1 SEPTEMBER - AMERICA FUCK OFF ASIA AND THE SOUTH CHINA SEA!!!!!!!

Xi Jinping's SCO SPEECH: “Cold War Mentality Has No Place in Today’s World”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=im1CRkU_k8c

Victor Gao: How China Is Shaping the World Amid U.S. Containment & Global Crises
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2Fj7S9uCT8

soup
I am just now realizing how BRAINWASHED we are as Americans in regards to China, Russia and Iran.

thebagelsproductions
Victor is always good value. He can articulate very well what China is thinking, overall strategy etc and kinda troll western government mouthpieces in debate when needed.

blang
Respect the host for not interrupting the guest during his answers which you rarely seen in other Indian channels. Bravo to the host once again.

Chubbchubb
I find myself following Professor Gao everywhere on YT.
He is an EXCEPTIONAL fountain of knowledge.
Thank you for having Victor Gao on your podcast.

harjitatwal
Dr. Victor Gao rocks. Always enjoy listening to him. ❤

Joyous
Yes, I agree with you. And the truth is important and worthy. Let China continue to do well for the people and set an example for all of us. ❤❤

socialistLeftist
Brilliant, Brilliant. India-China friendship should deepen. The small territorial disputes can be diplomatically resolved through some compromises on both sides.

rubenvaldermendez
Thank you both. Congratulations Mr. Gao for your excellent work for truth justice and peace for your beautiful and noble country and the world.

=

Full video: Taiwan Untangled
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVYTugFYols

sunwahChong
Following the founding of the People's Republic of China, the PRC's lawful seat at the United Nations had been unlawfully occupied by the Chiang Kai-shek regime. This state of affairs remained unchanged for 22 years until October 25, 1971, when the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 recognized the PRC as the sole legitimate representative of China to the United Nations.

DO YOU KNOW WHY SUCH A SUDDEN CHANGED?

Richard Nixon was elected in January 20, 1969 – August 9, 1974. Paul Volcker and Henry Kissinger went to Nixon and told him America was bankrupted. Nixon told them to use other countries money. In 21 February 1972 Richard Nixon visited China after UN announced the One China Policy in 25 October 1971. In the Ching Dynasty era when they refused to open up the ZIOPIGS started the Opium War. But Chairman Mao was willing to open up provided America agreed to the One China Policy. In 1974 Singapore created the Sovereign Wealth Funds and most of the funds was invested in the ZIOPIGS corporations like buying arms and my late mother was not happy.

Trump and the ZIOPIGS wanted President Xi to open up China like Singapore. President Xi told them NOT to interfere Taiwan reunification with China and follow the rule of law and they can have the rare earth… but Demand and Threaten tactics are NOT acceptable for the Chinese mind-set because good relationship start with RESPECT.

=

Taiwan is not a country! (Brief history between Chinese mainland & Taiwan island after civil war)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vI7hzXp-zvE

sunwahChong
Taiwan is still not a country. My late mother said Taiwan must return to the motherland without a war...

wc
This American Taiwanese really knows what he’s talking about and I agree with him entirely

4yUwantAxe
His personal story is SO WELL articulated.
Calling out the US, their allies, and their allies friends now is in the best interest of the future!!
Clip it and ship it. @};--

ZhuoAo
XiangYu couldn't put it more brilliantly.

itsme2be
It's hypocritical of the US to tell other countries to not break off relations with Taipei, while it did the same in 1979 and continues with a One China policy itself.

=

The Spratly Islands Dispute: China Defines the New Millenium
https://scispace.com/pdf/the-spratly-islands-dispute-china-defines-the-new-millennium-1d3acudu6a.pdf

The Spratly Islands Dispute and U.S. National Security Interests
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA326537.pdf

U.S. to China: Abide by International Ruling on Disputed Islands
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-08/u-s-to-china-abide-by-international-ruling-on-disputed-islands?cmpid=yhoo.headline

On March 1, 2016, I read in the local paper and what was written there worried me, "A stand-off at a the G20 finance ministers meeting in China last week is reflected in public calls by China to replace the US dollar and threats by the US military to start a nuclear war. The US military also said they stand ready to enforce any decisions by the international court of justice at The Hague over territorial disputes in the South China sea."

What gives the US the right to interfere in the matter of the South China sea? Because if there is really a dispute, isn't it between China and ASEAN? After reading this article, "A U.S. Carrier Strike Group Is Sailing Around the South China Sea" https://www.yahoo.com/autos/u-carrier-strike-group-sailing-152701972.html, I decided to instead talk about the South China Sea because not one journalist portrayed the true facts in their write up!

=

Video Featuring China's Stance on South China Sea Issue Screened at Times Square
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPe_TIYTn7c&t=112s

A publicity video explaining China’s right to claim sovereignty over the South China Sea Islands is currently being shown in Times Square in New York City. #VideofromChina

Historical documents prove China's rights over South China Sea...Historical documents prove China's rights over South China Sea islands

old documents collected by the US Library of Congress have proved China's historical rights over the islands and adjacent waters in the #SouthChinaSea.

A map collector based in Canada revealed historical documents and Persian maps from the 10th to 17th centuries that, according to a Chinese professor, mark the region as "Sea of China" or "Bay of China" with islands labeled as "islands of China," serving as evidence for China's historical claims to the South China Sea. This prove a long history of Chinese fishermen living and working on islands in the #SouthChinaSea.

The South China Morning Post reported in 2016 that China was actively seeking such "third-party" historical evidence from overseas to support its sovereignty claims in the region. (I have all the maps posted in one of my blog but Slut Miriam Adelson removed all my blogs.)

Honestly speaking, I know the evil ZIOPIGS can't wait to start WW3 here in Asia because they have failed in Iran and Syria and this is their last opportunity to make it happen! You might think they are so upright in their false front to appear to bring fairness in Asia but the true fact of the matter is the Evil Rotschild Zionism want to destroy Asia like they did in the Middle East!

Who Is the Biggest Aggressor in the South China Sea?
http://thediplomat.com/2015/06/who-is-the-biggest-aggressor-in-the-south-china-sea/

China has every right to do what they are doing now at the Spratlys island because they are the rightful owner and this was what Mr. Chang Wen Lam (Dr.) from Hong Kong had written to the Forum page on Thursday, May 28, 2015: http://thepoisonappleoftheworld.com/beijing-has-long-laid-claim-to-spratlys/

=

Just playing catch-up in South China Sea

ASSOCIATE Professor Robert ZC. Beckman, in noting that the Philippines has taken its case to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, neglected to mention that the Philippines had engaged in construction in the disputed Spratlys for many years ("China and 'might makes right' at sea"; May20).

Vietnam, too, did significant reclamation work in the South China Sea, even before China did ("Vietnam 'did major work in disputed S. China Sea'"; May 9).

The area Vietnam claims is almost as large as China's, but Vietnam occupiers some 25 features, versus China's six or seven.

This is why some analysts suggest that China is only playing catch-up in the South China Sea, and that it is, in fact, being forced to respond pre-emptively.

United States navy secretary Ray Mabus recently affirmed America's naval power and said that if challenged, he would not want his troops in a "fair fight".

Thus, even if China were resorting to "might makes right", it is only following the rules of engagement set out by the US.

The Zionist Puppet Obama reiterated the US commitment to freedom of navigation and regional order, while saying the leaders discussed "tangible steps" to ease tensions, including a "halt to further reclamation, new construction and militarization of disputed areas." Good for you Puppet Obama! If he is really serious about this matter, then perhaps he should first right the wrong of Zionist Israel and stop ALL settlements in the West Bank and get "Scumbag Satanyahu" to honor the Oslo Peace Agreement!!!!!!!

U.S. diplomatic strategy on South China Sea appears to founder
https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-diplomatic-strategy-south-china-sea-appears-founder-000528046.html

=

CHINA WARNS UNITED STATES
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/w01gTDqDZnk

China warns US against destabilizing East Asia
https://youtu.be/qwkmFxBxD9g

Published on Feb 4, 2017

China has lashed out at the US stance on East China Sea islands, saying it is putting regional stability in East Asia at risk.

The Chinese Foreign Ministry’s statement came in response to remarks by US Defense Secretary James Mattis about Beijing's control over the islands. In a press conference in Tokyo, Mattis said the US will continue to recognize Japanese administration of the islands. He also said Washington remains committed to defending Japanese territory, including the islands. Tokyo and Beijing have a long-running dispute over the islands that lie between Taiwan and Okinawa. Japan administers the islets and calls them Senkaku while China refers to them as Diaoyu.

China vs Japan: The Diaoyu/Senkaku-Islands dispute
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyXWqRDqUhk

=

BREAKING: RUSSIA JOINS SOUTH CHINA SEA CONFLICT AS CHINESE ALLY
https://youtu.be/f1AQ8s1k8xw

Published on Apr 2, 2016

Sub for more: http://nnn.is/the_new_media | Morning News USA reports, several countries are making their own moves with regards to the dispute over the South China Sea region. Japan just activated a radar station in the East China Sea allowing it to establish a permanent intelligence post that can track territories nearby. China expressed its anger over the matter, as reported by Business Insider.

See the report here:
https://youtu.be/f1AQ8s1k8xw
Read more:
http://www.morningnewsusa.com/looming...

=

DIAOYU islands documentary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yw_pM6gTeQ

Up first today, a documentary tracing the history of the Diaoyu Islands has been released at a theater in Los Angeles. "Diaoyu Islands, The Truth" is created by Hollywood writer and director Chris D. Nebe

shundi
Potsdam Declaration after Japan unconditionally surrendered stated that Japanese sovereignty is limited to the 4 main Japan islands only.

dungnguyen-pf9sk
Senkaku Island belongs to Japan, just like Paracel Island Spratly Island belongs to Vietnam. you don't have to argue. every white china is incorrect

=

Dennis Etler‎Xi Jinping - China's Exceptional President

Admin · Follow · 10 hrs · 25 January 2018
This map of China and Japan came from Rand McNally's Commercial Atlas, sixty-first Edition dated 1930. A highly successful run of atlases that lasted over a decade. All railroad routes are shown on the map. This map includes all cities and towns, lakes, rivers, and bodies of water.
The map shows internationally recognized borders in 1930. Tibet, Xinjiang and Mongolia are part of China, just as much as Texas, California and Florida are part of the USA.
Japan's 1895/1910 conquests of Taiwan and Korea are also shown.

=

Hollywood documentary says Diaoyu Islands belong to China
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToZElCmCikE

steuartscoleft
This is not even a question. Diaoyu Island belong to PRC with no doubt.

moonlander
In interview by the German journalist, in his recent visit to Germany, the shameless Japanese prime minister was question about Japan emulating the action of Germany in www2 by apologizing its war atrocities, the Japanese P.M shamelessly trying to evade the question by answering the 2 countries were not the same...WHAT a stupid reason, what is the differences then?

antoniogo
thank you Chris for speaking the truth...

waynetong
WW2 was ended by 2 most important documents 1945 - THE Cairo Declaration and Potsdam's Declaration. In these 2 documents, it was clearly stated that all territories invaded and occupied by Japan has to be returned to original owners. Japan's territory is limited to her 4 local islands - Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, Shikoku (the message is simple and clear). But in 1951 due to Cold War and revenge of Korean War, US unilaterally signed the so-called San Francisco Treaty with Japan, at the ABSENCE of Mainland China, Taiwan China, Soviet Union to hand-over the Administration ( but not the Sovereignty ) of Diaoyu Islands to Japan ( sowing the seed for future conflict & dispute between China and Japan). Right away in July and August 1951, both mainland China (PM Chou En Lai) and Taiwan China (President Chiang Kai Shek) protested strongly against such a sneaky political set-up. The event and protests are registered in United Nation's record

=

What Professor Dennis Etler said about China
https://klse.i3investor.com/web/blog/detail/koonyewyinblog/2021-06-19-story-h1566913249-What_Professor_Dennis_Etler_said_about_China_Koon_Yew_Yin

All should read this article and circulate it to all your friends. As you know, the West especially US has been bashing China for no good reason and I have posted a few articles to defend China.

Professor Dennis Etler is an American political analyst who holds a doctorate in anthropology from the University of California, Berkeley.

Anthropology is the study of what makes us human. Anthropologists take a broad approach to understanding the many different aspects of the human experience, which we call holism. They consider the past, through archaeology, to see how human groups lived hundreds or thousands of years ago and what was important to them.

=

American political analyst with a PhD in Anthropology from the University of California, Berkeley
https://www.sammyboy.com/threads/prof-dennis-etler-why-is-the-west-attacking-china.366767/

My point of view:

Why is the West so concerned about China? The usual answer is that China's economic growth is challenging the global hegemony that the West has dominated for at least 250 years. The Chinese military has also reached a level comparable to that of the West, and is therefore no longer intimidated and bullied by the West. All of these are facts and reasons why the West wants to attack China and portray it as the source of all evil.

But there is another factor that must be considered. What scares the West is not just China's economic and military might, but China's success as a country versus the West's failures.

In addition, China has established a society of ethnic harmony, in sharp contrast to the systemic racism of Western society.

Western ruling elites and their media mouthpieces are unwilling to admit that China has eradicated extreme poverty while their own people are increasingly trapped in poverty. They are unwilling to admit that China has built 21st century infrastructure while they are lagging far behind. They are unwilling to face the fact that the Chinese people overwhelmingly support their government, while Western people have lost confidence in their governments; they are unwilling to accept that China has defeated the COVID-19 epidemic, but they have not; and finally, they do not Be willing to accept the fact that a non-white country is doing better than them and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future.

To divert attention from these facts, the West has concocted a series of lies and slanders that allow them to deny reality. The West slanders poverty alleviation as "genocide". Instead of acknowledging advances in high-speed rail, electric vehicles, alternative energy and e-commerce, they accuse China of "intellectual property theft" and instead of focusing on social and economic systems that serve the people, accuse China of forced labor and forced sterilization. They do not see China as defending its national sovereignty in the South China Sea, Hong Kong and Taiwan, but call it an aggressor.

All attacks on China serve multiple purposes, but one of the main ones is to ensure that Westerners don't hear or see the real China, because if they do, they might get what Western elites don't want them to have Ideas such as socialism is for the benefit of the 99% of the population, while capitalism is primarily for the enrichment of the 1%.

=

South China Sea: Sifting facts and fiction
http://www.indiawrites.org/diplomacy/south-china-sea-sifting-facts-fiction/

Facts and fictions about SCS which had been asked by too many Indians was answered by the Chinese Press Counselor for China Embassy in New Delhi accordingly...

South China Sea has become a hot topic recently, making people confused about the situation. Many Indian friends have asked me a set of questions: What are facts on the South China Sea issue? Who has the sovereignty over the islands and reefs in that area? Who on earth raises the tension there? I would like to share with you the truth.

China was the first country that found, exploited and exercised sovereign jurisdiction on the Nansha Islands. China’s sovereignty over Nansha Islands is grounded on ample historical and jurisprudential evidence. There were only Chinese people living on the Nansha Islands until the late 19th century, which was recorded in the historical archives of many western countries.

During World War II, Japan invaded and occupied the Nansha Islands. After WWII, the Chinese government recovered the Nansha Islands, based on a series of international conventions and agreements including the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation. The Chinese government also reaffirmed its sovereignty by naming, mapping, administrating and troops stationing. Major countries including the US, Soviet Union, Japan and France acknowledged that the Nansha Islands are China’s territory. Japan pledged to abide by the relevant regulations in the Potsdam Proclamation and renounced all right and claims to Taiwan, the Pescadores, Nansha Islands and Xisha Islands. Some countries in that area had long acknowledged China’s sovereignty over Xisha Islands and Nansha Islands.

China shares land borders with 14 neighbouring countries, and has solved border issues with 12 of them through bilateral negotiation. Besides, China and Vietnam have demarcated the maritime border on the Beibu Gulf by negotiations. The border treaties and agreements are all based on the friendly consultation on an equal footing. Most of these countries are small or medium countries but none of them had any complaint on the process of demarcation negotiation. In fact, China has consistently adopted the route of bilateral negotiation and consultation to resolve the territory and demarcation issue. China has also accumulated rich experience from its long-term practice.

The Philippines’ unilateral move to push forward the arbitration proceedings seriously undermines the order of international maritime law. It is a political provocation under the cloak of law. Except the United States, which has so far not ratified the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), four of the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, including China, had submitted the declaration on Optional Exceptions, in accordance with Article 298 of UNCLOS. The Philippines broke not only its own promises of resolving the relevant dispute through negotiations and consultations, but also the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea and the authority and sanctity of the Convention.

China is a responsible country in the international community. As the biggest country in the South China Sea area, China shoulders its international responsibilities and obligations. China’s construction on some islands and reefs of the South China Sea is aimed at better fulfilling its international obligations as well as improving the living standard of people living there. When the construction is finished, China will offer more public service to international community in the fields of search and rescue, disaster prevention and mitigation, meteorological observation, ecological conservation, navigation safety, etc. China’s deployment of necessary defensive facilities is different from the militarisation move conducted by some countries on the islands and reefs which were illegally occupied. In building defense facilities on our own islands and reefs, China is exercising its right to self-preservation under international law. China is not the first country to have deployed weapons in the Nansha; it’s not the country that has deployed the most weapons, and not the country that conducts the most frequent military activities. China cannot be accused of “militarization”; this label is more suited to some other countries.

China firmly upholds freedom of navigation and overflight by all countries in accordance with international law. There is no problem with freedom of navigation and overflight in the South China Sea. Every day, 15 million barrels of oil go through the Malacca Straits and the South China Sea to East Asia, three times of what goes through the Suez Canal. All the top three economies in East Asia, including China, Japan and the ROK, are highly dependent on the South China Sea route. Thanks to concerted efforts, the South China Sea is one of the safest and freest shipping routes in the world. According to a recent interview by the Reuters, ship owners of Southeast Asian countries agree that there is no problem with freedom of navigation in the South China Sea. A recent report by International Shipowners Mutual Assurance Association shows that China’s construction on the islands is conducive to, rather than impacting freedom and safety of navigation in the South China Sea. But the freedom of navigation does not give them a license to do whatever they want. If someone wants to muddy the waters or to destabilize Asia, China will not agree to it and the overwhelming majority of countries in the region will not allow it to happen.

China has always adhered to peaceful settlement of the South China Sea issue and called for a proper solution through diplomacy and negotiations with the parties directly concerned. Now China and ASEAN countries are fully implementing the DOC and working together toward a code of conduct. Countries in this region are able to manage their own issue.

(Xie Liyan is Press Counselor at the Chinese Embassy in New Delhi. The views expressed in this column are entirely those of the author)