Premium Only Content
Intent to Move is not a Residence
Residence Premises Requires the Insured to Live in Residence
Post 4944
In Paul Villalobos v. Â Clear Blue Insurance Company, No. 24-20125, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit (December 10, 2024) the district court dismissed Plaintiff-Appellant Paul Villalobos's breach of contract claim following a coverage dispute between himself and his insurer, Clear Blue Insurance Company, because he admitted he did not live in the insured premises.
FACTS
Villalobos is named on a Clear Blue homeowners' policy, which provides coverage for property located at 7503 Muirwood Lane in Houston, Texas (the "Property"). The policy's "Property Coverages" section states in pertinent part: "We cover . . . [t]he dwelling on the 'residence premises' shown in the Declarations." The policy defines "residence premises," also in pertinent part, as "[t]he one-family dwelling where you reside . . . on the inception date of the policy period shown in the Declarations." The Declarations page lists Villalobos as the insured, his mailing address as the Property, and the inception date as September 21, 2021.
In mid-November 2021, Villalobos reported to Clear Blue that wind and hail had damaged the Property's roof earlier that month. Clear Blue denied coverage after Villalobos admitted he lived in Colorado and had never resided at the Property.
Villalobos sued Clear Blue, alleging breach of contract, breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act and the Texas Insurance Code, fraud, and ongoing conspiracy to commit illegal acts.
ANALYSIS
During his deposition, Villalobos testified that he lived in Colorado for over nine years and did not reside at the Property when the Clear Blue policy went into effect. Clear Blue moved for summary judgment on Villalobos's claims, arguing there was no insurance coverage for Villalobos's property damage as a matter of law.
Applying Louisiana law, the Fifth Circuit has previously determined that an identical residence requirement in a homeowners' insurance policy required "more than purchasing a home or intending to move into it." GeoVera Specialty Ins. Co. v. Joachin, 964 F.3d 390, 393 (5th Cir. 2020).
Applying Joachin the Fifth Circuit agreed with the district court that the Property did not satisfy the policy's residence requirement and was not a covered "residence premises" because:
it is undisputed that Villalobos did not reside on the Property on the inception date of the Clear Blue policy; and
Villalobos's only material argument on appeal is that he intended to move onto the Property.
Joachin held that "intending to move" is not enough. The Fifth Circuit concluded that there is no coverage under the policy. Accordingly, Villalobos's breach of contract claim failed and the USDC's judgment was affirmed.
ZALMA OPINION
That something as obvious as a home in Texas cannot be the residence premises of a person who lives full time in Colorado. Insurers issue property insurance policies providing coverage similar to a homeowners policy to the owner of a rental property while a homeowners policy limits coverage to the person who actually resides at the property. That this case went to the Fifth Circuit was the waste of Plaintiff's time and money, the waste of the time of the trial court, and the waste of the time of the Fifth Circuit who rendered a concise and clear opinion. A less kind judge or appellate court would have imposed sanctions on the party plaintiff and his counsel.
(c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.
Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.
Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe
Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg
Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk
-
LIVE
LFA TV
17 hours agoTRUMP'S 1ST DAY! HE'S BACK!| LIVE FROM AMERICA 1.21.25 11am
5,972 watching -
2:31:20
Matt Kohrs
14 hours agoTrump Pumps Stocks, Pelosi's Trades & Breaking News || The MK Show
31.5K2 -
39:13
Rethinking the Dollar
54 minutes agoTuesday Morning Check-In: TRUMP, TRUMP & More Trump
2 -
1:03:18
2 MIKES LIVE
2 hours agoTHE MIKE SCHWARTZ SHOW with DR. MICHAEL J SCHWARTZ 01-21-2025
3.87K4 -
29:44
Neil McCoy-Ward
3 hours ago🔥 Day 2... And Things Are Heating UP!!! 🚨
4.07K10 -
27:22
BonginoReport
3 hours agoA Nation Reclaimed (Ep.122) - 01/21/2025
48.8K66 -
1:32:27
Game On!
11 hours ago $2.71 earnedOhio State DOMINATES Notre Dame! Chip Kelly FINALLY wins a National Championship!
33.5K3 -
48:58
World Nomac
20 hours agoWhat happens in the Philippines AFTER DARK 🇵ðŸ‡
61.2K6 -
40:28
Rethinking the Dollar
1 day agoTrump’s 200 Executive Orders (420+ & Counting): What’s Next for America?
67.1K28 -
1:48:38
The Criminal Connection Podcast
1 day ago $3.13 earnedYUSEF BOUATTOURA Pro PT: Mean Streets of TOTTENHAM, Belmarsh to Bootcamp! (CRAZY Life Story)
54.4K2