Colon cancer Breast, prostate, lung, bowel, melanoma, kidney, lymphoma Cause of cancer deaths, lung bowel US data, 10.5% of newly diagnosed colorectal cancers now occur in people younger than 50 Expected to rise to 15% by 2030 https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/colon-rectal-cancer/causes-risks-prevention/risk-factors.html Colorectal cancer is rising among people who are younger than age 50, and the reason for this remains unclear. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9177054/ Index of suspicion at younger age Anaemia, (red flag), SOBE, fatigue, pallor Abdominal pain, bloating Diarrhoea or constipation Change in normal bowel habit, (looser, more or less often), 3 weeks PR bleed, mixed, streaked, dark and tarry Pencil stools Feeling of fullness after passing stool Straining Abdo or back passage pain Lumps or obstruction Weight loss DVT Aetiology Obesity Physical activity DM2 Diet Microbiome, probiotics, prebiotics Vitamin D Smoking Alcohol Microplastics Personal and family history Adenomatous polyps Inflammatory bowel disease Lynch syndrome, hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer or (HNPCC) mRNA injections

Obesity, diabetes, cancers, asthma, allergies, autoimmune diseases, behavioral disorders. Drivers a combination of factors, food, chemical exposure, medications, changes in lifestyle and behavior, physical activity, sleep, the use of technology. The food American children are eating Most American children’s diets are dominated by ultra-processed foods (UPFs) Lacking sufficient intakes of fruits and vegetables. UPFs has led to a depletion of essential micronutrients and dietary fiber (Vit D, Bs and C, Zn, Mg, Se, I, omega 3s, amino acids) Nearly 70% of an American child’s calories today comes from ultra-processed food, many of which are designed to override satiety (increased from zero 100 years ago) UPFs makeup over 50% of the diets of pregnant and postpartum mothers. American children’s exposure to environmental chemicals Cumulative load of thousands of synthetic chemicals From food, water, air Including neurodevelopmental and endocrine effects. Over 40,000 chemicals are registered for use in the U.S. Pesticides, microplastics, dioxins, commonly found in blood and urine of children and pregnant women—some at alarming levels. Children are particularly vulnerable to chemicals Utero, infancy, early childhood, and puberty. Current risk assessment methods, may not allow us to fully understand how these exposures affect human health. Children’s pervasive technology use Past 40 years Over the past four decades, children have transitioned from an active, play-based childhood to a sedentary, technology-driven lifestyle. Specifically, increased screen time, reduced physical activity, psychosocial stressors like loneliness, chronic stress, and sleep deprivation. Teens average nearly 9 hours of non-school screen time each day. Over 70% of children, and 85% of teens, fail to meet the 2024 federal guideline of 60 minutes of daily moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Nearly 80% of U.S. high school students do not sleep at least 8 hours per night, up from 69% in 2009. 2009, 69% high school students do not sleep at least 8 hours per night Now its 80% Persistent sadness and hopelessness among U.S. high school students surged between 2011 to 2021 from 28% to 42% Female students’ suicidal ideation rising from 19% to 30%. In 2024, 73% of 16–24-year-olds reported loneliness, 15% of young men having no close friendships, a fivefold increase since 1990. Teens using social media over 3 hours daily face double the risk of anxiety and depression, a 2022 meta-analysis showing each additional hour increases depression risk by 13% American children are highly medicated – and it’s not working The health system has aggressively responded to these increases in childhood chronic disease with increasing rates of pharmaceutical drug prescriptions, which may cause further harm Stimulant prescriptions for ADHD in the U.S. increased 250% from 2006 to 2016, despite evidence they did not improve outcomes long-term. Antidepressant prescription rates in teens increased by 1,400% between 1987 and 2014, even though a systematic overview shows that psychotherapy is just as effective as drugs in the short term, and potentially more effective in the long term. Antipsychotic prescriptions for children increased by 800% between 1993 and 2009, with most of these medications prescribed for conditions not approved by the FDA for use in children. Studies find that more than 35% (more than 15 million prescriptions) of childhood antibiotics are unnecessary infants exposed to antibiotics in first 2 years of life are more likely to develop asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, celiac disease, obesity, and ADHD. Corporate Capture and the Revolving Door Perverse incentives that impact the regulatory bodies and federal agencies tasked with overseeing them Government funding has been a small portion of the totality of research dollars being spent on chronic childhood disease. The majority is funded by the food, pharmaceutical, and chemical, as well as special interest Non- Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and professional associations. Examples The food industry funds the bulk of research in the field. A BMJ analysis found that industry spent over $60 billion on drug, biotechnology, and device research in nutrition science; by comparison, the government spends an estimated $1.5 billion on nutrition research. Concerningly, industry-funded nutrition research may bias conclusions in favor of sponsors’ products. Moreover, one analysis reported that 95% of the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee members had financial ties to food and pharmaceutical companies. The chemical-manufacturing industry Spent roughly $77 million on federal lobbying activities in 2024, while 60% of their lobbyists previously held federal posts. More than 10,000 thousand chemicals listed on the EPA’s inventory are designated as confidential, and generic chemical names are used to identify them. The pharmaceutical industry, 1999 to 2018 Spent $4.7 billion on lobbying expenditures at the federal level, more than any other industry. 9 out of the last 10 FDA commissioners have gone on to work for the pharmaceutical industry. 70% of FDA the medical reviewers — have gone on to work for the pharmaceutical industry. Over 80% of clinical departments and teaching hospitals at U.S. medical schools receive some degree of pharmaceutical funding, Half of the total costs for continuing medical education (CME) is funded by industry. 2010 and 2022 Industry provided $6 billion to over 20,000 patient advocacy organizations.

American children, health crisis Today’s children are the sickest generation in American history in terms of chronic disease Obesity, heart disease, diabetes, cancers, asthma, allergies, autoimmune diseases, behavioral disorders. Preventable trends continue to worsen each year https://www.whitehouse.gov/maha/ Federal and state policy have sometimes been guided more by corporate profit than the public interest. Scientific and medical institutions, complacent, defaulting to symptom management. We need gold-standard science to prevent and reverse root causes. The U.S. food and agricultural systems, embraced ultra-processed ingredients and synthetic chemicals. Healthcare system has over-medicalized children, frequently masking and compounding underlying issues. Rising screen addiction and sedentary lifestyles Chronically stressed, sick, and isolated generation. Purpose of this report, radical transparency, spur a conversation about how we can build a world Farmers are put at the center of how we think about health. Healthcare system thrives when disease is prevented and reversed, not just “managed”. AI technology that will develop new tools and push the frontiers of science, re. reverse chronic disease. America’s children 73 million children Over 40% (aged 0-17) in US, at least one chronic health condition Over 75% of American youth (aged 17- 24) are ineligible for military service, primarily due to obesity, poor physical fitness, and/or mental health challenges. More than 1 in 5 children over 6 years old are obese. More than 270% increase compared to the 1970s 80% of obese teens will become obese adults 70% of youth with obesity already have at least one risk factor for heart disease Both type 1 and type 2 diabetes have consistently increased the past 2 decades By 2060 if current DM trends continue 65% increase in type 1 diabetes 600% increase in type 2 diabetes Autism spectrum disorder impacts 1 in 31 children by age 8, Over 10% of children have been diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (1 million more children diagnosed in 2022 compared to 2016) Rates of other neurodevelopmental disorders and learning impairments are also increasing. Over 7.5 million (over 10%) K-12 students received special education services in 2023-24 Childhood cancer incidence has risen over 40% since 1975 Teenage depression rates nearly doubled from 2009 to 2019 More than 1 in 4 teenage girls in 2022 reporting a major depressive episode in the past year Three million high school students seriously considered suicide in 2023 Diagnosed anxiety increased by 61% among adolescents between 2016 and 2023. Over 57% of girls report feelings of sadness and hopelessness From 2007 to 2021 Suicide deaths among 10- to 24-year-olds increased by 62% Suicide deaths among 10- to 24-year-olds increased by 62% Suicide is now the second leading cause of death in teens aged 15-19. Over 1 in 4 American children suffers from allergies Eczema (atopic dermatitis), 12.7% of children Between 1997 and 2018, childhood food-allergy prevalence rose 88%. Celiac disease rates have increased 5-fold in American children since the 1980s. Rates of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), including Crohn’s, have increased by 25% over the last decade. Factors Food Exposure to environmental chemicals Pervasive technology use Children are highly medicated – and it’s not working

This talk was inspired by Neil’s book, ‘Hauntings’. I guess its about , time, place, the human condition and possibly more. Graveyard talk with Neil Oliver, Tim Kelly and John Campbell. Get a copy of the book from, https://www.neiloliver.com/ https://www.amazon.co.uk/Hauntings-Ghosts-Across-British-Locations/dp/B0C2JBGWVV/ref=sr_1_4?crid=3QUM6L9FXJR6C&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.mLbnmQ_DKzkupDJuNsksYwHbszW7C9jz7uZuaO_F5I2m2DMzvo2qgX4fqYauEmyCJU1wJUOA4zrlbxQkPsG0-eher2KWxu8asng3Dlw79tQ-X8CkI-o1rYyctGphXJA78MKvABFbQVap_fG-PY7nAcorf6nf97-GgfseTA7_JC3QrJ6XujGG3Sn0f7Q84a8b64m-Mujt-Ua9tCbwJUKpvHBeCQQ9gXGdSOCDC9sS-6pl4C-QaAJzaAluuKl-9T8EG208yGJmGMEcUxTumBa9fX07XZsm1YEQca_qGQnCfTM.3WyLfxxmnsakN8ZCkXM3Gftl3iADP5uVQjlV6Zxblbk&dib_tag=se&keywords=hauntings+oliver&qid=1748176951&sprefix=hauntings+oliver%2Caps%2C123&sr=8-4 Check out Neil's channel, https://www.youtube.com/@Neil-Oliver Follow Tim on X, https://x.com/DrTimothyKelly

Free downloads of my books, https://drjohncampbell.co.uk Rates of Successful Conceptions According to COVID-19 Vaccination Status: Data from the Czech Republic https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202504.2487/v1 Birth rates about 30% lower in vaccinated v unvaccinated women 1,300,000 women Total fertility rate in the Czech Republic 2021, 1.83 births per 1000 women 2022, 1.62 births per 1000 women 2023, 1.45 births per 1000 women Declining birth rates have been reported in many countries following the COVID-19 pandemic, and have been linked with economic instability, social inequality, and related social restrictions Adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccination on human menstrual cycle characteristics have been observed, but limited data are available on the relationship between vaccination status and birth rates. We used nationwide data from the Czech Republic To examine rates of successful conceptions i.e., conceptions leading to live births 9 months later, for women, either vaccinated or unvaccinated against COVID-19, before successful conceptions Data from January 2021 to December 2023 Monthly COVID-19 vaccination and birth data for women aged 18-39 years in the Czech Republic Numbers of SCs per month per 1,000 women, preconception-vaccinated or unvaccinated women Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines comprised 96% of all vaccine doses, Results 1,300,000 women aged 18-39 years in the Czech Republic The proportion of COVID-19-vaccinated women increased until reaching a steady state of around 70% by the end of 2021. During the entire study period, SCs per 1,000 women were considerably lower for women who were vaccinated, compared to those that were unvaccinated. At the end of June 2021 39% of all women had been vaccinated, those vaccinated before SC contributed only 7% of all SCs. Furthermore, SC rates for the vaccinated group were generally much lower than expected based on their proportion of the total population. Throughout 2022, SC rates remained about 1.5 times higher for women that were unvaccinated before SC compared with those that were vaccinated before SC Conclusions In the Czech Republic, SC rates were substantially lower for women vaccinated against COVID-19 before SC than for those who were not vaccinated. These hypothesis-generating and preliminary results call for further studies of the potential influence of COVID-19 vaccination on human fecundability and fertility. Unfortunately, the potential influence on reproductive health was not assessed in randomized preauthorization trials of COVID-19 vaccines The Czech Republic is one of the few countries where nationwide birth data are available for women who were vaccinated or unvaccinated for COVID-19, It is possible that more women who wished to become pregnant, i.e., achieve SC, chose not to be vaccinated, and/or that more women who did not plan to become pregnant opted for vaccination. Mechanisms Vaccination may be associated with menstrual pain and changes in menstrual flow and cycle length Direct effects of Pfizer on the ovarian follicle were reported recently. https://drjohncampbell.co.uk

Despite taking 4,000 to 8,000 units per day for the past few months. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence NICE Do not routinely test for vitamin D deficiency in people who are asymptomatic. https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/vitamin-d-deficiency-in-adults/diagnosis/diagnosis/ Check the vitamin D level by measuring serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) if a person has: Musculoskeletal symptoms Suspected osteomalacia. Chronic widespread pain with other features of osteomalacia (such as proximal muscle weakness). Suspected bone disease that may be improved with vitamin D treatment, such as osteomalacia or osteoporosis. Known bone disease, where correction of vitamin D deficiency is needed prior to specific treatment, such as: Prior to Paget's disease treatment with a bisphosphonate. Note: asymptomatic people at higher risk of vitamin D deficiency do not need routine testing for vitamin D deficiency, but should be advised on the need for maintenance dose vitamin D supplementation.

Linf for free downloads of my books, https://drjohncampbell.co.uk/

Why die before your time? Link for metabolic reset subscription with Dr malhotra and Kim Pearson, https://www.kim-pearson.com/metabolic-reset-by-dr-aseem-malhotra-and-nut

If the pharmaceutical industry, (Dr Michael Holick) had developed a single drug capable of: Reducing cancer mortality by more than 25% Reducing the incidence of metastatic and fatal cancer by 38% Reducing autoimmune disorders by 39% Reducing type 1 diabetes by 88% Preventing advancement of prediabetes to type 2 diabetes by 76% Reducing peripheral vascular disease by 80% Lowering risk of upper respiratory tract infections by 58% Reducing covid infectivity by 54% Reducing COVID 19 infection by up to 74% Reducing covid RDS by 78% Reducing COVID 19 hospitalizations by up to 22% Reducing COVID 19 mortality by up to 45 – 66% Accelerating COVID positive patients to COVID negativity by 66% Reducing risk of preterm birth by 62% Reducing risk of pre-eclampsia by more than 50% Reducing gestational diabetes, 50% Reducing infant dental caries, 75% Reducing multiple sclerosis, 62% Colon cancer, 80% Cardiovascular mortality, 67% Autoimmune disease, 39% the drug would be heralded as a “miracle drug.” With patent protection, this single drug sold worldwide would be the first trillion-dollar drug. The sunshine vitamin D provides all these health benefits especially when an adequate amount is taken to sustain circulating concentrations of 25(OH)D of at least 30 ng/ mL, (75 nm / L) with the maximum benefit obtained with concentrations of 40- 60 ng/mL,(100 – 150 nm / L) At least 30 ng/ mL Best, 40- 60 ng/mL. GDP (Guideline Development Panel, US Endocrine Society) 24% or more (children and adults), United States, have a circulating concentration of 25(OH)D less than 20 ng/mL. Approximately 40% in Europe have a circulating concentration of 25(OH)D less than 20 ng/mL. Recent report from the VITAL trail https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj-2021-066452 For the last 3 years of the intervention Group receiving 2000 IUs vitamin D3 daily raised their serum concentration of 25(OH)D from 29.8 ng/mL to 41.8 ng/mL after 1 year This group had 39% fewer confirmed autoimmune diseases than the placebo group (who were permitted to take up to 800 IUs daily) NIH, 5 – 8% in US have an autoimmune condition. When should I suspect or test for vitamin D deficiency? https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/vitamin-d-deficiency-in-adults/diagnosis/diagnosis/ Do not routinely test for vitamin D deficiency in people who are asymptomatic.

Tucker Carlson and Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgZaT-OriO8&t=668s

and the diabetes pandemic. Natural medicine series with physician, Dr. Suneel Dhand Influence of Cinnamon on Glycemic Control in Individuals With Prediabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7577407/

Autism (ASD) Endogenous Exogenous Sociological / psychological Food Environmental toxin Iatrogenic, drugs, vaccinations Cocktail effect ‘Autism Epidemic Runs Rampant,’ New Data Shows 1 in 31 Children Afflicted https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/autism-epidemic-runs-rampant-new-data-shows-grants.html WASHINGTON, DC—APRIL 15, 2025 Autism prevalence in the U.S (at 8 years of age) 2021, one in 36 children 2022, one in 31 children 1 in 31 is 3.22% https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/74/ss/ss7402a1.htm?s_cid=ss7402a1_w U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy “The autism epidemic is running rampant,” “One in 31 American children born in 2014 are disabled by autism. That’s up significantly from two years earlier and nearly five times higher than when the CDC first started running autism surveys in children born in 1992 https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5601a1.htm Prevalence for boys is an astounding 1 in 20 and in California it’s 1 in 12.5.” “President Trump has tasked me with identifying the root causes of the childhood chronic disease epidemic -- including autism,” “We are assembling teams of world-class scientists to focus research on the origins of the epidemic, and we expect to begin to have answers by September.” The new (ADDM) Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring report Conducted in 2022 across 16 sites in the U.S. Surveyed children aged 8 years born in 2014. Autism prevalence in 2000 One in 150 children Now, (well, 2022 data), one in 31 4.8 times higher 2022 compared to 2020 4.8 times higher Increasing intellectual disability among those effected Percentage of ASD cases with lower IQs has increased Nearly two thirds of children with ASD in 2022 data had either severe or borderline intellectual disability (ID). IQ less than 70 Arizona 31 % Arkansas 43.3 % California 28.4 % Prevalence of ASD by sex in 2022 (8 years) Boys, 49.2 per 1,000 (4.92%) Girls, 14.3 per 1,000 (1.4%) Male-to-female prevalence ratio was 3.4 Prevalence by ethnicity in 2022 (8 years) Black children 3.66 % Asian children 3.82 % Hispanic children 3.3 % White children 2.77 % Severe or borderline ID (8 years) Black children 78.9 % Asian children 66.5 % Hispanic children 63.9 % White children 55.6 % This report exposes a series of critical public health crises A persistent rise in ASD prevalence An alarming escalation in case severity Increasingly stark disparities across racial and ethnic groups This also highlights the urgent need for real-time data. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy “The autism epidemic has now reached a scale unprecedented in human history because it affects the young,” “The risks and costs of this crisis are a thousand times more threatening to our country than COVID-19. Autism is preventable and it is unforgivable that we have not yet identified the underlying causes. We should have had these answers 20 years ago.” UK also dramatic rise in autism https://digital.nhs.uk/supplementary-information/2024/autism-prevalence-in-england-march-2024 https://www.priorygroup.com/mental-health/autism/autism-statistics June 2024 Boys, prevalence rate 2.8%. Girls, prevalence rate 0.65% 193,203 to 204,000 referred for suspected autism, awaiting assessment or diagnosis 1998 and 2018 787% rise A 2023 study, people aged 20 to 49 150,000 to 500,000, in England may be autistic but undiagnosed. Antipsychotics are prescribed to about 2.1% of autistic children and young people, with usage increasing with age Rates of co-occurring bipolar disorder in autism In children, 7.8% In adults, 15% Title of Brownstone article withheld my me https://brownstone.org/articles/vaccines-autism-and-brownstone/ That’s how much taboo there is around this subject, which is itself deeply strange. If science is simply a matter of evidence and causal inference, it should be fearless and not doctrinaire. It should go where evidence leads.

With Professor Colleen Aldous Critical appraisal of multidrug therapy in the ambulatory management of patients with COVID-19 and hypoxemia Part II: Causal inference using the Bradford Hill criteria https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/antibiotics/78/1/78_35/_pdf/-char/en We continue the critical appraisal of three published case series of 119 COVID-19 patients with hypoxemia, treated in the United States, Zimbabwe, and Nigeria with similar ivermectin-based multidrug treatments, to assess the available evidence supporting a causal relationship between treatment and reduction in hospitalizations and mortality. A narrative review was conducted to assess the Bradford Hill criteria for a causal association. We used a previously proposed refinement of the Bradford Hill criteria that reorganized them into three categories of direct, mechanistic, and parallel evidence. The efficacy of the two most aggressive ivermectin-based multidrug protocols is supported by the Bradford Hill criteria for temporality, strength of association, biological gradient, biological plausibility, coherence, consistency, and analogy. The causal relation between the treatment of hypoxemic COVID-19 patients using these protocols and the reduction in hospitalizations and mortality is supported as an inference to the best explanation. Critical appraisal of multidrug therapy in the ambulatory management of patients with COVID-19 and hypoxemia Part I. Evidence supporting the strength of association https://faculty.utrgv.edu/eleftherios.gkioulekas/papers/032-c19-ivm-oxygen.pdf On March 11, 2020, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), the disease caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) [1]. Worldwide, 768,187,096 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and 6,945,714 deaths have been reported to the WHO as of June 21 2023, amounting to an average Case Fatality Rate (CFR) of 0.9% [2]. During 2020, while several governments and public health agencies were focused on contagion control and in-hospital patient care, several medical doctors from all around the world innovated and discovered early outpatient multidrug treatments using several repurposed medications in combination [3–15]. In the United States, several independent efforts coalesced into the formulation of a sequenced multidrug protocol [10, Fig. 3] (hereafter, McCullough protocol), which is based on the pathophysiological understanding of COVID-19 as a triphasic illness with three overlapping phases: (1) viral proliferation; (2) hyperinflammatory cytokine storm (COVID-19 pneumonia); and (3) thrombosis. McCullough’s protocol proposed a combination antiviral therapy for treating the viral proliferation phase, immunomodulators for treating the cytokine storm, and antiplatelet agents and antithrombotics for handling the thrombotic stage, based on risk stratification and how the disease presents in each individual patient. Thus, the McCullough protocol is an algorithmic treatment using sequenced multiple drugs in combination and customized to the individual patient and their response to treatment; no single drug is necessary nor sufficient to achieve treatment efficacy towards reducing hospitalizations and deaths. A recently published update of the McCullough protocol [16, Fig. 3] introduced some adjustments including virucidal nasal washes and oral gargles [17–24]. A large case series of 869 high-risk patients [25, 26], who were treated using an early version of the McCullough protocol, has been compared against population-level and historical controls [27], showing the existence of efficacy with respect to the reduction of mortality and hospitalizations, which is also resilient with respect to random selection bias, provided that patients are treated early enough within the first 3 to 5 days from the onset of illness. Indeed, an earlier study by Fazio et al.[28] showed that the ideal window of opportunity for initiating an effective early outpatient treatment of COVID-19 to prevent hospitalization is approximately within the first 3 days.

Bottom line of this video, Flu jab, calculated vaccine effectiveness of −26.9% N = 43,857 ‘This study found a significantly higher risk of influenza among the vaccinated, compared to the unvaccinated state in northern Ohio during the 2024-2025 influenza season.’ Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Bivalent Vaccine (April 2023, Cleveland Clinic) https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/10/6/ofad209/7131292?login=false ‘The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19’ Effectiveness of the Influenza Vaccine During the 2024-2025 Respiratory Viral Season https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.30.25321421v3 Study to evaluate effectiveness of influenza vaccine during the 2024-2025 respiratory viral season. Methods Employees of Cleveland Clinic in employment in Ohio on October 1, 2024, were included. The cumulative incidence of influenza, Vaccinated status Unvaccinated status Compared over the following 25 weeks. Results Among 53,402 employees, 43,857 (82.1%) had received the influenza vaccine by the end of the study. Influenza occurred in 1,079 (2.02%) during the study. The cumulative incidence of influenza was similar for the vaccinated and unvaccinated states early, but over the course of the study the cumulative incidence of influenza increased more rapidly among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. In an analysis adjusted for age, sex, clinical nursing job, and employment location, the risk of influenza was significantly higher for the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated state, HR, 1.27 95% C.I., 1.07 – 1.51 P = 0.007 Yielding a calculated vaccine effectiveness of −26.9% 95% C.I., −55.0 to −6.6% The results are generalizable to relatively healthy adults in the USA, which is a major target of adult influenza vaccination efforts. Although the study was done in northern Ohio, there is little reason to assume that the effectiveness of the vaccine would have been different in a different geographic region within the continental USA. Conclusions This study found that influenza vaccination of working-aged adults was associated with a higher risk of influenza during the 2024-2025 respiratory viral season, suggesting that the vaccine has not been effective in preventing influenza this season. Some details Influenza, respiratory viral infection, 145 000 deaths worldwide among all ages in 2017 1918, case fatality rate 2.5%, more than 50 million deaths worldwide Seasonal pattern to illness Annual influenza vaccination is often recommended Trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV), two influenza A virus types (H3N2 and H1N1), and an influenza B virus type Efficacy will vary depending on prognostication mRNA pressure?

We Were Badly Misled About the Event That Changed Our Lives https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/16/opinion/covid-pandemic-lab-leak.html Since scientists began playing around with dangerous pathogens in laboratories, the world has experienced four or five pandemics 1977 Russian flu Almost certainly a research mishap. https://armscontrolcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Escaped-Viruses-final-2-17-14-copy.pdf Scientists quickly suspected the odd 1997 Russian virus 2020, speculation about a laboratory accident - kooks and cranks. Mad / eccentric / pick fights to feel superior / fantastic / insane Many, public health officials, prominent scientists - conspiracy theory A nonprofit, EcoHealth Alliance Lost a grant, planning risky research into bat viruses at Wuhan Institute of Virology, lax safety standards But 77 Nobel laureates and 31 scientific societies lined up to defend EcoHealth Alliance Consensus. We have since learned, however, that to promote the appearance of consensus, some officials and scientists hid or understated crucial facts, misled at least one reporter, orchestrated campaigns of supposedly independent voices, and even compared notes about how to hide their communications in order to keep the public from hearing the whole story. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/news/2024/03/26/new-york-times-donald-mcneil-wuhan-lab-leak-theory/ Mr Donald McNeil Jr said their efforts to throw him “off track” influenced the newspaper’s coverage of the theory and likely contributed to the topic being “dropped” for a year. Wuhan laboratory’s research, details now emerged - safety precautions might have been terrifyingly lax. Is this just history? If anyone needs convincing that the next pandemic is only an accident away, check out, Cell https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0092867425001448 Researchers, (past and present) Wuhan Institute of Virology workers, describe taking samples of viruses found in bats, and experimenting to see if they could infect human cells, and pose a pandemic risk. “insufficient for work with potentially dangerous respiratory viruses.” You’d think that by now we’d have learned it’s not a good idea to test possible gas leaks by lighting a match. And you’d hope that prestigious scientific journals would have learned not to reward such risky research. Why haven’t we learned our lesson? Admitting its risky now – must have always been risky? And that perhaps we were misled on purpose. When Wuhan experienced an outbreak of a novel coronavirus related to ones found in bats, and researchers soon noticed the pathogen had the same rare genetic feature that the EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan researchers had proposed inserting into bat coronaviruses, https://theintercept.com/2021/09/23/coronavirus-research-grant-darpa/ you would think EcoHealth would sound the alarm far and wide. It did not. Were it not for public records requests, leaks and subpoenas, the world might never have learned about the troubling similarities between what could easily have been going on inside the lab and what was spreading through the city. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/les-decodeurs/article/2025/02/18/covid-19-how-a-group-of-amateur-investigators-pushed-the-lab-leak-theory_6738298_8.html https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/06/03/opinion/covid-lab-leak.html The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 (Nature Medicine, 2020) https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9 ‘we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible’ But we later learned through congressional subpoenas of their Slack conversations that while the scientists publicly said the scenario was implausible, privately many of its authors considered the scenario to be not just plausible but likely. https://www.thetimes.com/uk/science/article/how-private-slack-messages-have-sparked-claims-of-a-wuhan-lab-leak-cover-up-7jdfdqq3x https://theintercept.com/2023/07/12/covid-documents-house-republicans/ https://reason.com/2024/06/18/anthony-faucis-inner-circle-initially-thought-covid-came-from-a-lab/ Evolutionary biologist, Kristian Andersen, (Slack messages) “The lab escape version of this is so friggin’ likely to have happened because they were already doing this type of work and the molecular data is fully consistent with that scenario.” Jeremy Farrar, now the chief scientist at the World Health Organization. In his book, Farrar reveals he acquired a burner phone https://www.thetimes.com/world/asia/article/jeremy-farrar-book-extract-spike-burner-phones-and-clandestine-meetings-the-inside-story-of-covid-9wq0cl0c6 Burner phones are prepaid phones purchased with cash for privacy reasons, often associated with avoiding authorities.

The association between acute transverse myelitis and COVID-19 vaccination in Korea https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ene.70020 Acute transverse myelitis (ATM) has been reported as a potential association between COVID-19 vaccination. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38350768/ Results 368 ATM cases diagnosed after first COVID-19 vaccination during the study period (159 ATM patients were included). Among them, 82 (51.6%) were male The incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 2.41, for the ATM risk within 1–42 days after COVID-19 vaccination. The IRR (Incidence Rate Ratio) 3.31 for ChAdOx1-S (AZ) 1.99 for BNT162b2 (Pfizer) 2.57 for mRNA-1273 (Moderna) 3.33 for Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen) Methods A self-controlled case series study https://www.bmj.com/content/354/bmj.i4515 Large database that combines the COVID-19 vaccine registry and the national claims database. The COVID-19 vaccination Data, information on individuals aged 18 + who received COVID-19 vaccination from February 26, 2021, to August 31, 2022. Patients who developed acute transverse myelitis The claims database covered the entire Korean population Patients who develop ATM within 1–42 days following COVID-19 vaccination The observation period was 270 days after the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Conclusion These findings indicated an increased risk of ATM following COVID-19 vaccination within 42 days. An association with the risk of ATM was found both for viral vector and mRNA vaccines. Acute transverse myelitis (ATM) A rare neurological disorder Inflammation of the spinal cord Can lead to sensory and motor deficits, paralysis, severe disability, autonomic loss The causes of ATM are uncertain; however, it is known to be associated with autoimmunity triggered by various environmental factors, including vaccination. DISCUSSION This nationwide population-based SCCS study identified a significant increase in the incidence of ATM within 1–42 days following COVID-19 vaccination. Our findings contribute to the ongoing debate on the safety profiles of COVID-19 vaccines by providing evidence of potential neurological complications. The pathogenesis of TM appears to be immune-mediated from infection, para-infection, and autoimmune disease Post-vaccination TM may be associated with various types of immune pathways, including autoimmune It is generally accepted that post-vaccinal CNS demyelination occurs after 7 days post-vaccination In the case of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines, an immunological reaction between SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies and tissue proteins may contribute to the development of demyelinating autoimmune disease Previous literature has not drawn conclusions as clear as our findings because most earlier studies relied on voluntary AE reporting data from countries such as the United States and the UK. However, these reports often have problems of underreporting, and inconsistencies in data quality, which can lead to bias. Our analysis benefits from South Korea's robust healthcare infrastructure, which boasts a high density of MRI machines. This could potentially explain some of the discrepancies observed between our results and those from studies conducted in other settings. CONCLUSION Our findings indicate an increased risk of ATM following COVID-19 vaccination regardless of whether it is a viral vector and mRNA vaccine. Physicians should exercise caution regarding the possibility of ATM following vaccination An emerging pattern Neurological complications after first dose of COVID-19 vaccines and SARS-CoV-2 infection https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/servlet/linkout?suffix=null&dbid=8&doi=10.1111%2Fene.70020&key=34697502&getFTLinkType=true&doiForPubOfPage=10.1111%2Fene.70020&refDoi=10.1038%2Fs41591-021-01556-7&linkType=PMID&linkSource=FULL_TEXT&linkLocation=Reference Emerging reports of rare neurological complications associated with COVID-19 infection and vaccinations are leading to regulatory, clinical and public health concerns. Acute Transverse Myelitis after COVID-19 Vaccination https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34684047/#full-view-affiliation-1 The adverse effects of the COVID-19 vaccine have been discovered as the rapid application of the vaccines continues. Neurological complications such as transverse myelitis raise concerns as cases were observed in clinical trials. Overview of Transverse Myelitis after COVID-19 vaccination https://www.lareb.nl/Knowledge/FilePreview?id=42797&p=33550 Until January 16th 2023, The Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre received 48 reports of TM following COVID-19 vaccination. Neurological side effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/servlet/linkout?suffix=null&dbid=8&doi=10.1111%2Fene.70020&key=34750810&getFTLinkType=true&doiForPubOfPage=10.1111%2Fene.70020&refDoi=10.1111%2Fane.13550&linkType=PMID&linkSource=FULL_TEXT&linkLocation=Reference The most frequent neurological side effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are headache, Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), venous sinus thrombosis (VST), and transverse myelitis. A systematic review of cases of CNS demyelination following COVID-19 vaccination https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/servlet/linkout?suffix=null&dbid=8&doi=10.1111%2Fene.70020&key=34839149&getFTLinkType=true&doiForPubOfPage=10.1111%2Fene.70020&refDoi=10.1016%2Fj.jneuroim.2021.577765&linkType=PMID&linkSource=FULL_TEXT&linkLocation=Reference Majority of cases (71.8%) occurred after the first dose of the vaccine, with neurological symptoms manifesting after a median of 9 days. The most common reported presentation was transverse myelitis Transverse Myelitis Following SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination: A Pharmacoepidemiological Study in the World Health Organization's Database https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/servlet/linkout?suffix=null&dbid=8&doi=10.1111%2Fene.70020&key=36054163&getFTLinkType=true&doiForPubOfPage=10.1111%2Fene.70020&refDoi=10.1002%2Fana.26494&linkType=PMID&linkSource=FULL_TEXT&linkLocation=Reference TM was significantly associated both with the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) and vector-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines that are authorized by the FDA or the EMA.

A Narrative Review of the COVID-19 Infodemic and Censorship in Healthcare LIESTER, MITCHELL; Sohaib Ashraf; Patricia Callisperis; Hector Carvallo; Shankara Chetty; Robert Enzenauer; Carlos Franco-Paredes; Raul Pineda; Panagis Polykretis; Rachel Wilkenson; and Peter McCullough. 2025. "A Narrative Review of the COVID-19 Infodemic and Censorship in Healthcare." Secrecy and Society 3(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.55917/ 2377-6188.1087 https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/secrecyandsociety/vol3/iss2/3/ Ideological and financial motivations have undermined science for decades. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_ZDQKq2F08 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJBaBJawnSY Organizations and governments used misinformation, disinformation, censorship, and secrecy to manage the COVID-19 pandemic. Information can be distorted and shaped by corporations and governments for financial gain or ideological purposes. Various rationales for employing censorship and secrecy during the COVID-19 pandemic are examined including, how organizations and governments create confusion about the risks associated with their products, and blame avoidance to shift responsibility and to avoid accountability for their actions. Methods of censorship employed during the COVID-19 pandemic are reviewed Data sources Scientific papers, government documents, mass media articles, books, and personal accounts of physicians and scientists. Use of censorship and secrecy created a challenge for scientists, physicians, politicians, and the general public in trying to understand COVID- related topics. Defeating the Merchants of Doubt Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik M. Conway. 2010. Nature 465 (7299): 686-87. https://www.nature.com/articles/465686a Tactics of doubt Corporations engage in deliberate strategies to create doubt about scientific findings. (the tobacco industry, cast doubt on the health risks of smoking) despite overwhelming evidence of the dangers of smoking. Use of so-called “experts” Corporations hire or fund scientists to challenge or undermine scientific findings. Support the corporate narrative Media manipulation By introducing fringe or discredited perspectives, corporations ensure that media coverage gives disproportionate weight to their desired narrative 'In the End, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.' https://www.socratic-method.com/quote-meanings/martin-luther-king-jr-in-the-end-we-will-remember-not-the-words-of-our-enemies-but-the-silence-of-our-friends#google_vignette By creating doubt and confusion, corporations manipulate public perception for their own financial gain. William R. Freudenburg Risk and Recreancy https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-349-62201-6_5 Privileged Access, Privileged Accounts https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236805506_Privileged_Access_Privileged_Accounts_Toward_a_Socially_Structured_Theory_of_Resources_and_Discourses Weapons of Mass Distraction https://www.elgaronline.com/display/book/9781803921044/ch27.xml Blame avoidance Shifting of responsibility / accountability for actions that result in adverse social consequences. Disproportionate attribution of blame When corporations manipulate public narratives to redirect blame toward others Normalization of deviance Over time, risky practices become normalized, reducing the likelihood that problems will be recognized as serious threats Privileged access to information By controlling access to critical information, corporations and governments make it difficult for the public or regulatory bodies to fully understand the risks or consequences of their actions or products. By controlling the flow of information, corporations diffuse or delay blame Misdirection Divert public attention away from their actions, they focus attention on smaller, less critical issues, or shift the narrative away from their culpability to natural causes Regulatory capture Is another way corporations avoid accountability

Link to video from Montana proponent testemony https://www.youtube.com/live/PK0LOFc2BAE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1zMYF2O0Gs https://x.com/toobaffled/status/1889090641684271272 Minutes Special Meeting of Electors, Fremantle, WA https://www.fremantle.wa.gov.au/sites/default/files/Minutes%20-%20Special%20Electors%20Meeting%20-%2014%20March%202022.pdf Link to video of full meeting https://www.youtube.com/live/bDnkQkMQWgU

Peoples vaccine inquiry https://substack.com/home/post/p-156782056 CCVAC Speech to PVI Press Conference 4 February 2025 I’m Ros Jones, a retired consultant paediatrician, and I am here on behalf of more than 200 experienced health professionals and academics. We’ve sent numerous letters to the regulators and politicians about the folly of covid vaccines for children. We, like others here, were asked for a detailed witness statement which we provided, even agreeing to it being shared with one of their ‘experts’ . When we were told we wouldn’t be called, we were nevertheless thanked and told our statements had been very useful to the Inquiry team in their deliberations. However, nothing we provided was used at all. We were simply ascribed to the ‘misinformation brigade’. Apropos of which, our first fully referenced letter with all our names was sent by Chris Whitty’s department to the Counter Disinformation Unit, who previously monitored online child pornography & terrorism! So following on from Dr Evans, firstly the ethics – it was very clear that whatever bug was doing the rounds in spring 2020, it did not affect children to any significant degree, yet the government measures caused disproportionate harm. It wasn’t just the school closures, it was the testing and masking and the don’t kill your granny messaging. And parents saw first hand the harms of lockdowns. So when the vaccines were presented as the only route back to normal, parents were not immune from the messaging. The risk : benefit balance is widely variable by age so a one-size fits all was never right. Matt Hancock was absolutely clear this was an adult vaccine, Kate Bingham went further to say for more than 50 s with comorbidities. Professor Lim in his evidence confirmed that the phase 1 rollout was expected to cover 99% of the mortality from Covid-19. Yet none questioned why the vaccine juggernaut seemed to be unstoppable. So that brings me to the approval process. MHRA authorized the use of Pfizer for 12- 15s on the basis of 1131 vaccinated children followed for 2 months. You don’t need to be a medic to know that is not a measure of safety. Yet Kate Bingham said the studies were large!! MHRA only checked data provided by Pfizer. They then passed the baton to the JCVI. The Moral and Ethical Advisory Group (MEAG), a multifaith and ethics group set up in 2019, asked specifically to be involved in discussions re children’s vaccine but their planned meeting in June was cancelled as they were told there were plans to vaccinate kids. In fairness, JCVI meeting minutes show they were worried - they were looking at myocarditis reports from Israel and the US. And they said NO, not for healthy under 18s. But 48 hours later they held an emergency meeting at the request of the CMO to ‘reconsider their decision’. Why was Chris Whitty not questioned about this? Or about the CMOs decision that this would help keep children in school and hence good for mental health! He admitted their calculations (it worked out at 15 mins / child) allowed no time out of class for the vaccination procedure, let alone for any adverse effects. Turning to myocarditis, this has been acknowledged & added to the PIL but their so called expert misquoted the Oxford study, saying it showed more myocarditis with covid than with the vaccine (as stated in the conclusion sentence of their abstract) but even the results section of the abstract actually reported that for males under 40, myocarditis was 6x more likely after vaccination than after infection. Again the MHRA were never pinned down as to why they didn’t give more detail of rates by age to enable informed consent. Everyone just kept repeating ‘VERY rare’ and ‘recovers quickly’. How rare depends on how hard you look. Israel, where the first cases were reported, sent letters to all their paediatricians, cardiologists & Emergency physicians, telling them what to look out for and this resulted in ~ 1 in 6000, so not ‘very rare’ , Mr Keith, that is ‘rare’. But Thailand did what the MHRA should have demanded of Pfizer: they organised a prospective study in two large secondary schools with cardiac blood tests and ECG before and 1/52 after vaccination and they found a worrying 1 in 29 with either clinical or subclinical myo- or pericarditis. That is ‘COMMON’ As for ‘recovers quickly’, teenagers admitted to US hospitals with chest pain seemed to recover quickly but 89% had abnormal cMRIs. JCVI wanted to see their follow up data before making a decision. If they had been allowed to delay, they would have learned that 60% were still abnormal 6/12 later. These are abnormalities which have been

Exploring the Anticancer Potential of Fenbendazole: A Review of Anecdotal Case Reports and Emerging Evidence (2025) https://www.onedaymd.com/2025/01/anticancer-potential-fenbendazole.html A compilation of 80 case reports across various cancer types, including breast, lung, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers While these anecdotal accounts suggest potential anticancer effects of fenbendazole, the lack of controlled clinical trials necessitates caution. Healthcare professionals should be consulted before considering fenbendazole as a treatment option. There has been growing popularity in recent years for the use of Fenbendazole (FBZ) as a single agent or supplementary therapeutic Methods Reports were categorized by cancer type, and outcomes were assessed based on self-reported measures such as tumor regression, remission status, and overall survival. Results These findings, while compelling, must be interpreted cautiously due to the inherent limitations of the data sources. Breast Cancer Eight cases of breast cancer reported outcomes such as tumor shrinkage or remission. A majority of these cases involved early to moderate-stage disease, with some patients combining fenbendazole with standard treatments like chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. One notable case involved a patient with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer achieving remission after six months of fenbendazole use, alongside a ketogenic diet and immune-supportive supplements. Lung Cancer Nine cases, highlighted improved survival rates and tumor regression. One patient with advanced NSCLC demonstrated significant tumor shrinkage within three months of incorporating fenbendazole alongside checkpoint inhibitors. Colorectal Cancer In nine cases, patients reported tumor reduction, remission, or disease stabilization. The most striking outcome was from a patient with stage IV colorectal cancer achieving no evidence of disease (NED) status after integrating fenbendazole with conventional therapies and dietary modifications. Pancreatic Cancer Eight cases involved pancreatic cancer, an aggressive malignancy with limited treatment options. Outcomes were generally less pronounced than in other cancers Other Cancer Types Reports included melanoma, prostate cancer, glioblastoma, and ovarian cancer, with mixed outcomes. Some patients indicated significant clinical improvement, including reduced tumor markers and alleviated symptoms. Combination Therapies, with conventional cancer treatments (e.g., chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy), ? making fenbendazole’s specific effects. Supplement Use: Many used supportive supplements, (e.g., D3, C), zinc, curcumin, ? synergistic effects Consistency and Dosage: Regular and sustained use of fenbendazole appeared to correlate with better-reported outcomes. Dosages ranged from 222 mg (a standard veterinary dose) to 1 gram per day, depending on individual protocols. Limitations Sample size, (N=80) Self-Reported Data Concurrent Therapies Potential Mechanisms of Action Microtubule Disruption Metabolic Effects, (inhibits glucose uptake in cancer cells) Immune Modulation, (may enhance immune responses) Discussion Consistency of positive outcomes across diverse cancer types suggests a potential biological effect that merits further investigation. The pattern of case reports also suggests that fenbendazole may exhibit broad-spectrum anticancer properties. It is imperative that patients consult healthcare professionals before considering fenbendazole as a treatment option. Future Directions Controlled Clinical Trials Mechanistic Studies Combination Therapy Research Conclusion The consistency of anecdotal outcomes, supported by plausible preclinical mechanisms, positions fenbendazole as a promising candidate for further investigation in oncology.

Metabolic Reset https://www.metabolicreset.co https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-14255509/trump-doctor-five-ingredient-diet-reverse-diabetes-lower-blood-pressure.html https://wellbeingmagazine.com/ground-breaking-metabolic-reset-programme-by-dr-aseem-malhotra-and-kim-pearson-attracts-over-2500-to-waiting-list/ Dr Malhotra -? key role in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) 'If an item comes out of a packet and it contains five or more ingredients then it is not allowed,' There is nothing natural or healthy about items like that.' Look for A short ingredient list indicates food has been through very little processing Studies suggest The more processed your diet is, the higher the risk of conditions like diabetes and high blood pressure. (which affect a combined nearly 140 million Americans and Britons) His patients have reversed their prediabetes and lowered their blood pressure within 28 days on the diet No calorie counting, 'we don't want people to feel hungry' All sugary / carby foods that lack fibre are banned (Sugar, white bread, pasta and rice). 'It's for sugar addicts, like I used to be, who need to snap out of their addiction to junk food and reset their metabolic health.' (used to consume around 40 teaspoons a day). He only recommends following it for a month or so. After that, people can slowly reintroduce carbs on the weekends. 'I know this stuff works, I've been doing it for years and recommending it to my own patients too.' One man, after 4 weeks Lost 11 lbs (5 Kgs) and put his type 2 diabetes into remission Person, aged 51 All of their joint pain disappeared when they cut out bread, carbs and cheese Dr Malhotra with Kim Pearson Largely based on the Mediterranean Diet (plant-based foods and healthy fats, such as olive oil and raw nuts) Breakfast Berry smoothie or vegetable omelet Berries, nutrients, vitamin C, K, Bs, K, Mg, antioxidants, fibre Lunch A protein salad, + limitless veg Evening Stir fry with Japanese noodles or meatballs with vegetable spaghetti. Eat three meals a day and leave four to five hours between each sitting. 'allow for a fasting window overnight of between 14 to 16 hours to reset the digestive system'. Learning some skills in the kitchen. May cost more in short term At least five vegetables or pieces of fruit per day Drinks Coffee, water and tea. Diet sodas are banned 'would be considered ultra processed with additives that have the potential to compromise health'. 'fake sugars' perpetuate a ‘sweet tooth’ cravings 'we want to work with people to unsweetened their sweet tooth and attune their palate to whole foods.' Alcohol Suggested consumption, three small (175ml) glasses of dry wine or seven single (25ml) measures of white spirit. Ms Pearson 'We want to ensure that the plan is sustainable for people long term and for many, the ability to have a couple of glasses of wine a week is something they enjoy.' Dr Malhotra Doesn't suggest a junk food ban for America Rather to kickstart new habits 'simple switches' Eating burgers without the buns. In one of his investigations, found the bread contains 50 additives. '80/20 rule' Fits with RFK Jr Mr Kennedy Ban some pesticides Food additives, seed oils and some ultra-processed foods. 'Make America Healthy Again' plan, provide families 'with safe food and end the chronic disease epidemic plaguing our children'. Ingredients, which are either banned or heavily regulated in Europe American diet is made up of 70% percent ultra-processed foods.

Ignaz Semmelweis was ridiculed 1846, Started Vienna General hospital Postpartum infection, purpureal fever, childbed fever, bacterial infection of the reproductive tract. Sepsis from infections acquired in a hospital, healthcare-associated infections (nosocomial) Home and street deliveries, low mortality 1847, death of Jakob Kolletschka Link between cadaveric contamination and purpureal fever "cadaverous particles" 1847, Instigated hand washing, chlorinated lime, calcium hypochlorite, mortality rate in the First Clinic declined 90% April 1847, mortality 18.3%. Hand washing started mid-May 1847 June 1847, 2.2% July 1847, 1.2%, August 1847, 1.9%. 1848, 2 months of 0% 1849, Semmelweis obliged to leave the obstetrical clinic 1850, left Vienna, "unable to endure further frustrations in dealing with the Viennese medical establishment" 1851 -1857, unpaid doctor in Pest Purpureal fever virtually eliminated, (8 out of 933, = 0.85%) Semmelweis's ideas not accepted by other obstetricians in Budapest 1861, Published Aetiology, concept and prophylaxis of childbed fever 1865, Committed to asylum by colleagues, beaten up, gangrenous would to hand, died 14 days later Semmelweis Reflex https://www.thebehavioralscientist.com/glossary/semmelweis-reflex Or the “truth is the first casualty of war” Psychological phenomenon, rejection of new or novel ideas Rejection of anything that contradicts established norms, beliefs, paradigms of thought, even if ideas are well-supported by evidence. Semmelweis’s ideas were rejected AND he was ridiculed and ostracized. "Mob behaviour found among primates and larval hominids on undeveloped planets, in which a discovery of important scientific fact is punished". (TL, Harvard) So, people reject new ideas, without considering the evidence in support of them Belief perseverance Common barrier to innovation and progress How to avoid Semmelweis Reflex Eliminate compromise, financial, blackmail Eliminate vested interests Eliminate dictatorial organisations or individuals Control active suppression of new ideas Accept new ideas that do not make lots of money Don’t automatically censor new ideas Don’t able new ideas ad disinformation Be open-minded Carefully evaluate new ideas on their merits. Avoid conformation bias, favour information that is consistent with prior beliefs. Avoid authority bias, “doctors are gentlemen, and gentlemen’s hands are clean, (Charles Meigs). Avoid belief perseverance, adhere to their initial beliefs despite contradicting evidence. Avoid groupthink, where consensus overrides consideration of alternatives. Eliminate doublethink Eliminate Newspeak Don’t re-write history Critically evaluate beliefs that are taken for granted Use guided reflection Allow new thinking by the elimination of fear of punishment More free speech to allow circulation of new ideas, How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher? Truth telling, War is peace, Freedom is slavery, Ignorance is strength. More system 2 thinking https://thedecisionlab.com/reference-guide/philosophy/system-1-and-system-2-thinking System 1 is fast, automatic, and intuitive, operating with little to no effort, (make quick decisions and judgments based on patterns and experiences). System 2 is slow, deliberate, and conscious, requiring intentional effort. Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis, 1818 - 1865 "saviour of mothers"

mRNA "vaccine" biodistribution, persistence, and adjuvant toxicity library https://zenodo.org/records/14559625 Biodistribution Research collection presents 54 peer-reviewed studies documenting, the wide distribution of “vaccine” mRNA and the associated spike protein, throughout human beings and animal test subjects. These articles confirm that “vaccine” mRNA and spike protein can reach tissues and organs including, heart, liver, brain, lungs, placenta, umbilical cord, breast milk, lymph nodes, thymus, kidneys, spleen, bladder, large intestine, eyes, adrenal glands, ovaries, testes, bone marrow, skin, lacrimal glands, appendix. Australian Government Department of Health—Therapeutic Goods Administration https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2389-06.pdf The concentration of radioactive lipid marker reached the peak level in plasma between 1 – 4 h post-dose and distribution mainly into liver, adrenal glands, spleen and ovaries over 48 h Also listed as tissue distribution positive Adrenal glands, bladder, femur, brain, eyes, heart, kidneys, colon, small intestine, liver, lungs, lymph nodes, ovaries, pancreas, pituitary gland, spinal cord, spleen, stomach, testes, thyroid, uterus Other useful section from TGA publication Journal of Immunology https://journals.aai.org/jimmunol/article/207/10/2405/234284/Cutting-Edge-Circulating-Exosomes-with-COVID-Spike Results demonstrated induction of circulating exosomes expressing spike protein on day 14 after vaccination Intramyocardial Inflammation after COVID-19 Vaccination: An Endomyocardial Biopsy-Proven Case Series https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/23/13/6940 A comprehensive histopathological analysis of EMBs from 15 patients with reduced ejection fraction and the clinical suspicion of myocarditis following vaccination with, Comirnaty® (Pfizer-BioNTech) (n = 11) Vaxzevria®(AstraZenica) (n = 2) Janssen® (Johnson & Johnson) (n = 2). Immunohistochemical EMB analyses reveal myocardial inflammation in 14 of 15 patients, with the histopathological diagnosis of active myocarditis (n = 2), severe giant cell myocarditis (n = 2) and inflammatory cardiomyopathy (n = 10). Importantly, infectious causes have been excluded in all patients. The expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein within the heart and the dominance of CD4+ lymphocytic infiltrates indicate an autoimmunological response to the vaccination. Long-lasting, biochemically modified mRNA, and its frameshifted recombinant spike proteins in human tissues and circulation after COVID-19 vaccination https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/prp2.1218 It was also originally estimated that recombinant spike proteins generated by mRNA vaccines would persist in the body for a few weeks. In reality, clinical studies now report that modified SARS-CoV-2 mRNA routinely persist up to a month from injection, and can be detected in cardiac and skeletal muscle at sites of inflammation and fibrosis, while the recombinant spike protein may persist 187 days in blood. Understanding the Pharmacology of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Playing Dice with the Spike? https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/23/18/10881 Both vaccine-derived SARS-CoV-2 S protein mRNA and the resulting S protein exhibit a complex pharmacology and undergo systemic disposition. Taken as a whole, evidence strongly supports the possible link between inappropriate expression of S protein in sensitive tissues and subsequent tissue damage. Case of a woman suffering from Moderna-COVID-19-vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia with 10 ng/mL vaccine-induced S protein levels in plasma 10 days after vaccination, nearly 100 times higher than those reported previously, suggesting excessive vaccine-induced production of S protein as a determinant of vaccine toxicity. A comprehensive review of the literature recently discussed the role of COVID-19-mRNA-vaccine-induced S protein in adverse effects following vaccination, a major explanation of adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination could well be that mRNA vaccines induce in selected individuals’ excessive production of S protein, for too long and/or in inappropriate tissues and organs, and this occurrence is at present unpredictable.

Have a great Christmas and New Year.

Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee December 12, 2024 Meeting Announcement https://www.fda.gov/advisory-committees/advisory-committee-calendar/vaccines-and-related-biological-products-advisory-committee-december-12-2024-meeting-announcement Entire briefing document https://www.fda.gov/media/184301/download Pediatric RSV vaccine trial enrollment on hold in US, VRBPAC says https://www.contemporarypediatrics.com/view/pediatric-rsv-vaccine-trial-enrollment-on-hold-in-us-vrbpac-says The halt follows a severe respiratory disease safety signal observed in a July 2024 phase 1 trial of Moderna's mRNA-1345 and mRNA-1365 vaccine candidates. A phase I trial The effects of the medication on about 20 to 80 healthy volunteers To evaluating safety and ideal dosage 70% move on to phase II This study, safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity Who were the subjects Children aged younger than 2 years Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) -naïve children aged 2 through 5 years The halt of this mRNA RSV vaccine Severe respiratory disease safety signal Safety signal led to study pause Potential safety signal for RSV severe lower respiratory tract illness (sLRTI) was identified. An imbalance in cases of RSV sLRTI was also observed, with more cases present among vaccine groups compared to control group counterparts, 5 cases in the mRNA-1345/1365 15 µg groups compared to 1 case in the part B placebo group. Of these 6 cases, 5 required hospitalization, including 1 infant who required mechanical ventilation. which raised concern for vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease. The protocol’s study pause criterion of any sLRTI with positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for RSV in ≥2 participants was met. One, two and three dose parts planned Part A (Cohorts 1 and 2) 30 µg mRNA-1345, 30 µg mRNA-1365, and placebo approximately 90 participants 8 months to <24 months of age (randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio, respectively)." "Part B (Cohorts 3 through 6) 2 dose levels of mRNA-1345 and mRNA-1365 and placebo Approximately 120 participants 5 months to <8 months of age (randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio, respectively) Part C (Cohorts 7 and 8) 3 doses of 30 µg mRNA-1345 Approximately 100 participants 8 months to <12 months of age who have (Cohort 7) or have not (Cohort 8) previously received nirsevimab. VRBPAC meeting and outlook Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease Currently considering criteria for recommencement Scam Accounts https://www.facebook.com/Campbellteaching/ https://www.facebook.com/dr.john.campbell/ Genuine Campbell Teaching Accounts https://www.patreon.com/c/JohnCampbell2?utm_medium=unknown&utm_source=join_link&utm_campaign=creatorshare_creator&utm_content=copyLink https://substack.com/@johninengland?utm_source=user-menu https://www.paypal.com/mep/dashboard https://www.paypal.com/donate/?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=78GGHGLK5ZXAE

With Major Tom haviland

With professor Angus Dalgleish

With Dr. David Grimes

The Seven Principles of Public Life Nolan Principles https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-7-principles-of-public-life/the-7-principles-of-public-life--2 Committee on Standards in Public Life https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/the-committee-on-standards-in-public-life Selflessness Holders of public office should act solely in terms of the public interest. Integrity Holders of public office must avoid placing themselves under any obligation to people or organisations that might try inappropriately to influence them in their work. They should not act or take decisions in order to gain financial or other material benefits for themselves, their family, or their friends. They must declare and resolve any interests and relationships. Objectivity Holders of public office must act and take decisions impartially, fairly and on merit, using the best evidence and without discrimination or bias. Accountability Holders of public office are accountable to the public for their decisions and actions and must submit themselves to the scrutiny necessary to ensure this. Openness Holders of public office should act and take decisions in an open and transparent manner. Information should not be withheld from the public unless there are clear and lawful reasons for so doing. Honesty Holders of public office should be truthful. Leadership Holders of public office should exhibit these principles in their own behaviour and treat others with respect. They should actively promote and robustly support the principles and challenge poor behaviour wherever it occurs. Lord Michael Patrick Nolan The Seven Principles of Public Life (also known as the Nolan Principles) apply to anyone who works as a public office-holder. This includes all those who are elected or appointed to public office, nationally and locally, and all people appointed to work in the Civil Service, local government, the police, courts and probation services, non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs), and in the health, education, social and care services. All public office-holders are both servants of the public and stewards of public resources. The principles also apply to all those in other sectors delivering public services. The Banality of Evil Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, The New Yorker, 1963. https://aeon.co/ideas/what-did-hannah-arendt-really-mean-by-the-banality-of-evil C.S. Lewis, Preface to The Screwtape Letters, 1942 “The greatest evil is not now done in those sordid dens of crime that Dickens loved to paint. It is not done even in concentration camps and labour camps. In those we see its final result. But it is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voices.” https://open.spotify.com/episode/5sxut2ugUdQwbAlGjQfZMC?si=UW3vWzp-R8ySYgMyUz-2Uw Isaiah 5:20 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah%205%3A20&version=NIV Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.

Tickets for event 2 June in Glasgow https://tickets-scotland.com/brin X Twitter link for Alex, https://twitter.com/ake2306 Bring on the noise podcasts on Spotify https://spotify.link/SA55n9tjuJb Twitter - https://x.com/BringTheNoise_X?t=k1-QbSa16D4GbTcMFr6pug&s=09 Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/bring_the_noise_podcast?igsh=NWtnMXE4dWI1NnIx

Direct links to Marc’s book and substack Amazon.com (USA) https://www.amazon.com/NEEDLES-SECRET-UNRAVELING-MYSTERY-REVOLUTION/dp/B0CYLSCMHN/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8 UK Amazon https://www.amazon.co.uk/NEEDLES-SECRET-UNRAVELING-MYSTERY-REVOLUTION/dp/B0CYLSCMHN/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8 Australia Amazon https://www.amazon.com.au/NEEDLES-SECRET-UNRAVELING-MYSTERY-REVOLUTION/dp/B0CYLSCMHN/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8 The Bolus Theory Series on Substack https://covidmythbuster.substack.com My Bolus Theory website https://marcgirardot.com

Unnecessary deaths are a tragedy in themselves, but also distorted the covid fatality data. Use free download link- https://ufile.io/xp4acnuj Dave, independent researcher on Substack, https://biologyphenom.substack.com https://twitter.com/biologyphenom Witness statements: Lianne Menzies- https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0068-000001.pdf DNACPR (DNR) 44. They asked Jamie five times to sign a DNR, a do not resuscitate document and he kept telling them no. The following day (28th March) they asked him again and it was five times in total that they asked him to sign a DNR. There were two other occasions and he repeatedly said they would need to speak to me. 46. Jamie got upset enough about this that he called me; he wanted me to reassure him that I wouldn't agree to it. He was terrified. He never signed one and there were never any conversations about DNR before. They eventually tested him for Covid. Jamie was initially told that the result was negative but then the doctor came round to see him later that day and said he had tested positive. He said the doctor thought he was over the worst of it. My friend works in the hospital, and she said that there had been e-mails and a leaflet sent out to say who would and wouldn't get treatment so I knew Jamie wouldn't get it. 53. On 4th April Jamie facetimed me; he looked really well. He was up and dressed. Jamie's oxygen must have been reduced because I had no trouble hearing him. He was laughing and joking away. I thought he must have been getting better and I would get him home soon. I asked if he was getting out and he said he would ask the doctor. Bereavement. 57. She asked if I understood that Jamie was going to die. I said absolutely not as he was sitting up in bed joking yesterday. 60. They gave Jamie midazolam to help him sleep. I went home but asked them to phone me and I would come straight back as I didn't want him to be alone. 61. I got a call the next morning (8th April 2020) to ask me to go back to the hospital. They said, 'it was time.' When I arrived, there were five nurses in the room with him in case I didn't arrive in time. 62. Jamie was in and out of consciousness most of that day; he was scared because he was having trouble breathing. He kept grabbing onto the bed rails frantically and shouting to me as he struggled to breath. The palliative care team came in and asked if I would like them to give him something to make him more comfortable; I agreed. They rotated the midazolam with morphine. 63. Jamie passed away at 11.29pm that night. Before Jamie passed away, we got married. He had been asking me and up until he became really ill, I had always said no not until you are better. I thought it was the last thing I could have done for him. He knew what was going on, a nurse took a video, and they got rings from the lost and found. 64. My mum got the chaplain, and we were able to get married in the hospital.

Confirmed horrifying scandal https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/05/20/infected-blood-scandal-inquiry-live-latest/ Rishi Sunak “a day of shame for the British state” Worst treatment sandal in HNS history “Today’s report shows a decades-long moral failure at the heart of our national life – from the National Health Service to the Civil Service, to ministers in successive governments, at every level the people and institutions in which we place our trust failed in the most harrowing and devastating way. “They failed the victims and their families and they failed this country.” “moral failure at the heart of our national life” in which doctors, civil servants and ministers had put reputations above patient safety. “On behalf of this and every government stretching back to the 1970s, I am truly sorry.” The final report concluded Health service and governments took part in a “chilling” cover-up, as they “closed ranks” to hide the truth, even destroying documents to keep patients in the dark. Sir Brian Langstaff the “horrifying” scandal could and should have been avoided, but a “catalogue of failures” led to “calamity”. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/05/20/nhs-cover-up-avoidable-disaster-infected-blood-inquiry/ “It will be astonishing to anyone who reads this report that these events could have happened in the UK …that a level of suffering which it is difficult to comprehend, still less understand, has been caused to so many”. victims of the scandal “have been forced into a decades-long battle for the truth “Successive governments claimed that patients had received the best medical treatment available at the time, and that blood screening had been introduced at the earliest opportunity. Both claims were untrue. “Standing back, and viewing the response of the NHS and of government overall, the answer to the question ‘was there a cover-up?’ is that there has been. “Not in the sense of a handful of people plotting in an orchestrated conspiracy to mislead, but in a way that was more subtle, more pervasive and more chilling in its implications. “In this way there has been a hiding of much of the truth.” tragedy “was not an accident”. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/05/20/infected-blood-inquiry-report-key-findings/

Important issues of life and death. Thanks to Neil Oliver and the GB News team.

Pfizer misled the public that it had a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine. https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/egvboakldpq/2024-06-15-pfizer-complaint-(002).pdf Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was effective even though it knew its COVID- 19 vaccine waned over time and did not protect against COVID-19 variants. Pfizer concealed this critical effectiveness information from the public. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission of COVID-19 even though it knew it never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission of COVID-19. To keep the public from learning the truth, Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims about its COVID-19 vaccine. Pfizer’s misrepresentations of a “safe and effective” vaccine resulted in record company revenue of approximately $75 billion from COVID-19 vaccine sales in just two years. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated previous consent judgments with the State of Kansas. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act Pfizer must be held accountable for falsely representing the benefits of its COVID- 19 vaccine while concealing and suppressing the truth about its vaccine’s safety risks, waning effectiveness, and inability to prevent transmission. 28. Millions of Kansans heard Pfizer’s misrepresentations about its COVID-19 vaccine. 29. In May 2021, Pfizer advertised to Kansans on Facebook about its “life-saving vaccines” and its “cures.” 30. Pfizer took advantage of Kansans’ fear of COVID-19 and desire for safety by offering a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine, while concealing, suppressing, and omitting material information that undermined its safety and effectiveness claims. in Kansas. B. Pfizer used confidentiality agreements to conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. 57. Pfizer has kept data hidden through confidentiality agreements with governments around the world. C. Pfizer used an extended study timeline to conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. 65. Scientists were outraged that they still could not review Pfizer’s COVID-19 study data. “Pfizer’s pivotal COVID vaccine trial was funded by the company and designed, run, analysed, and authored by Pfizer employees. The company and the contract research organisations that carried out the trial hold all the data.” D. Pfizer used FOIA denial and delay to conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. E. Pfizer destroyed the vaccine control group, which will conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine. 86. Pfizer planned to follow COVID-19 vaccine study participants, both vaccine and placebo recipients, for 24 months to monitor the safety and effectiveness of its vaccine. 87. Once the FDA approved Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine through an emergency use authorization in December 2020, Pfizer unblinded the study participants and offered vaccine placebo recipients the option to receive the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. 88. Of the 21,921 vaccine trial participants who received the placebo, more than 20,000 placebo participants decided to receive the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine as of March 13, 2021.

Excess mortality across countries in the Western World since the COVID-19 pandemic: ‘Our World in Data’ estimates of January 2020 to December 2022 https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000282 Our world in data https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/excess-mortality-p-scores-average-baseline Human Mortality Database (2024); World Mortality Dataset (2024); Karlinsky and Kobak (2021); Human Mortality Database (2024); World Mortality Database (2024) – processed by Our World in Data https://ourworldindata.org/excess-mortality-covid Introduction Excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic has been substantial, includes not only deaths from SARS-CoV-2 infection but also deaths related to the indirect effects of the health strategies Insight into excess death rates in years following WHO’s pandemic declaration is crucial for government leaders and policymakers to evaluate their health crisis policies. This study explores excess mortality in the Western World from 2020 until 2022. Although COVID-19 vaccines were provided to guard civilians from suffering morbidity and mortality by the COVID-19 virus, suspected adverse events have been documented as well Methods All-cause mortality reports were abstracted for countries using the ‘Our World in Data’ database. Excess mortality, deviation between the reported number of deaths in a country during a certain week or month, and the expected number of deaths in a country for that period under normal conditions. Karlinsky and Kobak (2021) This model uses historical death data in a country from 2015 until 2019 and accounts for seasonal variation and year-to-year trends in mortality. Results 1 January 2020 until 31 December 2022 The total number of excess deaths in 47 countries of the Western World was 3, 098, 456 Excess mortality was documented in: 41 countries (87%) in 2020 42 countries (89%) in 2021 43 countries (91%) in 2022. In 2020 (the year of the COVID-19 pandemic onset and implementation of containment measures) 1, 033, 122 excess deaths (P-score 11.4%) In 2021 (the year in which both containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines were used to address virus spread and infection) the highest number of excess deaths was reported: 1, 256, 942 excess deaths (P-score 13.8%) In 2022 (when most containment measures were lifted and COVID-19 vaccines were continued) 808, 392 excess deaths (P-score 8.8%). Conclusions Excess mortality has remained high in the Western World for three consecutive years, despite the implementation of containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines. This raises serious concerns. Government leaders and policymakers need to thoroughly investigate underlying causes of persistent excess mortality. More details Previous research confirmed profound under-reporting of adverse events, including deaths, after immunisation Consensus is also lacking in the medical community regarding concerns that mRNA vaccines might cause more harm than initially forecasted. French studies suggest that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are gene therapy products requiring long-term stringent adverse events monitoring Although the desired immunisation through vaccination occurs in immune cells, some studies report a broad biodistribution and persistence of mRNA in many organs for weeks. Batch-dependent heterogeneity in the toxicity of mRNA vaccines was found in Denmark. Simultaneous onset of excess mortality and COVID-19 vaccination in Germany provides a safety signal warranting further investigation. Despite these concerns, clinical trial data required to further investigate these associations are not shared with the public. Autopsies to confirm actual death causes are seldom done. Governments may be unable to release their death data with detailed stratification by cause, although this information could help indicate whether COVID-19 infection, indirect effects of containment measures, COVID-19 vaccines or other overlooked factors play an underpinning role. Expression of concern https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000282eoc Other work by Saskia Mostert https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Saskia-Mostert-39309794 Other work by Gertjan Kaspers https://researchinformation.amsterdamumc.org/en/persons/gerardus-j-l-kaspers

Dr. Johathan Engler https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63qeqLA9V9Q Dr. James Royle https://odysee.com/@HealthandTruth:8/Stone-Summit-Stormont-Belfast-Session-4:d Jerry Quinn https://odysee.com/@HealthandTruth:8/Stone-Summit-Stormont-Belfast-Session-5-With-Gerry-Quinn:d Dr. Elizabeth Evens https://odysee.com/@HealthandTruth:8/Stone-Summit---Stormont,-Belfast---Session-2-with-Dr.-Elizabeth-Evans:4 Dr. Clare Craig https://odysee.com/@HealthandTruth:8/Stone-Summit-Stormont-Belfast-Session-6-With-Dr-Clare-Craig:0 Dr. Ros Jones https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2IvS6KSo9I https://odysee.com/@HealthandTruth:8/Stone-Summit---Stormont,-Belfast---Session-3-with-Dr.-Ros-Jones-1080:1

Intradermal Mycobacterium vaccae and obuense (IMM-101) Oral Non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) UK could be first country to offer norovirus jab against ‘winter vomiting bug’ New vaccine could stop people developing the highly infectious illness after early trial results found it creates a ‘strong immune response’ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/10/23/norovirus-vaccine-winter-vomiting-bug-moderna-wes-streeting/ mRNA Systemic distribution inevitable Antigenic dose produced varies Longevity of mRNA? Use of synthetic base Contamination from manufacturing process https://www.nihr.ac.uk/news/uks-first-norovirus-mrna-vaccine-trial-launched First Phase 3 randomised clinical trial Nova 301 trial, mRNA-1403 Trivalent, targeting three major strains of norovirus mRNA norovirus vaccine, UK wide, 39 sites Sponsored by Moderna, Trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of mRNA-1403 Aims to recruit 2,500 participants, UK, late October to early 2025 Some mobile sites for community visits 25,000 globally Half mRNA, half placebo 18 years + but 60 + wanted Single dose vaccine at the first visit - a jab given in the upper arm. The trial lasts up to 25 months. At least six in-person visits to the clinical trial site, and five phone calls with the trial team. Part of a 10-year partnership between Moderna and the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) on behalf of UK Government https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-cements-10-year-partnership-with-moderna-in-major-boost-for-vaccines-and-research UK Vaccine Innovation Pathway (VIP) and the NIHR working together to accelerate vaccine trials in the UK. https://bepartofresearch.nihr.ac.uk/?utm_source=nihr-website&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=bpor-nova Dr Patrick Moore, Chief Investigator of the trial The UK is really pleased to be able to play an important role in helping find an effective vaccine against this highly contagious disease. NIHR Chief Executive Professor Lucy Chappell Leveraging the UK’s expertise in vaccine development, the DHSC through the NIHR and Moderna are delivering this large-scale trial at pace, so that people across the UK and the world can benefit sooner. From the NIHR site the Nova 301 trial serves as a model for future collaborations between the public and private sectors in advancing medical research. Norovirus https://www.cdc.gov/norovirus/data-research/index.html#:~:text=Economic%20impact,-Norovirus%20illness%20is&text=Every%20year%2C%20norovirus%20is%20estimated,healthcare%20costs%20and%20lost%20productivity. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/224225-overview Worldwide, about 1 out of every 5 cases of acute gastroenteritis is caused by norovirus. Gastroenteritis typically develops 12-48 hours after ingestion of contaminated food or water or after contact with an infected individual. Symptoms typically last for 24-72 hours. All ages Nausea and vomiting Watery diarrhea Possible dehydration Abdominal cramps Headaches Low-grade fever Myalgias and malaise Norovirus genus More than 40 different strains GII.4 Sydney Transmission Person to person, direct contact, exposure to aerosols, fecal–oral routes. ID50 = 10 virions

'Inappropriate financial inducement', company had brought “discredit upon the pharmaceutical industry”.Moderna under fire after children offered cash to test Covid vaccine Company targeted 12 to 18 year-olds through WhatsApp with payments of £1,500 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/10/02/moderna-offered-children-cash-test-covid-vaccine/ Moderna has been rebuked by regulators Moderna ordered to pay £14,000 (Moderna, total revenue was $6.8 billion in 2023) Moderna representative had sent a WhatsApp message offering £1,500 to children to be subjects in covid booster trials. NextCove trial The offer was made by a paediatrician from an unnamed NHS trust UK Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA) https://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/completed-cases/auth3886324-a-complaint-on-behalf-of-children-s-covid-vaccines-advisory-council-v-moderna/ Ruled that the offer amounted to “inappropriate financial inducement”, found the company had brought “discredit upon the pharmaceutical industry”. UK Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority https://www.pmcpa.org.uk https://www.pmcpa.org.uk/about-us/ https://www.abpi.org.uk A research ethics committee Warned about the “large amount of money” that Moderna was offering, voiced concern it was “much higher than would be considered a reasonable reimbursement”. The Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations (2004) https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/1031/contents It is prohibited for incentives or financial inducements to be given to children or their parents. Complaint was filed in the UK https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/moderna-blamed-after-children-offered-1-500-to-take-part-in-covid-19-trial/ar-AA1rhn4y On behalf of the Children’s Covid Vaccines Advisory Council https://childrensunion.org/ccvac/ In a statement, the PMCPA ruled “On balance, the panel considered that this brought discredit upon and reduced confidence in the pharmaceutical industry.” Moderna must provide a written undertaking that the practice will “cease forthwith” and pay for administrative costs. Esther McVey MP (formerly of the APPG on Covid-19 vaccine damage) “A charge of £14,000 to a company that enjoyed a total revenue of $6.8 billion in 2023 is hardly likely to make them think twice before breaking the rules again. “Not only are the charges too small but when they come, they come too late. There is a major backlog in handling these kinds of complaints, with a recent case against Moderna taking the PMCPA 18 months to consider. “The system is clearly broken and failing to keep patients safe from misleading information and advertising about medicines. The public’s trust in healthcare authorities will only continue to be damaged unless meaningful action is taken.” Corporate interests vs the public’s right to know By Rt Hon Esther McVey It is time for real transparency in clinical research. The case details the company’s inappropriate and unacceptable use of social media and big financial incentives to recruit healthy children into its Covid-19 vaccine trial. For me, this case prompts further questions about how and why Moderna’s NextCOVE trial was ever approved in the first place.

Mother wins battle to stop son having Covid vaccine she feared could kill him https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/07/13/mother-battle-covid-jab-feared-kill-son/ Landmark case Sarah, Tom’s mum Kafkaesque nightmare’ that nearly bankrupted her Franz Kafka German-language from Prague Writing fuses elements of realism and the fantastic Typically features isolated protagonists, facing bizarre or surrealistic predicaments and incomprehensible socio-bureaucratic powers. Tom (24) Rare heart condition, learning difficulties Chromosome abnormality Doctors and social workers Demanded that he be injected for the “greater good of society” The experts Professor, paediatrics Martin McCaffrey (US) Tom was more likely to suffer heart complications – such as myocarditis and pericarditis – if given the mRNA vaccine. Because Tom has partial trisomy 13 he was more likely to suffer heart complications if given the mRNA vaccine. Professor, paediatrics Adam Finn, (UK) Agreed with Prof McCaffrey, stressed the possibility of such adverse side-effects would not have changed public policy at the height of the pandemic. Sarah (60) Battle has eroded her trust in public organisations such as social services, doctors and the courts, Government introduced a policy that ignores individual circumstances. Spent her life savings (£25,000) plus £60,000 crowdfunding. Threatened with arrest, jail, seizure of her assets, possibility of Tom being removed from home to be “forcibly jabbed”. “It has felt like a Kafkaesque nightmare because I was taking on the state that wouldn’t budge. “I went from being a loving mother and Tom’s sole carer to a near criminal. I have been made to feel like a liar, a bad person and a fanatic. “I was wrongly accused of being an anti-vaxxer just for questioning whether this new gene therapy was right for my son and his complex conditions. To me, it was the state that was fanatical about its policy by bringing its might to bear down upon me. “Doctors, cardiologists, lawyers and social workers hid behind Government guidance, which is just that – guidance.” Court of Protection Assigned Tom a lawyer to act in his “best interests”. Lawyer and local integrated care board, agreed with vaccination Judge Burrows, Tom was in an at-risk group and so should have the jab, Court was “ill-equipped” to say if the vaccine was safe or not but taking it was “altruistic” and required of every citizen. Mr Justice Hayden “no longer in Tom’s best interests to receive the jab” “changing landscape of the virus and increasing immunity within the community” had created a “wholly changed situation” “genuinely pleased” to conclude it was “no longer in Tom’s best interests to receive the Covid vaccination”. Paul Diamond, Sarah’s barrister “mother who loves her child” In future all parties involved in similar legal disputes should adopt a “more cooperative” rather than “aggressive” approach. Stephen Jackson, Sarah’s solicitor “love and good decision-making meant he is now 24 years old”. Ruling that the judge’s reliance on the virus’s “changing landscape” meant he had not tackled “uncomfortable issues”. “Prof McCaffrey’s findings were that the working assumption should be that individuals with trisomy – those who have 47 instead of 46 chromosomes – may be less able to cope with mRNA gene therapy technology in the vaccine,” “More investigation is needed. But anyone caring for those with trisomy conditions, such as Down’s Syndrome and Edwards’ Syndrome, should be made aware of Prof McCaffrey’s warning.” “Yet the court and state and lawyers and medics who’ve never met Tom decided they should make decisions for him and denied his mother had any rights at all. “State overreach and attack on the family unit could not be clearer. This situation is being faced by many families up and down the land.” The Hope Accord https://thehopeaccord.org The Hope Accord, resources https://thehopeaccord.org/resources Unsafe and Defective: Dr Clare Craig https://peoplesvaccineinquiry.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/HART-Witness-Statement-Dr-Clare-Craig.pdf Co-chair of the Health Advisory and Recovery Team (HART) https://www.hartgroup.org

OECD data, Excess deaths https://data-explorer.oecd.org/vis?tm=excess%20mortality&pg=0&snb=3&df[ds]=dsDisseminateFinalDMZ&df[id]=DSD_HEALTH_MORTALITY%40DF_MORTALITY_EXCESS&df[ag]=OECD.ELS.HD&df[vs]=1.0&dq=.W.EM._T._T.&pd=2023-W01%2C&to[TIME_PERIOD]=false&ly[cl]=REF_AREA%2CUNIT&ly[rw]=TIME_PERIOD&vw=tb https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/excess-mortality-p-scores-average-baseline UK, Jan 2023 – week 16 2024 Total = 63,455 Weekly average = 7.9% US, Jan 2023 – week 16 2024 Total = 366,894 Weekly average, 10.0% Australia, 1 Jan 2023 – week 47 2023 Total = 18,421 Weekly average, 12.9% Canada, 1 Jan 2023 – week 6, 2024 Total = 59,011 Weekly average, 19.1% Weekly average for weeks 1 -6, 2024 = 14.6% Israel, Jan 2023 – week 16, 2024 Total = 7,332 Weekly average, 12.5% Weekly average for weeks 1 -16, 2024 5.8% 6.15% 12.4% 14.5% 17% 28.8% 20.5% 26% 26.7% 19.1% 21.8% 13.8% 10.3% 15.1% 6.3% Netherlands, Jan 2023 – week 16 2024 Total = 25,071 Weekly average, 13% Maintained for first 16 weeks of 2024 NZ Jan 2023 – week 16 2024 Total = 6,303 Weekly average 15.3%

Senate Homeland Security Committee Holds Hearing on the Origins of COVID-19 https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/hearings/origins-of-covid-19-an-examination-of-available-evidence/ FULL COMMITTEE HEARING ORIGINS OF COVID-19: AN EXAMINATION OF AVAILABLE EVIDENCE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kbUDmJPwtU

NHS staff told to apologise for using ‘wrong’ pronouns https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/05/27/nhs-staff-ordered-apologise-using-wrong-pronouns/ Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust issued an 18-page diversity and inclusion policy forcing medics to accept patients’ personal pronouns. Should not confront patients using single-sex facilities regardless of their appearance. The trust’s trans policy, which came into effect in February last year according to the Daily Mail, said staff must say sorry to patients if they made mistakes relating to a patient’s pronouns. It also ordered them to make a “commitment to try harder” if they made mistakes about patients’ preferred pronouns. Victoria Atkins, Health Secretary “I am crystal clear: biological sex matters, and the language used by the NHS needs to recognise the different biological needs of men and women,” “Illnesses and conditions that we know impact men and women differently should be communicated in a clear and accurate way. “NHS staff must be allowed to get on with the job of caring for patients, not tiptoeing around trans guidance. “the Government’s proposed update to the NHS constitution makes clear what patients can expect from NHS services in meeting their needs, including the biological needs of the sexes.” Miriam Cates, MP and women’s rights campaigner “Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust seems to have gone through the looking glass into a world where biological sex doesn’t exist, and where the safety and dignity of vulnerable patients is ignored in the interests of being seen to adhere to a ridiculous ideology. “It is shocking that an organisation dedicated to evidence-based practice can be so blind to the reality of the differences between men and women.” Baroness Nicholson “This NHS trust seems to be deliberately ignoring the Health Secretary whose guidance declares that sex overrules gender in all medical matters,” “The NHS seems determined to follow its own unscientifically proven agenda; does this trust not recognise that male and female health profoundly differs? And that calling a man ‘her’ may so easily result in a nurse handing out the wrong medicines for the patient’s condition?” Cancer incidence for common cancers Breast cancer is the most common cancer in the UK, accounting for 3 in 20 (15%) of all cases in females and males combined The next most common cancers in UK people are prostate (14%), lung (13%), bowel (11%) Though there are more than 200 types of cancer, just these four types - breast, prostate, lung and bowel – together account for more than half (53%) of all new cases in the UK The two most common cancer types occur mainly or exclusively in only one sex. Breast https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/breast-cancer/about Breast cancer is more common in women than men. Around 55,500 women and around 370 men are diagnosed in the UK each year. 1 in 7 women in the UK develop breast cancer during their lifetime. It is more common in older women. Breast cancer is the most common cancer in the UK. Around 55,900 people are diagnosed with breast cancer every year in the UK. That is more than 150 people a day. 15 out of 100 (15%) newly diagnosed cancers in the UK are breast cancer. Prostate The prostate gland is part of the male reproductive system. You need a prostate gland to get prostate cancer. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/prostate-cancer/about Around 52,300 men are diagnosed with prostate cancer in the UK each year. In men, it is the most common cancer in the UK. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/ovarian-cancer/what-is-ovarian-cancer Ovarian There are 2 ovaries, one on each side of the body. The ovaries produce an egg each month in women of childbearing age. Around 7,500 women are diagnosed with ovarian cancer in the UK each year. This makes ovarian cancer the 6th most common cancer in women. Causes of death https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/causesofdeath/articles/leadingcausesofdeathuk/2001to2018 The leading cause of death in the UK in 2018 was dementia and Alzheimer disease, accounting for 12.7% of all deaths registered. In 2008, the leading cause of death for females aged 50 to 64 years changed from malignant neoplasm of breast to malignant neoplasm of trachea, bronchus and lung, which accounted for 10.1% of deaths for this age group in 2018. From 2001 to 2018, suicide and injury or poisoning of undetermined intent was the leading cause of death for both males and females aged 20 to 34 years in the UK, for all years observed, accounting for 27.1% of male deaths and 16.7% of female deaths for this age group.

Dr Tina Peers is a physician with a special interest in menopause, an inflammatory condition called mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) and chronic fatigue. In this video Dr. Peers presents information that indicates MCAS is much more common than most doctors believe. She has developed treatment strategies that have transformed many lives for the better. Dr. Peers has also recently been treating people after covid vaccine injury. Consensus 1 and 2 discussion: Dr Afrin and Dr Dempsey. https://drtaniadempsey.com/dr-lawrence-afrin-on-mcas-diagnostic-criteria-consensus-2/ Dr Lawrence Afrin explaining MCAS with Dr Mobeen Syed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cX6uZKInI7c&t=669s

Unnecessary deaths are a tragedy in themselves, but also distorted the covid fatality data. Use free download link- https://ufile.io/xp4acnuj Dave, independent researcher https://twitter.com/biologyphenom Witness statements: Gilliant Grant- https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0142-000002.pdf I was provided with a document at a meeting I had with one of the solicitors. The document was the DNR but this had my name written on it. I was shocked as this was the first time I had seen this document and did not even know it existed. I had never had any sight of this document before meeting with the solicitor. Initially it was thought a DNR document had been signed by my mum. This is incorrect. There is no signed DNR by my mum. The DNR had my name on it. I had never given permission for the DNR and I am very shocked and upset that this has my name on it. I do not understand it. The DNR is incomplete. The first part of the DNR asked if the patient authorises the DNR. This part had been left blank. The next part asks if the welfare attorney/ guardian authorises this and has my name written next to it but it is not dated. The part below that is signed by the GP and is dated for 2 November 2020. On this date my gran was showing only very mild signs of COVID symptoms. My gran suffered from mild dementia but had enough capacity to make her own decisions. I was asked about a DNR but categorically stated that I was not prepared to make any decision on a DNR if she was not critically ill and I knew she could make these decisions for herself. I was very clear and strongly worded on this with the care home. I think this conversation happened on the 2 of November 2020 and this is the date of the DNR. I think this is very important to include because I am shocked that this document exists as I had no knowledge of this before being presented with it and I had never authorised a DNR but this has my name on it. I would be happy for the inquiry to be provided with a copy of the DNR. It was also stated on these records that we did not wish her to go to hospital and this was also untrue. I stated on several occasions that if she deteriorated I wanted her to go to hospital immediately.

Thousands (or is it millions) believe covid vaccines harmed them https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/03/health/covid-vaccines-side-effects.html May 3, 2024 Case study, 37 year old woman Fit and well Within minutes of getting the Johnson & Johnson Covid-19 vaccine, felt pain racing from her left arm up to her ear and down to her fingertips. Within days, she was unbearably sensitive to light and struggled to remember simple facts. Now, + 3 years Diagnosed with brain damage, cannot work, drive or stand for long periods of time. ‘devastation of what this has done to my life, and how much I’ve lost’ As of April 2024, over 13,000 vaccine-injury compensation claims filed with the federal government 19% have been reviewed 47% deemed eligible for compensation https://www.hrsa.gov/cicp/cicp-data 12 claims paid out, average of $3,600 Akiko Iwasaki, immunologist, vaccine expert, Yale University people who say they have post-vaccination injuries are “just completely ignored and dismissed and gaslighted,” Dr. Janet Woodcock, retired, FDA some recipients, uncommon but “serious” and “life-changing” reactions beyond those described by federal agencies. “I feel bad for those people,” “I believe their suffering should be acknowledged, that they have real problems, and they should be taken seriously.” “I’m disappointed in myself,” “I did a lot of things I feel very good about, but this is one of the few things I feel I just didn’t bring it home.” Article then comments on disparate US health care systems No central repository of vaccine recipients Government’s compensation fund, officially recognizes few side effects for Covid vaccines. And vaccine supporters, including federal officials, worry that even a whisper of possible side effects feeds into misinformation spread by a vitriolic anti-vaccine movement. Patients who believe they experienced serious side effects say they have received little support or acknowledgment. SB, 54, nurse practitioner, (man) New York City ever since his first Covid shot, merely standing up sent his heart racing, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome stinging pain in his eyes, mouth and genitals, which has abated, and tinnitus, which has not. AF “I can’t get the government to help me,” “I am told I’m not real. I’m told I’m rare. I’m told I’m coincidence.” RF, 49, physical therapist, (woman) Seattle Bell's palsy dramatic facial rash shingles RF reported it to federal databases twice. “I thought for sure someone would reach out, but no one ever did,” Interviews with 30 people Neurological, autoimmune, cardiovascular. All said they had been turned away by physicians, told their symptoms were psychosomatic, or labeled anti-vaccine by family and friends BC, doctor, (man) tinnitus and racing heart lasted about a week after each shot. GP, doctor, (man) loud whooshing sound in his ears had accompanied every moment since his first shot, entreaties to colleagues at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to explore the phenomenon, tinnitus, had led nowhere. “If they have done studies, those studies should be published,” CDC recognises Agency has documented only four serious but rare side effects Johnson & Johnson vaccine, Guillain Barre, blood clotting disorder mRNA vaccines, heart inflammation, or myocarditis Anaphylaxis Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, director, C.D.C.’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. agency’s systems for monitoring vaccine safety are “pretty close” to ideal, he said. The C.D.C. has said there were no confirmed deaths related to myocarditis, but in fact there have been several accounts of deaths reported post-vaccination.

Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan https://www.cureus.com/articles/196275-increased-age-adjusted-cancer-mortality-after-the-third-mrna-lipid-nanoparticle-vaccine-dose-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-japan#!/ Gibo M, Kojima S, Fujisawa A, et al. (April 08, 2024) Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan. Cureus 16(4): e57860. DOI 10.7759/cureus.57860 Conclusions Statistically significant increases in age-adjusted mortality rates of all cancer and some specific types of cancer, namely, ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate, lip/oral/pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers, were observed in 2022 after two-thirds of the Japanese population had received the third or later dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine. These particularly marked increases in mortality rates of these ERα-sensitive cancers may be attributable to several mechanisms of the mRNA-LNP vaccination, rather than COVID-19 infection itself or reduced cancer care due to the lockdown. Researchers have reported that the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine may pose the risk of development and progression of cancer. Several case reports have described cancer developing or worsening after vaccination and discussed possible causal links between cancer and mRNA-LNP vaccination. Details of the paper No significant excess mortality was observed during the first year of the pandemic (2020). However, some excess cancer mortalities were observed in 2021 after mass vaccination with the first and second vaccine doses, and significant excess mortalities were observed for all cancers and some specific types of cancer after mass vaccination with the third dose in 2022. During the COVID-19 pandemic Excess deaths including cancer have become a concern in Japan Study aimed to evaluate how age-adjusted mortality rates (AMRs) for different types of cancer in Japan changed during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2022). Official statistics from Japan, used to compare observed annual and monthly AMRs, with predicted rates based on pre- pandemic (2010-2019) figures In 2020 (first year of the pandemic) Significant deficit mortality for all causes, and no excess mortality for all cancers. In 2021 Significant excess mortality of 2.1% for all causes, and 1.1% for all cancers. In 2022 Excesses mortality, 9.6% 2.1% for all cancers Number of excess deaths 115,799 Number of excess cancer deaths, 7,162 Lung, colorectal, stomach, pancreatic, and liver cancer Accounted for 61% of deaths from all cancers. AMRs for the four cancers with the most deaths showed a decreasing trend until the first year of the pandemic in 2020, but the rate of decrease slowed in 2021 and 2022. Since February 2021, the mRNA-lipid nanoparticle (mRNA-LNP) vaccine has been available for emergency use, and is recommended for all aged six months and older As of March 2023 80% of the Japanese population had received first and second doses, 68% had received third dose, 45% had received fourth dose Excess deaths from causes other than COVID-19 have been reported in various countries, including deaths from cancer, and Japan is no exception Japan, good data Large population of 123 million Availability of official statistics 80% accuracy rate of death certificates according to autopsy studies Vaccination rates by age group, the websites of the Prime Minister's Office and the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare Discussion All cancer deaths: A statistically significant excess emerged in 2021 and increased further in 2022. In addition, significant excess monthly mortality was observed after August 2021, whereas mass vaccination of the general population began around April 2021. There were excess trends in cancer deaths across most age groups. The significant increases in mortalities for six specific cancer types were unlikely to be explained by a shortage of healthcare services.

Direct link to TV Parliament site, https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/168f642a-5708-4b1a-9857-d8eacf475252 Direct link to Hansard https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-04-18/debates/9F01F787-D758-43D4-B8D1-4FA357EB3EED/Covid-19ResponseAndExcessDeaths Let me move to some of the questions that we must raise and answer today, openly and transparently, and with full access to ONS record-level data. I am not saying that that should be disclosed to all and sundry, but surely the Government cannot defend the position that they are not willing to release that information to interested clinicians and clinical academics as a minimum. Those are the people who need to interrogate the data. It is of little relevance to me—I do not have the means or academic ability to interpret it—but it is something that interested clinical academics should have access to. Let me move on to what we know about some of the issues surrounding mRNA technology. We know that it does not replicate locally, as we were assured it would do on launch. It metastasises to distant tissue, and replicates spike protein systemically distant from the site of administration. That is problematic for a number of reasons. According to the University of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish, this has precipitated various serious and sometimes fatal consequences due to antibody development mediated by the spike protein. I will not go into the detail of that, but at a meeting convened by the hon. Member for North West Leicestershire, Professor Dalgleish told us that the UK Government and their agencies are in serious denial about this issue, resulting in many deaths being poorly understood. Let me give a couple of examples. Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia is one of the principal causes of blood clot formation, which can cause stroke, pulmonary emboli, and other cardiac-related events including heart attacks, all of which can be life-limiting or fatal. Another antibody linked to the Toggle showing location of Column 528 spike protein exerts an effect on myelin, and is associated with Guillain-Barré syndrome and transverse myelitis, which is a swelling around the spinal cord. Professor Dalgleish believes that that constitutes medical negligence, because the facts are there for all to see. He contends that many deaths are as a direct result of unnecessary vaccination. Furthermore, he advises that there are a greater number of yellow cards in MHRA for covid vaccines than for all other vaccines recorded, and nothing has really been done. In a recent written answer to me, it was confirmed that the MHRA has received 489,004 spontaneous suspected adverse drug reaction reports relating to the covid-19 vaccine, up to and including 28 February this year. Across the United Kingdom, 2,734 of those reports were associated with a fatal outcome. Of course the true number is unknown—that is the nature of yellow card reporting, as only a fraction of adverse events are reported—and that is probably because of limited public awareness about some of the potential consequences and complications of vaccines, and the well-understood under-reporting of those adverse events. That is important, because the yellow card system is a key element of safe and effective clinical care. If things are not being evaluated properly, I can think of no greater betrayal of the MHRA’s clinical governance responsibility. I suggest that accountability for that must be swift and decisive. The rigorous assessment of these data is essential and must be actioned urgently. Will the Minister now engage with the MHRA and invite it to come to the House to explain the facts on these reports? Another issue, which arises from a further written question that I tabled, relates to the role of the MHRA. It has a crucial role—in fact, it is a statutory function—to provide post-marketing surveillance and to operate the yellow card system, but the Minister responded to my question about the assessment of the potential implications of the BMJ article “Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is ‘likely’ responsible for deaths of some elderly patients, Norwegian review finds” by stating: “The MHRA communicates safety advice based upon consideration of the totality of evidence from all relevant information sources, rather than the strengths and limitations of individual data sources.” Surely, a fundamental step in any meta-analysis of published data is to interrogate the robustness of those data and for the public to have confidence that that is happening.

Are the Covid-19 drugs produced by Pfizer and Moderna GMOs or genetically modified organisms? https://julesonthebeach.substack.com/p/zee-fda-had-zee-science-but-intentionally https://www.givesendgo.com/GAVAZ An Australian Federal Court case has evidence to say they are GMOs Case File Number: VID510/2023 Dr Julian Fidge v. Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd & Moderna Pty Ltd Dr Fidge is an Australian medical doctor and trained pharmacist. The case has been brought under the Australian Gene Technology Act 2000 Section 10 of Gene Technology Act defines what a Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) is. First, an Organism is: ‘any biological entity’ ‘capable of transferring genetic material’ The Pfizer and Moderna Covid products contain LNP-modRNA complexes These complexes satisfy being called ‘any biological entity’ under the law The modRNA is genetic material The Lipid Nanoparticles or LNPs encapsulate the modRNA and together bio-distribute and transfer the LNP-modRNA complexes throughout the human body The LNPs then transfect and transfer the modRNA cargo across cell membranes to deliver the modRNA inside cells By moving the modRNA about the body and then into cells, the LNP-modRNA complexes physically transfer genetic material after injection So the Organism part of the GMO definition is satisfied by the physical mode of transport of the LNP-modRNA complexes The next part of the GMO legal definition is – a Genetically Modified Organism is: an organism that has been modified by gene technology The Gene Technology part requires showing: any technique for the modification of genes or other genetic material. Pfizer and Moderna admit they modify genes to create modified RNA or modRNA for their products The MHRA, EMA, FDA, and TGA when approving the Covid-19 products recognised Pfizer and Moderna use modified nucleosides for the modRNA In the TGA Australian approval for Pfizer for example, the TGA notes: The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, BNT162b2 mRNA (tradename Comirnaty), comprises a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2. Pfizer and Moderna create their modified nucleosides in the lab using recombinant techniques So the Gene Technology part of the GMO legal definition is also satisfied This means the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 products satisfy the Australian legal definitions for being properly called GMOs Under the Australian Gene Technology Act anyone who ‘deals’ with a GMO in Australia must be regulated under a GMO licence Pfizer and Moderna failed to apply for GMO licences in Australia Dealing with GMOs in Australia without a GMO licence is a serious criminal offense under Section 32 of the Gene Technology Act 2000 In fact the boss of Australia’s Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, or OGTR, recently admitted to an Australian Senate Committee that both the Pfizer and Moderna products are GMOs No Australian was told by the OGTR or the TGA that they were being asked to receive Genetically Modified Organisms or GMOs when getting a Covid-19 injection This is not just an Australian GMO legal issue In the United Kingdom Genetically Modified Organisms are dealt with under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and specifically Section 106 under Part VI The United Kingdom legal definitions for what is regarded as a GMO is almost identical to the Australian legal definitions we just looked at Like in Australia, the United Kingdom requires new GMOs to be subjected to an extensive Risk Assessment Even after an extensive Risk Assessment the United Kingdom Secretary of State still has to provide a Consent before a GMO can be introduced into the United Kingdom The MHRA knew United Kingdom GMO legal definitions applied to Pfizer and Moderna because it is their job to know and they have GMO experts But both Pfizer and Moderna applied for marketing approvals under the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 which exempted them from having to undergo a GMO Risk Assessment for their Covid-19 products And because of that exemption neither company had to mention on the Product Information that their products contain GMOs even though they satisfy the legal definitions

Dr. John Campbell Mar 28, 2024 The curious tale of hydroxychloroquine https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0haCpUCfNo Lots of data available from https://c19hcq.org/meta.html Great talk with Professor Robert Clancy on his latest publication on this well known drug.

Get your copy of Topher's book at: www.goodpeoplebreakbadlaws.com Watch the full Battleground Melbourne Documentary for FREE at: www.battlegroundmelbourne.com Follow Topher Field on all his social media platforms via: @topherfield on Youtube, Facebook, X, Instagram, Rumble, and more! Join Topher's email list via: www.topherfield.net

Pfizer, bringing discredit to pharmaceutical industry https://www.pmcpa.org.uk/media/cwvkqvyz/3741-case-report-28-march-2024.pdf https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/04/06/pfizer-breached-regulatory-code-five-times-watchdog-finds/ Senior executives used social media to promote an “unlicensed” Covid vaccine. Pfizer found to have breached the regulatory code five times, Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA) Pharmaceutical watchdog, relates to a complaint about a message posted on twitter November 2020 by senior Pfizer employees. COMPLAINT the complainant alleged that it turned out that such misbehaviour was even more widespread than they had thought, extended right to the top of their UK operation and was apparently continuing to this very day. PANEL RULING The Panel noted Pfizer’s submission that on further investigation into this complaint four other Pfizer UK colleagues, including another senior colleague in the UK organisation, had re-tweeted the same post. The Panel queried whether a social media platform, such as Twitter was the appropriate forum to share such information. The Panel noted the tweet contained limited information regarding the efficacy of the vaccine candidate with no safety information provided. On the balance of probabilities, it was likely that the Pfizer UK employee’s connections would include UK members of the public as well as UK health professionals. The Panel noted that the tweet clearly referred to the outcome of the Pfizer and BioNTech’s vaccine being developed to protect against COVID-19. The Panel noted that Clause 3.1 prohibited the promotion of a medicine prior to the grant of its marketing authorisation. They must not mislead either directly or by implication, by distortion, exaggeration or undue emphasis. Material must be sufficiently complete to enable the recipient to form their own opinion of the therapeutic value of the medicine. It must not be stated that a product has no adverse reactions, toxic hazards or risks of addiction or dependency. The Panel noted the tweet made no reference to adverse events and was therefore concerned that important safety information relating to the vaccine candidate was not provided and ruled a breach of Clause 7.9 of the 2019 Code as acknowledged by Pfizer. The Panel noted Pfizer stated that the senior employee whose re-tweet was the subject of this complaint had completed the social media training module in October 2019. Activity which was clearly outside of company policy had not been taken down or deleted. ‘Unlicensed medicine proactively disseminated’ “unlicensed medicine being proactively disseminated on Twitter to health professions and members of the public in the UK”.