Election Fraud Videos

I took out the intro about Cooke's travels and a few parts on the other trials that you might not notice, and one defaming President Trump about Stormy Daniels. That whole story of hers is fake. I think she was banging Cohen and pressured him into extorting Trump.

with Big Mig, Tina Peters and a video scroll-through of the doc which it sounds like Big Mig made for him. Mostly this is the Big Mig Mig interview. I tried to clean up off-topic parts in the early interview so it's easier to figure out what Evans is doing. Once his case was dismissed in district court, he appealed which lets him petition SCOTUS/Justice Alito and that's what he's done, that's the news. He cites Merchan prosecuting federal law without jurisdiction, estoppel which they explain, and more, doc is about 20 pages and it's here: https://electionpdfs.locals.com/post/5739592/treniss-evans-scotus-petition

.... and he thinks it's the latter. Audio only. On the various constitutional violations.

"Episode 2 of the Trump trials: Yale law professor Jed Rubenfeld goes over the arguments for selective prosecution and jury unanimity. Proving selective prosecution is very difficult, but Rubenfeld explains why Trump has a serious shot at proving it happened in this case." NY can argue it wasn't selective prosecution because what about Al Capone? He was a crook and they found a way to take him but. But the difference is, unlike Trump, Capone wasn't targeted for his political beliefs. That's hard to prove in court, where you need a comparable crime that wasn't prosecuted. Rubenfeld cites HILLARY CLINTON funding the peepee hoax and not reporting it as a campaign contribution, which the FEC called her out on but DOJ didn't charge. There's a difference there that Rubenfeld doesn't get into and it's the typical scenario where a Democrat crime is compared to a Republican non-crime. If you heard former-FEC Chair Brad Smith explanation (posted in comments), the Cohen-Daniels NDA was NOT reportable as a campaign contribution because it's an expense he could've paid anyway, unlike Hillary's "Steele Dossier" which there was one and only reason for her to fund: the election. With Jury unanimity, even though it's in the Bill of Rights, Rubenfeld says it was a recent SCOTUS decision to make state courts follow it. What NY could cite even after that verdict is case law saying jurors can convict a man of murder if half think he used a knife and the other half think he used a gun. Trump's team would reply, that's different, because murder with either weapon is the same crime, whereas doc falsification to hide campaign finance violations contains a different "underlying" crime than falsifying the docs to hide other falsified docs or a tax form. Other clips on my channel are from Ep. 1 and the follow-up Q&A. I did not include the basics of the case since there are other vids on that on my channel but he explains it well. It's embedded in this review: https://legalinsurrection.com/2024/06/trump-guilty-verdict-there-are-some-serious-constitutional-problems-with-this-case/ Michael Schellenberger 5m review vid with text breakdown: https://x.com/shellenberger/status/1799165383041228961

There's another SCOTUS case in the late 90s, and the lower court ruling Prof Rubenfeld mentions. I'll upload the Google Scholar breakdowns on locals soon.

This is an earlier report, the total last I heard was $400M plus another $12M from a sold-out fundraiser in Silicon Valley. Obama/Biden "record" fundraiser sortof recently was $25M.

full 2.5 hours https://rumble.com/v4ygqxn-this-is-bogus-banana-republic-lawfare-and-everyone-knows-it.html Jr. Interview on Tuckler: https://rumble.com/v4yvgo2-tucker-carlson-donald-trump-jr.-on-his-fathers-conviction.-.html

Will there be a 2024 election? Schaftlein Report with Lee Elci & Joe Visconti Fall of "democracy" would be a positive, it would be the fall of the Deep State. Is that what they really mean? Clearly we are seeing the fall of the Deep State as the People educate themselves on what's been happening all this time, and Merchan's kangaroo court verdict is a move in that direction.

previous on this here https://rumble.com/v4wrj16-gouveia-day-20-trump-battles-merchan-for-critical-jury-instructions.html

Doc https://electionpdfs.locals.com/post/5727477/merchans-final-jury-instructions-trump-nda-trial

Trump's not a convicted felon" until Merchan enters the judgement at sentencing. Temporary restraining order would kneecap Bragg's prosecution by killing the fake news media campaign to brand him "convicted felon" during election season, which was the entire point of Bragg's prosecution.

Phil Holloway Esq.