. But such as the BLM, councils, universities and many on the left informed us that if your offended by something then pull it down. As such they seemed to support statue’s being pulled down. And so people apparently are angered at a sign called Black Boy names after King Charles II being charged. As such rather than bothering to seek legal ways to change it back they seem to be taking the advice from BLM, councils, universities and many on the left to simply vandalise the sign. Clearly I am not stating that one should vandalise this sign in the way I stated vandalise of the statues. However my point is those on the left who say this is wrong I suspect supported the statues being pulled down and as such I would call them hypocrites. But again the question is why did the BBC article not mention the fact Black Boy was the name of King Charles II but only stated Black Boy was the name of a 17th century pub. Why did they not state many pubs who supported King Charles II named the pubs Black Boy. Was it to mislead people? The next question is did Jeremy Corbyn know the King Charles II connection to the Black Boy name? If not then is he lazy and does not do the most basic research into things he supports? One would presume it would be fundamental of any mp to fact find things before adding support. But if he does know the King Charles II connection to Black Boy Lane then why has he supported it? Clearly he is not stupid and as such would know in no way could it be racist name. So in that circumstance would he simply not say this is an important name of history. Rather than try to change history like the Nazi party would it not be something to be proud of as an interesting fact. Would it in fact be something schools could teach children. Show then the sign and teach the connection to King Charles II. If we are to remove references to Kings and queens then will we now be pulling castles down and pull Houses of Parliament after all presumably these are just as offensive as the name of King Charles II. By the way I notice Black Bot Lane is still on the sign. So it cannot be that offensive.

Black Boy is the name given to King Charles II. After a quick look online it turns out that the street name Black Boy Lane is the name given to King Charles II and many pubs who supported him were named Black Boy. As such has zero to do with race. So the question is why has the BBC in its article only stated Black Boy was named after a pub but not added the most important part that it was to do with King Charles II. One wonders if this was done to mislead people. One also wonders if those on the left know the connection or not to King Charles II. If not then they are lazy and stupid for backing the name change without bothering to see why it was called Black Boy in the first place. If they know the connection then one must conclude they seek to change the name to create hatred and divisions after all they could not claim it is about race or being racist as they would know it has no connection to anything racist. One also wonders why people have stayed silent about the King Charles II connection rather than just say about it and point out that the sign is most interesting as a bit of history. It is disturbing that people now feel that history should be altered or irradiated like the Nazi people tried to do.

Black Boy Lane to La Rose Lane is a gift for racists. If your aim is to wind people up and get people angry then you do things like this. Why would people on the left support this? Perhaps they want division. If you was a real racist then you would want things like this to happen knowing it creates divisions and will turn people against each other. One presumes that most people on the left will know this so one must presume the aim by some is division. Or perhaps people do not want to question this in case the woke mob turns on them. Often better to keep your head down and go along with things just like many did during the German Nazi times. Perhaps people are too desperate to look good regardless and do not care about the black community, only being seen to go along with anything in the hope they look good.

I was tested a few years ago at college for dyslexia. And my mum died of breast cancer when I was about two. I then lived with my grandparents. So your saying I am lying. So let’s have a bet of £100,000 per claim. And when I prove it. I want the cash in 24 hours.

Each day we see how damaging the lockdowns were to people. I would say the lockdowns would save few lives if any but would result in the deaths of many such as those who could not get cancer treatment. But then we find things were and in fact are worse than I said they would be. Yet the left pushed for the lockdowns and still see them as wonderful. While calling us conspiracists and nuts to suggest the lockdowns were bad. I will always hold those who were pro lockdown responsible for the results.

Call Me Chato has posted an excellent film on WOKE #callmechato. https://youtu.be/PjApqQsCfqY

This shows the problem with the left Rather than debate they say sarcastic comments. Or try to suggest your racist. Unlike the left who live in an echo chamber where they tell each other how they are all wonderful and correct. A chamber where no one can have alternate views because they is thought. A place where debate is wrong as it could mean your ideas are wrong and you may not be a nice person as you want people to think you are. Unlike them I like to follow and listen to an many people as I can so I can hear all views. Also I fail to see how one is not racist to support the change of the name. Because even someone who is not too smart can see this is going to create divisions and hatred and feed people who are racist ammunition. One suspects this will do not more than wind people up. It is the sort of thing if I wanted to have people have race wars I would encourage changing name signs knowing it would create problems. So in truth to me only those who are thick or racist or cowardly for not saying it is wrong would support this.

Black Boy Lane apparently was named after a pub in the 17th century (it is thought). This is what the BBC informs us. As I have said one wonders if the name change is to create divisions where there was none. To wind people up. To turn people against each other. Hate is something the left use to gain support. Hate the rich. Hate males. Hate white people. One wonders if the black community are simply being used by left wing people for division. Link: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-64354190

The car insurance playing the yearly game of putting the costs up. Each year we have to play this silly game where I phone back and say how can we sort this out. They then reduce it. It is one big annoyance. I suspect they hope most people cannot be bothered to phone back. It is the game we play each year with the mobile phone contact. Life is too short for these games. I end up not having a nice experience with car insurance firms and other girls that play these games. Firms used to be run and owned by people who had price in the business and wanted customers happy. Today many seem to be run by people with low self esteem who just want to get rich because they think people will respect them. And they seem to see customers as just people who should hand over money regardless.

The Cannonball Run 1981 film is wonderful. You forgot how exciting the start is. How different it was in the 80’s when we had exciting films. And today the bland WOKE non offensive drivel they churn out for the drab morons todays who get offended by everything because they have such low IQ’s and see being offended as a way to be seen as clever. Link: https://youtu.be/8b7erU_DOfE Link: https://youtu.be/evA3_NV7cPM

Tim pool talks about the threats and possible attacks from the left. Today we seem to now accept that it is left wing people who are violent and some act like the Nazi youth. But rather than speak out most people on the left support this or stay silent. Yet these are the people who tell us they are kind and nice. Many on the left seem to get huge enjoyment seeing others suffer. This may be getting them sacked. Banned on YouTube. Banned from speaking. Posting a persons address hoping someone will murder them. Seeing old people not seeing family for months due to lockdown and dying in misery. People dying of cancer because they did not get hospital treatment during lockdown. Children missing out on education because of strikes. People missing lifesaving treatment because of strikes. People loosing jobs because businesses go bust because of strikes. The list goes on and on. Then they will pretend they are nice and kind, then call you names. But the fact that this seems to be normal now in 2023 is disturbing. We now seem to be living in a new Nazi time with those who claim to be socialists almost copying what the Nazi Germans did in 1930’s. Even openly telling us who to hate. This may be the rich. Or males. Or white people. We are told to hate. Link to his vid: https://youtu.be/0yeIFVQ_2ng

The puma demonstration. To me this demonstration is pointless. Just another of the many protests we see each day often by people who just want to be seen to be taking part in a play day. So then can tell others how wonderful and important they are. Probably having lots of meetings where they can feel important. One suspects not a single person has ever gone to any of the countries. In truth most probably know as much as me about the situation. And I can tell you I know sod all. I can also tell you I have did all interest too. If it was animals suffering I would be interested. But all I hear from both sides is we are good the other side bad. The left seem to support one side and the right the other. One wonders sometimes if it is more about hating the side your opponent supports. But I will tell you folks something. If you really care, rather than pretend for Instagram. Then go over to the countries involved. Interview both sides. Film different places. Show both good and bad on both sides. And upload to such as YouTube. That is the way to convince us and to show the world what is going on. And ask people what solutions they have. Just giving us your third fourth or fifth hand stories of what someone in the pub told you is not evidence.

Is it safe to send children to school these days? If I was a parent I would home school or work several jobs to send my children to a private school. Each day on Twitter I see children being assaulted to the point where one could be killed. These are not fights like when I was at school in the 80’s and 90’s. These are close to gang violence of the type mafia would do. This school is apparently took place in a classroom at the Waid Academy in Anstruther, a coastal town in Fife, on Monday. The teacher sounds like she just accepts this rather than jump up throwing the girl out. The pupils sit also calm. It is as this must happen all the time. One wonders if this is daily life now in many schools. Perhaps children should be thankful for teachers on strike as at least they may be safe for a few days if they are home. I have often seen school children walking home drinking beer and smoking weed. This now seems normality. For me this seems to be a result of modern WOKE ideology. Where children are told they have rights and they are never blamed for anything as it is always the fault of someone else. Perhaps we should just accept the UK is finished rather than be upset hoping things will improve. Link: Disturbing moment schoolgirl repeatedly punched and kicked in the head https://mol.im/a/11656103

The public seem to have low support for the strikes. It is interesting today to read an article about the claims well paid people are using food banks. Often I like to read the comments section. Often you get people giving different views. While the left claim the daily mail is right wing I often notice many left wing people post in the comments section. So I often find almost half the comments are from left wing people. But this article was unusual in the fact that almost ALL the comments were not supporting the unions claims about food banks. As I have often said as a student nurse we were told never strike and never talk of going on strike as the public will turn against you. And clearly the respect for nurses is going fast. The feeling one gets is support for the strikes is not around. The only ones who seem to support the strikes are left wing middle class people who in truth will not be affected much if at all by the strikes. While real people will find they end up unemployed as businesses go bust because people cannot travel. Children miss out on education. And people cannot get to hospital. Rather than bring the government down as one suspects that was the real aim of the unions, one suspects that it will keep the conservatives in power longer as the public will be angry at Labour for supporting the strikes. Putting the unions first before the public (as Labour get a lot of money from unions). Link: Do workers earning £32,000 really have to rely on food banks? https://mol.im/a/11655917