THE Y US? CHANNEL

Sequels are a tricky beast to tame. Oftentimes, they fall victim to the crushing weight of expectations, leaving audiences disappointed and filmmakers scratching their heads. Mortal Kombat: Annihilation is a prime example of a sequel gone awry. Released in 1997, just two years after the surprisingly enjoyable original Mortal Kombat film, this sequel attempted to capitalize on the success of its predecessor. However, instead of building upon the foundation laid by the first film, Mortal Kombat: Annihilation crumbles under the weight of its own hubris. Let's talk about the plot, or lack thereof, in Mortal Kombat: Annihilation. The film picks up right where the first one left off, with our heroes Liu Kang, Sonya Blade, and Johnny Cage facing off against the evil sorcerer Shang Tsung. However, when the sinister Outworld emperor Shao Kahn invades Earthrealm, chaos ensues. The story quickly spirals into a nonsensical mess of subplots, inconsistent character motivations, and baffling decisions that leave viewers scratching their heads. One of the biggest sins of Mortal Kombat: Annihilation is its complete disregard for the source material. Fans of the iconic video game franchise will be left fuming as beloved characters are butchered beyond recognition. From the laughable portrayal of the shape-shifting reptilian ninja Reptile to the cringe-inducing dialogue spouted by the thunder god Raiden, this film takes everything that made the Mortal Kombat games great and throws it out the window. Now, let's talk about the special effects, or lack thereof, in Mortal Kombat: Annihilation. As a film released in 1997, one would expect at least a modicum of decent CGI. However, what we get in this abomination of a movie is a hot mess of poorly rendered creatures, laughable fight sequences, and green screen effects that look like they were lifted straight out of a Saturday morning cartoon. The iconic characters of the Mortal Kombat universe, such as Sub-Zero, Scorpion, and the fan-favorite Kitana, are reduced to mere shadows of their video game counterparts. So, should you watch Mortal Kombat: Annihilation? Only if you have a high tolerance for pain and a strong stomach for cinematic atrocities. Otherwise, do yourself a favor and steer clear of this trainwreck of a movie. Stick to the video games and the original Mortal Kombat film if you want to experience the true essence of the franchise. And remember, sometimes the best sequels are the ones that never get made. Thank you for joining me on this journey through the wreckage of Mortal Kombat: Annihilation. Until next time, stay safe, stay entertained, and avoid bad sequels at all costs. Until Next Time, your souls belong are mine !

Picture this: it's the mid-90s, and the world is obsessed with hip hop culture and the rise of rap music. In comes Kazaam, a film that attempts to capitalize on this cultural phenomenon by casting none other than Shaquille O'Neal as the titular character. Yes, you heard that right – Shaq, the basketball legend, tries his hand at acting in what would become one of the biggest flops of his career. Let's start by discussing the character of Kazaam. Shaq plays a genie who is trapped inside a boombox for thousands of years until he is unintentionally released by a young boy named Max. From the moment Kazaam appears on screen, it's evident that Shaq's acting skills leave much to be desired. His line delivery is wooden, his facial expressions are minimal, and his overall performance lacks the charm and charisma needed to carry a film of this magnitude. Unsurprisingly, Kazaam was met with scathing reviews upon its release. Critics panned the film for its lackluster script, poor acting, and overall lack of originality. Audiences agreed, with many expressing disappointment at the missed opportunity to create a memorable and entertaining family film. To this day, Kazaam remains a cautionary tale of what happens when a film fails to deliver on its promises and falls short of audience expectations. In conclusion, Kazaam is a prime example of a bad movie that misses the mark on every level. From its lackluster performances to its uninspired production design, this film fails to deliver on its promise of a fun and engaging family adventure. While it may hold a nostalgic place in the hearts of some viewers, Kazaam ultimately falls flat as a piece of cinematic entertainment. So if you're looking for a truly bad movie to watch and laugh at, look no further than Kazaam – it's a real stinker. Thanks for tuning in, and until next time, stay tuned for more movie reviews and discussions on my channel. Remember to like, comment, and subscribe for more content like this. Have a great day, and happy watching! Please Like and Follow Fair Use and Parody Disclaimer: This channel and website and the content made available through this site are for educational, entertainment and informational purposes only. These so-called “fair uses” are permitted even if the use of the work would otherwise be infringing. Content may contain copyrighted material owned by a third party, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. A copyright owner’s rights are listed under the Copyright Act, Section 107 of the Copyright Act. This channel often features satire, parody, commentary and critique mixed with factual news reporting. All references to politicians, celebrities and/or other personalities that are critiqued and/or commented upon that are based on real people are identified as such.

For those who may not be familiar, Shaquille O'Neal, also known as Shaq, is a retired professional basketball player who dominated the court during his heyday. Standing at a towering 7'1" and weighing in at over 300 pounds, Shaq was a force to be reckoned with in the NBA. However, his athletic prowess did not translate well to the silver screen, as evidenced by his lackluster acting skills. Shaquille O'Neal made his acting debut in the 1994 film "Blue Chips," where he played Neon Boudeaux, a talented but troubled basketball player. While Shaq's performance in the film was passable, it was clear that he had a long way to go in terms of honing his acting chops. Despite his shortcomings, Shaq's star power helped him land more roles in Hollywood, paving the way for a less-than-stellar acting career. One of Shaq's most infamous roles was in the 1997 superhero film "Steel," where he played the titular character, John Henry Irons. The film was widely panned by critics and audiences alike, with many citing Shaq's wooden acting as a major detriment to the movie's success. From cringe-worthy one-liners to awkward fight scenes, Shaq failed to convince viewers that he could carry a film on his own. Another one of Shaq's biggest flops was the 1996 film "Kazaam," where he played a rapping genie who befriends a troubled boy. Not only did the film bomb at the box office, but Shaq's performance was ridiculed for its lack of depth and emotional range. Critics slammed Shaq for his forgettable turn as Kazaam, with some even going as far as calling it one of the worst performances in cinematic history. Please Like and Follow Fair Use and Parody Disclaimer: This channel and website and the content made available through this site are for educational, entertainment and informational purposes only. These so-called “fair uses” are permitted even if the use of the work would otherwise be infringing. Content may contain copyrighted material owned by a third party, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. A copyright owner’s rights are listed under the Copyright Act, Section 107 of the Copyright Act. This channel often features satire, parody, commentary and critique mixed with factual news reporting. All references to politicians, celebrities and/or other personalities that are critiqued and/or commented upon that are based on real people are identified as such. Kazaam Movie Review https://rumble.com/v4uq27h-kazaam-not-shazaam.html

Welcome back to our channel, where we delve into the world of movies and entertainment. Today, we're talking about the one and only Tommy Wiseau - a man who has become synonymous with over-the-top, cringe-worthy acting. From his iconic performance in The Room to his bizarre public appearances, Wiseau has carved out a unique niche for himself in the world of cinema. So, sit back, relax, and let's dive into the wild and wacky world of Tommy Wiseau. First things first, who exactly is Tommy Wiseau? Well, that's a bit of a mystery. Wiseau burst onto the scene in 2003 with his self-funded film The Room, which has since attained cult status as one of the best worst movies ever made. Wiseau wrote, directed, produced, and starred in the film, cementing his status as a true auteur. Despite his lack of formal training or experience in the industry, Wiseau has become a beloved figure in the world of cult cinema, known for his unique brand of awkward, over-the-top acting. Outside of his film career, Tommy Wiseau has become a larger-than-life figure in popular culture. Known for his eccentric fashion sense, impenetrable accent, and baffling social media presence, Wiseau has cultivated a persona that is equal parts endearing and baffling. From his cryptic tweets to his bizarre YouTube videos, Wiseau's antics have captivated audiences around the world, solidifying his status as a true internet sensation. Now, let's talk about Wiseau's acting style. Or should we say, lack thereof. Wiseau's performances are characterized by their sheer audacity, with the actor throwing caution to the wind and embracing every emotion with gusto. From his melodramatic deliveries to his awkward physical movements, Wiseau's acting is a sight to behold. While some may dismiss his performances as amateurish or cringeworthy, there's no denying the sheer entertainment value of watching Wiseau in action. One of the most enduring aspects of Tommy Wiseau's legacy is his penchant for unforgettable quotes. From the iconic "Oh hai, Mark" to the infamous "You're tearing me apart, Lisa!" Wiseau's lines have become ingrained in the pop culture lexicon. His unique delivery and offbeat cadence only serve to make these lines all the more memorable, ensuring that they will be quoted and referenced for years to come. Please Like and Follow Fair Use and Parody Disclaimer: This channel and website and the content made available through this site are for educational, entertainment and informational purposes only. These so-called “fair uses” are permitted even if the use of the work would otherwise be infringing. Content may contain copyrighted material owned by a third party, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. A copyright owner’s rights are listed under the Copyright Act, Section 107 of the Copyright Act. This channel often features satire, parody, commentary and critique mixed with factual news reporting. All references to politicians, celebrities and/or other personalities that are critiqued and/or commented upon that are based on real people are identified as such.

Hello everyone and welcome back to our channel! Today's topic of discussion is the polarizing figure in Hollywood, Rob Schneider. While some may praise him for his comedic performances, others argue that he is a terrible actor. In this video, we will delve deep into the reasons why Rob Schneider is considered a terrible actor, and analyze the various aspects of his career that have led to this conclusion. Rob Schneider first rose to fame as a cast member on Saturday Night Live in the early 1990s. His quirky and often over-the-top comedic style quickly garnered attention, leading to a successful film career in the years that followed. Schneider is perhaps best known for his collaborations with fellow comedian Adam Sandler, appearing in films such as "The Waterboy" and "Big Daddy." However, despite his popularity, Schneider has been often criticized for his lackluster performances and inability to truly embody the characters he portrays. One of the main criticisms leveled against Rob Schneider is his limited range as an actor. Many argue that Schneider relies heavily on his signature comedic persona, often playing exaggerated versions of himself in his roles. This lack of versatility has led to his performances feeling stale and one-dimensional, with little variation from one character to the next. While Schneider may excel in comedic roles that require physical humor and zany antics, he falls short when it comes to more nuanced, dramatic performances. Please Like and Follow Fair Use and Parody Disclaimer: This channel and website and the content made available through this site are for educational, entertainment and informational purposes only. These so-called “fair uses” are permitted even if the use of the work would otherwise be infringing. Content may contain copyrighted material owned by a third party, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. A copyright owner’s rights are listed under the Copyright Act, Section 107 of the Copyright Act. This channel often features satire, parody, commentary and critique mixed with factual news reporting. All references to politicians, celebrities and/or other personalities that are critiqued and/or commented upon that are based on real people are identified as such.

Another Episode of Bad Acting 101, Featuring John Wayne. We'll get this out of the way now, he is not a terrible actor. However he has left plenty examples of bad acting for our viewing pleasure, such as 1956's The Conqueror. In that movie he plays himself pretending to be Genghis Khan. This is something that was made for real and got a theatrical release. It would be a career killer for most. John Wayne, born Marion Robert Morrison, rose to fame in the golden age of Hollywood, becoming one of the most iconic actors of all time. With his rugged good looks, towering presence, and distinctive drawl, Wayne embodied the quintessential American hero on screen. However, as his career progressed, some critics began to claim that Wayne's performances lacked depth and subtlety, leading to accusations of laziness on his part. One of the main arguments against John Wayne as a lazy actor is his tendency to rely on mannerisms and stereotypes in his performances. Critics have pointed out that Wayne often played the same character in multiple films, with little variation in his delivery or demeanor. His reliance on familiar tropes, such as the stoic cowboy or the tough military man, led some to accuse him of phoning in his performances rather than fully immersing himself in his roles. Please Like and Follow Fair Use and Parody Disclaimer: This channel and website and the content made available through this site are for educational, entertainment and informational purposes only. These so-called “fair uses” are permitted even if the use of the work would otherwise be infringing. Content may contain copyrighted material owned by a third party, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. A copyright owner’s rights are listed under the Copyright Act, Section 107 of the Copyright Act. This channel often features satire, parody, commentary and critique mixed with factual news reporting. All references to politicians, celebrities and/or other personalities that are critiqued and/or commented upon that are based on real people are identified as such.

What to say here? This was a hard episode to make, just because Uwe Boll's acting and his movies are just terrible, and not in the so bad its good way. (Although some qualify). Before we delve into his acting abilities, let's take a closer look at Uwe Boll's career. Boll, a German filmmaker, gained notoriety for his video game adaptations, such as "Alone in the Dark" and "BloodRayne," which were critically panned and considered some of the worst films ever made. Despite the negative reception of his work, Boll continued to push forward in the industry, often funding his films through controversial means. But how does Boll fare as an actor in his own films? Let's find out. When it comes to Uwe Boll's acting abilities, there is no sugarcoating it: he is a terrible actor. Boll's performances are often wooden, lacking emotion, and fail to resonate with the audience. His line delivery feels forced and unnatural, making it difficult for viewers to connect with his characters on screen. Boll's lack of range as an actor is glaringly obvious in his films, where he fails to bring depth to his characters and often comes across as one-dimensional. One of the most common criticisms of Boll's acting is his inability to emote convincingly. Whether he is supposed to convey sadness, anger, or joy, Boll's expressions come off as robotic and unconvincing. This lack of emotional depth makes it challenging for audiences to invest in his characters and root for them throughout the film. In many instances, Boll's performances distract from the overall narrative, taking viewers out of the story and leaving them questioning his casting choices. Furthermore, Boll's delivery of dialogue is often stilted and awkward. His lines come across as rehearsed and lacking in spontaneity, failing to add any nuance or depth to the character he portrays. Boll's limited range as an actor becomes even more apparent when he is tasked with delivering complex or emotionally charged dialogue, where he often falls short and fails to convey the intended impact. In addition to his lackluster performances, Boll's physical presence on screen is also a point of criticism. His body language and movements feel awkward and unnatural, further detracting from the overall viewing experience. Boll's on-screen presence lacks charisma and fails to command attention, making it challenging for audiences to stay engaged with his performances. Please Like and Follow Fair Use and Parody Disclaimer: This channel and website and the content made available through this site are for educational, entertainment and informational purposes only. These so-called “fair uses” are permitted even if the use of the work would otherwise be infringing. Content may contain copyrighted material owned by a third party, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. A copyright owner’s rights are listed under the Copyright Act, Section 107 of the Copyright Act. This channel often features satire, parody, commentary and critique mixed with factual news reporting. All references to politicians, celebrities and/or other personalities that are critiqued and/or commented upon that are based on real people are identified as such.

We Proudly Present another episode of Bad Acting 101. This time, we circle back to our favorite actor, Neil Breen. What else can be said about his movies that hasn't been said already? While Neil Breen's acting may leave much to be desired in terms of skill and technique, it has inadvertently led to his films becoming cult classics in the realm of so-bad-it's-good cinema. Audiences have been quick to latch onto Breen's unintentional comedy, turning his melodramatic performances and over-the-top dialogue into meme-worthy material. Neil Breen's status as a terrible actor is undeniable. From his over-the-top performances to his lack of range and poor dialogue delivery, Breen fails to embody the nuance and authenticity required of a skilled actor. While his unintentional comedy may have garnered him a cult following, it's clear that Breen's acting skills leave much to be desired. As we continue to explore the world of cinema, let's remember that while some actors may be bad, their performances can still provide entertainment value in unexpected ways. Thank you for joining us today, and we'll see you in the next video. Please Like and Follow Fair Use and Parody Disclaimer: This channel and website and the content made available through this site are for educational, entertainment and informational purposes only. These so-called “fair uses” are permitted even if the use of the work would otherwise be infringing. Content may contain copyrighted material owned by a third party, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. A copyright owner’s rights are listed under the Copyright Act, Section 107 of the Copyright Act. This channel often features satire, parody, commentary and critique mixed with factual news reporting. All references to politicians, celebrities and/or other personalities that are critiqued and/or commented upon that are based on real people are identified as such.

Before we jump into the nitty-gritty of this iconic scene, let's set the stage. "Tough Guys Don't Dance" is a 1987 neo-noir film directed by the legendary Norman Mailer. The film stars Ryan O'Neal as a struggling writer who finds himself entangled in a web of murder, betrayal, and, you guessed it, tough guys who may or may not dance. Ryan O'Neal leads the charge for this example of bad acting 101. Sit Back and enjoy

Welcome to our channel. we are gonna do a lazy review just to mess with our software settings and the Rumble & YouTube Algorithms. Demon City Shinjuku is an anime cult classic, and we love this one for sure. Great Animation, plot, and captivating visuals make this one an all time classic. long live the 80's. Demon City Shinjuku begins with a battle between former friends, the evil Rebi Ra (also pronounced Levi Ra) versus the short-lived hero Genichirou. Rebi Ra has allowed himself to be possessed in order to gain the incredible powers of evil and plans to summon demons to conquer the world. Defeating Genichirou and destroying Shinjuku, a part of Tokyo, with a devastating earthquake, the area becomes a demon-haunted wilderness. The novel doesn't have a fight scene between Genichirou and Rebi Ra. It opens with a quiet time in Shinjuku and then in a sudden change the Demon Quake hits only Shinjuku.

We here at the Y US Channel have touched on this subject with our Casting Couch Video, but now it appears the more of Hollyweird is being exposed. Sean Combs, known as P. Diddy, is a legendary figure in the entertainment industry. But behind the glitz and glamour, there have been disturbing allegations of sexual assault and rape. In 2018, a woman named Jane Doe filed a lawsuit against P. Diddy, alleging that he sexually assaulted her at a party in 2017. She claimed that he forced himself on her, despite her repeated pleas for him to stop. Several other women have since come forward with similar allegations. One woman, known as 'Mindy,' claimed that P. Diddy raped her in 2001. Another woman, who wished to remain anonymous, alleged that he sexually assaulted her in 2015. The allegations against P. Diddy are part of a larger pattern of sexual assault and abuse in the entertainment industry. When celebrities are accused of such crimes, they often face a public humiliation ritual. The media relentlessly scrutinizes their every move, and they are subjected to intense social media attacks. This can have a devastating impact on their careers and reputations. The Hollywood humiliation ritual not only harms the accused but also the victims. Many victims of sexual assault are reluctant to come forward because they fear being shamed and ridiculed. This silence allows perpetrators to continue their crimes with impunity. It also creates a culture of fear and intimidation that prevents victims from seeking justice. Victims deserve justice, and the perpetrators must be punished. The Hollywood humiliation ritual must end. We need to create a culture where victims are supported and perpetrators are held accountable. If you have been the victim of sexual assault or rape, know that you are not alone. There is help available. Please reach out to a trusted friend, family member, or professional. You deserve justice, and you deserve to be heard. Please Like and Follow Fair Use and Parody Disclaimer: This channel and website and the content made available through this site are for educational, entertainment and informational purposes only. These so-called “fair uses” are permitted even if the use of the work would otherwise be infringing. Content may contain copyrighted material owned by a third party, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. A copyright owner’s rights are listed under the Copyright Act, Section 107 of the Copyright Act. This channel often features satire, parody, commentary and critique mixed with factual news reporting. All references to politicians, celebrities and/or other personalities that are critiqued and/or commented upon that are based on real people are identified as such.

We decided to do a short review of the Science Ninja Team Gatchaman: The Movie (科学忍者隊ガッチャマン 劇場版, Kagaku Ninjatai Gatchaman: Gekijōban) 1978. Those of you familiar with G-Force or Battle of the Planets will already know that those shows are based off of Gatchaman. The franchise started off as a 105 episode anime that aired from 1972 to 1974. The movie is an abridged retelling of the original 105 episodes. In fact the vast majority of the scenes and dialogue are recycled and re arranged for this movie. The only original brand new animation is from the opening 3 minutes that features the birth of Berg Katse. Some highlights are the battle with the Turtle King (Mecha) that is controlled by Galactor and the final battle. A great entry point for those interested in this classic franchise. Plot Sosai X traveled millions of light years to reach the planet Earth and creates a mutant Berg Katse. Thirty years later he is the leader of the terrorist organization known as Galactor. They want to conquer the world. Since Galactor controls the mechanical monster "Turtle King," the nations of the world live in fear. Earth's only hope lies with five teenagers who can move like shadows. They are Gatchaman, five superheroes who arrive in their spaceship "God Phoenix" to stop Galactor's Machiavellian plans of world domination. Please Like and Follow Fair Use and Parody Disclaimer: This channel and website and the content made available through this site are for educational, entertainment and informational purposes only. These so-called “fair uses” are permitted even if the use of the work would otherwise be infringing. Content may contain copyrighted material owned by a third party, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. A copyright owner’s rights are listed under the Copyright Act, Section 107 of the Copyright Act. This channel often features satire, parody, commentary and critique mixed with factual news reporting. All references to politicians, celebrities and/or other personalities that are critiqued and/or commented upon that are based on real people are identified as such.

Such Glory, so remarkable, never has a masterpiece of a movie graced the silver screen until now. Neil Breen proves that us stupids need smarts in his Magnum Opus, Cade The Tortured Crossing (2023). You will cry tears of piss, and crap rainbows in awe of this spectacle. Please Like and Follow Fair Use and Parody Disclaimer: This channel and website and the content made available through this site are for educational, entertainment and informational purposes only. These so-called “fair uses” are permitted even if the use of the work would otherwise be infringing. Content may contain copyrighted material owned by a third party, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. A copyright owner’s rights are listed under the Copyright Act, Section 107 of the Copyright Act. This channel often features satire, parody, commentary and critique mixed with factual news reporting. All references to politicians, celebrities and/or other personalities that are critiqued and/or commented upon that are based on real people are identified as such.

Cade vs Cale (Neil vs Neil). This is his best acting ever, nothing can surpass this. We should review this movie. Please Like and Follow Fair Use and Parody Disclaimer: This channel and website and the content made available through this site are for educational, entertainment and informational purposes only. These so-called “fair uses” are permitted even if the use of the work would otherwise be infringing. Content may contain copyrighted material owned by a third party, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. A copyright owner’s rights are listed under the Copyright Act, Section 107 of the Copyright Act. This channel often features satire, parody, commentary and critique mixed with factual news reporting. All references to politicians, celebrities and/or other personalities that are critiqued and/or commented upon that are based on real people are identified as such.

Neil Breen Vs a Tiger, that's it, that's the description. From Cade The Tortured Crossing (2023). We Are So Reviewing This Please Like and Follow Fair Use and Parody Disclaimer: This channel and website and the content made available through this site are for educational, entertainment and informational purposes only. These so-called “fair uses” are permitted even if the use of the work would otherwise be infringing. Content may contain copyrighted material owned by a third party, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. A copyright owner’s rights are listed under the Copyright Act, Section 107 of the Copyright Act. This channel often features satire, parody, commentary and critique mixed with factual news reporting. All references to politicians, celebrities and/or other personalities that are critiqued and/or commented upon that are based on real people are identified as such.

We have finished our deep dive into the claims of not just 1, but 2 documentaries. This clip is from Loose Change, we just sit back and react to it. Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 and Dylan Avery's Loose Change: Final Cut. We explore a little of the background connections behind the scenes that allegedly led to the 9/11 attacks. From Michael Moore's perspective, it was initiated so the industrial war machine would profit a select few benefactors. From Dylan Avery's perspective, it was all done for money and to launch various espionage programs. We explore claims that both movies make. The biggest claims are the Saudi and Bin Laden Family connections with the Bush family along with suspicious timing mentions Larry Silverstein, who supposedly stood to receive a substantial insurance payout after the attacks due to a fictional "anti-terrorism clause". It makes other allegations of insider trading and Halliburton's benefiting from the subsequent launch of America's War on Terror. We now discuss and elaborate on our opinions and other facts related to these films watch the review and reactions and decide for yourselves Please Like and Follow Fair Use and Parody Disclaimer: This channel and website and the content made available through this site are for educational, entertainment and informational purposes only. These so-called “fair uses” are permitted even if the use of the work would otherwise be infringing. Content may contain copyrighted material owned by a third party, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. A copyright owner’s rights are listed under the Copyright Act, Section 107 of the Copyright Act. This channel often features satire, parody, commentary and critique mixed with factual news reporting. All references to politicians, celebrities and/or other personalities that are critiqued and/or commented upon that are based on real people are identified as such.

We have finished our deep dive into the claims of not just 1, but 2 documentaries. Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 and Dylan Avery's Loose Change: Final Cut. We explore a little of the background connections behind the scenes that allegedly led to the 9/11 attacks. From Michael Moore's perspective, it was initiated so the industrial war machine would profit a select few benefactors. From Dylan Avery's perspective, it was all done for money and to launch various espionage programs. We explore claims that both movies make. The biggest claims are the Saudi and Bin Laden Family connections with the Bush family along with suspicious timing mentions Larry Silverstein, who supposedly stood to receive a substantial insurance payout after the attacks due to a fictional "anti-terrorism clause". It makes other allegations of insider trading and Halliburton's benefiting from the subsequent launch of America's War on Terror. We now discuss and elaborate on our opinions and other facts related to these films watch the review and reactions and decide for yourselves Please Like and Follow Fair Use and Parody Disclaimer: This channel and website and the content made available through this site are for educational, entertainment and informational purposes only. These so-called “fair uses” are permitted even if the use of the work would otherwise be infringing. Content may contain copyrighted material owned by a third party, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. A copyright owner’s rights are listed under the Copyright Act, Section 107 of the Copyright Act. This channel often features satire, parody, commentary and critique mixed with factual news reporting. All references to politicians, celebrities and/or other personalities that are critiqued and/or commented upon that are based on real people are identified as such.

We begin our deep dive into the claims of not just 1, but 2 documentaries. Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 and Dylan Avery's Loose Change: Final Cut. We explore a little of the background connections behind the scenes that allegedly led to the 9/11 attacks. From Michael Moore's perspective, it was initiated so the industrial war machine would profit a select few benefactors. From Dylan Avery's perspective, it was all done for money and to launch various espionage programs. We explore claims that both movies make. The biggest claims are the Saudi and Bin Laden Family connections with the Bush family along with suspicious timing mentions Larry Silverstein, who supposedly stood to receive a substantial insurance payout after the attacks due to a fictional "anti-terrorism clause". It makes other allegations of insider trading and Halliburton's benefiting from the subsequent launch of America's War on Terror watch the review and reactions and decide for yourselves Please Like and Follow Fair Use and Parody Disclaimer: This channel and website and the content made available through this site are for educational, entertainment and informational purposes only. These so-called “fair uses” are permitted even if the use of the work would otherwise be infringing. Content may contain copyrighted material owned by a third party, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. A copyright owner’s rights are listed under the Copyright Act, Section 107 of the Copyright Act. This channel often features satire, parody, commentary and critique mixed with factual news reporting. All references to politicians, celebrities and/or other personalities that are critiqued and/or commented upon that are based on real people are identified as such.

That is it. our next review is almost done

We are currently cooking up a review of the 9-11 related documentaries: Fahrenheit 9-11, & Loose Change. Both documentaries offer flawed or compelling information related to the 9-11 attacks. We are going to nitpick and analyze most of the key points that are discussed such as who knew what and when, motives, and alleged political cover ups. #moviereviews, #conspiracies, #Rumble Please Like and Follow Fair Use and Parody Disclaimer: This channel and website and the content made available through this site are for educational, entertainment and informational purposes only. These so-called “fair uses” are permitted even if the use of the work would otherwise be infringing. Content may contain copyrighted material owned by a third party, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. A copyright owner’s rights are listed under the Copyright Act, Section 107 of the Copyright Act. This channel often features satire, parody, commentary and critique mixed with factual news reporting. All references to politicians, celebrities and/or other personalities that are critiqued and/or commented upon that are based on real people are identified as such.

Our clip from the Close Encounters of the 5th Kind review seeks to debunk or confirm the claims of Dr. Stephen Greer. Is he for real or does he suck farts from buttholes? watch and decide for yourself. As the UFO's suddenly hits the covers of Washington Post and NY Times in the age of "fake news" and conspiracy memes, how can we make sense of these revelations without losing grip on reality?. "Close Encounters of the Fifth Kind" is a feature documentary that is presented by the global authority on extraterrestrials who has created the world wide disclosure movement and routinely briefs the presidents and the heads of state on the ET phenomenon: Dr. Steven Greer. His preceding works: Sirius and Unacknowledged, broke crowdfunding records and sparked a grassroots movement. In this film, Dr. Steven Greer presents the most dangerous information that the architects of secrecy do not want you to know; how forgotten spiritual knowledge holds the key to humans initiating with highly advanced ET civilizations. This film features a large amount of groundbreaking video and photographic evidence and supporting interviews from some prominent figures such as legendary civil rights attorney Daniel Sheehan; Adam Curry of Princeton's PEAR Lab and Dr.Russel Targ who headed the CIA's top secret remote viewing program. Their Message: For several thousands of people, contact has begun. #Rumble #UFO #UFOS #CONSPIRACY #MOVIEREVIEWS Please Like and Follow Fair Use and Parody Disclaimer: This channel and website and the content made available through this site are for educational, entertainment and informational purposes only. These so-called “fair uses” are permitted even if the use of the work would otherwise be infringing. Content may contain copyrighted material owned by a third party, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. A copyright owner’s rights are listed under the Copyright Act, Section 107 of the Copyright Act. This channel often features satire, parody, commentary and critique mixed with factual news reporting. All references to politicians, celebrities and/or other personalities that are critiqued and/or commented upon that are based on real people are identified as such.

Close Encounters of The 5th kind is our next review. We are currently in the editing stages. enjoy this teaser. decide for yourself if we are truly alone in the universe or not? #UFO As the UFO's suddenly hits the covers of Washington Post and NY Times in the age of "fake news" and conspiracy memes, how can we make sense of these revelations without losing grip on reality?. "Close Encounters of the Fifth Kind" is a feature documentary that is presented by the global authority on extraterrestrials who has created the world wide disclosure movement and routinely briefs the presidents and the heads of state on the ET phenomenon: Dr. Steven Greer. His preceding works: Sirius and Unacknowledged, broke crowdfunding records and sparked a grassroots movement. In this film, Dr. Steven Greer presents the most dangerous information that the architects of secrecy do not want you to know; how forgotten spiritual knowledge holds the key to humans initiating with highly advanced ET civilizations. This film features a large amount of groundbreaking video and photographic evidence and supporting interviews from some prominent figures such as legendary civil rights attorney Daniel Sheehan; Adam Curry of Princeton's PEAR Lab and Dr.Russel Targ who headed the CIA's top secret remote viewing program. Their Message: For several thousands of people, contact has begun. This is their story Please Like and Follow Fair Use and Parody Disclaimer: This channel and website and the content made available through this site are for educational, entertainment and informational purposes only. These so-called “fair uses” are permitted even if the use of the work would otherwise be infringing. Content may contain copyrighted material owned by a third party, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. A copyright owner’s rights are listed under the Copyright Act, Section 107 of the Copyright Act. This channel often features satire, parody, commentary and critique mixed with factual news reporting. All references to politicians, celebrities and/or other personalities that are critiqued and/or commented upon that are based on real people are identified as such.

Close Encounters of The 5th kind is our next review. We are currently in the editing stages. enjoy this teaser. decide for yourself if we are truly alone in the universe or not? #UFO #Conspiracy #Movie Reviews As the UFO's suddenly hits the covers of Washington Post and NY Times in the age of "fake news" and conspiracy memes, how can we make sense of these revelations without losing grip on reality?. "Close Encounters of the Fifth Kind" is a feature documentary that is presented by the global authority on extraterrestrials who has created the world wide disclosure movement and routinely briefs the presidents and the heads of state on the ET phenomenon: Dr. Steven Greer. His preceding works: Sirius and Unacknowledged, broke crowdfunding records and sparked a grassroots movement. In this film, Dr. Steven Greer presents the most dangerous information that the architects of secrecy do not want you to know; how forgotten spiritual knowledge holds the key to humans initiating with highly advanced ET civilizations. This film features a large amount of groundbreaking video and photographic evidence and supporting interviews from some prominent figures such as legendary civil rights attorney Daniel Sheehan; Adam Curry of Princeton's PEAR Lab and Dr.Russel Targ who headed the CIA's top secret remote viewing program. Their Message: For several thousands of people, contact has begun. This is their story Please Like and Follow Fair Use and Parody Disclaimer: This channel and website and the content made available through this site are for educational, entertainment and informational purposes only. These so-called “fair uses” are permitted even if the use of the work would otherwise be infringing. Content may contain copyrighted material owned by a third party, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. A copyright owner’s rights are listed under the Copyright Act, Section 107 of the Copyright Act. This channel often features satire, parody, commentary and critique mixed with factual news reporting. All references to politicians, celebrities and/or other personalities that are critiqued and/or commented upon that are based on real people are identified as such.

UFOLOGIST or Scumbag?

Total silence of watching paint dry courtesy of us. We love Rumble.