Is it biblical or a terrible blasphemy against God? How does it not make God the author of evil? Is that okay? Jayden will be presenting his evidence for why he believes in theistic determinism and I will be presenting evidence why I don't think his evidence is convincing and my evidence that it's a blasphemy against God.

Jerry Duckworth (Twitchy Theologian) is being the typically arrogant and self-absorbed Calvinist. I'm recording a comment interaction on his video before it disappears.

WE'LL COME BACK TO THIS LATER. I expect we'll look at Romans 9 and dig into words that convince Jayden of determinism. We'll see if that confidence is justified. It will also include the link to Deuteronomy 2.30. I will be linking Romans 9 to Jeremiah and the parable of the Potter and the Clay, which proves determinism is false. I also have quotes from the church "fathers" that I will be showing Jayden and how they dogmatically and categorically rejected determinism. (Determinism is the idea that everything has been determined and in this context, God has determined everything.) I hope we discuss, if God determined everything, how does that not make Him the author of evil? Does scripture teach that God determined everything? Does Romans 9 teach it?

Review of https://rumble.com/v6vf41t-responding-to-c-jay-on-westminster.html?playlist_id=YDjPrlv7VWA&e9s=src_v1_pl I will not review the whole video, I'm looking for the specific part where C Jay is arguing for God being the effective worker behind evil using Ephesians 1.11. But I believe there was a lot more arguing for God being the author of evil (without admitting the phrase, because he holds that he denies that God is the author of evil, illogically).

Rock has a list of verses with some thoughts that he wants to use for a Youth Bible study and we're going to study them and check how Biblical the teaching is that is being presented.

A Calvinist was recently sharing his version of the "gospel" with Joe Rogan. The conversation about what Chadd is calling the gospel starts about https://youtu.be/xpM-pGPb8kc?si=RNVq53aixzZJZmqk&t=4004 But he dogmatically asserts determinism and God has to have chosen you ("elected" you) and "called" you for you to be able to believe, else you can't believe. That's a perfectly accurate representation of the Calvinist "gospel". It's only good news for those who are "elected", by Calvinism's gnostic definition of the term.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXCFBXO88RI Here I Stand: 7 Takes That Will Offend Everyone & https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILfzQmqdgfk One Thing Most People Get Wrong About Calvinism (Even Many Calvinists)

Lee calls himself "Servant of Christ" on YouTube. He purchased my book against Calvinism https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0F1LKDH5T and we have been discussing it and calvinism generally https://rumble.com/playlists/d0Fa0h18xAk. This video continues that conversation. I expect that we will start discussing how much Lee agrees or disagrees with my book.

I will not be reviewing the whole video as Smokey destroyed himself immediately and the debate was over as soon as he answered the first question. But I will review a little more than that. And we'll also look at a couple of ChatGPT summaries of the debate. https://youtu.be/c7iBgyJXIN0?si=AZSzH0Y3R5a_l_fT

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DRQBEdZYfY&lc=UgzkJirXSQYka_Re1nZ4AaABAg.AL0HALnGjH_AL5Tq3pKHEy This is a clip from a conversation Leighton had with Austin Fischer. We'll also be looking at the comments, especially from Calvinists.

I'm going to be approaching this from a different aspect than others. I want to play and review my favourite Jmac sermon. "Killing the sin in your life - Colossians 3:4" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUSHEKnqp5A And then point out some issues with jmac and his theology. He is human and has good and bad. Even as a Christian, he is still imperfect.

Kevin and I did a review of a debate between Free Gracers and Calvinists. In the side chat were Charles Jennings (who was one of the two Free Grace proponents) and C Jay Cox who is Lordship Salvation but not in the debate. Kevin and I reject both extremes and consider ourselves moderate Lordship Salvation (which in my opinion overlaps with moderate Free Grace). Here is our review https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zy8WVsUuk0s. I'll be starting from an hour and 9 minutes as I don't see any interesting comments prior to that.

Primarily these two videos. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLOTDKGHcRM and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXCFBXO88RI

Continuing the video of C Jay's debate with Dan Chapa on this topic. https://www.youtube.com/live/qszE4MM_96E?si=e5p8UGD7rHfaRIjz&t=5546

This is a debate between C Jay and Dan Chapa on this topic. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qszE4MM_96E

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upXv0Yic8YM Two videos I did showing John MacArthur is a deceiver. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSBYYjguj_4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ege1o07JBoA And then Idol Killer on Orginal sin. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MiyBVMFh6Vg

I just did a Google search - "proof of calvinism" The top search results promoting Calvinism were https://opc.org/new_horizons/NH99/NH9902a.html https://www.monergism.com/calvinism-fact-sheet https://www.reddit.com/r/Reformed/comments/en2dqk/what_biblical_evidence_is_there_for_calvinism/ https://www.aomin.org/aoblog/reformed-apologetics/a-biblical-case-for-calvinism/#:~:text=Although%20both%20Calvinists%20and%20Arminians,while%20others%20are%20more%20Arminian. If you think there are better proofs or evidences for Calvinism, please let me know so I can examine them. Even better, let's have a chat and study scripture together on the topic.

Burris is a Calvinist and did a series defending this neo-gnostic heresy. I will be reviewing, at least until I can't stomach listening to stupidity and lies. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPi9WGStScA&list=PL0-3Tg2lFuXpu4V-_bKZhVEolNUBhxhnL

C Jay Cox did a review of the video I did with Kevin on Chapter 3 of the Westminster Confession of Faith. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbQ1cIUwe3o We've looked at part of C Jay's video before but it's been bugging me for weeks that I should look at more of it since C Jay imagines that he's answered us. I will be showing he hasn't. He does what Calvinists always do and just assumes, asserts and commits other logical fallacies.

A review of https://youtu.be/uXlFRk_j48Y?si=25rlaUrxEsXIBMtC

What does this mean, especially in relation to Lordship Salvation vs Free Grace etc. 1 Peter 1.5, 9 Jud 1.24 (and whole chapter) Heb 10.23, 38, 39 And maybe John 10

What does this mean? We'll look at this is Matthew 7 and a few other passages. This will be partly in response to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoEcMVzFBRc which has the description "In this video I will go over numerous passages with Max such as Matthew 7.15-20, Luke 6.43-45,Matthew 3.7-10 & Galatians 5.22-23. What is the fruit? Can Christians have bad fruit?

Matt and I will be discussing the book I wrote against Calvinism and some questions he has about it. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0F1LKDH5T

Reviewing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHLNA23NrK4

Why is there controversy about the gospel that Ray Comfort preaches? Is repentance necessary for salvation? Yes. Does repentance mean to "turn from sin"? Yes, but only in your mind. The change in life is later. What does the word "repentance" literally mean? It is a translation of the word "μετανοια" which means "another mind/thinking" and is used to mean "a change of mind". We'll investigate these and related topics. I apologise for the poor recording. I hope you can figure out most of it. Please ask questions, not just about the gaps in recording but any confusion and objections to what we say.

C Jay wrote a book in answer to 15 questions I proposed to him. He admits in the book that he doesn't understand the questions (and he never talked to me about them), but still claims to have answered my questions. Let's continuing examining his pathetic attempt to provide answers.

This will specifically be a study of Romans 3.25 and Vincent's commentary on it. I will be joined by Rock.

John claims to be a Calvinist but has invented his own unique version. Let's examine his claims from about https://www.youtube.com/live/hYaDk71XiEg?si=BmZxhoVPzbXhT4fT&t=3649

God requires us to love Him with all our heart and mind and soul and strength. That is His standard. If you are not doing that, you are worshipping the devil because there are only two kingdoms. Anything not done in worship, love, service and trust of God, serves the kingdom of darkness and therefore the devil. However, we cannot do that perfectly, so God accepts imperfect, incomplete faith Jesus Christ as being sufficient for Him to gift us with the imputed righteousness of Christ which covers our sins. Clip from https://rumble.com/v6qidh2-reviewing-the-anti-calvinist-side-of-youtube-is-so-cringe.html

I was inspired by Idol Killer to check out this video. https://youtu.be/urG2_WqhcV4?si=My4Y49YpdprSAvR8 I will be doing my own review of it. I suspect my stream will be a LOT shorter than his.

Rogue Calvinist is one of the more angry, nasty and vitirolic Calvinists online. He seems to love arguing just to argue. He appears to have zero humility (especially on the topic of Calvinism) and just loves to troll. Kevin tried to talk to him recently and as a result of that conversation did a video trying to explain and investigate faith. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgaP1hrW368

First, a video from Leighton Flowers which I'll review, which includes lies and stupidity from James White. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGWxeIpHcps Next, clips from assorted Calvinists with heresy and lies and deception. And some new slides that I've created. and maybe https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jr4bZ2QqTz0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMDzhTeuo5E

Jason Breda disagrees with Calvinism but appears to be saying we should not disagree about soteriology with Calvinists. But they have a different gospel, Jason! When they feel like it. Calvinism destroys the gospel when the Calvinist preaches Calvinism. But let's examine the video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hbZKkTkPWs

Calvinists regularly engage in logical fallacies. They love to assume they are right, just like atheists do. They refuse to listen carefully to disagreement with them. I just encountered an "argument from silence" from a Calvinist. Now other Calvinists are defending that Calvinist and arguing it is not an "argument from silence" even though it perfectly fits the description. We may discuss other topics as well, including reviewing my recent "debate" with Twitchy, even though I dogmatically told the liar I refuse to debate because it is always useless in my experience. Here's the "debate" if you want to listen to it. And check out the comments and the arrogance and cultic behaviour of the Calvinists. https://www.youtube.com/live/U6S9DXje1Y4?si=bMvjlBxJcXeWTGge

Twitchy Theologian is a Calvinists and was very upset when I sent my book that calls Calvinism a doctrine of demons.

I will be showing quotes from Calvin and comparing them to scripture and logic. If you think I've made a mistake in my thinking, please let me know. If you want to help me expose Calvinism, please let me know. [email protected]. Here is the clip from C Jay that I promised where he says "The light is Him. The darkness is also Him." https://www.youtube.com/live/55w_XgncDdI?si=7aaQD0eQ7oCBW3oz&t=1036 If you think I am taking him out of context or misunderstanding him, please show me how.

Some people have the idea we should never be insulting. This is obviously unbiblical since numerous Bible authors were insulting and numerous godly Bible characters were insulting. There is a place for being insulting of not just ideas but of people. Calvinism is a false gospel that must be rebuked and Calvinists who refuse correction or are publicly being wolves must be biblically rebuked, which includes accurate insults. We will look at two videos that might include insults (one definitely does). If you have a delicate fleshly nature that refuses correction and despises godly, biblical rebuke, this is not the video for you. First, we'll look at Kevin Thompson rebuking "Stealth Calvinists" and their vile deception tactics. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzvldaDbCYc Second, Christian Prince will be rebuking the Calvinist James White for his stupidity and lies about Islam. https://www.youtube.com/live/85Z0XS_GEII

Using quotes from John Calvin and comparing and contrasting them to God’s holy word, this book shows how unbiblical Calvinism is. It is a semi-gnostic heresy that has borrowed concepts from the gnostics and reworked them to make them appear more Christian. Their doctrine of “election” is a prime example. This is not designed to be an exhaustive treatment of Calvinism or any of the points of Calvinism. It is a quick, helpful summary that highlights some major points and gives a quick response showing how it is unbiblical and/or illogical.

John MacArthur was at "Together for the Gospel T4G" Session 3 from a T4G conference 8 years ago or something. "The Sinner Neither Able Nor Willing The Doctrine of Absolute Inability" Here's the link if you want to torture yourself listening to him. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTqimCh4OnA

Jayden wants to examine the Greek in Romans 8:28-29 and Ephesians 1 (eg v4, I assume) with me and see what objections I have to the Calvinistic understanding of these passages and what makes more sense.

A new stupid calvinist - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_N7x5YW37DE&lc=UgyA_HGRLP9O3kaMe-t4AaABAg.AAsmvaxLQAuAB-IHpBYTQY

We were just listening to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOMHodrbw7w which is an upload of https://rumble.com/v57xaa5-reviewing-chapter-six-of-dave-hunts-book-what-love-is-this-part-five.html This is a reading and review of chapter Six of Dave Hunt's book "What love is this?" which is a critique of Calvinism as presenting a god who is not loving. During this, the issue of whether the atonement paid for all sins or not was raised, and what this means. Kelvy and I will be discussing our views (which appear to be different).

and other topics.

James White (Calvinist) and Dave Hunt (non-Calvinist) discussed the topic of Calvinism. Kevin and I will review it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q61K6ZITck4

VEKL was recently on Praise's stream gibbering on when Kevin pointed out he was contradicting Calvinism. https://youtu.be/UW1GWaXKtHs?si=bT4NfSxxKSfXM2b6 And VEKL has doubled down on his lunacy. https://www.youtube.com/post/Ugkx1PpdQ0qFAyO_Ln183KcIWCH187nWMBIL?lc=Ugwd10zXKOAaA2cYNMp4AaABAg.A98o5gQGN1WA9CtvgxJj9k&lc=Ugwd10zXKOAaA2cYNMp4AaABAg.A98o5gQGN1WA9CtvgxJj9k

We'll be reviewing a few comments from VEKL and his tirade against me where he lumps me in with Steven Anderson. VEKL is utterly demonic and completely stupid. He tells me to stop visiting channels I disagree with (like his) and then streams about me and calls me a coward for not attending. I didn't even know the stream was on, or that it would be about me. There was no indication and no advance warning that I could see. He posted about it while I was in bed and started the stream while I was sleeping. How stupid do you have to be to not let someone know about something and then complain they don't know? AND to call them a coward?? Projection much, VEKL?? And especially after you told me not to attend your channel! How self-centred do you have to be to imagine that I never sleep and just sit all day watching VEKL's channel hoping that he does a stream?? I'm not even subscribed because you never have anything useful to say. Imagine accusing Paul of cowardice because you organised a secret meeting of the Sanhedrin and he didn't attend. I wonder how much stupider VEKL can get. We start with https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkmp6gL6g24 And then some other videos and community posts on VEKL's channel. eg https://www.youtube.com/live/YXZjewW-IrY?si=pl_pacpwte3QWgDB

C Jay (a Calvinist) asserts that we can't disagree with him because he says so. Clip taken from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J37UIphAWZU&t=269s

We're going to study these two phrases especially in relation to the Calvinism question.

Firstly, Leighton's video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5aqR23SrHy0 and whether he is right. Second, the phrase "outer darkness" in scripture. And whatever else comes up as we go.

VEKL is doing what bullies and arrogant morons always do and playing the victim because his abuse and lies were called out. Review of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaJzqxsyhHQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ChnTOiYXcA In this video, RC claims if you don't believe the Westminster Confession that God decrees everything, you must be an atheist. Why would he say that and what does he mean?

The Gospel Truth recently hosted Warren McGrew (Negative) vs C Jay Cox (Affirmative) on the topic. Broadly, we could call the former an Open Theist and the latter a Calvinist. Here is the link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55w_XgncDdI Kevin and I will most likely agree more with Warren's negative position on this topic since we disagree with C Jay Cox on this issue. But we have an issue with Warren's Open Theism (God doesn't know the future) position. I have not listened to the debate, so you will be hearing a live reaction from me as well as my review.

Numerous Calvinists have responded to Leighton Flowers https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Q8y57p4NJQg I tried to reply to them but my comments don't appear to be getting posted. So I decided to do this video as a record. Good ol' YouTube, as usual.

We did a video of the ordo salutis in John 1 to 6. Let's continue studying.

No, not that Election! We're talking about the election and predestination of God to us. And even then, you're probably wrong. Calvinists have so hijacked this term that almost no-one knows what the Bible actually says about the two topics. It's not about the gnostic idea of determinism which Calvinists are beholden to. Election is always to service and an end result. And predestination is also about the destination (glorification), not the pathway (salvation). We'll also examine the word "adoption" in scripture in connection to those two words and show you what scripture actually says.

There is a channel on YouTube called "Consistent Calvinist" and he tries to be consistent with his calvinism. I haven't listened to him enough to determine whether he tries harder to be consistent with Calvin or Logic or Scripture. Like most Calvinists, it probably varies. I'm going to play this clip and you tell me what you think of it. I will tell you what I think. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRY8c0J-jns

Part 2 of reviewing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnVKrppa2G8 "Calvinism or Calvinislam?? Does God decree sin? Let's respond!!- ep15"

Reviewing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnVKrppa2G8 "Calvinism or Calvinislam?? Does God decree sin? Let's respond!!- ep15"

Leighton Flowers was recently on The Gospel Truth which is a Calvinist channel. This is a clip where he is explaining the Provisionist view on "inclination to sin" rather than the Calvinist view of "created totally depraved". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EqvWfM63f0

This Calvinist routinely demonstrates all the typical Calvinistic logical fallacies that I have come to expect from them. They have zero ability to be logical and NO humility. And are total hypocrites. Notice the strawmanning and false dichotomies (or trichotomies) and the false accusations. And then complaining about me calling him a heretic. Notice that "heretic" does not (necessarily) mean unsaved. It simply means divisive. And those teaching false doctrine are always the divisive ones. And notice how Calvinists always assume they are right and anyone who disagrees is a heretic. But notice all the lies they have to tell. https://www.youtube.com/post/Ugkxw3UYAqxmCgiSB9dfvqQT44pJoLSNkUHi?lc=UgzX9FStuyZaqCMJRQd4AaABAg.A7Vr9TFDqX8A7X5j6vtXBe&lc=UgzX9FStuyZaqCMJRQd4AaABAg.A7Vr9TFDqX8A7X5j6vtXBe

Are Calvinists right that regeneration precedes faith? Does the Gospel of John teach irresistible grace? Does God only draw the elect? Does the Gospel of John teach Calvinism or Provisionism or some other doctrine?

Andrew Rappaport emailed me regarding my opposition to Calvinism. "My challenge to Calvinism would be that I assume you have a misunderstanding of it and actually believe in it. I have yet to find a person that attacks the doctrine of God’s sovereignty in salvation that is a Christian that disagrees with the doctrine. Give a listen to my views https://podcasts.strivingforeternity.org/programs/rapp-report/bonus-superintending-the-solution-to-calvinism-vs-arminianism-what-we-believe-part-27/"

This is a video by Leighton Flowers about James White. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGdRQSpyjf8 And we'll also watch "Solving Calvinism's Cornelius Conundrum" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ymgy8RxiU8

We're going to start with reviewing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ymgy8RxiU8 "Solving Calvinism's Cornelius Conundrum" with Leighton Flowers and Louis Ruggiero. Then we'll see what happens.

Tyler Vela is a "Calvinist" who has rejected Christianity and Calvinist affirm that he accurately understands scripture and Calvinism and Christianity (from their perspective). But he is unsaved and Calvinists also affirm that. This contradicts Calvinism which asserts the unsaved cannot understand spiritual things. Why do some who reject Christianity still hold to Calvinism being the only way to understand Christianity and many Calvinists affirm this? Reviewing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBrVxHi9hKs and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CbsdcullyCw and we'll point you to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjNSkn0-W2Q And we'll point out 1 Cor 2:14 and the Calvinist interpretation that contradicts their acceptance of Tyler's understanding of Calvinism.

I recently reviewed C Jay's recent conversation with Kevin but was unable to show the side chat. This video will do that and give more information on the complete lack of integrity of C Jay Cox and VEKL. They are either ignorant of the truth about definitions of words or being deliberately deceptive, or both. From https://www.youtube.com/live/Cj5P61SATEc?si=IMMHU6jdyNojL28G&t=5962

https://www.youtube.com/live/HlsH0WwD2Gs?si=PMqaoblPggKDVCG-&t=4836 I use StreamYard to create my livestreams. If you would like to upgrade to StreamYard, please use the following link: https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5288181195079680

Is he deliberately being deceptive or is he so deceived he can't be honest? Review of part of https://www.youtube.com/live/Cj5P61SATEc?si=HaDLrJpKvBjWFFCC between Kevin and C Jay.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0D2SSmooqg

Charles Haddon Spurgeon "Compel them to come in" from https://www.spurgeon.org/resource-library/sermons/compel-them-to-come-in/#flipbook/ This sermon is not at all Calvinistic and Spurgeon was widely attacked for preaching such an "Arminian" sermon. We could also call it Provisionist (although that term was not known then). This is just good, sound Bible preaching without all the Calvinistic philosophising and explaining away scripture. Spurgeon later became far more Calvinistic, persuaded, no doubt, by the Calvinist "intellectuals" of his day instead of steadfastly holding to scripture.

Calvinistic Predestination means that God is NOT loving to all. He is only loving to a very small number. The God of the Bible says to love your enemies to be like Him. But Calvinism teaches He doesn't love His enemies in any meaningful way. He actually hates them intensely and completely and only pretends to love them. This is taken from a review of Dave Hunt's book "What love is this?" https://rumble.com/playlists/PNVoVqWUwfk Predestination in scripture is not to believing and eternal life (as it is in Calvinism). God has predestined us to be conformed to the image of His Son and to be glorified.

No, scripture makes it clear that Faith precedes spiritual life. John 1:12-13 But as many as received him, to them gave he authority to become the sons of God, to them that believe on his name: [note the order] 13 Which were born, not of bloods, nor of will of flesh, nor of will of man, but of God. Calvinists ignore v12 and think that v13 is saying the opposite of v12. They assume that "faith" is "salvation". They don't understand the gospel. John 5:24 KJV 24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life. Note the order! And this order is provided over and over in Chapters Five and Six. Read through both chapters. John 20:30-31 KJV And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book: 31 But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name. And you will find the same order all through the book of John and everywhere else in the Bible. Jesus is appealling to you to believe SO THAT YOU HAVE LIFE. Come to Him. Hear Him. Trust Him and THEN He will save you! This clip is from a review of Dave Hunt's book "What love is this?" https://rumble.com/playlists/PNVoVqWUwfk

Clip from a longer video reviewing Dave Hunt's book "What love is this?" See the playlist here. https://rumble.com/playlists/PNVoVqWUwfk

This is a clip from a review Kevin and I did of Dave Hunt's book "What love is this" which criticises Calvinsm. Please check out my playlist reviewing this topic https://rumble.com/playlists/PNVoVqWUwfk

Be prepared for a surprising answer. This is a clip from a review Kevin and I did of Dave Hunt's book "What love is this" which criticises Calvinsm. Please check out my playlist reviewing this topic https://rumble.com/playlists/PNVoVqWUwfk

Part 2 Joel on Ephesians 1 - https://youtu.be/jn6h-uxW2cA?si=1XH6RuySqcCfRqND&t=3418

In this video, we examine provisionism as defined by Leighton Flowers. I am in agreement with his points and examine the verses he provides and add some more. P. People sin – which separates all from fellowship with God Gen 3.15-24, Deut 1.39, Rom 3.23, Rom 5.12, Rom 6.23 R. Responsible – (able-to-respond) to God's appeals for reconciliation Deut 30.11-19, Matt 23.37, Jn 5.40, Jn 12.48, Jn 20.31, 2 Cor 5.19-20 O. Open Door – for anyone to enter by faith. Whosoever will may come to His open arms Matt 11.28, Jn 3.16, Rom 10.21, Eph 1.13, 1 Tim 2.4, 2 Pet 3.9 V. Vicarious Atonement – provides a way for anyone to be saved by Christ's blood Isa 53.1-12, Jn 12.32, Rom 4.5, 2 Cor 5.21, 1 Pet 3.18, 1 Jn 2.2 I. Illuminating Grace – provides clearly revealed truth so that all can know and respond in faith Jn 1.9, Jn 12.32, Rom 1.18-2:16, Rom 11.32, 2 Cor 4.3-6, Titus 2.11 D. Destruction in Eternal Torment for unbelief and resisting the Holy Spirit Matt 7.13, Matt 5.22, Jn 12.48, Acts 7.51, Rom 4.5, 2 Thess 2.10 E. Eternal Security for all true believers Jn 20.31, Rom 8.38-39, Eph 1.13-14, Philp 1.6, Php 3.12, Jude 24-25 Here is the playlist for the full series. https://rumble.com/playlists/VhYEAKnnQU4

Reviewing "Why Ephesians 1 Doesn't Support Calvinism" Joel Korytko https://youtu.be/jn6h-uxW2cA?si=aJ_o7-_BaxsI5OA9 Joel is a Septuagint scholar so knows the Biblical (Koine) Greek very well. He rejects the Calvinist interpretation of Romans 9 and Ephesians 1. He has a video pointing out that the quotes Paul uses in Romans 9 prove Calvinism wrong. You have to be ignorant of the OT and the context of those quotes to believe Calvinism is taught in Romans 9. He will show in this video that Ephesians 1 is not teaching Calvinism either. I don't know his theology on soteriology, but I am a provisionist and have learned a lot of things from him. He is a very careful scholar who just takes the Bible for what it says.

I will be reviewing a video by Leighton responding to Jeff Durbin who questions if we should tell sinners that God loves them. And we'll look at scripture teaching that God loves the whole world. Calvinism corrupts the message of the gospel. It is a false gospel.

Reply to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHOsuBBzBzc It you want to see the full video that this coward deceptively clipped https://rumble.com/v4vxx66-total-depravity.html Please listen to the original video and then listen to Ryan's "response" and see if you think he has a valid point, AT ALL. I'd like to see what valid point you think he is making in response to the video Kevin and I made. Please include timestamps from our video where you think we made mistakes. If you have a valid criticism, I want to hear it. I really do. But so far, all I've received is pathetic and shallow bluster and sophistry. Even better, join me on a livestream and let's discuss it. I'll even join you on your livestream if you allow Kevin to moderate. You can contact him at [email protected]

Reviewing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRo0p4XVnOg by John of Sharpening Iron Podcast. We are primarily reviewing this to examine Colton's explanation of Guidance Control as a defence of "compatibilism" and see if there is any logical argument that rescues the assertion of determinism.

Let's do a study of the word "elect" and "chosen" in scripture. We'll not only look at English but also look at the Hebrew and Greek words connected to these ideas.

Frank White (rebukeandreprove) recently asserted that "If you do not understand how John 3:16 teaches limited atonement then Im afraid you are not even close to understanding what we mean by limited atonement. Not even close." He said this in response to me on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ypa_mn9upo which is Kevin's upload of the Limited Atonement video he and I did. Here is my upload here https://rumble.com/v4x3q4q-limited-atonement-what-is-it-and-what-is-wrong-with-it.html He gives no explanation for his assertion, as is his usual tactic. He operates just like all cultists (including outspoken atheists) do. He has zero argument. Only assertion and accusation. I imagine that he is assuming (like Limitarians HAVE TO) that LA includes application not just intent and extent as it was designed to convey. Here are some questions for people like Frank. What is the term for Christ only saving the elect (as defined by Calvinism)? What is the term for Christ dying only for the elect (as defined by Calvinism)? I bet your answer is "Limited Atonement" for both. And that is your right. But how can you have an honest conversation with me when I separate them? How can you have a logical conversation on the two separate topics if you conflate them (as you must)?

Calvinists love to use John 6 to teach determinism and TULIP. But does it really? No, they ignore much of what it says, and what John has already said. I use StreamYard to create my livestreams. If you would like to upgrade to StreamYard, please use the following link: https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5288181195079680

The arrogance of C Jay Cox never ends. He's decided (contra all the evidence) that EVERY word out of my mouth is a lie. Every word, CJ? Seriously. And that all he can see from me is anger, because he ignores all the times I'm not angry. Well, it's your choice to focus only on the lies you want to believe, C Jay. That's YOUR choice. Oh, of course, you don't believe that either. It's God's fault that you love to lie, in your theology. Review of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D36X1hmpddE from about and hour and 20 minutes into this stream. I use StreamYard to create my livestreams. If you would like to upgrade to StreamYard, please use the following link: https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5288181195079680

The arrogance of C Jay Cox never ends. He's decided (contra all the evidence) that EVERY word out of my mouth is a lie. Every word, CJ? Seriously. And let's remember that C Jay insists on defining "lie" as being deliberate? Do you use the same definition for deception, C Jay? Is that God's definition in the Bible? And that all he can see from me is anger, because he ignores all the times I'm not angry. Well, it's your choice to focus only on the lies you want to believe, C Jay. That's YOUR choice. Oh, of course, you don't believe that either. It's God's fault that you love to lie, in your theology. Review of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D36X1hmpddE from about an hour and 20 minutes into this stream, however, this has now been cut from that link by Kevin and is only available to me privately. I will ask him if I can upload it to youtube so I don't get accused of lying or hiding anything. I use StreamYard to create my livestreams. If you would like to upgrade to StreamYard, please use the following link: https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5288181195079680 I use StreamYard to create my livestreams. If you would like to upgrade to StreamYard, please use the following link: https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5288181195079680

The arrogance of C Jay Cox never ends. He's decided (contra all the evidence) that EVERY word out of my mouth is a lie. Every word, CJ? Seriously. And let's remember that C Jay insists on defining "lie" as being deliberate? Do you use the same definition for deception, C Jay? Is that God's definition in the Bible? And that all he can see from me is anger, because he ignores all the times I'm not angry. Well, it's your choice to focus only on the lies you want to believe, C Jay. That's YOUR choice. Oh, of course, you don't believe that either. It's God's fault that you love to lie, in your theology. Review of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D36X1hmpddE from about an hour and 20 minutes into this stream, however, this has now been cut from that link by Kevin and is only available to me privately. I will ask him if I can upload it to youtube so I don't get accused of lying or hiding anything. I use StreamYard to create my livestreams. If you would like to upgrade to StreamYard, please use the following link: https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5288181195079680 I use StreamYard to create my livestreams. If you would like to upgrade to StreamYard, please use the following link: https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5288181195079680

Calvinists all fundamentally rely upon the idea that God alone gets to "sovereignly" choose who will believe. If we choose of our free will, they somehow imagine that God's sovereignty is undermined. But this attacks the idea that we are to blame for not believing. And the Calvinist illogically ignores this contradiction. They also usually ignore that this makes God the author of sin, so their god is evil. Calvinists deal with this lunacy in different ways, but they all have this issue. And they love to strawman those who disagree. They cannot understand the idea that we are completely responsible for our choices because God has NOT determined them. They try to strawman that into us being creators and having power that only God has (somehow). I have not found a reasonable Calvinist that can have a rational conversation about this. I use StreamYard to create my livestreams. If you would like to upgrade to StreamYard, please use the following link: https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5288181195079680

on Calvinism, Determinism, Arrogance, Humility and more. I use StreamYard to create my livestreams. If you would like to upgrade to StreamYard, please use the following link: https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5288181195079680

They are multiplying. Let's start with https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4y9hlH3T3c Then https://www.youtube.com/@Soteriology101/community Then the Biblical gospel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oUvp57jdOI I use StreamYard to create my livestreams. If you would like to upgrade to StreamYard, please use the following link: https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5288181195079680

A review of comments at and before https://www.youtube.com/clip/UgkxL-qNE2a8roKuZHTHqNFbCxRXLzZxBF4B And Charles Jennings agrees that faith is a work?? The Pelagian error is alive and well in Calvinism AND Fake Grace. I use StreamYard to create my livestreams. If you would like to upgrade to StreamYard, please use the following link: https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5288181195079680

I haven't listened to it yet but I've listened to so much Calvinistic "reasoning" that it's safe to assume this will be more logical fallacies and assumptions. https://www.youtube.com/live/iQkPOYtPOgM?si=JYWpEOliTv9pk2dH&t=2693 Colton Carlson and Chris Date on "The Gospel Truth". And then Nicholas with his "Top Ten Heresies". Most of this I suspect I will agree with until he starts assuming Calvinism and attacking the Biblical gospel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbL9ka6knYc And then we might get back to https://www.youtube.com/live/HlsH0WwD2Gs?si=5kXZuOWGzkQa0L1-&t=1446 and Leighton correcting James White, again. I use StreamYard to create my livestreams. If you would like to upgrade to StreamYard, please use the following link: https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5288181195079680

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpQjubuKI00 #Calvinism #Provisionism #gospel I use StreamYard to create my livestreams. If you would like to upgrade to StreamYard, please use the following link: https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5288181195079680

Calvin dogmatically asserts that God is the author of evil. This is consistent with the assertion of Calvinism that God asserts everything. Most Calvinists today ignore or reject this logical conclusion of their system and their most respected Bible scholar. We deal with the evidence that Calvin taught this, the logical necessity of this position in Calvinism, and how unbiblical and blasphemous it is.

The video we are reviewing was done by Leighton Flowers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G96IkKPQNYU He is reviewing or responding to a video by James White which is linked in the description of the video above. I have no watched it so you will also be seeing a live reaction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jy8zrmJeMAY&t=18496s I use StreamYard to create my livestreams. If you would like to upgrade to StreamYard, please use the following link: https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5288181195079680

A review of "Stealth Calvinism and How it Splits Churches" by The Church Split. We will be reviewing this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyOedzx1OSA I use StreamYard to create my livestreams - try https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5288181195079680

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDiTLl61Zu8 John runs a channel called "Sharpening Iron Podcast". He is a "Compatibilistic Calvinist". Kevin examines the meaning of compatibilism with John. I use StreamYard to create my livestreams. If you would like to upgrade to StreamYard, please use the following link: https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5288181195079680

Responding to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWtlI_G4x68