President Trump says a great crime was committed with Biden’s Autopen

President Trump says a great crime was committed with the Autopen, Suggested the Autopen can tell you WHERE it was used

Generally, autopens do not come with tracking features, but how much you wanna bet the Autopen of a president does? Kek

He goes on to suggest Joe Biden may be innocent and had no idea what they were doing.

🔴 AGAIN!…. I’m telling you right now, there is a Constitutional Reason why Donald Trump signs everything, BY HAND.

Donald Trump has NEVER used an autopen for EO’s or legislation.

🔴 THE CONSTITUTION

1. Article I, Section 7: This outlines the legislative process, stating that a bill becomes law if the president “approves” it and that he “shall sign it” if he does, or return it with objections (veto) if he doesn’t.
—— The phrase “shall sign it” is the key…. does this imply a personal, physical act?

2. Article II, Section 1: The president’s executive power is vested in him
—— this suggests that certain acts—like approving laws—are his alone to perform, raising questions about delegating that act to a machine.

• The Constitution assumes the president’s conscious, individual assent to a law.
—— An autopen, even if authorized, is a mechanical proxy—some argue it’s akin to delegating the decision itself, which the president can’t legally do.

• The framers envisioned a hands-on executive role. In 1787, signing meant PEN TO PAPER by the person in question
——no machines existed to complicate this. An autopen might clash with that original understanding.

• Legal Authenticity: A signature traditionally proves intent and identity.
—— If a machine replicates it, could someone later challenge the law’s validity by claiming the president didn’t truly “sign” it? (LIKE TRUMP IS DOING NOW)

• Precedent Concerns: If autopens are okay, what’s next—digital signatures, aides signing, or AI approvals?