Who Stands to Benefit? The Hidden Agenda Behind Amendment 2

If protections are truly being preserved, why remove them from the Constitution in the first place? William Most and Chris Alexander break down the contradictions behind Amendment 2, questioning why state officials would shift crucial safeguards from constitutional law to mere statutes.

It’s like someone taking something out of your house and insisting, “Don’t worry, I’m putting it in your car.” Wouldn’t you still ask why they’re taking it at all?

This episode dives into the motivations behind the amendment, who gains from these changes, and why voters should be asking tough questions before casting their vote.

What do you think—should constitutional protections ever be removed if they’re supposedly being “preserved” elsewhere?