Eat to prevent dementia
Take the free cognative function test yourself, foodforthebrain.org
Direct order for Patrick's book Upgrade Your brain, https://foodforthebrain.org/product/upgrade-your-brain-book-preorder/
Amazon link for the book for people outside of the UK, https://www.amazon.co.uk/Upgrade-Your-Brain-Unlock-Potential/dp/0008661200?crid=31ZSV4O2RLSZP&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.TQCWZQW06kHFWQKwo5iRI2IxK8N0jqHbvIH0M4RoXWHBV7I7dcEmxFhLDMTt3sVg0klSKQ7zb_--xje-F8T7OYxnnnkY3XNCKPS0asRb50IqqtaUjaorcyaR2ovSBQjn9OapQ-Vs5g6n8e1w3j7Iy7mhimPWRTc8oon9JFYXEN42ewMqtVyotjrjSl_iwBPT9Yv8y_BTjBU0AwrnmNZlC4I4uKVLmFIe9wbpMzmkDB4.7PPF8_cw_7l7wc81AMKISHxUGvDsOy5geU3O8JBvMf0&dib_tag=se&keywords=upgrade+your+brain+patrick+holford&qid=1716986254&s=instant-video&sprefix=upgrade+your+brain+patrick+holford,instant-video,69&sr=1-1&linkCode=sl1&tag=foodfortheb01-21&linkId=8de770776f3cdc5a00b10bcd0467db98&language=en_GB&ref_=as_li_ss_tl
00:00 - Introduction of Patrick Holford
01:30 - Discussion on dementia, its prevalence, and fear associated with it
03:30 - Dementia and nutrition: Introduction to the concept
04:50 - Alzheimer’s disease and its preventability
05:50 - Four biological drivers of brain breakdown: sugar, brain fats, B vitamins, antioxidants
08:50 - The role of fish consumption and omega-3 fatty acids
13:00 - Omega-3 index and its significance for brain health
16:50 - Case study of a man with mixed dementia improving through dietary changes
20:20 - Importance of specific types of fish and omega-3 sources
23:10 - Algae-based DHA supplements for vegetarians and vegans
26:50 - The role of B vitamins and methylation in brain health
35:50 - Combination of B vitamins and omega-3s to prevent brain shrinkage
40:00 - Impact of sugar and insulin resistance on brain health
49:30 - Importance of antioxidants in brain health
54:00 - The role of vitamin D in reducing dementia risk
21.9K
views
32
comments
Sex is biological
NHS staff told to apologise for using ‘wrong’ pronouns
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/05/27/nhs-staff-ordered-apologise-using-wrong-pronouns/
Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust issued an 18-page diversity and inclusion policy forcing medics to accept patients’ personal pronouns.
Should not confront patients using single-sex facilities regardless of their appearance.
The trust’s trans policy, which came into effect in February last year according to the Daily Mail, said staff must say sorry to patients if they made mistakes relating to a patient’s pronouns.
It also ordered them to make a “commitment to try harder” if they made mistakes about patients’ preferred pronouns.
Victoria Atkins, Health Secretary
“I am crystal clear: biological sex matters, and the language used by the NHS needs to recognise the different biological needs of men and women,”
“Illnesses and conditions that we know impact men and women differently should be communicated in a clear and accurate way.
“NHS staff must be allowed to get on with the job of caring for patients, not tiptoeing around trans guidance.
“the Government’s proposed update to the NHS constitution makes clear what patients can expect from NHS services in meeting their needs, including the biological needs of the sexes.”
Miriam Cates, MP and women’s rights campaigner
“Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust seems to have gone through the looking glass into a world where biological sex doesn’t exist,
and where the safety and dignity of vulnerable patients is ignored in the interests of being seen to adhere to a ridiculous ideology.
“It is shocking that an organisation dedicated to evidence-based practice can be so blind to the reality of the differences between men and women.”
Baroness Nicholson
“This NHS trust seems to be deliberately ignoring the Health Secretary whose guidance declares that sex overrules gender in all medical matters,”
“The NHS seems determined to follow its own unscientifically proven agenda; does this trust not recognise that male and female health profoundly differs?
And that calling a man ‘her’ may so easily result in a nurse handing out the wrong medicines for the patient’s condition?”
Cancer incidence for common cancers
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in the UK, accounting for 3 in 20 (15%) of all cases in females and males combined
The next most common cancers in UK people are prostate (14%),
lung (13%),
bowel (11%)
Though there are more than 200 types of cancer, just these four types - breast, prostate, lung and bowel –
together account for more than half (53%) of all new cases in the UK
The two most common cancer types occur mainly or exclusively in only one sex.
Breast
https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/breast-cancer/about
Breast cancer is more common in women than men.
Around 55,500 women and around 370 men are diagnosed in the UK each year.
1 in 7 women in the UK develop breast cancer during their lifetime. It is more common in older women.
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in the UK.
Around 55,900 people are diagnosed with breast cancer every year in the UK.
That is more than 150 people a day.
15 out of 100 (15%) newly diagnosed cancers in the UK are breast cancer.
Prostate
The prostate gland is part of the male reproductive system.
You need a prostate gland to get prostate cancer.
https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/prostate-cancer/about
Around 52,300 men are diagnosed with prostate cancer in the UK each year.
In men, it is the most common cancer in the UK.
https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/ovarian-cancer/what-is-ovarian-cancer
Ovarian
There are 2 ovaries, one on each side of the body.
The ovaries produce an egg each month in women of childbearing age.
Around 7,500 women are diagnosed with ovarian cancer in the UK each year.
This makes ovarian cancer the 6th most common cancer in women.
Causes of death
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/causesofdeath/articles/leadingcausesofdeathuk/2001to2018
The leading cause of death in the UK in 2018 was dementia and Alzheimer disease, accounting for 12.7% of all deaths registered.
In 2008, the leading cause of death for females aged 50 to 64 years changed from malignant neoplasm of breast to malignant neoplasm of trachea, bronchus and lung, which accounted for 10.1% of deaths for this age group in 2018.
From 2001 to 2018, suicide and injury or poisoning of undetermined intent was the leading cause of death for both males and females aged 20 to 34 years in the UK, for all years observed,
accounting for 27.1% of male deaths and 16.7% of female deaths for this age group.
24.7K
views
95
comments
Down's discrmination
Chief Executive of Down's Syndrome Scotland
EddieMcConell- https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0450-000001.pdf
123. Our experience is that there is still what we call 'diagnostic overshadowing'. What we see is, when somebody presents at a GP practice or at a hospital with Down's syndrome, we commonly see them focus on the Down's syndrome and the presenting health issues are almost nullified because they say, "Well that is part of the Down's syndrome".
However, it is a health issue that needs to be
addressed but they cannot see past the Down's syndrome. That was certainly heightened during the pandemic.
124. We are quite strong about this and want to make our feelings clear. That is a form of discrimination, and we will call it out as discrimination. I think it is fair to say that the frailty scale issue and that access to equal healthcare existed before the pandemic, it was just escalated in the pandemic.
125. We had an incident not long after the pandemic where a gentleman went for a heart appointment, a cardiac appointment, and the specialist in the treatment room turned round to the young man's mother, the man was in his 20s, and she said, "I do not know whether it's worth operating on somebody like him".
Those were the words that came out and that was the mindset, that his life is less worthy because he's got Down's syndrome to undergo heart treatment.
Woman with Down’s syndrome loses court of appeal abortion law case
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/nov/25/heidi-crowter-woman-downs-syndrome-loses-court-of-appeal-abortion-law-case
Heidi Crowter argued that the law was discriminatory and stigmatised disabled people
Heidi Crowter, who brought the case alongside Máire Lea-Wilson, whose son Aidan also has Down’s syndrome, had argued that allowing pregnancy terminations up to birth if the foetus has the condition is discriminatory and stigmatises disabled people. But in a ruling on Friday, three senior judges dismissed the appeal and said abortion laws were for parliament to decide.
Heidi Crowter
“absolutely distraught” by the ruling,
and the existing law made her feel that people like her should be “extinct”.
I am very upset that babies with Down’s syndrome can be aborted up to birth. This tells me that I am not valued and of much less value than a person without Down’s syndrome. I am angry that the judges say that my feelings don’t matter. That makes me feel that I am not as valuable as a person without Down’s syndrome.
Heidi outside court
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjc1RgzezVQ
https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/ncardrs-congenital-anomaly-statistics-annual-data/ncardrs-congenital-anomaly-statistics-report-2020/prevalence-t21-t18-t13
Down’s syndrome (Trisomy 21), Edwards syndrome (Trisomy 18) and Patau syndrome (Trisomy 13)
Use free download link- https://ufile.io/xp4acnuj
34.3K
views
122
comments
May 23, 2024
Dr Tina Peers is a physician with a special interest in menopause, an inflammatory condition called mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) and chronic fatigue. In this video Dr. Peers presents information that indicates MCAS is much more common than most doctors believe. She has developed treatment strategies that have transformed many lives for the better.
Dr. Peers has also recently been treating people after covid vaccine injury.
Consensus 1 and 2 discussion: Dr Afrin and Dr Dempsey.
https://drtaniadempsey.com/dr-lawrence-afrin-on-mcas-diagnostic-criteria-consensus-2/
Dr Lawrence Afrin explaining MCAS with Dr Mobeen Syed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cX6uZKInI7c&t=669s
29.3K
views
125
comments
UK medical coverup
Confirmed horrifying scandal
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/05/20/infected-blood-scandal-inquiry-live-latest/
Rishi Sunak
“a day of shame for the British state”
Worst treatment sandal in HNS history
“Today’s report shows a decades-long moral failure at the heart of our national life – from the National Health Service to the Civil Service, to ministers in successive governments, at every level the people and institutions in which we place our trust failed in the most harrowing and devastating way.
“They failed the victims and their families and they failed this country.”
“moral failure at the heart of our national life” in which doctors, civil servants and ministers had put reputations above patient safety.
“On behalf of this and every government stretching back to the 1970s, I am truly sorry.”
The final report concluded
Health service and governments took part in a “chilling” cover-up, as they “closed ranks” to hide the truth, even destroying documents to keep patients in the dark.
Sir Brian Langstaff
the “horrifying” scandal could and should have been avoided, but a “catalogue of failures” led to “calamity”.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/05/20/nhs-cover-up-avoidable-disaster-infected-blood-inquiry/
“It will be astonishing to anyone who reads this report that these events could have happened in the UK
…that a level of suffering which it is difficult to comprehend, still less understand, has been caused to so many”.
victims of the scandal “have been forced into a decades-long battle for the truth
“Successive governments claimed that patients had received the best medical treatment available at the time, and that blood screening had been introduced at the earliest opportunity. Both claims were untrue.
“Standing back, and viewing the response of the NHS and of government overall, the answer to the question ‘was there a cover-up?’ is that there has been.
“Not in the sense of a handful of people plotting in an orchestrated conspiracy to mislead, but in a way that was more subtle, more pervasive and more chilling in its implications.
“In this way there has been a hiding of much of the truth.”
tragedy “was not an accident”.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/05/20/infected-blood-inquiry-report-key-findings/
32.7K
views
209
comments
DNR at 38 years of age
Unnecessary deaths are a tragedy in themselves, but also distorted the covid fatality data.
Use free download link- https://ufile.io/xp4acnuj
Dave, independent researcher on Substack, https://biologyphenom.substack.com
https://twitter.com/biologyphenom
Witness statements:
Lianne Menzies- https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0068-000001.pdf
DNACPR (DNR)
44. They asked Jamie five times to sign a DNR, a do not resuscitate document and he kept telling them no.
The following day (28th March) they asked him again and
it was five times in total that they asked him to sign a DNR.
There were two other occasions and he repeatedly said they would need to speak to me.
46. Jamie got upset enough about this that he called me; he wanted me to reassure him that I wouldn't agree to it. He was terrified.
He never signed one and there were never any conversations about DNR before.
They eventually tested him for Covid. Jamie was initially told that the result was negative but then the doctor came round to see him later that day and said he had tested positive. He said the doctor thought he was over the worst of it.
My friend works in the hospital, and she said that there had been e-mails and a leaflet sent out to say who would and wouldn't get treatment so I knew Jamie wouldn't get it.
53. On 4th April Jamie facetimed me; he looked really well. He was up and dressed. Jamie's oxygen must have been reduced because I had no trouble hearing him. He was laughing and joking away. I thought he must have been getting better and I would get him home soon. I asked if he was getting out and he said he would ask the doctor.
Bereavement.
57. She asked if I understood that Jamie was
going to die. I said absolutely not as he was sitting up in bed joking yesterday.
60. They gave Jamie midazolam to help him sleep. I went home but asked them to phone me and I would come straight back as I didn't want him to be alone.
61. I got a call the next morning (8th April 2020) to ask me to go back to the hospital. They said, 'it was time.' When I arrived, there were five nurses in the room with him in case I didn't arrive in time.
62. Jamie was in and out of consciousness most of that day; he was scared because he was having trouble breathing. He kept grabbing onto the bed rails frantically and shouting to me as he struggled to breath.
The palliative care team came in and asked if I would like them to give him something to make him more comfortable; I agreed. They rotated the midazolam with morphine.
63. Jamie passed away at 11.29pm that night. Before Jamie passed away, we got married. He had been asking me and up until he became really ill, I had always said no not until you are better. I thought it was the last thing I could have done for him. He knew what was going on, a nurse took a video, and they got rings from the lost and found.
64. My mum got the chaplain, and we were able to get married in the hospital.
18.3K
views
70
comments
DNR orders allowed people to die
Unnecessary deaths are a tragedy in themselves, but also distorted the covid fatality data.
Use free download link- https://ufile.io/xp4acnuj
Dave, independent researcher
https://twitter.com/biologyphenom
Witness statements:
Gilliant Grant- https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0142-000002.pdf
I was provided with a document at a meeting I had with one of the solicitors. The document was the DNR but this had my name written on it. I was shocked as this was the first time I had seen this document and did not even know it existed. I had never had any sight of this document before meeting with the solicitor. Initially it was thought a DNR document had been signed by my mum. This is incorrect. There is no signed DNR by my mum. The DNR had my name on it. I had never given permission for the DNR and I am very shocked and upset that this has my name on it. I do not understand it. The DNR is incomplete. The first part of the DNR asked if the patient authorises the DNR. This part had been left blank. The next part asks if the welfare attorney/ guardian authorises this and has my name written next to it but it is not dated.
The part below that is signed by the GP and is dated for 2 November 2020. On this date my gran was showing only very mild signs of COVID symptoms. My gran suffered from mild dementia but had enough capacity to make her own decisions. I was asked about a DNR but categorically stated that I was not prepared to make any decision on a DNR if she was not critically ill and I knew she could make these decisions for herself. I was very clear and strongly worded on this with the care home.
I think this conversation happened on the 2 of November 2020 and this is the date of the DNR. I think this is very important to include because I am shocked that this document exists as I had no knowledge of this before being presented with it and I had never authorised a DNR but this has my name on it. I would be happy for the inquiry to be provided with a copy of the DNR. It was also stated on these records that we did not wish her to go to hospital and this was also untrue. I stated on several occasions that if she deteriorated I wanted her to go to hospital immediately.
35K
views
113
comments
Agreement on aspiration
Direct links to Marc’s book and substack
Amazon.com (USA)
https://www.amazon.com/NEEDLES-SECRET-UNRAVELING-MYSTERY-REVOLUTION/dp/B0CYLSCMHN/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8
UK Amazon
https://www.amazon.co.uk/NEEDLES-SECRET-UNRAVELING-MYSTERY-REVOLUTION/dp/B0CYLSCMHN/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8
Australia Amazon
https://www.amazon.com.au/NEEDLES-SECRET-UNRAVELING-MYSTERY-REVOLUTION/dp/B0CYLSCMHN/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8
The Bolus Theory Series on Substack
https://covidmythbuster.substack.com
My Bolus Theory website
https://marcgirardot.com
28.4K
views
71
comments
Midazolam deaths
Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry
https://www.covid19inquiry.scot
Direct link to all inquiry hearings
https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/hearings
Link to Dave, independent researcher
https://twitter.com/biologyphenom
Day 15 of the inquiry
Direct link to this witness statement
https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0142-000002.pdf
54. The care home thought that they should give her a mild sedative to stop her getting up and down so much and help her sleep through the night and keep the cannula in. My mum agreed to that but if she had known what the sedative was she would have said no as she was a retired nurse and, they (care home) should not have asked her anyway as she was not authorised to approve this.
55. At this point my grandmother was eating and drinking by herself, moving to the toilet herself, that there was only mild symptoms and that they were giving her the nasal oxygen just as a precaution as her stats were a little low but, with the cannula in, she was fine. Her stats had actually improved
65 I was provided with a document at a meeting I had with one of the solicitors. The document was the DNR but this had my name written on it. I was shocked as this was the first time I had seen this document and did not even know it existed.
Also from day 15
Direct link to this witness statement
https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0069-000001.pdf
Day 21 of the inquiry
Day 30 of the inquiry
Direct link to transcript for day 30
https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-trnspt-000029.pdf
23.3K
views
40
comments
First US AZ case
Brianne Dressen, first US lawsuit against AstraZeneca
Covid Vaccine Injury Global Study: www.react19.org/study
Covid vaccine injury medical expense fund: www.react19.org/donate
AstraZeneca Lawsuit
Full Complaint: https://aboutblaw.com/bd0D
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/health-law-and-business/astrazeneca-sued-over-covid-19-vaccine-clinical-trial-injury
Vaccine trial patient files first US lawsuit against AstraZeneca
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/05/13/vaccine-trial-patient-files-us-lawsuit-against-astrazeneca/
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13416585/utah-teacher-astrazeneca-lawsuit-covid-vaccine-disabled.html
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/utah-mom-sues-astrazeneca-claiming-she-was-left-permanently-disabled-in-covid-vaccine-trial/ar-BB1mmASM
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/health-law-and-business/astrazeneca-sued-over-covid-19-vaccine-clinical-trial-injury
Phase 3 Safety and Efficacy of AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) Covid-19 Vaccine
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2105290
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32623-4/fulltext
25.7K
views
97
comments
Stroke after vaccine
Fatal Post COVID mRNA-Vaccine Associated Cerebral Ischemia
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37064937/
Keywords: COVID-19; Moderna vaccine; cerebral edema; neurology; stroke.
McMillan N, Rosenberg HJ, Anderson MP, Pal P, Stephenson K, Fehnel CR. Fatal Post COVID mRNA-Vaccine Associated Cerebral Ischemia. Neurohospitalist. 2023 Apr;13(2):156-158. doi: 10.1177/19418744221136898. Epub 2022 Dec 5. PMID: 37064937; PMCID: PMC10091442.
Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Background
Venous thromboses have been linked to several COVID-19 vaccines
Here we describe a case of post-Moderna COVID-19 vaccination arterial infarct,
with vaccine-associated diffuse cortical edema,
that was complicated by refractory intracranial hypertension.
Case summary
24 hrs after receiving her first dose of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine,
a 30-year-old female developed severe headache.
Three weeks later she was admitted with subacute headache and confusion.
Imaging initially showed scattered cortical thrombosis with an elevated opening pressure on lumbar puncture.
An external ventricular drain was placed,
but she continued to have elevated intracranial pressure.
Ultimately, she required a hemicraniectomy,
but intractable cerebral edema resulted in her death.
Pathology was consistent with thrombosis and associated inflammatory response.
Conclusion
Though correlational, her medical team surmised that the mRNA vaccine may have contributed to this presentation.
The side effects of COVID-19 infection and vaccination are still incompletely understood.
Though complications are rare, clinicians should be aware of presentations like this one.
More information
Had prior asymptomatic COVID-19 infection three months earlier
24-hours after first dose of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (Moderna).
Developed severe, atypical throbbing bi-frontal headache
Headaches were atypical
(no prior headaches)
Three weeks after vaccination
Developed blurred vision and confusion
Bifrontal headache with photophobia
Lumbar puncture revealed lymphocytosis
Broad spectrum antimicrobial coverage was started.
Her mental status acutely worsened later that evening
New left hemiparesis.
Elevated D-dimer
CSF cultures and PCR testing returned negative
Intracranial pressure remained refractory to maximal medical management,
including deep sedation, paralysis and hypothermia,
prompting a right decompressive hemicraniectomy.
The patient expired from refractory cerebral edema.
Brain autopsy showed infiltrates of CD8 and CD4-positive T-cells,
in association with intravascular thrombi
Fungal and bacterial stains were negative.
Discussion
Diffuse endothelial damage and vessel wall inflammation,
suggested an underlying pro-thrombotic state and T cell inflammatory response.
The arterial infarct in this case is likely related to a pro-thrombotic state
Due to the large volume of infarction, the patient was not started on anticoagulation after extensive discussion of the risks vs potential benefit.
In summary, administration of COVID-19 vaccine was considered a possible cause of the extensive multifocal arterial thromboses with associated inflammatory response and elevated intracranial pressure given the temporal association.
The mechanism for initial elevation in intracranial pressure is not known but may relate to cerebral autoregulatory changes in the setting of cortical microvascular thrombosis.
https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/fatal-post-covid-19-mrna-vaccine?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1119676&post_id=144566381&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=1f3dql&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSAR) such as this would have put a pause on the entire study and an investigation into why this happened and a call for risk mitigation measures to prevent the same complication from happening to more subjects.
21.3K
views
124
comments
Amputation after vaccination
Tickets for event 2 June in Glasgow
https://tickets-scotland.com/brin
X Twitter link for Alex, https://twitter.com/ake2306
Bring on the noise podcasts on Spotify
https://spotify.link/SA55n9tjuJb
Twitter - https://x.com/BringTheNoise_X?t=k1-QbSa16D4GbTcMFr6pug&s=09
Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/bring_the_noise_podcast?igsh=NWtnMXE4dWI1NnIx
34.4K
views
130
comments
NewYork Times vaccine harms
Thousands (or is it millions) believe covid vaccines harmed them
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/03/health/covid-vaccines-side-effects.html
May 3, 2024
Case study, 37 year old woman
Fit and well
Within minutes of getting the Johnson & Johnson Covid-19 vaccine,
felt pain racing from her left arm up to her ear and down to her fingertips.
Within days, she was unbearably sensitive to light and struggled to remember simple facts.
Now, + 3 years
Diagnosed with brain damage, cannot work, drive or stand for long periods of time.
‘devastation of what this has done to my life, and how much I’ve lost’
As of April 2024, over 13,000 vaccine-injury compensation claims filed with the federal government
19% have been reviewed
47% deemed eligible for compensation
https://www.hrsa.gov/cicp/cicp-data
12 claims paid out, average of $3,600
Akiko Iwasaki, immunologist, vaccine expert, Yale University
people who say they have post-vaccination injuries are
“just completely ignored and dismissed and gaslighted,”
Dr. Janet Woodcock, retired, FDA
some recipients, uncommon but “serious” and “life-changing” reactions beyond those described by federal agencies.
“I feel bad for those people,”
“I believe their suffering should be acknowledged, that they have real problems, and they should be taken seriously.”
“I’m disappointed in myself,”
“I did a lot of things I feel very good about, but this is one of the few things I feel I just didn’t bring it home.”
Article then comments on disparate US health care systems
No central repository of vaccine recipients
Government’s compensation fund, officially recognizes few side effects for Covid vaccines.
And vaccine supporters, including federal officials, worry that even a whisper of possible side effects feeds into misinformation spread by a vitriolic anti-vaccine movement.
Patients who believe they experienced serious side effects
say they have received little support or acknowledgment.
SB, 54, nurse practitioner, (man)
New York City
ever since his first Covid shot, merely standing up sent his heart racing, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome
stinging pain in his eyes, mouth and genitals, which has abated, and tinnitus, which has not.
AF
“I can’t get the government to help me,”
“I am told I’m not real.
I’m told I’m rare.
I’m told I’m coincidence.”
RF, 49, physical therapist, (woman)
Seattle
Bell's palsy
dramatic facial rash
shingles
RF reported it to federal databases twice.
“I thought for sure someone would reach out, but no one ever did,”
Interviews with 30 people
Neurological, autoimmune, cardiovascular.
All said they had been turned away by physicians, told their symptoms were psychosomatic, or labeled anti-vaccine by family and friends
BC, doctor, (man)
tinnitus and racing heart lasted about a week after each shot.
GP, doctor, (man)
loud whooshing sound in his ears had accompanied every moment since his first shot,
entreaties to colleagues at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to explore the phenomenon, tinnitus, had led nowhere.
“If they have done studies, those studies should be published,”
CDC recognises
Agency has documented only four serious but rare side effects
Johnson & Johnson vaccine, Guillain Barre, blood clotting disorder
mRNA vaccines, heart inflammation, or myocarditis
Anaphylaxis
Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, director, C.D.C.’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases.
agency’s systems for monitoring vaccine safety are “pretty close” to ideal, he said.
The C.D.C. has said there were no confirmed deaths related to myocarditis, but in fact there have been several accounts of deaths reported post-vaccination.
47.4K
views
207
comments
Vaccine injury journey
Update from Mr. Kyle Warner
Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP)
https://www.hrsa.gov/cicp/cicp-data
CICP Claims Compensated
https://www.hrsa.gov/cicp/cicp-data/table-4
See More from Kyle Warner
@ KyleWarnerMTB - Instagram
@Kyle&April-RideMTB - Youtube
Website- Ridemtb.com
Backlogged: Few cases finished after millions spent investigating COVID vaccine claims
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.investigatetv.com%2F2024%2F04%2F29%2Fbacklogged-few-cases-finished-after-millions-spent-investigating-covid-vaccine-claims%2F&data=05%7C02%7Ckyle.warner%40react19.org%7C69b08b89172e462aa6ff08dc689b595
30.7K
views
72
comments
Kyle goes to DC
Update from Mr. Kyle Warner
Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP)
https://www.hrsa.gov/cicp/cicp-data
CICP Claims Compensated
https://www.hrsa.gov/cicp/cicp-data/table-4
See More from Kyle Warner
@ KyleWarnerMTB - Instagram
@Kyle&April-RideMTB - Youtube
Website- Ridemtb.com
Backlogged: Few cases finished after millions spent investigating COVID vaccine claims
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.investigatetv.com%2F2024%2F04%2F29%2Fbacklogged-few-cases-finished-after-millions-spent-investigating-covid-vaccine-claims%2F&data=05%7C02%7Ckyle.warner%40react19.org%7C69b08b89172e462aa6ff08dc689b595
26.3K
views
92
comments
Accelerated arterial disease
Professor Sherif Sultan, MB BCh MCh MD FRCSI DEVS FISVS FASA DMD FRCS/Vasc EBQS/Vasc FAARM FACS FEVBS PhD
Professor of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery National University of Ireland
Chief of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery at The Galway Clinic
Chairman of Western Vascular Institute
President of International Society for Vascular Surgery University Hospital Galway NUIG & The Galway Clinic
https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:ea3bf115-1a02-4440-a153-6ec0149f258a
https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:95fadfe1-88d4-4708-8729-ef38596cdcee
https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:a4572ad8-0375-4aa7-a6a7-b9ad0a8d78ca
https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:8a9f87d0-e9a3-4af5-9675-d9dfe4f91e28
https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:779ab225-f4bf-4757-a540-62e7036c3fef
https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:893d701f-acd0-4f03-bba3-1a8e0ca8fc2e
22K
views
120
comments
Arterial disease after vaccination
Professor Sherif Sultan, MB BCh MCh MD FRCSI DEVS FISVS FASA DMD FRCS/Vasc EBQS/Vasc FAARM FACS FEVBS PhD
Professor of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery National University of Ireland
Chief of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery at The Galway Clinic
Chairman of Western Vascular Institute
President of International Society for Vascular Surgery University Hospital Galway NUIG & The Galway Clinic
https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:ea3bf115-1a02-4440-a153-6ec0149f258a
https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:95fadfe1-88d4-4708-8729-ef38596cdcee
https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:a4572ad8-0375-4aa7-a6a7-b9ad0a8d78ca
https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:8a9f87d0-e9a3-4af5-9675-d9dfe4f91e28
https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:779ab225-f4bf-4757-a540-62e7036c3fef
https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:893d701f-acd0-4f03-bba3-1a8e0ca8fc2e
26.9K
views
178
comments
Official denial
Direct link to TV Parliament site, https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/168f642a-5708-4b1a-9857-d8eacf475252
Direct link to Hansard
https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-04-18/debates/9F01F787-D758-43D4-B8D1-4FA357EB3EED/Covid-19ResponseAndExcessDeaths
Let me move to some of the questions that we must raise and answer today, openly and transparently, and with full access to ONS record-level data. I am not saying that that should be disclosed to all and sundry, but surely the Government cannot defend the position that they are not willing to release that information to interested clinicians and clinical academics as a minimum. Those are the people who need to interrogate the data. It is of little relevance to me—I do not have the means or academic ability to interpret it—but it is something that interested clinical academics should have access to.
Let me move on to what we know about some of the issues surrounding mRNA technology. We know that it does not replicate locally, as we were assured it would do on launch. It metastasises to distant tissue, and replicates spike protein systemically distant from the site of administration. That is problematic for a number of reasons. According to the University of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish, this has precipitated various serious and sometimes fatal consequences due to antibody development mediated by the spike protein. I will not go into the detail of that, but at a meeting convened by the hon. Member for North West Leicestershire, Professor Dalgleish told us that the UK Government and their agencies are in serious denial about this issue, resulting in many deaths being poorly understood.
Let me give a couple of examples. Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia is one of the principal causes of blood clot formation, which can cause stroke, pulmonary emboli, and other cardiac-related events including heart attacks, all of which can be life-limiting or fatal. Another antibody linked to the
Toggle showing location of Column 528
spike protein exerts an effect on myelin, and is associated with Guillain-Barré syndrome and transverse myelitis, which is a swelling around the spinal cord. Professor Dalgleish believes that that constitutes medical negligence, because the facts are there for all to see. He contends that many deaths are as a direct result of unnecessary vaccination. Furthermore, he advises that there are a greater number of yellow cards in MHRA for covid vaccines than for all other vaccines recorded, and nothing has really been done.
In a recent written answer to me, it was confirmed that the MHRA has received 489,004 spontaneous suspected adverse drug reaction reports relating to the covid-19 vaccine, up to and including 28 February this year. Across the United Kingdom, 2,734 of those reports were associated with a fatal outcome. Of course the true number is unknown—that is the nature of yellow card reporting, as only a fraction of adverse events are reported—and that is probably because of limited public awareness about some of the potential consequences and complications of vaccines, and the well-understood under-reporting of those adverse events. That is important, because the yellow card system is a key element of safe and effective clinical care. If things are not being evaluated properly, I can think of no greater betrayal of the MHRA’s clinical governance responsibility. I suggest that accountability for that must be swift and decisive. The rigorous assessment of these data is essential and must be actioned urgently. Will the Minister now engage with the MHRA and invite it to come to the House to explain the facts on these reports?
Another issue, which arises from a further written question that I tabled, relates to the role of the MHRA. It has a crucial role—in fact, it is a statutory function—to provide post-marketing surveillance and to operate the yellow card system, but the Minister responded to my question about the assessment of the potential implications of the BMJ article “Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is ‘likely’ responsible for deaths of some elderly patients, Norwegian review finds” by stating:
“The MHRA communicates safety advice based upon consideration of the totality of evidence from all relevant information sources, rather than the strengths and limitations of individual data sources.”
Surely, a fundamental step in any meta-analysis of published data is to interrogate the robustness of those data and for the public to have confidence that that is happening.
41.5K
views
298
comments
Midazolam deaths in the UK
Excess Deaths in the United Kingdom: Midazolam and Euthanasia in the COVID-19 Pandemic
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377266988_Excess_Deaths_in_the_United_Kingdom_Midazolam_and_Euthanasia_in_the_COVID-19_Pandemic
Citation: Wilson Sy (2024) Excess Deaths in the United Kingdom: Midazolam and Euthanasia in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Medical & Clinical Research, 9(2), 01-21.
Macro-data during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom (UK) are shown to have significant data anomalies and inconsistencies with existing explanations.
England 2020
UK spike in deaths,
wrongly attributed to COVID-19 in April 2020,
was not due to SARS-CoV-2 virus,
which was largely absent,
but was due to the widespread use of Midazolam injections,
which were statistically very highly correlated (coefficient over 90 percent) with excess deaths in all regions of England during 2020.
Importantly
Excess deaths remained elevated following mass vaccination in 2021,
but were statistically uncorrelated to COVID injections,
while remaining significantly correlated to Midazolam injections.
The widespread and persistent use of Midazolam in UK suggests a possible policy of systemic euthanasia.
Unlike Australia, where assessing the statistical impact of COVID injections on excess deaths is relatively straightforward,
UK excess deaths were closely associated with the use of Midazolam and other medical intervention.
The UK iatrogenic pandemic
Caused by euthanasia deaths from Midazolam and also,
likely caused by COVID injections,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374261986_Early_Indication_of_Long-Term_Impact_of_COVID_Injections
but their relative impacts are difficult to measure from the data, due to causal proximity of euthanasia.
Global investigations of COVID-19 epidemiology,
based only on the relative impacts of COVID disease and vaccination,
may be inaccurate, due to the neglect of significant confounding factors in some countries.
36.5K
views
157
comments
Genetically modified organisms
Are the Covid-19 drugs produced by Pfizer and Moderna GMOs or genetically modified organisms?
https://julesonthebeach.substack.com/p/zee-fda-had-zee-science-but-intentionally
https://www.givesendgo.com/GAVAZ
An Australian Federal Court case has evidence to say they are GMOs
Case File Number: VID510/2023
Dr Julian Fidge v. Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd & Moderna Pty Ltd
Dr Fidge is an Australian medical doctor and trained pharmacist.
The case has been brought under the Australian Gene Technology Act 2000
Section 10 of Gene Technology Act defines what a Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) is.
First, an Organism is:
‘any biological entity’
‘capable of transferring genetic material’
The Pfizer and Moderna Covid products contain LNP-modRNA complexes
These complexes satisfy being called ‘any biological entity’ under the law
The modRNA is genetic material
The Lipid Nanoparticles or LNPs encapsulate the modRNA and together bio-distribute and transfer the LNP-modRNA complexes throughout the human body
The LNPs then transfect and transfer the modRNA cargo across cell membranes to deliver the modRNA inside cells
By moving the modRNA about the body and then into cells, the LNP-modRNA complexes physically transfer genetic material after injection
So the Organism part of the GMO definition is satisfied by the physical mode of transport of the LNP-modRNA complexes
The next part of the GMO legal definition is – a Genetically Modified Organism is:
an organism that has been modified by gene technology
The Gene Technology part requires showing:
any technique for the modification of genes or other genetic material.
Pfizer and Moderna admit they modify genes to create modified RNA or modRNA for their products
The MHRA, EMA, FDA, and TGA when approving the Covid-19 products recognised Pfizer and Moderna use modified nucleosides for the modRNA
In the TGA Australian approval for Pfizer for example, the TGA notes:
The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, BNT162b2 mRNA (tradename Comirnaty), comprises a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2.
Pfizer and Moderna create their modified nucleosides in the lab using recombinant techniques
So the Gene Technology part of the GMO legal definition is also satisfied
This means the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 products satisfy the Australian legal definitions for being properly called GMOs
Under the Australian Gene Technology Act anyone who ‘deals’ with a GMO in Australia must be regulated under a GMO licence
Pfizer and Moderna failed to apply for GMO licences in Australia
Dealing with GMOs in Australia without a GMO licence is a serious criminal offense under Section 32 of the Gene Technology Act 2000
In fact the boss of Australia’s Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, or OGTR, recently admitted to an Australian Senate Committee that both the Pfizer and Moderna products are GMOs
No Australian was told by the OGTR or the TGA that they were being asked to receive Genetically Modified Organisms or GMOs when getting a Covid-19 injection
This is not just an Australian GMO legal issue
In the United Kingdom Genetically Modified Organisms are dealt with under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and specifically Section 106 under Part VI
The United Kingdom legal definitions for what is regarded as a GMO is almost identical to the Australian legal definitions we just looked at
Like in Australia, the United Kingdom requires new GMOs to be subjected to an extensive Risk Assessment
Even after an extensive Risk Assessment the United Kingdom Secretary of State still has to provide a Consent before a GMO can be introduced into the United Kingdom
The MHRA knew United Kingdom GMO legal definitions applied to Pfizer and Moderna because it is their job to know and they have GMO experts
But both Pfizer and Moderna applied for marketing approvals under the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 which exempted them from having to undergo a GMO Risk Assessment for their Covid-19 products
And because of that exemption neither company had to mention on the Product Information that their products contain GMOs even though they satisfy the legal definitions
40K
views
309
comments
Excess deaths and hidden data
Original video link
https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/168f642a-5708-4b1a-9857-d8eacf475252
Hansard link
https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-04-18/debates/9F01F787-D758-43D4-B8D1-4FA357EB3EED/Covid-19ResponseAndExcessDeaths
We know, by all the different measures, that many more people are dying now than were before the pandemic.
In particular, the impact on people’s hearts, and increasingly younger people’s hearts, deserves attention. The British Heart Foundation reported last June that since the start of the pandemic, 100,000 more people have died than would have been expected. That is surely significant cause for us to take this question seriously.
We know that there are adverse effects from the vaccination. Everybody acknowledges that; it is a question of the extent to which those effects have been manifested.
I am afraid, is that the MHRA is significantly deficient in the way it operates. The Cumberlege report—this was referenced in the earlier debate—raised concerns about the way treatments are regulated and licensed that have not yet been addressed.
I am afraid that through the covid episode many of the same concerns were manifested in relation to the vaccines.
We now know that the MHRA knew about the effect of the AstraZeneca vaccine on blood clotting as early as February 2021, but issued a warning about that only some months later—in April, a month after other countries had suspended the AZ vaccine. The MHRA also knew about the prevalence of heart problems and myocarditis in February 2021 but did nothing about it until June that year. In the intervening time, millions of people were vaccinated without the knowledge that the MHRA had. As has been said, we found out recently that Pfizer misrepresented the safety and efficacy of the vaccine. There has been very little comeback against it for that, and no meaningful fine. As we heard, just a few thousands pounds were charged in expenses.
The regulatory system that oversees the pharmaceutical companies is surely deeply conflicted, not least due to being partly funded by the pharmaceutical companies that it was set up to represent.
It is significant and of concern that they have made so much money out of the vaccines, and so far do not appear to be making due recompense for some of the acknowledged harms— I am not talking about the wilder claims—that their vaccines have been responsible for. Will the Minister enlighten us on whether the indemnities against civil and Government action that the Government awarded to the vaccine manufacturers at the beginning of the production process still apply if it transpires that the companies misled the Government and the public about the safety and efficacy of their product?
The inquiry has been mentioned. There are so many unanswered questions and apparent red flags that it surprises me that the media and Parliament are not more up in arms about excess deaths.
I am surprised that more attention is not being paid to this question.
The fact is that this scandal—if it is a scandal—suits no one in high places in our country.
It is true that we have an inquiry, but as the hon. Member for Blackley and Broughton said, surely it is asking the wrong questions.
It is very concerning that the module looking at the vaccination programme has been postponed.
It strikes me that the inquiry is essentially asking the wrong questions; it is really just asking why we did not do more lockdowns quicker. That seems to be its prevailing question for the experts—not whether the whole response was the right one, and crucially, in the light of what we now know, whether the final response of a mass vaccination programme was as safe and effective as was claimed.
We are rightly proud in this country of the effectiveness, speed and operation of the vaccine production and roll-out. It was a triumph of effective collaboration between Government and the private sector. The operation of the roll-out was a victory that all people can acknowledge, but it is not enough to say that the roll-out was done well. Was it done safely? Did it need to be done on the scale on which it was done? Particularly, did young people need to be vaccinated at all? We all remember Kate Bingham and others saying early on that the vaccine was only for the older population. These questions are increasingly being asked by the public and raised in the media.
Let me conclude quickly with what I have been doing. I hope that we will get more answers from the Minister than I have had so far from the Government. On 17 April 2023—a year ago yesterday—I wrote privately to the Secretary of State, asking him for evidence that justified the Government’s assertion that there was no link between the vaccines and the excess deaths. I did that because I had so much correspondence from people raising that concern.
45.8K
views
105
comments