Ostroff Destroys Ballistic Gel Scam, Makes Case Roof Shadow Loss was Compression Artifact, Loves FBI

Previous from Ostroff's Channel:
https://rumble.com/v6zi3lq-charlie-kirk-assassination-new-video-evidence-fbi-coverup.html
which I reposted here:
https://rumble.com/v6zl3uw-jeff-ostroff-range-day-bro-analysis-new-video-evidence-fbi-coverup.html
This Roof Shadow argument doesn't convince me. It's possible I guess. But I think he knows it's a weak argument, because you see him lead it by saying Robinson had a shadow over the gray roof area, and suggests that this disputes the no-shadow argument. The shadow being there on the gray part of the roof, then disappearing when he crosses over to the white is the whole point. Every single person who makes that argument knows he cast a shadow over the gray.
Then he explains compression could disappear the shadow, ok maybe, and then he explains the shadow being there for a couple frames at the end, as if it were there the whole time!
And everyone else is a liar now if they said it disappeared. No, maybe they were unaware of the compression issue, but this guy is massively overstating his argument, there is no evidence these guys are lying about that particular issue, as it's not common knowledge what he's saying about the compression, and I have no idea if he's right.
However, he's right that everyone's lying. Everyone's lying that Kirk was shot at all. That's what I think, anyway.
Next statement on the police securing the crime scene is so asinine I won't include it, but basically, he shows the police secured the crime AFTER TPUSA removed the footage and walked all over it for a long time and spoliated everything. That my friend, after all the evidence has been destroyed, does NOT count as "securing the crime scene." But if you want to see it, the full ep is here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMfhRD7QHWk