Dr. John Campbell

Canadian National Citizens Inquiry (interim report) Discussion with Mr Ches Crosbie, National Citizens Inquiry administrator. Check out the full report on this link https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/commissioners-report/ Surely it is the job of governments to evaluate the nature of the national response to the covid pandemic? Why have a group of concerned Canadian citizens felt it necessary to make this enquiry and evaluation? How were the covid vaccines first authorised in Canada? Its over 2 and a half years later, have the covid vaccines not been approved under the traditional approval process for drugs in Canada? Is NCI now satisfied that Health Canada has now establish the safety and efficacy of Covid-19 vaccines? Has HC published transparent strict proof of safety and efficacy of covid vaccines as it has worked through the established Canadian drug approval regulations? What is the system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in Canada? Is this system functional, universally known and easy to use, does it publish full objective data for individuals to make a vaccination decision based on full informed consent? https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/coronavirus-disease-covid-19.html

Free download John’s textbooks in high res pdf. https://drjohncampbell.co.uk Order my Physiology Notes in hard copy if you live in the UK, https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/154973392319?mkcid=16&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-127632-2357-0&ssspo=K6raxMZrQnm&sssrc=2047675&ssuid=&widget_ver=artemis&media=EMAIL

Updated COVID-19 vaccines are recommended for everyone 6 months and older and will be available by the end of this week ‘Safe and effective’ Estimated hospitalizations prevented per 1,000,000 vaccine doses 12 -17 years 19-95 hospitalizations, 5-19 ICU admissions, and perhaps one death. 5 – 11 years 16 hospitalizations, (based on Spring 2023 data) 18 – 49 years 75 hospitalizations, (based on Spring 2023 data) Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36055877/ Pfizer vaccines excess risk of serious adverse events (Higher than placebo baseline) 10.1 per 10,000 101 per 100,000 1,010 per 1,000,000 Moderna vaccines excess risk of serious adverse events (Higher than placebo baseline) 15.1 per 10,000 151 per 100,000 1,510 per 1,000,000 In Western Australia https://www.health.wa.gov.au/~/media/Corp/Documents/Health-for/Immunisation/Western-Australia-Vaccine-Safety-Surveillance-Annual-Report-2021.pdf Total AEFI rate following a COVID-19 vaccine 264.1 per 100,000 doses 2,641 per 1,000,000 doses https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/moderna-ceo-bancel-defends-130-covid-vaccine-price-senate-hearing-2023-03-22/ March 22 Moderna chief executive defended the company's plan to quadruple the price of its COVID-19 vaccine, $130 per dose Pfizer last year suggested $110 to $130 per dose. From FDA to MHRA: are drug regulators for hire? https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj.o1538 Money derived from Industry US Food and Drug Administration, $3,416,000,000 (2022) The revolving door FDA, nine out of 10 of its past commissioners, 2006 to 2019 went on to secure roles linked with pharmaceutical companies https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/fda-organization/robert-califf 2005 UK, House of Commons’ health committee Industry funding could lead MHRA, to “lose sight of the need to protect and promote public health above all else as it seeks to win fee income from the companies.” BMJ investigation (2022) We found that industry money permeates the globe’s leading regulators, raising questions about their independence Sociologist Donald Light, Rowan University, New Jersey “Like the FDA, the TGA was founded to be an independent institute. However, being largely funded by fees from the companies whose products it is charged to evaluate is a fundamental conflict of interest, and a prime example of institutional corruption.” It is no longer possible for doctors and patients to receive unbiased, rigorous evaluations from drug regulators. FDA “It’s the opposite of having a trustworthy organisation independently and rigorously assessing medicines. They’re not rigorous, they’re not independent, they are selective, and they withhold data. Doctors and patients must appreciate how deeply and extensively drug regulators can’t be trusted so long as they are captured by industry funding.” Revisiting financial conflicts of interest in FDA advisory committees https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25199895/ Large study, FDA advisory committee members over 15 years, those with financial interests solely in the sponsoring firm were more likely to vote in favour of the sponsor’s product.

Nuremberg Code (1947) https://research.unc.edu/human-research-ethics/resources/ccm3_019064/ https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-nuremberg-code https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/nazi-medical-experiments Medical Case: US prosecutor details illegal experiments In case you want to support our community work use the following: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/buwanga-mill?utm_term=gmbP2vbY3 https://www.buymeacoffee.com/awmedicalvideos patreon:https://www.patreon.com/awmedicalvideos Link to our organization's website: https://buwanga.org/ Donate: SENDWAVE/ WorldRemit / Wise transfer/Money Gram Mobile money number:+256785698803 Country: Uganda Registered name: Wefwafwa Andrew State: Eastern Uganda Address: Nkokojjeru Zip code:0000 Wallet Service provider:MTNE To contact Wefwafwa directly, wefandrew@gmail.com or WhatsApp+256756320736 Medical professionals on trial, after war for war crimes and crimes against humanity Including experiments on prisoners in the camp system. Doctors and nurses, participated in the killing of physically and mentally impaired Germans German doctors argued "Doctors Trial." 1946 Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. Nuremberg October 1946 – April 1949 Their experiments differed little from those conducted before the war by German and American scientists. No international law or informal statement differentiated between legal and illegal human experimentation. “Permissible Medical Experiments.” Washington. U.S. Government Printing Office (n.d.), vol. 2., pp. 181-182. One The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion, and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. Before the acceptance of an affirmative decision, subject should know the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity. Two The experiment should yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods, and not random and unnecessary in nature. Three The experiment should be based on the results of animal experimentation, a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem, the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment. Four The experiment should avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury. Five No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects. Six The degree of risk should never exceed, that determined by the humanitarian importance, of the problem to be solved by the experiment. Seven Proper preparations should be made, and adequate facilities provided, to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury disability or death. Eight The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment Nine During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end Ten During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, that continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

Dr. Joseph Fraiman, Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults Paper in Vaccine, 31 August 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36055877/ What stimulated you to carry out this research in the first place, what got you interested in the topic? You refer to the Brighton Collaboration, what is this and how did this feed in to your thinking? Brighton Collaboration identified adverse events of special interest following covid vaccinations, what adverse events were identified? You conducted a secondary analysis of the placebo-controlled, phase III randomized clinical trials of Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in adults. Tell us a bit about these trials, is this sort of trial standard in testing new pharmaceuticals? What is a secondary analysis? What do you mean by excess risk? What excess risk did you discover? Pfizer vaccines excess risk of serious adverse events 10.1 per 10,000 Higher than placebo baseline of 17.6 per 10,000 Is it fair to say that this transposes into one serious adverse event per 990 vaccines? Moderna vaccines excess risk of serious adverse events 15.1 per 10,000 Higher than placebo baseline of 42.2 per 10,000 Is it fair to say that this transposes into one serious adverse event per 662 vaccines? Combined RNA covid vaccines excess risk of serious adverse events 12.5 per 10,000 Is it fair to say that this transposes into one serious adverse event per 800 vaccines? You also gave reanalysis data in terms of risk ratio. What is risk ratio? Combined, 1.43 Pfizer trial Exhibited, 36 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group Risk ratio 1.36 Moderna trial Exhibited, 6 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group Risk ratio 1.06 Combined Exhibited, 16 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group Risk ratio 1.16 These risks of harm sound high to me, how does this level of risk compare to other vaccines and treatments? You suggest a formal harm-benefit analyses, what is this and how would this be done? What are participant level datasets, are these important. Did you have access to participant level datasets The original vaccine papers indicated high levels of efficacy in protecting against infection. What is the difference between relative and absolute risk? Were these results presented as relative or absolute risk of infection? Would it have been useful if the original vaccine trial papers had presented absolute risk as well as relative risk? FDA Now using near real time surveillance for vaccine safety. Is this near real time claim working, are we getting timely data? Is there a risk of false positives in the FDA data collection, or are false negatives an issue? Can the FDA safely ignore AESIs that are of minimal clinical significance? Is the FDA methodology confirming previously known AESIs, or is it missing some? From where is the FDA collecting data and are the data from all sources pooled to improve the power of the analysis? Is all data being collected from all 50 States? Is all FDA data open to independent peer review?

Our world in data, excess mortality https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/excess-mortality-p-scores-average-baseline?country=~BIH Our world in data covid vaccination status https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus Office for health improvement https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiYmUwNmFhMjYtNGZhYS00NDk2LWFlMTAtOTg0OGNhNmFiNGM0IiwidCI6ImVlNGUxNDk5LTRhMzUtNGIyZS1hZDQ3LTVmM2NmOWRlODY2NiIsImMiOjh9 https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsregisteredweeklyinenglandandwalesprovisional/weekending25august2023 Week ending 25 August 2023 (Week 34) England and Wales 10,086 deaths 203 mentioned novel coronavirus 2.0% of all deaths Of the 203 deaths 67.0% (136 deaths) recorded as underlying cause of death Deaths registered in the UK 11,522, (4.5% above five-year average)

Trafficking in human beings All age groups https://worldcouncilforhealth.org https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/p/human-trafficking Sexual exploitation (66% of global revenue) Labour / servitude Organ removal Exponentially growing worldwide, internet, trafficking of children for online commercial sexual exploitation, videos and photos, torture and rape of children, including toddlers Methods Deception Kidnapping Coercion and/or force Violence and torture Forced to watch abuse of children Forced injection with drugs US Department of Homeland Security https://www.dhs.gov/topics/human-trafficking Human trafficking is the fastest growing criminal industry in the world. Annual revenue of US$150 billion (2014) Second largest criminal enterprise after drugs Particularly vulnerable Poverty Abusive family environment Displacement during violent conflict Living under corruption International (UN) Labour Organization (2022) https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/09/1126421 50 million humans One in every 150 people in the world Over 12 million are children Sexual exploitation 6.3 million people in situations of forced commercial sexual exploitation on any given day, (2021) This number includes 1.7 million children in commercial sexual exploitation, (ILO 2022) https://www.americanbar.org/groups/crsj/publications/human_rights_magazine_home/human_rights_vol37_2010/spring2010/sex_trafficking_and_hiv_aids_a_deadly_junction_for_women_and_girls/ Some survivors report having been forced to engage in sexual intercourse with up to fifty perpetrators in a single day Children trafficked for sex tourism serve about 1,500 customers per year, more than half of those children are under the age of 12 https://www.missingkids.org/home Internet abuse, 2019 Nearly 70 million child sexual abuse files (videos/pictures), https://protectchildren.ca/en/about-us/ 78% of child abuse files involved children under the age of 12, 63% showed children under 8 At any given time, there are 750,000 to over 1 million predators online searching for these files Forced labour and servitude https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/659360/EPRS_BRI(2020)659360_EN.pdf Over 20 million people Hazardous conditions, mines, fields, factories, homes, construction sites. Carry heavy loads, exposed to pesticides and other toxins Work excessive hours, severe weather conditions. Denigrating treatment, constant risk of violent abuse. Tens of thousands become ill and die. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/feb/12/mars-nestle-and-hershey-to-face-landmark-child-slavery-lawsuit-in-us Organ and blood harvesting Numbers uncertain Reports of it are increasing across the world Medical and ritual purposes 2017, Daesh (ISIS) https://www.dni.gov/files/NCTC/documents/jcat/firstresponderstoolbox/First-Responders-Toolbox---International-Partnerships-Among-Public-Health-Private-Sector-and-Law.pdf Organs from oppressed minorities and prisoners Governments and organised crime networks Human Trafficking in the U.S. and Europe Trafficking for sexual exploitation most common type https://www.unov.org/unov/en/unodc.html 72% of detected survivors in North America “with the market forces of prostitution driving demand for human trafficking of women and girls“ https://nij.ojp.gov “Studies find that up to 80% of samples of women and girls serving as prostitutes had been coerced or forced to engage in prostitution by pimps or traffickers.“ United States “accounts for nearly 50% of all IP addresses engaging in P2P file sharing of child pornography images“ The New York Times (2019) “ The images are horrific. Children, some just 3 or 4 years old, being sexually abused and in some cases tortured. Some followed by travel to Latin America and the Caribbean. Europe The majority of trafficking victims, Bulgaria, Romania, Moldowa, Ukraine, Nigeria Brought to Central and Western Europe for exploitation. A CALL FOR TARGETED ACTION We call for decisive, targeted measures to end human trafficking. These include but are not limited to the following: Public Awareness Legislation Law Enforcement Survivors Culture

From FDA to MHRA: are drug regulators for hire? https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj.o1538 Proportion of budget derived from Industry European Medicines Agency, 89% (2022) Therapeutic Goods Administration, 96% US Food and Drug Administration, 56% (Total budget $6,100,000,000) Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, 86% Japan, PDMA 85% Health Canada, 50.5% (Total budget C$2,700,000,000) Australia TGA and Canada HC Conflicts of interests NOT available as public information Covid-19 vaccine committee members who declared a financial CoI UK, HMRA, 32% Australia, TGA, 50% Japan, PMDA, 75% Regulators do NOT routinely receive patient level datasets Australia, TGA Europe, EMA UK, MHRA Canada, HC Proportion of decisions to recommend new medicines v did not approve Australia, TGA, 94% Europe, EMA, 88% UK, MHRA, 98.5% US, FDA, 69% Canada, HC, 83% The revolving door FDA, nine out of 10 of its past commissioners, 2006 to 2019 went on to secure roles linked with pharmaceutical companies 1992, US Congress Passed the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) Allowing industry to pay “user fees” directly to FDA 2005 UK, House of Commons’ health committee Evaluated the influence of the drug industry on health policy, including the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). The committee was concerned Industry funding could cause MHRA, to “lose sight of the need to protect and promote public health above all else as it seeks to win fee income from the companies.” BMJ investigation (2022) We found that industry money permeates the globe’s leading regulators, raising questions about their independence Industry money saturates the globe’s leading regulators. The BMJ found that the majority of regulators’ budget —particularly the portion focused on drugs— is derived from industry fees A string of drug and device scandals Opioids, Alzheimer’s drugs, influenza antivirals, pelvic mesh, joint prostheses, breast and contraceptive implants, cardiac stents, pacemakers. Sociologist Donald Light, Rowan University, New Jersey “Like the FDA, the TGA was founded to be an independent institute. However, being largely funded by fees from the companies whose products it is charged to evaluate is a fundamental conflict of interest, and a prime example of institutional corruption.” It is no longer possible for doctors and patients to receive unbiased, rigorous evaluations from drug regulators. “Countries have independent safety boards for airlines and their passengers. Why not for drugs and patients too?” FDA “It’s the opposite of having a trustworthy organisation independently and rigorously assessing medicines. They’re not rigorous, they’re not independent, they are selective, and they withhold data. Doctors and patients must appreciate how deeply and extensively drug regulators can’t be trusted so long as they are captured by industry funding.” External advisers Advisory panels intended to provide regulators with independent expert advice BMJ investigation Several expert advisers for covid-19 vaccine advisory committees in the UK and US had financial ties with vaccine manufacturers Revisiting financial conflicts of interest in FDA advisory committees https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25199895/ Large study, FDA advisory committee members over 15 years, those with financial interests solely in the sponsoring firm were more likely to vote in favour of the sponsor’s product. TGA (FoI in BMJ) Conducted its covid-19 vaccine assessments based on “the information provided by the vaccine’s sponsor.” TGA said it had not seen the source (individual participant level datasets) data from the covid-19 vaccine trials.

Pirola, BA.2.86 An asteroid that hangs out by Jupiter World Health Organization, BA.2.86 a “variant under monitoring” https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/sars-cov-2-genome-sequence-prevalence-and-growth-rate/sars-cov-2-genome-sequence-prevalence-and-growth-rate-update-30-august-2023 First monitoring 14 August 2023, (horizon scanning) 34 amino acid differences compared with BA.2 https://www.bmj.com/content/382/bmj.p1964 All in spike protein https://www.cdc.gov/respiratory-viruses/whats-new/covid-19-variant.html 36 amino acid changes compared with the 2023 circulating XBB.1.5 This number of genetic differences, is roughly of the same magnitude as seen between the initial Omicron variant (BA.1) and previous variants, such as Delta (B.1.617.2) Declared a variant on 18 August 2023 Week beginning 28 August 2023 2 UK sequences found Denmark, Israel, US, SA, (unlinked) https://www.gov.uk/government/news/flu-and-covid-autumn-vaccine-programmes-brought-forward Precautionary measure taken to protect those most vulnerable from illness during winter following the identification of COVID-19 variant BA.2.86. Vaccinations are now set to start on 11 September 2023 UKHSA suggests speeding up autumn vaccine programme will deliver greater protection, supporting those at greatest risk of severe illness and reducing the potential impact on the NHS. People in care homes for older people, the clinically vulnerable, those aged 65 and over, health and social care staff, and carers. Those who fall into higher-risk groups are being encouraged to take up the jab as soon as they’re invited. Chief Executive of the UK Health Security Agency, Dame Jenny Harries As we continue to live with COVID-19 we expect to see new variants emerge. Thanks to the success of our vaccine programme, we have built strong, broad immune defences against new variants throughout the population. https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/public-health/latest-cdc-fall-covid-variants-new-flu-guidelines-plus-malaria-health A variant that's adept at evading immunity would not necessarily take off in a population if it doesn't spread efficiently. Inherent transmissibility unknown https://www.bmj.com/content/382/bmj.p1964 Transmissibility and severity Little is yet known about the transmissibility of BA.2.86 or whether it may cause more severe disease, but scientists do not expect it to be much different from previous omicron strains currently in circulation. Sore throat 63.41 Runny nose 59.18 Headache 55.84 Blocked nose 54.3 Sneezing 52.5 Cough no phlegm 50.71 Hoarse voice 38.77 Cough with phlegm 38.38 Muscle pains aches 31.58 Fatigue 23.88 Swollen neck glands 20.67 Altered smell 20.54 Dizzy light headed 19.77 Eye soreness 18.1 Earache 15.15 Loss of smell 14.38 Fever 13.61 Joint pain shoulders 13.35 Chest pain tightness 12.84 Shortness of breath 12.84

Excellent discussion with Russell Brand. Russell demonstrates a sound grasp of the reality of numerous situations and asks perceptive and challenging questions. Direct link to original video introduction on Stay Free Media on YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xh5WqeE3H-A&t=74s Direct link to original video on Stay Free Media on Rumble, https://rumble.com/v3bkb4w-i-no-longer-trust-authority-dr-john-campbell-on-moderna-myocarditis-and-mrn.html

Senate Health, Labor, and Pensions Committee hearing https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5063184/senator-paul-questions-moderna-ceo-covid-19-vaccine-side-effects Senator Rand Paul Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel, Moderna paid NIH $400,000,000 Making money from the vaccine while dictating government policy on how many times the vaccine is used. ‘Thank you for the question Senator’ 16 to 24 years vaccine increased myocarditis, Especially after the 2nd dose "I spoke with your president just last week and he readily acknowledged, in private, that yes there is an increased risk of myocarditis. The fact that you can't say it in public is quite disturbing." CDC Covid, vaccine, myocarditis, vaccine, vaccine CDC/FDA latest guidelines https://twitter.com/FDAHealthEquity/status/1689313362717417472

USA deaths, 2020 – 2021 Years mostly complete https://www.soa.org/4a55a7/globalassets/assets/files/resources/research-report/2022/excess-death-us.pdf https://www.soa.org/49b504/globalassets/assets/files/resources/experience-studies/2022/group-life-covid-19-mortality-12-2022.pdf Deaths reported by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Actual-to-expected ratios (A/E ratios) using 2015-2019 April to December 2020 A/E of 122% Full year of 2020, 116.4% 13.3% excess due to COVID, and 3.1% not COVID Full year of 2021 Completed at 117% In both years, the age group with the highest A/E was ages 35-64 During 2021, excess deaths were higher in all age groupings 15 to 34 years, non-covid deaths were 21.4% higher Date through to March 2022 Excess deaths,(all ages) 115.2% excluding covid October – December 2022 35 to 44 years, 34% excess deaths Non covid deaths If the main issue was lack of access to health care, why are excess deaths highest in 15 to 34 years? Followed by 35 to 64 years? 2022 Cause of Death Report https://www.soa.org/49667f/globalassets/assets/files/resources/research-report/2022/2022-cause-death-report.pdf Cancer deaths, usually in the range of 102% to 105% of expected Cardiovascular deaths, 4% higher than expected Other non-communicable deaths, 10% lower than expected Deaths from diabetes, as high as 30% more than expected Deaths ascribed to the nervous system, sometimes as high as 30% greater than expected Respiratory deaths, in line with expected Non-Medical Deaths Deaths by suicide, (excludes drug overdoses), were noticeably lower during the pandemic Jump in death claims on insurance Higher non-covid deaths https://eu.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2023/08/11/more-americans-dying-than-before-pandemic-covid-deaths/70542423007/ NZ https://www.stats.govt.nz/topics/births-and-deaths

Senator Babet, live births https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezeW1JWdr9w

Second Annual Report on Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada 2020 https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/publications/health-system-services/annual-report-medical-assistance-dying-2020.html Second Annual Report on Medical Assistance in Dying Based on these regulations; https://canadagazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2018/2018-08-08/html/sor-dors166-eng.html Significant collaboration between federal, provincial and territorial levels of government, as well as practitioners and pharmacists has permitted the collection, verification and accuracy of the data contained in this report. The number of medically assisted deaths continues to increase in 2020 In 2020, there were 7,595 cases of MAID reported in Canada, accounting for 2.5% of all deaths in Canada. The number of cases of MAID in 2020 represents a growth rate of 34.2% over 2019. All provinces experienced a steady year over year growth during 2020. Total number of medically assisted deaths reported in Canada since the enactment of federal legislation in mid-2016 is 21,589 Profile of MAID recipients Men 51.9% Women 48.1% Average age, 75.3 years Cancer, 69.1% Chronic respiratory conditions, 11.3% Neurological conditions, 10.2% The majority of MAID recipients received palliative care and disability support services 88.5% were reported to have had access to these services had they wished 43.6% of MAID recipients were reported as requiring disability support services Primary care physicians remain as the principal MAID providers, but the administration of MAID has shifted to home-based settings 1,345 unique practitioners administered MAID in Canada 94.7% of providers were physicians 5.3% of providers were nurse practitioners 68.1% of cases of MAID were administered by a family physician The most commonly cited intolerable physical or psychological suffering Loss of ability to engage in meaningful activities, 84.9% Loss of ability to perform activities of daily living, 81.7% The Honourable Patty Hajdu, Minister of Health As Minister of Health, I am proud to present Health Canada's Second Annual Report on Medical Assistance in Dying (2020). Superior Court of Québec's September 2019 ruling, struck down the MAID eligibility requirement that a person's natural death must be reasonably foreseeable. Third annual report on Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada 2021 https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/publications/health-system-services/annual-report-medical-assistance-dying-2021.html 2021, 10,064 MAID provisions reported in Canada, accounting for 3.3% of all deaths in Canada. The number of cases of MAID in 2021 represents a growth rate of 32.4% over 2020. All provinces continue to experience a steady year over year growth. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)01733-0/fulltext September 2022 Trudo Lemmens, health law specialist, University of Toronto “What was originally conceived as an exceptional practice in medicine has quickly become normalised” “Even before the law is set to be expanded to include mentally ill patients, we already have worryingly high numbers of people dying,” Argues that Canada's approach is far more permissive than comparator nations, including Belgium and the Netherlands. “We've failed to sufficiently safeguard against the medicalisation of ageing.” The new law enacted last year stipulates that, starting in March, 2023, MAID will be expanded to include patients with mental illnesses. First deaths expected 17th march 2024 Senator Babet, live birtha https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezeW1JWdr9w

A system beset by conflicts of interest MHRA approach to patient safety requires a radical overhaul encompassing legislative changes on reporting and, in a system beset by conflicts of interest, changes to how the MHRA is funded. A failure to act will only lead to more harm. CDC latest guidelines https://twitter.com/FDAHealthEquity/status/1689313362717417472 https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/downloads/COVID-19-immunization-schedule-ages-6months-older.pdf MPs warned Yellow Card system and vaccine damage payment scheme failing injury victims https://appgpandemic.org/news/yellow-card https://appgpandemic.org 17 July 2023 The Pandemic Response and Recovery All-Party Parliamentary Group, failings of the Yellow Card system Professor Carl Heneghan Professor of Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of Oxford, Director of the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine and an NHS General Practitioner working in urgent care. Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions to the Yellow Card system could be as high as 98%, https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk meaning the ability to detect signals and assign causation is substantially hindered. In theory, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) relies on the early warning system provided by Yellow Card reports of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs), to signal possible harms from pharmaceuticals. In practice the system is woefully inadequate, much too complicated and is failing. If you consider that ADRs are a major cause of hospital admissions, 6.5%, then Yellow Card reports represent a valuable source of information, not only to protect public health but reduce the cost to the health system, which can only be a good thing. But the ability to detect signals and assign causation are hindered by substantial problems, not least under-reporting. In 2018 the MHRA “estimated that only 10% of serious reactions and between 2 and 4% of non-serious reactions are reported” MHRA Reporting rates for covid vaccines are better due to higher public awareness, there appears to be no evidence base for this heightened awareness. Should the MHRA, our regulatory body, be primarily funded by fees derived from services to the pharmaceutical industry? We could improve the reporting system and the MHRA has published various strategies and proposals to do so but fine words butter no parsnips. The bottom line is that the MHRA has failed in its remit to keep patients safe. Peter Todd Solicitor acting for 43 who suffered blood clots as a result of AstraZeneca vaccination, VDPS https://www.gov.uk/vaccine-damage-payment is letting down those with injuries and families of those who died as a result of their injury, with some applications taking more than 18 months. “I have dealt with such cases for many years, including acting for 86 people who contracted narcolepsy due to the 2009 Pandemrix swine flu vaccine. I have noticed many parallels between that and the Covid vaccine, a hasty roll out of an under-tested emergency vaccine using new technology, and for which the government gave an indemnity against any civil claims. VDPS as of 20 June, of 6,183 applications for compensation, it has determined 2,101, 33% so far, and 139 applications have been waiting for more than 18 months, excessively long despite additional resources. Pandemic Response and Recovery APPG Co-Chair Esther McVey “What we heard has been extremely concerning. The entire system is failing patients, from start to finish. MHRA’s approach to patient safety, the inadequacy of the Yellow Card system …. are all compromised and that is severely compromising patient safety. “One serious concern is the knock on effect on people’s inclination to have vaccines generally. Many could be dissuaded from taking other vaccines, we have all seen the recent warnings of a measles outbreak in London due to low levels of vaccination. These vaccines seem to have a disproportionate adverse reaction rate, with injuries including strokes, blood clots, heart attacks, amputations and neurological conditions. So a reporting system that misses as many as 98 out of 100 adverse reactions, inevitably misses safety signals. Pandemic Response and Recovery APPG Co-Chair Graham Stringer MP I think the example of the time lag between AstraZeneca being suspended in Denmark, Norway and Iceland and being suspended here is a case in point. Why did the MHRA not act when its scientific review of UK reports of blood clots with lowered platelets concluded strong evidence of a link with AstraZeneca’s vaccine?

US and EU excess mortality persists in May 2023 Our world in data https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/excess-mortality-p-scores-average-baseline?country=~USA https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20230616-3 https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20230714-2 May 2023, excess deaths, +2.9% (8,100 excess deaths) Above the baseline period in 2016-2019) April it was +3.3% May 2022, 8% (31,100 excess deaths) May 2021, 10.7% (48,700 excess deaths) May 2020, 3.1% (9,700 excess deaths) https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsregisteredweeklyinenglandandwalesprovisional/28july2023 Week ending 28 July 2023 (Week 30) 9,684 deaths registered in England and Wales 63 of these deaths mentioned novel coronavirus (COVID-19), accounting for 0.7% of all deaths. Of the 63 deaths involving COVID-19 in Week 30, 61.9% (39 deaths) had this recorded as the underlying cause of death Deaths registered in the UK Week 30 were 11,115 0.8% above the five-year average (91 excess deaths) https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiYmUwNmFhMjYtNGZhYS00NDk2LWFlMTAtOTg0OGNhNmFiNGM0IiwidCI6ImVlNGUxNDk5LTRhMzUtNGIyZS1hZDQ3LTVmM2NmOWRlODY2NiIsImMiOjh9

With professor Robert Clancy. The Curious Tale of Hydroxychloroquine You have prescribed hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) 20,000 times, why do you use it and what side effects do you commonly see? Has medicine changed in the past few years, influenced by powerful commercial and political forces? Is WHO a threat to independent local health systems? The doctor-patient relationship, and science-based medicine. Why are these important? Is there a concern over conflict of interest created by grants and payments from pharmaceutical companies? Emergency Use Authorization of Medical Products and Related Authorities https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/emergency-use-authorization-medical-products-and-related-authorities d. No Alternatives For FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition. A potential alternative product may be considered “unavailable” if there are insufficient supplies of the approved alternative to fully meet the emergency need. A potential alternative product may be considered "inadequate" if, for example, there are contraindicating data for special circumstances or populations (e.g., children, immunocompromised individuals, or individuals with a drug allergy), if a dosage form of an approved product is inappropriate for use in a special population (e.g., a tablet for individuals who cannot swallow pills), or if the agent is or may be resistant to approved and available alternative products.

Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Chairman Dr. Brad Wenstrup (Ohio) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_eXm9wOkS8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10I3hQUf3oI&t=10s https://oversight.house.gov/subcommittee/select-subcommittee-on-the-coronavirus-pandemic/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fKWYFsupQk https://oversight.house.gov/release/wenstrup-opens-investigation-into-federal-covid-19-vaccine-mandates/ https://oversight.house.gov/release/wenstrup-to-hold-first-hearing-on-covid-origins/ Investigation into overreaching, federal COVID-19 vaccination mandates and policies at the, Department of Defense (DOD), U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), Department of Labor (DOL), and Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Chairman Wenstrup is requesting access to all documents, communications, and guidance, utilized by these agencies to craft their coercive policies prior to forcing a novel vaccine — that did not stop the spread or transmission of the virus — on millions of Americans. At the Select Subcommittee’s hearing on vaccine mandates last week, expert witnesses highlighted the Biden Administration’s abuse of executive power and disregard for individual freedoms that resulted in employment termination, decreased military readiness, and increased distrust in public health authorities. The Select Subcommittee is seeking further information from DOD, OPM, DOL, and HHS regarding any political interference by the Biden White House and other outside organizations on federal COVID-19 vaccine mandates.

Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Chairman Dr. Brad Wenstrup (Ohio) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_eXm9wOkS8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10I3hQUf3oI&t=10s https://oversight.house.gov/subcommittee/select-subcommittee-on-the-coronavirus-pandemic/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fKWYFsupQk https://oversight.house.gov/release/wenstrup-opens-investigation-into-federal-covid-19-vaccine-mandates/ https://oversight.house.gov/release/wenstrup-to-hold-first-hearing-on-covid-origins/ Investigation into overreaching, federal COVID-19 vaccination mandates and policies at the, Department of Defense (DOD), U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), Department of Labor (DOL), and Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Chairman Wenstrup is requesting access to all documents, communications, and guidance, utilized by these agencies to craft their coercive policies prior to forcing a novel vaccine — that did not stop the spread or transmission of the virus — on millions of Americans. At the Select Subcommittee’s hearing on vaccine mandates last week, expert witnesses highlighted the Biden Administration’s abuse of executive power and disregard for individual freedoms that resulted in employment termination, decreased military readiness, and increased distrust in public health authorities. The Select Subcommittee is seeking further information from DOD, OPM, DOL, and HHS regarding any political interference by the Biden White House and other outside organizations on federal COVID-19 vaccine mandates.

Great to learn from professor Robert Clancy. Every time I learn so much. Robert is a consultant physician and pioneering immunologist, professor of medicine, emeritus professor of pathology, doctor of medicine, doctor of philosophy and doctor of science, author, teacher and broadcaster. Also holder of the Order of Australia.