Kindergarten Cop

~ Supplemental Material ~

"With power comes the abuse of power. And where there are bosses, there are crazy bosses."

- Judd Rose

In an age where technology plays a significant role in our daily lives, it is not surprising that social media platforms have strict Terms of Service (TOS), that users must adhere to. However, what is peculiar is how individuals can violate these TOS and be immediately suspended, shadow banned or fully banned; while certain content that raises red flags, seems to go unnoticed or unaddressed.

This raises the question of whether these actions are intentional, rather than mere oversight. It is important to note the level of diligence with which these Big Tech platforms monitor and police their content. They have sophisticated algorithms and teams of moderators dedicated to taking down, removing or flagging inappropriate material and individuals who do not comply with their guidelines.

Given this level of vigilance, it is difficult to believe that certain content slips through the cracks accidentally. The fact that some content that may be harmful or misleading and allowed to remain on the platforms; while individuals are swiftly penalized for minor infractions; raises suspicions about the true intentions behind these actions.

One could argue that these platforms may have ulterior motives; for targeting certain individuals or content; while turning a blind eye to others. For example, if a user posts information that is critical of a certain political figure or organization, they may be more likely to be suspended or banned, even if their content does not explicitly violate the TOS.

On the other hand, content that aligns with the interests or agenda of the platform, may be given a pass; even if it contains misinformation or harmful rhetoric. Furthermore, the fact that these platforms have been accused of denying or downplaying serious issues, such as the systemic problem of the trafficking of minors (despite evidence proving otherwise), further adds to the suspicion that their actions are not purely based on maintaining a safe and inclusive online environment.

https://rumble.com/v5fcyct-the-boys-in-the-band.html

https://x.com/Red_Pill_US/status/1836873954797224111

https://x.com/mommapancakess/status/1836791347941957814

https://x.com/BGatesIsaPyscho/status/1837155192476778568

There have been numerous reports and investigations that have uncovered instances of trafficking and exploitation of minors on Facebook, also in Meta's other platform, Instagram. Yet, they continue to claim that these activities are not prevalent. This raises questions about their credibility and integrity, which has been an ongoing situation.

https://rumble.com/v31x8qa-lair-of-the-dragon-krueger.html

The examination of Mark Zuckerberg's behavior and its correlation with issues surrounding his company, Meta; allows for a greater understanding of the ethical implications of social media platforms on personal privacy and security. Zuckerberg has perpetually been under scrutiny for his leadership style and approach to business ethics.

His behavior has been likened to that of serial offenders. Observers have often pointed out traits commonly associated with narcissism in his public persona. Narcissism can manifest in various ways, including a lack of empathy, an inflated sense of self-importance and manipulation of facts and perceptions.

https://rumble.com/v319twe-lair-of-the-dragon-true-lies.html

https://rumble.com/v31ghvq-grand-order-of-the-beast-pinocchio.html

Although Zuckerberg maintained his innocence, in the interview linked above; he was found guilty in court and ordered to pay restitution for his actions. All of this shows his lack of respect and sensitivity, reflecting his true character.

Meta's history with legal issues underscores the darker implications of Zuckerberg's leadership and business practices. Over the years, the company has faced multiple lawsuits and has been mandated to pay significant restitution for privacy violations. In a notable instance, Meta reached a settlement over accusations related to improper data handling of users, reflecting broader concerns about how the platform treats personal data.

Allegations of narcissism and gaslighting, combined with the company's history of legal troubles, contribute to an unsettling picture of user exploitation. This continuous pattern of behavior raises critical ethical dilemmas surrounding user privacy and consent. Zuckerberg's actions, both personally and as a CEO, showcase a lack of respect for individual autonomy and safety, aligning him with behaviors that evoke more serious criminal acts.

https://youtu.be/mxDNZJKdryI

This discussion about privacy and security; offered by social media platforms, would be incomplete, without addressing the situation with TikTok. As comparisons between the two companies arise; TikTok has faced allegations of data management similar to those leveled against Meta. It is essential to understand the reasons behind these narratives.

The campaign to ban TikTok in various jurisdictions appears, in part, as a strategic move influenced by competing interests. Accusations levied against TikTok, for its association with the Chinese government, amplify fears around personal data safety. In contrast, Meta's long-standing infractions often escape the same scrutiny.

These selective condemnations suggest a manipulated narrative designed to maintain the status quo, favoring established players like Facebook and Instagram. A detailed list of fabricated material, designed for manipulation purposes, can be seen at the link below:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2014/06/28/facebook-manipulated-689003-users-emotions-for-science/

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/05/technology/facebook-device-partnerships-china.html

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/20/facebooks-mark-zuckerberg-meets-china-propaganda-chief-in-beijing

https://gizmodo.com/politicians-who-voted-to-ban-tiktok-may-own-as-much-as-1851356203

https://youtu.be/x3z-H_UkpNE

The widespread use of Meta platforms should prompt users, especially those with religious beliefs, to reconsider their support. These apps pose significant threats to personal security, essentially functioning as spyware. By using these platforms; a person is paying people to be spied upon. Every employee gets paid by your activities.

https://rumble.com/v4b08k6-maid-in-manhattan.html

The link above, underlines a crucial point: most media corporations, including radio, TV, and online entities, rely on monetization strategies. "Free" services come at a cost, which is often users' personal data and privacy. It is essential to recognize that these corporations operate on profit models, whether through direct charges or indirect methods.

"Do not love the world or the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him."

- John 2:15

For all those that are Christian. That verse and others similar to it, needs to be seriously considered. There are better alternatives.

https://rumble.com/v4440rf-pulse.html

Again, it's something everyone that calls themselves a Christian, really needs to think about.

Those that have enjoyed the video presentation and wish to see more from the creator: Paul Joseph Watson, his material can be found at:

https://rumble.com/c/PJW

For those who find value in this channel and wish to contribute positively; the most significant manner of doing so is through prayer. The lifting up of prayers for this channel; represents undoubtedly the most profound gift one can offer.

Given the various bureaucrats and their operatives, that support the Woke movement; I will not reveal my identity. However, you can always pray for "the individual running the channel, Blue Enigma zero-one." God will know your intentions.

Thank you for your thoughtful consideration!

https://gab.com/Carryingmarine/posts/112940676595137637

Post Scriptum: In the contemporary age that we live in, the proliferation of false information and propaganda in daily life is extensive.

https://rumble.com/v6sefv7-the-soulmate-search.html

A useful tool that facilitates the differentiation between reality and falsehood:

https://freespoke.com/

Individuals seeking spiritual solace through prayer, a valuable resource is available at:

https://prayer.social/

Those who have not yet registered with Rumble, consider signing up through the provided link below:

https://rumble.com/register/ourjewishroots

The aforementioned channel represents a reputable Christian organization, with a mission to serve Christians and reaches out to the Jewish community. They are not in any way affiliated with this channel. Why recommend them as a referral?

To put it simply: Rumble offers a benefit program, where new members who sign up through their referral link, can contribute financially to the ministry. To learn more, visit the link provided:

https://rumble.com/v46ztf3-wheres-the-money.html

In case the referral field is empty, kindly insert the following:

ourjewishroots

Addendum: Within the "Supplemental Material" section (situated beneath the date of the video post, the number of views and assigned tags); there lies a treasure trove of valuable content waiting to be discovered. This segment frequently comprises an abundance of extra information and resources.

Exploring this segment could prove to be advantageous in obtaining deeper insights. The purpose of this detailed explanation, is to accommodate the varied terminology used by different individuals; which can sometimes make it challenging to locate the desired content.

(LEGAL DISCLAIMER AND NOTICE FOR USER-GENERATED CONTENT PLATFORM:

1. FAIR USE NOTICE UNDER COPYRIGHT LAW

All audiovisual materials, excerpts or derivative content (collectively, "Third-Party Content") displayed on this channel are utilized STRICTLY PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. § 107 (Copyright Act of 1976). Such use is confined to:

- (a) Criticism, commentary and educational analysis;

- (b) Historical documentation and scholarly research;

- (c) Transformative repurposing that adds new meaning, context or insight distinct from the original work.

This channel does not claim ownership over Third-Party Content. Any copyright-related inquiries must be directed to the rights holder(s) pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 512(c).

2. ABSOLUTE NON-ENDORSEMENT CLAUSE

- Persons & Entities: Mention, depiction or reference to any individual, organization, political group or entity (including hyperlinks in descriptions) DOES NOT CONSTITUTE endorsement, affiliation, sponsorship or approval by this channel.

- Platform Liability: Rumble Inc. and its affiliates are EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED from responsibility for this channel's content under 47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(1).

- Viewer Interpretation: All analysis, conclusions or narratives presented are solely those of the channel operator and DO NOT REFLECT the views of creators of Third-Party Content.

3. RELIGIOUS, SYMBOLIC & AESTHETIC CONTENT

Use of religious iconography, political symbols or cultural imagery serves EXCLUSIVELY for:

- (a) Academic analysis of sociopolitical movements;

- (b) Visual contextualization of subject matter;

- (c) Satirical or critical commentary protected under *Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.,* 510 U.S. 569 (1994).

*USAGE DOES NOT IMPLY PROMOTION OF/AFFILIATION WITH any faith, ideology or institution.

4. PROHIBITION ON CONTENT REUSE

EXPLICIT RESTRICTIONS:

- Third-Party Content is NOT LICENSED for redistribution, commercial exploitation or derivative use by viewers.

- Written commentary by the operator is permitted for citation under fair use only if:

(i) Attributing this channel;

(ii) Not modified;

(iii) Used non-commercially.

5. HEALTH & FINANCIAL DISCLAIMERS

- HEALTH/NUTRITION CONTENT: Any references to medical treatments, supplements or diets are FOR INFORMATIONAL SCRUTINY ONLY AND CONSTITUTES PERSONAL OPINION. They lack review or approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Consult licensed healthcare providers before acting on such information (21 U.S.C. § 343 et seq.).

- FINANCIAL/POLITICAL ANALYSIS: Discussions of economic policy, investments or legislation constitute OPINION, not professional advice. No outcomes are guaranteed. Independent verification via qualified advisors is required.

6. GENERAL LIABILITY RELEASE

This channel disclaims all liability for:

- (a) Accuracy of Third-Party Content;

- (b) Damages arising from viewer reliance on content;

- (c) Legal actions initiated by third parties (viewers indemnify operator per DIGITAL MILLENNIUM COPYRIGHT ACT safe harbor provisions).

Jurisdiction for disputes resides exclusively in U.S. federal courts governing copyright law.

*ACKNOWLEDGMENT

By accessing this channel, viewers confirm:

"I understand this content is educational/commentary. I release the channel operator from liability and acknowledge that political neutrality is maintained in legal assertions herein."

Help rekt the system of ctrl and abuse by the ieleez