The Shocking Defense Strategy in Charlie Kirk’s Assassination Case

Today we’re reacting to the latest developments in the case of State of Utah vs. Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk. In a recent procedural hearing, the defense requested a preliminary hearing—hinting that they may attempt an insanity plea as part of their legal strategy.

But could that actually work? In this video, I break down:

What the insanity defense really requires under U.S. law

Why advance planning and text messages could destroy that argument

The prosecution’s likely strategy to counter the plea

What this means for the trial moving forward

The insanity defense is one of the most difficult legal strategies to pull off. Can Robinson’s defense really convince a judge or jury that he didn’t understand right from wrong? Or is this a desperate attempt to avoid accountability?

Join me as I explore all the angles and share my reaction to this developing case.

Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more deep dives into current events and high-profile cases.

#charliekirk #InsanityPlea #truecrimecommunity #courtcase #justiceforcharlie #legalanalysis #reactionvideo #currentevents #breakingnews