Attorney Steve® Legal News

https://www.thephotolawyer.com/ - Make sure to register your photos and images. Call us at (877) 276-5084. Feel free to share our video with your photographer and artistic friends!! In this video, we're discussing the $6.3 million dollar infringement verdict out of the Central District in California that was awarded to a photographer whose interior design photos were used without a license. This verdict is a wake-up call for anyone who uses photos without properly licensing them with the copyright owner. If you're a photographer this is also a wake-up call to register your images. You never know when an infringer will use them without your permission, and refuse to take them down. Make sure to register your photos and protect your intellectual property!

http://www.vondranlegal.com - General overview of the civil litigation process. This can vary greatly by states, courts, and judges. Click here to watch the full video - https://youtu.be/fg0_wPGiUZU?si=0zpiDbtdY7h_Bhe-

http://www.BoxingPiracy.com - Thanks for watching, feel free to share this video with other restaurant, bar and tavern owners and even tattoo shops, barber shops, bowling alleys, hookah and cigar clubs and others. It's no funny having to shell out settlement money in a tough economy.

http://www.vondranlegal.com - Thanks for watching. Don't forget to SUBSCRIBE and share our videos with someone who needs it! You might think that once you sign a contract, you are bound to it no matter what. However, there are a few ways to break a contract if you absolutely need to. One of the most common reasons for breaking a contract is fraud in the inducement. This means that one party deliberately misrepresents something important in order to get the other party to sign the contract. Another way to break a contract is through frustration of purpose or commercial impracticability. This occurs when something happens that makes it impossible or excessively difficult to fulfill the obligations of the contract. If you were forced to sign a contract under duress, that can be a reason to break it. Finally, if there was no consideration provided in exchange for signing the contract, that can also make it invalid. While breaking a contract should not be taken lightly, it is always good to know your options in case you find yourself in a difficult situation.

Click here to watch the full video: https://youtu.be/Z-OR-4hqNRw?si=aMRivlwJHlupFucy

http://www.vondransports.com - GOLF LAW - errant shot liability primer, based on case law. Make sure to SUBSCRIBE and feel free to SHARE this video! SOME THINGS THAT CAN MAKE A PERSON OR THE GOLF CLUB LIABLE FOR RESULTING INJURIES 1. Failure to warn people in the foreseeable zone of danger (yelling "FORE") when they are not looking and you know they are not looking. Some courts look at the 0-90 angle (acute angle) in the line of flight for the duty to warn. Outside this area, there may not be any duty to warn, or yell FORE (as errant golf shots are considered part of the game, and assumption of the risk by other golfers) 2. Having knowledge of your known propensity for slicing, hooking, over-hitting and failing to warn those is the "expanded zone of danger." 3. Intentionally or recklessly causing injury to another golfer, caddie, bystander or nearby homeowner - for example if you are voluntarily intoxicated. NOTE: States like Arizona have DRAM SHOP ACTS that can hold a golf course liable for injuries proximately caused by over-serving someone known to be intoxicated. 4. Intentionally, recklessly, or negligently causing injury to person or property by failing to follow golf course rules for cart usage, including being intoxicated and flipping carts, crashing into trees, or causing other damages. This is not a full list of potential liability. Be careful out there, and have fun but be safe. If you need legal representation in California or Arizona, contact the Sports Law Group at Vondran Legal® - vondransports.com

http://www.vondranlegal.com - AI ART LAW BY ATTORNEY STEVE® In the age of technology, machines and computers have become creative partners in the world of art. However, the question of who owns the rights to such art has become a controversial issue. It has been determined that creating art with artificial intelligence is not copyrightable unless there is human authorship involved. Simply put, without human input, a machine or computer cannot be legally recognized as the rightful owner of a piece of art. Even though copyright registration is not required, it is crucial for artists to acknowledge the importance of human participation in order to protect their creative works and avoid any legal disputes.

http://www.vondranlegal.com WHAT ARE SOME COMMON DEFENSES FOR BREACH OF A CONTRACT? 1. Lack of enforceable agreement: The defendant may argue that a valid and enforceable contract never existed between the parties. 2. Impossibility of performance: The defendant may claim that it was impossible to fulfill the obligations stated in the contract due to unforeseen circumstances or events beyond their control. 3. Mutual mistake: Both parties may argue that they made a mistake about a fundamental aspect of the contract, such as the subject matter or terms, and therefore, the contract should be void. 4. Unconscionability: The defendant may assert that the contract is so one-sided or unfair that it is unconscionable and therefore unenforceable. 5. Duress or undue influence: The defendant alleges that they were coerced, pressured, or manipulated into entering the contract under circumstances that vitiate their consent. 6. Failure of a condition precedent: The defendant may argue that a condition precedent mentioned in the contract has not been met, and therefore, they are not obligated to perform their part of the contract. 7. Statute of limitations: The defendant asserts that the plaintiff took too long to file a lawsuit for breach of contract, and it is now barred by the applicable statute of limitations. 8. Performance was excused or discharged: The defendant claims

http://www.DigitalDefamation.com - Trump seeks 1.5 billion from major media outlets who he accuses of publishing fake news about the proposed merger of Truth Social and alleged 73 million dollars of losses. Case is filed in Florida State Court. What do you think, can he succeed? FEEL FREE TO SHARE THIS VIDEO ON YOUR SOCIAL MEDIA NETWORKS. California Defamation Per Se Elements 1704. Defamation per se - Essential Factual Elements (PrivateFigure - Matter of Private Concern) [Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] harmed [him/her/nonbinary pronoun] by making [one or more of] the following statement(s): [list all claimed per se defamatory statement(s)]. To establish this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove all of the following: Liability 1. That [name of defendant] made [one or more of] the statement(s) to [a person/persons] other than [name of plaintiff]; 2. That [this person/these people] reasonably understood that thestatement(s) [was/were] about [name of plaintiff]; 3. [That [this person/these people] reasonably understood the statement(s) to mean that [insert ground(s) for defamation per se, e.g., “[name of plaintiff] had committed a crime”]; 4. That [name of defendant] failed to use reasonable care to determine the truth or falsity of the statement(s) There are different standards if a public office or public figure is concerned. In these cases, a Plaintiff may also have to establish "actual malice." NY TImes vs. Sullivan Standard. If you need legal representation for a defamation case in California or Arizona, visit our website by clicking on the link above or call (877) 276-5084.

http://www.IPlawyer.ai - HOT TOPIC!! Feel free to share this video on your social media networks. Surprise someone in the legal profession!!! AI FOR LAW IS ABOUT TO GO NUCLEAR! With the EXPLOSION of artificial intelligence ("AI") (Trust me folks this is going to get CRAZY) lawyers need to have some guidelines on who to deal appropriately, and ethically with this new technology. I think 2023 and 2024 is going to be a year or launching mobile applications, websites, and analytical tools, but 2025 is going to the LAUNCH of AI in the legal profession. If you are a lawyer (newly minted or old dinosaur) this is something you need to keep your eye on. In California, the state bar is being very proactive in launching these guidelines so lawyers have things to think about as new apps, websites and tools that help lawyers are literally going to POP UP EVERYWHERE!! Attorney Steve® will be covering and reviewing these new tools, so make sure to SUBSCRIBE to our legal channel! If you are dealing with an AI legal issue, call us at (877) 276-5084 or click on the link above to discuss your case. THANKS FOR WATCHING!

http://www.vondranlegal.com - TIME SENSITIVE INFORMATION - last day to apply for your piece of the settlement is December 31, 2023. Chance to get "mailbox money" following the 181 million-dollar settlement in the consumer class action and antitrust case. Case No. 1:16-cv-08637 (N.D. Ill.) MORE INFORMATION Settlements have been reached in a class action antitrust lawsuit filed on behalf of End-User Consumer Plaintiffs with Defendants: Fieldale Farms Corporation (“Fieldale”); George’s Inc. and George’s Farms, Inc. (“George’s”); Mar-Jac Poultry, Inc., Mar-Jac Poultry MS, LLC, Mar-Jac Poultry AL, LLC, Mar-Jac AL/MS, Inc., Mar-Jac Poultry, LLC and Mar-Jac Holdings, Inc. (“Mar-Jac”); Peco Foods, Inc. (“Peco”); Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (“Pilgrim’s”); and Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Chicken, Inc., Tyson Breeders, Inc., and Tyson Poultry, Inc. (“Tyson”) (collectively, “Settling Defendants”). If approved by the Court, the Settlements will resolve Plaintiffs’ claims that the Settling Defendants conspired to stabilize the price and supply of chicken from January 1, 2009 through July 31, 2019, and for Pilgrim’s from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2020, in violation of federal and state laws. Settling Defendants have not admitted any liability and continue to deny the legal claims alleged in this lawsuit. If approved, the Settlements will avoid litigation costs and risks to End-User Consumer Plaintiffs and Settling Defendants, and will release Settling Defendants from liability to members of the Settlement Class. The Settlements require the Settling Defendants to pay a combined $181,000,000. In addition to this monetary payment, Settling Defendants have agreed to provide specified cooperation (as set forth in the Settlement Agreements) in the End-User Consumer Plaintiffs’ continued prosecution of the litigation. The Court has not decided whether Settling Defendants did anything wrong, and the Settling Defendants deny any wrongdoing.

http://www.vondranlegal.com - Breaking Legal News. Make sure to LIKE, DROP A COMMENT, and SUBSCRIBE!! OVERVIEW OF THE FEDERAL CAN-SPAM ACT The CAN-SPAM act was introduced in the early 2000s as a response to the growing problem of spam emails flooding inboxes. It's a federal law that mandates certain requirements that businesses must comply with when sending commercial emails. These requirements include providing a clear and easy opt-out option, avoiding the use of misleading email headers, and providing a physical address for the business in the email. Failure to comply with the CAN-SPAM act can result in hefty fines from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). By implementing these regulations, the act aims to protect consumers from deceptive and unwanted emails, while providing businesses with guidelines for sending effective and ethical commercial emails.

http://www.vondranlegal.com - Vondeezy, Law Made EZ! Feel free to share this video! Thanks for watching and don't forget to SUSBCRIBE, LIKE and MAKE A COMMENT!! WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A MOTION FOR ADDITUR VS. REMITTITUR A motion for additur and a motion for remittitur are legal procedures related to jury awards in civil cases. They are typically used when one party believes that the jury's award is either too low (for a motion for additur) or too high (for a motion for remittitur) and seeks to have the court adjust the amount of damages awarded. Here's the difference between the two: Motion for Additur: Additur is a legal remedy used when a party believes that the jury's award is insufficient, and they want the court to increase the amount of damages. In this scenario, the party who is dissatisfied with the jury's verdict requests the court to add an additional amount to the jury's award. The judge has the authority to grant or deny the motion for additur. If granted, the judge will increase the amount of damages awarded by the jury. Motion for Remittitur: Remittitur is the opposite of additur and is used when a party believes that the jury's award is excessive or that the jury made an improper verdict. In this case, the dissatisfied party seeks to have the court reduce the amount of damages awarded by the jury. Similar to additur, it's up to the judge to decide whether to grant or deny the motion for remittitur. If granted, the judge will reduce the amount of damages awarded by the jury. These motions are typically used when there is a clear and significant disparity between the jury's award and the evidence presented during the trial. The party making the motion must present a persuasive argument to convince the judge that an adjustment is necessary. It's important to note that the availability and procedures for additur and remittitur can vary by jurisdiction, and not all legal systems allow for these motions. Additionally, the judge's decision to grant or deny such a motion is generally discretionary and based on the specific facts and circumstances of the case. If the case is in federal court (ex. a copyright, trademark, or trade secret case), look to FRCP Rule 59 which permits a motion to amend or alter a judgment.

http://www.trademarkcollege.com - FEEL FREE TO SHARE THIS VIDEO! If you liked this video, or it helped you, how about a THUMBS UP or SUBSCRIBE!! We appreciate your support and assistance in growing our educational YouTube channel. HOW TO RENEW YOUR TRADEMARKS AFTER THE 5TH YEAR WITHOUT AN IP TRADEMARK ATTORNEY Trademark rights are based on USE. Your trademark can potentially last forever, as long as you are using it and keeping up with your renewals. The renewal process can look a little tricky, but watching this video may inspire you to try it on your own and save on legal fees. You need to make sure to renew your trademark between the 5th and 6th year after it was registered. Follow these steps in this video to help understand the process, how you need to submit specimens, noting any changes to your trademark information, making the section 8 declaration and also a short tip on trademark incontestability status that you can also apply for in certain circumstances. If it looks too complicated, call us to retain counsel to do this for you. We don't charge an arm and a leg and can quote a low flat rate fee based on your circumstances. We can be reached at (877) 276-5084.

http://www.commissioncollege.com (for more great videos). Feel free to share this video on your social media websites! WHATS GOING ON WITH THE N.A.R. CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT? The Sherman Antitrust Act has been enforced in the United States since 1890, yet even now in the 21st century, allegations of price-fixing and anti-competitive behavior persist in the real estate industry. Recently, the National Association of Realtors, one of the largest trade organizations in the country, was taken to task for its alleged role in a conspiracy for fixing the commission rates paid by home sellers (over 260,000 home sellers who sold from 2015 to 2019). In a class action lawsuit filed in federal district court in Kansas City, Missouri, The judgment of the jury was 1.8 billion, with the potential for the damages to be trebled to over 5 billion dollars. Defendants have initiated an appeal, and this could take years and even make its way up to SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States).

http://www.PublicDomainLawyer.com - Preserving Creativity and Knowledge: The Importance of a Public Domain in Copyright Law. Thank you for supporting free legal education and equal access to justice. Feel free to share this video. Introduction Copyright law plays a vital role in safeguarding creators' rights and incentivizing innovation and artistic expression. However, without a balanced framework that includes a public domain, copyright laws can inadvertently stifle creativity and hinder the dissemination of knowledge. The public domain acts as a rich repository of cultural heritage, allowing for the free flow of ideas, inspiration, and building blocks for future creations. Preserving Cultural Heritage: The public domain ensures that important works of art, literature, and scientific research are accessible to all, regardless of social or economic barriers. It allows artists and researchers to build upon past achievements, promoting the progression of ideas and the advancement of human knowledge. Think of the scientific discoveries made possible by freely accessible research papers or the countless adaptations of classics such as Shakespeare's plays. A vibrant public domain ensures that our cultural heritage is not trapped in the confines of copyright, but embraced by humanity as a collective and shared wealth. Fostering Innovation and Creative Inspiration: Creativity does not exist in a vacuum; it thrives on inspiration and the ability to draw upon existing works. The public domain provides a vast resource for artists, filmmakers, musicians, and writers to reinterpret, adapt, and build upon existing ideas without the fear of copyright infringement. This creative freedom allows for the birth of new and innovative creations that fuel cultural and artistic progress. Consider the impact of popular reimagined fairy tales or the remix culture in music, which often draws inspiration from public domain works. By preserving the public domain, copyright law fosters a dynamic environment where creativity can flourish without excessive restrictions. Promoting Education and Knowledge Sharing: Access to information and educational resources is a fundamental aspect of human development. A robust public domain contributes to the dissemination of knowledge by enabling teachers, students, and researchers to freely access and distribute educational materials. Within the public domain, classic literary works, historic documents, and scientific treatises become freely available resources for students and scholars. Similarly, digitization projects, fueled by the public domain's availability, have successfully preserved countless rare books and manuscripts, making them accessible online to anyone with internet access. Promoting Diversity and Inclusivity: A diverse and inclusive cultural environment benefits society as a whole by promoting representation and understanding. The public domain plays a crucial role in ensuring that a diverse range of creative works remains accessible to everyone. While copyright protection may extend for decades after an artist's death, the public domain guarantees that eventually these works become freely available, allowing different cultural perspectives to be incorporated and celebrated. By embracing the public domain, copyright law enhances cultural diversity and fosters a more inclusive societal narrative. Conclusion: A robust public domain is an essential component of copyright law. It ensures that knowledge, creativity, and cultural heritage are not confined to a select few but are shared and built upon by all of humanity. By preserving the public domain, we foster innovation, inspire creativity, promote education, and embrace the diversity of cultural expression. Encouraging a fair and balanced copyright framework that acknowledges the importance of the public domain ultimately benefits society, as it allows for the continued progression of human knowledge and creativity. If you need a copyright public domain lawyer contact us at (877) 276-5084,

http://www.trademarkcollege.com - Make sure to SUBSCRIBE for more great Trademark Videos by Attorney Steve Vondran! Feel free to share this video on your social media networks! GENERAL BACKGROUND In a recent development, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has denied a trademark application for the phrase "Trump Too Small," citing concerns that it identifies a living person and creates a false association. The trademark application was filed by an individual according to the USPTO's records. However, the application was seeking to use the phrase in connection with "clothing, namely, t-shirts, hoodies, and hats. (class 25). In their response, the USPTO argued that "Trump Too Small" identifies a living person, Donald J. Trump, the 45th President of the United States. They stated that the phrase creates a false association with Mr. Trump, suggesting a message that may not accurately reflect his physical stature or any other characteristic. Furthermore, the USPTO reasoned that allowing the trademark could potentially lead to confusion or misleading perceptions among consumers, as it could be perceived as an endorsement or criticism of Mr. Trump's personal traits. While the USPTO has denied the trademark application, it's worth noting that the denial can be appealed, and it has been taken to the Supreme Court which granted review. The final decision on granting the trademark will ultimately lie with the judicial system. This case highlights the complexities and considerations involved in trademark applications, particularly when it involves identifying a living person and potentially creating false associations, and weighs this against the First Amendment. VIDEO RESOURCES 1. Attorney Steve discusses the First Amendment: https://youtu.be/5PhqAePU5Uk?si=WxRiXw0imPywQPZz If you need help with a trademark or free speech (first amendment) issue contact us at (877) 276-5084.

http://www.vondranlegal.com - Intellectual Property and Business Law. Make sure to SUBSCRIBE for more great future legal videos. THE STATUS OF NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS IN CALIFORNIA JUST GOT WORSE FOR 2024 The status of non-compete agreements in California is a topic of much concern for employers and employees alike. And it looks like things just got worse for 2024. Recently, Governor Gavin Newsome signed two new laws that are set to have a major impact on the enforceability of non-compete agreements. SB699 and AB1076 both aim to restrict the use of these agreements, making it more difficult for companies to restrict their former employees from working for competitors. This news is sure to be met with mixed reactions, but one thing is certain: the landscape of employment law in California is changing rapidly.

vondranlegal.com - What your business needs to know about boxing piracy demands and default judgments. G&G Closed circuit can be TOUGH in enforcing their legal rights. Their demands can be HIGH. The main reason we hear is that they invest millions of dollars into each fight and piracy creates serious monetary issues. At any rate, this video talks about weighing the legal demands vs. what a federal court judge may actually award against an infringing Defendant (restaurant, bar, night club, tavern). If you received a phone call or letter from a lawyer seeking a settlement, best bet is to CALL US FIRST at (877) 276-5084. We have helped many companies settle these types of legal disputes many times brought under the copyright laws or telecommunications laws.

http://www.deepfakelawyer.com - Make sure to SUSBCRIBE for more legal goodies! Thank yo ufor supporting FREE legal education and EQUAL ACCESS to JUSTICE!! NO FAKES ACT - [Current Proposed Text]: —Any person that, in a manner affecting interstate or foreign commerce (or using any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce), engages in an activity described in paragraph (2) shall be liable in a civil action brought under subsection (d) for any damages sustained by the individual or rights holder injured as a result of that activity. (2) ACTIVITIES DESCRIBED.—An activity described in this paragraph is either of the following: (A) The production of a digital replica without consent of the applicable individual or rights holder. (B) The publication, distribution, or transmission of, or otherwise making available to the public, an unauthorized digital replica, if the person engaging in that activity has knowledge that the digital replica was not authorized by the applicable individual or rights holder. POTENTIAL REMEDIES FOR A PLAINTIFF REMEDIES.—In any civil action brought under this subsection— (A) the person committing a violation of subsection (c) shall be liable to the injured party in an amount equal to the greater of— (i) $5,000 per violation; or (ii) any damages suffered by the injured party as a result of the violation; (B) in the case of a willful violation where the injured party has proven that the defendant acted with malice, fraud, or oppression, the court may award to the injured party punitive damages; and (C) the court may award to the prevailing party reasonable attorneys’ fees. VIDEO RESOURCE: To learn more about the California Right of Publicity Law click here: https://youtu.be/AtMP6xF4Z8Q?si=mDmWJQ6FNbqDEJca If you are dealing with a deep fake issue (fake ads, false endorsements, trademarks, righgt of publicity, celebrity endorsement or copyright infringement) call us at (877) 276-5084. We are a civil litigation firm based in California and Arizona focused on entertainment, technology and intellectual property infringement issues.

http://www.vondranlegal.com - Make sure to SUBSCRIBE to our great legal information channel. We would love to have your onboard! Thank you for supporting equal access to justice with Attorney Steve®. ADA WEBSITE COMPLIANCE, AN EMERGING ISSUE ADA website compliance is an emerging issue that businesses and organizations need to be aware of. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which was passed in 1990, prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in various areas, including public accommodations. In recent years, there have been an increasing number of lawsuits filed against businesses and organizations alleging that their websites are not accessible to individuals with disabilities. The ADA does not specifically address websites, but courts have interpreted the law to apply to online platforms as well. This means that businesses and organizations may be required to ensure that their websites are accessible to individuals with disabilities. Web accessibility refers to the inclusive practice of designing and developing websites that can be used by individuals with disabilities. Some common accessibility features include alternative text for images, captions for videos, and keyboard navigation options. Making a website accessible is not only a legal requirement in some cases, but it also improves user experience for all visitors and may help capture new clients your business has been missing. There are several reasons why ADA website compliance has become an emerging issue. First, there has been a significant increase in the use of technology and the internet in everyday life. As a result, individuals with disabilities rely on websites and online platforms for access to information, goods, and services. Additionally, advancements in technology have made it easier for individuals to file lawsuits and advocate for their rights. Lawsuits may come in the form of a federal case under the ADA or a discrimination case under various state laws. If you received a legal demand letter relating to non-compliance, call us for a courtesy consultation. at (877) 276-5084. If you enjoyed this video, share it with a business friend of yours, you just might save them some money and legal hassles!

http://www.vondranlegal.com - Make sure to subscribe to become a verified friend of the channel! 1. In this action-packed episode, Attorney Steve discusses ChatGPT and how it can cause problems in the legal profession. 2. We also discuss the Business Software Alliance—where did they go, and is Microsoft working on a blockchain (Etherium) piracy reporting solution? 3. Theater is sued for unauthorized performances of copyright-protected musicals. 4. Metaverse lauches virtual courtroom? 5. Ignoring Dish-Network letters can lead to a lawsuit 6. Guns and Roses goes after fan art bootleggers Thanks for watching, feel free to share our video!!

http://www.vondranlegal.com - Trump Gag Order - Sneak Peak (Just posted). Will it stick? Put your comments down below. KEEP IT FRIENDLY PLEASE!! THE LEGAL SIDE OF POLICITS In this episode Attorney Steve® discusses what a "Gag Order" is and how the courts balance free speech rights against the right to maintain order in the court. Donald Trump is facing criminal charges in relation to the January 6th "insurrection" at the capital building. He has maintained his innocence. The case is moving forward and due to alleged threats against Trump the prosecutor Jack Smith sought a "gag order" with the judge recently granted. See what the gag order actually says. What is prohibited? This is HOT OFF THE DOCKET folks. Make sure to SUBSCRIBE to my legal channel for more great legal goodies. Trump has filed an appeal of the order with the U.S. Court of Appeals in D.C.

http://www.vondranlegal.com - make sure to SUBSCRIBE!!