InnerLight

"September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor" is a 5 hour documentary by Massimo Mazzucco that summarizes 12 years of public debate on 9/11. All the most important issues in the debate are presented in full detail, showing both the positions of those who regect the official version, the 9/11 Truth Movement, and the positions of those who support it, called "the debunkers." INTRODUCTION 0.01:02 - 12 parallels between Pearl Harbor and September 11 0.14:10 - The debate: main issues PART 1 - AIR DEFENSE 0.14:55 - Where are the interceptors? 0.16:12 - The "incompetence theory" (radars, transponders) 0.22:00 - The military drills 0.29:40 - Specific warnings 0.33:08 - The chain of command 0.38:10 - Promotions, not punishments 0.39:50 - The Mineta case 0.47:38 - Debunkers: "Mineta was mistaken" 0.53:18 - The Mineta case - A summary PART 2 - THE HIJACKERS 0.57:15 - "Piss-poor student pilots" 0.59:38 - Marwan al-Sheikki (UA175) 1.01:52 - Ziad Jarrah (UA93) 1.03:06 - Hani Hanjour (AA77) 1.04:00 - The debunkers' positions 1.06:00 - 2 simulations of the Pentagon attack 1.13:10 - Someone knew? 1.16:40 - Airport security cameras 1.20.15 - The missing black boxes PART 3 - THE AIRPLANES 1.26:50 - Passenger planes or military drones? 1.28:20 - Impossible speeds 1.37:30 - What happened to the passengers? 1.38:35 - The cellphone calls 1.48:30 - The debunkers' position 1.50:38 - If not from the planes, from where? PART 4 - THE PENTAGON 0.02:35 - Downed light poles 0.03:30 - The missing plane 0.04:30 - The official version 0.05:24 - Problems with the official version (wing, ailerons, tail, engines) 0.13:09 - The mystery hole 0.14:10 - The debunkers' explanations 0.16:20 - Conclusions on damage analysis 0.17:00 - The missing tapes 0.18:30 - Security video analysis 0.23.40 - Pentagon summary PART 5 - FLIGHT 93 0.24.15 - The empty hole 0.28.00 - The debunkers' explanations 0.33:00 - Plane crash or bomb explosion? 0.34:50 - The debris field 0.37.20 - The shootdown hypothesis 0.38:50 - The small white plane 0.41:40 - "Let's roll" 0.44:25 - Summary of Flight 93 PART 6 - THE TWIN TOWERS 0.45:10 - Introduction 0.47:45 - The Towers' small dirty secret 0.53:10 - Larry Silverstein 0.56:15 - NIST vs. Architects & Engineers 0.58:00 - Robust or fragile buildings? 1.04:45 - The initial collapse - Explanation #1 1.05:45 - The initial collapse - Explanation #2 1.07:35 - Problems with the official explanation 1.18:00 - The full collapse - No official explanation 1.18:50 - Law of physics violated 1.20:50 - The Twin Towers and freefall 1.27:50 - Debunkers' response to A&E 0.00:20 - The hypothesis of controlled demolitions 0.01:08 - Debunkers: "Impossible to place explosives" 0.07:34 - Explosions in the Twin Towers (witnesses) 0.15:00 - "Fuel in elevators shafts" theory 0.23:25 - Debunkers: "Explosions not recorded by tv cameras" 0.30:26 - Squibs 0.33:00 - Explosive force (montage) 0.35:00 - Ejecta 0.38:00 - Diagonal cuts 0.40:15 - What happened to the hat trusses? 0.42:20 - Extreme temperatures 0.45:30 - Debunkers' explanations 0.46:45 - Twisted and mangled beams 0.47:40 - Molten steel 0.51:05 - Molten concrete 0.53:50 - Pulverization 0.57:40 - Victims vaporized 1.02:20 - Conclusion on the Twin Towers PART 7 - BUILDING 7 1.05:10 - Introduction 1.06:35 - Official version by NIST 1.09:36 - Collapse computer simulation 1.11:00 - Fire computer simulation 1.12:20 - Debunkers: "Building 7 weaker" 1.14:25 - Preknowledge 1.19:00 - Symmetry 1.20:00 - Freefall EPILOGUE 1.22:30 - John McCain 1.24:35 - The last word

A look back on the news events from 2014 reveals a confusing, muddled mess. Things are increasingly chaotic, along with the reporting of the events in the culture of 24-7 rolling news, sound-byte feeds and the Internet. The result, as we see, is not a coherent public understanding of these complex events, but more a profound mass-confusion, with discourse destroyed, which in-turn broods disengagement from the world and further atomizes an already divided-and-conquered public. It is this response that is a powerful form of social control, and is by design… https://thoughtmaybe.com/oh-dearism-2/ Transcript So much of the news this year has been hopeless, depressing and above all confusing. To which the only response is 'Oh Dear' But what this film is going to suggest is that defeatist response has become a central part of a new system of political control and to understand how this is happening you have to look to Russia and to a man called Vladislav Surkov who is a hero of our time. Surkov is one of President Putin's advisors and has helped him maintain his power for fifteen years, but he has done it in a very new way. He came originally from the avant-garde art world and those who have studied his career say that what Surkov has done is import ideas from conceptual art into the very heart of politics. His aim is to undermine people’s perception of the world so they never know what is really happening. Surkov turned Russian politics into a bewildering constantly changing piece of theatre, he sponsored all kinds of groups, from Neo-Nazi skin-heads to liberal human rights groups, he even backed parties that were opposed to President Putin, but the key thing was that Surkov then let it be known that this was what he was doing which meant that no one was sure what was real or fake. As one journalist put it 'It’s a strategy of power that keeps any opposition constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because its indefinable.' which is exactly what Surkov is alleged to have done in the Ukraine this year. In typical fashion as the war began Surkov published a short story about something he called Non-Linear War. A war where you never know what the enemy are really up to or even who they are. The underlying aim Surkov says is not to win the war but to use the conflict to create a constant state of destabilized perception in order to manage and control. But maybe we have something similar emerging here in Britain, everything were told by journalists and politicians is confusing and contradictory, of course there is no Mr. Surkov in charge but it’s an odd non-linear world that plays into the hands of those in power. British troops have come home from Afghanistan but nobody seems to know whether it was a victory or whether it was a defeat. Aging disk-jockeys are prosecuted for crimes they committed decades ago, while practically no one in the city of London is prosecuted for the endless financial crimes that are being revealed there. In Syria we are told that President Assad is the evil enemy, but then his enemies turn out to be even more evil than him, so we bomb them and by doing that we help keep Assad in power. But the real epicenter of this non-linear world is the economy and the closest we have to our own shape-shifting post-modern politician is George Osbourne. He tells us proudly that the economy is growing but at the same time wages are going down, he says he is cutting the deficit but then its revealed that the deficit is going up. But the dark heart of this shape-shifting world is quantitative-easing, the government is insisting on taking billions of pounds out of the economy through its austerity program, yet at the very same time it is pumping billions of pounds in to the economy through quantitative-easing, the equivalent of £24,000 for every family in Britain. But it gets even more confusing because the Bank of England have admitted that those billions of pounds have not gone where they have supposed to, a vast amount of the money has actually found its way in to the hands of the wealthiest 5% in Britain, it has been described as the biggest transfer of wealth to the rich in recent documented history. It could be a huge scandal comparable to the greedy oligarchs in Russia. A ruthless elite siphoning off billions of public money. But nobody seems to know. It sums up the strange mood of our time where nothing really makes any coherent sense. We live with a constant vaudeville of contradictory stories that makes it impossible for any real opposition to emerge, because they can't counter it with a coherent narrative of their own and it means that we as individuals become ever more powerless, unable to challenge anything because we live in a state of confusion and uncertainty. To which the response is 'Oh Dear' But that’s what they want you to say.

Sean Stone and Christopher Bollyn on Israel’s role in the September 11, 2001 attacks on America 9/11 links to Israel, the Mossad, and the crime within a crime is all discussed with Christopher Bollyn in an uncensored discussion with Sean Stone. The disposal of evidence, promotion of a scripted story, and how Ehud Barak and Benjamin Netanyahu are involved, plus the accusation of anti-semitism leveled against those that explore the connection to the Israeli government and intelligence are all explored. Who profited from the operation, false flags, and the mysterious influence of the Saudis and British are demystified in this full length episode of Buzzsaw. Christopher Bollyn is an American journalist who has investigated the events of 9-11. He helped Professor Steven E. Jones in the spring and summer of 2006, when Jones found solid evidence of Thermite in the dust of the Twin Towers. The discovery and discussion of Thermite in the demolition of the World Trade Center led to serious trouble for both Jones and Bollyn. Christopher Bollyn's website https://bollyn.com/ https://archive.ph/ZlGES - Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed The World by Christopher Bollyn https://archive.org/details/B-001-003-835/mode/2up - SITE Intelligence Group https://ent.siteintelgroup.com/ - The Little Drummer Girl - John le Carré https://readerslibrary.org/wp-content/uploads/The-Little-Drummer-Girl.pdf - The Missing Money - Solari Report by Catherine Austin Fitts https://missingmoney.solari.com/ https://missingmoney.solari.com/missing-money-2021-update/

Doctors and Scientists with Brian Hooker Ph.D. - Children's Health Defense Dr. Hooker and his guest, J.J. Couey dive into the relationship between COVID mRNA technology and biodistribution, research studies, immune responses and more. Dr. Brian Hooker invites some of the leading voices in science and medicine to break down the studies and weigh in on the controversies so the rest of us have an opportunity to understand the science that drives public health policy and medical progress. References: JJ Couey | Twitter https://twitter.com/jjcouey JJ Couey | Twitch https://www.twitch.tv/gigaohmbiological/videos JJ Couey | Youtube https://www.youtube.com/c/JConabike JJ Couey | Rumble https://rumble.com/user/GigaohmBiological https://rumble.com/c/GigaohmBiologicalArchive Gigaohm Biological https://gigaohmbiological.com/ The Next Wave Of COVID Fear With Dr. Pierre Kory https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/doctors-and-scientists-with-brian-hooker-phd/the-next-wave-of-covid-fear-with-dr-pierre-kory-show-page/ JW V HHS FDA Pfizer BioNTech Vaccine Prod 3 02418 https://www.judicialwatch.org/documents/jw-v-hhs-fda-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-prod-3-02418/ - Source: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/doctors-and-scientists-with-brian-hooker-phd/spike-protein-transfection-with-jonathan-jay-couey-ph-d/ Children's Health Defense® is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. “Our mission is to end childhood health epidemics by working aggressively to eliminate harmful exposures, hold those responsible accountable and establish safeguards to prevent future harm. We fight corruption, mass surveillance and censorship that put profits before people as well as advocate for worldwide rights to health freedom and bodily autonomy.”

An independent analysis of the events of September 11, 2001. Includes historical and geo-political background and examines the motivation of the people who played key roles in the destruction of the evidence and the obstruction of justice for the families of the victims. Investigative journalist and best selling author Christopher Bollyn makes the case for why he believes the Israeli Zionist government was behind the 9/11 attack. Source https://archive.org/details/christopher-bollyn-tricked-into-war Pirate Television http://www.edmaysproductions.net/ - Christopher Bollyn's website https://bollyn.com/ https://archive.ph/ZlGES - Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed The World by Christopher Bollyn https://archive.org/details/B-001-003-835/mode/2up - The Little Drummer Girl - John le Carré https://readerslibrary.org/wp-content/uploads/The-Little-Drummer-Girl.pdf - Catastrophic Terrorism: Tackling the New Danger (1998) Authors: Ash Carter John M. Deutch Philip D. Zelikow https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/catastrophic-terrorism-tackling-new-danger

Michael Ruppert discusses the theory of Peak Oil and how Peak Oil influenced 9/11, a potential conspiracy. Michael Ruppert is the founder, Publisher, and Editor of From The Wilderness, or FTW, a newsletter he created in March of 1998 by mailing out 68 copies to friends and researchers. Today, FTW is read by more than 22,000 subscribers in 50 countries, including 45 members of the US Congress, the intelligence committees of both houses, and professors at over 40 universities around the world. Michael Ruppert was an investigative journalist and peak oil advocate from the United States that has written and spoken extensively on the subject of 9/11, as well as many other subjects. 'Denial Stops Here' collates presentations that he has made, tying together many different elements in the global picture. - Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil By Michael C. Ruppert https://archive.org/details/fp_Crossing_the_Rubicon-Decline_of_the_American_Empire_at_the_end_of_the_Age_of_Oil/mode/2up

Graeme MacQueen shares his final words on 9/11 and the 2001 anthrax attacks. “You can discover the fraud pretty quickly, if you have the ability to read carefully"—Graeme MacQueen Peace, War and 9/11 is a production of the International Center for 9/11 Justice. It is directed by Ted Walter and Richard Heap. Executive producers are Ted Walter and Marilyn Langlois. It is distributed by Questar Entertainment/Hipstr. International Center for 9/11 Justice https://ic911.org/ MacQueen was a professor of religious studies and peace studies at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, for 30 years. He then went on to become a prominent scholar and widely respected leader in the 9/11 truth movement from 2006 until his passing in April 2023. He is best known for his analysis of eyewitness accounts of the World Trade Center’s destruction and for his highly influential 2013 book The 2001 Anthrax Deception: The Case for a Domestic Conspiracy. Also, in his final months, he was instrumental in forming the new International Center for 9/11 Justice, which launched earlier this week. The 2001 Anthrax Deception: The Case For A Domestic Conspiracy By Graeme Mac Queen, 2014 https://archive.org/details/graeme-mac-queen-the-2001-anthrax-deception-the-case-for-a-domestic-conspiracy-clarity-press-2014/mode/2up Video source Redacted Presents: Peace, War and 9/11 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBnJBocjxVM - Project For a New American Century: "Rebuilding Americas Defenses" Publication date 2000-09 https://archive.org/details/ProjectForANewAmericanCenturyRebuildingAmericasDefenses/mode/2up New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration & 9/11 By David Ray Griffin, 2004 https://www.cia.gov/library/abbottabad-compound/1D/1D070EA544FE7928BEEF09659C079ACC_David_Ray_Griffin_-_The_New_Pearl_Harbour.pdf Extremely high temperatures during the WTC destruction Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction January 2008 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233943572_Extremely_high_temperatures_during_the_WTC_destruction_Extremely_high_temperatures_during_the_World_Trade_Center_destruction Destruction of the World Trade Center North Tower and Fundamental Physics January 2010 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238749886_Destruction_of_the_World_Trade_Center_North_Tower_and_Fundamental_Physics The Missing Jolt: A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis January, 2009 http://www.journalof911studies.com/the-missing-jolt-a-simple-refutation-of-the-nist-bazant-collapse-hypothesis/ An essay on the slavery and commerce of the human species https://repository.wellesley.edu/object/wellesley30444 https://oll.libertyfund.org/title/clarkson-an-essay-on-the-slavery-and-commerce-of-the-human-species

2004 introduction by Michael C. Ruppert. Michael Ruppert - The Truth and Lies of 9/11 (2001) https://rumble.com/v3iig0w-michael-c.-ruppert-the-truth-and-lies-of-911-2001.html In the wake of the September 11th attacks, Mike Ruppert was among the first to be publicly critical of a number of transparent flaws in the official story presented by the US government. Mike is a former LAPD narcotics investigator who discovered CIA trafficking drugs in 1977. After attempting to expose the corruption, he was forced out of LAPD while earning the highest rating reports possible and having no disciplinary actions. Mike has been shot at by people who have tried to keep him from bringing his findings to light. In more than 80 stories since 9-11, he has followed his tested strategy of using only government documents, official statements or verifiable press reports as the basis for his work. As a result, he has been openly received by several members of Congress and maintains open lines of communications with congressional and committee staff. Mike gave his first post 9-11 lecture at Portland State University, which was attended by more that 1,000 citizens and resulted in a standing ovation. “The Truth and Lies of 9-11” is the video of that event, including special exclusive interviews with Ron Paul, Cynthia McKinney, Barbara Lee, and Dillon Reed.

Updated 2004 DVD Edition In the wake of the September 11th attacks, Mike Ruppert was among the first to be publicly critical of a number of transparent flaws in the official story presented by the US government. Mike is a former LAPD narcotics investigator who discovered CIA trafficking drugs in 1977. After attempting to expose the corruption, he was forced out of LAPD while earning the highest rating reports possible and having no disciplinary actions. Mike has been shot at by people who have tried to keep him from bringing his findings to light. In more than 80 stories since 9-11, he has followed his tested strategy of using only government documents, official statements or verifiable press reports as the basis for his work. As a result, he has been openly received by several members of Congress and maintains open lines of communications with congressional and committee staff. Mike gave his first post 9-11 lecture at Portland State University, which was attended by more that 1,000 citizens and resulted in a standing ovation. “The Truth and Lies of 9-11” is the video of that event, including special exclusive interviews with Ron Paul, Cynthia McKinney, Barbara Lee, and Dillon Reed. 2004 introduction: https://rumble.com/v3iihnu-michael-c.-ruppert-the-truth-and-lies-of-911-2004-introduction.html From the Wilderness: https://web.archive.org/web/20140416051227/http://www.fromthewilderness.com/ - The Grand Chessboard American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives (1997) https://www.cia.gov/library/abbottabad-compound/36/36669B7894E857AC4F3445EA646BFFE1_Zbigniew_Brzezinski_-_The_Grand_ChessBoard.doc.pdf Source: https://odysee.com/@QuantumRhino:9/The-Truth-and-Lies-of-9-11

Good Morning CHD James Corbett interviews Dr. Meryl Nass on her acclaimed new connect-the-dots article exposing how the WHO’s proposed treaty will increase man-made pandemics. Learn how cataclysmic lab escapes become increasingly inevitable in a science fiction futurescape where 94+ countries are “incentivized and encouraged” to perform gain-of-function experiments and to share their weaponized genomic sequences with member states through a vast new “biodefense” surveillance network. Source https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/bioweapons-of-mass-destruction-with-james-corbett/ References: Dr. Meryl Nass: The WHO’s Proposed Amendments Will Increase Man-Made Pandemics https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2023/09/the-whos-proposed-treaty-will-increase.html Brownstone Institute: The WHO’s Proposed Amendments Will Increase Man-Made Pandemics https://brownstone.org/articles/who-amendments-increase-man-made-pandemics/ Door to Freedom https://doortofreedom.org/ Next to Old Rec Hall, a 'Germ-Making Plant' — Judith Miller https://archive.ph/DC7va Germs: Biological Weapons and America's Secret War https://www.amazon.com/Germs-Biological-Weapons-Americas-Secret/dp/0684871599 Rebuilding America’s Defenses — Using ethnic targeted bioweapons as a political tool https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century#:~:text=Rebuilding%20America's%20Defenses%20recommended%20establishing,security%20environment%22%20in%20key%20regions%2C Requiem for the Suicided: David Kelly (2011) https://www.corbettreport.com/flashback-requiem-for-the-suicided-david-kelly-2011/ Further Down the David Kelly Rabbit Hole https://www.corbettreport.com/davidkelly/ Finding Mental Health - #SolutionsWatch https://www.corbettreport.com/solutionswatch-mentalhealth/ - Meryl Nass is a physician and researcher who proved the world's largest anthrax epidemic was due to biological warfare. She revealed the dangers of the anthrax vaccine. Her license was suspended for prescribing COVID medications and 'misinformation.' https://substack.com/@merylnass - VACCINE EPIDEMIC http://web.archive.org/web/20140221180947/http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/031604_vaccine_epidemic.html A Tragic History of Lies, Fraud, and Death Remains the Standard. * FDA Suddenly Approves Anthrax Vaccine by BioPort * Nanotechnology and Gene Shuffling – New Insanity * Scarlet Cloud Drills Point to Illegal Aerosol Vaccine “Solution” * AIDS Vaccine Hoax – Is There an Alternative Agenda? * Many Vaccines Proven to Promote Disease

OBEY OR SUFFER: EU Chief Ursula von der Leyen calls for creation of GLOBAL DIGITAL ID SYSTEM 09/12/2023 // Arsenio Toledo // Naturalnews European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has officially called for the world to establish an international framework that will create a global digital ID system. She also called for the development of artificial intelligence to be regulated by an international body. Von der Leyen, the unelected chief executive of the European Union (EU), made this statement while speaking before the "Our Future" session of the recently concluded G20 Summit in India on Sunday, Sept. 10. (Related: Say goodbye to your privacy: Use of digital IDs in American states is spreading rapidly.) The EU chief argued for the global adoption of "digital public infrastructures," along the lines of those created to facilitate the use and recognition of Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine passports. Specifically, von der Leyen is in favor of the system adopted in the EU. "Many of you are familiar with the COVID-19 digital certificate. The EU developed it for itself," she said. "The model was so functional and so trusted that 51 countries on four continents adopted it for free." "Today, the WHO [World Health Organization] uses it as a global standard to facilitate mobility in times of health threats," she added. "I want to thank [WHO Director-General] Dr. Tedros [Ghebreyesus] again for the excellent cooperation." Von der Leyen's call comes as the EU is already in the process of introducing a bloc-wide "digital identity" app – a super-app that would contain an EU citizen's passport, driver's license, credit cards and other personal information. "The trick is to build public digital infrastructure that is interoperable, open to all and trusted," she said. Von der leyen also calls for creation of global body regulating AI development During her speech, von der Leyen also talked about the need to mitigate the risks of unrelenting AI development. "As it has been described, AI has risks but also offers tremendous opportunities. The crucial question is how to harness a rapidly changing technology," said von der Leyen. "In the EU, in 2020, we presented the first-ever law on artificial intelligence. We want to facilitate innovation while building trust," she added. "But we need more. What the world does now will shape our future. I believe that Europe – and its partners – should develop a new global framework for AI risks." Von der Leyen argued that the world would need a potentially United Nations-led body to govern AI policy, similar to how the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change handles issues related to so-called global warming. "We need to outreach to the scientists, entrepreneurs and innovators," she said. "They need to provide the knowledge on the risks posed by AI – as well as the potential benefits for humanity." In the G20 Summit, von der Leyen's calls for AI regulation were received positively by other G20 members. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself said the group should create a framework for "human-centric" AI governance. German Minister of Finance Christian Lindner said the bloc would address the ethics of AI development in common rules. "This is a process that is starting now, also at the level of experts, and is to be deepened next year," he said. In the group's final communique of the summit, G20 leaders said they would continue working to ensure "responsible AI development, deployment and use" that would protect personal rights, transparency, privacy and data protection and avoid other issues. G20 leaders also agreed to pursue a "pro-innovation regulatory/governance approach" that takes into account the risks associated with AI development while attempting to maximize its benefits. "It is telling that even the makers and inventors of AI are calling on political leaders to regulate," said von der Leyen. She noted that the responsibility to regulate AI is one that transcends borders. Von Der Leyen asserted that the world's collective actions in regulating AI development is critical for shaping the future for the better. In light of this, she is urging the EU and its global partners to embark on this endeavor together. The EU chief's proposed framework is similar to the one G20 leaders want to adopt – it will be one that pursues AI development in a way that promotes investment in safe and responsible AI systems while at the same time protecting against systemic societal risks associated with artificial intelligence. Article source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-09-12-eu-chief-creation-global-digital-id-system.html Video source: https://rumble.com/v3gzlc6-nigel-farage-reacts-to-proposals-for-a-digital-id-card-in-the-european-unio.html

Natural immunity 27 times better Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Naturally Acquired Immunity versus Vaccine-induced Immunity, Reinfections versus Breakthrough Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study Article link: https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/75/1/e545/6563799 video source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiA1S6NvCo4 - Background Waning of protection, conferred by 2 doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine, begins shortly after injection, becomes substantial within 4 months. We examined long-term protection of naturally acquired immunity, compared to vaccine-induced immunity. Group 1, N = 673,676 Vaccine not Infection Group SARS-CoV-2-naive individuals who received a 2-dose regimen of the BioNTech/Pfizer mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine. Group 2, N = 62,883 Infection not Vaccine Group Previously infected individuals who have not been vaccinated SARS-CoV-2-related outcomes June 1st to August 14th 2021 (Delta variant times) Infection, 13 times more infections in vaccinated group Symptomatic disease, 27 times more disease in vaccinated group Hospitalization, 8 in vaccinated group, 0 in infection group Death 0 / 0 Results When the first event (infection or vaccination) occurred during January and February of 2021. That’s 4 months up to 8 months Vaccinees not Infection Group, 13.06-fold increased risk for infection, compared to Infection not Vaccine Group Group 2, Infection not Vaccine Group, 13 times less likely to get infected with delta Group 2, Infection not Vaccine Group, 27 times less likely to get symptomatic infection. Group 2, Infection not Vaccine Group, 0 COVID-19-related hospitalizations Group 1, Vaccine not Infection Group, 8 COVID-19-related hospitalizations Allowing for more time since first event 6 to 17 months after first event Evidence of waning naturally acquired immunity was demonstrated Vaccine not Infection Group, 5.96-fold increased risk for infection Vaccine not Infection Group, 7.13-fold increased risk for symptomatic disease. Conclusions Naturally acquired immunity confers stronger protection against infection and symptomatic disease caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 2-dose vaccine-indued immunity. Cleveland Clinic https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.01.21258176v3 Health-care workers 1,359 unvaccinated, who had previously tested positive, non got infected The study authors concluded: “individuals who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection are unlikely to benefit from covid-19 vaccination.” Professor Marty Makary, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health, editor-in-chief of Medpage Today https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/09/15/natural-immunity-vaccine-mandate/ It’s okay to have an incorrect scientific hypothesis. But when new data proves it wrong, you have to adapt. Unfortunately, many elected leaders and public health officials have held on far too long to the hypothesis that natural immunity offers unreliable protection against covid-19, a contention that is being rapidly debunked by science. Sixteen studies have demonstrated the power of acquired immunity That’s why it’s so frustrating that the Biden administration has repeatedly argued that immunity conferred by vaccines is preferable to immunity caused by natural infection, In my clinical experience, I have found patients to be extremely forgiving with evolving data if you are honest and transparent with them. The incorrect hypothesis that natural immunity is unreliable has resulted in the loss of thousands of American lives, avoidable vaccine complications, and damaged the credibility of public health officials. it would be good for our public health leaders to show humility by acknowledging that the hypothesis they repeatedly trumpeted was not only wrong, but it may be harmful. Public health officials changing their position on natural immunity, after so much hostility toward the idea, would go a long way in rebuilding the public trust. Dr. John Campbell

American Thought Leaders - Jan Jekielek “When you are afraid, you’ll take any train that’s leaving the station, even if it’s not going where you want to go.” Gavin de Becker, author of the 1997 bestseller “The Gift of Fear” and one of America’s leading security experts. He’s a three-time presidential appointee, and among his security firm’s clientele are people like Amazon founder Jeff Bezos. “When it is true fear, we get adrenaline, for example—that’s the famous hormone. The less famous hormone is the brain chemical cortisol. And cortisol prepares the body for combat. It sends blood to the arms and the legs, it hardens the muscles, and it causes the blood to clot more quickly in case I’m stabbed or opened up in some way. And that’s a great, wonderful resource to have. The problem is it’s toxic,” Mr. de Becker says. How have governments exploited and weaponized fear in the last few years? What is it that makes a society irrational? And how can people ultimately take back power from governments? https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/gavin-de-becker-the-psychology-of-fear-and-how-fear-is-weaponized-globally-5464815 ___________________________________________ The Gift of Fear (PDF) 2015 https://pdfroom.com/books/the-gift-of-fear/Wx5aD0vY2BJ

The Century of the Self is a 2002 British television documentary series by filmmaker Adam Curtis. It focuses on the work of psychoanalysts Sigmund Freud and Anna Freud, and PR consultant Edward Bernays. In episode one, Curtis says, “This series is about how those in power have used Freud’s theories to try and control the dangerous crowd in an age of mass democracy.” Episodes: “Happiness Machines” (originally broadcast 17 March 2002) “The Engineering of Consent” (originally broadcast 24 March 2002) “There is a Policeman Inside All Our Heads; He Must Be Destroyed” (originally broadcast 31 March 2002) “Eight People Sipping Wine in Kettering” (originally broadcast 7 April 2002) Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis, changed our perception of the mind and its workings. The documentary explores the various ways that governments and corporations have used Freud’s theories. Freud and his nephew Edward Bernays, who was the first to use psychological techniques in public relations, are discussed in part one. His daughter Anna Freud, a pioneer of child psychology, is mentioned in part two. Wilhelm Reich, an opponent of Freud’s theories, is discussed in part three. Along these lines, The Century of the Self asks deeper questions about the roots and methods of consumerism and commodification and their implications. It also questions the modern way people see themselves, the attitudes to fashion, and superficiality. The business and political worlds use psychological techniques to read, create and fulfill the desires of the public, and to make their products and speeches as pleasing as possible to consumers and voters. Curtis questions the intentions and origins of this relatively new approach to engaging the public. Where once the political process was about engaging people’s rational, conscious minds, as well as facilitating their needs as a group, Stuart Ewen, a historian of public relations, argues that politicians now appeal to primitive impulses that have little bearing on issues outside the narrow self-interests of a consumer society. The words of Paul Mazur, a leading Wall Street banker working for Lehman Brothers in 1927, are cited: “We must shift America from a needs- to a desires-culture. People must be trained to desire, to want new things, even before the old have been entirely consumed… Man’s desires must overshadow his needs.” In part four the main subjects are Philip Gould, a political strategist, and Matthew Freud, a PR consultant and the great-grandson of Sigmund Freud. In the 1990s, they were instrumental to bringing the Democratic Party in the US and New Labour in the United Kingdom back into power through use of the focus group, originally invented by psychoanalysts employed by US corporations to allow consumers to express their feelings and needs, just as patients do in psychotherapy. Curtis ends by saying that, “Although we feel we are free, in reality, we—like the politicians—have become the slaves of our own desires,” and compares Britain and America to ‘Democracy’, an exhibit at the 1939 New York World’s Fair created by Edward Bernays. https://consciousnessminded.com/the-century-of-the-self-full-documentary/

The Century of the Self is a 2002 British television documentary series by filmmaker Adam Curtis. It focuses on the work of psychoanalysts Sigmund Freud and Anna Freud, and PR consultant Edward Bernays. In episode one, Curtis says, “This series is about how those in power have used Freud’s theories to try and control the dangerous crowd in an age of mass democracy.” Episodes: “Happiness Machines” (originally broadcast 17 March 2002) “The Engineering of Consent” (originally broadcast 24 March 2002) “There is a Policeman Inside All Our Heads; He Must Be Destroyed” (originally broadcast 31 March 2002) “Eight People Sipping Wine in Kettering” (originally broadcast 7 April 2002) Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis, changed our perception of the mind and its workings. The documentary explores the various ways that governments and corporations have used Freud’s theories. Freud and his nephew Edward Bernays, who was the first to use psychological techniques in public relations, are discussed in part one. His daughter Anna Freud, a pioneer of child psychology, is mentioned in part two. Wilhelm Reich, an opponent of Freud’s theories, is discussed in part three. Along these lines, The Century of the Self asks deeper questions about the roots and methods of consumerism and commodification and their implications. It also questions the modern way people see themselves, the attitudes to fashion, and superficiality. The business and political worlds use psychological techniques to read, create and fulfill the desires of the public, and to make their products and speeches as pleasing as possible to consumers and voters. Curtis questions the intentions and origins of this relatively new approach to engaging the public. Where once the political process was about engaging people’s rational, conscious minds, as well as facilitating their needs as a group, Stuart Ewen, a historian of public relations, argues that politicians now appeal to primitive impulses that have little bearing on issues outside the narrow self-interests of a consumer society. The words of Paul Mazur, a leading Wall Street banker working for Lehman Brothers in 1927, are cited: “We must shift America from a needs- to a desires-culture. People must be trained to desire, to want new things, even before the old have been entirely consumed… Man’s desires must overshadow his needs.” In part four the main subjects are Philip Gould, a political strategist, and Matthew Freud, a PR consultant and the great-grandson of Sigmund Freud. In the 1990s, they were instrumental to bringing the Democratic Party in the US and New Labour in the United Kingdom back into power through use of the focus group, originally invented by psychoanalysts employed by US corporations to allow consumers to express their feelings and needs, just as patients do in psychotherapy. Curtis ends by saying that, “Although we feel we are free, in reality, we—like the politicians—have become the slaves of our own desires,” and compares Britain and America to ‘Democracy’, an exhibit at the 1939 New York World’s Fair created by Edward Bernays. https://consciousnessminded.com/the-century-of-the-self-full-documentary/

The Century of the Self is a 2002 British television documentary series by filmmaker Adam Curtis. It focuses on the work of psychoanalysts Sigmund Freud and Anna Freud, and PR consultant Edward Bernays. In episode one, Curtis says, “This series is about how those in power have used Freud’s theories to try and control the dangerous crowd in an age of mass democracy.” Episodes: “Happiness Machines” (originally broadcast 17 March 2002) “The Engineering of Consent” (originally broadcast 24 March 2002) “There is a Policeman Inside All Our Heads; He Must Be Destroyed” (originally broadcast 31 March 2002) “Eight People Sipping Wine in Kettering” (originally broadcast 7 April 2002) Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis, changed our perception of the mind and its workings. The documentary explores the various ways that governments and corporations have used Freud’s theories. Freud and his nephew Edward Bernays, who was the first to use psychological techniques in public relations, are discussed in part one. His daughter Anna Freud, a pioneer of child psychology, is mentioned in part two. Wilhelm Reich, an opponent of Freud’s theories, is discussed in part three. Along these lines, The Century of the Self asks deeper questions about the roots and methods of consumerism and commodification and their implications. It also questions the modern way people see themselves, the attitudes to fashion, and superficiality. The business and political worlds use psychological techniques to read, create and fulfill the desires of the public, and to make their products and speeches as pleasing as possible to consumers and voters. Curtis questions the intentions and origins of this relatively new approach to engaging the public. Where once the political process was about engaging people’s rational, conscious minds, as well as facilitating their needs as a group, Stuart Ewen, a historian of public relations, argues that politicians now appeal to primitive impulses that have little bearing on issues outside the narrow self-interests of a consumer society. The words of Paul Mazur, a leading Wall Street banker working for Lehman Brothers in 1927, are cited: “We must shift America from a needs- to a desires-culture. People must be trained to desire, to want new things, even before the old have been entirely consumed… Man’s desires must overshadow his needs.” In part four the main subjects are Philip Gould, a political strategist, and Matthew Freud, a PR consultant and the great-grandson of Sigmund Freud. In the 1990s, they were instrumental to bringing the Democratic Party in the US and New Labour in the United Kingdom back into power through use of the focus group, originally invented by psychoanalysts employed by US corporations to allow consumers to express their feelings and needs, just as patients do in psychotherapy. Curtis ends by saying that, “Although we feel we are free, in reality, we—like the politicians—have become the slaves of our own desires,” and compares Britain and America to ‘Democracy’, an exhibit at the 1939 New York World’s Fair created by Edward Bernays. https://consciousnessminded.com/the-century-of-the-self-full-documentary/

The Century of the Self is a 2002 British television documentary series by filmmaker Adam Curtis. It focuses on the work of psychoanalysts Sigmund Freud and Anna Freud, and PR consultant Edward Bernays. In episode one, Curtis says, “This series is about how those in power have used Freud’s theories to try and control the dangerous crowd in an age of mass democracy.” Episodes: “Happiness Machines” (originally broadcast 17 March 2002) “The Engineering of Consent” (originally broadcast 24 March 2002) “There is a Policeman Inside All Our Heads; He Must Be Destroyed” (originally broadcast 31 March 2002) “Eight People Sipping Wine in Kettering” (originally broadcast 7 April 2002) Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis, changed our perception of the mind and its workings. The documentary explores the various ways that governments and corporations have used Freud’s theories. Freud and his nephew Edward Bernays, who was the first to use psychological techniques in public relations, are discussed in part one. His daughter Anna Freud, a pioneer of child psychology, is mentioned in part two. Wilhelm Reich, an opponent of Freud’s theories, is discussed in part three. Along these lines, The Century of the Self asks deeper questions about the roots and methods of consumerism and commodification and their implications. It also questions the modern way people see themselves, the attitudes to fashion, and superficiality. The business and political worlds use psychological techniques to read, create and fulfill the desires of the public, and to make their products and speeches as pleasing as possible to consumers and voters. Curtis questions the intentions and origins of this relatively new approach to engaging the public. Where once the political process was about engaging people’s rational, conscious minds, as well as facilitating their needs as a group, Stuart Ewen, a historian of public relations, argues that politicians now appeal to primitive impulses that have little bearing on issues outside the narrow self-interests of a consumer society. The words of Paul Mazur, a leading Wall Street banker working for Lehman Brothers in 1927, are cited: “We must shift America from a needs- to a desires-culture. People must be trained to desire, to want new things, even before the old have been entirely consumed… Man’s desires must overshadow his needs.” In part four the main subjects are Philip Gould, a political strategist, and Matthew Freud, a PR consultant and the great-grandson of Sigmund Freud. In the 1990s, they were instrumental to bringing the Democratic Party in the US and New Labour in the United Kingdom back into power through use of the focus group, originally invented by psychoanalysts employed by US corporations to allow consumers to express their feelings and needs, just as patients do in psychotherapy. Curtis ends by saying that, “Although we feel we are free, in reality, we—like the politicians—have become the slaves of our own desires,” and compares Britain and America to ‘Democracy’, an exhibit at the 1939 New York World’s Fair created by Edward Bernays. https://consciousnessminded.com/the-century-of-the-self-full-documentary/

Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.13998 Source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZAso_eLJLI Viral vaccine paper, Dr Vibeke Manniche https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgldG9r-i9M - 71% of the suspected adverse reactions occurred in 4.2% of the vaccine batches Numbers of suspected adverse events (SAEs), after BNT612b2 mRNA vaccination in Denmark. 27 December 2020–11 January 2022, (population 5.8 million) (According to the number of doses per vaccine batch) Each dot represents a single vaccine batch. By 11 November 2022 (European area) 701 million doses of Pfizer given 971,021 reports of suspected adverse effects (SAEs) Clinical data on individual vaccine batch levels have not been reported (batch-dependent variation in the clinical efficacy and safety of authorized vaccines would appear to be highly unlikely) We therefore examined rates of SAEs between different BNT162b2 vaccine batches administered in Denmark Data on all SAE cases, Danish Medical Agency (DKMA) SAE seriousness was classified as non-serious, serious (hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, life-threatening illness, permanent disability or congenital malformation) or SAE-related d**** Anonymized data SAEs were counted on a batch level by linking individual SAEs to the batch label(s) of BNT162b dose(s) 10,793,766 doses administered 4,026,575 persons 52 different BNT162b2 vaccine batches (2,340–814,320 doses per batch) 43,496 SAEs were registered in 13,635 persons 61,847 batch-identifiable SAEs, of which 14,509 (23.5%) were classified as severe, 579 (0.9%) were SAE-related d***** Unexpectedly Rates of SAEs per 1000 doses varied considerably between vaccine batches From 1 SAE per 20 doses given to I in many thousands to zero Variabilities Vaccine manufacturing Storage Transportation Clinical handling and control Administration technique ____________________________________ LinkedIn profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-john-campbell-5256223b/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/Johnincarlisle Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/john.l.campbell1/

Dr. Russell Blaylock: How Vaccines Harm Child Brain Development Filmed at the 2008 Radio Liberty Seminar Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRbO8Cij12w Dr. Russell Blaylock is a board certified neurosurgeon, author and lecturer. He attended the Louisiana State University School of Medicine in New Orleans and completed his general surgical internship and neurosurgical residency at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston, South Carolina. During his residency training he worked with the eminent neurosurgeon, Dr. Ludwig Kempe. Together they developed the transcallosal removal of intraventricular tumors, a technique still used today. For the past 25 years he has practiced neurosurgery in addition to having a nutritional practice. He recently retired from his neurosurgical duties to devote his full attention to nutritional studies and neuroscience research. Blaylock has authored three books on nutrition and wellness: Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills, Health and Nutrition Secrets That Can Save Your Life and Natural Strategies for The Cancer Patient. He co-authored the book Cellular and Molecular Biology of Autism Spectrum Disorders with Dr. Anna Strunecka and written over 40 papers for peer-reviewed journals. Blaylock serves on the editorial staff of the Fluoride Journal, the Journal of the American Physicians and Surgeons and the Journal of the American Nutriceutical Association. Blaylock has been appointed to serve on the Scientific Advisory Board of the Life Extension Foundation. He is the 2004 recipient of the Integrity in Science Award granted by the Weston A. Price Foundation. An in-demand guest for radio and television programs, he lectures extensively to both lay and professional medical audiences on a variety of nutrition-related subjects. He previously served as clinical assistant professor of neurosurgery at the University of Mississippi Medical Center in Jackson, Miss. and is currently a visiting professor of biology at Belhaven University, also in Jackson. _________________________________________________ Vaccine Safety Conference: Dr. Russell Blaylock, Session 21 (2011) https://rumble.com/v1d0rel-the-vaccine-safety-conference-dr-russell-blaylock-session-22.html - Role of Systemic Inflammation in Neurodegenerative Diseases https://crimsonpublishers.com/jbb/pdf/JBB.000525.pdf

EU Parliament COVID-19 Summit: “Covid-19 was an Act of Biological Warfare Perpetrated on the Human Race. It was a Financial Heist. Nature was Hijacked. Science was Hijacked” The EU Parliament held the International COVID-19 Summit III in Brussels, Belgium earlier this month. In a recent address to the European Parliament, a US businessman specializing in patent auditing David Martin claimed that COVID-19 was not a natural occurrence but a calculated act of “biological warfare and a financial heist. Nature was hijacked, science was hijacked.” In his presentation in front of the EU parliament, Martin argued that the pandemic we said happened in the last few years did not overnight, citing sources in the public domain. According to him, the coronavirus was first identified in 1965 and serves as a model pathogen. In addition, they learned that coronaviruses can be modified. “But in 1966, the very first CoV coronavirus model was used as a transatlantic biological experiment in human manipulation. And you heard the date 1966. I hope you’re getting the point of what I’m saying. This is not an overnight thing. This is actually something that’s been long in the making. A year before I was born, we had the first transatlantic coronavirus data-sharing experiment between the United States and the United Kingdom.” According to Martin, “Later we started learning how to modify a coronavirus by putting them in animals such as dogs and pigs,” and this led to the development of the first coronavirus spike protein vaccine by the US pharmaceutical giant Pfizer in 1990. However, the medical community and pharmaceutical companies quickly learned that the vaccines were ineffective. “Because the coronavirus is a malleable model, it mutates,” Martin said. “Every medical publication concluded that coronaviruses escape vaccines because it modifies and mutates too rapidly for a vaccine to be developed.” Martin claimed that the United States “intentionally released” the Covid-19 coronavirus in Wuhan, China, with the goal of causing a global pandemic in order to increase public support for vaccines. “This whole story started in 1965 when we decided to hijack a natural model and decide to start manipulating it. Science was hijacked when the only questions that could be asked were questions authorized under the patent protection of the CDC, the FDA, the NIH, and their equivalent organizations around the world,” he said. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/05/eu-parliament-covid-19-summit-covid-19-was/ - International Covid Summit III - Part 1 - European Parliament, Brussels, https://rumble.com/v2nxfvq-international-covid-summit-iii-part-1-european-parliament-brussels.html International Covid Summit III - Part 2 - European Parliament, Brussels, https://rumble.com/v2nxmts-international-covid-summit-iii-part-2-european-parliament-brussels.html Source: https://rumble.com/v2qenwq-dr-david-martin-at-international-covid-summit-iii-european-parliament-it-is.html https://twitter.com/saggiori/status/1660093879566102528

Doctors and Scientists with Brian Hooker Ph.D. Celia Farber has been in the trenches as an outspoken journalist in her fight to expose the truth about AIDS. She appears on ‘Doctors & Scientists,’ this week, to explain her findings from past research and discusses resurfacing literature. Celia also deliberates on parallels of this past epidemic to the COVID pandemic. - Serious Adverse Events: An Uncensored History of AIDS Mark Crispin Miller (Foreword), Celia Farber https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/123436352-serious-adverse-events The Truth Barrier - https://celiafarber.substack.com/ The AIDS War: Propaganda, Profiteering, and Genocide from the Medical Industrial Complex John Lauritsen https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1399719.The_AIDS_War - Source: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/doctors-and-scientists-with-brian-hooker-phd/serious-adverse-events-an-uncensored-history-of-aids-with-celia-farber/ - How the Dallas Buyers Club changed HIV treatment in the US The Conversation - Published: February 6, 2014 7.40am CET In the award-winning movie The Dallas Buyers Club, Matthew McConaughey plays the role of Ron Woodroof, a real-life Texas cowboy who was diagnosed with HIV/AIDS in 1985. HIV/AIDS is now a chronic but manageable illness, at least for people in high-income countries who have access to highly effective antiretroviral drugs, but at the time of Ron’s diagnosis, a positive HIV test was largely a death sentence. The first effective treatment for AIDS, zidovudine (AZT), was still in development in 1985. AZT wouldn’t be approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) until 1987, so access was largely restricted to patients enrolled in clinical trials. During the early years of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, the disease was largely seen as primarily affecting gay men, prostitutes and drug users. Discrimination against people living with HIV/AIDS was common: they were routinely and legally kicked out of their homes, expelled from their classrooms, and fired from their jobs. Patients even faced discrimination at the hands of healthcare professionals. Even as this public health crisis unfolded, many doctors and nurses openly proclaimed they would not be going anywhere near a patient with AIDS because of the personal risk and because of their obligations to protect their own family. Small wonder, then, that most people living with HIV/AIDS in the mid-1980s died within a few months of receiving a diagnosis. Ron’s story Ron Woodroof would have been just another statistic: his disease was relatively advanced at the time diagnosis, he was precluded from enrolling in a clinical trial of AZT for safety reasons, and he was largely abandoned by his friend and family because of the shame of having a “gay disease”. But he chose to fight rather than succumb to a then untreatable illness. Thus began Ron’s prolonged struggle, which ended in 1992 when he died from an AIDS-related illness (nearly seven years after doctors gave him but a few weeks to live). Ron began to self-treat using unapproved and illicitly obtained antiviral medications. Soon, he and his colleagues are routinely travelling to Mexico, Japan, Israel and the Netherlands to purchase antiviral drugs and treatments that were not approved or available for use in the United States. They begin providing these drugs to those living with HIV/AIDS – primarily members of stigmatised communities like gay men and drug users – via the commercial operation that gives the movie its name, the Dallas Buyers Club. The activists who changed history Ron Woodroof also (albeit unsuccessfully) took the FDA to court to force them to allow the importation of the experimental HIV inhibitor Peptide T from Denmark. In doing so, he became part of a larger movement in which community-based organisations and activists began to set their own agenda for biomedical research and treatment. Outraged by federal regulations and policies that slow the development, testing and distribution of new drugs to treat HIV/AIDS, for instance, activists in New York City, San Francisco and elsewhere established groups such as the Gay Men’s Health Crisis, Project Inform, AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT UP) and the Treatment Action Group. Like Ron, these organisations helped change the way clinicians, researchers, drug companies, and local, state and national governments addressed the HIV/AIDS epidemic. In the documentary How to Survive a Plague, nominated for best documentary at last year’s Oscars, we see how ACT-UP mobilised a national demonstration at the FDA in 11 October, 1988. On that day, more than 1,500 activists from around the world surrounded and effectively shut down FDA headquarters. Shortly thereafter, in consultation with ACT UP and like-minded organisations, the FDA instituted new policies to speed up the testing, approval and distribution of HIV/AIDS drugs, including the first program to provide pre-approval access to new drugs for people failing AZT treatment. Similar demonstrations at the US National Institutes of Health lead to other significant changes in how clinical trials are designed and conducted. This included the formation of groups in which members from afflicted communities participated as full members of trial committees and protocol teams. Woodroof’s legacy What these two films, the semi-fictional Dallas Buyers Club and the documentary How to Survive a Plague, expertly show is how a single individual or a small group of dedicated activists can have a significant and long-lasting impact on public policy even in the face of private apathy or open hostility. At the start of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, public response to the disease was tepid at best. Federal funding for public health had been repeatedly cut, effectively preventing agencies such as the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from responding to the emerging threat. Public health officials and politicians also seemed largely unconcerned about the disease, so long as it largely affected marginalised members of society. All that changed thanks to the efforts of Ron Woodroof and those like him. These people both highlighted injustice and prejudice against people with HIV/AIDS, and demanded increased government resources for fighting the disease. Since then activists and advocacy groups have become an increasingly important part of biomedical research and clinical practice, not just for HIV/AIDS but also for diseases such as breast cancer, Alzheimer’s and autism. There is still a long way to go. Community advocates and activists are not always fully empowered, equal members of research and treatment teams, and more wealthy and connected organisations can often dictate the topic of conversation. But public health research and practice is vastly improved from the highly politicised approaches of the past. Source: https://theconversation.com/how-the-dallas-buyers-club-changed-hiv-treatment-in-the-us-22664

The Dr. Jordan B. Peterson Podcast | EP 363 Dr. Jordan B. Peterson and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. discuss his candidacy for the 2024 presidential election, his thoughts on key issues such as climate change, woke ideological capture, Big Pharma’s stranglehold on Democrat campaign funding and the legacy media, and how the ideals that unite Americans are stronger than the ones which divide. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a writer, attorney, activist, and politician, who has had a career-spanning focus on clean water, environmental, and public health issues. RFK Jr. is the founder of the Waterkeeper Alliance — the world’s largest clean water advocacy group — and served as its longtime chairman and attorney. In this role, he spearheaded the New York City Watershed Agreement, which has come to be considered an international model for sustainable development and stakeholder consensus negotiation. RFK Jr. was named Time Magazine’s “Hero For The Planet” for his efforts to restore the Hudson River, which along with other achievements has led to more than 300 Waterkeeper organizations taking root across the globe. As nephew of the United States' beloved 35th president, and having dutifully earned his own acclaim across decades of formative work, he is now running for the presidency himself in the 2024 election. Kennedy 2024 Campaign site: https://www.kennedy24.com/ Robert F. Kennedy on Twitter: https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr - Chapters (0:00) Coming up (0:20) Intro (1:18) Why Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is running for president (4:35) In the polls, media bias (6:46) A viable plan for success: beating Biden and bridging Trump (8:33) Is the Democratic Party salvageable? (13:30) Democrats collusion with Big Pharma, Covid Pandemic (18:17) Where Democrats get their campaign funds (22.43 - 23.48) Intermission (23:51) 70 percent of advertising on the news is from Big Pharma (27:52) The firing of Tucker Carlson (31:23) Bill Gates, the Cochrane Collaboration, and how they corrupt (35.38 - 36.55) Intermission (36:56) A new age of campaigning: non-traditional media (41:06) The 2024 election will be decided by podcast if the candidates refuse to debate (44:14) Joe Rogan is the most powerful journalist who has ever lived (45:17) Is cancel culture uniquely liberal? (48:49) Where does the left go too far? Filling key positions. (55:00) Focused on what brings all Americans together (57:46) The use of fear: lockdowns, regulations, repeat (59:15) On Climate Change: the narrative, what’s true, and RFK Jr’s plans once in office (1:06:25) The Exxon memos, why RFK Jr. is convinced (1:08:42) RFK Jr: “The climate crisis is real, the climate orthodoxy is wrong” (1:10:22) Both Republicans and Democrats want a clean environment (1:12:17) Free market climate approach, efficiency and effectiveness should decide (1:12:59) The biggest problem with renewable energy (1:14:23) Driving change toward what you love, instead of away from what you fear (1:19:48) The depth behind FDR’s famous quote, “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself” (1:23:25) The Russia/Ukraine war, money laundering into the military industrial complex, and the obvious settlement solution (1:31:45) Summary and closing remarks Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1h5AhrDajI ________________________________________________ Children’s Health Defense - Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is founder, chairman and chief litigation counsel for Children’s Health Defense. He is the founder of Waterkeeper Alliance — the world’s largest clean water advocacy group — and served as its longtime chairman and attorney. Kennedy’s reputation as a resolute defender of the environment and children’s health stems from a litany of hundreds of successful legal actions. TIME Magazine named Kennedy its “Hero for the Planet” for his success in helping Riverkeeper lead the fight to restore the Hudson River. The group’s achievement helped spawn more than 300 Waterkeeper organizations across the globe. The New York City watershed agreement, which he negotiated on behalf of environmentalists and New York City watershed consumers, is regarded as an international model in stakeholder consensus negotiations and sustainable development. Kennedy has enjoyed legal victories in many milestone environmental battles over the past four decades in Latin America, Canada and the United States. Most recently, Kennedy received recognition for his role on the trial team in the landmark victories against Monsanto in 2018, and against DuPont in 2019 in the contamination case that inspired the movie “Dark Waters” (2019). In addition to his environmental work, he has represented Indigenous groups asserting legal and treaty rights across much of Latin America. Among Kennedy’s published books is the New York Times’ bestseller “Crimes Against Nature” (2005). His book, “The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health” (2021) sold more than 1 million copies and was on the New York Times Best Sellers List for 17 weeks. His highly reviewed biography is “American Values: Lessons I Learned from My Family.” Kennedy is the author of two children’s books on American history and a third on Saint Francis of Assisi. Kennedy’s articles have appeared in the New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, the Wall Street Journal, Newsweek, Rolling Stone, Atlantic Monthly, Esquire, The Nation, Outside Magazine, the Village Voice and many others. His award-winning articles have been included in anthologies of America’s best crime writing, best political writing and best science writing. Kennedy is a graduate of Harvard University. He studied at the London School of Economics and received his law degree from the University of Virginia Law School. Following graduation, he attended Pace University School of Law, which awarded him a Master’s Degree in Environmental Law. He served on the Pace Law School faculty from 1986 to 2018 and cofounded and supervised Pace's Environmental Litigation Clinic. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/authors/robert-f-kennedy-jr/ - The Mission of Children’s Health Defense A world free of childhood chronic health conditions caused by environmental exposures. It's mission is to end childhood health epidemics by working aggressively to eliminate harmful exposures, hold those responsible accountable and establish safeguards to prevent future harm. To fight corruption, mass surveillance and censorship that put profits before people as well as advocate for worldwide rights to health freedom and bodily autonomy. - Mercury, Vaccines and the CDC’s Worst Nightmare RALLYING THE TROOPS — Mr. Kennedy spoke to parents and advocates at the CDC rally in October 2015 about the lack of truth and transparency within the agency. Environmental and humanitarian legend RFK, Jr., mainstream media and the very corrupt CDC Interview by Rita Shreffler, CHD Director of Advocacy & Outreach For over three decades, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. has been one of the world’s leading environmental advocates. He is the founder of Waterkeeper Alliance, the umbrella group for 300 local Waterkeeper organizations, in 34 countries, that track down and sue polluters. Under his leadership, Waterkeeper has grown to become the world’s largest clean water advocacy organization. Around 2005, parents of vaccine-injured children began encountering Kennedy’s speeches and writings about the toxic mercury-based preservative thimerosal. They embraced new hope that this environmental champion would finally expose the truth about vaccine injury and win justice for injured children. Kennedy is known for his fierce and relentless brand of environmental activism and his advocacy for transparent government and rigorous science. He is now applying his tenacious energies and sophisticated strategies to exposing fraud and corruption within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the pharmaceutical industry. Last month, he launched his new non-profit, Children’s Health Defense, with vaccine safety advocates Lyn Redwood and Laura Bono, legends themselves among parents of vaccine-injured children. Autism File executive editor Rita Shreffler spoke with Kennedy about CDC corruption, pharmaceutical industry greed, media malpractice and his vision for the Children’s Health Defense. Rita Shreffler: How did you first get involved in the autism-vaccine controversy? Robert F. Kennedy: I was dragged kicking and screaming into this brawl. By the early 2000s, I was fighting multiple lawsuits on behalf of Riverkeeper and Waterkeeper against coal-fired power plants. I was touring the country speaking about, among other things, the dangers of mercury emissions, which, by then, had contaminated virtually every freshwater fish in America. Following many of these appearances, mothers would approach me. Their tone was always respectful but mildly scolding. They said that if I was serious about eliminating the perils of mercury, I needed to look at thimerosal. Vaccines, they claimed, were the biggest vector for mercury exposure in children. I really didn’t want to get involved because vaccines were pretty remote from my wheelhouse. I’d always been pro-vaccine. I had all my kids vaccinated and got my annual flu shot every year. But, I was impressed by these women. Many of them were professionals: doctors, lawyers, scientists, nurses and pharmacists. They were overwhelmingly solid, well-educated, extraordinarily well-informed, rational and persuasive. RS: Was there a particular one of these mothers who finally got you to take the bait? RFK: Yeah, my brother Max’s wife, Vicky Strauss Kennedy, introduced me to a psychologist named Sarah Bridges. Her son Porter was vaccine-injured and later diagnosed with autism. After an eight-year legal battle, she had finally received compensation from the vaccine court, which acknowledged that Porter got his autism, seizures and brain damage from thimerosal and pertussis vaccines. She persuaded me to start looking into the science. RS: That was a daunting request! RKF: I have always loved science and I’m comfortable reading it. By then, I’d handled many hundreds of environmental cases. Almost all of them involved scientific controversies. When I started reading about thimerosal, I was dumbstruck by the gulf between the scientific reality and the media consensus. All the network news anchors and television doctors were assuring the public that there was not a single study that suggested thimerosal was unsafe or that it could cause autism. After a short time on PubMed, I’d identified many dozens of studies suggesting that thimerosal causes autism and a rich library of peer-reviewed literature — over 400 published studies — attesting to its deadly toxicity and its causal connection to a long inventory of neurological injuries and organ damage. RS: What do we know about thimerosal safety testing? RFK: First of all, vaccines are not subject to the safety rigors undergone by other pharmaceuticals in the FDA approval process. There are no large-scale, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. And, in the one 1930 human study of thimerosal that predated its use in vaccines, all the subjects injected with thimerosal died. In 2004, an FDA official acknowledged in testimony before a Congressional committee, that no government or privately funded study has ever demonstrated thimerosal’s safety. On the other hand, there is plenty of science suggesting that thimerosal is NOT safe. Several hundred studies available on PubMed link thimerosal exposure to the neurodevelopmental and immune system diseases that are now epidemic in the generation of American children born after the CDC dramatically increased childhood thimerosal exposure starting in 1988. My book, “Thimerosal— Let the Science Speak,'” summarizes these studies. The scientific literature inculpates increased thimerosal exposure as a culprit in the explosion of ADD, ADHD, speech delay, narcolepsy, SIDS, ASD, seizure disorder, tics and anaphylaxis, including asthma and food allergies. According to the CDC, one in six American children — the so-called “thimerosal generation” — now suffers from a developmental disability. We have published a compendium of 80 published, peer-reviewed studies that strongly suggest a link between thimerosal exposure and autism. RS: The CDC started adding to the vaccine schedule in the late 1980s and all these diseases, including autism, began spiking among kids in the mid-1990s. That’s when parents started seeing perfectly healthy children regress into autism after receiving their vaccines. RFK: Yeah. A rising chorus of complaints from parents and pediatricians linked the new thimerosal-heavy vaccine schedule to an explosion in autism. In response, the CDC, in 1999, commissioned an in-house Belgian researcher, Thomas Verstraeten, to study the Vaccine Safety Datalink, the largest American repository of childhood vaccine and health records, collected by HMOs (health maintenance organizations). The HMO data clearly showed that the massive mercury doses in the newly expanded vaccine schedule were causing runaway epidemics of neurological disorders — ADD, ADHD, speech delay, sleep disorders, tics and autism among America’s children. Verstraeten’s original analysis of those datasets found that thimerosal exposures increased autism risk by 760%. The CDC now knew the cause of the autism epidemic. RS: How did the CDC react to the revelations in the Verstraeten study? RFK: The vaccine branch called an emergency meeting of regulators from WHO, FDA, vaccine industry stakeholders and the American Academy of Pediatrics at the Simpsonwood Conferences and Retreat Center in Norcross, Georgia. They reportedly held the meeting off the CDC campus to shield the deliberations from freedom of information requests. During a frantic two-day debate, that group decided to embargo Verstraeten’s study. The CDC then pushed Verstraeten aside and assembled a team of industry and CDC scientists to rework the study using dodgy statistical devices to make the autism signal disappear. After four increasingly deceptive iterations, that team succeeded in eliminating the signal linking thimerosal with autism and a half dozen other neurodevelopmental disorders. The CDC published that version and told the public that thimerosal was safe. When parents asked to see the raw data, the CDC claimed that it had somehow “lost” all the raw data so that no independent group could check this result. Full interview: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/about-us/mercury-vaccines-cdcs-worst-nightmare/

“Looking at the data from a totality of sources, I mean, the signals were absolutely alarming … You saw a failed medical experiment being covered up on a global scale,” says Dr. Pierre Kory. We discuss the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, what Dr. Kory describes as a decades-long war on repurposed drugs, and the information warfare tactics that have been deployed these last 3 years. And we also take a look at an interesting and perhaps not well-known part of Dr. Kory’s medical experience—he was an expert medical witness for the George Floyd civil case. Dr. Pierre Kory is a pulmonary and critical care medicine specialist and co-founder of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC). “Once you read a study, and you see that they have numerous conflicts of interest with the actual molecule or compound or medicine that’s being studied, you cannot trust that paper,” Dr. Kory says. He’s the author of the upcoming book “The War on Ivermectin: The Medicine that Saved Millions and Could Have Ended the COVID Pandemic.” Source: American Thought Leaders https://www.theepochtimes.com/dr-pierre-kory-deadly-conflicts-of-interest-and-the-global-coverup-of-a-failed-medical-experiment_5266434.html FULL TRANSCRIPT Jan Jekielek: Dr. Pierre Kory, such a pleasure to have you back on American Thought Leaders. Dr. Pierre Kory: Thanks, Jan. It’s a pleasure as well to be back. Mr. Jekielek: I want to start with something that I didn’t realize until yesterday. You were one of the expert medical witnesses at the George Floyd trial. Please tell me about this. Dr. Kory: In the middle of my Covid journey, I had just done a month in New York City running an ICU for five weeks, and I was exhausted. I was an emergency volunteer there, and then, I went back home to Wisconsin. One Saturday, I got a call from the agency that usually asks for me to be an expert witness on various medical malpractice cases. It’s a little odd because they called me on the phone, and it was a Saturday. I didn’t even notice the number, because I don’t even answer those calls anymore. But I answered the phone and a woman started to tell me that they were looking for an expert for a case, and requesting three things. They were looking for someone who could maintain confidentiality to the highest degree. I thought, “This is interesting.” Then, she asked if I could do the full report within 10 days. The third thing was asking if I had any conflicts of interest with the Minnesota Police Department. As soon as I heard that question, I said, “This is what’s going on.” I realized that it was George Floyd. There was already a lot of unrest around George Floyd. I was intrigued, and I wanted to know what happened in that case. I had seen things on the news, plus I like challenges. I said, “Sure.” Now, they had to interview me. They had a big, high-priced law firm, and I sat for an interview the next day on a Sunday. They liked my background and my answers, and I got hired. The next 10 days were spent reading about a lot of things, and the 100-year history of the Minnesota Police Department. I had to learn about different methods of restraining suspects. In particular, I had to learn about what’s called prone restraint, when you put a suspect down on the ground, and how that’s a never event in policing. Properly trained police officers would never do that. Then came reviewing the facts of the case, which was largely video evidence with some audio. I had to watch it over and over and over again. There were medical records, and there was an autopsy. Let me just say one thing, Jan, because I’ve talked about my involvement with George Floyd before. I almost feel like I have to make a disclaimer, because it was such a contentious and volatile case, and I suddenly get attacked and accused of all sorts of things. It’s very strange. Here’s what I want to say about the case. I get that it’s very controversial. I get that people have strong opinions. But I was really interested in bringing all of my professional medical knowledge to bear in trying to produce as accurate an interpretation of what happened. I’ve never known a saint. I know a couple people who come close, but I’ve never met Mr. Floyd. I was not a judge in the case, or a lawyer, or a prosecutor, or a jury member. I was a medical expert, and I did my job. I’ll briefly tell you what I concluded, based on a review of all of the evidence available to me. There are a couple of things, because there are some misunderstandings of this case. Number one, I could find no rational reason to argue that he died of a drug overdose. People will point out the drug levels of the fentanyl and a couple other substances that he had in his blood were actually quite high. What people don’t recognize is, those levels are not predictive in a chronic drug user. That’s number one. Number two, drug overdoses occur within seconds to minutes of administration. If you smoke it, or inject it, the absorption is rather quick, and it’s always preceded by unconsciousness. You don’t just suddenly stop breathing. First, you lapse into unconsciousness, and then the breathing slows and stops. He had used drugs before his apprehension, but the prolonged arrest before he was put into prone restraint was an inordinate amount of time. First, they put him into a police car. He was claustrophobic. He tried to get out, then they moved him. They put him on the sidewalk. He was upright and talking. Even if he was impaired, you cannot argue that the drugs were the cause of his arrest, based on everything that happened. Then, there’s the temporal association. There is also another common misunderstanding in that case. My professional opinion is that it was not just Officer Chauvin’s knee on the neck. Clearly, I don’t think that was enough, because of a couple of reasons. He could phonate and make sounds, so his trachea was not completely occluded. It was the cumulative pressure of three officers, and if you look at some of the videos, it was actually four. He was placed prone, which is a never event, because of the suspects that have died in prone restraint. But it was quadruply worse, because he had pressure on his neck. He had an officer who had two knees on his back, another one on sort of his waist area, and then, a fourth officer restraining his legs. He had zero ability to relieve the restriction on his thorax for breathing, which is probably one of the most distressing symptoms to feel. Even in my report, I gave an example of that. If you can recall as a child roughhousing with a bunch of children, if you’ve ever found yourself under a pile, as soon as you sense you can’t get enough air in, you start to scream, “Get off of me. Get off of me.” It’s a very distressing symptom. Mr. Jekielek: I’ve been there. Dr. Kory: We all have been, right? Mr. Jekielek: Yes. Dr. Kory: I remember as a child getting really scared, because there were three kids on top of me and I couldn’t breathe. Similarly, did you ever get an overexuberant bear hug? As soon as that hug comes, and you suddenly can’t breathe, it’s instant. It was clear to me what happened to Mr. Floyd. He was in extreme distress. He was asking for his mommy. He was repeatedly saying that he couldn’t breathe, and it was because he knew he was not taking in enough air to survive. The prolonged minutes of that cumulative combined pressure eventually led to excess carbon dioxide in the blood. That’s really what he died of. When the carbon dioxide gets high enough, it’s called CO2 narcosis. That’s when he became unconscious, and eventually his heart stopped. I will tell you, it was a pretty traumatizing case to have to watch over and over again. The thing that I will never forget is that there was a bystander who apparently had gotten some training. He kept yelling at the officers, “You’re not supposed to do that. Get off of him,” because he knew that the prone restraint they were doing was highly dangerous. People were yelling, “Check his pulse.” People were yelling, “He’s dead.” They never moved, and they never checked the pulse. As a physician who does CPR, which is one of my areas of expertise, it was really, really hard to watch. I watched a man essentially suffocate through the combined weight of officers, who were either callous or just poorly trained. The last thing I want to say is I was the expert witness in the civil case, which led to a monetary compensation judgment for the family. I had nothing to do with the criminal case. It was judged to be a homicide in the criminal case, and that was by a jury of peers. I just gave a medical opinion in the civil case as to what was the proximate cause of death. I didn’t do it for the family to win money. I did it because I was asked, and I thought it was important that I bring an objective and expert insight into the case. It was a very emotional time for me and I’ll never forget it. I can’t even really talk about it without people getting really, really upset. The other controversy was the national unrest that was occurring with people in the streets, and with the two sides of the political aisle. Everyone saw it as black and white from two different sides. I didn’t know if I was inserting myself into that. To this day, it’s still not an easy topic to talk about, because there are so many emotions involved in that case. Mr. Jekielek: Thank you for sharing it with me. I believe that you offered your absolute best expert opinion from everything I’ve come to know about you. It’s interesting that this happened early in Covid. You have this book coming out, The War on Ivermectin. In the book, you talk about both the old you and the new you. This was still part of the old you. Dr. Kory: Oh, yes. At that time? Mr. Jekielek: Yes. Dr. Kory: I was still the old me at that time. With most of what I have learned and how my life has been transformed, very little had occurred by that point—a lot more was to come. Mr. Jekielek: Of course, and to get the details, people will have to read this book. But please tell me about that transformation. Dr. Kory: At the time when Covid started, I was a regular New York Times reader, and I believed it to be the paper of record and a symbol of top journalism. If you really wanted to know what’s going on, you read The New York Times. I felt similarly about medical journals, in particular the high-impact medical journals, like the New England Journal of Medicine and JAMA. I thought the best scientists were published there. I believed that the health agencies had the primary focus of protecting the public health of our population, and they were the most expert at doing that. I believed very strongly in those things. I was also a believer in the concept of good government. I was a Lefty liberal. One thing that hasn’t changed is that I was distrustful of big pharma. I was taught that as a Lefty and a liberal, corporations were not cool to some degree. But I really thought the government could fix things and that government would probably be the best way to provide the solution. I thought it was supposed to be there to level the playing field. I had that general political orientation. Obviously, politics is more complex than that, but that’s where I started. Now, I’ve been subjected to immense amounts of propaganda and censorship for three years in almost every august media outlet of journalism. I got transformed by becoming an expert on a few very important things around the science of Covid. I became deeply knowledgeable. If you become an expert and you generally know the scientific truth of something is how everything gets exposed. I saw lies and misrepresentations and censorship. I saw things that were really important for the public to know that were actively being censored, widely and repeatedly. Being exposed to the control of mass media has been really disorienting. It’s frightening to think that I’ve been relying on them as a source for accurate information for most of my life. I’ve been a New York Times reader since I was a child, and I found out that they were capable of being complicit in mass propaganda and censorship. It’s not just The New York Times, it goes across the mediascape. That’s what I’ve come to today. I know how to spot narratives, or at least I think I do. I’m sure we’re all still at risk of falling for narratives, but I have a sense of what propaganda is, and how it’s deployed. I’ve learned to be much, much more skeptical, if not just plain ignoring, of what the media says. I have to do my own deep dives and do my own research. I’m not going to believe anything just because it’s printed in some newspaper. That’s just the media. With the journals, you’ll have to read my book. What I learned about high-impact medical journals was not new, but it was new to me. It has not been new in science. A former editor of one of those high-impact journals, Marcia Angell, resigned in 2001. She wrote a book about her experiences as the editor of the top medical journal in the world. She said, “You cannot believe half of what is published in these journals, because it is manipulated and censored.” I always knew pharma was bad. I didn’t understand that they are literally a criminal syndicate, who have been committing crimes for decades. They pay fines, then move on and continue their standard operating business. We have talked about the media and the agencies. When it came to government, I wasn’t aware of how corporations have literally taken over almost all the agencies of government. The response to Covid was controlled and conducted by the pharmaceutical industry, with probably even bigger powers behind them. But to understand the pharmaceutical industry, I looked at three years of every policy issued by those agencies. All you had to ask yourself was, “What would a pharmaceutical company want?” Voila, there was your policy. Every single policy was in line with serving the interests of a pharmaceutical company. Guess what that brought us? It brought us multiple humanitarian catastrophes, millions of lives lost from the suppression of early treatment, millions of people dead around the world from the vaccines, and now epidemics of vaccine injury and long Covid with very little treatment. That’s why we’re here at this conference. To say I’ve been transformed is an understatement. With a lot of folks that I know, the adage is about going from blue pill to red pill. The journey has been very disturbing with what I’ve had to see and had to learn. It has been quite frightening and even dystopian, but I wouldn’t trade it for the world. That’s number one. Number two, some of the beauty has been in connecting with people who didn’t fall for those lies, and who could spot the propaganda. They taught me things and made me understand things that maybe I didn’t want to understand, but that I’ve come to understand now. I now have a huge network of colleagues that I trust. I trust their counsel, their insight, their objectivity, and their desire to really make things right and put out information. Ultimately, it was a war of information. All of the destruction was about information and how it was controlled. I was already transformed before the Twitter Files. The Twitter Files are just absolutely astonishing. Government intelligence agencies and health agencies were literally controlling Twitter, and what was showing up on Twitter. That was also happening in the media. You heard about the billion dollars from our government. It wasn’t really from our government. It was from the corporations that are running our government. The corporations are sending money to media agencies to promote a vaccine campaign, and to censor anything that would elevate vaccine hesitancy. It’s almost like you’re watching a military operation, and they’re using all of the institutions of society. If I sound crazy, that’s just how I’ve interpreted these three years, and there’s no other way to explain it. If you look at the history of propaganda and censorship, we usually relate it to certain countries like WWII Germany and the former Soviet Union. But suddenly, for the first time in history, we had technology and we had a consolidation of power on a global level. You had these industries that had the technology and the global reach both to censor and spread propaganda. I saw a global propaganda and censorship campaign, which made the world go mad. I saw them do things with this blanket of propaganda and censorship, like mandating these vaccines for young children, who had basically zero risk of anything serious happening to them from Covid. They mandated these vaccines and people lost their jobs. They were victimized and vilified for being unvaccinated, along with those who were adjacent to them. If you were anywhere near an unvaccinated person, you still got attacked. The most absurd thing was the people who got vaccinated and then got injured. One of the most telling cases was the mountain biker who got vaccine injured. He recorded a video of what he was going through. He was so sincere and he was tearful because his career was decimated. Then, he started to cry, because of all of the attacks on him for being an anti-vaxxer. This young professional athlete was just trying to share what happened to him, and he received a mass of attacks calling him an anti-vaxxer. I never saw anything so absurd. People were whipped up into doing these things, and again, this was a blanket of fear. The other ingredient that you saw was the fearmongering. By the way, I was also scared. I saw stuff that made Covid really, really scary. But actually, when you let the dust settle and saw everything, it wasn’t as scary as it was first advertised to be. But the fear and dangers of Covid were constantly propagated. We started to discover that you really only had to worry about it in certain strata. You really only had to worry about it in people who were untreated. If you treated it early, it was nothing. Jan, you’ve interviewed so many people who have treated thousands and thousands. So many times doctors in this movement have said, “We’ve treated 2000, 3000, 10,000,” and no one is going to the hospital.” What happened? The reply was, “That’s misinformation.” We were accused of being misinformationists. It was a war where the voices of truth and sanity were getting drowned out by lies that were told for different objectives. The CEO of Moderna has $4 billion of wealth. The pharmaceutical companies made tens to hundreds of billions, with this massive transfer of wealth. It has been a really difficult three years. Most of the population thinks it was a rough time and we’re just going to move on now. That’s not what my experience was. The last thing was reading the books and articles by former high-level academics and editors of journals, and seeing what the journals did. The high-impact medical journals played a massive role in the human toll of Covid by censoring positive studies of repurposed drugs like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. They published clearly fraudulent trials that were designed to fail; to show that ivermectin didn’t work, and to show that hydroxychloroquine didn’t work. They also manipulated trials showing the safety and efficacy of the vaccines. I saw this corrupted science being held as the truth and being arrogantly determined by all doctors. Here’s where the doctors messed up. They were like me in the beginning. They were too trusting of the institutions of science, the agencies, and the journals, where they placed an immense amount of trust. They didn’t understand why there were so many people in the population saying, “Yes, we see your journals.” “You say the vaccines are safe and effective, but that has not been our experience here on the ground.” You had this discord between the top scientists and what the doctors were saying. The institutions would say it so arrogantly and smugly and definitively, and then, what they would say would change a few days later. Remember 95 percent effective, then to 70, 50, 30 percent? Then, they said, “Okay. It doesn’t work for transmission, but it still protects against hospitalization and death.” The reality is that nothing was ever true, and they were just shifting their stories. That has left me where I can’t really read high-impact medical journals now. When I read a study, the first thing I read now is about the conflicts of interest. That’s all you have to read. Once you read a study and you see that they have numerous conflicts of interest with the actual molecule or compound or medicine that’s being studied, you cannot trust that paper. It may be true. It may not be true. But I refuse to act on a paper whose conclusions were reached by investigators who have direct conflicts of interest with their findings. There’s no more objectivity. I’ve seen too many lies being published. I’ve seen things that were determined to work and things that were determined not to work, and both were lies. Every time the investigators were reeking and drowning in conflicts of interest. The most troubling one is the ACTIV‑6 protocol. The National Institutes of Health finally did get around to doing a large randomized controlled trial on ivermectin. Who did they choose as the principal investigator? A woman from Duke who they gave a $140 million grant to, who has stock in a competitor to ivermectin. She has conflicts of interest with Gilead Sciences, who manufactures remdesivir. She’s got a long rap sheet of pharmaceutical industry influences, as does almost every other investigator on that trial. What are they studying? They’re studying a drug that would decimate the Covid market for every single one of those pharmaceutical companies. Can anyone actually believe they’re going to lead to anything but a predetermined result? By the way, disinformation is actually defined in an article that I always cite by the Union for Concerned Scientists that says, “The tactics used by industry when science emerges that is inconvenient to their interests.” Disinformation was actually invented in the 1950s by the tobacco industry. They hired a PR firm, and they started using these five tactics. The first and most effective tactic is called the Fake, and the Fake has three different ways it is run. It’s conducting and designing trials with predetermined results, censoring positive reports of your competitor, and then promoting negative editorials and selectively publishing only negative studies. I detailed how they did all of this. I have huge collections of rejection letters from these journals to investigators that had done good randomized controlled trials, showing phenomenal benefits of ivermectin. The rejection letters were all the same, “I’m sorry, this topic is not of sufficient interest to our readers at this time.” You either want to laugh at that or cry, because in the middle of a global pandemic with people dying across the world they said that a positive trial of ivermectin was not of sufficient interest to their readership. This is how it’s done. When I decided to write this book, I was angry. I said, “I am documenting what these criminals are doing, and how they’re corrupting the science around a life-saving drug.” I started to document everything. I read the Disinformation Playbook in March of 2021. I gave testimony in December of 2020 when everything was going sideways. I didn’t understand what was going on. I didn’t understand why people weren’t just looking at my paper and the immense amount of evidence showing it worked. Yet, there was nothing but attacks on ivermectin. I couldn’t figure out why our advice wasn’t being openly embraced. One day, I got an email from Professor William B. Grant, who’s one of the world experts on vitamin D. It was a two-line email, and I didn’t know who he was. He said, “Dear Dr. Kory, what they’re doing to ivermectin, they have been doing to vitamin D for decades,” and he included the link. It was only when I read that article that the world made sense. It’s a short and very powerful article, and they outlined each tactic. I said, “Wait. I’ve seen this. I’ve seen that. They did this yesterday. They did that to me two days ago. This is what they’re doing to the FLCCC [Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance].” It was almost like getting the teacher’s edition to the world. Suddenly, it was like a light went on. I said, “That’s what is happening. The FLCCC and I have launched ourselves into the middle of a decades-long war on repurposed drugs. This is not about ivermectin, and it’s not about hydroxychloroquine.” However, my book is a case study around ivermectin, because it’s a really good case study. The disinformation has been going on for a long time. Another example is the NFL [National Football League] with chronic traumatic encephalopathy. With the researcher who first tried to publish his results that the football players were developing these microhemorrhages and suffering all these illnesses, do you know what happened to him? Oh boy, did the NFL go after him. They made a movie about it. That’s just one tactic called the Blitz. You go after the researchers who produce inconvenient results, like me, who lost three jobs and I’ve also been attacked widely in the media. But it’s what they do. Mr. Jekielek: But you found a new job. Dr. Kory: I found a new one. That’s the thing, and I’m happy now. That’s what I said. The transition was rough, especially when I didn’t know what was going on. Once I knew what was going on, I fought as valiantly as I could in that war. Ultimately, I’m unemployed by the system, but I love my nonprofit. I love my private, fee-based practice where no one can touch me. I actually practice under the jurisdiction of the Crow Indian Tribe now. The states don’t have any jurisdiction over me. My patients are all tribal members. Once I’m a Certified Tribal Practitioner, and as long as I’m treating a tribal patient, the states have no jurisdiction. I found that parallel system where I’m safe for now, and I’m helping a lot of people. I’m very happy with what I do. Mr. Jekielek: Let’s just say that’s a fascinating solution. Dr. Kory: It is, yes. Mr. Jekielek: You made friends. Dr. Kory: Definitely. Mr. Jekielek: You mentioned this, “aha,” moment when you read this article, and we will include a link to it in our piece here. Dr. Kory: Wait. Can I interrupt you for a second? Mr. Jekielek: Yes. Dr. Kory: I am very curious as to whether you’re going to be allowed to include that link in your piece, and I’ll tell you why. I just finished the book in a two-week marathon with my co-writer. In my book, I had numerous references to that article, including an image of the cover, the title of the article, and where you could find it. I literally cited the names of each tactic and used their definitions. One of the last little checklists in writing our book was asking permission of the Union for Concerned Scientists to cite their article. The first response from this organization was, “I don’t think that will be a problem. Let me just check.” A day later, we got a very stern email, “You do not have permission to use any material from that article.” Can I ask you a question, Jan? What do you think happened? Originally they had said, “Sure, you can use our article.” My co-writer said, “This actually sounds like the Union for Unconcerned Scientists.” I thought, “Why are they doing this?” It was because of the controversy around me. It’s so odd because they wrote an article about disinformation, but I’m literally the target of that disinformation. I’ve suffered a lot from it. I wanted to use their article to show what they did to me. Yet, they’re believing this stuff about, “Oh, he’s controversial. We saw that he tried to publish a paper without listing something.” It was because there was a little episode where we published a paper and I got attacked, because I didn’t include the fact that I use ivermectin in my private practice, and that I’m part of the FLCCC, which is a nonprofit. I’ve never heard of that being a conflict of interest in a paper. They literally made up the fact that I’m trying to hide my conflicts of interest. Those aren’t conflicts. Working for a nonprofit organization is not a conflict of interest, nor is using a certain medicine in your practice. I don’t make money off of ivermectin. But the people at the Union for Concerned Scientists apparently thought I was some sort of controversial, bad guy, and they just did not want me to cite their work in the book. We had to vaguely reference it in the book. I was actually pretty upset about this. I said, “I can’t believe it.” Mr. Jekielek: This was a key moment for you, profoundly inspiring, and profoundly changing. Ironically, you are not allowed to reference it directly. Fascinating. Dr. Kory: It is fascinating. The other thing is, I’ve gotten to know Bill Grant, the professor who sent me the link. He and I now are good pen pals, and he sends me articles all the time. What he said was also equally interesting, “They’ve been doing this to vitamin D for decades.” When you do what’s called meta-analyses of vitamin D for any condition, whether it be cancer, infectious illness, or anything autoimmunity, the literature is polluted with trials designed to fail; giving too low of a dose, giving at too late of a time, and the wrong formulation of vitamin D. You have tons of negative trials that have been published over decades. With those trials, they knew what they were doing. They don’t want you to believe that vitamin D is protective of your health. In the entire system, no doctors tell people to take vitamin D. Sometimes they’ll check if the level is low. Also, they artificially set the levels too low. They say 30 micrograms or nanograms per deciliter is normal, which is not true. People would do much better with higher levels. Vitamin D has been a long-standing object of a war from the pharmaceutical industry. That’s why I said the war on ivermectin is not about ivermectin. They’ve been doing it on numerous repurposed drugs. Let’s be clear. A repurposed drug is one that’s generally off-patent. It does not hold out profits. They want to bury the older drug to make you always want to take the newer, patented, profitable one, and they will go to any lengths to do that. Mr. Jekielek: We reached out to the Union of Concerned Scientists for comment, but did not immediately receive a response. The deployment of the Covid genetic vaccines happened at a scale greater than any other previous medication, probably even close. Doesn’t the raw scale of it reveal so much that was hidden in other similar contexts in the past. What do you think about that? Dr. Kory: That’s a brilliant point you just made. The scale helped expose it, but also the fact that it failed. You could see that it failed early on, and how much they had to do to hide that. If it had been a success, it would not have exposed anything. In fact, it would’ve entrenched it even more. They would have said, “See how well our system is working? It produced a vaccine in record time, and it obliterated case rates.” If it had been a success, I don’t think it would have exposed anything. What exposed it is how a tiny minority of deeply researched laypeople and doctors in every country around the world were aghast at what they were seeing. When you started to look at the data from a totality of sources the signals were absolutely alarming. Yet, you never heard that in the media, and you never heard it in the journals. That was what exposed it. You saw a failed medical experiment being covered up on a global scale. It was the cover-up. There is the old adage, “It’s not the crime that gets you in trouble, it’s the cover-up.” It was the fact that they had to cover up a global catastrophe, and there’s no way to do that. The truth is starting to come out now. You’re starting to see more and more investigations. I wouldn’t call them tribunals, but some of the state legislators are starting to look harder. Even Fauci with his never-ending victory tour has had a rough go of it in the past week . By the way, I just published an op-ed on FoxNews.com, where I detail how things aren’t going so well for Fauci. He’s starting to see questions from formerly friendly news outlets that are a little challenging for him, and he’s getting very defensive. Things are changing, but this was a cover-up of a failed medical experiment. I like your point. We’ve never seen anything like that, with the scope and scale of what they tried to do—vaccinate the entire world, like overnight. The entire world? Mr. Jekielek: There are different theories about how and why all this happened. You’re pretty strong on the corporate takeover of government being the central driver. One of the theories is that this is just raw incompetence on a mass scale. But you don’t think that. Dr. Kory: We’re getting into some complicated stuff. I would say the pharmaceutical industry and its tactics were the final driver. That was actually the instrument they used. Who is behind pharma? Actually, this wasn’t pharma. Pharma was working for the military to make these vaccines. The contracts were all from the Department of Defense. That was a Department of Defense contract. The Department of Defense did not do their due diligence in ensuring safety. The manufacturing of these products violated every CGMP [Current Good Manufacturing Practice] standard, which is an FDA regulation. This is from experts like Sasha Latypova, who’s an expert at good manufacturing practice. There’s never been a product, even a baby seat, a car seat, a car, a can of peaches, nothing has had this level of adverse events reported, including deaths and the variation between lots. It was a manufacturing catastrophe. If the pharmaceutical industry was working correctly, those things would’ve been stopped and taken off the market immediately. But it was just an unrelenting push through the media, even the government and the Department of Defense. I don’t understand what this was. It definitely came out of a lab, and that’s already settled science, but was it leaked or was it an accident? Let’s say it was an accident and our government had been preparing for this massive countermeasure, and it really was the military that was employing a military countermeasure. That actually makes some sense, because when you see all of the medical ethics that were violated, that’s telling you it’s not healthcare. We still have a sense of ethics, and they forgot it overnight. It sounded like a military exercise, where you have to sacrifice 100 people to take that hill. The VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System] exploded, and with the amount of deaths that were reported within the first weeks, nobody looked at it. It was nothing but attacking VAERS as a source of data, “Nothing to see here.” It was like the military seeing the battlefield strewn with soldiers and just moving ahead, “You have to get your objective.” Do you understand what I’m saying? The corporations benefited and profited greatly, but the conduct was like nothing we’ve ever seen before. When you think about the case of Vioxx compared to the vaccine, with Vioxx they certainly suppressed the adverse event data. Between 50 and 60,000 people in the United States died during the time that they knew that Vioxx was causing deaths. Eventually, that case was brought to court. They paid the biggest fine ever at that time. There were some checks and balances in the pharmaceutical industry. Whereas, here it seems the guardrails were removed, and there was no data coming out that was going to stop this train. It’s even somewhat bigger than the pharmaceutical industry. The government was complicit. The military was complicit. Whoever was manning this operation was basically giving out orders to ignore all warnings and move ahead with this unrelenting vaccine media campaign, which whipped up people into craziness. You’ve heard all the stories where the unvaccinated were not invited to Thanksgiving. Many of my friends and colleagues were crying. They were the mothers of daughters who didn’t want their grandmothers to come to the house. How much discord and enmity in society did it sow? It was carnage. It was carnage. That’s just not a dangerous pharmaceutical product, it’s bigger than that. I want to say that for a long time. I put everything at the feet of, “This is just pharma doing their thing to make money.” But I do get a sense that it’s much bigger than that. But pharma is the best industry on earth at doing disinformation. They have been doing it the longest. I wouldn’t count tobacco as the pharmaceutical industry, but they’re close. They are absolutely expert at this. With modern consolidated media technology and control, it’s immense what they can do. When you think of technology, actually, there was an enemy to their control, which is social media. Social media is the wild West. Look at what they did to control social media.That is evidenced in the Twitter Files concerning Facebook, LinkedIn, and Twitter. Because if you don’t try to control and censor in social media, the truth will spread like wildfire. Those social media companies ended up being the enemy to their objectives. However, the Twitter Files shows you the extent to which they tried. They used a central clearing house at Stanford, where every agency with that hub linked, every governmental agency, intelligence agency, with every social media company. Stanford was algorithmic monitoring all these communications and trying to snuff out information that would be inconvenient to their goals. It looked like a military operation to me. Mr. Jekielek: To your point about it being something bigger, a number of guests on this show have convincingly shown that the apparatus of censorship and manufacturing perceived consensus pivoted from doing this around election issues, into doing it around Covid issues. This thing was already developed. Dr. Kory: Correct. Mr. Jekielek: It’s different elements of society; government, corporate, and nonprofit. Dr. Kory: That’s the history of the Trusted News Initiative, which first convened around controlling information around elections. I find it absurd on its face. You literally have the top journalism organizations in the world get together and decide they have to control the flow of information. I thought freedom of the press and speech were central to an election. It’s almost like a doctor saying, “Yes, I don’t think the patient is my primary consideration anymore.” Freedom of the press is suddenly not sacrosanct? You saw that, and then, they pivoted to Covid. But there’s a difference, though. Manipulating information around elections does cause great harm. However, it does not lead directly to death. Whereas, here you’re talking about censorship and propaganda around something that was causing an immense amount of death, either through the suppression of treatments, or the propagation of a toxic intervention. The harm was at catastrophically different scales. But you’re right, both of these are wrong. Mr. Jekielek: At the very least, it’s a lesson that if you create a monster for maybe even the best intentions, it’s still a monster. Dr. Kory: Yes. I agree completely with what you just said. Mr. Jekielek: Here’s the challenge, and you talked a little bit about this in your speech earlier. The challenge is that, in theory, there’s a whole lot of money out there to study vaccine injury as it exists right now. It’s not really being used. You end up having smaller organizations who don’t have huge access to funding trying to figure things out. These large-scale RCT trials, which are very expensive, really aren’t happening. Because how would they happen? What is the path forward in trying to understand what’s going on? Because in many cases, we still don’t know. Dr. Kory: Jan, I don’t want to answer by saying, “I hate that question,” but I find it the most difficult one to answer. I wish I knew. I think of more in terms of big concepts like, “Is this about tearing down and rebuilding the system?” I don’t know if that’s a viable path. Is it about building a parallel system anew that people will flock to when they see that the present system has failed them, and has been corrupted and controlled by industry? People need truth and good information and good guidance. They’re going to go where that’s provided. But first, they have to understand where bad information is coming from. I don’t know. I don’t have the answers for the world. I just know what has worked on this journey, and our organization has done really good work. The impact of our work has saved a considerable amount of lives. Mr. Jekielek: Earlier, you said old gumshoe medicine was a factor. Dr. Kory: Yes. Mr. Jekielek: Let’s finish with that. Dr. Kory: Even though I was a believer in evidence-based medicine and randomized controlled trials and picking apart studies, I also knew about things that didn’t come out of studies. It came out of clinical experience, observation, and trying different approaches where you could find things that worked. People like to believe that anecdotal evidence doesn’t work, like if a doctor gives someone a medicine or a treatment and sees them improve in a way that’s palpably different from how they’ve seen other patients behave, that’s not to be trusted. It’s not real, unless it has been tested in a large, multicenter, double-blind randomized controlled trial. That’s absurd. We have hundreds of years of medicine where doctors discovered different treatments. Were they always right on everything? No. But are we right now with these randomized controlled trials? Absolutely not. That system has been corrupted. Old gumshoe medicine is just leaning on the powers of observation, clinical reasoning, understanding mechanisms, understanding the action of interventions, and then using risk-benefit analysis and trying things until you figure out how to get patients better, while always trying not to harm the patient. But also, untreated disease is harmful. Doing nothing is not really ethical when someone is deteriorating. That’s why that whole “Go home and wait till your lips turn blue,” is so absurd. There is no disease that you can’t try to treat using a sensible, prudent approach. That’s where we are with long Covid and vaccine injury. With the research funding from the government, that $1.2 billion that I cited, they haven’t enrolled one patient in a trial yet. We have to rely on the older methods that we have as doctors. The other thing that we can do is collaborate. My partner and I are always sharing clinical experience when we find something that works, or a new strategy. I talk to doctors who’ve been dealing with chronic illness for decades, and I learn new tactics from them. I have to tell you, it’s really fun. We don’t have to deal with these trials that we need to be skeptical of. That’s the other thing, Jan. With the $1.2 billion that they funded for these trials that they’re supposedly doing for long Covid, do you know what the first one is that they decided to do? It’s the trial that’s on Paxlovid. The results you get are from the way the system is designed. Of course, they would choose Paxlovid as the first thing, but it makes no scientific sense. I have no idea why they would think Paxlovid would work for long Covid. I guess there’s a couple of rationales, which I don’t think are correct. It’s a pricey, patented, pharmaceutical drug with more drug interactions than I’ve ever seen. These patients are chronically ill. How long can you give Paxlovid for? Long Covid is a chronic illness, and they want to test Paxlovid, which is a short course. Don’t get me started. Because of the way the system has failed and been captured, we have to rely on older, time-tested methods like good reasoning and collaboration. We are figuring this out. I’ve been in practice for 15 months, and with each month that goes by, I get better and better at what I do. Mr. Jekielek: Dr. Pierre Kory, it’s such a pleasure to have you on again. Dr. Kory: Thank you. Great, Jan. Mr. Jekielek: Thank you all for joining Dr. Pierre Kory and me on this episode of American Thought Leaders. I’m your host, Jan Jekielek. This interview has been edited for clarity and brevity.

The third International COVID Summit was held at the European Parliament. As noted by the European Parliament Members in attendance, this was an historic event. The summit lasted all day, with many fantastic speakers. The ICS summit covered all aspects of the pandemic, as well as the documentation of the increasing power grab by the World Health Organization to control public health and increased control by organized globalized entities throughout the world. ICS website: https://www.internationalcovidsummit.com/ Sources: AndreCorbeil https://rumble.com/v2m53uc-dr.-robert-malone-on-the-stand.-the-international-covid-summit-3-the-europe.html ICS at the EU Parliament Summary: Dr. Malone's summary video and transcript https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/ics-at-the-eu-parliament-summary - Transcript of the International COVID Summit Summary Statement Dr. Robert W. Malone Four members of the European Parliament (EP) have basically given rise to this growing momentum here in the European Parliament of willingness to recognize the truths that have occurred despite all of the propaganda, censorship, defamation, and other malicious activities that have been deployed on them and so many others across the world. The two members that initially spoke, Mr. Christian Terhes (Romania) and Mr. Ivan Sincic (Croatia) emphasized that we should allow scientists to speak, and that this pandemic of the COVID narrative has finally collapsed. And with this conference, they had hoped, and I think we have succeeded, in demonstrating the failures of that approved narrative. That being the truth that has been revealed over the last three years thanks to these many researchers and all of those that work with them to provide this information for us. Dr. David Martin (United States) discussed that he had warned the European Parliament years ago about the risks of allowing the licensure or the patenting of genetic organisms and the proceeding of gain of function research. He had anticipated many years ago and warned the parliament about the risks that might incur if we allowed these policies, and then documented extensively how humanity has been hijacked, morality has been hijacked, science has been hijacked, nature has been hijacked, all in the service of a universal vaccine template with a presumed hundred percent protection. He called out that this must be reversed, that we must have in the future, 100% product liability for those that wish to impose these or other new technologies on the populations of the world. Nick Hudson (South Africa) from PANDATA (Panda), who I have known personally and who has worked very, very hard with his group (always been willing to challenge the dominant narrative) shared with us that we really have had false narratives dominating world discussion and press for these last three years. That false narratives included that these were deadly viruses, that there was no preexisting immunity, that this was a novel virus, that everyone was susceptible to this disease, that we had asymptomatic transmission, that the lockdown saved lives, that the mask mandates reduced transmission. Every one of these things was a lie, and yet they were repeatedly propagandized and distributed throughout the world in a harmonized fashion that I think has left all of us in awe. If nothing else, we must give credit to those who have deployed this propaganda. I think it is one of the most amazing demonstrations of modern PSYOPs and propaganda, as was well demonstrated during the various presentations. Dr. Ciro Isidoro (Italy) demonstrated that this is not really a novel disease, it's an old disease, and emphasized that you can't find the cause of death if you do not do autopsies. You can't save COVID patients with paracetamol and watchful waiting. He also presented a lesson that was repeatedly emphasized throughout the conference: Spike is a toxin. This is something that I was roundly attacked for saying over two years ago, and I'm very reassured to see that this is now universally accepted, at least within our community. Dr. Giovanni Meledandri (Italy) demonstrated and spoke about the evolution of coronavirus, which demonstrates a pattern of disease attenuation, and as many had predicted that what we have seen during this outbreak is absolutely the selection of vaccine resistant mutants. Although we have seen the rise in infectivity with the latest Arcturus variant, the infections are ocular. As has been the case with viral outbreaks throughout history, we've seen the increasing attenuation of the virus and its reduction in pathogenicity now to the point where we really just have something akin to a normal circulating respiratory virus, the likes of which we have seen throughout all of our lives as physicians and as general members of the patient population. Dr. Stramezzi (Italy) emphasized the importance of early responses in Italy, and most importantly that it was known in June of 2020 that COVID was a treatable disease. Despite the various efforts from throughout the world, in particular the Italian authorities, to suppress that information and to encourage the narrative that this was a novel disease that was highly pathogenic, that required sophisticated novel treatments, Dr. Stramezzi gave us a great lesson in the ability of a well-trained physician to obtain and derive and demonstrate the ability to treat a respiratory virus with existing agents. This is a theme that has been echoed throughout this conference and throughout the world, starting with the original International COVID Summit, which pioneered bringing together physicians from all over the world to demonstrate in particular and discuss and share with each other best practices in early treatment. And as I think that this whole series of International COVID summits, I just want to give a shout-out to the two organizers that always wish to remain anonymous, Lilly (Canada) and Rob (Italy), who are not medical professionals. They're brave, committed individuals who felt the call to duty and stood up at a time when everyone else was afraid and said, "We are going to get these conferences started and run and operated." They have encountered repeated obstacles throughout the history of the International COVID Summit and have overcome every single one. I can't tell you how many times we thought this particular conference was going to come to naught. And yet here we are, I think with one of the most successful ICS conferences to date. Moving on, Dr. Luis Fouche (France) gave us a great essay on the effects of mandates, early treatment, and he particularly focused on masks and associated data. He explained that there's no utility for masks for preventing Coronavirus infection, which I know will shock most of you (sarcasm). As early as March 2020, the evidence existed that masks could cause harm, that the CDC evidence for mask use is not existent or weak, that masks do not work in schools – as shown by studies in the European Union, that the data are quite clear, that the lockdowns in the European Union increased the speed of transmission by 50% relative to Sweden. That's shocking to me. Lockdowns must be avoided and mask use in children absolutely must be avoided going forward for these types of respiratory diseases. I think that's something we can all get behind. Professor Dr. Phillipe Brouqui (France) forgive me if I'm mispronouncing, gave us his analysis of the IHU experience in use of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID disease. We were unfortunately deprived of the opportunity that many of us looked forward to, for Professor Didier Raoult (France, also of IHU) to share his time and insight. I remember personally how badly Dr. Raoult was defamed, slandered, harassed, de-legitimized by the press, and yet he persisted; one of the greatest virology scientists and immunologists in France, who unfortunately has been forced into retirement. He built an amazing institute, the IHU, and we did benefit from Phillipe Brouqui sharing with us the experience of the IHU in the use of hydroxychloroquine, and in particular, his courage in speaking about the limitations of evidence-based medicine and randomized clinical trials in the face of an outbreak, and their (IHU) willingness to make the same decision I had made and focus on early treatment with repurposed drugs. And I think in retrospect, many of us will agree that was the wisest position taken, to focus on drug repurposing, not development of new vaccines and not seeking novel drugs. The IHU led the world in this, and had great success and also demonstrated that the vaccines have had no effect on the pandemic, unfortunately. But I think we all owe the institute. And Dr. Raoult, an enthusiastic thank you for their courage and fortitude in the face of all the obstacles and all of the derision that they've encountered for their guidance and leadership in pioneering the various treatments that revolved around use of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin in particular. Dr. Pierre Kory (USA), my American colleague, stepped in then and spoke at length about Ivermectin, and gave us just a classic series of demonstrations about how the whole enterprise of the pharmaceutical industry and the academic publishing industry has been compromised throughout this COVID crisis in a way that we can now clearly see, particularly in the way they've mismanaged repurposed drugs and ivermectin in particular. And I certainly resonate with that. I have many examples with him of how the likes of the FDA have suppressed ivermectin very adequately. I saw what was going on during ACTIV-6 and I resigned. Jason Christoff (Canada) gave us what I think was one of the most important speeches here, from my perspective. As we think about going forward, Jason gave us clear demonstrations of how the media and information warfare technology has been weaponized and deployed against us. And he concludes that crimes were committed and psychology and psychological technology (including “Nudge” technology) was weaponized against the public, and that this must never happen again. This is one of the things that I feel most strongly about, is that somehow we need legislation that makes it clear that deploying fifth generation warfare technology, PSYOPs, psywar technology on civilian populations is absolutely not acceptable. And the bizarre thing is that the deploying of this technology has been justified on the basis that it's necessary to do this to preserve democracy. I argue the contrary is what's true, that this makes the concept of democracy obsolete. The idea of personal autonomy, of the ability of an individual to have personal sovereignty is completely negated in a world in which governments feel that it's acceptable to deploy modern PSYOPs technology on their own populations. It means that everything that we hold dear in terms of free speech and democracy and representation and the evolution of power down to the lowest level that it should be delegated to, which was a core principle upon which the European Union was founded, has been negated over the last three years. And we have seen that clearly. It's the theme that runs all the way through this meeting. Dr. Harvey Risch (USA) gave us great examples about the problems with the manipulation of data on the efficacy of vaccines. Dr. Byron Bridle (Canada), who I think has just been a hero all the way through this, also spoke. I don't think there's a better case study that I'm aware of, of how somebody has spoken truth, acted with integrity and dignity, and just been harassed mercilessly by his academic institution and his government than the example of Dr. Bridle over the last three years. But Byron has stood his ground. I think he's developed some nervous ticks over the last three years, but I think he's just been an amazing hero in what he's done in revealing the Pfizer/Japanese common technical document and so many other things. EP Member Francesca Donato (Italy) gave us a summary from the morning about the importance of truth, democracy, and freedom, which has been important to all of us since the beginning. I think those were excellent summary comments. And EP Member Mislav Kolakusic (Croatia), made the clear, unequivocal statement that physicians should define pandemics, not the World Health Organization. I think that's another thing we can all concur with. EP Member Christine Anderson (Germany) followed with an emphasis that the “official” EP COVID Committee reports are repeating. The COVID committee reports that have come out of this institution are repeating as accepted wisdom every single lie that we have encountered all the way through this outbreak. That report is really not valid. It is clearly biased. I could go on and on about the excellent presentations from Dr. Guiseppe Tritto (Italy), Dr. Natalia Prego (Spain), Professor Giovanni Frajese (Italy), Emmanuelle Darles (France) , Alejandro Diaz Villalobos (Mexico), giving us the perspective on the pediatric consequences of the mismanagement from Mexico. Dr. Kirk Milhoan (USA), my good friend, making it abundantly clear about the cardiac pathology associated with the COVID “vaccines”, the unnecessary deployment of these “vaccines” in pediatric populations and the excess mortality and morbidity that has been associated with that. And Dr. Rosanna Chifari (Italy) spoke about the fetal effects of the “vaccines” and that spike activates microglia in the brain, as well as the CNS consequences of this. Dr. Arne Berkhartd (Germany) spoke about damage to heart and lungs observed in his series of 75 autopsies. So we now have clear autopsy data, and excellent presentations from our pathologists, including my friend Dr. Ryan Cole (USA), about the effects of the COVID “vaccines” on cancer. We also had Vincent Pavan (France) speaking about the data concerning all-cause mortality in France. Supporting these observations were the all-cause mortality statistics of Dr. Theo Schetters (Netherlands) showing the correlation between the deployment of the vaccines and the waves of excess all-cause mortality in the elderly, which are perhaps the most clear and explicit demonstration of what is really a “re-challenge study” that I've ever seen. There should be no more doubt about the cause and effect relationship between mRNA vaccines and death. We have seen all of this noise about correlation does not prove causation. We've seen data from Theo and from Dr. Jessica Rose (Canada) and so many others that refute this thesis. And as Dr. Rose kindly points out, without screaming it to the roof, that the Bradford Hill criteria have been abundantly met here in demonstrating that this is a valid correlation. I could go on and on about the legal consequences and breaches that have occurred throughout the European Union and the world, as documented by Children's Health Defense and many others. Many other attorneys, both in the United States, in Australia, and throughout the European Union, Switzerland, are finally reaching the point where they're holding officials and hopefully pharmaceutical companies accountable. And I think that we will all be able to synergize as this discovery process moves forward. Then in conclusion we had what were frankly forward looking presentations, frankly from Drs. Meryl Nass (USA) and Katarina Lindley (Croatia), my good friends, an alert, the thing that you should take home, is that these new regulations, these International Health Regulation modifications that the WHO is trying to slip under the rug so that we don't pay attention to them, and unfortunately they've been promoted by the government that I'm a citizen of. And I can tell you that in my country, there is great consternation and disagreement about pushing these from this administration and our health and human services through the World Health Organization. I concur that the risk is substantial for basically a surreptitious power grab by a group that is not elected, is not representative, and has shown (for instance) in the Monkeypox outbreak as well as with this outbreak to not be responsible custodians of world health and human health.

Where did the global biosecurity agenda come from? Where is it going, what was it intended to do? Was it hijacked, or was it always nefarious? How then do the IHR Amendments and Pandemic Treaty fit into this, and who were the funders? Dr. Meryl Nass and James Corbett continue their discussion in the 7th installment of their series on the WHO + One Health to answer these questions and more, with former WHO expert Dr. David Bell. - A Primer on the WHO, the Treaty, and its Plans for Pandemic Preparedness https://brownstone.org/articles/a-primer-on-the-who-the-treaty-and-its-plans-for-pandemic-preparedness/ Germs: Biological Weapons And America's Secret War (2002) https://archive.org/details/GermsBiologicalWeaponsAndAmericasSecretWar/page/n2/mode/2up - Source: Good Morning CHD https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/the-myth-of-pandemic-preparedness-with-james-corbett--dr-david-bell/