The Full English Show

The law can create a legal fiction. The monarch - The King or Queen is a legal fiction. The prime minister is a legal fiction. Why? they are created by the law. It may be beneficial to understand classes of criminal cases where individuals charged have a charge changed from the norm. Murder and Treason are an example. To murder a Judge is not Murder, it is Treason, to Murder the monarch or the monarch’s direct family is not murder it is Treason. The murderer is no longer a murderer he is a Traitor. The class of person caused by the offence, upon the victim, as a class of person. Likewise, the sentence changes. No class of people are above the law, however so high, the law is above you. If a member of the public was to murder a bus driver, the murderer would receive a tariffed life sentence. The second less obvious class of case is the murder of a police officer doing his duty. The sentence imposed is often a 30-year tariff. If it was premeditated, with no remorse, a whole life sentence tariff would be passed. This was put in place to protect police officers doing their lawful duty. This is right and a deterrent. The Criminal Justice Act 1988 section 134 was an act of parliament that created a “class of offender”. That is to say the class of offenders were state officials acting as state officials at the time of the offence. The class of offender if convicted is called a torturer. A torturer is the enemy of all mankind. Torture is often misconceived as to extract information, in fact it is defined wider than that, to include coerce or intimidate and the coercion and intimidation does not have to be the claimant it could be those around the claimant. All state officials including police constables are crown servants. If a member of the public was to beat, wound, kill, cause severe pain or suffering to an individual other than a monarch or judge he or she would stand charged as normal charging or indictment. However, if a police constable committed these offences acting as a police officer and many have. The crime changes to torture. For a reason. For example, GBH with attempted section 18 becomes torture if the arrest is unlawful or the level of violence used is unlawful. Likewise, malicious prosecution becomes “causing suffering” suicides on bail are often the result. To protect the public from the few hundred rogue constables and to act as a deterrent. It was not the intention of the act to give immunity via paragraph 135. But immunity they have. Bear in mind last year 23 members of the public were killed after or during arrest 5 of which died during restraint, hundreds have died since 1988 with no access to justice approximately 560 deaths 3500 serious unlawful violence in 35 years. There are hundreds of violent incidents perpetuated each year by the police, some causing the death of detainees. There is no known test for this indictment. Not a single police constable since 1988 has been indicted. This looks like immunity. These are worth reading. https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2011-0115-judgment.pdf https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-150618.pdf https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-131015.pdf

The law can create a legal fiction. The monarch - The King or Queen is a legal fiction. The prime minister is a legal fiction. Why? they are created by the law. It may be beneficial to understand classes of criminal cases where individuals charged have a charge changed from the norm. Murder and Treason are an example. To murder a Judge is not Murder, it is Treason, to Murder the monarch or the monarch’s direct family is not murder it is Treason. The murderer is no longer a murderer he is a Traitor. The class of person caused by the offence, upon the victim, as a class of person. Likewise, the sentence changes. No class of people are above the law, however so high, the law is above you. If a member of the public was to murder a bus driver, the murderer would receive a tariffed life sentence. The second less obvious class of case is the murder of a police officer doing his duty. The sentence imposed is often a 30-year tariff. If it was premeditated, with no remorse, a whole life sentence tariff would be passed. This was put in place to protect police officers doing their lawful duty. This is right and a deterrent. The Criminal Justice Act 1988 section 134 was an act of parliament that created a “class of offender”. That is to say the class of offenders were state officials acting as state officials at the time of the offence. The class of offender if convicted is called a torturer. A torturer is the enemy of all mankind. Torture is often misconceived as to extract information, in fact it is defined wider than that, to include coerce or intimidate and the coercion and intimidation does not have to be the claimant it could be those around the claimant. All state officials including police constables are crown servants. If a member of the public was to beat, wound, kill, cause severe pain or suffering to an individual other than a monarch or judge he or she would stand charged as normal charging or indictment. However, if a police constable committed these offences acting as a police officer and many have. The crime changes to torture. For a reason. For example, GBH with attempted section 18 becomes torture if the arrest is unlawful or the level of violence used is unlawful. Likewise, malicious prosecution becomes “causing suffering” suicides on bail are often the result. To protect the public from the few hundred rogue constables and to act as a deterrent. It was not the intention of the act to give immunity via paragraph 135. But immunity they have. Bear in mind last year 23 members of the public were killed after or during arrest 5 of which died during restraint, hundreds have died since 1988 with no access to justice approximately 560 deaths 3500 serious unlawful violence in 35 years. There are hundreds of violent incidents perpetuated each year by the police, some causing the death of detainees. There is no known test for this indictment. Not a single police constable since 1988 has been indicted. This looks like immunity. These are worth reading. https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2011-0115-judgment.pdf https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-150618.pdf https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-131015.pdf

Why are the free thinkers and small government individualists suckered into believing Russell Brand is a good guy? He is not. Fabians are wolves in sheep's clothing. In this this video he mentions three names he promotes Naomi Klein, Noam Chomsky, Thomas Piketty. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EV8NMLFP6U 3m in

Don't forget tonight's show. You'll love this. email events@davidstarkey.com Dear Dr. David Starkey, I hope this email finds you well. I am an avid follower of your work as an English historian, particularly your recent videos on the British Union Parliament. Your insightful analysis on the state of Britain as a political union and the drawbacks of such a system have resonated with many like-minded individuals. It is with great appreciation for your expertise that I am writing to you today. In your recent videos, you have eloquently highlighted the argument that Britain is not a single country but rather a collection of distinct nations each with its own unique identity and history. Your emphasis on the idea of returning to a confederacy of shires and counties, akin to the decentralised governance of the past, is a compelling vision for many who believe in the merits of local autonomy and accountability. Moreover, your discussions about the historical foundations of our constitution as a potential saviour for our current political challenges have struck a chord with me. It is clear that our constitutional heritage holds the key to finding solutions to the complex issues facing our nation today. I would like to humbly propose a topic for your future video content – Ashby v White 1703. This historic case has profound significance in the context of our constitutional history, and your expertise in this area would undoubtedly shed valuable light on its importance. Exploring the legal intricacies of the case and its implications for our constitutional development would be both enlightening and instructive for your audience. Furthermore, I share your concern about the erosion of democratic values and the growing disillusionment with the political system. The notion that "tacit agreement" with corruption is not voting and the idea of writing "I DO NOT CONSENT" on a ballot as a legitimate and non-violent means of expressing dissatisfaction and demanding accountability is thought-provoking. It is a unique form of protest with constitutional legal impact that deserves more attention and understanding [Ashby v White 1703 both the law lords and Queen Anne backed the people over parliament]. Indeed England is the only Country in the world with this solution available. I believe that your expertise and ability to communicate complex historical and constitutional concepts would make such a video not only informative but also empowering for those seeking avenues to effect positive change within our political system. Thank you for your dedication to preserving and sharing our rich history, and for your contributions to the ongoing discussions about our nation's future. I look forward to the possibility of seeing a video from you on these topics and hope that it can inspire greater awareness and engagement with our constitutional heritage Please note I have a Rumble channel and we run The English Constitution Society. The channel is called The Full English Show. https://englishconstitutionparty.com/2023/05/22/spoilt-ballot-vs-abstention/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59naXN4d9g4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O46y9iKI7Vg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lu22nG7CN8Q

Pubs open and time to have a chat about how we send a claim of right letter and who too? https://englishconstitutionparty.com/2023/05/22/spoilt-ballot-vs-abstention/

send email to godfrey.bloom.official@outlook.com subject - Spoilt Ballots are counted and recorded for a constitutional reason. Godfrey Bloom. Spoilt Ballots are counted and recorded for a constitutional reason. You have inadvertently misled your audience, please correct the miss instruction else you are assisting the enemy. The reason I say you - inadvertently misled - is that I know you are a Yorkshire/English patriot. Constitutional law via Ashby vs White 1703 (full Judgement) 10 -2 House of Lords and Queen Anne stated ALL BALLOTS MUST BE COUNTED as they relate to "consent" irrelevant of who wins. It is on our website. The only political party telling people - to write I DO NOT CONSENT (as allowed by law) across their ballot paper. English Constitution Society/English Constitution Party. There is a video and detailed explainer - We are one of three groups that support - I DO NOT CONSENT - NONE OF THE ABOVE - SPOILT BALLOT England is unique to have a democratic constitutional solution to clearing out parliament non violently. Every Englishman has a Cromwellian right to delegitimise parliament. https://englishconstitutionparty.com/2023/05/22/spoilt-ballot-vs-abstention/ [Your Name]

We live in a surreal world where we pay for non existent protection.

When Juries speak and dollars or gold is involved then they will listen. You must claim your rights. https://englishconstitutionparty.com/2023/05/22/spoilt-ballot-vs-abstention/

Good day. They left the best till last.

Things are heating up in the USA and here in England. How many are coming to Reigate on Sunday? It starts at 12pm.

The letter has been sent by Charles and we await the reply.

Has parliament acted unlawfully by repealing any part of the Bill of Rights 1688? In my opinion yes. But what will be the opinion of the courts? https://englishconstitutionparty.com/2023/08/19/parallel-sanctums-equivalence-of-constitutional-statutes-and-convention-parliaments-in-legal-safeguarding/

This is all part of the plan and we are just sitting back. These people are evil. Not new https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/05/30/asda-issa-brothers-petrol-station-eg-group-merger/

The video conveys the message clearly. It's been banned on Twitter. I believe the situation regarding the nurse in the UK allegedly causing the deaths of babies might potentially be a deception. They aim to demonstrate that statistics (or science, if you will) can be manipulated. Consider Professor Neil Ferguson, who not only taught statistics but also how to employ them deceitfully. What if the case were to be appealed, and the appeal succeeded? What if people were then presented with the evidence of manipulation? In American law, it's referred to as the Brady rule, where you are obligated to reveal exculpatory evidence, which supports innocence. In the case of the nurse, they presented statistics through a prism of guilt, whereas the majority or more comprehensive statistics revealed exculpatory evidence of innocence. What if the Brady rule were applied in the Trump case to demonstrate that he was correct in his claim that the election was rigged? This would entail the presentation of evidence from states, courts, and the military. The Brady rule, in the context of American criminal law, requires prosecutors to disclose any exculpatory evidence to the defence. Exculpatory evidence is evidence that could potentially prove the defendant's innocence or undermine the prosecution's case. It's named after the U.S. Supreme Court case Brady v. Maryland (1963), which established this principle. In my scenario, i'm suggesting that if the Brady rule were used in the Trump case, it would involve the revelation of evidence that supports his assertion that the election was rigged. This evidence would come from various sources, including state authorities, court proceedings, and possibly the military. Applying the Brady rule in this context would mean ensuring that all relevant information, whether it supports Trump's claim or not, is made available to the defence and the public, thereby allowing for a more transparent and fair examination of the election'sintegrity. Some strange things happening I'll go through them tonight.

This world is getting madder and madder by the day.

Big news from America, Elon is also under attack. They have weaponised the law. TIME to take it back. https://englishconstitutionparty.com/2023/08/31/jans-back-minerals-and-home-schooling/

Jan is coming back on Thursday. More minerals and health. But Home Schooling and how to do it. Tonight. https://englishconstitutionparty.com/2023/08/30/home-schooling/

Absolute Zero - Cambridge University - 15m cities https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/api/core/bitstreams/75916920-51f6-4f9c-ade5-52cbf55d5e73/content Scotland gets international advice on Self Determination https://assets.nationbuilder.com/albaparty/pages/659/attachments/original/1687279203/OPINION_ON_MATTERS_RELATING_TO_INTERNATIONAL_LEGAL_ISSUES_CONCERNING_THE_RIGHT_TO_SELF-DETERMINATION_FOR_THE_PEOPLE_OF_SCOTLAND.pdf?1687279203 and finally The NHS and elderly care - or any care for that matter. paragraph 200 - NHS care is free at the point of delivery. The funding provided by ICBs in NHS Continuing Healthcare packages should be sufficient to meet the needs identified in the care plan. Therefore, it is not permissible for individuals to be asked to make any payments towards meeting theirassessedneeds. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/consumer-affairs/how-to-reclaim-nursing-home-fees-nhs-pay-retirement/?WT.mc_id=e_DM180250&WT.tsrc=email&etype=Loy_Dig_Acq_Sat_0Dto7D&utmsource=email https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1170290/National-Framework-for-NHS-Continuing-Healthcare-and-NHS-funded-Nursing-Care_July-2022-revised_corrected-July-2023.pdf https://rumble.com/v3237fg-national-framework-for-england-nhs-continuing-care.html https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-nhs-constitution-for-england/the-nhs-constitution-for-england

Tonight we will have live show plus my hang over. Not much of one. https://englishconstitutionparty.com/2023/03/14/digital-bill-of-rights-for-the-protection-of-individual-privacy-and-freedom/

First 10 minutes will be a Scott Ritter interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEdA846aN18 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4686540/Equipment-ammo-contributed-plane-crash.html

When an interview on one platform - X - produces over 200m views in less than 24hrs would you say the deep state have an issue. He has promised to deport 15m illegals using the military and domestic law enforcement. He has promised to drain the swamp. He has promised to put America first. Would you want to hear him? https://englishconstitutionparty.com/2023/06/03/the-peoples-freedom-convention-at-runnymede-the-land-of-liberty-and-freedom-27th-august-2023/

These elites will try again to lock us down and this time throw away the key. Police will be enforcing the lockdown WITH VIOLENCE and say it is for your own safety. Who is with me in saying NEVER AGAIN. Runnmede Sunday. 27th August 2023 FREEDOM CONVENTION https://englishconstitutionparty.com/2023/06/03/the-peoples-freedom-convention-at-runnymede-the-land-of-liberty-and-freedom-27th-august-2023/

Why has GB News suddenly started to see the light? I don't think they have I think they are playing a political game.

This is literally the elites using "pretended laws" to deceive. It is fraud. https://englishconstitutionparty.com/2023/06/03/the-peoples-freedom-convention-at-runnymede-the-land-of-liberty-and-freedom-27th-august-2023/

Pub is open is it me or is time flying by? https://englishconstitutionparty.com/2023/06/03/the-peoples-freedom-convention-at-runnymede-the-land-of-liberty-and-freedom-27th-august-2023/