ChaunceysGarden

Our history has been fabricated. The official timeline of our recent past, does not match our reality. Our Rockefeller "his-story" books are pure fabrication. There has been a massive cover-up. Director Sean Hibbeler Writer Sean Hibbeler Stars Lord Jamar | B.J. Penn | Max Igan

When the crisis became a business Former London banker Alexander Pohl worked for years for one of the world's greenest banks. Idealistically driven he financed big wind and solar farms genuinely convinced he was making the world a better place. Gradually he woke up to the fact that today's green is actually an ego-driven, corrupt, and broken system. He gave up banking and emigrated with his family to his little forest paradise in remote, northern Sweden. The dream was to get back to Nature, start an eco-farm and put as much distance as he could between his family and the industrialization of nature. Until….. A wind park was planned at the gates of his paradise garden. Documentarian Poels and Alexander Pohl are taking the journey together…. to ask questions and unravel the green wonderland to its true core …

After eight years of travelling through conflict and poverty zones, Marijn Poels – a progressive filmmaker – decided to take some time off. In the Austrian mountains no less. It confronts him unexpectedly with the roots of agriculture and its modern day perspective. Globalisation and climate politics are causing radical changes such as farmers becoming energy suppliers. But the green ideology raises questions. The scientific topic of climate change has now become incontrovertibly a matter of world politics. Poels faces a personal conflict. Are we doing the right thing? The Uncertainty Has Settled is the first film within a planned trilogy by Marijn Poels. “What is so beautiful and compelling in this documentary is the ignorance of the maker”, Jan Jakobs wrote in his review. “Marijn stumbles from one surprise to another. You can see his disbelief and amazement and sometimes even read the despair on his face. The beautiful images and transitions, along with the necessary rest points, provide the viewer with the necessary breaks but at the same time evoke a desire for more information. The way in which the issue is addressed, the words used to interpret the information, make the film extremely suitable for all and sundry. Even for those who thought there was only one opinion on the subject of climate change and CO2. There are also the conversations with ordinary people, who are victims of the remote and detached politics in Europe, which add so much more to this documentary than just a collection of facts to show that you are in the right. The human factor is ever present; the painful exposure of failed politics aimed at reducing human CO2, the devastating consequences for the landscape and nature, the income of entire populations that disappears and farmers who are busy producing energy instead of food. It eats away at the sense of justice of a man such as Marijn Poels”.

Return To Eden - It’s all about coming home. When Natural and human interests impinge on each other and over-regulation disturbs our biological balance. important questions arise. Do we belong to nature or does nature belongs to us? A thought-provoking story in which documentary maker Marijn Poels explores the human urge to control our climate, security and preferably the other. Balancing on a razor-thin line between regulation and manipulation. When technology reigns supreme and common sense vaporizes through the test of time, humanity is on the brink of becoming the tool. Miles away from the collective panic, fear and chaos, there is hope, inspiration and reconnection.

People who dare to question important themes today, are often silenced or labeled as suspicious and dangerous. Where once democracies valued and encouraged debate society is dividing itself with stark lines between the left, the right, the good or the bad. What is strangling debate? How liberal is the West? Should we ignore or embrace other perspectives? A critical, thought-provoking journey through ancient tribal conflicts, in a new era wherein world views clash and free speech crumbles under pressure to conform. —Marijn Poels

THE SALIENT FEATURE of the 20th century was the collective suicide of the White race. In 1900 we ruled the world. We ruled politically, militarily, culturally, economically, scientifically, and in every other way. No other race even came close. We ruled India and Africa directly, and China was for all practical purposes an economic colony of Europe and America. The Chinese Emperor remained on his throne only so long as he let White men have their way in China. Japan was the only non-White nation of any significance that even had pretensions of autonomy. We had superior weapons, superior armed forces, superior communications, superior transportation, superior agriculture and industry, superior standards of health, superior organization, superiority in every facet of science and technology. We had the best universities — really, the only universities worthy of the name — the best engineers. We built things that other races couldn’t even imagine. We explored, we conquered, we ruled. More important than anything else was our moral superiority — and please don’t misunderstand my use of that term. I don’t mean that we were meek and inoffensive and turned the other cheek. I mean that we were proud and self-confident. We knew who we were, and we knew that we were far, far better than anyone else, and we weren’t at all embarrassed by the fact that we were better. We recognized racial differences in the same way we recognized that the sun rises in the east, and we felt not the slightest need to apologize to anyone for that. Egalitarianism was a moral and mental disease that afflicted only a few of our people, despite the murderous outburst of egalitarian insanity that was the French Revolution a century earlier. Any sort of racial mixing was abhorrent to us. We looked on miscegenation with the same disgust and disapproval as on bestiality or necrophilia. We didn’t tolerate it. And we didn’t accept or trust Jews. That was our situation a century ago. We did have some faults, however: some very serious faults. We were not vigilant. We were so confident in our superiority that we failed to heed the warnings of the few among us who were vigilant. We didn’t pay attention when a few warned us, “Hey, we’d better do something about the race problem. We have nine million non-Whites in the United States, according to the 1900 census, and in the future they could become a real problem for us. Let’s start getting rid of them now.” We thought, “Well, as long as they stay on their side of town and stay out of sight, how can they be a problem for us? Besides, they’re useful for picking cotton and as cleaning women and cooks and gardeners.” And when a few warned us about the Jews we also didn’t pay attention. A few warned us about the damage the Jews had done to us in the past, about their malevolence, about their growing wealth, but most of us didn’t take the warnings seriously. We saw the Jews as obnoxious and unpleasant people, and we didn’t let them into our private clubs and our better hotels, but we didn’t consider them really dangerous. We didn’t even become alarmed when they began buying up our newspapers and elbowing their way into other propaganda media. And lack of vigilance wasn’t our only fault. We were too ready to quarrel with one another. No other race was seen as a threat to ours, so we felt no need to suppress our internal rivalries and jealousies and hatreds and form a solid front against the non-White world. We let fester old rivalries between the English and the Germans and between the Germans and the French and between the English and the Boers in South Africa and between those of us who spoke Germanic languages and those of us who spoke Slavic or Romance languages. We didn’t notice our faults, our weaknesses — but others did. The latter half of the 19th century saw not only the beginning of the acquisition of our mass media by the Jews, but also the nearly simultaneous hatching of two long-term, murderous conspiracies designed to exploit our weaknesses and turn them against us. These two conspiracies were Zionism and Marxism. Some Jews went with one, some with the other, but both were deadly for us. The Marxists issued their Communist Manifesto as far back as the middle of the 19th century, but it was another 50 years before they were able to have much of an impact on the Gentile world. As for the Zionists, they also began propagandizing and organizing about the middle of the 19th century and only became noticeable at the beginning of the 20th century, when they began having international Zionist congresses and more or less openly laying their plans to foment wars and revolutions, of which they could take advantage to promote Jewish interests. For example, at the Zionist Congress in 1897, in Basel, Switzerland, the Zionist leader Theodor Herzl told his fellow Jews that they were having trouble persuading the Turks, who at that time controlled Palestine, to turn the country over to them, but that the Jewish leaders had plans for getting around the Turks. And I should mention that Herzl’s address to the 1897 Zionist Congress has been published in a number of places, and any diligent researcher can dig up a copy. Herzl said: It may be that Turkey will refuse us or will be unable to understand us. This will not discourage us. We will seek other means to accomplish our end. The Orient question is now a question of the day. Sooner or later it will bring about a conflict among the nations. . . . The great European war must come. With my watch in hand do I await this terrible moment. After the great European war is ended the peace conference will assemble. We must be ready for that time. Remember, Herzl was talking about the Jews’ plans 17 years before the outbreak of the First World War. But the Jews were ready when the time came. In 1916, with the war more or less stalemated, they approached Britain’s political leaders and made a deal to bring the United States into the war on the side of Britain in return for a British promise to take Palestine away from Turkey and turn it over to the Jews after the war. The British side of the deal was made public in the so-called Balfour Declaration. And the Zionists kept their end of the bargain by working through Jews close to the Democratic President of the United States, Woodrow Wilson. Wilson had won the election to his second term in the White House in 1916 by promising America’s voters that he would keep the United States out of the European war. But as soon as he took office in 1917 he began scheming to get the country into the war on the side of Britain, which, of course, he did two months later. That cost a couple of million additional Gentile lives, but it got Palestine for the Jews — and it also prolonged the war enough for the Jews in Russia to topple the czar and get their communist revolution off the ground. When I said that some Jews took the Marxist route and some the Zionist route, I didn’t mean that all Jews became active workers in one or the other of those movements. Most Jews remained full-time money-grubbers and provided propaganda and financial support for their conspiratorial brethren, continuing to buy up mass media and to dispense capital to the Zionists or the communists as needed. And they didn’t wait for the First World War for that. The first big Gentile bloodletting of the last century in which they had a hand was the Boer War in South Africa, between the British and the Boers. This cruel and murderous war, in which Jewish capitalists were allied with British capitalists against South Africa’s Dutch and German and French farmers — the Boers — laid the foundations for Jewish control of much of Africa’s mineral wealth. In 1904 the Jewish Wall Street speculator Jacob Schiff, planning ahead for a communist takeover of Russia, helped to finance the Japanese side in the Russian-Japanese war and used his influence to block loans to the Czar’s government from America. This was the same Jacob Schiff who a little more than a decade later provided the Jewish-Bolshevik movement with an infusion of $25 million to finish the job in Russia: that’s $25 million from capitalist Wall Street to finance the communist butchery of Gentile Russians. In 1917 $25 million was a lot of money; in any case it bought enough bombs and bullets and communist propaganda leaflets to get the job done. Now, none of this Jewish activity was really secret. The lemmings didn’t know about it, because it wasn’t in the funny papers or the movies. But Jews weren’t even trying to keep their sympathies or their activities secret, and observant Gentiles continued to issue warnings to anyone who would listen. But, as I said a moment ago, we weren’t vigilant. White Americans didn’t believe that they were in any danger. Things such as the deal to bring America into the First World War in return for the turning of Palestine over to the Jews were too subtle for the American mind. After the war the mass murder of Ukrainians and Russians by Jewish-Bolshevik commissars might possibly have registered with White Americans, except that the average White American didn’t think of Russians and Ukrainians as real people: they spoke a different language and dressed differently from us. And besides, by that time the Jews had gotten a pretty good grip on Hollywood and the broadcasting industry, and so the only side of the story that most Americans were allowed to see or hear was the Jewish side. Europeans were more vigilant than Americans. For one thing Europeans had longer memories: they were more aware of the long history of Jewish scheming and predation than Americans were. For another thing, in Europe the danger was quite a bit closer. Communist parties in a number of European countries besides Russia had taken advantage of the chaos in the wake of the war to make grabs for power, and in a few countries — Hungary, for example — they succeeded temporarily. People noticed the ethnicity of the commissars and were horrified by their behavior toward the Gentile populations. Even in insular Britain no less a public figure than Winston Churchill spoke out clearly about the danger of Jewish communism. In a full-page feature article in the February 8, 1920, issue of London’s Illustrated Sunday Herald, Churchill wrote: This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weisshaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky in Russia, Bela Kun in Hungary, Rosa Luxembourg in Germany, and Emma Goldman in the United States, this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality has been steadily growing. It played . . . a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the nineteenth century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. "There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky or of Zinovieff . . . or of Krassin or Radek — all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commission for Combating Counter-Revolution [the Cheka] has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.” Actually, Churchill said quite a bit more in this article about the dangers of allowing Jewish communism to go unchecked, and if you really want to make a study of the background of our present mess you should read the entire article yourself. That’s the February 8, 1920, issue of the Illustrated Sunday Herald. If you can’t find it yourself in a large research library, the entire article is photographically reproduced in the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard Tabloid, which is available from the sponsor of this program. And when you do find the article from which I just read — a major article written by one of the most prominent personalities of the last century and published in a major British newspaper — you might ask yourself why you had never heard of it before I called it to your attention. As I said, we lacked vigilance. A few people paid attention — America’s pioneer automaker Henry Ford, for example — but most White Americans were too busy with their ball games and funny papers. And we didn’t really care about what the Jews were doing to White people overseas, since they weren’t Americans. About the only people who really paid attention were the Germans, who resolved not to let the Jews do to them what they had done to the Russians and had tried to do to the Hungarians. So they proceeded to get Rosa Luxembourg and her pals off their backs and out of Germany. And when the Germans did that, the Jews in America began screaming bloody murder and calling for another world war to save them from the Germans. And by this time the Jews had almost a monopoly on getting their side of the story to the American public. Well, our people had one other fault in addition to an inadequate sense of racial solidarity with other Whites around the world and a lack of vigilance: we also lacked responsible leadership. We lacked even a system for giving us responsible leadership. What we had were politicians: skilled liars — actors, lawyers — who never asked themselves, “What policy is good for our people?” but only, “How can I get elected? What must I promise the people in order to get their votes? What policy will make me popular?” And as the grip of the Jews on the mass media, on Hollywood and Madison Avenue — and therefore on the minds of the public — became more and more nearly complete throughout the last century, the question the politicians asked themselves became, more and more: “What must I do to please the Jews and gain their support?” And so in 1933, in the same year that a German government took office with a policy of freeing the German people from the grip of the Jews, in America a government took office with a policy of doing whatever the Jews wanted done. Franklin Roosevelt surrounded himself with more Jews than any previous American President. In this regard he was the Bill Clinton of his day. Using Roosevelt as their willing tool, the Jews pulled the same sort of bait-and-switch trick on the American people to get us into the Second World War that they had pulled using Woodrow Wilson to get us into the First World War. Just as Wilson had done 24 years earlier, Roosevelt ran for re-election in 1940 on a campaign promise to keep the United States out of the war in Europe, and while he was making that promise to the American people he was actively scheming with his Jewish advisors and supporters to get the United States into the war as soon as he could, and meanwhile to keep the war in Europe going by making promises of support to those countries opposed to Germany. It was fighting on the wrong side of that war, more than anything else, that laid us low. It also destroyed the British Empire and laid Britain low. Throughout the non-White world Whites began abdicating their rule, withdrawing, apologizing. The disease of egalitarianism spread like wildfire. There was a moral collapse throughout the White world. It wasn’t just the German people who lost the Second World War; it was all Europeans, all White people, including European-Americans. The Jews were the only real winners. The First World War resulted in opening up Palestine for their Zionist faction and delivering Russia to their communist faction. The Second World War not only saved them from getting booted out of Europe by Hitler, it delivered all of eastern and much of central Europe to their communist faction and finished delivering Palestine to their Zionist faction. The war cost them a million or so of the less-nimble Jews in Europe, but it gave them the basis for their enormously profitable “Holocaust” story, with which they have beaten the White world over the head ever since. And so today we have George Bush trying to outdo Bill Clinton in multiculturalizing the government of the United States. Conservative Americans, patriotic Americans, put their hope in Bush to pull America back from the insanity of the Clinton era, and the first thing Bush does is try to ingratiate himself with the Clintonistas, with the Jews, by appointing non-Whites to the most important posts in his administration. Read the man’s lips. What he’s saying is: “Hey, I’m really not such a bad guy. See, I’m appointing Blacks, I’m appointing Jews, I’m appointing Mexicans. And the Blacks and Mexicans I’m appointing are just as pro-Jewish as I am. My tough-talking Black secretary of state speaks Yiddish and will support Jewish interests around the world just as strongly as Bill Clinton’s Jewish secretary of state has done. You can trust me. I’ll do whatever you tell me. I’ll support Israel. I’ll support ‘speech crime’ laws. I’m your man.” And he’s not saying that, he’s not making these appointments, because that’s what Republicans want or even what Americans want. It’s what the Jews want. George Bush is a hollow man, an empty man. And George Bush is a splendid symbol of the state of our race today: a splendid symbol of our moral collapse during the past century. It is entirely fitting that such a man should be our figurehead leader as we continue on the course of racial suicide that we have been on for the past century. It is entirely appropriate that he became our figurehead leader through the comic-opera sort of process we have witnessed during the last two months of the first year of this century — which certainly will be our last century if we do not make a radical change of course soon and begin regaining our lost moral strength. _________________ ON THIS DAY, 11 September 2021, America remembers the firefighters, policemen, and first-responders who died at Ground Zero twenty years ago. We remember them as heroes. No doubt, many remarkable and selfless deeds were done on this day, worthy of praise and remembrance. But there is a difference between a heroic, selfless deed and a heroic soul, a heroic mindset, and a heroic life on the world-historical stage. In our present and very strange time the use of the word “hero” is as inflated as our currency and as perverted as the self-righteousness of our Politically Correct anti-White ruling class. The downfall of the term “hero” really started to take off a few years after the World Trade Center collapse, and I also think it was deliberately set into motion by our Jewish political “elite.” Now purple-haired mutants who “come out” as perverts are deemed “heroes”; shriveled souls who search decades-old letters and speeches for words that are now forbidden to ruin careers and lives are “heroes”; leering bureaucrats and drug-pushers who cynically use a disease as a way to advance their careers or increase their power and wealth are “heroes.” By inflating something, even the meaning of a word, one reduces its value. The Jew understands this like no other. * * * The Jew wanted us to kill primitive Brown people who were getting uppity in Israel’s neighborhood, so for a while we had “heroes” who bombed and killed them with abandon, even though they had exactly zero to do with 9/11. (But, to Jews, Brown people are needed as a weapon against us, so bringing them here after slaughtering their kin in their homes was part of the plan — a process that still continues.) Let’s look at the most recent inflation of the word “Hero.” Facing the deadly threat of a mild flu — every hero needs a worthy challenge or enemy — a new class of heroes is celebrated on yard signs throughout the country: “Thank you Essential Workers.” Has kind of a Chicom ring to it. Essential Workers — what a glorious name! Nurses, cashiers, salesmen and the kid that mowed my neighbor’s lawn last summer are lauded as saviors of mankind. Whenever I go grocery shopping, I salute the double-masked obese female “of color” that hides behind a half inch of acrylic sheet: “Thank you for your service, ma’am.” (No, actually, I don’t. I get out of there as soon as possible and get back to building a new world for my people and my children, a world in which she will have no part.) To sum up the obvious, the state of heroism, especially White heroism, has massively declined. We went from the Minutemen, from Lexington and Concord, from men fighting for their people’s future — to dreadlocked, racemixing freaks throwing urine bombs and fighting against their own people. Or to submissive slaves, bowing to the latest insane edicts of their self-appointed, traitorous masters. And that’s tragic. And dangerous. People need heroes — real ones — not just to slay monsters or solve problems, but to guide them as role models. A hero is more than just a remarkable human being. He represents a call to greatness; he opens a metaphysical perspective that transforms our existence into something higher; he shows us something essential that we didn’t even know was essential before. We need a hero to become heroes ourselves. And we need to become heroes to save ourselves. Becoming a hero is now an existential necessity for every mentally and spiritually healthy White person who wants to take part in the future. * * * Let’s talk about a real hero — our hero, Dr. William Luther Pierce, the founder of the National Alliance, born on this day in 1933 and still remembered by thousands of men and women he inspired. Talking about true heroes and heroism one has to define what the term really means. I think Julius Evola got it right in his essay “The Aryan Doctrine of Combat and Victory.” The hero realizes that there is a metaphysical level of existence, a higher meaning. He finds himself embedded in a cosmic struggle between the forces of Life and Death, the never ending “Holy War” of existence. And he has come to the conclusion that he has to take sides in this cosmic struggle. He has heard the call and answered it. The “Holy War” itself has two aspects. It takes place within the world under the influence of various historical circumstances. With two factions fighting, one is always representing the forces of darkness and disintegration while the other represents Life and light. Evola refers to the war on the material plane as the “Small” or “Minor War.” The “Greater War” is of a spiritual nature. It takes place within the hero himself. Here he has to fight his inner demons — tropisms, really — which tend to corrupt and pervert him, that seek to force or lure him onto the path of self-degradation and self-destruction. The internal struggle is of greater relevance than the external one because the eventual outcome of the war is decided there. The hero might fall in battle but still be victorious — overcoming the forces of Death within — while, on the other hand, the villain may temporarily prevail on the material plane but may ultimately lose the “Greater War,” since he has internally surrendered himself to the forces of Death. The pre-condition to survival and victory is laid in the souls of men. William Luther Pierce was a hero much greater then the mere facts of his life might imply. He heard the call to arms and followed it without hesitation. His biography by Robert Griffin is a testimony to his supremely radical devotion to the survival and well-being of his people. * * * Pierce, a physicist, worked as a college professor and then as a researcher in private industry. He had wife and children, and he was well paid for doing what he loved — a blessing only few of us are granted — and he enjoyed good health and lucid intelligence. He had everything one could reasonably dream of, and, taking his great mind, talent, and discipline into account, there really were almost no limits to what he could have achieved within society’s framework of conventional success. And yet, he sacrificed it all without a moment’s hesitation when destiny called upon him to take up the fight against the enemy. And what an enemy he faced: cunning, deceiving, rich and powerful beyond all others, and endlessly scheming to weaken and destroy our race while at the same time exploiting its genius and stealing its wealth: the International Jew. He took on an enemy that smaller men would claim we could never hope to defeat. But his lifelong resistance to the Jew, that bought him the hatred of the System and the admiration of millions of racially conscious Whites across the globe, was only the “Small War.” In his quest to save his race, he willingly suffered countless hardships and heartbreaks, poverty, uncertainty, and many, many defeats and setbacks. By his enemies he was and is depicted as an outcast, pariah, and monster. Yet his heroic spirit kept him going, kept him fighting against all odds, until, all too soon, his body eventually succumbed to the unbearable pressure. But again, this was only the “Small War” he fought. The “Greater War” took place in his soul, in his mind, invisible and quiet. I’m talking about those dark hours many of us know and dread, when our demons — our doubts and fears — suddenly emerge from the abyss of our souls and start shaking the foundation of our convictions. The greater one’s mind and the deeper one’s commitment to the truth, the stronger the doubts that have to be faced. “Is it worth sacrificing my life, my talent, my ambition to this cause?” “Am I even right? Or are my enemies correct when they call me a monster?” “I can’t possibly win, why not give up and enjoy whatever life has to offer?” Most men give in at some point or other. We pacify the demons by compromising, walking on the path of gradual destruction, or submitting ourselves to the seductive lies society keeps whispering in our ears, putting on the “light” yokes our smiling masters hold ready. We compromise on our convictions, our beliefs, and by compromising we murder the truth. Not completely, of course, and not all at once. The death of the coward is slow, and he thinks it will be painless. We give in just a little bit at a time. And then, maybe, a little more. Another small compromise to earn a “necessary” convenience. Shut your mouth and keep the job, keep the pension. Close your eyes to the sickness that has befallen your people. Pretend not to hear the cries of anguish and suffering that would — very inconveniently — call you to take a stand and pick a side. You become mute, blind, and deaf. But you can still think what you want! Or can you? And so do many of us succumb to our inner foe until we eventually disappear in the soulless and dying mass that is the rotting flesh of our so called “civilization.” Not so William Luther Pierce. Heroically he faced his inner demons and overcame them. He stood strong and toiled relentlessly for the truth — teaching, writing, publishing, organizing, speaking, inspiring, gathering his people and building the National Alliance — the organization that will serve as the keystone for a new, golden age for our race. Dr. William Pierce is more than his deeds and his teachings. His life itself, the life of an accomplished yet seemingly “mainstream” White American who became a hero, serves as an example for us. We, too, can cultivate the heroic mindset that he embodied. * * * Let us on this day, 11 September, 2021, remember and celebrate the life and legacy of Dr. William Luther Pierce, who would have celebrated his 88th birthday today, by committing ourselves to the cause of the National Alliance, building his dream of a New Consciousness; a New Order; a New People into a reality for all the ages to come.

It’s all here…Ted Pike’s monumental new video documents the whole story of conspiracy by Israel’s false leaders in the Mid-East. From Israeli terrorists to Christian televangelists, this is the incredible account of how Zionist abuses and atrocities, plus evangelical Christian support, have worked together over the past century to incite international Arab terrorism. That terrorism erupted in fury on September 11, 2001.

Trailer by 'The Impartial Truth' (on X: @IImpartialTruth) [an astonishingly good film-maker of whom I'm a MASSIVE fan!!] See the full 'Dennis Wise - Trilogy of Truth' (of which this film is the first) HERE: https://tinyurl.com/2puxd559

Paul Eisen, the founder of Deir Yassin Remembered, wrote the following: "Ernst Zundel is, in my view, the greatest dissident of our time... I have read about Ernst and I have written about him.., but it was only two years ago that I met him. He was soft-spoken, kind and gentle, but every so often you could see the flash of steel. He had just been released from prison and was engaged in rebuilding his ancestral home. It's a peasant's house in the Black Forest, in the heart of Germany - and it had housed his woodcutter father, his large family and the young Ernst. Never have I seen an edifice so rooted in the land. Like Ernst himself, it seemed to grow out of the soil. In this documentary, you will meet an entirely different Ernst Zündel - not the "hate-spewing" firebrand a poisonous mainstream media has painted him to be, but the sensitive, creative artist who spent one-tenth of his life incarcerated for his outspoken political convictions on behalf of his demonized people - and still retained his extraordinary spirit of defiance." As always.., after watching.., do your best to "pass it on"..... "Truth Does Not Fear Investigation" "The Truth Shall Make You Free".., but at first.., it'll make you Damn Mad !!!

The Kalergi Plan (Creation Of The EU | International Communism) by Matthew North The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid is the race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, [they]will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals. Instead of destroying European Judaism, Europe, against her will, refined and educated this people[Jews], will be driving them to their future status as a leading nation through this artificial evolutionary process...Insofar as Europe is Christian, it is in a spiritual sense Jewish, insofar as Europe is moral, it is Jewish. Almost all of European ethics are rooted in Jewry. All protagonists for a religious or non religious Christian morality, from Augustine to Rousseau, Kant and Tolstoy, were Jews of choice in a spiritual sense. Nietzsche is the only non Jew, the only European heathen moralist. In the East the Chinese people are the ethical par excellence [..] - in the West it is the Jews. Strength of character paired with sharpness of the mind predestines the Jews in their most excellent specimen to become the leaders of urbane humanity, from the false to the genuine spiritual aristocrats to the protagonists of capitalism as well as of the revolution. Now we stand at the threshold of the third epoch of the new times: Socialism. Also socialism is supported by the urban class of industrial workers, led by the aristocracy of revolutionary writers. This development, and with it the chaos of modern politics will only then find its end, when a spiritual aristocracy seizes the means of power of society. Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi - Praktischer Idealismus (1925) (AUDIOBOOK: https://rumble.com/v4qyfn6-audiobook-practical-idealism-count-richard-nicolaus-coudenhove-kalergi-1925.html)

As a young man., Adolf Hitler believed (just as many do today.!) that the Jews were a 'persecuted people' ONLY for their religion. But., as this wonderfully read / narrated section from Adolf Hitler's book 'Mein Kampf' ('my struggle / battle') explains., how he came to understand 'the Jewish question' by way of a number of 'Red Pill' experiences., after moving (as a young man) to the 'big city' of Vienna., and what the TRUE reasons were., for the abhorrent disdain towards the 'Chosen Race' known as the Jews...

@krasinskid

by Eric Dubay They say “the winner’s write history,” and it is absolutely true; the most egregious example in modern times has to be the mainstream (mis)understanding of Adolf Hitler and pre-WWII Germany. Adolf Hitler was actually a vegetarian, animal-lover, an author, an artist, a political activist, economic reformer and nominated for a Nobel Peace prize. He enacted the world’s first anti-animal cruelty, anti-pollution and anti-smoking laws. Unlike the demonic portrait that history has painted of him, Hitler was beloved by his people and he wanted nothing but peace. From 1933-1940 Hitler tried repeatedly to make peace with the Jews and “allied” forces even calling for complete disarmament on everyone’s part. He was nominated for the Nobel peace prize in 1939, the very year he was attacked on his own soil after repeatedly pleading for peaceful solutions In 1936 99% of German registered voters went out to vote and 98.8% voted for Hitler. The Jewish media has ever since painted an evil picture of Hitler and the Jew World Order has even enacted laws in 18 European countries prohibiting free-speech on the issues of Judaism and the Holocaust. Contrasting and comparing the actions and policies of modern day America with those of Adolf Hitler. Is America now the “Fourth Reich”? Is it run by “evil Nazis”? Or has somebody been lying and fear mongering? This is a slideshow presentation of images with text overlay, including many authentic quotes by Adolf Hitler, translated to English. Background music courtesy of J. Belenger.

The World Council for Health hosted the Better Way Conference 2023 in Bath, UK on June 3rd through June 5th. Laura Aboli spoke during a session entitled From AI & Transhumanism to Being Human. Her topic of conversation was Transhumanism: The End Game. This is her full speech. "Transhumanism is simply the transitional stage between humanism and post-humanism. Make no mistake, the final goal is to eradicate humanity as we know it." ~ Laura Aboli About Laura Aboli: Laura Aboli's entrepreneurial career began in the year 2000 when she co-founded World-Check, a database of Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) and heightened risk individuals and organizations. ____________ In May 2023, public speaker Laura Aboli gave a powerful speech titled “Transhumanism: The End Game” at the Better Way Conference. It was described as the shortest but most accurate description of the current world state of affairs. “Make no mistake, the final goal is to eradicate humanity as we know it. Once you understand the final destination, it becomes much easier to look back and identify the psychological conditioning, biological tampering, cultural grooming and educational prepping that we have been subjected to for decades in preparation to making us accept a posthuman future,” she said. In the said meeting of scientists, doctors, law specialists and health activists in Bath, United Kingdom, she tackled how the world is being destabilized, dehumanized and demoralized by destroying the nuclear family, children being indoctrinated by the state, legalizing abortion, eradicating God and spirituality, promoting of toxic food, air and water, as well as social media replacing real human connection and interaction toward a global totalitarian reality. Aboli further talked about this important matter during her recent appearance on the “Health Ranger Report” with Mike Adams. She highlighted what the one world government has been working on for decades and a lot of structure has already been started to be implemented. A trigger would just be needed to fully implement it. “There are three vertices, or three angles, that they’re coming at us with right now. First, they are breaking sovereign nations. Then, they’ll destroy financial independence. Finally, they’ll demolish physical sovereignty as well. And that’s where transhumanism comes into play,” she told Adams. According to the Spanish pro-humanity advocate, destroying nations’ sovereignty has been targeted by the World Health Organization (WHO) Pandemic Treaty, which is to be decided in April or May 2024. “If all 194 member states — and that’s the entire world — sign it, it grants the WHO the power to declare a crisis or health emergency at their whim,” she alerted, pointing out how the authors made provisions very vague on things and how these could grant them the right to declare a crisis. “ They become the dictators of all mandates, regulations and forced vaccinations, amongst all the members of the WHO,” she added. Breaking nations’ financial independence is ongoing as well. She cited the World Economic Forum’s (WEF’s) mantra: “You’ll own nothing and you’ll be happy” as well as David Rogers Web’s book “The Great Taking,” which talked about details on exactly how the globalists are going to pull off the greatest heist in human history by destroying certain industries under the guise of their rhetorics including the climate crisis. “We know they’ve been attacking farmers and the whole reconversion of a lot of industries because of climate change. This man [Webb] describes the exact mechanism, a legal construct that they’ve created to steal all the collateral,” she said. Adams, who is the Brighteon and Natural News founder, agreed and added that the construct for this has already been put in place. “If you think you own the stocks in your portfolio at your stockbroker, you do not own them. If you think you own the money in your checking, savings and corporate accounts, you don’t own them,” he warned. “If you have house or car loans, even though you paid it off, the original lenders still appear on the lien section of the titles of those assets. They can still take them from you even though you’ve paid them off.” The two also said that in one click, all people’s assets can go into thin air by the declaration of a cyberattack, artificial intelligence glitch and other narratives. As to personal sovereignty being attacked, Aboli referred to WEF’s Yuval Noah Harari saying that “governments need to get under our skin” and that “Humans are now hackable animals.” “This ongoing narrative makes people believe that unless we start implanting technology under our skin, we’re just going to be rendered useless. And then he goes on to say, ‘Well, what are we going to do with the useless class? We’ll just give them drugs and video games,’” she pointed out. Humanity is worth protecting Elsewhere in the show, Aboli underscored the importance of raising awareness now and facing the difficult topic so everyone can do something to prevent the massive disrespect of life. Adams agreed, saying humanity is worth defending and protecting. “We can’t be replaced by machines. I know they’re trying with the rise of AI but those systems don’t have souls. They don’t have hearts, compassion, empathy, morality, or love for each other, their families or fellow human beings. Only human beings have those properties — we are worth fighting for,” the Health Ranger remarked. The HRR host also cited the disturbing events in the Middle East and other parts of the globe, where one side says the other side are subhuman animals, that they are not humans, and that it would just be okay that they are exterminated. The pro-lifer then mentioned the whole psychological brainwashing that humans are being referred to as “ape-brained meat sacks.” Oxford University transhumanist Elise Bohan, while promoting her book, said that the only way to survive is by merging with technology. “If humans could go on in a state of robust health, could keep learning, you’d have this cumulative effect where our experiences and knowledge would accumulate much faster. The things that our species could do with that! The mysteries of the universe that we could unlock. The problems we could solve. And the depths of each other’s souls that we could explore,” Bohan wrote. “I cannot think of a more horrific way or a more insulting way of referring to humanity, but this conditioning of making us think that we are so much less than we are. They believe humans have no soul, no emotion, no creation and no divinity. We’re just this material lump of flesh,” Aboli reacted to the transhumanist’s view. “This justifies the globalist extermination agenda because they say they’re not killing humans,” Adams agreed. By Belle Carter ______________ In a riveting discourse that left the audience on the edge of their seats, Laura Aboli addressed the 2023 Better Way Conference, diving into the heart of a topic she believes is paramount in our current era. With a speech titled “Transhumanism: The End Game,” Aboli passionately conveyed her perspective on a subject that goes beyond the technicalities, exploring the philosophical and ethical implications that transhumanism holds for humanity. Once you understand the end game you’ll be able to understand how we have been influenced through their social weapons and we love it right now. But…..

Make no mistake. Abortion is big business. Really big business. Planned Parenthood and other abortion perpetrators are huge profit centers. Doctors get rich. Those who run abortion businesses make a very good living. Bloodmoney: The Business of Abortion, a pro-life documentary released last year, makes these facts perfectly clear. Women’s health care? Family planning? Safe and legal abortions? It’s all a ruse. David Kyle, writer, producer, and director of Bloodmoney, has distilled hundreds of hours of interviews into a fast-moving, accurate exposé of the seedy abortion industry.1 The film debunks the great American myth that Planned Parenthood and other perpetrators of abortion on demand care about the welfare of women and girls. For over a year, Kyle and his crew traveled nationwide to interview pro-life leaders, clergy, judges, scientists, legal and public policy experts, a prominent former abortionist, a one-time abortion mill owner, and women who have endured the trauma of abortion. Bloodmoney is an emotional, well-written, and riveting unmasking of a veiled, greed-infested industry that deceives the public into believing that women benefit from its “reproductive health services.” “The information in Bloodmoney is information that the general public has never known—that has been kept under wraps by the pro-abortion community,” the film’s narrator, Dr. Alveda C. King (niece of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.), told Celebrate Life. The founder of King for America and a Priests for Life pastoral associate continued, “And of course, they stay in business when the truth is not told. Bloodmoney is … a truthful film that everyone should see.” All roads lead to the money trail As Kyle and his filmmaking partner, John Zipp, were making this documentary (see sidebar), they were stunned to learn just how lucrative abortion can be—so stunned that they changed its name from American Holocaust to Bloodmoney. “As we were doing the interviews, the issue of money kept coming up, and that’s when we . . . changed it to Bloodmoney,” Kyle explained to Celebrate Life. “People have no idea about most aspects of abortion, but they certainly don’t look at it as a moneymaking industry. And that’s what it is. That one doctor makes almost $2 million a year—that’s a tremendous amount of money. If that doesn’t shock people, I don’t know what will.” Ardent pro-life activist Carol Everett, founder of the Dallas-based Heidi Group pregnancy centers and former abortion mill administrator, vividly attests that the mills generate tremendous revenue. Financially, they’re very much in the black, and government funding helps keep them that way. Millions of taxpayer dollars help them build bigger facilities and market the product under the guise of sex education and family-planning services. The only red they see is the spilled blood of preborn babies and mothers who choose to end their babies’ lives—often through deceptive counseling and slick sales tactics. In Bloodmoney, Everett likens abortion mill counselors to telemarketers: They follow a script to answer every objection to abortion, and they prey on the woman’s emotions to get the quick sale: an abortion—sometimes even if the woman isn’t pregnant. Abortion mills view any woman who walks out the door without buying an abortion as a lost sale. While abortionists collect their abortion money in cash (to avoid paying income taxes), abortion mill clients leave without the priceless gift of a baby. What they do take home is a supply of low-dose birth control pills and cheap condoms that will likely fail. These free handouts encourage relations outside of marriage. Then the ladies return after they again become pregnant, for a second or even a third abortion. Guaranteed cash flow: It’s the goal of every business. Everett candidly explains the lucrative abortion business model and her plan to become a millionaire. But in 1983, she realized she was indeed receiving blood money. That later became the title of the book she wrote2 to recount the role she played in 35,000 abortions, one woman’s death from abortion, and 19 other women requiring either a hysterectomy or a colostomy after botched abortions. Ironically, Kyle and Zipp had renamed their film even before learning about Everett’s book. The power of putting it all together The filmmakers also examine the historical, legal, scientific, medical, and social aspects of abortion, including the fact that biology confirms that a human being’s life begins at the moment of creation,3 which was acknowledged in a 1981 U.S. Senate report4 but ignored in the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, and that the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution affirm the right to life. They educate viewers about key court cases concerning abortion, and expose the flawed legal and scientific reasoning used by abortion proponents to justify the killing of preborn children. Bloodmoney didn’t shy away from the growing outrage over the black genocide being perpetrated by the abortion industry, which also targets other ethnic minorities. The abortion rate for African-Americans is far higher than that of other races,5 and that threatens their population sustainability. Dr. Levon Yuille, a prominent pastor and director of the National Black Pro-Life Congress, calls abortion the worst thing that has happened to America and says he is “terribly, terribly, terribly concerned.” The documentary points out that Planned Parenthood foundress Margaret Sanger had ties to Nazi eugenicists and referred to African-Americans as “human weeds” who should be eliminated. These trends shouldn’t be surprising. “We know that minorities are targeted and college students are targeted by the abortion industry, with Planned Parenthood being the leader,” Dr. King observed. “Carol Everett explains that position so well, as one who has run abortion clinics. And Norma McCorvey [the “Jane Roe” of Roe v. Wade] having worked in them—they admit that they really were in it for the money.” McCorvey (another ardent pro-life convert) and Everett share their insights, as do prominent pro-life activists Jim Sedlak, vice president of American Life League and founder of Stop Planned Parenthood International; Joe Scheidler, director of the Pro-Life Action League; Father Frank Pavone, director of Priests for Life; the abovementioned Dr. Yuille; Troy Newman, president of Operation Rescue; Dr. Bernard Nathanson (before his death); and many others. Bloodmoney offers some truly poignant, heart-wrenching moments: Everett describing botched abortions and coercive marketing tactics, a woman tearfully revealing how she was relentlessly pressured into an abortion, and another woman recounting her young daughter’s stunned reaction when she confessed that an older sister had been aborted. “He gets the truth out in a way that no one has ever done before,” Everett told Celebrate Life. “This is the truth. I’ve done a lot of stuff in the 27 years I’ve been a Christian, and I’ve never watched something and cried so much every time I watch [Bloodmoney]. The message I get from it is the culmination of all the pain we’ve ignored and is being ignored today. We’re a nation hurting from it and we don’t want to admit it.” Bloodmoney brings the facts together in a non-threatening, non-preachy way that could make it a very effective tool for exposing the abortion lobby’s underlying motives. But would it be enough to persuade an abortion supporter or a person on the fence to see the light? “We wanted to give that broad overview that . . . would get people to . . to say, ‘I remember this from Bloodmoney,’ and maybe look into this more,” Kyle explained. “Get them questioning and get them thinking about the whole issue. Foremost, we hope it saves lives.” With the Obama administration ever more aggressively promoting the culture of death, Kyle, Everett, and Dr. King all stress the urgency of making known the truth about abortion. “We already know people are swinging to the pro-life side, and we know there are a lot of people in the middle that can be convinced, especially those people who say they would never have an abortion, ‘but I’m not going to tell someone they can’t,’” Kyle observed. Instead of showing films in school health classes that refer to preborn babies as “products of conception,” imagine the hearts and minds of young people and parents that could be changed by watching Bloodmoney. “If you could get them to sit down and watch this movie, they would understand,” Everett asserted. “But will they ever sit down to watch this movie?” That is the question. Doug Bean is a writer/editor who resides in Westerville, Ohio, with his wife, Janice, and their six children. Click here to order the Bloodmoney DVD. It can be viewed online here. The long road to making and distributing ‘Bloodmoney’ David Kyle and John Zipp had no filmmaking experience when, in 2004, they conceived the idea that eventually became Bloodmoney. They were then working for the Institute on the Constitution and its cofounder, Michael Peroutka, was a presidential candidate. As typically occurs in a campaign, the candidates were repeatedly asked questions on abortion. And because abortion typically receives only cursory treatment in the “mainstream” media, the two men thought a documentary might deepen the public’s understanding. It took Kyle, writer, producer, and director of Bloodmoney, and Zipp, its executive producer, nearly four years to land a private investor to fund the project. Finally, in the spring of 2008, they received a $300,000 donation and started filming that summer. They made some errors along the way that resulted in delays and cost overruns, which required obtaining additional financing. But after one and a half years of full-time work, they put a wrap on Bloodmoney in 2010. Kyle and Zipp had hoped for a theatrical release, but the prohibitive $5–7 million cost for a distributor has relegated the documentary mostly to DVD. Bloodmoney has made its way into theaters in Spain and one owned by a pro-life advocate in Park Ridge, Illinois. “The Spanish Ministry of Culture rated it as no one under 18 allowed to see it without a parent,” Kyle reported. “. . .There was an outcry over there from pro-life groups and the Catholic bishops, and they finally put it back down to 16.” Bloodmoney is also being shown in churches and Knights of Columbus halls throughout the U.S. Kyle has been working with the Baltimore archdiocese’s Respect Life Committee and hopes to disseminate the film in other dioceses as well. EWTN aired a shortened version on the Roe v. Wade anniversary this year, and at press time, the film’s YouTube trailer had received over 537,000 hits. Marketing and financial support remain the biggest challenges for the filmmakers, who suffered another setback when their DVD distributor went bankrupt. “The biggest thing is reaching as many people as possible,” Kyle said. “It’s been a long, hard road, but we’re finally picking up steam. We know, content-wise, just from the reaction of people who have seen it, that we did a really good job. We’re hoping to do other films that put out the pro-life message.” _____________________ Bloodmoney viewers should keep in mind that numerous abortions also occur outside of abortion mills, as a result of using abortifacient contraceptives, discarding human embryos during the in-vitro fertilization process, and destroying human embryos in research labs. See ThePillKills.com for more information on abortifacient contraceptives.—Ed. Carol Everett’s book, The Scarlet Lady: Confessions of a Successful Abortionist, was published in 1991 and reprinted as Blood Money: Getting Rich Off a Woman’s Right to Choose (co-authored with Jack Shaw) in 1992.—Ed. American Life League now recommends, in place of “conception,” such terms as “biological beginning,” “moment of creation” or “point of creation” because some human beings are created asexually (for example, by cloning in labs), and “conception” is often inaccurately defined as implantation of the preborn baby in the mother’s uterine lining. To learn more, see ALL.org/personhood.—Ed. In 1981, a subcommittee of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee requested expert testimony regarding when a human being’s life begins, in conjunction with S. 158, the Human Life Bill. According to the subcommittee’s report, “Physicians, biologists, and other scientists agree that conception marks the beginning of the life of a human being—a being that is alive and is a member of the human species. There is overwhelming agreement on this point in countless medical, biological, and scientific writings.”—Ed According to the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute’s 2011 Facts on Induced Abortion in the United States, 30 percent of abortions are committed on the babies of non-Hispanic black women. According to the U.S. Census Bureau’s Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010, the “black alone” population accounts for only 12.6 percent of the total U.S. population .—Ed.

The Secret Masonic Victory of WW2 Documentary by Dennis Wise Western Freemasonry and their Masonic-funded Eastern Communist friends won World War 2. Everything we see today stems from that Jewish Masonic victory. All Freemasons in politics know the aim is a one world communist utopia. All policies today aid the minorities and are aimed at breaking down the family, the very basis of white culture. Hitler knew who was behind it and now so do you. Dennis Wise Documentaries - The Trilogy of Truth... 1: Adolf Hitler: The Greatest Story Never Told (https://odysee.com/@ChaunceyGardiner:5/Adolf-Hitler---The-Greatest-Story-Never-Told-(2013):1) 2: New World Order: Communism By The Backdoor (https://rumble.com/v4vkj7i-new-world-order-communism-by-the-backdoor-2014-dennis-wise.html) 3: The Secret Masonic Victory of WW2 👆 Also watch: 'Europa: The Last Battle' https://odysee.com/@ChaunceyGardiner:5/Europa---The-Last-Battle---Part-01-The-Jews'-Plans:e?lid=4a37adea4943658bd5810048e1969463c9e4c435

SPECIAL INVESTIGATION: Spies, Lords & Predators It’s shaping up to be the biggest political scandal in Britain’s history. There is new evidence that some of the country’s most respected men were in fact depraved paedophiles. Leaders that were preying on children as young as eight and nine. Many of the kids were trafficked from state-run homes and other institutions to be abused by MPs, Lords, and spies. They were protected from on high by a secret code, and have never been held to account for their horrific crimes. 60 Minutes investigates the scandal and the cover up, speaks to the victims and the witnesses, and confronts a member of the notorious paedophile information exchange. Reporter Ross Coulthart also reveals how children were killed in order to protect this network of predators – and how the driver to the Australian High Commissioner could hold the key to blowing this case wide open. Reporter: Ross Coulthart Producer: Stephen Rice ———————————————————————- Senior MP accused of child sex abuse: Two MPs report same serving Labour politician to police over sex attacks and corruption claims Labour MP John Mann one of the informants to pass information to police A fortnight ago a Conservative MP told police about the same politician Unnamed MP is accused of offering political favours to a brothel owner Also claimed they were arrested for indecency in public place with a minor By Glen Owen and Miles Goslett For The Mail On Sunday Published: 07:46 EST, 19 July 2015 | Updated: 09:28 EST, 19 July 2015 A senior Labour MP has been reported to police by two fellow MPs over claims of child sex abuse, The Mail on Sunday has learned. One of the informants, Labour MP John Mann, passed details about the prominent individual to officers earlier this year. Then, a fortnight ago, a Conservative MP went to the same police force armed with information about the same individual, some of which had been provided to him by a former Government Minister. It is believed to be the first time that a sitting MP has been scrutinised by any of the ongoing police investigations into child abuse, representing a further extension of the ever-widening sphere of historic sex allegations. Mr Mann handed his information over to an ongoing criminal investigation into another public figure, which included links between that figure and the Labour MP. The Conservative MP’s allegations about the MP, which date back to the late 1980s, include claims that the MP had been arrested for indecency in a public place with a minor – during which he is said to have assaulted the arresting officers. It is claimed the MP had performed political favours for the owner of a brothel in his constituency in which men consorted with underage males. The Conservative MP also made further allegations about drink-driving, assault and corruption involving the Labour MP. A BBC News team, headed by a journalist who specialises in reporting on sex abuse crimes, is also understood to have had access to the information. The team, which has been granted significant resources by bosses, has already started interviewing potential witnesses about the MP. Director-general Tony Hall has been made aware of the special project. Mr Mann, a former member of the Treasury Select Committee, has established a strong campaigning record on the issue of abuse, and last year he compiled a dossier of historic allegations which detailed claims against 12 former Government Ministers. The Met Police are carrying out Operation Fairbank, an umbrella inquiry into historical child sex abuse claims involving politicians in the House of Commons and House of Lords and other leading public figures The Met Police are carrying out Operation Fairbank, an umbrella inquiry into historical child sex abuse claims involving politicians in the House of Commons and House of Lords and other leading public figures. Earlier this year Mr Mann claimed that the number of victims could reach ‘tens of thousands’. He said: ‘The state can’t deal with the numbers of people coming forward. The police and social services cannot cope with the volume that’s there, even now. And we’re hardly at the beginning of people coming forward.’ There are a total of five police investigations under way across the country into historical abuse allegations, of which the main one is Operation Fairbank – the Met Police’s umbrella inquiry into historical child sex abuse claims involving politicians and other leading public figures. The Independent Police Complains Commission are also investigating if there was an Establishment cover-up of the late Cyril Smith MP’s abuse of boys The Independent Police Complains Commission are also investigating if there was an Establishment cover-up of the late Cyril Smith MP’s abuse of boys The police watchdog, the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), is also investigating claims that there was an Establishment cover-up over the abuse perpetrated by the late Liberal MP Cyril Smith, including threatening a police officer with the Official Secrets Act after he said he had found the MP with two teenage boys in 1988. Twenty-three people have claimed they were abused by the Liberal MP, who died aged 82 in 2010. The Commons and the House of Lords are featuring heavily in the investigations. Earlier this year, Scotland Yard officers contacted Lawrence Ward, the Serjeant at Arms, the Commons’ most senior security official, to ask him to search files kept on MPs. Mr Ward told the officers that if they produced a warrant, they could enter the Commons to investigate the files themselves on a ‘case by case basis’. Earlier this month, Justice Lowell Goddard finally opened the public inquiry into child sex abuse, vowing that ‘no one, no matter how powerful’ will be able to avoid its scrutiny. The New Zealand judge – brought in to head the inquiry after her two predecessors resigned over concerns about their links to the Establishment – said it could take a decade to complete. Her works covers five key areas of society from ‘the corridors of power in Westminster to children’s homes in the poorest parts of the country’. Another abuse campaigner, Labour’s Tom Watson, has called for the inquiry to be given full access to MI5’s secret files containing the names of offenders. Last night, the police force which has received the information about the Labour MP said it was unable to comment on any ongoing investigations which had not included any arrests. Mr Mann declined to comment.

"Human Sacrifice among the Fanatical Hasidic Jews and Other Cults from Ancient Times to the Present" tells the forbidden true story of numerous children - and even some adults - who were murdered in similar fashions for their blood. It tells of countless children whose bloodless corpses were discovered to have been reportedly murdered by fanatical Jews. It also describes some other cults that have existed in the past - some of which may even exist today in Mexico - that have participated in similar acts of human sacrifice. 'Human Sacrifice among the Fanatical Hasidic Jews and Other Cults from Ancient Times to the Present is an excellent video demonstrating without question that the accusation of Jewish Ritual Murder is indeed true. This video will make yea sayers out of all nay sayers!' --Rev. Dr. Matthew F. Hale, head of the World Creativity Movement 'The ADL is steaming! [Almost] two hours of documentation, illustrated through paintings, woodcuts, drawings, sculptures, rare books and other obscure sources. Worldwide Revisionist News & Views has put out the first-ever video documentary on Jewish ritual murder [in English]. Listen now - no one with an objective mind (an important stipulation) can watch this tape without at least admitting that the matter is worth looking into further. Do you have a friend who 'just doesn't believe in such things'? This documentary is virtually irrefutable, and is most educational. You will NEVER see this material on the History Channel, but truth takes no backseat in this fast-packed documentary.' --Harrell Rhome, Ph.D., head of Eagle Publications 'The new video on the history of Human Sacrifice is the best study of this suppressed subject that I have ever seen. It is a real breakthrough for serious students of the subject. The research is unique in that rare photos never seen by the general public before are presented here for the first time. While controversial, the film presents the facts in an impartial way. I believe that it will spark new interest and thoughtful discussion which will help resurrect additional study for a more clear understanding of this subject.' --Dr. Ed Fields, editor of The Truth at Last"

by Marijn Poels THE PRIMORDIAL CODE is a new insightful Dutch/English documentary film by Marijn Poels. The film exposes how humanity has gradually slipped into the system of obedience and - the crucial point - how we get out of it. It is time for us people to regain our strength and reactivate our primal code. In The Primordial Code, Marijn talks to scientists, experts and great thinkers around the world. They take us on a mind-boggling journey that will forever change the way we see things. What if you visit a place where you’re confronted with our history that turns out to be much different than the one you were always led to believe? How a false narrative has managed to keep the whole foundation of our being in its grip by shifting reality into myths. A story of how oppression and fear have kept us from developing our primal forces for thousands of years, which are now being reclaimed worldwide. Because it's just in our human DNA and it's easier to reclaim than once thought. A mind-boggling experimental quest by documentarian Marijn Poels into our distant past to win back our primal code again

Cast Mary Bauermeister (Self - Artist)Sucharit Bhakdi (Self - PhD Micorbiology)Thomas Binder (Self - Cardiologist)Mathias Bröckers (Self - Journalist)Dietrich Brüggemann (Self - Film Director)Dolores Cahill (Self - Immunologist)Ole Dammegard (Self - Journalist)Monica Felgendreher (Self - Artist)Daniele Ganser (Self - Historian)Ulrike Guérot (Self - Professor Political Science Bonn University) Director Marijn Poels Synopsis In 2022, the world population had been under the spell of the coronavirus for the past two years. Emergency regimes had been established, civil liberties had been dismantled, surveillance programs were being installed and an unprecedented global vaccination program had been rolled out. Were we doing the right thing, or did we make a deal with the devil in exchange for a benefit? Through critical voices from various areas of expertise, PANDAMNED attempted for the first time to paint the whole picture and shed light on the darkness. It has become a relentless stocktaking of our time, which global organizations, governments and big tech companies would have preferred to prevent. Documentary maker Marijn Poels takes the viewer on an enlightening journey through the emerging absurd world of the "New Normal" and how we can still prevent it.

by Germar Rudolf With her book Denying the Holocaust, Deborah Lipstadt tried to show the flawed methods and extremist motives of “Holocaust deniers,” who, so the book’s description claims, have “no more credibility than the assertion that the earth is flat.” This video documentary is based on the book Bungled: “Denying the Holocaust.” How Deborah Lipstadt Botched Her Attempt to Demonstrate the Growing Assault on Truth and Memory,” which is available from the publisher’s website. Both this documentary and the book demonstrate that Dr. Lipstadt clearly has neither understood what the principles and methods of science and scholarship are, nor has she any clue about the historical topics she is writing about. She misquotes, mistranslates, misrepresents, misinterprets, and makes a plethora of wild claims without backing them up with anything. Among other things, she utterly fails to use generally recognized standards of evidence. Given the way she handles documents and data, it is clear that she has no interest in scholarship or reason. In fact, truth has been the antithesis of her enterprise. Rather than dealing thoroughly with factual arguments, Lipstadt’s book is full of ad hominem attacks on her opponents. It is an exercise in anti-intellectual pseudo-scientific arguments, an exhibition of ideological radicalism that rejects anything which contradicts its preset conclusions. Since she admits herself that her opponents’ motives are irrelevant, as an inescapable consequence, so is her book.

A person’s high regard for the Nuremberg Trial tends to be taken down a peg or two upon learning that the American prosecution team offered a shrunken head into evidence, blaming the Nazis for what obviously came from a South American rain forest tribe many years prior. Toward the end or World War II, U.S. armed forces entered the German wartime concentration camp at Buchenwald. The first Americans to become active there were officers of the Psychological Warfare Division. They had a plan: to plant “evidence” in the camp that suggests the German SS had committed atrocious war crimes against the Buchenwald inmates: shrunken prisoner heads, lampshads made of the skin of murdered inmates, etc. Much of this “evidence” was later used during the Nuremberg trials and other similar legal mockeries as evidence against German defendants. From there this atrocity propaganda entered the history books of the world, and the world believed it, and it still does. The video maker advocates kindness and good vibes toward all Jewish people. And the video maker does not have the intention of reviving Hitler or Nazism. Hitler was a militarist and this video is anti-militarist. Having said that, the maker of this video also believes that the holocaust is a giant myth. A myth that reverberates today into the promotion of war. This video is about how the media and politicians manipulate the gullible American public and much of the rest of the world for pro-war purposes then and now. One less frequently exposed example for this war-mongering: The notion that Uganda’s Idi Amin was likely portrayed as a psycho-killer due to his anti-Israel views and Arab alignment. Idi Amin was probably not someone who thought he was “the last king of Scotland,” as the movie about him was titled. This video has considerable overlap with the more recent documentary “Buchenwald: A Dumb Dumb Portrayal of Evil,” which among other things describes Eisenhower’s role in the holocaust hoax. This is “version 2” of Nazi Shrunken Heads. Originally released in April 2007, it was re-worked and re-released in August 2008.

by Anthony Lawson Having been tortured, Rudolf Höss, who was the commander of Auschwitz from 1940 to 1943, almost certainly lied to save the lives of his wife and children. Even if torture and duress cannot be proven, the overwhelming reason for recognizing the utter falsity of the Höss confession is that the gassing method he described was not scientifically plausible. Yet Höss’s conviction has stood, by inference, as a testament to the cruelty of Germans in general, since he was tried at Nuremberg, in 1947, and subsequently hanged on April 16th, 1947, in Poland. Making a statement like this which doubts the officially ordained narrative can be a crime in a number of western “democracies,” believe it or not, and it is at least considered to be reprehensible in those countries that have not (yet?) outlawed dissenting views on this topic. This video discusses the social and judicial persecution of individuals voicing dissident opinions on the historical event usually referred to as the Holocaust. It castigates that persecution and lays bare the illegality and amorality of such activities. In addition, a number of the most striking historical arguments why dissenting = revisionist views on the Holocaust are reasonable, are presented. A brief look into the political agenda of those furthering the orthodox Holocaust narrative rounds up this amazing movie. NOTE: This Video was originally uploaded to YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gycNMf0xAc), but YouTube deleted it, initially only temporarily under the pretext of some spurious copyright claim over some of the used footage. YouTube switched it free again in mid 2012, only to delete it permanently in the summer of 2019, when YouTube implemented a general ban on anything Jewish pressure groups don’t like. Suppressing free and open discussion on any subject, however, is as bad as telling lies, and knowingly suppressing the truth is the biggest lie of all, because it is based not on a mistake or a genuine error, but on a deliberate intention to deceive. This is the author’s dedication: With great respect for those who have tried—though harassed, punished, fined, imprisoned and otherwise abused—to tell it like it really was: Arthur R. Butz, Robert Faurisson, Jürgen Graf, Gerd Honsik, David Irving, Kevin Käther, Nicholas Kollerstrom, Fred Leuchter, Horst Mahler, Carlo Mattogno, Ingrid Rimland, Germar Rudolf, Bradley Smith, Wilhelm Stäglich, Sylvia Stolz, Fredrick Toben, Ernst Zündel and many others.

On May 9, 2016, Dr. James Fetzer, retired professor of philosophy of science (until 2006 at the University of Minnesota, Duluth), hosted Germar Rudolf during Episode 198 of his internet broadcast series The Real Deal. Rudolf presented a two-hour slideshow giving an overview of the recently released study CURATED LIES: The Auschwitz Museum’s Misrepresentations & Deceptions by Italian Holocaust Historian Carlo Mattogno. This is the original narrated PowerPoint presentation in high quality, not Fetzer’s low-resolution version. Since the early 1990s, revisionist historians have published an increasing amount of research about the infamous German facility at Ausch­witz in what is now Poland. This research surpasses the work of the Auschwitz Museum’s own research department in both quantity and quality while failing to find in the tens of thousands of available wartime documents any trace of plans for gas chambers for executing people at Auschwitz or any of its satellite camps. Because these facts contradict a great body of the history of World War II, Polish researchers at the Auschwitz Museum have been under enormous pressure to respond to this revisionist challenge. In 2014, the museum researchers issued a book, The Beginnings of the Extermination of Jews in KL Auschwitz in the Light of the Source Materials, reprinting 74 original German wartime documents which they claim prove the construction and use of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz by the German government and the German civilian and military forces who ran the camp. However, upon examination of the book, none of the “new” evidence or analysis holds water. In its main section, Curated Lies is therefore a point by point refutation of the Auschwitz Museum’s book. This main section is preceded by a section focusing on the Auschwitz Museum’s most coveted asset: the alleged gas chamber inside the Old Crematorium, toured every year by well over a million visitors. We begin Curated Lies therefore by exposing the many ways in which visitors have been deceived and misled by forgeries and misrepresentations committed by the Auschwitz Museum, some of which are maintained to this day.