Conspiracy Chronicle

The California Senate has passed Assembly Bill 1955, a measure preventing school districts from notifying parents about their children's "social" gender transition at school without the child's consent. The bill, approved by a 29-8 vote, will now return to the Assembly for final approval of amendments. This legislation responds to policies in some California school districts that require notifying parents if a student undergoes a "social" gender transition, where the student publicly identifies as a different gender with affirmation from teachers and peers. AB 1955 aligns with guidance from California’s Department of Education, which mandates that schools must consult with transgender students to decide who will be informed of their transgender status, including their families. Proponents, like Democratic Senator Susan Eggman, assert that the bill fosters a supportive environment crucial for students' self-discovery. Eggman emphasized the importance of allowing students to explore their identities without undue interference, stating that schools should not act as "the gender police" but rather ensure safety and affirmation for all students. Opponents of the bill argue that parents have a right to be informed about significant aspects of their children's development, including issues related to gender identity. They warn that the bill represents excessive state intrusion into family affairs and sets a concerning precedent. Recent incidents, such as Montana parents losing custody of their child for opposing her gender transition, underscore these fears. Republican Assemblyman Jim Patterson criticized the bill for creating a barrier between children and parents, insisting that the state should not assume control over parental roles. Detractors label AB 1955 as "unconstitutional, morally corrupt," and "an embarrassment for our state," reflecting deep divisions over the appropriate role of schools and parents in addressing students' gender identities.

BioMADE, a lab-grown meat company that has received over $500 million in U.S. tax dollars from the Department of Defense (DOD), is seeking a contract to supply U.S. service members with lab-grown meat to reduce the military’s carbon footprint. This experimental product, created in a lab using animal cells and chemicals, aims to innovate food production and minimize CO2 emissions in military operations. The initiative aligns with the modern "green" movement supported by organizations like the World Economic Forum, World Health Organization, and United Nations. However, a University of California, Davis study suggests lab-grown meat might have a larger carbon footprint than natural beef and may not be as nutritious or safe. U.S. veteran Matt Bracken criticized the initiative, and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos recently donated $30 million to a research center for sustainable proteins like lab-grown meat. GOP Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has banned the production and sale of lab-grown meat in his state. The decision on funding the lab-grown meat for military use will be made in November, with the project potentially starting in February 2025 if approved.

Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former vice president at Pfizer, made bold and alarming claims at a vaccine awareness event, asserting that "[The COVID vaccines] were designed—intentionally—to harm, maim, and kill, and to reduce human fertility." Drawing on over 30 years of experience in pharmaceutical research and biotech, Dr. Yeadon emphasized his credentials to question the vaccine designers' decisions. He stated with conviction, "I am sure of it, not slightly, but sure. These materials were intentionally created to harm, maim, and kill, and to reduce human fertility. That is my verdict." Dr. Yeadon further argued that the lies, economic destruction, murder, and intentional harm from the vaccines point to a deliberate effort to reduce the population. His speech, delivered on October 20 last year in London, also featured 15 MPs, including Andrew Bridgen, who highlighted excess deaths in the UK and attributed them to the vaccines. Dr. Yeadon, a longstanding critic of the hastily approved mRNA vaccines, expressed concerns about a potential global depopulation agenda. His testimony contributes to the growing calls to ban these vaccines.

America First Legal, a pro-Trump legal organization, announced on Wednesday that it has filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) against Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and the Joe Biden presidential campaign. The complaint alleges that Bragg and the Biden campaign coordinated efforts to interfere in the 2024 presidential election. The group posted on X, stating, “Evidence reveals Bragg’s political prosecution aimed to assist the re-election of Joe Biden.” Along with their announcement, they shared a screenshot of the official complaint and raised concerns over Bragg’s hiring of former DOJ employee Matthew Colangelo, who had previously held a senior position at the New York Attorney General’s Office. The group pointed out that Colangelo’s career move was “so abnormal” that they sued the DOJ a week ago to obtain records regarding him. According to America First Legal, Colangelo’s prior roles and his contributions to Bragg’s campaign raise suspicions of coordinated efforts between Bragg and the Biden administration. They believe this coordination was intended to prosecute Trump and aid Biden’s re-election. Additionally, the group highlighted Attorney General Merrick Garland’s refusal to commit to providing communications between the DOJ and Bragg’s office during a congressional hearing. The group claims that the Biden campaign’s directive to prosecute Trump constitutes a coordinated expenditure that should have been reported under the Federal Election Campaign Act.

At a Moms Demand Action event in Atlanta, Georgia, President Joe Biden taunted American gun owners, suggesting they’d be overpowered by “F-15s” in a hypothetical revolt against government oppression. This comment inadvertently reinforced the argument many Americans make for needing firearms. Biden's slurred remarks included a call for banning “assault-style weapons,” stating, “if they think it’s to take on government if we get out of line, which they’re talking again about, well, guess what, they need F-15s, they don’t need rifles.” Simultaneously, the Biden administration is working to seize F-15s and F-16s under state National Guard control, though this point went unaddressed. Biden also made a peculiar comment about having “attended too many mass shootings,” raising questions about his mental acuity. During the event, he falsely claimed to have been a constitutional law professor, incorrectly stated that owning cannons was illegal during the Civil War, and misquoted Thomas Jefferson’s famous “tree of liberty” quote, referring to the “blood of liberty” instead of “the blood of patriots and tyrants.” Social media critics dubbed Biden a hypocrite for advocating gun reforms while his son Hunter was convicted on three felony gun charges the same day. Conservative commentator Dana Loesch highlighted this irony, questioning Everytown's stance on the matter. This event followed another problematic appearance by Biden at a Juneteenth celebration at the White House the previous night.

Dr. Eithan Haim, a relatively unknown surgeon, has been indicted by the Department of Justice for exposing Texas Children’s Hospital's covert transgender surgeries and treatments on minors. Haim faces four felony charges for allegedly violating a medical-records law. Last year, he anonymously provided evidence to conservative journalist Christopher Rufo, showing the hospital continued its transgender program despite claims of compliance with Governor Greg Abbott’s 2022 directive against such interventions. The Houston-based hospital stopped its transgender medical practices after a state law banning “gender-affirming” treatments for minors took effect in September 2023. Recently, U.S. marshals informed Haim of his indictment and summoned him to court for violating the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Haim and his legal team are set to appear in court on June 17. Haim’s attorney, Marcella Burke, expressed confidence in the trial outcome. In January, Haim publicly identified himself as the whistleblower to protect against DOJ and Department of Health and Human Services retaliation. He discovered he was a criminal investigation target for leaking medical records and is accused of not redacting sensitive patient information. Haim defended his actions, stating he exposed corruption to avoid burdening future generations. Rufo, who reviewed the records before publishing, denies any personal patient information was exposed. Assistant U.S. Attorney Tina Ansari, leading the investigation, claims Haim had no right to share minors' medical records, although she did not mention the documents were redacted and compliant with HIPAA for exposing medical misconduct. Requests for comment from Haim and Ansari’s office were not immediately answered.

In a controversial and seemingly irrational move, Governor Gavin Newsom, D-Calif., has proposed significant cuts to crucial public safety budgets, specifically targeting prisons and law enforcement. This decision comes as California struggles with a substantial budget deficit. Rather than addressing the financial shortfall with fiscal responsibility, Newsom is intensifying his radical climate agenda, prioritizing "equity" over the safety and well-being of Californians. According to Fox News, the California Democrat’s proposed budget, released in May, acknowledges the need for “difficult decisions” to address the estimated $27.6 billion deficit, which is projected to persist for years. The budget includes a $97 million cut to trial court operations, $10 million to the Department of Justice’s Division of Law Enforcement, and over $80 million to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. A Newsom spokesperson initially claimed to Fox News Digital that there were “no cuts to law enforcement.” They emphasized that the budget aims to make government more efficient and reduce taxpayer costs, including cuts on inmate spending. Since taking office in 2019, Newsom has overseen record investments in law enforcement, including $1.1 billion to combat crime, support police, and hold criminals accountable. However, officials from the Department of Finance conceded that the state’s proposed budget for Justice was reduced by 1.6%. Florida’s chief financial officer, Jimmy T. Patronis, criticized the move, describing it as the greatest misuse of taxpayer resources in American history. He suggested California is in a state of panic, scrambling to cover its enormous budget deficit. The budget cuts come as retailers in San Francisco, such as Aldo, J.Crew, and Madewell, have closed stores this year, with Zara expected to follow by 2025. The latest crime statistics reveal 8,686 thefts in San Francisco since January 1, in addition to 1,962 burglaries and 2,298 motor vehicle thefts. Newsom’s proposal to cut $80 million from the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation aims to eliminate 4,600 beds across 13 prisons. He also plans to reduce law enforcement training funds and cut $4.4 million from county probation departments. The California State Legislature is pushing back against some of the proposed public safety cuts, particularly a $15 million reduction from the DOJ, according to H.D. Palmer, the Department of Finance deputy director for external affairs. “These proposed reductions are unallocated, meaning it’s up to the department to implement them,” Palmer explained. Legislators have until June 15 to approve the budget, which will take effect in July.

New York Democrat Paula Collins, running against Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), sparked controversy by suggesting that Trump supporters should be placed in "reeducation camps" following the 2024 election. During a recent town hall, Collins mentioned the need to reeducate after the "MAGA nightmare," implying a reeducation camp scenario, which she acknowledged was a problematic term. This echoes remarks made by Hillary Clinton last year, calling for "deprogramming" of MAGA extremists. After backlash, Collins attempted to clarify her comments, stating she meant "widespread civics education." She explained that the goal was to help citizens understand state and federal court processes. Stefanik responded, accusing Democrats of wanting to persecute Trump supporters for prioritizing America. She highlighted past derogatory remarks from Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton towards Trump supporters and claimed this reflects the current Democrat strategy of silencing and punishing opposition.

Two videos from President Joe Biden’s Thursday appearance at a French ceremony honoring the 80th anniversary of WWII’s D-Day invasion in Nazi-occupied Normandy, France, show the president awkwardly bending over before being escorted offstage. During the event, Biden shook French President Emmanuel Macron’s hand but then suddenly hunched over and remained in that position for several seconds, prompting a concerned glance from Macron’s wife. Jill Biden then swiftly escorted him away while the ceremony was still ongoing. Such abrupt exits are typically reserved for urgent national security concerns. Given Biden’s reputation and rumors about his health, many online speculated that an "accident" might have caused his odd posture and sudden departure. This incident occurred less than 24 hours after Alex Jones ranted about sources claiming Biden frequently has such accidents. Prior to this potential mishap, Biden spoke with ABC News about his visit to Normandy, D-Day, and the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war. During the interview, Biden claimed to have known Vladimir Putin for forty years and used the opportunity to promote continued support for Ukraine. While it’s possible that Putin and Biden could have known each other that long, it implies an affiliation between KGB officer Putin and U.S. Senator Biden in 1984. Elsewhere in the discussion, Biden addressed concerns about U.S. weapons being used in Russian territories, stating they are approved only for strikes on the Russia-Ukraine border, not deeper into Russia. Whether Russian leaders will view these border strikes as a provocation remains uncertain, but the risk of escalation to WWIII is real. Mainstream media has been downplaying this threat despite the high stakes and the Democrats' leadership in the White House.

Next week, three Russian Navy ships and a nuclear-powered submarine will arrive at the Port of Havana for an official visit, as announced by the Cuban armed forces on Thursday. This visit, initially disclosed by U.S. officials, will feature military exercises. The Cuban Revolutionary Armed Forces specified that the missile frigate Admiral Gorshkov, the nuclear submarine Kazan, the oil tanker Pashin, and the salvage tug Nikolai Chiker will dock on June 12 for a week-long stay. They emphasized the visit underscores the “friendly” relations between Cuba and Russia, adheres to international law, and poses no regional security threat as none of the vessels are carrying nuclear weapons. A U.S. official informed McClatchy and the Miami Herald that these exercises will involve increased naval and air activity near the United States, marking the first coordinated Russian air and sea exercise in the Western Hemisphere in five years. Despite expressing disappointment over Cuba’s decision to host the Russian fleet, the official noted that the nuclear submarine is not assessed to be carrying nuclear weapons and does not pose a direct threat to U.S. national security. U.S. officials believe that Cuba's approval of the Russian port call is partially in response to a U.S. nuclear submarine docking at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base last year, which had angered the Cuban government. The official also remarked on the routine nature of Russian naval visits to Cuba, which have intensified due to U.S. support for Ukraine and NATO exercises. The Russian vessels, part of the Northern Fleet, embarked on May 17 for “a long voyage... to demonstrate the Russian flag and ensure naval presence in important areas of the distant oceanic zone,” according to the Russian news agency Tass. The Admiral Gorshkov frigate recently conducted an artillery exercise in the Atlantic Ocean, and the Kazan submarine, commissioned in 2021, is outfitted with long-range precision missiles. In its statement, the Cuban government highlighted that the Russian sailors will participate in cultural activities, including courtesy visits to Cuban officials and tours of historical and cultural sites. Historically, Russian submarines have been visiting Cuban ports since 1969, with spy ships making unannounced appearances in Havana before notable events like Russia’s invasion of Crimea in 2014 and U.S.-Cuba talks in 2015. The Russian navy’s training ship Perekop also visited Havana last July.

The widespread adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) would significantly increase electricity consumption per household in the U.S. Congressman Thomas Massie, an electrical engineer, raised this issue during a discussion with Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg about President Biden’s goal for 50% of car sales to be electric by 2030. Massie noted that the current and future power grids in most areas couldn’t handle the equivalent energy demand of running 25 refrigerators per household. California, for example, is already struggling with its existing grid load. He argued that the push for widespread EV adoption is a dangerous fantasy driven by political agendas rather than sound engineering principles. Despite these concerns, governments, media outlets, academic institutions, large corporations, and celebrities continue to promote an imminent transition to EVs as inevitable. However, this push seems to be an attempt to manufacture public consent for what could be an enormous scam. Here are three major concerns about the push for EVs. Firstly, EVs are not as environmentally friendly as claimed. While the premise is that EVs help reduce carbon emissions by using electricity instead of gasoline, over 60% of the electricity in the U.S. is generated from hydrocarbons like oil, coal, and gas. Additionally, the extraction and processing of materials needed for EV production are energy-intensive and environmentally damaging, often occurring in countries with lax environmental regulations like China. Secondly, EVs cannot compete without substantial government support. The U.S. government has subsidized EVs through various incentives, amounting to at least $393 billion in taxpayer money. Even with these subsidies, EVs are still significantly more expensive than gasoline vehicles. Without such support, the EV market would likely collapse. Finally, EVs have the potential to serve as tools for surveillance and control. They generate large amounts of data, which governments can easily access. This capability could be integrated into broader systems of surveillance and control, limiting individual freedom and independence. In conclusion, the push for EVs is not just about promoting green technology. It is also about establishing control over personal mobility and energy use. Critics argue that this is part of a larger strategy by global elites to control essential resources and limit individual choices, aligning with broader agendas like the Great Reset. Given these concerns, it's essential to scrutinize the motivations behind the push for EVs and consider the implications for freedom and independence.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is advocating for governments to endorse fake meat and alternative proteins to influence consumer behavior. In their white paper, “Creating a Vibrant Food Innovation Ecosystem: How Israel Is Advancing Alternative Proteins Across Sectors,” the WEF argues that a global collaboration between governments and corporations is necessary to promote these alternative proteins and modify human behavior. The report stresses that government leadership is crucial to address significant global challenges by: - Accelerating protein diversification - Advancing sustainable production systems - Driving consumer behavior change The push for alternative proteins is rooted in the belief that meeting the Paris Agreement obligations and decarbonizing the global economy requires investing in sustainable protein diversification and transforming the overall food system. The WEF claims that prioritizing alternative proteins can help nations achieve goals related to climate, biodiversity, food security, and public health. However, the high-tech nature and significant capital expenditure requirements of alternative proteins pose challenges for some private sectors, necessitating government intervention to steer consumer behavior within existing frameworks. In contrast, countries like Italy have banned lab-grown meat, and similar legislation is being proposed in states such as Florida, Alabama, Arizona, Kentucky, and Tennessee. The WEF emphasizes the need for open-access research and private sector incentives to fully realize the benefits of plant-based and cultivated meat and make these options accessible. Interestingly, the latest WEF report omits the mention of insects as an alternative protein, focusing instead on plant-based meat, cultivated meat, and fermented products. The WEF argues that alternative proteins can significantly benefit planetary and public health by addressing challenges related to climate change, food security, and planetary health. Ultimately, the WEF's push for alternative proteins aims to disrupt traditional farming, control land use, and influence food consumption patterns. While the report suggests that integrating alternative proteins into national policies could positively impact global food systems, critics argue that this agenda seeks to undermine independent farmers, centralize control over food production, and impose strict regulations on food choices. This initiative is part of a broader strategy by global elites to control essential resources such as food, money, and energy through measures like carbon footprint trackers and central bank digital currencies. In summary, the WEF's agenda involves manipulating food systems to promote fake meat and alternative proteins, claiming it will address global challenges. Critics, however, view it as a means to centralize control over food production and limit individual choices.

Robert De Niro has been stripped of a prestigious leadership award after calling Donald Trump a “clown” and a “tyrant” at a public press conference outside the former president’s “hush money” trial last week. De Niro was scheduled to attend the National Association of Broadcasters Leadership Foundation’s Celebration of Service to America Awards, where he was to receive the Foundation’s Service of Leadership Award. In a statement, the Foundation explained that De Niro’s presence at the event would be a “distraction.” “The Celebration of Service to America Awards is dedicated to honoring the vital local journalism and public service that local radio and television stations provide to their communities,” the statement reads. “This event is proudly bipartisan, uniting those from across the political spectrum to celebrate the impactful work of local broadcasters and our partners Robert De Niro has been stripped of a prestigious leadership award after calling Donald Trump a “clown” and a “tyrant” at a public press conference outside the former president’s “hush money” trial last week. De Niro was scheduled to attend the National Association of Broadcasters Leadership Foundation’s Celebration of Service to America Awards, where he was to receive the Foundation’s Service of Leadership Award. In a statement, the Foundation explained that De Niro’s presence at the event would be a “distraction.” “The Celebration of Service to America Awards is dedicated to honoring the vital local journalism and public service that local radio and television stations provide to their communities,” the statement reads. “This event is proudly bipartisan, uniting those from across the political spectrum to celebrate the impactful work of local broadcasters and our partners. While we strongly support the right of every American to exercise free speech and participate in civic engagement, it is clear that Mr. De Niro’s recent high-profile activities will create a distraction from the philanthropic work that we were hoping to recognize. To maintain the focus on the service of the award winners, Mr. De Niro will no longer be attending the event.” De Niro was invited to speak outside the New York courthouse by Joe Biden’s presidential campaign. “When Trump ran in 2016 it was like a joke,” De Niro said. “This buffoon running for president. No, never could happen. We have forgotten the lessons of history that showed us other clowns who weren’t taken seriously until they became vicious dictators. With Trump, we have a second chance, and no one is laughing now.” The veteran actor was loudly heckled by Trump supporters outside the courtroom and ridiculed on social media. In a post last year, Donald Trump branded De Niro a “total loser.” “De Niro should focus on his life, which is a mess, rather than the lives of others. He has become a total loser, as the world watches, waits, and laughs!” The incident involving Robert De Niro’s remarks about Donald Trump and the subsequent withdrawal of his leadership award highlights the deep divisions and heightened sensitivities in contemporary American politics. The decision by the National Association of Broadcasters Leadership Foundation to exclude De Niro underscores their commitment to maintaining a bipartisan focus on service and journalism, free from the distractions of political controversies. As political discourse continues to polarize, the challenges of honoring free speech while preserving the integrity of public events become increasingly complex. De Niro’s outspoken criticism and Trump’s retaliatory remarks reflect the ongoing tensions that shape the current political landscape, reminding us of the delicate balance between exercising free speech and respecting diverse political views.

Google is reportedly suppressing searches related to donating to former President Donald Trump’s campaign following his conviction in a New York court on Thursday. Social media users have shared instances where Google searches for the term “donate to Trump” yielded no results in the autofill suggestions. Google Trends data shows that searches for “How to donate to Trump” surged to unprecedented levels after his conviction on 34 counts of falsifying business records. However, the Google autofill feature suggested “donate to trans youth” as the top result instead. One user noted, “Organically, Biden’s donation site search results go directly to page 1, to the top” of Google’s search results, while “Trump’s query yields all far-left media with no link to donate on page 1.” Despite Google’s alleged censorship, the Trump campaign received over $53 million in donations within the first 24 hours following his conviction. The Biden campaign also fundraised off of Trump’s conviction but has not disclosed the amount raised.

For the first time in history, a presumptive presidential nominee from one of the two major U.S. political parties is a convicted felon. Donald Trump’s conviction in the Manhattan hush money case does not prevent him from running for — and potentially serving — as president. The requirements for federal office, as outlined in the U.S. Constitution, are straightforward: the president must be at least 35 years old, be a natural-born U.S. citizen, and have lived in the U.S. for at least 14 years. Criminal convictions are not mentioned. Trump, the leading contender for the 2024 presidential nomination, faces potential prison time, which could create practical complications if he wins the presidency. Running the country from a cell is implausible, and some legal experts suggest that a constitutional crisis might ensue, potentially leading to his sentence being suspended to allow him to fulfill his duties as president. The judge in the hush money case has yet to deliver Trump’s sentence, which could range from no jail time to up to four years behind bars. While Trump is the first felon candidate with a feasible chance of winning the presidency, he is not the first criminal to run for the office. In 1920, Eugene V. Debs, the Socialist Party nominee, campaigned while serving a 10-year federal sentence for urging resistance to the World War I draft. Debs received 3% of the popular vote, a respectable number but not enough to force the nation to address the improbable constitutional question of an imprisoned candidate winning the presidency. A Trump victory from behind bars would present significant constitutional challenges. Legal scholars generally believe that the necessity for a duly elected president to fulfill the duties of office would override a criminal conviction, likely requiring the sentence to be put on hold. If Trump were convicted of a federal crime, he could even attempt to pardon himself immediately upon taking office, a maneuver Debs also promised if he had won. Seton Hall law professor Eugene Mazo remarked, “Then we’re just going to get into uncharted waters. I don’t think we have an answer to this.” Debs’ case, much like Trump’s situation now, raises the question: Can a person run for president, or be elected president, after being convicted of a crime or even while in jail? The answer, both then and now, appears to be yes. “There’s nothing barring Trump from running. Even a federal conviction doesn’t prevent that,” explained a legal scholar. “The Supreme Court has said what’s in the Constitution are the only requirements you need to run for federal office.”

In a covert move reported by Politico, U.S. President Joe Biden has authorized Ukraine to conduct strikes inside Russia near the Kharkiv region using American weapons. This decision, confirmed by a U.S. official and two others familiar with the plan, permits Ukraine to use U.S. weapons for counter-fire purposes, allowing them to retaliate against Russian forces targeting or preparing to target them. Despite this, the policy on long-range strikes inside Russia remains unchanged, with no clear indication of when this permission was granted. Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned that such actions could lead to a global conflict, especially if Western allies enable Ukraine to use supplied weapons to strike inside Russia—a stance Ukraine's government is advocating for. Although the United States officially does not support using its weapons for direct attacks on Russia, Secretary of State Antony Blinken recently stated that Washington’s stance could "adjust and adapt." This revelation raises critical questions about the balance of power and the potential for escalation in an already tense conflict. As the U.S. navigates its support for Ukraine, the distinction between defensive aid and offensive capability becomes increasingly blurred. Will this calculated risk empower Ukraine to defend its sovereignty more aggressively, or could it provoke a retaliatory response from Russia, potentially leading to a broader conflict? The global community watches with bated breath, aware that each strategic decision could either bring us closer to peace or edge us further into the abyss of war.

Donald Trump’s historic conviction in his New York hush money case on Thursday may put the former president in prison, but it hasn’t dampened the enthusiasm for his campaign. Surge in Support Shortly after the verdict was announced, the official GOP fundraising site connected to his 2024 effort crashed. "The American people see through Crooked Joe Biden’s rigged show trial," the campaign posted on X. "So many Americans were moved to donate to President Trump’s campaign that the WinRed pages went down. We are working on getting the website back online as quickly as possible." Energized Base Major Trump supporters were undeterred by the conviction; instead, they appeared energized. "All of the charges are contrived," said Robert Bigelow, who has donated over $9 million to an outside group supporting Trump, in an interview with Reuters. Within minutes of Trump being convicted, his campaign sent out a fundraising email claiming the former president was a "political prisoner." "I was just convicted in a RIGGED political Witch Hunt trial: I DID NOTHING WRONG!" the email read. The message also declared that Joe Biden’s "chances of a 2nd term END TODAY!" Public Opinion and Fundraising Tactics Seventeen percent of voters in a new poll said a guilty verdict would make them less likely to vote for Trump, while 67 percent said a guilty verdict would make no difference in their choice in November. Trump has previously fundraised off his legal troubles. Last year, following the publication of his mugshot in his ongoing 2020 election conspiracy case in Georgia, the Trump campaign used the image to raise millions in donations. Trump later gave away pieces of the suit worn in the photo alongside trading cards as part of his fundraising efforts. Moving Forward Trump may be the first president in U.S. history to be convicted of a crime, but his campaign continues to steamroll ahead, maintaining a slight lead over Joe Biden in national poll averages.

Elon Musk’s Neuralink Receives FDA Approval for Mind-Blowing Second Brain Chip Trial Elon Musk's Neuralink, a pioneering brain-chip startup, has received FDA approval to implant its experimental brain chip, Telepathy, in a second patient. This approval follows complications with the first trial participant, leading to modifications in the device's implantation approach. Addressing Initial Trial Challenges In response to issues faced by the first participant, Neuralink has made significant adjustments, including embedding some of the device's ultrathin wires deeper into the brain. These changes aim to enhance the stability and functionality of the device, as reported by sources familiar with the company and a document reviewed by the Wall Street Journal. Expanding Clinical Trials Neuralink plans to expand its clinical trials to include 10 participants this year. The primary goal of this project, known as the PRIME Study, is to develop a "fully implantable, wireless brain-computer interface" that allows users to control a computer cursor or keyboard with their thoughts. Potential Transformative Treatments This groundbreaking technology holds promise for transformative treatments for various physical disabilities, such as blindness and paralysis, and conditions like autism, depression, obesity, and schizophrenia. Neuralink’s ambition is to unlock new possibilities for individuals with these conditions, offering them a new lease on life. First Implantation and its Aftermath The first Telepathy implant was performed in late January on Noland Arbaugh, a 30-year-old quadriplegic. The chip initially allowed Arbaugh to control a computer mouse using his thoughts without any adverse effects. The procedure involved a specially designed robot implanting the coin-sized chip, which has ultra-thin flexible threads, into the brain's movement intention region. This chip records and wirelessly transmits brain signals to an app that decodes movement intentions. Setbacks and Recovery However, about a month post-surgery, Arbaugh experienced a significant setback when most of the implanted threads came loose, impairing the device's functionality. This issue highlighted the unpredictability of brain movement within the skull, which exceeded Neuralink’s expectations. Arbaugh described the emotional rollercoaster of gaining newfound abilities only to lose them shortly after. “I was on such a high and then to be brought down that low. It was very, very hard. I cried,” he shared. Technical Adjustments and Future Plans Neuralink has since implemented software updates to restore much of the device’s capabilities, and Arbaugh has demonstrated these improvements in live streams. To prevent similar issues in future trials, the company has received FDA approval to implant the threads deeper into the brain of the second patient, targeting eight millimeters into the motor cortex compared to the three-to-five millimeters used for Arbaugh. The next procedure is scheduled for June, with eight more participants lined up for trials by year-end. Over 1,000 quadriplegics have registered interest in participating in Neuralink’s trials, reflecting the significant demand and hope surrounding this innovative technology. For ongoing updates on Elon Musk and Neuralink, visit ElonMuskWatch.com.

Denver, Colorado, is set to deploy aerial drones for certain situations instead of dispatching officers, as announced by the city's police department. This innovative initiative will be funded by a $100,000 grant from the Denver Police Foundation. The department plans to purchase several drones and launch the program within six to 12 months. In response to an $8.4 million budget cut by Democrats, the Denver Police Department (DPD) will use drones as first responders. These drones will assess incidents before deciding if a physical police response is necessary. "The DPD would respond to any call for service where someone is physically requesting a police officer on the scene. But if there was a fight at Colfax and Cherokee, and we put a drone in the air and there is no fight and nothing causing traffic issues, then we would reroute our police officers to other emergent calls," explained Phil Gonshak, director of Denver PD’s Strategic Initiatives Bureau. He emphasized that the program is just beginning to "lift off" and assured that drones would not replace police officers entirely. Sgt. Jeremiah Gates, leader of Arapahoe County’s drone unit, described drones as "the future of law enforcement at some point, whether we like it or not." He illustrated their practical use: "I could fly the drone over a reported suspicious vehicle and say, 'Hey, that vehicle is not out of place,' and I never had to send an officer over to bother them, and I can clear it with that. It’s saving resources." He added that drones could identify if a reported weapon was not a gun before officers approach a suspect, potentially diffusing dangerous situations. However, civil liberties advocates express concerns over privacy and the potential for misuse. Laura Moraff, an attorney with ACLU Colorado, warned of the implications of widespread drone surveillance. "We’re worried about what it would mean if drones were really just all over the skies in Colorado," she said. "We are worried about what that would mean for First Amendment activities, for speech and organizing and protesting — because being surveilled by law enforcement, including by drones, can change the way people speak and protest." Moraff also highlighted the risk of "over-policing" in black communities, where many 911 calls originate. "We know there is a problem with people reporting Black people doing normal everyday things as if there is something suspicious going on," she said. "So sending out a drone anytime there is a 911 call could be dangerous and lead to more over-policing of communities of color." Moraff added that the normalization of drones in the skies could impact public behavior significantly, as constant surveillance may cause people to alter their actions and interactions. While police claim they will use drones responsibly, the potential for abuse and the establishment of a surveillance state remain significant concerns.

Moderna’s Covid vaccine was manufactured by a government contractor with close connections to the CIA, FDA, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, according to a bombshell report. In 2021, Moderna hired National Resilience (Resilience), a supposedly new pharmaceutical manufacturing company, to produce all of their Covid-19 mRNA vaccines. This company, also known by several names including Nanotherapeutics, Nanosphere Inc, Ology Bioservices, and Government Resilience Services, was first brought to light by independent journalist Destiny Rezendes last year. Resilience’s investors included Google, Lux Capital, Magnetic Ventures, and 8VC. According to Crunchbase, the company’s COO also served as a senior adviser to Pfizer. Rezendes revealed that Resilience’s board members and investors are tied to significant entities such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, CIA affiliates, Merrill Lynch, and the Rockefeller University. Former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb also served on Resilience’s board. Rezendes noted that Resilience, previously known as Nanosphere and Nanotherapeutics, holds numerous government contracts related to biological warfare and gene-specific sensors for the Department of Defense. Adding to the intrigue, Resilience was selected by the World Economic Forum to lead the Davos panel on cybersecurity. Journalist Whitney Webb detailed more of Resilience’s ties to the CIA in 2022, noting that the concept of starting Resilience came from Luciana Borio, founder of In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s venture capital firm. Additionally, several agency whistleblowers revealed that the CIA bribed its own COVID-19 origin team to reject the lab-leak theory. The involvement of the CIA in creating pharmaceuticals raises significant questions about transparency and the motivations behind the push for widespread Covid vaccine adoption. The CIA's primary role is intelligence and national security, not public health. This overlap between intelligence agencies and pharmaceutical development could lead to conflicts of interest and erode public trust. The push for everyone to take the Covid vaccine, coupled with the CIA's involvement, underscores the need for clear boundaries and accountability in public health initiatives. The CIA should focus on its core mission, leaving pharmaceutical development to specialized, transparent, and accountable entities dedicated to public health.

Warning: WHO Global Coup in May! As the World Health Organization (WHO) prepares for a crucial vote on the Pandemic Treaty and changes to the International Health Regulations (IHR), concerns about global governance and national sovereignty are reaching a fever pitch. The assembly will take place in Geneva from May 27 to June 1. If approved, these changes would transition the WHO from an advisory body to an authoritative entity capable of enforcing its directives globally, effectively establishing a world government run by unelected bureaucrats. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the first WHO Director General without a medical degree, has previously served on the board of GAVI, a Bill Gates organization. Given that Bill Gates' organizations are the second-largest funders of the WHO, Gates has significant influence over global health policies, a fact underscored during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite his lack of medical credentials, Gates advocated for widespread vaccination, asserting that life couldn't return to normal until nearly all 7.5 billion people received the COVID-19 vaccine. Gates has since acknowledged that these vaccines do not prevent infection and has remained silent on their safety concerns, despite widespread assurances of their safety and efficacy. Dr. Meryl Nass, founder of Door to Freedom, will provide live coverage of the WHO meetings starting May 27 at 2 PM EST. According to the site, 24 US governors and 22 state attorneys general have signed letters opposing the WHO treaties. Dr. Nass also highlights that eleven countries, including Belarus, Cuba, North Korea, and others, have informed the UN General Assembly of their refusal to support the WHO's Pandemic Preparedness initiatives. In Europe, the Netherlands' lower house of Parliament has instructed its government to delay or vote against the WHO proposals. Slovakia has declared it will not sign the current drafts of either document, and Croatia's new majority party is against the WHO’s Pandemic Preparedness Plan. Italy’s Senator Borghi has stated that Italy will vote “No” on the treaty, and there are ten more months to reject the IHR amendments. The WHO’s Relentless Power Grab The world is closely watching as delegates gather for the 77th World Health Assembly in Geneva to discuss global health governance. However, there is significant opposition from various countries, including Japan, Germany, Slovakia, and the United States. Meryl Nass and James Corbett, co-hosts of 'Good Morning CHD,' will return to CHD.TV to present a final warning about the implications of the May 2024 meeting. They will discuss the critical points related to the WHO's proposals and their potential impact on global governance and individual freedoms. Assassinations and Suspicious Deaths Dr. Nass explains that on May 10, Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico publicly opposed the WHO Pandemic Treaty. Just ten days later, Tedros visited Slovakia, urging Fico not to break the consensus. Five days after that visit, Fico was shot in the abdomen and is now in critical condition, marking the first assassination attempt on a European leader in two decades. The new government led by populist Robert Fico won a mandatory confidence vote amid this turmoil. Similarly, the President and Foreign Minister of Iran, a country that opposed the WHO Pandemic Treaty, died in a helicopter crash on May 20. Iranians believe the deaths were orchestrated. Additionally, Tanzanian President John Magufuli, who exposed fraudulent PCR tests, died of a heart attack at age 61. Debunking the Claims Reuters previously addressed claims that five leaders who died in office were killed for opposing COVID-19 vaccines. The unfounded assertion includes the deaths of Jovenel Moise of Haiti, John Magufuli of Tanzania, Hamed Bakayoko of Ivory Coast, Ambrose Dlamini of eSwatini, and Pierre Nkurunziza of Burundi. Despite widespread speculation, there is no evidence linking their deaths to their stance on COVID-19 policies. Conclusion The upcoming vote on the WHO's Pandemic Treaty and IHR changes raises critical questions about transparency, global health governance, and the preservation of national sovereignty. The involvement of influential figures like Bill Gates and organizations like the CIA in global health initiatives underscores the need for accountability and clear boundaries. The WHO's shift from advisory to authoritative status could have profound implications, making it imperative for specialized, transparent, and accountable entities to manage public health.

**Ashley Biden’s Diary: Alarming Revelations and a Media Silence** The confirmation is in: Ashley Biden's diary, much like Hunter Biden's laptop, is real, and its contents are deeply troubling. Yet, the media remains largely silent on this explosive story. In 2019, Ashley Biden, the then 37-year-old daughter of President Joe Biden and his wife Jill, penned journal entries revealing disturbing details about her childhood. She wrote about showering with her father at an inappropriate age and expressed fears that she had been sexually abused. These revelations are undeniably significant. However, a near-complete media blackout has kept this story under wraps for years. After receiving treatment in rehab, Ashley moved to a halfway house in Florida, where she left the diary under a mattress. The diary, which also chronicled her drug use, was discovered in 2020 by a Florida woman who subsequently stole it, leaked its contents online, and sold it for $40,000. During this period, the Biden campaign allowed the left-leaning media to question the diary's authenticity or dismiss it as a right-wing fabrication akin to a Russia hoax. This dismissal echoed the initial treatment of Hunter Biden's laptop. However, both the laptop and the diary have now been confirmed as real. Ashley Biden herself has verified the authenticity of the diary in a court document made public last month. The contents of Ashley's diary raise serious concerns and demand scrutiny. In a July 2019 entry, she wrote, "Hyper-sexualized @ a young age. What is this due to? Was I molested. I think so —" The use of a period rather than a question mark suggests a level of certainty. Ashley continued, "I can’t remember specifics but I do remember trauma… I remember somewhat being sexualized with [her first cousin] Caroline; I remember having sex with friends @ a young age; showers w/ my dad (probably not appropriate); being turned on when I wasn’t supposed [sic] to be." The mention of showers with her father stands out starkly. Ashley also noted in her diary that she was undergoing treatment for "sexual trauma." Let’s consider this: If these revelations were about a Trump daughter, the media would be in an uproar. It would dominate headlines, with special investigative editions on Rachel Maddow, exhaustive primetime coverage on MSNBC and CNN, and a relentless focus in op-eds and Sunday shows, with the press demanding answers. Yet, the majority of the media, which has not hesitated to label Donald Trump with various severe accusations, has largely ignored similar allegations against Joe Biden. This discrepancy in coverage is striking. Last month, the New York Times reported that the woman who stole Ashley’s diary was sentenced to prison. However, the Times did not delve into the diary's actual contents. There was no mention of the alarming entries. Instead, the focus was on the "brazen scheme to steal the diary of President Biden’s daughter and sell it to a right-wing group in the hope of disrupting the 2020 election." Within this coverage, a letter from Ashley was linked, in which she has never denied the diary’s authenticity, unlike the initial reactions to Hunter's laptop. It is time to address these revelations with the seriousness they deserve. Ashley Biden has confirmed the diary is real, and its contents raise important questions. What is the truth, Joe? The American public deserves transparency and answers.

Admiral Daryl Caudle, Commander of the U.S. Fleet Forces Command, has issued a stark warning about the increasing attempts by foreign nationals, particularly from Russia and China, to breach U.S. military bases. During an appearance on Fox News Channel’s “America’s Newsroom,” Caudle revealed that incidents of unauthorized individuals attempting to penetrate military installations are happening with alarming frequency—up to two or three times a week. He emphasized that while many of these individuals carry passports and other identification, they are not permitted to be on the bases, and their true motives remain unclear. This troubling trend includes reports of Chechen nationals found near a special forces officer’s residence close to a North Carolina military base, armed with a camera and telephoto lens. Additionally, two Jordanian nationals in a box truck were intercepted while trying to ram through the security gate at Marine Corps Base Quantico in Virginia. While neither Jordanian has a criminal record in the U.S., the FBI has not confirmed if they are on a terrorist watchlist. Moreover, approximately 100 incidents involving Chinese nationals attempting to access American military bases have been recorded in recent years. One notable case involved Chinese citizens detained at Fort Wainwright in Fairbanks, Alaska, after bypassing a checkpoint and being found with a drone in their vehicle. Despite these security breaches, the U.S. border remains open, allowing thousands of unvetted illegal aliens to enter the country daily, a situation that some find surprisingly easy. The rise in attempted infiltrations by foreign nationals highlights significant security concerns that require immediate attention and action.

The Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response at the US Department of Health and Human Services has announced a plan to produce 4.8 million doses of the H5N1 avian flu vaccine as part of pandemic preparedness efforts. Dawn O'Connell, JD, explained that health officials have secured a manufacturing line with one of their partners for the fill-and-finish steps, ensuring this process will not disrupt the production of the seasonal flu vaccine. The H5N1 vaccine is currently in bulk form and will be prepared in multidose vials, with the fill-and-finish process taking a couple of months to expedite vaccine availability if needed. O'Connell mentioned ongoing active discussions across federal agencies to determine the key triggers for deploying H5N1 vaccine doses. Talks with mRNA vaccine manufacturers Pfizer and Moderna are also in progress, with an announcement about their involvement expected soon. Nirav Shah, MD, JD, principal deputy director at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, highlighted potential triggers for vaccine deployment. These include changes in transmission patterns, such as human-to-human spread in addition to animal-to-human transmission, and signs of increased illness severity. Shah also noted that detecting H5N1 infections in people without epidemiologic links to affected dairy farms could be a trigger. "We are always monitoring for mutations," Shah said, emphasizing thorough discussions across federal agencies. As the 2024 election approaches, the early development of a bird flu vaccine raises questions that echo the anxieties of the last pandemic. With memories of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout—its urgency, controversy, and perceived efficacy—still fresh, many are skeptical about the timing and intent behind this new vaccine push. Is the government being extra cautious, or is there a more strategic plan in play? The overlap of pandemic preparedness with the election season invites speculation. Some view it as a prudent step to safeguard public health, learning from past experiences to stay ahead of potential crises. However, others see it as a troubling pattern, wondering if this is another instance where political and health agendas intertwine, potentially forcing the public into compliance once again. The COVID-19 vaccine's mixed reception has left a mark, with many feeling coerced into taking a shot they did not want, only to later question its effectiveness. This experience has fueled distrust and resistance, raising the stakes for how any new vaccine campaign, such as for H5N1, will be received. Will people be forced to take another shot, or will there be a more transparent and voluntary approach this time around? Ultimately, the key lies in communication and trust. Authorities must address public concerns openly, ensuring that health measures are genuinely aimed at protecting the population rather than serving hidden agendas. As we move forward, the challenge will be to balance preparedness with respect for individual choice, learning from the past to create a future where public health efforts are seen as supportive, not coercive.

Ominous Warnings About H5N1 Pandemic Amid WHO Pandemic Treaty Vote Health officials are issuing dire warnings about the potential for an H5N1 bird flu pandemic among humans. These alerts come as the World Health Organization (WHO) prepares to vote on the global pandemic treaty at the 77th World Health Assembly at the end of this month. The treaty, if passed, will grant the WHO significantly more authority than it had during the last pandemic, raising concerns about how this power might be used in future health crises. Growing Concerns Over Bird Flu Recently, two more human cases of bird flu have been confirmed. If the H5N1 virus mutates into a form that spreads easily from human to human, it could cause widespread panic and a potentially catastrophic death toll. This possibility raises critical questions about what extreme measures the WHO might institute. Finalizing the Global Pandemic Treaty Negotiators have been working intensely to finalize the global pandemic treaty. According to the official WHO website, governments have agreed to continue working on a proposed pandemic agreement and to further refine the draft ahead of the Seventy-seventh World Health Assembly starting on May 27, 2024. Governments meeting at the WHO headquarters in Geneva have agreed to resume hybrid and in-person discussions over the coming weeks to advance work on critical issues, including a new global system for pathogen access and benefits sharing, pandemic prevention, One Health, and the financial coordination needed to scale up countries’ capacities to prepare for and respond to pandemics. Lack of Media Coverage in the U.S. In the United States, mainstream media has been unusually quiet about this treaty, despite its significant implications. Negotiations have been ongoing for the past two years, and the plan is to submit the final draft for a vote at the World Health Assembly at the end of this month. The Member State-led Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), established over two years ago, is guiding this process and will submit its outcome for consideration at the Assembly. Expert Opinions and Historical Context INB Bureau Co-Chair Dr. Precious Matsoso of South Africa noted the progress made during the latest discussions on a wide range of issues in the draft agreement. “We are witnessing history play out before our eyes during this process, with the coming together of all countries to decide a binding pact to protect all citizens of the world,” said Matsoso. “This is not a simple exercise. This is the first-ever process to develop a proposed agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. Getting this done means getting it right, and the INB Bureau is committed to helping finalize a meaningful, lasting agreement.” Upcoming Vote and Implications The 77th World Health Assembly will be held in Geneva, Switzerland from May 27 to June 1. Member nations will cast their votes on the final draft of the global pandemic treaty, which is expected to pass. Although there are claims that the treaty has been "watered down," the reality is that the language has merely been made more vague. If the treaty is approved, the WHO will take the lead in managing the next pandemic, a fact that many people are unaware of. Recent Bird Flu Cases and Potential Threats The potential threat of an H5N1 pandemic is growing. On Wednesday, the CDC announced another confirmed human case of bird flu in the United States. The case involved a Michigan dairy farm worker, marking the second instance of bird flu in a dairy worker this year. The virus appears to have developed under similar circumstances to an earlier case in Texas. Despite these cases, many dairy workers are reluctant to get tested due to fears over job loss, immigration status, language barriers, and general distrust in public health systems. Additionally, four more cats in the U.S. have died from H5N1, including two pets in South Dakota with no links to poultry or dairy cows. This troubling development suggests that the virus could spread more widely among animals, potentially increasing the risk to humans. Global Impact and Future Pandemics If cats are dying from H5N1, it is likely only a matter of time before humans start experiencing similar outcomes. Reports indicate that cats that died from H5N1 in Texas suffered from brain hemorrhaging and blindness. The question remains whether H5N1 could cause similar damage in humans. In Australia, a child has been confirmed as the first case of H5N1 bird flu. The child contracted the virus in India and fell ill in March. This case, along with the detection of bird flu on a farm in Victoria, Australia, raises further concerns. Since 2003, more than 50 percent of humans who tested positive for H5N1 have died. The potential for widespread fear and chaos if millions of people become infected is immense. Conclusion Global pestilences will likely play a significant role in the chaotic era ahead. The panic witnessed during the COVID-19 pandemic could pale in comparison to the fear generated by a pandemic with a higher death rate. The implications of the global pandemic treaty and the growing threat of H5N1 underscore the urgent need for preparedness and vigilant monitoring.