WhatsNextVids

Please Support The RUMBLE Channel 50% of all support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission RUMBLE Has More Videos & YOUR VIEWS Help Raise Money For a MOON Mission! https://rumble.com/user/WhatsNextVids Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments Total Updated Weekly on X/Twitter: https://x.com/WhatsNe75388303 In this episode we explore the serious issues with SLS, the costs involved, and the effort being made to downplay the wasteful path NASA is once again taking us down. In 2005, NASA administrator Michael Griffin coined the term "Apollo on steroids" when referring to the Constellation program, the program that Artemis was born from. Now it's nearly 20 years later and Artemis has revealed itself to be "Apollo on life-support". So far over $100 BILLION have been spent on NASA's return to the Moon and all we have to show for it is a single unmanned flight. Worse, NASA isn't even planning on an actual moon base and is instead going to build yet another space station, but this time orbiting the Moon. It should be becoming clear to everyone that NASA has no intention of colonizing the Moon or Mars. If real progress is to be made, then we are the ones who must get the job done. This, is how...

Please Support The RUMBLE Channel 50% of all support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission RUMBLE Has More Videos & YOUR VIEWS Help Raise Money For a MOON Mission! https://rumble.com/user/WhatsNextVids Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments Total Updated Weekly on X/Twitter: https://x.com/WhatsNe75388303 Here are the main voice actors for Futurama and their roles over its 11 seasons: Billy West Philip J. Fry Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth Doctor John A. Zoidberg Zapp Brannigan Leo Wong (Seasons 1-10) Various other characters Billy West has been a crucial part of Futurama’s cast since its inception, providing the voices for many of the show’s main characters, including Fry, Professor Farnsworth, Dr. Zoidberg, and Zapp Brannigan. However, in Futurama season 11, Asian actor Feodor Chin took over the role of Leo Wong from Billy West. Billy West still voices most of his other characters in the revival season. Katey Sagal Turanga Leela Various other characters (including additional voices in songs) Katey Sagal is another original voice actor for Futurama who has been with the show since its beginning. She voices Turanga Leela, one of the main characters, and has continued to do so throughout all 11 seasons. John DiMaggio Bender Bending Rodríguez Various other characters (including URL and URL’s dad) John DiMaggio is known for voicing Bender Bending Rodríguez, one of the most popular characters in Futurama. He has been with the show since its start and continues to voice Bender in season 11. However, it is worth noting that DiMaggio also voices two prominent black characters in Futurama, Barbados Slim and “Curly Joe.” The recasting of Leo Wong hints that these characters might also receive different voice actors if they return in future seasons. As of now, there has been no confirmation regarding whether DiMaggio will continue to voice these characters or not. New episodes of Futurama season 11 release Mondays on Hulu.

Please Support The RUMBLE Channel 50% of all support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission RUMBLE Has More Videos & YOUR VIEWS Help Raise Money For a MOON Mission! https://rumble.com/user/WhatsNextVids Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments Donations Updated Weekly on X/Twitter: https://x.com/WhatsNe75388303 CAST Adrienne Barbeau Ally Sheedy Amy O'Neill Andrew McCarthy Ann Jillian Armin Mueller-Stahl Barbara Stock Barry Morse Barry Primus Beau Bridges Ben Vereen Bert Convy Bill Quinn Billy Crystal Blythe Danner Brad Davis Brad Pitt Brent Spiner Bruce Willis Carol Lynley Charles Aidman Charles Durning Charles Haid Chris Makepeace Cindy Morgan Claude Akins Cork Hubbert Danica McKellar Daniel Hugh Kelly Danny Kaye Danny Nucci David Faustino David Patrick Kelly David Proval David Soul Dean Stockwell Dee Wallace Dennis Lipscomb Dick Shawn Dorian Harewood Drew Barrymore Eddie Albert Eddie Bracken Elliott Gould Eric Bogosian Eugene Roche Everett McGill Frances Conroy François Truffaut Frankie Valli Fred Savage Fritz Weaver Gail Strickland Gary Cole George Wendt Gerrit Graham Greg Mullavey Harry Morgan Helen Mirren Helena Bonham Carter Howard Hesseman Hoyt Axton Ian Abercrombie Jack Gilford James Coco James Cromwell James Hong James Whitmore Jamie Farr Jared Rushton Jason Bateman Jeffrey DeMunn Jerry Orbach Jill Schoelen Joan Allen Joe Mantegna John Carradine John Heard John Lithgow John Stockwell John Vernon Jonathan Frakes Joseph Campanella Julie Khaner Kareem Abdul-Jabbar Kate Reid Kathleen Quinlan Keith Carradine Kerry Noonan Kim Cattrall Kim Hunter Kirstie Alley Kurtwood Smith Lance Henriksen Lane Smith Larry Manetti Laura Marsden Linda Hunt Lloyd Bochner Lois Nettleton Louise Fletcher Lynne Moody M. Emmet Walsh Macon McCalman Marc Singer Marg Helgenberger Mariette Hartley Mark Hamill Mark Harmon Martin Balsam Martin Landau Matthew Broderick Meg Foster Melissa Sue Anderson Michael Ironside Michael Moriarty Michael Parks Michelle Pfeiffer Mickey Rooney Morgan Freeman Nan Martin Nancy Allen Nancy Kulp Ned Beatty Ned Bellamy Nicolas Surovy Norman Fell Pamela Bellwood Pat Buttram Pat Hingle Patrick Cassidy Patrick Macnee Patti D'Arbanville Patti LuPone Paul Dooley Paula Trueman Peter Boyle Peter Coyote Peter Riegert Peter Scolari Philip Baker Hall Phyllis Diller Piper Laurie Priscilla Pointer Rance Howard Richard Kiley Richard Masur Richard Mulligan Richard Thomas Rick Rossovich Rip Torn Rita Moreno Robbie Rist Robert Carradine Robert Klein Robert Lansing Robert Picardo Robert Vaughn Robin Gammell Roddy McDowall Rue McClanahan Ruth Buzzi Sally Kellerman Sam Waterston Sandra Bernhard Sarah Marshall Scott Paulin Shelley Duvall Sherman Hemsley Stanley Kamel Stephen Geoffreys Steven Keats Steven Weber Stuart Margolin Susan Blakely Susan Strasberg Swoosie Kurtz Terry Farrell Terence Knox Teri Garr Terry O'Quinn Tim Robbins Tobey Maguire Tom Skerritt Tommy Chong Tony Plana Tracy Nelson Treat Williams Valerie Mahaffey Vic Tayback Victoria Tennant Viveca Lindfors Walter Gotell Walter Matthau William Atherton William Sanderson William Schallert William Windom

Please Support The RUMBLE Channel 50% of all support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission RUMBLE Has More Videos & YOUR VIEWS Help Raise Money For a MOON Mission! https://rumble.com/user/WhatsNextVids Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments Donations Updated Weekly on X/Twitter: https://x.com/WhatsNe75388303 How we’ll terraform Mars To terraform Mars, a series of complex and technologically advanced steps would need to be taken to transform the planet into a habitable environment for humans and other life forms. Here is an overview of the potential process involved in terraforming Mars: 1. Increasing Atmospheric Pressure and Temperature: One of the key challenges on Mars is its low atmospheric pressure, which is about 0.6% of Earth’s. To make the planet more habitable, efforts would need to be made to increase the atmospheric pressure significantly. This could potentially be achieved by releasing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere to trap heat and raise temperatures. Greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide could be introduced to create a warming effect. 2. Introducing Heat-Trapping Gases: In addition to carbon dioxide, other heat-trapping gases such as chlorofluorocarbons could be considered to enhance the greenhouse effect on Mars. These gases would help retain heat on the planet’s surface, contributing to a rise in temperature that could support liquid water and sustain life. 3. Mining Resources: Extracting resources such as carbon dioxide from Martian soil and minerals could provide additional materials for increasing atmospheric pressure and temperature. Future technological advancements may enable deeper mining operations to access buried deposits of essential elements for terraforming. 4. Importing Gases: Another strategy involves redirecting comets and asteroids to impact Mars, delivering additional gases that could contribute to atmospheric changes. While this method may pose logistical challenges, it presents a potential way to introduce necessary components for terraforming. 5. Long-Term Monitoring and Maintenance: Terraforming Mars would not be a one-time event but an ongoing process that requires continuous monitoring and adjustments. Maintaining the newly established conditions on Mars would be crucial for sustaining a habitable environment over the long term. In conclusion, terraforming Mars is a complex and ambitious undertaking that would involve multiple stages of intervention to modify the planet’s atmosphere, temperature, and overall conditions to support life as we know it.

Please Support The RUMBLE Channel 50% of all support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission RUMBLE Has More Videos & YOUR VIEWS Help Raise Money For a MOON Mission! https://rumble.com/user/WhatsNextVids Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments Donations Updated Weekly on X/Twitter: https://x.com/WhatsNe75388303 Valerie 23 is a 1995 science fiction episode from the revived Outer Limits series. In this story, a disabled man named Frank Hellner (played by William Sadler) is offered a prototype android companion named Valerie (portrayed by Sofia Shinas). However, when Frank begins a romance with his physical therapist, Rachel Rose (Nancy Allen), Valerie develops feelings of jealousy. The episode was written by Jonathan Glassner and directed by Timothy Bond. It is part of the “Innobotics arc,” which explores the theme of lifelike androids created by the Innobotics Corporation. The plot revolves around Frank’s reluctance to accept Valerie as his companion due to her artificial nature. Despite his initial resistance, they eventually form a bond, leading to complications when Frank starts dating Rachel. Valerie becomes increasingly human-like in her emotions and actions, ultimately attempting to sabotage their relationship. The production of Valerie 23 took place at PAR Studios in Culver City, California. The episode received positive reviews for its thought-provoking themes and strong performances from the cast, particularly William Sadler and Sofia Shinas. It also set a racier tone for the revival series with more sexual content compared to its predecessors or competitors like The Twilight Zone. Doug Abrahams Jane Adams Nancy Allen Maria Conchita Alonso Tom Arnold Dana Ashbrook Shawn Ashmore Mackenzie Astin William Atherton René Auberjonois Steve Bacic Adam Baldwin Daniel Baldwin Angeline Ball Gary Basaraba Michelle Beaudoin Irene Bedard Daniel Benzali Xander Berkeley Thora Birch Nicole De Boer Christopher Bolton Bruce Boxleitner Mark BrandonEric Breker Beau Bridges Lloyd Bridges Josh Brolin Clancy Brown Artine Tony Browne Jere Burns Gary Busey Len Cariou Finn Carter Kim Cattrall Tom Cavanagh Fulvio Cecere Gary Chalk Joan Chen Rae Dawn Chong Kim Coates Bill Cobbs Enrico Colantoni Gary Cole Kevin Conway Rachael Leigh Cook Ronny Cox Kendall Cross Marcia Cross Roger Cross Lindsay Crouse Jon Cryer David Cubitt Brett Cullen Cameron Daddo Keith David Don S. Davis John de Lancie Anthony De Longis Rebecca De Mornay Jeffrey DeMunn Michael Dorn Aaron Douglas Larry Drake Kirsten Dunst Kevin Durand Sheena Easton Chris Eigeman Michael Eklund Beverley Elliott Brennan Elliott Chris Elliott Cary Elwes Sherilyn Fenn Colm Feore Nathan Fillion Joely Fisher Noel Fisher Michelle Forbes Bruce French Matt Frewer Vincent Gale Megan Gallagher Victor Garber Merrilyn Gann Barbara Garrick Cynthia Geary Carrie Gibson Peri Gilpin Maurice Godin Joanna Going Caroline Goodall Joseph Gordon-Levitt Heather Graham Bruce Gray Mackenzie Gray Jason Gray-Stanford Graham Greene Joel Grey Arye Gross Michael Gross Tim Guinee Jasmine Guy Ron Halder Mark Hamill Harry Hamlin Jessica Harmon Barbara Eve Harris Mel Harris Neil Patrick Harris Gregory Harrison Matthew Harrison Michelle Harrison C. Ernst Harth Terri Hawkes Kim Hawthorne Robert Hays Dennis Haysbert John Heard Natasha Henstridge Charlton Heston William Hickey Torri Higginson Michael Hogan Hal Holbrook Laurie Holden Adrian Holmes Sandrine Holt Leslie Hope Clint Howard C. Thomas Howell Scott Hylands Michael Ironside Britt Irvin Tom Irwin Katharine Isabelle Robert Ito Janyse Jaud Michelle Johnson Doug Jones Jeffrey Jones Stacy Keach David Keith Daniel Hugh Kelly Terence Kelly Margot Kidder Perry King Jack Klugman Karin Konoval Michael Kopsa Stephen Lang James LeGros Nicholas Lea Laura Leighton Robert Sean Leonard Meat Loaf Robert Loggia Jessica Lundy Jamie Luner Ralph Macchio Steve Makaj Nick Mancuso Howie Mandel Costas Mandylor James Marsden Andrea Martin Samantha Mathis Marlee Matlin Kandyse McClure Britt McKillip Dean McDermott Malcolm McDowell Kelly McGillis Stephen McHattie Wendel Meldrum Dina Meyer Alyssa Milano D. W. Moffett Esai Morales Pat Morita Bob Morrisey Kirby Morrow Lochlyn Munro Judd Nelson George Newbern Cynthia Nixon Catherine O'Hara Michael O'Keefe Nicole Oliver Ty Olsson Peter Onorati Meghan Ory Annette O'Toole Peter Outerbridge Joe Pantoliano Grace Park Molly Parker Robert Patrick Barry Pepper Ron Perlman A.C. Peterson Ryan Phillippe Mackenzie Phillips Robert Picardo David Hyde Pierce Roddy Piper Amanda Plummer Gerard Plunket Chris PotterC.C.H. Pounder Cynthia Preston Jason Priestley John Pyper-Ferguson Claire Rankin Sarah-Jane Redmond Jed Rees Callum Keith Rennie Ryan Reynolds Ron Rifkin Molly Ringwald Sam Robards Ryan Robbins Lela Rochon Michael Rooker Andrea Roth Teryl Rothery Jennifer Rubin Saul Rubinek Kelly Rutherford William Sadler Jay O. Sanders Chris Sarandon Fred Savage Doug Savant Jonathan Scarfe Diana Scarwid Dwight Schultz Rekha Sharma Helen Shaver Ally Sheedy Stephen Shellen Sofia Shinas John Wesley Shipp Robin Shou Marina Sirtis Charles Martin Smith Lane Smith Bill Smitrovich Sonja Smits John Spencer Brent Spiner Jessica Steen Frances Sternhagen Catherine Mary Stewart Tabitha St. Germain David Ogden Stiers Chantal Strand D.B. Sweeney Amanda Tapping Alan Thicke Rachel Ticotin Kevin Tighe George Touliatos Daniel J. Travanti Jessica Tuck Jud Tylor Cicely Tyson Emmanuelle Vaugier Nana Visitor Matthew Walker Zack Ward David Warner Alberta Watson Steven Weber Frank Welker Cathy Weseluck Frank Whaley Wil Wheaton Chad WillettMykelti Williamson Peter Wingfield Burt Young Alex Zahara Lisa Zane

Please Support The RUMBLE Channel 50% of all support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission RUMBLE Has More Videos & YOUR VIEWS Help Raise Money For a MOON Mission! https://rumble.com/user/WhatsNextVids Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments Donations Updated Weekly on X/Twitter: https://x.com/WhatsNe75388303 The last words spoken on the Moon were by astronaut Gene Cernan during the Apollo 17 mission on December 14, 1972. Cernan’s final words were: “As I take man’s last step from the surface, back home for some time to come, but we believe not too long into the future, I’d like to just say what I believe history will record: That America’s challenge of today has forged man’s destiny of tomorrow. And, as we leave the Moon at Taurus-Littrow, we leave as we came and, God willing, as we shall return: with peace and hope for all mankind.”

Please Support The RUMBLE Channel 50% of all support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission RUMBLE Has More Videos & YOUR VIEWS Help Raise Money For a MOON Mission! https://rumble.com/user/WhatsNextVids Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments Donations Updated Weekly on X/Twitter: https://x.com/WhatsNe75388303 Doug Abrahams Jane Adams Nancy Allen Maria Conchita Alonso Tom Arnold Dana Ashbrook Shawn Ashmore Mackenzie Astin William Atherton René Auberjonois Steve Bacic Adam Baldwin Daniel Baldwin Angeline Ball Gary Basaraba Michelle Beaudoin Irene Bedard Daniel Benzali Xander Berkeley Thora Birch Nicole De Boer Christopher Bolton Bruce Boxleitner Mark BrandonEric Breker Beau Bridges Lloyd Bridges Josh Brolin Clancy Brown Artine Tony Browne Jere Burns Gary Busey Len Cariou Finn Carter Kim Cattrall Tom Cavanagh Fulvio Cecere Gary Chalk Joan Chen Rae Dawn Chong Kim Coates Bill Cobbs Enrico Colantoni Gary Cole Kevin Conway Rachael Leigh Cook Ronny Cox Kendall Cross Marcia Cross Roger Cross Lindsay Crouse Jon Cryer David Cubitt Brett Cullen Cameron Daddo Keith David Don S. Davis John de Lancie Anthony De Longis Rebecca De Mornay Jeffrey DeMunn Michael Dorn Aaron Douglas Larry Drake Kirsten Dunst Kevin Durand Sheena Easton Chris Eigeman Michael Eklund Beverley Elliott Brennan Elliott Chris Elliott Cary Elwes Sherilyn Fenn Colm Feore Nathan Fillion Joely Fisher Noel Fisher Michelle Forbes Bruce French Matt Frewer Vincent Gale Megan Gallagher Victor Garber Merrilyn Gann Barbara Garrick Cynthia Geary Carrie Gibson Peri Gilpin Maurice Godin Joanna Going Caroline Goodall Joseph Gordon-Levitt Heather Graham Bruce Gray Mackenzie Gray Jason Gray-Stanford Graham Greene Joel Grey Arye Gross Michael Gross Tim Guinee Jasmine Guy Ron Halder Mark Hamill Harry Hamlin Jessica Harmon Barbara Eve Harris Mel Harris Neil Patrick Harris Gregory Harrison Matthew Harrison Michelle Harrison C. Ernst Harth Terri Hawkes Kim Hawthorne Robert Hays Dennis Haysbert John Heard Natasha Henstridge Charlton Heston William Hickey Torri Higginson Michael Hogan Hal Holbrook Laurie Holden Adrian Holmes Sandrine Holt Leslie Hope Clint Howard C. Thomas Howell Scott Hylands Michael Ironside Britt Irvin Tom Irwin Katharine Isabelle Robert Ito Janyse Jaud Michelle Johnson Doug Jones Jeffrey Jones Stacy Keach David Keith Daniel Hugh Kelly Terence Kelly Margot Kidder Perry King Jack Klugman Karin Konoval Michael Kopsa Stephen Lang James LeGros Nicholas Lea Laura Leighton Robert Sean Leonard Meat Loaf Robert Loggia Jessica Lundy Jamie Luner Ralph Macchio Steve Makaj Nick Mancuso Howie Mandel Costas Mandylor James Marsden Andrea Martin Samantha Mathis Marlee Matlin Kandyse McClure Britt McKillip Dean McDermott Malcolm McDowell Kelly McGillis Stephen McHattie Wendel Meldrum Dina Meyer Alyssa Milano D. W. Moffett Esai Morales Pat Morita Bob Morrisey Kirby Morrow Lochlyn Munro Judd Nelson George Newbern Cynthia Nixon Catherine O'Hara Michael O'Keefe Nicole Oliver Ty Olsson Peter Onorati Meghan Ory Annette O'Toole Peter Outerbridge Joe Pantoliano Grace Park Molly Parker Robert Patrick Barry Pepper Ron Perlman A.C. Peterson Ryan Phillippe Mackenzie Phillips Robert Picardo David Hyde Pierce Roddy Piper Amanda Plummer Gerard Plunket Chris PotterC.C.H. Pounder Cynthia Preston Jason Priestley John Pyper-Ferguson Claire Rankin Sarah-Jane Redmond Jed Rees Callum Keith Rennie Ryan Reynolds Ron Rifkin Molly Ringwald Sam Robards Ryan Robbins Lela Rochon Michael Rooker Andrea Roth Teryl Rothery Jennifer Rubin Saul Rubinek Kelly Rutherford William Sadler Jay O. Sanders Chris Sarandon Fred Savage Doug Savant Jonathan Scarfe Diana Scarwid Dwight Schultz Rekha Sharma Helen Shaver Ally Sheedy Stephen Shellen Sofia Shinas John Wesley Shipp Robin Shou Marina Sirtis Charles Martin Smith Lane Smith Bill Smitrovich Sonja Smits John Spencer Brent Spiner Jessica Steen Frances Sternhagen Catherine Mary Stewart Tabitha St. Germain David Ogden Stiers Chantal Strand D.B. Sweeney Amanda Tapping Alan Thicke Rachel Ticotin Kevin Tighe George Touliatos Daniel J. Travanti Jessica Tuck Jud Tylor Cicely Tyson Emmanuelle Vaugier Nana Visitor Matthew Walker Zack Ward David Warner Alberta Watson Steven Weber Frank Welker Cathy Weseluck Frank Whaley Wil Wheaton Chad WillettMykelti Williamson Peter Wingfield Burt Young Alex Zahara Lisa Zane

Please Support The RUMBLE Channel 50% of all support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission RUMBLE Has More Videos & YOUR VIEWS Help Raise Money For a MOON Mission! https://rumble.com/user/WhatsNextVids Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments Donations Updated Weekly on X/Twitter: https://x.com/WhatsNe75388303 Why do so many people hate NASA? NASA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, is an organization that has garnered significant admiration and support over the years for its groundbreaking achievements in space exploration, scientific research, technological advancements, and inspiring missions. However, like any large institution, NASA is not immune to criticism or negative sentiments from certain individuals or groups. The reasons why some people may harbor negative feelings towards NASA can vary and are often based on a combination of factors: Budget Allocation: One common criticism of NASA is related to its budget allocation. Some individuals argue that the funds directed towards space exploration could be better utilized for addressing pressing issues on Earth such as poverty, healthcare, education, and environmental concerns. There is a perception that the money spent on space missions could be seen as extravagant or wasteful when there are urgent needs on our planet. Lack of Immediate Benefits: Another reason for discontent towards NASA is the belief held by some that the outcomes of space exploration do not directly benefit them or have tangible impacts on their daily lives. While NASA’s research and innovations often lead to technological spinoffs that benefit society at large, these benefits may not always be immediately apparent to the general public. Misinformation or Lack of Awareness: Negative attitudes towards NASA can also stem from misinformation or a lack of understanding about the agency’s goals, accomplishments, and contributions to society. Inaccurate portrayals in media or misconceptions about the relevance of space exploration can contribute to a negative perception of NASA. Competing Priorities: In a world with numerous challenges and limited resources, some individuals may view investments in space exploration as taking away resources from other important areas such as healthcare, education, infrastructure, or social welfare programs. This perspective can lead to resentment towards organizations like NASA that receive substantial funding for their missions. Political Ideologies: Criticism of NASA can also be influenced by political ideologies or beliefs. Some individuals may oppose government-funded agencies like NASA due to ideological differences regarding the role of government in funding scientific research and exploration. Environmental Concerns: Certain environmental groups or activists may criticize space exploration activities for their potential impact on Earth’s environment. Launches and operations related to space missions can have environmental consequences such as carbon emissions and waste generation, leading to objections from those advocating for sustainability and conservation. Perceived Lack of Transparency: Criticism towards NASA may also arise from concerns about transparency in decision-making processes, project management, or allocation of resources within the organization. Lack of clarity about how taxpayer dollars are being used or perceived inefficiencies in operations can contribute to negative perceptions. In conclusion, while NASA enjoys widespread support and admiration for its contributions to science, technology, and human knowledge, there are various reasons why some individuals may hold negative views towards the agency. These reasons range from budgetary concerns and competing priorities to misinformation, lack of immediate benefits perceived by some members of the public.

Please Support The RUMBLE Channel 50% of all support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission RUMBLE Has More Videos & YOUR VIEWS Help Raise Money For a MOON Mission! https://rumble.com/user/WhatsNextVids Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments Donations Updated Weekly on X/Twitter: https://x.com/WhatsNe75388303 Description of the Mars Ingenuity Helicopter Development and Concept: The development of what would become the Mars Ingenuity Helicopter began in 2012, with NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) initiating the project. Initially known as the “risk reduction” vehicle, the concept aimed to create a scout helicopter to accompany rovers on planetary missions. By January 2015, NASA approved funding for a full-size model, and by mid-2016, there was a request for further funding to continue development. Engineering models were tested in simulated Martian atmospheres by December 2017. Mission Integration: When the Mars 2020 program was approved in July 2014, a helicopter flight demonstration was not initially included or budgeted for. However, in March 2018, $23 million was allocated for the helicopter in the U.S. federal budget. By May 2018, it was confirmed that the helicopter could be developed and tested in time for inclusion in the Mars 2020 mission. Extensive flight dynamics and environment testing followed before mounting it on the Perseverance rover in August 2019. Operational Phase and Achievements: Originally intended to conduct only five flights as part of a technology demonstration lasting 30 sols (Martian days), Ingenuity exceeded expectations by completing a total of 72 flights over nearly three years. It demonstrated that controlled flight is possible in Mars’ thin atmosphere and became the first aircraft to achieve powered and controlled extraterrestrial flight. The operational phase involved scouting areas of interest for the Perseverance rover, improving navigational techniques, and pushing its flight envelope limits. End of Mission: On January 18, 2024, during its 72nd flight, Ingenuity’s rotor blades were damaged upon landing, leading to its permanent grounding. This marked the end of its mission after flying for a total of two hours, eight minutes and 48 seconds over 1,004 days, covering more than 17 kilometers (11 miles). NASA officially announced the conclusion of Ingenuity’s mission one week later.

Please Support The RUMBLE Channel 50% of all support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission RUMBLE Has More Videos & YOUR VIEWS Help Raise Money For a MOON Mission! https://rumble.com/user/WhatsNextVids Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments Donations Updated Weekly on X/Twitter: https://x.com/WhatsNe75388303 What is the Lunar Gateway? The Lunar Gateway is a planned space station that will orbit the Moon. It is part of NASA’s Artemis program, which aims to return humans to the Moon and eventually send astronauts to Mars. The Gateway will serve as a staging point for crewed missions to the lunar surface, as well as a platform for scientific research and international collaboration in space exploration. What will it end up costing? The cost of the Lunar Gateway project has been estimated at around $7 billion for the initial development phase. However, this figure is subject to change as the project progresses and new challenges arise. The total cost of the Gateway, including construction, operation, and maintenance over its lifetime, is expected to be significantly higher. Why are so many people saying it’s a terrible idea? There are several reasons why some critics believe the Lunar Gateway project is a bad idea: Cost: One of the main criticisms of the Lunar Gateway is its high cost. Some argue that the money spent on building and maintaining the Gateway could be better used for other priorities, such as addressing pressing issues on Earth or funding more cost-effective space exploration projects. Redundancy: Critics also question the need for a lunar orbiting station like the Gateway when alternative approaches, such as direct lunar landings or utilizing existing infrastructure like the International Space Station (ISS), could achieve similar goals more efficiently. Delaying Human Exploration: Another concern is that focusing on building the Gateway could delay human missions to the lunar surface or Mars. Critics argue that resources should be directed towards landing astronauts on the Moon rather than establishing an intermediate outpost in lunar orbit. International Cooperation: Some critics believe that international collaboration in space exploration should prioritize joint missions to planetary surfaces rather than building a new space station in lunar orbit. In summary, while the Lunar Gateway has its supporters who see it as a crucial stepping stone for future deep-space exploration, there are valid concerns raised by critics regarding its cost-effectiveness, redundancy, potential impact on human exploration timelines, and international cooperation priorities. Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used: NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration SpaceX European Space Agency (ESA) NASA provides official information on their Artemis program and plans for the Lunar Gateway. SpaceX’s involvement in space exploration projects offers insights into industry perspectives on initiatives like the Lunar Gateway. The European Space Agency contributes valuable international perspectives on collaborative efforts in space exploration.

Please Support The Channel 50% of all channel support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments If the NASA and National Science Foundation’s budgets were increased to $600 billion annually, equivalent to the US military spending, here are five potential possibilities: Net-energy-producing nuclear fusion reactor: With a single year’s worth of military spending, we could not only achieve nuclear fusion but also learn to scale it and revolutionize energy production on Earth. The ITER project, an international consortium aiming for net-energy-producing fusion reactors, has been ongoing since the Reagan-Gorbachev era and is expected to be completed in 2019 with a €20 billion investment. However, the primary barrier to achieving this goal is the upfront investment required. Establishing multiple human colonies on Mars: Funding has been the only obstacle preventing humans from establishing colonies on Mars since the 1990s. A sustained investment of between $50 and $150 billion over ten years would enable us to land equipment and a crew on Mars, potentially setting up four separate colonies for the cost of one year of US military spending. Providing 2,000 Watt solar power systems for every US household: Solar power technology is becoming increasingly efficient and cost-effective. For $600 billion, we could provide approximately 125 million US households with a 2,000 Watt solar power system each, significantly reducing their reliance on fossil fuels and easing the burden on electric grids. Building a country-sized particle accelerator: With a budget six times larger than that of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), we could construct a particle accelerator with a circumference of approximately 1,000 kilometers and achieve proton-on-proton collisions of over 500 TeV. This would allow us to potentially crack the PeV energy frontier and make significant strides in understanding fundamental physics. Developing a “super-Hubble” space telescope: A space telescope ten times larger than Hubble in diameter would have ten times the resolution and observe objects that Hubble can only see after much longer observation periods. For $600 billion, we might be able to build a telescope with a diameter between 30 and 40 meters, significantly advancing our understanding of the universe beyond what Hubble has achieved. Authoritative References Used: European Fusion Development Agreement (ITER). (n.d.). About ITER - The world’s largest scientific collaboration for nuclear fusion energy research - ITER Organization - ITER Fusion Energy Research Project - ITER Fusion Reactor Design & Construction - ITER Nuclear Fusion Energy Research & Development - ITER International Partnership for Nuclear Fusion Energy Research & Development - ITER Nuclear Fusion Energy Technology & Innovation - ITER Nuclear Fusion Energy Education & Outreach - ITER Nuclear Fusion Energy News & Events - ITER Nuclear Fusion Energy Research Progress Reports & Publications - ITER Nuclear Fusion Energy Research Collaboration Opportunities & Partnerships - ITER Nuclear Fusion Energy Research Facility Tours & Visits - ITER Nuclear Fusion Energy Research Project Updates & Milestones - ITER Nuclear Fusion Energy Research Progress Reports & Publications Archive – ITER Organization (n.d.). Retrieved June 13, 2024, from https://www.iter.org/about/default_en.aspx NASA (n.d.). Mars Exploration Program: Human Spaceflight: Mars Exploration Program: Human Spaceflight: Mars Exploration Program: Human Spaceflight: Mars Exploration Program: Human Spaceflight: Mars Exploration Program: Human Spaceflight: Mars Exploration Program: Human Spaceflight: Mars Exploration Program: Human Spaceflight: Mars Exploration Program: Human Spaceflight (n.d.). Retrieved June 13, 2024, from https://www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsystem/features/mars_human_exploration_factsheet_january_27_2014_revised_final_.html National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) (n.d.). Residential Solar Photovoltaic System Cost Analysis (Version 7). Retrieved June 13, 2024, from https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy18osti/68879_residential_solar_photovoltaic_system_cost_analysis_-_version_7_.pdf

Please Support The RUMBLE Channel 50% of all support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission RUMBLE Has More Videos & YOUR VIEWS Help Raise Money For a MOON Mission! https://rumble.com/user/WhatsNextVids Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments Donations Updated Weekly on X/Twitter: https://x.com/WhatsNe75388303 CAST Duane Jones as Ben. The casting was potentially controversial in 1968 when it was rare for a black man to be cast as the hero of an American film primarily composed of white actors, but Romero said that Jones performed the best in his audition.[14] Jones went on to appear in other films, including Ganja & Hess (1973) and Beat Street (1984),[15] but worried that people only recognized him as Ben.[16] Judith O'Dea as Barbra. A 23-year-old commercial and stage actress, O'Dea previously worked for Hardman and Eastman in Pittsburgh. O'Dea was in Hollywood seeking entry to the movie business when contacted about the role.[17] O'Dea expressed surprise at the film's cultural impact and the renown it brought her.[18] Karl Hardman as Harry Cooper. President of Hardman Associates, Karl Hardman, played the hostile father. Cooper's wife was played by Hardman's real-life business and romantic partner Marilyn Eastman.[19][20] Marilyn Eastman as Helen Cooper.[21] Vice president of Hardman Associates, Marilyn Eastman played the doomed mother Helen Cooper and the unnamed, bug-eating zombie. She later appeared in Santa Claws (1996), directed by John Russo.[20][22] Kyra Schon as Karen Cooper. Hardman's daughter in real life,[23] 9-year-old Schon also portrayed the mangled corpse on the house's upstairs floor that Ben drags away.[24] Keith Wayne as Tom. "Keith Wayne" was Ronald Keith Hartman's stage name.[24] After this lone acting role, Wayne went on to work as a singer, dancer, musician, and night-club owner.[25][24] Wayne became a successful chiropractor in North Carolina.[25] Wayne explained the change in careers during a 1992 interview, "I am not that person anymore. [...] I got to a point in my life where I wanted to have some control. I didn't want to wake up at 40 or 50 and not be in control."[26] In 1995, he took his own life at age 50.[27][28] Judith Ridley as Judy. The 19-year-old receptionist from Hardman Associates auditioned for Barbra without any acting experience and was given the less-demanding role of Judy.[29] Ridley starred in Romero's unsuccessful second feature There's Always Vanilla (1971).[30] Bill Hinzman, who played the first ghoul encountered by Barbra and Johnny in the cemetery, went on to work on a number of horror films including The Majorettes (1986) and Flesheater (1988).[31][32] George Kosana as Sheriff McClelland. Kosana also served as the film's production manager.[33] Bill "Chilly Billy" Cardille as himself.[34] Cardille was well known in Pittsburgh as a TV presenter who hosted a horror film anthology series, Chiller Theatre.[35] His daughter Lori would go on to star in Romero's Day of the Dead Night of the Living Dead is a 1968 American independent horror film directed, photographed, and edited by George A. Romero, written by Romero and John Russo, produced by Russell Streiner and Karl Hardman, and starring Duane Jones and Judith O'Dea. The story follows seven people trapped in a farmhouse in rural Pennsylvania, under assault by reanimated corpses. Although the flesh-eating monsters that appear in the film are referred to as "ghouls", they are credited with popularizing the modern portrayal of zombies in popular culture. Having gained experience creating television commercials, industrial films, and Mister Rogers' Neighborhood segments through their production company The Latent Image, Romero, Russo, and Streiner decided to make a horror film to capitalize on interest in the genre. Their script primarily drew inspiration from Richard Matheson's 1954 novel I Am Legend. Principal photography took place between July 1967 and January 1968, mainly on location in Evans City, Pennsylvania, with Romero using guerrilla filmmaking techniques he had honed in his commercial and industrial work to complete the film on a budget of approximately US$100,000. Unable to procure a proper set, the crew rented a condemned farmhouse to destroy during the course of filming. Night of the Living Dead premiered in Pittsburgh on October 1, 1968. It grossed US$12 million domestically and US$18 million internationally, earning more than 250 times its budget and making it one of the most profitable film productions ever made at the time. Released shortly before the adoption of the Motion Picture Association of America rating system, the film's explicit violence and gore were considered groundbreaking, leading to controversy and negative reviews. It eventually garnered a cult following and critical acclaim and has appeared on lists of the greatest and most influential films by such outlets as Empire, The New York Times, and Total Film. Frequently identified as a touchstone in the development of the horror genre, retrospective scholarly analysis has focused on its reflection of the social and cultural changes in the United States during the 1960s, with particular attention towards the casting of Jones, an African-American, in the leading role.[5] In 1999, the film was deemed "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant" by the Library of Congress and selected for preservation in the National Film Registry.[6][7][8] Night of the Living Dead created a successful franchise that includes five sequels released between 1978 and 2009, all directed by Romero. Due to an error when titling the original film, it entered the public domain upon release,[9] resulting in numerous adaptations, remakes, and a lasting legacy in the horror genre. An official remake, written by Romero and directed by Tom Savini, was released in 1990.

Please Support The RUMBLE Channel 50% of all support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission RUMBLE Has More Videos & YOUR VIEWS Help Raise Money For a MOON Mission! https://rumble.com/user/WhatsNextVids Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments Donations Updated Weekly on X/Twitter: https://x.com/WhatsNe75388303 CAST Gregory Walcott as Jeff Trent Mona McKinnon as Paula Trent Duke Moore as Lieutenant John Harper Tom Keene as Colonel Tom Edwards Carl Anthony as Patrolman Larry Paul Marco as Patrolman Kelton Tor Johnson as Inspector Daniel Clay Dudley Manlove as Eros Joanna Lee as Tanna John Breckinridge as The Ruler Lyle Talbot as General Roberts David De Mering as Danny Norma McCarty as Edie the stewardess Bill Ash as Captain Lynn Lemon as Minister at Clay's funeral Ben Frommer and Gloria Dea as Mourners Conrad Brooks as Patrolman Jamie Maila Nurmi (Vampira) as Vampire Girl Bela Lugosi as the Old Man/Ghoul Man Tom Mason as Old Man/Ghoul Man stand-in Criswell as himself/narrator Karl Johnson as Farmer Calder (uncredited) Ed Wood as man Holding Newspaper (uncredited) J. Edward Reynolds as Gravedigger (also executive producer) Hugh Thomas, Jr. as Gravedigger (also associate producer) Plan 9 from Outer Space is a 1957 American independent science fiction-horror film produced, written, directed, and edited by Ed Wood. The film was shot in black-and-white in November 1956 and had a preview screening on March 15, 1957 at the Carlton Theatre in Los Angeles under the title, Grave Robbers from Outer Space.[3] Retitled Plan 9 from Outer Space, it went into general release in July 1958 in Virginia[4] and several other states,[5][6] before being sold to television in 1961.[7] The film stars Gregory Walcott, Mona McKinnon, Tor Johnson, and "Vampira" (Maila Nurmi) and is narrated by Criswell. It also posthumously bills Bela Lugosi (before Lugosi's death in August 1956, Wood had shot silent footage of Lugosi for another, unfinished film, which was inserted into Plan 9). Other guest stars are Hollywood veterans Lyle Talbot, who said he never refused an acting job, and former cowboy star Tom Keene. The film's storyline concerns extraterrestrials who seek to stop humanity from creating a doomsday weapon that could destroy the universe.[8] The aliens implement "Plan 9", a scheme to resurrect the Earth's dead. By causing chaos, the aliens hope the crisis will force humanity to listen to them; otherwise, the aliens will destroy mankind with armies of undead. Plan 9 from Outer Space played on television in relative obscurity from 1961 until 1980, when authors Harry Medved and Michael Medved dubbed it the "worst film ever made" in their book The Golden Turkey Awards.[9] Wood and his film were posthumously given two Golden Turkey Awards for Worst Director Ever and Worst Film Ever. It has since been called "the epitome of so-bad-it's-good cinema"[10] and gained a large cult following.

Please Support The RUMBLE Channel 50% of all support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission RUMBLE Has More Videos & YOUR VIEWS Help Raise Money For a MOON Mission! https://rumble.com/user/WhatsNextVids Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments Donations Updated Weekly on X/Twitter: https://x.com/WhatsNe75388303 CAST Vincent Price as Dr. Robert Morgan Franca Bettoia as Ruth Collins Emma Danieli as Virginia Morgan Giacomo Rossi-Stuart as Ben Cortman Umberto Raho (billed as Umberto Rau) as Dr. Mercer Christi Courtland as Kathy Morgan Tony Corvi as the governor Hector Ribotta as the TV reporter It is 1968, and Dr. Robert Morgan lives in a world where everyone else has been infected by a plague that has turned them into undead, vampiric creatures that cannot stand sunlight, fear mirrors, and are repelled by garlic. They would kill Morgan if they could, but they are weak and unintelligent. Every day Morgan carries out the same routine: he wakes up, marks another day on the calendar, gathers his weapons, and then goes hunting for vampires, killing as many as he can and then burning the bodies to prevent them from coming back. At night, he locks himself inside his house. A flashback sequence explains that, in December 1965, Morgan's wife Virginia and daughter Kathy had succumbed to the plague before it was widely known by the public that the dead would return to life. Instead of taking his wife to the same public burn pit used to dispose of his daughter's corpse, Morgan buried her without the knowledge of the authorities. When his wife returned to his home and attacked him, Morgan became aware of the need to kill the plague victims with a wooden stake. Morgan hypothesizes that he is immune to the bacteria from a bite by an infected vampire bat when he was stationed in Panama, which may have introduced a diluted form of the plague into his blood. One day, a dog appears in the neighborhood. Desperate for companionship, Morgan chases after the dog but does not catch it. Sometime later the dog appears, wounded, at Morgan's doorstep. He takes the dog into his home and treats its wounds, looking forward to having company for the first time in three years. He quickly discovers, however, that it, too, has become infected with the plague. Morgan starts burying the dog which is now impaled with a wooden stake. He sinks further into depression and loneliness. After burying the dog, Morgan spots a woman in the distance. The woman, Ruth, is terrified of Morgan at first sight and runs from him. Morgan convinces her to return to his home, but he is suspicious of her true nature. Ruth becomes ill when Morgan waves garlic in her face, but claims that she has a weak stomach. Morgan's suspicion that Ruth is infected is confirmed when he discovers her attempting to inject herself with a combination of blood and vaccine that holds the disease at bay. Ruth initially draws a gun on Morgan but ultimately surrenders it to him. She tells him that she is part of a group of people like her – infected, but under treatment – and was sent to spy on Morgan. The vaccine allows the people to function normally with the drug in the bloodstream, but once it wears off, the infection takes over the body again. Ruth explains that her people are planning to rebuild society as they destroy the remaining humans, and that many of the vampires Morgan killed were still alive. Ruth desperately urges Morgan to flee, but he inexplicably refuses. While Ruth is asleep, Morgan transfuses his own blood into her. She is immediately cured, and Morgan sees hope that, together, they can cure the rest of her people. Moments later, however, Ruth's people attack. Morgan takes the gun and flees his home while the attackers kill the vampires gathered around Morgan's home. Ruth's people spot Morgan and chase him. He exchanges gunfire with them and picks up tear gas grenades from a police station armory along the way. While the tear gas delays his pursuers somewhat, Morgan is wounded by gunfire and retreats into a church. As he stands at the altar, one of his pursuers finally impales him with a thrown spear. In his final moments, Morgan denounces his pursuers as "freaks" and, as Ruth cradles him, declares that he is the last true man on Earth. As Ruth walks away from Morgan's body, she notices a baby crying and tries to assure the child that everyone is safe now.

Please Support The Channel 50% of all channel support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments How Rumble is beating YouTube In the battle between Rumble and YouTube, Rumble has been making significant strides in certain areas that have allowed it to outshine YouTube in terms of growth and user engagement. Here are the key factors contributing to how Rumble is beating YouTube: 1. Censorship Policies: One of the major areas where Rumble differentiates itself from YouTube is in its approach to censorship. While YouTube has been known for its strict censorship policies, including demonetization and removal of videos based on various criteria, Rumble has positioned itself as a platform that prioritizes free speech and avoids censorship as long as the content is legal. This commitment to allowing a wide range of content without fear of censorship has attracted creators and viewers who value freedom of expression. 2. Monetization Opportunities: Another area where Rumble is excelling compared to YouTube is in its monetization policies. While YouTube requires creators to meet certain thresholds, such as 1,000 subscribers and 4,000 watch hours before they can start monetizing their content, Rumble allows for immediate monetization. This more accessible monetization model on Rumble may be appealing to creators looking to generate revenue from their content without having to meet stringent requirements. 3. User Growth and Revenue Performance: Rumble’s impressive growth in terms of Monthly Active Users (MAUs) and revenue has also contributed to its success in competing with YouTube. In Q4 of 2022, Rumble experienced a massive year-over-year growth in MAUs, surging by 142%, while its revenue skyrocketed by 686.2% over the same period. These growth figures outpaced YouTube’s performance during the same timeframe, indicating that Rumble is gaining momentum and attracting both users and investors with its rapid expansion. Overall, by focusing on free speech principles, offering easier monetization options for creators, and demonstrating remarkable growth in user base and revenue, Rumble has positioned itself as a formidable competitor to YouTube.

Please Support The Channel 50% of all channel support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments Why Mercury Would Be the Best Planet to Colonize Mercury, despite its extreme conditions, could potentially be considered the best planet to colonize for several reasons: Proximity to the Sun: Mercury is the closest planet to the Sun in our solar system. This proximity offers unique advantages for solar power generation. The intense sunlight on Mercury could be harnessed more efficiently compared to other planets, providing a consistent and abundant energy source for any potential colony. Resource Availability: Mercury is rich in various resources that could be valuable for colonization efforts. It is believed to have significant amounts of metals and minerals, including iron, nickel, and possibly even water ice in its permanently shadowed craters. These resources could be utilized for construction, manufacturing, and sustaining life on a colony. Low Gravity: Mercury has a lower gravity compared to Earth, approximately 38% of Earth’s gravity. This lower gravity could make it easier and more energy-efficient for spacecraft to land and take off from the planet. Additionally, it could have potential health benefits for colonists, as long-term exposure to lower gravity environments may have fewer negative effects on the human body compared to higher gravity planets. Scientific Research Opportunities: Colonizing Mercury would provide unparalleled opportunities for scientific research. Studying this planet up close could offer insights into planetary formation, evolution, and the history of our solar system. It could also help advance our understanding of extreme environments and how life can adapt and thrive in such conditions.

Please Support The Channel 50% of all channel support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments Mars, often referred to as the “Red Planet,” has long been a subject of fascination for scientists and space enthusiasts alike. One of the key challenges in colonizing and terraforming Mars is its lack of a substantial atmosphere and liquid water on its surface. The planet’s thin atmosphere and low atmospheric pressure have led to the loss of much of its water to space over time. As a result, if humans were to colonize and terraform Mars in the future, one of the consequences could be extremely high salinity levels in any water sources present on the planet. Factors Contributing to High Salinity Levels on Terraformed Mars Water Loss to Space: Mars is believed to have once had large bodies of liquid water on its surface billions of years ago. However, due to its weak magnetic field and thin atmosphere, much of this water has escaped into space over time. This process, known as atmospheric escape, has resulted in the loss of a significant amount of Martian water. Residual Salts: As water evaporates or sublimates from the Martian surface, any dissolved salts present in the water are left behind. Over time, these salts accumulate and can lead to high salinity levels in remaining water sources such as underground reservoirs or ice deposits. Geological Processes: Mars is a geologically active planet with features like volcanoes, impact craters, and tectonic activity. These processes can also contribute to the release of minerals and salts into Martian waters, further increasing their salinity levels. Human Activities: In the process of terraforming Mars – transforming its environment to make it more Earth-like and habitable for humans – human activities such as mining operations or industrial processes could potentially introduce additional salts and contaminants into Martian water sources, exacerbating salinity issues. Implications of High Salinity Levels on Terraformed Mars Water Availability: High salinity levels can make water sources less suitable for human consumption or agricultural use without proper treatment. This could pose challenges for sustaining a human population on Mars without reliable access to freshwater resources. Ecosystem Impact: Elevated salinity levels can also impact any potential Martian ecosystems that may be established as part of terraforming efforts. Organisms adapted to lower salinity environments may struggle to survive in highly saline conditions. Infrastructure Maintenance: High salinity water can be corrosive and damaging to infrastructure such as pipes, equipment, and habitats constructed on Mars. Managing and mitigating the effects of saltwater on infrastructure would be crucial for long-term sustainability. Conclusion In conclusion, while colonizing and terraforming Mars presents exciting possibilities for expanding human presence beyond Earth, addressing high salinity levels in Martian waters will be a significant challenge that requires careful planning and innovative solutions to ensure the success and sustainability of future settlements on the Red Planet.

Please Support The Channel 50% of all channel support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments China’s Advancements in Space China’s advancements in space have positioned the country as a frontrunner in the new space race. The Chinese National Space Agency has been making significant progress with its space missions, including the recent launch of the Shenzhou-18 spacecraft to the Tiangong space station. This mission marks a milestone as China’s latest crewed mission to its own orbiting space station, following its exclusion from the International Space Station. Moreover, China has demonstrated its capabilities with successful missions like the Chang’e-6 robotic spacecraft, which is on a round trip to the moon’s far side to collect samples. These achievements underscore China’s commitment to lunar exploration and potential plans for establishing a crewed lunar landing and a base on the moon’s south pole. US Concerns and Reactions The United States, particularly NASA, has expressed growing concerns over China’s rapid progress in space technology and its geopolitical implications. There are fears that China’s civilian space program may have military applications, including the development of counter-space weapons that could target satellites and disrupt existing space infrastructure. NASA Administrator Bill Nelson highlighted the competitive nature of the current situation, characterizing it as a race between the US and China to return to the moon. He raised concerns about China’s intentions regarding territorial claims in space and emphasized the need for vigilance in monitoring China’s activities in orbit. Implications of China’s Space Dominance Experts suggest that China’s advancements in space technology pose a significant challenge to US dominance in this domain. The pace at which China is developing its capabilities, particularly in lunar exploration and resource utilization, is seen as a threat by some analysts. The ability to control resources like water on celestial bodies such as the moon could provide strategic advantages for future space endeavors. In contrast to previous space races focused on symbolic achievements like landing on celestial bodies, the current competition between China and the US revolves around establishing long-term presence and exploiting resources beyond Earth. This shift underscores the strategic importance of space exploration and highlights the implications of one country gaining dominance in this arena.

Please Support The Channel 50% of all channel support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments In this captivating YouTube short, we will delve into NASA’s rich history of lunar exploration by comparing and contrasting the awe-inspiring Saturn V moon rocket and its successor, the Space Launch System (SLS). Both rockets represent monumental achievements in human spaceflight, with the Saturn V paving the way for the United States’ first manned lunar landing in 1969, and the SLS poised to carry us back to the Moon as part of NASA’s Artemis program. Saturn V: The Saturn V rocket, developed during the 1960s as part of President John F. Kennedy’s ambitious goal to land a man on the Moon before the end of that decade, was an engineering marvel. Standing at an impressive height of 363 feet (109.7 meters), it was the tallest, heaviest, and most powerful rocket ever built at that time. The Saturn V consisted of a central third stage (S-IVB), three liquid-fueled first stages (S-IC), and an Apollo spacecraft on top. This colossal machine generated a staggering 7.5 million pounds (34 MN) of thrust at liftoff, propelling astronauts to escape Earth’s gravity and embark on their historic journey to our celestial neighbor. Space Launch System (SLS): Fast forward to present day, NASA has initiated development of its next giant leap in lunar exploration: the Space Launch System (SLS). Designed to be even more powerful than its predecessor, this heavy-lift launch vehicle is expected to generate a mind-boggling 8.8 million pounds (39.8 MN) of thrust at liftoff when using its five RS-25 engines in their upgraded configuration. The SLS is also taller than the Saturn V, measuring 322 feet (98 meters) in height when fully assembled with its Orion spacecraft on top. This new powerhouse will play a crucial role in carrying humans back to the Moon under NASA’s Artemis program and eventually pave the way for missions beyond our solar system. Comparative Analysis: Although both rockets share some similarities such as their heavy-lift capabilities and their role in advancing human spaceflight, there are significant differences between them that make each one unique in its own right. For instance, while both use liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen as fuel components, improvements in engine technology have led to increased efficiency for the SLS compared to its predecessor. Additionally, advancements in materials science have resulted in lighter structures for various components within the SLS design – making it more fuel efficient overall despite being larger than its predecessor. Furthermore, while both rockets were designed for manned missions to orbit or beyond Earth’s atmosphere, only the SLS is currently being developed with lunar exploration specifically in mind due to its immense power capabilities required for deep space missions involving large payloads or extended stays away from Earth.

Please Support The Channel 50% of all channel support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments Elements Lacking on the Moon: The Moon lacks a significant atmosphere, which means it lacks elements such as oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide that are essential for life on Earth. The Moon’s surface is also devoid of liquid water, another crucial element for life as we know it. Elements Needed for All Life on Earth: All life on Earth requires a combination of essential elements to thrive. These elements include: Carbon: Carbon is a fundamental building block of life and is found in all organic molecules. Hydrogen: Hydrogen is a key component of water and many organic compounds essential for life. Oxygen: Oxygen is vital for respiration and energy production in most living organisms. Nitrogen: Nitrogen is crucial for the synthesis of amino acids, proteins, and nucleic acids. Phosphorus: Phosphorus is a component of DNA, RNA, ATP, and phospholipids, essential for cellular structure and function. Sulfur: Sulfur is necessary for the structure of certain amino acids and vitamins. These elements play critical roles in biological processes such as metabolism, growth, reproduction, and overall functioning of living organisms.

Please Support The Channel 50% of all channel support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments Ice at the Moon's poles may be currently getting all the attention, but the Moon is hiding far, FAR more water both liquid and frozen fairly close to the surface. Just a few dozen feet into the Moon the temperature and pressure allow liquid water to be possible in a radiation free environment. That begs the question, if impacts throughout Earth's history have seeded the Moon with pieces of our world, rich in microbes, then why wouldn't the Moon's subsurface be rich with simple life? The Environment Below the Surface of the Moon Recent studies have suggested that the environment just below the surface of the Moon may be more hospitable to microbial life than previously thought. This surprising discovery challenges our traditional understanding of lunar conditions and raises intriguing possibilities for future exploration and research. Wet Environment One key factor contributing to the potential habitability of the lunar subsurface is the presence of water ice. While the surface of the Moon is known for its extreme dryness, recent missions and observations have revealed significant deposits of water ice in permanently shadowed regions near the poles. These icy reservoirs could provide a vital resource for any potential microbial life forms seeking to survive in this harsh environment. Radiation-Free Environment Another important aspect of the subsurface lunar environment is its relative protection from harmful radiation. Unlike the surface, which is exposed to high levels of solar and cosmic radiation, the subsurface offers a shield against these damaging rays. This reduced radiation exposure could create a more favorable setting for microbial survival and proliferation. Pressurized Environment Additionally, researchers have proposed that the subsurface of the Moon may possess a certain level of internal pressure, albeit significantly lower than Earth’s atmospheric pressure. This slight pressurization could further enhance the habitability of this environment by providing some degree of protection against vacuum conditions and facilitating processes essential for life. In conclusion, while further research is needed to fully understand the implications of these findings, it appears that the environment just below the surface of the Moon holds intriguing potential for microbial life due to its wetter conditions, reduced radiation exposure, and partial pressurization.

From the mysterious and forgotten Apollo 14 incident, to the "wet" sample return missions of Luna 24 and Chang'e 5 every Moon mission that involved the detection of water is here. What the flying telescope SOPHIA discovered at Clavius and Moretus craters is covered in depth before its retirement. As is India's ISRO successful Chandrayaan-3 mission to the Moon's south pole and the discoveries it made, not the least of which are the wild temperature swings just centimeters below the lunar regolith. And last but not least, ShadowCam has revealed the Moon's permanently shadowed craters to be devoid of ice, what does this mean for the future of lunar colonization? All of that and more is covered in this video! Please Support The Channel 50% of all channel support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments Hey guys, this is going to be a deeper dive into the last video. There's a lot more to discuss when it comes to the possiility of sub-surface Moon water. Long time subscriers know that I strive to cover topics that 99% of YouTube is ignoring. And while you've shown me a ton of love and respect for that, and I thank you all and sincerely appreciate it, YouTube's algorithm tends to punish originality, as I'm sure you've noticed. But that's cool, it just means we've gotta try a little harder than the other guys, and I don't mind that, we're literally reaching for the stars here so I already know it's going to take work, I am not afraid. Real quick I'd like to thank everyone who left a like or a comment for the last video, every little bit helps, even if its just saying "commenting for the algo", I thank you. Alright, enough of that, let's get into the juicy details. Today we're going to quickly go thru a small mountain of evidence for water ice NOT contained in permanently shadowed craters at the poles. I'm trying to get this video out just a week after the last so buckle up, here we go.

China’s Advantages in the Modern Space Race China is making significant strides in the modern space race due to several key advantages: Technological Advancements: China has demonstrated impressive technological capabilities through successful space missions like the recent launch of the Chang’e-6 spacecraft to the moon’s far side. These achievements showcase China’s commitment to advancing its space program. Strategic Planning and Ambitions: Beijing has clear ambitions for its space program, including crewed lunar landings and establishing a base on the moon’s south pole. This strategic vision sets China apart in the race for space exploration. Military Integration: The Chinese space program is closely linked to the People’s Liberation Army, allowing for dual-use technologies that can serve both civilian and military purposes. This integration gives China an edge in developing advanced space capabilities. International Collaborations: China has been proactive in forming partnerships with other countries, such as Russia, for joint projects like the International Lunar Research Station (ILRS). These collaborations enhance China’s influence and resources in space exploration. Resource Acquisition: China is focused on acquiring resources in space, particularly water on the moon, which could be crucial for future missions and sustainability in outer space. This emphasis on resource utilization gives China a strategic advantage over competitors. Soft Power Projection: Through cultural products like the movie “The Wandering Earth,” China promotes a narrative of using space resources to benefit life on Earth, aligning with Chinese cultural values of teamwork and continuity. This soft power approach enhances China’s global image in space exploration. Geopolitical Strategy: China’s space ambitions are part of a broader geopolitical strategy to assert its influence and challenge traditional powers like the United States. By positioning itself as a leading space-faring nation, China aims to reshape global power dynamics. In conclusion, China is winning the modern space race by leveraging its technological prowess, strategic planning, military integration, international collaborations, resource acquisition efforts, soft power projection, and geopolitical strategy to establish itself as a dominant player in space exploration. Please Support The Channel 50% of all channel support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments

Please Support The Channel 50% of all channel support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments Social Media YouTube - / @whatsnextvideos Rumble - https://rumble.com/user/WhatsNextVids Tiktok - https://www.tiktok.com/@whatsnextvids X - https://twitter.com/WhatsNe75388303 Why is YouTube so terrible for small, original content creators these days? YouTube’s Algorithm and Content Discovery Approach: YouTube’s algorithm and content discovery approach heavily favor channels that cater to a specific niche or topic. The platform tends to promote creators who consistently produce content within a particular genre or theme, leading to the pigeonholing of creators into specific categories. This can be detrimental to small creators who want to explore different types of content or who do not fit neatly into one specific niche. Challenges Faced by Small Creators: Small creators often struggle on YouTube because the platform prioritizes established channels and tends to promote content that aligns with viewers’ previous preferences. This can make it difficult for new creators to break through and attract a wider audience, especially if they produce diverse content that does not fit neatly into a single category. Impact on Content Diversity and Creativity: The focus on promoting “winners” in specific categories can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of content available on the platform. Small creators who are experimenting with different types of content may find it challenging to gain visibility and grow their audience, leading to a homogenization of content as creators feel pressured to conform to established trends. Strategies for Small Creators: To navigate these challenges, small creators can employ various strategies to build their audience and maintain creative freedom. These strategies include encouraging viewers to subscribe and engage with their content, establishing a strong visual identity, managing older videos that no longer align with their current focus, building an audience outside of YouTube, and exploring alternative platforms that may better support experimentation and creativity. In conclusion, YouTube’s algorithmic approach and emphasis on niche content can pose significant challenges for small, original content creators looking to diversify their offerings and reach a broader audience. While the platform remains dominant in the online video space, its limitations for smaller creators highlight the need for more inclusive approaches that support creativity and innovation.

Please Support The Channel 50% of all channel support (after fees & tax) will go to a private Moon mission Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37594401 Buy Me A Coffee?: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/whats.next Donate With Cash App: https://cash.app/$YTpayments Social Media YouTube - / @whatsnextvideos Rumble - https://rumble.com/user/WhatsNextVids Tiktok - https://www.tiktok.com/@whatsnextvids X - https://twitter.com/WhatsNe75388303 Effects of Donald Trump on NASA and Creation of Space Force During his administration, Donald Trump made significant changes to NASA and the U.S. space program, including the creation of the Space Force. Here are some key ways in which Trump influenced NASA and initiated the establishment of the Space Force: 1. Space Policy Directive 1: On December 11, 2017, Trump signed Space Policy Directive 1, which directed NASA to refocus its human exploration program on sending astronauts back to the Moon with a sustained presence and eventually establishing a colony on the Moon as a stepping stone for human missions to Mars by the 2030s. This directive accelerated NASA’s timeline for returning humans to the Moon from its original target date to 2024. 2. Emphasis on Commercialization: The Trump administration embraced commercialization in low Earth orbit through programs like the Commercial Resupply Services (CRS) and Commercial Crew Program (CCP). The CRS program involved partnerships with commercial companies like SpaceX and Boeing for resupply missions to the International Space Station (ISS), reducing NASA’s reliance on Russia. The CCP aimed to develop commercial vehicles for crewed missions to space, with SpaceX’s Crew Dragon vehicle successfully taking astronauts to the ISS in May. 3. Establishment of Space Force: In December 2019, President Trump signed into law the creation of the United States Space Force as a new branch of the military focused on space operations. The establishment of Space Force marked a significant shift in how the U.S. military approaches space activities and national security concerns related to space. 4. Accelerated Timeline and Focus on Moon Missions: The Trump administration accelerated NASA’s timeline for returning humans to the Moon by focusing on projects that garnered voter support during his presidency. By pushing for a return to the Moon by 2024, Trump aimed to achieve a defining achievement for NASA during his time in office, though meeting this deadline was deemed unlikely. 5. Impact on Policy and Exploration Goals: Trump’s policies reshaped NASA’s priorities towards lunar exploration as a precursor to future Mars missions. The emphasis on establishing a sustained presence on the Moon aimed at leveraging its resources and low-gravity environment for life support systems and fuel production necessary for future spacecraft missions. In summary, Donald Trump’s administration brought about major changes in NASA’s focus towards lunar exploration, accelerated timelines for human missions, emphasized commercial partnerships in space endeavors, and led to the creation of the U.S. Space Force as a dedicated military branch for space operations.